The Liz Moody Podcast - We Were Wrong About Secure Attachment & It's Ruining Our Relationships
Episode Date: September 16, 2026We have more resources than ever before to become securely attached, but rates of secure attachment are DROPPING. Dr. Marisa G. Franco, professor of psychology, says it’s because we’re getting att...achment theory all wrong. In this episode, Dr. Marisa G. Franco shares clear solutions so we can have better relationships with others, with ourselves, and feel better overall. 🎧 What you’ll learn: • Exactly how you can change your memories to be happier and more securely attached • What attachment style you are (and when it can change) • How attachment styles are formed and how to actively change them • The two types of "high self-esteem" and which one you want • A habit that signals insecurity, even when you think you're secure • What’s happening when getting the love or job you want doesn’t make you feel better longterm (and what actually will) If you like this episode, check out “The 40 BEST Health & Happiness Hacks I've Learned In 40 Years” episode: • Listen/Watch on Spotify • Listen on Apple • Watch on YouTube For more from Dr. Marisa G. Franco: • Her Book, Worth: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/784327/worth-by-marisa-g-franco-phd/ • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drmarisagfranco/?hl=en • Website: https://drmarisagfranco.com/ Ready to uplevel every part of your life? Order Liz’s book 100 Ways to Change Your Life: The Science of Leveling Up Health, Happiness, Relationships & Success now! Connect with Liz on Instagram @lizmoody or online at www.lizmoody.com. Subscribe to the substack by visiting https://lizmoody.substack.com/welcome. Buy our cute sweatshirts, conversation cards, and more at https://shop.lizmoody.com/. Use our discount codes from our highly vetted and tested brand partners by visiting https://www.lizmoody.com/codes. To join The Liz Moody Podcast Club Facebook group, go to www.facebook.com/groups/thelizmoodypodcast. This episode is brought to you completely free thanks to the following podcast sponsors: • Wildgrain: go to Wildgrain.com/LizMoody (or use promo code LIZMOODY at checkout) to get $30 off your first box + FREE croissants for LIFE. • OneSkin: go to OneSkin.co/Liz and use code LIZ to get 15% OFF for a limited time. • IQBar: text LIZ to 64000 for 20% off. • Lumebox: right now get 40% off, that's $260 off the regular price of $629, when you go to TheLumeBox.com/Liz. • LMNT: head to DrinkLMNT.com/Liz to get a FREE 8-count sample pack with any order • Timeline: visit Timeline.com/Liz to save up to 39% off. The Liz Moody Podcast cover art by Zack. The Liz Moody Podcast music by Alex Ruimy. This podcast and website represents the opinions of Liz Moody and her guests to the show. The content here should not be taken as medical advice. The content here is for information purposes only, and because each person is so unique, please consult your healthcare professional for any medical questions. The Liz Moody Podcast Episode 466. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Despite the fact that we have more resources than ever before in history to become secure,
rates of secure attachment have been dropping.
Dr. Marissa Franco is a professor of psychology.
She wrote the best-selling book Platonic, and now she is back with her amazing new book,
Worth, and she argues that one of the reasons for this drop is that we are getting attachment
theory all wrong.
Welcome to the Liz Moody podcast, where we believe that there is always something that you
can do to create a life that feels amazing, and we help you figure out how to help you figure out
how to find the lever to pull at any moment to actually do that.
Dr. Franco, welcome to the podcast.
Thanks so much for having me.
What is the number one thing that attachment theory gets wrong?
There's so many things.
I mean, one is that we're only one attachment style versus it being a relationship
that when we're around different people, different parts of our attachment style comes up.
The second is that we're doomed, that if we're anxious, we're going to be anxious for the
rest of our lives and there's no way to change our attachment style.
And the third, I would say, the only answer.
asked me for one, but here I am going off, is that there's a hierarchy of attachment styles and that we
should all try to act secure. And if we're anxious or avoidant, we should be ashamed of ourselves.
Wait, so I do feel like I'm avoidantly attached. That's not worse than being securely attached.
Well, here's the thing, what I kind of argue is that the way attachment theory has been used
is secure is the best. So now let's all try to act secure, try to be secure, try to do the secure thing.
and in a way we start to try to suppress, ignore the parts of ourselves that are anxious or avoidant.
And then we are reenacting on our very selves the harm that made us insecure in the first place.
Someone shamed us. Someone ignored us. Someone tried to dismiss us. Someone pushed us away, right?
And so I think if we want to heal our attachment styles, it's actually about being able to tell the truth.
Like, wherever you are is okay because you can only heal the parts of yourselves that you're willing to acknowledge.
Can you just lay the groundwork for us for somebody who maybe doesn't know.
what an attachment style is or what we mean by secure, anxious, or avoidant, or any of those things.
Can you say in a nutshell what that is?
Sure.
So basically in your early relationships with your caregivers, the ways your caregivers treated
you lent itself to you creating an internal template for how people will treat you throughout
your life.
And so if your parent was preoccupied with other things, maybe their marriage, working hard,
you became anxious.
You learn that you have to earn love from other people and that if you're just yourself,
you're not going to get it. So you tend to be attracted to people that kind of pull away from you.
You tend to see rejection when you're not there, when it's not there. Even your amygdala lights up
more brightly at signs of rejection in the other attachment styles. Or you can be avoidant. And that
means your parents probably gave you food, shelter, but there was emotional neglect. They wanted to
shut you down emotionally. They want to hear about your sadness, your anger. And you learn that if you
get close to people, it's dangerous and you will be harmed and you will be hurt. And so you tend
to navigate relationships by keeping people at a distance, not sharing a lot of affection,
not being very vulnerable. People feel like they don't really know you. There's not all the
intimacy in your connections. You're not putting a lot of effort into them and you're not experiencing
them as rewarding again because they feel threatening to you. So you just keep people out
a distance. They have people that are secure and their parents were good enough. Try to fulfill
their emotional needs. If you were sad, they try to wonder what you needed and care for you and have
compassion. And you go into relationships basically assuming that people will like you and that
things could go well and you trust and you can be vulnerable and you can be affectionate.
But if someone else doesn't match you, you kind of are flexible.
You switch and secure people.
They tend to have good relationships with other people.
And there's a fourth style too.
Disorganized attachment style.
I feel like it's like the evil stepchild.
Like nobody talks about it.
Yeah.
It's the least common one.
And it's for people that went through serious situations of abuse.
It's disorganized in that your parent didn't have a way, a typical way of relating to you.
Sometimes it was completely erratic.
Sometimes they were loving.
Sometimes they were cruel.
You never knew what you were going to get.
And basically you display a disorganized attachment.
Sometimes you're like, I really want to get close to you.
Sometimes you're like, I need to run away.
And it feels like chaotic for you internally.
You're experiencing very strong emotional reactions to intimacy with other people.
And you both experience the need to get very, very close very quickly.
And as soon as you do, you just want to run away.
In your research and in your new book, you're upending a lot of the common wisdom around attachment theory.
how does your new view of attachment theory impact the average person just going about their day-to-day life?
I tell a little bit about my own story in this book and about how I knew about attachment theory.
I knew what it meant to be secure.
And in one of my previous relationships, I tried to act secure.
My partner was not communicating with me.
I tried to anchor him.
I tried to do things like co-regulate.
You know, that means trying to regulate his emotions in addition to my own.
He would give me one word answers and I would try to continue to show curiosity.
Meanwhile, internally, I'm feeling bad.
I'm feeling so anxious.
And I'm trying so hard to do the secure thing
that I'm becoming a strange from how I actually feel,
which is kind of neglected and hurt.
And so there's this way, I think,
that those of us that are so familiar with attachment styles
can try to act secure in a way that makes us abandon
where we're really at.
And that's why I say it's really about telling the truth
as to where you are.
The first step of actually being secure,
which I say secure-ish,
so we always leave room for the parts of ourselves
that need our help and care
is to check in with yourself.
And I think a lot of discussion on attachment
is how we treat other people.
But first, can I offer this regulation to my partner?
I just regulated myself, right?
Like, can I extend grace?
Because women will destroy their sense of self
to have grace for other people.
Can I offer this grace?
Or I'm actually pissed right now.
And that's like not actually attainable for me.
And so I think the first step
of any sort of secure-ish attachment style
is to ask yourself,
where am I actually at?
how do I actually feel and given where I'm actually at, what can I offer this other person?
Wait, women will destroy their sense of self to have grace for other people.
Can you explain what you mean by that in some ways that might be manifesting in our lives?
Yeah, so I remember I first said this line.
I was doing a speaking event.
And the questions were like, so my friend just had a baby shower and I had a miscarriage.
So like I really didn't want to go.
But like, am I being a bad friend?
or like, oh, I've been like reaching out to my friend, but they never respond to me, but I see them posting on Instagram.
Like, should I keep trying to reach out? And we just heard over and over the stories of these women that were just so uncomfortable and felt so bad, but couldn't acknowledge how they actually felt because they felt like they had to be a good person and they had to have grace for the other person to the extent that they were shaming themselves for their natural and reasonable reactions to what was happening.
And so when I saw that in real time, the ways that like women often have this internal battle with themselves, like we may feel a certain way, but we don't give ourselves permission to feel that way. And we label it as I'm not being a good person. And I just want to give all of us permission to feel how we feel, even if it's quote unquote irrational, even if it's what we shouldn't be feeling, even if it's antisocial, right? Because the first step to changing any feeling is allowing it to exist in the first place.
What if we've been met with negative reactions for feeling how we feel in the past?
What if people have gotten mad at us or stopped hanging out with us or told us that's not okay?
Well, this is a good clarifying point, right?
Because feeling how you feel has nothing to do with other people.
It's within you, right?
Like, within you, do you allow yourself to notice when you feel upset or are you convincing yourself
out of it as quickly as it comes up?
You know, I'll say examples of how this works for me is I have a friend who is like, oh, I
overslept, so I'm going to be an hour late. And I'm like, oh, I've been like trying to get ready for
an hour rushing to see you and now you overslept, but you didn't mean it. This is before I even say
anything to her. I'm already fighting internally. And I don't need to do that. I can just be like,
hey, I'm kind of upset. Like, I'm kind of pissed by this. Okay, that's valid. That's reasonable.
Let me let that feeling exist within me. And I think for so long, I thought that that would make the feeling
worse, but now from writing worth, I realize simply labeling feelings actually deactivates the
amygdala, the part of your brain associated with threat. And so the more that you can tolerate
the feeling, the less likely it is then to hover over my interaction with that late friend.
I can then offer this friend compassion and grace from a place of groundedness that it doesn't
involve me abandoning myself. So it's not about the conversation that you have with your friend.
It's about the conversation that you have with yourself. Exactly. You hit the nail on the head.
the conversation you have to, it has to be, I embrace whatever feelings come towards me.
It's okay to feel.
I'll give you another example is.
So I had a friend, I didn't feel like I was necessarily getting reciprocity and we kind of had talked about it.
Anyway, so finally we were going to hang out.
And this friend got into an accident and couldn't see me.
And I was like, oh my gosh, of course, take care of yourself.
But if I slowed down, I actually felt rejected.
I didn't want to feel rejected, right?
Because this isn't about me.
This is this friend's thing.
They've gone through an accident.
Obviously, I just wanted to feel compassion for them.
But my ability to slow down and acknowledge, oh, I feel rejected in the context of this friendship
and to feel that and to allow that, even if it was not what I wanted to feel, even if I felt
like a good person wouldn't feel that way, right, to put all of that aside and to just
acknowledge this moment of rejection, then it moves through me.
And I'm able to offer this friend compassion and say, absolutely, take care of yourself,
like do what you need to do in a way that feels wholehearted and not in a way that
feels like in this moment I'm trying to people please and do the right thing, which I know the
right thing is. Even if in my body, I'm feeling kind of differently because this is bringing up other
stuff in me. Actually, attending to our feelings makes us treat the other people around us better as well.
How do you recognize if you have this buried thing? Like you said, actually, like I felt a little
rejected. I didn't really like that. Before I wrote this book, Liz, I would have just sent that
compassionate text and felt kind of a little torn on the inside, but felt like I needed to do the right
thing which I knew. And just it would have, it would have been an ambivalent experience if I'm
honest in a way that I wouldn't have completely been conscious of. But when I wrote this book,
Worth, and I interviewed people that were secure, they said things like, I would wave my hand
over the day to see where my emotional energy lied. And I was like, whoa, you're actually
looking for those moments where you're a little triggered? Like, that is amazing to me. Like,
I'm used to acknowledging feelings when they're hitting me over the head, but not when they're like
that subtle.
So knowing that, knowing that these people that were secure, they embrace antisocial feelings,
negative feelings, like they welcome them.
They allow them to be there because that's a part of themselves that they don't want
to leave, that every part of yourself is worth cherishing.
And so that made me engage in this practice of mindfulness where now my goal is to be
more aware.
And I notice in myself that these feelings I shouldn't be feeling, I so quickly push them
away.
I don't even know that it's happening unless I'm engaged in a practice of trying to look
for it.
And so it was writing this book and realizing that security is about feeling at all, like welcoming
at all.
And then the next time someone says, I got into an accident and I need to take care of myself,
like, because I felt that feeling of rejection, the next time it comes up less strongly,
right?
It is an investment in myself and in my relationships in the future.
Okay.
I have a game to play because there is so much misinformation about attachment styles, attachment
theory, et cetera.
So we're going to play a secure attachment myth versus fast.
Okay, I love this.
This is a video from Anna on TikTok.
I healed my anxious attachment and became a secure person.
And this is how I stopped giving a fuck.
In all seriousness, the best thing my therapist ever told me is that we all have all attachment styles.
The trick is to find a person who brings out your secure attachment style.
For me, this meant I had to date someone who is naturally communicative, consistent, and trustworthy.
Instead of chasing emotionally unavailable, mixed messaging, a dicker.
addicted to chaos, bookery. And that happened by loving myself. And I know that there's that
annoying platitude of you can't love someone else until you love yourself. I would like to reframe
that platitude as loving yourself teaches you what love you're going to accept from other people.
Once I started really loving myself the way that I kept wishing a partner would love me,
the less I started tolerating people who showed up with any less. So can you heal your attachment
simply by the people that you're in relationship with.
Is that a myth or is that a fact?
It can and does improve your attachment style
to be in relationship with people
that make you feel secure.
I mean, what we'll go through
probably later in this book
is that our attachment style
are basically a series of memories
that we have as to how we've been treated, right?
And building new memories,
there's this theory called
retrieval competition theory,
which is our behaviors and our actions
are determined by which memories
are most salient to us.
And so as you date someone secure
and more of these memories of people care when I'm upset, people communicate, I don't have to walk on
eggshells, become more salient to you, then those become more prevalent in your bag of attachment-related
memories. Yeah, that was crazy to me, that you essentially can change your memories by the way
you approach and think about them. Is that true? Yeah, this is what the crux of the book is. Yeah,
I mean, I've just never heard that before. Yeah, it is wild stuff.
Okay, we'll get into more of the memory stuff later, but suffice to say that one of the things
that you hypothesize that you share in this book is that we can literally change our memories
and change the ways that we remember things, which is wild. Do we all have all attachment styles
in us? I would say, yeah. I think attachment styles are less of a category. And even in the
research world, they started calling them orientations or styles because different people can
bring up different aspects of our attachment styles. And it makes sense, right? Because a lot of us have
memories of both being abandoned and of people, people that we couldn't trust, people that have
betrayed us, right? Different parents can have different ways of relating to us. And so we have different
memories and new situations can trigger any one of those memories. So you may experience yourself
in one relationship as anxious and you date a very anxious person, all of a sudden you become more
avoidant and you see that these different attachment styles exist without us. Just to wrap your
head around this, Liz, like, if you described yourself as funny, there'd be some friends you were
funnier with. There'd be some friends you were less funny with, right? There's some friends that
that part of you doesn't get tapped into at all. Like, this is, this is actually true about
personality in general that you have trait base, which is like, I tend to be funny across
different circumstances, but you also have state base, which is in certain situations, these
parts of me come out. I identify as a funny person, but I don't think the podcast listeners
get to see that side of me, which makes me, I'm like, do they think I'm so serious and so boring? Okay,
So kind of fact, fact for this person, do you think that a good way to approach healing our attachment
issues is to kind of go relationally first, or do you think it's to go inward personally first?
I mean, hopefully both.
The hard thing about only going relationally, which is self-verification theory, which we were talking about,
which is this idea that we look for people that verify our sense of self.
And so if we feel bad about ourselves and people see us too positively, we tend to feel threat
that they're going to figure out who I really am.
It's only a matter of time.
I'm so anxious.
Eventually, they're going to reject me.
It doesn't actually feel like safety.
It feels like precursor for harm for people that have poor self-esteem.
And so because of that, even when people with low self-esteem get into more positive
relationship with loving partners, they experience less intimacy because it's quite
threatening for them.
It reveals how deeply entrenched their low sense of worth is.
If you struggle with self-esteem, someone can really love you, but you don't actually
receive that love. You underestimate how much people love you. That's what low self-esteem's
correlated with that underestimation. And the love I learned in your book can make you feel worse.
Like getting praise, getting compliments. It raises your blood pressure to get compliments if you have
low self-esteem. When positive events happen to you, you're more likely to visit the doctor
months later. What's happening there is that our sense of worth is a theory for how the world works.
And if it's low, it's that, okay, people are going to reject me and harm is going to come. And that might
sound like a sucky theory, but what it does is it makes you feel prepared if that does happen.
And when people do things that counter your theory, it's like, do I have a coherent sense of
reality? Do I have control? Like chaos can happen. Anything can happen. Like, it's quite threatening
when something happens that counters our theory, even if it's a good thing. I will get back into
myth versus fact in a second, but I want to linger on this for a little bit because it explained so many
of the ways that I have interacted with the world historically and so many of the things that I
see my friends doing. Like, I have a friend and she says all the time that she wants a life partner,
but she doesn't do anything that would bring her closer to having a life partner. And the people
that she surrounds herself with are not the type of people she would ever want to make a life
partner. Could that be because she's trying to reinforce the certainty of the way that she sees the
world, even though it's not good. It's not actually what she wants, but she's stuck in this life.
because it feels certain.
And according to self-verification theory,
like the certainty of the worst option
is better than the uncertainty of this life
that she really dreams about.
I love the way that you're applying it.
I mean, I don't know your friend, obviously,
but certainly, according to that,
that's aligned with self-verification theory,
that we're actually soothed when someone treats us
just as badly as we feel we deserve, right?
That is crazy.
We are actually soothed when somebody treats us
just as badly as we feel we deserve.
Yes, because it's like you're validating,
my sense of reality. Like, oh my gosh. It's like women who suspect their husbands are cheating on them.
In a way, when they find out he actually is, it's like, oh, what a relief here. I thought it was
crazy. I was suspicious this whole time, you know? Like, finally, like, finally. Like, now I have the
closure that I need before I was just kind of on eggshells waiting for that bad thing to happen
and not knowing what reality was. You can kind of see it in that way, the way that it's actually
a relief when the reality that we think will happen, even if it's negative, actually comes to
past. Well, and I think to take that a step further, and I want to leave infidelity out of it because I don't
think that it's your fault if your partner is cheating on you. And I don't want anybody to perceive what I'm saying
in that way at all. But if we are always trying to create the world that lives in our head because
we like that certainty, that's going to impact the way that we show up in our friendships. That's going to
impact the way that we show up at a job interview. That's going to impact in a real way the results that
we're getting from the world and the positions that we're putting ourselves in and the risks
that we're willing to take.
And so to me, self-verification theory was this, like, lightball moment of being like,
oh, this is why people are trapped in lives that they hate.
Exactly.
Because the life that they hate feels certain.
And so they have this subconscious part of their brain that's sabotaging them whenever
they try to deviate from that.
And here's the thing.
If you break out of it, it doesn't actually feel like you broke out of it, right?
If you found that love that you always wanted and that person is so loving, right?
you don't actually feel loved.
If you find that great success and you become that CEO,
you're just feeling like an imposter the entire time.
And that, I think, is one of the most compelling reasons
to work on our sense of worth.
Everything beautiful about life slips off of us
if it doesn't match how we see ourselves.
Wait, so what is one concrete action step
for somebody who's like, wait, I do have the beautiful life
and it doesn't feel good,
or I feel trapped and I feel like I can't even get to the place
where I get that beautiful life that I want?
First, the concrete action step is to notice that this is happening, to notice the part of you
that's trying to reject this, to notice the part of you that's assuming that the bad thing
is going to happen.
Because only if you notice that that happens and take a step away from it, can you begin
to question whether this reality that you fear is actually going to happen?
But for so many of us, this is so deeply entrenched that it's hardwired, it's running on autopilot.
And so the first step is to notice that I have these fears that the other shoe will drop.
doesn't necessarily mean that it's reality.
Understanding how the brain works, right?
My prediction might not necessarily mean that it's reality.
And then it's, I mean, the other way is like,
we psychologists call it, we capitalize, we try to savor.
When something good happens, actually focus on the good.
One practical way that we can do this is, let's say I said,
you're so smart, Liz, and you don't feel smart, right?
And you're just like, no, no, no, no,
because now I have to act so smart all the time.
And this is so much pressure to live up to this.
Instead, the researchers asked, can you accept that she thinks you're smart?
And then they're like, oh, I can accept that she thinks I'm smart.
And that's a way to circumvent the sort of sense of self-filter that's happening.
Like, okay, I don't have to accept that this compliment is true about me, but I can accept that someone thinks that it is true.
Is there anything that we can do to help if we have another person in our life who we see that they're suffering from this?
We see that they're limiting their own life or they're always like, I knew it was going to work out like this or like there's no men.
in this whole world for me or stuff like that.
Like if we see those signs of that,
is there anything that we can do
to kind of shake them out of it?
Confident your own desire to shake.
Really?
Oh no.
I know.
Okay, so I had a friend,
bad at taking compliments.
I started to say,
I'm about to give you a compliment
and you have to receive it.
I started to disclaim that.
And now that I study worth,
I realize that this is really the wrong approach, right?
Because I am trying to force this person
to do something that is gravely threatening for them.
That is literally triggering an identity crisis in them,
that I see them so differently than they see themselves.
Oh, like to your whole point, it's raising their blood pressure.
It's actually like having a negative impact on them.
Exactly.
So I catch myself when friends express doubts about themselves.
And that part of me that wants to say,
but you're so amazing and you're so great.
And I'm like, no.
What I have to do is validate how they feel.
I have to be a witness for exactly how they're feeling.
Wait, so do you say your piece of shit?
No, I say it's okay to feel that way.
It's okay to feel insecure.
It's okay to feel anxious. All of us feel anxious from time to time. Tell me more, what piece of this feels threatening. What's coming up in you? Like, I'm here to listen.
Okay. So to my friend, it's okay to feel like there's literally no good men in this world. It's okay to feel cynical. So many people dating come to a place of cynicism. Tell me more. What are some of the recent experiences that have made you particularly cynical? Like, what's something you've been struggling with lately? I'm here to listen.
It is so interesting that when I am trying to be a good friend, I'm actually like attacking them.
It actually is so interesting that I'm sitting here thinking like I'm trying to help you see your options, your opportunities, how great the world can be.
And actually I'm raising their blood pressure and making their idea of certainty feel under threat.
Well, Liz, what do you see happens after you do this?
Oh, it's never great.
Yeah.
And that's the thing.
I think that's a very instructive.
like if your friend's sense of reality
was somewhat close to the one that you were offering,
they might be able to meet you there, right?
So it's not like we should never compliment our friends.
Like it could be like a bridge reality.
Exactly. And so if I compliment my friend
on something very specific, like,
I really like this pie that you made, right?
She can take that in.
And so it's about giving our friends affirmations
that are attainable for them
rather than trying to completely pull them
out of their sense of reality completely.
Because, you know, I'm not saying never compliment
your friend, never love on your friend, it's always going to be threatening. For example, there's
research on affirmations when people say, I am loved. People tend to feel better after they do these
affirmations. But people with low self-worth, do not, because that is not attainable for them.
I am loved, right? Maybe it's, I could be liked by some people, right? And so we need to find
what's actually obtainable for our nervous system and offer ourselves that and offer the people in our
life that. So my action step is, one, examine my desire to enforce my worldview on the people that I
love and maybe reel that back in a little bit. But two, it would be to see where they are at. And if
anything, give them like a baby step, a bridge. A bridge. I saw one man who appeared single and nice.
I have a nice date. Yeah. And even like noticing that with your friend, like, oh, I know it's been
hard in dating and you felt so cynical, but it sounds like you had one really nice date. You know,
you can even point out what they're saying back to them. Okay. I love that. Okay. Back to myth versus fact.
Secure people don't need outside reassurance. They take care of their own emotional needs.
Oh, no. What secure people have is flexibility, which means that they can go to themselves or other people.
Anxiously attached people can only go towards other people. They need another person to soothe them.
Avoidantly to attach people can only go to themselves. They can't go to other people because they find that so shameful and even cringe-worthy.
And so they have a lot of trouble being vulnerable and are having a confidant.
But secure people have the flexibility. They say, I'm going to offer myself some care.
maybe if I need more care, I'll go to a friend.
You know, the friend will offer me something.
Then I'll do a little reflection in journaling on myself.
Secure-ish attachment is all about having that flexibility.
Okay, so that is a myth.
Secure people don't get jealous.
Their feelings aren't reliant on other people's.
No, secure people are not perfect.
Like, they're human.
It's not that they never feel sadness, pain, jealousy.
It's just that they have a lot more agility around it.
And that's because they welcome the feeling and they don't shame themselves for them, right?
And it's like if you had a friend next to you who was always like, hey, how are you feeling is okay?
And it's valid.
And I'm here for you.
Tell me more.
And that's like kind of the more of the internal world of the person that's more secure.
Okay.
So if you have a partner who gets jealous or you are in a relationship where you get jealous, even a friendship, which I do think we're talking about friendships as much as we're talking about romantic relationships here and you get jealous of your friends, that doesn't mean that you have an attachment issue?
No, no.
And in fact, I think we need to allow normal, human, messy emotion.
I think that's the way forward to move towards security.
It's less about the feelings you feel and more about the reaction to the feelings you feel that
marks your attachment style.
So the anxious person is typically catastrophizing.
I should be ashamed of myself.
I'm too much.
I'm too needy.
The avoidant person is like, oh, I got to push this away.
This is weak.
This isn't something I should be feeling.
This means I'm less than if I have this feeling.
And the secure person is like, oh, there's my jealousy.
You know, what do I need? What care do I need? What compassion can I offer myself? So again, secure
attachment is not marked by the initial feelings that come up, but what you do with those feelings when they come up.
Would a secure person act not to themselves, but to somebody else differently in the situation?
Like, let's say we are jealous of our friends made plans without us.
What a secure person do something differently externally in that situation?
Yeah, potentially. So a securely attached person would probably feel more comfortable
will bring it up, but in a particular type of way.
Securely attached people, they tend to be more emotionally regulated because they have this
more positive relationship with their feelings.
And so when they bring up problems and issues, they do it with high amounts of perspective
taking without blaming or attacking the other person.
They might just say like, hey, like, I saw you all hung out.
I'm really happy for you, but like, I've been feeling kind of lonely and I would love to be
invited versus the anxiously attached person who's like, I can't believe you all treat me like this.
How could you do this to me?
I thought you were my friends.
And the avoidant person who's like,
I'm silently planning my own rejection
of this entire group
and moving on with my life.
I'm not going to say which one I see myself in.
Big news.
After me taking seeds DSO1 daily symbiotic
for five years now
and you guys sending me literally thousands of DMs
about how much you love it,
Zach, my dear husband,
finally decided to try it.
And it turns out he is obsessed.
Surprise, surprise.
He's like, I did not know that my gut could feel like this.
Here's the thing about DSO1 that I do not think most people fully appreciate until they
experience it.
This is not your average probiotic.
The vast majority of probiotics that you can buy do not even survive digestion.
The SO1 is specifically engineered and actually tested to get through your stomach acid and
actually reach your colon where it can do its job.
It also has prebiotics, which very few probiotics have and are critical.
If you have probiotics but no prebiotics, the probiotics do not have the food that they need to thrive and they just die off.
So they're basically wasting your money.
And the 24 strains that it has are clinically shown to reduce bloating, improve regularity and alleviate gas.
And there are strains in there for skin health or heart health, for immune health.
We're getting more nutrients out of our food.
Our gut microbiomes impact everything.
More than 2 million people have experienced the power of DSO1 and 92% of members have recommended it to a friend or family member.
This is definitely a situation where if you have been curious, just try it. See if it makes a difference
for you. If you're ready to experience a probiotic that actually works, go to cede.com slash Liz Moody
and use code Liz Moody to get 25% off your first month. That is seed.com slash Liz Moody,
code Liz Moody. Your skin isn't just getting older. It's being actively broken down by something
called senescent cell. They sit there releasing inflammatory signals, breaking down your collagen,
degrading your skin barrier, and accelerating every visible sign of.
aging. Scientists call them zombie cells and they are one of the primary drivers of how old your skin
looks and feels. The team at one skin spent five years testing over 900 peptides to figure out how to
help reduce the accumulation of senescent cells. And they finally landed on it. OS01, the first peptide
scientifically studied to reduce skin's biological age at the molecular level. OSO1 goes in and it clears
out the senescent cells so it helps skin function like healthier, younger looking skin. It is not masking the
signs of aging. It's not targeting one thing. It is actually rolling the clock back at a cellular level.
I've been using the face moisturizer for almost six months now and I love it so much. It feels
amazing. It goes on really smoothly. It's not tacky at all. And I actually see a difference.
My skin looks firmer. It looks glowier. The texture feels dramatically smoother. I also love the
body moisturizer. It dries down really quickly, which is always a pet peeve of mine with
moisturizers. And again, I'm reducing my skin's biological age. I am not making it just look younger. I am
making it actually younger.
OneSkin has four peer-reviewed clinical studies in over 10,000 five-star reviews.
The data backs everything up for a limited time.
Get 15% off with code Liz at oneskin.co slash Liz.
Again, that's 15% off at one skin.c.co with code Liz.
This episode is brought to you by IQ Bar, our exclusive snack sponsor.
One of the easiest micro habits to change your diet is to stop giving yourself the unhealthy
option.
and the option you don't want to reach for in the first place.
So the key is to plan ahead, and I do that by keeping IQ bars in my car and in my bag.
So no matter how busy the day gets, I already have a smart, healthy option ready to go.
These were one of the bars that my personal RD recommended for me as I worked with her over the course of a year to lose 30 pounds in a healthy way.
And I truly, truly love them.
This is the perfect time to try IQ bars ultimate sampler pack that includes brain and body boosting bars, mushroom coffees, and more.
All of their products are entirely free from gluten, dairy, soy, GMOs, and artificial sweeteners.
There's a reason why IQ Bar has over 15,000 five-star reviews and counting.
It's because IQ bars have more fiber.
Fiber is going to be the word of the day this year, I promise you guys.
They have more fiber, less sugar and carbs than other protein bars, and they actually somehow,
even with all of that, still taste good, which is truly a miracle.
Right now, IQ Bar is offering our special podcast listeners 20% off all.
IQ bar products, including the ultimate sampler pack, plus free shipping. To get your 20% off,
text Liz to 64,000. Text Liz to 6400. That's Liz to 64,000. Message and data rates may apply,
see terms for details. This is from Instagram. I don't know who needs to hear this, but that person's
shitty mood is not your responsibility. Their bad day, their stress, their sadness. I know,
I know that you love them and I know that you care, but it's not your problem to fix.
In fact, there may even be a part of you that actually wants to fix it because their distress
feels like a threat to your connection with them.
Like if they get too upset, too overwhelmed, they'll withdraw.
You'll lose them and their love.
But if you can detect and fix every problem for them, then you're good.
You're safe.
Right?
No.
That's called codependence.
Love doesn't require you to manage the emotions of another adult.
your feelings from theirs, allow them to rely on their own resilience, and trust them to manage
their own feelings. Be supportive, be present, be kind. But remember, you can't fix their problems
for them. Is wanting to fix somebody else a sign of insecure attachment and is not wanting
to do that a sign of secure attachment? Well, first of all, I just want to say, like, I think a lot of
us attachment influencers.
We portray a standard of perfection that's unhuman.
And like in the psychology world, emotional contagion, which is like if someone
around you feels a certain emotion, it's contagious.
And this is a fact.
This is a well-researched fact, right?
And it's not necessarily a sign if you're uncomfortable because someone else is like
exuding this really negative energy that that's your codependence speaking, right?
That's your inability to separate your own sense of self.
Like I just, I don't know.
I'm just tired of the shaming language around like natural human methods.
and natural human tendencies. So I don't think that that's necessarily a sign of your own
co-dependence that you're affected by other people's mood. It's a good reminder to have that,
like, this doesn't necessarily mean anything about you or this doesn't necessarily mean that
you've done something wrong. I can see how that would be a really reassuring reminder to have,
but like, what I want people to do is stay connected to you and stay connected to your nervous system.
And so if you're constantly around someone in a bad mood and you don't have the ability to separate
yourself from it, right?
It's not just about enduring and trying to cosplay like you're secure in the situation, right?
It's about attending to who you uniquely are and your idiosyncratic needs.
And so you as someone who's affected by the energy of the room, which could be a temperament thing,
could be basic emotional contagion, right?
If this is like somebody around all the time in particular, you may have to talk about it and say,
like I want you to be able to like feel the way you're feeling.
I also have noticed that it affects me and that sometimes I might withdraw and I just don't
want us to get into that cycle.
And so what can we do moving forward?
What can we do?
Because I heard this and I was like, shoot, because I do get, Zach will get grumpy and
then I'll get grumpy because I'm hanging out with Zach.
And then he'll be like, well, shouldn't I be allowed to feel the way that I feel?
I'm like, you sure should.
And it makes me grumpy.
Yeah.
I mean, you can create a plan together.
Like think of it as if we're a team, right?
What feels caring to you?
What feels caring to me?
And so maybe Liz is like, all right, if you're a grumpy mood, I'm going to remind you that I love you.
And then I might go play my pickleball.
I might stick around and try to be reassuring to the extent that I can.
But once I reach that moment where I'm like, oh, now I'm going to get in this cycle with you, it's not good for either of us.
Maybe I will redirect my energy.
There's this parable of like somebody falls into a hole and one person comes along and they're like reaching down and trying to pull them out of the hole and they get pulled into the hole.
And then another person comes along and like throws a ladder down and then they climb out of the hole.
And I think you're saying, like, stop yourself before you fall into the hole.
I'm saying, yeah, instead of trying to be secure, you have to start with being who you are.
Yeah.
Because completely disregulating yourself because this is what a secure person should think.
It's not healing you.
Secure people don't take responsibility for stuff that isn't theirs and they don't deflect responsibility for stuff that is.
Yeah, secure people are pretty good at taking accountability.
Secure people tend to take feedback less as an attack on the self.
That really comes from their history where one of the first.
the defining factors of parents that raise secure kids is they let their kids make mistakes.
And they're not like, you should be ashamed of yourself. Why did you do that? That's such a screw
up, right? They're like, oh, it happens. Like, we drop the milk sometimes. Like, I'll pick it up for you, right?
And so they haven't necessarily internalized that belief that when I do something wrong,
I am wrong as a person that some of the other insecure attachment styles have internalized.
Okay, so fact.
Secure people admit when they're wrong have caused harm or been mistaken, including when it wasn't
intentional.
Yeah.
There's research that secure people are more forgiving.
They tend to, again, be better at conflict in terms of more regulating and more
considerate of the other person's sense of reality.
They're able to recognize another person's sense of reality, even if their own is different,
right?
And so they can say, like, I know I didn't mean that, but I understand that it affected you.
And I still want to acknowledge the ways that you feel.
My first book, I talk about, like, mutuality, which is understanding, considering both
people's reality at the same time.
rather than one person's reality needing to eclipse the other person.
Is this like when they say when you're in a relationship, you shouldn't fight for who's right?
You should fight on behalf of the relationship kind of.
Yeah, because it's like, what is right?
I'm instead more curious about what is true for you.
Maybe it's not right that my partner feels threatened when I hang out with my friends, right?
Maybe that's not right for me.
I don't think they should feel threatened.
I'm not doing anything shady, right?
That doesn't feel fair.
but like if I discount my partner continuously in that,
then we're not actually going to be able to work on their feelings of insecurity in that moment.
And we don't actually make it better.
And so I think we need to be less concerned with what is the right way to act in a relationship
and what is actually happening.
What's actually triggering us.
And once we know the truth, then we can figure out what to do from a place of reality.
This is from Bree on TikTok.
Here's the thing.
Secure women are not just following different rules.
they're operating from an entirely different internal foundation.
They're not white knuckling their way through not texting.
They genuinely feel differently about it.
We don't feel the urge the same way because their sense of self and safety and okayness
isn't tied to his response.
How does the work, not the rules?
My question here is, is it okay to fake it until you make it?
Or do you need to be operating by this whole different internal playbook?
Oh my gosh.
I struggle so much with this content
because I'm just like,
it's the hierarchy of attachment styles.
It's the abandon yourself
to act secure in this connection
that is actually making things worse.
Because now not only are you anxious
about getting the text back,
but you're like, this is so bad,
I'm not secure, right?
And you're adding that layer of shame.
It's okay if your nervous system's reacting.
Let's start with that.
Like, it's okay if you're anxious.
You need to be secure
and you really should do better
and, like, play by this different playbook.
We just need to tell
the truth. Yes, securely attached people generally less threatened. They might have less of reaction,
but they still might have some reaction. And like, once you acknowledge that you are anxious in that
moment, if that is the truth, you can feel that and you can say, I'm anxious. And you can say,
let me put my hand on my chest and tell myself, I'm safe, I'm safe, I'm safe. And that is the moment
when you start to become more secure. Not the moment when you're like, well, I got to be a secure
lady. And so I shouldn't feel this anxious. And now I'm just going to pretend I'm not. I'm operating
from a different playbook than this influencer, which is that it's okay to be anxious.
It's okay to be avoided and we need to start with the truth.
And whatever is true and whatever is real is good.
It's good.
Okay, so let's take the specific situation that she seems to be referencing, which is like
when you're dating somebody newly and you wish they were texting you and you can't
decide whether you should send a text.
And you're like, if I was more securely attached, I would just be off living my life and
not caring if they're texting me.
What should we be doing in that situation?
If I was very anxious about getting a text back, well, I would try to self-sooth.
And so that's, again, me putting my hand in my chest and telling myself, I'm safe, I'm safe.
I might bring up in person a conversation about texting styles.
And what anxious people really need is a sense of predictability.
So if they know someone tends to text once a day, they can be okay.
It's when they feel like that person should be texting them throughout the day and they're not, right?
And so just be like, you know, I know, like texting can be a thing when you're dating
new person and people can like attribute all types of meaning to it.
And I just kind of want to see like, what does it mean to you and show some curiosity there?
And then you might share, I do get anxious.
So it's helpful for me to hear what your own style is and go off of that.
And you could even just say like, oh, you know, what feels caring to me is if you ever do
have an issue or you're not feeling this anymore, like just communicate it with me directly.
And I really benefit when I know I can trust that in another person.
What about the idea that we're trying to portray secure so that we are desirable so that
You don't scare people away, et cetera, et cetera.
Yeah, for me.
And this might not be everyone.
I get it.
First of all, like we have so much internalize this shame around our insecurities rather than, like, it's what we need to be looking for is people that are vulnerable about their insecurities, not people that don't have any.
And so I understand why people feel compelled.
But I really think of security as the ability to communicate your insecurities without shaming yourself or attacking another person.
That is a beautiful thing.
That would make me feel more secure with someone.
The person that brought up the conversation on texting in a way that was just curiosity,
that's actually a sign of security.
Yeah, I actually can picture the conversation and it would feel quite confident if somebody
said, hey, it makes me feel good to get a text once a day.
Yeah.
Does that work for you?
Yeah.
That feels confident.
My needs matter.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's interesting.
Okay.
Let's do, as the last one, securely attached people have high self-esteem.
and don't rely on other people
to make them feel good about themselves.
I think some of these statements
have been very black or white.
They're still human.
Their amygdala is not lighting up
as much as the anxious person
in reaction to perceive rejection,
but they still are really anxious about it, right?
They're still a little worried.
They still feel rejected sometimes.
They still feel excluded sometimes.
It's just not as strong of an emotion,
again, because of their history
of people showing care when they feel emotion
and their ability to give them that to themselves,
which the anxious person they've worn in people can cultivate.
You say there's actually two types of high self-esteem.
There's like a good high self-esteem and a bad high self-esteem.
And I immediately had people like pop into my brain for both.
But can you tell us the difference?
So I'm reading all this research on self-esteem and I see these people that say they feel good
about themselves, they feel worthy.
And they have very different profiles in terms of how they treat other people.
So one kind, who I call the bad twin in the book,
They're trying to act superior to everyone.
They're always bragging, maybe trying to be the center of intention, very reactive,
tend to put people down, tend to assume the worst than others.
And we're antagonistic, have worse relationships than people with low self-esteem.
I always viewed that as like compensatory, but you're like that actually is they have high self-esteem.
This is just the way it's manifesting.
They say they do on the questionnaire.
Okay.
Got it.
Oh, that's interesting.
Yes, they say they do on the questionnaires and they're often not conscious of their own insecurities.
And then the other type that says they feel worthy, right?
Compassionate towards others, kind, has the best relationships of anybody, able to admit fault, take accountability, non-defensive, pretty emotionally regulated.
And so there's really these two different kinds.
And so when you ask people, like, do you feel good about yourself as a measure of whether they're a person with high self-esteem?
Is it that they feel good about themselves or that they would be unable to admit if they didn't?
And that is the quote unquote bad twin.
They are unable to admit their own shame, their own vulnerabilities.
They constantly have to present as invincible and perfect.
How does this relate to the conversation about worth and secure attachment, et cetera, et cetera?
Great question.
So as I'm reading all of this, I'm like, I don't want to help people become mean kind of high self-sely.
And that's why I'm like maybe cringing at some of these videos because I'm like,
you are telling people they have to be perfect.
They can't show their flaws.
and that is exactly what is driving the kind of mean high self-esteem, right?
And so I'm talking to one of my colleagues, Beth, and I'm like, I don't know what the
difference is between these two.
Like, why are they both saying they have high self-esteem, but their relationships manifest so
differently?
And so she's like, I'm trying to think about when I feel defensive, and it's usually
because I'm feeling ashamed.
And Beth is someone I could see had this sort of more positive type of high self-esteem.
And I realized in the moment the difference between these two.
too high self-esteem is one can admit their vulnerabilities, can admit how they feel, can
acknowledge how they feel. And because of that, these feelings don't hijack them and lead them to
firebom the next person. So that person is then becoming your way of regulating your own feelings
by putting them down, right? And so it's the ability to feel everything. And that's really how I
define worth is the ability to treat our internal world as if it matters, specifically to treat
the way that we feel as if it matters to us,
as if we are deserving of our own attention,
care, and compassion when we feel certain types of emotions
and that continuous practice
of treating your internal world,
how you feel as if it matters,
culminates in you feeling as if you matter.
And that to you is the missing piece of the conversation that's been...
Yes, exactly.
Let's start talking about how you're relating yourself internally,
not just how you're relating other people
because how you relate to other people is a byproduct of how you're relating to yourself internally.
And if you aren't relating to yourself internally as this whole person, then you can have this high self-esteem, quote, unquote, but it's really blanketed and shame.
Yeah, exactly. It's a way to escape shame by I'm going to portray myself as if I'm perfect all the time.
And there's so much shame at the core of that.
I know. Whenever I see those people, I do want to just like give them a hug.
You giving them a hug would be involved acknowledging that the shame is there. And that's exactly.
what they don't want to happen. So what can we do with those people? I don't know. It's there so far.
You know, I hope they listen to this podcast. They can get some insight and some directions forward.
What are some signs that we're not securely attached, even if we think we are? This is a good question.
People pleasing, doing the right thing for other people, even if it evolves in abandoning your own
sense of reality. Ignoring your own discomfort for the sake of your relationship. That might be a sign you think you're
secure, but you're actually not. When you desire to withdraw from other people, and you don't really
know why, and you keep trying to ignore it. Wait, I do that. When I'm feeling anxious or sad,
and my friends can tell, and then they'll reach out, reach out, reach out, it's when I should
answer their text the most. It's when I should respond to their invitations to hang out the most,
and I don't, I retreat, retreat, retreat. Is that because I'm not securely attached? What do you think?
What do you think of what's going on for you? No, you're the expert.
Well, I would say, like, often the withdrawal can be, and I can't speak for you, right?
But from the assumption that their care isn't real, and then in fact, it feels quite shameful,
and now I'm acknowledging the shame that I have by talking to you about it, right?
And so it's a struggle to actually internalize the care that's been offered to you that makes withdrawing much more attractive.
What should I do?
Like, should I white knuckle into?
I would confront that desire to withdraw and sit with it.
and maybe ask yourself what's happening there.
What does it mean to you?
What's scary about talking to them?
You know, explore, explore that.
Explore your own sense of reality.
I think I struggle sometimes with when I'm not my sparkly as shiny as self.
Am I still lovable in that state?
Yeah.
And that's so relatable.
I feel like so many people can relate to that and feeling like, oh, if I don't present
perfectly, people aren't going to like me.
You said in the book, I thought that this line was really interesting.
We think that maybe if I finally find the right job, get the right body or date the right person,
I will feel good enough.
We're pushing off that sense of security for,
and then we're so motivated.
You know, I have friends that are so motivated by romance.
And I'm like, why?
Like, you have this beautiful community of friendship.
I mean, this is my shtick,
because I wrote a book on friendship.
But I realize, oh, it's because they're chasing their own sense of self.
And then I have a lot more compassion.
I'm like, yes, like, we see our sense of ultimate validation
as wrapped up in so many things.
Some of its career.
it's body type, it's getting a romantic partner.
And we have this almost urgency around it, right?
Where it feels like it's almost consuming.
That's like this is the most important thing in my life and I elevated it above all else, right?
And whenever there's urgency or rigidity, I think there's a deeper, often a deeper wound there.
And often it's because I'm seeing my sense of self-worth as being offered to me if I do this one thing.
Well, and going back to self-verification theory, if you get the thing, if you find the
love of your life. If you get your dream body, if you get your dream job, it will not feel good to you.
If it feels incongruent with your vision that you have for yourself in your life.
I'm sure you've seen this so much, Liz, because you're around successful people all the time,
that they're not always happy. They're often not happy. And in fact, you know, I've had a doctor
tell me that, like, at least before I was a doctor, I had hope. I had hope that if I became a doctor,
it would all go away. I've heard this from very rich.
people who have like hundreds of millions of dollars and they're like at least before I had the money and I'm
not saying, like, you don't have to out there, like, sit there feeling bad for very rich people.
And they're like, before I had this money, I had this idea that if I made a lot of money,
that would solve all the problems in my life. And now I realize that's not true.
And now it's worse because I don't have the hope that there's something that will solve it, right?
I mean, not saying having a ton of money makes your life worse, but.
Yeah. I'll still take it. Yeah. Exactly.
But, no, I think there's a very real thing with, yes, go after all of those things.
Like, so much of my time on this podcast is spent saying, here's how you get.
your dream job. Here's how you get your dream partner. All of these things. Here's how you get the
health that you deserve. And if you don't feel internally worthy of this, this is real psychology,
real research, it won't feel good to you. It will actually make you more stress.
Make you more. Isn't that so sad? That's crazy. The very things that we think should make us feel
better are only making us feel worse. Like, it's hard to be a human being. For me, that was just the
biggest wake-up call in your book. It's like, you have to do this work. Otherwise, everything else that
you are working towards in your life is not only not going to feel good to you. It's going to make you
feel worse than if you did not get the things of your dreams. Okay. Let's talk about if we are not
securely attached. How might that play out? Let's say it work. Again, insecurely attached, people are
more reactive. And that might manifest in different ways. You might be snapping at people. You might be
withdrawing. You may have trouble bringing up that there's a problem or issue to your manager or boss,
because if you're anxious, you just think it's your fault. If you're avoidant, you don't trust anybody to
help you. You might struggle to take criticism at work. If your boss gives you negative feedback,
you might be planning your escape, whereas securely attached people often tend to have more of a
growth mindset. Again, because of their history, they're able to say, oh, I made a mistake.
Okay, this is something I can work on. Like, what can I do to improve this? It's also going to
manifest in your relationships with their colleagues. Like, if you're avoidant, less likely to form
close relationships with their colleagues, which, you know, leads to more career success and
and promotion versus if you're anxious, you might feel like you have.
You do invest in those relationships, but you're constantly wondering if they really like you
or they're invested in you or a lot of insecurities come up around those connections at work
too.
And we've talked about friendship and romantic relationships a little bit.
I'd love to talk about our relationship with our kids.
Are we destined to repeat our attachment styles with our kids?
I just have so much empathy for parents, right?
because it's so hard.
Like related to this process of truth telling
of like being able to speak to
when you're insecure and have that be okay,
I understand what a juggernaut parents are in
because it's like, yes, I'm really disregulated right now
and also like the gentle parenting,
this kid needs me to like be an anchor for them.
They're forming.
And so I just wanted to acknowledge like how hard it is.
But I think for parents,
a lot of this work that I talk about in the book
and I share exercises on how to do it,
of being able to, when you're triggered by your kid,
I even talk about a woman in the book
who, when her daughter was angry,
she would lock her outside.
And she was like, you could only come in
once your attitude is better
because of how much that anger triggered her
and her own ability to sit with and confront
what's happening with her.
So then she has to control the environment
and control her child.
As parents, like this work of compassion for ourselves,
of acknowledging how we feel,
of starting to offer ourselves that care,
even when we're feeling things that are not motherly or not fatherly, right?
To acknowledge that and allow it and to care for ourselves means that we take it out on our kids less.
So the version of everything that you're talking about in this book, which is like to really be
securely attached, you have to be able to accept everything you're actually feeling.
As a parent means you have to be able to accept how you're really feeling as a person first,
I would say, and then a parent.
Yeah, exactly.
Like I think especially moms, there's so much pressure.
is, I love all of this. Nothing stresses me out. This is great. I never have any regrets to any of this.
And we think that that will make us a better parent trying to be perfect, right? But in fact,
that's just too much pressure and you're going to crack. What I've realized in this book is these
people that try to numb out emotions become hyper-emotional in moments. All of these emotions
that they try to push away come out in an extreme way. And in fact, allowing
yourself to be angry, upset, annoyed, frustrated, sometimes regretful, feeling guilty.
Like, all of that being acceptable actually allows you to be better at regulating your kids
because when you acknowledge it, you're regulating it in yourself.
Not to be like too nuanced, but should you be doing this in front of your kids or will that mess
them?
You're like, mommy sobbing.
You're like, I don't know.
Like, is that going to freak them out?
It can be as quiet as just like taking a moment and being like, all right, I'm a little
annoyed right now.
putting your hand on your chest and acknowledging that and noticing where you're feeling it.
Like, all right, I feel this is like a lump in my chest.
Just a moment.
Just a jiff, right?
Later on, maybe you could explore that feeling more deeply.
But even taking a moment, again, just labeling your feelings deactivates the amygdala can be really helpful.
You talk about, is it identity stretching?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And so not the, this is like, I believe, tell me if I get this wrong, but it's the idea that
we kind of say certain types of identities should exhibit certain traits or behave in a
certain way. And I think that exists so strongly for moms. So strongly for moms. Like moms should be this
type of person. Exactly. And that's what I talk about in the book. Instead of using our identities to
dictate our sense of reality, we can go from the ground up. Here's what I feel. And that's maybe what
it reveals about my identity, right? Here's how I feel in this interaction. Maybe it reveals that
this is the kind of mom I am. I'm the kind of mom who needs more support. I'm the kind of mom who needs
more care. I'm the kind of mom that needs to go into work, right? Because this is driving me crazy.
and I can acknowledge how I feel.
And that tells me more information about my style of mothering and my needs as a mother, right?
Instead of like, this is a mother and this is the only things I can feel, this is what I feel.
And how does that shed light on my own needs as a mother, my own style as a mother?
It's an interesting conversation, even about labels.
I was listening to a podcast recently that was about the idea of diagnoses and how those impact our sense of identity.
and whether labels like autism or ADHD or anxiety or attachment styles, whether they're
helpful or harmful in specific situation.
And it's interesting even with the label of like mom or dad that you're essentially taking on
this word that has so much history, so many shoulds attached to it.
And how do you break free of that even with your most conscious effort?
Yeah.
I talk about it in the book, Eric Fromm is this I call it.
He really says that our identities can disconnect us from ourselves, right?
Because we're not actually experiencing our sense of reality.
We're filtering our reality through what's acceptable to that identity.
He even says, like, do you like Coke or do you like a label?
Are you actually tasting the Coke when it's there for you?
Like, are you actually being mindful in this moment?
Or you just like, this is what I've known about myself throughout history?
And so that's replacing my experience of this moment now.
And so Worth, I think, is an invitation to live more fully in the present.
And for that to not be threatening, right?
maybe I'm different than who I was back then.
That is okay, right?
I have high regard for myself no matter who I become.
Even if I'm like, oh, I was always a teacher, but like at this moment, I don't enjoy this job as much.
And that can be really threatening to admit because we feel like our identities are what gives us a sense of control and a sense of stability.
Self-verification theory.
Yeah, exactly.
So much comes back to this idea of like when stuff fits within our preconceived notion of ourselves in the world, we feel safe.
We feel safe.
Exactly, exactly. But I think when we do this work of worth, what it allows us is more flexibility. Because we feel safer more generally, we don't necessarily have to have such a rigid identity to find safety. And this is Robin Carhart Harris. He does great work on psychedelics. And his theory is that when things are so chaotic, one thing that we do to give ourselves a sense of control and predictability is we make ourselves rigid. We come up with a rigid sense of identity for ourselves. Now I am the self-made
And if I have to acknowledge that anyone help me, that's threatening my sense of reality, right?
Like, it's protective for us.
But sometimes it can be like freezing your credit score at the lowest score, right?
That's like what low self-worth is, is like, yes, I have a coherent sense of reality that makes things feel less chaotic and unpredictable.
But it's also kind of keeping me low in a way.
Okay.
You prepared two truths and a lie for me, right?
Yes.
Okay.
Attachment styles are hardwired in childhood.
Okay.
You can have different attachment styles with different people.
Okay.
And even though they don't show it, avoidantly attach people are very sensitive to relationship harm.
Okay.
I feel like are those all true?
No.
I feel like the lie is the last one because avoidantly attach people do show that they're sensitive to relationship harm.
They show it physiologically, but they don't tend to show it.
Oh, they're like masking?
They mask it, but if you're taking their physiology, they're actually freaking out internally.
Oh, wait, that's so interesting.
Okay.
I feel like I have some avoidant tendencies, but I don't feel like I'm subtle about it.
Oh, really?
I feel like I'm over here.
Like, I remember when I was a kid and I would be unhappy and I would go close my door
to my room and then I'd cry really loudly so that whoever is on the other side would hear it
and come and be like, oh, are you okay?
And I'd be like, no, I don't want to talk to you.
You know?
Like, I feel like I'm a loud avoidant.
You're a loud avoidance.
Yeah.
Attachments are hardwild in childhood.
at birth and do not change.
Oh, that's a lot.
That part, exactly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And then second one was...
You can have different attachment styles
with different people.
And that is definitely true.
You can have one attachment style with your boss, another one with your partner,
another with a friend, et cetera.
And is that because they bring up different memories from your childhood essentially?
Yeah, you have different associations with different people.
Okay.
And the first one, just to go back to that, they are hardwired in your childhood.
Yes.
Yes.
That is true.
But they do change.
They do change.
Okay.
continue to evolve throughout life.
And then the last one would be true then.
Yes, yes.
Which is?
Even though they don't show it, avoidantly attached people are very sensitive to relationship
harms.
Okay.
So they really, most avoidance don't show it.
I'm the weird.
Yeah.
Yeah, they tend to be like, I'm fine.
Like, it's not a big deal.
Like, I don't know why you're making a big deal out of this.
Like, you're dramatic.
That's the kind of a typical energy of a more avoidant person.
You guys ask me constantly if the hype around red light is real.
And the answer is yes.
but with one huge caveat.
Most of the devices on the market
aren't actually powerful enough
to make a difference.
But if you get one that is,
it can transform your skin,
your pain, your energy,
your hair, even your mood.
The huge problem is that the vast majority
of red lights on the market
are nowhere near the right dose level
or what's called a radiance
to actually have those benefits.
That is why I love Loombox.
It was founded by a doctor
who could not find a device
that actually met the studied standards
to have real results.
So she made her own.
It is a lightweight portable panel. You can use it anywhere that you need it. I love putting it on my head for headaches. And it is a god send for cramps. And of course, I use it every single day on my skin. Each bulb amidst both red and near infrared light. Wave lengths and irradiens are third party verified. It's FDA registered, which is so rare. It's really less of a beauty gadget and more of a medical device that also happens to be great for beauty. So if you have been curious about trying red light therapy at Loombox is the one that I would recommend. And right now you can get 40% off.
40% off when you go to the loombox.com slash Liz.
One more thing.
If you have an HSA or FSA, Lombox may qualify as a medical expense through TrueMed and qualified
customers save about 30% on average.
You can head to trumed.com slash loombox to check your eligibility before you buy.
TrueMed is for qualified customers.
HSA, FSA tax savings vary.
Again, though, go to the loombox.com slash Liz for that 40% off.
I've been drinking element every single day for literally years.
I usually use one packet a day, but I break it up and I kind of spike my water throughout the day.
So it makes my water taste amazing and it helps me stay consistently hydrated, which for me means more
energy, fewer headaches and way clearer thinking.
That's like probably the biggest difference I notice is my brain just works so much better.
Research actually shows that you hydrate better when you sip throughout the day instead
of chugging all at once.
An element makes that so much easier because plain water is honestly so boring and I just will not
drink enough of it otherwise. I even use a glass straw because research also shows that you will
drink more water if you drink it through a straw. Right now I'm obsessed with the lemonade salt
flavor. It's my favorite hands down. Zach and I fight over who gets the last packets that we have
left. Although I also love watermelon, but like lemonade, oh, it's so good. I also love muddling a few
raspberries in a glass and then I'll add the lemonade element and then I'll sip it all afternoon
or I'll use it as like a fun little moktail. Element is a zero sugar electrolyte drink mix with no
fillers, no dodgy ingredients, and it delivers a powerful dose of sodium, potassium, and magnesium
to support real hydration. Electrolate imbalance can cause headaches, fatigue, cramps, and brain fog, things
that so many of us deal with daily. You can get a free eight-count sample pack with any order at
drink element.com slash Liz. It is totally risk-free. If you do not love it, they offer no questions-asked
refunds. You truly have nothing to lose. Go to drinklm-tt.com slash Liz. Every single
movement that your body makes every step, every workout, every muscle contraction depends on
energy produced at the cellular level. And at the center of that is your mitochondria.
Here is the thing that nobody tells you, certainly nobody told me, starting around age 30,
our mitochondria naturally become less efficient. More get damaged, more become sluggish,
and over time that impacts your energy, your strength, your recovery, and your resilience.
Most of us respond by pushing more. We're like noticing these things and we're at
adding in more protein. We're trying to fix it with more supplements. We're trying to do
harder workouts. And those things do help. But timelines research suggests that we also need to be
supporting the cellular machinery underneath. And that is exactly what their supplement
mitochondria does. It contains urolithin A, which helps your body clear out damage mitochondria
and support healthier ones so that your cells can produce energy more efficiently. Because this
is happening to your cells, it's going to impact your entire body, your immune system,
your muscles. It's going to impact your energy, your sleep, your skin. Your cell health impacts
all of this, and urolithin egg keeps your cells healthy. Support your cells and how you age
with mitopure gummies from Timeline. Visit Timeline.com slash Liz and save up to 39% on your
mitopier gummies. That is timeline.com slash Liz. Okay, so let's talk about the memory thing
because you were like different types of people
can bring out different attachment styles in us.
And that's because they are triggering
these different memories from our childhood,
even if we're not consciously connecting them.
And your hypothesis is that one of the top ways
to heal our attachment style
is to essentially re-remember our memories
and change them in the process?
Yes.
What the fuck?
Yeah.
What mad scientist mumbo-jumbo am I talking about?
Well, it's all quite sad and tragic to think that attachment styles are a reflection of your memories.
Because what can you do with your memories?
It's in the past.
You can't change the past.
But here's the thing, Liz.
Memories are not made to record the past.
They're made to predict the future.
Which is why they have this function that when we revisit a memory, we can change the memory.
And specifically, we can change the emotional valence of the memory.
We can take a memory that was negative and be at peace when we look back at it now or be less anxious or be less angry at remembering.
It's really started with these rat studies where they would shock these rats and play beeps and shock these rats and play beeps.
And eventually when you play the beep, the rat starts freaking out because they're like, I'm going to get shocked.
But then you give them propanol and it's this drug that makes them have less of reaction.
Yeah, less of reaction.
Then later on, the researchers were like, okay, now if I show you.
show them the beep, is the rat still going to freak out?
Because they had that memory of the shock, well, they're not on the propanol, when they're not
on these drugs.
That memory of the shock is still there.
It's hardwired in them.
Or did that new memory where they were calm at the beep?
Did that sort of replace the old memory in a way?
What's going to happen when this beep plays?
And at the time, the researchers were like, oh, no way, that mouse is going to freak out.
Or a rat, I don't remember.
But it's going to freak out, right?
Because it has all these memories of being shocked.
But what they found was actually the new memory of being calm.
at the beep would sort of replace the old one.
And then the mouse was able to be calm at the beep.
And this was big in the field of memory.
Like everyone thought memories were so calcified
and you couldn't change them, right?
And for the human beings,
it contributed to this like inner child work,
this reparenting work,
which involves going back to memories from your childhood
and picturing a different outcome,
picturing yourself intervening
when your parent yelled at you to tell you you're safe
and I am here,
and it is going to be okay.
Yeah, I have done a little bit of inner child work,
even on this podcast.
I did an episode with the founder of IFS,
and he had me do some live on air.
And I've always been a little skeptical of it
because I've been like, why would this work?
Like, I know this isn't the real little me.
And so you're saying the reason that it works
is because you're essentially retrieving your memory
and changing the tone of it.
Yeah, changing the emotional tone,
the emotional valence of the memory.
And then you put it back.
And then whenever you retrieve it in the future,
it has.
balance comes up. And that's what the research finds that when people go back to the memory,
maybe picture positives that came out of a negative experience or picture their adult self-intervening.
Not only do they report less trauma symptoms, higher self-esteem, you see changes in the hippocampus,
the part of their brain, that stores memory. Okay. We'll get into that a little bit more in a second,
but first I want to ask, if we take like a beta blocker and public speak, I know a lot of comedians take it
on stage, then can we stop taking the beta blockers and we won't be afraid of that?
that thing anymore? Potentially, yeah, that's kind of what memory reconsolidation theory indicates.
That's so interesting. Yeah, I haven't seen research on that directly, but that is a fair
application of the theory. That's so interesting. You'd think all the times I've flown on Xanax would
make me less afraid of flying by now. I guess a caveat to memory reconsolidation theory is sometimes
you have to do it a bunch of times to reconsolid a really deep memory. And the struggle is that
when we're kids, we're taking in the world very differently. We're not looking to confirm our sense
of reality, we are looking to experience it as it is. So those memories from our childhood
tend to be particularly powerful versus memories in your adulthood. When you're returning to that
memory, you're still returning to it as yourself with all of your assumptions and your biases.
And so it's kind of hard to convince yourself of something different when you are literally
the outcome of that different thing, right? Wait, okay. So our childhood memories are
harder to shift. They're more ingrained. They're more ingrained, yeah. So how do we do that? Is it like
revisiting over and over and over and over. You can do multiple revisitings. One of the like attachment
techniques for secure attachment is going back and picturing a secure parent that you didn't have
and how they might have treated you in that moment. And it is a repetitive practice that people do.
If it's a more recent memory or if it's a less emotionally intense memory, it's often the
emotional intensity that can take time to change, then it might be just one thing, one interaction
and it can make it better. But yeah, you might have to revisit a couple times or you use
strategies that are focused on implicit memory, which we can get into as well.
Yeah, what would be some of this?
So implicit memory are things that you don't remember that continue to affect your sense
of reality now, your sense of self, how you perceive others.
I mean, that's this attachment styles.
An interesting research on it.
When people were shown a slide, a blue slide, a loud noise came.
A blue slide, a loud noise came.
A blue slide a loud noise.
Eventually, the blue slide comes.
The loud noise doesn't.
They're sweating.
They're already sweating because of that memory.
But if people had damage to their,
hippocampus, then you would ask them, what color slide was associated with the noise? Is it green? Is it red?
They say, I don't know. But you show them the blue side. They start sweating. So there's another part of
your brain that's capturing memories, even that you're not conscious of, and that's the amygdala,
part of your brain associated with threat. And it is building those memories when you are
super young before you even remember. And it could be happening in your infancy that the amygdala is
picking up on things and using it to affect your sense of reality now.
And so that's why implicit memories affect us.
Because even if they're not stored in your conscious memory, your hippocampus, where you're, like, checking out books and you're like, oh, yeah, I remember this.
But in the book back, it's stored in this more reptilian part of your brain that's like threat, threat, I'm processing threat.
Yes.
Yeah, exactly.
And so some of the strategies to work with implicit memory have involved, you know, if people are familiar with like EMDR or tapping, it basically involves focusing on the trigger and something else simultaneously and holding both.
of those things in your memory, because your working memory is quite limited. And if you
overtax it, what is going to happen is that trigger, which is a representation of an implicit
memory, that trigger is going to become less vivid and less strong because your brain doesn't
have capacity to focus on this ball moving back and forth and fully embody that trigger at the
same time. This was so interesting to me in your book because tapping and EMDR are both other
things I'm kind of skeptical of. I've done EMDR. When my cat died, I was like in the midst of grief.
I'll do anything.
I watched like a ball go back and forth and thought of memories of my cat and my grief
and all of these things.
And I was just like, why would this work?
And you're saying because you're essentially like overriding.
Oh, yes.
You're overwhelming your brain's capacity to remember.
And so it remembers less vividly and the memory becomes less poignant.
And you're almost like causing the computer to glitch out.
Exactly.
You're using your brain's flaws to heal yourself.
And that's the same with tapping, which I also thought was kind of like a load of shit,
but it's not.
Well, I'm just like you, Liz.
I'm not going to believe it unless I understand it.
I have to understand the science behind it.
I understand working memory theory.
It also applies like there's, I don't know if you've heard of this already,
but research on people bringing up a trauma symptom and playing Tetris at the same time.
I have.
And it's actually really interesting.
There was recently a very traumatic event on the internet.
And a lot of people saw a video that was really, really traumatizing.
And in almost every comment where somebody would say, I stumbled across this thing.
It was a person self-harming.
and they were like, I really didn't want to see that thing.
All the comments would say, go play Tetris, go play Tetris, go play Tetris right now.
And the reason that works, though, because I'm not sure any of the people commenting that necessarily,
they're just like, this is what you should do.
It's because you are glitching out your brain essentially.
Limited working memory capacity, yeah.
That's so interesting.
Yeah, so I'll even do it like a very simple way to do it is I'll focus on a trigger and I will count off.
Like, let's say I'll say one and then add two to that, three, and then add
four to that, seven, and while try to focus on this trigger simultaneously. This is just like a really
easy way to do it wherever you are. But what are you focusing on if you can't remember the thing?
Yeah, that's a good question. So implicit memory manifests as sensations in your body. So I'm getting
triggered. I'm feeling reactive. I'm feeling aggressive. And you don't know why. You don't know why.
It's probably something from your past. What's hysterical is historical, as Freud said.
And so you're focusing on the manifestation in your body. Is it a tightness in your chest?
Is it a gulp in your throat?
Is it a tingling sensation in your leg?
Is it feeling like your jaw is really tight?
You're focusing on that sensation
while doing the other thing.
That's so interesting.
Again, I've done so many therapy sessions
where they're like, where do you fill that in your body?
And like, I'm like, okay, but why?
Like, why does this matter?
You're so right.
And that's, I wrote words for us why, people.
Because I'm like, I will be so much better at doing this EMDR
if I understand why it's working, if I actually buy into it, you know?
Well, and I find that.
is so helpful. I'm somebody who doesn't have a ton of memories from my childhood, but I certainly do
feel like my childhood is impacting me today. So you're saying, you don't need to be sitting there and
like, well, what happened on this day? Whatever you're like, whatever you feel now, let's work
with that. And let's glitch out your brain. Let's glitch out your brain. And give you a fresh start.
Yeah, I relate to that. I don't remember a lot. But when I have those triggers now, I'll do my counting.
I also do EMDR in my therapy or I will. And do you find EMDR really helpful? Yeah, it's really
help me. Has it helped you? Not yet, but I'm excited for it too. And you tap as well?
Sometimes I'll tap. Yeah, it depends on how public I am. Which strategy I will try to use.
And then the other way that you talk about to move ourselves into the secure-ish attachment realm
is to reinforce our positive memories, which you seemed like you liked a little bit less.
I did. I mean, I was a little scared of it. There's these competing theories. Memory Recon.
consolidation that we have to change the memory and retrieval competition. It doesn't matter if we have
these negative memories as long as positive memories become more salient, right? It's about those memories
being activated less. And so I'm like, well, I'm kind of scared if the negative memory's still there.
I can kind of pop up at any time. But I really pulled from retrieval competition when I was talking
about stigma. And like, I interviewed someone who has a larger body and feels the stigma of that.
And she said, I feel like I have to be a spiritual guru to not be affected by this. And I validated that.
I drew from this really great book called Entangled Life.
It's all about fungi.
And he talks about how, like, there's microbes in our body that we need to digest food.
And they are foreign to us.
And so we are ecosystems.
We are not individuals.
We are inherently infected by our environment to survive.
And so there's no shame if you as a bigger body person have been affected by all the messaging that's around you.
There's no shame if you as a person of color have been affected by the sense that you're inferior or you as a woman of
certain age, start feeling bad about yourself because of your appearance, right?
We are just vulnerable to our environments.
But the power that we have is to change our environments, right?
To change what social media is coming up.
So it's more positive or affirming to that identity to change the people that we're
interacting with.
So they're not making negative snide comments about us for these different identities.
And that's really retrieval competition theory at play is like, we need to develop more positive
memories and associations with this identity, even if the negative ones will still exist
inevitably because we live in a society where people of certain identities are perceived as more
worthy. So it's not cheating to remove triggering content from your social media or to not hang out
with somebody because they make you feel bad about yourself. No, you have to listen to how you feel and
what you need. That's the secure attached thing. It's not never being affected by your environment.
It's being aware of the ways that you are and trying to meet your needs in that. And it's retrieval
competition theory. So the idea is that you can kind of only store and store and
pull out so many memories at a time? The idea is that the memory that your brain uses to make sense
of the current environment will depend on what's most accessible. Not just what's there, but what's
most accessible. Okay. And the most accessible, does that tend to be the most recent? Yeah, it can be
the most deep-rooted. I mean, that's the part where I'm like, oh, it's hard about retrieval
competition. The negative memory's still there, so it can still pop up at a random time, but it'll be
less likely to pop up if you have a lot more positive memories that are buffering that negative one.
So our two approaches here are either we can pull out those memories and we can change the emotional
valence of them and then put them back in and then our amygdala reacts differently.
Or we can essentially like take the drop of water in the pool and we can flood it with a bunch more water.
And that's why we talked about with the anxious person who finds a secure partner, right?
They are flooding the pool.
Wait, that's what I'm doing with Zach.
I'm flooding my pool.
You're flooding your pool with more examples of security.
Oh, that's so interesting.
In your mind, are we doing both of these things all the time?
That would be great.
I think we should be doing both of them.
I think there's so many different approaches we're talking about curating our environment
for more positive memories and associations, going back to the past, but also while we're
triggered in the present being there for ourselves when we are.
And then the last approach that you talked about in the book that I would like to just
touch on briefly is psychedelics.
Yes, I do touch on psychedelics.
Why are psychedelics so effective?
Okay, so I interviewed this woman, Esme, and she had the first.
this really sad story of like really trying to be friends with this person when she was in
like eighth grade and she just calling them every day and being like, let's hang out.
And eventually that person is like, I don't like you.
I don't know why you're calling me all the time.
And then from that moment forward, she was never able to initiate another friendship.
She met someone she liked and she was like, you're going to have to call me first because
of this thing that happened all of these years ago.
And so I'm sitting with Esme and I'm like trying to use some reconciliation exercise.
And I'm like, well, if you go back to your.
younger self, what would you have wanted to tell them that might have made you feel better?
And Esme is like, it's just a blip, like other people will like you.
But I could see that she didn't have the conviction, right?
Because literally, she had been interpreting reality in ways that had matched that memory ever
since.
So it was hard for her to say convincingly, oh, people do you like you.
You'll find people that like you.
But the thing that psychedelics do is they deactivate the default mode network, which is the part
of our brain related to our sense of self.
And so all of a sudden, we're able to see old.
memories in completely new ways, almost like a third party might see them, right?
We're taking it far less personally.
We're blaming ourselves far less.
And so if, if Esme safely did psychedelic therapy, she might actually be able to go back to
that memory.
And this is MDMA is the one that's been used most for like PTSD symptoms and be able to
say to herself, hey, you know, everybody gets rejected sometimes.
And I am so proud of you for putting yourself out there.
And there's so much more out there for you.
And she'll actually believe it.
and she'll actually internalize it because of her sense of self is less active.
So it lets you pull out that memory and change the emotional valence if you're maybe struggling to do that otherwise.
Exactly. Yes, in a sort of more compelling, visceral way.
And if we're afraid of psychedelics because we overdid drugs in our early 20s asking for a friend,
but we maybe are having some of those struggles removing the memories and putting them back in,
is there something that we can do that would give us that same effect?
In the book, there's a lot of like takeaways from the science of psychedelics that can be really helpful for you.
And so you kind of are going to have to manually do it.
When you're rejected, ask yourself, what if I don't take this rejection as a reflection of my worth?
How would I feel differently?
Pause and acknowledge that feeling.
It's almost like, what if I didn't receive it this way?
What if I was able to put aside that I felt rejected ever since?
What if?
What would that actually feel like for me?
And pause to actually receive it in your body.
Focusing on that new sense of reality more intentionally, more visited, more visible.
literally until it actually changes the way that you feel in your body.
It's just more intense and focused work of trying to recreate the memory.
There's a group of people that you say that therapy doesn't really help.
Intellectualizers.
Intellectualizers.
I feel like this is me.
Can you explain who this is and why therapy doesn't work for us?
We are, I say we.
But I've become a little better at it.
We are obsessed with developing insight as to what is wrong.
logical reasons why things are going the way that they do. But we're not actually confronting how we feel
and sitting with and tolerating how we feel, the deeper emotions that are underneath all of these
insights. We're almost escaping and evading them through focusing more on information than emotion.
Why are we this way? Oh, I don't know Liz. It's safer. It's certainly a lot safer than
feeling very vulnerable feelings and emotions that are shrouded in so much shame and having to
tolerate that, right?
So would a therapy session look like, well, here, like, I'll go into therapy and I'll say,
okay, here's why I am the way that I am.
Here's what happened when I was two.
Yeah.
And you won't actually feel any better.
Yeah.
You won't actually feel any better because it's about the feelings.
Like, one of the things I say in the book is that people had the same memories of maybe
someone, a house burning down, or a very harmful relationship.
and then they reported their self-esteem.
Self-esteem was only lower for people that had something called open memories,
which are memories that still trigger emotion in us.
We don't want to look at them.
It feels uncomfortable.
We don't have closure.
We don't know why it happened.
We still get angry when we think about it.
It's only open memories that affect our sense of self.
If the memory is closed, if we're like, yeah, that happened.
I'm kind of at peace with it.
I have closure.
Like, I feel like I've moved forward, right?
That no longer affects our sense of self.
So really what we are targeting to,
to improve our worth and engage in that memory reconciliation is emotion, more than it is the
reality, more than it is the insight about that experience. The reason we want to give ourselves
new insight is because that new insight triggers different emotion in us. And in fact, there was
a study on people that tracked therapy clients and looked at what are the factors that most
predict whether their self-esteem improved at the end of therapy. And it was how much they emoted,
how much feeling they released. So if we do want to be in therapy or if a therapist is listening,
it would not be let's explore what the thing is.
It'd be like, okay, let's sit with how did that make you feel?
Exactly. And let's explore the new feelings that come up for you when you see your adult self,
providing you what you needed. What do you feel in this moment?
I could be a lot more grateful to my adult self, I think. I have a speed round for you.
Sure.
What is one thing that people commonly do in dating or relationships that you would never do
knowing what you know is somebody who studies attachment?
I would never ghost on someone.
Because, like I said, like having a sense of closure around your memories means that it never
hovers over you in the future.
And so when you're ghosting on someone, you don't give them a sense of closure around that
experience.
And so it's just more likely to continue to follow them.
They're more likely to fear, rejection, fear that someone's going to unexpectedly pull away.
And so realizing the domino effects of that, that you're creating a new harmful open memory
because they don't have the reason to kind of clomp on to that helps them move on.
like, it's kind of cruel.
And if we're being ghosted, what do we do?
Play Tetris?
Well, there, a lot of this memory reconciliation is like making meaning out of an experience
that was negative, so it's more positive.
And that changes the emotional.
Exactly.
So it could be, I realize that I don't want someone in my life who does that kind of thing
to people.
And so by them doing the active ghosting, they showed themselves to me as someone that
wouldn't be a compatible partner to me.
I appreciate that I found that out early on.
I love that too because it means that when you're,
rationalizing, it's almost like, it's to an end because you're changing the emotional tone in
your mind, which is going to change your attachment self. I like the idea that it's not just like me
bullshitting myself. What's one thing that people commonly do in friendships that you would never do
knowing what you know is somebody who studies attachment? Oh, man. I mean, the big one I've been
working on is staying with my friend's sense of reality. I think we've talked about this.
You know, I find myself so quickly being like, no, you're so great. What are you talking about?
I literally still have to remind myself, even after I've written this whole book, to be like, okay, you feel upset, you feel insecure, that is okay. I am here with you. Like, tell me more about what you're feeling. Like, it is, it's still a process of reminding myself to be with them where they are rather than trying to pluck them out of it.
What's your hottest take about attachment theory? That attachment theory is leading a lot of us to abandon ourselves. What's one piece of research that really changed your mind about something?
There was a study on what predicts who gets PTSD, you know, aside from that you went through an experience that can be seen as traumatic.
And they looked at factors like whether you have a history of trauma, you have social support, all the big guns.
But the number one factor that predicted whether people got PTSD was whether they dissociated at the time of the trauma.
It was really compelling for me because that really spoke to the importance of being with your feelings and acknowledging your feelings and the ways that if you don't, it can really feel.
follow you. And again, no shade on anyone that has to dissociate. That's a process that our body does
automatically when we are overwhelmed and we can't possibly take it anymore. And it gets to be a point
like you're underwater and you need to take a breath and you can't take a breath. And so that is
something that our brain does automatically. But it was a compelling way for me to really be
intentional about acknowledging my feelings and emotions. Can I ask just a clarifying question?
What's the difference between dissociating in a moment of trauma and like playing Tetris or tapping
or doing this like re-overwhelm your brain and click restart.
So when you are doing working memory theory,
you are practicing both acknowledging the emotion and feeling and another thing at the same time.
When you are dissociating, you are, it's a circuit breaker that completely shuts down all feeling and emotion.
Okay.
So the people who saw that traumatic video online, they're not being like, I didn't see anything.
I'm playing Tetris frantically.
They're saying that brought up these feelings for me and I am playing Tetris.
Yes.
Okay.
That's really interesting.
And is our likelihood of being somebody who is dissociating during trauma because of our childhood?
Yeah, we're more likely to dissociate if that's been our go-to strategy in the past.
And when we're kids, I mean, you can't fight or flee.
You can't fight or flee.
So all you can do is dissociate.
And then that becomes cumulative.
You become more likely to dissociate and you face traumas in the future.
One of the biggest things I've been doing in adulthood is recognizing when I have adapted these coping strategies at a time where I had so few options available to me.
and which one of those are left over when I have so many options available to me now, which is really helpful.
That is like a reconciliation, right? You're like, now I'm an adult and I have so many more opportunities.
Being an adult's great. And you can also eat ice cream for dinner.
Recommend, recommend. 10 out of 10. What's a piece of common self-worth advice that's actively harmful?
Okay, fake it till you make it from what we've talked about today that actually trying to disconnect from your vulnerabilities and insecurities.
can make them a lot worse because you can only heal from what you can acknowledge. But fake it till you make
it can work again if that faking it is obtainable for you. You're like, oh, I'm like being confident and it
feels like I actually am more confident. This is actually making me feel better and not like I'm gaslighting
myself and now feeling really bad. So it really depends on the person. But if you're faking it and it's so
detached from how you actually feel, then that is going to put you in a place of more pain.
I think a really cool thing to do can be to not fake it in terms of how you feel, but fake it in terms of what you do.
So I remember for my last book, I decided to do a one woman show because I was insane.
And I went out the very first night.
And right before I was going to go out, they were actively introducing me.
I was like, and Zach was standing next to me and I was like, I need to go poop.
My whole body was rebell.
And he's like, you can't do that.
They're actively introducing you.
And I was like, I can't be here.
I got to go.
And he literally pushed me out on stage.
And I got out on stage and I looked out at these like hundreds of people in the
crowd. And I said, I'm so nervous right now, but I'm so excited to be here. And I can't wait to do
this with you guys. And so I was like, look, I'm physically doing it, but I'm not going to deny that
this is scary for me. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. I mean, it also reminds me of like when people are
stressed and they're anxious and they can say, this is extra energy for me to do what I want to do,
right? That kind of reframe that if it's accessible to you, it's really helpful. Yeah. And sometimes
it's like braver to be shitting your pants and doing it anyway. Yeah. Exactly.
I just went on this trip and we had to fly in these teeny tiny planes to get to the hotel that we were at.
And I was like, for everybody who was like, this is no big deal for me.
I'm like, this was a huge deal for me.
Like, this is much braver for me to do because I thought I was going to die the whole time.
Exactly.
It's like, oh, when I bring all of my feelings, then I can realize just how big this is.
Yeah.
Oh, I love that.
Finish this sentence.
People would be so much happier in their relationships if they just stopped.
Lying to themselves and their partners.
What is one habit that's changed your life? This can be in the realm of attachment theory, everything we've been talking about, but also anything in the whole world.
I spend time with my pain literally every morning. I'm like, hmm, how was I activated? I'm okay. I'm okay. I'm okay. I'm safe. I'm safe. Just being a loving person for myself internally, like getting away from shaming myself or pushing things away to like embracing it all.
like palms open like I'm here for you I'm just here for you and like you don't need to present
any different way than what you are like that has been so transformative to be a practice I've taken
on internally from writing this book and you do that like pragmatically as part of your morning
routine yeah and part of my morning routine when I wake up from bed and you know sometimes when
you're going through something you kind of get hit by that thing in the morning you know it's the
first thing that comes to my is the thing that's stressing you out and instead of being like no I got to
go focus on my day I'm like okay it's okay I'm safe what do I need to
here. I'm loved. I'm loved. Just providing myself a moment of care every morning and treating my own
pain as a request for my attention and compassion. What is one thing that anybody who's listening
are watching right now could do immediately to begin to feel some of the benefits that you're promising
in your book? Take whatever you're stressed about. Ask yourself what you would need to hear to feel
better and actually tell yourself that thing. And in a way that it actually affects how you feel in your
body. You actually feel yourself internalizing it. And why scientifically will that work?
Because that involves accessing emotion, being able to label the emotion in a way, and also offering
yourself compassion and self-compassion is what's behind the good twin of self-esteem, their ability
to feel their emotions and allow them to exist and have compassion for them. Amazing. Your brilliant new book
is out now. It's called Worth, The New Science of Self-Esteen and Secure Attachment. Can you tell us a little bit
about it in your own words? The beauty of finding worth is that the beauties of life are actually
internalized by you. People are going to love you and you're actually going to feel loved.
You're going to get your dream job and you're actually going to feel excited about it and like you
belong there. And that is, I think, one of the most compelling reasons for us to all work on our
sense of self. I love that. And if people want more from you, where can they find you? I am on
Instagram sharing tips on how to connect with self and others at Dr. Marissa G. Franco, D.R. M-A-R-M-A-R-I-S-A-G-F-R-A-N-C-O.
And on my website, Dr. Marissa G-Franco.com, you can access a list of tips, practices to improve
yourself worth, or reach out for speaking events on self-worth at work. And worth is available wherever
books are sold and you can get a signed copy if you order it from Lost City Books in D.C.
Amazing. Well, thank you so much for this conversation and also just for changing what I believe
to be true about attachment theory. It just feels revolutionary. Thank you so much. You know,
like, I'm going in for like the nervous system change, you know, not just the surface level,
but the nervous system. We need it right now. That is all for this episode. Thank you so much for
listening on Apple or watching on Spotify or YouTube. You can subscribe or follow so our next
episodes get sent directly to your feed. If you like this episode, leave a comment or better yet,
send it to a friend, a coworker, or a parent, or somebody else that you think might love it.
I love you. Thank you so much for listening and I'll see you on the next episode of the Liz Moody
podcast. Oh, just one more thing. It's the legal language. This podcast is presented solely for
educational and entertainment purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for the advice of a
physician, a psychotherapist, or any other qualified professional. Big news after me taking seeds
DSO1 daily symbiotic for five years now and you guys sending me literally thousands of DMs about how much
You love it. Zach, my dear husband, finally decided to try it. And it turns out he is obsessed.
Surprise, surprise. He's like, I did not know that my gut could feel like this.
Here's the thing about DSO1 that I do not think most people fully appreciate until they experience it.
This is not your average probiotic. The vast majority of probiotics that you can buy do not even survive
digestion. The SO1 is specifically engineered and actually tested to get through your stomach acid
and actually reach your colon where it can do its job. It also has prebiotics, which
very few probiotics have and are critical. If you have probiotics, but no prebiotics, the probiotics
do not have the food that they need to thrive and they just die off. So they're basically wasting
your money. And the 24 strains that it has are clinically shown to reduce floating, improve regularity
and alleviate gas. And there are strains in there for skin health or heart health, for immune health.
We're getting more nutrients out of our food. Our gut microbiomes impact everything.
More than 2 million people have experienced the power of DSO1 and 92% of members have
recommended it to a friend or family member. This is definitely a situation where if you have been
curious, just try it. See if it makes a difference for you. If you're ready to experience a
probiotic that actually works, go to Cid.com slash Liz Moody and use code Liz Moody to get 25% off
your first month. That is seed.com slash Liz Moody code Liz Moody. A lot of you guys know that
about four years ago, I started being what I call an intentional drinker, meaning that I've stopped
drinking just because it's like a Thursday night. Now I drink a few times a month at the most.
And the only downside of that is that I have almost zero tolerance for feeling poorly after
I drink now because I'm so used to feeling energetic and good every single day, which is why I'm
so, so excited about Zbiotics pre-alcohol.
I tried these for the first time at my friend's birthday party in Vegas, and I was very skeptical,
but now they are my absolute go-to.
Zbiotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic
invented by PhD microbiologists to tackle rough mornings after drinking.
When you drink, alcohol converts into a toxic byproduct in your gut,
and it's actually a buildup of that byproduct, not dehydration,
like we have been told forever,
that's to blame for those rough days after drinking.
Zbiotics pre-alcohol produces an enzyme that helps break that byproduct down.
The science actually makes a ton of sense, and again, I felt a huge difference.
August does not slow down, and neither to you.
Pre-alcohol keeps it that way.
Go to Zbiotics.com slash Liz Moody and use code Liz Moody for 15% off.
That is zbiotics.com slash Liz Moody, code Liz Moody.
