The Majority Report with Sam Seder - 3704 - Far-Right Exploits Moroccan Migrants; Israel's UN Mole w/ Stephen Zunes, Murtaza Hussain

Episode Date: August 6, 2026

It's an Emmajority Report Thursday on The Majority Report On today's program: In the Wake of Abdul El-Sayed's winning the Democratic nomination for Senate in Michigan, the GOP-machine's Islamophobia is reaching a fever pitch. El-Sayed's GOP opponent Mike Rogers tries to tie the Democratic nominee to Osama Bin Laden in his opening statement to kick off the general election. NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is asked about Speaker Mike Johnson's comments on El-Sayed's victory on Tuesday putting the U.S. in danger of being overrun by "mini-Mamdani's'. Zohran says if El-Sayed's campaign promises of "money out of politics, money in your pocket and Medicare for all" are scary then that shows just how out-of-touch the Republican party is with the concerns of the working class. Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics and Director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, joins to discuss his piece in The Nation: "The Real Story Behind the Human Wave That Entered Ceuta." For more from Professor Zunes, check out his most recent book, coauthored with Jacob Mundy: Western Sahara: War, Nationalism, and Conflict Irresolution.  Murtaza Hussain, covering national security and global affairs at Drop Site News, joins to discuss his piece: "For Your Eyes Only: Israel's Mole Inside the United Nations" In the Fun Half:   Brandon Sutton joins.   Chris Rabb changes Sean Hannity's name to Scott and then humiliates him in a debate over his platform.   Democratic nominee for U.S. House of Representatives in Michigan's 13 district, Donovan McKinney speaks to the Wall Street Journal about how he is fine with being labeled a Socialist. McKinney points out that although Trump is very unpopular the Democratic party remains even more unpopular because people want champions and fighters for the working class.   Donald Trump is wearing a wig; Brandon disagrees but he is wrong.   At a Trump event in Nevada, Governor Joe Lombardo tries to initiate a moment of silence for a slain Cop but the cattle in the crowd heard his surname 'Abdelnabi' and instinctually start booing.   Stephen Miller has a meltdown on Scott Hannity's show as he tries to fearmonger the geriatric audience with Hasan Piker's comment on America "deserving" 9/11.   As Stephen Miller and Scott Hannity feign heavy hearts over 9/11, we take a look at the 16-year history of Republicans trying to block healthcare for September 11 victims and first responders. all that and more. To connect and organize with your local ICE rapid response team visit ICERRT.com The Congress switchboard number is [phone]. You can use this number to connect with either the U.S. Senate or the House of Representatives. Follow us on TikTok here: https://www.tiktok.com/@majorityreportfm Check us out on Twitch here: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Find our Rumble stream here: https://rumble.com/user/majorityreport Check out our alt YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/majorityreportlive Gift a Majority Report subscription here: https://fans.fm/majority/gift Subscribe to the AM Quickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! https://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: https://majority.fm/app Go to https://JustCoffee.coop and use coupon code majority to get 10% off your purchase Check out today's sponsors: TRUST & WILL: Get 20% off trustandwill.com/MAJORITY SUNSET LAKE CBD: Use coupon code "Left Is Best" (all one word) for 20% off of your entire order SunsetLakeCBD.com  @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattLech On Instagram: @MrBryanVokey Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on YouTube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's YouTube channel: https://ww.youtube.com/Th3Discourse Check out Ava Raiza's music here: https:/www.youtube.com/avaraiza

You are listening to a free version of the majority report. Support this show at join the majority report.com and get an extra hour of content daily. It's Sam Cedar. It is Thursday, August 6th, 2020. My name is Emma Vigland, in for Sam Cedar, and this is the five-time award-winning majority report. We are broadcasting live steps. From the industrially ravaged Gowanus Canal in the heartland of America, downtown Brooklyn, USA. On the program today, Stephen Zunis, professor of politics and director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, will be with us to discuss the real story behind the migrant surge in Suta.

And later in the show, Murtaza Hussein, National Security and Foreign. Affairs correspondent at DropSight News joins us to talk about his latest piece and reporting for your eyes only Israel's mole inside the United Nations. Also on the program, Iran and Oman make progress on agreeing to a fee structure in the Strait of Hormuz, which would amount to millions of dollars per shift. The Houthis say they've killed at least 30 Saudi-backed government soldiers in Yemen. Trump threatens jail time for anyone leaking about the munitions shortage. He says we have massive amounts, thank you very much, as he privately rails against Hegzef.

The CIA has secretly established a Cuba task force, the New York Times reports, enlisting spies. We're back, baby. The Senate Homeland Security Committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt. of Congress, and three Republican attorneys general have subpoenaed him. Economists warn that Treasury bond yields are approaching economic collapse territory due to Trump's tariffs and oil price swings. A Trump-appointed federal judge is under scrutiny for running her PR firm six months after her confirmation.

She's on that grind set. The Senate confirms pro-vaccine Dr. Erica Schwartz, at the very least, nominally, as CDC director. They're worried about the Maha coalition not showing up for them, I think, in 2026. Or they're worried about moms and backlash to those policies, rather. Meanwhile, the FDA just approved the U.S.'s first mRNA flu vaccine. New Mexico sues the DOJ over obstructing the state's criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his ranch. A military helicopter got so close to Trump yesterday. What'd you say?

Blew his wig off? We will be getting. That should have been the first headline. Trump debuts the most obvious hairpiece of all time at Rally. That must have been where he lost all his hair. He got too spooked because the past. passenger jet was so close, tantalizingly close to Trump's military helicopter. And lastly, Tennessee's elections are today on the Thursday.

I know it's weird. Get out and vote. Justin Pearson in particular. All this and more on today's majority report. Welcome to the show, everybody. It is an emmajority report Thursday. We're back to our normal schedule. However, this is the last you'll hear from me until next.

next Thursday, where I'll be back after my little vacation, so I'm leaving tomorrow. I'm going to enjoy the beach, work on my natural tan, so I don't have to rely on the spray tan, which I don't have on right now. I don't know why I'm going down this road. I should stop obsessing about tanning now that I'm in my 30s. It's really getting a little ridiculous. It's not good for me, but I do love the beach, and it's going to make me feel better and a little bit more refreshing. Hello to Brian. Hello to Matt. Hello to the audience.

We've got a great show for you today. So as soon as El Saeed won the primary in Michigan, the Republican Party immediately is running to Islamophobia. I mean, what else do they have? It was predictable. But they're running on a, basically an Islamophobic pitch right at the outset. We have this statement from Mike Rogers

as soon as basically Abdul al-Sayed won the nomination here. He says, the choice in November is simple. Common sense or complete insanity. For more than 25 years, one party has controlled Michigan's two Senate seats and they've run our state into the ground.

La, la, la, la, la. Blaming Democrats for running manufacturing jobs out of Michigan, even though we see that, those increased under Biden and decrease under Trump. Sorry, a Republican talking about manufacturing jobs in Michigan, the people who would have avoided any kind of bailout and just let Michigan completely died during the 2008 financial crisis? Okay.

Yeah, exactly. By the way, UAW has endorsed Abdul Al-Aa. Yeah, so he calls him an extremist and says, here we go. He wants to empty prisons and put murderers and sex offenders back on our streets. He's pledged his support to the Muslim Brotherhood and campaigns with people who refuse to condemn terrorism. Oh wow. Once again,

guilt by association with Hassan Piker. Again, this is all projection because if you support Israel, you support terrorism and they need to point a finger at first before people

start pointing a finger at them. Like this idea about authoritarianism, these people tried to steal elections. Yeah. Like, so worried about communist authoritarianism because of Joseph Stalin or something. You tried to steal,

you stole the 2000 election, you tried to steal the 2020 election, you will try to steal another election, another election in our fucking lifetime. The Zionist fear-mongering about violent religious fundamentalism it's just not

this is not something that the American public right now which according to some polls a majority of the public believes or at least a plurality that Israel's committing genocide like nobody nobody is buying that these are the barbaric people we need to worry about here

on U.S. soil. I would just love for somebody like Mike Johnson to say I would love for him to tell me what... Mike Rogers, you mean? No, Mike Johnson. Just like guys like that who, like, what do you disagree with with Sharia law? You know, with the Christian fundamentalist?

The wrong people in charge of it, basically. Right. So the fact that it's brown people. Abdul doesn't represent a vision for the future. He says he basically calls him a terrorist. And here's the worst part. I spent years hunting terrorists and bringing Osama bin Laden into, justice. Never in a million years did I think that I would be running against someone who believes

America deserved 9-11. Again, he didn't say that. Hassan said that, has apologized for it, and was making an appropriate point about imperial blowback, just said it inartfully. My goodness. Because guess what? When people like Mike Rogers support Israel and the horrible things it's doing, it's doing, guess what? It doesn't make us safer either. No. But, Why does it matter? Should we distinguish between these two Muslim men? Or are they just all the same, essentially? That's what he's relying on. He believes America deserves 9-11. As the United States, Senator, I'll fight to bring jobs back home, lower cost, protect our families, defend our freedoms, and put Michigan workers ahead of radical activists every single time. Now, you know, the Republicans were primed to take up the mantle of this racist argument, like they were in 2008 against Barack.

Obama because of a Democratic primary opponent who desperately deployed those tactics in that context. Hillary Clinton is in many ways the reason that there were so many people who were more prime to accept arguments about birtherism with Obama, given the fact that she ran an Islamophobic campaign against him in particular. There were some anti-blackness to darkening of his skin. people forget that in some of their campaign material, or at least, you know, upping certain photographic contrasts and colors to make him look more black. And then, most notably, Hillary Clinton's campaign

circulated this photo of him in traditional Somali attire during that primary. It was David Brock, I think, specifically Hillary's a part or a hatchet man. And it didn't work then, but it did hand a racist argument to the Republicans. And you see that that's how they're, how they're already operating right now. Now, what's interesting to me, too, and just one more note on this race because of the Islamophobia here, there people were surprised, of course, that Abdul al-Sayed didn't win by larger margins given the polling. And I would agree with that. But I think there's a theory here that we don't, we won't know for sure, but Michigan has open primaries. And,

there were some weird irregularities, and I could see Republicans who are genuinely racist and fearful of Arab Americans and Muslim Americans. Psychotically hysterical. Yes. Seeing that Mike Rogers was essentially running unopposed, had that nomination locked up, and you can choose which party primary to vote for on the day, and you don't have to be a registered member of the party. I could see many Republicans who are genuinely concerned about Sharia law taking over,

and sincere in their racism and Islamophobia, dipping their toe into the Democratic primary because the Republican was already locked up. This is just to say that I think that perhaps, like, the overstatement about Abdul al-Said's margins might be missing this. Controlling for 2024, the results kind of suggest. This is from Patrick Rafini of Eschelon Insights.

Stevens was buoyed by crossover Republican votes, especially in Metro Detroit, where primary composition swung 30 points towards Democrats. This is just a theory we don't know. But, you know, I think that is where they're seeing actual activation for their base, which is Islamophobia. And this could carry over into the general. That's what they're going to rely on. And it would also explain.

Yeah. Stevens's overperformance in poorer rural areas that wasn't necessarily anticipated. She also overperformed with wealthier Michiganders and Abdul's results were kind of in the middle. And by the way, that's where those ad buys work best in rural areas where door knocking and organizing is more difficult. So the APP money getting there. And it's cheaper. Money goes farther too. And by the way, I'm not for open primaries for this reason. I think you should be able to same day register because of this.

Because they did this in Texas too. I mean, I think that there are shenanigans that can be involved here. But I digress. They're going to run on Islamophobia. they're already leaning into it. Speaker Mike Johnson called Abdul al-Sayed a mini-Mamdani. They're all calling him

mini-Mamdani and cutting ads with Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib, to drum up Islamophobia. Now, Mamdani is arguably the most popular Democrat in the country right now in elected office. When you look at polling, Bernie Sanders and AOC, give him a run for his money. But I don't know if you want to be making that argument. However, Mike Johnson and the Republicans have been circulating a memo throughout the caucus that says,

lean into anti-communism as a way, that's our best midterm argument right now, because we can't make an argument about the economy being better. No, no, no. We can't make an argument about getting us out of any wars. Trump just got us into the worst one. We can't, we have nothing to offer. So we'll do red scare tactics and they rope in Muslim people into this effort. So

Mamdani here was asked about Mike Johnson's post which this reporter will read out to him talking about how dangerous people like him and Abdul Abdul al-Sayed are for America. Please. He said, there is an urgent question facing America. Are we going to

maintain our status as the world's greatest superpower and beacon of liberty, opportunity, and security, or allow radical Marxist Democrats to destroy the very foundations that make us the envy of the entire world. And he has a new paragraph. Democrats now openly expressed disdain for America and erased the failed, dangerous, deadly path of communism. He must take a stand and fight to protect the greatest nation in the history of the world from being overrun by many Mondanis. it's a lot of characters he must have the pro account

well I'm assuming that's in response to Abdul al-Sayad's victory yesterday evening and I think first I'd just like to congratulate Dr. Abdul-El-Las-Iad on his victory he ran a campaign where it was

best described by his words of money out of politics money in your pocket Medicare for all and if those simple commitments and believe are what drives Representative Johnson to these kinds of conclusions. I think it shows you how deeply out of touch the Republican Party is with the concerns of working class Americans.

Because what we have seen is, despite him facing more than $60 million in outside spending, he was able to prevail with a focus on a cost of living crisis and the way in which health care is exceedingly out of reach for those who have helped to make this country what it is. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Boom. Later in the press conference, he also said that Abdulah said, I can't be a minim, Doni, because he benches more than me. Just perfect responses to everything. But this level of naked xenophobia, Islamophobia is going to be, I mean, it's an actual emergency. And it's not being treated like such by our media that wants to talk about anti-Semitism without, linking it to like the actual reason it's rising, which is Israel's actions. But the anti-Muslim sentiment here is at such a, I mean, it's rising so fast.

I call it a fever pitch, but like it's still gaining. And it reminds me of reading like Eric Foner, Reconstruction about the rise of Jim Crow and the way like those white supremacists, like would be soon to be Klansmen, would talk about reconstruction and black people in power. and that sort of thing. This is just, these are just the same people, just a few generations removed.

These are clan kids. Yeah. Yep. And they are, they understand, too, why they should be more afraid of the, of DSA candidates

than the standard liberal that will fold and will make their arguments for them before they use it, basically, just in a more watered-down way. A third way is, yeah, basically giving them the,

I mean, kind of like running their attacks before they get a chance to. Right. So they're concerned about Abdul al-Sayed, even though he is not DSA, but they're also concerned about the fact that we now have seven DSA members that are going to be in Congress next term. You have AOC, you have Claire Valdez, Darius, Darius, Javier Lérya L'A Chavilley, you have Chris Rab, Melak Kiroz, and then Donovan McKinney and Rashida Taleb, who now make up the two representatives from Detroit, which is a very democratic and very black city.

And if with black voters being the base of the Democratic Party, that's why they were trying to bring in Clyburn at the 11th hour here. Now both parts of the city are being represented by DSA members, DSA endorsed representatives. So Mike Johnson is freaked out and he should be. But let's not be, let's be aware of the racist arguments that they're going to use to desperately attempt to keep DSA members and people like Abdul al-Sayyad out of power.

In a moment, we are going to be speaking to Stephen Zunez about what's happening with Spain and Morocco and this migrant issue, this horrible exploitation by the far right. But first, a word from one of our sponsors here, trust and will you know it's nice to have peace of mind about your finances and your estate no matter how large or how small uh because your loved ones they have to worry about it no matter what and they have to deal with the fallout and um if the worst happens you don't want to have them holding the bag as it were trust and will offers affordable attorney designed state specific estate

plans online that you can create in as little as 30 minutes. It makes it really easy as well. So you can kind of rip that band-aid off. Trusting Will is the most trusted name in online estate planning. It has an easy to use website. Trust in Will's platform makes it easy for all of us. For Sam in particular, he's talked about this, how easy it was for him to create his will and trust.

It's fast. It's just in as little as 30 minutes. It helps create a will. that will let you document your wishes for guardians, asset distribution, health care planning, and more. And you have an ability also to update it with new documents. You can easily update your plan at every life stage or transition. Trusting will's platform keeps everything organized, updated, and ready.

You can share access with trusted contacts to ensure your will is carried out as well. It puts it all in one place. And trusting will also has bankers. level encryption and secure sharing features. So the most important documents that you put up there, stay protected and accessible. And according to Trust Pilot, Trusting Will is the most trusted name in online estate planning. Trust and Will, affordable estate plans, priceless peace of mind. Go to trust and will.com slash majority and get 20% off.

That's trustingwill.com slash majority to get your 20% off. Trust and will. dot com slash majority. link down below in the video and episode descriptions and at majority.fm. Get 20% off at trustingwill. dot com slash majority. All right, quick break. And when we come back,

we are going to be joined by Stephen Zunis. We are back and we are joined now by Stephen Zunes, professor of politics, director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, co-author of his latest with Jacob Mundy, Western Sahara, War nationalism

and conflict. resolution and his peace in the nation on our topic that we're discussing today is called the real story behind the human wave that entered Suta. Stephen, thanks so much for coming on the show today. Great to be with you. Great to have you. I wanted to get a grasp on this story because it's so important, but it's difficult to assess from the outside, and your peace in the nation did a great job of clarifying a lot of things

for me. So last week, tens of thousands of Moroccans somewhere I'm seeing between the United States. between 50,000 and 70,000, swam or waded from Morocco to this Spanish, North African enclave called Suta. And doesn't... Or crash the gates as well. There's people who are going to crossings as well. Yes, exactly. And that is a big part trying to climb the border fence.

A lot of people died. Some drowned. Some died attempting to climb the fence. Tell us about what happened there. Well, first of all, Suita. is one of two Spanish enclaves in North Africa, surrounded by Morocco on one side and the Mediterranean on the other. They've been Spanish territory for many centuries.

Legally, there is much a part of Spain as the Canary Islands or the Balearic Islands, majority of Spanish population. But because it's technically EU territory, even though it's not in the Schengen zone, which allows for free passport control, it's sometimes been a target for, you know, for migrants and others, you know, trying to get into Europe. But what it appears to have happened was the Moroccan regime who was upset at Spain's warming relations with Algeria, their traditional geopolitical rival.

Prime Minister Sanchez had just returned for a meeting with the Algerian president. They're seeking Algerian natural gas. Obviously, natural gas is in short supply in Europe, thanks to the wars in Ukraine and Iran. And this was sort of a way of punishing, quite frankly. And they've done this before. There was a similar, a bigger, it's a smaller scale, more like 10,000. people that Morocco enabled to rush in to one of the presidios in response to Spain accepting the president of Western Sahara, a country that Morocco also claims for itself in Spain

for medical treatment. So the Moroccans for some time have been using this threat of mass migration as a way of getting some political leverage. And there's a fair amount of evidence is exactly what happened. I mean, you don't get, you know, 50,000 to 70,000 people in this remote corner of Morocco simultaneously without some major logistical support. Indeed, there are films of these truckloads of Moroccans being ferried in to the frontier. Spaniards have identified Moroccan.

intelligence agents among the crowds that went across the border, checking out security and the Spanish response. So I have a little question that this was not some kind of spontaneous event by desperate migrants. It's that that seems to be the obvious conclusion here, especially when you read more about Morocco's government. You talk about them as a kind of colonial power with West. Western Sahara. Can you speak about the Moroccan government and their closeness with, say, the U.S. and Israel as well?

Well, Morocco is an authoritarian Arab monarchy that has a great vision of La Grande Morocco, you know, Greater Morocco, which not only includes the two Presidios and some Spanish islands off the coast, but a good chunk of Western Algeria, which is actually invaded back in 19. 1963, and western Sahara, pretty much all of Mauritania and northern Mali as well. Western Sahara is recognized by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory that deserves the right of self-determination, which would necessarily include the option of independence. Morocco has rejected that. this position is upheld by the unanimous decision of the International Criminal Court. But the United States, at the very end of Trump's first term, ended up becoming a first country to formally recognize Morocco's illegal annexation of that country, which I should mention.

They do have a functioning government, which governs a good third of the population, primarily in refugee camps and far western Algeria that the Algerian government has given them effective autonomy over. They are also a full member state of the African Union. They were recognized at one time or another by over 80 countries, but the U.S. says, no, this is Morocco. And much of many people's disappointments, Biden did not reverse it. And this had some implications.

I was traveling in Africa a while ago, and I was defending the Biden administration's position on Ukraine. You know, that you can't expand your territory by military force, the inviolability of international boundaries. And everyone from cab drivers to cabinet officials would say, what about Western Sahara? Indeed, even Michael McFall, the former Obama's former ambassador to Moscow,

who has been a big Ukraine hawk in any respects, as was disappointed that the Biden essentially upheld this illegal annexation because he saw how it negatively impacted the U.S. diplomacy on this question, particularly in the global south. But anyway, the recognition of Western Sahara came in return for getting Morocco to formally recognize Israel, not waiting, breaking them away from the Arab League position, which is we'll recognize Israel once in the occupation and allow for Palestinian statehood, but to recognize them beforehand and become part of the so-called Abraham Accords.

So there has been this nexus of the Israel, United States, and Morocco with greater strategic cooperation. And let's be honest, Trump is more comfortable with leaders like Netanyahu and various Arab despots than he is with the liberal democracies of Europe. It's really important to point, out how U.S. credibility on issues of, say, sovereignty has been undercut and it trickles down from our support for the genocide in Gaza and Israel's territorial expansion into Lebanon, into the

West Bank, into Gaza. And then the downstream effects, it has that people don't even consider about something like Western Sahara and how really, honestly, in terms of U.S. support for conflicts around the world, we're mostly supporting the territorial expanders with the rare exception of Ukraine. Ukraine is the exception right now with the United States. In many ways, yes. I mean, Western Sahara, along with Palestine, are the only nations that are recognized as non-self-governing territories under foreign religion occupation. And one can argue that some countries have a moral right to self-determination, like Tibet or or Kurdistan or Kashmir or whatever.

But legally speaking, those are the only two entire nations that are essentially under occupation. And this is one reason I don't like people to exaggerate the power of APEC and the Zionist lobby because, you know, Morocco shows we are quite willing to support an occupation without, you know, pressure from an ethnic minority, just as we supported Indonesia's occupation of East Timor,

and prior to that, the party of South Africa's occupation of Namibia. Yes. But the, but they try to absolve U.S. Empire, and those people that are only making that argument tend to be fairly anti-Semitic, but yes. Yeah, exactly, exactly. But what's interesting is that you have, in the past few months, leading up to this, you had right-wing elements in the United States, including an official report supported by the Republican majority in the House of Representatives,

that have claimed that have claimed that the Spanish enclaves, which haven't been part of Moroccan territory for 600 years, should belong to Morocco. And you have Israelis, urban officials, pushing the same line. Now, it's a reasonable debate whether any European country should have any land on the African continent. But it's not like these folks have suddenly become anti-colonial on principle. And what's interesting is that the Israelis are really mad at Sanchez because he's been one of the most outspoken European leaders regarding the Palestinians and the oppression and the genocidal war in Gaza and the like. And they've been using this to say, and for example, the Israeli ambassador to the UN, Diane DeLan said this just recently, that, oh, Sanchez is a total hypocrite.

Spain, that is the occupier. And similarly, and meanwhile, the United States, of course, is very angry at Sanchez for not raising military spending to the degree that Trump has ordered. And even more so, because opposition to the Iran war, not allowing U.S. bases in Spain to be used in fighting that war and even banning airspace from U.S. Air Force. In fact, just a few weeks ago, Trump ordered the Secretary of Treasury to halt all trade with Spain. Of course, he had to be informed that Spain being part of the EU, it couldn't do that. And he now to get, you know, to go after Spain in some other ways. So anyway, this has led to some speculation that Israel and the United States may have been behind Morocco's decision. Now, personally, I have not seen proof of this.

I think it's really stretching to say that Israel orchestrated this or the United States orchestrated it, but that they definitely emboldened Morocco to do this, which would normally be seen as kind of an aggressive act against a NATO country. And they're trying to reap the benefits from it. You know, on the U.S. side, you had Trump's saying, you see these scenes. it's going to be many times worse on our border with Mexico if the Democrats get back in power

and the, and in advance saying, oh, this is the responsibility of the globalist and these liberal people who, you know, and, you know, all this talk about a Muslim invasion and the like is very much, you know, feeding the narratives of the right wing in both Israel and the United States, and I might add, in Europe as well. it's a level of coordination from the global right that we just don't have on the left but you know I mean that it's a coordination of messaging at the very least and I am curious what you're like how the Moroccan government motivated tens of thousands of people to migrate here what are they what tactics are they using and like can you speak to how the coordination

may have come to pass. It's hard to say. And people are looking into this. New York Times and the Guardian have noted this, and I don't doubt they're looking at it more. Spain is obviously concerned with this. And they're being somewhat low-key about it, because, again, if they upset Morocco too much,

they could open the floodgates again. Indeed, one thing is kind of interesting, if I may look at the European side of this for a moment, that Spain actually, after years of following the international consensus of supporting self-determination, like a referendum, and Western Sahara, has now joined a number of other countries in endorsing the so-called autonomy plan that Morocco has for Western Sahara,

which is a joke, it's not much autonomy, and it would essentially allow for the annexation without an act of self-determination. But in many ways, the left of center governments, and in many ways often more hard line against Western Sahara than the more conservative governments, because basically

Morocco has been extorting Europe and basically saying, unless you back us on Western Sahara, we're going to really open the floodgates. Remember, it's only 12 miles of water between, you know, Morocco, and the European continent. But even this

encouragement into Ceuta, even though the vast majority of the migrants, or whomever they were, returned, you're seeing the far right saying, oh, my God, we have this Muslim invasion. And you have conservative governments saying, we've got to kick Spain out of the Schengen zone, which allows for the free,

a passport-free movement within Europe, even though Ceuta is not in Europe. And Morocco has very tough internal controls between the Presidios and Spain. I mean, the migrants

are no closer to getting in the Europe from Ceuta. They are from Tangier or any other Moroccan city on the north coast. So this has been used to pump up this hysteria in Europe by the far-rush. and dividing Europe like this, that's very much in Trump's, you know, playbook.

And in King Muhammad's, you know, a playbook, that this is, you know, there is a great political advantage around doing this. Can you, can you expand on that point? What, beyond, you know, Trump trying to break the, the EU's back, I guess, and have more say, what is your sense of the political advantage for the U.S.? Well, basically, you know, we've had Trump and Vance and Rubio quite openly, you know, supporting the far-right parties, the alternative for Germany, Le Penz party, the Nigel Franz Foreign Party in Britain.

I mean, and, you know, they are a big issue and how they've gotten to be the threat that they have become, has been largely on this anti-immigrant platform. And so the more that the United States can encourage this kind of hysteria. And Morocco, for its own reasons, of course, you know, support this as well, the better. It also weakened Sanchez and makes him more vulnerable in the next Spanish elections. And again, both Israel, the United States, you know, definitely want to see him defeated in a more conservative government come to power. But it's amazing how this, you know, this hysteria has come.

When I published my article, I was getting comments from people that were saying things like, I had a friend who is a single woman who was really looking forward to hiking the Camino, but she canceled because she's afraid of this Muslim invasion, even though, again, you know, there are nowhere close to continental Spain, particularly northern Spain. So, you know, this, again, you can see how this very much, you know, helps, feed the right-wing narrative. And what are the conditions in Morocco that are leading to migration? You know, there's coordination, of course, clearly it seems to be the case.

But people have to be kind of primed to accept this argument to migrate outside of the country. Well, you know, Morocco is potentially, they don't have oil or any, you know, a super-valued. natural resources, but they've got a fair amount of arable land. Indeed, the geography is quite similar to California in many respects, Mediterranean climate for most of the country, the deserts, in the east and the south. And they, you know, but it's a very corrupt government. One reason the United States is so friendly with Morocco is that almost more than any other Arab or African nation, they have embrace the neoliberal orthodoxy, you know, which, you know, while it can increase cumulative wealth, it's very, very unevenly distributed. And so, you know, you know, that you have, as you do,

and in quite a few other Arab and African countries, you have a lot of unemployed youth that are seeking, you know, better lives. And again, the close proximity to you. Europe makes this particular tempting. I should mention you also have a fair amount of migrants from elsewhere in Africa, who have made their way up to Morocco as sort of the jumping off point as well. And of course, this raises a whole bunch of questions about development, you know, and how U.S. and European policies, you know, contribute to, you know, these kinds of economic strange, not to mention the wars in Africa and elsewhere, where some of the additional

migrants from which some of the additional migrants are fleeing. You mentioned the Islamophobia. Can you speak more about the role that Islamophobia is playing in this argument and even in just the global rights arguments against migration? Well, interesting, Nigel Farange claimed that these migrants were sweeping into Ceuta, breaking the homes, raping and beheading, and all this kind of stuff, comparing it to October 7th and Israel. That's total nonsense. I mean, that simply did not take place.

But, you know, the, the, the, clearly the, clearly the, the kind of panic that came with the big migration from the Civil War and Syria and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, you to conflict in Iraq with the rise of ISIS and others, and that we saw, you know, 10, 15 years ago. This is seen as a second wave of this sort of thing. Now, in total, Muslims make up, I think, about 3% of the European population. They're not about to take over. And at least as immigrants are assimilated,

into society, you know, they become European in many respects. You know, you do sometimes have problems in first and second generation who are oppressed and, you know, in prison for drugs or theft or things like that, and they get radicalized. But, you know, if you look at the profile of these migrants or second, first and second generation immigrants, to Europe that have engaged in terrorism. They're very much like gang members here in the United States. It's not the religion that has

motivated them. Though they'll use that as an excuse. It's the poverty. It's discrimination. And the kind of thing that you find in many western societies when it comes to racism and bigotry towards

immigrants. I recently reread James Baldwin's no name in the street and he talks at length about the racism that Algerians face in France during the time he was there and how the irony of a colonizing power than having being upset once the process of decolonization begins and the people that were colonized coming and living alongside them. It's just, you know, it's both comforting and troubling how history is so long and the struggles that we face today are so similar to the ones from decades prior. And indeed, what's kind of crazy about this thing, if I may begin up Western Sahara again,

is that the Sahrawis, you know, who have a distinct history and culture and dialect, and, you know, they are indeed different than Moroccans in many respects. One reason they don't want to be part of Morocco. and part of that is that while they are observant of Sunni Muslims, they practice a fairly liberal interpretation. Women are unveiled. They have equal rights to inheritance and divorce. The primary leader of the nonviolent resistance movement within the occupied territories,

Amman Tjahidhar, and called the Saharan Gandhi. She's won the Right Wivalhood Award, the Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award, the Syracurge Award from the Russian Train Foundation. I mean, you know, here's a model of a country, and they also democratically elect their parliament

and their president. So here we have what should be a model for what the West supposedly wants of an Arab Muslim country that supports women's rights. That's democratic. That's moderate. That has never engaged in terrorism at all.

And yet we support the occupation. Meanwhile, in Congress is a bipartisan bill to declare the Poissario, which is the National Liberation Front, a terrorist organization, even though, again, they've never engaged in terrorism. I mean, rock and propagandists have claimed they have ties to Hezbollah and Iran, but that is total nonsense. Right. Total nonsense. And so, and I think it underscores that the Islamophobia is really an excuse to, you know, essentially promoting Western imperialism, that we have. to support these autocratic regimes like Morocco, in part, supposedly suppress Islamist extremism, while in fact what they're primarily doing is suppressing a very moderate, indeed liberal,

a Muslim country that is simply seeking the right of self-determination. And again, as you mentioned as we apply to the outset, Morocco is actually a colonizer. And so they're used, in fact, what's interesting, they originally seized Western Sahara in part back in 1975 by assembling 300,000 unarmed Moroccans in what they call the Green March. And supposedly this anti-colonialist effort when Spain had already agreed to end of the territory and was ready to hand it over to the Palisario. Morocco simultaneously had a military invasion, which was quite brutal and ended up expelling nearly half the population. but in many ways this effort around Siota is a replay of that of trying to take and, you know, play the anti-colonialist card, you know, for a country that is itself a colonizer. Fascinating stuff and very illuminating. Stephen Zunez, professor of politics, director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco,

co-author of the latest, his latest Western Sahara, War nationalism, and Conflict Irresolution. and you can read his piece in the nation called The Real Story Behind the Human Wave that entered Suta. Stephen, thanks so much for your time today. I really appreciate it. Thank you. All right, folks, quick break, and when we come back, we'll be joined by Drop Sites Mertaza Hussein on his latest reporting for Your Eyes only, Israel's mole inside of the United Nations. Be right back.

We are back, and we are joined once again by Murtaza Hussein, National Security and Foreign Affairs correspondent at DropSight News. His latest reporting is called for your eyes only Israel's mole inside the United Nations. Mertaza, welcome back to the show. Hey, I'm on. Good to see you again. Good to see you and some more phenomenal reporting over at DropSight with your name on it. This report that you have, it centers around one individual, this guy, Yajav Lickner, I believe I'm maybe I'm saying that correctly.

You can correct me, Mertaza. But who is this individual and what role does he serve in the UN currently? Sure, yeah. So Mr. Lickiner is currently the head of the Washington office of UNICEF. People probably know UNICEF is the arm of the UN dealing with children's welfare. And, you know, he took that role, I believe, last year. But about 10 years ago or maybe 12 years ago now, he was in a different role at the UN Population Fund. And prior to that, he was a diplomat at the Israeli mission to the UN working under then Israeli ambassador to the UN Ron Prossor.

So our story is actually based on a leaked cash documents or hacked cash documents, I guess, from Prossor that was posted online by a website called Distributed Denial of Secrets. It's like a successor to WikiLeaks in some ways. They posted that a little while ago, but the emails show a period from 2014-2015 when ProSor was helping Lickner get a role at the UN from his position at the Israeli mission. And then immediately after he got that role, he began leaking documents,

confidential documents, confidential internal communications, and really just acting as basically a font of classified information from the UN to Israeli diplomats. And that continued for the whole portion of the emails we have for about two years. And since then, in that intervening time, Lickner has risen through the ranks of the UN, such that he holds that office in UNICEF that I mentioned earlier. So the article is about, it's talking a lot about what he leaked, what was happening, what was being said. It's all based on the emails.

So it's not really making any assertions or, you know, speculating, it's just documenting the people's own communications themselves. So that's kind of what it is. And the story does strongly suggest that perhaps he was put there for a purpose to play sort of a intelligence role inside the UN and give the Israelis heads up about UN activities and internal details about the functioning of the organization, which are intended to be classified. And also accounts of UN official discussions with the other world leaders, which are private.

So that was all happening. And that's kind of the crux that's the story, which is detailed in the dark side report. Let's go back then to the period of 2014 and 2015 where these communications show him supplying Israeli officials with internal documents as you talk about accounts of the private meetings. In 2014, the Gaza, there was a military of. offensive in Gaza by the Israelis. Once again, history did not begin on October 7th. Israel killed over 2,000 Palestinians in a two-month period during that time.

And this overlapped with Lickner's time at the UN. What did you find there and how, what could he possibly have leaked in relation to the Gaza offensive? Yeah. So, you know, it's a very important context that, you know, Israel is a very, very, probably the lowest level of popularity globally that's ever been right now. But it wasn't always the case so much. A decade ago, it was probably, reputation was probably not as bad.

And a decade prior to that, it was more positive in general. But it's been on this downward decline, mostly triggered by the expanding occupation of the West Bank. And then this series of wars which took place in Gaza over the course of a decade and a half, and which have now culminated in the total destruction of Gaza and the genocide of the Palestinian. population. So these communications took place in 2014, which was timed with a previous military offensive called Operation Protective Edge, which had taken place by Israel in Gaza. And there were a number of civilian casualties, many hundreds of civilian casualties in the war. And Israel was starting to come under great scrutiny for its conduct in Gaza. And so these communications show Lickner,

giving kind of a heads up to Israeli diplomats that, you know, FYI, this is what the UN is doing, there's a Gaza Commission of Inquiry, here's the meeting agenda of the human rights official, senior most high commissioner for human rights when he goes to D.C., you can do what you want with that, and the Israelis seem to take the information and try to craft their own messaging and also reach out to members of Congress and so forth to defray this growing scrutiny that was coming upon the government for its actions. There's also an interesting passage in there where in one email, a guardian reporter is reaching out to the UN about the listing of Israel as a country which is engaged in human rights abuses against children and pressure against the listing

within the organization. And Lickner forwards the communications, the private communications between the reporter and a UN official to Israeli diplomats and even tries to help them figure out who the source of the leaks may have been inside. the broader system. So he's really playing a double role here, it seems, from the emails. And another important thing I forgot to mention earlier as well, too, that Lickner took this role in 2014. The same set of emails showed that, you know, it was these really official, they're diplomats, particularly Ron Proser, who were working really hard to place him in that

role. They put a lot of emphasis on making sure he gets into the UN population fund and other roles thereafter. But it was Samantha Power, the former U.S. ambassador of the UN who was working with Proser according to emails, talking about him being placed this role. Proser was asking her for pressure on UN officials to accept him. So it was interesting. They're not very keen that he gets in there, but also that they had assistance from the U.S. side, specifically Samantha Power, as their kind of contact and make sure that the UN officials are leaned upon to promote this individual to this role. And, you know, one last point, it seems a proser was kind of like a, you know, like a sponsor or a patron to Lickner's career within the UN establishment. Because Lickner was

actually writing assessments or writing talking points for Proster used to promote himself for other roles after that role to be further promoted. And one of the emails, he actually describes himself as a number of things. He's like a good analytical thinker and stuff like that, more generic talking points. But he also says, I'm an intelligence agent in training. And, you know, there's no elaborate. Well, he's still in training, so he doesn't know not to put that in email form, in written form. I'm an intelligence officer in training. Right, right. It was a, really interesting sort of, you know, the detail to include it by yourself. And, you know, there was no elaboration or what that meant, and there was no further communications,

regarding mentioning that in the emails. But that is interesting that that was in there. And one can only speculate what the meaning is. But that is the way he self-described. Okay, well, I'll speculate. I'll speculate on him saying, I am an intelligence officer in training and say that perhaps he was sincere about that,

given that his actions back up those, that claim. But, I mean, the fact that you talk about how his intelligence, you know, his activity here was involved in what was surrounding accusations against Israel committing human rights violations against children, the fact that he was, is now

leading, or a leading official at UNICEF for children's welfare in the Washington D.C. office feels you know, almost like some, like a, it would be ironic if I wasn't entirely unconvinced that like

the Israelis were doing this on purpose. Well, you know, Yeah, my understanding, if I'm talking to people inside the UN, is that that office was basically created for the purpose of lobbying D.C. And, you know, acting as intermediary between the organization and the administration wasn't really a traditional activity that UNICEF engaged in. And this individual, this gentleman, Lickner, he's very involved in UN operations related to UNICEF in the Gaza War.

It's been quite prominent in that sense. So he's by no means of marginal figure in the current situation. Now, you know, if one were to say, like, you know, Israel is in, by the UN, Israel has been concluded to have killed 20,000 children in Gaza. So it's clearly a country which is culpable in mass abuses against children. That is not preclude in Israel and is really working effectively in the UN per se. But if you're working there and it's the case that you are collaborating with the Israeli government or any government which is committing such abuses,

obviously it seems like a conflict of interest. So during the Rwandan genocide, there was a supporter of the Hutu Power movement working for the UN Human Rights Commission. It would be seen as problematic for obvious reasons. And likewise, if somebody is a supporter of the current Israeli government or acting on its behalf or in some way implicated in its activities, then it would be cross-purposes with the mission of an organization like UNICEF, which many people trust to have a, you know, a philanthropic or, you know, to be an organization

which sincerely adheres to the state admission for helping children and protecting human rights of young people. Well, you know, this also pairs with reporting in other outlets from the time about, like, say, UN officials being bullied by the Israeli government or president. pressured by the Israeli government over its reports and recommendations on children's rights violations. And so when you pair, say, potential intelligence activity with outside pressure campaigns and Israel's history of threatening, you know, the ICC prosecutors, this is outside of the UN, right? But like, in conjunction with their attempt to infiltrate some of these and pressure,

these international accountability organizations. You can see how robust the Israeli intelligence network really is. Totally. You know, there's a lot of countries out there that would like to destroy certain international government organizations, ICC, ICJ, many UN agencies.

And they'd like to do that for different reasons, but often because they would like to enjoy a sense of impunity and they don't like that these organizations, however limited they are, they impose some sort of, of check or oversight on the behavior of foreign states, and thus they would like to either have them shut down or infiltrate them and subvert their mission and so forth. But not all countries have the ability to do that. And even Israel probably wouldn't have had the ability

to infiltrate the UN, potentially in this case, without the support of the U.S. officials. People like Samantha Power who see it as their duty to help Israel achieve its political aims even at the cost of the destruction of these organizations, which in theory are supposed to represent the global commons and international law and all these things. So, you know, I would think that probably Russia would love to destroy the ICC because the Russian president is indicted by the ICC, but it really takes the U.S. now working avowedly for the interests of Benjamin Netanyahu to destroy the international criminal court. And then even the ICC as limited as is, in the future it won't be able to even grow to a more robust role and actually hold people

committing war crimes and genocides to account because it will have been destroyed for the crime of trying to police the government of Israel in this case with the assistance of the United States. So I think that's the really unfortunate aspect. And you know, the UN itself, I should add, it's a organization which almost is an utopian in the idealism, at least on paper, because it says, and we wrote about this in the article, that if you were to join the UN as a UN official, you must see yourself as purely an international official and not representing the interests of any nation state,

including the state that you may have citizenship, and you need to transcend that and embrace a universalist perspective. But it seems like some people able to do that, but then other people are not able to live up to that, and they continue representing primarily or even exclusively the interests of their member state, and they're not fit for the UN in that case. They can't, the two perspectives cannot gel with one another. And if everyone were to act like this in the UN, I think the UN will fall apart tomorrow.

And that goes for a lot of global governance organizations, which are very flawed, but at least reflect an attempt to create some sort of shared global, legal and cultural space. Lastly, Mertaza, how do you put these revelations about, say, Israeli intelligence, infiltration or efforts in the United Nations in the context of the attacks on UNRWA, which was essentially the only real infrastructure in the Gaza Strip that was able to provide health care for people and the defunding of that was really crippling and aiding abetting some of the worst death tolls and health impacts of this genocide. what is your kind of assessment via your reporting of how UNRWA fits into this?

Well, you know, it's funny, after, this is a huge cache of emails, and after I wrote the report, other people started going through the cache themselves and sending me certain clips. And they're like many, many, you know, countless thousands of communications here. It's very hard to go through all of them and see everything. But it seems like there's some indications in the emails that Lickner was also, use kind of game plan ways of attacking UNRWA. That was how it was described to me,

but another reporter, following up on the same story. So I have to look at that myself, but my belief, and I think it's quite plausible, is that really they were looking at every possible avenue they could take to undermine and destroy UN institutions because they see them as a check on unconstricted Israeli power

in the West Bank, Gaza, and even beyond in the broader region, So it wouldn't surprise me that, you know, and what they actually did, what the story represents is the tactic that communist groups were accused of in the 20th century of entreeism. And entreeism is basically taking an organization and introducing somebody within it who is actually working for different cause and is aimed at either destroying the organization itself

or subverting it to a different aim. And, you know, that took different connotations. It wasn't all very sinister. But, you know, in some cases, you know, if you take it out of that context and you view it in the sense of taking global governance organizations, having individuals who are either ideologically adverse to them or you're actively working for the foreign governments or intelligence agencies, if you enter enough of those people in these organizations, you could really change them. You could change their character entirely and then within a generation or less.

The mission has been inverted in something totally different so gradually that people don't notice. So I think they'd like to either destroy the UN or turn it. into an institution which serves the purposes of the Israeli government and the Israeli occupation and does not serve Palestinians in the West Bank or Gaza or anywhere else. Mertaza Hussein, national security and foreign affairs correspondent at Dropsite News. You can read his latest for your eyes only, Israel's mole inside the United Nations, but of course everybody should be following and supporting Dropsite News and Mertaz's work in particular. Thanks so much for your time today.

I really appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Thank you. All right. With that, folks, we're going to wrap up the free part of this program and head into the fun half where we will read your IMs and we may take some calls. We have no Matt Binder today, so check out leftist mafia and his work as well. Matt Leck, what's happening on the Jackman Show and with Left Reckoning?

Yeah, Left Reckoning. We had a good show this week. Oh, tomorrow on Jacobin Show, I should plug that. Dino's back on the show, we're talking about some, Dino Gistella talking about some of the hot button issues in terms of labor and the left and politicking. So I asked him about data centers and that sort of thing because, and you'll never see a Republican run with this,

but like there is, there might be some issues with data centers and labor because there are not only jobs in it, but it's actually helping to unionize certain areas that have been tougher to unionize, and how can we, like, protect that and also respond to what is absolute atrocious type of economic planning going on by venture capitalists by making these things everywhere and becoming more and more hated. So, yeah, check that out tomorrow on Jacob and Show. And check out our Mahmode Khalil interview from last week, too.

Oh, yes. Yes. Great stuff. Join the majority report. If you can, join the majority report.com. Become a member. We'll read your I.M. You can I am into the show.

You can help us stay resilient in these troubling times. Join the majority report.com. Justcoffee.coop, fair trade coffee, and something else. You can check it out on the website. I'll never remember what it is. Just coffee.coop. All right. Check out the discourse with Brandon Sutton as well.

Go subscribe if you haven't already. Brandon will be joining us in the fun half. I believe See you in the fun Have Okay, Emma, please Well, I just, I feel that my voice is sorely lacking On the majority report

Wait, whoa Look, Sam is unpopular I do deserve a vacation at Disney World So ladies and gentlemen, it is my pleasure To welcome Emma to the show It is Thursday I think you need to take over for Sam Yes, please, sir, I'm gonna, I'm gonna pause you right there

Wait, what? You can't encourage Emma to live like this and I'll tell you why. So it was offered a twir? Sushi and poker with the boys. Twerp. Sushi and sushi and poker with the boys. What?

Twerp. Sushi and poker with the boys. It was offered a twerk. Sushi and that's what we call bids. Twerp. Sushi and poker with the boys. Right. Twerp.

We're going to get demonetized. I just think that what you did to Tim Poole was mean. Free speech. That's not what we're about here. Look at how sad he's become now. You shouldn't even talk about it. I think you're responsible. I probably am in a certain way, but let's get to the meltdown here.

Twir? Ugh. Sushi and poker with the boys. Oh my God. Wow. Sushi. I'm sorry. I'm losing my fucking mind.

So it's offered a twir? Yeah. Sushi and poker with the boys. Logic. Twerp. Sushi and poker with the boys. Boy, boy, boy. I think I'm like a little kid.

I think I'm like a little kid. Add this debate. A little kid. Some people just don't understand. So I'm not trying to be a dick right now, but like, I absolutely think the U.S. should be providing me with a wife and kids. That's not what we're talking about here. It's not a fun job. That's a real thing. That's a real thing. Willie Walker. To work. That's a real thing. That's a real thing. That's a real thing. Offered it. Twere. That's a real thing. That's a real thing. We got not a pan.

Like the weight of the world on the shoulders. Sanders didn't want to do this show anymore. It was so much easier. One of the majority of the majority report was just you. You were happy. Let's change the subject. Rangers and Nick's going right. Now, shut up.

Don't want people saying reckless things on your program. That's one of the most difficult parts about this show. This is a pro-killing podcast. I'm thinking maybe it's kind of we bury the hatchet. Left is best. Violet twir? Don't be foolish. And don't fucking tweet at me and don't get shit.

to the way. Honor's thesis. I'll see on foreign policy. We already fund Israel, dude. Tough of a question. Another name. Incredible theme song. I Bumbler.

Emma Viglin. Absolutely one of my favorite people. Actually, not just in the game. Period.