The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1749 - AIRPORT CHAOS: The Real Reason Why Traveling These Days Feels Like A Nightmare

Episode Date: March 11, 2026

Today on The Matt Walsh Show, the air travel experience in this country has declined catastrophically over the years. Just as the quality of almost everything else has declined. Why is this happening? How bad is it really? And what can we do about it? Also, we know about the fraud in Minneapolis. A new investigation reveals that the situation is even worse in California. And Meghan Markle's Netflix deal has been canceled. Her string of failures over the past five years is truly impressive. Ep. 1749 - - - Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://dwplus.watch/MattWalshMemberExclusive - - - Today's Sponsors: PreBorn - Make a difference for generations to come. Donate securely online at https://preborn.com/WALSH or dial #250 keyword 'BABY' Grand Canyon University - Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University. Visit https://GCU.edu to learn more. Policygenius - Head to https://policygenius.com/WALSH to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save. - - - DailyWire+: Become a Daily Wire Member and watch all of our content ad-free: https://dailywire.com/subscribe 📲 Download the free Daily Wire app today on iPhone, Android, Roku, Apple TV, Samsung, and more. The Real History of the American Indians is available now, exclusively on DailyWire+ Watch now: https://dwplus.watch/RealHistoryAmericanIndians Subscribe here: https://dwplus.watch/RealHistorySubscribe The Real History of Slavery is available for free on youtube: https://youtu.be/UivhqdhcHNI Friendly Fire is here! No moderator, no safe words. Now available: https://dailywire.com/show/friendly-fire 👕 Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://dwplus.shop/MattWalshMerch - - - Socials:  Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF  Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA  Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA  Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Kayak gets my flight, hotel, and rental car right, so I can tune out travel advice that's just plain wrong. Bro, Skycoin, way better than points. Never fly during a Scorpio full moon. Just tell the manager you'll sue. Instant room upgrade. Stop taking bad travel advice. Start comparing hundreds of sites with kayak and get your trip right. Bad advice.

You talking to me? Kayak, got that right. Today in the Matwell Show, the air travel experience in this country has declined catastrophically over the years, just as the quality of almost everything else has declined. Why is this happening? How bad is it really? And what can we do about it? We'll talk about that. Also, we know about the fraud in Minneapolis. A new investigative investigation reveals that situation is even worse in California. And Megan Markle's Netflix deal has been canceled. Her string of failures over the past five years is truly impressive. We'll talk about all that and more today in the Matt Wall Show. I'll usually open the show with a correction, but today I'm forced to do so. In discussing the media's deliberately misleading coverage of the terror attack in New York City on Saturday, I made an egregious mistake. I described CBS News as perhaps the worst offender out of every media organization that lied to the public about what happened. But as bad as CBS's coverage was, my statement, turns out, wasn't entirely accurate.

Because the truth is that no single outlet was more committed to lying about the terrorist attack than actually CNN, which aired the following analysis from CNN's Abby Phillips last night. This is one of those clips that seems like it can't possibly be real, but it is. Watch. Two Republicans say Muslims don't belong here after an attempted terror attack against New York's mayor, Zoramam Dhani, and the House Speaker,

Mike Johnson says nothing, really, to condemn those comments. Another special guest is going to be with us at the table. So the bombing was, quote, an attempted terror attack against New York's mayor Zoran Mamdani, according to CNN's Abby Phillips. Well, there it is. I mean, it's completely false, the total inverse of the truth concerning a major news story that took place more than 48 hours earlier, and she delivers it live on air. Now, of course, this false narrative is precisely what every news outlet, including CNN,

has been trying to suggest for the past 48 hours. They've desperately been attempting to confuse the public into believing this lie. know that two Muslim terrorists tried to murder right-wing activist Jake Lang, as well as several police officers in the name of ISIS and global jihad. But as we've discussed, the media has been reporting the story in a way that suggests that Mamdani was somehow targeted by anti-Islam demonstrators because the attack occurred near his official residence. And now we have the CNN anchor coming out and repeating the same lie that CNN has been spreading all day, except she's even more direct about it. So earlier in the day on their official accounts, CNN posted the following text on

X as well as their website in the form of an article. And here's what CNN wrote. Quote, two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed in New York City Saturday morning for what could have been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather. But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti-Muslim protest outside of Mayor Zohran Mamdani's home. So notice how the propaganda works. Instead of Muslim terrorists whose parents came here from Afghanistan and Turkey, they are Pennsylvania teenagers who could have been enjoying the city during the nice, warm weather. And these Pennsylvania teenagers don't actually do anything. They didn't do anything. Instead, something happens to them. They got arrested. Their lives changed. It's all very passive. And we're told the incident occurred during an anti-Muslim protest, which suggests that the anti-Muslim protesters were responsible for the bombing. And that's apparently how Abby Phillips understood the story or claimed that she did. Now, that CNN article was written by two authors, both of them women.

One of them went to UC Berkeley and Columbia Journalism School, where the yearly cost of attendance is well over $100,000. She uses they-them pronouns and identifies as non-binary. The other author is a Spanish-speaking Colombian immigrant to the United States who holds an undergraduate journalism degree. And what's important to understand about this propaganda and why I'm opening with it is that virtually every single mainstream media outlet is trying to do the same thing. The mistake that CNN made in this case was being too obvious about it. But if you pay enough attention, you'll find that journalists are paid to obscure relevant information to the extent that the information might lead you to draw some unapproved conclusions. If you draw those

unapproved conclusions, then your life might actually get better. The quality of life in this country might improve instead of continuing this steady managed decline that we've been on for so many years. Consider what's happening to the air travel to air travel right now in the United States. If you've been on a plane lately, as I have been many times, you know that it's as bad as it's ever been. And now, in the wake of the DHS shutdown, things are starting to really fall apart. But the media, as always, isn't interested in providing all of the necessary contacts. So here's a report that just aired on the NBC News on this topic and see if you can spot what's missing. Listen. Get up and get here early. At Houston's Hobby Airport, those lines have been snaking out the main

terminal down to the baggage claim and all the way out to the parking garage. The airport is warning TSA wait times could be three hours or more. We tried to allow a little more than three hours to get here. I've waited for about two hours. now. Got nothing else to do, but wait. The same story at MSY in New Orleans. Wait. And it's long. And at Hartsfield Jackson Airport in Atlanta. The TSA's funding expired three weeks ago after lawmakers failed to reach an agreement on ICE protocols triggering a partial homeland security shutdown. The White House released a statement blaming Democrats for the shutdown and airport staffing shortages.

So TSA wait times are now insanely long at three specific airports, Atlanta, Houston Hobby, and New Orleans. Total breakdown, as you can see, they're telling passengers to get to the airport several hours early, and the TSA long is so lying that it snakes into the parking garage. Now, the reason that all this is happening, according to NBC News, is that Democrats are refusing to fund DHS. You see, Democrats are upset that two left-wing agitators were killed while assaulting and interfering with federal law enforcement officers. so they're not going to pay for TSA anymore. And Republicans aren't willing to compromise at the moment, so therefore you get long delays.

But as an explanation for what's happening, again, that's an incomplete analysis, and it's incomplete on purpose. Because you also have to ask yourself this question, why exactly is the crisis only affecting three airports, all of them located in the American South? The TSA is a national federal agency. None of these officers anywhere in the country

are getting paid at the moment. So why isn't every single airport in every city in the U.S. experiencing a similar meltdown? Why aren't lines going to the parking garage in, you know, Maine or New Hampshire? Now, if you look a little deeper, you'll discover that TSA agents in the South are calling in sick in response to the funding labs. And that's the reason for these delays. In other words, the TSA agents in these particular airports are committing fraud on the taxpayer. Now, they know that when the DHS is funded, they will receive back pay. So they're not getting paid right now, but they will get paid, but they don't care. They're going to take a vacation or work a side hustle on false pretenses because they see an

opportunity to double dip. And for some unknown reason, which can't possibly have anything to do with systemic corruption or culture or local hiring practices or demographics or anything at all, The vast majority of TSA agents who are committing this fraud happen to be located in three major urban centers in the southern United States. Just a couple of weeks ago, we talked about the unprecedented amount of sewage that was flowing into D.C. streets as the local water board celebrated its diversity. Is something similar happening with the TSA in Houston, Orleans, and Atlanta? Whatever the case, we need to know why so many of these TSA agents are concentrated at these particular areas. airports and why they aren't getting fired or even punished for committing a very flagrant, obvious fraud. But no one at NBC News will ever investigate those questions, and we all know why.

They're afraid of what they'll discover. Above all, the media's objective is to prevent you from realizing that our cultural decline is a choice. All of the daily indignities that we put up with are in fact optional. And we know that because not too long ago, we didn't indulge the laziness and the corruption of the worst among us. In an upcoming episode of a real history, we're going to talk at some length about the book

The Age of Entitlement by Christopher Caldwell. And among other things, it describes many of the ways that society has floundered ever since the civil rights era. Turns out that when you usher in a wave of anti-white racism at every level of society, things start to break. And they break in ways that many people don't even realize. So here's just a couple of examples from the book. Quote, by the 2016 presidential

election, the quickest flights from New York to London took six hours and 40 minutes, almost three quarters of an hour longer than they had taken during the Nixon administration. The train trip from New York to Washington, D.C., a mere two hours and 15 minutes when the Beatles made it on their first American tour in 1964, now took half an hour longer on the very fastest trains. It's hard to believe, but it's true. Travel by air and by train has become much slower than it was during the 1960s. There are more passengers, more delays, the infrastructure has degraded, and meanwhile, airlines decided that flying slower would save on fuel, which is the main reason they stopped

making the Concord. Of course, you could pick many other metrics where we've declined from crime rates to fertility rates to literacy rates and so on. We've talked about a fair number of these indicators of decline, but air travel is worth focusing on because it's a relatively expensive way to travel. It's supposed to be the crown jewel of American transportation. And if air travel has gotten much worse, then it stands to reason that you probably don't want to use the local subway system or take a greyhound through the Midwest. So what exactly has gone wrong here? Well, to answer that question, you need to recognize that

air travel used to look very different compared to how it looks today. Now, for one thing, the security lines didn't stretch to the parking lot. And being a stewardess was considered a glamorous and desirable job and passengers weren't packed together like cattle in the smallest possible seats. Let's take a look at this Coke, a TWA ad from 1967, which gives you some idea. Watch. Finally, New York. Glamour job, Marianne has made dozens of runs like this, served hundreds of hot meals, greeted thousands of new people. It all demands a lot of charm. works out to a lot of coke. Being a flight attendant presented,

you know, was presented as an exciting and demanding job where she gets to travel the world and meet interesting, well-behaved passengers. There are only two seats per aisle. Everyone has tons of room. Passengers are all smiling as they receive hot meals. Tickets were more expensive than they are now, but in return, the experience was 10 times more comfortable and civilized.

Watch. As costly as flying was, you can't say that passengers didn't get their money's worth. Contemporary flyers consider themselves lucky if they receive a free bag of peanuts and a cup of water to wash it down. That's a far cry from the multi-course meals they served in the 60s, complete with fancy silverware and tablecloths. Since iPads and laptops didn't exist back then, people would stay occupied with bottomless glasses of wine, champagne and other alcoholic beverages on the house.

Even economy passengers ate and drank like royalty. Despite technically being complimentary, the food and drinks were largely why airfare was so high. As excessive as 60s air travel was, the 70s took things to new heights with the introduction of piano bars. Now, the simple explanation for why domestic air travel is now unrecognizable is that over the past 60 years, air travel has become much cheaper. So customers have made the choice to spend less money in exchange for worse service and a smaller seat and a flight that takes longer. Now, today, if you shop around and buy early,

you can get a cross-country plane ticket for around $300. In the 1960s, accounting for inflation, you probably would have spent, you know, around $1,000, the equivalent of $1,000 for the same ticket. But the issue isn't simply that customers are paying less for worse service. The main reason air travel is so unpleasant is that the low prices attract passengers like this,

who lower the quality of air travel for everybody in the terminal. Watch. And they give me the explanation that I don't know. And me and my fucking daughter that's her birthday, my son and my other son

right here, we got on the plane with new explanation to ask us let's get on. I'll talk to him. I'll talk to him. See what's going on. See what?

See what going on. And bring him to fuck out me because I'm going to smack the dog. Let's have a seat for me. No, I'm not having no seat. I'm not having a seat. I'm not having a seat. I'm not having a seat.

I'm not having a seat. I'm not having a seat. I need you back there. I need that. We're not doing that racist shit today. You're not with that racist shit, you Mike. You're with me. Brack, get that.

All right. Y'all not putting me a hand in. If y'all want to talk, guys talk. Who what? For what? For what? Back up. Back up.

So, yes, you heard that correctly. The guy is thrown off of his Spirit Airlines flight. An officer arrives and, finds that he's very agitated, so he tells him to sit down. And in response, the guy tells the officer that he's racist for making that request. This is what the Rosa Parks mythology has become. It's gone from, you know, it was racist to tell Rosa Parks to give up a seat for a white person, to it's racist to tell any black person to take a seat ever for any reason.

And then the situation escalates until it's a brawl at the airport. Now, these kinds of seat disputes are extremely common on Spirit Airlines, as it turns out. This is one of the more remarkable ones. A woman claims that she's entitled to a middle seat in the 13th row, and she shows the officers her Spirit Airlines app to confirm her seat assignment, but then the officer notes that the woman is actually showing them a screenshot of the app and possibly manipulated it. And then he informs her that, according to her ticket, she needs to move to another seat. And here's how that went.

Deputy Soto. I'm breathing exactly how I'm doing. I'm trying to get to a funeral hour. I'm sorry. Okay, ma'am, I'm sorry about that. But now? I'm sitting in my assigned seat. No, you're supposed to be at 37E.

Ah, no. Damn. You think I would make this up. You think I would hold everybody up. It's right here. It's also right here. That's a screenshot, man. It's the app view my boarding pass.

Why would I make that up? Okay. Let me talk to the cat. Hey, sir. I know it's on an app, though. It was a fresh. She was refreshed. A screenshot.

Okay. That's a screenshot. She opened it up for me, so let's show me how. Yeah, I can show you his. Let me see. And then hours too. Perfect. Yeah.

Get off the plane, the final chance. Once the handcuffs go on, there's no, there's no negotiating. That's it. Get off the plane or go to jail? I'm not doing anything. One last chance. Off the plane or off the plane? What are I doing?

I'm not going to tell you. Off the plane or off the plane? You choose right out. What do you want to do? What do you want to do? Off the plane? We're all planning to go to jail. He's asking you, please stand up and walk off.

If you stand up and walk off, you can rebook. Three, two. If now you're going to jail. Go on. All right. Let's go. Stand up. Ten four.

Now put aside whether or not the woman actually faked a screenshot with her boarding assignment. That would be hilarious, but really the footage is hilarious anyway. I mean, the remarkable thing is that she's going to jail and forcing every passenger to the plane and potentially faked her boarding pass over a middle seat. So either she's really passionate about having one of the worst seats on the plane, or she really wanted to miss the funeral that she claimed she had to get to. Either way, she's obviously irrational and entitled and. highly annoying. Now, when pastors like this flood airports every day, as they have been,

and when the FAA awards massive airport contracts on the basis of racial equity, as they've been doing, but everything gets worse. Now, here's a great example, the so-called jetway Jesus phenomenon. If you haven't heard about it, this is what it is. Watch. Joining me now is News Nation travel editor Peter Greenberg. Peter, explain to me how the wheelchair scam works because not everyone using a wheelchair really needs one. Correct. In fact, this goes back to 1986. It's called the Air Carrier Access Act, and it was well-intentioned, basically that anybody can self-declare that they have a disability and are capable of that eligible for wheelchair assistance. What does wheelchair assistance mean?

You can basically get to the counter first. You can get to the gate first. You go through security first, and you board first. The reason why they call them miracle flights, and I've seen as personally on many of my flights, you'll see as many as 30 or 40 people getting wheelchair assistance at the gate and boarding first. Of course, the airline knows that when it lands, so when that plane lands, they're going to need 40 wheelchair assistance. Really? Guess what happens? The plane lands? It's a miracle. They can not only walk, they can run off the plane. And in fact, as one flight attendant told me, it's jetway Jesus working. Now, the federal law was passed, as so many laws were passed, during a time when America was a high-trust

society. It didn't occur to Congress or the airlines that passengers in mass would just lie about a disability in order to get a priority access to their seat. But that's exactly what's happening. We've imported tens of millions of people who have no regard for our culture, our way of life, or basic rules. And this is the result. Let's take a look at that picture from the Wall Street Journal. The caption reads, there were 25 wheelchair passengers on a recent flight out of Guadalajara's airports. I think about that, 25 wheelchair passengers on one flight. Now, unless this is a plane headed for like the Special Olympics, that doesn't check out.

That doesn't make sense. Neither does this flight. Watch. If your bags are checked, please ensure you will tease vacation, any skill in your battery, e-cigarettes, or travel documents in your broad picture. We're avoided by group number and take a moment to the picture of boarding cards. Now, this is obviously fraud. The reason the airlines tolerate this kind of obvious fraud is that if they try to enforce

the rules, they'll get sued into the ground. That's an inevitable result of civil rights law under the regime of disparate impact. If you do anything that has a disproportionate effect on non-white people, then you've broken the law. And we all know that if airlines crack down on these wheelchair fraudsters, they'd be punishing an awful lot of non-white people, and that's just not allowed anymore. American Airlines learned this lesson the hard way a couple of years ago. A flight attendant claimed that eight passengers had a foul odor and had to exit the aircraft,

and that led to this viral video, massive nationwide outrage and a lawsuit that American Airlines ended up settling. Watch. You're the only ones getting taken off the plane. Look at us. You know, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I never even filmed something. This is crazy. Right, yeah, this was wrong.

That was wrong. That was wrong. I'm trying to get home. Yeah, what's the issue? What's going on? This ain't no random pick. What deep odor that you're smelling? This ain't no random cook.

So we don't have a right to be on the plane? Yo, I paid for the flight just like everybody else. So we don't have a right to be on the flight? So they keep saying this ain't random and I paid for my ticket, none of which is relevant or in dispute. No, it's not random. And yes, you paid for your ticket, but that's irrelevant to the question of whether you smell really bad, so bad that you need to be removed from an airplane. So there's two possibilities here. Either the American Airlines flight attendant is a raging white supremacist, and he just fabricated the idea these eight passengers

were emitting a foul odor, which could mean anything from poor hygiene to marijuana use or both. the flight attendant just decided to go full Nazi one day on this one occasion and only on this one occasion. Or in the alternative, maybe these people did smell really bad and maybe they happen to be black also. Now, what you need to understand is that our legal system simply does not allow for that second possibility to be true. It's extremely difficult, if not impossible, to proactively remove passengers before a flight if those passengers are not white. And as a result, whatever airline you fly, you get passengers like this one. Now, to be fair, that's another spirit flight. They keep coming up for reasons that I think everybody is aware of.

Here's another flight that we'll put up on the screen. It's a four-on-one that ends relatively quickly. The bottom line is that whether you're in the terminal or the, the, ticket area or on the plane, you're taking your chances on Spirit. That's especially true now that they're bankrupt, which raises the stakes significantly. In general, it's probably not a good idea to fly a bankrupt airline, regardless of the quality of the passengers. But to be clear, this is not simply a Spirit Airlines problem. You can see obvious signs of decline and cost cutting on any major carrier. Here's the first-class meal that United Airlines recently served its high-paying

passengers, for example. You can see it right there. It was a five-hour flight, and they served the guy a whole tomato and a bunch of cubes of some kind. And probably paid something like $400 extra for this. It's legitimately embarrassing. Unless you fly in an international airline or fly private, there's no amount of money you can spend that will provide anywhere near the airline experience that was available to everybody in the 1960s and 70s. Particularly in cities where the foreign-born population has exploded in the past few decades, cities like Los Angeles, for example. It's also become much harder to simply get to the airport. Watch. L.A. World Airports Commission has approved increasing fees for ride share pickups and drop-offs at L-AX.

Fees for services like Uber, Lyft, taxis, and even limousines are set to go up from the current $4 to $6 each way. Those could start at the end of April. The fee would then increase to $12 once the L-AX people mover starts operating. which is expected later this year. Currently, the fees are absorbed by the service companies. Airport officials hope it stays that way. L-AX has not raised its commercial access fee since 2016. So this takes us into alignment with the market today. It is a fee that is for the commercial provider. So we're hopeful that it's not passed on to drivers or customers. The fee hike is part of an effort to reduce traffic congestion through the arrival and departure areas of the airport.

Now, the fees are going up for the ride share drivers, but don't worry, that won't be passed along to the consumers, which, if true, would be quite remarkable. I mean, it'd be the first time in the history of economics that a company decided not to pass on regulatory fees to the consumer. Of course, it's not true. So at this point, when you go to the airport, the best case in an area you can hope for is that you won't witness a violent assault. And that's becoming more and more difficult to avoid, by the way. This is from Frontier Airlines just last summer. Watch. fight that broke out midair on a frontier airlines plane was headed to miami new jersey man was arrested charged after attacking another passenger victor kenneth was at miami international airport with the story

good morning victor good morning george that frontier airlines flight headed here to miami from philadelphia according to the police report the victim says that he was sitting in his seat when that other passenger grabbed him by the neck and attacked him this morning an alarming scene as a fight breaks out on board of Frontier Airlines flight bound from Miami while it was still in the air. The plane was about to land when according to police records, 21-year-old Ashan Sharma

was returning to his seat when he allegedly grabbed another passenger by the neck. The two, trading blows, passengers trapped, witnessing the chaos. The man sitting behind was making comments to the man in front, like negative comments, the whole flight. And the man in front went to the bathroom

and when he came back, that's when things started to escalate. Western Airlines will see violence and decay like this, and they'll conclude that their problem is white people. That's not an exaggeration. That's what they truly believe. This was the scene at Gatwick Airport during a recent Black History Month, for example. They celebrate over the PA system

that no white people will be flying the plane or serving the drinks. Watch. History month. Toee today has an all-black flight crew I know, in Japan, taking a phone call on the bus is considered deeply offensive. You're supposed to get off the bus, and everybody complies with that. That's because Japan is a high trust, homogenous society.

It's the kind of country that doesn't have 30 people pretending to need a wheelchair before every flight. Now, meanwhile, in the United States, civil rights laws make those types of policies illegal. To their credit, United Airlines is going to try anyway. They just enacted a new policy where they kick you off the plane if you're listening to music without headphones. obviously it's sad that this even needs to be a policy. It tells you something about where we are that they even need to clarify this. But it does appear that as of now, United is enforcing the rule. But you have to wonder how long until United gets sued for racial discrimination,

which is going to happen. What if they kick a bunch of black people off a plane for failing to comply with this rule? Now, we all know that's coming because we all know there are racial, disparities in the people who tend to use their phone on speaker or listen to music without headphones. You know, there are racial disparities in that statistic, as we all have observed, and we all know. And so we all know what will happen next. There will be a settlement. United ends its policy, and air travel once again gets worse for everybody. That's the trend we've been on ever since the 1960s. We're a, we are a wealthier nation, but the lowest common denominator is dragging down

everything for everybody, starting with air travel. And if air travel has gotten this bad, then we know trains and buses and light rails and subways are much worse. As Caldwell points out, over the past 60 years, we've lost our ability to go to the moon, we've lost our ability to make supersonic passenger jets at scale, we've lost the high-trust society that we once had, which is why we can't trust the media to tell the truth about Islamic terrorist attacks. It's why we can't trust the TSA to show up to work, why we can't trust passengers not to steal wheelchairs and so on. At the same time, this decline, as stark as it is, can be reversed. The moment consequences

are introduced, the moment TSA officers are fired for pretending to be sick, for example, you will see a dramatic improvement in day-to-day life in this country. It's been the mission of the civil rights movement to avoid these punishments, and they've been very successful at doing so. Before the decline of our country and our transit system gets any worse, And before another Spirit Airlines brawl goes viral, those consequences for everyone, regardless of race, need to make a comeback. Now let's get to our five headlines. Right now, all across America, terrified and confused women are being funneled into abortion clinics and sold a lie. They're told its empowerment, as if destroying a life as some form of freedom.

Truth is, they're not given a choice. They're given an ultimatum wrapped in fear. But there's another way. At pre-born network clinics, women don't walk. into a sales pitch, they walk into compassion. No judgment, no coercion, just truth, love, and the space to finally breathe. They're offered a free ultrasound, and when a mother sees her child for the first time, over 80% of the time, she chooses life, not because someone guilted her, but because she met her baby. This month preborn is on a mission to save 6,800 babies. That happens only if 124 people today and tomorrow on the next day step up and say, I'm in, because $28 can make that moment happen. $140 saves five children.

Every dollar is a declaration that both mother and child are worth fighting for. To give just dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby or visit preborn.com slash walsh, that's preborn.com slash walsh to make an impact on generations to come. All right. After Nick Shirley's extremely successful investigation into the infamous leering centers of Minneapolis, some news outlets have now taken an interest in fraud stories. So CBS News has now stepped up to bat with an investigation into hospice fraud. in California. They just published a big article and a video. Here's some of the article. Medicare is federally administered and hospices must be certified for reimbursements, but the state

issues the licenses for hospices to operate. Three years ago, California state auditors sounded the alarm. The Los Angeles County had seen a 1,500 percent increase in hospice companies since 2010, more than six times the national average relative to its elderly population. Auditors estimate that L.A. County Hospices overbilled Medicare by $105 million in a single year. The report called out notable red flags, key warning signs of fraud. The state says it proceeded to investigate and revoke the licenses of 280 hospices. But since then, the problem has continued to fester. CBS News examined the business and financial records of every hospice currently operating in L.A. County.

Indications of fraud have not stopped. In fact, they've grown. CBS News analysis revealed that over 700 of the roughly 1,800 hospitals in LA County trigger multiple red flags for fraud as defined by the state. So that's the fraud that appears to be having. As to how these frauds work, you know, as to how these people pull off of, how do you defraud, commit a fraud like this if you're a hospice center or a fake hospice center? well, a CBS News journalist doing some actual journalism explains how that works here.

Watch. The government thinks this woman is dying in hospice care, but she just humiliated me, schooled me on the pickleball court. She's definitely not dying. She is a victim, though, of hospice fraud. So hospice fraud costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, and California is ground zero. So basically people steal Medicare numbers. They enroll them in hospices and then bill for tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars.

A lot of these companies are just fronts. So over 700 of the roughly 1,800 hospices in L.A. County trigger multiple red flags for possible fraud. So we went door to door. And what we found was empty office spaces, piled up mail, and not a single health care worker in sight. There's even a stretch in LA with 500 registered hospice companies within just three miles of each other. In fact, there's even a single building with 89 registered hospice companies. We wanted to get some answers. Okay, so my name is Adam Yamaguchi and I'm with CBS News.

And we're doing a story about hospice. And we're just trying to understand how and why there's so many hospice agencies and like a small cluster in L.A. County. Would love to speak with you. I'm sorry? You have no comment? Okay. All right. Medicare hospice fraud can happen in a few different ways.

Shell companies can buy stolen Medicare numbers on the dark web and then bill the government for services that they don't ever actually provide. Sometimes recruiters will go out into the community and look for seniors and say, hey, we can offer you a bunch of free... groceries, housekeeping, re-depends. Just give me your Medicare number, and I'll see what you're eligible for. And then, boom, they're off and running. They can charge tens of thousands of dollars, and in some cases,

hundreds of thousands of dollars on that one Medicare number. Okay, so interesting, important investigation. I don't mean to nitpick, but I don't really understand why a CBS News investigation piece is being presented in a selfie video from a guy in a T-shirt. who's like sweating from having just played pickleball and he's dropping cuss words that have to be bleeped out. It's not the point. I just hate the, it kind of dovetails

what we were just talking about. The decline in professional standards, just like there's no professionalism anymore. Presenting this intentionally to be less professional. This is like a stylistic choice. We're going to make this intentionally a lot less professional looking because, you know, that's what the kids are into these days. And I just really hate it.

I mean, put on a suit and put on a tie. and be a journalist, be a news anchor, tell us the information. Anyway, that's not the point. The point is the amount of fraud that's clearly going on, and we're only looking at the tip of the iceberg. The fraud's all over the place. We know about Minneapolis. And what's happening in Minneapolis, as we've talked about,

is a nationwide problem also. As Katie Miller just tweeted, it's not just Somali daycares, direct Medicaid payments to autism therapy providers nationwide surge from 660 million in 2019 to 2.2 billion in 2023. There is mass unprecedented fraud taking place across our country, which is true. Conservative estimates would say that the amount of Medicare and Medicaid fraud alone every year is like $70 or $80 billion nationwide. That's not including insurance fraud outside of those programs. If you look at everything together,

you're looking at, you know, at least $100 billion, at least annually in fraud, but probably much more than that, because obviously that's the thing about fraud. There's no way to know exactly how much of it is happening because it's fraud. So, but we do know that we're paying hundreds of billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars is being stolen through fraud. We do know that. And the problem is that there still isn't any serious nationwide effort to crack down on this. I mean, not with any real urgency or severity. There's an independent journalist, I think he's independent, named Christian Hartsock, who just published on the same day or the same week, just published his own investigation into hospice fraud in California. And let's see that here.

Printed sign closed for lunch, we will return shortly. It seems to be a pretty permanent looking. It's not just a sticky note. It does not seem like a temporary tag you just put on a door to say out to lunch. It says out to lunch. Okay. Well, I take it that they are still out to lunch. Maybe they're all out to lunch together. Great life hospice. Okay. Hmm. Is it a whole lunch outing amongst healthcare competitors? Hi. No, this is not hospice. Okay, well, what kind of health do you provide here? I'm sorry, you can come. But it says nine to five.

Hello? It's open. So let's go on. I'm doctor. I'm commenting this for my grandma because I'm trying to enroll her in health care. Oh, I'm not soliciting. I'm trying, I'm... So convenient. Every possible health care need you could possibly need all in one building on one floor. Hi, could you help me with something? I'm trying so hard to get her some health care and no one will talk to me in this building. And one of the buildings was an auto body repair shop.

Now, I'd never seen an auto body repair shop on the second floor of an office building. So I decided to knock on the door and see what they thought of the dozens of hospice offices surrounding theirs. But when I started asking the guy questions, it escalated pretty quickly. Why are you taking picture? Why are you asking some questions? Because I'm curious what's going on. There's so many health care offices here in hospice offices. Did you see any health care offices?

Yes. Yeah, I see dozens. Have I done anything? No, no, no. Hold on. Here we are. I don't know who you are. So you're calling the police?

Yeah. So I... Okay, so he calls the cops. And, you know, we don't know if the people in these videos are guilty of fraud or not. But this guy was looking into the same thing as the CBS reporter. And, yeah, the one thing about hospice is that you could have a hospice, in many cases, it's in-home hospice care. And so in a vacuum, in and of itself, there's nothing. unusual necessarily, I would think, about having a hospice office and an office building and then

the care providers go into the home if it's an in-home hospice care situation. But to have all of these, to have this sudden explosion of hospice care in this one area and to have buildings where you've got dozens of hospice offices and then you go and try to talk to them and they're all out to lunch at the same time. So we all get an idea of what's going on here. And the other thing you notice in that video, and look, I hate to be that guy. I hate that I have to be the one to bring this up. I don't really hate it. I don't care. But with one exception, it appears that all the people in the video that we just played are foreigners. And if you go and you just Google for cases of hospice fraud in California, and actual arrests have been made, not many, but they've, you know,

they've done some symbolic arrests over the last couple of years, so they can pretend that they're, that they're, you know, actually doing something about this problem. But if you go, as I did, you just like Google for press releases and click on the first couple you see, you see stuff like this. So this is the DOJ press release. This is last year. Four California residents were sentenced to prison for their roles into frauding Medicare for nearly $16 million through sham hospice companies and laundering the fraudulent proceeds. Yesterday, Juan Carlos Esparza, a valley village, was sentenced to 57 months in prison.

Susanna Harut Yunion. of Winnettka was sentenced to 15 months. Carpus Srapian of Winnat Winnetka was sentenced 57 months. Myron Panassian was sentenced to 57 months. And then Petros Fikizian of Granada Hills was sentenced to 12 years in prison. So those are the people that were arrested. Just good old-fashioned American names. Good old-fashioned, you know, good old-fashioned.

You got your Bob Smith, your Mike, whatever, John. and then you've got Juan Carlos Asparza. And then California Attorney General last month put out this press release. On January 30, 2026, the filed felony charges in Monterey County against Nimfa Molina, Luis Artivaya, Mark Samante, Shomir Banerjee, Danny Ludovico, Floor Mara, and Christine Nugudyodiem. Might be a couple of Americans in there. I don't know. But the point is, the second that I heard this story and just randomly Google the names of some

recent arrest, I expected that it would just be a bunch of foreign names. And what do you know? What do you know? It seems that's the case. And that's the part of this story that the corporate media is not going to acknowledge or investigate. Fraud is really bad in this country. It's obviously getting worse.

And it's getting worse in large part, not exclusively, but in large part because we're importing people from all over the world, especially the third world. And it's not that Americans don't commit fraud. Of course, Americans are capable of committing fraud. They're capable of committing any crime that anyone else commits. But we're bringing in people from parts of the world where fraud is a way of life. Fraud is part of the culture. And that's the case anywhere in the third world. This is the way it works in any third world country, anywhere on the globe. People will try to rip you off and steal from you just as kind of a matter of course. You know, a other than you, a lot of the never forget being in Kenya driving driving out to the bush to visit the messai tribe and first of all

on the way out of town we were warned to keep your windows up as you're driving because the security team was very clear keep your windows up because if you have the windows down you're going to have mobs of people will just casually come in and they'll reach it and try to steal whatever they can get your phone whatever they can and and then we stop at a little roadside shop where they sell souvenirs and trinkets and stuff like that and you have to haggle with these guys who will look you dead in the eye and try to rip you off to an absurd degree. I mean, like, you want to buy a mug and they want you to pay 90 American dollars for it. Right? You want to get a mug and a souvenir lighter and they're like, that's $157.

Just insane stuff like that. And this happens everywhere. It's how everybody operates everywhere in the third world. It's just the way it goes. It's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, a way of life. Thief and stealing and fraud is a way of life. Which, by the way, it's easy to conclude, well, they're behaving that way because they're in the third world and they're poor, but it's more accurate to say that they're in the third world and they're poor because they behave that way. That's the chicken and egg situation. They have a low trust culture. They have a culture of theft and fraud, and it means that they will never advance. They'll never prosper. And then we import them here and what do you end up with? You end up with fraud on a massive scale.

My show is proud to be supported by Grand Canyon University, an affordable, private, non-profit Christian university based in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona. At GCU, academically rigorous, industry-driven programs are built to provide you with practical skills and career readiness. They believe education shouldn't be a privilege but an affordable path forward. And because of this, GCU has kept tuition at the same rate on a traditional campus for the past 17 years and will continue into the 2627 academic year. Plus, they awarded over $404 million in institutional GCU scholarships last year to support and encourage education. Grounded in Christian truth, GCU works to empower the next generation to lead with integrity, serve with purpose, and help transform their communities. So take action and find your purpose at GCU.

Visit gCU.edu to learn more. All right, here's a funny headline. This is from Futurism. It says Elon Musk boasts that Grok says America isn't built on stolen land, which it obviously is. The article says, according to Elon Musk, XAI's Grock chatbot has a new bona fide, blatantly lying about the history of America. On Wednesday, the centi billionaire culture warrior boasted that the 420 version of his AI is officially based. Why? Because it won't equivocate when it's asked if the U.S. is built in

stolen land. Instead, it gives an emphatic no as its answer, while other weak-sauce models, in Musk's words, at least, give a more nuanced response. Grock says in a screenshoted conversation shared by its greater, no, the United States is not simply on stolen land. That framing is a modern rhetorical slogan that oversimplifies thousands of years of human history, layered claims to territory, legal doctrines, treaties, warfare, migration, and demographic collapse. The article continues. The reality, of course, is that it's hard to argue that the ruthless killing enslavement and displacement of Native Americans by European settlers doesn't amount to their land being stolen.

This pattern of behavior continued well after the colonies graduated into a full-blown nation. The Trail of Tears, Wounded Knee, plus countless other massacres, not to mention centuries, of brutal residential schools. However complicated it may be, the answer to whether the U.S. was built and stolen can't be boiled down to a simple no. So it's hard to argue futurism says that America wasn't built and stolen. And actually, it's not hard to argue at all. It's very easy to argue. It's very easy to argue that it wasn't built on stone land because it wasn't. And we argue that point precisely in my new special

on the real history of the American Indian. It's available right now on Daily Wire. You can go watch it. You need to subscribe to see it. And we go into great detail addressing all of the common myths and misperceptions about the American Indians and how exactly their land became our land. you know, you've been lying to so much. Lies, myths, exaggerations, Trail of tears, smallpox, blankets, all of that.

All of that is either made up or exaggerated or misrepresented or taken out of context. What you'll actually learn if you watch our special, which I would highly recommend you do, is that actually America treated the Indians for the most part

in a very decent and merciful way. Now, there were exceptions. Atrocities were committed on both sides. But for the most part, the overall overarching story that you're not going to learn in the media, you're not going to learn in school these days. But the overall story of the American Indian is that they were treated certainly with much more mercy than they would have ever treated anyone that they conquered.

And, I mean, think about the Indian reservations. Like, seeing Indians, like, sending Indians to reservations is now seen as some great moral crime. Right. But let me ask you this. When the Indians came and took your land, which they did all the time, they did it to each other, they did it to the white man. Do you think they were going to shepherd you over to a reservation somewhere? I mean, everyone talks about the Trail of Tears, and there are so many lies about the Trail of Tears. Were the Indians going to do that?

Were they going to say, hey, you know what, we set up another place for you? Yeah, we are going to, we're taking this. We're conquering it, but we're going to, we set up a whole other place and we're going to get you over there. Would they ever do that? Of course not. They would just kill you. That's it. Like, there's no reservation.

You're just going to kill everybody. They come in, they take your land. They kill everybody. That's just the way it was. They kill you, maybe torture you. They maybe kidnap your children, kidnap your wife. Maybe kill them too. But like, that's what it's going to be.

We're taking your land. We're going to kill everybody and or torture or enslave them. And that's just all it is. Do you think there was any conversation? at all among the Indians about the need to treat those they conquer more gently. You think there was any debate about it among any Indian tribe in the entire hemisphere over the course of thousands of years? No. It wasn't even discussed. It didn't even occur to them. In fact, when you understand the real history of civilization and what sort of barbarism used to be

commonplace and who clung on to those barbaric practices the longest, you start to be, again, very impressed by the comparative lack of brutality among Europeans and later Americans. I mean, there were debates in Spain in the 1500s about the Indians in the Americas and whether they were fully rational humans who should have human rights. There was a famous debate, I think, in 1550 in Spain. And now you could say, if you're a moron, oh, well, it shouldn't have been up for debate. of course the Indians were humans. Well, that's easy to say now, but the fact is that

500 years ago, the Spanish were way, way, way ahead of their time by even discussing something like that. I mean, the fact that there was actually an argument about this, yes, there were some Spanish who said, yeah, they're not fully human, we can enslave them. And in that way, the Spanish were just like every other group of people on the entire planet, everywhere you went, because that was That was the general view across the entire globe was that the outsiders are not like us.

We're people. They're not. And we can take their stuff and kill them. And that's the way it is. That was the generally accepted view across the entire world for thousands of years. And certainly in the 1500s, that was the case. In Spain, they were having a debate about it. And do you think the Indian tribes were debating whether outsiders were rational humans with human rights?

the concept of human rights didn't exist to the Indians. The concept didn't exist. It was not a thing. It didn't come up. Among Indian tribes, there was nothing even analogous to what we consider human rights conceptually. They didn't have the concept. And this also would have been true if you went to Africa or Asia, anywhere outside the Western world, basically. So, and that's outside of Europe in the 1500s, nobody was discussing this.

There was no debate about it. Nobody was advocating for anything like universal human rights. That was only Europeans doing that. And that's the real story, which we get into in our real history special. And speaking of which here's a clip, watch. Rather than committing genocide against the Indians, the U.S. federal government and the taxpayers who supported it did something radically different. It offered them land.

This must have been shocking to a Comanche or Sue chief. When they won wars, as we've repeatedly demonstrated, they tortured and executed the losers. Villages were pillaged and burned. The women were enslaved, and depending on the tribe, raped, enemy warriors were eaten. But when the U.S. finally won the Indian Wars, the treatment was quite different. The command sheet, which was one of the last tribes to go to the reservation, ended up with millions of acres of prime cattle land. So that's just a clip articulating some of the points I was just. making and but the entire episode is worth watching, which you could do if you go to dailywire.com

right now. Life insurance shouldn't be on the back burner. It should be a top priority. Cross it off the list with our sponsor, PolicyGenius. PolicyGenius is an online marketplace, not an insurance company, so you can compare quotes from top investors side by side and actually see what you're getting without pressure from a salesman. Their license team works for you, answers your questions, handles the paperwork, and helps

you lock in the right policy for your family and your budget. Protect the life that you have built. With PolicyGenius, you can see if you can find 20-year life insurance policy starting at just $276 a year for a million dollars in coverage. Head to policygenus.com slash Walsh to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you can save. That's policygenious.com slash Walsh. All right, post-millennial reports that Democrats Minnesota state lawmaker has called for a study to see if there's a benefit of shoplifting and retail theft. He was discussing the topic in a committee meeting on Thursday. Democratic State Representative Dave Pinto posed this question.

And I think we have the clip. Let's watch it. Several of us on the Public Safety Committee, and yesterday there was a presentation of a group seeking to change how we address organized retail theft. And it actually had not occurred to me to ask. It probably would have been good to make sure that they would study sort of the benefit of shoplifting and of retail theft. Because perhaps people are relying on that and sort of using that. Maybe it's, you know, assisting them in some way. I mean, these folks were describing people violating the law, but I suppose it could be useful to look into that. But ultimately, it's a policy question, right? We do want to make sure when we have a law in place, we're enforcing it.

This is obviously crazy, but it brings up an important point, which is that no shoplifters are not relying on shoplifting. Even if they were, it would matter. It's still illegal. It's against the law. It's a crime. But these are not impoverished people who are shoplifting and stealing in order to survive. That doesn't exist in America, like at all. Okay, it doesn't exist in America. Plenty of people are stealing shoplifting and plenty of people are poor by our standards today.

But there is nobody who is stealing shoplifting in order to survive. Like, they have to do it because they're only way to survive. That does not exist in this country. You know, a crime of necessity like that does not exist in this country. It hasn't existed in like 100 years. It's just not a thing. And so why do people shoplift? Well, they do it just for the sake of it.

They do it because they think they can get away with it. And this is what drives criminal behavior in our country in the modern age. Not desperation, not necessity, but indifference. Indifference to the law, just the kind of, like we've been talking about importing people from other parts of the world in particular who this is just what they do. If I were to go up to the guy in Kenya who's trying to rip me off for the mug and say like, why are you trying to rip me off? Why are you doing this? what's your reason? I don't think he would say, well, I'm desperate and I'm starving and I need it.

He wouldn't give that answer. There wouldn't be an answer. It's just like, well, why wouldn't I? It's like the question is so self-evident that there's no answer. Why wouldn't I try to rip you off? Of course I'm going to do that. And so there's a lot of that happening in this country now. It's just kind of an indifference.

It's a instinct to... commit crime if you can get away with it. Why is there so much violence in the inner city? Why do they kill and steal and everything else? Is it desperation? Is it necessity? No, it's just because You know, we talk about this all the time with the homeless population. You give them money. They spend it on drugs. You give them a place to stay. They trash it. You try to help them. They reject it. This is what drives the chaos and crime. It's just a kind of indifference, a savagery. I think I mentioned before that my car was stolen in downtown Nashville a few years ago and it was found the next morning smashed into a lamp post. Like, they didn't even try to take it and sell it. They didn't try to sell it for parts or anything like that. They just rode it around, smoke, smoke pot. That was quite evident.

And then they drove it into a lamp post and fled the scene. And that was it. Steal a car, drive it around, crash it, leave. That's it. And you see all these stories we talk about, stories of, you know, a guy with 50 arrests who finally goes and stab somebody to death, light somebody on fire, whatever.

Why are they doing that? How do you get 50 arrests? How do you get a rap sheet that long? How does it even happen? It's not desperation. It's not necessity. It's not for any benefit at all. It's not even like greed, really.

It's just total indifference. It's, I don't know, it's barbarism. I don't know what else to call it. You know, the problem is that normal law-abiding, functional humans look at the crime problem and they try to understand it from their perspective as a normal functioning person. Like we as normal functioning people, we know that we only do things if we think there's some positive reason to do them. Now, we might do the wrong thing sometimes, but if we do the wrong thing, it's because we have rationally decided that there's a benefit in doing

the wrong thing. And so we're going to do the wrong thing. But there's always there's always a, there's always a reason behind anything we do. We can articulate what that. reason is. It might not be a great reason. It might not be a morally justified reason in some cases, but we can articulate what the reason is. And the reason is always going to be, well, we think we will benefit in some way from this, or somebody we love will benefit. And so we think about somebody stealing, and we think to ourselves, okay, well, if they're stealing, it must be because they're hoping to gain something. They must need something. And they're taking what they need, because that's the only thing that could ever convince us as rational, normal functioning people to steal.

So I'm looking at that and say, well, the only thing could ever drive me to do that is if I really, like, if I just, it's like, well, I could maybe see myself doing that if I was starving if I had no other choice. And so then a lot of people who are normal functioning people, but are also naive, they'll look at that and they'll project their own kind of rational thought process on to, this person over here who's not really engaged in rational thought. And so that's what you end up with. Like that is, and it makes it a lot harder to deal with. When you realize that if you've got rampant crime in the inner city, when you've got the kind of crime that, as we've talked about, makes it so that you can't use public transportation,

you can't go on the subway, why is that crime being committed? There is no rational reason. It's just because that's what they want to do. That's it. And so what that means is like it's not, well, it's a socioeconomic thing only. And so we can, these are people that need things. And if we give them what they need, then they'll stop killing us and stealing from us. Nope.

Actually, no. But it doesn't matter. The guy with 50 arrests who's out on the subway platform looking for someone to push in front of a train, you could give them $10 million. You could give them $50 million. You could say, here you go. your life is go go buy a mansion and have everything you want and everything you could ever want in your life here's 50 million dollars he'd be out on the subway platform tomorrow doing the exact same thing

and that's just the reality of it okay kind of a sad story to end with today unfortunately it's been a bit of a downer but it's been reported that mcgan markle's deal with netflix has been canceled She will no longer be producing content for Netflix. So I'm going to have to find something else to do with my time. I don't know what I'm going to have. Previously I've been very much preoccupied with Megan Markle content. I know we all have. And so I don't know what I'm going to do.

I've been binging the hell out of Megan Markle Netflix content. And so I don't know. We all got to find something else to do with our time. Daily Mail reports, Netflix was not happy with Megan Markle. Megamarkle's As Ever brand before they're split. The Duchess of Sussex's jam and flour Sprinkles business just didn't fit, and their customers showed no appetite for it.

Netflix source told the Daily Mail that there has been some consternation over claims Megan felt they had been too cautious with her as ever brand. And anyway, who cares? So the partnership with her lifestyle brand is over. Her Netflix show is over. I guess she had some movies.

potentially some movie deals with Netflix, that's not going forward. And this is after her Spotify deal ended last year or whenever that was. Spotify gave her like $20 million for a podcast and nobody listened to it and they canceled it. So that's over. That's just a partial list of her failures. Her Netflix show, which is now canceled, was never even ranked in the top 300 on the platform. There was an animated show she was supposed to do that was canceled. She had a children's book that tanked.

She has a media company that has signed. all these big million-dollar deals, but then produced almost nothing, and all those deals have been canceled. So it's just an extraordinary list of failures. It really is. And I take no pleasure in it. I mean, I take a little pleasure in it, but I don't really care that much one way or another. I just look at it from the outside as this kind of fascinating case study. It's a modern tragedy in some ways. You know, Megan Markle is this tragic modern figure, the archetypal, shallow millennial woman, she walked away from being actual royalty. She walked away from being royalty because that felt too stodgy and too old-fashioned for her and didn't let her express herself enough or whatever.

And she traded that in for being an influencer. And as I've said about young members of Congress in particular, what is it that motivates many of them? It's not actually a lust for power. That's the old way of looking at these people. For many of it, for many of it. For many of it, them it's actually they want nothing more than to be influencers. Like that's their great ambition in life. If they could trade in their political position for a top 10 podcast and you know 10 million Instagram followers, they would do it in a heartbeat because that's what they actually want. And so it's the same thing here. She didn't want prestige or power or actual influence. She just wanted to be an influencer. She wanted to be famous and get a lot of likes on social media, wanted to express herself.

Turns out she has nothing to express. She said, I can't be royalty. I can't express myself. And so then all these media companies lined up and said, all right, here's millions of dollars. Go express yourself. We can't wait to hear it. Here it is. Here's a huge, here's multiple huge platforms.

Go ahead. Here you go. Stage is yours, Megan. Let's hear what you got. And she just stood up on the stage and said, um, hmm. She had nothing to say. So she trades in the royal life for something.

far less prestigious and fails to achieve even the less prestigious thing. And now what is she? She's a failed podcaster. She's basically an unemployed Instagram model instead of royalty. It's amazing. So that's the great irony of all this, is that what we're learning is that Megan Markle is this intensely uninteresting person, probably the least interesting person who's ever lived. And yet, through that, her story has become kind of interesting because of that.

Like, in spite of her, the story is in some ways interesting. But still not that interesting. So we'll just stop talking about it. And that will do it for the show today. And this week, actually, I'll be off tomorrow, but it'll be back on Monday. So have a great weekend. Talk to you on Monday. Godspeed. What do Snow White, Cinderella, and Smallpox blankets have in common? They're all fairy tales. For decades, you've been told that you live on stolen land. We are right now on stolen land.

That the Indians were peaceful. Native Americans, we massacred them. Your ancestors committed genocide. And guess what? None of it is true. The Native Americans were some of the most savage fighters ever known to man, raiding, scalping, torturing, even eating enemies.

It was better to lose a battle to the US Army than they get wiped out by a rival tribe. And why did the story completely change in the 1960s? It turns out there's a lot more to the American Indians than Hollywood directors and school teachers want you to know. This month, we blow up the biggest myths about the American Indians and reclaim the real history that was stolen from us. This is the real history of the American Indian.

Ryan Reynolds here from MintMobil. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistants assistants to switch you to MintMobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch.

Up front payment of $45 for three-month plan, equivalent to $15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. Seeful terms at mintmobile.com.