The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1803 - New York Has Been Taken By The Communists. Your Town Might Be Next.

Episode Date: June 25, 2026

New York has fallen to the new communist revolution. There is a lesson to be learned from this, which we will discuss today. Ep. 1803 - - - Today's Sponsors: Mount Titano Media - Go to MountTitanoMedia.com to get your copy of Finding Our Words: Words That Made America Leaf Home - Schedule your free inspection at leaffilter.com/WALSH - - - Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://dwplus.watch/MattWalshMemberExclusive - - - DailyWire+: Become a Daily Wire Member and watch all of our content ad-free: https://dwplus.watch/RealHistorySubscribe 📲 Download the free Daily Wire app today on iPhone, Android, Roku, Apple TV, Samsung, and more. 📜 Real History with Matt Walsh is available ad-free, exclusively on DailyWire+ https://dwplus.watch/RealHistory 👕 Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://dwplus.shop/MattWalshMerch - - - Socials:  YouTube — https://youtube.com/@mattwalsh Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/mattwalshblog Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/mattwalshblog TikTok — https://www.tiktok.com/@mattwalsh_ X — https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,

free of charge. BetMGEMGEM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming, Ontario. This might seem like a deep cut, like some esoteric trivia that no one would ever need to know, but it's one of the most important historical facts that you never learn in school. The Bolsheviks never won more than 30% of the vote in Russia in any election. They were never close to obtaining the support of a majority of the population. In fact, they were widely detested. As it turns out, Russians did not want to empty their bank accounts at gunpoint and transfer all their money.

to the government. They didn't want the government to seize private property and arrest the clergy. They didn't want the government to take the grain from the peasants causing mass starvation. But all of that happened anyway. Why did it happen? Well, because the Bolsheviks were extremely dedicated to their mission. They were well organized. They were willing to wage war to advance their ideology, while the traditionalists, the supporters of the Tsar and the empire were not. The traditionalists were growing wary of World War I. They were skeptical. of the Tsar who was spending too much time they thought with an Epstein-like figure named Rasputin. They weren't energized or cohesive, so the Bolsheviks won by default.

They abolished the legislature and ruled for more than seven decades. They murdered tens of millions of people and brought economic ruin to the entire country, and they did it all with less than 30 percent support. Now, none of my teachers ever taught me this, and I'm willing to bet that yours didn't either. You'll learn a lot about the Nazis from your high school history teacher, but virtually nothing about the Soviets. And that's a big problem, one that we're going to address actually in the next episode of real history, which focuses on the Bolsheviks rise to power and the many atrocities they committed. This is a lesson that could not be more urgent, especially now that socialists have taken over the Democrat Party. As you're probably seen, socialists just want a clean sweep in the New York congressional primaries, which guarantees that we'll have several more of these people.

in Congress next year. And to be clear, the majority of Americans do not support this. They don't support socialism. The majority of Democrat voters, in fact, don't support socialism. But the socialist will win anyway, just as they did in Russia if Americans remain passive. If everybody just assumes that someone else will take care of the problem, unless we treat these communists as a direct threat to the lives of every American, which they are, unless you're not. we fight them with the same fervor and commitment they have, they will overpower us. They will do to every conservative precisely what they did to Charlie Kirk and Brian Thompson. They will exterminate their political enemies, just as the Bolsheviks did.

And then they will plunder the country until there's nothing left. The turnout in the primary elections this week in New York was less than 15%. That's 1.5. That was it. 15%. In the primary for New York's 13th congressional district, which has a population of 750,000, only 66,000 votes were cast in total. And of those 66,000 votes, only 33,000 went to Dorealiza Avila Chevalier, whatever her name is, the Mamdani-backed socialist whose platform explicitly is to destroy Western civilization. And by the way, that's not hyperbole. I'm not just editorializing. It's literally pulled from the Instagram of the student group that she founded called Columbia University Apartite and Divest.

We'll pull that up on the screen. It says, quote, we are Westerners fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization. Our intifada is an internationalist one. As the fascism ingrained in the American consciousness becomes ever more explicit and irrefutable, we seek community and instruction. from militants in the global south. Well, gone are the days when New York's leaders would seek the guidance of men like George Kelling and James Wilson, the academics who pioneered the broken windows approach to law enforcement.

Today, New York's leaders are soliciting lessons from warlords in Africa and Latin America and other renowned experts in killing white people. This is now the dominant controlling ideology of the Democrat Party. If you vote for Democrats for any reason in any context, you are supporting a communist takeover of the United States. Already party elites are capitulating to these Bolsheviks, hoping it might buy them a few more years in office. The leaders of the Democrat Party have already ceded power to the communists. In response to a former DNC chair who said these candidates are terrible for the party, here's what Chris Murphy, as a very powerful, prominent senator from Connecticut, wrote on social media.

Quote, I don't know, man, who is the Democratic Party? If not, it's the voters. Democratic voters choose candidates, not party leaders, and party leaders need to listen to what voters are telling us. And right now they are demanding our party be bolder. The voters choose the candidates. I wonder if he said he say that about Kamala Harris. Did he say that when Kamala Harris was installed without any votes at all? as the nominee. Did he say that then? Something tells me he didn't. So there it is. This is capitulation. These communists are not demanding that Democrats be bolder. They're demanding the end of capitalism and Western civilization itself. There's a very big difference there.

And Chris Murphy knows that. But he's too cowardly to stand up and risk his political career, or perhaps his life, given how insane these people are, in order to be a very big difference. to defend the United States from these communists. And this is exactly how trans ideology took hold as well. Every sane person understands that men can't transform into women and that boys can't transform into girls. But trans activists were so aggressive and so violent that they successfully browbeat the entire party into submission to the point that Democrats' presidential nominee in the last election appeared on camera in front of a national audience to declare that she supported taxpayer-funded sex changes for illegal immigrants in prison,

a proposal so demented that it seems like it was designed in a lab to be the single most indefensible policy position of all time, but Democrats and a lot of so-called moderates who were terrified of being called transphobic went along with that fraud at the highest levels. And all this is playing out again.

Now, if you're tempted to think that I'm overstating the case here and that the rise of communism is confined to the coasts, Take a look at this footage out of Idaho from a few weeks ago. The Party for Socialism and Liberation organized a school walkout over ICE, and hundreds of furious children showed up demanding an end to immigration enforcement, period, in the United States. Again, this is not New York. This is not California. This is Idaho.

Watch. We want justice. We want peace. We want ICE off our state. streets. We want justice. We want peace. We want justice. We want peace. We want ice off our streets. Now, ten years ago, when you compare it, the communist preferred method of childhood indoctrination involved climate change or global warming. As they used to call it, they screen the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth in many public schools. They trotted out an android by the name of Greta Thunberg to inform the UN that will all be dead in 10 years unless the government takes over the economy and shuts down all the factories and all the cow farts. That was AOC's actual platform when she first took office, by the way.

Let's not forget she wanted to reduce cow flage lins on the theory that farts release methane into the atmosphere, which traps heat and will kill all of us. They wanted the president to declare a climate emergency. Now, none of this fear-mongering worked, mainly because none of the predictions ever came true. None of them did. For the past 60 years, these people have been predicting catastrophe. First, it was an imminent ice age, then it was global warming, and then it moved on to climate change. And none of it happened. None of it came close to happening, and people grew tired of it.

During George W. Bush's first term, the Guardian wrote a story citing climate experts, predicting that the UK, the entire UK, would be frozen over by 2020. Quote, Britain will be Siberian in less than 20 years. Threat to the world is greater than terrorism. Well, how did that work out? In 2006, NBC published an article stating, quote, a leading U.S. climate researcher says, the world has a 10-year window of opportunity,

take decisive action on global warming, and avert catastrophe. And on and on and on. There were hundreds of predictions like this going back decades, and none of them panned out. it was hard to get even the dumbest, most committed left-wing college student to care about any of this because it was so obviously fake. When Trump called global warming a Chinese hoax that was intended to convince Americans to sabotage their own economy, everybody knew he was right. So the socialists needed another plan. If they weren't going to be able to cite climate change as a pretext to take over the country, they'd have to come up with something else.

and now they have. The socialist new rally and cry primarily relates to the conflict in the Middle East and Jewish influence in the United States more generally. That's their main issue, along with open borders. Everything else, the wealth confiscation, the government-run health care, the free rent is a lot more complicated and obviously insane and unworkable, so it's harder to use as their kind of marquee message. So they're sticking with the more emotionally charged issues. It's a lot easier to get uninformed young. people motivated about an alleged genocide than, say, tax policy, even if the alleged genocide is taking place thousands of miles away and does not affect anybody in this country. Now, this rebranding has worked at the national level. As you can see here, surveys show that Democrats under 50 prefer socialism by an 80 to 13 margin. Overall, the party prefers socialism to capitalism by a 68 to 20 margin. These are numbers that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. Gallup has similar numbers. Watch. Well, among Democrats themselves, the Democratic Socialists of America have a higher net favor than the Democratic Party does, at least those who members of Congress. I mean, just take a look

here. Dems Socialists of America plus 17 points. Democrats in Congress plus four points. No wonder that Dem Socialists are getting nominated across the political map in different primaries, because simply put, They are more popular than the Democrats currently in charge. Okay, I'm just thinking back to when I was sitting here and Zora Mamdani was sitting there when he was running and I asked him about capitalism. Yes. And he had no problem saying that he had real issues with it.

Okay, he wasn't afraid to say it. By the way, he ended up winning. It didn't hurt him. How do Democrats today view socialism compared to capitalism? There's a reason why it didn't hurt him. And that is simply because this is one of the biggest political changes I've seen during my lifetime. Match up socialism, capitalism.

Among Democrats, you go back 16 years ago, 2010, capitalism and socialism right there, favorable rating, 51% 50%. Look at it now. Socialism, clearly in the lead among Democrats, 66% of them view socialism favorably. Just 42% view capitalism favorably. No wonder, Mom Donnie had no problem blasting it. In response to these polls, a lot of people will say, well, the system has failed. Affording a home has become a challenge. Getting a job has become much more difficult. And all of those trends are real. We've talked about them on. the show before. We talked about them this week. And that's not to say that we're doing poorly, though, relative to other countries. Our quality of life is much higher than Canada's or Mexico's or the UK's. Our economy has been growing consistently for a long time, while their economies have stagnated. The average American today enjoys luxuries that would have been hard to comprehend

not that long ago. Everybody has a supercomputer in their pocket, just as one example. At the same time, obviously, we could be doing better. And we talk about that all the time on this show. That's definitely true. But let's be very clear about this. If your solution to our problems is to embrace socialism, then you are historically illiterate, unintelligent, and therefore dangerous. If you want government bureaucrats to run the economy, just like they run the DMV, then you are so ignorant and stupid, if not simply evil, that you are a threat to everybody around you. You should be deported immediately. I don't care where you were born. You don't belong here. Now, even if you buy the idea that things were vastly better 30 or 40 years ago, even though in many ways they weren't, you still don't come anywhere close to justifying socialism. After all, we didn't have socialism 30 or 40 years ago, if that's when you're saying everything was better. The only countries that have tried socialism have inflicted unimaginable suffering on millions of people for the obvious reason that free markets are a much better way to distribute resources than retarded government. government bureaucrats who don't have an incentive to do anything correctly and don't know how to do anything correctly even if they wanted to. Nevertheless, on CNN, Democrat strategists are now talking about how to spread socialism across the country. They say it's part of building a big tent party, which is a term that used to mean appealing to moderates. And now in the eyes of the Democrat

party, the tent needs to include people who want to burn the tent down and kill everybody inside it. In fact, the tent needs to include people who want to stab you to death and kill you. As we learned with Carmelo Anthony. Watch. What's next? How do you grow the ideals, particularly behind the democratic socialism, beyond New York City and other deep blue cities? I mean, we've seen it here in D.C. and in Seattle. But how do you get beyond that?

I mean, to me, this is less about any specific label and more about a fundamental question of who is our government going to work for and does it work? And I think right now the answer is our government does not work. And our government works for the wealthy and the well-connected, for lobbyists, for those with the money to buy power. And it doesn't work for anyone else. And we need to change that. And New York City and New York City, DSA had an incredible night last night, slates of candidates across the city winning. There are a lot of other places where you're seeing similar things.

But I think it's not restricted to anyone label. And we talk a lot about the party being a big tent party and we should be. I think the question is, what is that tent going to be? and can't be united around the affordability crisis and taking on corruption. Again, we have a very weak, passive man. He's probably not a communist himself. Seems reasonably intelligent. But he understands that these communists are vicious.

They'll shoot a father in the neck in front of millions of people because he disagreed with them. If you stand up to these demons, they might do the same thing to you. So it's best to just go on CNN, talk about a big ten, and let the communists do whatever they want. That's the official position of the Democrat Party at this point. Here's Roe Kana, one of the most powerful and dishonest Democrats in Congress, reacting to the primaries on Tuesday. Watch. I want to speak to fellow progressives today. Yesterday was the beginning of a new, bold, strong Democratic Party.

Democrats are winning, not just in New York, we're winning across this country in New Jersey, in Michigan, and Maine. The reality is that our platform, of a new deal for our time is resonating. It's a platform that says no to foreign wars, no to genocide, but it's also a platform that says yes, yes to Medicare for all, yes to childcare for all, yes to unions for all, and yes to a tax on billionaires

and trillionaires. It turns out that when you stand up for the working class over the Epstein class, over the billionaire class, the American people respond in huge numbers, but we shouldn't be naive. The oligarchs are going to come after us. Yesterday, Elon Musk spent the morning saying that I should be put in jail or he was going to sue me. Why? Because I stood up to him.

We have a simple message for these oligarchs, channeling FDR, we should say to them, bring it on. Actually, Elon said that he was going to sue Rocana because he spread the malicious lie that Elon had killed millions of children. This is a claim that left-wing Soros-funded academics invented out of thin air based on doge cuts to foreign aid. And Rokana should obviously be sued for making that claim. But more importantly, he is talking about the oligarchs. Rokana is as if he isn't one. He's worth hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks largely to his marriage. He has multiple homes, each worth well over $10 million. He's one of the most prolific insider traders in Congress. By every definition, Ro Khanna is an oligarch,

but he's pretending he's not in order to crusade as some kind of working-class hero. As we'll see in a minute, this is a perfect illustration of the new socialist movement in the Democrat Party. It's driven in large part by wealthy people who get off on portraying themselves as commoners. It's an illness. I mean, these people have no connection to reality. But before we dive into who these people are and how they're voting. We need to talk about the communists that they're installing in Congress right now as we speak. Here is one of their newest stars, the Mamdani-endorced socialist whose name I can't pronounce and don't care to, Chevalier, who I mentioned earlier. Let's check in on her logical reasoning capabilities. Listen. I want to still ask about two

sweets specifically because I think they are relevant to the race. The first is all deportation is wrong. Now, in Congress, obviously, that comes with a lot of questions about immigration enforcement and even as Democrats might agree with calls that you have shared to things like abolish ICE. I don't know if they're necessarily there on things like all deportation is wrong. Is that something you still believe? That phrase, yes. I still believe that all deportations are wrong. Even if we're talking about illegal entry to the country or someone who may have committed a crime? So when we're talking about things like illegal entry, we're actually talking about administrative laws, right? We're now talking about criminal law.

Let me concede the question of people who have not committed a crime because I think that that's not really the question. Like, if we're saying all deportation is wrong, though, that would seem to also include people who were convicted of breaking U.S. criminal law. Is the deportation of those people wrong? Yes. And the reason I say that is because we have a criminal system. It is imperfect. But it exists. And it is one that if we accept as the process by which we want to engage with the,

these issues, right, the issues of harm, issues of criminality, or what have you, then we need to make sure that it is one that isn't also discriminatory on the basis of where people were born, right? To subject someone who has committed a crime to both a criminal system and then additionally to an immigration system that also detains them in the very same facilities that criminal detail, people who are convicted of criminal convictions are also held, right? and then deported and ripped away from everything they know and love, that is also punishment. And that is punishment not on the basis of the crime they committed because they already served their time when they were processed through the criminal system. It is double punishment.

And if we truly believe that double jeopardy is something that is unconstitutional, something that is unethical, something that is against the principles of equality in this country, we cannot subject people to that on the basis of where they were born. Now, I don't think I've seen a worse misunderstanding of the concept of double jeopardy since that very bad 1999 film starring Ashley Judd, where the premise was that she somehow gets to murder the guy again because she was convicted of murder, but he wasn't actually dead. Something like that. It's genuinely jaw-dropping, though, to watch this kind of misunderstanding in real time. No, deporting someone who's arrested for committing a crime is not double jeopardy. That's just called enforcing the law. Okay, it's what happens when you commit two crimes. If you commit two crimes, you get punished for two crimes. That's not double jeopardy. You retard. You get punished for both of them, not just one of them. Okay, the court system doesn't, you commit 10 crimes. The court system doesn't have to just pick one. I committed 10 at once. You can only pick one to charge me with. You can't do all 10. If you're arrested for bank robbery and you happen to be an illegal alien, then you have to serve your time for bank robbery, offense number one. And then you get deported for being in the country. legally, which is offense number two. And yes, under our criminal law, eight U.S. Code Section 1325,

unauthorized entry by a foreign national is indeed a federal crime punishable by imprisonment. It's not an administrative issue. It's a violation of federal criminal law. This is one of those lies that leftists constantly repeat, even though anyone with Google can debunk it. Of course, she doesn't really care about double jeopardy, which is a product of her feverish imagination anyway. She has no idea what she's talking about, and she certainly doesn't care. about the law. All deportation is wrong, she says. The United States can't have borders anymore. We're open to everybody. A totally insane policy that anyway, she would immediately abandon if a high proportion of illegal immigrants were white males, as we all know. And of course, she also believes

that everybody in the United States is entitled to free health care, free housing, universal basic income, free preschool, everything. So how does that work exactly? How do you have a welfare state, the most generous welfare state that's ever existed, along with open borders. Who's going to pay for the tens of millions of people who will walk into the country under this system of government? I mean, did anyone who voted for the 19th Amendment

ever imagined in a million years that we'd have to deal with candidates like this? Now, while we're on the topic of Chevalier, CNN published some of her social media posts, which erase any ambiguity about the fact that she does indeed want to abolish Western civilization. I mean, she's already said so. Here's a few of them.

Quote, a world without borders, just like a world without prisons or police, is possible, necessary, and the only moral way forward. Read one deleted repost from September 2021. During a three-day period in September 2021, Avila Chevalier, also reposted now deleted messages declaring, yes, literally abolished the border and all deportation is wrong. Her Twitter profile biography described her location as occupied

Lenape land and Lenape Hoking, NYC, an acknowledgement to indigenous claims to New York City. During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, Chevroleter reposted a message calling for sweeping government takeover of large parts of the economy. The reposts advocated nationalizing utilities, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies, suspending rent and mortgage payments, dissolving private health insurance companies, and seizing all properties from landlords. Seize the means of production, she wrote in a sense deleted 2019 post, the phrase commonly associated with Marxism. Shevalier rejected an argument that abolishing police meant ending policing only. as we know it. No, it means ending policing full stop, period. No more police at all ever, she replied, adding several clap emojis. In another reposts from 2021, she shared a message

declaring, all pigs everywhere are harem. An Arabic term used in Islam to describe something that's forbidden. Okay, so there's no ambiguity here. She might as well be clinically insane. every single policy position, if we can call it that, that she just outlined is his lunacy, is indefensible, would lead to the immediate destruction of human civilization as we know it. But to this day, no prominent member of the Democrat Party, with the exception of John Fetterman, has said a word about any of this. They're all too afraid, just like the many cowardly opponents of the Bolsheviks. Sheverly, by the way, is currently in her seventh year of a sociology PhD at the

City University of New York. She's getting one of the most useless degrees imaginable outside of journalism. She's never done anything productive in her entire life. And instead of feeling a hint of shame about this, narcissism has taken over. She goes on television to complain about the fact that she can't afford to live in New York, even though she doesn't have any interest in actually getting a job, a real job. Watch. I am someone who has felt deeply abandoned by the establishment politics that far too often see my community as merely a statistic, that far too often only shows up to explain away the circumstances, that the politics that they have voted for time and time again, which have impacted our community in ways that they do not

feel the effects of. And as someone who has had to live with the question of whether I can even afford to stay in the city I love. If you want to afford to live in New York, then you need to earn enough money to live there, period. Instead of spending the better part of a decade getting a useless degree in sociology, you could contribute something to society, but if you can't do that for one reason or another, then you can get on a train or an airplane or a bus or a car, and you can move to someplace more affordable. No one has a right to live in New York City or anywhere else. Now, this entitlement, the absolute gall of these people really needs to be called out much more often. I've seen the expression, you know, it's easy to hate the top 1%,

but do you have the courage to hate the bottom 1%? And although we shouldn't hate anyone, there's some truth of the underlying point being made. I mean, in many cases, the bottom 1% of the country, people like this woman are a net negative. Don't create jobs. I don't even have jobs. In many cases, they leach off other people. They present a laundry list of demands and complain about everyone else is disappointing them and what everyone owes them, a society run by women like this is doomed to fail very quickly. San Francisco, of all places, has recently pulled back from the socialist abyss slightly by recalling their terrorist DA and getting rid of the mayor.

But New York is going full steam ahead on communism, and inevitably, the results will be catastrophic. And arguably, this woman isn't even the worst candidate who won a primary in New York this weekend, if you could believe it. Another candidate, Momdani endorsed a socialist named Claire Valdez is going to represent New York's 7th Congressional District next year. And here's just a couple of her bright ideas. Watch. My hot take is we need to abolish pre-check. I've got like a million beefs with the airline industry and the process of having to fly. We need to like nationalize the airline industry. So she wants to get rid of pre-check and nationalize the entire airline industry, which it needs to be said are two very different objectives in terms of their scope.

It's like listening to a child who's coming up with a Christmas list. I want a Barbie doll and a pony with no regard for the feasibility of any of it or the proportionality of what she's talking about. But as for nationalizing the airline industry, what could possibly go wrong besides everything? This is another area where, as we've discussed before, there are legitimate issues to complain about. a lot of them flying in many ways is a humiliation ritual at the moment, mainly because it's become too easy for degenerates to get on board planes. And I guess people are still passionate about pre-check for some reason. Of course, if the government seizes all of the airplanes, that every single problem with air travel will get infinitely worse overnight. Okay, and that's the common theme

with these communists, even when they're raising problems that are real, housing is too expensive. It's hard to get a job. Living expenses are too high. You know, healthcare is a disaster. Those are all real problems, but we shouldn't listen to them because their solution will make every problem worse in every single way. Because what's causing the problem, the things that are making all these problems that are contributing, they want to, they want to, they want more of that. They want to do the opposite of fixing the problem in every single case. And certainly with airlines, that would be true. I mean, all private investment in American industries would cease immediately, for one thing, if the government takes over the airlines.

The cascading effect on the U.S. economy would plunge us into a depression as everybody, as everyone, you know, pulled their investments out of other industries that this rampaging woman might decide to take over. And for another, it's guarantee the government would immediately begin lighting tax. pair money on fire if they ever took over the airlines. The airline industry is one of the highest volume, lowest margin industries on the planet. Okay, the margins in the airline industry are around 2 to 5 percent, which is nothing compared to, say, the technology industry. The average domestic airfare right now is around $430 compared to $660 back in 1999 adjusting for inflation. So market pressures have driven the cost of airline down, way down. It's easier to get an airline ticket right now that ever before by a lot.

The reason this is profitable, barely, is that the airlines have complicated algorithms that determine which routes to fly along with how to price the tickets. If the government simply deleted all of this, the industry would instantly become a money sink like everything else the government does. And of course, no one involved

would have any incentive to do a good job, so service would somehow get even worse. Not to mention, no one who values their own life would ever buy an airplane ticket from an airline industry being run by the same people who run the DMV. But the longer you listen to this woman, the more obvious it becomes that she doesn't care. She sees her role as punishing white men for the alleged sins of their ancestors,

which is all these people actually care about. That's what it comes down to. They actually just hate white people. And it should be obvious to you by now as well that for them, for these people, when they're talking about Israel versus Palestine, for them, that's all this is about. They just, whoever is the whiter side they hate. That's how they see it.

That's how they see the conflict. That's what all this is about. And if you have any doubt about that, watch. Immigration in a different way. You know, we hear all these, you know, white conservative men talk about who does and does not belong here. And look, this nation was founded on genocide and the mass displacement of people. This is, it's just the history.

And to say that some people cannot belong here, it's like, come on. Like, you know. You can leave first is what you mean. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You can show yourself the door. This is a nation that should be welcoming people here that want to, the people who come here to build better lives. for themselves and their families deserve real dignity, deserve to stay here, and we should be welcoming them.

Well, we're still doing this, I guess. Political discourse in the Democrat Party now has all the sophistication of a late-night drum circle at a hippie college from the 1970s. Yes, we conquered primitive tribes, which have been conquering one another long before we landed on the continent. No, that doesn't mean we need to open the borders to everybody and allow foreign nations to conquer us. If colonization is bad, then there's no conceivable reason why she'd be okay with hundreds of millions of foreigners colonizing America, unless, of course, she simply hates white men, which she obviously does.

Now, as dumb as women like this are, they do need to be taken seriously. In the sense that we have to understand that she's not joking when she says this. Neither are the people who just elected her. And neither are the Democrats all over the country who now support socialism. They're serious about doing what the Bolsheviks did.

They want to line all the conservatives up, forced them to turn over the bank accounts, and then send them to the gulag. That's actually what they want to do. You think this woman wouldn't want to do that? Literally do that? Round you and your family up and send you to the gulag. You think she wouldn't do it? That's why they celebrated when Charlie Kirk was murdered. And it's why they're talking like this now. But the Republican Party, which refuses to pass a very basic voter ID law that most American support and could help prevent at least some of the communist takeover, but they won't even do that. The Republican Party isn't taking this seriously. You know, not even close. As Fox News reports,

quote, the NRCC National Republican Congressional Committee has delivered flowers and condolence cards to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D.C office after the House candidates, he endorsed lost to Mondani back socialist in NY last night. NRC statement to Fox News, three losses in one night is tough. We wanted so-called leader Jeffries to know our thoughts are with him, his candidates, and whatever remains of his influence in the Democrat Party. Oh, isn't that? That's so cute, guys. What a cute, what a, very cute.

Oh, you got a viral post out of it. Congratulations. That's all these stupid Republicans care about. They don't want to govern or do anything. They just, they just, they, let's get a viral post. Look at that. We went viral. Good job.

You know, this is a prime example of not knowing. what time it is. This is a statement from the arm of the Republican Party that's in charge of handling congressional races, and as Democrats elects socialists who want to destroy the country, the Republicans are joking about it. They're mocking Hachim Jeffries for losing control of the party, as if that matters. No one cares about Hakeem Jeffries. Everyone understand he's a barely literate empty shell for the Democrat establishment. That's not the point. The point is that in just a few years, it's now very possible that we don't have an economy. anymore or any civil liberties. That's the threat the Republicans need to address.

As the historian Christian Helens pointed out, the Republicans, quote, are no different than monarchists in 1931 Spain celebrating the Marxist and socialist defeating the radical Republicans in Granada because they think it humiliates their enemies. First, it's, oh, that's just Granada. They're always crazy left-winger's there. Then it's, oh, the anarchists can have Barcelona. Those people are crazy. And finally, before you know it, these people have taken over the entire country and you are lying face down in a field as mobs of communist criminals spill out into the countryside to expropriate your property and ransack your house. And yes, this is precisely how conservatives are acting. They're acting like it's some kind of win for our side to see literal communists win elections

in New York, which is nothing short of madness. And it's based in a deep and troubling misconception about what the left is, how it operates, and how it achieves its goals. For another example, this, the Babylon B uploaded this video, saying they asked AI to simulate what a new civil war would look like. And, you know, they're obviously trying to be funny. I get that it's a joke. But they're failing here in a way that is important to understand. Watch. It was late 2026, and political conflict was coming to a head. The right was not giving any ground, and the left decided it was time to take action. We had to do something.

The Republicans were using every trick in the book, mainly voting to take over our country. It was finally time for war. The left began to quickly make preparations to take the country by force. It's not easy to start a war. It involves a lot of talking on the phone, which gives many of us anxiety. An initial target was settled on, a lazy suburb that served. as a symbol of the bourgeoisie and capitalism. But this small neighborhood was not caught by surprise.

Doreen's son goes to one of those fruity colleges on the west coast, and we got word from him, war was coming. The invading army descended on the small neighborhood, but the attack did not go as planned. In the city, we're used to being able to burn down a target and no one does anything. I guess it's different in the suburbs, though. The suburbanites had an ace up their sleeves. their sleeves, firearms.

One of the big issues is how we hate guns but the right loves them. I guess none of us considered how big a disadvantage that would put us in a civil war. Now the problem with this, aside from the fact that, look, AI slop just isn't funny. Even if you frame it as a simulation, it still just is not funny. An AI algorithm cannot, is not capable of wit. Okay, an AI algorithm can't like crack a funny joke. But, you know, the problem is that leftists aren't actually afraid of guns. They just used guns to assassinate Charlie Kirk and Brian Thompson and very nearly the president of the United States. They've sent snipers to shoot ice agents

in several different cities in just the past year. They've terrorized college campuses to the point that all political events featuring conservatives have to be held indoors with metal detectors and bomb sniffing dogs because the risk of a leftist assassin is too great. They're using violence using guns very effectively. They're using guns to intimidate or eliminate anyone who stands in their way. And although conservatives might have more guns, that fact has not dissuaded the violent leftists at all. And why should it? I understand the joke. There's nothing offensive about it, obviously. But make fun of leftists all you want. I do it all the time. But the joke that the left are a bunch of harmless little puppies is based on a fundamental.

misunderstanding about the threat we face. Actually, these people are extremely dangerous. They do have guns. They've already shown a willingness to use them and use them effectively. And, I mean, by the way, when they make their anti-gun arguments, do you think they're sincere? Do you think they actually believe that stuff? Well, the left has no guns because why do you think they have no guns?

Well, because they say they're anti-gun. Oh, okay. Well, if they said it, then that must be the way they live their actual everyday lives, right? That's to say nothing of the fact that an actual Civil War, by the way, not to get too technical, an actual Civil War in the 21st century would not play out like the Civil War in the 19th century. So when you hear these people like, oh, we'll win a Civil War easily. We got to, I got all these guns in my basement. We're fine.

Okay, we're not going to be fighting pitched battles on the fields of Sharpsburg, Maryland. It's not going to be two groups of men shooting at close range at each other and butchering each other fair and square like gentlemen. Those days are over. No, a civil war in this day and age will be fought with drones and cyber warfare and other methods that your arsenal of firearms in your basement are basically powerless against. Just so you know. Not to dissuade you from getting guns. Get all the guns. I mean, it's better to have them than not have them. But just so you know how these things work now. In any case, while conservatives are busy joking about those silly Democrats who are supposedly afraid of guns, even though they're using their guns on us,

as we speak, Democrats are electing women like Aber Kowas, who was also endorsed by Mamdani for a state Senate seat. In her view, 9-11 was justified because of white supremacy and capitalism. She also wants to abolish all immigration enforcement. Watch. And so, like, and finding that, like, you know, the system of capitalism and racism and white supremacy, et cetera, have all, and Islamophobic. have all been used, you know, to colonized lands, right, to take resources from other people.

And so this is, like, a long trajectory. And we're just seeing the manifestations of that continuation, right, with 9-11. And so a lot of times when people are asking us to respond about, you know, attack, right? When, if you look back, like, historically, right, you know, a lot of us come from lands that were colonized, lands where wars are being waged, right? a lot of times because of U.S. policy or the policies in Europe. And so I find that we can connect over that, but then also that the idea that we have to apologize for like a terror attack that like a couple of people did.

And then there is no apologies or reparations for genocide and for slavery, et cetera, is something that I kind of find like reprehensible. We're going to consider living in fear of ice every single day. What can we do to resist this? We are calling for abolishing ice. and agents who live to exceptionalize who gets to be part of this country. My parents were both undocumented, and I remember my parents speaking about what to do,

should they leave the country, where should they hide if an ICE agent comes to the home? What she doesn't mention there is that her father was deported for defrauding the country. We let him in here out of the goodness of our hearts, and he immediately ripped us off. The New York Post reports that, quote, Abdel Karim Kowas, a Jordanian national, arrived in the country in 1989, on a tourist visa and never left. He was then convicted of felony fraud in two separate states before federal authorities removed him from the country.

He was indicted in New Jersey on charges of theft by deception involving the false inflation of property values between $500 and $74,99. He pleaded guilty in August 2006 and was sentenced that October to three years in state percentage. So that's why she wants to eliminate ICE. She wants to allow more fraudsters like her father into this country to rip us off or to fly airplanes into our buildings. And she just won her election in New York based on this platform. So how is this happening? That's a question the GOP has no interest in answering. So let's take a look and see what you noticed about the crowd in this victory party.

This is from the Claire Valdez HQ after she was declared the winner. See what you notice here. where was there? Claire was there. Claire was there. Claire was there. Where was there? Where was there?

Your next. Your next. Your next. Your next. Your next. You're a special. There are some under-dly-clipped process before they could come in. Well, as you notice, rather conspicuously, the crowd is almost exclusively white women,

along with a handful of men who want to sleep with these creatures for some ungodly reason, you really don't see any so-called people of color or very few in that crowd, which is odd when you think of it. I mean, if you're on the left, it's confusing because these people claim to represent the oppressed non-white population. So why aren't those non-white people showing up to the victory party? And if you're on the right, it's confusing because you understand that New York has been taken over by foreigners from the third world, which it has, 25% of people.

of New Yorkers don't even speak English anymore. Half of them weren't even born in this country. So you assume that the socialists are getting elected by these third world invaders, since socialism is generally popular in third world hellholes. That's one of the reasons why they are third world hellholes, and we'll stay that way. But while foreigners are indeed playing an important role in electing these people, much of the support for these socialists is actually coming from white people, particularly white women. We're talking about the downwardly mobile.

children of wealthy parents who are suddenly discovering to their horror that their trust fund might not pay all their living expenses in New York, especially if they're going to spend 10 years getting a useless degree. These are people who have always had everything handed to them throughout their entire lives, and they expect that to continue for themselves and for everyone else who's on their side. That's who they are. These cross tabs from the primary tell the story. Chevalier is the rabid socialist. Espylot was the more moderate option. As you can see, lower income areas went for the more moderate candidate by a margin of 52% to 42% majority black areas chose the moderate candidate by a margin of 47 to 45,

majority Hispanic areas voted for the moderate option by a margin of 56 to 40. By contrast, higher income areas went for the socialist by a margin of 51 to 45. College educated areas and younger areas went overwhelmingly for the socials by margins of 20% and 24% respectively. So in other words, if voters were white, young, and educated, and especially if they were female, they were much more likely to vote for the communist. But if they were poor, Hispanic, or black, they were much more likely to vote against the communist. These numbers also help explain why Democrat Richie Torres won his New York

primary in a landslide with a 40-point lead, even though he's staunchly pro-Israel. His district is the South Bronx. It's overwhelmingly black and Hispanic and low-income. And those demographics generally are interested in the war in the Middle East or socialism or anything like that, to anywhere near the same degree as white leftists. Their concerns are much more grounded in what's going on around them. On the other hand, childless white women whose brains have been rotted by years of entitlement and university education simply cannot grasp basic economics or logic or history or anything else. And therefore, from a practical perspective, the Republican Party should be focused on encouraging family formation and, you know, childbirth. Married women aren't politically

radical like unmarried women. Parents with kids are especially not radical. I mean, the biggest threat we face in many ways is unmarried women. Unmarried single women are destroying the country. I mean, they just are. Their voting record is awful. They vote for the worst people everywhere. always. They vote for the most evil policies imaginable. They vote for like untold death and destruction. And and so one thing we could do is encourage, you know, more families and get as many women married as possible. Okay. And yes, this includes making it easier to buy homes, which means getting rid of property tax exemptions for boomers and other carve-outs that redistribute wealth from the young to the old. The Republican's secondary

focus should be crushing the universities, which are incubators of extremism. Why does any red state publicly fund universities at this point? I mean, it's completely absurd. What's the upside? And while we're at it, why did we pull ICE out of Minneapolis exactly? I mean, did we really get intimidated into submission by a bunch of lesbians with whistles? I should immediately redeploy to every major city, arrest the university presidents and administrators who are shielding illegal aliens for obstruction. arrest everyone who is committing crimes and standing in the way. And you can say, well, these are leftist tactics.

Fine. But in order to defeat these people, you need to adopt some of these tactics. What you can't do, what we're doing right now and what the Russians did in the early 1900s is stick to principles while the other side is openly declaring war on the country. While Republicans are talking about preserving norms like the filibuster as an excuse not to vote for the SAVE Act, Democrats are talking about ending American democracy and killing every single one of us. They will pack the courts. They'll give statehood to Washington, D.C. They will nuke the filibuster. They'll do everything in their power to eliminate the civil liberties of conservatives.

That's what they're going to do. That's what they're telling us they're going to do. We need to respond to that. And we need to respond now. But we still have the chance. And part of the response has to be to train our focus on the issues that actually matter to this country and its people. I received this response the other day, which is a response to my post that, you know, is declaring war on the third world communism in this country. But this is the response from Ryan Grimm. Quote, APEC gets wrecked in NYC and Matt Walsh capes in to try to reframe it in some race war terms. He plays this game where he's critical of Netanyahu, but when it matters, he does the thing most helpful to Netanyahu. What?

what the hell does Netanyahu have to do with, we're talking about primary elections in the United States of America. Okay. So what you're claiming is that if you care about the fact that communists are winning elections in our largest city and you care about how they're trying to destroy the country, nationalizing the airlines, destroying the economy, then you're an agent of Israel? That's what this guy is unironically claiming. If you want to preserve this, if you want, if you have a problem with candidates who have explicitly called for the destruction of Western civilization, then you're helping Netanyahu. If you don't want Western civilization to be destroyed by hordes of communists who have explicitly said that is their goal, then you're helping Netanyahu. The more we tolerate this

brain rot, the worse it will get. I don't give a damn about Netanyahu. The idea that American citizens who oppose the election of third world communists are somehow helping Netanyahu is so delusional and insane that it passes from a mere retarded talking point into full-blown schizophrenia, which is what we're dealing with. I mean, these people, as I've said before, are Israel first from the other direction. It's the only thing they can think about. And while they're talking about Netanyahu, this is what one of the most popular leftists in the country is saying right now. Watch. We got people who love Stalin, Mal, maybe even Trotsky, who are now saying, I'm going to vote.

I'm going to engage in electoralism for once. I'm going to engage in electoralism. I'm going to vote for Claire Valdez. I am further to the left. And I normally do not participate in bourgeois elections, but it's the commie corps. corridor, we gotta make it, we gotta make sure that people see how red this commie corridor is all the way from space. Primaries are how we change the trajectory of the Democratic Party and hopefully change the trajectory of America. Okay?

We're gonna be heading out first to Bushwick, the Kami Corridor itself, live and alive from the heart of the, the inflection point of the American. American Communist movement. This has nothing to do with Zoran's clout. This is everything to do with whether or not Democratic Socialists can doork and have the capacity to mobilize against tremendous amounts of money pouring in from outside expenditures.

It's an inside, outside movement. You obviously have to keep applying pressure with direct action. You have to engage in labor militancy, work stoppages, things of that nature. But then also simultaneously, you've got to have people on the inside as well. It's the decade of socialism. It's coming to a neighborhood near you. When I said we were going to let a thousand Zoros bloom, this is what I meant.

McCarthy was right. McCarthyism was fully justified. And we need a new wave of it. if we don't want to end up exactly like the Soviet Union did. McCarthy helps save us from going down this direction in the 1950s. And by following his lead, we can do it again. We can wage a war on third world communism and destroy anyone who subscribes to this ideology. And that's what is necessary at this point.

As we get closer to America's 250th anniversary, here's a question worth asking. Is it possible to actually fix education, restore some civic sanity, and enjoy summer with your family all at once? Mount Titano Media says yes. It's called Finding Our Words, Words That Made America, a collection of the greatest speeches in America history. Most of them have been almost completely forgotten, which is a shame because these are the words that defined what this country is supposed to be.

This summer, you can read it or listen to the new audible edition featuring voices you'll recognize, including Michael Knowles, Andrew Clavon, Spencer Clavin, Bill Whittle, U.S. Army Generals and Leaders in Classical Education. Every speech comes edited by Allison Ellis, with introductions by acclaimed journalist Tracy Lee Simmons, so the listener fully understands the context of what he's hearing. This is the perfect summer read alone with your kids on a road trip, wherever.

Let these words do what they were meant to do. Go to Mount Titano Media.com to get your copy of finding our words, words that made America. Again, that's mountatatonomedia.com. One of the most expensive habits people have is trying to save money, ironically. But, you know, when it comes to buying cheap versions of things that actually matter. Everyone's done it. I've learned over the years that some things are worth doing right the first time and protecting your home is one of them. That's why companies that claim

they're basically the same as Lee Filter aren't worth to gamble. Leifilter is a trusted aim built on more than 20 years of engineering and over 50 patents. Some of those knockoff systems don't hold up when they're actually tested. Clog gutters can cause serious water damage to your home. Heavy rain comes and water pours right over the edge. Lighter rain comes and debris slips through the gaps. Leafilter works differently, though. It's topped with surgical grade stainless steel, a micromesh that channels water in while filtering debris out where it belongs. No more cleaning out gutters guaranteed. Every insulation comes with a lifetime transferable warranty and a no-claw guarantee. Before insulation, a Leaf Filter trust pro will clean, realign, and seal your gutters

making sure the system is set up correctly from the start. More than a million homeowners trust Leaf Filter. Start protecting your home today with Leaf Filter. America's number one gutter protection system. Schedule your free inspection at Leaffilter.com. that's up to 35% off at L-E-A-Filter.com slash Walsh. Minimum purchase required. Restrictions apply. See representative for warranty and promotion details. Now, one of the things you'll see when our next episode of real history comes out is that the revolution starts in major cities, particularly the universities. The Bolsheviks actually co-opted an unrelated university protest, which erupted after

the students were told to stop partying too hard, essentially. And the Bolsheviks, very cleverly, manipulated the students and did joining their movement. They knew that the students were young and dunders. and angry and therefore very easy to manipulate. It's a remarkable story, and it's very similar to what's happening on college campuses today. Students are upset about Gaza or whatever, which has no relevance to this country, but the communists are savvy, and they know they can take that anger. And the communists, by the way, also don't give it about Gaza. But they can take that and they can channel it into something much more destructive, something that advances the interest

of the communists, which is all they actually care about. That's exactly what we're seeing right now. And just like the Russians in the 1900s, most Americans are passively watching the Bolsheviks rack up victory after victory. The opposition once again is too disorganized, too cowardly to do anything about the march of communism, even though the communists are outnumbered. Now, we should be encouraged by the story of those Antifa terrorists

who just received massive prison sentences in Texas. They shot up police officer in the neck as part of a massive coordinated assault on an immigration facility. The ringleader will be in prison. for the next 100 years as a result, a bunch of other people that were involved in that or got many decades in prison. That's a start, and we need to see much more of it. Every single communist who commits a crime of any kind should receive a similar sentence. And every communist who openly declares his hatred of the United States or who conspires

to defraud this country should be forcibly deported. We become a much stronger country as a result of our last major crackdown on communists, those decades ago. And before another one of these communists wins another election, which almost no one voted, we must heed the lessons of history, both our history and the history of the fall of the Russian Empire, and declare a full-scale and unapologetic war on communism while we still have the chance to win it. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Godspeed. Last month, we judged Martin Luther King, Jr., not by the color of his

skin but by the content of his character. American school kids spend a lot of time hearing about MLK and Rosa Parks. Have you noticed no one ever asks what Birmingham, Selma, and Montgomery are like today? The legacy of the civil rights movement wasn't a racially harmonious utopia. It's hollowed out urban cores, hundreds of thousands of dead Americans, raped grandmothers, ethnic cleansing, entire neighborhoods. This month we survey first-hand accounts. First-Hand accounts of the historic wave of non-violent crime, riots unleashed on this country by the Civil Rights Movement, which caused more enduring damage on America's greatest cities than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima, Nagasaki.

Who were the winners? And who were the losers? What's the truth about redlining, white flight, affirmative action? I don't want to miss the second part of our special on the Civil Rights Movement, the looting of America.