The Matt Walsh Show - Feminists Have Created The Worst Song In Human History

Starting point is 00:00:05 Well, it's been a busy couple of months for the feminist hordes on TikTok. First, they jumped into action to defend the honor of Lindsay Clancy, who murdered all three of her children. It was impressive in a certain way, because when you get a look at these people, you wouldn't think that they'd necessarily be capable of jumping at all. After Clancy, some of them took a brief detour to pretend to care about Krista Pike for five or six minutes. Pike is the death row inmate who mutilated, butchered, and killed a girl 30 years ago, then somehow survived her execution, demonstrating the almost supernatural determination some women have to avoid accountability no matter what. Feminist didn't spend a lot of time on Pike, presumably because her body count wasn't high enough to get them too excited. They quickly moved on to a woman who had a considerably higher body count

Starting point is 00:00:47 in the Cornell case. Now, if you followed the case the way the average media consumer follows things in this country by scanning the headlines and skimming through random social media posts, then you know that a woman at Cornell was sexually assaulted and brutalized by seven frat boys who drugged her against her will and held her hostage in a room for several hours while they took turns having their way with her. But if you follow the case the way the informed minority follows things, then you know that none of that is actually true. And in reality, the accuser got drunk and high of her own volition and engaged in an entirely consensual and entirely disgusting orgy with a bunch of men at a party. She was not drugged, she was not held against her will, and she consented to everything that happened. Indeed, according to her own accounting of events, she was, if anything, more sober and more conscious than the men, or at least some of the men. The feminists don't see it that way, of course. They have certain presuppositions that inform their analysis of these kinds of incidents.

Starting point is 00:01:49 Now, in fairness, I'll admit we all have presuppositions, right? We all have biases. For instance, my presupposition is, is that anyone, in theory, is capable of committing acts of evil, and anyone is capable of lying. So when one party in a dispute is accusing the other of committing an evil act, and the other party is accusing the first party of lying, all we can do is look at the evidence and the facts on the ground and arrive at our best assessment of what actually happened. Feminists, on the other hand, begin with the presupposition that women are always right about everything and can never tell a lie. And even when they do lie, as long as they feel like they aren't lying, that still counts as not lying. That was the framework that the Lindsay Clancy jury used in their deliberations. And it's the framework that has led to the feminist mob rallying around the Cornell accuser.

Starting point is 00:02:47 Now, over on TikTok, this rally has, as usual, taken the form of weapons-grade cringe, unlike anything the world has ever seen before. For example, there's just one example, women are filming themselves lecturing their sons about why gang rape is bad. Now, the problem aside from the fact that no gang rape actually occurred in this case, is that their sons are toddlers. Here's one example. So, if there was a little girl, right, and all your friends were hurting her and powering her and being mean, and they said to you, Noah, come and hurt the girl with me. What would you say? What would you say? They want you to go and hurt the girl. What would you say? I want to say no. Yeah. Yeah, you do. Well done. And what if they said, what if they said, oh, it's okay. You've got to. You've got. You. You say, no. Yeah, yeah, you do well done

Starting point is 00:03:40 And what if they said What if they said, oh, it's okay You can come and hit her What would you say? No way, yeah, see That's really, really good But What if, what would you do

Starting point is 00:03:59 If you saw the boys doing it? Would you? Yeah Oh, okay And what if you was in school And you saw the boys hitting the little girl Who would you go? Would you go to go?

Starting point is 00:04:11 tell someone? Or would you join in? You go tell someone. You're very clever, my little man. Won't kudu? Yeah. Yeah. Now, obviously, it's insane to have this conversation with your four-year-old in any context. Actually, if you're a competent parent, then there shouldn't be any need to ever specifically explain to your kids at any age, much less elementary school, that it's bad to gang rape people. I've never had that talk with my kids, and I never will for the same reason that I've never specifically told my kids that they shouldn't be serial killers or cannibals. I've actually never sat my kids down and said, listen, there are serial killers out there, and just so you know, you shouldn't do that. Listen here, okay? If I've told you once,

Starting point is 00:05:09 I've told you a thousand times, you cannot be a serial killer. or really any kind of killer. Thus is in self-defense or whatever. Now, if you provide even a basic level of moral guidance and formation for your children, then they'll understand fundamental moral principles enough such that there's never going to be any confusion about whether it's okay to be a gang rapist or a serial killer or a cannibal. If you find that you need to explicitly address either point with them, if you find that

Starting point is 00:05:43 they're like confused and not sure about whether gang rape is okay, you've already failed. Or you're performing for the camera. Which brings us to the even bleaker reality with these kinds of videos, which is that, of course, if these women couldn't record it for the internet, they wouldn't be having the conversation at all. You know, it's all just content designed to bring attention and affirmation to the women. Like, at least if a woman did this in private, had this conversation with their kid, maybe we could say, that although she's crazy and the subject is wildly inappropriate for a child that age, at some level, she's motivated by love and like a misplaced, confused attempt to offer maternal

Starting point is 00:06:25 guidance. But we wouldn't say that, actually, because we wouldn't know that it happened. And for a woman of this type, there's no point in doing or saying anything unless it can be commodified into attention and affirmation. They have basically no real personal life. They have no inner life, they are held in existence by attention. And if we look away, they cease to exist. That's how they see it. And in a way, they're kind of right. But there's an even cringier trend to come out of the Cornell orgy. Feminists are banding together to declare, I am Jane Doe. That's the hashtag. That's the trend, the slogan. I am Jane Doe. It's like a Spartagus moment for Sluts. Listen up, there are enough people listening to this show right now that if they don't vote,

Starting point is 00:07:18 it could swing key states in the 2026 election to the Democrats. And everyone listening knows every single ultra-far-left Democratic Socialists will be showing up to vote this fall. Democrats are fired up and we can't let them win. Because if we lose, they'll undo everything our movement has fought for. I need you to vote early so that you can bank your vote and fight back against the left's turnout machine. If you live in the critical Senate battleground states of Maine or Ohio, early voting is already underway starting this week. So go to gopvotes.org right now, find out when you can vote. Making your voice heard is easier than ever. You can get election reminders, look up your polling location, and pick a date to vote early. Go to gopvotes.org

Starting point is 00:08:01 today paid for by SLF PAC, not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. So I'll play a few of these videos and tell me if you notice. a common theme with these videos. Watch. Jane Doe had a consensual orgy with seven men, which, again, is really disgusting. But it seems unlikely that the women in those videos, many of them, could find seven men who would participate in an activity like that with them. Like, even if they scoured the entire globe, maybe among the blind community or, like, the coma community. But who knows? But aside from that, you probably noticed that song.

Starting point is 00:09:08 Okay, that song has been featured in approximately every feminist TikTok or Instagram video for the past three years. Feminists love this song. It puts them in a trance. Okay, they cannot resist it. It's to them it's the greatest song that's ever been written. Right? It's like a, it puts a hypnosis. It's like a slop hypnosis that it puts them in. They're hypnotized by the slop. There are countless videos, that, thalphalicious. maybe millions of them, featuring some self-important feminists pretending to be a brave fighter for some unclear cause while that song plays in the background. Watch. Now, I'll admit, when I first heard this song, I assumed that it was AI generated. That's what I thought. I thought that for like a year when I first started this song would pop up in these TikTok videos. I thought it was like an AI thing. I figured that someone had gone to some AI app and they had typed in a prompt like, you know, generate a feminist anthem that will stir the hearts and minds of every 30-year-old liberal white woman in the nation.

Starting point is 00:10:32 And this is what it spit out 15 seconds later. But it turns out that actually I was surprised to learn. This feminist anthem is an actual song, which may or may not have been made with the help of AI, ostensibly written and performed by a singer who, I guess, is a human named Paris Paloma. And the song is called Labor. and as I said, it's very popular with women, with feminists in particular. It has 100 million views just on YouTube. Now, I'm not going to play the music video because I've already subjected you to enough torture,

Starting point is 00:11:04 but you could just take my word for it. But it is worth, I think, very briefly considering why this particular song is so unbelievably popular with liberal women. So let's go to the lyrics, at least the passage that has so fascinated, so entranced the feminists of the world. So here it is. Here's the lyrics. All day, every day, therapist, mother made, nymph than a virgin, nurse than a servant, just an appendage, live to attend him so that he never lifts a finger. 24-7 baby machine so he can live out his picket fence dreams. It's not an act of love if you make her. You make me do too much labor. Now a few things jump

Starting point is 00:11:45 out, aside from the rather strained rhyme scheme. Maker and labor don't really rhyme. Neither do appendage and attend him. But never mind that. The greater point is that, first of all, these feminists who are in love with this song don't actually do any of those things or fill any of those roles.

Starting point is 00:12:10 Most of these women are on birth control and childless. They're childless on birth control, and yet the line 24-7 baby machine deeply resonates with them. You've got childless women saying, yeah, I'm a baby machine. I'm tired of being a baby machine with my zero babies ever. If these women are baby machines, then the machine is extremely defective. The machine is broken. It has yet to produce anything at all, much less a baby. There's no feminist in the country who is anything close.

Starting point is 00:12:43 to a baby machine? Okay, you're in your 30s and have no kids. You're not a baby machine. And maybe you have one. You have two at the absolute most. For a TikTok feminist, like two kids at the most. I'm not sure at what exact point you get to claim the baby machine title, but it's definitely not when your entire family can still fit in a four-door sedan.

Starting point is 00:13:08 And it's certainly not when you have zero children at all, as is the case with most of these TikTok women. And same goes for the first three lines. All day, every day, therapist, mother made nymph than a virgin, nursed and a servant. Just an appendage lived to attend him. Well, again, this describes precisely 0% of these feminist women. We've already covered how most of them aren't even mothers,

Starting point is 00:13:34 so we can cross that off the list. Most of them are not virgins. As shocking as that might be, given their average BMI, Most of them are not virgins. Whether they're nymphs or not is not a question any of us want to dwell on in any detail, so we'll move on for that. They certainly are not filling the role of maid or nurse or servant in any relationship in their lives. They're not attending to any man. The only person they attend to is themselves, and they're barely sufficient in even that role. So here's the actual life that the average 20 or 30-something feminist leads. this is her day. She wakes up and scrolls her phone. First thing she does. She goes to some easy adult daycare type job somewhere and scrolls her phone. And then she comes home and she sits on the couch or on the bed or something and she scrolls her phone. And she eats at some point, you know, throughout that process, often throughout that process. Then she goes to sleep. And that's like basically

Starting point is 00:14:37 it. If she's married, the routine I've just described really doesn't change. If she has a child or two, the routine still doesn't change. Her child is in daycare or public school. She barely even sees her kid, and yet still complains, you know, these feminist mothers on TikTok or even not. And we heard a lot of this with the Lindsay Clancy thing. Complaint about how put upon and they are sort of oppressed they are, how difficult it is to be a mother. It's like you barely even see your kid. They're in daycare or public school almost all the time. You barely see them.

Starting point is 00:15:17 And yet you still complain for the 75 minutes you spend with the child, you know, every day. Even that is a burden of titanic proportions. When the kid is home, both she and the kid are spending most of their time staring at separate screens. maybe on occasion they stare at the same screen together. She does very little that could be described as labor. Most of her day, every day, is structured around serving, entertaining, and distracting herself. If she's married, if she's married and her husband ever was bold enough to demand or even, like, mildly request that she focus on him, or God forbid serve his needs to any extent.

Starting point is 00:16:03 extent at all, she would divorce him. And that would be it. That's the actual reality of the feminist experience in the year 2026. I may be generalizing slightly, but not that much. And actually, probably not at all. This is the actual experience, but it doesn't work as well for like a pretentious feminist anthem. Because imagine instead of all day, everyday therapist mother made. It said, all day, every day, eating snacks, scrolling my phone. That rhymes even less, but also it's not as inspiring, even if it is vastly more accurate. So instead, they all pretend that they're like 1840s housewives living on the Wyoming frontier. That's the fantasy of oppression they've constructed in their minds. And to some extent, they really believe it. So they cry out,

Starting point is 00:16:55 I'm doing too much labor. There's so much labor, so much emotional and physical labor, even though the most laborious thing they do in a given day is set up multiple camera angles to film a TikTok video about all the labor they have to do. Now, the irony, of course, is that, and this is the part they're not going to want to hear, well, they didn't want to hear about any of this, is that these women would be much happier if they were, quote, unquote, oppressed the way they claim to be. Right? The traditional role of a woman is indeed some of what that song describes. The song obviously gives it a negative connotation and phrases it in a negative way. And some women, not feminist and most of them not on TikTok, still fill this role. What's actually being described

Starting point is 00:17:44 in the song, again, if you put aside the negative framing with terms like maid and baby machine, what's being described is a woman with an incredibly full life who fills an indispensable role in her family and therefore in society. I mean, if you actually do all those things and you fill all those roles, that's an amazing life. That's an important life. She tends to the physical and emotional needs of her children and her husband. She keeps her house in order, everything running and functioning smoothly. She has work to do real, valuable, meaningful work. She's important. She is necessary. She has purpose. Call it labor if you want. Call it being a maid if you want. I wouldn't call it that. I don't think it is that. But use whatever word you want. That's up to you. Now, that's not the

Starting point is 00:18:34 life that these feminists actually lead. Not even close. So perhaps the best response to a line like all day, everyday therapist, mother maid, is to say, yeah, if only that were true. But unfortunately, the song is a fantasy. If it were a reality, you'd be happier. And certainly busier, at the very least, which means the rest of us wouldn't be subjected to these ridiculous TikTok trends anymore. And that is why the I am Jane Doe trend, and especially the retarded song that's fueling it, are today canceled.

The Matt Walsh Show - Feminists Have Created The Worst Song In Human History

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.