The Megyn Kelly Show - Biden Cover-Up Continues, Gavin Newsom's Terrible Answer, and Trump's New Epstein Hoax Framing, with Rich Lowry | Ep. 1109

Episode Date: July 16, 2025

Megyn Kelly is joined by Rich Lowry, editor of National Review, to discuss the breaking news that Jill Biden's top aide Anthony Bernal pleading the Fifth, his potential role in the Biden cognitive decline cover-up, Gavin Newsom's rambling and terrible answer to Shawn Ryan about gender transition for an 8-year-old, his weird affect and hand movements, Ana Navarro’s attack on a fellow CNN guest calling him a “white man,” the host Abby Phillip siding with Navarro and allowing the racism, Trump trashing his own MAGA supporters who want more Jeffrey Epstein answers, promising to release further documents that are "credible" but slamming the entire story as a "hoax," his ongoing support for AG Bondi, how terrible Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams are as candidates for NYC mayor, why Zohran Mamdani will likely win and his truly dangerous policies, and more. More from Lowry: https://www.nationalreview.com/ Cozy Earth: Visit https://www.CozyEarth.com/MEGYN & Use code MEGYN for up to 40% offSelectQuote: Get the right life insurance for YOU, for LESS at https://www.SelectQuote.com/MEGYNPique: Get 20% off your order plus a FREE frother & glass beaker with this exclusive link: https://piquelife.com/MEGYNARMRA: go to https://tryarmra.com/MEGYN to get 30% off your first subscription orderFollow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow 

Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on SiriusXM Channel 111 every weekday at noon East. Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, still in Vail, Colorado, but not intentionally. I am in an airport like back room because my flight was delayed five hours, which pretty much blows up one's day. I was going to do the show when I got back home on the opposite end, but that not being possible you now, I mean, for the listening audience, I'm sitting in one of these like crappy little white walled rooms. Although I have to say the staff at the airport has been absolutely lovely, but I'm just saying it's not like a it's not a real set. I do have the Colorado mountains in the

foreground here. You can't see it because it would completely wash out the shot. But I have a lovely view of the mountains here. And it was a lovely two day trip. And it's not really like the trappings of the red studio, but it's going to work. So forgive all the boxes in the background and my makeshift studio comes with me on the road and this is exactly why. Okay, let's start with some news about what was it like a week ago now? We led with the fact that Joe Biden's doctor, Kevin O'Connor had pled the fifth in response to James Comer's subpoena as he tries to get to the bottom of who was president

at the tail end of Joe Biden's alleged presidency. And he would not answer his questions about whether he was taking, whether he noted any cognitive decline, et cetera, and whether he was asked to lie. Well, it's happened again. Do you guys remember when Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson came on on their book?

And they talked about in that book, they wrote about in that book and talked about in the show, how this guy Anthony Bernal was a total bully and really at the center of the cover up of Joe Biden's mental infirmity. He was Jill Biden's chief enforcer, her jackal. It sounds like everybody in the Biden White House loathed this guy per this book. He was not well liked and he was drunk on his own power. That's my own take reading the book. So he got subpoenaed since he clearly was in on the whole Biden mental infirmity coverup.

He might've been one of the chief architects of it. And he just pled the fifth too. He showed up this morning to Comer's committee and reading here off of the representative James Comer post on X that was just put out and just invoked the fifth amendment during his congressional deposition. This is a quote here from Comer. This week new reporting confirms President Biden's aides took unauthorized executive actions during his presidency amid his cognitive decline.

He's referring to the AutoPen article from the New York Times that we discussed yesterday. It's no surprise that Anthony Bernal is pleading the Fifth Amendment to shield himself from criminal liability. During his deposition today, Mr. Bernal pleaded the Fifth when asked if any unelected official or family members executed the duties of the president and if Joe Biden ever instructed him to lie about his health. This is a historic scandal and Americans demand transparency and accountability. We will continue to pursue the truth on their behalf and examine options to get the answers we need. Wow.

Joining me now to discuss it is National Review's Rich Lowry. Go ahead and subscribe. Become an NR Plus member today. Let's talk about transforming the time that matters most into the most comfortable part of your day. That's the mission behind Cozy Earth. Their bamboo sheets are designed to regulate temperature and provide a cooler, more comfortable night's sleep.

Made from viscose from bamboo, they naturally wick away heat and moisture, helping you sleep several degrees cooler. For daytime comfort, the All Day Tea is an essential everyday item. It's naturally breathable fabric, helps you keep cool and comfortable from morning to night. And the Studio Pant Collection offers softness,

breathability and comfort. Cozy Earth offers a 100 night sleep trial, so you can try their bedding during the hottest nights of the year. And if it's not a fit, returns are hassle-free. Plus, there's a 10-year warranty on all bedding products. Luxury should not be out of reach. Go to CozyEarth.com and use the code MEGAN for up to 40% off Cozy Earth's best-selling,

temperature-regulating sheets, apparel, and more. Trust me, you could feel the difference the very first night. That's CozyEarth.com. Code MEGAN. Sleep cooler, lounge lighter, stay cozy. Are you numb to it yet? This spastic economy we're living through, where AI is reshaping entire industries

and tariffs and taxes are shifting under our feet, markets bouncing like a yo-yo up one day and down the next. If you're like most of us in our 30s, 40s, and 50s, you've probably realized no one can really come and save you. You're out here, and I am too, building our safety nets on our own. But there's one smart move that often gets overlooked, life insurance.

Consider your options with select quote, because life insurance is never cheaper than it is today. And the younger and healthier you are, the more affordable it is. Waiting even a few years could double your rate. SelectQuote has helped out over 2 million Americans in getting the right coverage. Over $700 billion insured. It's not an insurance company.

They're a broker that shops top-rated insurers on your behalf and their agents work for you for free. They make it easy, so get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than 50% at selectquote.com slash Megan. That's selectquote.com slash Megan. Rich, here we are again. First the doctor. Now, one of the chief enforcers within the Biden administration, Jill Biden. Again, he's her jackal.

That's what all the reporting suggests. Up there will not answer the question, incredible Incredible of whether any unelected official or family members executed the duties of president and whether Joe Biden ever told him to lie about his health. Your thoughts? Yeah, it's pretty extraordinary. My assumption was that they just lie or dance around such questions. I never imagined they'd take the fifth, but here we are. Usually not a great sign about your health. or dance around such questions. I never imagined they'd take the fifth, but here we are. Usually

not a great sign about your health if your doctor feels compelled to take the fifth. And those two questions are incredibly telling, right? That he doesn't feel comfortable answering those. And on the auto pen controversy, Biden does this interview with the New York Times. Kind of extraordinary that he didn't do an interview with the New York Times his entire presidency. Donald Trump, who hates New York Times, is on the phone with Maggie Hab interview with the New York Times his entire presidency. Donald Trump hates New York Times. It's on the phone with Maggie Haberman and New York Times journalist all the time. But in the course of that interview, it was damning, right? He didn't approve individually these people.

He approved broad categories. So I think there's a legitimate question about whether those pardons are indeed legally valid. Do you think there's any chance these things actually get overturned? You know, all along I've been kind of looking at the Comer investigation as a political move and a worthwhile one, but not one that's likely gonna lead anywhere.

I'm starting to second guess myself. Yeah, I wonder what the mechanism would be. Would a court feel empowered to just say no? Yeah, I wonder what the mechanism would be. Would a court feel empowered to just say, no, sorry, this doesn't apply? I guess it would start with the Trump administration challenging one of these pardons, right? And then getting litigation going. But we'd be an uncharted territory because we never had that. Well, I don't think they have enough based on that New York Times article.

Okay, so that article was damning, but I don't think they have enough based on that New York Times article. Okay, so that article was damning, but I don't think that was enough to get a pardon reversed. However, I'm interested more in this Comer Lane, because they're running in tandem. And so you've got the admissions to the New York Times coupled with, they're gonna get Kevin O'Connor's testimony at some point.

I think they're gonna give this guy immunity. They don't wanna put Kevin O'Connor behind bars. They want an answer to the question. Right. And his only other claim of privilege is Dr. Patient, which can be pierced by a subpoena. As a lawyer, I can speak to that. You know very well that you've got a lawyer-client privilege you have to uphold, but if you get subpoenaed to federal court, it's a different story.

So this guy's gonna be forced to talk. And my only question is whether, like if you get O'Connor and possibly Burnell, if they give him immunity too, because again, they're not interested in putting him behind bars. They want to get the story. Whether we could wind up with testimony

from two of these top guys saying, yes, I was told to lie about a self. Yes, there were civilians. You know, this is Burnell right here today, this second told to lie about himself. Yes, there were civilians. You know, this is Brunel right here today, the second guy in the middle there. And there's Griff Jenkins trying to get him on record. If you've got those guys eventually on record saying that they were in charge of the presidency and they were told to lie, now we're talking about possibly undoing, I mean, forget the pardons, we could go well beyond that.

about possibly undoing, I mean, forget the pardons, we could go well beyond that. Mm hmm. Yeah. Well, but the ultimate play though, right, is transparency and just knowing the truth. What was a conspiracy against the public interest? So that you just, you just want to want to get it out. You know, I don't think Democrats are ever going to fess up to what they they did. What's his name? Andy Beshear, the governor of Kentucky was on Meet the Press last weekend. He wasn't part of this conspiracy. He wasn't close to the White House. Asked, you know, were Democrats too secretive about this and didn't acknowledge the truth soon enough? And he just, he wouldn't say it, right? None of them will say it. So obviously you got some journalists who've dug in,

Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson and Comer's doing good work here. Yeah, here's Dr. O'Connor on July 9th, refusing to answer. Watch. Dr. O'Connor, were you ever told to lie about the president's health? The advice of council, I respectfully declined to answer based upon physician patient privilege and in the reliance on my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. I am not a lawyer. I must follow my lawyer's advice in this matter. Let the record reflect that Dr. O'Connor has invoked the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Dr. O'Connor, please be very clear. Are you declining to answer the question put to you solely on the ground that you believe the answer will incriminate you?

I'm the Advice of Counsel. I must respectfully decline to answer, based upon the physician's patient privilege and in reliance on my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. I am not a lawyer, and I must rely on my lawyer's advice in this matter. Dr. O'Connor, did you ever believe the president was unfit to execute his duties as president? On the advice of counsel, I must respectfully decline to answer based on the physician, patient privilege and in reliance on my right

under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. I'm not a lawyer, and I must follow my lawyer's advice in this matter. Wow, and you heard the same from Bernal this morning, who sounds like a very unlikable guy. This is pretty incredible. I mean, Joe Biden's been out of office now for six, almost seven months, and they're still embroiled

in scandal created by him. Yeah, and that's just extraordinary. to claim a fifth on that question. I, you know, I had a very dim view of, of what, how they were handling Biden and thought they were lying all along, but I never would have considered a possibility that someone would have directly told his doctor to lie. And that at least opens up the possibility there. You would think, you know, you do it all in body language and you're picking someone who's loyal, you know who's going to be on the team and knows the score. So nothing explicit

has to be said, kind of mafia rules. But that non-answer, that invocation of the fifth raises a possibility that he was actually told affirmatively to cover it up. That's exactly right. Because truly the discussions that must have happened behind closed doors with both O'Connor and Bernal would have gone between the lawyer and the client. Did anybody tell you to lie about the right? And if the answer were no, God, no, nobody told me that. And no, there were no unauthorized civilians making presidential decisions.

And I have nothing to hide. Then you could easily walk in here. You could be combative. You could give it to Comer, just as good as you were getting it. They clearly do have something to hide. And I just, I do not believe they're gonna be able to keep it hidden indefinitely.

Comer or somebody, you know, Comer's enforcement mechanism is to go to the DOJ and have contempt charges brought against them, like we saw done to Steve Bannon. And if they don't comply, they could wind up behind bars, like we saw done to Steve Bannon. So I just don't think Kevin O'Connor is going to go sit in a jail cell. I think they're going to say, you will talk, or you'll go to jail. On the other hand, hand we could offer you immunity and then you could just give us Straightforward answers. It's just a matter of time before we get to the bottom of this here is Here is that a bit of our conversation with Tapper and Thompson on Anthony Bernal who they did quite a bit of reporting on in

that book You write about this guy Bernal a lot and it's it's you suggest Jake It was very tough to find anybody with a nice word to say about this guy who is a lot. And it's, it's, you suggest Jake, it was very tough to find anybody with a nice word to say about this guy who is Jill Biden's top person. Yeah. And he, he acknowledged that he had a tough reputation. He was the chief of staff for Jill Biden and perhaps the most powerful first lady chief of staff in the history of this country. He is somebody that enforced what Jill Biden wanted. And at the end of the day, one of the things that was interesting when we wrote this book and researched this book was trying to figure out why was there no discussion of whether

or not he should run for reelection? Why was it just a foregone conclusion that he was going to run for reelection, especially after he had made this kind of vague promise that he would be a one-term president? And it came down to two people, one of whom spoke for Biden, that's Mike Donilon, and the other one spoke for first lady Jill Biden, and that's Anthony Bernal. And basically they communicated to the rest of the staff. Bernal would say, you run for two terms,

you serve for two terms, you don't do one. I mean, he was calling the shots inside that White House and it really looks like it's possible Joe Biden found out that he was running for a second term after Anthony Bernal and Jill Biden decided he was going to. Wouldn't that be amazing? It's very unusual for a First Lady chief staff to have so much power, but it makes sense here because the First Lady was so influential and she's at the center of this conspiracy. If Democrats are going to be upset with anyone, yeah, sure, they should be upset with Joe,

but they should be upset more about Jill because she knew everything about his condition more than anyone else. And she could have pulled the plug and said, no, honey, you know, in 2023 when they're considering this. Yeah, sorry. That's not necessary yet. Pull the plug politically. It said, we're not doing this. Sorry. We're not doing this, honey. You're not a flirt. But obviously she was fully on board trying to get him to serve a second term,

which the idea that he could have served to January 2029 is one of the most preposterous things the American public has ever been asked to believe, and they didn't believe it. Yep, and here is Bernal now through his lawyer. We've received the statement that they offered to the committee this morning. This is it in part via Kelly O'Donnell, the, the, the NBC. The committee has sought testimony from Mr. Bernal

for nearly two years without any actual evidence of wrongdoing by Bernal. Most recently, the committee seeks Bernal's testimony based on a purported controversy regarding the use of the auto pen at the conclusion of President Biden's term. President Biden has already confirmed that he personally made all decisions concerning his grants of clemency. Oh, contraire. I think you're taking some liberties with the facts, Brunel's lawyers. They say while the committee only recently began its auto pen investigation, the chairman has already declared that this matter is quote, the biggest scandal in Oval

Office history, end quote. In addition, on June 4th, 2025, this is the same memo that Dr. Kevin O'Connor cited. The White House directed the Department of Justice to open a criminal investigation into this matter. The chairman has acknowledged that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has announced an investigation at DOJ. So we're very interested. That's quoting her, under these circumstances, it's entirely appropriate and justified for Brunel to invoke his rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, blah, blah, blah, blah.

There we go. And so he respectfully declines to answer any of the committee's questions in deposition today. So that's where we stand. That controversy goes on, and all of this looms over the Democrats like pig pens dirt as he walks around the set of peanuts. Right. It's just there lingering over anybody who's going to potentially run and throw their hat in the ring for 2028. Like you

mentioned, Bashir, like he's definitely Bashir. And all of them are going to get asked about this. And all prior statements where they defended Biden will be brought up. The other person who's in the news this week as an obvious contender for the nomination is Gavin Newsom, who went on Sean Ryan's podcast and absolutely dissembled over the question of transition procedures and surgeries on minors as young as eight. Listen to this. What about for your values? I mean, is eight years old too young? Yeah, I mean, look, now that I have a nine-year-old, just became nine. Come on, man. I get it. So those are legit. You know, it's interesting, just the issue of age, I haven't, as I am, as someone that's been

so focused on equality, broadly, LGBT rights, particularly gay marriage. The trans issue for me is also novel. It's over the last few years. I'm trying to understand as much as anyone else, whole pronoun thing, trying to understand all of that. Well, you know, that was like the hell, I mean, all that stuff. I get it. Oh my God.

First of all, his hands are flailing. He gets so nervous and can't stop moving his hands. Right? It's to tell. I'm uncomfortable and I'm probably lying too. Hands above the midline moving can be a sign of deception. Come on man. I mean, I get it.

Those are legit. Period. Those are legit, period. The issue of age, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, and you know, someone who's been so focused on LGBT and gay marriage, you know, the trans thing, I just like, I've been thinking about the pronouns, yeah. That's how he answered that question, Rich. Would you want, are you okay with the surgical procedures on an eight year old?

Yeah, it was a good answer in the sense that it kind of seemed as though he was acknowledging it was a problem with like the, come on man, I get it. But it led nowhere and he didn't say it. And he was clearly afraid to say it. And this is a Democrat who showed a little more leg on this than other Democrats by at least saying in that famous podcast with Charlie Kirk,

that's unfair for males to beat against females in sports, but he can't just come out and say, no, of course it's wrong for an eight-year-old. Of course it's wrong. And this is another huge problem for the party, right? If there are two things I would advise them on, which would seem relatively easy, one, say Biden shouldn't have been running again and people should have blown the whistle

on it much earlier. Bad on us. And we're not going to do surgeries for minors and men shouldn't compete against the emails. It's so easy. It would seem to be so easy, but people like Bashir and Newsom who know much more about the Democratic base than I do apparently don't think it's easy Mm-hmm, they won't do it and they're clouding their chances with every mealy-mouthed Answer picture JD Vance in a presidential debate being asked that question or Marco Rubio for that matter or any of them But but you know assuming for now that it's likely JD, he would be so eloquent, he would be so reasonable, he would be so measured, and you're gonna have that flailer with the hands

and the stuttering and the, come on, man, pulling the Joe Biden, come on, man, it didn't work for Biden and it's not gonna work for Newsom. Like, I'm just seeing the runway of how the Republicans' chances are gonna look, and right now I'm feeling good. Not necessarily about the midterms,

but about the presidential race. Here's another thing. It's a little off point on the trans issue, but a great moment where Sean asked Gavin Newsom about why they were so able to very quickly clean up the city of San Francisco when Chinese president Xi Jinping came in 2023. And hear his answer, and then you can hear how he answered it at the time

when it came up. Listen. You got a lot of shit when Xi came to California. Yeah. And the big narrative was and I tend to believe it is we hear a lot about San Francisco and the homelessness and pooping on the road and all that kind of stuff. And it seemed like all of that was cleaned up when she came to town. Yeah. Is that true? Complete bullshit. That's complete bullshit. I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. Ha ha ha ha. I got to credit Morning Wire, my pals over at the Morning

Wire who put that together. Such a good catch. There's no room for wiggle, for wiggling. It's diametrically opposed because he's getting a little closer to running. Yeah, I remember him saying that at the time, right? It was a big deal. We're all talking about it. So clearly, he hasn't forgotten. He just thinks he needs to dissemble about it and be against poop on the sidewalks in and of itself, whether you're having a big high-profile international event or not. I guess this is moderation.

Yeah. But my point in showing this is really just to show, I think some people have the impression Gavin Newsom is some formidable politician. He looks the part. I'll grant him that. He's a relatively handsome man. There's no taking that away from him. But as soon as he starts speaking, things change because Because he starts lying, he starts obfuscating.

He has a tendency to say whatever the person across from him wants to hear. And then just completely one-ating on it in front of a different audience at a different point. That's just one example there. The Charlie Kirk example is another one because he tried to say to Charlie, oh, it's a question of fairness for me on the boys and girls sports. And then as soon as he got away from Charlie Kirk, he's like, yeah, I looked at it, I couldn't find an answer. So I've moved on.

Okay, so that's another reason to feel good about 2028 for team GOP. The Democrat candidates are not looking so great. Down more at the local level, staying on team blue in New York City, Mario Cuomo's son, Andrew, thinks he's Mario. And that's a big mistake, because Mario Cuomo was legitimately very popular in New York, and that's why he made a credible run

for president. Andrew Cuomo has disgraced himself as a sex pest and the murderer of a bunch of elderly people, to put it uncharitably, because he's the one who ordered COVID positive patients to go back into these nursing homes after having been warned that it would lead to the death of the most vulnerable population in those nursing homes.

And he did it anyway. And that's never been fully addressed. But then he tried to lie about the number of people who died all while he got $5 million to have his staff on taxpayer money, write a book about how amazingly he handled covid where we were all but in prison for two years in new york i was there okay so he's not popular he lost the democratic primary to this nutcase some mom

donny who's a socialist a communist and now he's refusing to drop out saying i'm going to run i'm going to run as an independent Well, that's the lane that Eric Adams the sitting mayor of New York is running in and all this sounds nuts Except when you look at the current polling Cuomo would beat mom Dami in a race if it were just the two of them head-to-head So what do you make of all that? if it were just the two of them head to head. So what do you make of all that? Yeah, so the problem is that both Adams and Cuomo

are more radioactive than the communist, right? They have higher negative and unfavorable ratings than the communist. So if they have any chance of winning, excuse me, what they're gonna have to do is discredit Mom Donnie with Democrats, because the Democrat electorate, the electorate in a New York City election, about 70% Democrats. So Mom Donnie just holds 25% of them.

You can lose a lot. He's still going to win. So you need to convince the average Democrat that this guy is going to make you lose your job. He's going to make your streets unsafe and that he's unacceptable. And if you manage to do that, it's doable. I'm not sure it's likely or not, but it's doable. Then one of them could surge, whether it's Cuomo or Adams, whoever is in second place,

and the others fall away. So I think there's too much focus. One, and Cuomo thinks he's going to make himself likable by just going out and glad handing people in the streets. I don't think that's going to happen. And two, there has to be some sort of deal. Don't touch me. The focus has to be bringing Mamdani's ratings down, making him radioactive, and then maybe

a vista opens up where something's possible where New York City can dodge this bullet. But I wouldn't bet on it. I really think it's crazy not to be hitting Mamdani over the head every day with the law and order stuff. He 100% was for defund the police. When other Democrats said, when we say defund the police, we don't really mean defund the police. We mean transfer some money over to more social services type systems that could intervene in other matters.

Then he said, no, we mean defund the police. And then as we get to know him better, clips keep resurfacing because in addition to being a sex pest and a killer of elderly people, Andrew Cuomo has a very, very shitty Oppo research team that didn't find any of this stuff when he was running against him in the primary. So here comes the following soundbite from 2020,

where Mamdani seemed to be very, very anti-cop and very, very pro, some other third force on domestic violence incidents. Take a listen here to Sat9. Police do not create safety. For many, many people across the city and the state, police actually create and amplify violence. And it is very important to speak about that reality that many people have because it pushes up against the conventional understanding of police who are seen to be people who come to resolve violence. But I mean, you just look at the history of the NYPD and you see that we have invested in a system that functions in many ways to punish

poor black and brown people across this city and across the state, frankly, across this country. And there are so many responsibilities we have given to police that frankly should have nothing to do with their departments. A homeless person is on a train. They do not need a stranger with a gun to come and resolve that situation. If somebody is jaywalking, if somebody is going through domestic violence, there are

so many different, different situations that would be far better handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations as opposed to an individual with a gun. So what Nicole Brown Simpson really needed, Rich, was for some social worker to step in and try to explain to O.J. that it's not nice to nearly decapitate your ex-wife. Or maybe somebody who would talk to him about centering his blackness.

That could have really brought out You know some softer side of OJ in mom Dami's world. That's what they do. This is absolutely absurd So women who are getting the shit kicked out of them by their husbands now are gonna have some sweet little social worker show up Her like knitted sweater to try to talk the husband down off the ledge in mom Donnie's, New York Yeah, totally preposterous. One, you're right about Cuomo's APO research in the primary. There's a video like this literally every single day popping on X.

Where were they during the primary campaign? And ordinary Democrats aren't anti-cop. The activists and the ideologues and the progressive element of the Democratic Party like Mamdani are anti-cop. But Eric Adams won the Democratic Party, like Mamdami, are anti-cop. But Eric Adams won the Democratic primary four years ago on a pro-police platform, a pro-law and order platform. And people in dangerous neighborhoods

do not want the social worker showing up. They want the guy with a gun on his hip, and they want more of them, and they want he or she to get there faster than they do now. So this is absolutely, you're absolutely right, this is a huge opening. And Cuomo or Adams or whoever wants to have some chance of stopping this guy needs to just hammer it.

Especially because it is the communities of color, especially those in the more working class and poor neighborhoods of New York, who need cops more than anyone. They need cops. And only people who come from a very privileged background like Mom Donnie don't understand that. Yeah, probably never needed a police officer to help resolve a situation that was dangerous or potentially dangerous in his life and probably never will. But that's not the lived experience of a lot of New Yorkers. And the crime that we read about in the New York

Post and elsewhere that's so harrowing, it's generally quite limited in several very specific neighborhoods. So what you want to do is flood those places with cops and go specifically after the gang members and the people have records you know, those specifically after the gang members and the people have records, you know, are dangerous and you can make the city a lot safer. Rudy Giuliani proved this back in his day. And it was popular. No one wants to get shot.

No one wants to be fearful of getting shot. No one wants to get harassed on the subways. And the beginning of the answer, at least in terms of public policy terms, are more cops and better cops. My brother Paul was a lifelong cop, made it to lieutenant in Albany, New York. He's retired now. And do you know how many domestic violence calls he had to go out on and actually save

women's lives? This is in inner city Albany. These women are terrified and grateful to see the police show up. This is from the Free Beacon on what's happening in New York City. In particular, they write NYPD recorded more than 110,000 domestic violence incidents in the city during just 2024. More than 110,000 were someone called the cops. The four worst precincts for domestic violence with more than 3,000 recorded incidents each were located in poor and heavily minority districts

around East New York, Little Haiti, the North Bronx, the South Bronx. Listen to this. Former NYPD homicide detective Pete Pannuccio, who spent four decades with the department and responded to hundreds of domestic violence incidents called a lack of police involvement, quote, absolutely insane.

Homicide rates will increase, that women, he writes, will be pulverized. Women will be pulverized and homicide rates will increase under Mom Donnie. That should be in ads that circulate nonstop in New York for these upper west side white liberal women in their lululemons who want to feel good about themselves by electing a communist and will never have to worry about being one of the ones pulverized as a result of no cops.

Yeah, absolutely. So we all fear random crime, but the greatest threat to a lot of people are people you know, especially to women, right? It's the abusive spouse, it's the abusive boyfriend, it's someone you split up from and is stalking you, and you need law and order and the authorities to protect you from that person.

And Mamdami just isn't into this as an ideological matter. He doesn't care about the evidence. Yeah. The other thing that just occurred to me, sorry to interrupt you, is 99% of the social workers are female. They're all female. They just are.

Women have tons of empathy. Women are naturally attracted to that line of work. And a lot of them are middle-aged or older. And I wouldn't say in my experience, having met with a lot of them over the course of my career, that they tend to be like the super fit. So you're gonna send these like middle-aged women into these dangerous neighborhoods

where a man is beating the hell out of his wife and you're gonna have her try to stop it, take a guess what's gonna happen, okay? Because unlike Mom Donnie, I've actually interviewed countless numbers of domestic violence victims and it can happen across sociological spectrum. It can happen to rich women, it can happen to poor women, but in every case, it's happening at the hands of a man who's extremely controlling and extremely dangerous and could not be talked off the ledge by the person he's supposed to love

more than anyone else in the world. And the notion that you could send some third party, likely female, into that situation to defuse it is absolutely insane. The only person who can defuse it is a guy with a gun and a badge who can put that guy behind bars and even then sometimes they don't stop. Yeah and sometimes though right all you need is the big guy with the gun to show up and that defuses the situation but these wouldn't be situations if the party who is

bigger and stronger is not in a rage right perhaps? Perhaps a violent rage, perhaps even a homicidal rage. And that's just not, that's not the context for social work, right? If you need marriage counseling, you need advice on why your kid's through it and doesn't like going to school, whatever, we do, there is a reason to have social workers. I don't have anything against all social workers.

My mom was in social work, obviously a place for it, but she wasn't showing up in violent households at the cost of what might perhaps be a violent event. That's crazy. And by the way, hello, P. Diddy's defense team, Zoran, Mom, Donnie. They're the ones who just made this argument that domestic violence is different than criminality. Beating the daylights out of your wife is criminal. You do need a cop. Of course. It is not like jaywalking, you absolute fool. I can't believe good friends of mine

are going to be living in this city. Thank God we got out and moved to Connecticut and in danger now at the hands of this lunatic. Forget the economics of his policies, which I do also wanna hit on here. Before I move on to why our friend Andrew Schultz, comedian, just great guy, loves Mom Donnie, and I think it's more the economic policies,

I think Andrew's more Democrat leaning anyway, but meandered over to the Trump field in the last election, like a lot of, even lefties did, I do wanna spend one more minute on sort of identity, the obsession with identity over on team blue, because there was an extraordinary moment on, on CNN with Anna Navarro, who's constantly making inappropriate race comments, like racist comments. And they're having debate over Trump's immigration policies and the ice

raids and how he's rounding up people. And now there's a federal district court judge who said, you can't take into account whether a person is speaking Spanish or is at a day labor camp. You can't consider any of these things when you're trying to find people who are here illegally. Anyway, they're having a debate about this. And Brad Palumbo's on the set.

He's the co-founder of something called Baste Politics. He happens to be a white man. And the following extraordinary exchange took place. Take a listen, Saat 8. Millions of people out there protesting in small cities and big cities, from small protests and huge protests, defying the fear, defying the reign of terror

and retribution that Donald Trump is trying to impose on America. I think you're definitely being hyperbolic. You talk about a reign of terror. When the doomsday alarm from Democrats or from media critics is always at a 10, it doesn't hit the same. I want to respond to you saying that I was hyperbolic when I talked about a reign of terror.

No, it might be hyperbolic for you as a white man. Oh, okay. It's certainly not hyperbolic for you as a white man. Oh it's only not hyperbolic. Being a white man as an insult to your when you invoke it to dismiss my being a white man as an insult when you invoke it I you. But I just want to make a point that Brad all she's saying is that her view of the situation is different from yours. I don't think that's an insult is that I was I said I see because I'm a white man. No, no, no, she just said, she said, I see it differently from you, which is not an insult.

It's not, and it's also not a racial insult. Unbelievable. Unbelievable it was said and then Abby Phillip allowed it and defended it. Incredible, Rich. What a dereliction of duty as the anchor, first of all. And he was 100% right to call her out. I don't know if it matters, but Brad also happens to be gay. So he checks some minority boxes. Abby Phillip should be interested in defending him to the extent it was necessary, though he was raising exactly the right point.

Now, how dare she allow that to happen on her set? And how dare they keep booking Anna Navarro, whose bread and butter is comments like this? Yeah, so where to start on this? There's so much to it. One, the idea is the reign of terror is obviously absurd, right? But anyone can have their opinion about immigration enforcement. Anyone with any color, any creed, any gender should be able to have an opinion

about immigration enforcement. And he was challenging hers. And our argument basically was that this was her view and she has unique insight into it as a brown person. She referred to the brown community. What is the brown community? There is no such thing as a brown community. There's no such thing as a white community. And they're so into this idea of communities that don't exist. There's no LGBTQ plus community. The harshest people, some of the harshest critiques I've heard of lesbian have been by gay men, you know, and a lot of gay and lesbian people don't like the whole trans thing've heard of lesbian have been by gay men, you know,

and a lot of gay and lesbian people don't like the whole trans thing. And even if they're all on board, you know, that part elements of that agenda, some of them are Republicans, some of them are Democrats, some of them are Catholics, some of them are, there's no community. They don't live all in one big neighborhood

and get together for block parties. It's absurd. And if you just turn it around and would have, and if Brad had rejoinedinder, well, you just think that about the reign of terror because you're a Latina, right? He would have been escorted from the show, escorted out of the building and never heard from again on CNN. And by the way, not for nothing, but even if she wanted to make

this argument about how most of the people who are getting rounded up happen to have brown skin Most of them are also male So how does his maleness disqualify him from not saying this is a reign of terror? She that's their kneejerk You you lose your right to speak in the world of nana navarro If you are a white male because you're a sin your existence is a sin You were born with the sin. You can't recover from the sin. You shouldn't even be at the table commenting to her. And frankly, I think Abby

Phillip shares that view. For the first couple of years she was on the air, she hid what's obviously her racism. But as she gets out there more and more and more, it's coming out more frequently. She's a problem for CNN. It's very clear. Okay. I find the show unwatchable, but everyone ends up talking about the clips. It's only usually because of Scott Jennings, because he's great. And then occasionally just absolute lunacy like we just saw there, but no one's watching it like, hey, I'm really learning something.

This is actually a really good program. Not at all. It's like a hate watch and a like WTF. Back on the subject of Mamdani, I want to show you this clip from Andrew Schultz because it hits on a couple of things that I want to talk to you about politically. It's Saat 10. The only party right now that to me seems America first is the Democrat Socialist Party. Yep. Bernie is America first.

Mamdani and all his ideas that he will not be able to execute, and I frankly think many of them are not good ideas. But he is no doubt New York first. The policies seem to want to help people here. That's what I care about. If MAGA wants to take this America first thing back, they got to start looking out for America. It doesn't seem like they're doing it. Lying to Americans is not America First.

There is one lie, which is Epstein did not have a blackmail ring on all these very influential people. And by saying that that didn't happen, you have to tell a lot of other little lies. Every one of them just pulls a little piece of thread away from the fact. And we're starting to see right through right now, and it's just embarrassing. It's very interesting. So he's, that's a guy who I'm gonna have interviewed him many times. I think he's an independent,

but though he's been a registered Democrat for most of his life, he comes from a family of Democrats, though he was supportive of Trump and voted Trump this last election, who now you hear him, he's attracted by some of the things that Mamdani is saying.

And I've heard Andrew and others like him politically talk about that debate in New York City where the question by the moderator was, which country would you visit first as New York City mayor? And they all said Israel. And Mamdani said, I'm not really interested in visiting any country. I'm gonna stay in New York, which was a great answer.

I have to say to his credit. That was the answer, yeah. But like there is a belief in some circles that like you're not electable, you know, Democrat or Republican unless you do a genuflection toward Israel and you send all the right signals on how you're going to be pro-Israel. And Mamdani didn't do it. I mean, I think there are reasons for that. But separate and apart from those reasons, it was the right answer to say,

I'm the mayor of New York. Why are you asking me about going to travel to foreign countries? Yeah. So I think all that's playing in. Yeah. So that all that's playing in on his like, I'm looking at that guy. And then on top of it comes the Epstein scandal, whatever you want to call it, which is affecting Trump supporters supporters both in that middle ground and on the diehard right to within the core MAGA movement. I would say like the more national review types of the Republican Party have not been

big into the Epstein scandal. We haven't covered it that much here in the Megyn Kelly show over the past six years. We've been covering it more this past couple of what, 10 days because it became a political scandal. But there is a very loud piece of MAGA right now that is really outraged over how this is being handled. And we'll get to what Trump said this morning after you react to those points. Yeah, so on the clip, one, when he talks about Bernie Sanders

being America first, there was a time when Bernie was kind of an American first socialist. He had this famous exchange with Ezra Klein, I don't know, maybe it was 10 years ago now, the New York Times, where Klein is like, you like poor people, right? He's like, yeah, I do. You want to help poor people, right? Yeah, I do. So then what we should do is let in all these poor people from other countries in the United States who are really poor, and then they'll be better off than they're here. But he's like, no, no, no, I don't favor that. That'd be crazy. That hurts America. I'm about hurting, helping American working people. And the reaction on the left was such that Bernie backed off. Now he's kind of a

cosmopolitan socialist when he used to be kind of a nationalistic socialist. And on Mom, Domine, I will say this about him. The theme of affordability is not inherently a socialist theme. and it was an excellent theme because New York City is insanely expensive and is getting more so all the time. I think rents on average went up like 16% last year. That's crazy. The problem is his answers are wrong, right? And you have these problems in New York because it's already embraced socialistic policies. And he's coming in saying, well, we got these problems because of socialism and what we need is more socialism, which doesn't make sense.

It'll be a disaster. And I do think it's interesting how to pick up the Epstein thing. This is now being picked up, not just by influencers' voices like that, but by the mainstream media and by Democrats at the same time. It's not going away on the right. But you have Charlie Kirk saying, I'm just not going to talk about it anymore. So it wouldn't shock me if three weeks from now, it's kind of diminished more on the right and picked up more from those other sources.

So Trump gets out there. It's so it's I don't actually know what Trump is doing with his messaging because last night I watched the Bret Bear the top of his show and he ran a long report on Epstein and the scandal and the MAGA infighting. And he ran a soundbite

of Trump last night which we have where he's saying we I think we have it, yeah. Yeah, yeah, I think it's in Sat 1, where he says he's fine with having Pam Bondi release more materials that she deems releasable. Here it is in Sat 1. Your daughter-in-law said that there should be transparency in the Epstein case. Do you agree with her, sir?

The attorney general's handled that very well. She's really done a very good job. And I think that when you look at it, you'll understand that. I would like to see that also. But I think the attorney general, the credibility is very important. And you want credible evidence for something like that. And I think the attorney general's handled it very well. Okay, that wasn't on there, but he does say the credible part. And here's that. This is

later that day, um, sat six. Mr. President, I know you've urged people to move on, but I'm curious, why do you think your supporters in particular have been so interested in the Epstein story and so upset about how it's been handled? I don't understand it. Why they would be so interested in... He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is. I really don't. And the credible information has been given. Don't forget, we went through years of the Mueller witch hunt and all of the different things, the

Steele dossier, which was all fake. All that information was fake. But I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. It's sordid, but it's boring and I don't understand why it keeps going I think really only Pretty bad people including fake news want to keep something like like that going but credible information Let them give it anything that's credible. I would say let them have it Okay, so last night, yesterday, that was late Tuesday. Let's let him have it. If there's more credible information, she can release it.

Now, he was full of insults for the people who are still interested in Epstein. But then this morning, he sends out a truth social that was just a barn burner of a post that reads in part. OK, hold on. Let, let me get it here. It's long, I'm not gonna read the whole thing. First it starts off with how the radical left Democrats have hit pay dirt again, just like with the fake and fully discredited Steele dossier,

the lying 51 intelligence agents, the laptop from hell, blah, blah, blah. A totally fake and make up story used in order to hide crooked Hillary Clinton's big loss in the 2016 presidential election. These scams and hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at. It's all they have. Okay.

And then they say, he says, their new scam is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. The Democrats' new scam. I mean, this is more of a Republican issue. The Democrats are now piling on. But he says this is a Democrat news scam and what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. And my past, in all caps, supporters have bought into this bullshit, quoting here, hook,

line, and sinker. They haven't learned their lesson and probably never will, even after being conned by the lunatic left for eight long years. I've had more success in six months than perhaps any president in our country's history. And all these people want to talk about with strong prodding by the fake news and the success starved Dems is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work. Don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support

anymore. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Make America great again. And so what we've seen in the past couple of days is Trump has managed to call large portions of the MAGA base that are still interested in Epstein, one answers, selfish weaklings. He doesn't want their support and that they're believing in a Democrat created hoax. Now there's all sorts of, you know, substantive responses to that on the Epstein merits, but and that they're believing in a Democrat created hoax. Now there's all sorts of, you know,

substantive responses to that on the Epstein merits, but I'm not interested in that for now. I'm interested in the politics of it, Rich. Yeah, and so he's in the phase he often is in when he's in the midst of these controversies. I think spaghetti against the wall phase, and then he'll see what sticks and then go with that. But I don't think it's a great idea to make the connection to the Russia hoax, which was

about him. So this kind of implies that this also is about him. I don't think it really is. And the idea that he doesn't know where this is coming from, it was all created by Democrats. This has been more of a matter of interest for the right, including the highest officials in his justice department, right? Pam Bondi talked about it, Cash Patel talked about it,

Bongino talked about it. Now, Patel and Bongino, yeah, I give them a little leeway, because you know, Bongino was a podcaster and Patel was kind of a figure. They didn't talk about it the same way once they were in office. It's Pam Bondi, who is a sitting attorney general of the United States, handed out these ridiculous, bogus binders and a stupid act of pandering. These poor influencers, they held them up

like they finally had the holy tablets. Of course, when they looked poor influencers, they held them up like they had, finally had the whole eight tablets. Of course, when they looked through it, they realized it's all older, redacted and completely worthless. And then seemed to suggest, she's wiggled out, tries to wiggle out of it, but seemed to suggest she had a client list on her desk, on her desk. And then everyone wants it to go away. Well, she turns around a month or two later and says, oh, forget it. You know, so I understand there are questions about this. But I, you know, and as you put it, she either was lying then, right, when she said that

had the client list or is lying now when she says there's no client list. I take the first option. I think it was a stupid act of pandering that and she got wrapped around the axle on this thing. But she should, tomorrow, she should do a press conference. And it should be till the last dog die kind of press conference. Everyone can come in, we're credentialing everyone. I don't know, I don't care who you are,

what outlet you're from. And I'll answer every single question about it. And this is why the conclusion that we've come to and if there are other things that can be released as you know and as I've discussed on the show, the Epstein files makes it sound as if it's like a file cabinet in the corner of her office and she has one of those little file cabinet keys and she can open it and take out the 10 Manila folders with the Epstein files. It's a vast investigative record.

And surely more can be released than has been released. Surely there's some things, you know, grand jury secrecy and the rest that should stay, shouldn't be disclosed. But surely there's more to disclose. You know more about it than I do since I'm a national review type. But we haven't seen the autopsy, right? Have we seen the actual report on why they've concluded it's a suicide? We've heard from the medical examiner for sure.

I'm very well aware of what she found and why she found it, but I don't know that we have the actual paper. Could be, and I just haven't seen it. Why not? Here's the problem, Rich. I think they don't. Here's the problem. Like, there's a middle ground here

that I keep trying to remind people of. I don't believe that there's a massive pedophile ring that's being covered up though, you know stranger things have happened I don't believe Trump did anything terrible that's in there that he's trying to hide Though it is possible that somebody made some scurrilous allegations against him because that's happened on the record You know outside of the unseen case and would have you shocked to see somebody did it? No, I wouldn't I on the record, outside of the Epstein case. So would I be shocked if somebody did it? No, I wouldn't. I believe though that there might be some names in there who are politically connected to Team Blue and Team Red, and neither side has a great interest

in sort of hanging those people out to dry. And those people would be the kind of people making calls being like, would really appreciate it if you didn't do this. And maybe their donor, the donors are important enough that they're listening. That's a possibility. I'm just throwing that out there.

But I think the way this needs to be handled, like any scandal, any potential scandal is, you get out early, you get out loudly, you open up all the coffers and say, come on in and take a look. This is everything we know. This is everything we're gonna give you. Because now we're in a situation where, even if Pam Bondi had to be fair to

the administration, even if she does come on, I've asked her for an interview to come on this show or gives a presser or cash and Dan join or even if that happens, people who are really dug in on this are probably always at this point going to say, I don't believe it. You know, once you're dug in on something, it's almost unwinnable for Trump at this point going to say, I don't believe it. Once you're dug in on something, it's almost unwinnable for Trump at this point. Yeah, someone's reminded me of the old joke a little while ago. Guy dies, goes to heaven, sets the pearly gates.

God said, ask me any questions. I'm happy to answer anything now. He's like, what happened with the Kennedy assassination? And God says, Lee Harvey Oswald did it. I didn't know it went this high up, the conspiracy was far reaching. So there are some people that's where they are on this and there's gonna be no way to satisfy them.

Plus, look, it's, how did he get his money? I don't think we'll ever know, right? And we're denied the sense of closure by his death in jail. I think he committed suicide, but they should try to be as disclosive as they reasonably can without breaking any rules and disclosing things that our system says should be secret and upfront about it.

And I think part of the problem here, Frank, they had shared. What happens now, Rich? Yeah, you go ahead, finish your point. I was gonna say, I think Bond problem part of the problem here, right? But what happens now, Rich? Yeah, you go ahead. Finish your finish your point. I was going to say, I just I think Bondi is his weakest major cabinet pick. I understand why he wants her there. She's confirmed, right? It's hard to get someone confirmed. I sure he likes her and he'll do whatever he wants, basically. So, you know, so all good as far as he's concerned.

But I don't think this press conference, hypothetical press conference, I don't think she can do it. I don't think she'd pull it off very well. I think there'd be more questions left on, more questions afterwards than you were when you began. She just, she's handed this totally incompetently because I'm not sure she's that competent. So look, I think they're going to release more. I think they have to.

I think transparency is like the go-to for everyone here in this kind of situation Mike Johnson was saying release everything With Benny Johnson the other day, so I think they'll release more but I don't think they're they're ever gonna satisfy a lot of people because one I don't think they can be satisfied and I just I'm not sure how much of the total record can Be released Here is speaker Johnson on Benny's show yesterday, Sat 7. It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there

and let the people decide it. I mean, the White House and the White House team are privy to facts that I don't know. I mean, this isn't my lane, I haven't been involved in that, but I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there. And Pam Bondi, I don't know, when she originally made the statement, I think she was talking about documents as I understood it.

They were on her desk. I don't know that she was specific about a list or whatever, but she needs to come forward and explain that to everybody. I like Pam. I mean, I think she's done a good job. We need the DOJ focusing on the major priorities. So let's get this thing resolved. Yeah, just put it in their review. I think that's what many and probably most Republicans would very much like, including yours truly. Just put it in their rear view. Just put it to bed. Who wants to spend the next three and a half years obsessing over Jeffrey Epstein? Not me. And so what they

really need to do now is figure out how to put it to bed. I do think of Pam Bondi, maybe a fold in Todd Blanch. He could probably do it. The two of them together. Maybe you bring over a cash or a Dan. So it's like United Front and Cormaga has somebody there who they really do trust. I don't know. But what President Trump is doing is trying to, you know, he understands strength and he understands how to like, yeah, completely overpower people. And he's using those powers to try to stop the conversation.

But I think he's also risking some alienation of some key supporters. We kicked it off with that Andrew Schultz soundbite, but you can't, I don't think it's a good idea even for Trump to look at his supporters and say, you're selfish and you're weaklingslings and I don't want your support if you're still interested in this. Overly dismissive, right? But this is his MO, right? It's a bulldozer all the time and usually it's worked out for him. So you understand him going there and also understand the frustration. I mean, this has been like a historic month, a historic month in terms of his presidency

and whatever, what he's been able to get done and to have, after all this stuff has happened, to be talking about this has to be immensely frustrating. Who does he have to thank for that? Pam Bondi, who put out that stupid memo. Like, why didn't she, why did it have to come out now? Why didn't, like, what was the rush to get that out? Like, this, two Sundays ago, I don't get it. She did step on a lot of his big

accomplishments. It's I just don't think Pam Bonnie is going to recover from this very easily. She needs to save herself by some sort of a massive sit down oppressor. Although Trump still is in her corner. That's very clear here. He is moments ago in the oval. Watch. I really think that she's done very good. She says I gave you all the credible information. And if she finds any more credible information, she'll give that to what more can she do than that? I mean, honestly, what more can she do? And we do have bigger problems. You know, we have problems with millions of illegal people that came in here and they're killers and murderers. We have 11,888 murderers that were allowed in to our country by Biden,

sleepy Joe Biden, stupid Joe Biden. Okay. She's got the president in her corner. But I do think she's hurting him now. Now, like she's crossed over into political liability and that has to be rectified someplace. Put apart whether you're into Epstein or you're not. Put that to the side. Just talk, we're just talking politics here. She's been dinged up severely

and she's leading him to get, you know, in the controversy. Which I don't think any of his supporters want to see. Yeah, yeah, nobody wants to see. Why doesn't he just let her twist in the wind and put her out there to press her and then he's kind of washed his hands of it? Yeah. The problem is, if I'm right, the presser wouldn't go well.

And who knows, maybe I'm wrong and then very wrong before. There's just more fuel on the fire. So the problem is maybe that she messed it up and she herself might not be capable of fixing it. So she is just twisting out there in the wind. Well, they're banking on enough time passing that it'll go away. However, I, you know, Laura Trump said two nights ago

that they are gonna release more. You heard Trump say Bondi will release more to the extent she can. It's not confidential. So right now they're both saying, we'll release more and also fuck off. So that's where we are. I will say Megan,

we've been through this like a hundred times where there's some controversy, there's some fix that Trump is in. It's like impossible to see how he gets out of it or how it's gonna end. And it seems like it's gonna be a long lasting, then it always ends and he always gets out of it or how it's going to end. And it seems like it's going to be a long lasting, then it always ends. And he wants to gets out of it. Yeah.

This is a little different, right? Cause obviously it's a base pushing it rather than CBS news or whatever. But, but there seems to be an expiration date on every Trump controversy, no matter what. Yeah, I think that's right. I mean, I just think like Trump is doing too many great things for this to remain the dominant news headline and that's appropriate. I mean, there's always going to be curiosity with it.

It's now going to be like a JFK, you know, mystery that people always harken back to. The only question is when does this acute chapter of pain close and end and everybody in the news at least moves on so that we can start talking about other things. I think, you know, we're probably already getting there, but Trump could have certainly hurry that along and stop the bleeding by putting her out there or doing something to be a little bit more transparent. Notwithstanding the fact that you'll always have people

who will say, not enough, I still don't believe, but I think there's a huge faction that actually would accept that. We'll see. All right, I wanna ask you about Ukraine and Trump because it's pretty remarkable what's going on right now. Trump, when he was running for office,

said I'll get that war settled in a day. He said, I'll get that war settled in a day. He wasn't able to get that war settled in a day. He later said, I was being facetious, obviously, but he genuinely wants it to stop. I mean, I truly think Trump loathes war in a uniquely special way. And now he's sort of reopened the spigot of arms to Ukraine via NATO by like providing them to NATO and then they'll provide them to Ukraine, which is a little less exposure for the United States and rather than it just being us versus another nuclear power. And I think like I'm giving, I was giving this speech out here in Vail and a lot of Republicans there and somebody was saying,

has he betrayed us? Like, does he not understand that the base elected him to be, you know, to not keep funding Ukraine, to not keep funding our own forever wars or somebody else's, like, what's he doing? And my own thought on it, Rich, was, you know, Trump really gave Putin every benefit of the doubt. He tried to his typical like say nice things

about your enemies and mean things about your friends. And it worked to great extent on the tariffs and other ways, but Putin just can't be charmed. And slowly but surely Trump came to his own realization, which is what needed to happen on Putin. Trump no longer trusts him. I don't think he likes him. I think he feels like Putin was trying to play him and Trump has now seen that for himself.

And so I do think we're at a new day now where he's got, he's always had to have like one foot in the more isolationist JD Vans, Tucker Carlson camp, and one foot in the more neo-Khani camp. And I think maybe he's got like a couple toes from that first camp now also over, the balance is moving to something that I think, the more isolated, the more neo-Khani camp. And I think maybe he's got like a couple toes from that first camp now also over. The balance is moving to something that I think,

you know, the more traditional wing of the party would like. Yeah, I agree on all points. It's very, very important that person asks you that question, never said he was gonna cut off Ukraine. He never did. A lot of people around him said it. A lot of people who wanted to cut off Ukraine ended up in high level positions, but he never said it himself. And I was fairly, I'm a Ukraine hawk, but I was much more bullish on Trump's policy here than a lot of other hawks.

Because I thought there's a chance he could shake something loose and we'd get some sort of peace deal as it can be a good peace deal or it might just be a ceasefire for a couple of years, whatever it is, but you just really draw a line where the control is now and says, Russia, we regret it, but Russia is taking this territory. We're not gonna get it back anytime soon. They keep it for now. And that Putin might go along with that because he'd be afraid of pissing off Trump. And he wasn't, he's not as afraid enough.

And then I thought if Putin clearly is playing along, Trump would turn on him eventually. And a lot of Ukraine hawks over the last six months like, see, you're wrong. You're wrong about him. He just likes Putin. He's just with Putin. I'm not sure. It took a little longer than I would have liked, but he has made the turn because a lot of things about Trump, they're sort of gonzo and they're big true social posts, but underneath it's kind of a conventional

or commonsensical approach. Iran, you give them 50 days or 60 days or whatever to talk to them before Israel hits them. And then nothing comes of it, you hit them, right? That's a very conventional thing. Here, see if you can get a peace deal. Why not? If you can't, well then you move to another policy.

And I think the key thing is not the terror threats. I don't think that moves Putin. But I do think, unfortunately, you just got to give Ukraine more weapons and say to Putin, this has already been a meat grinder for you. It's going to be more of a meat grinder for you. And you're not really going to gain any more territory. And maybe you're going to outlast us. You think you're going to outlast us. We're going to be highly painful for you. And maybe you're going to outlast us, but you think you're going to outlast us, but we're going to be highly painful for you. And maybe you'll think differently in a year and we'll talk then. So I think that's the basic approach. Approach in is the correct one. Exactly right.

I think he said something interesting about Melania. Did you see this the other day? Yeah, I loved that. I'd hang up from a phone call with Putin and say, I had a really nice talk with Vladimir. And she'd say, oh really? Because he just bombed another city. I'd get home, I'd say, first lady, I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir.

I think we're finished. And then I'll turn on the television or she'll say to me one time, wow, that's strange because they just bombed a nursing home. They said, what? So. Now I think that's so interesting because of course, Melania Trump of all people would understand very well the instincts of a man like Vladimir Putin, given where she grew up in Eastern, you know, the Eastern Bloc, what used to be part of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and probably has a very different idea of how he operates and whether her husband should trust him. Completely. And this is, you know, with the Epstein clips from Trump, you know, he throws a lot of chaff and BS out there, but they're also part

of his power as a communicator. It's so real and hits home. Of course, this is the kind of thing that happens, right? You think you're doing something great You go home your spouse says I don't think it's so great, you know, why is this happening? you know, it's it was funny it was memorable and and rings true and Melania has been right about this and and the president finally realizes it I Think it's great because she doesn't She doesn't try to you know, she's not on camera or on the scene giving Trump a lot of political advice.

She's very happy, to my delight, frankly, to be behind the scenes, a supporter of her husband and not like a lady Jill Biden who's out there like a Lady Macbeth. Yeah, and Melania occasionally shows up with wearing a fancy hat, you know, and at events. Looking amazing. Yeah, she's not helping run cabinet meetings. But it's just a reminder that she obviously is very powerful. And if you talk to anybody in Trump land, anybody, they'll say the one person like he will listen to all the time and might even fear a little bit is Melania.

She's earned it by not being too vocal and too annoying on too many issues. And so it's pretty interesting that she she's playing an important role behind the scenes here. We'll see. I mean, no one wants to see this war go on and on and on. It doesn't seem winnable, but either side would love for it just to come to some conclusion sometime soon, so all the killing can stop. Lastly, let's talk up for a minute about illegal immigration because there was an ice raid in California on a marijuana farm the other day, and not only did they conduct an ice raid, but they wound up rescuing, this is on Thursday, at least 14 migrant children, including 10 who were unaccompanied minors.

They've been now turned over to HHS. So you have illegals who are here who are minors with no parents. You have no idea who their parents are. Working at a pot farm in California, the ICE agents arrested at least 361 illegals. That's up from the original 319 that were reported. And among those who were arrested, we've got previously deported Mexican alien convicted of kidnapping, attempted rape, and attempted child molestation. Mexican alien previously convicted of rape and DUI. Salvadoran alien previously convicted of DUI and hit and run. Mexican alien convicted three times for burglary and a DUI.

These are dangerous people who Gavin Newsom was effectively allowing to work on this pot farm and who Trump and his ICE agents and Tom Homan went in there and got, rescuing those children. This, as elsewhere, you get reports, still out of California, this is actually via National Review, that you've got a professor at California State, Jonathan Anthony Caravello,

who was being detained by federal agents after a riot at a different place, the Glasshouse Farms, I think, wait, that might be the same place actually, same place, for throwing tear gas, a tear gas canister at the ICE agents. He ran toward the canister, picked it up, threw the canister overhand back at the border patrol agents. It came within approximately several feet of the law enforcement's heads. So this is what the Trump team is up against. And the National Review team has a post up today

talking about how this could all be solved by E-Verify. Like, why haven't we done that? So your thoughts on the E-Verify piece of it and just the news out of California. Yeah, well, tolerating legal immigration creates this cesspool of illegality that leads to all sorts of hideous abuses. So it doesn't surprise me that you go to that farm that's employing so many illegal workers

and you have additional illegality on top of it. So there's always going to be a place for ice raids. But again, I think the main name of the game is cutting off the jobs magnet and making it much harder to employ illegal immigrants. In these raids, they shouldn't just be targeting illegal workers. They should be frog marching, you know, the occasional HR person or the employer or the boss of the business that's been violating the laws to make a point, don't do this because you might get caught by the law as well.

But the easiest way to do it is to have a mandatory verify system where you have to verify that your employees are actually legal. There is no nod and wink arrangement. You can't claim, oh, I didn't really know. They gave me these fake documents. And then it becomes much harder to employ illegal immigrants without ICE having to go to the trouble of actually raiding places. And if illegal immigrants get the message, you know, it's not as

easy to work here as I was led to believe it wasn't easy as easy to work here as it was six months ago, or a year ago, then you get the the self deportation, which if you're gonna get we've talked about this before, if you get the numbers way up, you need people to leave without having to expend federal resources, tracking them down, detaining them and returning them out of government plane or whatever. You need them to go the same way they came under their own power. So I think it verifies a key part of it.

But again, Trump, because he's a little conflicted about this issue, he hates illegal immigration, but he also has a lot of sympathy for employers who need immigrant employees, hasn't been willing to really push for this system. And he has so much power in the party right now. If he just said he favors it, it'd become a kind of orthodoxy almost instantly. Immediately. Immediately. Yeah. and he's also worried about the economy. And I think he's been convinced that mass deportations of farm workers and hotel workers would hurt the economy. I mean, I think maybe short-term that would be true,

but then they'd have to offer higher wages to actual American citizens, which would boost quality of life and net wind up boosting his approval ratings. That's my own back of the envelope. Would you like to see the professor, the Cal State professor who threw the canister at the cops? Maybe you didn't click on it on national review,

but there he is, right on brand. I mean, it looks for the listening audience like a totally crazed, I don't know. Oh, he's got the same hair as Scott Pressler, who we love, but then he's got just like this crazed look on his face with a very 70s looking shirt and big glasses and some facial scruff and they enjoy prison, professor. It looks like Zoran.

He looks like Zoran Mondani's economics professor from college. Taught him everything he knows about the market. But a little like Sonia Sotomayor, but that's too mean to Sonia Sotomayor. Here here is some of the video that we have here. A little like Sonia Sotomayor, but that's too mean to Sonia Sotomayor. Here is some of the video that we have here. Look at this, of protesters throwing objects at agents in vans. This is in Los Angeles as they try to conduct their raids. One appears to fire a gun at federal agents as they're out there.

These guys, the ICE agents are doing yeoman's work and they are just getting beaten up in city after city and then beaten up on the airwaves by losers like Anna Navarro, right? Who are comparing them to the Gestapo with their commentary. And then Tom Holman, who's a hero, goes on with NBC's Dasha Burns. And look at this, what happens here, South 13.

I think one of the things that's had a lot of folks up in arms is that ICE agents, unlike other law enforcement, have been masked to protect their identities. That's not something that we've really had on this scale in this country. Do you? Well, we never have the scale of attacks on ICE. We have now up 700% attacks on ICE. Doxing against ICE agents. Well, you've had increased attacks on police officers as well in the wake of attacks on ice. We have now up 700% attacks on ice. Doxing against ice agents

like- Will you find increased attacks on police officers as well in the wake of the defund the police movement too, but they haven't put masks on? You name a police agency as a 700% increase on assaults. Name one. I haven't looked at that data. Yeah. You won't find one. The same people are complaining about ice wearing masks. Have they ever said anything about BLM protests or wear a mask? Let me let me answer though

Let me yeah, okay Everything about the mass protesters that became criminals and college campuses that threatened Jewish students and took over buildings destroyed property They were all wearing massive anybody passed legislation saying they can't wear a mask during a protest. No or a mask, did anybody pass legislation saying they can't wear a mask during a protest? No. Is it possible for a administration official to be your own personal heroine? Because Tom Homan is my own personal heroine.

He's so good. When I was just looking at that, you know, I was looking at the clip, it reminds me a little bit of JD Vance during the campaign. JD would go on any program, always sure-footed, and occasionally corner the interviewers himself, which is exactly what Homan did there with Dasha Burns. And what's happening to ICE agents, this is what you'd want to happen in a healthy society if there really was a Gestapo stalking the streets, right? But this is not the Gestapo. They're federal law enforcement agents that are trying to enforce laws that are on the books. You know, they

they say they're internment camps, you know, alligator Alcatraz and all the rest of it. The federal law says illegal immigrants shall be detained, right? So it's the other side that's ignored the law and been literally lawless forever. And now the law is actually being enforced. And perversely, that's being made into the dark night of fascism descending. It's crazy. It's totally crazy. And I should correct myself. I guess Dasha Burns left NBC in January of last year and now is with Politico. That's what we were watching there. Well, look, I think the ICE stuff is just getting better and better.

They hit another record low on the illegal border crossings in June. I mean, it was a crazy number. It was so good. Everything's working there. Unfortunately, Rich, the latest poll I saw showed people are now veering more toward, well, we shouldn't deport them all. Which I'm like, that's because of the southern border being secure. It's the same way how New York City residents voted for the awful Bill de Blasio and are apparently gonna vote for this defund the police mom, Donnie.

They are forgetting what life was like pre-Juliani. It only took six months of Trump in office for this defund the police, Mom, Donnie, they are forgetting what life was like pre Giuliani. It only took six months of Trump in office for them to forget what life was like under Joe Biden and the masses who came in this country. Now they're like, oh, maybe it's not so bad. Now it was one poll, it was Gallup, it was a pretty decent sample size if memory holds. But it's just so funny how quickly people are like, oh, problem solved. Totally.

Yeah, totally. That was inevitable. But I think the administration is committed to kind of punching their way through it because I mean, have we even put a dent really on the Biden influx in terms of numbers, in terms of just getting that number of people out? No. So there's so much work yet to be done. So I don't think they're going to be deterred. But it's kind of inevitable the polling would shift at least

some because one, you know, that you don't have the problem coming in from the border, as you're pointing out. Two, I mean, you are going to have to reach people who are just illegal immigrants who aren't criminals. You know, they have to go to they don't belong here and they're more sympathetic than the MS-13 member or whatever. Yeah. Rich Lowry, you're such a standup guy for coming on and saving me this morning. You were supposed to come on later, but you readjusted schedule to join me here in Vail, Colorado.

If you can do the show from a random conference room at the airport, surely I could show up on my phone an hour or two early to accommodate you. Seriously, I wasn't expecting it. I was like, well, I was trying to get my makeup on in this room and the nice lady is running in the sound bite list. Thank God. I greatly appreciate their help.

Aspen and Vale are wonderful places to go, but you always run this risk. They're hard to get in and out of. Unfortunately, eventually I hope to make it home and I hope to be broadcasting tomorrow from the normal studio in New Jersey, at least during the summer. Rich, thank you. Awesome, safe travels. All right, thank you.

And thanks to all of you for tuning in. We will be back, we hope, tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Megyn Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear. Afternoons can be rough. Energy fades, cravings kick in, and focus goes out the window. The quick fix, another coffee. But that can lead to jitters, or a crash leader, or focus goes out the window. The quick fix? Another coffee.

But that can lead to jitters or a crash later or bad night sleep. Peek's Sun Goddess Matcha is another option. It can give steady energy and help you focus without the ups and downs. This isn't just any matcha. It's organic, ceremonial grade, and grown in Japan's pure volcanic soil, far away from pollution. It's harvested by tea masters and screened for toxins not once but four times. That's how serious they are about quality. The taste is smooth, creamy, and rich. Not bitter like lower quality matcha. It's packed with

antioxidants to keep you sharp and steady. Whether it's how the day starts or how it gets back on track, this matcha is not just a drink It can be a better daily habit right now You can get up to 20% off for life plus a free rechargeable frother and glass beaker. That's nice It's backed by a 90-day money-back guarantee. So go to peak life comm slash Megan that spelled p I q u e Life comm slash Megan to try it for yourself again. That's p I-I-Q-U-E-life.com slash Megan to try it for yourself. Again, that's P-I-Q-U-E-life.com slash Megan. Why are elite athletes, business leaders, and high performers turning to Armra Colostrum?

Armra Colostrum is nature's first whole food, packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that work at the cellular level to support lean muscle growth, accelerate recovery and fuel performance, all without artificial stimulants or synthetic ingredients. Whether you are training hard, managing a busy schedule, or simply looking for an edge, Armour says it can help optimize your body for peak output. Armour Colustrum reports to enhance metabolism, improve nutrient absorption, and support hormone balance for better energy and fat burning potential. Additional benefits include support for hair growth, skin radiance, and faster recovery

after intense activity, making it a powerful tool for anyone looking to perform at their best. Here's a special offer. Receive 30% off your first subscription order. Just go to armra.com slash megan or enter code MEGAN at checkout. That's armra.com slash megan to get 30% off your first subscription order.