The Megyn Kelly Show - Bill Clinton's TRUE Epstein Ties, and New Guthrie Case Videos Revealed, with Mike Benz, Fitz and O'Connell | Ep. 1262

Episode Date: February 27, 2026

Megyn Kelly begins the show by calling out Bill Clinton ahead of his forced deposition related to Jeffrey Epstein, revisiting his long history of connections to Epstein, his obvious lies and spin in public statements over the past couple months, and more. Then Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, joins to discuss the critical gaps in the Jeffrey Epstein files between 1999 and 2001, why Epstein's earlier Bear Stearns years are critical to understanding the whole picture, why full declassification of CIA and State Department records is essential to understand Epstein’s role and relationships, claims that Alex Acosta said Jeffrey Epstein “belonged to intelligence,” what Acosta has said publicly since, why Epstein's intel connections are so crucial to understanding the truth about him, and more. Then Jim Fitzgerald and Maureen O'Connell, former FBI agents, join to discuss Savannah Guthrie’s latest Instagram plea emphasizing that the cash reward can be claimed anonymously, whether her appearance was strategically crafted to appeal directly to the abductors, new Ring camera footage showing a white car leaving Nancy Guthrie’s neighborhood around the estimated time of her disappearance, conflicting reports about whether the vehicles could be connected to the case, and more. Then Megyn dives into Megan Rapinoe trashing Team USA men’s hockey for taking a call from President Trump, her critique of Kash Patel being in the locker room, her constant hate and hypocrisy, the wild story of a top SCOTUS lawyer gambling millions and now going to jail, and more.   Benz- https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber O'Connell- https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/best-case-worst-case/id1240002929 Fitzgerald- https://www.youtube.com/@ColdRedPodcast-tb2lb/featured   Done with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.com & tell them Megyn Kelly sent you! SaunaSpace: Discover why SaunaSpace’s infrared FireLight tech is redefining at‑home wellness—visit https://Sauna.Space/MEGYN and use code MEGYN for 10% off your entire order. PureTalk: Tired of big wireless prices? Switch to PureTalk for unlimited talk and text for $25/month—dial #250 and say MEGYN KELLY for 50% off your first month. Birch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold     Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow  Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Welcome to The Megan Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East. Hey everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly Show and happy Friday. We have new video in the case of Nancy Guthrie. We will break down whether it is providing any promising leads in the investigation with Fitz and Maureen just a bit. And a legend in the legal community discovered to be carrying on a double life convicted on the charges against, I'm sorry, but my legal world has been rocked by the conviction of this guy, Tom Goldstein. He is truly one of the most respected lawyers in America. one of the elite members of the Supreme Court bar, which is not easy to get into, the founder of SCOTUS blog, where all lawyers go whenever there is a big Supreme Court case. And he's been convicted. This guy is almost certainly heading to prison for a long time. He turned down a plea deal of five years because he was like, I'm not serving time. He was leading a whole double life. I mean, a total double life. He was cheating on his wife. He was using women off of some website for like sugar. daddies. He is like about five foot seven bald, um, as do we be legal looking as you get. You know, just like your quintessential look, what you picture when you picture like geeky Supreme Court lawyer. So well respected there. Guarantee all the nine justices know him and have

probably socialized with him. And the whole while in the past seven, eight years, he's been flying all over the world. He's been winning and losing fortunes at every turn. He was convinced. He was convicted of lying about it all on his tax returns, understating his income on the winning year, so he didn't have to pay taxes on it, not disclosing his debts when he applied for mortgages, which is a serious problem. You're $15 million in debt and you want to get a $3 million loan for a home. You better disclose that. That's relevant. It's crazy to me. It's just crazy to me that this can happen, right? It's like, who else out there is leading this like, respectable life. And then you find out it's all a facade. It's a facade. They, they're smart. A lot of

these guys, they're clever. This guy has no adrenaline. None. There's no adrenaline flow in him. He kind of talked about it at these high-stake poker games where he was winning 10 or 20 million dollars. And then the next day, he'd be in front of the Supreme Court arguing some massive case for like Google. They're built differently. Maybe they're sociopaths. I don't know, but I'm very interested in this. And it's not totally unrelated to the story we're going to kick off the show with, which is Epstein. Not that Goldstein was linked to Epstein.

He wasn't. But I'm just talking about, like, the facade that these prominent people put on. And it can be women. Galane Maxwell is one who comes to mind, possibly Hillary Clinton, though she denies even knowing Epstein. But Galane Maxwell certainly, and she was friends with Hillary. Mostly men, though, out there making gazillions of dollars. you know, the paragon of virtue, the principal person, the picture of responsibility.

And behind the scenes, you know, what's with the weird grape soda and pizza emails over and over between Epstein and his accountant? And what's with President Bill Clinton as soon as he's out of office? And we're not talking like, you know, 20 years passed. And he was like, no one's paying attention to me anymore. I'm going to go see this pervert, Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, right after. I showed you the picture yesterday of my friends with Bill Clinton in 1999.

By the way, that's literally the picture on the front of the New York Post's homepage right now. And like, it's Abby Rittman and Meg Florence. They're together in 1999 in this restaurant right outside or right in D.C. And they were, you know, 20 at the time. Now they're closer my age. But look at him. This dog is still president. and he's staring down the blouse of my one friend,

and his hand is dangerously close to my friend's side boob. Okay, this is, he's still in office. His wife and daughter are across the restaurant. And my friends gave me this photo, like a while back. They were like, look at this. We had a good laugh over it. And I'm like, you know, I'm going to put that on the air. And today seemed like a good day yesterday because the Clintons are testifying on Epstein.

But my point is like, brazen, brazen, right? Like, hiding in plain sight. So Bill Clinton goes from that right after Lewinsky. to paling around with Jeffrey Epstein, 2000 through 2004 or five around there, in that man's hot tub with all these women. It's incredible. It's incredible what happens. And I'm sure it is still happening with people other than Epstein right now.

He's sitting right now in the same seat. His wife was in yesterday up in Chappaqua, New York. I've been up there. They have this beautiful home. It's like picturesque on this roll. Hill type property. They're living large, the Clintons. They've got lots of staff.

They got their loser daughter out there. The ultimate Nepo baby trying to pretend we care what she has to say about. Maha. We don't. We don't care what you have to say about anything. We feel about you the way the Today Show did. They hated you even more than they hated me. And one of us had talent.

It was just, you know, you know who the one was who didn't belong there because she had absolutely no journalism chops and got the job because her last name was Clinton. So Bill Clinton is up there now under oath. And unlike his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, he had lots of connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Lots. I mean, he was on the guy's plane dozens of times. He had multiple social outings with the guy.

I mean, raise your hand if you've been in a hot tub with Jeffrey Epstein and some women. Not an experience most of us have had. Bill, though, we know from these files, had many interactions. with him for years. For years he did with Jeffrey Epstein. And so now he's on the hot seat and he's going to have to answer for all that today in front of the House Oversight Committee, which is investigating him. Yesterday it was Hillary, as I said, and she came out and said, no, and I didn't know anything. I swear, I knew nothing. Here she is to the press after the deposition and sought to. Well, I have just finished testifying. I answered every one of their

questions as fully as I could based on what I knew and what I knew is what I said in my statement this morning. I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had any connection or communication with him. I knew Galane Maxwell casually as an acquaintance, but whatever they asked me, I did my very best to respond. I don't know how many times. I had to say, I did not know Jeffrey Hepstein. I never went to his island. I never went to his homes. I never went to his offices.

So it's on the record numerous times. Ugh, she's so contemptible about that woman. And now Bill Clinton's in the hot seat. And it's going to go differently for him today. I mean, I believe her that she didn't know Jeffrey Epstein, but she knew Galane. That's what's interesting about her. She knew her husband knew Epstein very well, all of them. the time she was married to him.

What did, has she asked any questions? Did she then? Did she once Epstein pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution with a minor, which is not a thing? Here's Bill Clinton, who just offered an opening statement before his testimony. Would you listen to this? As someone who grew up in a home with domestic abuse. Okay. Not only would I not have flown on his plane if I,

any inkling of what he was doing, I would have turned him in myself and led the call for justice for his crimes, not sweetheart deals. Sure, Jan. The reason I'm here is that the girls and women whose lives Jeffrey Epstein destroy deserve not only justice, but healing. Okay. You and your crazy-ass wife used George Stephanopoulos and James Carville to create whole warrooms to destroy the young women who were accusing you of far less than Jeffrey Epstein was ever accused of. You destroyed them. You organized massive PR campaigns to undermine their credibility, woman after woman after woman, who we now know we're telling the truth, and who I certainly believe we're telling

the truth about you. Kathleen Willie is one. Juanita Broderick is another. Paula Jones is another. Jennifer Flowers is another. So just fucking spare me, spare me that you now really have a lot of concern about the women and girls allegedly called up in the Epstein web. The reason I'm here is the girls and women whose lives Epstein destroyed deserved justice

and healing. Oh my God, you're such a fucking liar. This guy just wrote in his stupid letter trying to get out of this deposition along with his wife, co-signed, literally by his wife, there comes a time in every person's life where they have to decide if they're going to roll over for this fascistic government or whether they're prepared to fight. That time for us is now. They were ready. They wanted to be martyr. We are going to fight this administration. We have no information on Epstein. This is just a complete bully job. And then they were told in no uncertain terms, they were going to get the Steve Bannon treatment.

You don't show up to comply with the subpoena. You go to. to prison and they folded like a cheap tent. They collapsed like a deck of cards, like that. Oh, maybe that time is not now. It's like, maybe somebody else was going to have to say this is the time. Maybe we'll say this at the time, but like six or 12 months down the line. Oh, wait, we have to give testimony before then. So they did. There's such a couple of posers. Everything about them. Everything is about their image. If you read, you should Google that letter. In fact, let's post that letter in our, let's include a link to that in our MK American News Minute. We send it out once a week.

We send you an email with all the news of the week. You can sign up at Megan Kelly.com. And I'm going to include a link to their letter that they wrote. It is the most absurd, self-aggrandizing thing you've ever read. It waxes poetic about all the reasons that this is so unjust that we're calling them in there to testify and how terrible this government is and they will fight. they will be the ones. They have the wherewithal. They have the means. They rolled over like Rover just as soon as James Comer was like, well, I will send you to prison. And I have a

Department of Justice ready to pursue those charges. I mean immediately. So that's how they got here under protest. But now Bill Clinton says, the reason I am here is that the girls and women whose lives Epstein destroyed deserve not only justice, but healing. You didn't want to show up. You said there comes a time in every man's life where he has to decide whether he's going to fight, and that time is now. You only went in once Comer threatened you with prison. They started off lying. It's like, unbelievable.

Here's the third paragraph. Though my brief acquaintance with Epstein ended years before his crimes came to light, and though I never witnessed during our limited interactions any indication of what was truly going on, I'm here to offer what little I know so that it might prevent anything like this from ever happening again. You made Hillary come in. She had nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Nothing. No matter how many photos you show me, I have two things that at the end of the day matter more than your interpretation of those 20-year-old photos. I know what I saw and more importantly what I didn't see. I know what I did, more importantly, what I didn't do. I saw nothing and I did nothing wrong. You'll often hear me say that I don't recall. Oh, he's setting the table before he says anything. That might be unsatisfying, but I'm not going to say something I'm not sure of. That was all. a long time ago. It ends with that, Mr. Chairman, fire away. This is a man who's already lied under oath. Depends

on what the definition of is, is. And that's what he was impeached for, because he lied under oath, threatened with disbarment because he's a lawyer. And so that's what we're getting under oath today. Not exactly a proven truth teller. And already he sets the table with, you're going to

hear me say, I don't recall. That's his favorite, among other dishonest people's favorite trick for getting out of telling hard truth. Yes, some honest people also don't recall. But over and over and over, to the point where you need to set it up before you even begin testifying,

and this stinks to high heaven. No one believes we're going to get the straight, skinny from him at all. But I'm glad they're putting him through the exercise. Let's get him on the record. Let's try. Why should he be treated differently than Les Wexner, who stinks to high heaven too? It's gross.

These guys are disgusting. Let me just go back to my friend's picture for a second. There's no crime in what he's doing there. But just think of what a disgusting pig. Ladies, think if you saw your husband like this. It's the sitting president of the United States, okay? And you're in the restaurant with him. Your child is in the restaurant with him.

Chelsea and Hillary were there, according to my friends. My two friends were there with a table full of guys and some other friends. And he came over to them. He wanted his picture with them. And think of this were your husband. After he'd been impeached, after the Monica Lewinsky story had broken, after the story with the, you know, sexual acts with a cigar had broken, you'd been nationally humiliated, yes, through Jennifer Flowers, that came out when he was running, and through

Monica Lewinsky now, who was giving him blowjobs in the Oval Office, and then you see your husband posed for a photo where he's literally trying to get a look at some strange, beautiful woman's tits while he's appearing to slide his hand toward the breasts of the other one. These are young girls, they're 20 at the time. He's a disgusting pervert. Truly, most of us, our husbands would never do this in a million years. They wouldn't behave like this. Never mind as sitting president, never mind in the wake of the Lewinsky and flowers and other scandals. All those names I ticked off that they created the war room for that happened all before this. That's who's testifying today, worried about the young women and the girls. That's what brought him here on the thing he totally objected to doing

until he was threatened with jail. Like, I can't. I can't with these two. There's a lot to go over on them, on Epstein in general, and where we think the disclosures thus far have led us, and we didn't think

there was a better person to talk to about that than Mike Benz, who's never been on the program, but who I've admired on his testimonials elsewhere. He's a former State Department official and executive director

of Foundation for Freedom Online. Let's talk about what's really happening right now. New data shows financial stress can be at an all-time high. Many Americans are at a breaking point. Debt maxed out, no extra dough, no room to breathe. And some people are running out of options. Listen, if debt has been weighing on you, you are not alone. And when it comes to debt, waiting usually makes it worse. Interest piles up, minimum payments keep you stuck. You stress out day by day, worse and worse. But you don't need another loan or bankruptcy. That'll only stress you out more. You need. You need,

a strategy. This is why I want to tell you about done with debt. They built a smart, personalized plan, and they build it around you. They are experienced at knowing what it takes to get you the biggest reductions possible. Whether you owe $10,000 or much, much more, done with debt has one clear goal to lower what you owe so you keep more of your paycheck every month. Start with a free consultation. They know you're in debt, so they make it free. It takes just minutes. Share your situation and find out what's possible. What do you have to lose? You don't have to stay stuck and stressed. Go to done with debt.com. That's done with debt.com. Mike, welcome to the show, your thoughts on all that. Thanks, Megan. Thanks for having me. Well, it's really two peas in a pod,

Clinton and Epstein. When you just went through your description of Clinton with your friend and that restaurant scene, you can certainly understand. how Clinton and Epstein were, you know, like attracts like, I suppose. But what comes to mind when I think about the Clinton-Ebstein story is there's this quote, you may remember, that Hillary Clinton came forward with in 2014. She said, we came out of the White House, not only dead broke, but in debt. As I recall, we were something like $12 million in debt. And that sticks out to me when I think about,

the Epstein-Clinton affair. It's been reported by the New York Post that Jeffrey Epstein is on the White House Visitors' logs in the 1990s, at least 17 times. We know that the Bill Clinton State Department rented out a five-story mansion to Jeffrey Epstein directly after it seized it from the government of Iran. And then we know that Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers testified in court. that Epstein helped set up the Clinton Foundation in the early 2000s. 2001, 2002 is when Epstein began flying Bill Clinton around on his Africa tour as they were

setting up the Clinton Foundation. We know from the Epstein files that Epstein's, you know, one of the ways that he seems to capture people in network is by getting politicians towards the end of their government service as they're transitioning into the private sector, hooked up with lucrative private sector deals that leverage their government connections. This was something that Epstein did with the Houd Barak, the Prime Minister of Israel, who was then the defense minister when he was poached by Epstein, did this with Bill Burns, who was the Deputy Secretary of State, when he went on to the Carnegie Foundation before he became CIA Director,

did this with Kathy Rumler, who was the White House Council, who then went on to represent the Rothschild Bank and then Goldman Sachs, and appeared to have done this in some respect with President Clinton. He's in and out of the White House 17 times. He's directly leasing from the Clinton State Department and then is immediately. 2001 is when, you know, basically the Clinton's fresh out of office starts the Clinton Foundation, is being flown around by Epstein. and I would not be surprised if Epstein's donor network were early contributors to the Clinton Foundation.

I think this is one of the lines of questioning that the world is eagerly awaiting in terms of the depositions that just took place with respect to President Clinton. The Clinton Foundation has been a font of corruption. And to get the Epstein side of that story would be fascinating. Do we think we're going to? I mean, what would be most helpful, the way you normally take a deposition, is you get interrogatories and you get document requests on the party before you sit down with them, and then you pour over all that information, the written admissions, and then the documents that relate to any issue you want to ask him about, so that you can shove the document in his face and say, what is this? What's this loan? What was this job that was provided? I don't know if they have all of that with Bill and Hillary.

And thus the cross-examination, which is what a deposition really is, may be less effective. That's very possible. I would say that, you know, even if you had those, I do suspect, as you pointed out, you know, this is a president who, you know, couldn't remember if he got a blowjob five minutes ago from an intern while he was president of the United States. This is someone who will haggle with you over what the definition of his is and who pre-set up his testimony by reminding reminding the room that his memory is not what it used to be. I just can't recall.

So, you know, even if you... He's going for a well-meaning man with a, with a poorer memory. He's going for the Joe Biden defense that stopped him from getting criminally charged. Right. That's exactly right. The Robert Hur, you know, well, these are crimes, but, you know, he's a senile old man, and we don't think that a jury would

convict. So here's a get-out-jail-free card. But the fact Meanwhile, he's not being looked at for criminal charges, but he's being looked at for information to try to put together a more complete picture of Jeffrey Epstein and what we've known about Jeffrey Epstein and didn't know. And by the way, why nothing has been done about Jeffrey Epstein, including during Biden's four years as president. Well, what's frustrating to me is the, there's this whole, we have these Justice Department files. We appear to have about half of the total. you know, it's very voluminous, but there does appear to be huge portions missing, for example. It's been reported that apparently about three years worth between 1999 and 2001, the Justice

Department files basically cut off. This is a very strange gap. It's the tail end of the Clinton presidency, and there are basically no Epstein files in this DOH. J drop from mid-1999 to 2000. Well, this is a very difficult thing to explain. Well, no one has really offered a good explanation of this. There's a lot of very strange, I don't want to sidebar this with, you know, the strange kind of 9-11 issues around Jeffrey Epstein, but it is a very serious missing chunk of the Epstein piece,

especially given that Epstein was asked to be on the 9-11 Shadow Commission and was in some of these very strange networks around both the military statecraft intelligence apparatus, both pre and post-9-11. But those are critical missing years. Those are also the years that Epstein himself foiled the CIA for any open and acknowledged agency links between the CIA and himself. That was in 1999 while Bill Clinton was president. At that time, in 1999,

is when Jeffrey Epstein resolved his dispute with the Bill Clinton State Department over a five-story mansion that had been seized from the government of Iran. This is American taxpayer property, and it was rented out solely and exclusively to Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein then violated the terms the lease, not only by not paying it, so the taxpayer was eating the bill, but subletting it out

to the criminal defense lawyer for the French connection and pizza connection drug ring cases, which are both drug ring cases involving alleged CIA protection of drug rings in France and Italy. Wait, I'm lost. But let me just pause for a second. Quick question. Is this, is this the mansion that Jeffrey would ultimately purchase? that was the largest mansion in New York?

This was prior to that. This was the... Okay, so you're saying when Bill Clinton was president, his State Department seized this townhome from the Iranians, and then he leased it, or the State Department, I guess, allowed Jeffrey Epstein to lease it, and it resulted in subsequent legal disputes with respect to Jeffrey Epstein's what, non-payment or who...

Yes, so Epstein stopped making payments. So it's $15,000 a month in the 1990. and this was, you know, this giant property overlooking Central Park, five stories, upper east side, and then he violated the lease terms by subletting it out to this lawyer connected to these very high-profile cases involving some pretty seedy elements of the intelligence overworld and, criminal underworld. What I'm getting at here is if this Justice Department and our legislative oversight bodies want to show their seriousness in terms of pursuing the Clinton leads here,

I'm calling for full declassification of all State Department and CIA files because all we have are a fraction of the Justice Department and by extension FBI files. But the fact is, the State Department would have had to have diligence Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s. We know that Epstein himself appeared to think that he was CIA adjacent enough to FOIA, the CIA itself, for any open and acknowledged agency links in 1999. Why would he do that? Well, Jeffrey Epstein had by that point for 20 years been doing kind of CIA adjacent banking work. or, I mean, banking is spending it charitably, but Bear Stearns, where he started his career.

Wait, wait, we'll go back. I do want to talk about the Bear Stearns thing, but just before you get to, just like I'm looking for just the broad answer on why he would FOIA, the CIA, about what context they had with himself. I mean, something he would presumably know, but I guess he's looking for what, contacts that or work they've done on him that he didn't know about? Epstein did it through a lawyer using the Privacy Act, which is a way of basically pre-foiling what other people could see about you. So this is before he became a public figure. He wasn't really publicly known until 2001, 2002. That was when he first became, the public took an interest who's flying President Clinton around Africa. That was really when his public star began to rise.

And before that, he was seeing what the public would see about him if they were to boy of the CIA for any open links. All right. Let's go back. Let's go back on the Bear Stearns thing. Because this is just getting ready for today and reading what you've said about that before is the first I understood what the Bearster. Because I've heard that thrown around. The Bear Stearns connection that Jeffrey Epstein started, he had a stint there, this massive, New York Bank at the time.

And you posit that his stint there, and the man he worked for and the work he did, was critical to everything that would happen in Jeffrey Epstein's life thereafter, most especially these nefarious ties with the guys he was subletting the $15 million or whatever townhouse from Iran to. And his intel connections, you know, call him an asset, call him whatever you want, but his connections, which were ubiquitous in Intel. with some very shady people and entities. And you posit that it all started

when he was a very young man hired to work at Bear Stearns. Okay, go there. So in 1975 and 1976, there were these, the CIA was brought to heal for the first time in its history. This gave rise to the Jimmy Carter years between 1976 and 1980, 19, there were reforms put on the CIA that prevented it from doing its usual.

type of operations. And so CIA exiles created this network basically in the Middle East and in Africa and Central Asia that was called the Safari Club, which was set up to basically have an offshore CIA that was unrestricted by the new handcuffs put on the CIA. And through that, a bank called BCCI was, it was, it had been created in 1972, but it became operationalized in 1976. is a way of running money to the Mujahideen. The Mujahideen was the kind of Islamo-Fascist group that would become Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

This was when the CIA was funding Osama bin Laden when he was a freedom fighter against the Russians during the Cold War. And those, the Mujahideen were financed by drug money on the Golden Crescent that was laundered through the BCCI Bank. and the guns that were shipped to the Mujahideen, the money was laundered through the BCCI bank. Bear Stearns was one of the top. So just to recap, we're talking about the Mujahideen, the Osama bin Laden linked group that we would wind up dealing with after 9-11. But they were on the opposite side of the Soviets in the 80s,

and so were we. So we did have this weird post-CIA group called the Sub-A. group called the Safari Club that was using this BCCI bank to launder its money and send out payments to bad guys who we thought could do some good for us, like against the Soviets. And, well, we're going to get to the Epstein connection, but that you're just setting it up. This is like former exiled CIA guys in the Safari Club using this BCCI bank to funnel money to groups like the Mujahideen because they were anti-Soviet as were we. Keep going.

Exactly. And so you need a broker to be able to clear. and put together these trades for the money laundering. The safari club was run by a guy. It gets his name from the Mount Kenya Safari Club in Kenya, which is where they stationed this group. That was run by a guy named Adnan Khashoggi, who at the time was rumored to be the wealthiest guy in the world.

The Time magazine floated that rumor itself. He was the world's most prolific arms dealer. He was a Saudi, based in Saudi Arabia, and he would come to be the CIA's key middleman during the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s that consumed the Reagan administration. If you remember, Epstein under Bill Clinton, was leased a building directly seized from Iran. Adnan Khashoggi was the Saudi billionaire middleman between the U.S. and Israel during the covert operation to run guns to the Iranians to fight off Saddam. Don Hussein's Iraq and to run skin profits from that to run guns to the Nicaraguan Contras against the Sandinases.

All right, Borin, two different lanes here, Iran-Contra. So how do they connect? They connect because Bear Stearns moved about $13 billion worth of transactions for BCCI that was used to launder the cash for this CIA work. that was running the guns to the Mujahideen, and then later the entire Iran-Iraq war. And so you see all throughout the Epstein files that Epstein is involved with the U.S. military,

that he's involved on DARPA projects, that he's working with military contractors, that he's getting intel about the impact of military activities on prospective deals, how he can get potentially seize military, from the government of Libya after NATO involvement with this. And what I'm trying to impress upon people is that there is a banking and military nexus that goes back decades.

And in Epstein's career, he had a 31-year continuous relationship with Bear Stearns. Even though he formally stopped being employed there in 1981, he claimed to have a 31-year continuous relationship until the day that the bank collapsed. and the New York Times even reported that late in the 1980s he was picking up the phone at home answering it as Bear Stearns even though he was on his own and I know and I want to make something also clear that I don't think has been widely reported in the Epstein files there's an incredible document that it appears to be around 2018 it's a six-page legal memo that it does not have the name of the author.

I don't know if it was Justice Department or FBI originated, but it's in the files, and it gives a list of all the counts that could be brought against Epstein prior to his indictment in 2019 after the Miami Herald break.

And it has a, it's a very thorough document, basically a dossier on all the crimes and legal theories that could be pursued. And at the very end, there is a note on background information. And it states that Jeffrey Epstein used to do work for the U.S. government. It's a direct quote in this legal memo. And it's the first time I've seen what

purports to be a government document claiming that Jeffrey Epstein worked at some point directly for the United States government. Now, what I'm trying to say here is, BCCI, the bank that was used by the CIA, to do all manner of money laundering covert ops activity. This was something that was literally used to run illegal guns, illegal drugs. It was covered up by Bob Mueller back when he was a young man and by Bill Barr, who personally wrote the pardons for six of the BCCI officials, back when Bill Barr was the head of the Justice Department the first time.

which involved, it was Doug Lease, who was Jeffrey Epstein was flying back and forth to me with in London, who used the BCCI Bank to run the guns. It was Adnan Khashoggi, who was moving billions of dollars through that, who would become a personal client of Jeffrey Epstein. It was Stanley Pottinger was using it. He was living with Jeffrey Epstein in the early 1980s. Every one of the key clients and figures for the first 15 years of Epstein's career, was involved in the BCCI scandal

while Bear Stearns, Epstein's firm, was serving as the prime broker for the BCCI banking affair. What I'm getting at is, you're basically talking about a CIA banking class. Everything the CIA does has to be laundered illegally, effectively, in order to conceal the source of the funds.

You need this banking infrastructure. this was all of these type of banking concealment arrangements require bankers. And what you're seeing here is this kind of class of folks in that finance world. And they appear to have get out of jail free cards for their other crimes because of the utility that they play in keeping the lights on at Langley. And so I bring this up because I think it's difficult to really penetrate. the Clinton side of the 1990s, if you don't have, for example,

the State Department vet of Jeffrey Epstein. Why did when they seized, and I brought up the Iran-Contra and this Safari Club thing, because it's a little strange that the State Department seized that five-story mansion from the government of Iran,

the very government that kicked off the entire CIA geopolitical whirlwind in 1979, when the whole BCCI Bank network was used specifically to respond to the Iranian Revolution in 1979 and then begin running guns. What I'm saying is, was Epstein leased that property by the State Department because he was fulfilling some sort of intelligence function, meeting with dignitarities, stakeholders, oligarchs when they came to New York City for the UN General Assembly?

was he working in some respect with intelligence or state craft and was given a five-story residence that could serve as a kind of diplomatic back channel? We know that he was on the White House visitor's logs at least 17 times in that time period. You don't go to the White House 17 times unless you're consulting with the White House in some fashion. But we don't have this side of the story. Not only is there a gap in the files themselves during these critical years, but there has not been, the bill that was passed by Congress only hit the DOJ originated side of this story. Nobody has coerced the State Department and CIA side of this, which the Democrats did,

by the way, to get JFK transparency. In 1992, they passed the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act, forced the State Department, CIA, to begin reviewing and declassifying JFK assassination files. That's how we learned about some of the most shocking documents that I've ever been declassified in American history. Operation Northwoods and the like, that only became public because of that. If the same bill were to be put forward today, I don't think anyone would vote against it. This one passed 427 to 1 and 99 to 0. Why would they have omitted state and CIA in the Epstein bill and focus just on DOJ?

I can see a reason for doing it separately because if you remember, there was this very strange moment when the bill passed and Mike Johnson came forward and did not appear particularly enthusiastic about this new obligation to do this. And he said something which I think surprised. He kept like stalling the resumption of Congress to do. to try to push it off so they wouldn't have to have a vote on it. Eventually, the pressure just got too great, and they did vote on it, and they passed it. And Trump signed it. The thing that he had been saying he didn't want, he had a huge fight with some of his favorite congresswomen over it, and ultimately he signed it, trying to look like he wanted it.

Well, it was veto. Whether he in fact wanted it. It was veto. I mean, yeah, it's, it was veto. Exactly. It was 427 to 1 in 99 to 0. nobody wanted to put their, you know, their name on the dotted line of a document, you know, of a bill, a vote count that would live in eternity. And you look like you're protecting Epstein by not not doing this. So everyone was afraid to bring it.

But once the bill was brought, everyone was afraid of the base to be on the other side of it. Now, I think one of the reasons that this was limited to the DOJ side is, for one is it does, if you had, if you, perhaps if you had lump them together, it would have, given a carte blanche to delay the, you know, the DOJ side of it because the declassification side is a sticky wicket. But the other is the national security side of this. Mike Johnson made this statement, which a lot of people, I think, were shocked by at the time. It didn't surprise me in the slightest because I've been, I've been almost campaigning on this intelligence connection side of it. But if you remember, he said, we need to make sure the documents are redacted, not to just to protect minors and victims, but to protect sensitive national security information.

And everyone went, what? What do you mean to protect sensitive national security secrets? The only way that's possible is if this is effectively classified, if Epstein was involved in classified networks or there's classified material about him. And if that's the case, that means that Epstein appeared to have been protected. But he's in, you know, the whole Alex Acosta. Yeah, wait, I want to get there. So in Vicki Ward's lengthy piece on Epstein back in 2003 for Vanity Fair, and she came on this program over the summer,

and we talked all about this. It was a great exchange. She was very interesting. And she wrote all about Jeffrey Epstein back then in 2003. She wrote the following. Because now she's looking at Alex Acosta later on whether Alex Acosta could be Trump's labor secretary, given the fact that he'd been the U.S. attorney who had given Epstein the sweetheart deal in 2008. And it was like, how is Trump going to make this guy in 2016 his labor secretary when by this point the guy's pleaded guilty to a couple of, you know, in connection with Alex Acosta's plea deal? bad counts, not as bad as they could have been, but not great.

And that it was already clear that there was like a whiff of impropriety, at least around Epstein in 16, and that Acosta had helped kind of whitewash the thing away from him. This would be for the big piece by the Miami Herald in 2018. And so Vicki writes the following. Acosta had been asked, is the Epstein case going to cause a problem for your confirmation hearings? Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day, he had had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He had cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein's attorneys because he had, quote, been told to back off that Epstein was above his pay grade.

Quote, I was told Epstein, quote, belonged to intelligence, end quote, and to leave it alone. Final end quote. He told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. And then before he was eventually forced to resign after the Miami Herald piece hit, and he was one of its stars and not in a good way, before he eventually was forced to resign on July 12th, he held a press conference on July 10th, 2019. Okay, this is right after Julie K. Brown in Miami Herald regarding outrage over his nomination. And he changed his tune from Vicki Ward's reporting. And by the way, Vicki Ward stands by every word she wrote that he, that a cost of him. was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone, but here was Acosta on July 10th, 2019.

Mr. Secretary, were you ever made aware at any point you're handling in this case if Mr. Epstein was an intelligence asset of some sort? So there has been reporting to that effect. And let me say, there's been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now, but over the years. And, and again, I would, you know, I would hesitate to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office. It was brought based on the facts. And I look at that reporting and others. I can't address it directly because of our guidelines.

But I can tell you that a lot of reporting is just going down rabbit holes. Okay. And then the Office of Responsibility, Office of Responsibility, Office of Professional Responsibility at the Department of Justice started investigating what did happen with the Epstein thing? Like, what happened there? And in November 2020, they released a 350-page report. And they claimed that they interviewed Acosta. And in their interview, he was more direct and said that no, Jeffrey Epstein wasn't Intel. That's what they claimed at OPR. So this guy, so we have Vicki Ward saying he did say, he was told to back off because he's Intel. Then we have him there equivocating on camera, sounding kind of mealy-mouthed about it,

but intimating, don't believe that. I don't, you know, he's suggesting clearly in that soundbite, he's not Intel. Then you have the Department of Justice interviewing him behind closed doors saying he said to us, no, Epstein wasn't Intel. And that's where it stands today. I don't believe word out of Alexander Acosta's mouth at this.

But I know you've taken a close look at all of this. What say you? Well, I was calling for the, for the transcripts of the OPR, the Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility, transcripts to be released, and they actually have been in the intervening time. And Acosta does appear to make a blanket denial under oath that he had any knowledge that Epstein was, quote, an intelligence asset. So that's probably as far as the thread could be pulled on that,

given the limited line of questioning that was asked about it. But the fact is, is you don't need to, you know, there's a lot of ways to interpret that question that allow you wiggle room. And I'm not comfortable with the risk. I know that there's a, I think given now that Acosta has made the denial, there's the question of forcing a kind of under oath response is, has now been probably gone as far as. as it could. But the fact is, I'm not, there's lots of ways that you can intimate that someone, quote, belongs to intelligence to a prosecutor without, you know, showing someone the 201 human intelligence file or making it, you know, making it so explicit. One of the things that the JFK file...

Well, Mike, I mean, you're right, but there's also a way that somebody at CIA or a related organization could get to you and say, you will answer that question the following way. And I don't really give a shit. What is true? This is how you're answering it. It happens all the time. Well, this is something that's just so important, I think, for the American people to not just understand, but really begin to add to their knowledge set of how our country works

and the kind of reforms that are needed. There is a relationship between the CIA and the Justice Department that I think most American people have no vision into the extent to which DOJ and CIA are interconnected. I mean, we'll just remind the audience that Bill Barr himself, who was the Attorney General, not just during the BCCI affair in the 1990s under George Bush, but also the Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department when Epstein died in prison, he started his career in the CIA for the first, I believe, seven. years of his career. He worked directly at CIA and then went to law school at night to only

become a lawyer while he was working for the CIA during the day in his first, you know, jobs there involved basically blocking any transparency into the very Iran-Contra scandal that Jeffrey Epstein himself was intimately involved with both through his client network, his banking network, and what appears to have been his operational role. And he's the one who would ultimately tell him. us that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself and that there was no way anybody could have gotten to him. This is very, like, I actually didn't understand that full history early on when I interviewed Bill Barr. It was kind of a passing reference when his book came out. We kind of covered it.

I'm like, okay, I believe him. It's a lot more complex. Back then, the Democrats were attacking Bill Barr as the mop-up man for the CIA scandals in the 1980s in the 1980s. They were attacking him in the press in the 1990s. They were attacking him in the 1980s for blocking Democrat congressional investigations into the CIA during the Iran Contra Fair, and then they were attacking him as Attorney General for basically blocking, pardoning the BCCI officials and blocking lines of inquiry into the CIA. But what's important is that last year, the JFK files dropped showing that the CIA was interfering extremely actively on criminal cases to get the Justice Department to back off of people who had committed open and flagrant crimes to protect their operational network.

There's this case of the... And for example... Wait, wait, wait. But I only have a minute left, and I don't want to... Can I just ask you, can you take that time? You have 90 seconds left. Give us the bottom line on this. What have we just learned with you over the past hour? Let's a takeaway for the viewers listening at home. The takeaway is we need the CIA and State Department side of the... this equation. We also need the missing years in the Justice Department side of this. But these two

things are connected. You heard Alan Dershowitz say on Pierce Morgan the other day that if Epstein was connected to the CIA or Mossad, he could have gotten him off and everyone went, wow, that means it's a get out jail free card? Well, Epstein, guess what he did get off basically in 2006 with the 2008 plea deal, serving basically less than a year in prison, being able to work from there and then house arrest while you had 50-some felony charges that were basically swept up and then a blanket non-prosecution for all co-conspirators known and unknown. So as far as I'm concerned, that that is what happened. And we need that transparency now as well as this is a moment of reform. The fact is the national security predicate for blocking disclosure.

has allowed the deep state to get out of jail free, in part because of its work with the Justice Department. Time and time again. That's a good point. I got to leave it at that. But Mike, fascinating. We'll have a longer talk later. I love it.

Thanks for your deep research and sharing it with us. Maybe you've seen those red light panels that are all the rage now. Well, this is totally different. Let me tell you about the glow infrared therapy light from sauna space. They say it helps with screenings. fatigue, your skin, your mood, and your energy. It's incandescent light, not LED, which makes all the difference. In the morning, it's like natural sunlight. And at night, it helps you relax and get ready for seriously deep sleep. They say you can even use it for pain relief on sore muscles or cramps.

And the real game changer is their firelight sauna, the future of saunas. It's portable. It's gorgeous and it's powerful. You get red light therapy and an infrared sauna all in one. all made in the U.S. with pure organic materials and zero EMFs. Sona space spent over a decade perfecting their firelight spectrum, and thousands of studies support the benefits. Elevate your at-home wellness with sauna space's firelight, infrared technology. Visit sauna.com slash Megan. And use code Megan to get 10% off your entire order.

Don't forget. That's sauna. That's sauna. That's Sona.space slash M-E-G-Y-N. Don't forget that code Megan when you check out for 10%. percent off your order. Turning now to the latest in the Nancy Guthrie case, newly released video from a neighbor's ring camera.

This is a person about, I mean, not exactly a neighbor. They said about 2.5 miles away. Obtained by Fox News shows 12 cars passing through the area between midnight and 6 a.m. on the morning of Nancy's suspected abduction. But one vehicle in particular is drawing attention. It's a car scene driving by at 2.30. A.m. The home where the footage was captured is just about a seven-minute drive from Nancy's house, and that timing would appear to align with when her pacemaker disconnected from her phone

at 228. TMZ reports, however, this morning that its sources within the FBI are calling the video a, quote, dead end, saying reports TMZ that they looked at the video and the area where the cars are driving, as well as the ingress and egress, has led the agency to the conclusion the cars have no association with the kidnapping. Now, we're not sure that's true, and we're not sure that TMZ has that right. We're going to discuss it in a second with our panel. Meanwhile, Savannah Guthrie is speaking out again on Instagram just now, sharing a Today Show segment about the reward on her Instagram, along with the caption, please be the one that breaks her home. Tips can be anonymous. Reward can be paid in cash, as explained here. Watch.

How does the FBI go about guaranteeing that people who do reach out that they actually remain anonymous? Yeah, so Craig, experts say that let's say you submit a tip, it qualifies for the reward. you want to remain anonymous, you can then pick up that reward at a neutral location that's decided, often a place like a post office. That reward will likely be given to you in cash. And all you have to do is show that unique PIN number that's associated with your tip. You do not need to show your ID. Experts say it is really not traceable and no questions asked. Not traceable, no questions asked. So Savannah's reposting that, that clip we just showed you on her Instagram, emphasizing that the tips can be anonymous. She's obviously desperate for tips,

and she wants to reassure someone who might have one that they can give the tip anonymously without it being traced back to them and get the reward, which is now up to a million dollars for either the return of Nancy or information leading to the abductor. So, you know, you can get it just if you know where Nancy is. And it's been made clear they mean dead or alive. Savannah then reposting a follow-up shorter clip from her latest video announcing that reward of up to $1 million. Here to react is Maureen O'Connell, former FBI special agent and co-host of Best Case Worst Case, a podcast, and Jim Fitzgerald, former FBI Supervisory Special Agent and co-host of the Cold Red podcast. Maureen Fitzgerald, welcome back.

Let's start with the latest breaking news just now, and that's the Savannah repost of that short clip on the Today Show, emphasizing you can stay anonymous and there's a way to retrieve the reward that would keep you untraceable. Fits, your thoughts on that. Sure, and this is a very smart move to make. And we talked early on, Megan, what was it, three weeks ago now, put some level of humanity onto Nancy Guthrie. Now the humanity part is being put on on Savannah and her family. They want their mother back. And they're basically saying in any condition here, here's the million dollars. I know, yeah, by the way, no strings attached.

You can get it without any. I'm not sure if you had to pay taxes on it or not. If the government takes something out up front. But who cares about that? But it's going to be a substantial amount close to a million dollars, perhaps in cash. And that is going to be a strong incentive. So where the early on stage was humanizing the mom. Now it's humanizing us. We realize things may have gone bad in so many words. They're intimating, but at least give us our mom back and let the

family have closure on this. There'd be nothing worse, of course. I've interviewed parents of little kids who have gone missing and have never returned. That's probably the worst. But even having any loved ones such as a parent that you can't somehow have closure, put them in their resting spot, and have the final rights, et cetera, that has to be tough too. So it's a million dollars is probably easy for them to put up. And they mean it, they mean it with all their heart. They really want their mother back. And I'm hoping someone out there, one or two people involved in this can look at this and have some element of their heart just say, you know what, we can do this in a tricky sort of way. Let's just make this phone call, go pick this money up, and then go from there.

I hope that person is listening. And if there's any little bit of a heart that they have, they follow through. Maureen, here's the clip that Savannah reposted just now. So what she thinks is the most salient part of her nearly two-minute video she dropped the other day. But we need to know where she is. We need her to come home. For that reason, we are offering a family reward of up to $1 million for any information

that leads us to her recovery. All of the information about this reward and the details is in the caption below. You can call the 1-800 tip line. You can be anonymous if you want. Someone out there knows something that can bring her home. Somebody knows.

We are begging you to please come forward now. She captioned it, please bring her home. You can be anonymous. So if memory serves what was omitted there from the first video that this was clip from are discussions of the agony. The family's been in and references to their understanding that she may no longer be with us. She may be with Savannah's dad with Nancy's parents in heaven. So sort of all that humanizing stuff, like take about Nancy and about the family taken out and boiling it down to bring her home, you can be anonymous. And here's a million dollars. It's haunting really. And it, uh, it worked on me. I can tell you that. I mean, I just, I could feel her broken heart through that message. And to Fitz's point, I think it's, I think it's

the right thing to do right now. And if they can get them that money anonymously, good for them. they're going to have to produce Nancy some ways somehow before that. And, you know, my advice is take the money and run. If this is who you are and this is what you did, get that money, take that money and just good luck to you. Can I see this? Savannah, in all these videos, you've sort of seen her. We talked about the fact that the one day she decided to put her makeup on, you know, like the first couple of videos she clearly didn't have any makeup on.

Her eyes were so puffy from all the crying. This was right after Nancy was taken. And that obviously was a choice. And then I thought it was a good sign. She did one with her makeup on, like she was kind of coming back to life, putting on her armor, you know, which makeup can be for a woman, especially a woman who's on camera every day. That's how you're used to seeing yourself. And here, too, she's got a little makeup on.

Her eyes are bloodshot. I mean, clearly this woman has been doing nonstop crying. And I wonder if that kind of thing fits is coordinated with the FBI. like your look, you know, if Savannah wanted to go full glam and put in the vizine and get rid of the red and, like, not be super up close to the camera, I mean, she knows full well, but like this super up close shot is not the most flattering thing ever on any of us. She's doing all this, I think, for a reason. She's, there's no way none of this is, like, this is just happenstance. I believe it's all calculated. And what do you think the discussion sounds like behind the scenes on that? Yeah, I've been in these, uh, multiple. times in my profiling career, advising people how to go before a camera or put out some kind of a message in some way. I obviously didn't get into the makeup category if it's a woman doing that, but certainly more importantly, the words to choose and the overall demeanor or persona you're

going to present on camera or in some kind of a public speaking situation where you're looking for someone or someone to come back into the fold for whatever reason, or someone to give themselves up if they've done a crime. So yeah, this is well coordinated and there have been, I'm certainly assuming there are profilers, behavioralist on the scene, certainly in touch with the family. They're talking to them. They're helping them put the words together. They don't want to offend the person. They don't want to challenge the person. There's no name calling that, you know, you're a low life, you're this, none of that stuff. And I'm not saying that either, but just appeal to their human, their basic human nature. And Maureen put it well.

It got to her. It got to me, too. I mean, it doesn't get more sincere. Megan, you're on camera all the time, and I do my share. And I always, you know, I'm always meaning what I say. But I've never had to put something together like Savannah just did in so much from my heart and sort of begging people to listen to what I'm saying. And that's a whole different part of your personality and your brain and your psychological makeup that has to come in front of a camera. Have you been crying all the time, as she said, as you said, Megan. But the bottom line is, this was, coordinated. They didn't give her the words to say, but I have no doubt that someone came in, hey, let's have your light looks a little bit, nothing heavy duty, but just enough that you're appealing looking and you're talking. The people watching this, you're important enough,

they're important enough to you that you should, you know, look your best whilst talking to them. And that's part of the reason why she may have glammed up, using air quotes here, just a little bit for this, basically this plea to whoever has her mother. I mean, I do think I said this the other day, but I think it's somewhat of a sign of resilience that she managed to get any makeup on at all and her jacket on, you know, and started to look a little closer to the professional Savannah we've seen. I just think as a woman in the exact same industry that she is, who came up with Savannah. I mean, I literally came up in the business right next to her. We were at the Supreme Court covering the high court together. She for NBC,

me for Fox News, when we were both like cub reporters, she went to NBC. I went to Fox. We covered a lot of the same stories. I wound up at NBC for a short stint with her. I got to know her very well during that 18 months that I was there, Savannah and her husband. I had known her for all those years prior, but like we got to be personal friends. And then the relationship ended when I left NBC for all sorts of reasons. But my point is simply, I know that she's going to feel more together and defended with the makeup on. I just know it. That's just how it is in this industry. So I think it's a good sign. I do think the puffy red eyes are an intentional choice because I'm sure they were authentic and they could have been resolved had she really wanted to do that for a camera, but she probably made the choice to show people the pain she's in because of the reasons you're saying. You know, there's no downside. It's what's real. It's what's real. And there's no downside to telegraphing to the public and to the perpetrator. I'm deeply wounded. And you could help me, Maureen. You know, you could help me is what she's saying.

She's also saying, you got me. You wanted to hurt me. You hurt me. You got everything you wanted. I am broken. My family is broken. Can we end this now? I'm willing to pay you my hard-earned money to end this now.

I surrender. Yes. You won. Yes. Oh. It's stomach turning when you think about it like that. Because the perpetrator, we'll watch this. You know, you, you point that out all the time, Fitz, you know, that the guys out

there watching all this coverage. And there's no question he's watching Savannah's latest messaging. And so he's going to see it. Like, it's so creepy for her to know that whatever she chooses to put out there, he will be watching and assessing. And we'll have a new decision to make. Right now this morning, as we speak, he has a new decision to make fits. Yeah, and this all goes back to from, again, day one, what is the motivation behind this? If it's strictly money, this is strictly a transactional crime that was committed on the part of this one, if not two or more people. I haven't locked in on that at this point. All right. So now this is kind of an offer you can't refuse. I mean, you're probably, you got away. You pulled an abduction very successfully. I've said this before.

You can talk about the flowers at the camera and all that kind of stuff, weird holster. They got away with this thing. He slash they got away with this thing. If there was ever about money, which I'm not convinced that's the case. But even if it wasn't about money, you've got a golden opportunity here. And Savannah is doing her best. And her inner makeup and her outer makeup is so expressive of what she's saying right now. She's not acting.

I don't know her at all, of course. But I'd be very much surprised if there was any. acting in here at all. So this person now goes back to motivation. Why was Mrs. Guthrie taken from her home at, you know, after 2 a.m. or, you know, around that time that Sunday morning. That we don't know. If it was about money, maybe this is a chance to then capitalize on it. If it was for some other reason, deeply personal to one or more family members, they said not, this isn't gone far enough. You've done this to me, again, real or perceived. you've done this to me in the past, you know, a week before or two decades before,

you're going to keep paying. And if they don't react to this million dollar reward with almost with virtually no strings attached, that would lean me towards the fact that this is a highly personal crime done for highly personal reasons and money was never a factor. Oh. Or can't it just be the person scared? Like, they're like, holy shit. The 400 cops.

I don't believe it's not traceable. I'm not, you know, I got away with it and I'm not going to jail now. So nice try, but I'm piecing out. There's high risk to begin with this crime. They knew who this woman was and to whom she was related. I don't think that would scare them off now. And if they think they could pull this, they pulled it off perfectly so far, quite frankly. They've had other people try to come in and take money from them.

I'm convinced multiple people, probably from overseas, wherever, with the whole Bitcoin thing, TMZ, all that. So it's like, all right, well, now this is my turn. I made my cause. I sent my message. Maybe now I'll take the money. But again, if the money isn't the issue here, then perhaps this is for a whole reason that's highly personal. I use the word revenge early on to describe this side of the abduction as opposed to for profit on the other side.

And that is so deeply entrenched in this person. Look at the Brown shooter. Went back 30 years to Portugal and his angered with this. this then fellow student, and he goes up to, you know, MIT outside of Boston and kills him there after, of course, shooting up the university itself. So these types of issues, you know, can go back that far, maybe something more closely connected to more recent times. But this is really, this is, this is the proverbial fork in the road for this person. And, you know, to me, to me, the Savannah messaging is like, to steal the term, the closing argument. Savannah also went to law school.

She then went and did like shoe leather reporting in small markets. I went and practiced law for 10 years. But she is a lawyer. At least she's been trained. And I think this is her closing argument because the reporters are gone. That annoying Democrat congresswoman, the local lawmaker, got her way. The press is gone. They left.

The story has been drying up. And that's when the influencers leave. And I think it's sad. sad for Nancy that they're leaving. The law enforcement is leaving too. The FBI had a Tucson Field Office that they were kind of a makeshift one. They're pulling up stops on that and going back to Phoenix. They're claiming that they're not going to reduce the man count, you know, man and woman count on officers, but there's no way they're going to keep 400 officers on this case, right? They're not. They are not. They have other cases to solve. They have missing children.

They have new crimes. They have murders. They've got to move on, sadly, because other crimes come and Savannah's leaving. There's a report today saying she's going back to New York. It was just a matter of time. It's been a month. This Sunday is the first of March. So we're at an actual month. And she's got two young children who are in school. They're being taken care of by a friend right now. I know the person. And, you know, they need their mother. And she knows that. And I'm sure she needs normalcy too in her life and her routine. So even she's leaving. And I think this is the closing argument. like reward, not traceable, anonymous. Goodbye.

And, you know, we'll see whether it shakes anything loose. Maureen, I want to talk to you about the video. It's very interesting to me that this gets dropped by Fox News last night, which has been doing very good reporting on this, Fox has. And they find, I want to read you the way they describe it. I know you're familiar, but the audience. It's a resident of the Catalina Foothills neighborhood, that's Nancy's, who has a street-facing ring cam

that caught 12 cars passing by in the morning, Nancy disappeared. The recording goes from midnight to 6 a.m. on February 1st. That's the relevant time frame. And the activity occurred near the 2.30 a.m. mark. That's the relevant time. The homeowners, Elias and Danielle Stradagulius, told Fox Digital that the police had not canvassed their neighborhood

at all in all the time since Nancy went missing. The FBI and the Pima County Sheriff's Department have been alerted to the video, writes Fox Digital, not immediately clear whether the video is of any use to the investigation. This is last night. The Stratagulius House is on a back road, Fox writes, North Camino Real, that leads out of Guthrie's neighborhood avoiding major intersections. Leads out of Guthrie's neighborhood avoiding major intersections, and they live about 2.5 miles away from the crime scene, which is outside the two-mile radius of neighbors who received a ring alert asking for video taken from Jan 1, VEP 2. So the concentric circle drawn by law enforcement did not include this house, but this couple nonetheless checked their ring camera and found something they think may be of relevance. Their house, writes Fox, is roughly a seven-minute drive from Guthrie's address, as I mentioned in the intro.

One of their videos was recorded at around 236 a.m., which is roughly eight minutes after Guthrie's page. casemaker last synced with her iPhone. So the timing would work. Danielle said the number of cars passing that night was not unusual, but she and a friend found it odd that no one from law enforcement had visited the neighborhood. The route itself had been flagged to Fox News Digital by another neighbor who said she also saw a suspicious man walking in the area on Feb 2, which would have been Monday, around the corner from what appeared to be an abandoned car. And then finally, she says she described that man as five foot nine inches tall, Hispanic with a close trim beard and wearing a silver bracelet smoking a cigarette. And then this is actually the final point. Another unidentified man was spotted in mid-January, according to a different neighbor who did not have your typical walking gear on. He had his hat pulled really far down over his eyes. He was just walking in the neighborhood near an intersection leading to Guthrie's home, leading to Guthrie's home, and hadn't in

countered him before or after, kind of younger. Just didn't look like he was going out for a walk. She thought he was suspicious. Now we get the TMZ report today saying our FBI source has looked at the video and says it's a dead end. The area where the cars are driving, as well as the ingress and egress has led the agency to the conclusion the cars have no association with the kidnapping. and yet Fox had reported that this house, the Stratagolius house, is on a back road that leads out of Guthrie's neighborhood, avoiding major intersections, and talking about how this is her neighborhood.

That's the neighbors themselves say this is her neighborhood. And I feel like the neighbors of all people would know very well if there was an ingress and egress out by their, home from Nancy's neighborhood. I don't know. This is, I'm not sure about TMZ. And I don't, you tell me whether we should be discounting the strata, Stradagulius's new lead so quickly. Well, there's a lot there. But first of all, if in fact the FBI is discounting this vehicle or these vehicles that, that drove down that Camino Real, then it's, it's definitely for just a number of a couple of reasons. Number one, they threw up a geo fence on that area for that night, and all the cars there were telegraphing different information via cell phone or their,

or just their vehicle. And they were able to get with those people and, you know, find out where they were coming from or going to. Wait, it can't be that because the Stratagulius is saying no one came to see them since Nancy disappeared. So the FBI, I certainly hadn't ruled them out. They hadn't seen this and ruled it out prior to this because no one had come to see them. Right. And also, there was a report after this by Fox that the FBI was seen going to visit the Stratagulius's after the Fox News report.

But I mean, so I guess overnight, you know, they may have ruled it out between like the time the Fox News Digital report hit yesterday evening and the time the TMZ report hit this morning. But they definitely hadn't ruled this out prior to yesterday evening. Right. Here's what I'm saying. Well, I think it came out yesterday mid-afternoon, if I'm not mistaken. The Fox, it came out on that. And everybody, a lot of people were getting alerted.

What I'm saying is right then you've got the cast team with the FBI, and they're already doing all kinds of work, and they're up to their eyeballs in it. And now they're like, okay, let's throw a geo fence. You don't have to go there. You don't have to visit anyone. I mean initially, and you put a geo fence up on that area at that time frame to see who's going past. Now, what we would expect if these were the offenders is we would expect no activity coming from the car, maybe a little from the telematics, but definitely not from cell phone data,

because we've already found out that there was no cell phone data pinging or anything around that house. They probably used little handheld radios or something. So they looked at that, they found out who those people were. They could have dispatched agents to those houses last night at midnight, for all we know. And they could have followed their phones wherever they went all the way to an investigative end, so to speak. So they could have done a lot of work last night, and it wouldn't be the first time a police officer or an FBI agent showed up at your door in the middle of the night because they probably wanted to really hammer this down. We don't know that that happened. We don't know that that would have.

I don't, you know, all I can say is I would expect one or two of those vehicles to have no telematics pinging or nothing from phones pinging if these were, if this was our offender or our two, or maybe two, you know, two vehicles. Yeah, the follow-up reporting fits from Fox was per Michael Ruiz. Pima County detectives arrived at the home of the Stratagul. Ulius's yesterday on Camito Real, where the new ring video was taken. So it does appear that in response to the Fox News Digital Report, they went there and they spoke with this couple. And then by this morning, not the Pima County Sheriff's Detectives, but the FBI, which has been somehow Harvey's source in this whole thing, is saying it's a dead end.

He puts it as, yeah, quote, it is a dead end, the area where the cars are driving. as well as the ingress and egress has led the agency to the conclusion that the cars have no association with the kidnapping. Well, Maureen did an eloquent job of explaining the, you know, the cell tower markers and what's coming out of the car and all those type of things. But I think all of us rely on what's worked for us in the past and investigations and the technology, of course, maybe DNA, if we're lucky, will ultimately perhaps help solve this case. But I also, earlier cases I worked, my police career as well as even FBI in New York and

later as a profiler, reaching out to the public is always an interesting way to sort of narrow the suspect bore. And it's certainly in a situation like this. And I would like to see perhaps on the part of the sheriff's department, the FBI, to put something out there like, all right, everybody, we all know about this crime that occurred, when it occurred, where can we ask for anybody who's been, who was driving in that area, if you're in the range of the internet, which, of Of course, everyone is, is what's going to be posted. And you were out there driving. Could you contact us and let us know?

And just maybe you saw some. You're not a suspect. Maybe you saw something. A car went by, somebody pulled over doing something strange. And then these videos that, there may be more videos coming in. There may be some we don't know about also. And do your best to slow everything down, blow them up. There's technology now they can make it probably read the tags.

And then if a person in one of these cars does not contact yet, the Sheriff's Department. Doesn't mean they're guilty of anything, but that's something I think we'd want to talk to them. They could have an affair and they shouldn't be out, you know, doing what they're doing at 3 a.m., whatever. But let's try to get people to come forward and say,

yeah, I was driving right in that neighborhood or, you know, a mile away or two miles away. If you're on back, when you're in some of these back roads that you described, Megan, I don't know the area well, but I'm looking at the map. This is not a wrong turn you made.

You're there for a reason you know where you're going, most likely. Clearly the person who took Nancy knew where, he was going. I just put out there, hey, anyone who's driving, you know, between 1 a.m. and 3, they can make it any time they want. Can you just contact us and let us know? And

if they do identify some cars, tags, ownership, etc., and that person didn't call, doesn't mean they're guilty, but at least move them up a few notches on the suspect list and let's do some more follow up with them. That's how I would go about this. They may have already, well, they haven't done the posting as far as I, if you were driving

around, let us know. But But, okay. Let's keep going because the only other, like, truly interesting thing I've seen in the case over the past couple of days is the following headline from Brianna Whitney, reporter for Arizona family. And it is follows. On Wednesday evening at 7.21 p.m., she posted multiple people have asked me what the status is on Annie Guthrie's car after it was taken for processing in the case. And that was taken for processing the first week that Nancy had disappeared. I asked Pima County Sheriff's Department today and just received this response. Quote, all we can say at this time, the vehicle is still part of the investigation.

WTF, Maureen. I've been banging this drum since the beginning because we've taken cars into custody and we processed them. I've processed hundreds and hundreds of cars in my career. We only keep the ones that are involved in some way, shape, or form or have some sort of evidentiary value. You're not keeping a car from a member of the victim's family. I mean, first of all, it's my understanding that may be the only car that Annie and Tomaso have. Why are you keeping the car? And is it a common practice to keep the car?

If there isn't evidentiary value, the answer to that is an absolute no. Ask anybody. Call 25 PIOs from police departments, municipal police departments all over the country. They're all going to say the exact same thing. You don't keep a vehicle unless you have the authority to do so. And you only need it if you're going to need it for trial. It's been three weeks. They've had that car in their possession, Fitz.

Yeah. And there are protocols within all these departments about how long you keep an impounded vehicle because it just gets in a way of their everyday functions too. But what I find even more interesting, Megan, is that the house was released after two days. then it was unreleased. That's the actual crime scene. We know the crime occurred there at Nancy's house. So I think two days was held, then unheld,

then pizza delivery people are coming up. I think it, you know, locked down again. And now I believe it was officially released, but not the car of Annie and Tomaso. That is odd. And it must have some evidentiary value to someone for some reason that it hasn't been released. But it does raise some interesting red flags.

Yet at the same time, what was it, a week, a week and a half ago, the family is fully absolved. They weren't involved. They're not suspects. But we're keeping their car out of what habit. He came off of that the next day. They haven't been identified as suspects as what he fell back on after everybody was like, what are you saying? How can you rule them out when you don't know who did it?

It's so bad. And with regards to releasing the house, back to the family, My hope was yesterday, Megan, when I heard that they were kicking all the press off the street and everything, I was like, please, Lord, let FBI, ERT descend upon that location and do a thorough stem to stern soup to nuts DNA search of that whole house to try to find DNA that will match the co-mingled DNA that they have for their touch DNA. but in a cleaner way so that they could say this is, in fact, who it was. We can now move forward with forensic genetic genealogy to find out who this offender was. Can I ask the following, is there any chance this sheriff who, it's easy to villainize the guy because he's all over the board on his messaging and we've come to not really trust him too much,

is, you know, too smart by half. and that this guy maybe does know what he's doing. And what if he has zeroed in on a family member? And from the get-go, he was like, this is a homicide, which is why he called in the homicide cops day one and called off the search and rescue day two. And why ever after we haven't had the hand-in-hand grid search by either law enforcement or volunteers?

That's the thing that's been missing in this case from the beginning, the urgency. When there's a missing person, you not only see law enforcement doing what you just said, Maureen, you see volunteers. You see the family members. You see everybody go out there arm in arm when there's a missing person, a child, a college student, an elderly person. And they all hold hands and they do the grid search together. And they make sure that every inch of their entire community has been traversed by well-meaning civilians and law enforcement to try to find any sign of them. And they find things. Yes. They often find bodies or they find, you know, the civilians, we haven't seen one, not one of the Guthrie family. They're hauled up in their multi-million dollar house coming out via video only. They never come out for a search. They haven't encouraged civilians to help in a search.

They haven't invited. In fact, I'm told they rejected the offer of, I think it was Equifax, which Equusurch. I mean, that always, like, offers to, yeah, that offers to go in and search whenever somebody's missing. They didn't want it. So like, is there any chance this sheriff is like, this is a homicide? I've got my eyes on the prize. I am going to intentionally confuse people on my messaging because I don't want any heat coming down on the people that I'm looking at.

I would like to keep them trusting me. And if I have to lie to the press and everybody else about where my beliefs lie, fine by me as long as I keep these people talking to me. It's possible. But if, you know, you're essentially calling him Colombo on steroids. And if that's the case, he should get his own series because he's very believable. He's good. Yeah.

So, yeah, there's a chance. And if so, he's playing it, you know, perfectly. And whoever. And very close to the vest. Yes. But he's talking too much. But, you know, I guess that could be part of his schick. And the bureau, on the other hand, is just being totally tight-lipped.

If I were the bureau, I'd be trying to figure out who that TMZ leaker is, because that's a bit of a nightmare for the Bureau. We don't take lightly. I'll give you a hint. It's whoever you put on the case of looking into the ransom notes. It's 100% that guy or girl. Because that's the only person I guarantee you that Harvey Levin knows at the FBI. And that person is continuing to leak to him. So yes, I agree with you.

You might want to shut that down since not sure TMZ is your most credible way of disputing leads or news items. I mean, I think, frankly, you'd be a lot better off going to Fox News, which does have credibility and also FBI sources. But what do you think about my theory, fits? Because let's not forget the other thing is he shut off all the press conferences. He only gave, he decided to seize the messaging. You shut down the press conferences. The FBI no longer gets to answer questions. Just me, the sheriff.

And then this week sent out a note saying, we're not going to be doing any more daily updates to the press. like all the messaging is shutting down, which I guess we shouldn't confuse with the conclusion that the investigation is going nowhere. We actually don't know that. And that's by design. And yeah, I guess our question would be to the sheriff or about the sheriff, what does he know and when did he know it to borrow that catchphrase. And I mean, if the car is being kept of, you know, the sister and the brother-in-law of Savannah, I think last I heard they were all living together in a gated community in a Reddit house or something. But yet here's the million dollar reward being put out.

I know I heard Savannah. It was interesting. She said up to a million dollars. Interesting, that was put in there. And also that it's a family reward. But I, without none, all the dynamics of the family, I have a feeling it's her million dollars. And that's fine. That part is their business.

But what are the dynamics? If the car is being kept, I mean, if I was completely innocent, I'd hire a lawyer by now and say, I want my car back, especially if it's the only car that I have. And who knows, Savannah has a rental car, or another one in, whatever, for the time she's there. But what are the dynamics going on in that household that we're still getting videos made, as you presented early on in our hit here by Savannah? And we're talking about makeup, how she's saying, what she's saying, but boy, out of the corner of her eye, does she have some suspicion? but she's still willing to put a million dollars up? Maybe she doesn't want to believe some things. I'm not saying she's involved at all,

but it just gets so interneasing involvement here within the family that I, and I don't want to give the sheriff, I don't want to take away from him or give him more credit than maybe he deserves here. It'll all come out to be a master, you know, Shakespearean play that's unfolded here all along. He knew what was going on. Yeah, time's going to tell. And that comes out, well, we knew all along, He was focused.

We know the neighborhood wasn't, you know, the neighborhood, the Tucson wasn't in danger of another abduction. And this is the whole thing and how it played out. Right. But it hasn't happened yet. Yeah. Isolated incident. Right.

Which is just like Idaho. How the hell can you say that when you don't know who did it or why they did it? You know, they're, and then we see the video of the masked man. It's like, oh, I don't, I'm not sure the Tucson residents do feel so safe. That guy's not in custody. I wouldn't. I wouldn't. I wouldn't know his motive in taking Nancy.

No, I wouldn't either, especially if I were 84 years old and living alone. Oh, my God. God, I would buy an arsenal instantly. Well, it's tough for an 84-year-old Maureen. You know your way around a firearm. Oh, when old Maureen hits 84. She'll be having an arsenal. Oh, yeah.

Totally have an— You do not mess with Maureen's house. I already have an arsenal. And I learned yesterday that your husband, it was 37 years on the force. So, yeah, nobody should break into Maureen's house. No. It's a bad idea. No.

Definitely not. Or give it a shot. I hope the sheriff proves everybody wrong. I really do. I hope we see an arrest by the end of the weekend. and we're all like, you know what, he was very clever. He was Colombo. I hope that's our update next time we all get together. Guys, thank you. Thank you.

Have a great weekend. We've got more news ahead. You know Pure Talk's favorite holiday? It's President's Day because they believe wireless service should only cost you a couple presidents. Just a little Jackson and Lincoln, to be exact. For just 25 bucks a month, Pure Talk gives you unlimited talk, text, and plenty of data. Now compare that to big wireless. They'd rather celebrate the Benjamin's, Mr. Franklin, to be exact, and his day so they can charge your family hundreds every month. That's not right. You deserve better.

Pure Talk is an American wireless company who supports our veterans and invests in a U.S. only customer service team. So when you call, you're talking to someone right here at home. Pure Talk uses the same towers as the big carriers. So enjoy superior 5G coverage without the inflated price. Just $25 a month for talk. text and plenty of data. No contract, no cancellation fee. What are you waiting for? Just dial pound 250 and say keyword, Megan Kelly, and you will get 50% off your first month. Again, dial pound 250 and then say, Megan Kelly, to make the switch to Pure Talk.

Cuban government is talking with us. They're in a big deal of trouble, as you know, they have no money. They have no anything right now. But they're talking with us, and maybe we'll have a friendly takeover. of Cuba. We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba. You don't say, we could have a friendly takeover of Cuba. Okay. Okay. I guess they have to get behind Canada and Venezuela. They could be like our 53rd state. Not sure what the president means there, but, you know, Cuba was very dependent on Venezuela and very intermixed with Venezuela. They said half the guards guarding Maduro or Cuban.

So maybe that's what he means now that we're kind of running Venezuela. I don't know. He didn't really expand on it. But his comments about Cuba come as we are evacuating personnel or strongly encouraging personnel to leave our U.S. embassy in Israel per Mike Huckabee right now. And we've got, we talked about yesterday with Tucker, all the aircraft carriers and other military assets that we've moved to the region. And we do appear to get.

be getting ready to bomb or start some sort of a war with Iran. So you can take that into the weekend and sleep well at night. I'm sorry. Like, why again? Why? To take out their nuclear facilities? We did that in July. Okay, we just did that. I mean, six months ago. So I'm sorry, but the administration needs to make a clear and cogent case for putting American lives at risk with such an extraordinary mission if that's what we're about to do. Like, what are we doing? He barely even mentioned it in the state of the union. Are we invading Iran?

Like, why? Let's hear it. Let's at least do, can we at least have the respect of having it laid out for us? Normally you go to Congress before you start a war, but if we're going to do it by commander-in-chief action, then shouldn't he at least make the case to the American people? It was like, we're going to save the protesters. They're killing tens of thousands. the protests have died down.

Okay, so that's not the rationale. Regime change? Well, how are we going to do that? Because it's not just the Ayatollah. All right? It's like the entire regime is filled with Ayatollah loyalists. So how many people are we taken out and how? It's not as simple as getting Maduro.

That's why reportedly Dan Raisin-Kane, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, is having some hesitation about a longer mission here or the mission at all suggesting we could be, this could turn into a quagmire, which President Trump denied, for the record in a true social saying that's not true. he'll do whatever he's commanded to do and he'll do it perfectly and all he knows how to do is win.

But I don't know, I mean, like a lot of us have real concerns about what we're about to do in Iran. I mean, it seems like we're getting closer and closer. Could also be a head fake where the president is just making them think we're getting closer and closer. So they give us what we want in these negotiations, which apparently aren't going that well. We're asking them for no enrichment forever. I don't know about you. I don't like where it's going. And I at least want to hear my president explain it to me in terms that I could get behind.

I think that's the bare minimum we are owed. Okay, so that's international relations. Now, onto the very exciting subject of Megan Rapino, who, as you know, decided to pull the ladder up behind her after she made millions playing soccer. And now it would love for your daughter and mine to have to play against biological boys who could physically hurt them at any turn. She has absolutely no care about that. She has a podcast with her wife or girlfriend, Sue Bird, and they ripped on the men's hockey team. for having the nerve to have Cash Patel on site and taking the president's phone call.

Here's a taste of that in Stop 5. What I like to call a classic, ripping defeat from the jaws of victory. The United States men's hockey team in their utter moment of glory, childhood dreams come true. once in a lifetime accomplishment

sensational ruined it for themselves because they allowed themselves to be totally co-opted co-opted, yep by a clown and now you're a clown you look like a clown

Cash Patel is in the locker room he's parting, he's chugging beers I'm not like to Whorem over everything. That's not what I need out of my FBI director. Like, what are we doing? The nerve of this extremely homely woman to call these guys clowns and say they look like clowns.

The nerve. So what should they have done? Should they have said, no, we don't. We don't want to take a congratulatory call from the president. We refuse. We are hashtag resistance. The absurdity of that. And let me show you more of what she said

and tell you how hypocritical it is. Here's the next thought. Number seven. Watch. They get on the phone with Trump. I have questions whether it's even a secure line. That's beside the point. And Trump makes the comments about the nuclear codes.

About the women's team. And then the men's hockey team erupts and giggles and har, har, har, har, har, ha. You just accomplished this amazing thing, and then you just gave this whole moment over to this person who you know it's just only going to use it for him, going to totally co-opt it. Hey, first of all, the joke isn't even funny, like from a technical joke standpoint. Like, what I don't understand the funny part of the joke. If I always say this, like, I can't believe how much, how people have such a, like, a lack of self-preservation. But if you don't think you're in threat, then you're not going to preserve.

For me, the choice point is like, I would have never, as a captain or a leader on my team, I think you can say the same. I think that would have been clear to our staffs and to the larger organization and, like, support staff. Those people would never be allowed in our locker room. Never. She wouldn't have taken the call and she wouldn't have allowed them in the locker room. And yet, Clay Travis reporting that President Obama, called the women's team after they won the World Cup in 2015, and Vice President Joe Biden was on the field for the title game

and joined the team in person for their title celebration that day. So Megan Rapino is lying. She was completely fine with a Democrat president calling in to congratulate the team with a Democrat VP celebrating on the field with them. She did not find that in any way controversial. It's only controversial when it's President Trump, you see, which transforms you into a clown from a national hero. She's jealous. She's full of hatred for anyone who's a white male. She's like a rabid, angry lesbian. And she is jealous that they are in the spotlight and she's not. In fact, she's loathed by more than half the country, unlike these guys who are beloved by.

by everyone except a tiny segment of rabid partisans, and she can't see straight. She wants it taken away from them, and she feels powerless to do it because she is. Enjoy your bitter, bitter life. We'll be right back. International disputes, inflation, rising national debt, digital currency. There's a never-ending list of reasons gold has risen over 700% in the last 20 years, and a never-ending list of reasons smart Americans diversify a portion of their savings into precious metals with Birch Gold Group. Gold can thrive during uncertainty, which is why it's a crucial part of a balanced financial strategy. It gives you peace of mind, given all the events that could impact the U.S. economy.

See if holding gold in a tax-sheltered retirement account is right for you. Birch Gold can help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold. Just text MK to the number 9898-98 to receive your money. your free info kit on gold. There's no obligation, just useful information. With an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers, consider letting Birch Gold help you diversify with gold so you too can have peace of mind, regardless of the uncertainty. Text MK to the number 9-8-9-8-9-8. Hey, everyone, it's me, Megan Kelly. I've got some exciting news. I now have my very own channel

on Sirius XM. It's called the Megan Kelly Channel, and it is where you will hear the truth unfiltered with no agenda and no apologies. Along with the Megan Kelly show, you're going to hear from people like Mark Halperin, Link Lauren, Morin Callahan, Emily Jashinsky, Jesse Kelly, Real Clear Politics, and many more. It's bold, no BS news only on the Megan Kelly channel, SiriusXM 11 and on the Sirius XM app. A couple more items for you before we go. Mayor Mom Donnie continues to downplay what happened to the NYPD officers who were pelted by a mob with snow, ice, and rocks after this big snowstorm that we had on Sunday into Monday. And his complicit DA, Alvin Bragg, who would love to throw 34 felony charges at Donald Trump for a

bookkeeping error, does not really want to bring charges against these people at all, just like his mayor. The mayor said it was a bunch of kids and he really didn't want to see charges brought. Well, the cops insisted on it and they arrested. they're starting to arrest the perpetrators, including this one guy who we've reported to you about yesterday, Ghazmaine Kulubali, 27, one of the so-called kids, nothing of the kind. By the way, the guys had other legal troubles that he's already been dealing with. And he was arrested two weeks ago for trying to rob a confused subway rider in what he claimed was a social media prank. He also had another issue, gosh, I'm trying to remember

it was. I can't find it in front of me. But there was a separate issue as well. involving this guy and now he's been charged. But the DA already downgraded the charges. He was initially arrested and charged with assault on a police officer obstruction of governmental administration and disorderly conduct. They've dropped the assault on a police officer charge. They are only pursuing the obstruction of governmental administration and disorderly conduct, which are much lesser and non-serious crimes that they're going after this guy. Now, you may just think, oh, what do you mean? He just threw a snowball.

Why should it be assault on a police officer? A, because it is. It is. B, because there are reports, as we mentioned to you the other day, that, well, the president of the police union said that the suspects knowingly packed the snow with ice and rocks before launching their so-called snowballs at cops. and clearly one officer, he said, has an obvious injury below his eye. His name is P.O. Johnson. They said he suffered redness, tenderness, and pain to the left side

of his face near his eye. We were told earlier by the union that at least one, if not more, had to go to the hospital for treatment of the injuries, which will happen when you're hit in the face with ice or a rock or even a very hard-packed snowball if it hits you with enough force. So the first one charged, gets charged over the objections of the mayor. And then as soon as he gets in the hands of Alvin Bragg, they dismiss the most serious charge. And now it's just a disorderly conduct case, basically, which is a nothing. That's a slap on the wrist. It's not even a misdemeanor. The other one is a misdemeanor. But this is nothing. This will go away. And this person will have no punishment because they don't believe in punishing crime in New York anymore now that the communist regime is taken over. And Alvin Bragg, as you know, is a George Soros funded prosecutor who doesn't believe in funding in pursuing crime at all, unless your name is Donald Trump. That's the state of the state in New York City. These poor cops are on their own.

And these two, this pair, Mom Donnie and Bragg, they're not going to be happy until every single New York City cop resigns. You remember Mom Donnie? All of his tweets. I want to abolish the police. And then when he got closer to the vote, he started to backtrack on that stuff. He only did that to win. That was obvious. This guy hates the cops. He hates cops. He does want to abolish them. Remember, he's already, he's been saying he wants to send non-cops to domestic violence calls. So a woman gets the shit kicked out of her by her husband. And he wants to send some 70-year-old, overweight female social worker with her little bifocal glasses to go intermediate the dispute. Good luck with that. What we would call that lady normally is his next victim. You need a cop.

with a firearm going to intervene there. It's just, it's absurd. And each one of these, the mom, Mom Donnie calling this a snowball fight, oh, I'm not going to get involved in kids, as if those of us who wanted to see some justice here just saw little like toddlers throwing snowballs at one another and wanted somebody charge. It's so absurd. It's a lie. He's not going to be happy until they all leave. I mean, it was, the writing was on the wall. He hates cops. He never stopped hating cops. He does want to defund the police. And this is another way of doing it. Don't defund. Just don't defend. Let them twist in the wind. Hang them out to dry. Let them get hurt. Don't do anything about it. Lie to the public's face about what actually happened. And then when the cops charge

him anyway, because they do have some authority here, you bounce, pass it over to the DA who's complicit and says, no, don't worry. Don't worry. I ultimately have the authority. And he's right about that. It is ultimately his call. And I'll get rid of it. And this will probably be pled out to a Nuffenberger too. So query whether they'll even bother arresting another person, right? Why spin your wheels? Why waste your time? So it's working. Their little plan is working just perfectly. And Mayor Mamdani is a disgusting piece of, you know what. I have absolutely no use for this guy. Cannot believe what he's doing right before our very eyes. Okay, wait, there was something else. Yeah, no, it wasn't that. But in any event, I do

want to get to this. Okay. The real reason I had to hold over is because I've got to tell you this story. We've touched on it in AM update, but it's an unbelievable story, and you can talk about this over the dinner table or at your cocktail party over the weekend with your friends, because it's that good. There's a guy named Tom Goldstein about whom you care nothing and you don't need to care anything. But it's an interesting story. For the reasons I stated at the top of the show, this elite guy in the most elite circles you can run in. I mean, Supreme Court bar, it out with Supreme Court justices. I mean, how many of us can say that every single Supreme Court Justice knows our name if we're not on TV every day or like in the news? You know, it's like this guy

wasn't. He's a lawyer. And he earned their respect. Unlike virtually everybody who gets admitted into the Supreme Court bar, Tom Goldstein did not have some super elite education. He went to, I think, American law school. He went to University of North Carolina undergrad. He did not clerk for a Supreme Court justice, which is sort of the path you go if you want to wind up being a star in the Supreme Court Bar. He was not Solicitor General of the United States. That's another way you can do it. Paul Clement, who is Solicitor General under Bush, is now, you know, killing it in private practice in front of the Supreme Court bar. Everybody wants to hire him if they have a Supreme Court case. Tom Goldstein, to his credit, did it with, you know, good old fashioned hard work. And he was a go-getter. He actually

worked at my old law firm for a Stint Jones Day. among other places. And he, in his Supreme Court practice, did something most people weren't doing, which is he started calling people who had lost at the circuit courts of appeal and making a case that he would be clever about getting the Supreme Court to take the case, that he had a pretty good track record of getting cert granted, certiorari. And that was looked down on it when he first started doing it. But he increased the firm's practice, like threefold, the Supreme Court practice. And then the cases at Jones Day reportedly kept getting taken away from him because he wasn't that experienced and eventually he left the firm and opened up his own shop with his wife, Amy Howe,

and they built an incredible Supreme Court practice. He had, I think, 40. He's had 40 arguments before Scotus. And he, like, he became the go-to shop. Like, I think only two others have more experience arguing in front of the Supreme Court than Tom Goldstein. So, I mean, self-made, to his credit, great story, very well respected. And then in 2002, I think that was the year, he started Scotis blog, you know, Scotis's Supreme Court of the United States, Scotis blog, which became a go-to destination for all of us who had a foothold in the law at all, whether you were on television or not, or just in a legal profession, that's where you go. As soon as the Supreme Court issues an opinion, you go there.

And they did great write-ups in advance of the cases. I used them heavily when I was a Supreme Court correspondent. Very, very efficient write-ups of the cases before the cases would go up with links to the briefs if you wanted them. and then immediately upon the decision coming down, they would be ready with a quick summary because they were steeped in knowledge about every case going up before the high court. Great stuff.

It takes a lot of work and takes a good legal brain to process quickly. I mentioned when we covered this story on AM Update, they got the Supreme Court ruling on Obamcare correct when everybody was getting it wrong. It was all over the news. It was like, remember when everybody got Bush v. Gore wrong? They thought the high court had ruled in favor of Gore.

because they didn't read through the opinion because in fact they had ruled in favor of Bush. Same thing happened on Obamacare when that went up and the whole question was whether Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to pass this sweeping law that changed one seventh of the U.S. economy

and that was the big question. Are they going to uphold Congress's power under the Commerce Clause or not? And the top of the decision said, no, Congress does not have this power under the Commerce Clause. And those of us who went to SCOTUS blog, including yours truly,

embarrassed because SCOTUS blog understood, as did yours truly, because I'd been following the case closely, that there was another argument on behalf of President Obama and those defending Obamacare saying it was like a catch-all. It was like a throwaway. It was barely discussed, saying, we also have the power under the tax clause. The individual mandate is a tax. And sure enough, the Supreme Court thinks to Chief Justice John Roberts, upheld that law under the tax clause of the U.S. Constitution. And so Obamacare stood. That's the reason we still have it to this day. And I went to Scooters Blog. I was on the air live.

Fox News was calling it wrong too. And I was on the air and I said, hold on. And the only reason Fox did not embarrass itself like CNN and the others did is because I knew about Skoda's blog. And we saved ourselves from a lot of embarrassment. Thanks to Tom Goldstein and his quick reporting over there. So I had nothing but respect for him. I had him on my show later that day.

He came on. I think it was that day or within a day or two. We pulled a clip from, you know, it seems like 200 years ago, but here it is. I owe you my thanks because I was on your blog this morning as this ruling came down and we were getting conflicting reports and you as expected and as always had it right. The high court upheld the individual mandate, but not on the grounds most of us expected. Not on the grounds that most of us expected, not on the principal argument based that the Obama administration had offered. The Affordable Care Act was saved by the conservative chief justice, John Roberts, applying maybe not a conservative result, but a conservative judicial philosophy saying,

it's my job. If I can find a way to uphold what the people across the street have decided to do as the elected representatives, that's what I'm going to do. There he is in front of the Supreme Court's facade, broadcasting live, saved the day, universally well-respected, revered. He's going to prison now. It's unbelievable to me. He was leading a whole double life, you guys. Not just professionally, but personally, too. For the listening audience, like, with respect, the guy's, you know, he's kind of like a dweeby. He's a kind of like a dweeby Supreme Court lawyer. He looks kind of short, very bald. Nothing to, you know, not homely, but like nothing, you know, whatever. Another like right home about it's fine, like a pleasant man. But I'm just saying he looks like you're

quintessential dwee be lawyer. And that guy had a life of Bentley's, Ferrari's, prostitutes. I don't think they'd call themselves that, but if you sleep with a man for money, that's what you are. Multiple women in one house, like he'd snap his fingers and they'd come and fall all over him

and God knows what else they were doing to him, all while married, stealing from his law firm to pay off debts, not declaring his actual income on his tax returns, understating his income to the IRS, and understating his debt to the mortgage application lenders, to the banks, because he didn't want his wife to know, reportedly,

that he had given, you know, on any given week or month, some 12, 15 million dollars that he owed, thanks to these high-stake poker games. I mean, it's unbelievable. And then he would fly in, like, the next day and argue a Supreme Court case flawlessly. I mean, frankly, it's all part of the same skill set, right? Like, taking huge swings. And if you nail the ball, great, it's a home run. You can also foul out.

you can strike out. And the stakes if you strike out in multi-million dollar poker are very, very high. So he was able, I guess just thanks to his smarts and his familiarity with these cases, to do fine before the Supreme Court. He was a gifted oral advocate and he would write the briefs. Somebody else would do all the legwork because he was gallivanting the world. It got to the point where he left his practice in 2023 because this was overwhelming him. He was just all poker all the time. but prior to that, he was still just doing the briefs reportedly and the oral arguments, and he was crushing those. So he's maintaining kind of like the alcoholic who was like a functional alcoholic.

And by the way, he denies being a gambling addict, though his close friends and clearly his soon-to-be ex-wife clearly think he is. He says, I stopped and I'm actually fine stopping. That doesn't sound like a gambling addict to me. But the behavior certainly tracks. So we went back, so he's been convicted. He just had a trial. I don't know. It's like it happened so fast. He just had a trial. And the jury found him guilty on 12 of 16 counts following a six-week trial in Maryland. One count of tax evasion,

one count each of willful failure to timely pay taxes for four tax years. Three counts of making a false statement on a loan application. That's your mortgage. Four out of eight counts found guilty on of aiding and assisting in preparation of a false tax return. Seven men, five women, her 15 days of evidence over six weeks, including testimony from Goldstein in his own defense, and they found him guilty. His strategy going in there was interesting. He made clear that he was going to, through his lawyer, say to the jury, like, this is either a very good man who made some mistakes or this is a very bad man who's nefarious, and he was going to argue the former. and the jury believe the latter entirely.

The jury does not believe Tom Goldstein is a good man, and I have to be honest, neither do I. It's like a lot of people have affairs on their marriage and they get divorced and they find love again in a second marriage or a third marriage, whatever it is. That's really between the two spouses. I don't know if that makes you a bad person. You violate a vow in any way.

It's not great. I'm not sure you're like universally a bad person because of it. You know, it's not a good thing to do. But you cheat on your way. repeatedly with multiple women, like you register on some sugar daddy website, touting the fact that what you'll bring to the table is dough. And you know that these young women will sleep with you just because you're rich. Like, who would want to get on top of a woman knowing that's the way you did it?

She's literally just there because she wants you to buy or something. That's so disgusting. How emasculating. How gross. Like, I can't even imagine a man could perform under those circumstances. and with no care whatsoever about whether she's attracted to you or enjoying it, none whatsoever. There's something hedonistic and selfish and disgusting, not to mention what he's doing to his wife, about the whole thing. And then on top of that, you're stealing from your law partners,

who's also your wife, so you're cheating on your wife in two different ways. You're stealing from the government, which means you and me and all the taxpayers. I pay my fucking taxes right on time. I mean, it's like, this is ridiculous. us. All of us would like to cheat on our taxes a little so we get allied some sort of massive tax, but we don't. It's not to say you never make a mistake here or there, but like if you make it, you make it in good faith and then you rectify it. This guy, no, it was active fraud against the government, which means against us. What, I have to pay my taxes. Why doesn't Tom Goldstein have to pay his taxes? Because he won the winnings at a poker match? F that. Bullshit. I won mine hard

work every day in and out with the research working for you guys, same as you guys do, you go to your job. Sometimes you miss your lunch break. Sometimes you miss your vacay. Sometimes you stay late to to the office till 11 or 12 at night. Sometimes you work the weekend. You work a vacation. You work a holiday. F this guy. Who thinks just because he wanted it at a poker table. He doesn't have to declare it. And the rules are different for him. It's crazy what he got away with. So Jeffrey Tubin, yeah, that Jeffrey Dubin, who notwithstanding his issues when it comes to whipping out his dick, I'm sorry, and jerking off in front of a whole Zoom full of colleagues.

What is our legal profession coming to? Had been a very well-respected lawyer and legal reporter at CNN, and he sat down with Tom Goldstein shortly after these charges broke.

We did a long report about this when the charges broke, because I'm just obsessed with this story. And in December, late December, he sat down with Jeffrey Tubin, Tom Goldstein did, which was dumb, dumb. And his admission that the reason he didn't declare how much debt he was in when he applied for the mortgage was because he didn't want his wife to know, because they were both co-applicants, came back to haunt him in the trial.

Of course it did. It was an admission that he did it. No one cares what your reason was. The point is you did it? Did you lie? Do you think Bank of America would care if you were like, oh, I didn't state my debt because I just felt so shamed about having it? They don't care.

You're going to jail. You defrauded them. They gave you a $3 million home loan for your beautiful estate in the Washington, D.C. area. And you were a very, very high risk, none of which was disclosed. We're all going to get charged for that kind of behavior. So this was a dumb thing to do to sit with Jeffrey Tubin. But hey, what the hell is it was his risk to take. And as we've seen with Tom Goldstein, he is not risk averse. Okay. Let's go through some of the highlights because you're not going to believe this. Okay. Tubin writes. he'd been leading a secret life of ultra-high-stakes gambling and sugar-daddy relationships with multiple young women, a life so sheltered from those around him that no one knew the full extent of it, least of all, his wife. When it came to light, his life unraveled. His friends have largely abandoned him. His marriage of three decades is ending. He is nearly bankrupt. Most pressing of all, he's staring down a 22-count federal indictment on tax fraud charges and a trial scheduled to begin in January, which it did. And now he's been found guilty. Outside the front door of his home, his $3 million home, are two Bentley's, writes Tubin, among other family vehicles,

or at least that's what was there. Now, writes Rubin, they're gone, replaced by a Honda. Oh, the shame. Like the rest of us. I used to drive a Honda. No, a Toyota. Now I drive a Beamer. Highly recommend.

But Goldstein is uncowed. I have never, ever believed I did anything wrong, he told me. And for defense at trial, he's planning the same. kind of bold all-in strategy that he used at the Supreme Court, this time with his own freedom on the line. His fall has been as precipitous as his rise was meteoric. And he goes on to talk about some of that background, how he actually worked for David Boyes and Lawrence Tribe, oh, on Bush v. Gore, and that he mastered Supreme Court practice, made a name for himself in the ways that I just described. and then talks about how he started gambling because in the early 2000s, ESPN began broadcasting poker.

He had never played it, but he loved watching. I think of it as a pretty intellectual thing, he says. But he quickly graduated from games around the kitchen table with jars of quarters to tables of high rollers in D.C. and New York. I would play in home games where you could win and lose 100,000. This is not that unusual. I have a friend whose doctor, whose brother is a doctor, like a well-respected doctor, and he's amazing at poker. And he finds these games where he will win or lose a hundred or $200,000 in a night. Now, he declares his winnings and losings, and therefore it's legal. But imagine, like, making a hundred grand in a night with hands of poker. Tom Goldstein took that to the next

level. His style of play reflected his swaggering, risk-friendly approach to litigation. Okay, let's see. He says, I'm a big believer. You have to figure out what your winning argument is. It's a poker thing. And that being willing, and that is being willing to say this is not working. And if I just sit here and hedge my bets and argue both, I'm not going to accomplish anything. So somebody who knew him said it the following. Tom is extremely wild and crazy like a lunatic at the poker table. He's fearless, an over-bluffing kind of player, what we call a chip bully. He tried to run people over at the table. You want controlled aggression, and he had unbridled aggression.

For better or worse, in poker and elsewhere, Goldstein believed in going all in. Listen to this. The first major turning point, writes Tubin, in Goldstein's poker career came in 2008. That was before that clip I just showed you of the two of us on the air in 2010 with Obamacare. when he put up the $10,000 fee to enter the World Series of Poker, a multi-day extravaganza in Las Vegas. On the first night after the tournament had ended for the day, Goldstein sat down at a table at the Bellagio. I end up playing without looking at my cards, Goldstein said, imagine it. That, to put it mildly, was an unconventional strategy.

He bet wildly and recklessly. but his opponents were flummoxed by his blind aggression. Goldstein told me he ultimately played that way for 18 hours and won $400,000 at the Belasian. So you can see what's happening to this guy, right? He's taken big risks in his career they've paid off. He's come up with a Supreme Court strategy where like you, if your argument is failing, you abandon it and you go for another one and you kiss off the first argument, even if it was your primary in the breach, because that's what wins.

You get to the poker table and you intimidate the hell out of everybody, but not even looking at your cards. And that's so wild and crazy and reckless. It was working $400,000 in a night. That's when he met somebody named Dan Bilzerior, an heir to a family fortune who became famous for his extravagant and ridiculous lifestyle as a professional poker player in Vegas. and later for being a social media influencer, who often featured guns and women and bikinis. Bilzerian recalled Goldstein's antics that night. People were all watching the game and talking about what an effing maniac he was.

The two got super tight, and suddenly Goldstein started wearing chunky silver jewelry. And like Blasarian, sporting a thick, full beard, you want to do all kinds of bets. The TV show that Goldstein decided might be a great idea, around poker and crazy things, never came to fruition. But they did make one famous non-poker bet. Goldstein bought a Ferrari worth about 300 grand.

Bill Zarian had a 1965 Shelby Cobra, and he bet Goldstein that his cobra could beat the Ferrari in a race. They agreed to a quarter-mile showdown at a drag racing track in Vegas. The original wager was $100,000. They up to $300,000 bucks. The Ferrari went 121 miles an hour. the Cobra went 133 and Bilzerian won the Ferrari from Goldstein. This is like, I might go to a movie or dinner with friends on the weekend.

What is happening with this dweeby little man from Scotus blog? Good gracious. And then he just saunteres into the Supreme Court and does arguments on behalf of Blue Chip Fortune 100 companies. Here's just a little color. during a photo shoot for Hustler magazine, Bill Zerian, his BFF, threw a naked porn actress named Janice Griffith off a roof in Los Angeles into a swimming pool. She broke her foot, she wound up suing. Goldstein was the lawyer and wrote to the lawyer for the woman in defense of Bill Zerian.

I, like, he wrote, like your client, the facts of this claim won't quite fly. I mean, it's a clever turn of phrase. You can see why he was in demand. Goldstein had law clients in the poker world, and that helped him explain to his wife his increasingly long absences from Washington. He had actively misled his wife and friends about how much he was gambling. Once he started playing in public tournaments like the World Series of Poker, the size of the stakes unnerved those who cared about him, including Nina Totenberg of NPR.

She's like this very uptight Supreme Court reporter over at NPR. She thinks she's the goddess of the Supreme Court. She's quite insufferable. She was so nasty when I was there. I covered the high court from nearly three years. She never warmed up. She thought she was better than everybody. Meanwhile, she never even fucking practiced law.

I had a decade of litigation under my belt. And she wanted to lecture me about the law. It's like, you know what, madam? Why don't you get back to me when you've passed three bars like I have? Anyway, not a fan, but she and he appeared close. So much so that they named a kid after her. And I think she might have been a godmother or something like that.

Okay, so she saw that he was huge into gambling. but she says he lied to us about it. In 2010, he promised Nina he wasn't going to gamble anymore, but he did. And so, and how so. The, he said, okay, he quickly realized that even with his successful law practice, he didn't have the cash to compete. The idea was to be able to play very, very, very deep and not be out of money. So he took out a $10 million line of credit from a guy named Stuart Resnick, a California billionaire. He owned the parent company of Palm Juice, who was a former client of Tom's, and that guy started backing him. In 2014, he met a Malaysian businessman who would bring his poker career to the next level. That guy, Paul Fuwa,

he's been called the world's biggest bookie. He owned one of the leading sports betting sites in Asia, and he was also an inveterate gambler. He traveled a world looking for high-stakes poker games. The FBI raided Fuah's villa at Caesar's Palace in Las Vegas and so on and so fourth bet he had his own trouble. But these two became great friends. And Fua introduced Goldstein to the kind of poker that made his contests with Bill Zarian look like Penny Andy by comparison. With Fua, Goldstein no longer flew commercial. They took Fua's jet to Hong Kong and Manila. Goldstein increasingly operated in hushed private sweets or homes. Two types of poker predominated. The ring games, six to ten players compete against each other, and the heads-up games one-on-one with just a dealer. Goldsteads.

promptly lost nine million playing ring games and realized they were not for him. They require patience, which he didn't have. He liked the heads-up contest one-on-one. He got billionaire after billionaire to back him in these heads-up poker games, which he was doing well at, but he didn't always stick to. And he says in Manila, the tube-in-writing, Goldstein played poker with a gambler known as tango and won 13.4.4. million. He also won 9.96 million from a gambler known as chairman, the chairman. From 2016 to 19, Goldstein was out of the country for almost a full year. He told his wife he was on business trips for Fua. At the end of 16, Goldstein played a California businessman named Alec Gores in Beverly Hills

and won $26 million. 26, imagine this. The biggest score of his life. Earlier that year, he'd won $200,000 in a game that included the actor Kevin Hart. During this run, he won a total of about $50 million, even though he had sold roughly 70% of his stakes to investors, but he still personally cleared around $12 million. So he's not personally, like, completely loaded. Twelve million is loaded. Don't get me wrong, but he doesn't have hundreds of millions. He's got about $12 million. And the problem with $12 million is he promptly lost $14 million to a different billionaire named Bob Safari, a real estate magnet. And he didn't have it. He did not have it. all out of pocket. And this is why he had debts and he had to steal, according to the prosecutors

from his law firm, to pay them and couldn't tell the mortgage company that he secretly owed millions of dollars to people like Safari or Safai, Bob Safai. And his wife certainly didn't know any of that. So like, imagine the stress. But he has no stressable emotions. He has no adrenaline flow? He has no conscience. I mean, honestly, I think you could make a pretty strong case. We're talking about a sociopath here. Imagine going home to your wife after this. Imagine standing up before the Supreme Court and making an argument about ethics. By the way, all of these are massive violations of your ethical duties as a lawyer and 100% Tom Goldstein's going to be disbarred. So he's gone from the vaunted top of the profession to going to be disbarred and a convicted

felon going to prison. Nice. Well done. That's some gamble. I asked Goldstein, writes and how he could stand the stress. He says, I have both the benefit and great disadvantage of not placing particular value on money. I'll take too many risks with too much money. It's a blessing and a curse. It doesn't cause my heart rate to go up. I'm like something wrong with you. Either you're the free solo guy or you're a sociopath.

Goldstein began to adopt the kind of decadent lifestyle. He saw on the jet set poker world, including contacting women on a website called seeking arrangement, which existed to foster sugar dating to connect wealthy men to young women. You're gross. You're a John seeking a prostitute. If you go there. According to the indictment between 16 and 22, he was involved in or pursued intimate personal relationships with at least a dozen women, transferring hundreds of thousands of dollars to them from his financial accounts or joint bank accounts he set up with the women and paying for travel and other expenses for them. Goldstein's wife remained in the dark. She had no idea about any of this.

Criminal investigators from the IRS came to see him in November of 2020. They showed up unannounced in his office to serve grand jury subpoenas. There was a report that somebody he beat or crossed in a poker game called the IRS with a tip. But nothing came of it. He was neither charged nor cleared and life just kind of went on until last year when they did show up and charged him. They say in addition, he became more estranged from his life in Washington and pursued relationships with the women he met online. At one point, he rented a house in California where three of the women lived together and he carried on relationships with each of them. So he sets up what, I mean, I would just call a whorehouse.

It's a brothel. Sorry, ladies, but that's what you are for living there because you met him on what's it called? Success wanted. Hold on, going back. Seeking arrangement, please. He's got the three ladies hauled up there and like pops in like a like a pimp to have sex with them whenever he wants. He was facing a big poker game at the Beverly Hills home of Alec Gors, which included among others Leonardo DiCaprio and a big gambler known as Big Al DeCarralis. Al Pacino came to watch but did not play.

He's going to his little dweeb going to hang out with Leo and Pacino and Kevin Hart. And this guy, Dick Carrollis, then invited Goldstein to a poker game in Costa Rica, where some guy, this big mark, as Tom Goldstein saw him, called the Southerner, was going to be playing. He wanted to play the Southerner who liked those heads-up games, too, one-on-one. He had a reputation, the Southerner, as an inveterate womanizer. So Goldstein thought he would impress him by showing that he was a kindred spirit, and he brought four of his girlfriends with him to Costa Rica. He found this to be the most interesting thing in the world. old Goldstein recalled that was on purpose. They struck up a friendship as well as a poker rivalry, and Goldstein began flying to play against him, usually successfully, traveling back and forth so often that he rented an apartment in the city where the man lived, which is undisclosed, to protect this guy's identity. And so he's going to get those three gals out of the house, as well as a fourth who lives someplace else, to come around like a harem, hanging all over him, praising his every move, rubbing his bald head. I'm editorializing, but you get the point. And this guy

was some sort of a mark and fell for a hook line and sinker. I was beating him, Goldstein said, and that was just a way more interesting life than his Supreme Court practice. He won roughly $50 million from the Southerner, netting $15 million for himself after paying out his investors. And then, right, Stubin, he got the worst break of his life, the tax investigation. which had drifted inconclusively for years, but was taken over by an aggressive federal prosecutor named Stanley Okula. And Bob is your uncle. They hit him with 300 plus subpoenas.

They interviewed dozens of people, and the former charges came down January of 2025. Four days before the end of the Biden administration, so he can thank Joe Biden for that. He used funds from his law firm to pay several million bucks in personal expenses, including poker debts, reducing his taxable income, errors by his office management and so on and so forth. I outlined for you what they accused him of. They alleged that he briefly hired four of the women that he met on his travels, but they did

no work for his firm. Thus, according to the government, the payments to them were personal expenditures, but he put them on the company payroll. And they said, these are personal expenditures that you're trying to launder through your firm and make them tax-free. That's illegal. As the government brief put it, he met woman one, then a recent college graduate on a dating website for individuals seeking to receive or provide financial support as part of an intimate personal relationship. He paid her 500 bucks for their first meeting. They began an intimate personal relationship. And these four women are different from the three who shared the house in California, the ones who went on his company payroll, his law firm payroll. Poor Amy,

the wife. He did establish that three of the four women did do some work for the firm. The fourth immediately went on medical leave. The payments were small, just a few thousand dollars. So the tax issues were almost trivial. Now they get close to trial. They offer him a plea, nearly five years, though, in prison if he takes it. He said, no. He said, I am not taking a plea that involves jail time. They say he's won upward of $88 million total in heads-up contests,

vast majority of which went to his investors. Most of his losses came in ring games where there were multiple people, where he financed himself. Bad move. Should have been the opposite. He told me, writes Toobin, that is overall he was a net loser with a deficit of between 10 million and 15 million, but denies he's addicted to gambling. As my brother Pete always says, you know, you know who's

calling the gamblers anonymous lines, you know who calls themselves a gambler, a gambling addict. Losers! Losers! If you're up 15 million, you don't call gamblers anonymous and you don't wind up getting indicted, usually. Tom Goldstein, you are a loser. I'm sorry to break it to you, but you're a loser in gambling and in life. You did not have a net profit when all was said and done. You defrauded the federal government. You defrauded your friends who went into business with you, law partners. The whole basis of a law partnership is trust.

You defrauded, worst of all, your wife and your family. If you have a kid that you named after Nina, you defrauded your children. You cheated them too. out of the example of an honorable father and the privilege of having a father to grow up with in one's home. And let me tell you, as somebody who lost your dad at age 15 to a heart attack, it hurts when your dad's not there. And teenagers and below need a father in the home.

Screw you for throwing that to the wind because you wanted to spend time with the southerner, because you wanted to have a harem of women waiting for you. at your little townhouse as you defrauded the government in all of us of our money. This guy's disgusting. So now he will go to jail. And his strategy of, quote, my strategy is going to come down to, am I a good guy or a bad guy, did not work.

The jury took one look at him, listened to him testify in the stand, and reached its own decision about the guy who bought the Bentley's. and the Ferrari and the women and his silver jewelry and fooled us all for far too long. I credit whoever called the IRS. That person is a hero. I credit the aggressive prosecutor at the DOJ under Joe Biden, who said I'm going to do something about this, even though this guy is at the top of my profession and probably has connections to a Supreme Court that I don't. Good for you for going to. I credit. at the jury for being able to see through this man's obvious, gifted ability to deceive,

whether at the poker table in front of the high court, in front of his wife, or elsewhere. That's not easy, but you know, you get lay people, a jury of 12 sitting there, and more times than not, they will see through a liar no matter how skilled and experienced he is. So good for them. And Tom Goldstein, I wait now to see what your sentence is. I only hope it's enough to actually send a message to you that you are a bad guy. You did something deeply immoral and wrong at every level. And I just think we are past the point as a civilian group where we are willing to put up with it.

You know, the Epstein files are part of it. Like we're just sick and tired of these so-called elites getting away with this shit. When we all know, we'd go to jail if we did it. So, just desserts for him. And I hope you guys enjoyed that story. Have a wonderful weekend. We'll talk to you on Monday. Thanks for listening to The Megan Kelly Show.

No BS, no agenda, and no fear.