The Megyn Kelly Show - Establishment Meltdown Over RFK, New Lisa Cook Questions, and Being a "Lion" Instead of a "Scavenger," with Ben Shapiro

Episode Date: September 2, 2025

Megyn Kelly is joined by Ben Shapiro, author of "Lions and Scavengers," to talk about the scientific establishment melting down over RFK's work at the HHS and his CDC firing, how the scientific elite lost their credibility during the COVID pandemic, new allegations about Lisa Cook, reporting casting doubt about her college and financial credentials, the coziness of Modi, Putin and Xi, what it means for America and how Trump should handle the moment, what it means to be a "lion" and a "scavenger," why it's important to think like a builder and impart that philosophy on your children, the "scavengers" in America today like Zohran Mamdani, the failures and lies of the establishment and the resulting public distrust, the distinction between conspiracies and conspiracy theories,whether Gov. Wes Moore is an actual 2028 Democratic contender, the controversy over his Bronze Star claims, the media actually hammering him on the issue, and more. More from Shapiro- https://www.amazon.com/Lions-Scavengers-Story-America-Critics/dp/1668097885 Grand Canyon University: https://GCU.eduPrizePicks: Download the PrizePicks app today and use code MEGYN to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup! Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/MEGYNJust Thrive: Visit https://justthrivehealth.com/discount/Megyn and use code MEGYN to save 20% sitewideDone with Debt: https://www.DoneWithDebt.com & tell them Megyn Kelly sent you!  Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

Welcome to the Megan Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at noon east. Hey, everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. Hope you had a great Labor Day weekend. I don't know. It's like bittersweet. Summer's over. Had such a nice summer this year. But also, I don't know about you. I'm actually, I was looking forward to going back to school with the kids so that I could see them again. My kids should, just scattered everywhere, the whole summer long. I was like, where'd they go? Now I think I'm going to see more of them in the fall than I did this summer. It's a blessing for them to have such fun. And, you know, look, even though September is the time when all the trees start to die and we're headed toward winter, it's always felt like a time of renewal, hasn't it? Because it's like the new school year. Sometimes when you start a new job, it tends to happen. I think for a lot of people in the fall, it's all possibilities. I'm already in my fall clothing, so we're off to the

races were steps away from pumpkin spice lattes, life is good. Not for Lisa Cook, but for us, she's the Federal Reserve overseer whose scandal is only growing. Lisa, you're going to have to give it up. Girl, you're going to have to give it up because you appear to have been caught multiple times on the alleged mortgage fraud. And she's not even denying it. She's really just kind of having her surrogates play the race card. I think she's going and I think Trump is within inches of taking over basically effective control of the Fed. But it's really, I mean, Yes, it is about that, but for me, it's about her. You can't just DEI your way into these powerful positions. And then when you're caught, try to fall back in your qualifications, which are

non-existent. We're going to get into that today. So more on her, because there's more problems around here, including we're learning there are big questions about how she got tenure at Michigan State University. Shocked, shocked. Plus, the left is freaking out over Trump and RFKJ's reforms at the CDC. They really are actually. playing the science and expert cards on us. But science, but experts, they don't understand the right half of the country at all. And Maryland's governor is having a great time while people in Baltimore are getting shot while he's over at George Clooney's place in Italy, having a grand old time. Remember when like Ted Cruz wasn't allowed to go out of the country for 24 hours

when there was a weather crisis down in Texas? But Westmore, I mean, people can literally be dying in his state and he can be on Clooney's yacht and he's not going to get the leftist treatment of what a bad person he is. Here now to react for the full show. So excited, we've never done this before. I've never done in person. Either me on his show or him on my show is Ben Shapiro. He's the co-founder of the Daily Wire, host of the Ben Shapiro show, and author of the new book, Lions and Scavengers, The True History of America, which is out today. Get your copy now. We've got to make sure he winds up, number one, he will, but we have to make sure of it on the New York Times bestseller list because they don't let people like Ben Shapiro wind up

number one in the bestseller list, unless we make them recognize reality. Grand Canyon University, a private Christian university in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona, believes that we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. GCU believes in equal opportunity and that the American dream starts with purpose. By honoring your career calling, you can impact your family, friends, and your community. Change the world for good by putting others before your yourself, whether your pursuit involves a bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree. GCU's online on-campus and hybrid learning environments are designed to help you achieve your unique

academic personal and professional goals. With over 340 academic programs as of September 2024, GCU meets you where you are and provides a path to help you fulfill your dreams. The pursuit to serve others is yours. Let it flourish. Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University, private, Christian, affordable. Visit gCU.edu. Good to see you. Well, thanks for having me. It's really sweet of you.

I don't think we've been together like this on the air for a show since my Fox days. Yeah, that's right. Right? We've seen each other like not on the air. On the air, it's been a long time, yeah. Yeah, I know.

It's great to see you in person. Should you have a good Labor Day weekend? I did. It was really, really nice. I was with the kids, and that's what it's about. And now they're going back and doing all of their schooling, which means I do their homework.

No, no, no, teachers, no. They probably have Ben Shapiro big brains, so they don't need you to do their homework. Yeah, I mean, I will say they get spicy on their social studies questions. I'll bet. Yeah. So your kids are little, though, right? What are the ages? 11-9-5-2.

Yeah, so you're still at the age where it is sort of more of a blessing when they go back to school. A little bit. They're so young. You need a break in the middle of the day. Yeah. Exactly. Mine are more like, mine are 15, 14, and 12 now. They're so fun.

And, like, I miss them so much. They're just, their lives are so complete with friends that I'm like, remember mom. Mom loves you. I will say this is a fun summer. We took them, like, all over the place. We took them to, like, Italy and Greece, and then we were in Montana. And so that was awesome, and they loved the travel.

And we did a lot of history lessons. So when we were in Sicily, I was showing my 11-9-year-old Patton, like the George C. Scott movie, and we were doing World War II history, and they're very into it. Yep, that's how it goes in the Shapiro. I'm listening to Dateline with my children,

so we went a different way. This is not good. This says something about both of us, I think. It's good one. My daughter's like, Mom, you listen to a lot of bad stories about crime. I'm like, honey, I swear, this is a genre. Like, this is a thing. It's not just my obsession.

I mean, you got to do what you're good at. You got to go with the thing. Dance with the girl that brung you. Maybe they're going to be, you know, law enforcement when they grow up. You never know. They could be in training. It could be a prosecutor. Some other kind of thing.

When we were waiting for the show to get started, I was telling you about my favorite story right now is Lisa Cook. I'm very into this woman because it's very clear to me she DEIed her way up to this seat. How dare you? How dare you? That's terrible. And now she's been caught, it's just like, honestly, there have, I'm just going to say it, there have been a lot of black women who have ascended these positions on very thin credentials and then some sort of scandal takes them down and the left freaks out about the fact that

you're going after a black woman. You know, it's like from prosecutors, whatever, whether it's Kim Fox or Fannie Willis. Like Marilyn Mosby? Maryland Mosby, thank you, like who get bounced out for whatever reason. But then you're not allowed to attack them because they're black women. but it's like, well, you elevated them for that reason. And we kind of were forced to skip. We just did an entire presidential election that was this.

Yes. Right? It was where Joe Biden was like, I'm picking a black woman. And I'm like, um, but you should really pick like a qualified person. And then she ends up as the nominee. And they're like, but you can't attack her saying she's a black woman. So well, when you said it, it was a good thing. Right.

When we say it, it's somehow like a bad thing. Like it's the same thing that we're saying right now. At least like, pick somebody who's got credentials that are pretty much unassailable, right? If you're just going to bypass all the, normal protocols and elevate them. So it turns out not only does this woman, has she allegedly committed at least three alleged instances of mortgage fraud with respect to a property in Michigan, a property in Atlanta. And now there's a third property where she allegedly misstated the purpose of her home. And this one was in, oh gosh, I'm trying to remember. It's a third

location. My team will get it to me. And in all three instances, she has stated the wrong purpose for the home. Two of them she claimed were her primary residences at the same time, which is not possible. And it wasn't possible in her case. And she's not even denying it. Cambridge, Massachusetts was the third one. She's not even denying it. She hasn't, like everyone's coming out saying she has the presumption of innocence. Well, she's not saying she's innocent. Not once as she said, I didn't commit this mortgage fraud. At most, her lawyers have said, well, one was a mistake. Well, my favorite is, well, she hasn't heard anybody because she's paying back the mortgages, which is, of course, exactly what one Donald J. Trump said in

his New York fraud trial when they claimed that he was defrauding, remember all of his lenders, by making claims about the value of his various real estate properties, and they said he's over claiming. He said, well, I mean, they can sue me. And like, if I'm not paying it back, then they consume me. And like, no, you'll have a $500 million judgment against you, sir. Right. And so it's amazing. When the shoe is on the other foot, they used precisely the same defenses without any understanding of what it is that they're saying. Right. With or without a victim, they were going to go after Donald Trump because justice. Right. You know, but with her, it's, you know, what? No one's been her. We don't know if she even did it, even though she's not even denying it.

And black woman, black woman. So now it comes out that this totally qualified woman, and I'll just give you an example of that, because Ellie Honig, who's the CNN legal analyst, he was even out there over the weekend saying, she's kind of in some deep, you know what, and for him to say it, you know, shows you, they've got her. But listen to how he describes in sort of the throwaway, how qualified this woman is. I mean, and I heard this over on NPR, I heard this on the daily. They really talk about this woman like she's, you know, minor keys. So here we go. Watch, Elie Hunter.

There's some suspicious activity here that's really problematic by Lisa Cook. The claim that this might be clerical error or just a mistake, that's not going to fly because Lisa Cook is one of the most established, accomplished financial and economic experts in this country. I think that the allegations on their face could be enough for a judge to say, look, I'm going to defer to the president on cause. Is she? one of the most accomplished, respected econ experts in the nation? I mean, I'd never heard of her. Had you heard of her?

Literally nobody has ever heard of her other than Chris Rufo, who, unlike the two of us, is always paying attention to these details. And he was there. You don't want to get on Chris's radar. You do not. You do not. Wow. If you went to look at my academic papers, he would find they are almost non-existent.

But Lisa Cook came under the Chris Rufo magnifying glass, as well as that of his one-time research partner Chris Brunette, who's an independent journalist. And both of these guys were the ones who exposed Claudine Gay's plagiarism at Harvard. And this guy works for the American Conservative. He's written for The Daily Caller, and he obtained her 10-year packet, her 85-page tenure packet via FOIA. It's heavily redacted, he writes, but here are the big takeaways. She was at Michigan State in the Econ Department, and he concludes, although everything's blacked out. You can see these blackout lines. that it was clear from his review that they did not want to give her tenure,

that they likely voted, the Econ Department likely voted against giving her tenure, but appear to have been overruled by the dean. There's a column titled recommended by department chair slash school director in blackout. The dean's column is not in blackout. You see the dean check to recommend her. But there's this, you can almost read between the lines. this was long blackout nor was this long blackout Lisa Cook is a valued colleague

whenever we fill a junior position we hope that the individual will succeed and be promoted to associate professor with tenure we do everything that we can to help out along the way blackout blackout blackout blackout it's very clear she didn't get it and then the dean elevated her

and when she was applying for tenure she relied on among other things Ben her paper, which was also mentioned when she came under fire from Trump last week because of the alleged mortgage fraud, okay, so here she was applying for tenure in a section called commentary and accomplishment. She devoted 15 paragraph to her research on lynchings and patents and only one paragraph to how she's served the economics profession. Okay. All right. But she's written a lot, like everyone obsessed with DEI about how terrible America was. And the Jim Crow South and lynchings in America.

You should probably make our inflation decisions. She totally should. It's obvious. Why not? And she knows a lot about mortgages. Clearly. Clearly. An expert. So in this, so 15 paragraphs on her research on lynchings and patents, only one in her economic service. And apparently Rufo writes, I was making fun of this paper because it was like the premise was that lynchings of black people led to fewer patents

held by black people. I was like, well, I mean, frankly, I get it. Right? That's math. It appears to have gone beyond that and crossed over into black people are depressed when they live in the Jim Crow South and therefore they're not even trying for patents. But I learned from Chris Rufo that even that was totally debunked after she wrote it because she relied on patents, patent applications in the year 1900, concluding that the number plummeted because of lynchings and discrimination. Discrimination will meantime other researchers soon discovered the reasons for

the sudden drop in 1900 was that one of the databases Cook relied on stopped collecting data that year. The true number of black patents, one subsequent study found, might be as much as 70 times greater than Lisa Cook's figure effectively debunking the study's premise. So even her greatest accomplishment fell apart after the fact. Well, sounds like, I mean, I heard Eli Honig. I mean, he said that she's amazing at this. He said. So I will take him for. I mean, he's on CNN. So, I mean, I think we're done here. Can we talk about why he did that?

I mean, I think we all know why he did that, right? It's so frustrating. It's obligatory. You must read the words. You must read the words before you. I mean, this Manchurian candidate kind of stuff. Right. And Chaw is the kindest, gentlest, most wonderful human being I've ever known.

It's racist. It is, of course, racist. By the way, you can name half a dozen black economists who happen to be on the conservative side of the island, who actually are really well qualified for this. Glenn Lowry. Glenn Lowry, Thomas Oill, Roland Friar. I mean, you can keep going with all of this. where they're busy trying to, you know, kick out of Harvard.

Yeah, exactly. And all those guys, very qualified, but given short-trift by the same exact people who will talk about the majestic qualifications of Lisa Cook, who, of course, does not seem to be a great check. If you just wanted some random black woman who actually had written a bunch of scholarly articles, who's actually really smart, you could go with Carol Swain. Yes. She's not an economist, but she's way more qualified to be on the Fed than this person from the sound of it. And then here's another. Her 10-year packet lists her writings that I just talked about on the lynchings as a peer-reviewed paper. And this guy who I mentioned, Brunette, the co-author de Rufo on the Claudine Gay Stuff,

he himself wrote an article for City Journal about this in 2022, pointing out she built herself as a macroeconomist, but she'd never published a peer-review macroeconomics article, ever. Not only that, but she misrepresented her publication history in her CV, claiming she had published an article in the journal American Economic Review. In truth, he writes, the article was published in American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, a less prestigious, non-peer reviewed magazine. So she lied. I mean, it's not exactly Elizabeth Warren, but she lied in an academic setting to get ahead to say that this paper had been peer-reviewed. And it was in the more prestigious senior partner to this less prestigious, shitty junior partner. And this sort of stuff matters, obviously, because when you're talking about the Trump administration,

the constant attempt by the media is any time there's something like this, it must be they're out to get Lisa Cook because it's a perversion of the Federal Reserve because the president has been so critical of Jay Powell over at the Fed. Or if it's about John Bolton, it must be, it can't be that there's actually a there, there. It must be that he hates John Bolton, and that's why he's going after John Bolton. And nobody just takes a breath for like five seconds to think, hey, why don't we let this play for three, four days and find out what the actual allegations are? Because as you're pointing out, the allegations are pretty bad. And it turns out this person probably shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. But the media, it's Lucy with the football. Every single time they think they've got this guy in some authoritarian trap, then it gets pulled away.

And turns out, actually, there's kind of a legitimate basis for the thing that he's doing here. Exactly right. So what I see here is a pattern of somebody who appears to me, dishonesty. honest. She's, she lied, according to this, about her peer review. Her paper fell apart. It wasn't academically sound. It's really the only thing she has. She was denied tenure, we think, based on this reporting. She only got elevated to a tenure position thanks to the dean. I'm going to guess Ben Shapiro would not have been given the same help up as she got. And then you have everybody running around saying how incredibly accomplished she is and how

incredibly. It's great for her. I mean, now when she goes, think about her income trajectory now. She can pay off all those primary mortgages. And it'll be amazing. She's already making money off of multiple properties because they're actually rental properties. Exactly. Not a primary residence, not a secondary residence. Now she'll be a resistance hero, right? And now she'll get a nice book to you a lot of this. She will get tenure at some other university on the basis of all of this. And she'll have a perennial slot next to Eli Honig talking about what a wonderful, I guess, legal professional he is and they can have a mutual admiration society. It'll be awesome. What you see in her history, which is like the other strain, so you've got these questionable

academic achievements. And then on the other side, right next to them, which really are blaring, are all of her woke commentary. Like all of it. It's everywhere. And just today on the Hills Rising, Robbie Sov, Suave, yeah, sorry, sorry, I always screw that up because of the spelling. He went into a big thing about what she was saying during the COVID pandemic and George Floyd a Palooza, and she was everywhere. She was everywhere talking about wokeism and Black Lives Matter and defunding the police. And apparently, she was involved in the effort to oust Harold Ullig, then editor of the Journal of Political Economy. He says, for crimes against wokeness. What did Ullig do? In the summer of 2020, quoting from Robbie here,

Ullig wrote a few tweets in which he politely but firmly criticized the Black Lives Matter movement for the defund the police push among him. His mom. His mom, most provocative sentence, this guy Oolid, was George Floyd and his family really didn't deserve to be taken advantage of by flat earthers and creationists. So what did Lisa Cook do? She demanded his head. She along with these other so-called conservatives or commentators like Janie Ellen was one of them. Paul Krugman was one of them. They were all calling for this guy to be fired. And he was. He actually did get the boot. Cancel culture came for him. It was successful, although temporarily he was placed on leave pending an investigation, eventually reinstated

after Cool Herds prevailed. But this woman was thrilled to see somebody canceled losing their profession for one ambiguous sentence that she found offensive. But she can lie, I mean, she can lie to get hired potentially, possibly to get tenure. She can lie to get her job at the Federal Reserve because there's real questions about whether she disclosed any of this mortgage shenanigan stuff. We don't know whether she lied or just didn't disclose. There's no way she disclosed. She would have already told us that. No.

And now she wants to run around claiming black woman, black woman, Trump bad, Trump bad. And yet in her history, who did she want to cut a break for? Right. I just feel like I'm looking forward to her going down. Yes. Well, I mean, a member of protected class gets hit by rules that she was trying to apply to others is definitely delicious. Yeah. And that's one of the things I think we've all been enjoying about the Trump era as far is just watching the rules be equally applied to

the people who are only applying them for themselves over the course of the last 10, 20 years. Yeah, I mean, a lot of, a lot of these folks. Yeah, like, I'm sorry, I don't have anything against John Bolton himself, but, like, if he actually did disclose confidential and classified information to the point where it's brought to our attention from some overseas CIA source, that would raise a red flag on anyone. Yes. I mean, clearly, and he will go to jail if that is what he did. And, you know, again.

On the CNN front, I just want to go back to the Ellie Honing over the top praise, we see this all the time. We see this on that Abby Phillips panel virtually every night. I am sick and tired. It makes me very uncomfortable of people being like when the subject of, let's say, a black woman like Abby Phillips comes up. I love Abby Phillips. I mean, she's extremely talented. She's incredibly talented. She's one of my favorite people. I consider her a friend. She's a friend. We've had dinner together. I grow so uncomfortable when people do this. It's so clear what they're doing. like who else do you i don't run around being like i call ben shapiro like when the israel folks got mad at me because i had like mtg on i don't run around like i'm friends with ben shapiro

ben shapiro's a good close personal friend of mine we are but i don't like i'm so uncomfortable stop fucking doing that it's definitely it's it's a weird tick it's a weird tick and it's kind of revealing tick when people do that but i think you you have to say the words if you don't say the words then you're not allowed to say the bad things about lisa cook unless you also say the the very nice things about about lisa cook she could just be a moron Yes, that, again, how dare you? Back to the beginning. No, no, she's brilliant. Michigan State University, the Harvard of Michigan. That's not University of Michigan? The Harvard of not University of Michigan schools in Michigan. I'd say Syracuse is the Harvard of upstate New York,

at least central New York, arguably. All right, well, that's Lisa Cook. I think her goose is cooked and she won't be around much longer. Let's spend a minute on foreign policy because the, there's, there's video out now from this big meeting of Putin and Modi and, um, Xi. Yeah, she. And on Morning Joe, they were very, very upset because Putin and Modi of India were shown very chummy together and kind of holding hands. And of course, they're not supposed to be doing that because we're trying to punish India for, with secondary sanctions, because Putin is continuing the war in Ukraine. And doesn't seem like he's that phased by it. They're still very chummy here. Here is what Morning Joe had to say about it in SOT Zero.

You literally had Putin and Modi holding hands yesterday. Clearly this meeting a shot at President Trump's. The image of Vladimir Putin holding hands with the leader of India and Narendra Modi. It was a sign that Putin is getting away with it. That three years into this war, he is now claiming this was the West's fault. And he's, has an audience of prominent world leaders who agree with them. 50% terrorists from the United States placed on India in some ways driving Modi to that photo op where he's holding hands with Putin and that incredible, extraordinary show of

support for Vladimir Putin. Okay. So this jumped out at me, Ben, because I was actually in the middle of those two men in July of 2017, Putin and Modi. And I got ripped for wearing like a sort of a dress to the thing instead of a suit. But I was literally told it was a state dinner to dress for a state dinner, which I did. In any event, I thought the dress was nice. But I was there. Here, look at this, this is the video of it. Here's Putin and Modi. And we are in St. Petersburg together meeting at the castle where Putin and I were together. And we had, thank you. We had sort of a state dinner

thereafter. Right after this, the three of us sat down at a table that was like barely enough to hold three teacups and had tea together, the three of us. And they are and were and have been extremely chummy for many, many, many years. So that's what jumped out to me. Like, they've always been like this. They actually do have a lot of strategic alignment. And I don't know how, like, I don't think even Trump thought that he was going to end the relationship between the men by opposing secondary sanctions. They're also aiming at the wrong thing there. The actual geopolitical change is Modi and Xi. It's not it's not Modi and Putin. As you say, Modi and Putin. Around for a long time. Yes. I mean, also India during the entirety of the Cold War was not

aligned, but actually aligned pretty closely with the Soviet Union. And it took until the mid-2000s for the United States to start really warming up the relationship with India to the point where they're now considered a military strategic partner as part of the so-called quad. That'd be like the United States, Japan, Australia, and India. And the idea there, and this is under Trump One, was to create essentially a ring of fire around China, because of the United States, If you look at the map, obviously, the Indo-Pacific is dominated by China, but not if you have India in kind of one corner and then Australia down in the south and Japan up kind of ringing them. And so the idea was that we were going to sort of box China in.

So I'm more concerned about India realigning vis-vis China because they have a bad relationship historically. They've almost gone to war several times. Him being aligned with Putin is nothing new. I mean, he's getting enormous amounts of oil from Vladimir Putin. Something like 47% of all Russian oil exports go to the Chinese and 38% go to the Indians. And that means that since 2022, the Indians have probably saved something like $17 billion on their oil cost because the amount of oil that they've been taking in from the Russians. And so the idea that, you know, the Indians were going to turn away from Russia full scale because of the sanctions.

I'm not sure if that's what Trump was going for. I think that that was not going to happen. But I'm not going to, you know, say that the realignment here is not a problem. I do think it is a problem. This particular event was Turkey, Iran, North Korea, I believe, was there. It was China. it was India and it was Russia. And that sort of anti-American coalition

that territorially now stretches all the way from China all the way in the east to theoretically Turkey in the West, that is a very large land bridge. I mean, that is a serious geopolitical issue. And so I think that, again, the idea that we were going to break the relationship between Russia and India

is foolish, and you're right. Modi and Putin have been friendly for a very long time. I will say that I think the tariff war does have some unforeseen consequences. And I think one of those consequences is that instead of boxing China in with all these other countries, if you slap Japan with the tariff and you slap India with a slap India with a slap China with a lower tariff than India,

then you could theoretically be making moves that push India in the direction of a realignment. And that that has some significant impact. I mean, monetarily it does. You've seen that the dollar has been dropping as the global reserve currency. The spot price of gold today is like the highest has been ever. And so there is downstream effect to some of these decisions being made. Do you think it's all about the tariffs? I don't think it's all about the tariffs.

I do think it is largely about the tariffs. I think that we've offered a lot of carrots and not a lot of sticks and not enough carrots to places like India. The truth is that the trade relationship that we have with India is not wildly important to the United States. They represent, I think, our 10th largest trading partner. They do have access to some rare earth minerals. And I think one of the goals, theoretically, should have been to if we were going to do cheap goods at all from other parts of the world to realign that from China to India. and make more of an ally of India, specifically because they're geopolitically between Pakistan here and China here.

And so what you want to do is make, by the way, we hold more military exercises with India than we do with NATO. I was going to say, and they're not, you know, creating mass amounts of ships to potentially take us down. Right. We're a lot friendlier with that. But if you start to see them like actually realign with China, if you start to see them move into the Chinese camp, then that really does upend the geopolitical order.

And so, again, I'm not a Peter Navarro guy. And I think that Peter Navarro's trade policy, if you do the opposite of that, typically, you're going to do well. So when you look at Putin, you look at Modi, you look at Xi. Are they all lions? I think that the idea of the lion in the book is somebody who believes in the lions and scavengers. Is somebody who is trying to build as opposed to tear down. So I would say no. I think that all three of those people, well, two of those three I think are attempting to tear down.

I'm not sure about Modi. I think Modi may be more in the lion category. And I think him sort of forging a middle path and trying to move as an independent in the world, which has been traditional Indian policy, you could see him as a line more than a scavenger. I think she is definitely a scavenger. Communism is a scavenger philosophy. And I think Putin is a scavenger too. I think that Putin is essentially attempting to savage various countries and institutions.

Where is he building? Yeah, nothing. I mean, it's a gas station with nuclear weapons. That's right. And so, yeah, I've never seen Vladimir Putin. I think very early in his career, there was the possibility he could be. If you remember back to 99, 2000, when he first took over, he lowered the tax rates like, 12 percent. People thought he was going to realign with the West. It didn't work out that way,

obviously. Lisa Cook? Definitely a scavenger. Totally. She defines scavenger. Yes, yes. Somebody who has nothing but complaints about the United States lives high on the hog because of the systems that she criticizes and then has the temerity to suggest that she is a victim while prospering. It's just pure, hard to come with a better example of a scavenger than Lisa Cook. The way, I mean, that's obviously the title of the book, but you kind of break down, what does it mean to be a lion? What does it mean to be a scavenger? And you don't do it purely right versus left. No, I don't think it's a right versus left thing. No. I even think it's a personal thing, meaning I think that if you take it to the personal

level, there's a part of all of us that wants to build, and there's a part of all of us that wants to destroy. And the easiest thing in the world when we face a problem is to say that it's somebody else's fault, that it's a system's fault, and we should tear down the system. Sometimes it is the system's fault, but you actually have to have evidence of that. And then there's the part of us that wants to build. And you get to wake up every morning to decide whether you want to build or whether you want to destroy. And civilizationally, do we want to build or do we want to destroy things? And again, I'm not talking here about unjust systems where you can show the evidence for why it's unjust and whom it's victimizing.

I'm talking about, you know, the Zoranamdanification of America, the sort of idea that America is a victimizing oppressor party and all the institutions need to be laid low so that Zora Maldani and his friends can feel better about themselves, even though they, again, are the greatest beneficiaries of American freedom and prosperity in the history of all of humanity. And so what you've seen, I think, over the course of the last couple of decades, is the rise of what I call the scavengers, this coalition of people who, I essentially have three categories of scavengers. They're barbarians, they're looters, and they're letchers.

Barbarians are people who believe that we have made their civilization poorer. It largely comes from outside the United States. I think there's a big gathering of them in Detroit, scavengers who basically say that America is an awful place, an exploitative place, an oppressive place that has made the rest of the world poorer and terrible. And then they import that into our borders. And then there are looters, people who believe that free markets, private property, equal application of the law. These are actually biased. And what we need is a system that benefits people, quote unquote, like me. So Marxism definitely falls into the time. Like the Democratic Socialists of America. Exactly. And then you have lectures, people who believe that family and church are a threat to them because their own identity is wrapped up in behavior that family and church pose a threat.

too, and so family and church need to be wiped away. And the reason I say they're a coalition is because you see them acting coalitionally. It's very weird. Like, they should be mutually exclusive. Barbarians and Letchers in particular, it's very weird to watch queers for Palestine. Yeah, sort of like the apex example of this. You know, people who would be thrown off of buildings in Gaza who are out there standing for Gaza, and you're like, why? Because the answer is they just don't like the civilization as a whole. It's not that they want to live in Gaza. It's that they believe the civilization that is responsible for the terrible situation in Gaza and is also responsible for the terrible situation I find myself in personally

because I'm not accepted at my local family dinner. Those are the same civilization. They need to be torn down. So we're all going to march together on mass. And you see, I think Mamdani is like a perfect example of this since we're in New York anyway. I mean, he is like a perfect example of this. You look at his coalition and it's like radical Islamists and radical transgender advocates and abortionists and communists. Like, what do all these people have in common? And the answer is they hate all of the good things. That's the thing that they have in common. They want to tear down all of these good things. It makes perfect sense, actually. And to me, one of the pieces that resonated with me

was you wrote something the effect of you don't have to have like a conscious philosophy with which you're going through life in order to be a lion. Like you can just be a person, let's say a strong person with moral convictions, a person of faith, a person who knows how they're raising their children. And there was one piece in there that really resonated where you were saying the difference between a lion and scavenger among others is a lion would never sit around saying this is so unfair. Right. You know, poor me, the whole attitude

is just very un-lion-esque. And you either teach that to your children or you don't. You may have a philosophy around it, it may be on the board as one of your family values, or it may just be something that a parent says to a kid, which is like, no, stop doing that. We don't do that in this family. That's not a healthy, positive way of thinking.

And if you don't pass it down to your kids, your kids end up becoming scavenger. Because the society is just filled with them, and they're trying to convert your child into a scavenger at every turn, K through 12 and beyond. A hundred percent. And also, I think there's a natural thing that lions do that has made us very vulnerable. And I speak here just, you know, for people who believe the duty is the way that you do life, that you get up in the morning, you figure what's your duty and you do those things. But one of the things that Western civilization does differently than a lot of other

civilizations is that we're a guilt-based culture as opposed to a shame-based culture. So we're a culture where we actually value the feeling of internal guilt. It shows that you're a good person, right that you recognize your own mistakes you try to correct those mistakes shame based cultures don't worry about what you're feeling internally with regard to guilt they are interested in avoiding shame and so what that means is they want to shame you and so this imbalance between kind of guilt cultures and shame cultures explains why the whole cancel culture thing went out of control because there were a bunch of people who would traditionally be considered lions who were like somebody would call them out for a sin they'd say oh you know what that's true you know i have sin i could have done better and then people would stomp on their neck and like wait that's not what's supposed to happen right right when i express guilt i'm supposed to like like get forgiveness at the other end of that. The religious concept of repentance is I acknowledge sin, in return, I am restored, right? That's the basic idea. And we have an entire side of the culture that says, if you acknowledge sin, you have been shamed and being shamed is shameful, right?

You are lesser now because you acknowledge your own guilt. And so people do this, and they don't understand if you pass on to your kids a sense of guilt without a sense of pride in your civilization and in your duty and in the important things to do, what you end up with is a bunch of kids who are ashamed of who they are. and they end up trying to dissociate from their own civilization, and they only feel good when they're doing that. And this is why you see so many of sort of the scavengers not appearing in the poorest areas of America. A lot of those people are lions. What you end up seeing is them appearing on very rich college campuses, having parents who are earning in six figures.

Because they're saying, I don't want to be like my shame-ridden parents, these terrible people who have made the world an exploited place. I'm different. I'm not like them. And so you see them marching in the streets, you know, hundreds of thousands strong in some places. in solidarity with destroying a civilization they've benefited from. And again, I keep going back to Mammatani, but he's like a perfect example. No one has run up richer and more privileged in America than Zara and Mammatia. He's walking around trying to rip down everything that makes success possible.

And also, like so many of these scavengers, he's accomplished nothing. Nothing. He has absolutely nothing on his resume to point to. Lisa Cook is way more qualified to be mayor of New York than he is. She wrote a paper one time. She did. Exactly. She did get that tenure, no matter how she got it.

She did get it. It's more than we can say for him. the person I keep thinking of when you're talking about this because she's on my list of things to ask you about today because I just find her amusing is Greta Turnburg.

So she embodies this scavengers. Exactly, totally. And also Little Lord Fauntleroy, both kind of all in one. She got the He-Man haircut now? Yes, it's very odd. I don't know. I mean, like, I'm sorry,

but if you're Greta Turnburg, your goal when you wake up at the morning should not be to say, I want to, how can I make myself look less attractive? It should not, you're good. You can stay. You're at the point

where you can say a whole, I hold. I don't need anything additional. I don't need the haircut with the bangs up here and the curl down. She's back. David Burge, Iowa Hawke had a great line. He said she's now surpassed the, what was, Gary Coleman record for playing a 10-year-old the longest? For playing a 10-year-old the longest, totally. Yes. Because, well, she, not only is scavenger-esque, and the book again is called Lions and Scavengers by Ben Shapiro. It's out now, get it. It's a great social, cultural, moral commentary on where we are. are as a world, not to mention a country. But she's not only a scavenger. She represents something

else, which is how scavengers elevate other scavengers, how they see it in a certain individual and they genuinely admire it. You know, it's not fake, their admiration for somebody like that. She's taught in schools. I mean, every single school we've been at, we've been at four of them because we were at the two in New York before we fled and now two out here, she gets mentioned as like someone for these kids to look up to. So she's gone from, do we have the thought of making predictions about, you know, world calamity that did not come true to now making all sorts of pronouncements on Israel because, sure, why not? Why not? Attracts.

Geopolitical expert. Yeah. Here she is just as a flavor for those who have forgotten. You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet, I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. entire ecosystems are collapsing we are in the beginning of a mass extinction and all you can talk about is money and fair tales of eternal economic growth

how dare you why is it so important to stay below 1.5 degrees Celsius because even at one degree people are dying from climate change because that is for the United Science calls for to avoid destabilizing the climate so that we have the best possible chance to avoid setting of irreversible chain reactions.

Every fraction of a degree matters. I feel like we're doing okay. Yes. Just for the first time, one of the Arctic ice shelves grew this past summer. Like, I feel pretty good about where we are. I think that's why she got off the climate change bandwidth. I had a rule, and the rule was,

until she was 18, I couldn't make fun of her, right? Because we have this stupid game that we play in the media where if somebody trots out like a child actor, which she is. I mean, she actually is like a child actor. her. And then you're not allowed to criticize because they're not of majority. Well, she's like 35 years old now. Right. And so we can make fun of her as much as we could possibly want. But she is a perfect embodiment of what people have called the Omnacause, right? What she

actually is in favor of is like all the things, right? She went from climate change seamlessly over to Gaza because it's all the same thing, which is, I just hate the civilization. I hate capitalism. I mean, when she was talking about climate change, she can't get about climate change. She openly said she wanted to destroy capitalism. Capitalism was responsible for for climate change. It was responsible for all the evils on planet Earth. And now she's transferred that right on over to Israel versus Hamas and the Gaza Strip. Seamlessly. And it's all the same people saying all the same things. They just change the banner out every so often. It's why you see what's happening on campus. And it's the exact same people. They just switched out the BLM for the

Gaza. They just went right from one to the other. And then whatever the next cause will be, probably immigration, that that'll be the next banner. Because they can just move seamlessly from the cause to cause. The only thing the causes have in common is the system sucks. I want to tear down the system. And again, this girl has had the most privileged life. I mean, she didn't go to school from the time she was like 12, 13 years old. She was jet-setting around the country, well, sailing around the world to the great plaudits of the rest of planet Earth. And now, I guess, she's getting attention for getting on a boat and trying to float her way to Gaza and then being turned away after taking a few pictures with Klamas members. And the Israelis gave her a bunch of sandwiches

and drinks. It was the nicest ejection ever. It was really funny. You saw the pictures of her. She's actually smiling as she receives the foods. Yeah. You can't come in, but here's a lovely meal for you on your way out. Take care. Enjoy. And of course, she's still with the, I'm a victim. I will say. I will say. They definitely, it was basically like an airline genocide because they put her in the back row next to the bathrooms on L.L., which I have done, which is brutal.

Well, she's not wrong about Israel becoming more and more controversial. And that is why Chris Martin did what he did at the Cole Play concert the other night, which I just thought was shameful. I really, I can't believe it's at this point now where you get an Israeli on the stage and you have to like, you're jarred. You can clearly see, I'm going to play the clip. You can see he's like jarred when he says,

where are you from? She says, Israel. As if she said, you know, I don't know. Hell. Like, yeah, North Korea. Yeah, something like where you were like, holy shit, what have you been through? What's going on?

I'll play the clip and we'll talk about it. Here it is. Where did you come from today? From Israel. Okay, well, wow. Okay, well, listen. Wow. Wow. Wow, he says.

I'll say this, very, very, I feel that you're here as humans, and I'm treating you as people on Earth, regardless of where you come from or don't come from. Thank you for being loving and kind. Although it's controversial, maybe, I also want to welcome people in the audience from Palestine because we are, I believe that we're all equal human. And, um, yeah. I want to treat you as equal humans on Earth.

Well, don't do any favors. I know. Like, first of all, your coal play, you suck. Second of all, like, and apparently all he does is just go around ruining random people's lives at a play concerts now. That's just all that happens. Beware if you go to a cold play concert, you get what's coming to you. But, yeah, I mean, the entire premise, which is like, look at me, I'm bestowing humanity on you,

because you come from a country that's in the middle of a war after the worst assault on Jews since World War II. And now I'm also going to name check, you know, people who are on the other side of that. Would you do this in literally any other circumstance? No. If we were Russians, let's say they were Russians. And they said, I'm from Russia. Would you say, well, you know, I just have a name, throw it out there, you're human, and so are people from, I'm just going to name check Ukraine. I can't imagine him doing, yeah, just, I can't imagine him doing something like that.

Why wouldn't you just say nothing? Or I'm sorry for all your country's been going through. Right, or like, I'm so glad you came. Yeah, that's it. Just leave wrong. You don't have to do anything. You don't have to do anything. But I mean, an Israeli citizen, like this isn't the IDF, right? Like, this is some, like, heavy-set woman who showed up at his concert. Right. Who's clearly, you know, not one of the chief fighters. And he can't, he's got to take a political. Like, why can't with her you just say, you know what?

It's unambiguous. Obviously, the war's gone on for two years and it's getting more controversial, as we've discussed. But that's not to say that Israel, it was anything other than wrongly attacked on 10-7, an absolutely brutal terrorist attack from which the country is still very much suffering. I mean, like, the bodies haven't even. been in the ground for two years, like maybe a word about the hostages, Israeli hostages who are still suffering, who are starving to death too? I always find it interesting at these sort of musical events.

I mean, you remember this thing was launched on the basis of a gigantic attack at a music event, right? It was the Nova Music Festival where some 300 people were slaughtered for going to essentially a rave on a Friday night in the desert. And at all these music festivals, they're out there, like, chanting in favor of essentially a group that bans all music festivals in the Gaza Strip. Not a lot of music festivals starring Coldplay in the Gaza Strip. but again he didn't have to go there

I mean wherever you are on these issues and obviously my perspective is extremely clear on this you just don't have to do it the fact that he felt the necessity to sort of apologize for the presence of Israelis at his concert says something really disturbing yeah because you don't have to do that

you don't have to and I understand that there are people there who immediately start blowing any mention of Israel he could just go right over the top of that yeah doesn't need to and I think if it were me caught by surprise by like somebody's in the middle of a war or his country's, I think I would have said something like, I hope your family's okay. Yeah, exactly.

I mean, and by the way, he would have said the same thing if it was somebody from Gaza. Yeah, right. You couldn't have done that. Right. But I'm choosing to treat you like a human. He would certainly not say that. If there's been two people from Gaza,

he would not have said, I'm choosing to treat you as a human. As a human. I just want to say, welcome to the people from Israel here also. No way in hell, which shows you exactly where he stands on it. And here's the thing, Ben, even though, like, even Trump is saying now, like Israel's losing the PR war. Okay. And I've been saying that.

think that's true. I don't think they should, but I think they are. I mean, it is true. Yeah. And also, like, wars go on a long time and they're ugly. And Hamas is great at propaganda. Hamas is great propaganda. And also, I've yet to see a longstanding war in which one side is Western and the other side is terrorist and you don't end up, quote unquote, losing the PR war if it goes on a long time. Well, this is where I was going to go with it because who does Chris Martin think his values, like his core values that actually he lives by align better with, right? I mean, if you actually press this guy, he would, of course, say Israel every day of the week. But so many people, when they comment on this, when they embrace Hamas or, you know, they won't usually say Hamas.

They'll say the Palestinians. Right. When pressed, like, what is it about them, you know, that really resonates with you? Really can't say anything. It's just about how bad Israel is. Right. It'll always be their victims, right? Victims, victims.

They're oppressed. And the thing was about the victims and oppression narrative, that that was basically thoroughly debunked by October 8th, meaning on October 7th, there was a gigantic attack that was launched on Israel. In 2005, Israel abandoned the Gaza Strip. They were not in control of the Gaza Strip. It's the reason October 7th happened. If they'd had any sort of security oversight in the Gaza Strip, it never would have happened in the first place. And on October 7th, there was a gigantic attack.

And then the idea was that somehow the attack was Israel's fault, despite having abandoned the Strip in 2005. And so it's like it's a no-win situation. Yeah, the blockade, it was occupied. Right, it's occupied. It's the blockade. But as everyone recognizes, who's watched this conflict. period of time. If the Palestinians in Gaza had put down the guns and put down the cement

mixers for building the gigantic terrorists on a larger than the London subway, and if they had said, we wish to economically develop, nobody would have been happier about that than the Israelis. And I know everyone on both sides of the Israeli political divide, the left and the right over there. And there's virtually no one there who would not have been very much in favor of an economically well-developed neighbor to its immediate southwest that was not a war with it. That would be a much nicer thing. Because, again, Israel has to draft all. of its 18-year-olds into an army where they're having their limbs blown off. I mean, nobody in Israel is like clamoring for more war. And this lie that that's what this is all about. Can I think

that goes to a broader perception of the West, that the West is a warmongering place, that the all problems that happen all over the world are the West's fault. Everybody is doing blowback to the West. Nobody ever has any individual agency anywhere else on Earth. Anything bad that happens anywhere on Earth is the result of American foreign policy or Israeli foreign policy or European foreign policy. Well, what if it turns out that the world is a complex place? And there are a lot of people out there who have their own ideas of what they would like in life and geopolitically. And those ideas don't match what the West wants, that people actually have agency. When you say, you know, people should just take, like, maybe take a minute and actually take a look over there.

I think you're being too hard. Even from X. Kendi, didn't he go for, was it? It was a tonnehousie coach. Oh, sorry. Confused my left-wing black scholars. And I use that term scholars very liberally. Ten days, I think he said. Ten whole days, Ben.

He knows. And his narrative, and he's a perfect example. his narrative lines up with the idea that there are brown people in the Middle East and white people in the Middle East and the brown people in the Middle East are the Palestinians and the white people are the Jews. And therefore it's just like, and he says this in his book, Black Americans and White Americans and White Americans. And so because he believes that black Americans are oppressed in the United States by the white supremacist structure, he then takes that exact same logic and he tries to apply that wrong, faulty, false, and ugly logic to the Middle East, despite the fact that, by the way, half of Israelis are brown. Okay, let me ask you this. You know, in a couple of minutes. How is it going to wrap up? Because I will say, you know, my, my, a good friend of mine, it might have been Alan Dershowitz. I was in the middle of several text exchanges. He said something like, I want to come on and we'll debate Israel. And I was like, there's nothing to debate. This happened with me in a couple of people. Like, there's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. I don't, I'm not, you're looking for the wrong target.

But I do, I do think they need to wrap it up because as a fan of Israel, I just, you know, you can see what's happening. I would, I think everyone in Israel wants them to wrap it up. So what's the solution because they don't have their hostages back? Right. So what if they don't get them back? So this has always been the serious problem with how Israel has approached the war from October 8th. And I've said this many, many times. Israel elevated as co-equal goals, getting the hostage back and winning the war. And those cannot be co-equal goals.

They can't. And because the minute that you get down to the end of the war and now you have to pick one of those, getting the hostages back or quote-unquote winning the war, then you're in a conundrum. And that's kind of where Israel is right now. Now I think that Netanyahu is doing the right thing by saying they all come out. We're not going to do this sort of Zeno's paradox with hostages, where I get 10 and then five and then two and then one. And Hamas obviously doesn't want to give all the hostages up because they're afraid that the minute they do, Israel goes in and finishes the job. And Hamas is basically defenestrated and that's the end of it. So that's the impasse that they're at right now.

I think the way that the war probably ends is that Israel goes into Gaza City. Israel sets up humanitarian enclaves. They've already talked about this in Rafah and several on the coast in Gaza, where humanitarian aid is available plentifully. right now the the gaza humanitarian foundation is shipping in something on the order of 4,400 calories per day per person into the Gaza Strip no war in history has seen the amount of aid go from one side to the opposing sides civilians in the history of all modern warfare the way that israel has been shipping in aid over the course of the last six months or so into the gaza strip and so those areas i believe the plan is to make those areas essentially terror-free the security will be provided by the israelis and I think they're hoping for a coalition of Arab countries as well.

And listen, I think the United States should be involved in the most minimal possible way, like really minimal. I don't want American boots on the ground ever, ever, ever, ever. I don't think the United States should have boots on the ground in that place. It's a very, very bad place. I think the idea that President Trump has put forward, which is essentially Israel should make the ground safe over there. And then economic building can happen. Let the free market rate.

Trump, Trump, International. Gaza, Gaza, Mar-Mara, Gaza. It's a, like, it's a better plan than whatever the hell they've been doing in the Gaza Strip for the last 80 years, which has been a hellhole for a very long time. Alternatively, by the way, on social media, either a hellhole or a paradise prior to October 7th, depending on which account you're looking at. But that seems to be the most likely scenario is full-scale military crackdown in the areas that are not humanitarian enclaves, a declaration of the end of the war by the Israelis and then the announcement that they are now in counter-insurgency operations in all the areas that are not the humanitarian. sanitary enclaves. That seems to be the direction that things are moving pretty quickly. Let's hope they move quickly. I think they will. Stand by. Ben stays with us. The books lions and scavengers. Football season is back on prize picks. We make decisions every day, but on prize

picks being right when you make a decision can get you paid cash. So kick off the season right by getting 50 bucks instantly in lineups when you play your first five dollars. With millions of users and billions of dollars awarded in winnings, prize picks is the place to put your takes to the test. Just pick two or more players across any sport. Pick more or less on their projections. And if you are right, you could win big. Prize picks is available in 40 plus states, including California, Texas, Florida, and Georgia. Prize picks does not play around when it comes to your money. All transactions on the app are fast, safe, and secure. Download the prize picks app today. Use code Megan and get 50 bucks instantly in lineups when you play those five bucks. That's

Code Megan on prize picks to get $50 instantly in lineups when you play $5. Win or lose, you're going to get $50 in lineups just for playing guaranteed. Prize picks. It's good to be right. Must be present in certain states. Visit prizedpix.com for restrictions and details. We're back. Welcome back to The Megan Kelly Show.

Back with me here. My friend Ben Shapiro, he's the author of the new book, Lions and Scavengers, the true story of America. and her critics. It's out today, go get it now, all sorts of good stuff in here, lots of wisdom for you, your kids, and just a philosophy in like how to be in your life. How do you accept daily troubles? How do you accept what the hand life has dealt you? How do you accept messages that are all around you about the news or our country and so on? What made you write it? Well, I mean, I think that the genesis of this book was different than some of my others. So usually I sit down and I sort of plan out what I want the book to be and then I read and I research and then it comes out. This one was written originally almost as a diary. I was writing contemporaneously over the course of the last couple of years. And so there's a lot of first person.

I never used first person in my writing ever. I hate using the word I on my show or in my books. It appears a fair bit in this one because there's a lot of travel involved in the course the last couple of years. The book opens in London because this is where it first forcibly struck me, what was going on. So I went to London. This is November of 23. I was supposed to debate over at Oxford and Cambridge over what was going on in the Gaza Strip. And there had been a gigantic like 300,000 person march with the entire

scavenger panoply. And my security said, like, you're not allowed to stand London. If you stand London, it's actually unsafe. You have to stay like an hour outside of London, closer to Oxford. And then when we actually went to Oxford, there was significant security threat. My security was quite concerned about it. I mean, I have 24-7 security, so I'm pretty used to that sort of stuff, but it was kind of a real thing. And so I sat down and I started writing, like, this is one of the most historic places. They're upstairs right now that I have my entire staff at gunpoint. Yeah, exactly. And I started thinking, like, this is one of the great

historic places of Western Civilization, University of Oxford. You're going back a thousand years to its establishment. And just a few blocks down, you can find the place where Richard the Lionheart was crowned. You can find all these places. And the people who are marching through these places are people who hate all of this, who hate every single bit of this. And so I started writing it because of that. It was kind of out of a confusion and anger and true kind of interior turmoil about what have we done to our own civilization that this sort of thing seems to be the rule rather than the exception. Because I think we all grew up in a time and I grew up in the 90s where this really was the exception. Everyone sort of accepted right and left.

And America is a pretty damned amazing place. And now it seems as though there is a bit of a horseshoe theory thing going on here where huge swaths of the left and small parts of the right may be growing. Think America is not all that great. Western civilization is the great center in the history of the world. And where is that coming from? And so over the course of the last couple of years, I sort of wrote it. One area from which it's coming, and I understand the theory of the book and really enjoyed it, Lions and Scavengers, everyone, by Ben Shapiro. But one area it's coming from is just right now great distrust of government, right, of our own government too. And like, to me, part of it is very understandable and justifiable,

because our government is so effed up. They're not to be trusted. Like, we saw that over the past five years in such technicolor that that's why I think you have people on the right sharing in this too. I mean, I agree with a lot of that, actually. I think that on the left,

it's endemic to the ideology. On the right, I do think it's an outgrowth of events and lack of trust. I do think that it's easy for conservatives and people on the right to throw the baby out with the bathwater because I've spent my entire life being skeptical of government

for the most part. I'm a conservative. I want the government to be small enough to be drowned in the bathtub, as Grover Norquist once memorably said. Lovely. You know, like, that's fine. I think that, I think the government is quite awful in most ways. With that said, the institutions that were set up by the founders are quite good.

And many of the institutions that we need in our lives, family and church, are really, really, really, really important. And when you start tearing away at the institutions or when the idea is that the institutions have been so thoroughly destroyed from the inside by the left that you have to tear them down, I think there are cases where that's true, but I think you can overlearn the lesson. I think you can go from the CDC really screwed it up in 2020 to never trust any science, random guy on the street, giving you advice.

And we still do need, like I was thinking about with the CDC controversy, I have no tears to shed for these losers who are leaving right now. Neither do I. But we need a CDC. Like, there needs to be some public health organization that keeps an eye on growing bugs and whatever in the world.

And ideally, it would be one that's non-politicized that could just give us a straight scoop on, here's what we know, here's what we don't know, we're not going to overreact, we're going to be, I think we have that team in place, right now. I love Dr. J. Badacharya, thrilled about him. Martin Koldorf would be amazing. Martin McCarrie's great. But Marty McCarrie's awesome. I like RFKJ, but my point is simply

under him. He's controversial, but under him, there's a wonderful team. Vanay Prasad over it. Yes. With Marty McCarrie. So I like those guys. And I feel the same about the FBI. Like, if the FBI would just do, like, crime fighting and actually, like, I'm fine with them keeping eye on all the domestic terrorists who want to, like, blow us up from, you know, radical Islam countries. I'm not, I don't have a problem with that. It's when they started to really like turn political and turn like us into political enemies. I totally agree. So it's like I agree, those institutions can stay, but down to the studs and then rebu. I mean, so I totally agree

at this. And I think that was one of the purposes of the Trump revolution, right? I mean, the idea of the Trump election was put people who had been victimized by these specific agencies in charge of the agencies and let them go to town, let them purge and let them go through and try to make these institutions more honest. By the way, including places like the State department where Secretary Rubio has been going through with the hatchet. All of that, I think, is really, really good. But I think that the gap emerges for me from the CIA has done some pretty terrible things over the course of the last five years or so in terms of going after political

enemies, for example, with regard to Russiagate. There's a leap from there to the CIA killed JFK, or the CIA was always an nefarious actor in the world, anything that it did from 1950. Or that it's been responsible for everything. Right. Oh, right. Secretly, it's behind the scenes manipulating. here's my thing evidence right so i can evidentially show you how the cdc screwed things up in 2020 and you can

too right it's like available for everyone to see lived it exactly you can see how the fbi screwed things up with russia gate because we all saw it happen and all the evidence is basically available i make the case in the book that conspiracy theories are bad but that doesn't mean conspiracies don't exist they do the difference between a conspiracy theory and a conspiracy is that a conspiracy has evidence to it and a conspiracy theory does not and there is something that carl popper the philosopher talked about is sort of the great conspiracy theory of life, which is this idea that everything in my life that's going wrong is the result of a shadowy cadre of people

I can't quite identify, but maybe I can't, but I can't quite identify, who are behind the scenes who are manipulating things. And that's beyond it being wrong, it's really enervating, like truly enervating. Any population that believes that there's a shadowy conspiracy, that they can't identify or fight in any material way who's wrecking their lives,

what you're really saying to people is you cannot succeed. There's no way for you to succeed. It's basically back to a pagan world before God where the gods are up their fighting. Let's do a real life example of it. Sure. You look at COVID, that's obviously the most recent, where we know, and we knew at the time, some of us who were paying attention, knew that this thing came from a lab, that it did not

come from some random pangolin. It became clear, I should say. Not everybody knew right from the get-go, but it seemed really super clear. And then the reason that conspiracy theory, in quotes, was borne out as an actual conspiracy that was being perpetrated against us, I think was in large part. The Republicans won the House. The Republicans started using subpoenas. the Republicans got documents from Fauci and Collins on all these others showing the top virologists.

We're all saying this looks like it is manmade. This does not look like anything that could grow in nature. You saw the men in power saying, fuck off. Do not say that publicly. Everyone needs to get in line. It would be very damaging to our relationship with China and health to say something like that. And literally overnight, those same virologists came out and said, from a pangolin, it's nature. Some two day to bat.

Definitely not lab made. I mean, so that, it's very rare when your conspiracy theory is actually proven with evidence, like with papers that you could submit in a court of law to win the case before a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. In nine times out of ten, the conspiracy theories never get that. So that's where some people get stuck in that, and some people are like adjacent. And it's like, I'm still waiting for my proof. I'm waiting. I agree with this.

And I do think you do have to do a sort of Bayesian analysis, meaning like, look at the plausibility of the conspiracy theory and the number of people that are required. it to carry it out. And usually the grandest conspiracy theories require an extraordinary level of competence, coordination, and number of people involved. So to take the example of the idiotic theory that the moon landing was faked, and the number of people who would have to be involved in the faking of the moon landing and be great at their jobs, right? Not just like good at their jobs, incredible at their jobs, because they'd have to fake it. And then they'd have to maintain that silence and that secrecy for six decades plus. And they would have to get everybody around them to also maintain that silence and secrecy in order to come up with this.

Well, isn't it also true that there's like an alien being held captive someplace in Nevada? Yeah, exactly. I mean, look at the government. You don't usually a conspiracy theory is an actual conspiracy in the government, typically, is some power hungry schmuck who's telling his immediate subordinates to do a thing. And usually the circle of trust is like, I don't know, 15, 20 people. Like, if you look at, like, the Mueller report, or you're looking at what James Comey was doing, that wasn't involving 2,000 agents. That was involving a fairly small team inside the FBI, and it was really bad and really ugly. But it was like that one was plausible, especially because all of the outside indicators matched up with extremely plausible activity that a person was doing. And then over time, it was revealed that that was true. When you see these sort of kind of grand overarching conspiracy theories where everything is the result, every single thing is a grand unifying field theory of why your life isn't the way you want it to be. It doesn't make your life better.

Does it make your life better? Or does it make you smarter? This is my test. If you believe in all of them, it's you. Yes. You know, I mean, truly, I know people like this who, like, used to have a stronger foothold in reality, but just to become untethered. I think COVID had a major effect on a lot of people like that who are like borderline

conspiratorial, but then went full. It's almost like they've had a break, and they've, nothing is as it seems anymore. They see conspiracies everywhere. They believe nothing that's being told to them, especially if it involves any facet of the government. And I really think a good test for anybody to ask themselves is, do I believe in all of them? Are there some where I'm like, that I don't buy? Because if you believe in all of them, we're dealing with a you problem. I mean, I think that's right.

I think also that when you're analyzing information, obviously the source of the information matters. This is obviously true. No one in the world is perfectly objective about anything. Maybe math is objective. Not very many other things are. And when you are hearing people who are espousing conspiracy theories, they are always taking somebody's expertise word for it, somebody's word for it, right? This idea, like, I never listen to anyone, right?

I'm a pure skeptic. You're really not, though, because in the end, you're believing a theory, that theory is based on somebody else's opinion, and so that means that you're having to take somebody's view for granted. So you have to try to establish, I mean, this is just how we go through life. You try to establish the credibility of the people that you're talking to based on prior track record. It's hard, though.

It is hard. It is hard. It's hard. It's hard. Because if you realize over the past. five years alone, you realize that the people who are given to you as the so-called experts are, they're liars. They're like, that's what I started the show by saying, right? Like, you know, 51 intelligence officials believe that the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation.

Now, we never believe that one. But you can see how well-meaning people in America believed it. Well, I think one of the things you said was right. You said, I mean, and the opposite of it also. You said, if you believe all the theories, it's you. And if you believe none of the theories, I think that it's also you. Yeah. Because I think that, you know, when you're looking at conspiracy theories, at least at the very outset, you have to judge the plausibility. And then you follow the evidence where it leads. But I think this is the difference also between what I've called on the show, just asking questions, and actually just like asking questions.

If you're just asking questions, typically you're not looking for an answer. If your question is not seeking an answer, and if no answer given to your question can satisfy you, you're not asking questions. You're positing a theory. Well, and also, I think if you genuinely don't have an agenda and you're in the business of just asking questions, then you'll ask those questions of people who say the opposite thing too.

Right? That's my own approach normally is I try to get both sides on, you know, so that the audience can make up their own minds. They're big boys and girls. They don't need me to pronounce this is what's real. Sometimes I will. But I think I like to be open-minded, unless something's just totally fucking lunatic, you know, and it's like, well, forget it. I'm not going to put you on. Because I don't want to intentionally confuse anybody. But it's very hard. And that's one of the things that's bothering me about the CDC meltdown. because so RFKJ, I mean, what appears to have happened is RFKJ had in the head of the CDC, Lisa Minores. Susan, right? Sorry, sorry, Monares.

Her last name confuses me too. And wanted her to do a couple things around vaccines and wanted to change some things around vaccines. And she disagreed with him. And then from what I read in the papers, she ran to Senator, Senator Cassidy and tattled on him. and was like, he's doing crazy things. We need more oversight. And then they got mad because she wasn't going to do what he wanted her to do. And she ran and tattled on him to Senator Cassidy, who's annoying and thinks he's the HHS secretary.

He annoys me greatly. And then she got fired. So fine. I'm fine with her being fired. Like, you're not the boss. No one elected you or nominated and confirmed you as HHS secretary. You're lucky you have the job you do have. Anyway, she got fired.

and then wouldn't leave. And now we have four or five top CDC officials being like, me too. I quit too. I'm not working for this lunatic. Including some of the greatest people. Okay. So this is, so the couple things. There's the, just ask him, very sexy BDSM, very gay, over the top, pregnant people person.

Mpox dude. Yeah. Mpox dude. Okay. I have zero use for somebody lecturing me on, as you would say, the science TM, who's using the term pregnant people and pronouns. saying I can't stand the rice in there, erasure of the trans community. Okay, stop. So that's, here he is. This is the most team. If you go on X and search this guy, Daskalakis, or whatever his last name is, you will find genuinely near X-rated photos of this person who never should

have been in a position of public authority, certainly not public health. Oh, here we go. Here's some of them. Does that look like somebody from whom you want your public health advice? It does not. I mean it looks like Mpox patient zero. Honestly, like what, that, none of that looks sanitary. Okay. So that's one thing. So he still wants to advise us on what vaccines we should be taking. Okay, so that's one piece of it, whatever, to somebody like that. But the nerve of these people to now be like the distrust in public health that RFKJ is creating and the team around him. I've never seen someone so immune to the science and real facts.

It really makes me want to figuratively, not actually, strangle somebody. Yes. They've got to be kidding us, Ben. They're doing the game that they did with Trump when he first came on the scene where Trump would say this institution sucks. This is all terrible. They say he's destroying the credibility of the institution. Well, what I always said about President Trump is the left accused him of being the killer and actually he was the coroner. He would stumble on a body. He'd be like, that's a dead body. And they'd be like, because you killed it. They're like, no, no, no. It was dead before I got here. I mean, the reason that RFK Jr. is the HHS secretary is the same reason that Cash Patel is the head of the FBI. It's very funny you should say this because I always said about Trump and the media and certain other organizations too. He was the Kvorkeian to their suicide.

right like he's there i'll give you the machine that's fair that's up to you what you want to do with it yeah exactly and i think that when it comes to rfk the reason he ended up as hHS secretary is specifically because of this it's because of the radical distrust of the public health authorities and one of the ways that you can tell they did this whole new york times op ed as like nine former cdc heads writing an op ed about how terrible rfk i know i know and some of the things that they're pointing out are frankly things were i actually kind of disagree with rfk junior i don't agree with everything rfk junior is doing what i've said before is that, you know, RFK Jr., I like him,

I feel like he needs to take the spinal tap 11 down to like a spinal tap 7. Everything is always all the way to the top. But, you know, like, you know, when it comes to completely defunding, for example, all RNA vaccine research, I think that the vaccine, obviously, not I think. It was clearly oversold.

We were lied to about the vaccine's ability to stop transmissibility of the virus that obviously was untrue, and that was like an overt lie that was told by members of government and by Pfizer. And its risks were undersold, particularly for young people.

For older people, the steel man case for the vaccine is that if you were over 65 and obese that it lowered your death rate okay fine fair enough the the killing of like all mr and i vaccine research because you don't like the COVID vaccine that might be overkill and that might be a problem but one of the things they did and this just demonstrates how incompetent they are let's say that you were going to advise them on PR what you would do is you'd say pick the single most obvious topic where he is in violation of sort of the typical understanding of science rfk junior right like find the thing where he's sinned the worst and then focus on that instead what that appad does it

like 10 things. And the last thing that it lists is, and he backed a terrible health bill that cuts Medicaid services and could deprive people of the lives. And it's like, okay, so now you're just doing politics. Yep. And now you're just doing politics. And then they bring out the AMA and say, well, the AMA has worked for our kids. We don't trust them at all. I literally did a story on my show last week about how the top, the guy who runs the M.A., Bobby Macomola, he literally did a, a Zoom call with Dr. Ethan Hame, the guy from Texas Children's Hospital, who's talking about transing the kids. in which he made all sorts of insane claims about why it was necessary to trans the kids

and how 50% of transgender people were going to kill themselves if they didn't have their body parts chopped off. And that guy is going to critique RFK Jr. The AMA and the American Association of Pediatrics, whatever it is. Yeah, exactly. They're just as bad. Or the APA. They're dying to trans our kids. 100%.

And so you guys emptied out science of its content. And then you ran around wearing its face like a Hannibal Lecter mask. And then we're supposed to believe you. Like, that's not good enough. What you should do, again, you want to reestablish trust in science. What you should do is basically what we would call. peer review. You should say, here's the thing he's doing. Here's the analysis of the data, and here is why it's wrong. Because that leaves commentators like you and me in the position

of having to now analyze the data that you're presenting as opposed to you as a human. Yep. Right. But when you go out there and you say, it's all about the pregnant people in my BDSM gear and I feel disrespected, he, him, her, then like, I'm sorry. I'm out. Yeah, not interested anymore. And it's amazing. Just like the over-reliance on experts, like they actually want us to be like, 20 former CDC direct. We don't care. No one cares. You don't care. The CDC has humiliated itself. It has lost the trust of at least half of the country. We no longer, like the moment Rochelle Walensky came out crying during the COVID pandemic. We actually cut it, for those of you who had the lovely benefit of forgetting.

Here she was crying. She was upset that some people might not get vaccinated and might go outside. Here she is. When I first started at CDC about two months ago, I made a promise to you. I would tell you the truth, even if it was not. the news we wanted to hear. Now is one of those times when I have to share the truth and I have to hope and trust you will listen. I'm going to pause here. I'm going to lose the script and I'm going to reflect on the recurring feeling I have of impending view. We have so much to look forward to, so much promise and potential of where we are and so much reason for hope. But right now, I'm scared.

shit what Rochelle Wollenski thinks about what's happening at CDC. It's ridiculous. And when they started with the whole, you must vax your kids stuff in the, again, against all available data, one of the things we knew from the very beginning is that the virus was not hitting kids the same way that it was hitting old men, for example. And when they were like, you must vax your kids. You've got to be kidding me. And so, again, that's how you end up with RFK Jr.

And there's been no accounting for it. No. No admissions, no legal liability. for the drug manufacturers, no terminations for the people who made up the, quote, science, and shoved it down our throats and the throats of our children, endangered our children. How about like, okay, so for me, when I, I tried to go along with the data during the early pandemic. And what that meant was I was always against mask mandates and Vax mandates, where my company sued the federal government to try and stop the Vax mandates.

But I also said at the beginning, when they were arguing and the Trump administration and Pfizer were arguing that was going to stop transmission that you should get the Vax, right? that if you, that I said this in, I believe, January of 2021, I believe. And this is before Trump left office. And then the data came out. The transmission was not being cut off by any of this. And that it was actually, the vaccine was actually not nearly as effective as people thought. And I apologized.

I said on my show, I got it wrong. I followed the data. The data that they presented was not true. And so, you know, I got it wrong. I'm sorry. Like, why is it that the same people who presented that data to me aren't out there apologizing? They should be apologizing, right? Why was it that Pfizer, they literally said in a, in a conference,

like a year later, we never even bothered to do research on the transmissibility post-vaccination. But you remember, they retail this idea that you got it to stop your mother from getting it, right, which is the reason I got it. My parents were 65 at the time, and we were basically in California with them. Yeah, that made sense initially. If that were true, then you would want to get vaccinated if you're going to spend time with your eligibility. And then it was like, okay, if I had to have the info that we have now in retrospect, what I,

no, why would I have? That would been silly. And when it came to my kids, I certainly didn't get my kids vaccinated, no matter how much pressure they're putting on because the data just wasn't there. But like, why is it that none of the public officials are willing to follow their own data, right? Why won't they just say the thing that's true? Because the overselling is the problem. If they just came out and they said, listen, the vaccine didn't say, it didn't do what we originally said it was going to do.

We were wrong or we fibbed or whatever it is. And now here's what we know. What we know is kids don't need it. Young people don't need it. It may do, you know, it may have cardiac problems that are cardiomyopathy and all the rest of this, that it's a problem. but it's good for like if you're 65 and fat. Yeah.

Right? And then we all be like, oh, you know. And now they want to be like, well, we disclosed that there was a risk of myocarditis at the time. It was in the most minuscule low publicized, like minor press release. You've ever seen it was a CYA. The problem was much more pernicious behind the scenes. Veney Prasad, again, who's working with McCarrie over at FDA, was one of the only ones out there saying, this is bullshit.

This is a real problem. Like this is actually potentially life-changing. or ending for teenagers. And this is insane that we're not telling people this. There's been no accountability for that. And for me, this is one of the reasons why, you know, we're sort of laying into people who see conspiracies everywhere, but they didn't get the vaccine.

Like people who are hardcore, like, I don't trust my government and I don't trust this. I remember some of them, like, texted me or not texting me, posted online after I said I got the vaccine. Something like, we'll miss you when you're gone. And I was like, oh, wow, that's harsh. But, you know, I wound up getting an autoimmune issue from that fucking thing. And I wish I had listened to them.

You know, sometimes when you're too trusting, and I was very trusting of these, I just, I was like all the data. And of my doctor, my doctor, who I do love, but he loved the vaccine. Yeah. Well, I mean, but I think this is also the danger on all sides of trying to analyze information. We can say, well, yeah, they didn't get the vaccine. And that's true. And they got that one right. but also does that mean that you're going to listen to them when it comes to, you know,

broken leg? Like you do have to sort of analyze each one of these issues independently. That's what makes it so hard. It's a very hard informational environment. I think part of what our entire society is struggling with is how do you analyze this fire hose of information that's coming from all available sources, including AI, which may actually be trying to actively mislead you. Right, exactly.

And how do you then deal with that? And I think that, honestly, in some cases, you're just going to get it wrong. Like, nobody has a perfect record, I think, is the best thing. And if we all recognize who are not perfect records, then we can say, okay, well, you know, here's what I got wrong. Here's why I got it wrong. And hopefully I won't get wrong in the future.

But one of the things that tends to happen on social media and also in the commentary is you get one thing right that was very heterodox and 99 things wrong. But we pay attention to the one thing that you got right. And that happens on all sides. And, you know, again, consider the source of your information. It doesn't mean that it's always going to be the same source, right? Nobody is gospel, right?

Yeah. But it's, I'm not going to pretend like it's not hard. course it's hard. I know. Gosh, it's harder than it should be. Most people don't, they don't have the time, right? They don't. People ask me this all the time, given the business I'm in, and I'm sure you get it too, just like, how, how am I supposed to, like, know what's real? And I always say the same, which is like, it's not just because I'm in this lane, but you have to find the person or the handful of people you trust. That's it. Like, don't trust a big platform. I wouldn't anymore. I wouldn't at all. I would never just say, I trust the CNN for the news, or Fox News,

either. But I do have certain individuals, you're among them. who I trust not to actively mislead me and whose brain I've come to say, that's reliable. You know, like that brain analyzes information much in the same way I want to analyze in the way my own aspires to. And so you get that.

That's sort of how I curate my own news feed, which I would say, right or wrong on everything, like I think we have a high grade on our overall accuracy. I mean, I think that's right. And I think that, listen, in life, we're all having to use heuristic shortcuts. We're all looking for the shortcut.

When it comes to, you know, any problem that you have in your life, you're not the person who's, like, going to town on engineering to fix your engine unless you're actually a person who works on engines for living. You're going to find somebody who you know, who knows how to do that better than you. And we're constantly doing that throughout our lives. Some people are better at analyzing information. But what I always say is you should listen to more than my show, right? Try to find, like, three or four shows that you think are trustworthy and analyze information in a responsible way. And then where they intersect is the fact and everything else is the opinion. Yeah, exactly right.

It's funny because I just said to my husband, Doug, just speaking of, like, what can we actually do? What are our actual abilities and knowing what they really are and where they're limited? Our kids are getting at that age where here and there, they're winning some sports trophies and stuff like that. And I said, you know, maybe we should get like a little trophy case in some place to put them, because right now we just kind of put them in a chest, nobody ever sees him again. And Doug actually said he would build one, which still has me laughing, Ben. And I said, okay, well, that'll be ready just in time for our little boys to win. the men's senior tournament down at the club.

We do need to know where our limitations are and, yeah, calling not their experts, but people we believe have expertise. By the also a great way to tell who's telling lies to you and who is not is telling them what, does that person also say what they don't know? Yeah, that's right. What are the limitations of your knowledge? Like, how far are you willing to go? Yep.

And that's why, you know, the people, it actually is sort of a brain thing with human beings that we tend to listen to very authoritative language, the more strongly someone speaks, the more we believe them. But the problem with that is that actually the people you probably ought to believe are the people who are not speaking necessarily. Well, I mean, I hate to go back to this, but was there, there aren't in history much many greater, many, easy for me to say, speakers than Adolf Hitler. He was amazing.

Certainty and language is, is an easy shortcut to authenticity and belief by people that you know what you're talking about. His style, so strong. Right, exactly. The feeling of authority that comes along with using very charged language, particularly in politics. I mean, again, there are lots of studies on this, and they all demonstrate the same thing. The stronger the language you use, the more trust you get from the audience, but the reality is that that actually may be sometimes the worst way to analyze information, particularly when you're talking about, for example, the science, where every single study has some element at the very end of every study.

It's a bunch of limitations explaining what exactly the data is doing and what the data is not actually doing. Yep. And honestly, on, you know, this so-called revered science, you know, you wait two weeks, you'll get a different answer. I was like the stupidest stuff too I recently what was last six months or so one of my doctors my lady doctor said oh do you take a multivitamin I'm like no I don't she's like oh you know they're great for you you should consider one okay so I bought one for me

I bought one for Doug then I just saw a study multivitamins if you take one every day you're more likely to die early I'm like this can't be real so I googled it and it was like oh they saw at least one thing that said that was actually real like give me back your multivitamin doc it's so annoying you can't get real information when it comes to help these days because it changes underneath your feet like quicksand.

In any event, I think that this woman at the CDC will go. RFKGA will get his way. And then when it comes to MRNA vaccines and the research, I'm actually okay with it, what he's doing, because I think the public sector can handle all of this. We don't need our government. Yeah, sorry, the private sector. We don't need our government doing this stuff.

I mean, I think there's a case for that across research lines. Yeah, we need money and we need it for a lot of things, and this doesn't have to be on the list. But I am, like when it comes to MRI, like my doctor, again, he loved the COVID vaccine, but he was saying someday that MRNA technology might have a vaccine against pancreatic cancer. I mean, thinking of that, or like, if you told me there was an MRI vaccine against all forms of dementia, right? Can you imagine? I don't even know if that's possible. I'm just saying, like, it depends. I can't say, I can't rule out all vaccines.

Cutting out research is definitely a dicey proposition. But yes, I mean, I think a lot can be done in the private sector. A lot more than has been. I'll tell you what you can't do. You can't say, innovate in the private sector, but cost control the drugs on the other end. Yeah. That you can't do. And that, that I think, is a bit of a problem. Yeah, that's fair. All right.

Stand by. More with Ben Shapiro right after this quick break. That cookie calling your name at 3 p.m. The midnight fridge raids, the extra slice of pizza you swore you would not eat. If you feel like your cravings control you, it's not just willpower. It could be your gut crying for help. That's why I want to tell you about Just Thrive probiotic and their digestive bitters. See, modern diets often lack essential bitters compounds that manage appetite hormones like

GLP1, the same hormone in those expensive weight management shots. Just Thrives digestive bitters give you the power of 12 clinically proven herbs that help your body break down food efficiency, efficiently, while supporting GLP1 production naturally. Controlled cravings, less bloat, steady energy, and comfortable digestion. Try Just Thrive digestive bitters and Just Thrive probiotics. today at justthrivehealth.com. And use code Megan for 20% off your first order, 20% off your first order. Justthrivehealth.com, code Megan, your body will thank you.

When you're a buried in credit card and loan debt, it's human nature to put it off and say, I'm going to deal with that later. If that is you, here's something you need to know. Done with debt discovered a little-known strategy that works in your favor to dramatically reduce or even erase your debt altogether. They can aggressively engage everyone you owe money to. in September. And here's why. They know which lenders and credit card companies are doing year-end accounting and which need to cut deals. They even know which ones have year-end audits

and need to get your debt off of their books. So consider getting started with Done With Debt now in September. Dun With Debt accomplishes this without bankruptcy or new loans. In fact, most clients end up with more money in their pocket the first month. Get started now. While you still have time. Go to done with debt.com. Speak with one of their specialists for free. Visit done with debt.com. Done with debt.com. I'm Megan Kelly, host of the Megan Kelly show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal, and cultural figures today. You can catch the Megan Kelly Show on Triumph, a Sirius XM channel featuring lots of hosts.

may know and probably love. Great people like Dr. Laura. I'm back, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly. Megan Kelly. You can stream the Megan Kelly show on Series XM at home or anywhere you are. No car required. I do it all the time. I love the Serious XM app.

It has ad-free music, coverage of every major sport, comedy talk, podcast, and more. Subscribe now, get your first three months for free. Go to SiriusXM.com. MK Show to subscribe and get three months free. That's SiriusXM.com slash MK Show and get three months free. Offer details apply. Welcome back to the Megan Kelly Show. Ben Shapiro is with me today.

He's author of the new book, Lions and Scavengers. And among the many things that Ben has done is testified before Congress about this advertising group that was trying to exclude right-wingers. And at that appearance, you mixed it up with somebody who, I think it's fair to say, none of us likes, Eric Swalwell. And here's this moment, which shall live, not in infamy, but with respect and admiration. It's not 32. You did say, I think homosexual activity is a sin. Yes, I'm a religious view. I'm sure there's a genetic component. You found me out. Orientation. But the view of all religious people I know has always been that sexual behavior is something that is up to you. And you said, I may have a desire to sleep with

many women, but I do not. I agree with me. Yes, that's true. Congratulations on your, yeah. I'm sure it's very hard to restrain yourself. You know how hard I had to restrain myself not from making a fang-fang reference right there? Yes. I was holding myself back.

I was like, don't do it. Bye, girl. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Did you have that in your back pocket? I agree with me. No, that one was for the moment, actually. That was well done. What are you doing a quote of me?

What do you think I'm going to say? come on. Right. He didn't know you. You know what I mean? He actually thought he could scare you off of your prior position because it was too controversial for you to say publicly, which is how he heard it in the first place. Right. Exactly. No, I'm terrified of you reading back a quote of me saying a thing that I said. Right. Are you aware what I do for a living? Yeah. I'm always on air. Also, that quote doesn't make like the top thousand things that I've said that are controversial. My goodness. You know, I have noticed something interesting in my own life since I've gotten more into this line of work, you know, podcasting as opposed to like journalism on Fox News or NBC for that matter. I don't worry about that anymore. I used to worry that somebody might tape me and then all of my opinions would be out there and as a journalist you're not supposed to share that and it would somehow feel like dishonest because like I tried to report the news in a fair way

without saying my real opinions and then if you heard the way I talked off camera like a normal person, you'd realize I had a lot of them and I was just trying not to blow that by, you know, you're not supposed to as a journalist. Now it's so freeing. It's like, oh yeah. And there's nothing somebody could tape of me

that the audience wouldn't be like, yeah, that sounds exactly like her. Exactly. Exactly. I remember I had this kind of tete-a-tete with Sam Donaldson back in the day. It was like 2012, I was at the RNC, and Sam Donaldson had moved over from being, you know, reporter on ABC, yelling at Ronald Reagan, to being a guy who did commentary. And so I remember going up to him, like, so you held all the same beliefs when you were

a reporter that you do as a commentator. Do you think that impacted your work in any way? And he said, what are you trying to say? You're trying to say, you're better than me? And I was like, well, I mean, kind of. I mean, like, I'm totally honest about where I'm coming from. And so if you detect bias, that's because my bias is quite obvious. I'm not trying to hide it from you in some sort of radical way.

And so I do think, you know, I've been an advocate for a very long time of this idea that objective journalism is a lie, is true. Like, it is. It's just a lie. There's no such thing. It's going to get shaded one way or the other. Some people do a better job of getting it out of their work for sure. But you're right.

I mean, nothing you say, you know, privately, if we got hot miced here, nothing would change for what we're saying on the air. Nothing. Whereas at Fox, people would have been like, oh, whoa, she's got all these different opinions about these different things that she reports on and doesn't show her cards, which is fine. That is the way we used to do it. But I agree with you. And it's one of the reasons why I'm not worried about what some people worry about it, which is like mainstream news is collapsing. You know, when I gave my interview to the New York Times, they were very, very worried about these like errant, weird podcasters who are going to drive the national conversation now because there's no standards. There's no belts and suspenders. There's no guardrails, I guess. And therefore, we're going to be living in just a nonstop disinformation. misinformation, misinformation age, and I get it because there are guardrails in the existing corporate media, but they're the wrong guardrails. So I feel like taking those away and letting it become the Wild Western, which it is, and then maybe there'll be excesses, maybe it will implode and then rebuild. I don't know, but whatever it is, I'm in favor of it.

I mean, I totally agree with that. I think there was a monopoly or an oligopoly, and then the oligopoly dissolved, and now what you've got is kind of anarchic, but, you know, better than the anarchy that eventually consolidates, I hope, into something that's like a more varied but trustworthy informational environment than one guy telling you what you ought to think. And you don't have any alternative because there's like three channels on your TV. Yeah, and you must think it. All right, let's talk about politics for a bit. West Moore is interesting to me. I mean, he's definitely on the short list for Democratic contender in 2028. He's the governor of Maryland. He's obviously a Democrat. He's a military vet. He's a black guy. He's a good-looking.

guy. And he's starting to get out there a little bit more on the TV circuit, which tells me something, even though he's officially said he's not into it. But he's into it. He's into it. He's going to run. So he's now making news the way everybody wants to make news these days from Brandon Johnson of Chicago to Pritzker, the governor out in Illinois, which is to make themselves an adversary of Trump, Gavin Newsom and so on. And so he's basically saying, I don't want your help. I know Baltimore's got, I think, the fifth highest murder rate in the country. I don't want your help. Don't send any troops here.

But as he's, like, saying that, and people are getting shot and killed in his city, he's on George Clooney's yacht over on Lake Como, Italy, which I'm sorry. I'm sure it's very nice to get the George Clooney invite. Apparently, he wasn't there, Clooney. So it's just they had the mansion and the yacht to themselves. That's even better. But think, of course, for us. The resources of George Clooney

without having to deal with George Clooney That's amazing. I think probably somebody like Westmore would like to spend time with him. But that's a nightmare. I mean, that actually could come back to haunt him as he potentially runs. But like, your state was hurting,

your city that you were fighting with Trump, as you were rejecting troops that would keep them safe. You paraded off on Clooney's yacht. First of all, this is like the dumbest fight in the world. The Democrats are picking here on crime. It's really, really, really stupid because, again, it's not as though Trump can

indefinitely legally, leave gigantic numbers of federal troops like policing pickpocketing in Baltimore. He can't actually do that. A judge will strike it down and he will have to stop doing that. He's been using sort of the bootstrap of immigration enforcement in order to get federal troops into places like L.A. or into Chicago. And again, there's kind of an expiration date on that sort of thing. If Democrats were smart, they would basically just wait him out.

They would say, okay, you know, we don't like what he's doing. But, you know, if it lowers the crime rate, we're open to anything, right? Anything would be good. And then just this is the wrong issue for them. It's the wrong issue. And the fact that they all seem to consolidate around this issue demonstrates President Trump has an enormous number of gifts. This is, I think, his greatest gift is that his enemies constantly be clown themselves. It's just a field of rakes and they're constantly jumping on them.

And no matter what he does, they have to declare themselves in opposition. If he came out in favor of abolishing cancer tomorrow, they would come out in favor of stage four. Well, that's kind of what they did with the little boy at the State of the Union. 100%. Yeah, we're against him. Or Cabo Garcia or like any other thing. Or men in women's sports. They can't help themselves.

They have to pick the 20% side of every 80, 20 issues so long he's. he picks the 80% side of that issue. And so, listen, I think Westmore is formidable, actually, in a Democratic primary. South Carolina, it's still unclear what the first Democratic primary is going to be, right? Because remember that Biden rigged the calendar to avoid Iowa, New Hampshire. So that's like a big internal DNC fight right now. If it ends up being South Carolina, again, Westmore is the Azon favorite. Because 58% of the Democratic electorate in a primary in a presidential year is black.

And so he's going to hope that they vote as a block. And that will stop, like an AOC candidacy or a super white person, Gavin Newsom. candidacy. Super white. I mean, he's the whitest person who's ever whited. Not white supremacist, but super white. Yes, he's, he's like unbelievably white. Like, like, blends into the, into just the paint, white. But have we seen him dance? Because that will be the true test. Oh, man. I feel like he and Justin Trudeau are kind of, like, two halves at the same whole. I think that's an insult to Gavin Newsom. I will defend the American in that equation. There, I mean, there's no one more stomach turning as a possible, like, life.

partner than Justin Trudeau to me. I mean, have you seen Gavin Newsom's history? It's not like a great history. Like, if you said, who are you going to wind up with, like, one of the Tate brothers or Trudeau? Wow. Brutal. I know.

I just, I find Justin Trudeau makes my skin crawl in his, like, effete, effeminate, mealy mouth, zero backbone. His father, Fidel Castro, would be so ashamed of him. He's so soft. He's soft. He's soft in every way. Yeah, right. But, yeah, Gavin Newsom, he's got some problems in the primaries. I don't think that Gavin Newsom has the kind of juice that Gavin Newsom seems to think he does. Westmore has Clooney's support, and he'll be able to raise a lot of money, Westmore.

The fact that he is a black man is going to help him a lot in the Democratic primaries because, again, you do have that effect in the Democratic primaries right now. And he is not quite as openly psychotic as some of the far leftists in his party. So, yeah, he does have another problem, though. There is a stolen valor issue. Yeah, but he actually. served in the military? So the stolen valor is about him. He said he said that he had that he'd been awarded the Brown Star when he had not. And then later he got it, correct?

He got it in 2024. Clearly somebody was like, oh, shit, he'd stole Valor. So let's give it to him so he can say he got it. Yeah. And his story is my commanding officer told me that he was going to submit me for it. And so I thought it was okay to fill out this application saying that I got it. But he was introduced, just like Tim Walz, by many, many news anchors over the year saying he got it when he did not have it. He was asked about it, actually by Will Kane on Fox and also by Martha Raditz on ABC.

Here's Martha Sot 15. You're claiming you had a bronze star in 2006 when you were applying for a job. Why did you do that? Well, I think it's, I'm deeply proud of my service to this country. Oh, boy. And I know my soldiers that I serve with are deeply proud. And the veteran community is as well. When you're commanding officers and your superior officers tell you, listen, we've,

put you in and we've gone through everything so as you're going through your application uh included i i included it and i didn't think about it they introduced you gwen i full saying you had earned a bronze star medal that's 2008 2010 you're on the colbert show when he said you had a bronze star you did not correct him you had to know you did not have one then well it was i did not go back and you know go back until the pentagon hey i was told uh to put this on my application and didn't. And honestly, at that point, I'm not talking about the Pentagon. I'm talking about you knew in those interviews, you did not have one. No, because even at the time of those interviews, it wasn't something that I even thought about. When I came home, it wasn't something

I even thought about. By the way, full points to her doing a journalism right there. I would say that, but she's clearly trying to get it out of the way before he actually runs. That's true. But you're not going to get credit or credit is due. No, those are good questions and good follow-ups. I don't believe one word of what he just said. No. I have You know whether you've received the Bronze Star or not. I haven't. So, I mean, yeah. I would assume that you would know this.

It's a big deal, I think, when you get it. Yes. And the actual medal is a thing that they give you. He didn't have it. And he knew it. If it's him versus JD, JD will hammer him over the head with it. I look forward to that. Yes.

I'm sick at these Democrats with their stolen valor. And like, it truly is deeply immoral to say that you have the bronze star when you don't. He wasn't confused. He didn't think he had it when he didn't have it. I wouldn't be surprised if he tries to go back and find some of his commanding officers. to retell the story, though, right? Like, sign a letter saying, I applied for it. I mean, the question's whether it will play.

Where is it? Why? Why? Did you think they just forgot to mail it to you? I agree with you. I'm just saying, like, as a political candidate, how many points of damage is that worth? I mean, here's the reality. A lot. I mean, maybe.

I think it changed Tim Walts's trajectory with the electorate when all the stolen valor stuff came out about him. I mean, I think Tim Walz's, like, weird hand. I agree. And his transing of the children. He wants to be, he's worse than Pritzker's. I mean, the strange clapping and hopping around. And the fact that.

come on down yeah exactly that he looked like one of the things that was like an inflatable outside he used car lot as you know like normal americans you know democrats too they care about the military and they care about stolen valor i i don't think this is going to make or break him but i do think it's going to hurt i think that's probably true i think it's probably true but again i think when we get to 2028 the biggest thing is going to be the economy if the economy is good in 2028 then jd's his shoe and basically if he's the nominee and if the economy is bad then things get real dicey, real fast. And I'm old enough to remember when Republicans thought we would never lose an election again after 2004. And then by 2006, Democrats were running the Congress,

and by 2008, Barack Obama was president. And I'm also old enough to remember when Democrats thought they would never lose another election after 2012. And then, lo and behold, four years later, Donald Trump was president to the United States. So things shift real fast in this country. Well, that's why the executive orders are not ideal. Yes. Yes. I mean, But he can't do anything more. I mean, you can't get, it's almost now, it's not all. I used to I feel like Congress. I feel like Congress was fun. You need 60 votes in the Senate. 51 is irrelevant.

53 is irrelevant. So I've made a proposal. Actually, my friend Jeremy Boring originally aired this, and I think it's a smart idea. He suggested that Senate Majority Leader Thune should go to the Democrats and say, listen, we need a constitutional amendment today to enshrine the filibuster in the Constitution. And you have 12 months. And if in 12 months, this is not enshrine in the Constitution, we're nuking it. Because that puts a time limit on it.

And you don't want to wait for Democrats to be the first to activate the full filibuster nuke option. Just get rid of the filibuster next time they're in power. Where we don't need 60. Right, exactly. So either it's good for the goose and good for the gander or it shouldn't be good for either. I think it's a pretty good idea. I like that a lot. Right now, like nothing can get done.

Yes. But I'm thankful for nothing getting done when it's the other side that's in power. Right. Exactly. So I don't know. The whole thing's been frustrating because I love the Trump executive orders. I can't think of one I didn't really love. I'm sure there is one because there's been so many,

but I know they're all going away. You know, it's like, yeah, Christmas every day, but then, you know, something comes up and it blows up your entire Christmas. All the presents are gone. Someone took them. You know, it's like that scene in Mommy Dearest where she then makes little Christina

give all the presents back. Every election cycle, we're going to do this, like hundreds of executive orders to rebut the original executive orders. Yeah. It definitely is a problem. That's why I think what he's doing with staffing

may be long term more important. Like the reductions? Yeah, the staff reductions. eliminating departments if you can get away with it. All that sort of stuff. It takes a while to rebuild that. So I think going through with the chainsaw that we mentioned before is definitely a good thing. I do think some of the things he's done on like the executive order on boys and girls sports.

That's going to stick. Yeah, because it has such majority support. Who wants to be the president that switches that around? Immigration, by the way. I don't think Democrats are going to reopen that one. I had Ron Emanuel on the show. I said, what would you change about Trump's border policies? He said nothing.

Yep, that's smart. Nothing. That's smart. It doesn't like the deportation policies, but the border, nothing. Well, I mean, if Democrats are smart, that's what they will do. They will pocket the fact that Trump basically won the issue for them and then move on with their lives. It's sort of like how everyone thought that Roe v. Wade, when it was overturned, it was going to be like the only thing that mattered in American politics. And then it turns out that within two years, everybody just kind of was moving on.

And while it was still a hot issue, it was helping the Democrats. So they were like, yeah, actually. Exactly. Is this so bad? And abortions went up, which is not so great. Yeah. But on immigration, if the Republican solved it, Democrats don't have to talk about it anymore. So that's actually quite nice for them.

And what about crime? Because that's crime, both on a national level and that committed by Biden administration officials, will be one of the big, big storylines, I think, for the next two years. Well, that giant, I still think the worst scandal of our lifetime, you know, there's many in the last five years. I still think the worst scandal of our lifetime is we didn't have a president for full on two years and we were being lied to about it every single day. That is so insane. You hear Trump's joke about the picture he's going to put up of Biden in his new, like, presidential hall of fame he says he's going to put a picture up of the auto pen

he told the daily caller that so good yeah it's the fact that we didn't have a president for a solid two years like anybody who is even remotely attached to that administration has to be nuked out of the process no i mean that that gets rid of like paula people to judge that that unbelievable great secretary of transportation oh my lord so so he grew a beard so that that's that's exciting yeah very and so that's that's exciting But, yeah, I mean, anybody who's attached to that. Scavenger. Yes.

Yes. The book is called Lions and Scavengers by Ben Shapiro. Yeah, total scavenger. Yeah, that dude has spent an awful lot of time talking about how much America sucks after being made Secretary of Transportation based on not being able to fill potholes in South Bend. I was just thinking, are there any Democrats we would call Alliance, Rahm Emanuel. In his new iteration, I think he could make that case. There's some of the, there are a few kind of like abundance-based Democrats who are sort of interesting.

Seth Moulton from Massachusetts, kind of an interesting guy. I'm against him. So, okay, explain. Because he said he was like, oh, I don't, it doesn't make sense to have the boys. Yeah, it was the run away. As soon as he got his hand slapped, he was like, never mind. Yeah, it was the wrong. But the fact that he dipped it, you know, again, partial credit, he dipped his toe into

a water that Democrats won't. I wish you'd go all the way. Denied. I'm a meaner greater than you are. Exactly. Exactly. Harsh standards here. Yeah, it's, it's hard to identify.

The Democratic Party has moved so far to the left that it's very difficult to identify a non-grievance-based Democrat at this point. I know. It's not the way it was when we grew up. We used to have Normies on both sides. I can make a solid case in the 1990s. It might have been the best time in American history. Seriously.

Yeah, it's certainly better than the 70s, but I'll take the 80s. I have to say, the hair was great. The style, the fashion was very hot. The music, come on. There's no better music than 1980s. The 80s channel, it's awesome. There is a theory that whatever was the decade where you were like 13. Yeah.

It was what you think is the best decade. Yes, and that's why I'm right. Yeah, exactly. All right. Don't forget. The book is called Lions and Scavengers by Ben Shapiro. Go get it right now. Great to see you, my friend. Thanks. All the best of it. Okay. We'll see you guys tomorrow. Thanks for listening to The Megan Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.