The Megyn Kelly Show - Nick Reiner Defense Ahead, and Brown U. Shooter Inaction, with Arthur Aidala and Matt Murphy, and Leadership Traits with Dakota Meyer | Ep. 1215

Episode Date: December 17, 2025

Megyn Kelly is joined by Arthur Aidala and Matt Murphy, MK True Crime contributors, to talk about the new Washington Post reporting on Tyler Robinson's actions and text on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination, the revelation he was talking about his Wordle score in the hour before, the unfair politicization of Charlie post-death by the left-wing media, the horrifying Rob and Michele Reiner murders, the question of whether Nick Reiner's lawyer will try an insanity defense, Megyn's theory that Nick Reiner might try to blame his father for abuse or neglect as a defense, if a plea could be reached to avoid the death penalty, whether the man named as a "person of interest" in the Brown U. shooting could sue for defamation, the lack of preparation by police and politicians, the embarrassing Brown U. shooting press conferences, how the police and politicians are not projecting confidence, and more. Then Dakota Meyer, founder of "The BLUF" Substack, to talk about why he re-enlisted in the Marines after 15 years, the new standards for the military put in place by Sec. of War Pete Hegseth, the dangers of the "Seditious Six" like Sen. Mark Kelly, why strong leadership is so crucial in our society, and more. Subscribe to MK True Crime:Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mk-true-crime/id1829831499Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4o80I2RSC2NvY51TIaKkJWYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MKTrueCrime?sub_confirmation=1Social: http://mktruecrime.com/ Aidala- https://am970theanswer.com/radioshow/the-arthur-aidala-power-hourMeyer- https://dakotameyerthebluf.substack.com/ Birch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on goldByrna: Go to https://Byrna.com or your local Sportsman's Warehouse today.Firecracker Farm: Visit https://firecracker.FARM & enter code MK at checkout for a special discount!Grand Canyon University: https://GCU.edu/MYOFFER  Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Welcome to the Megan Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East. Hey, everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. With so many high-profile criminal cases in the headlines right now, we needed today's Kelly's court. And there is breaking news now on Tyler Robinson, the accused killer of Charlie Kirk. We're going to take a look at that. We're going to take a close look at the murders of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michelle, as we get new details on that case as well.

There is new video of Nick Reiner, the accused killer, their son, taken after the murders. What defense could be in store as Nick hires a very high profile and successful defense attorney? Plus, police releasing new images of the suspected shooter at Brown University, but still disappointing at these pathetic press conferences. And by the way, what about the man named in the me? earlier this week as the person of interest, who turns out not to be a person of interest, and according to the Attorney General, has nothing to do with this case. Can this guy sue? Has he been defamed in the way Richard Jewell was for the Atlanta Olympics bombing back in the 1990s?

Okay, but we're going to start with this bombshell report from the Washington Post about Charlie Kirk's accused killer. It literally just broke. The post reporting that Tyler Robinson's mother, we knew this, said that he had been become more pro-gay and trans rights oriented, and that one person who knew him said he began to voice concerns for transgender rights after Trump's win in November 2024. I think that piece is new. But the Post has done a deep dive on messages from the online platform Discord, where Robinson discusses Charlie's murder soon after it happened, and we'll tell you what he said. We begin today with M.K. True Crime contributors, Arthur Idala and Matt Murphy.

Arthur is a managing partner at Idala, Bertuna, and Kamens. Matt's a former homicide prosecutor and author of the book, The Book of Murder. They are best, the best of the best when it comes to legal analysis. So subscribe and download to the hit show. Everyone's watching M.K. True Crime on podcast platforms and on YouTube. It's amazing because this thing only releases twice a week and everybody loves it. If I had a nickel for every time somebody stops down the streets say, I love a MK True Crime. We've got big plans for the new year, by the way, on that front, more announcements to come. So go to mKtruecrime.com now. There are a lot of politicians that should be getting coal in their stocking for Christmas,

but Birch Gold thinks, as a smart planner, you deserve silver. That's why for every $5,000 you purchase between now and December 22nd, Berch Gold will send you an ounce of silver, which is up over 60% this year. See, smart people diversify and have a hedge. That's why you should consider Birch Gold. With the rate cuts from the Fed in 2026, the dollar could be worth less. And what happens if the AI bubble bursts? Consider letting Birch Gold Group help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in physical gold. And for every $5,000 you buy, you will get an ounce of silver for you or your kids. Just text MK to the number 98-9-8-98 to claim your eligibility for this offer. Again, text MK to 9-8-9-98 because Birch Gold's free silver with

qualifying purchase promotion ends on December 22nd. Message and data rates may apply. Arthur, Matt, great to see you guys. Hi. They only watch because Matt's so handsome. They're not watching for my big bald head, Megan. I mean, for the record, I just, you know, I'm not trying to like that. You know, you know, slouch yourself, Arlene. I tried to do a tie. I try to do a tie up, you know, anything to distract from the dome, but, you know, Matt gets all the fan. You're just being modest. But what we don't, we, what we do, but we don't publicize it is you have to be at to nine to even make it on nk true crime so you're you're selling yourself short well that that's actually

actually but we can talk about that another time that is actually she's the 10 okay um here are a couple of highlights from this washington post report which is actually pretty extraordinary on um on on on on tyler robinson here's just uh like an excerpt um this is the washington post trying to call him they've called their reporters have been calling him since he got put in jail he's He doesn't talk. They talk to him, just waiting for some sort of a reaction, which appears not to have come. I can't answer any questions, he said to the Washington Post reporters. You're welcome to talk. In four calls spanning about 40 minutes, he maintained that disciplined approach, listening silently as a reporter described what friends and acquaintances has said

about him. He did not audibly react to hearing that Kirk's wife, Erica, had publicly forgiven him. He did not react in any audible way to the fact that Kirk had been awarded the Medal of Freedom. Eventually, Robinson asked that the reporters communicate with him only in writing. He did not respond to messages sent to the jail's email system. And his attorneys declined to answer questions for this report. But they do report. And to me, I've got to say, overall, this looks to me like the post attempt to try to say, he wasn't a lib. He was a conservative. You guys probably having a chance to read it because it's very lengthy. But they give lip service. They give lip service to the mother's statements, the mother to her statements, that he had become much more

enamored with pro-gay, pro-trans ideology in the year prior to the murder. They kind of, they have to mention that because it would be journalistic malpractice not to. And it's been alleged in the indictment. And then they spend the rest of this piece trying to prove that he was really apolitical. And his friends who knew him said, well, we didn't really see any of that. But then they do talk about the fact that he was holding his trans furry lover roommate who was crying about all the hatred towards trans people as Tyler Robinson stroked him and tried to make him feel better about all the hate that it was out there and about how he didn't like, quote, hateful people. And we know he said he killed Charlie in those text messages right after the murder

because he was full of too much hate. Some hate can't be negotiated out. And the post tries to downplay what he wrote on the bullets saying it was just a meme. But really what they're writing about is a guy overall who was kind of listlessly going through life. He dropped out of Utah Valley or the Utah University he was in. It wasn't UVU or Charlie was killed. But he dropped out. He became a tradesman, I think, electrician learning that trade and was seen on site bawling his fists up, you know, walking around with his fist, balled up to the point where his coworkers would say, Tyler, what's wrong with you? And he'd say, oh, that's just something I do. I'm fine. But he would eat lunch alone. The only thing that ever animated him was guns that he would get

really interested in. There are some text exchanges with his friends about the election and how, let's see, there's fake news around it. He thought Joe Biden might have been winning on the night of the election, but he wasn't sure. Here's one friend writing to him in the fall of 2020. I wish there was a simple solution against fake news, but there isn't. I have my own opinions, but that's it. Robinson, pretty much see if there are any sources cited and check the accuracy. If really any of it's not true, then it's fake. Friend, I understand freedom of speech and it's cool, but it makes it so media can lie

about anything. Robinson, I wish at least shit like anti-vax wasn't protected under freedom of speech because it's speech that actively harms people. Talking about the anti-vax messages doesn't really sound like a conservative to be. me. After Trump was almost assassinated, they quoted a Robinson text, which they do note that all of his friends said they thought was a joke, where he wrote, Snowflake Liberals can't shoot straight because they're too busy being gay. Of course, Robinson did appear to be gay. He was having sex with his male roommate who had declared himself female and was a furry. And then they

point out that he, the roommate, his roommate viewed Trump's election, this is his boyfriend, as a loss for trans rights and was distraught more than once a friend said he saw Robinson cradling his sobbing roommate in his arms. The roommate would erupt at friends who came to visit who would say things about boys and girls' sports, shouting repeatedly to shut up as Robinson sat nearby on a couch. The group went quiet before their gaming eventually resumed. Then they talk about how he did a wordle. He did a wordal like right before Charlie's assassination. By the morning of September 10th, three days later, after this earlier exchange he had online, which is irrelevant. Robinson had made the drive north to Utah Valley University. That's where Charlie was killed,

according to prosecutors. He texted his wordal score to his friend at 1128 that morning. At 1151, he allegedly walked onto campus and then made his way. way under the roof of the building in the courtyard below, a crowd had gathered to hear Charlie at 12.23 p.m. I mean, it's remarkable. So the wordled score was texted to his friend at 1128. Less than 60 minutes later, he shot Charlie, according to prosecutors. At 12.23 p.m. came the crack of a single shot. As a student pressed Kirk on his views of transgender people and mass shootings, Kirk slumped backward. At 9 a.m., that morning, that very morning, before the shooting, Robinson's friend in New England sent Robinson, the friend's whirl

resorts. He'd gotten chair in just two tries. Robinson replied 21 minutes later. It had taken him three. It was their last exchange. He's getting ready to shoot Charlie. He's doing the whirdle. He's exchanging texts about the wordle. And then, of course, he would shoot Charlie and the bullets would include message is like, hey, fascist, catch. Okay. So those are the highlights, you guys. All of this is interesting because clearly the shooter's friends are starting to speak out to the media in like drips and drabs. And I do believe there's an attempt by the media to try to divert the narrative away from he was a leftist. I don't know. He may have been a righty much in the way that Tyler Crooks, who shot Trump. Wait, not Tyler.

Thomas Crux was a righty for a period of time, but then had shifted left, notably leftward in the last year before. That's also what appears to have happened to this guy, Tyler Robinson. But what comes in of what I've just said and is any of that relevant to you guys? Arthur, I'll start with you. Well, from a human point of view, it's relevant about how sick this guy is. I mean, unfortunately in society, we've lost the concept of what it's like to kill. another person. Like, you know, even if you looked at what happened in Bondi Beach, the guy who

took the rifle away from the executioner, he didn't just, he didn't kill the guy who was killing everybody else. It takes a lot to kill someone. And the fact that you're playing a game, a word game, moments before you're about to kill anyone, anyone is just like, I mean, to a jury to if you're trying this case, if you're Matt and you're the prosecutor, I mean, it just shows you how this guy doesn't just, he doesn't either doesn't care. As the defense attorney, you want to talk about how sick he clearly was. The fact that the politicians and the media are trying to figure out, well, whose team was he on? It's, to me, it's upsetting. It should be everyone on the planet or should condemn what happened.

Megan, I haven't watched the video because of Charlie getting killed because it's just, it's too disturbing to me. But I have watched at this point hundreds, and I'm not exaggerating, of Charlie Kirk videos. And boy, oh, boy, what a cool guy he was and the way he conducted himself. And it's hard for me to believe that someone who believed in the same things that Charlie did and Charlie was clearly on the conservative side of things. although I hate all of these labels, you know, would execute him. So, you know, good luck to the media saying, oh, no, he was really a lefty who's killing

him. He's really righty who's killing him. You know, the whole trans thing is very confusing to me. And I'm not being a wise guy. You use this word furry. I don't really know what that means. I really don't. It's not like a legal term.

Nobody does. Okay. Okay. Okay. So I think. I mean, it's been explaining me. It's like the people who have anthropomorphic, I don't even know, like features. They want to be like half human, half animal, and they masquerade around in like animal gear.

They want to be treated like animals. They want to make animal sounds. And it's related to their sex lives as well. It's like a sexual fetish. And it is very closely linked with the trans community. I mean, honestly, they're mentally, you know, in the law, it's called a mental disease or defect. That's all the right dollar's opinion. If that's what you're thinking, like how you should go through life, the way you just described it, that's a mental disease, a defect, and maybe his lawyers are going to prosper, are going to try to put that kind of a defense forward.

Oh, well, I mean, I think they're more likely to be pointing the finger at everybody. I mean, you know, it's like I think the defense is going to try to say, you know, I mean, it was this guy, it was that guy, it was the other guy, it wasn't sweet Tyler who never had a violent moment, who, you know, was some sort of a patsy. don't know what they're going to argue about Tyler. I have little, I have no doubt that Tyler Robinson committed this crime. And I think he will be convicted. But does any of this come in, Matt Murphy? Like, or is it irrelevant? Because the prosecution doesn't need to prove motive. And they, if to the extent they do, it's written on the bullets and in his confession. Yeah, it's, uh, it is relevant, Megan, here's why. Um, that, it shows such a cabler disregard, just like Arthur just said, this can come in.

They've got to attack mens rea. They've got to attack what he's thinking at the time he does it, which means they can either go with a voluntary manslaughter. He's so outraged by the things that Charlie Kirk is saying. And I'm with Arthur on this. If you watch his videos, he is center right. And he's trying to engage in the American art of debate. And he's trying to sway people with words.

And he's respectful to everybody. So that is going to come back and hurt him. If I'm the prosecutor on that, that's a great fact because that shows that he's cavalier when he's not angry. He's playing Wordle. Like he's not so outraged at some position or something that Charlie Kirk said that they're going to be able to say, hey, look, he's he is coming at this from a perspective where he's trying to defend the honor of his partner. You know, so I think there are a lot of ways it can come in. I can also come in. And correct me if I'm wrong on this, Arthur, if you disagree.

agree, but if they try to go with some mental health defense on this, that's a big roadblock for the same reasons, right? Because he's cogent. He's, I mean, and whirdle's tough, right? And if he's bragging about his whirdle squirrel, then his brain is working. There's for- But wait, wouldn't you argue, if I were a defense lawyer, I would say, this is proof he didn't do it. Like, look how calm he is. Yeah. He didn't do it. He wasn't there. You know what? I hope they ran out defense, Megan, because it's so obvious when you go through the facts of this thing and the text messages that he wrote afterwards, it's his grandfather's gun, which, by the way, is a 100-year-old Mauser rifle, which when all the gun debate stuff came in after this,

as everybody loves to jump on it like we're seeing in Australia right now with the Bondi Beach, we're going to solve this with more gun control. This is a type of rifle. The design is pretty much trying to be controlled almost nowhere. It's not as no evil features, like they call it in California. This is an ancient gun that is still totally effective because they're made of metal. But, you know, another thing, going back to the Washington Post article, and I agree with Arthur 100% on this, the first line in the article is right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk. And this is something that we've heard a lot in the media, just in the last few days here with the horrible murder of Rob Reiner that I know we're going to get into. You know, when you go

to a scene, I know, I know Arthur's done a bunch of these, too. When you actually go to a murder scene and you see a human being lying on the floor, they are a human being. And a right-wing political activist, the way that was written, it almost dehumanizes this man from the first line of the article. It's like that alienates, you know, in the hot-blooded, divisive times that we're living in and alienates all the readers on the other side, whatever that means. And it's Arthur is exactly right. He's a human being, especially once somebody's dead. And unfortunately, I have watched that. I mean, I've seen a lot of videos where murders have taken place.

But anybody who is interested in the furry world, I had one of these cases. It was prosecuted by my unit at Westminster. It was the furry community, and it was a horrific triple shotgun slang in the city of Westminster. And it's a weird world. There's an episode on the show Entourage on HBO where one of the guys meets a furry. and it's a woman who sends them a rabbit suit because she's into the sexual side of that. And it's actually, that's a comedy. It's worth a watch if you want to educate yourself in a sort of funny way.

I don't think Arthur's tune in on that. There's a lot of things I would like to learn about. You know, Megan, I didn't know if you were thrown around a slang. Like, I swear, I'm a New York City trial attorney with 30-some odd years. I've never, this is the first time I've ever hearing of this concept. But, you know, Matt? What? You got to get out more.

Yeah. You got to get online more. Or not. My four-year-old and nine-year-old isn't really, yeah. A furry to my daughter is a very different. She wants Santa Claus to bring her next week. Yeah. No, I mean, they're like in colleges, like that, you know, when your kids, well, yeah.

Yeah. Your one son's going off to college. Like, they're popping up. Luca goes to Iona. It's a Catholic university. I'm not exactly, I know, he goes to fast on Sunday. I'm not sure what's going on there. Maybe it's not.

But, I mean, the fact that... Well, whatever. It appears to have been... I mean, it was the boyfriend of Charlie's alleged killer. He was into furry culture, and this kid had declared himself trans as well, and was a hot mess, according to lots of posts online from people who are frequently in their apartment, was growing weird mold experiences, allegedly, reportedly, like all over the apartment where he was like a hoarder and growing bizarre bacterias in the apartment, that there was a lot of

drugs, again, allegedly, reportedly. Thanks, Maureen. So there were, this was a very unhealthy household. And Tyler Robinson, I don't know, chicken egg, I don't know, Tyler Robinson was raised by a nice family and conservative parents who seemed to have loved him very much, taught him family values. Maybe he was off, he does seem off to me. He seems like a spectrum, someplace located on the spectrum, potentially when you hear him talk. His academics were very strong, but he was very socially weak. That combo, you know, was not infrequent. And the behavior, like I mentioned on the site of his electrician apprenticeship, very, very focused in the online world and the gaming community and very online, including the references on his bullets. In any event,

I think they've got him dead to rights. And I actually want to ask you a question about this, because I asked Cash Patel this when he came on two Fridays ago. The one thing that stinks, believe Tyler killed Charlie, no question. But the one, the best point I think the so-called conspiracy theorists have, and I don't mean to be dismissive of them because they're just pursuing other possibilities, which is fine, is those text messages sound bullshit. They do sound very like, it was not you, was it? It was I. It was like they sound very weird and not like the text of a, you know, 22-year-old guy, or 2-20-some-odd-year-old guys. And I wonder, Matt, let me ask you, like, how do they get that text exchange in?

And is there going to be hay made, do you think, by the defense attorney saying, obviously that's not from Tyler. That sounds like a fake plant. Because it's one thing to talk about that on a podcast, as this smells fake. And it's quite another to make that argument in court. Right. That's a tough one. because look, it's like the Brian Walsh murder that we all just watched.

He got on a computer and did all kinds of incredibly incriminating searches, like how to get rid of a body after a murder. People really do send stupid text messages like that. And it's, you know, they're going to have a forensic chain of evidence. They're going to have a forensic specialist come in and break down those cell phones and they can explain the whole thing. That is, I know Arthur's dealt with these before in court. I certainly have, it's very powerful evidence. And when you break it down and, you know, you have some gum shoe, probably an FBI agent on that

because a lot of counties contract with the FBI for cell phone analysis and that. And they come in and they're like your, they're like cartoon character G-Men. They come in in their suit. It's like Joe Friday, like just facts, ma'am. They're very, very good at what they do. And they explain the technology. And they will have taken those cell phones and they will have found those text messages. And it's a tough argument to make that somehow they planted it.

And like you said, Megan, you know, conspiracy theories and people on the Internet can speculate about all kinds of things. But when the rubber hits the road in a courtroom and you dust off that book with the rules of evidence, that's a tough argument to make to a jury that's taking it seriously and following the law. So I don't know what their defense is going to do. And the other thing, Arthur, is they're probably going to have Lance Twigs, the furry trans roommate, who they have said is cooperating with law enforcement. take the stand and say, yeah, I had that text exchange with him. So that adds a new element to this fact pattern. But I will tell you, Megan, I got a hung jury. And I'm going to acquittal with a nine to three for not guilty on what I thought was

pretty damning evidence against my client regarding messages going back and forth. And I was able to break it down enough where I said, look, it just doesn't make sense. Use your New York City common sense. someone would not do this, et cetera, and the people believe me, he did go to trial another lawyer and got convicted in 30 minutes. But anyway, if his furry friend comes on and testifies and corroborates this, now, you know, now you're in a whole different level of corroboration. And also, you're telling that, you know, Tyler was off to begin with on several ways. And if you're in that state after you executed someone, and it's an international story,

who knows where your brain is going and how you're conducting yourself and what you're writing and what you're saying? I think you're doing wordles and then writing confessions. That's how it looks here. I mean, according to the Washington Post in any event, and according to the prosecutors in the case of the confession. Here's the other question. The prosecutors are alleging, you know, they caught him because they. had video of the alleged shooter, and they put it out. The FBI put out a picture of him, and it was a much better picture than we've seen of the Brown University shooter, and he wasn't

wearing a mask, and you could see a lot more of his face. He had a low baseball cap, but you could see the bottom half of his face and his outfit, which was also telling. And they also put out the picture of the gun, which they found in a nearby grassy area. And that's what led his parents to recognize him and recognize that gun, which, as you point out, Matt was so distinctive and was a family heirloom that came from Tyler's grandfather. But what happened from there is the parents called Tyler reportedly, according to the prosecutors, and he confessed. He confessed to the parents.

And then the parents brought in a family friend who was both a preacher and had a relationship to law enforcement, like he was sort of an off-duty sheriff type. I can't remember what the exact title was. And that guy brought in Tyler for the surrender and, you know, the negotiation or I don't know if he confessed to the police after that or not. But can you make – you can't make a spouse testify, Matt, against his or her spouse. But can you make a parent? Can you make the mom and dad take the stand and say what he told them?

Yes. You sure can. They may not like it. But, yeah, it's not one of the privileged communications. It's essentially psychotherapists, priests. and your spouse. And that's about it. So yeah, you can make a parent testify.

And remember, this is Utah. And I practice in California. Arthur is the man of New York City, which by the way, that last thing, that's why I would hire Arthur if I got in trouble in New York, because if I had damning text messages, he's the only guy I can think of them. I might be able to get me off the hook.

Probably Garagos in LA, but it's Arthur out here. But look, we're talking about, this is a really serious case. We're talking about Utah. As a prosecutor, a Utah jury is a dream jury. And they're going to come in and I have no doubt they'll be fair. They will follow the law. But that is a, that is a very good, it's called the Veneira era jury pool for the prosecution, especially in that county. And they're not, you know, in L.A., those arguments can carry the day sometimes. Those crazy conspiracy theories. New York, they certainly can. And Utah, that is a, that is a tough road to hoe. That is a, that's a tough one. And that's why I, you're right. And that's why there's rumors out there now that the feds are trying to get involved with this case.

Like, feds, you don't. Oh, yeah. Just to let the audience know what we're talking about. There's a report today from NBC News that the DOJ is weighing, quote, novel federal hate crime case against Charlie's alleged killer, weighing how to bring federal charges against the shooter. including a, quote, novel legal theory that it was an anti-Christian hate crime, which could potentially give the fed's jurisdiction. He's facing multiple state charges in Utah at the moment,

but to make it federal would give like a backup lane of prosecution if the Utah prosecution fails. Go ahead, Arthur. Yeah, I mean, including, I believe, the death penalty they're seeking in the state of Utah. So, like, you know, like I respect the federal system, but sometimes, you know, just step back. The feds are not, they don't do murder cases, because people understand that. State prosecutor's office handles straight up murder cases. And this is a straight up murder case. Yes, there's political issues, et cetera. But let's look at the actual facts of the elements of the crime. No one's got to prove if someone's a Republican, a Democratic, a conservative, a liberal, or anything else. It's, you know, at this time, at this place, did you cause the death of Charlie Kirk by firing a firearm and it causes death?

Yes, period. Amen. Guilty. End of story. Judge, what's the sentence, life in prison, death penalty. Like, we're good. Like, we don't need you to come in and start manipulating and masticating the laws, the federal laws to figure out how to bring a federal case. You know, they did this with Puffy. But what, isn't it a decent backup? Isn't it a good backup? Like in case, hopefully you don't need a backup, number one. But, you know, they did this. I know. But if you do. where, oh, the feds had to come in and take this over. Now, there may have been a statute of limitations issue, but that video of Sean Combs beaten up the young woman there, Casey, whatever her name is Cassie, like that's a slam-dump conviction of a kid who's still in law school would get a conviction on that case,

and he would have gotten a lot more time in jail than 40-some-odd months that he's going to wind up doing. So, you know, sometimes the feds step in, and they wind up making things worse than making these better. I feel like I don't know. So far I have no reason not to trust in the competence of the Utah prosecutors. They unlike what's happening at Brown University, they, for me, have done nothing other than instill confidence. I haven't seen Keystone cop like behavior out there. So I believe in them. The one thing that's so annoying, though, I'll say this, Matt. I mean, you've tried so many cases. The doubters that Tyler Robinson had anything to do with this are out there over and over on the internet. Like I see tons of comments to this effect. Why doesn't the FBI come out and update the evidence? Why? It's the FBI's fault that there are conspiracy theories because they're not telling us what they have. Like, why don't they explain this? Why don't they explain that? And it's like, first of all, this is a state prosecution. It's not an FBI case

anymore. And second of all, when do prosecutors do that? They come out sometimes and make an initial statement about the case and why they've indicted this person. But I don't remember a case other than with an inappropriate prosecutor, where they continue running out to the cameras to say, oh, I just got this. Oh, and let me explain this. Oh, and I saw a show that questioned my evidence on that. And so I'll explain to you why that theory doesn't make sense. Well, you're exactly right.

And look, so is Arthur. I totally agree. Murders are state cases. A lot of people don't know this. And that kind of reminds me a little bit of the Pro Burgers on the Brian Coburger case. Remember that, Megan? He had a whole cheering section. And people were putting money on his books.

It's a bunch of, you know, well-meaning lunatics who think they know better because they have a friend who sent him some frigging podcast on a conspiracy theory. It is unethical. A lot of people don't know this. It is unethical, both from the modern rules under the ABA. But in California, the professionals prohibit a prosecutor from releasing evidence during a pending case. It's like the press conference that we saw with Nathan Hockman yesterday in L.A. He did it exactly right. So going back to that, though, the feds, they do, they're really good at a lot of white-collar stuff, and they're not good at murders.

This is, at the end of the day, as much national attention and interest as there is, this is a state case, state prosecutors and murder cases, Fed prosecutors, federal prosecutors are really good at white-collar crime. That's basically, and we, and again, Arthur's right, I'm agreeing with him so much at this point, but look, Diddy's a perfect example. It really is. But the reason why the feds had to go after Diddy, Megan, is because George Gascon, who was a terrible DA in Los Angeles, wasn't pursuing any of those, like that slam-dunk domestic violence case that we saw regarding the beating of Cassie Ventura, that was not being pursued in state court because the district attorney was terrible, in my opinion.

So that's why the feds had to come in. This is one where the Utah authorities have this in hand. this goes to the 10th Circuit, by the way, Utah's 10th, not 9th Circuit, which is the most liberal federal circuit in the country, which means this guy really has, they're going to convict him based on this evidence, and it's going to be upheld on appeal as long as they don't do stupid things like releasing evidence that they have to appease people online. Well, the other thing is, you tell me, Arthur, but let's say the mom and the dad find some reason to change their story.

I misremembered what Tyler said. That's not how it went down. He didn't actually confess. I just, you know, I had my questions about it, but he didn't confess. Then you put that preacher slash cop on the stand, the one that they called saying he just confessed, the one that brought him in. And that guy is going to tell the truth. And it's not going to be hearsay, Tyler to the parents, the parents to him, because the parents will be hostile witnesses at that point. It'll be an impeachment, right?

Through this other witness of what the parents told them. So either way, they're going to get Tyler Robinson's alleged confession before this jury. Am I wrong? No, I don't think you're wrong. The bigger point, though, about the feds and all this is, again, we shouldn't. Obviously, everyone wants the proper person to be convicted of this crime. I don't know anyone who would disagree with that. But if a jury finds that a prosecutor doesn't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt,

the feds shouldn't then create a new law just to go after a guy the way they did here in Manhattan to go after Trump. They created a new criminal law that just didn't exist before. And they totally mismatched the statute of limitations because we want this guy. Once we start doing that, once we start bending the rules and changing the rules and creating rules to get one individual, that's the end of our society and at least the criminal justice system. Okay, let's keep going because I do want to talk about the Reiner case too. There was new video released yesterday showing Nick Reiner calmly strolling near his parents' home

hours before the murders. This is obtained by the New York Post. Let's take a look at it. It's video one. It's just a sidewalk. This is just him walking for the listening audience. he has a bag over his left shoulder. He's walking calmly. Doesn't look irate, doesn't look out of his mind. Looks kind of normal. He's walking past a gas station with a hat. He has not yet murdered anybody, allegedly, and looks within his wits for what it's worth. Then we have video of him purchasing a drink at a gas station moments before he was arrested. This is an ABC News video. Here he is. Once again, he's got a bag over his left shoulder, it appears, and he's kind of meandering around a convenience store. And again, does not look out of his mind, deranged in any way, disturbed. And this is after, this is after again, the murder. One more video I want to show you. This is of him surrendering on an L.A. Street as the cops corner him. This is a little harder to see, but you can see a bit. Hold on. Where do we get this? Oh, this is from the New York Post. Okay.

The law enforcement has since said he went into custody willingly. He didn't resist arrest. Hold on. I can see the cops. You can't really see the defendant at this point. He's behind the car. But you can see the cops are not in like a terror stance that we sometimes see when somebody resists or pulls a gun or a knife on them. They actually look pretty calm. They far outnumbered the one guy. But he was brought into custody without incident, according to all reports. And I mention all that and show all that because it is evidence, Matt, and it could become relevant as more and more people question whether this gunsling and lawyer who just got hired to represent Nick Reiner, who's been very successful, at least in the Karen Reed case and getting an acquittal, is going to argue that he's not guilty by reason of mental defect that he was out of his mind on drugs or had a lifelong struggle with mental illness that manifested the night that he took his parents' lives allegedly.

Right. So I've known Alan Jackson for years. He was an L.A. for a long time when I was working in Homicide in Orange County. And he is an immensely talented lawyer. And he's actually a good guy. But you're absolutely right. He's going to have a hard time with those videos. California uses what's known as the McNoughton rule. I think New York is pretty similar, Arthur, if I'm not mistaken. And essentially, it's a 150-year-old rule, again, that provides that if you understand the nature and quality of your acts, you are responsible for them, even if you're suffering from mental illness or if you're suffering from intoxication. So what a jury essentially has to find, and the burden is on the defense to establish that by preponderance of the evidence.

So what that means is if you've got somebody that's howling at the moon and they don't know what they're doing, that's a case that you might have a shot at insanity. Otherwise, even if they're drunk, even if they're high, even if they are suffering from mental illness, if they, if they understand the nature and quality of their actions, in other words, they understand that they're killing human beings and not stabbing bananas or aliens or whatever crazy delusion they're suffering from, they are legally responsible in the state of California. And as crazy as California is, and it feels like it gets a little crazier every day, sort of pro-defendant. That is a law that they haven't touched yet, and that is the current state of the law.

And those videos are bad for them. I'm sorry? Yes. Is sanity a jury question? Yeah, so California uses what's known as a bifurcated system, Megan, where first you have a, you have a guilt phase, and then you have a sanity phase. It's like a death penalty case. We have a guilt phase and then a penalty phase. One of my last murders before I left the DA's office was a case that was freakishly close, facts-wise.

It was my Nicholson case at a Newport Beach where a young, very entitled, very wealthy young man who was suffering from pretty well-documented organic mental illness mixed with addiction, got into it with his parents, and he stabbed his mother and father to death in the house, and he also waited for the housekeeper. That case just went to trial on October 31st this year, and a friend of mine, I handed the batons to when I walked out of the office. my friend Dave Porter, and that one, that guy had documented organic mental illness in addition to it, but the bar is really high on insanity, and that jury found him legally sane, and his sentencing is coming up actually at the end of this week. So a jury, despite really well-documented actual mental illness, mixed with addiction, found that under the McNaughton rule, that guy was responsible. And I'll tell you another thing, what that young woman Romi saw when she discovered her parents, you know, and art, art has seen these two, stabbing murders are the worst,

because it's not like TV, Megan, where somebody gets stabbed once with a knife and they fall down dead. That's what you see in the movies. In reality, they die from what's called exanguination. That means they bleed to death, and that takes minutes, which means they are fighting, they're running around. And the rumor is, this is from multiple sources. I don't know if this is true, and we don't know the evidence yet. And of course, he's presumed innocent. But the rumor is that he cut both of their throats. And when you present one of those as a prosecutor. Well, they said while in bed, but there's a report today saying that they were found in bed.

Right. But if you go back later and you cut their throats or you slash their wrists, and I've prosecuted those two in stabbing cases, juries do not like that. It shows a calculated, cold-blooded, premeditated nature. Even if the initial contact or the initial fight is spontaneous and hot-blooded, When the killer goes back and cuts throats, that is such a, just a decidedly vicious move that, that, that, look, and I heard you say yesterday on one of the commentaries, Karen Reed was one thing, but my friend Alan Jackson has his work cut out for this one. And another thing is behind the scenes. I got a bunch of friends in the L.A.'s office, and they're all telling me that the team that Nathan Hockman put together on this is top, top notch. So that, that's going to be interesting to watch.

It's going to go to trial. there's no deal that they're going to be able to make. I don't think Hockman's going to seek the death penalty on this, just because it's an inner family. And in California, you seek the death penalty. There's a moratorium on it. But you seek, we sought it. I was on our committee for 15 years.

We saw it in less than 4% of the cases that qualified. So those are the special circumstance murders, which are a small fraction of all the murders. And so I don't think they are saying this is, though. They are calling this special circumstance. Yes. Now. It's definitely special circumstance. They, it was multiple murder.

They say it is, but I agree that doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to seek the death penalty. They've charged him with, well, hold on a second. That's a different case. But in any event, yes, they have alleged special circumstances against Nick Reiner. Just, I should have, I always presume people know the cases that we've been covering nonstop. But I hate when people will do that. We are discussing the murder of fame director, Rob Reiner, and his wife, Michelle, Singer-Riner, killed in their home, allegedly by their own 32-year-old son, Nick Reiner,

who had a lifetime of drug addiction problems and reportedly mental health problems as well. Getting some more details on that. Here's the charges. Sorry, two counts of first-degree murder with a special circumstance of multiple murders. Also faces a special allegation that he personally used a dangerous and deadly weapon, that being a knife. These charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison and the possibility, or without the possibility of parole and also potentially the death penalty. They'll make the decision on the

death penalty later. But now we're getting a few more details. The Daily Mail, Arthur, reporting, they were found in bed with their throats cut and may have been asleep when they were murdered. A source close to the investigation tells the Daily Mail. I mean, that would only amplify Matt's point if he, in other words, left them no chance whatsoever, just like sneaked up on them, took their lives while they were asleep. I'm not sure a jury's going to feel too fondly about that either. They died, we believe, sometime overnight, Saturday night. Their bodies were found 3.30 p.m. on Sunday when their daughter Romey found them and called 911. The report yesterday that we aired from Billy Bush has been contradicted that Romy did not find her mother alive and that

there was no last-minute statement that it was the son. That was his reporting. Now several reports contradicting that saying that there's no support for that whatsoever. Nick, one of the of the Reiner's three children had been living in the mansion's guest house. He would, quote, according to a friend, do meth and not sleep for days and then have outbursts, breaking things, punching walls. He was, quote, a ticking time bomb. His drug use was getting worse. His parents wanted him out, claimed the friend. According to TMZ, after leaving the Conan O'Brien Christmas party on Saturday night, where Rob and Michelle had been invited, and it looks like they graciously brought their kid along who lived at their guest house, Nick. By the way, we were told that it was

some sort of formal dress. I've even heard in one report that people were wearing formal wear, except Nick was not. He showed up, rude, behaving inappropriately. A witness told TMZ, he appeared, quote, tweaked out. And they said that he stormed off, New York Post reports, after getting into a tiff with comedian Bill Hader, that H-A-D-E-R, that Nick interrupted Bill Hader at the bash, and eyewitness told NBC. When Hader told Nick that he was in the middle of a private conversation, the source said, Nick just stood there and stared before storming off in one final piece here that may be relevant. Well, this is definitely relevant, but this isn't the piece I meant. They said in the hotel room, he rented after the murders. His shower was later found

full of blood with blood stains on the bed and bed sheets covering the windows. That's incriminating. And finally, this. Daily Mail reports from someone who says he knows the family and Nick well that this person had just spoken with the other brother, Jake, within the past 24 hours since the murders, so it does appear to be close to them, saying Nick was a deeply troubled child who needed physical restraint for his rages from a very young age, that his issues began well before his teenage years, and thus we presume well before his drug use, that Jake, the other brother is, quote, beyond himself with grief. Nick's uncontrollable anger was not new, said the friend. A lot of the, quoting here, a lot of their fights had to do with him just doing

something self-destructive and fighting back when they tried to help him. It did get physical sometimes, not talking punches, but restraining him. I was over there. It must have been early 2000s. He was about 11. He was throwing the biggest tantrum, and Rob Reiner just had him in a bear hug to restrain him. The tantrum was over nothing, but he had so much anger in his eyes. It was terrifying, really. And this happened, excuse me, a lot. He never outgrew it. He had tantrums well into his 20s. This I don't like the term bad seed, Arthur, but it brings up the nature versus nurture thing. Yeah, I mean, in the single digits you're behaving like this? From all the reports, it seems like Robin Michelle did everything humanly possible to try to help their kid.

You know, our mutual friend Geraldo, you know, he always says you're only as happy as your unhappiest child. and now being the father of three, you know, I get it. Ariana woke me up the two mornings ago at 5 a.m. telling me, Daddy, I love you. Now I have to throw up. And I'm, you know, I broke my heart. She's like, Daddy, hold my hair. So you got her a pony.

You got her another pony. I'm going to the farm, what's the matter with you? But, I mean, it seems like they've done every, I mean, Rob Reiner made a film with his son to try to pull him out of this. And I know this sounds weird, but I didn't know the report. reporting you just said about the beds and getting this cut, their throats cut in their bed. Like, I hope they didn't know what happened. I was imagining like some kind of real fight scene where Rob Ryan is trying to protect

his wife and something much more, you know, hand-to-hand combat. That could still manifest. You know, we don't know. These early reports are often wrong, i.e. the Billy Bush thing yesterday with all due respect to my friend, Billy. Yeah, I get it. And that's why I always tell people go slow on these. Actually, the Megyn Kelly line that told me years ago on Kelly's,

court off air before we were not, she goes, this is initial reporting, don't get over your skis. I'm like, I don't know what that means. I don't ski, but okay, I think I figured it out. Folks should know just going back to the insanity defense, how rarely it's used, how rarely it's successful,

and I had a young woman who her dad died in the course of a fight, and she dismembered his private part because he had been raping her, and I was going to use the insanity defense until I found out, at least in New York, you are incarcerated for a longer period of time, if you are found not guilty by reason of insanity, basically,

that if you're found guilty of murder and you get 25 to life. So it doesn't really make a lot of sense. But Megan, I had a case. Now, thank God, Mom and Dad didn't die. But it was a young man around the same age. Maybe he was a little younger. He was in his mid-20s. And they prohibit him from seeing his girlfriend.

The family was Asian and she was, I believe, Caucasian. and they were very strict and they said no you can't date her anymore the kid came home while the parents were in bed that's what's bugging me out a little bit here hearing this and he took one of those like barbecue forts the two it just has two prongs on it and he went to town now thank god they lived but here's the here's the punchline they didn't want him prosecuted now he was prosecuted um i was able to get him plea this was a while ago but it was in the teens of years, but they were very uncooperative, and they, you know, there was a prosecutor who's got, he's sitting there with, with the parents who were the victims, begging not to prosecute him

at all, and he wants to give him 25 to life. And so, you know, well, he couldn't give him 25 to life, but he could have given him 25 on the straight-up assault one. And so they kind of split the difference and gave the kid, like, I don't know if it was 12 or 14 years in prison. So, you know, the question people ask is like what is Nick brother and sister you know want to see happen here who hired this fantastic expensive presumably lawyer yeah who's paying for him yeah and if but you know meg if you look at the online version this morning of the wall street journal there is a family photo of rob michel and their children and everyone's smiling except nick nick nick looks scary in this particular in all the pictures yeah it's a little it's a little it's a little this this case meg i can see it

you can see the deep unhappiness depression and possible mental defect in almost all the family photos i lot i'm there's so much more to discuss including i actually have a suspicion about where the defense is going to go i i don't think it's insanity either can i throw what i think it is and why can you can but you have to sorry no stand by okay quick break okay you get the first comment after break okay right back with Arthur Idala and Matt Murphy. After this quick break, M.K. True Crime stars. Let's be honest. America can still be a dangerous place, and you cannot afford to wait for help. Sure, you could use a firearm, but in today's America, defending yourself with deadly force

could have legal consequences. According to FBI data, 99.9% of all altercations do not require lethal force. And that's exactly why so many are turning to Berna. Burna is proudly American, hand-assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana. These less-leafel self-defense launchers are trusted by hundreds of government agencies, law enforcement departments, and private security companies. Over 600,000 Berna pistols have been sold, mostly, to private citizens who refuse to be victims. Burna launchers fire rock-hard kinetic rounds and powerful tear tear gas and pepper projectiles, capable of stopping a threat from up to 60 feet away. No background checks, no waiting periods, and Burna can ship straight to your door. Take responsibility. Protect your

future. Visit berna.com right now or your local sportsman's warehouse. That's bryrna.com or your local sportsman's warehouse. Visit now and be prepared to defend. M.K. True Crime contributors, Arthur and Matt Murphy are back with me now to actual real live trial attorneys. Arthur's been on both sides, prosecutor and defense. Matt has spent his life putting bad people in jail. So he wins the morality game. Just kidding. Just kidding. There's an important need for defense attorneys. You bet you're not a daughter, you know, lady. We're the ones who keep these profits in line. And I'm doing some... That's right. I know. And standing up for the Constitution, I know you're now doing some limited, some defense. Okay, Matt, you were going to say before the break.

Yeah, look, there's a, there's a really interesting interview with, with Reiner about Charlie Kirk and it's you know he he's asked about that and and he's known for with Rob Ryanner I'm sorry I keep thinking Carl and shows how old I am I know well I mean there's a lineage yeah right so there's a really interesting interview with Rob Reiner where he's asked about Charlie Kirk and it is it's something I think everybody should should Google and see because he he makes a really good point of saying this is a human being nobody should die like that. Nobody should die for their political beliefs. Like, it is, it's kind of the thing that everybody should listen to. And by the way, for whoever wrote that Washington Post article, I haven't seen

anything where Rob Reiner, it's beloved Rob Reiner, you know, cultural icon Rob Reiner. I haven't seen any, anywhere has he been described as left-wing activist, even though he, you know, he embraced it. Oh, my God. Matt, can I tell you, this morning, I listened to the New York Times, the Daily podcast, which I have to say I enjoyed because they played a lot of clips from Rob's movies. But they also then said, like, he was just a happy guy. He was just so happy and joyful. Okay, you've gone too far because the way the right wing experienced Rob Reiner over the last 10 years was him being as nasty as humanly possible against MAGA and Donald Trump. So it's fine.

We don't have to go into the politics of Rob Reiner. We haven't since he's been murdered. But the New York Times cannot get away with he was just universally happy in Sweden. joyful. No, there was actually a very toxic core inside of him when it came to politics. Go ahead. Sorry for the introduction. Yeah, no, no, you're absolutely right. But he, at the end of the day, he's a human being, and he is motivated at what he believed to be right, just like we all have friends, or at least, we used to all have friends on various sides of this debate, right? And he's a human being, and he was doing what he thought was right, even if he disagreed with him. And so was

Charlie Kirk. And he pointed that out. So it's just, you know, when you, when you, when you look down and you go through one of these scenes and you look down you see somebody who's dead their politics don't matter and they shouldn't matter and it's like we can't we can't go through this filter or this dehumanizing description like we saw in the washington post man i'm sorry to interrupt you but you know meg i i am like a little i don't like the fact that people keep comparing these two murders they're so different i mean they are so i totally great different charlie kirk got killed by a stranger who didn't like what he was saying, which is as anti-American as you can imagine. And Rob Reiner agrees with that.

So that's one issue that needs to be addressed in the United States of America. It's a form of terrorism. Correct. Rob Reiner and his kid and his wife got killed by another issue, two issues, really, that we need to address, which is mental health and drug addiction. And, you know, I mean, because obviously there was drugs involved, but it seems like talking what you just reported about when he was 11 years. old, the kid was out of control. I mean, those are, those are issues that need to be addressed as well.

But they're very, very different things. And people keep comparing the two. And I'm like, it's apples and oranges. It's just that, yes, they're two homicides. It's very true. They're so different. But at the same time, at the end of the day, what I'm guessing. It's a, it's a, it's a, where they're going to take the defense.

Yeah, no, it's, I was just going to say because we looked at some of these cases in which they raised self-defense or criminal insanity. the one that jumped out at me was Richard Chase, who they called the vampire Sacramento in 1979. He killed six people between 77 and 78 in Sacramento. They were all chosen at random. One was a pregnant woman. He drank her blood after he mixed it with yogurt. He had a delusional belief he needed to consume the blood of other beings to replenish his own supply. He'd been treated at psychiatric hospitals before the murders many times. He was at one hospital after having injected rabbit's blood into his veins. He'd been diagnosed as a paranoid, schizophrenic.

He was on psychotropic drugs. They tried to use the insanity defense. It failed. It failed in that case. So it's not going to work for Nick Reiner. It's just not. But here's what I think. And this is like out of left field prediction.

And it's just because the Menendez case is on my mind because that's also California. And this is what triggered it in no way am I impugning Rob Reiner, Noda. I believe there's anything untoward. I think he seems by all accounts a loving father and an appropriate father. But on this same Daily Mail report we were quoting from, one actor who was on the set of being Charlie, he's a cast member, Eric Aoud, 45, told the Daily Mail, he found the dynamic between Robin and his son, Nick, troubling. They were fighting. They were arguing with each other while they were on the set. They did point out that this guy's scenes were ultimately cut from the film. Okay, maybe he's got an ax to grind. Quote, they were kissing each other on the lips, which was weird. They bickered, or they were bickering. They were going off on each other on set. It wasn't. wasn't comfortable. There was definitely hostility there. So my question is, is there a likelihood Nick Reiner pulls a card from the Menendez defense? We're in California. It's going to be a California jury and says he was molesting me my whole life. That's why I was so messed up from

the time I was 10. That's why I got hooked on drugs. There's no way of disproving that and plays the sympathy card with a California jury about why, from a very young age, he was all messed up, Matt? Well, he might, but remember, until recently, until, again, George Gascon became the DA and our friend Mark Erigus got a hold of that case, they were convicted, and a California jury rejected all that. And it was, there's a... But the California juries are not what they used to be. No, that's true. But there's a blistering opinion, affirming the... the conviction of both those guys authored of all places by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that anybody who's interested in it is you can find it online and it just it just destroys the

defense and every word of it is I think correct so Alan can run with that I think that you're going to hit headwinds because remember we have all these other all these other kids in the family and look addiction is one of those things it touches almost every American family but there is a huge difference, I think, in the minds of certainly prosecutors and judges and appellate courts, but also jurors between somebody who's suffering from organic mental illness, where, for lack of a better term, it's not really their fault, even if they're self-medicating with drugs, and the spoiled, kind of entitled, you know, young rich guy who has a problem with daddy. And I think everything that I'm reading on this, it seems like the evidence is stacking up

more and more in that direction. There was an interview I saw yesterday with Nick Reiner where he describes himself as an entitled Rich White Kid. And I think it was during the promotion of that movie. And there's an interview that they did promoting that where you can kind of see some of that dynamic between Nick and Rob Reiner. And it's almost hard to watch, especially in retrospect. So this is a horrible case.

But thankfully, Gascona's out. We've got Nathan Hockman, and in this case, it's going to be handled the right way, wherever it goes, whatever happens. Go ahead, Arthur. Well, the only thing, Matt, is, you know, Megan was just talking about this witnesses saying when he was 11 years old, he was out of control. And that, you know, you know, I don't think at 11, you know, you're an entitled rich kid living in the most more exclusive neighborhood on the planet. So I, you know, and then I just think there was some indications before his drug use that he had. And, you know. Definitely.

They brought the yoga instructor in for him when he was 10 to try to bring calm into his life because they were already seeing the problems. And that goes back to what you're saying, Meg, about nature or nurture. You know, there are some, I mean, look, I do believe people are born with a certain disposition. And then it can be pointed in one direction or another. I mean, I will tell you this, your friend Alan, if he stands at a podium and says, you know, our defense is. is going to be that Rob Reina was sexually assaulting his son. You know, that's not going to fly. Yeah, I agree.

Wait, it did fly. It flew. It flew like a bird in the Casey Anthony case, where Jose Baez got up there in opening statements and blamed George, the dad for allegedly molesting Casey, the 20. Wait, let me finish when she, the mother of little Kaylee, he said he molested her. And then he said, oh, also, he helped cover up the babies drowning. He never came back to it. He never proved it. It was barred from being used in closing argument because he didn't introduce any proof in it on it.

And she was acquitted. But my point of that he was in Rob Reiner. I mean, Rob Reiner, for those of us old enough, I mean, he's still Meathead. Rob Reiner is quoted as saying, if despite all my movies and all the success in life, even if I won the Nobel Peace Prize, the headline would be Meathead won the Nobel Peace Prize. So, I mean, he's a household fixture to many of us. What do you mean? The defense lawyer is going to be like, that doesn't prove anything about what happened behind closed doors. The defense lawyers constantly, they throw anything at the

but the kitchen sink to try to make it stick because it's a potential death penalty case. There's other, there's two other children and three, actually, other children involved here who seem to have very normal upbringing. You know, the young woman who I was talking about earlier who killed her father. She had a sister who testified and said, yeah, he was molesting my sister and he was molesting me too. Here, I don't think that. Casey Anthony did not have any other witness come and say, like, he threw it out in opening. The horse left the barn and the jury was tainted on it. I'm just saying, like, this is going to be a desperation defense because they've, if that stuff about the hotel room is true, this guy's up the creek without a paddle mat.

And defense lawyers like Alan Jackson, right, they don't go down with not swinging. They swing for the fences. That's why they get hired. Well, I'll throw another one out there for you. That video that we saw of him walking outside the gas station, that's an area of Brentwood that is very close to a restaurant that we've all heard of called Mezzaluna. Remember that? You talk about crazy L.A. juries.

Right. It's about a couple hundred yards down the road. And there's some great restaurants in there now. That's, I mean, I've, that's basically just a little north of my part of town. I know that area is very well. Metsaluna. Metsa means half Luna means moon. Just, I mean, I know that there is that one half of Megan Kelly, even though she was introduced the other day as a great Irish American.

I'm like, do you not know who Nona is? But anyway, I actually corrected somebody just the other day, say, I am part of Italian. Just slow your word because they were ripping on Italians, too. I can be insulted on many fronts. Go ahead. Yeah, no. Kate, look, and Arthur knows this as well as I do. Trial work is an art form, Megan, and you've seen that a million times, too.

And the Casey Anthony case is a different part of the country, but they were, in my view, the prosecution was outclassed. Kind of like the prosecution in the Karen Reed case. They were just outclassed. They had good evidence, but they were outclassed by the talent of the defense lawyer. And, you know, this is one where, again, this comes back to the District Attorney of L.A., He's, and I don't know who it is yet, I'm sure I'll know who they are, but they, from a buddy of mine I talked to yesterday, who's been a career prosecutor in that office. He said he didn't want to say who it was, but they're very, very good. And look, I've got confidence. Marsha Clark was good. She was really good. You know, Megan, I agree with almost everything you say most of the time. I'm going to go out and I don't know here and disagree with you that. I met her recently. She's a lovely woman. I tried a case against Christopher Darden. I did a murder case against him when he was a defense lawyer.

Nice man. OJ. was no fluke. That case was the only book worth reading on OJ. guys, is a book written by Vincent Bugliosi called Outrage, where he takes the prosecution of task. That was prosecutorial incompetence from the first minute. And I don't see, I don't think that's going to happen here. Okay. Mistakes were made. Can I ask Matt a question about that your system? Is it in the realm of possibilities that they indict him on a death penalty? charge, and then they say, look, if you, you know, if you want, we'll give you the plea to life without parole, you know, like we just saw in Perlberger, however you say his name. I mean, is that something that happens in that jurisdiction? That's a great, that's a great question, Arthur. And a lot of people wonder about that that don't, that don't do cases in either, even professionals don't do cases in capital case jurisdictions that have the death penalty. The answer is no. It's, that's, it's unethical to do that because it's it's known as extracting a plea. You you plead what you prove

and you go in and you prove what you pled. That's the philosophy. And you don't, you don't file a death penalty case in the hope you're going to get a plea. That was my problem with what they did in the Brian Kogger case because that's really what it looked like. There was no change in the evidence. And then he comes in for a plea after the, they've done everything right. So, so a lot of people think that correctly, you see that on TV. That happens all the time. I mean, I was in court yesterday, right? It's a murder two case.

He's facing 25 to life. And what people understand is the life part is the problem. So you get, at 22 years, you go in front of the parole board. If you don't get parole, you got to wait two years to 24, you go, 26, 28, and you can be for the right to life. We got it. But man, this is only mildly interesting, so I want to get to the next point. All right. Let's keep going.

Let's keep going. Okay, I have a question I need to ask, which is we mentioned it earlier. What about the money situation? Because Nick doesn't have any, by all reports, but Rob and Michelle had a lot. I didn't realize until listening to the Daily this morning that – did you know that Castle Rock was Rob Reiner's too? He created that movie company that backed Seinfeld, among other – that produced Seinfeld among others. I mean, so there's a lot of money in the Reiner estate. He's got three other children, but the question is whether any dispensation, disbursement would ever be made to Nick.

so he could pay for a lawyer by the estate. I mean, we don't know how the will was written, but Matt, how would it normally work in California where one of the people who would potentially be inheriting is the one who caused the murders, allegedly, the death? The only thing I can think of, Megan, is that he had some sort of a trust, that he had access to a trust.

I mean, the guy was essentially, I mean, he wasn't working. He wasn't a functional human being because of all his addiction. So I don't know, but I think, We all have that question. Alan Jackson is, as Arthur correctly pointed out, he is top drawers, he's messy talented, but he's also very expensive, as the best defense lawyers are. So that's, they got money from somewhere. I can't imagine it's coming from his siblings. So the only thing I can think of, and then in California, you can set up a trust that he might have access to.

Is there any way Alan Jackson would do it for free for the notoriety? No. No. He's already got all the notary in the world. And he's well known in L.A. and he's got a thriving practice. And yeah, the answer to there's no. He's being paid. And he didn't tell me this, but I guarantee he's being paid a lot. And you know, and Megan, and this is not a case as a defense turn. You're going to come out, you know, kind of looking at good, really under any scenario because of who the, what the crime is, how it was committed, who was committed against, you know, this is really you're going to be wearing the black cowboy hat, not the. the white cowboy, yeah, not the matter.

And he may lose. Mm-hmm. Yeah. He probably will lose. Likely to lose. But I just feel like there's not going to be, I have my doubts about a trust because even though he's 32 and I think most like trusts from rich people to their children kick in before age 32, not when they're a drug addict.

They were too aware of and like worried about his drug addiction, I think, to have given him some lucrative trust. I feel like they probably would control those purse. They had him living on their compound in a guest house. So I think that's another way of trying to control this, you know, very problematic child. So I really wonder where, like, I don't, I don't, I, actually, I guess it's a question for a trust in estates lawyer. If the estate was to be divided, because most people say it should all go to my spouse, but if my spouse is also dead, it should be dispersed equally amongst my children. He's one of the four children, unless you've made a spouse.

provision that not this one. But it would take years. And like whether he gets something is up to somebody else, like a trustee or the other kids. But Meg, as you know, my bride is also my law partner. This is her area of expertise, surrogates law. These things don't happen quickly. Like the, you know, even if everything is in order, it's not like it's triggered.

You've got to get death certificates. They have to be filed with the court. They have to be certified. Now, unless Alan is going to say, look, I'll, I'll roll the dice here. and I am going to get paid a seven-figure number down the road when this kid gets his inheritance. You know, I think probably someone stepped up and said, Rob would want and Michelle would want their son,

at least protected by constitutionally. And let me see if I can help out. And you never know. It could be one of the siblings. Like, you don't know, Megan, these situations are so family dynamics. I'd be worried I'd be next. I mean, like, the ire is clearly against the family. I'm not saying he's coming out of prison anytime, Sue, Megan.

Don't get me wrong. But someone may say, look, let him get him a lawyer and protect his constitutional rights. Get him like a 1-800, 1-800 lawyer. 1-900 is a different thing. I was thinking about with my voice permanently like this, apparently, starting a new business with the 1-900 line. I think I could actually make real money. Okay, let's keep going because there's other cases. we teased in the beginning, can 24-year-old Benjamin Erickson sue anybody after being publicly

identified as the Brown University shooter, a thing which is not true, according to the Attorney General? So we did not say his name. We did not report. By the time we got to the story, they'd already released him saying, whoops, he's actually not the person of interest. It wasn't him. And the mayor, the moronic mayor of Providence, is still saying, well, we don't know that that he's been cleared. And then the AG is out there saying, oh, no, he's cleared. He's cleared. So they don't even have their message straight on this guy. But this guy was named by many media outlets. CNN and many others went down the list, but it's a very long list. And they all cited law enforcement sources. The media did not make up that. They didn't pull it

out of a hat. They got it from cops who were leaking it to them. So the media, in my view, you guys, but you tell me they have a defense that this was not. published, and maybe the guy will be a limited public figure. Like he wasn't a public figure before this, but he could be considered, quote, a limited public figure. You'll tell me what you think. But if you get that designation is like you're a limited public figure for like just this one story, then the burden to prove that someone has defamed you is much higher. And you'd have to be, you'd have to prove the actual malice standard that these outlets were, that they knew it was false or were reckless about the probability of falsity in reporting it, that they had actual

malice in their hearts when reporting it, which was done reporting it by NBC News, CNN, New York Post, Washington Post, so many others. So you tell me, does this guy have a defamation lawsuit against anybody? Arthur, you want to go first? Yeah, I don't think so. I've handled a lot of these now. And Megan, you're very well, we're first on the law because you just laid it all out there. I don't think they're going to be able to prove this the way a wrestler got Gawker knocked off the planet Earth by saying, you knew you were making things up, you were only doing it to sell newspapers, yet only the only purpose was to hurt me, and you knew that it was false. So I don't think it rises to that level that he would be successful in front of a jury as long as they could show the steps of what led to him, why they had a reasonable cause to believe it may have been him. I think ultimately some of the ballistics didn't match. And that's what was one of the real straw that broke the camel's back that said, no, no, we got the wrong guy.

Well, reportedly he also said he had been in the hotel room the entire time. And now, again, that is what was reported. Don't know for sure that that's what he said. But if so, that would be verifiable with hotel videotape, with possibly keycard records. It takes a little while. But it takes a little while to get that stuff. I don't know. If you're the FBI, does it take that?

Why the hell do you have the tapes on the front door of your hotel, if not to show the FBI when there's been a mass shooting down the road? Right. But when I say a little while, I don't mean weeks, but, you know, you got to figure out, okay, when did he check in? When did he check out? How many cameras are that? Which cameras are we going to look through? You know, it takes hours. I'm not saying it takes days, but it probably takes eight, 12 hours.

Well, and he was in custody, I think, for 18 hours. Custody, I say. Like, he was a person of interest for 18 hours as they questioned him. I don't know, Matt. You know, I made the case that the media has a defense, right? Like, it was told to them by law enforcement. But that was also the case in Atlanta with the Olympics. in the 1990s, and Richard Jewell, who many people still think was the Olympic bomber.

And he wasn't, hold on a second. We pulled a couple of headlines, okay, from the time. Atlantic Journal Constitution. They're the ones who, like, blew the lid off of him, allegedly being the suspect. This woman, Kathy Scruggs, said he was the guy. Remember, because Richard Jewell was the one of memory service who found the bomb and was a hero. And then a few days later, she dropped a story in the Atlantic Journal of Constitution saying, oh, no, he was the bomber.

And completely ruined this guy's life. The title of the initial story, FBI suspects hero guard may have planted bomb, body of the story that followed. The security guard who first alerted police to the pipe bomb that exploded in Centennial Olympic Park is the focus of the federal investigation into the incident that resulted in two deaths and injured more than 100. Richard Jewel, 33, a former law enforcement officer, fits the profile of the lone bomber. This profile generally includes a frustrated white man who is a former police officer, member of the military, or police wannabe who seeks to become a hero. There was a column by Dave Kindred, implying a comparison between Jewel and a convicted murderer. The New York Post had it in its front cover, Saint or Savage with a photo of him, separate article titled Who Checked Rambo Crossing Guard's record? He was a fat, failed former sheriff's deputy who spent most of his working days as a school crossing guard.

NBC news, same. Broca said in a news broadcast, the speculation is that the FBI is close to making the case in their language. They probably have enough to arrest him, Jewel, right now, probably enough to prosecute him, but you always want to have enough to convict him as well.

There are still some holes in the case. And guess what happened? Lots of settlements. That's what happened. Let's see. They actually call him fat. They called him fat. They called him fat.

Yeah, that was 96. That failed former sheriff's deputy. Well, that's a New York Post. Would they do that today? Richard Jewel. Yes, they would. The post, God love them. They haven't gone PC.

Richard Jewel versus NBC. The lawsuit arose from the comments made by Tom Broca that I just read. NBC stood by its story, but later agreed to a reported settlement of $500,000. Richard Jewel versus CNN. Terms of the settlement confidential, CNN maintained that it acted properly, but it did. pay out. And then let's see. I don't know if he must have sued the Atlantic Journal Constitution, but it is.

It's right there. Where is it? Isn't there a movie about this? There is. No. There is. There was a movie about him being falsely accused. Oh, it was the only major news organization that refused to settle.

The newspaper fought the lawsuit for years, arguing it's reporting that Joel was a suspect, was substantially true at the time of publication. The case went all the way to the Georgia Court of Appeals, which eventually ruled in the paper's favor in 2001, concluding the articles were accurate at the time they were published. And they did indeed find that Jewel was a limited purpose public figure, Matt. So where do you come down on it? There's a really interesting case in California, Megan, called Rothman v. Jackson, which is the Michael Jackson case, where essentially when you are a government entity, you have really good immunity protections and litigant privilege until you step outside that role.

I don't think this case is, every case is unique and different. I think it's going to be tough against these newspapers because they're just covering, you know, they're covering information that they got from a source. The problem is the county and the state of Rhode Island because that shouldn't be happening. And shame on whoever it is, it's leaking that. That should never happen. And that is one small piece of what has very much appeared to be a hugely incompetent investigation so far on this. And I always want to give the benefit of the doubt.

Murdered cases sometimes take a long time to come around. But these press conferences, I've never seen anything quite like this. They're demonstrating such a lack of command of the facts. And I've stood on that stage more times than I can count with an elected official, as we've described a case. I've never seen a lack of preparation this bad. And that goes from the professor or the president of Brown University to the questions that they don't know basic facts. So the idea that somebody in that shop is incorrectly jumping the gun and leaking information about somebody who may be innocent is awful. And I think that there's a better lawsuit against the government on this than the news outlets that have been reporting on it.

That's my thought. in the in the jule case they tried that but they they they could not figure out i guess there were many many fbii agents who had been you know privy to the information and they could never figure out who among them uh leaked richard jule's name and the reporter scrugs for the atlanta journal constitution would not divulge it sadly she died i think at 42 years old i don't know shortly into her life but in any event i don't think this is the fbi finding who the law enforcement guy is, is a much bigger challenge. You know, Megan, no, from a very practical point of view, if you're the CEO of NBC News and

CNN, and then what was the outlet that fought it all the way to the Georgia? AJC. Okay. So from a financial point of view, I am sure the $500,000 that NBC paid was a heck of a lot less than the legal bills were for the other entity. I know it's a precedent-setting thing, but you fight a case all the way up to that court over, It started in 96, it ended in 2001. That is very, very, very expensive.

And that's what's called nuisance value. And they didn't want Tom Broca to sit for a depot either, right? So like that, that would be another piece for the television stations that got sued, like NBC, that he was their main anchor. And I'm sure the CNN anchor didn't want to sit for a depot in this case either. Here's, before we go, Matt, to your point, here's Peter Nerona. He is the AG. And he was getting asked questions about there was reporting yesterday and today all over the internet about whether this one person who's at Brown was potentially a person of interest. Internet sleuths are trying to come up with names right now.

And they've been asking at these pressers, is this person on your list? Have you looked into this? And watch this exchange here in SOT 6. I think this is an area where caution is really necessary. There are lots of reasons why a page might be taken down, particularly if there's chatter out there about words that were spoken. It's easy to jump from someone saying words that were spoken to what those words are, to a particular name that reflects a motive targeting a particular person. That's a really dangerous road to go down. Really dangerous.

If that name meant anything to this investigation, we would be. out looking for that person. We will let you know we were looking for that person. You know, again, I think it's just a really dangerous road to go down. He loves the dangerous road. I'm going to give you one more soundbite from this guy and sought seven because, again, there are two other pieces in the news that they haven't confirmed. One is that the vice president of the college Republicans who was shot Ella Cole, that she was targeted, Elkoek, that she was targeted, which would be obviously people are asking in the wake of Charlie, whether that she was the main target there. Many other people were shot. But that's a

question. And secondly, there's a question about what the shooter yelled, because everyone in that classroom says he yelled something. But no one is telling us what he yelled. All these law enforcement types are saying is, we don't know. Like, people are unclear. And we heard from the T.A. who was there conducting the review class in advance of the exam with the students, he didn't understand what the guy had yelled and that none of the students he spoke to understood where the guy had yelled. But there are some claiming it was Allahoo Akbar. Totally unconfirmed at this point. That too would be relevant because it would imply a motive, quite obviously. And here was his, I think, reference to those issues in SOT 7.

There is no information that the investigative team has about motive. Zero. Zero. There's nothing about even if taking at face value what one or two witnesses may have said about what something was said okay and there are many witnesses that say nothing was said there's nothing about what we know was perhaps said that indicates any kind of motive that is related at all to ethnicity or or political outlook or culture there's nothing at all that we know right now about that. And I think that that is a dangerous road to go down. Okay, here's a problem, Matt Murphy. We don't believe him and we don't trust him. And these are all far left libs who have an agenda of their own. And I honestly, I don't believe this guy.

Like if some of those witnesses said that the guy yelled aloh Akbar, I don't think he tell us. I don't trust him. He doesn't understand what he's doing. That seems clear to me. He doesn't, not on the same page as his mayor. The police chief, too, inspires no confidence. And can we just spend two seconds on the weird sign language lady she's over the top and she's like too needy of attention bring it in keep it small doesn't have to be so huge you're not the star of the show they constantly do this don't the hearing impaired have closed captions like everybody else why do you need this like it's to me it's a virtue signal i'm telling you it's like yet another reason people are watching this like okay i know who these people are go ahead man no you're

exactly right they're undermining the public's confidence in the in the integrity of this investigation. By the way, this reminds me of Fast Times of Ridgemont High with Mr. Hand and Jeff Spicoli. If I'm here and you're here, doesn't that mean this is our time? If witnesses heard and yell something, you don't get to get up and say there's zero evidence of motive. Like, there is evidence. That's evidence that they heard something. Now, I'm a firm believer in the integrity of the investigation moving forward, not releasing information. I have no problem with any of that. But if they took all this stuff down to protect one guy and then they're leaking information about another guy that may be innocent. That's not fair. But then don't have

a friggin' press conference, guys. If you can't release the information or address that in a competent way where you're going to undermine the integrity and the public's confidence in what you're doing, don't have the friggin press conference or do a professional one like we saw with Nathan Hockman where he came in, he announced the charges. They took like three questions. They didn't really answer anything. They stayed well within the lines, the ethical rules. And then it was done. You watched that. And it's like, okay, that's a bunch of pros that know, what they're doing, they're in charge, and I have confidence in where that investigation is going. This is Keystone Cops, and again, I want to give the benefit of the doubt to them, but I watch

these things, and I can't. And you're right, in the land of COVID and iPhones, isn't there some way, and not a hack on anybody who's hearing impaired at all? But if they don't have, if there's a reporter in there that is hearing impaired, it makes perfect sense. But it is disturbing. It is distracting. You're trying to listen. And it's just, it appears to me that this whole thing is amateur hour, and that is disturbing because you have a killer on the loose. Wow, you guys are rough. And they're telling that. They're telling Providence residents to send their little kids to school this week because there's no threat. They don't know that. The mayor keeps saying that there's a killer on the loose. We have no idea whether he has left

Providence or whether the motive is to kill a bunch of young people. Like there's zero chance I'd be sending my children to school in Providence, Rhode Island this week. It just, yet again, it's this like woke mayor who wants to pretend it's all rainbows and unicorns. Meanwhile, two people are dead and nearly 10 others are still fighting for their lives, Arthur. No, I mean, what you just said about sending your kids to school and them saying there's no threat. I mean, I don't know how you could say that, right? You got a killer on the trade who's going into schools and killing people, number one. Number two, I mean, to show you that, forget my objectivity, my dear friend who just retired as the chief of the NYU

PD, John Shell, he was the chief uniformed officer. He called me. He goes, I feel like I want to go up there and help them. He goes, these press conferences are train wrecks. He goes, nobody, there's no consistency. Nobody knows what they're saying and what they're doing. He goes, it's really, really bad. But he was saying it not to be critical, but like to be helpful. So I agree with you. One other term I just, again, from Megan Kelly, I'm learning a lot in this episode. Someone gave me a pin last week that just said, be kind. So I went to this holiday. party and I wore it. And Diana in my office goes, what the hell is that? I go, I don't know. Someone gave to me. She was, that's virtue signaling. I go, what the hell is that? Right on. I go, what the hell does that be? What is virtue signaling? It means like, oh, let me. How do you not know that term? Like your kind answer? That's, it's the same as the liberal law and sign in this house. We believe in kindness, tolerance, none of which they actually believe. None. I got it two doors down. I got the liberal law and side.

And then next to them has a trump bumper sticker. Next to have the bed window is a trump bumper sticker. The other one has your side. And I'm the one who's shoveling both of their sidewalks to keep the piece. Don't put on a pin. Don't put on a pin with any message. It's just a bad idea. Just steer clear.

All right. Look, I got no pins. All right. I got to go. I love you guys, but I got a middle of honor winner here. So goodbye. It's great to see you both. Merry Christmas.

I'll see you. Merry Christmas to you too. All right, guys. You bet. to mktruecrime.com and you can subscribe to the show, their show, however you want. You can watch it on YouTube. You can take it in via podcast. And truly, it's a hit. They take on all the latest cases. And as you heard, like with true trial lawyer's minds will dissect it for you in a way you will not hear anyplace else. Up next, Dakota Meyer. Do you know that he is the first man to receive

the Medal of Honor as a living recipient since 1973. This guy is a walking jewel, and he is here next. Don't miss him. It's that time of year, and the clock is ticking. Want to give a gift they will really love? Luckily, there's still time to get your hands on Firecracker Farm, Hot Salt. That's right, hot salt. You've heard the buzz because it's incredible. This small batch product is genuinely special and made with love. Delicious is an understatement. It has the perfect amount of heat and flavor and elevates everything you put it on. Plus, it comes in these sleek, laser-etched stainless steel push grinders. The presentation alone tells you, someone cares about what they're doing here. They have a ton of different flavors, gift sets, and you'll be very happy to know you are

supporting a small family business that is also now available at Black Rifle Coffee locations. But it's made in small batches, so when it's gone, it's gone. With Christmas right around the corner, they will sell out. To get the widest selection and score a discount, head on over to their website, firecracker. Farm. Do yourself a favor and get your best gift shopping done today. That's firecracker. Farm and use code MK at checkout for 10% off your order. Last night, President Trump escalating pressure on Venezuela, announcing a total blockade of all sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country and declaring President Maduro regime, a foreign terrorist organization. It's the very latest different way President Trump and

his Pentagon have approached the military and foreign policy. My next guest, Dakota Meyer, made headlines earlier this year for re-enlisting in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve returning to service after 15 years out of uniform. Dakota is best known for his heroic actions during the Battle of Gangesh on September 8, 2009 in Afghanistan's Kuna province. a 21-year-old corporal. Meyer repeatedly drove into an ambush under heavy enemy fire to rescue his wounded brothers and recover fallen service members, actions that saved 36 lives, including 13 Americans and 23 Afghan personnel, earning him the Medal of Honor in 2011. He is now preparing to head back to training camp. Dakota, so great to have you back. You want back in.

Yes, well, there's quite a few of us, but I was the first to receive it for the Marines since the Vietnam War. But, yeah, I mean, I went back in. Some of the guys have been serving, but, yeah, I think I'm the, I think I am the only one that's currently serving. I do think that, I don't know. It's awesome, though. It's been so awesome going back in. I mean, I just felt like I have more to give. And, I mean, gosh, it's like, you know, I do think that we need it right now as well.

Wow. But wait, now, how old are you? I knew that was coming. You're still relatively young. No, not compared to these kids. You know, like I'm 37. You know, I'm old enough. Like, these kids love to point out to me.

I was in some training over the summer, and they loved to point out to me that I was old enough. I was older than their mom. So, you know. Wait, so it still sounds very young to me. But so is there an age limit on when you can re-enlist in the reserves? No, you know, like I, what happened was, is I was speaking to these Marines. like I do quite a bit. I go around and I love to talk to leadership to these, you know,

NCOs, which is kind of like our mid-level leaders inside of the military. And I was speaking to this group and this kid stood up to me and he goes, you know, knowing what you know, I'm kind of at this point of re-enlistment. And he said, you know, knowing what you know, like I have a family, you have a family, like, is it still worth serving? And I was like, absolutely. And I could just tell that that that probably didn't come off right. And I felt terrible about it because I'm telling them that it's worth them serving as I'm going to go home and I'm not having to meet any standards. I'm not having my family's not having to sacrifice of what this country's asking. And I felt like it was one of the most unbecoming things that I had said. And so I looked at them and I said,

you know what? You know what? Like I'm so glad this question got asked. I'm going to walk out of here and I'm going to do everything I can to come back in the Marine Corps because it's not right for me to stand out here and tell you, yes, it's worth serving. Yes, it matters and all of this as I'm going home and not having to sacrifice anything that you are and I'm asking your family to. So I don't think it's right and I'm going to make this right. And I'm going to show you how much I believe in serving. And so I did that. It walked away, you know, 18 months later, jumping through all the hoops and all that. Yeah, like I didn't have to get an age waiver or anything like that. You know, I was just able to reenlist and I was able to come back in and continue

my service. And yeah, I mean, and in the results. of it. Okay. Now, you will forgive me for asking you this because we've talked about this before, and I know you're, I know how you are on this. There was a period at which it's fair to say you had let your tight physique as a Marine go. We talked about when you were awarded the Medal of Honor by President Obama, and you were actually drunk in the moment and not your, your peak shape. Actually, we'll just show it because it's quite a moment. This is a video of it. Yeah, back in 2011, hold on Let's watch it. Stand by. Here he is. You're standing there. You cannot tell that you're drunk, but you told me that you were. And you are not at your most fit. But I know from our behind-the-scenes

conversations, you have been getting fit. You've been working out like a fee. So do you feel that you can live up to the Pete Hegseth, no fat people mandate in the modern day military? I mean, absolutely. Look, I have to meet all the standards, you know, going back in, the first thing I, one of the first things I had to do was meet the physical fitness standards. You know, I will say this, while a lot of the other branches possibly have let the standards go, the one thing that the United States Marine Corps does is it holds standards pretty well. I mean, we usually set the standard. The Marine Corps usually sets the standards and holds the standards to a level that none of the other branches do.

And I will say that confidently. And so, yeah, I mean, coming back in, like, I've had to meet all the standards that everybody else did. Just literally two weeks ago, I had to meet the bi-angual fitness, fitness standard, you know, the fitness standard, the combat fitness test. I got height and weight. I got taped. I got all of it. So I'm meeting my good friend Pete Standards.

Nice. Okay, good. I say this, judging from the comfort of my studio where it's been literally a year since I've done anything meaningfully aerobic. So no judgment whatsoever. In fact, I'd like to know what that test is. I could see if I could pass it. Okay, let's keep going.

Well, you'll come to you and we'll run it. Yeah, go, you go. I'll come to you and we'll run it. Well, what do I have to do? Well, what are my goals? Physical fitness test to get 100 at, but my age. It's a three-mile run, 18 minutes is perfect. And then you go into pull-ups, 21 pull-ups, 24.

The younger kids have to do 24, but at my age, I get to do 21, dead hang pull-ups, and then we do a three-minute and 45. second plank, which is the physical fitness test, the combat fitness test. Okay, I can do that. I can do the plank. Okay. Well, that's it. I certainly can't do a pull-up. I can't even do one pull-up and a dead hang pull-up. I mean, in no world. Do the way, I know where this is a controversy, but do the women have to do all that too? You know, I don't, I don't know. Like, you know, this has been another dynamic that I, you know, I don't know. I don't know what the standards are for the female side of it. I've never had to beat them. Um, so I don't

know. And so I, I would. I mean, I think Pete said months ago, we're not changing, we're not having two standards for men and women. Like if you want to be a Marine, you're going to have to do what the men do as the women, which I'm fine with. I mean, there are some women who can do it. There are some real badasses who work on their upper body strength. I just happen to have none. So I'm not on the list. But I'm going to work on that three, three point five miles in 18 minutes. That seems like something I could potentially do. Okay, three miles in 18 minutes. And I can definitely do a plank for three minutes and 45 seconds that I can do. And then the pull-ups, no. Are there sit-up requirements?

Those I could do? No, there used to be. There used to be 100 crunches in under two minutes. How about push-ups? So, no, we don't do push-ups in the Marine Corps. Dang. That's the, this is like, that's the hardest thing is the pull-ups. Okay, we got to keep going.

Let's talk about, let's talk about the controversy involving the seditious six, as the Pentagon has labeled them, and this whole bit about how you shouldn't follow an illegal order. And it's ongoing now. The Pentagon, while it threatened Senator Mark Kelly with a possible inquiry, they said they'd opened one into whether he had committed some sort of breach of protocol in joining in this video and trying it to advise troops to get ready to disobey an order from the commander in chief in case it's illegal. Even though that's technically something that soldiers are already told, where do you stand on it? How did you see that video and how did you see the Pentagon's response? Well, context matters. I think we're not talking about an isolated statement. We're talking about, you know, months of them.

I mean, okay, well, yes, that right there was calculated. It was, it is. Like that statement, there's nothing wrong technically with that statement. But what the intentions are of that statement is exactly what cannot be ignored or denied. I mean, they have gone months of calling legal acts illegal, right? They're not the law. Like, they make the laws, but they don't execute and they don't hold. the laws. I mean, that's why we have a system that does it, right? And just because you don't

like it doesn't mean that it's illegal. And just because you don't agree with it, it doesn't mean that it's illegal, right? And so I think that whenever you put this into context and take it out of just an isolated event, you have to add up everything else that comes with that. And so I think that, look, I mean, what they're doing is, is they're trying to undermine the institution. They're putting a responsibility all the way down. I mean, and if they truly believed that it was illegal, they would go through the legal routes and they wouldn't be making this a spectacle out on the news, right? Like the intentions are very clear. And so I think that their intentions are what we have got to take into consideration in this. And I think they have to be held accountable

because let me say this. I would expect them to be held accountable. I mean, they're not even being held accountable. What happens whenever a court system is ruling what we are doing as far as the National Guard or all of this, that it is legal. And they have called it illegal, you know, who do you blame whenever one of somebody stands up because they believe these trusted leaders are supposed to be trusted leaders. Yeah, who have sown doubt unjustifiably. Who becomes the problem? Is it the person that says it or the person that believed the person who was in the position, right? Like who becomes who is out accountable? And so I think it's a huge issue. Yeah, and it's not resolved yet. I started the segment by mentioning what's happening in

Venezuela. Now Trump trying to stop these oil tankers from going to and from Venezuela. He's been hitting the drugboats to and from Venezuela. There have been many, many speculations about whether this is all really about regime change because technically Maduro lost an election, but he's just refusing to go. A lot of the more isolationist right, they don't want to see us getting involved in Venezuela. They do not want to exchange war in the Middle East for war south of the border with Venezuela. Trump denies it's about regime change, though he doesn't deny it that forcefully. And Susie Wiles seems to have suggested that's what this is about in her interview with Vanity Fair. So how do you see the issue of what we're doing in Venezuela?

Look, I think we're trying to make these things too complicated. My question to you is this, is do you, and this is really what I care about, do you think any of those, like, are we going to argue back and forth, do you think the boats that we are hitting and we are taking lethal action on, do we think that they have drugs on them? Yeah, I do. Then what does it matter? I mean, at any point, like, at what point are we going to, why do we, like, look, as long as we are doing, as long as we are protecting America, that is all that should matter. If those boats, if we believe that those boats have drugs on them and those drugs are coming to the United States of America, we should kill every one of them.

It's that simple. I think we're trying to complex this, and I think that we are just getting into this. A, we haven't gone into Venezuela. We haven't done anything. We're sitting here. We're making statements. We're drawing lines and we're putting America first. And so we're putting America's interests first.

Like, what is wrong with that? And I don't understand why we're arguing about this. And what I am so sick and tired of, because look, I have a medal of honor because of this. I have a medal of honor because of specific statements, like the insinuations and the fear that someone like Mark Kelly is doing in the Democrats. And no, you know what, take the Democrats out of it. Just leaders. I have a medal of honor for these simple facts. And this is why I'm so,

so pissed off about it is because they put in, they send us over there. They're like, we don't make the decisions on who we're going to go fight and who we don't. But then they send us over there and they put in their, you know, idealistic rules of engagement. And then they put the fear of taking action into it. And they put all of these like seeds of doubt into the people who are having to live and die from the consequences of their decisions. and their actions or their lack of, all for their political gain. And it's not the part of us dying and going and fighting for America is not what we get pissed about. It's the sheer fact that they send us over there and then they try to make us question our decisions.

And then at any point that some of these policies and rules of engagement, like in my case, they want to protect the place and the other people more than they want to protect the troops that they sent over there to do the fighting. when you go back to this Venezuela thing, I think like everybody's trying to fill in a bunch of hypotheticals and let's sit back. Look, at the end of the day, like, do we all know somebody who is taking drugs and who has lost their life and whose family members are losing people and all this aspect? I mean, let's talk about it. I mean, like, I think that no matter what, if you are here to harm America, if you are here to hurt Americans, we should never put anything above that and you are an enemy, period.

Yeah. That's how Trump sees it. Trump sees it. Yep. His critics say, well, I mean, his critics say a lot. They say there's no war declared. They say they can't give the death penalty for drug running. It's not a capital offense.

But they, there's, I don't think there's any circumstance under which they would back these strikes. And Trump's DOJ has told him, and not just DOJ, but the lawyers in the military, the JAG Corps have told him he's totally within his rights as the commander in chief to do this, especially because he's now declared them a foreign terrorist organization. All right. Stand by. I've got to take a quick.

break, and then we're going to come back for a few more minutes. Grand Canyon University, an affordable, private Christian University based in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona, is one of the largest universities in the country. Praised for its culture of community and impact, GCU integrates the free market system, a welcoming Christian worldview, and free and open discourse into more than 360 academic programs, including more than 300 online.

Join a nationwide community of learners, redefining what online education looks like through academically rigorous and industry-driven programs that can spark bold ideas and prepare you for a future that matters. In addition to federal grants and aid, GCU's online students received nearly $161 million in institutional scholarships in 2024. Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University, private, Christian, affordable. Visit gCU.edu slash my offer to see the scholarships you may qualify for. Hey, everyone. It's me, Megan Kelly. I've got some exciting news. I now have my very own channel on Sirius XM. It's called the Megan Kelly channel, and it is where you will hear the truth,

unfiltered, with no agenda, and no apologies. Along with the Megan Kelly show, you're going to hear from people like Mark Halperin, Link Lauren, Callahan, Emily Dyshinsky, Jesse Kelly, Real Clear Politics, and many more. It's bold, no BS news only on the Megan Kelly channel, SiriusXM 111 and on the Sirius XM app. Back now with Dakota Meyer. Find his work on Substack at the Bluff. That's the BLUF.

Dakota, there was a terrible attack over in Syria on our National Guards troops, and then there was an attack back at home on our National Guards troops. by this person who took them out. And so things do seem to be getting more dangerous. You know, we had an ISIS attack on Jews in Australia. We had this ISIS attack in Syria on our troops. It seems like Middle Eastern inspired terror is making a comeback right now. And it does seem like, you know, our troops domestically, like those National Guard troops who were killed by, allegedly by that guy who drove cross-country to kill them, who may or may not have been radicalized, again, possibly inspired by ISIS terror, certainly seemed that way, has got people

feeling a little on edge. How do you view this apparent resurgence of an old enemy? Yeah, I mean, look, I think that at any point in time you identify with something, whether it's religious, whether it's left or right, I mean, it doesn't matter. I think you're going to have to stand and you're going to have to defend it. I think today that violence is, going through the roof because I mean I think it's just it's more of it's it's more of what we are our life is going to be like right I mean this is just it's not going away you can you can bank on that I think what we've seen in Australia is something that we have a bunch of sleeper cells here you know we've got director gabard who just came out and her team like literally confirming that

there's at least 2,000 that have ties back to extremists and this is not something that's unique but what it is unique is that again we've had four four years of not America first, of us not being able to stand for what's right, of us not protecting and putting the United States of America first. And that, that's something that cannot be tolerated. And so I just think that, look, the reality of what life is like going to be like daily is going to be that, look, we have enemies. You know, I just, I heard a conversation going on before I came on about, you know, don't want to send our kids to school until the threat's gone. Well, the reality is there's a threat there every single day. Like, the reality is if you're

living in a bubble that there's not a threat every day, you're naive and you're just hoping and living on a false insurance policy. It's there, it's there. But that's, that's, we're not going to cower to terrorism. We're not going to cower to any of that. What we need to do is we just need to be prepared. We need to be ready. We just need to understand that this is going to be part of our life until we start putting this country first and still we, until we start only allowing people here that are, that want to be America, that love America, right? I mean, when we're allowing people to live in this country that hate this country well what do you expect what do you expect right i mean like like this is not it doesn't take uh it's there it's it's not a it's not mental jiu jitsu right i mean this

is pretty simple like when you allow allow you know uh rhetoric to be spoken about about hating america when we have leaders elected leaders that hate america when we're voting for people that hate america and then we're like accepting you know all of this like look the silence majority is going to have to stop being silent because the loud minority is overcoming and they are setting the standards for what this country looks like. So, I mean, we can get in the details of, yeah, I mean, I think all of this is horrible. I think it's terrible. I don't know that we need to draw it back and forth to, you know, one demographic over the other, right? I mean, I just, I think that it just comes down to people. Well, it's very interesting. That's an interesting

security analysis because I will say, you know, the guards, They'll tell you, security guards, of course, I've had plenty, will tell you that the, if the guy standing next to you with a gun is the one who actually has to stop someone from trying to kill you, there's been a massive system failure that, like, your security team should be looking at threats, threat profile, how do you keep the person safe? It's almost like, look at President Trump, you know, it's like a would-be assassin should not be able to get anywhere near him. and threats online should be thoroughly investigated. The president shouldn't be offered up to any venue that hasn't been secured. You know, it's like if the Secret Service with the guns are actually taking out a potential shooter, something's gone catastrophically wrong. And it's almost the same with our foreign policy.

You know, if we're getting ISIS lovers shooting our National Guardsmen here domestically, there's been a system failure long before they actually got in the presence of the National Guardsman. I think that's what you're saying, and I totally agree with that. It made me wonder, because when I saw what was happening in Providence, for example, you're right, every day there's risk. There's more risk now with an active shooter on the loose. And the problem I have in Providence is it's not Texas. You know, no one there is going to have a gun at those schools to protect children this week.

You know, like there's not going to be a good guy with a gun. And I wonder, you know, I thought to myself, how about all these ex-military guys who would love to use some of their skills to protect defenseless American children? you know, by standing outside of a school, armed and ready for bad guys. Like, is there any sort of a program where that could happen? Have you ever spoken with military guys about their willingness? You know, it seems like we have such a wealth of talent from guys who no longer on active duty that we don't tap into.

Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I mean, my kids have a, a, my kids have a, you know, look, a person at their school. You live in the South. Well, I mean, I do, but I also don't think that he's going to stop a shooter, right? I also don't trust the training and the mindset and the mentality. I mean, I don't. And so I don't know that that's going to be the solution. I think that the solution is going to be is that, you know, if we don't feel that the baseline protection of our children,

if we don't feel secure and we can't sit here and defend ourselves and take care. If we have to dial 911 in order to have somebody come protect. protect us. We probably shouldn't live in that state. You know what I mean? There's a personal responsibility to this, right, of why are we outsourcing, and I get part of it, but we should, part of this comes down to. We have outsourced all of our responsibilities and we are outsourcing, you know, hey, we're going to try to get it. We know this, but I mean, okay, if you start putting armed people to where, you know, the schools aren't soft targets, well, guess what? They're going to catch them at a football game. I mean, they're always looking for soft targets.

right and that's why you look at i mean these these hardened criminals or whatever you call them i call them you know hardened cowardly criminals um you know they go and they pray on people and they crime is so high in places where it makes it the laws allow them to go and to operate freely because they don't want to stand up against people or places that will not tolerate it and so you know while you're not going to stop a shooting here what you will happen is is that uh i am like 10 minutes from my daughter's school and I have a gun in my vehicle and like I would go help right like you're not going to get away with hurting people here and you're going to have people who are going to stand up for it and you have to worry about that all around the state of Texas and so you know I think

that we have a personal responsibility of where we're raising our families and where we're at and if the laws are allowing us at a minimum laws are made I mean I mean you get this better than anybody laws are there to do what to protect people And at the point that laws are there are being put in place or people are being elected leaders are keeping us from the ability to protect ourselves or our families, well, we have a responsibility to move to live in places where we can do that. That's true. I mean, you think about what happened in Australia, the strictest gun control laws anywhere.

And what did we see? I mean, we honestly, what we saw was four female cops cowering next to their cars and no good guys with guns because they didn't have any. And they were just sitting ducks getting shot by the bad guys who did have the guns who had been on the watch list, but then removed, like investigated his potential terror threats, at least the one, the son. And then they said, no, he's not. He's good. And then he went off for a month to the Philippines, an area of it that is known for terror training, for a month with the dad, didn't set off any alarm bells, even though the guy had already been, like, hmm, he's on our radar.

And they knew the father had six guns. Those people get six guns and drive to the beach with three ISIS flags on their car. And it takes 10 minutes for a good guy, a cop with a gun and someone willing to actually use it, unlike the cowering female police officer to save people. It's so frustrating. But to your point about, like, choose where you live and be mindful of, like, what you're getting. I think people in Australia think that they're immune to gun violence now after all these years. they've had attacks, but it's been a long time because of their laws. And sadly, it was a

reminder that no one's immune. Well, that's what they've been told, right? I mean, this is what they've been preached to is like, hey, where we take away guns and gun laws are strict, it's going to be safer. I mean, that's what they've been told. And I mean, it's, you know, and the problem with this, Megan, like the real problem of why we have to stand up and we have to start calling things where it is, is that eventually there's going to be a generation that knows no different than violence and by this being the norm. They're not going to know a time where there was safe streets, where there was, you know, where there were, where there were people who could stand up and say something or people who could take action. So now they just watch

people take inaction. And we've accepted an action, right? Like, like, it is safer and better for you to do nothing and let other people suffer than it is for you to go do this. And I blame lawyers. I blame, I blame lawyers. This is the problem with, like, the law has been weaponized in order for people to profit. And now it's put people in a position to where they have to decide if do I do what's morally right or what's legally right and most of the time a lot of times those don't coexist and and you know I think the sickest part to me watching Australia was was watching the video like I want you to watch that video and like like my gut wrenched of people filming it those you know those shooters like did you see them even having to run around like they weren't

scared they weren't fear that anybody was no stop them they were like one guy behind they had the run of the place is on right and you just stand up shooting people people freely and nobody is willing to go take this guy on right like i mean well two people tried two people try you see okay you got three out of how many out of how many look at all the people filming i want you to watch these people and i just like i look at it and i go what would you want somebody to do if there if your kids were out there if your kids were there what would you want people to do and i think that's how we should all handle ourselves And I just, like, I think it's just, it's sad.

It's so sad that, that, you know, you had three people taking action. You had three people. Two of them lost their lives. One of them actually, you know, took the gun from a guy. But, I mean, like, those terrorists, they knew that, I mean, they were just walking around freely, shooting people in daylight, in daylight. It does make you think, like, would they have done that in Houston, Texas? No. No.

No, they wouldn't. They would. They know. they would know exactly what they'd get down there. And that's a good thing. That's a good thing for the citizens of Houston. All right, I want to end it on this because I thought this is an interesting post you made.

You, on your substack, were making the point to young men that your feed is creating the man you are becoming. This is very important. Your social media and the consumption that comes through passively to you every day does change who you are. I mean, it actually, it's really important to step away from that and also to curate that.

It's almost why, like, I try to go over to Instagram as often as possible because over there, almost everything I follow is like a positive thing, you know, like something about how you can be more healthy, like a maha type stuff. You know, like, it's stuff like, oh, these are supplements you might want to consider, or here's a workout you could do. Or just like, now I'm very into, here are the best eight gifts you can get your son for Christmas or your daughter, you know, like, that's positive. Twitter is a sewer fight. And too much time on Twitter can make you comfortable with sewer fights and a sewer fighter, which, okay, can be

useful skill, but it's also not really where you want to spend your time or who you want to be. Seems to me this is in part the point you were making. Can you expand on it? Yeah, I mean, look, you know, we all grew up with the understanding the term of you are what you eat, right? I mean, you are what you eat. And that was like a simple phrase that that was my nutrition. talk whenever I was back in public school. And now it's like, you know, you are what you consume. Mentally, emotionally, you are what you consume and, right? And like, you know, what you're bringing in and the conversations, you know,

and it comes down to people, places, and things. And that's what I was trying to point out in my, you know, my YouTube video. Because look, I have came out here lately. And I do believe this with every moral fiber of my being and I'll defend it till the day I die. I believe every problem we have in the world right now is caused by weak men, period, hard stop, and I can draw it back to that. And so, look, I don't know that you're going to change adult men, but I think what we can do

is we can influence the next generation of men. And we're going to have to. We're going to need them to step up and to be strong and to be kind and to be leaders. You know, we've got this war on masculinity. And I do understand toxic masculinity, but masculinity, it's very important to the survival of any, of any like aspect of society and so a society that makes that makes men is going to eventually fail but men who strong men good men who make a society is going to prevail and so we're going to have to get it back and so yeah I was talking about this that it starts with your mindset I mean

everything that you do comes down to mindset what you believe is what you will achieve and you can never achieve more than you believe and so I think that like you have to believe that there's potential on it. And that is the American spirit, Megan, like, it's the American spirit of people believing that they can perform the impossible against all odds. There is no logic to the American spirit, right? I mean, you take, you go back, we're about to be 250 years. 70 people stood up in, and I think it was like 1.5 million at the time, possibly in 13 colonies, maybe I'm off on that number, but 70 people who had no training, nothing else, but they just believed that they were going to stand up for what was right and they were not going to live under uh you know this again and they went

up against the most uh you know the most powerful military on the planet and just because they believe they could do it they did it so back to my point is is like understanding like your mindset and shaping your mind and chipping away at your mind is conversations it is the negativity it is what you're consuming on content it's video games it's all of this all of that is driving you to setting you up to what the rest of you and how you believe and how you handle yourself and what you think is right and what's not, it's all, it is all doing that. And so, and you've seen it and it's not arguable and especially when our kids are moldable and they're all looking for something to be part of because that is what I've seen with this generation. They want to be

part of something bigger than themselves. And we've just got to, we can't just walk around and point out what's wrong because that's what we're all doing right now. Like, oh, this is wrong. This sucks. This sucks. Okay, well, tell me something better. We're going to have to out market it with something better, not just walk around and point out what's wrong because, well, I mean, we're seeing where that's getting us. And that's what I was trying to get through on the video was what you consume, like, is what you're going to eventually become. And, you know, the person you pointed out at the beginning of the show of who I was,

I mean, I was a victim, right? I mean, I was hanging around people who were just complaining about service and about how bad life was and, you know, trying to make my struggles unique to me. And guess what? It got me. It got me depression, anxiety. It got me. I mean, it literally got me the most out of shape that I've ever been.

And eventually I looked in the mirror and I couldn't even read. recognized a human being that was standing there. And so, you know, and it wasn't the world's fault. It wasn't my parents' fault. It was my fault. And I need to take responsibility for that so that I could change it. As you talk about it, Dakota, I think to myself, I mean, I have two sons and a daughter. How do you raise a leader? How do you raise someone with courage, Dakota Meyer style? You first have to be a leader. You know, I looked in the mirror and the way I call it the mirror check. Every morning I look at it and I go, would I be proud if my daughter selected me as their husband?

Is that what I expect for them? Because before I can tell them what they should go do, I have to be able to show them. And I have to be it. And so I have to set the standard by living the standard. You know, the biggest problem in every aspect of our world right now is hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is killing us. We hold others to a standard. we don't hold ourselves to we expect from others we don't expect from ourselves we try to expect other

people to be something that we couldn't even be and it's absolutely insane and it's absurd and so for me how i raised my daughters uh we have this little i call it the box you know my daughters came in one day and they you know look they're having to make decisions this idea of like hey let's let's keep them young long like you don't get to decide how long they get to be young you don't get to decide what the world's going to throw at them you don't get to decide what the world's going to throw at them you don't get to decide that and to think that you're going to be able to do that is is is nothing short of insane right now and it's going to end up you're going to end up with a problem like we just seen over this last week uh the results of bad parenting and so you know when you look at this i give my daughters

the tools to take on what the world's going to throw at them so for me we have the mire box and so the mire box it's got four sides uh and it's got one destination right and so the box is is I expect my daughters to be kind, to be respectful, to be strong, and to be leaders. And every decision and action that they take must fit in that box. That is the expectation of a mire. And that is what we are, that is the front and right, front sight and the back site of their decisions and actions. And we are aiming at changing the world and making it a better place.

And there is nothing, it is not conditional upon how people treat us or the situations or the circumstances that we are in, we must always conduct ourselves amongst that. And so when my daughters come in, they're like, hey, so-and-so, you know, said this to me and it bothered me. So I pushed her on the playground. It's like, well, is that strong? Like, is that strong you're pushing a girl that's smaller than you? Nope. Is that being a leader? What if everybody did that? Nope. Is that kind? Nope. Is that respectful? No. So it doesn't fit in the box. So now, what decision can you make in that situation that will fit in that box? Well, I can tell her that this is how it made me feel and that if she does this again, I'm not going to be

around her and I'm not going to be her friend and I'm not exactly. So do that. Do that and be the bigger person and also, but, you know, head it straight on. Don't avoid conflict. I want my daughters, like there is no acceptance of avoiding conflict. They need to be very good and very tactical at conflict to where that they're going to win at it. Yeah, you can't, you can't be in the safe space, so-called safe space all your life and then expect to develop coping skills. or leadership skills. Did your parents do that with you? Because something had happened with you

that made you do what you did, you know, and just keep going back, helping people great risk to your personal safety. You just didn't care. So it seems to me you might have either had a death wish or there was something else in there that made you you. Yeah, I'm so fortunate.

I grew up around hard men and foundational, my grandmother was, I mean, she, I mean, I grew up around. incredible people, you know. And back then, like, I'm not saying it's easier to parent back than it is today, but back then you could control more of what influences your kids, right? Like, you could control more of it. You had more of a take on it. You could decide what was actually coming in and they were consuming than you can today, right? Today you are always fighting for, you're always fighting for that influence on your children. And so, you know, my dad and my

grandfather and my uncles and my cousins and my you know my aunts my grandmother they were principal people and i'll tell you something the the one thing my my uncle you know and my dad and and they all mentioned was you know you know and they well they made clear i don't i don't know how they definitely it wasn't like a certain talk but it was you understand like there's been a lot of people that's tried to keep that name and that have honored that name before you and and you're representing that and it's about keeping that going forward and like they never my dad never was a willing to accept societal norms he didn't care what anybody else thought my dad and then we're always striving to do what needed to be done and what was right and that was never conditional upon

the opinions of what everybody else thought and what everybody else was doing wow when it explains a lot i'm thrilled you're getting back into the game dakota there are so many other things you be doing. You could be making a bunch of money. You could be taking it easy. You could be getting soft. That's what happens to most of us after like the peak of our career. And you're getting back into it and serving again. We are so, so lucky to have you. Thank you. Thank you for the service you've already given and are about to give as well. Great to see you. Yes, ma'am. All right, don't forget, check out Dakota's work on Substack at the Bluff. That's the B-L-U-F. What a man. Thank you guys for watching. And we'll be back.

tomorrow. Thanks for listening to The Megan Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.