The Megyn Kelly Show - Rahm Emanuel on How the Dems Lost Their Way and Trump's Immigration Successes, Plus, Mark Halperin, Link Lauren and Dan Turrentine | Ep. 1112

Episode Date: July 21, 2025

Megyn Kelly is joined by Rahm Emanuel, former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, to discuss why he came on the show, speculation about 2028 political prospects, the famous story that got him the "dead fish" nickname, how Democrats alienated voters with language policing and a focus on pronouns, why authenticity and strength are key to winning a presidential election, the truth about the issue of men in women's sports, how American cities became full of crime and homelessness, why America must reinvest in its own workers, how strengthening education can help rebuild struggling cities, the border crisis and Trump's immigration success, to Hunter Biden’s vulgar podcast comments about him, why Biden’s political decline was inevitable, how the Dems could have won in 2024, what it will take to win in 2028, and more. Then Mark Halperin, Link Lauren and Dan Turrentine, hosts and commentators, join to discuss whether Rahm Emanuel has what it takes to win in 2028, how he handled tough questions on gender and immigration, whether a non-woke Democrat can break through with the party’s progressive base, Tulsi Gabbard’s explosive claims about Russiagate and the Obama administration, whether this is really new information and if there will be indictments, whether Trump’s base will keep pushing for Epstein transparency, why Trump seems disengaged from the conversation online,Subscribe to Mark's show Next Up: https://nextuphalperin.com/Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/next-up-with-mark-halperin/id1810218232Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2f0n8G4xqUo8aGxbbbtRjHYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nextuphalperin Subscribe to Link's show Spot On:https://spotonwithlink.com/YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@spotonwithlinkApple:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spot-on-with-link-lauren/id1812663737Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/2RPHR4jKTJqkruxJjn6kzn?si=954974315d3848bf Turrentine- https://x.com/danturrentineEmanuel- https://x.com/rahmemanuel Kars4Kids: Call 1-877-kars4kids or visit https://kars4kids.org/MK DailyLook: https://dailylook.com to take your style quiz and use code MEGYN for 50% off your first order. Firecracker Farm: Visit https://firecracker.FARM & enter code MK at checkout for a special discount! Tax Network USA: Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit https://TNUSA.com/MEGYN to speak with a strategist for FREE today Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on SiriusXM Channel 111 every weekday at noon East. Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show coming to you live today from the SiriusXM headquarters in New York City. We are only six months into President Trump's historic second term, but that has not stopped speculation about who's going to run for president in 2028. I gave a speech as you guys know, last week out in Vail and everyone there wanted to know who's the likely next Republican and who's the likely next Dem. I don't have a crystal ball, but I keep seeing the same names you guys are seeing. And over on Team Blue, one name keeps coming up

is Rahm Emanuel, okay? He's the former Chicago mayor. He was Obama's one-time White House chief of staff. He certainly has a top-shelf political resume and is deeply connected to the Democrats' massive fundraising operation. And unlike some of the loons over on the other side, he's a centrist.

He's an actual centrist. We've talked about his potential candidacy many times here on the Megyn Kelly show. Is he too centrist for his party? He's made a lot of enemies inside the Democratic Party over the years, and we'll ask him about how that might affect his potential chances. A lot of you may have some kind of extra car

just sitting around. Maybe it's an older model, you don't drive anymore. Maybe it's that second vehicle collecting dust in the driveway, or maybe yes, it's the one that hasn't moved in months and you're not even sure it still runs. Whatever it is, if you are not using it, you could be donating it.

And here's a better idea than letting it rot. Donate it to cars for kids. That's cars with a K. They've been doing this for over 30 years, taking a million vehicle donations by this point. That's amazing. And they make the process super easy for you. You're gonna wonder why you didn't do it sooner.

Free towing, fast pickup, no hassle. And you get a tax deductible receipt. You donate your car, running or not, and Cars for Kids will turn it into funding for children's programs across the country. And let's not forget the jingle, 1877 Cars for Kids. I don't totally remember the exact 1877 Cars for Kids. I would sing it, but I don't remember the tune. But yes, I remember the commercials. And this is one of them. Go to carsforkids.org.mk. That's Cars with a K, carsforkids.org.mk. It's fast, it's smart, and it helps kids.

Carsforkids.org.mk. Donate your car today. Joining me now to discuss his life and career and future potential political career is Rahm Emanuel. Rahm, welcome. Thank you. Great to have you. Thanks for having me.

So what are you doing here on the Megyn Kelly Show? I got a free hour. I thought I'd just come by, swing swing by yeah, I thought there was lunch I thought we were gonna there will be we're gonna have brunch or so will be we'll have ice cream We'll have bonbons to talk about the issues talk about things But you you know a lot of Democrats won't come on this show because they don't want to talk to somebody like me So what why would you? Well, I mean you kind of started it because you've brought me up before, and I thought, well, if you're gonna bring me up

a couple times, I'll come on the show, since my favorite subject is me, I thought I'd do that. No, but to talk about things, and you say from Team Blue, which is fair, I get that, but I think you would agree, and I think your listeners would, there's Team USA before there's Team Blue and Team Red. I know, we see everything through the political lens. Yeah. Just because that's what we do every day.

So that's why, and I, you know, people have opinions. I'm gonna talk about what I think, and also, you know, kinda just rip the mask off. All right, let's start with this, because you know, I came of age as a reporter at Fox News, and my show. There's a 10-step program for that. I'm not looking to recover, though. There were some years where I was.

And my friend Sean Hannity used to refer to you every night as Rom Deadfish Emmanuel. And there is a story behind that. What happened? Okay. So you got to, I don't know how much time, but I'll cycle it fast. 1988 chair, I'm political director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign, political. And it's presidential year. George, what? Kemp seat, upstate New York.

We have this- Those are my people. Yeah, Dave Schwartz, candidate clerk of the county. And he said that if he gets within a single digit, he's gonna take a second mortgage. We go from 36 down, 24 down, blah, blah, blah, blah.

And then all of a sudden a poll comes back and it was five polls in a row, he's just four or five points, six points, narrowing it, and it blows up 18. And so he says forget about it, it's like nine days out. Wait, wait, refresh me, who's winning and who's losing? The Republicans winning? The Republicans winning, but the Democrats closing in

consistently over two months. Okay, he's closing in the gap. And then goes, blows back out 18 points. And the campaign manager figures out that the pollster had pulled the wrong group. And obviously we weren't going to win a lot of races, but to symbolically win in 1988, Jack Kemp's seat would have bigger than a single district. They would have big national import.

And it was too late then with seven days to go to really impact. Dave Swartz goes on to lose by a few points in a presidential year. So myself and a number of people sent the Democratic pollster, a dead fish for costing us a seat, and I happened to sign it out. It was great working with you, et cetera. So the pollster comes back after two weeks. The dead fish was in a box. Oh God.

And opens it up, stinking, da da da, sends me this long, eight-page, single-spaced letter of how horrible it was working for me. And then this moment in time becomes a page single spaced letter of how horrible it was working for me. And then this moment in time becomes kind of mythological of that. So that's where. Did you like it?

Did you like the reputation or you don't like it? It's, you know, like all things. Not you just because you work at Fox doesn't capture who you are. It doesn't capture who I am. When it comes to my kids, I'm quick to a tear. You wouldn't know that. When it comes to other people's kids,

I'm also quick to a tear. I get very emotional. My kids always say, you're not allowed to talk about us, grandpa or dad. And on the other hand, I did it. So I own it and I did do it because he cost us a seat because he made a mistake. And I'm unmerciful in that sense when it came to winning.

Well, this is probably why I was saying- And that may be also, not to interrupt you. No, go ahead. This is your show after a while. Is I'm a middle child, and I always joke the middle children wrote a book, War or Peace. We could do either one. But I think this is actually to your advantage

in capturing this nomination, because I think the country likes a strong man even though we were kind of pretending we didn't for a while and I think Democrats are in need of a strong man. I mean I think too many in the party have gone along with the like no we have to be you know everyone's toxically masculine and we have to over correct the other way. I don't know the words to kumbaaya. So here's my thing is, one is when I'm having work for both President Clinton and President Obama.

And if you look at, and also an avid reader of presidential history, history and in general, there are three qualities of president and a presidential candidate have to project, strength, confidence and optimism. Nobody, if you look at history, Kennedy versus Nixon just go through it. We never nominate the weaker or the more indecisive or the less optimistic, just full blown.

Second, and then that's on a comparative basis, and second, winning is important. And I do think there's a currency in our party and this is my theory of the case at least where both candor authenticity and strength have a currency and have a blame I might I kind of say that and then there was an article the other day and it's I forgot what paper was either the Washington Post or Politico that said Democrats were were studying authenticity. Well, you can't study authenticity either. That's such a kind of like, what's wrong? You can't manufacture your authenticity.

You either are who you are or you're not, and I'm comfortable with who I am. They're studying too how to speak to young men. Yeah, yeah. Do you know why they're doing that? Well, one is there's a simple, they've lost it with young men for a whole host of reasons. And the other thing is because for you date your time there,

I said basically COVID forward, maybe even a little before that, our party had everybody including ourselves walking on egg shells. Like it was so PC, you couldn't even, you got forbid you had to thought privately to yourself and you were scared and and jumped and literally you had this kind of flinch all the time and that's ridiculous and people did not and not Just young men. It was also if you look at the data even young women were tired of basically just a PC type Thinking and talking about stuff and also this idea that you had a walk on egg shells. But the truth is

Republicans have the same kind of thing where people jump on them all the time, et cetera, inside their own party. It's not, they're not PC though, it's for different issues. I mean, if you criticize President Trump within the Republican party, depending on who you're talking to, you get blowback. Though I think the Republicans are more fractured

and always have been than Democrats. It's always a- I feel like Democrats stick together. You know, we both admire the other parties since the loyalty. So you feel like Democrats are more fractured internally in general as a group than Republicans are? Well, it's kind of Mark Twain's original.

I'm a part of no organized party, I'm a Democrat. Look, I think Democrats, as you can see recently, have a little bit of a firing squad in the circle. Take a look recently, people, you can say whatever you want, and I have my disagreements, a lot of them, countless with President Trump, but he has brought us a level of discipline and loyalty.

Take a look at this. On the big, beautiful bill, which I have my own criticisms of, people have voted for something they criticize, and now as soon as they've done it, they're trying to ear brush the record take a look at Senator Hawley he's now introduced trying to eliminate all the Medicaid cuts that he just voted for that was so has the president brought loyalty there's an example a of

what kind of loyalty he's brought do you feel like the Dems have changed on the PC the over-the-top PC language police I mean is that trickle down I know you care deeply about education that's trickled down. I know you care deeply about education. That's trickled down into my kids' single digit education all the way up through high school. Well, some elements, yes, and some elements, like this is what does when you get to education. I mean, to me, you know, at another point in my life, early, before I decided to go into public service or politics, I was going to be an early childhood educator. That's what interested me. My dad was a pediatrician, it was something that drew me. And there is this kind of, you know,

the fundamentals of education we have missed. We now have the worst reading scores in 30 years or with math scores, and we're focused on everything but the most important thing, which is why you have three children, I have three children, why parents send kids to school to support the type of education we also try to do at home. And we've gotten focused, as I said,

things like bathroom access rather than the classroom excellence. We've gotten focused, and I'm sensitive, to one person's pronoun versus the other 35 kids in the class that don't know what a pronoun is. And I'm sorry, 35 kids not knowing what a pronoun is, having your worst reading scores and math scores in 30 years, we have a crisis on hand. Going back to Ronald Reagan's time where Bloom wrote the report, A Nation at Crisis,

we're back to where we started and we better focus on the priority. This is tomorrow. These are our kids. And I do think, not just Democrats, but everybody, from the naming of a school to bathroom access to who's playing what sports. And the fundamental, we've lost sight of the, you know, the forest for the trees. And I think that's really, and we're supposed to be the adults and take care of our kids and nurture them. I don't disagree. We need to work on the basic reading and math scores.

But I feel like the Democrats are the ones who introduce things like pronouns and the bathroom access. And those of us on what I call the side of sanity stood up to say, no, you're not putting your six foot tall boy in my daughter's eighth grade soccer class or gym class. And that doesn't make me the one trying to ignore what's important about math and reading. It's a Democrat created problem. Well, let me back you up a little. Not wrong about those examples.

And we have a, and I want to say one thing here and do a shout out for Mississippi. It's called the Mississippi miracle. Ten years ago they started this very tough demographics. They're reading excellence, unbelievable, Alabama on math, and I would nationalize that. I would say we're taking this at large because they've shown with some of the toughest constituencies, poor kids, children from single parent homes, black kids, to make major gains in both math and reading. That's A. B, yes, Democrats played a role, but there's also politicization, culture

wars by Republicans on what topics we're allowed to talk about, how we're allowed to talk about them. Do I think Democrats led that in kind of this whole pronoun debate? No doubt. And that's why they basically, and it's gotten us sidetracked, and we're stuck in a cold, not only a party, but more importantly, a country. And it's why, to be honest, I have my own view on what I would do on education. I call it TART if I could. T for technology, and we should get kids ready with AI capabilities. A for attendance. We have a massive post-COVID attendance problem. It's triple digits from where it was, and I would have a national, more than 7%, you

repeat the clock. And absenteeism in a lot of the big cities is up to 30% right now. You have kids graduating high school with a 20% absentee rate. That means they're not graduating. They don't have the skills to go on to college and it's gonna be remedial education we're pretending right are for reading and using the Mississippi example to blow it up nationally take it to every state and T for truth parents should know where their kids are every grade level on national standards and where their kids schools are Meeting those national levels for every

grade. To me, if you do that type of thing, we can start to focus again on the most important thing, why I as a parent of three, why you as a parent of three, why a parent of two, one, whatever, send those kids to school. That's why parents move, like I said, as the mayor of the city of Chicago. You know how I knew a neighborhood was doing well? On the real estate form, they would say they're here in this school district. That meant as a mayor of the city of Chicago. You know how I knew a neighborhood was doing well? On the real estate form, they would say, they're here in this school district. That meant that school district

became a magnet for that area. And to me, that's the most important thing because we live in a time where you earn what you learn. And we need to ensure that every child has a chance to live up to their potential. And it starts at school, but I would also, I used to, I fundamentally believe this night,

there are three doors a child walks through that will explain their future. The front door of the home, the front door of the school, and the front door of the place of worship. And if those three doors are aligned, I don't care your zip code, I don't care your family background, I don't care your family background, I don't care your income.

That child's got a future. You know, I love hearing that and I think we need to get back to that kind of a focus. I have my doubts because my own experience has been with a rising, as I say, about to go into sixth grade, ninth grade, and tenth graders, is there's just been so much ideological nonsense shoved down their throats. And we came out of New York City privates. That's where we were up until we fled in 2021 to get away from that and moved to Connecticut.

But it was so over the top, Ram. I mean, you want them to focus on reading. Now, obviously, New York City private schools are elite schools. They don't have to worry about reading scores and math generally there. But my point is, in these schools, my boys' school, they took three weeks to devote to transgenderism.

Three weeks at an all boys' school, trying to get these boys to spend time on whether you're sure you're a boy, might you not be totally sure, raise your fist, five if you're totally sure, four if you're only a little, I mean, it was crazy, showing them videos of men and boys and skirts and dresses and makeup.

Crazy indoctrination. And it's not just New York City. You know, so it's like, to me, it's so much more than a culture war. You're messing with a child's mental health. It's abusive. There is, look, again, I'm gonna get back the three doors. Your kids are gonna be okay. They come from a loving, I don't know you they come from a loving home and they have the sport they

Basically school backs up the education of child which is my one if I can't take a side note. I totally Hate this term homeschooled every child's homeschooled Every child it's a horrible term because it assumes that no every child's home-schooled, every child. It's a horrible term, because it assumes that, no, every child's home-schooled, the school reinforces the capabilities that the home nurtures. And the other door, the place of worship, which is important for a child's total character development. Very true.

Okay, now, was and is and does it continue cultural wars and stuff? Yeah, it does. I happen to think it happens on both sides. That's the way I look at it, etc. Things that like topics like slavery that are totally kind of trying to be airbrushed out of history books. That's a cultural war.

You may not see it the same. I think you do. The fact is we get to teach kids and we should basically focus on the fundamentals and get back to the fundamentals. I do think as it relates to, and I did this as mayor 2016, ambassador, I worked with, you got an issue and you're working through on your pronoun, et cetera. I respect that. I come from an inclusive kind of culture, but it is not the preoccupation for the rest of the class.

The preoccupation for the class. So you want the schools to stop pushing that stuff? Yeah, here's my thing. I get, look, in 2016 I signed and passed the ordinance to city council as it relates to bathroom access. But my focus as mayor was on graduation rates. But just to be clear, in that you were on the side of the trans people having access to the bathroom of choice.

Yeah, we dealt with that. It was an issue. I'll give you that Trump was also on that same side back in 2016, but has changed. Have you changed? No, my position, no, not from an inclusive standpoint. My point is though, it's not the dominant issue. I get it. And then so to me.

But to a lot of us, it's really important. I get that, and you'll make choices. Well that's why I'm trying to nail you down on where you are. I got what you're trying to do, and I'm trying to be the ballet dancer I was. I know. But you know, if you're going to really run for this position... No, but here's the thing. You're going to have to take a position on it.

Here's the thing. I'll give you an example. When I was an ambassador to Japan, Trans people working in that. We worked on what our job was. That wasn't the focus. I respected what you made a choice, and also they're adults, you're talking about kids slightly very different.

Very, very different. And a parent has a right to speak up at the school about this. My point though on this whole subject though, Megan, we are talking about, let me give you an example. You were spending now, I don't know, eight minutes on this. There's 50 million kids. That's only because you won't give me a straight answer.

We can move on to give you a straight answer. I'm giving you a straight answer. Let me give you a rapid fire. 50 million kids go to public schools, to schools in elementary education in America. We're talking about 0.01%. Okay, I get it, but I know people. I don't think it'd die. But I know people who have been hurt by the boys

who are participating in the sports and so on and they matter. As a father of both a son and two girls they are fundamentally physically different and we have to under we have to that's just biology you get that. Okay so as it relates to sports. So let me just ask you a couple things quickly so do you believe boys should be able to play in girl sports? No. Do you believe that- Is this the round robin?

Yeah, we'll do a quick rapid fire. And then we can move fast. Do you believe that kids under the age of 18 should be able to be put on puberty blockers and then cross sex hormones? I think parents have to make that decision themselves. I think that is too, a child is too young at 18 to make that decision.

It has to be made with a family and that choice. I think before somebody makes a life decision, they have to think twice about that. So you disagree then with the Tim Walz policy in Minnesota where a child who doesn't get affirmed by his parents can go into Minnesota and get jurisdiction there and get the parental decision overruled. Yeah, look, I think these are life decisions,

and I'm also slightly both, I have two minds, not two minds, but two strains that influence an opinion. One, this is a life decision, and a child can't make that decision. You have to have some moral development and character and judgment and foundation for that. Two, parents have to be involved in that and I think that's for them to make.

I don't think the public should be in that space. What if, I mean, there are some parents out there who are completely whacked in the head. There really are. Well, that's not news, is it? But it's not just, no. No, it's not news, but to me it's terrifying because. Look, and the other, and I left this out, but I want to repeat it is

I have a son and two daughters and they are physically different and that's why when it comes to sports Why did all the Democrats bail off of that point? They a couple came out right after the election and they said what you just said and then they got brow-beaten And then the answer is in the question. I mean that's not ever scared me And you know, I used to say this to President Clinton and President Obama, sound is not always fury. Sometimes it's just sound.

And don't assume just because somebody's screaming at you, they represent more than the wrong voice. Ken, should we be putting men in female prisons? Men claiming they're women. No. And all right, here's my last one for you. Can a man become a woman? Can a man become a woman?

Not, no. Thank you. No. That's so easy. Why don't more people in your party just say that? Because I'm now gonna go into a witness protection plan. Yeah. My money's on you.

I think you'll be fine. No, it's just so nice to hear the truth said. Okay, we spent too much time on this. Without qualifications. Yeah, well, it just can't happen. Let's talk about- I'm not saying medically, I'm just saying it can't happen. I got it.

Let's talk about our cities and NAFTA, because I know you had a role in NAFTA. And NAFTA has become so controversial now, this North American Free Trade Agreement that had the net result of shipping a bunch of American manufacturing jobs overseas or down to Mexico. And it's become super controversial with both parties. You can look back and find, you know, in-depth articles in the New York Times,

and of course over on National Review and the Wall Street Journal about what this has done to American manufacturing. My friend Tucker and many others have made this like a central plank that they want in discussions, which is how bad American cities have become. How you step out of the train station, Union Station in Washington,

and you're stepping over homeless people. I went out for a premiere of a TV show in LA, literally stepping over homeless encampments just to get to the building, like open air drug markets in some cities in California and further north in the Pacific Northwest. Here in New York City, you know, you've got human excrement on the street, you've got trash cans

constantly overflowing, and he- That's why New York needs allies like Chicago. Chicago, don't even get started. Listen, Chicago had a heyday. I lived there. I was there for five years under Mayor Daley. Those days are behind it. But this is my principal question to you, okay?

Because Tucker and many others will use that as an opening to say, and therefore why are we giving money to Ukraine? And I get that point. But I think, you know, there's another question to be asked, which is, does it have to do with federal money at all? Is the condition of our cities really to blame on the feds, or is it to blame on Democrat mayors in those cities,

and decisions like NAFTA that outshipped all the jobs that kept them thriving? So let's go, you got like seven questions there, so let me try to peel through all eight answers. Okay. One, first let me give a shout out that's being lost in the national debate to cities. We're on course right now,

and I talked to the mayor of Baltimore, Birmingham, Lower Rock, and Cleveland in the resume, probably the lowest homicide rate in recorded history. Baltimore's experienced the lowest homicide rate right now since 1968. So while there aren't- How's Chicago doing? Chicago's also reduction, also.

But come on. No, wait a second, no wait, look. I'm with you on homeless, I get the open drug market. Nobody's been morrowed spoken about that. And you can go through my tenure, but that doesn't obscure or brush out, and I disagree with you on this one point, that crime is on both homicide rates,

violent and also property crimes, on historic lows. It's a fact that's happening. No, they said that last year and it was debunked by the FBI. No, the FBI numbers, just anyway, you can look at the, we're gonna, you and I are gonna disagree to disagree on this one. That's fine.

It is on course for historic low levels. Now as it relates to homeless encampments, I think municipalities, mayors have been way too permissive in a culture as it relates also to drug markets. Way too permissive in a culture not just for businesses but most importantly for families and for children. Giving out needles. And I think that the example of mayor in San Francisco, at least what I've read, the mayor in San Francisco I think has got now the right approach to how to handle both of these issues.

And it's also pretty clear, I can say this as I was ambassador to Japan came back for the Asia Pacific Conference in San Francisco, when a city wants to clear out homelessness, all of a sudden it happens when you have a bunch of foreign dignitaries. So when their own residents want it, you should actually be as vigilant as you were when foreign dignitaries come. Well, and you tell me, Japan doesn't have this problem in its cities.

They also have a different type of social system and that's a longer conversation than when this show permits. Second piece, and I would just not have a permissive culture in that. And Portland has now realized the wrongs of their ways. Parts of Seattle, you cannot allow a zone for open quote unquote drug markets.

It then becomes a permission slip to a whole host of other type of social and criminal aspects. So that's a massive don't go there. Now, two things that I think are really important. One is, I think there was, as the president himself kept basically the structures of NAFTA, and by the end of President Clinton's term, just a fact, there were 300,000 more manufacturing jobs

than when he came in. Now, I think there was a mistake made, and no doubt about it, just a fact, there were 300,000 more manufacturing jobs than when he came in. Now I think there was a mistake made and no doubt about it. You can't leave Peoria, Battle Creek, Racine, Kenosha to confront on their own. There was not enough support, not enough investment. America has always succeeded, always succeeded when you invest both in America and Americans. That's why I'm big about education, big about the investments in technology and in our strengths.

The bigger challenge, I would say, is not so much NAFTA, but is what happened with China. That's where you really had a fundamental and big swaths of America were left, basically, to fend for themselves against the PRC, the Chinese Communist Party and their strategy. And that's where you've seen the devastation. Now do I think everything should be cleaned up?

You've learned certain things after a certain point vis-a-vis NAFTA, et cetera? I do. Both parties have kept it in place, the basic structure, because it's better to have, as Ronald Reagan said, two neighbors that are allies working with you because that's a large economy and also Bring some of the capacity to focus on other parts of the world second though China coming into the WTO without with all of us hoping they would stay as strategic competitors not realizing that President Xi in 2012 decided that China was going to become a strategic adversary.

And that unchecked, as you can see right now, both with the United States and the European Union dealing with China, that is where we've had a major devastation to the United States. So what would you say to men in those cities like Detroit wondering where their manufacturing job went? What's the Rahm Emanuel plan to bring it back? Well, one is build, baby, build. And my basic point is when we are short right now, not tomorrow, not looking into the future, which we are also short, massive amount of investment in carpenters, electricians,

plumbers, operating engineers, the whole building trade. You can't AI that away and you can't get it to China. How do we do that? Like, at the high school level? Yeah, I'm gonna tell you one thing we did in Chicago that I think should be a national program. And you have to hire career counselors, et cetera. You could not get, we made it a requirement,

starting your freshman year we gave you support. You could not get your we made it a requirement, starting your freshman year we gave you support, you could not get your high school diploma without showing a letter of acceptance from either a college, community college, a branch of the armed forces, or a vocational school. You had not just the Kelly children and the Emanuel children, but every child had to have a post high school plan. We changed the high school from a diploma driven to a career college driven. And what comes next? There you ensure that every child can invest. And let me say one side note. If you look at the American history, there are three great periods of economic

growth all underpinned by one thing. There's land grant colleges under Lincoln. There are the universal high school education in the turn of the century, and the GI Bill. You could also add probably a fourth, NASA, in the science and engineering and basically STEM as a challenge to Sputnik. When you invest in Americans, America succeeds. Just to be clear, just to be clear,

because there's a lot of my audience, understandably, has questions about whether the modern day college education is a worthwhile thing. I didn't say college I said college so you college I know branch armed forces Let me finish the question So I wanted to pick up on the last thing you said which is vocational education Yeah, so what would that look like an addition like how to fix cars how to it was maybe a beauty school everything from

Carpentry electrician I be operating engineer Bricklaying painting, but it- Can you do it in high school? Like in my high school in upstate New York, we had the BOCES program. And you could actually do that in your ninth through 12th grade education. We created a high school in Chicago for exactly that. And you also, one of the things we did

in our community colleges, we had dual credit, dual enrollment. So we brought community college classes into high schools and kids went from high school back to the community college. A lot of the community colleges had carpentry. They had electrical. That would be amazing because we need it. But it's a requirement to get your own high school diploma. Your kids are gonna know because they grew up in your home. High school is just one step. For a lot they're gonna know where you few ask your

children where you're gonna be in four years or whatever, they have a plan. I just gotta be honest, in the city of Chicago, which is true across the country, not just Chicago, some kids, four weeks is their plan, not four years. And making them think past high school, making it a requirement, stepping in where it's not having at home, socializing this idea starting your freshman year

is essential, that's number one. Number two, I happen to think investing dramatically in the most promising technologies of tomorrow ensures that America stays competitive. And so that's part of not only build, you got to build these data centers, you got to build the submarines that we need to confront China. And we don't have that capacity. We're not even really thinking about it.. And we don't have that capacity. We're not even really thinking about it. No, we're not thinking about it. We're not investing in it.

And the truth is the mistake of the last decade, the best thing I can say about President Xi is he woke us up about a decade ahead of time. Now are we making the most use of the time? Absolutely not. We have to start investing quantum computing, AI, biomedical, alternative energy, take all the promising technologies of tomorrow, massive investment in the research side, what I call the brains part, and massive invest in the broad side

so we have the capacity to make the most of this. And if you start with AI education in school, every child, every student will have the basics and fundamentals to succeed as you look around the corner. Unless the AI has already eaten us all by the time the children get this program. Let's talk about immigration, because this is another issue in schools and elsewhere that kids are doing it.

I mean, in New York right now, it's crazy. The number of translators they have to have in the public schools, what the kids who are American born are having to deal with. Why do you think Joe Biden let between 10 and 20 million illegals into the country? Yeah, so there's, one is, let me start with what I think the challenge is. And I'm not sure why Biden did that

or the Biden White House. You're also, and I wanna preface, it's not your audience knows this, my father is an immigrant, my grandfather on my mother's side, 1914, comes to America. We're a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. That's who we are. And we're clear about the law.

You break the law, the law is going to follow you. That should be simple. And we're also a nation of immigrants. We want people from around the world who want a better tomorrow. People like from Asia, from Latin America and Africa who want to come here and start a better future legally. Yeah, legally. Now that's number one.

Number two, and I just note is recent Gallup data all about how the numbers on immigration have flipped on Trump. People reacted to the chaos on the border. Now President Trump went from basically being the voice of order to the inspiration behind this order. They do not like what he's doing in Los Angeles and around the country. They see him now the inspiration behind this order. I think if I was in for the Democrats, we have no disagreement on confronting illegal immigration.

We should be for, let's have a discussion about legal immigration because there's a break. Yeah, but you didn't answer my question. On my way, I'm good. Why did Biden let 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants in our country? They were not focused on what they should have been

focused on. The border should never allow to be out of control. Now you're also- He opened it. You're also talking to the person that for President Clinton was responsible for Operation Gatekeeper in San Diego, Operation Safeguard in Nogales, Arizona.

The border should be secure. So you disagree with what Joe Biden did? I disagree with allowing chaos at the border that where people can flaunt the laws. As again, my North stars on immigration. We're a nation of laws and we're a nation of immigrants. You have to honor both. You can't allow disorder at the border and assume that it's going to be any respect for the rest of the process.

Do you think, would you change any of President Trump's border enforcement mechanisms if you were elected president? The border enforcement, no. I do think it's mistake to call out, you know, I say this five years, President Trump's room, you know, first term, the first six months of his, the only place he's ever called out U.S. troops is on an American city. And I think that's absolutely wrong. I do not, I, you have a prisoner who's illegal? Pick them up. If they're in the orange jumpsuit, take them. We'd love to, but the sanctuary cities don't allow it.

No, no, but here's my point. A lot of states, all the states basically participate in making sure if you have a criminal element who is illegal, fine. No, they don't. The sanctuary cities don't allow that. You know that's true. Megan, let me then go farther.

You have people going to Home Depot to get a job. That's not the problem here. You have people trying to go to a place of worship at the Catholic church, that's not the problem here. You have people trying to go to a place of worship at the Catholic Church, that's not the problem here. Border stuff, I said it. Problem is, and this is why President Trump's also numbers have flipped on this in the country, not only Republicans and immigrants. I've seen the numbers. The latest Gallup poll shows a shift in support on President Trump for his deportation program.

Yeah, and that's what we're talking about now. You've endorsed the border policies, but not the deportation policies. No, and I'm also, to then get back to where I was, there is a split in the Republican Party on legal immigration. Yes, there is. Chamber of Commerce Republicans still want more.

And if Democrats were smart, said we're good with you on illegal, as it relates to the border. Now let's talk about legal, because that's where the wedge is in the Republican party. They haven't though, you know, they haven't. Well, I'm aware of that. That's what makes you a little different.

And some would say, therefore not electable by Democrats. Like I can see Rahm Emanuel, if he gets past the primary, appealing to some more centrist independent types. But that, you know, I had Mark Halpern on the program recently, he's coming on next. Then he was saying, you know, your biggest problem is gonna be getting past the primary because with the Democrats who have moved to the left,

who are endorsing democratic socialists like Mondami and this guy in Minnesota. Well, look, that's what, primaries, you know, President Clinton wasn't who we know him to be, President Obama, primaries will prove something and we'll prove something who we know him to be, President Obama, primaries will prove something and we'll prove something. As I like to say, given the field, we're all stuck at that big number, 3%. Okay, that's where we are.

I'll have to prove something. But you know, sometimes when you say, let's just say, quote unquote, the progressive left, who as you noted, or as Mark has noted, have a problem. Was it the free community college if you earn a B average in high school, you have have a problem. Was it the free community college, if you earn a B average in high school, you have a problem with? Was it the pre-K? It was the Laquan McDonald tape, right?

Sorry, was it the minimum wage? Yeah, and the inspector general said that and did a report on it, and look. Just the audience, let me just tell the audience what that is. So when Rahm was mayor of Chicago, there was an officer involved shooting of a black man named Laquan McDonald.

And there was a tape of the incident that was kept quiet, kept not accessible by the public, by a decision by you, for a year and then ultimately, you can correct me when I'm done, and then ultimately you released it and it did show that the officer was to blame and that he shot when he shouldn't have. And then there was an immediate drop in polling in support of you by especially the black

and Hispanic communities in Chicago. And some have never forgiven you for not releasing the tape earlier, you can correct me. As your lawyer, you know what the rules are as it relates in the middle of an investigation. So one, let me go all the way to the back. Laquan's uncle is a pastor on the West Side, big supporter of mine.

And there's not a day or a week that goes by that I don't rethink what ifs. And you don't get a do-over in politics. You only get lessons learned applied forward. And I thought I had fixed the system beforehand, and clearly the problems are much deeper. And I own that, that's why, and clearly the problems are much deeper. And I own that. That's why, and I take responsibility for that.

And responsibility not only to fix it, but to also get the place of the city in a better place. There were seven attempts at police reform before I got there. This one is finally sticking. And the other thing is, you know, Joe Ferguson, the Inspector General went through it, said I followed, the problem was went through it and said, the problem was I did follow the procedures. That's the problem.

They were put in place and you have two tensions on one side. You've got the FBI, the US Attorney investigating, the city is investigating, the state is investigating. If you unilaterally make a decision, you hamper a criminal investigation. That officer went, served three years. If you don't do it, you only drive the wedge between the police and the community even further. And so you're caught between this Solomon-like choice, either one, one you break the law, the other one.

What I hear you saying is you think it's explainable. You think this is not a deal breaker for you as Democrat primary voters. Look, I have the responsibilities I did when I got Senate confirmed for and for ambassador Japan I will explain it. I own it and if you're looking for a hundred percent Nobody is but I learned my lessons Going forward and that's gonna be true for anybody who's a chief executive we tying together the

The possibility of you as the Democrat nominee with our previous discussion on illegal immigration, you may be aware that Hunter Biden has some thoughts on you. Shared with the podcaster, I do not know and have never heard of. Hold on a second, I'll tell you who he is. His name is Andrew Callahan.

He's a three hour long interview. This guy's a comedian and journalist and YouTuber. And Hunter had some thoughts on you among other issues, including illegal immigration. Here he is. He's somehow convinced all of us that these people are the fucking criminals. White men in America are 45 more times likely to commit a fucking violent crime than an immigrant. And the media says, well, you got David Axelrod and, you know, Rom fucking Emanuel.

So fucking smart Rom Emanuel. And so we got to understand that these people are really mad. And we got to appeal to these white voters. Rom, the only people that fucking appealed to those fucking white voters was Joe Biden, 81 years old, and he got 81 million votes, and he did not because he appeased their fucking Trumpian sense, but because he challenged it. And he said, you can be an 81 year old Catholic from fucking Scranton that doesn't understand it,

but still has empathy for transgender people and immigrants. Then nobody said, oh, Joe Biden's gonna turn us into a socialist state, no matter how much they said it. But these guys think that we need to run away from all values in order for us to lead. I say, fuck you. How are we getting those people back from fucking El Salvador?

He's got a potty mouth. Neither you nor I have failed to utter that word in our past, I know this. But we went 50 minutes here clean. He's a big fan of it. I don't know, I kinda like Rahm fucking Emmanuel. I could see that on a sign, like a lawn sign for you. Your thoughts on his thoughts about you?

I'm kind of feeling for Axelrod right now. He got thrown down in the gutter with me. I've got an empathy. Like, I don't. I think we're giving this more time than it's due. That's my own view. Yeah. A little empathetic.

You have a son who's blinded by his own love for an effect and loyalty for his father. And I get that, but not the first phone call I'm gonna make for a strategic read. Good to hear. He's also been out there and said it there in part, saying the only reason that the Dems lost the last presidential election

is because they weren't loyal to his father. Yeah, Meg, as you probably know, there's a lot of stories about Dems have to now start swearing to look like they're normal or something like that. I was 30 years ahead of my time. I'm like a good bottle of wine. Still not normal?

Is that it? I mean, I don't, I just, it's not, we spent two minutes way too much time on that. This isn't about Hunter, but I know your brother Ari, according to the Jake Tapper book, was very outspoken about getting Biden off the ticket, saying he cannot do it, we need a plan, come up with a real plan.

You're not your brother's keeper, but you're Joe Biden's ambassador to Japan. Did you share those feelings? I was appointed by Joe you're Joe Biden's ambassador to Japan. Did you share those feelings? I was appointed by Joe. I was America's ambassador to Japan. So and that's how I took the role. But I was honored that President Biden selected me. So here's my thing is, look, one, that everybody said, oh, it was a cover up or whatever.

83% of the American people issued a judgment. there was a cover-up, the American people were in on it because they had their own opinion. Number two, does this look like subtle, quiet, reserved? No. Okay. So number three, I have a general rule. I mean, just look. Oval offices are very seductive.

Been in and out of them with two presidents for eight years. White houses, one of the challenges they have is not to be as insular as they become. It's pretty clear that both of those qualities played a role here. Now I slightly disagree with other Democrats. I actually think this was a winnable race And It's pretty clear if you look at the data was a winnable race and the real Challenge in my view is why Democrats failed It was not going to be a blowout race

but you could the the data was there and the capacity was there to win and The Democrats fumbled it you think it was winnable with Joe Biden? No, I bet it was a winnable race. Okay. If there had been some sort of a reset. Look, 70% of the country thought it was headed in the wrong direction. That's kind of architecturally built in for a challenger. But the day Kamala Harris takes over, the Democrats are down, Biden Harris are down eight. By the time you get to her

debate with Donald Trump, she's up three. That's not a statistical error. She was running on the economy, running on what I think is the most important issue, that the American dream is unaffordable. It's inaccessible to the American people, and that is unacceptable to us. This shouldn't be that hard. Owning a home has become a struggle. The system is stacked against people. It used to be... You're not wrong. Okay. That's the fun. And we went off on all these other transgender, they're telling you what the core thing is. And when Kamala Harris spoke to it, she goes up plus three. After

the debate, she wanders off into this democracy thing. So in a weird way, when she makes a break with Joe Biden and says, I'm gonna be the future, I'm gonna be change, she, boom. But all the answers of, I don't distinguish my agenda at all from him. But then basically debate or from the view performance, she basically, I'm gonna be continuity, she goes down. So to me, it tells you that, no disrespect to Hunter Biden's analysis, that this was

winnable. Now, I do think there are below that surface, forget 2024 for one second, I think the Iraq war, the financial meltdown of 08, China into the WTO unchecked, and COVID have fundamentally not only upended our politics, upended our economics, upended our schools, and we haven't yet recovered from war. Totally agree with that. Every word. One, Iraq was built on a lie and a deception and people responsible for it have never been held accountable. As somebody who in the Obama administration argued for Old Testament justice, the bankers should have been slapped silly on the south lawn, line them up and just beat the living crap out of them.

And they weren't. They were arguing for their bonuses and people lost their homes. Yeah. Number three, what we talked about China earlier still applies in this conversation, which is they were cleaning our clocks and we left America basically unilaterally disarmed to face off against China by themselves. And COVID also, and this is where I think Democrats made a mistake. We donned the jacket of the establishment, follow the science, And COVID also, and this is where I think Democrats have made a mistake, we don the jacket of the establishment, follow the science, follow the science, when it's pretty clear,

take schools. COVID, as it relates to young kids, wasn't what it was related to people that were either both ill or much older. And now we have an absentee rate of 20% and we look at our shoes and we don't want to talk about it. So when you look at those four things, that is to me the biggest structural challenges of our society, our economy and our democracy. Here's the thing I have to ask you.

Is it possible for a cisgender, heteronormative male who happens to be Jewish to get the Democrat nominee for president in 2025 America? Well, that's gonna be up to the Democratic force, but I'm gonna make the best, yeah, I got the number. Don't worry about that. Look, let's just take like Jewish. Yes, I do, because I'll say one thing.

When I ran for Congress, my predecessors were Dan Rosentowski, Roman Vechinsky, Frank Conunzio, Rob McClavage, Flanagan, and along comes Ron Miserable Emanuel. Same thing, there was only 2% Jewish in the district. But the den party has changed on Israel. I'm gonna get right there.

You know that. I've had Nazi insignia sprayed on our fence. I've seen it. And I've seen, I still don't know, somebody go clean it up. So I've seen the best of people. I've seen people look not past faith, or more importantly, not past my faith, because it is who I am. My name is Rahm Israel Emmanuel,

not according to Hunter Biden, but it is who I am. Okay, so look at that. And my faith and my Jewish education is what led me to public service. And I'm very proud of it. Now, by way, I am the only person who's ever gone toe to toe with Bibi Netanyahu. He called me a self-hating Jew, publicly.

So I support the state of Israel, I support its existence, I support it as a Jewish democratic nation, a sovereign nation, but I am willing, when I disagree, speak about that, and I've said that, but do I think so? I do because in the end of the day, our party believes in both economic kind of equality and also equality in a political system. And this country, this idea, and I say this, I want you to hear, my grandfather came here from Ukraine with nothing. That his grandson that he used to call a schmuck

could be both a chief of staff to a president, a senior advisor, elected to congress, the mayor of the city that we called home and then represent America over. This is the greatest country in the world, not because of my success, but because of the story and the permission that has allowed somebody whose own grandfather didn't have a bucket to spit in and a window to throw it out of could provide that opportunity. And I'll close on this because we didn't get to this amount family. My parents in our family room had my grandmother's purse with her and my two great aunts room had my grandmother's purse with her and my two great aunts' passports. And on either side of that purse were the black and white photos of my aunts, uncles, cousins, on mom and dad's side who never made it to this country.

There's nothing subtle in a Jewish home. You are given a gift. It's called the United States of America. You respect that gift and you honor that gift. And that is what I look at. And I think the country as a father with two kids in the armed forces will respect that. Thank you so much. I think your children are wrong. You should talk about your dad and your grandpa. You nailed it. I gotta thank God it was only a minute because I was close to tears there and I see the clean ducksx right there. Rob, Emmanuel, thank you. Thanks for having me.

Come back, will you? Yeah, sure. All the best to you. And we'll be right back with Mark. I wanna tell you about Daily Look. Their mission is simple, elevate your style. They work with top brands and emerging designers like AG, Good American, Kate Spade,

Girlfriend Collective, and more. Sizes range from extra small to 3X and zero to 24. Here's how it works. You fill out a style quiz with your particular preferences. Then you receive up to 12 hand-selected items at home. Keep what you love, return the rest, shipping's free both ways. Daily Look is the highest rated

premium personal styling service for women. You get a dedicated stylist, not an algorithm, who curates each box based on your body shape, lifestyle and taste. It's the same stylist every time. Try on premium pieces at home and save time. Visit dailylook.com and use code MEGAN for 50% off your first box. It's time to get your own personal stylist with Daily Look. Head to DailyLook.com to take your style quiz

and use code MEGAN for 50% off your order. Five oh, I say. Once again, that's DailyLook.com for 50% off and make sure you use my promo code MEGAN so they know we sent you. Okay, we've got some friends on the show joining me now to recap what we just saw and talk about all the latest headlines as well.

Let's get to it with two of the hosts on the MK Media Podcast Network, Mark Halperin, host of Next Up with Mark Halperin, and Link Lawrence here too. He's host of Spot On with Link Lawrence, along with former Democratic strategist Dan Turrentine, a co-host of The Morning Meeting on the two-way YouTube channel with Mark.

Guys, welcome, great to have you. Thanks for having us. Thanks for having us. So fun, I didn't know which hour to look forward to more, but I'm psyched this one's here. It's like game post game. All right, so let's start, let's pretend we didn't talk about the Rahm Emanuel interview during break and give me your fresh impressions.

Dan, you go first. I thought he did great. I mean, I think considering this is like early in the game, no one's gonna be perfect at this point. He had good answers. I thought when you asked him about the workforce and the economy, I thought even on immigration, right? You heard like echoes of Bill Clinton,

followed by a nation of laws, a nation of immigrants. He kept coming back to that. He, you know, when you tried to talk to him about the border and everyone coming in, he said, I don't know why they didn't do it, but they shouldn't have. I thought he did well. I thought the one issue where he was a little bit was the transgender. That's obviously a touchy issue in the party, but I thought that he did very well. And when I think about people who understand what you need to do to win, that is somebody who understands what it takes.

Yep. I think for me, maybe it's a generational difference, but half the electorate is going to be Gen Z and millennials by 2028. And when you think of Rahm Emanuel and you Google him, every picture of is him cavorting with the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens. He looks like politics as usual, and he looks like the embodiment of the swamp. And even in the interview, I felt he came across a little smarmy trying to control the interview. He was wishy-washy on some of the trans stuff, and it's like, you're a 65-year-old man. You've been in politics for decades,

the upper echelons of politics, and you can't give straight answers on these questions that we want. And you kept asking about men in women's restrooms and in girls' bathrooms. He said, oh, it's not a dominant issue. Let's move on. It's not a dominant issue.

But then Kamala Harris, part of the reason she lost were those swing state ads on taxpayer funded transgender surgeries for inmates. These might not be the dominant issues to use to you. And you might think they're culture war issues, but they're still gonna galvanize voters. So I just didn't find him that likable. Okay, so he did not get Link's vote, Mark.

No. And they're both right. I've known Ram since your senior year in college. So I've known him a long time. Dan is right that Rahm, it graded on a curve against some of these other people who were talked about, his level of sophistication, his level of confidence, his level of understanding the intersection of politics, politics and the press. It's light years ahead of almost any other Democrat, not just thinking of running for

president, but almost any Democrat active on the national stage. But Link's right too. There are so many issues related to Rahm that make it almost impossible to imagine him actually being the nominee. Not only because he's, as your questions teased out, he's crosswise with the base. But he's yesterday. He's a longtime political figure,

made millions in investment banking. He's not on paper what the party is currently looking for. So I think he showed his best and his worst with you. And I think you asked him about all the right issues that tease that out and put it in sharp room. It was fascinating. So from my perspective, but I'll say one thing about yesterday

before I get to my perspective. So it was Joe Biden, he was yesterday and he won. You know, I'm talking about the first time around. So there is the possibility that even though you've got baggage and you've got party affiliations and you've got all the connections for 50 years, you could be the man. Walter Mondale was a nominee too,

but we're in a different time, I think. And even from four years ago. Yeah, we've got mom Donnie now, like they are next mayor here. So they're really going. Maybe, maybe. Let's hope not. But my own impression was,

so I thought we had a very cordial first 48 minutes together, and that's good. I mean, and we kind of laughed about it after the fact that we're sure meeting number two will be a little bit more contentious. Was that your first time with him? Yeah, yeah, that was my first time interviewing him. No, people like Rahm Emanuel did not come on Fox News.

We did not have access to the show. Yeah, so, but I liked it. We touched on some hot button issues, but we kept it cordial and I think that's good. I really wanted the audience to get to know him and I wanted to see if he would say normal things to me without me beating him over the head or him beating me over the head.

And I was amazed at some of his direct answers. Like, yes, he wiggled on the trans thing for quite a while, but in the end, when we did our little lightning round, he did give me a couple of points, like the men in prison, we have it cut, here, watch. I have a son and two daughters, and they are physically different, and that's why when it comes to sports.

Why did all the Democrats bail off of that point? The couple came out right after the election and they said what you just said, and then they got brow-beaten, and then they started to walk out. The answer's in the question. I mean, that's not ever brow-beaten, and then they started to walk away. Well, then you got the answers in the question. I mean, that's not ever scared me. And, you know, I used to say this to President Clinton and President Obama.

Sound is not always fury. Sometimes it's just sound. And don't assume just because somebody's screaming at you, they represent more than the wrong voice. Ken, should we be putting men in female prisons? Men claiming they're women? No. And, all right, here's they're women? No.

And, all right, here's my last one for you. Can a man become a woman? Can a man become a woman? Not, no. Thank you. No. That's so easy. Why don't more people in your party just say that?

Because I'm now gonna go into a witness protection plan. Is he? I mean, listen, you guys know, I realize that wasn't like hugely, like a huge breakthrough. We all talk about what's true and what's real every day, but for a guy who wants to be the Democratic nominee, that was pretty bold.

Well, I think the overarching thesis and takeaway from the interview is just how broken the Democrat brand is that a guy goes, men and women are different, and we're like, hooray, yay. He's like, oh my God, men and women have different. And we're like, hooray, yay. He's like, oh my god, men and women have biological differences. We're going, yes, amazing, this is groundbreaking for a Democrat.

That's how broken the identity is. But he's going to have a hard time in the primary because the Democrat party has been co-opted by this loud, progressive, vocal minority, and they just keep capitulating to them. So I don't really think he has a prayer. He might have some good ideas, and he seems strong on some issues, but I don't think he has a prayer in a primary. Does that come back to haunt him? No, I mean, I think, look, the interesting thing- No, it does not come back

to haunt him? No, and I'll tell you why, because hanging out with you might come back to haunt him. That's right. There's two things going on. The first is the party after the election said, we know we need to make change. Now, anytime anyone's attempted to do it, as he said, the base has yelled. Rom's issue is going to be both two things. He's anyone's attempted to do it, as he said, the base has yelled. Rom's issue is going to be both two things. He's going to have to do these sister soldier moments. The party needs to do sister soldier moments. Where you break with your party. And he's got that, right? I don't worry about that. Rom's other challenge is he's going

to have to throw some bones to the base. And where he chooses to do that, because the problem for Rom is the energy is in the base and the base can't stand them. You asked him about it. You asked about a very sensitive issue that he has with the black community. He's going to have to figure out and I have no doubt he's thinking about this. Where am I going to lock arms with them and unapologetically charge against Donald Trump and JD Vance and everybody else. Other candidates, it's the complete opposite. They're inching up to that Sister Soldier moment.

Gavin Newsom on the podcast with Charlie Kerr flirted with it, took so much heat, he then, you know, and was really kind of struggling until the immigration thing propelled him forward within our party, maybe not the general electorate. So, I mean, Rahm's got two things, but again, he thinks about that stuff. He'll be smart about it.

He'll be strategic. And I have no doubt when he does, he'll move forward aggressively. Let me be honest about Rahm. It's not Rahm likes to be honest. Rahm's talented, right? He's one of the most talented Pauls. He's not Bill Clinton. He's not Barack Obama.

He's not George Bush and he's not Donald Trump. He's not in their league. He's a super talented staffer, which he once was. He was a super talented candidate for mayor super talented D triple c head he's he's he's Talented but he's not their category of talented So can someone less talented than those four guys all of whom stood up to their party and appealed to the base, right? Simultaneous make people in the base feel good and stand up to people in the base.

That's really hard. I just don't know that Rahm is talented enough to do that except he's running against a bunch of people who are less talented. So he might be talented enough to do it, but he's not in their league. But I will say the people he's running against, let's say it's like AOC, Gavin Newsom,

they have some star quality and charisma. That's what is missing. Maybe if I watched it, I would get a different feel, but listening to it, it was kind of like low energy Jeb Bush, kind of like that sort of slow, some army. I don't think he's low energy. But it's just like the answer is, where's the other gear though?

I guess in this interview, it just felt kind of like low to me and he's kind of like, yeah, I'm thinking about that. So I don't know if he has the star power and charisma to tap into this sort of like populism on the left that the right has had for so long. And then to go to what you mentioned, the reason President Trump caught fire in 2015 and 16

is because he was willing to call out the elites and the establishment in his own party, these neocons, and who'd been running the party for 15, 20 years. I don't know if Rahm is gonna be able to do that because the left likes. But the left, yeah, but he has one. And the left likes to cast purity test way more than the right.

You said one thing we disagree with or we don't like this one little thing. So I think he's gonna have a tough time. He doesn't sound woke. I'm not sure whether any Democrat who's not woke is going to get nominated next time around the party just does. They're captured by it. It's a cancer. It's metastasized. There's no excising it. I know normies like you, Dan, would like it to be, but I just don't think it can happen. The only thing is our party's history, we flirt with these very progressive candidates, Howard Dean, you know, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren,

Sanders in 16, and both of them in 2020. Our history is we back off and go with the safe candidate. Now, our party is more left than we were in the past, and at some point that may come to an end, that pattern. But as a party, we tend to value victory and who we think has the best chance way more than people I think kind of give us credit for. Here's what's cautionary for me.

What was the most obvious question you were gonna ask him? What was the thing he should be prepared for more than any other? About how he's gonna to win over his... Well, trans. Trans, right? Oh, you mean from me making count? Yes, for sure.

So he basically tried to avoid answering until you wouldn't let him, right? Yeah, yes. That to me, I mean, how he could have been relative, maybe he thinks that was the right way to do it, but to me that seems unprepared, not just mechanically unprepared, but if he's not ready to confront that issue with you, what's he waiting for? Yeah, you know for sure I'm gonna be asking about that. He also, he did, for the record,

endorse minors getting puberty blockers into cross-sex hormones, meaning they get sterilized for life, they lose sexual function, as long as their parents agree, which is not what the side of reason believes at all. And his bathroom answer wasn't great either. No, because he'd already allowed it. Well, but he could say on reflection,

I think it was a bad idea. And you gave him the opening. And he didn't abandon it. With that Trump had evolved. I did. He did not abandon that. But he did not say that a man could become a woman. And he said, mention being women's prisons.

And he seemed to say mention being women's sports. He's kidding himself if he thinks, I believe, he can say that's not the focus. The focus is on the economy. That's never gonna fly with me or anybody else. Like, I'm sorry, whether it's hubris, we'll decide what the focus is. That's the one advantage of having this job.

But also the base will decide too. Yeah, but I'm saying literally, having done all these presidential debates, I'm sorry, I will decide. It is up to me. I will be the one to put this issue. We're trying to win back the working class voters for whom that was a bigger issue than we thought it was.

It's the cultural, do you understand us? We started losing them culturally in the 90s. We then lost them economically in the last 10 years. We got to win them back on both fronts. And I don't want to just be negative about him. Because again, I think he's more talented than almost anybody else who might run. What he gave you was a bunch of tactical replies.

Megan's going to ask this. I'm going to say this. I'm going to try to change the subject. She didn't change the subject. Now I got to answer. Did you feel as hard on any of those issues? I liked the last answer about America. I'm saying on the top of those.

The American stuff's easy. He can do hard on that. There was no, again, don't go back to the question of authenticity. It was all tactics. I think the education thing is legit to him. I mean, that's sellable. It's a real issue, exactly.

On the easy ones, he's great. On the hard ones, I thought it was all just tactical. The one place I disagree with you though, Mark, is on the vocational training stuff. I do think he believes in it, which- But that's easy. No one's against vocational training. Well, but we've fumbled over what we wanna do on the economy,

like to no end. Sure. Sure, but to me, he's not trying to show his heart on those things. He's just trying to get through it. I wonder whether he'll have it improved to the point that he can sell it. Because look, Gavin Newsom suffers from a different problem. And he was saying we're all at 3%.

That's not exactly true. Kamala Harris is at 12. My God, good luck, Dan. Titan. Let's go back to Rome. Right after Kamala is Gavin, who's up there, I think single, like maybe nine. And then everybody else is down lower.

AOC is up there, but she's not, it's not gonna happen. So he's right that like there's no real front runner and we don't think Kamala Harris is actually gonna run for president again. So it's really him and Gavin maybe looming up there. And Gavin Newsom, I don't know, he may be formidable. To me, he's just such an obvious snake oil salesman who will say anything depending on who's across from him.

I just think people will be able to see through that from a mile away and they might like the steady Eddie the couple sharp elbows rom fucking Newsom is he can't even call his wife his wife She's like his partner and she's given the man multiple kids and then he was against men and women sports for a minute and the Charlie Kirk interview he's gone back now He's fighting with the DOJ Gavin Newsom

stands for nothing so from a manual can have black and white straight up answers for things just be straight with the American people and to go to your point Dan the left in the mainstream media constantly like to tell Americans what issues are important to them oh trans is a culture were issue it's not a big deal. Well, these millions of moms turned out for president Trump because it was a big deal. We don't care about seed oils this food isn't going to decide this election. Those maha moms came in turned out for President Trump because it was a big deal. Oh, we don't care about seed oils. Food isn't gonna decide this election.

Those maha moms came and turned out. So every issue matters now, especially with social media. I think Rom's gotta fine tune some of these answers. The other thing is, can I tell you, I was thinking about this last week, right before the fall of the Roman Empire, the culture completely imploded with debauchery and no connection to faith

or something bigger than oneself and all these, you know, not caring for the weak or, you know, for unborn babies at all. And that's why the culture wars do matter. Like we're right, we're back there in some ways with like throuples and people trying to normalize pedophilia with the minor attracted person label and the cutting off of children's genitals in the name of like equity and inclusion, dividing us by race, trying to make little girls boys when they're not like, all this stuff, you can dismiss it as culture wars,

but I actually think it's the degradation of a cohesive society. It's what happens when you remove faith as a guiding principle of any society. And it really is the road to end times. Like it's fine to just dismiss it as like, faith as a guiding principle of any society, then it really is the road to end times. Like, it's fine to just dismiss it as like, oh, you're a sweet little culture.

No, it's the road to end times. So like, if we don't fight back against it, we're gonna completely lose everything that's dear to us. I don't know if he knows that, or if he's just too much of a Democrat to really see that. He travels in circles where these things are not as big a deal. He just does. What do you make of Gavin Newsom, though, against him? Those two on a stage, see that. Travels in circles where these things are not as big a deal, he just does. What do you make of Gavin Newsom though, against him?

Those two on a stage, picture that. I still think Newsom's not gonna run, I'm the only one who does. You really do, why? Because in the interview I did with him on the MK Media Network, he talked about his daughter being upset that she had to be followed around by one security person when she went out.

And when are you gonna leave, he said, he said, his daughter said, when are you gonna leave office so I can stop this? If he runs for president and wins. He's not, he's not gonna stop running for president. He doesn't even know the daughter's damn name. He doesn't, who the hell is this daughter? Oh please. I also don't think his wife wants him to run.

You don't? Jennifer, Jennifer? Jennifer? Jennifer. First partner does not want him to run. I may be wrong, maybe he'll do it, but I don't, if he does run and it's him against Rahm, then I think you will see an elevated debate.

I think those two guys will have a serious conversation about the party. With all due respect, this is a guy who sleeps with his campaign manager's wife. He's an alcoholic who kind of lied about going to rehab and we're suddenly like, he's father of the year. His daughter really doesn't want him to run for president. Oh, please, he's gonna run if he wants to run. And they'll still make his daughter play against a boy

in sports, even though he gives lip service that he won't when he's interviewing her. I mean, I don't know. Charlie can't be thinking seriously about it and leaning towards it, given the last month and a half that he's had. I mean, we can all debate whether what he advocated for with the LA riots was smart or not,

but he's had a moment in the party. I don't think anyone's had a better last month as a Democratic candidate for 2028 than Gavin Newsom. Wow. Because the bar is low. Agreed. 100% agreed. Our seventh ring of hell.

But the party now, like if you read articles when he went to South Carolina, you look at focus groups, what does everyone say? He's fighting. Oh my God, he fights. He stood up to Trump. He now has this communications team where he's trolling JD Vance. He's trolling. He's doing better on social media. It's too much for me. He's employing a lot of the tactics. He's not speaking our language, but you have to acknowledge that he's out there swinging. It's a lot of hosting. Well, he is speaking the language of Donald Trump, which is nonstop,

front foot, in your face. I'm going to troll you. I'm going to hit you. I'm going to mock you. I'm going to do everything. And our base, just as the Republican base craved it in 15 of like, oh my God, he's not apologizing on immigration or any of this stuff. We can, again, we can debate good general election strategy. But I don't know how you go to South Carolina and Jim Clyburn says, I like this guy. He's got a bright future. I think, and go home and say, well, hon, exactly. I'm hanging it out. Yeah. All right, that was nice. I would have won. There's four factors that I think get lost in the conversation about running for president that I don't know that he'll do as well in. And I'm very bullish, more bullish than you,

Tora, on his skills. One is, what are the early states they're gonna vote? We don't know. But if the early states include Iowa and South Carolina, let's see how he does. Gavin, we're talking about him. Gavin, Gavin. Number two, raising money.

He should be able to raise a ton of money as governor of California. He's got the best digital list to raise money. I want to see if he can raise serious money, okay? Number three is effort. Is he wanting to get up every day with his young kids and living on the West Coast and do the 10 things that's necessary to do to run?

And then the last thing is, how do you handle a crisis? How do you handle a political crisis when they come at you? I don't think we've seen him handle political crisis particularly well. Or real crises. There's nothing rebuilt in LA whatsoever. Not a single home is rebuilt. But look at when he's been, like remember that thing

where he was on the cell phone and the lady was trying to talk to him? Oh God. Look at how Bill Clinton, look at how Donald Trump handled Axis Hollywood, look at how Bill Clinton handled Jennifer Flowers in the draft, look at how Barack Obama handled Reverend Wright. I just don't see in him someone who digs deep

when that stuff happens. So in those four areas, he's not as great as he's been in some of these other things, as Dan pointed out. And I just think there's reason to be skeptical that he's gonna play at that level. I'll tell you something about Ron that we didn't get into today. He's as vicious on Trump as Gavin Newsom is.

Like, we didn't get into Trump today. He won't be running against Trump, notwithstanding what Steve Bannon says. And so, but every Democrat is still gonna run on Trump, right, like whoever it is, whether it's JD or Marco or could be Tulsi, who knows. It's gonna be all about Trump. So I think he'll also appear as a fighter because he'll be out there saying the nastiest things possible about Donald Trump. And I do wonder though, like, how's that going to go? Because I don't think Rahm Emanuel or Gavin Newsom or

anybody else I've heard of on Team Blue has the oratory skills of JD Vance or Marco Rubio, who are I just think going to eat their opponents alive. Either one of those guys will kill them unless they increase their game by the time they get out there. Well, even Gavin Newsom, they thought he was going to do great in that debate with DeSantis. They're like, DeSantis, they're going to wipe the floor with him. Newsom's the snake oil salesman, greasy guy, talker. And he goes out there, Ron DeSantis holds up like a poop map.

He just wipes the floor with Newsome. I forgot about that. Yeah. I don't think people were expecting. And Newsome kind of floundered and flailed. And I think that's what happens when you press Newsome. And we saw that in the Sean Ryan interview. He was pressed very delicately about eight-year-olds transitioning and cross-sex hormones for kids.

Couldn't give a straight answer. It was a lot of this sort of air traffic controller, Bob Fosse, jazz hands, and he couldn't give an answer. And so Gavin Newsom, I don't even think it's a guarantee, Gavin Newsom makes it out of a primary because you put him on a debate stage, he crumbles so quickly. Like he seems unwell.

Like something's off with him. Like he's gonna crumble really fast. I know what you mean. Like why does he gesticulate so violently? More than Tim Walz. It makes me distrust him really, because I've said this before, but my CIA guy, Phil Houston,

invented the deception detection program there. They still use all over the world. Hands above the midline is a tell, if coupled with another sign of deception, that you're lying. Has to be two signs of deception within five seconds of asking the question.

This is not voodoo, this is real. He's a human lie detector. He's outed bad guy terrorists who we thought were working for us. He's found double agents within the CIA who we thought we were using against another country, but really they'd been turned against us. Phil Houston is the man.

And he's ready to arrest Gavin Newsom. He says, no, he doesn't wait in on Gavin. But just FYI, hands above the midline can be a tell if it's coupled with another sign of deception. I've literally never done that, by the way. Like this. I do it all the time, but I'm not a real blonde. Watch out.

Jazz hands. I'm deceiving you. I'll do it when I'm like making a point. It has to be coupled with something else, like a verbal attack, like, how could you ask me that kind of a question? That's, I'm lying. Like Nathan Thurman, Saturday Night Live. Who's he? He's a character who would attack, like, how could you ask me that kind of a question? That's, I'm lying. Like Nathan Thurman, Saturday Night Live.

Who's he? He's a character who would say stuff like, maybe someone should interview you. Maybe someone should investigate you. Are you asking me all the questions? All right, so that's enough about Rahm Emanuel and Gavin Newsom. This is a long way off, although kind of, it's not.

It always starts early. Sorry, I was getting on a bit. It's underway. I don't know, it's too soon, okay? President Trump has been in there for six months. Can I say one more thing about the very first question you asked him, why are you here? I thought his answer was abysmal.

He just kind of joked about it. You didn't like it. He should have said, I want to reach every American. You have a huge audience of people who have been trending Republican, and I want to win them back. I had nothing better to do. I don't know.

I just thought that was, it set a tone. If he's serious about reaching your audience, I just thought that was kind of disrespectful. Come on bended knee with a bouquet of flowers. Yeah. Yeah. That's a good point. And say, we had to fight for every vote. We can't let people who voted for Donald Trump

vote Republican in four years. And again, I'm not against joking. I just think the reason that George Bush and Donald Trump and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama all won is because they ran simultaneously appealing both to their party and to a general election electorate. And he just seemed to me to miss the opportunity to do that. He told me before the interview, and I don't think he would mind if I repeated that because he seemed to suggest he might tell the story himself, that he was here in part because his sister-in-law listens to the show and heard me say something nice about him.

He should have said that. His family could have done a good job. Yeah, so he was like, well, maybe she'll give me a fair shot and I'll go over there. And I did. And so listen, when he comes back, we'll see if he does better, if he takes these pieces of advice to heart. But I wanna talk about Trump because there's been a very interesting development now

on the, within the Intel community around Trump. Tulsi Gabbard late on Friday. And I just wanna say, as on all things, I am a truly honest broker on this. I'm still trying to figure out what's real. I don't know. Like who she is accusing of what, for instance. No, whether she's right, and Matt Taibbi, who I love,

is right, that this is a bombshell and it's terrible and people really could go to jail, or whether Andy McCarthy at National Review, who I love and respect, and who's a totally honest broker too, is correct, that this's a totally honest broker too, is correct, that this is a complete nothing burger, and she's totally off, and apparently hasn't read her own CIA director's release of last week.

And that he would suggest she hasn't really been following the Russiagate scandal, because everything she just told us is old. And so I'm really trying to figure out, but just to set it up for the audience, because it's very complex. On Friday night, Tulsa Gabbard went on Fox News and said that she'd found documents

that she was releasing that show, in some substance, that one day the intelligence community under Barack Obama was ready to come out and say that the Russians did not interfere in the 2016 election and really had no part in it. And that whole thing was kind of bullshit. Then Barack Obama pulled them all into the White House. They had a big meeting.

And then literally the next day, they were like, Russia interfered to help Trump and leaked it to all the reporters Washington Post. And the suggestion is that Obama turned to them and said, I'm not having a report coming out of you guys saying that they didn't interfere. The whole narrative is that Hillary would have won had it not been for the Russians. Now, give me a report that says that. That's the Russians. Now give me a report that says that, that's the implication. And that then the intel community did it

and the subservient Washington press corps ran with it. And that's how the narrative really took off that the Russians had gotten Trump elected. Okay, so Annie McCarthy's point in response is, okay, you're talking apples and oranges. What they said prior to the Obama meeting was, we've seen nothing to suggest the Russians hacked election machines,

even though they tried in a couple of places, but that they were not able to do anything technologically that would have altered the outcome in election with raw vote. Then they have the Obama meeting and then they come out. And it's true that their report that they issued then was all about the ways Russia did interfere. Like fake articles about Hillary, bots that circulated

negative news about her and they hacked the DNC mail which is how we have a lot of the admissions we have from her and her terrible family. Anyway, he's saying it's apples to oranges. And while she is producing now emails that do show they were ready to say no interference when it comes to election machines prior, that we kind of knew everything that she's saying already.

I'm going to show you her announcement. I think we have it guys, don't we? On Friday night. yeah, sat nine, let's play it. Spells out in great detail exactly what happens when you have some of the most powerful people in our country directly leading at the helm, President Obama and his senior most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan,

James Clapper, and Susan Rice and others, essentially making a very intentional decision to create this manufactured politicized piece of intelligence with the objective of subverting the will of the American people. The list goes on and on about the consequences of President Obama and his senior cabinet members politicizing intelligence once again, and I say these words very clearly, to enact what was essentially a years long coup, subverting the will of the American people.

One of the other points Andy made was that, he's not a fan of Tulsi, he wasn't behind her confirmation. But he's also saying it's not a surprise to him that Tulsi Gabbard would try to exonerate Russia entirely and instead blame America, right? Like sort of say, Russia didn't do anything whatsoever. And his point is she's overstating it.

Russia did do some things, but it didn't cost Hillary the election. Andy doesn't contend that. But that we're now sort of manufacturing something for press clicks and possibly indictments that may not be there. Anybody want to take this? I mean, look, I'll say this. I, with you, I'm not sure what she's doing because I think what she's trying to argue is it wasn't determinative to the outcome, but there is no debate. Russia tried to influence the election. As you say, they bought ads on YouTube.

They bought ads on Facebook. They had chat bots. They hacked email. They wanted Donald Trump to win. Now the question was, did the Trump campaign collude Robert Mueller ruled? There was no definitive proof that they colluded, but I'm not sure what, I almost get the sense that what she's saying is like, they didn't try to interfere in the election. And what's also fact is the Obama administration, the last month of the campaign was aware of what was going on and struggled.

Do they go public with this? Do they put it out? If we do, it's going to look like we're trying to tip the scales. After the election, they huddled and said, we need to get out. Both as like a PSA, hey Russia, you tried to do this and we're aware of it. And then they said, was there collusion? Was there perhaps something more there?

I think that latter part, they wanted to put out into the kind of mainstream to be like, someone needs to go look at this, right? And obviously that enraged Trump and he didn't want, he wanted everyone to know that he did this. But I'm not sure what she's implying. If there's real signs of crime or, Trump and he didn't want, you know, he wanted, and he wanted everyone to know that he did this. But I'm not sure what she's implying. If there's real signs of crime or naffi, then by, you know, goodness, put it out and let

the public see it. But I'm very skeptical. I know. Have you looked at this? And it's very smart people who I normally trust are in diametric disagreement on it. If she sees a crime, she's got to say who and what law they broke. It's just too vague. I pick up on a point Dan made, which I know because I did a lot of reporting on this.

They really did struggle with what to say. They didn't want to let the Russians go uncalled out in public, but they also didn't want to be accused of trying to make it seem like the Russians were doing something. They were pretending the Russians were doing something to help Hillary. I actually think there's 19 things you could list that say caused Hillary Clinton the election. And this is one of them. It was very close.

You don't know what would have happened otherwise. But I think Russia helped Trump win substantially, not through collusion, but because they wanted Trump to win. And that is something she's playing down, which she's playing up is that they somehow broke the law in trying to protect Hillary Clinton. And again, she's suggesting they manufactured it.

She's basically suggesting this is the same thing as COVID where the scientists went from, this looks like it came from a lab. We've never seen such a virus from an animal. And then after Fauci and Collins browbeated them, they came out and they were like, it's definitely not from a lab. It's from a pangolin. They're people associated with Barack Obama who leaned into collusion without a doubt. And that wrong, I don't know if it's against the law,

it was dirty pool. But mostly what they said was the Russians interfered with the election and they did. I think this is a little bit of cosmic karma, everything comes full circle because Tulsi was accused by Hillary Clinton and the Obamas, I believe, of being like a Russian asset. And then she went on The View and said she's owned by Russia, she's a Russian puppet. And Tulsi was coming out saying, I'm nobody's puppet, I've served this country, I'm a woman

in uniform, as she is, and she's a rock star. But yeah, no, I think this is a little bit of Cosmic Karma. She gets to now come out and say, ha, look at what we've just uncovered in these files. But I think it's Monday, maybe by the end of the day we we'll have more information, because I read on the way over here, she's now given something to the DOJ or PMBOM. Something's gonna happen. She said it's gonna come out this week. We're gonna see.

Yeah. I think it's weird Friday night to make the announcement with everything going on. I know, why, why? They put out news that's bad for them, heading into a weekend after a holiday, they put out news that's good for them on Friday night. Hannity will be here Monday,

so I don't know if I have to go out tonight. That might have been an Epstein circuit. I was just gonna say that, yes. I'm not sure that's gonna work either. We'll talk about that when we come back. Let's take a break and then we will discuss where we are in Epstein Palooza. Stand by.

Okay, do you wanna know about something positive and upbeat? I have been telling you about Firecracker Farm Hot Salt. It's been a showstopper gift and must have item for anyone that enjoys spicing up their food. What is hot salt, you may be asking. Well, it is a sea salt infused with a blend of hot pepper that's made by a wonderful little family company.

It comes in sleek stainless steel push grinders that feel great in hand and are really satisfying to use. Their motto, everything is better with hot salt. And based on the reviews, customers are in full agreement. So give it a try now. Go to firecracker.farm right now and use code MK at checkout for a special discount. Yes, that's firecracker.farm code MK and get some hot salt before it's all gone. You'll thank me. If you're stressed about back taxes, maybe you missed the April

deadline or your books are a mess, don't wait. The IRS is cracking down. Penalties add up fast, 5% per month up to 25% just for not filing. But there's help. Tax Network USA can take the burden off your shoulders and stop the spiral before it gets worse. They've helped thousands of Americans, whether you're an employee, a small business owner, or you haven't filed in years. Messy books, no problem. They've seen it all. Tax Network USA has direct access to powerful IRS programs and expert negotiators too on your side.

You'll get a free consultation and if you qualify, they may even be able to reduce or eliminate what you owe. More importantly, they'll help protect you from wage garnishments or bank levies. So don't wait for the next IRS letter. Call 800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash Megan to talk to a real expert at Tax Network USA. Take the pressure off yourself. Let Tax Network USA handle your tax issues. I'm Megan Kelly, host of The Megan Kelly Show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations

with the most interesting and important political, legal, and cultural figures today. You can catch The Megyn Kelly Show on Triumph, a Sirius XM channel featuring lots of hosts you may know and probably love. Great people like Dr. Laura, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly, Megan Kelly. You can stream The Megan Kelly Show on SiriusXM at home or anywhere you are, no car required. I do it all the time. I love the SiriusXM app.

It has ad-free music coverage of every major sport, comedy, talk, podcast, and more. Subscribe now, get your first three months for free. Go to SiriusXM.com slash MKShow to subscribe and get three months free. That's SiriusXM.com slash MKShow and get three months free. Offer details apply. So you were saying before the break, it's fancy here, isn't it?

Talking around, something I can steal. Like an ashtray. Do you have ashtrays? You know what's funny? I don't think anybody does anymore. The same guy has been driving me and my family for like, since I started at Fox. Super nice man. And he was dropping me off today and he said, you know, Megan, you've been coming to this

same location because the series is right across from Fox and right across from NBC. He's like for like almost 20 years now. As long as you can spit a watermelon seed far enough to hit the other building, that's good for you. You know, it's like, this is media central and it does bring back a lot of memories.

Anyway, so we were saying before the break that possibly the Tulsi Gabbard thing was a head fake to change the topic of conversation from Epstein. Did it work? Well, it's hard to know, right? Because the two intervening things that seem bigger around Epstein, one is the Wall Street Journal story, which rallied MAGA back towards the president. And the other is the announcement of the filing to release, that's the grand jury transcripts to be released.

I think those two things did the most to take the steam out of it for the media, even though the New York Times now seems obsessed with reviving it. So I wanna say two things. I don't think we're gonna learn much from the grand jury files at all. And I think the Trump administration knows that.

So he says, oh, nothing I do will ever satisfy them, which is true, but this definitely won't. Like this won't even come close. It's not a good faith effort to say. It's definitely not a good faith effort. But secondly, on the New York, or the Wall Street Journal hit piece, it was so lame. It was the best thing Trump could have asked for.

And I realized he came back swinging, but even if he had it like, there's nothing we on the right hate more than the left's fake news hit pieces on Donald Trump. We've seen so many of them. The guy literally took a bullet. He's been put through hell. Like we have all had it up to here with the with the false attacks on Donald Trump. And so the best thing that the left, and I include the journals reporting that, could have done

was just be quiet and let it stay a Trump slash influencer problem. Don't help because that only makes people on the right wanna drop it and defend him. And that's kind of where I am. Like it was such a lame, I'm very interested in what the truth about Epstein is. Very interested. You try to tell me the whole scandals about Donald Trump,

fuck off, I'm out. Like that's a lie. We know that we would know that by now if it were true. I will not be your truth warrior on that because I know it's a lie. We know that we would know that by now if it were true. I will not be your truth warrior on that because I know it's not right. But I do want real answers in the underlying scandal. Go ahead, Link. You know, I just feel like the left really wants

to tie Trump to Epstein more closely. And I think that's what the Wall Street Journal really was about. I mean, I just have a hard time believing he's sitting there drawing and doing this. The whole thing sounded really silly to me. And then there's also still this narrative online that, you know, maybe Trump visited the island.

I'm like, the guy doesn't even stay in hotels that don't have still this narrative online that, you know, maybe Trump visited the island. I'm like, the guy doesn't even stay in hotels that don't have his name on it. I certainly don't think he visited the island, but they want to keep tying Trump to Epstein. I think JD Vance is still looking like a winner because he doesn't seem as mired down in the Epstein stuff. JD Vance, I don't think he's spoken about it as much. He's now rallying around the president with the Wall Street Journal story as he

should. So I think going into 2028, I don't see this Epstein stuff having really any bearing on the election. He brokered the piece between the FBI guys, Cash Patel and Dan Bongino and Trump. Right. And because Trump was mad at them after the, like she goes or I go thing with Dan

and that reportedly JD Vann stepped in. You want me to take an opposing view? Yeah, go for it. Do it. Okay. Trump is making these decisions about what the country learns about something people are really interested in.

Yes. And he's got a conflict. He was close friends with the person at the center of this. How close I think the Wall Street Journal story, if true, speaks to that. You say he stays in his own hotels. I've never heard of Donald Trump flying on anyone else's plane, ever.

Flies on his plane. He flew on Epstein's plane. That suggests something. Again, I'm not assuming facts, not in evidence. I'm not saying the president broke any laws. I'm not saying he did anything improper, but he was close friends with the guy. For 15 years. Yeah. And so he should really be recused from this in terms of the public interest and confidence in decision-making. So any story that illustrates or claims to illustrate their closeness, I

think just speaks to that. You think about it. He shouldn't be the one deciding these things because they're about his good friend. I think just speak to that. You think about it. He shouldn't be the one deciding these things because they're bad as good friends. That's a pipe. But let me tell you something. My own feeling is not that Trump has something to hide in these files. I really don't believe that.

But I do believe Trump probably has some powerful donors and or friends who are in there. Which is why he shouldn't be deciding. But I think that's the question. Is that the question, it dies down if there's nothing, if there's no more new oxygen. But I think we've all probably heard, there are more stories in the works. Now they may not ever see the light of day, there may not be anything there.

But I think to Mark's point, they were close friends. New York and Palm Beach are small worlds. We're sitting in one of them right now. If there's another story and it starts to get closer to them, then I think this continues to have more oxygen and people start, you know, it brings it back in front of the public. People demand stuff.

And to Mark's point, people started thinking, is Trump hiding something about his friends or about him, or what is it? The Trump, it brought that piece of it on himself. If Trump had just stayed consistent with the base, and this had never been Trump's issue. You know, he really hadn't been touting Epstein on the campaign trail, though his son touted it many, many times, and so did his top deputies and his emissaries out on the campaign trail.

But if Trump hadn't done that weird answer at that cabinet meeting and then gone on the attack against the MAGA base, nobody would be thinking this is like a Trump scandal. They just, he's making it, he's so defensive on it, it's making people be like, whoa, there's the target right there. Go ahead, Lincoln. Is there a simpler explanation here? When I look at President Trump, I think, is he bored?

Sometimes I look at him and go, is he bored by something? That's sometimes an explanation. And I think President Trump, because he doesn't live on X, because he has Fox rolling 24 seven, that's what he watches, they're not really covering Epstein that much. And I don't think he really gets everything that's happening on X because he has Fox rolling 24 seven. That's what he watches. They're not really covering Epstein that much. And I don't think he really gets everything that's happening

on X in the podcast space with the discussion around Epstein. I think President Trump is also frustrated because he had weeks of just consistent winning, right? When it came to the border, the Iranian nuclear facilities going down to Texas with the grieving families. I know because I was there. But President Trump had weeks and weeks of winning. And then now he's like, you guys want to talk about Epstein, this loser scumbag?

His attorney general should not have put out that memo. Right, but here's like, he is going to stand by, she is not going any freaking where, even at, what's so funny to me is at that FIFA soccer game, Pam Bondi was in the box, so was Rupert Murdoch, and now he's doing Rupert Murdoch five days later. But yeah, I think Pam Bondi's not going anywhere, she's Florida, Suzy Wiles likes her, and she's good on cable, and so I don't see her going anywhere anytime soon. I don't know if I agree with that, I think Pam Bonny's not going anywhere. She's Florida, Susie Wiles likes her, and she's good on cable.

And so I don't see her going anywhere anytime soon. I don't know if I agree with that. I really don't because it's, I believe Trump likes her and doesn't want to switch out his AG. And Susie Wiles likes her, but the base has turned on her. They will forgive the big man.

They're not going to forgive her. I think it'll take some time, like with the Mike Waltz situation. I don't think he's going gonna give a dog a bone right now and give you the body and the head that you want. Could I see her going and being moved and shifted down the road? Sure, I don't see it happening now

in the dark days of summer. And my information is that she's miserable anyway. I don't think she's happy anyway. Yeah, I mean- Comfortable with the status quo. Yeah, very, yeah. It's so remarkable too, because he's so culturally deaf. He so has his finger on the pulse of his base,

of what's being talked about around the country. This is the first time in 10 years that I've just seen him on the wrong side of this, repeatedly to your point, he's dug in about it. And that is surprising, right? You would just think he's so smart and so clever that he would see this, he'd shift, other than throwing out something

like the Russia with Tulsi Gabbard. When does he make that move, right? And how does he do it? Because asalbert, when does he make that move, right? And how does he do it? Because as a Democrat, I just am like, whoa, you're so on your back foot, you can't get off it. I know this is a weird place to go with it, but in a way it kind of reminds me of what happened at Fox

with the Gretchen Carlson investigations. She filed this lawsuit, nobody liked Gretchen, no one really wanted to deal with her. We all knew she got fired because she had terrible ratings and she wasn't popular. But then she dug up this Me Too allegation, which we were all like, oh sure, whatever. Even I was like, there's no way that's why she got fired. Even though I knew what Roger had done with me, to me, not with me, years earlier. But what was happening in that case was Roger had managed

to limit the investigation into Gretchen's allegations to only the team that worked with her on her show, which would mean he would never get, that the investigators, Lachlan and Rupert and their lawyers would never get to the women who actually had stories. And this grand jury thing has that feel to me. Like, I don't think we're going to hear anything from those grand jury files regarding any Trump friends,

any super rich New Yorker or Floridian who, because you know, Julie K Brown, as annoying as she is, was on, was it Ross Do Thoughts, whatever his last name is, Douthat's podcast over the weekend. And she was once again reminding us all that he is believed, Jeffrey, to have trafficked girls to third parties, to other rich men. And she was naming some very rich men, I'm not gonna name them here, you can listen to the podcast if you want to,

as like having made Jeffrey super rich, super fast, other than just Les Wexner, the Victoria's Secret guy, other than him. And it just really got me thinking again about the fact that there really are reports, there are women out there who can point the finger at a third man or a fourth man or a fifth man. And I got dollars into donuts

that those names probably aren't in the grand jury. But the point of it was to just say, we're doing something, we're for disclosure and see where the story goes. And from their point of view, hope it goes away. But you could. I'm also never really into file dumps. Like people said, we want JFK, we want RFK, we want all these files.

And then they made noise for like six hours online and we didn't really learn that much. There was no big bombshell. The earth didn't come to an end. Nothing shattering happened. So I don't really lose sleep over it. Like if we learn something new, we learn something new, but I don't find it all that interesting.

Well, let me ask you this. What's the net effect of all of this? Because my own feeling is, I didn't like how Trump handled this, especially last week, but it didn't change my feelings about Trump. I still support him. I still think he's incredibly good for the country. He is chalking up so many wins.

So like you look at the fact that Trump is getting boys out of girl sports, he is stopping the mutilation of children, he is closing down the border, he is deporting dangerous illegals. Well, that matters way more to me than about Epstein. But there are people in Cora Maga for whom, you know, this is a very big issue and it speaks not to just like their conspiratorial nature, but like the system

that protects corrupt rich guys and shits on the little people. And that could be an ongoing problem. I think it's huge because look, the last three elections have been games of inches, two, three percent, right? Trump barely wins in 16, barely loses in 20, barely wins in 24. As you just said, for the first time in 10 years, Trump and his movement have been defending the status quo, defending institutions, right?

You're Charlie Kirk saying, I trust the government. We haven't heard that in a decade. And for these younger people, and I give Trump tons of credit to get all these young people to buy into him, to buy into MAGA, to believe in him. They're saying, wait a second, this is no different than what we kind of heard during COVID.

You know, some people go back to the Iraq war and Ron kind of touched on all these different things. That's where I say he's tone deaf a little. How does he fix that? Not that they're rushing to us Democrats yet because we have a huge trust problem with them, but for the first time we've been about change, We've been about transparency and the Republicans are just- That's where you fell off, Dan.

You got to start somewhere. Maybe Elon Musk and his America party, maybe they'll get a couple, but they're not going Democrat. Here's my thing. If I'm president Trump, right, he's looking at these polls that even CNN is running that he's gone up the last week or two, even with all the Epstein stuff. And I think one of the takeaways is even if they're really loud voices on X and in the podcast space, they might not have as much effect on these polls and in the broader electorate. And I think for president Trump, because he's not living in those online spaces, he's like, I'm winning, I'm killing it. We've got

the most secure border. Why aren't you talking about this? I'm bored with Epstein. I think it's really that for me. I don't think it's so much the friends or there's some secret thing he's hiding. I think he's like, I'm bored. Why are we talking about this guy? He's dead. He's gone. Some piece of Trump genuinely believes this is a Democrat conspiracy that like this was, this is like a long trap that's been laid by Democrats somehow. I haven't totally figured it out, but I think he, there's a piece of him that does genuinely believe this is like some sort of a thing that's been laid for him.

And I've reported this earlier. I was told by a few people that there is a belief, this is not confirmed, that there's a belief that there were some like poison pills put in the files by the Biden team before leaving office. That would make it such that Trump wouldn't wanna release the files. I have no idea whether that's true. But now I've heard it from a couple of people

and even President Trump intimated it. Credible. I want them to put out the credible documents is what President Trump keeps saying now when he's gaggling. She can put out anything that's credible. And so I think he's just worried there could be some stuff in there that's supposed to paint him in a negative light.

And he's like, I'm winning so much, my polling is great. Why are we talking about this guy? Why don't you just love me the way I deserve to be loved? I think he's bored with it. I think he's so bored and the news that he's watching isn't covering Epstein at all. And his aides might be coming to him saying, this is really big online, this is big online. And I think he's so bored in the news that he's watching isn't covering Epstein at all. And his aides might be coming to him saying, this is really big online, this is big online.

And I think he's like, I'm sick of this. Yeah, I don't like online. So Mark Halpern, does it affect him in any way, shape or form or no? I don't think so. I think it's the 485th lesson that we all should be humble and remember that Donald Trump understands MAGA better than we do.

Yeah, and politics in general. The guy's instincts for it have been. Yeah. And politics in general. The guy's instincts for it have been spot on. Spot on. Spot on. Punishment. Trademark copyright. And he can do stuff and say stuff that other people can't.

Yeah. I think it's also July. I was talking about this with someone yesterday. Like it's the middle of summer, it's July. I think a lot of people are at home. I think by a couple of weeks, we won't even be discussing it. Well, maybe that's why they released it when they did. Because it's summer. But I was just amazed why they released it when they did, because it's summer.

I was just amazed that they released it during such a slow news time when the media is always looking for something to chew on. And this has been such a juicy story. If they're super sophisticated, maybe they figured out it can burn out over the summer. Same way BBB is gonna burn out by the time we actually get to the midterm.

Yeah. I know what's happening. All right, guys, a pleasure. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you all for being here. We never get to be in the same room. Yeah, it's wonderful. Okay. Tomorrow, we've got another MK Media star,

one of the EJs, Emily Jasinski, will be here for the full show. Don't miss that. Thanks for listening to the Megyn Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.