The MeidasTouch Podcast - BREAKING: DOJ and MAGA States FILE dueling BRIEFS to 8th Circuit in Student Loan Cancellation Appeal
Episode Date: October 26, 2022On this edition of The Mighty, MeidasTouch Network host Ben Meiselas breaks down the recent filings before the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals by the DOJ and several MAGA-led states that may determine th...e fate of Biden’s student debt cancellation program. Last week, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted an emergency stay temporarily blocking the Biden administration from discharging student debt pursuant to the debt cancellation program. On The Mighty, we feature some of the most impactful responses, reactions, narratives, musings, and rants of Meidas content creators and highlight pro-democracy candidates and activists throughout the country. New episodes of the traditional MeidasTouch Podcast featuring drop every Tuesday and Friday morning. Shop Meidas Merch at: https://store.meidastouch.com Join us on Patreon: https://patreon.com/meidastouch Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Offer valid on standard browsers, U.S. only.
When I heard about Date My Age, I thought, really?
But there I was in my empty, quiet house, my laptop on the kitchen counter, and I typed in my name.
Looking for a man between the ages of, hmm, 40 to 60? Sure, why not?
Date My Age is different.
With verified profiles, you can feel safe and secure to explore meaningful connections with interesting and mature singles.
Date My Age made it really easy.
I could join and view online profiles for free.
All of a sudden, my empty house wasn't so quiet anymore.
I got so much attention, it just made me feel seen and alive.
Date My Age helped me start a totally new chapter in my life.
Find a friend, a lover, a partner at Date My Age helped me start a totally new chapter in my life. Find a friend, a lover,
a partner at Date My Age. Get 60% off when you join at datemyage.com today. That's datemyage.com to connect with thousands of singles worldwide. datemyage.com.
I'm Ben Mycelis from the Midas Touch Network, and this is a breaking news alert. So last week, we talked about the surprising and very upsetting ruling by the Eighth Circuit
Court of Appeals, which granted an administrative stay motion filed by a number of Republican
states, including the state of Nebraska, temporarily halting the Biden administration's ability to
discharge debt under the student debt cancellation program. And in the order by the Eighth Circuit
Court of Appeals, they set an expedited briefing schedule for the Department of Justice to submit their briefs and for the Republican-led states to
submit their briefs challenging the district court's ruling, where the district court,
which was in the Eastern District of Missouri, and it was a George W. Bush appointee district
court judge who actually made the ruling, who found that these Republican-led states did not
have standing to bring lawsuits trying to stop or block or enjoin the Biden student debt cancellation
program. And just to remind you of what this lawsuit is about, on September 29th of 2022, six Republican-led states,
Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas,
and South Carolina brought lawsuits
in the Eastern District of Missouri.
They all joined in on the same lawsuit.
And they alleged that they were harmed
because their tax revenue
would be decreased because they would be collecting less taxes from their taxpayers based on
Biden canceling debt. And this didn't really make all that much sense because in these states, discharge debt was not taxable as income.
Yet what these states argued
is that it could be taxable as income.
And they also argued that a number of collection agencies
that would go after students
if they didn't pay their debt,
that their revenues would be decreased also,
which would in turn harm the states.
But the district court judge, again, a right-wing appointed judge, did not agree with that analysis,
found that there was no standing and dismissed the lawsuit.
These states then filed an appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and as part of their appeal, saw an emergency stay
stopping Biden's program for going into effect pending the resolution of the appeal. So let's
just pull that order up, and then let's talk about the briefing that was filed pursuant to this
briefing schedule. So here we have on the screen the ruling from last week,
from October 21st of 2022, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit,
State of Nebraska et al., et al., referring to all the other states, versus Joseph Biden in his
official capacity as the President of the United States at all. They also sued the Department of Education,
and it's an appeal from the district court for the Eastern District of Missouri, St. Louis
Division. Order. Appellant's emergency motion for an administrative stay prohibiting the appellees
from discharging any student loan debt under the cancellation program until this court rules on appellant's motion for an injunction,
pending appeal is granted. So what they're saying there is that the Republican state's
emergency motion for an administrative stay for this action to prohibit the Biden administration
from discharging the student debt under the cancellation program until the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on this motion for an injunction, which is to totally stop, essentially,
to basically totally stop Biden from implementing the student debt cancellation program, not on a
temporary basis, but on an enduring basis. And they said that is granted. What's granted is the temporary stay pending the
court reviewing the motions on the more permanent injunction. The request for an expedited briefing
on the motion for an injunction pending appeal is granted as followed. And so what they're seeking,
these states, is an injunction, enjoining or stopping it,
pending a full-fledged appeal,
which can take a long period of time.
So the practical effect, that's why I say
this enduring injunction, that right now this stay
is a temporary maneuver, but if the injunction pending
appeal is granted, that can seriously derail
the student debt cancellation program for a very,
very, very long period of time. And one of the things I pointed out as well in the prior video
that this Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals order didn't make much sense to me because if you look
at it too, they're entertaining an emergency motion for an administrative stay. But what the district court did was find that there was no standing for the states to even sue,
that the states couldn't assert a cognizable injury.
So how could you stay on an emergency basis that finding by the district court judge of no standing? How are you staying that on an emergency basis, that finding by the district court judge of no standing. How are you staying
that in an emergency basis? What this actually really was, there was a injunction, a temporary
injunction that the Eighth Circuit was granting. In any event, whatever the technicality is,
and the reason why I have problems with the technicalities is those that courts used to
care about technicalities. Technicalities used to say,
oh, wait a minute, we, the Eighth Circuit, don't have the procedural power to do this.
But it seems like they don't care about those technicalities anymore. But in any event,
the practical effect of this was to temporarily block the Biden administration from implementing
the student debt cancellation program pending the expedited briefing. And now the expedited briefing schedule
set forth here. Appalachia's response in opposition, so the DOJ's response in opposition,
shall be due on or before 5 p.m. Central on Monday, October 24th. An appellant's reply,
the Republican-led state's reply, if any, is due on or before 5 p.m. Central Tuesday, October 25th, 2022. So now, as of the
time of this recording, the Department of Justice has submitted their briefing on the issue.
Theirs was due on Monday. The Republican-led states submitted their briefing on the issue.
That was due Tuesday. And here's what the Department of Justice argued in their briefs. They say,
look, these Republican-led states are seeking this extraordinary injunction pending an appeal
in a suit that the district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, that there was no standing.
Such an application demands a significantly higher justification than just a request for a stay. The Department
of Justice goes on to say, Congress granted the Secretary of Education broad authority
to ensure that national emergencies do not financially harm student loan borrowers.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, secretaries from two administrations, Trump and Biden,
invoked that authority to suspend interest accrual and payments on federally held student loans.
As those protections wind down, the Secretary of Education reasonably determined it was necessary to provide
targeted debt relief to federal student loan borrowers affected by the
pandemic. Now, six states seek to enjoin the secretary's action, but the district court
correctly held that they lack standing. They go on to say plaintiffs cannot establish the need
for injunctive relief. Plaintiffs do not have Article III standing, and even if they did,
they are unlikely to succeed on their claims given Congress's authorization for the Secretary of Education's actions and the Secretary's explicit consideration of the relevant factors.
Further, these Republican-led states, this is an important part, will suffer no irreparable injury from the provision
of much needed relief to millions of Americans. But the public interest would be greatly harmed
by its denial. The people will be harmed. And these states are creating fake irreparable harm
issues because when you're seeking this injunctive relief, this emergency
injunctive relief, these states are arguing that they're about to suffer irreparable harm
if regular Americans, mostly who are making less than $75,000, get this very targeted relief. I
mean, how cruel can you be, especially where the states have not even articulated really what amount of money
they're going to lose. Hypothetical tax revenue by going after students for the $10,000 that would
be discharged under Biden's student debt cancellation program. That's how cruel these
Republican-led states are. So that was the fundamental argument that the Department of
Justice made on their brief filed on October 24th.
And then you have the Republican states.
They filed their brief.
And in their brief, they basically said, look, we're not just seeking for an injunction here
in the Eighth Circuit states.
The same way you, the Eighth Circuit, granted a national temporary injunction, we want,
and this is what they say, the court should enjoin the entire cancellation program for the entire
country. That's the relief that they're seeking. And what the states argue is they go, the
department's contrived reasons for rejecting this major question doctrines do not override the clear
evidence confirming it applies. And the agency's baseless reading of the HEROES Act places
practically no limits on the secretary's power to discharge debt during or after national
emergencies. And so the central argument that the states are arguing
after they claim that they have standing,
they argue that the HEROES Act,
which was passed by during the George W. Bush administration
giving powers to the Secretary of Education
to do things like discharge debt in case of war
or national emergencies, What they argue is that
cannot possibly apply to the pandemic and to the current conditions affecting students, that that
is outside of the scope of the authority that was delegated to the Secretary of Education and that the HEROES Act cannot be used as the basis for
providing the student debt cancellation program or implementing the student debt cancellation
program. So that's the argument that's being made by the states. And they've been joined by
numerous other right-wing radical groups that have millions of dollars of funding from right wing billionaire groups who
have filed amicus briefs, which are also known as friends of the court briefs, to try to fight for
the court to deny students this very, very, very targeted relief. I mean, we're talking about
less than $10,000 relief for loans and $20,000 for Pell Grants.
I mean, that's the targeted relief here that we're talking about.
Breaking news.
A brand new game is now live at Bet365.
Introducing Prize Matcher, a daily game that's never ordinary.
All you have to do is match as many tiles as you can.
And the more you match, the better.
We also have top table games like our incredible Super Spin Roulette, Blackjack, and a huge selection of slots.
So there you have it.
How can you match that?
Check out Prize Matcher and see why it's never ordinary at Bet365.
Must be 19 or older, Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you or someone you know has concerns about gambling, visit connexontario.ca.
T's and Z's apply.
And, you know, one thing to mention, the White House on the same day of all of these briefings,
the White House tweeted out as well or has made clear that over 22 million Americans have already
given the Biden-Harris administration the information to be considered for life-changing
student debt relief. Think about that. 22 million Americans would benefit from this,
and the Republican-led states are working harder than almost on any other issue out there.
More than focusing on their electric grids, more than focusing on their roads, more than focusing
on their police, more than focusing on keeping their states safer, more than focusing on their police, more than focusing on keeping their state safer,
more than focusing on their highways and roadways, and more than focusing on building firehouses.
They are uniquely focused and they are obsessed with the fact that here is a situation where
regular folk, where average Americans can get targeted debt relief. They don't care when
it comes to the PPP, when all these lawmakers took out hundreds of thousands or if not millions of
dollars. They're cool with that. They're cool when you have tax cuts for billionaires and
billionaires get bailed out when they get into financial duress. They're cool with that. They
don't care about the impact on the economy
there. Here, there is a program that could actually help just some real Americans for once
in an area where the burden of these student loans is, in many cases, preventing people
from buying homes and participating in the economy. It's creating this jam in the pipeline of financial freedom.
And so this is just trying in a small way to target it.
And these Republican-led states and these Republican-led groups,
and we got to be clear where this is coming from,
the Republican-led groups are the one who's pushing it,
are obsessed, absolutely obsessed with ensuring that this
program does not take effect. Now, one of the things about the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals,
it's composition. One George H.W. Bush judge, five George W. Bush judges, one Obama judge,
and four Trump-appointed judges. So there are 10 Republicans,
one Democrat on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, just one Obama appointee,
no other Democrats on there. It's why elections have consequences and why, even though I believe
here for a number of reasons on the standing aspect of it, on the merits
itself, but on the standing aspect and on the fact that one of the things if you're
seeking this emergency injunction pending the outcome of the appeal, you have to show
irreparable harm.
And the only people who would suffer irreparable harm right now would be
the students who will be deprived of this relief that they should get.
So the states, to me, haven't asserted irreparable harm. They haven't asserted
jurisdiction or standing. So they shouldn't even get to the merits. But when you get to the merits,
to me, they clearly lose on the merits as well.
Um, but so where do I think it should come out?
I think the department of justice should win, but we're in front of the eighth circuit and the chances here that the eighth circuit and even the United States Supreme court,
uh, would perhaps have a favorable view of what the states are
trying to do and to block Biden from implementing this student debt cancellation program. I think
that either the Supreme Court or the Eighth Circuit is going to try to stop this from
happening. And one of the questions you may be asking is, and I heard this before,
well, I thought that the Supreme Court previously rejected this challenge. Didn't Amy Coney Barrett reject it? That was a different case. That was in
the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. That was a group called the Brown County Taxpayers Association,
some other AstroTurf group. What the Republicans do is they flood the zone.
They filed these lawsuits literally everywhere,
different groups and states and all over to try to get through one of these courts. That's part
of their strategy. And here they got through with the Eighth Circuit and the states, but they tried
getting through with all of these other courts to get what they happened, what occurred here.
In that case, the Brown County Taxpayers Association, they were a group of taxpayers
and they claimed as taxpayers that this would impact their taxes would go up.
And there, the district court judge said no.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected it.
And then an emergency application was filed with the Supreme Court.
Amy Coney Barrett is the supervising judge that hears emergency applications
over the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. And Amy Coney Barrett said, rejected, denied the
emergency application. But that was on the basis of standing. That came through another court.
These are now states saying, unlike the Brown County Taxpayer Association,
we as states and our ability to collect revenue from taxpayers here, that we have damage,
we have injury, so we should get past the standing argument. And let's talk about the merits
regarding the HEROES Act and that we believe that the HEROES Act does not allow the Secretary of
Education to provide for the student debt cancellation program. So I normally would
give predictions. It's a tough call with the Eighth Circuit. If they followed the law,
the student debt cancellation program should go into effect, and they should not grant the
injunctive relief by the states. But I think you have an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals,
depending on the panel, that will be sympathetic to the states. And if it's, unfortunately,
the wrong panel, I think they will grant the injunction, in which case it will go to the
Supreme Court through an emergency application. Whoever loses here will file an emergency application.
And I think the emergency application
will be ultimately denied by the Supreme Court.
So I feel like whoever wins here,
that's going to be the status quo of what takes place.
But meanwhile, at least 22 million lives hang in the balance of people who rely on
this and just regular Americans. And I just hope that, I just think it's so cruel. I just hope that
everybody who's watching this, please share these videos and just let people know what's going on.
That's why I take the time to explain it in this detail because you need to understand the way our
legal system to understand that way our legal system understands
that it is uniquely Republican-led states and Republican groups who are challenging this
initiative. This is not a both sides issue and courts doing it. This is all Republicans,
Republican judges, Republican groups, and they don't do this when billionaires get their tax benefits and when billionaires get tax cuts and when billionaires get bailed out and when billionaires get all of the perks that they get. to going down, our deficit has decreased close to $2 trillion under Biden, it's not really a
logical factual debate with them. MAGA Republicans and the Republican Party don't want regular
Americans to have this relief. They view when regular Americans get it, they view that as a
handout. They say, pull yourselves up by the bootstraps. That's their view. But when billionaires get it, they call it trickle-down economics. They call it
that they deserve it, that they should get it, that that will be great for the economy when
wealthy people can hoard money. And I just think that we have to look at these issues with common sense. And we have to say it's important that we also help regular Americans too.
So we'll keep you updated here on the Midas Touch Network.
Wanted to give you that extensive but I think important background on where we are with
the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals case, which is currently holding up the student
debt relief program by President Biden.
We'll keep you updated here on the Midas Touch Network. Hit the subscribe button. Now we're on
our way to 1 million subscribers with your support. Hit the subscribe. Also, if you want to support
independent media like this, here's what you can do. It goes a long way and you always ask,
how can you help? Here's how you can help. Go to patreon.com slash Midas Touch, P-A-T-R-E-O-N.com slash Midas Touch.
Become a member of one of the membership tiers there. There's lots of exclusive content and
behind the scenes footage and much more, but most importantly, you can help grow this independent
platform. We're not funded by anybody and certainly not the millionaires and billionaires
who fund the mainstream media and the fascist leaning media. None of that. So we rely on you.
And so if you could help out, it would go a long way. Go join us at patreon.com slash Midas Touch.
Until next time, I'm Ben Myselis. Midas Touch is unapologetically pro-democracy. And look,
we know you are too. So please make sure sure you check out our best-selling shirt and our best-selling gear,
the unapologetically pro-democracy gear.
And hey, while you're at it, make sure you check out my favorite shirt
and one of our most famous designs.
It wasn't rigged. You're just a loser.
At store.midastouch.com.
That's store.midastouch.com.