The MeidasTouch Podcast - Justice Allison Riggs Responds to Court Certification Ruling
Episode Date: May 7, 2025MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on a stunning ruling by the federal district court in North Carolina in the case where MAGA GOP Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin tried to change the rule...s and steal a Supreme Court seat from Justice Allison Riggs when she won the election 6 months ago in November 2024. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game
and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
The excitement doesn't stop there.
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption,
UFC Gold Blitz, and more.
Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.
And make same-day withdrawals if you win.
Download the BetMGM Ontario app today.
You don't want to miss out.
Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.
19 plus to wager.
Ontario only.
Please gamble responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you please contact connex ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor
free of charge bet mgm operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming ontario
we've got major news out of north carolina folks where the supreme court race back from november
was thrown into turmoil where the MAGA Republican candidate for
the Supreme Court seat, Jefferson Griffin, refused to concede after losing in multiple recounts to
Justice Allison Riggs, who was on the Supreme Court, the Democratic-backed candidate, Justice
Allison Riggs. At every step, the MAGA Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin tried to challenge
existing votes that were already counted. He tried to disenfranchise people. He tried to literally
steal votes from people. This had been a six-month ordeal where the votes of the people were just not
being counted. It went through the state court system, from the lower level court to their court of appeals,
to the Supreme Court, where ultimately a subset of votes was ordered by the North Carolina Supreme Court
to be recounted through this process, which was counter to what the will of the people were who actually
voted. So after the Supreme Court in North Carolina made that ruling separately, Justice
Allison Riggs was bringing an action in federal court. And we just got a very important federal
court ruling in this entire saga from, of all people, a Trump-appointed judge in North Carolina,
a judge by the name of Judge Richard Myers. And you got to hand it to the guy. He followed the
law. He put politics aside. And U.S. District Court Judge Richard Myers ordered the North
Carolina State Board of Elections to certify a 734 vote win for the Democratic Supreme Court Justice
Alison Riggs and rejected all of the MAGA candidate Jefferson Griffin's election protest.
The judge did stay the order for one week so that Jefferson Griffin may appeal. And knowing
Jefferson Griffin, I'm sure he's going to do what Jefferson Griffin does. But when you take a look
at this order by the district court judge, you get a Trump
appointed judge.
I don't even like saying Trump appointed judge, Obama appointed judge, but I think it is still
a notable factor here.
Here's what the judge wrote.
This consolidated action concerns an attempt to change the rules of the game after it had
been played.
The court cannot countenance that strategy.
Permitting parties to upend the set rules of an election after the election has taken place
can only produce confusion and turmoil, which threatens to undermine public confidence in federal courts, state agencies, and elections
themselves. Accordingly, the court finds as follows. One, retroactive invalidation of absentee
ballots cast by overseas military and civilian voters violates those voters' substantive due
process rights. That's one of the things Jefferson Griffin wanted to happen. The cure process violates equal protection rights of overseas military and civilian voters. And three,
the lack of any notice or opportunity for eligible voters to contest their mistaken designation
as never residents violates procedural due process and represents an unconstitutional burden
on the right to vote. Therefore, the judge ordered that
the win for Justice Allison Riggs be certified. Let's bring in Justice Allison Riggs to respond
to this ruling. Where are we at? Where do we go from here? It's great to have you on, and we've
been having you on now for a few months following this entire saga with you. So, you know, here we are, May 6th,
the order dropped May 5th. Yeah, thanks so much for having me, Ben. Six months to the day after
Election Day, after North Carolina voters spoke, a federal district court judge issued what was an
enormous victory, not just for North Carolina voters, but for voters all across the country.
This has been a tough six months, but I'm no stranger to tough fights.
And we knew all along that the threat here was existential,
that if people with power can toss out ballots selectively after an election,
cancel the votes of people they think didn't vote for
them, that democracy cannot exist in those conditions. And so we have been fighting tooth
and nail in a courtroom, not just for North Carolina service members, that was a worthy
enough fight for sure. North Carolina service members deserve to have someone standing up to
defend them the way they defend us. But we knew that this would open the door to enormous mischief
and frivolous challenges after election day across the country. So we're very gratified
by the ruling and stand ready to continue the fight if need be. But really, this should have
decisively ended it yesterday. Can you remind our viewers what the 65,000 votes were that were
being challenged? I know there was one group of 60, then there was another 5,000 that were the military overseas. And maybe you can describe also
what Jefferson, Griffin, and the Republicans were doing to like specifically, one, just target your
race, not the other races, not the Trump race, not the other congressional races. Those were
apparently fine. And then they micro-targeted Democratic areas only to try to change the vote after the fact.
Can you go into that?
Yeah.
So the legal terminology for what this was is throwing spaghetti at the wall.
My opponent decided to challenge it.
It reached as high as 68,000 eligible North Carolinians who cast lawful ballots. The biggest
bucket, 60,000 of them, were voters who were alleged to have information missing from their
voter file, including a social security number or a driver's license number. But that information
is not required under federal law. Federal law actually provides that those voters can vote
if they show a certain ID. My parents were in that bucket of 60,000. My dad is 30 years retired
military. He and my mom retired down to North Carolina to be near to me and my sister. They
went to register in person using their military IDs, retired military IDs, which don't have driver's
license or social security numbers on it. The Department of Defense decided years ago not to
put social security numbers on military IDs. So my parents followed every rule, did everything
right, as did the rest of the 60,000 voters in that bucket. Over the course of the last six
months, we were able to knock out
that challenge. Even the North Carolina Supreme Court said those voters did nothing wrong and we
won't disenfranchise them. What has persisted has been the selective targeting of voters who use
a federal mechanism to vote. It's called the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Voting Act.
It's a federal law designed to address how hard it is for military members and their family to vote
when they are serving away from home or overseas. Upwards of 5,500 of those voters in four counties
only were challenged. So these are people who used a specific identifiable kind of
voting because they were service members or working overseas for certain reasons.
My opponent, there's a hundred counties in North Carolina. He picked four of the most
democratic counties and challenged the military and overseas voters in those four
counties only and said they should be challenged. In other more red counties, no problem. And mine
was the only race uncertified from the 2024 election cycle. it still is, but no complaints about Donald Trump winning North Carolina
in the presidential race.
A number of Democrats and Republicans won up
and down the ballot.
North Carolina is a very purple state,
but this was really troubling, inconsistent, challenging,
and it really is reminiscent of the arguments in Bush v.
Gore, where in the 2000 election, the question was, well, do we do something in a handful of
Florida counties that we're not doing in other counties and subjecting military voters to the
presumption that their vote is invalid unless they jump through hurdles,
even when they may be serving on a submarine under seas in the Atlantic Ocean, that that
is unconstitutional. And we were gratified that the federal court yesterday upheld every one of
the arguments we made about why these challenges violated the federal constitution.
We've talked about this concept of the laboratories of autocracy, how sometimes you're seeing these MAGA Republicans try out these playbooks in states and say, okay, well,
we can do voter suppression here. We could gerrymander here. And now, even if we lose
the election after doing all of those things, we can basically just kind of redo it.
We can target certain areas, throw out 65,000 votes.
And it's why I think, you know, to your point, this has national implications here.
If this stands, they then kind of roll this out, this test balloon everywhere else. I just want to show the video of your parents,
because I think it brings it home when they're both like, if you add our ages up together,
we've been voting for like 100 years. Of course, we're going to vote for our daughter. What are
you talking? You're throwing out our votes for our daughter? What do you mean? Here,
just watch this video. This is for our viewers. Yeah, well, we were thoroughly shocked to find
out there even was a list and then to find out that we were on the list when we have voted successfully for 50 years.
And combined, we have voted religiously for over 100 years, the two of us together.
And this is the first time a ballot's ever been challenged. And I know that my daughter had spoken a lot about recognizing voter suppression
when she sees it. I can tell you, this does not feel like election integrity. Personally,
this feels like voter suppression when it involves us and a very important election to us personally. It involves our daughter.
Well, I'll tell you, Justice Riggs.
So my parents were very proud when I graduated Georgetown Law.
They were a little bit curious when I became a podcaster, but I got them back on my team now and they're proud again.
But I can only imagine you got proud parents.
You're a Supreme Court justice in the state of North Carolina.
They go out to vote for you in the election and then they find out that and they're going to be so careful.
How could you be more careful than the parents voting for that? I bet you they looked at it.
They took photos of it. They mounted it on the wall. I bet you it was one.
And their vote was one that was initially going to be thrown out.
So if it happened to them, just imagine what's happening overseas and everybody else.
So I'll let you address that.
But just as we wrap up, where do we go from here?
What happens next?
Yeah.
I mean, I have always represented voters in fights to make sure that their right to vote
counted.
I was a civil rights and voting
rights attorney before joining the bench. And my parents' experience only reminded me
of what I already knew, that there are real people at the other end of these attempts to
put political, personal political ambition over the rule of law and the Constitution.
I put my hand on a Bible two years ago, raised my hand and swore an oath to uphold the federal and state constitutions. And it's been my honor to fight for North Carolina voters. It's been my
honor to make sure that democracy carries the day across the country and that nothing,
I stood hand in hand with voters in North Carolina who said, democracy is not going to die here in
North Carolina, not on our watch. And I hope this fight is over, but if it's not, we'll keep
fighting. We need people, voters to decide elections, not politicians and not courts.
And it's a good day here in North Carolina, but we will not let our guard down.
We will never, ever give up in fighting to keep power in the hands of the people.
North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs,
right off the big decision by the district court in North Carolina.
Great to have you on.
Thank you so much.
Everybody hit subscribe.
Let's get to five million subscribers.
Can't get enough Midas?
Check out the Midas Plus sub stack for ad-free articles, reports, podcasts, daily recaps from Ron Filipkowski and more.
Sign up for free now at MidasPlus.com.