The MeidasTouch Podcast - Justice Allison Riggs Responds to Court Certification Ruling

Episode Date: May 7, 2025

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on a stunning ruling by the federal district court in North Carolina in the case where MAGA GOP Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin tried to change the rule...s and steal a Supreme Court seat from Justice Allison Riggs when she won the election 6 months ago in November 2024. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.
Starting point is 00:00:29 And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you please contact connex ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor
Starting point is 00:00:50 free of charge bet mgm operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming ontario we've got major news out of north carolina folks where the supreme court race back from november was thrown into turmoil where the MAGA Republican candidate for the Supreme Court seat, Jefferson Griffin, refused to concede after losing in multiple recounts to Justice Allison Riggs, who was on the Supreme Court, the Democratic-backed candidate, Justice Allison Riggs. At every step, the MAGA Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin tried to challenge existing votes that were already counted. He tried to disenfranchise people. He tried to literally steal votes from people. This had been a six-month ordeal where the votes of the people were just not
Starting point is 00:01:42 being counted. It went through the state court system, from the lower level court to their court of appeals, to the Supreme Court, where ultimately a subset of votes was ordered by the North Carolina Supreme Court to be recounted through this process, which was counter to what the will of the people were who actually voted. So after the Supreme Court in North Carolina made that ruling separately, Justice Allison Riggs was bringing an action in federal court. And we just got a very important federal court ruling in this entire saga from, of all people, a Trump-appointed judge in North Carolina, a judge by the name of Judge Richard Myers. And you got to hand it to the guy. He followed the law. He put politics aside. And U.S. District Court Judge Richard Myers ordered the North
Starting point is 00:02:39 Carolina State Board of Elections to certify a 734 vote win for the Democratic Supreme Court Justice Alison Riggs and rejected all of the MAGA candidate Jefferson Griffin's election protest. The judge did stay the order for one week so that Jefferson Griffin may appeal. And knowing Jefferson Griffin, I'm sure he's going to do what Jefferson Griffin does. But when you take a look at this order by the district court judge, you get a Trump appointed judge. I don't even like saying Trump appointed judge, Obama appointed judge, but I think it is still a notable factor here.
Starting point is 00:03:14 Here's what the judge wrote. This consolidated action concerns an attempt to change the rules of the game after it had been played. The court cannot countenance that strategy. Permitting parties to upend the set rules of an election after the election has taken place can only produce confusion and turmoil, which threatens to undermine public confidence in federal courts, state agencies, and elections themselves. Accordingly, the court finds as follows. One, retroactive invalidation of absentee ballots cast by overseas military and civilian voters violates those voters' substantive due
Starting point is 00:04:00 process rights. That's one of the things Jefferson Griffin wanted to happen. The cure process violates equal protection rights of overseas military and civilian voters. And three, the lack of any notice or opportunity for eligible voters to contest their mistaken designation as never residents violates procedural due process and represents an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote. Therefore, the judge ordered that the win for Justice Allison Riggs be certified. Let's bring in Justice Allison Riggs to respond to this ruling. Where are we at? Where do we go from here? It's great to have you on, and we've been having you on now for a few months following this entire saga with you. So, you know, here we are, May 6th, the order dropped May 5th. Yeah, thanks so much for having me, Ben. Six months to the day after
Starting point is 00:04:51 Election Day, after North Carolina voters spoke, a federal district court judge issued what was an enormous victory, not just for North Carolina voters, but for voters all across the country. This has been a tough six months, but I'm no stranger to tough fights. And we knew all along that the threat here was existential, that if people with power can toss out ballots selectively after an election, cancel the votes of people they think didn't vote for them, that democracy cannot exist in those conditions. And so we have been fighting tooth and nail in a courtroom, not just for North Carolina service members, that was a worthy
Starting point is 00:05:39 enough fight for sure. North Carolina service members deserve to have someone standing up to defend them the way they defend us. But we knew that this would open the door to enormous mischief and frivolous challenges after election day across the country. So we're very gratified by the ruling and stand ready to continue the fight if need be. But really, this should have decisively ended it yesterday. Can you remind our viewers what the 65,000 votes were that were being challenged? I know there was one group of 60, then there was another 5,000 that were the military overseas. And maybe you can describe also what Jefferson, Griffin, and the Republicans were doing to like specifically, one, just target your race, not the other races, not the Trump race, not the other congressional races. Those were
Starting point is 00:06:39 apparently fine. And then they micro-targeted Democratic areas only to try to change the vote after the fact. Can you go into that? Yeah. So the legal terminology for what this was is throwing spaghetti at the wall. My opponent decided to challenge it. It reached as high as 68,000 eligible North Carolinians who cast lawful ballots. The biggest bucket, 60,000 of them, were voters who were alleged to have information missing from their voter file, including a social security number or a driver's license number. But that information
Starting point is 00:07:19 is not required under federal law. Federal law actually provides that those voters can vote if they show a certain ID. My parents were in that bucket of 60,000. My dad is 30 years retired military. He and my mom retired down to North Carolina to be near to me and my sister. They went to register in person using their military IDs, retired military IDs, which don't have driver's license or social security numbers on it. The Department of Defense decided years ago not to put social security numbers on military IDs. So my parents followed every rule, did everything right, as did the rest of the 60,000 voters in that bucket. Over the course of the last six months, we were able to knock out
Starting point is 00:08:05 that challenge. Even the North Carolina Supreme Court said those voters did nothing wrong and we won't disenfranchise them. What has persisted has been the selective targeting of voters who use a federal mechanism to vote. It's called the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Voting Act. It's a federal law designed to address how hard it is for military members and their family to vote when they are serving away from home or overseas. Upwards of 5,500 of those voters in four counties only were challenged. So these are people who used a specific identifiable kind of voting because they were service members or working overseas for certain reasons. My opponent, there's a hundred counties in North Carolina. He picked four of the most
Starting point is 00:09:00 democratic counties and challenged the military and overseas voters in those four counties only and said they should be challenged. In other more red counties, no problem. And mine was the only race uncertified from the 2024 election cycle. it still is, but no complaints about Donald Trump winning North Carolina in the presidential race. A number of Democrats and Republicans won up and down the ballot. North Carolina is a very purple state, but this was really troubling, inconsistent, challenging,
Starting point is 00:09:44 and it really is reminiscent of the arguments in Bush v. Gore, where in the 2000 election, the question was, well, do we do something in a handful of Florida counties that we're not doing in other counties and subjecting military voters to the presumption that their vote is invalid unless they jump through hurdles, even when they may be serving on a submarine under seas in the Atlantic Ocean, that that is unconstitutional. And we were gratified that the federal court yesterday upheld every one of the arguments we made about why these challenges violated the federal constitution. We've talked about this concept of the laboratories of autocracy, how sometimes you're seeing these MAGA Republicans try out these playbooks in states and say, okay, well,
Starting point is 00:10:36 we can do voter suppression here. We could gerrymander here. And now, even if we lose the election after doing all of those things, we can basically just kind of redo it. We can target certain areas, throw out 65,000 votes. And it's why I think, you know, to your point, this has national implications here. If this stands, they then kind of roll this out, this test balloon everywhere else. I just want to show the video of your parents, because I think it brings it home when they're both like, if you add our ages up together, we've been voting for like 100 years. Of course, we're going to vote for our daughter. What are you talking? You're throwing out our votes for our daughter? What do you mean? Here,
Starting point is 00:11:17 just watch this video. This is for our viewers. Yeah, well, we were thoroughly shocked to find out there even was a list and then to find out that we were on the list when we have voted successfully for 50 years. And combined, we have voted religiously for over 100 years, the two of us together. And this is the first time a ballot's ever been challenged. And I know that my daughter had spoken a lot about recognizing voter suppression when she sees it. I can tell you, this does not feel like election integrity. Personally, this feels like voter suppression when it involves us and a very important election to us personally. It involves our daughter. Well, I'll tell you, Justice Riggs. So my parents were very proud when I graduated Georgetown Law.
Starting point is 00:12:13 They were a little bit curious when I became a podcaster, but I got them back on my team now and they're proud again. But I can only imagine you got proud parents. You're a Supreme Court justice in the state of North Carolina. They go out to vote for you in the election and then they find out that and they're going to be so careful. How could you be more careful than the parents voting for that? I bet you they looked at it. They took photos of it. They mounted it on the wall. I bet you it was one. And their vote was one that was initially going to be thrown out. So if it happened to them, just imagine what's happening overseas and everybody else.
Starting point is 00:12:52 So I'll let you address that. But just as we wrap up, where do we go from here? What happens next? Yeah. I mean, I have always represented voters in fights to make sure that their right to vote counted. I was a civil rights and voting rights attorney before joining the bench. And my parents' experience only reminded me
Starting point is 00:13:11 of what I already knew, that there are real people at the other end of these attempts to put political, personal political ambition over the rule of law and the Constitution. I put my hand on a Bible two years ago, raised my hand and swore an oath to uphold the federal and state constitutions. And it's been my honor to fight for North Carolina voters. It's been my honor to make sure that democracy carries the day across the country and that nothing, I stood hand in hand with voters in North Carolina who said, democracy is not going to die here in North Carolina, not on our watch. And I hope this fight is over, but if it's not, we'll keep fighting. We need people, voters to decide elections, not politicians and not courts. And it's a good day here in North Carolina, but we will not let our guard down.
Starting point is 00:14:13 We will never, ever give up in fighting to keep power in the hands of the people. North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs, right off the big decision by the district court in North Carolina. Great to have you on. Thank you so much. Everybody hit subscribe. Let's get to five million subscribers. Can't get enough Midas?
Starting point is 00:14:36 Check out the Midas Plus sub stack for ad-free articles, reports, podcasts, daily recaps from Ron Filipkowski and more. Sign up for free now at MidasPlus.com.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.