The MeidasTouch Podcast - Trump gets DESTROYED over and over AGAIN

Episode Date: May 5, 2023

Welcome to the latest episode of the MeidasTouch Podcast! On today's show, we have a lot to cover, including a major victory for the Department of Justice. The trial of the Proud Boys, a far-right extremist group, has resulted in multiple convictions of Seditious Conspiracy. We dive into the details of the case and what this means for the investigations into January 6. We also discuss the latest failed smear attempt by Republicans against President Biden. As usual, their baseless claims have fallen apart under scrutiny, but not before causing more outrage in the far-right news cycle. We also touch on the latest updates of E. Jean Carroll's trial against former President Donald Trump. In other news, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds himself embroiled in yet another scandal. All this and more on this episode of the MeidasTouch Podcast! New full-length episodes of the MeidasTouch Podcast featuring the brothers are released every Tuesday & Friday morning. The rest of the week, enjoy our short-form content we call ‘The Mighty.’ If you enjoyed this episode, please be sure to rate, review and subscribe. Thanks to our sponsors! MANSCAPED: Get 20% Off and Free Shipping with code MEIDAS at Manscaped.com Fast Growing Trees: Head to fastgrowingtrees.com/meidastouch right now to get 15% off your entire order! Klyman Financial: Go to Klymanfinancial.com/meidas and speak to the owners directly to figure out what insurance policy best fits your needs! Yair Klyman is a Registered Representative who offers securities through American Portfolios Financial Services, Inc. (APFS) Member FINRA/SIPC. Klyman Financial is not affiliated with APFS. David Klyman is insurance licensed only. Shop Meidas Merch at: https://store.meidastouch.com Join us on Patreon: https://patreon.com/meidastouch Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 American Psyop: https://pod.link/1652143101 Burn the Boats: https://pod.link/1485464343 Majority 54: https://pod.link/1309354521 Political Beatdown: https://pod.link/1669634407 Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://pod.link/1676844320 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue? A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool. Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart. Grocer $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games

with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly

to jump in on the fun and make same day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. After fleeing America during the E. Gene Carroll federal trial and making the excuse that he had business to attend to in Ireland and Scotland, Donald Trump just said that he had to cut short his very important golf game in Ireland to return to America because he wants to confront E. Jean Carroll in court during trial. But of course, Trump was lying. Even his lawyer, Joe Takapina said, yeah, I have no clue what he's talking about. He's absolutely not testifying at this trial. But the federal judge in the E. Jean Carroll case is calling Donald Trump's bluff. And this comes after a complete disaster of a trial for Donald Trump.

And the case is set to be turned over to the jury on Monday. We'll let you know what went down in that trial this past week. Another major court loss for Donald Trump, Donald Trump's $100 million, he just like makes up these numbers, $100 million defamation case against the New York Times for accurately reporting on his tax fraud. Guess what? It was dismissed by a New York court. And not only that, but the New York Times was awarded attorney's fees, likely hundreds of thousands of dollars. Another Donald Trump and Alina Haba specialty for you right there and this as the new york state court judge presiding over the manhattan district attorney's criminal case against donald trump stated that trial was going to take

place is going to take place in february or march 2024 and that a protective order would be in place. Get this, restraining Donald Trump from threatening judges, lawyers, witnesses, a very novel concept. We'll talk about that. And look, there is a reason that the modern day Republican Party, the MAGA Republicans, hate the court system. And it's because it still remains a place where facts supported by evidence actually matters, right? Outside of the court, the MAGA Republicans just continue to get these platforms on right-wing disinformation media, which doesn't hold them accountable. Where they just defame President Joe Biden every day with completely fraudulent and frankly, disgusting allegations.

Also, the Republican leaders on the House Judiciary Committee tweeted that the disgraced right-wing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was the goat. They actually said that, that Justice Clarence Thomas was the goat, the greatest of all time. And they said this in response to a story that broke earlier in the day from ProPublica, that in addition to the millions of dollars in vacations and gifts, and in addition to buying his mom a home, Republican billionaire donor Harlan Crow also paid for Clarence Thomas's adopted son's private school tuition, which Thomas also did not disclose. MAGA Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, their response was, the goat? I call it the clowns. And now, just before we went live,

a new story just broke in the same day from the Washington Post that Leonard Leo, who's the head of the Federalist Society, was basically funneling tens of thousands of dollars to be paid to Clarence Thomas's wife through Kellyanne Conway as an intermediary. That story just breaking right now. Also, special counsel Jack Smith is piercing Trump's inner circle and has got some major new evidence in the ongoing criminal investigations into Donald Trump. And finally, the five members of the terrorist group known as the Proud Boys who were on trial in federal court were all convicted by a jury on Thursday of multiple felony counts. Four of those Proud Boys were convicted of seditious conspiracy.

So the Department of Justice has now won full or partial convictions in 100% of the January 6th jury trials, folks. This is the Midas Touch podcast. I and my cell is joined by Brett and Jordy. My cell is, we're all on East coast time, right? Let's go. Let's go. We're adapting Brett and I. It's a struggle. Yeah. It's, it's a struggle guys. It's the East coast life is a struggle. See, we get to look like we have superhuman powers. I think when we're on the West coast, cause we, it looks like, wow, they're up really late, working really late, and we could still get up at a normal time and relatively be on top of things. But this just ruins the whole thing. You see the dark circles under my eyes. You see us working 15-hour days,

but we're here to deliver you all the facts. Man, the DOJ, 100% conviction rate or partial conviction. I mean, that is absolutely unbelievable. Ben, that's a lot of Antifa and BLM protesters going. Oh, wait. Oh, wait. The Proud Boys were there. Oh, wait. Seditious conspiracy.

It feels like just yesterday, actually, when we heard Fox News and Sesame make comments like they keep calling it sedition, but I haven't seen anybody charged with sedition. Well, guess what? How many guilty seditious conspiracy charges do we have now? Like a dozen or more? I think it's 14 convictions. Oh my God. 14 seditious conspiracy. Not two.

Three separate seditious conspiracy trials. I think there has been 14 seditious conspiracy, three separate seditious conspiracy trials. I think there has been 14 seditious conspiracy convictions. Know what I got to say to that? Keep going, Merrick. Keep going, Jack. Keep working your way up. You're almost there. This is good to see. A lot of justice, finally. And it's really great to see. A lot of bad news for Donald Trump, which is typically good news for our democracy. And he is just absolutely melting down there. Just pure humiliation in Scotland. I mean, what the hell was that? I mean, we got to laugh at the DeSantis world tour last week. And now you see Trump head to Scotland and Ireland and just make a complete fool out of himself as well. Just when these magas leave their bubbles, like you said, Ben, it's just the fascist Furbies

in the wild. It just doesn't work. The whole thing just doesn't work once they leave the country and actually get confronted. It's just all totally, totally, totally bizarre. Jordy, how are you doing, man? I'm doing good. I'm so happy to have you guys on the East Coast. Now you guys understand the struggle of someone who lives on the East Coast. You know what I'm saying? That's why me as the youngest brother actually looks 20 years older than both of you guys, man. The East Coast is stressful. We work out here. It's not that la-la land crap that you guys are doing over there in California. It's real America. Yeah, there you go. What's up, big bro? We're going to have a big show tonight. So just so the audience knows, when we do these shows, we put together like really robust outline, like of the, of the most important consequential news of the day to bring you up to speed.

And just an hour before the show, I mean, bam, bam, bam, just hit with more breaking news that we'll definitely get into here. I'm excited. You know what I got to say to that, Jordy, stand back and stand by. We got a big episode of the Midas Touch podcast coming your way. Ben, where shall we start? I guess we should start where you talk about fascist Furbies in the wild. And for those saying, Brett, what in the world are you talking about there? I compared this MAGA- No, I'm going to say this. For you guys saying that, make sure you listen to every episode of the Midas Touch podcast. How dare you for missing episodes and not getting the reference. I'm just kidding,

Ben. You could explain. We call this MAGA Republican language. We called it kind of fascist Furby talk because it's unclear, unless you're living in the echo chamber. Everybody know what the Furbies are. The Furbies, well, from I think 20 years ago, 25 years ago, it was like the hottest Christmas gift, right? And it was these like little furry technology things. And they would just go. And so what we would say here is that, you know, when these MAGA Republicans like talk to each other, it's their own language that they talk about. That's why you can't get into a debate with a Furby. I mean, right? If you start debating a

Furby, you put yourself on the level of the Furby. But that's why when they want to bait you into talking about – they want to act like bathrooms and pronouns are like the biggest issues that Americans are dealing with. Like you can go perpy, perpy, perpy and have that conversation with them. Or what you should most, what you should really do is be like, what the heck are you even talking about? Like, no, I don't wake up thinking about pronouns. Okay.

I don't wake up thinking about the. I don't wake up thinking about the bathroom other than I have to go to the bathroom. But I'm not thinking about, oh my God, is that person going to use this bathroom or that bathroom? It's just not one of the top 1,000 things that actually cross my mind. And there are real issues that we have to deal with where MAGA Republicans are like, you know, while they're all into talking about their pronouns, like when it comes to the debt ceiling, they're happy to be like, you know what, let's just, you know, let's just destroy the country. Like, whatever, like, we'll see what happens. And by the way, there was a recent study,

I don't know if you saw this, and it was done was done by Moody's. And speaking of the fascist Furby language, if you just watch how these MAGA Republicans talk, you show them something like, okay, Moody's is not a democratic entity, okay? They're just analyzing the existing data. But the MAGA Republicans will always create a conspiracy for everything. So their new one is, Moody's are Democrats or uniparty, and they put out this data to undermine them. Not that the MAGA Republican plan is not a plan. It is a poison pill to destroy Americans. But this is what Moody said. U.S. GDP growth would be 1.61% in 2024 under the GOP debt limit plan versus 2.23% otherwise. So significantly less. The plan

would meaningfully increase the likelihood of a recession. GOP proposed spending cuts are substantial headwind to near-term economic growth. The plan would cost 790,000 jobs by the end of 2024, right? So that's data. That is just reviewing the plan, saying what the data is. But the MAGA Republicans, they don't care about data. They just care about their fascist, Furby, whatever conspiracy theory they have of the day, Brett. Yeah, no. I mean, they're averse to anything that goes against their worldview and goes against what they're told. So, you know, you have this whole ecosystem, this whole toxic ecosystem on the right that's just pumping out propaganda every single day, right? Just nonstop. And Republicans tend to think that the media and the justice system,

oh, it's all biased. They're all against us all the time. I don't understand what's happening. How could they just be going against? Look, they're writing all these negative stories. But why are they never writing about Hunter Biden? Why are they never pursuing Burisma? Why are they never doing that? You know, whatever the term du jour is by the Republican Party. And it's because these claims are not taken seriously by reputable organizations. So it's not taken seriously by the actual media. It's not taken seriously by the Department of Justice, who may investigate these things, by the way, and then be like, oh, there's nothing there. This is BS. And so they think that there is an inherent bias against them because of all this. But it's actually kind of the opposite of what they think. On the whole, like 99.9% of the time, the stories pushed by the Republican Party and their conservative right-wing fascist ecosystem, I didn't even mean to say conservative. How dare me?

They're entirely like just BS. Like they just make shit up. And we'll talk about that in this episode. They will just throw things at the wall, see what sticks, out of thin air entirely. And they pick the most salacious, most disgusting, most abhorrent claims so that they could get headlines, so they could be invited previously onto Tucker Tucker show, now on to Hannity show, and now on all these bizarre Newsmax and OAN shows. And they just, they brainwash people into thinking that these are real things. in the way of their BS, reality gets in the way of their lies, all of a sudden what's happening? Donald Trump is getting indicted. Donald Trump is being investigated for serious crimes. Clarence Thomas is being investigated by these investigative journalists, and we are seeing the actual receipts of everything. They are backing it up with actual facts and they are going, woe is me, everybody is out to get me, how

could this be? But instead of, I just propose this, if by any chance we have one person on this show who's just tuning in to say, hey, I just want to see what these guys are about. I normally, I'm a MAGA guy or whatever you call it. I'm ultra MAGA, but for some reason I'm tuning in, I'm ultra MAGA, but for some reason I'm tuning into the Midas Touch podcast tonight. If I get through to just one of you, then I don't think it's possible. But I'll say this, instead of being mad at the media, instead of being mad at Democrats or whatever boogeyman that these people are shoveling your way, perhaps you should consider turning your anger to the folks who keep lying to you

and keep getting your hopes up over all these things over and over and over. These right-wing politicians, the right-wing media who is gaslighting you, who is lying to you, who is getting you angry, who is riling you up and is making you pissed off at everything once inevitably, nothing happens. These people are using you. That's all I want to say. You are being used. You are the mark in this situation. I can't be any clearer. Jim Jordan thinks you're an idiot. OAN Newsman, these people think you are morons. And I wish that you would turn the tables on them and say, finally, I'm going to stand up to you. I'm not going to be gaslighted by your lies anymore. It's insane. I'll give you a perfect example.

It's why the Jim Jordans of the world. Oh, you, Jordy. Ben. Oh, you. No, Ben. No, I'm really Jordy. It's why it's sort of what we talked about on Monday. It's why the Jim Jordans of the world and the Marjorie Taylor Greene's decide to attack experts and try and make the term expert a bad word in the

Magaverse. It's because experts come with data. They come with resources. They come with information that's actually studied and nuanced and really brings to light what exactly is going on. And then when you look at the data, just objectively, it is so never in the Magaverse favor, the Marjorie Taylor Greene's, the Jim Jordan's, it's so never in the MAGAverse favor, the Marjorie Taylor Greene's, the Jim Jordan's, it's so never in their favor that the only thing that they can do is say, you're a liar. I don't believe you. Well, I have this fact. And it's just like, what are you doing, man?

Like look at yourself. And if you are a Marjorie Taylor Greene or a Jim Jordan supporter, you're being played just like Brett said, you are the mark. They'll just go Joe Biden, pedophileophile human trafficker i saw it i saw it believe me and marjorie taylor green is one of them yeah your marjorie taylor green is getting so good that it almost makes me angry and you're like what are you saying like have you ever wake up and just be like what the heck are you even saying? But unfortunately, they have this whole ecosystem of fascist Furbies. It's an army of fascist Furbies out there who immediately go,

all in each other's ears. And I guarantee you, if you dug into it, you would see heavy coordination too between all of these groups. I guarantee you there is a very clear line of communication between Jim Jordan, for example, and the Charlie Kirks of the world and all those other crazy accounts you see on the internet, on Twitter, on social media, that the second they come up with their next scheme, they blast it everywhere. It's all over the place and they just try to gaslight you and then all of a sudden they have to go on tv and now it's funny like you see fox like a little bit at least

being a little more cautious and what they're doing after the major settlement and trying to like hedge it a little bit and say you know what we don't actually have any evidence of this i just want to say that um but and then whenever they end up going into court or in front of prosecutors or whatever, it's, they've, they've got nothing. They've got absolutely nothing. And it's just time and time again, it's, and, and they're, they're smearing people. I mean, it's pure defamation. It's pure slander.

It's, it's absolutely disgusting. Let's talk about what happens in the court, right? Because you have this E. Gene Carroll trial. You have, we're now in the second week of it. E. Jean Carroll's got great lawyers who are doing what you're supposed to do in trial, right? Put on evidence, put on witnesses, and to make your case to the jury. On the other hand, you have Donald Trump's lawyers who have stated they're not going to put on any witnesses at all, that Donald Trump was not going to show up as a witness. They're not even going to call their expert witness. General's preliminary injunction where they wanted to get a financial monitor, which they

ultimately won to oversee Donald Trump and the Trump organization's finances. What Justice Arthur Ngoran said back then in the order, and I think this order was issued last year, was Donald Trump did not put forward a scintilla of evidence, like nothing. At that time, Donald Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, so he put on no evidence then. And they put on no witnesses. When you are trying to rebut a preliminary injunction, what you do as a lawyer is you get individuals to sign declarations truthfully under penalty of perjury to rebut the facts of the moving party. Even if Donald Trump was going to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights,

maybe you get an expert to appraise the properties and talk about how the valuation and the appraisals may have some kind of nexus and that there isn't a fraudulent scheme there, but they don't even do that. Then what does Donald Trump say about Justice Arthur and Goran? Oh, he's a horrible judge. He's a hack. He hates me. Every judge hates Donald Trump, is what he says. Coincidence. It's the same thing here in the E. Jean Carroll case, not a scintilla of evidence. What Donald Trump's plan evidently was, and the judge called his bluff on this, this is Donald Trump's plan. During trial, Trump's going to lie and claim he's got business to deal with in Scotland and Ireland, that he's got to open up a new golf course there.

And so he couldn't be, this is what he's saying to his supporters. He couldn't show up at trial. However, on the very last day of trial, coincidentally, he told the reporters, not coincidentally, obviously, I'm going to go back now. I have to confront E. Jean Carroll. Very conveniently, you wait for the last day as the case is about to be over to get back when the judge would say, hey, too late. You've now waived your rights to testify. Because what was Trump planning on doing here? He was going to say to his supporters, I was going to testify. I flew back. You saw what I said to the press. I was going to head back and the judge shut it down. So the judge did something freaking brilliant that I want to tell you all about. But first I want to play this clip. This is from

Ireland today where Donald Trump's out there playing golf during the time when evidence is being presented in a trial against him that is accusing him of the most disgusting and dastardly acts a human being could be in. And what's he doing? He's golfing. And he acts like to the press, I got to stop playing golf right now. I'm a rich. He goes like, I'm a rich guy. I'm out here enjoying myself. And now I've got to go back to the United States to confront E. Jean Carroll. So first, I want to play this clip, and then I want to tell you what brilliant thing the judge did. But play the clip.

I'll be going back early because a woman made a claim that's totally false. It was fake. She's a fake. She wrote in a book she's a Democrat. We have a rough judge. We have a judge that doesn't like me much, appointed by Bill Clinton. He's a guy that doesn't like me much. He's, I guess, not allowing the coat that they wanted to put into evidence. Once we said, yes, put it into evidence, they said, oh,

we don't want to do that. It's a disgrace, but I have to do it. That's part of life. Because of that, I have to leave Ireland and I have to leave Scotland, where I have great properties. I have to leave early. I don't have to, but I choose to. Will you attend the trial, Mr. President? I'll probably attend. And I think it's a disgrace.

It's a disgrace that it's allowed to happen. False accusations against a rich guy, or in my case, against a famous, rich, and political person that's leading the polls by 40 points. And I have to go back for a woman that made a false accusation about me, and I have a judge who's extremely hostile. And I'm going to go back, and I'm going to confront this woman. This woman is a disgrace, and it shouldn't be allowed to happen in our country. First off, I think Donald Trump voted for Clinton. Like wasn't he at the Clinton's wedding?

Like Donald Trump used to be a Democrat first of all. Like so let's just say like Donald Trump is just, he's just a fascist authoritarian. Like he's making up all of these things to just like, Brett, to your point, if you happen to be a MAGA Republican and you're watching this, everything the guy does is a complete con. Like, it's all a total lie. So what happened in court? Well, first, the plaintiff, E. Jean Carroll, they rested their case. So they said, we put on all of our evidence. We put all of our witnesses on.

We played Donald Trump's deposition. We have no more evidence to present. So then it went to Donald Trump's lawyer, Joe Takapina. And Joe Takapina said, the defense rests. We're not putting on any witnesses. And then the judge said, well, what about your client, Donald Trump? He doesn't want to testify. And then Takapina had to say, no, no, no. He's waived his right to testify. Takapina actually said that because the judge confronted him, but the judge didn't accept that representation. What the judge says is, you know what?

Based on what he said in Ireland, I'm going to give him a few days. So we'll give him until Sunday to let us all know if he wants to come in and testify on Monday. And I haven't ruled on whether or not I will allow him to testify or not. But if he wants to testify, make the request to me by Sunday at 5 p.m. and we can see if he'll testify on Monday. Of course, Donald Trump's not going to avail himself of that. He's too big of a coward to testify. But it stopped, like Trump thought he was going to be so smart here to engineer that on the last day to say, oops, now I wanted to try it. And this Clinton appointee stopped me from testifying. And the judge is like, no, no, no, he could testify,

have him come in on Monday and let me know by Sunday if he wants to do it. It was a brilliant move right there. Yeah, it's such a brilliant move. And this judge is clearly not taking any of Trump's crap and sees right through all of his moves because he's the most transparent person in the world. And this may be a little beside the point, but it looked like the worst day for golf imaginable. Like that is not golf weather. It was like windy as hell. It would look like it was about to downpour. Like that's not even like a golf day, right? Like it's not even a day for golf. He's like forcing himself to be on the golf course. It's like in a giant coat, like, yeah, just playing around a golf here, everybody. It's like, what is he doing? And it's like what is he doing and it's

like he defamed her again right there like he's on trial partially for defamation and he defamed her right there again calling her a liar attacking the judge always smart to attack the judge uh right before the ruling comes down i mean this guy this guy is a fricking moron. And Brett, you raised such a good point there too, because if, and I think when, E. Jean Carroll prevails in the trial, remember, this case is technically referred to as E. Jean Carroll II, because the defamation claims were kind of split,

because there were initial defamation claims that Donald Trump was engaged in when he was in the office. And that went through a whole appeals process. But basically, the courts are allowing that to proceed. But in the meantime, because Donald Trump defamed her again in October of 2022, and then New York passed another law called the Adult Survivors Act, which allowed victims of sexual assault to bring a case if the statute of limitations expired within one year of the passage of the law.

This case that's currently before the jury involves the defamation from October of 2022, as well as the underlying sexual assault claims from 1996. But the defamation claims from 2019, when Trump was in office, yeah, 2019, those are still alive. And that will be tried after this. There will be another trial on those claims. And now I think E. Jean Carroll will sue Donald Trump based on that statement as well. Wow. So there will now be, I think, a third defamation case, Brett, to your point, based on that. Keep doing it. And I just want to talk very briefly about what went down in court. As I said,

both sides rested their case. The judge is giving Donald Trump through Sunday to decide if he wants to testify and make that request. But the jury- What's up, guy? through Sunday to decide if he wants to testify and make that request. But the jury, the jury will get handed the case on Monday and will probably get a verdict Monday or Tuesday, but Trump presented no evidence at all in the case. Now, the jury saw through Trump's deposition testimony, Trump suggesting that four women who have appeared in the court are too unattractive for him to assault. Like, how disgusting is that? Like, E.J. and Carol, Jessica Leeds, Natasha Stojanoff.

And he even said it about the lawyer, Robbie Kaplan, on the deposition. I just want to pause there for a second. That's like the crux of the entire argument that he has is not even like, I didn't do it. The main argument that he uses is I wouldn't do that to her or her, and I definitely wouldn't do that to you. That's what he said to the lawyer. I definitely will not do it to you because of the way you look to the lawyer. I mean, it's disgusting in general. I mean, he brings the lawyer into it and makes it very personal with the lawyer, Brett, to your point and kind of proves the point. But what the jury also saw was in the deposition testimony, Trump confused E. Jean Carroll with his ex-wife,

Marla Maples. There was a moment where he saw a picture of E. Jean Carroll and said, that's Marla. That's Marla Maples. And then as well, Roberta Kaplan asked Trump about the, she's not my type comment, but said, if that meant that you didn't find her physically attractive, and Trump did not deny that. So then E. Jean Carroll's lawyer asked him, I take it then that the three women you married, they are all your type. And Donald Trump said yes and kind of walked right into that, that the women he married are his type and he thought that E. Jean Carroll was Marla Maples, his type.

I mean, you never know what a jury is going to do. There's one juror who I think in the questioning was someone who said they watched Tim Pool podcast or something like that. Yeah, that's a big red flag. That was the one red flag, but I don't know if that juror is an alternate or I don't think anybody knows yet. But I think any juror who's fair and watches this regardless of whether you watch a Tim Pool podcast or not, can only come to one conclusion. But, um, I think we'll find, we'll find this out on Monday or Tuesday. So we'll, we'll get that info soon. Yeah. That's going to be, that's going to be next week is going to be

a big week. I feel like we're going to hear a lot of news breaking next week. Every week is a big week. Like the Pence testimony. I think it was a Washington Post reporter before did like, here's the news that happened since Mike Pence testified before Jack Smith. And it was like, just like the craziest list of all time of convictions and arrests and news. Like the news cycle is moving so quick, but that's why we distill and break it down. That's why we're here. That's why we're here. We talked Trump. Trump yelling at the judges, Ben, talking about how all these judges are corrupt. At what point would a sane individual look inward

and be like, oh, it's me? It's like if someone is dating a lot of people and they're the person who continues to get broken up with, like, oh, what's wrong with these people? I mean, the guy's just completely on his. Yeah, well, you know the saying, if everyone is crazy in your life and everybody then look inward.

You know, Jordan, but it gets worse than that, right? Because it's now the whole MAGA Republican ecosystem, though, that views things that are objectively horrific. And they try to frame it as, oh, this is just a bunch of lefties trying to attack us. And it's like, there's nothing left about these positions. They're just kind of common sense positions. And you know you're living in a weird world where Mitch McConnell feels like he is one of the more moderate Republicans today when he's normally, he's not moderate at all. Let's be very clear. He's a very extreme right-wing person. But compared to the Marjorie Taylor Greene's and the Boebert's, sometimes Mitch McConnell's been

getting a pass for just what a desp despicable person he is as well, because relative to Marjorie Taylor Greene, he looks somewhat normal. But let's not normalize Mitch McConnell. So going back to this idea of like the MAGA Republicans all say, oh, well, this is what the left is trying to do. Let me show you what Mitch McConnell said about Clarence Thomas and what he called as these politically motivated attacks by the left. Because Clarence Thomas, he says, was just someone who was just taking vacations. Why would you attack a man for vacations? Here, play this clip. Now, now we've got the next raft of silly personal attacks.

This time, the left and some of their media allies want the American people to gasp in horror, in horror that one Supreme Court justice vacations with his friends. But another one sold his house when he moved, and that Chief Justice Roberts' wife has a career outside the home. The Democrats even tried to pressure Chief Justice Roberts to trade the Supreme Court for their kangaroo court and show up in person today to hear them grandstand. A totally inappropriate request as the chief's polite and facts-based reply made clear. I want to talk about just how despicable that is that you just watched. Then I want to show you what the other Republicans are saying, what the House Judiciary GOP Twitter account, but where they called Clarence Thomas the GOAT, the greatest of all time in response to these horrific scandals. We'll talk about that,

but let's just take a quick break. Support for Midas is brought to you by Manscaped, who has the best in men's below-the-waist grooming products. That's right. Their products are precision-engineered tools for your family jewels. Join over 8 million men worldwide who trust Manscaped with this exclusive offer for you. 20% off and free worldwide shipping with the code MIDAS at manscaped.com. Look, everyone knows that you have to be careful when dealing with the family jewels.

You definitely don't want to use an old crusty electric trimmer. Yikes. That's why I'm so excited to partner with Manscaped. Manscaped's Performance Package 4.0 has arrived and oh man, it's a game changer. Inside this package, you'll find their Lawn Mower 4.0 Trimmer, Weed Whacker, Ear and Nose Hair Trimmer, Crop Reserver Deodorant, crop reviver toner, performance boxer briefs, and a travel bag to hold your goodies. First off, the Lawn Mower 4.0. This trimmer is the future of grooming and, dare I say, the greatest below-the-waist trimmer ever. Their fourth-generation trimmer features a cutting-edge ceramic blade to reduce grooming accidents thanks to their advanced SkinSafe technology.

The Lawn Mower 4.0 is waterproof and also has 4,000K LED spotlights you'll need for a more precise shave. And because this trimmer is waterproof, you can say goodbye to the mess on the bathroom floor. You thought that was good, but want to take your grooming game to the next level? The Performance Package 4.0 also includes the Weed Whacker Nose and Ear Hair Trimmer. The Weed Whacker is also waterproof and provides proprietary skin-safe technology, which helps reduce nicks, snags, and tugs in those delicate nose holes. Their Crop Preserver deodorant and Crop Reviver toner will change the way you approach your hygiene routine. Manscaped even threw in two free gifts to their Performance Package 4.0, the Manscaped Boxers and the Shed Travel Bag. Bring your comfort and boxers to another level.

It's time to take care of yourself. So go to manscaped.com and get 20% off plus free shipping with the code MIDAS. That's 20% off with free shipping at manscaped.com and use code MIDAS. Unlock your confidence and always use the right tools for the job with ManScaped. Wow, great ad read there, Jordan. Let's go. We don't want to see it. We don't want to see it, but great product. And you can check it out in the description below. It's really great. It's a great product. Let's play that clip again

of Mitch McConnell. I want to show you what he said about, you know, it's just the left. They are grandstanding. They are mad that Justice Clarence Thomas is just taking vacations. And they're mad that Justice John Roberts' wife is just earning a living. Forget the fact that she earned $10.3 million in commissions from law firms that go before her husband. She's just trying to earn a living. Everybody's just a hardworking Americans here and just want to take vacations. Play the clip. Now, now we've got the next raft of silly personal attacks. This time the left and some of their media allies want the American people to gasp in horror that one Supreme Court justice vacations with his friends, that another one sold his

house when he moved, and that Chief Justice Roberts' wife has a career outside the home. The Democrats even tried to pressure Chief Justice Roberts to trade the Supreme Court for their kangaroo court and show up in person today to hear them grandstand. A totally inappropriate request, as the chief's polite and facts-based reply made clear. You know, these Democrats, they're playing these silly games. They are upset that Republicans are singing songs with January 6th insurrectionists. Have you heard of folk songs? Are you anti-song lefties? You are upset that we are partying with the terrorists. I mean, you go through these things. This isn't like a lefty issue. It's like a common sense issue. No, we don't want Supreme Court justices to get millions of dollars in gifts from donors with agendas, and even regardless if there isn't an agenda, that you

don't disclose that you are required to disclose. No, it's not a normal... Look, Chief Justice John Roberts' wife, she should earn a great living, but her living is really going to be working as a recruiter, making more than $10 million for law firms that have cases before her husband. Obviously, why do you think these firms are giving a lot of this business? You don't think that they want a quid pro quo here for the amount of money that they are paying, but even the appearance of impropriety. And as I always say, it's so upsetting to me, having gone through law school and just seeing this. When you call a judge your honor, when you stand, when you rise, it's because they're supposed to be honorable people. And they bring, by the way, as I've always said, if they're in private practice or whatever,

and you want to go take vacations and you make a lot of money, enjoy it. Enjoy it. Do what you want to do. I mean, to each his own. I'm going to do me. You can do you. But they're not getting criticized because they're going on vacation or that someone's wife's earning a living. These are the justices. They're all right-wing justices. It's not like a both sides issue where all these scandals are happening. And it's every single one of them too. It's not like one of them. It's like all of them have these incredible- Like Neil Gorsuch. It's like, who bought your log cabin for like $2 million in Colorado that nobody else wanted to buy? At this point, these dudes should just, at this point, they should just tell us what they paid for themselves. Because it's clear... That would be a much smaller

list. Kavanaugh gets his mortgage paid for and all of the allegations against him gets covered up. His debt is just gone and then mysteriously... It's insane. And like the... McConnell's like, and the person just sold his house. I mean, you're not allowed to sell your house these days. He sold his mother's house to Harlan Crow above market value. And then his mother continued to live in it and still lives in it to this day. And they did tens and tens of thousands of dollars on renovations in the house. And I think the whole kind of corruption of this entire judicial philosophy was on full display when they did this ethics hearing in the Senate the other day. And you had the former Bush AG, Michael Mukasey, I'm probably saying the guy's name off, but John

Ossoff did an incredible job questioning him. And let's play his comments and we could dissect it a little right after this. Judge McKay said I'm not in any way questioning or even seeking to interrogate your personal conduct. What I'm what I'm asking you is that as a judge, is it fair to say that you most likely would have declined an offer of foreign travel worth hundreds of thousands of dollars because quite reasonably you would have had the concern that public disclosure of such travel could have undermined public confidence in the impartiality of your judgment? Simply because it amounted to, I mean, if somebody took me, I mean, if I were a district judge and somebody wanted to fly me on his private plane on a vacation with his family, I were friendly with that person.

Would I have refused and endangered the friendship? I'm not sure that I would have. Well, I think the American public sees that kind of conduct and quite reasonably asks the question whether it's appropriate. And also, let's just also take a moment to go back to Mitch McConnell's words when he described what the Democrats were doing, which is an actual investigative function right there. That's actually good questioning. That's actually trying to get to the bottom of some real serious issues in this country. And McConnell had the nerve to call that a kangaroo court while these maniacs in the House are running an actual kangaroo court and are just being absolute maniacs. And there are so many red flags with that statement. And it's just such brazen corruption.

First of all, it's like, dude, would you have disclosed it though? If you took that private jet, would you have disclosed it? And if that person came before the court shortly after you did that private jet trip with them, would you maybe have recused yourself? How about you answer that? Also, you just flat out admitted that you are putting the loyalty of your friendship over the loyalty to the actual court, to the loyalty to the country. You are saying, that billionaire who took me on that private jet, I work for him and not for the American people. I mean, he said it in that way. And also, just imagine- It's a pretty weird friendship though, right? Like.

Yes. It's not a friendship. But like in what friendship situation though, would the person be so offended that you're refusing to go on a vacation with them because you have to be a judge? Like you would think it would be like a pretty basic conversation to have with your buddy your buddy's like hey you know we're going out to aruba you you want to come with aruba we'll pay for it and then you said to your friend you know what i'm a district court judge i don't like the way it looks and then your friend goes you're not my friend anymore okay that is truly that's a weird freaking that's some weird freaking friendship. That makes place. You would think the friend would say, look, I totally get it and I respect that. Because it's not a friendship. Because let's

go to Harlan Crowe for a second, then I'll circle back to my other point. Harlan Crowe did not befriend Clarence Thomas until after Clarence Thomas became a Supreme Court justice. That should be a red flag, shouldn't it? All of a sudden, this billionaire really wants to be good friends with me and is taking me on vacation. I guess he just thinks I'm a really swell guy. I guess that must be it, right? That must be it. He must think I'm so much fun to hang out with. And on that point that you were saying, Ben, about the friendship, if declining a vacation with this so-called friend would upset them, imagine how ruling against them, imagine what that would do to the relationship.

And therein lies the corruption and therein lies the problem with his statements and with the way these Republicans are treating the Supreme Court. And by the way, not just the Supreme Court, the way they're treating the entire government. The Republicans, this is a microcosm of the entire people, they view it as I am here to help my constituents, my billionaire buddies who I go on private jets and vacations with. And that's on full display in all of these. And all the people you see defending him when you see McConnell defending him or Ted Cruz defending him or all these people defending him, they are all being paid by this guy. Like these billionaire donors are all putting money in their pockets. Of course, they're going to defend them. Harlan Crowe's one of the biggest GOP billionaire donors out there. They're not going to talk smack about him. They're not going to say it's wrong. It's the problem with

money in our politics. And specifically, it shines a light on the corruption that you see in the Republican Party. Here's the thing. Clarence Thomas, with his wife, their combined income is significant. They make close to $1 million a year. Let's just be clear how out of touch they are with American people to begin with. The fact that they think that that is not a lot of money. They're making a million dollars a year. And the report that we're just learning from the Washington Post that just broke a lot of money, right? They're making a million dollars a year. And the report that we're just learning from the Washington Post that just broke is one of the ways that Ginny Thomas, Clarence Thomas's wife, makes all of this money

is that people like Leonard Leo, who run the Federalist Society, tell people, in this specific example, it's Kellyanne Conway, to basically take funding from a certain group and to pay that money to Ginny Thomas's group so that she could be paid. And also Harlan Crowe would put a lot of money to Ginny Thomas's various, you know. This is the worst crossover episode of all time. How did Kellyanne Conway

make it into this episode? This is BS, man. It's the story that just broke in the Washington Post that they had Kellyanne Conway deliver the payments to Ginny Thomas. This was about 10 years ago or so, but this is how she made lots of money with her proximity to Justice Clarence Thomas. But they made about a million dollars a year. So look, this story that broke from ProPublica about Clarence Thomas's adopted son, this guy by the name of Mark Martin, who was living in what sounded like very difficult circumstances up to the age of six. I think his father was in prison. It was technically Clarence Thomas's grandnephew. And Clarence Thomas adopted Mark Martin and said, I'm going to raise you like my child. By the way, pause right there. Very laudable, right? There's nothing to criticize about that.

And I think providing that opportunity is absolutely awesome and great. The issue becomes when Harlan Crowe pays for Mark Martin, Clarence Thomas's adopted son, to go to these very prestigious and incredibly expensive private schools. So there's one called Hidden Lake Academy, which is a private boarding school in the foothills of Northern Georgia, where tuition basically costs $75,000 a year. There was another Randolph Macon Academy in Virginia, where Mark Martin also went. And again, the issue isn't that, look, if Clarence Thomas wants to send Mark Martin to those specific schools and he wants to pay for it himself, great. Let me add that Clarence Thomas using the money of billionaires to fund the education of his adopted son. I guess that's okay in his world. Just use Harlan Crowe money. But Clarence Thomas could pay for it. And then if you want to send him to Hidden Lake Academy,

you could pay for it yourself. Or how about this? If Harlan Crowe pays for it, then you disclose it. It's obviously a gift to you. And just as Clarence Thomas previously disclosed when some other entity gave him a similar type of gift from Mark Martin for a lesser amount, $5,000, Clarence Thomas disclosed that, but didn't disclose these things. And what Clarence Thomas, I suppose, is trying to claim, well, technically, Mark Martin is not a biological dependent for me. So therefore, it was a gift that was being made to Mark Martin, not a gift made to me. Well, if that's your judgment, you deserve to be nowhere near the Supreme Court. But again, the issue isn't that Mark Martin went to good schools.

It's who paid for it and why wasn't it disclosed? And you're a Supreme Court justice. That's the issue. And the MAGA Republicans will be like, well, the lefties, they just want to stop a kid from getting a good education. No, it's not about that. It's just about they're a Supreme Court justice and stop gaslighting us. Yeah. And then they go so opposite and the other direction. They go, oh, this is awesome. Let's celebrate this. Let's celebrate the corruption. And so immediately after the story breaks, as we said, the House Judiciary GOP, who should be an entity that is investigating issues exactly like this, says, retweet if you think Justice Thomas is the GOAT, the greatest of all time. And they use an emoji of the GOAT. I mean, they tweet like they're teenagers, first of all.

And it's just such an affront to the rule of law to make that tweet when you say this, even if you want to hide and pretend like you are looking into it. Even that is better. At least the old Republican Party would BS about it and be like, we take accusations on whatever basis and we will look into it and make our best judgment. But they don't even fake it anymore. They've just dropped all pretense. They're like, yeah, we're corrupt. What the hell are you going to do about it? We actually celebrate corruption here. That's what we do. Corruption. That's what we do in the Republican Party. And that's why this whole divide with every single issue out there, it's really not Democrat versus Republican, but they make every issue Democrat versus Republican. During COVID, for example, the most obvious example was you would see people literally coughing in people's faces, actually coughing in people's faces going, I'm going to give you COVID.

That was a thing that some people on the right would do, and that would be celebrated. That's just a monstrous thing. That's just a monstrous thing. Like that's objectively a monstrous thing to do, but they'd be like, Oh, look at the lib that got owned. Look at the, it's like, dude, you're just trying to take away. You're trying to take away my free speech. The Dems are trying to cancel me. They're trying to cancel me. They're, they're anti-free speech. It's like, no, it's not anti-free speech. It is a basic decency thing. Like part of my free speech is that I want to criticize your conduct, which is horrific. Free speech doesn't give you a pass not to be criticized for being a hateful and racist and despicable person.

Boom. Period. Full stop. Jay. Can we talk about that tweet just a little bit more? It gets even sadder when you realize who runs the House GOP account being Jim Jordan is the one tweeting that out. The judiciary account, yeah. And then he retweets himself. And then he retweets himself and just has a conversation with himself. Again, not working for the American people, but rather just on Twitter having a conversation with himself. And then just also, it's just so this modern day Republican party,

like is Clarence Thomas, retweet if Clarence Thomas is the goat, like he's obviously the worst human ever, but now they have to paint him because they're all in their megaverse. They have to paint him as the best. He's not even the best criminal of all. Like you could make the argument he's one of the worst criminals of all time. They reward corruption. I saw AOC say something online the other day to the effect of they cast not harassing people as some sort of leftist liberal value. And anytime that you speak out against that harassment, they go, stop persecuting me, stop persecuting me.

And it's the tactic and it's what they use. And honestly, I think that they, in their mind, saw people on their side being quote unquote canceled, which was just having consequences for their disgraceful actions. And they said, let's flip this on their head. And they go in the opposite direction and they go, oh, you know, they try to pull that card, but in the opposite. But it really doesn't work because you are trying to cancel people for speaking out against harassment, for speaking out for equality.

Like these are the things that people are going after. And it goes back to what we were talking about a couple episodes ago. It's all about whatever right-wing nut said out loud, and it might've been Charlie Kirk, whatever. It's all about the Overton window, which is they're trying to shift the entire political discourse as far to the right as possible. So they pick the most extremist stances as possible so that that mark in the middle moves over along with it. And then what happens when that mark in the middle moves along with it, the media kind of buys into the BS and the media goes, oh, well, we need to be want the truth. And that's why we, I think, exist, honestly, as a media. And I think that's why people tune in here, because people just want to hear the truth. It's not a both sides issue to just be a decent human being. It's not a both sides. Well, maybe Clarence Thomas has a few points here about taking... No, that's wrong. That's objectively wrong. And if a justice on

the quote unquote liberal side of the bench did that also, I would also say that's wrong, but that just doesn't exist. And they try to muddy the waters constantly by finding they're like, well, Ruth Bader Ginsburg traveled. Yes, she disclosed her book deal i like what point are you trying to make in fact you're proving the exact opposite point you're hurting your own point but the maga furby fascists they just eat it all up and then they start going trips no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no maybe that's why they call them now that now that you say it it's very similar to uh like the handling of the documents which i'm sure we'll get into later in the show or whatnot. But it's always the cover up is in many instances, almost worse than the crime. It's that same playbook that to your point, yeah, they all disclosed it. You know who didn't disclose it? Clarence Thomas. You know who didn't disclose the documents and where it all was? Trump. And so when you could just look at that from a lens of just like hey what are these people really like why are people so upset and it's just because

there's a lack of transparency but it's not a lack of transparency because of just like I don't know unintentional ignorance it's because they want to hide it from you because they don't want to disclose it because they want to keep getting these perks exactly Exactly. They ultimately know if they disclose it, then there's going to be ridicule. There's going to be condemnation. And that's why they don't disclose it. That's why sunset and sunlight is the best disinfectant to that corruption. That's why there are these disclosure rules. And Brett, as you talk about shifting this Overton window, it's when large media networks then embrace that concept. In their recent announcement when CNN stated they're going to be hosting a town hall for

Donald Trump in New Hampshire, which is utterly horrific that they are doing that, they described his views as having very unique positions and that they're going to treat him the same as any other presidential candidate and that he has unique perspectives and point of views. If by unique, you mean fascist, if by unique, you mean authoritarian, if by unique, you mean unique in the history of America, that there's someone who's modeling themselves off of Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, and Vladimir Putin, then you have to call that out. Otherwise, you are complicit. And Donald Trump, the same day that CNN announced they want to platform Donald Trump's unique positions in a town hall, Donald Trump put out this following video

where he talks about if he's elected, he's going to use the Department of Justice to seize the private endowments of universities, including private universities, if they support equity. If you think I'm making that up, just play this video clip. Time has come to reclaim our once great educational institutions from the radical left, and we will do that. Our secret weapon will be the college accreditation system. It's called accreditation for a reason. The accreditors are supposed to ensure that schools are not ripping off students and taxpayers, but they have failed totally. When I return to the White House, I will fire the radical left

accreditors that have allowed our colleges to become dominated by Marxists, maniacs, and lunatics. We will then accept applications for new accreditors who will impose real standards on colleges once again and once and for all. These standards will include defending the American tradition and Western civilization, protecting free speech, eliminating wasteful administrative positions that drive up costs incredibly, removing all Marxist diversity, equity, and inclusion bureaucrats, offering options for accelerated and low-cost degrees, providing meaningful job placement and career services,

and implementing college entrance and exit exams to prove that students are actually learning and getting their money's worth. Furthermore, I will direct the Department of Justice to pursue federal civil rights cases against schools that continue to engage in racial discrimination and schools that persist in explicit, unlawful discrimination under the guise of equity will not only have their endowments taxed, but through budget reconciliation,

I will advance a measure to have them fined up to the entire amount of their endowment. A portion of the seized funds will then be used as restitution for victims of these illegal and unjust policies, policies that hurt our country. Like y'all realize that's like literally fascism. That is literally using the government to seize private entities and then to take the entities and distribute it to people racial discrimination, it's not what one would think when they hear that they want to end racial discrimination. What he's saying is these schools, if they bring in black and brown students, I'm going to find them and I am going to take over their operations as the government. It is the most directly fascist statement imaginable. And it's just like, oh no, he just has some strong ideas, everybody. He just has some strong ideas. I mean, you wonder who's supporting this guy. And then you look at some of these polls that come out and you see what the heck is even going on. You guys see the CBS News, YouGov poll. Yeah. And you see like, what the heck is even going on? You guys see the CBS News, YouGov poll.

Like this is the 2024, the CBS News poll. This is for 2024 Republican nomination. You prefer a candidate who dot, dot, dot. And here were the top answers from likely GOP primary voters. And they could pick multiple answers. So it's not like they're going to add up to 100, but 85% of the respondents said the most important thing for a Republican candidate is someone who challenges woke ideas. 66%, someone who opposes any gun restrictions, 61%. They need a candidate who says that Trump won in 2020 and 57% all agreed that we need a candidate who, quote, makes liberals angry. So not the economy, not the inflation, not gas prices, all that just BS, I guess. Not foreign policy. Not foreign.

No, just someone who makes libs angry. That's all they care about. And that's why, though, they play to that. And that's why they advance, these these MAGA Republicans advance these heinous conspiracy theories every week and they do it under the guise of oh there's we're investigating it there's a whistleblower they use and manipulate those terms and the latest one that they just go on Fox and all these right-wing platforms and just start spreading is that a whistleblower gave them super secret information. They don't know what it is. They have no clue what it actually says.

But this whistleblower said that Biden was involved in a bribery corruption scheme during the Obama administration and wrote a whistleblower letter to the FBI about it. By the way, what Brett's putting up out there for our audio listeners and for our YouTube watchers, you can see this. This, by the way, is the types of things that they're talking about. Michelle wants more sugar for kids, and they did a study on Obama's body languages and how, I guess, they're critical of the way the body languages are slanted towards each other when Michelle and Barack Obama hug each other. This is the stuff that they're being fed each and every day.

And in between that, they're getting these conspiracy theories about President Biden. So we put together here a montage that I just want to play. And we did it through our Midas Touch Twitter account. We'll play it for you right now. Of all these MAGA Republicans going on these right-wing shows and basically just saying that President Biden may have engaged in a bribery scheme, we don't really know yet. We don't have any evidence, but we're just going to talk about it. Here, play this clip. You know, caveat that we don't have any hard information. We're wondering

exactly what this is all about according to a press release that was sent out by james comer's office it says the information provided by a whistleblower raises concerns that then vice president biden allegedly engaged in a bribery scheme does this have to do with hunter biden's foreign business dealings in ukraine or china or is it something else? Well, I guess basically we've got to wait to see what the document exactly says. This is a very serious allegation against the then vice president. It is a very serious allegation. I wish I could say that I know what was true or untrue. But this is something new. Do you have any information on that? I do not. I don't have any information on what the whistleblowers has alleged in terms of the

specific substantive allegations. It says specifically, the release today, that the vice president may have altered policy for money, a primary scheme. He may have actually changed policy. Have you narrowed it down to what policies or can you at least tell me if you have what area? If you can't say specifically, what do you know about it, sir? Congressman Fallon. Well, Greg, that'll all come out, I think, and it'll come out very soon. The bottom line is, let's ask another question, a very simple one.

What business, what product or service did the Bidens ever provide? This seems more direct, at least in what's being said by Grassley and Comer. Well, this is, after all, if there's anything to it. In other words, we don't know very much. And this is an early stage of this. It doesn't keep these politicians on the Hill from coming out and talking about it and for the White House to respond. But we need to be careful here because, you know, the air is full of charges, as it sometimes is. And we're entering the political season.

So my advice is let's be careful here. Will your colleagues make those underlying documents publicly available? We know the whistleblower will remain protected, but what about the allegations? Will the American people see them? Well, we'll have to see what's in them. You'll see whether credible allegations, whether they connect to other wrongdoing by the Biden family. And if they turn out to not be credible, sir,

will your colleagues acknowledge that, you think? Only got a couple seconds left. That'll be up to them. If they turn out to not be credible, will your colleagues acknowledge that? And the response is, that will be up to them. If they are not credible, of course, we will tell the truth. And this goes exactly to the strategy that I was talking about earlier, where they throw out the most salacious, most disgusting claims that have zero evidence. They pretend they have some whistleblower, and then inevitably nothing happens because it's complete BS. And then you have all their supporters and followers go, oh, it's just a corrupt system. The corrupt system wins again. No, the truth wins again because everybody you listen to continues to lie to you. And even Geraldo Rivera was like, yo, people, this is ridiculous, right? He wrote a tweet that said, does anybody really, just remember, Geraldo Rivera, Fox News, Geraldo

Rivera, does anybody really believe President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme? Dollars to donuts, it's another bogus, blowhard, pretend whistleblower. Hint, if the person announcing a would-be criminal scheme is a partisan politician, it's a partisan political event. That last part is the most important part of his statement. If there's actually a whistleblower, the whistleblower would come forward or through an attorney come forward. It would not be James Comer and Chuck Grassley and Jim Jordan saying, we got a big one. And,

but you know, this Murdoch ecosystem, this right-wing ecosystem, it kicks right into gear. It was the cover of the New York post today and they couch it in whistleblower says, you know, but they literally put it on the front cover. This is what New Yorkers were seeing of the New York Post today, and they couch it in, whistleblower says, but they literally put it on the front cover. This is what New Yorkers were seeing in the New York Post today. Joe Bribin, FBI has secret file a legend that then beat Biden, but then they accredited to whistleblower to give themselves some cover. I mean, this is just complete BS. It's really heinous and outrageous and disgusting, and frankly frankly should be absolutely illegal. I mean, like people should go to jail for doing stuff like this. This is absolutely sickening to me.

You know who benefits from all of this? The people like Harlan Crowe, the people like Leonard Leo, the people like Rupert Murdoch. They love it. You know, they love it, right? Because you have these Jim Jordans and these Marjorie Taylor Greens, right? They're basically kind of pawns and props, right? You put them around, they're crazy, they have no sense of dignity. They're just these monsters, right? Who go out there, attack the Democrats, frankly, just pro-democracy and logic. Because if you ultimately follow logic and you care about our democracy, you start saying, hey, you know what? It doesn't make sense if you have a Supreme Court that is for sale to billionaires. That's not something

that we all like, right? Everybody would agree with that, unless you've got bribing Biden and Burt's certificate scandals and all of these other things on then you're just angry and you're living and you don't think straight about your own economic interests and then Rupert Murdoch and Harlan Crowe on their freaking yachts in the Mediterranean are freaking laughing at you MAGA Republicans so They are pointing and laughing at you and the Jim Jordans and all these people are just their pawns, which is why law and order matters. And it is why MAGA Republicans want to destroy law and order. And I am always grateful when I hear good news about special counsel Jack Smith and the developments there and what's going on in our court system.

Some more updates as well in the Manhattan court where the Manhattan district attorney is pursuing the criminal charges against Donald Trump. Let's talk about that, but take one more final quick break. And now let's take a quick break to talk about our next partner, FastGrowingTrees.com. Breathe some life into your own backyard with FastGrowingTrees.com this spring. From shade to fresh fruit to privacy and natural beauty, let FastGrowingTrees.com help you plant your dream garden with their expert advice and fast, reliable shipping.

FastGrowingTrees.com's plant expert, they curate thousands of easy-to-grow plant, shrub, and tree varieties for your unique climate, from Meyer lemons to evergreens and everything in between. Happy plants, happy home. Am I right? But sometimes it's hard to know which plants will do best. Well, no problem. Because with FastGrowingTrees.com,

you get customized recommendations based on your specific needs. Plus, their plant experts are always available to help keep your plants growing healthy through the season and beyond. No more waiting in long lines and hauling heavy plants around. With FastGrowingTrees.com, you order online and your plants, they arrive at your door in just a few days. Now, I love Fast Growing Trees because I found the Meyer lemon tree that I was looking for at a great price, and you will too. And with Fast Growing Trees 30-Day Alive and Thrive Guarantee, you know everything will look great fresh out of the box. Now join over 1.5 million happy Fast Growing Trees

customers. Go to fastgrowingtrees.com slash MidasTouch now to get 15% off your entire order. That's 15% off your entire order at fastgrowingtrees.com slash MidasTouch. Our next partner is Climate Financial. Now, in an unpredictable world with pandemics and who knows what, life insurance offers those who rely on you financial freedom and peace of mind, knowing that if something were to happen, they would be taken care of. Life insurance can also be used for your own needs, including long-term care, illness protection, and a way to build significant cash value so you won't ever have to put the burden on your bank account. That's why I'm so happy to introduce you to our next partner, Kleiman Financial, a son-father insurance brokerage firm founded in 2014 by Yair Kleiman.

This independent insurance brokerage has the ability to help you obtain life insurance, disability insurance, long-term care. Whatever your family needs, Climate Financial can help guide you and obtain it. Climate Financial, they take a hands-on approach to get to know you personally before ever putting a policy in front of you. And Climate Financial, they pride themselves on having a fully customizable and bespoke approach that works on an independent track to deliver you the policy that best fits your needs. All their recommendations are tailored to your specific situation. And at Climate Financial, their intimate team has over 80 years of experience between them. They commit themselves to being not only with you today, but to guide you through your financial

strategies with your ever-changing lifestyle. Now, I've personally met with the founder several times before agreeing to have them come on as a sponsor because I just know how serious the subject matter is. And I have to be honest, they didn't just meet my expectations. They exceeded them. They showed me innovative solutions to age-old problems that really opened my eyes. Don't believe me? Call them yourselves and see how they could help you. Climate Financial agreed that as an exclusive offer to Midas Touch listeners, you can call and speak directly to the owners of the firm. That's right. Head to climbingfinancial.com slash Midas right now to see how they can help guide you to the right coverage for your family.

Welcome back. And we are live here on the Midas Touch podcast. Let's talk about what's going on in the courts. Let's start in New York, shall we? Another major court loss for Donald Trump. Donald Trump's case against the New York Times was dismissed. The case was also against Mary Trump. The court hasn't ruled on the Mary Trump portion of that case, but Donald Trump's lawsuit against the New York Times reporters who wrote this expose about his tax fraud and they analyzed decades of his

tax records. He sued them, claimed that they defamed his character, demanded $100 million. That case was dismissed. It was obvious that case was going to be dismissed. Alina Haba was the lawyer there again. And because of the nature of the case there, the New York Times and its reporters will be able to get attorney's fees. And I think it will be significant six-figure attorney's fees. So I think in the past six months, if you're keeping track, Alina Haba, between her sanctions and the cases being dismissed, I think her tab is close to $2 million in losses. And mind you, these are cases that Donald Trump is filing. He is the plaintiff. So he is the person asking for the money. And not only does he lose these cases, but he loses them so badly that he then has to pay

the defendant cases, defendant money for bringing these cases. And in America, unlike some other countries, you know, normally there isn't a cost shift or a fee shift when you lose these cases, which is, you know, a unique and debatable thing that we have here in the United States. However, Donald Trump loses so badly, he ends up having to pay the fees and he gets sanctioned. And look, I think it's so important that we talk about Donald Trump's losses because he files these cases looking for the headline. He wants the headline. Donald Trump sues New York Times for $100 million, right? Because it's the same reason that the New York Post wants that headline,

bribing Joe Biden. Then it goes whistleblower. They just think people care about the headlines and the media is too lazy to report anything after that. So if you're just not following the news and you look at that cover, how can you decipher the real news, for example, right? If you see Donald Trump suing the New York Times for $100 million, then he's lying to you and says that it's a great case. And then you just, you know, you're busy. You're doing other things. You don't necessarily follow the story. What if you're in New York and you get a copy of that New York Post or, you know, you're walking home, you're catching the subway, whatever, you see the New York Post and you see that and it just sticks in your mind, bribing Biden. Oh my God, is he involved in a bribery scandal? Because then the next day,

if there's a report in the New York Times or some legitimate outlet that talks about Donald Trump's crimes or his misconduct, like we're going to be talking about in a little bit, that special counsel Jack Smith's investigating. For example, Donald Trump's relationship with the Saudis and how that relates to his stolen documents. Like a real thing. The fact that Donald Trump is hosting the live golf tournaments at his properties and then spreading disinformation about 9-11 while the Saudis golf tournament is there. Disgusting. And to the average person, sometimes you look at it, you're like, you got Biden's bribing and you got Donald Trump.

Oh my God, everything is so screwed up. What do I... And that's what they want you to do. That's part of their disinformation campaign to just conflate everything and know that most Americans are just so busy that they can't follow all of this and it's all kind of confusing. And that's why you got to break it down. That's why the media and the fourth estate is supposed to be so important and why when they've given up on that role, why it's so completely and utterly problematic. In other news in New York courts, the New York judge, Judge Juan Merchan, who's presiding over the Manhattan District Attorney's criminal case, the 34 separate felony accounts against Donald Trump for falsifying

business records, held a hearing on Thursday. And the hearing was originally supposed to be over the issue of a protective order, whether documents should be kept confidential. Can Donald Trump get access to these documents and post about it? And ultimately, Judge Juan Merchan, he's not calling it a gag order. He's calling it part of this protective order. And the protective order is going to be issued relatively soon. And one of the stipulations with this protective order is that Donald Trump's going to have to go on a Zoom call with the judge where the judge is going to let him know that it will be a violation if you threaten me, the judge, the lawyers, or if you attack witnesses or jurors or attack the court process, you're free to talk

about the case. You're free to say you're innocent or whatever you want to say. But if you start threatening people, like with the baseball bat, that will be a violation of the protective order and you can be held in criminal contempt and be thrown in jail for that. So a pretty big news. It's not getting reported like that, but I think a very big update there. Also, another big update there is that the judge stated that trial's going to be held in February or March of 2024 and told Donald Trump's lawyers, basically, he better be here. It's a criminal case, unlike a civil case, so he's forced to be here. Do not book travel plans during that

time period because he will be in court. We'll pick the time together, give us some dates, but once we pick it, there's no trips. He will be in this court every single day as a criminal defendant. So mark your calendars for February or March of 2024. That is when the criminal case will go in front of a jury. So you may be looking at a criminal conviction of Donald Trump by late March, early April of 2024 for 34 separate felony counts there. And then finally, Donald Trump's lawyers, they filed a completely frivolous motion to try to remove the criminal case that's in state court. Because again, what's the theme here? Oh, I'm being treated so unfairly. Everyone's treating me so meanly here. This case should

really be heard in a federal court. Donald Trump just filed a motion to try to remove this case to the federal courthouse. But by the way, you know who the federal judges are in New York? You got federal judges like Judge Lewis Kaplan, who's presiding over the E. Jean Carroll case. Now, I think Trump's hoping that maybe he can pull one of the judges that he appointed, that same right-wing judge who made the bad ruling for the Manhattan District Attorney. I think he's hoping that it goes in front of her again. But there's no basis for federal jurisdiction here. It's a state prosecutor filing state law claims. And in Donald Trump's motion that was just filed, he argues, well, because it happened during the election, it somehow invokes his powers as a

former president. I read it. It makes absolutely no sense. I'm not even going to try to dissect the illogical nature of that motion, but I just want to let you know that that was filed. Special Counsel Jack Smith has really been piercing Trump's inner circle this past week. We previously reported, of course, that former Vice President Mike Pence testified before the grand jury. But let's talk aboutino testified this week. And Scavino has been the person who's been in charge of all of Donald Trump's Twitter accounts and social media and has always been around Donald Trump. He's, I think, Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff when Donald Trump finished his term in office. And by the way, I think Scavino got his job as Donald Trump's former caddy and then worked at Donald Trump's golf course in Westchester before becoming Donald Trump's social media head and then the deputy chief of staff at the White House, just so you know the career trajectory there. And also you had Matthew Calamari Sr.

and Matthew Calamari Jr., who have both been largely responsible in the Trump organization. Calamari Sr. is obviously the father of Calamari Jr. Calamari Jr. is in charge of Trump security. Calamari Sr. used to be in charge of the security. He's technically the COO of Trump org, but he oversees lots of the security within the Trump organization as well and got his son that job. And one of the things special counsel Jack Smith's been very focused on lately is potential tampering with surveillance footage at Mar-a-Lago and in other Trump properties. Certain surveillance footage was turned over in response to the May 2022 subpoena to Special Counsel Jack Smith, but not all of the footage. There appears to still be missing footage and the footage that

was turned over was delayed and there are some inconsistencies in the footage. So was the footage tampered with? Is there footage that is missing? We know, for example, from the footage that has been turned over, that's how the Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith was able to determine that Walt Naute, one of Donald Trump's employees at Mar-a-Lago, he used to work in the White House, was lying when he claimed that he didn't know how certain boxes that had classified documents were moved. The surveillance footage showed that Walt Nauta was moving the boxes. And so Walt Nauta had to basically come in and then kind of change his testimony. And Walt Nauta, I think, could potentially be charged with obstruction of justice and lying to federal officials. And so he's had to cooperate as a result of basically being caught and exposed,

moving these documents after the subpoena was issued by the Department of Justice to return all of these documents. And so that's a big development right there. One of the other things that Special Counsel Jack Smith's focused on, as I mentioned earlier, is the relationship between Donald Trump and Liv, which is the new golf league run by the Saudi Arabian Sovereign Wealth Fund, the same wealth fund that gave Jared Kushner $2 billion. The relationships there, I don't specifically know if this is the line I'm questioning, but was Donald Trump using his possession of classified records to lure the Saudis into his various properties, either expressly or impliedly, that he has these records? Was there a quid pro

quo there? We know that one of the areas of inquiry that Jack Smith's been looking into before was Donald Trump showing political donors classified maps in his office and kind of weaponizing his possession over these classified documents like that. So all big news right there. And this also kind of explains Evan Corcoran, Donald Trump's lawyer. Remember, Jack Smith in the Department of Justice got an order compelling Evan Corcoran to testify again when the judge made a finding that the crime fraud exception applied, that Evan Corcoran was either knowingly or unwittingly, one or the other, but he was being used by Donald Trump to commit the crime obstruction of justice.

And specifically, there was a call between Corcoran and Donald Trump in May of 2022, when the subpoena from the Department of Justice first issued for Donald Trump to turn over classified records that still remained at Mar-a-Lago after, at that point, over a year, going on two years of Trump lying and saying that all of the records were turned over when they weren't, Corcoran called Trump up and Corcoran took notes of that conversation and perhaps audio recordings about that call. And so was there then a plan in May of 2022 in response to that subpoena to then take action to try to hide or conceal the records from the Department of Justice or destroy the records. And that could potentially be linked to

what else is going on with the surveillance footage. Because once that subpoena issued, there seems to have been something going on with the surveillance footage that could be part of the Department of Justice's obstruction of justice investigation into Donald Trump's classified record. So let's just say a lot going on. That's an amazing breakdown. And that's been within the past few hours. That's why it's just, it's moving so, everything is moving so quickly. And did we even touch on the Proud Boys yet in detail? I don't even know if we got- We have not. Why don't you hit it? Which is absolutely massive. In short, not to belabor the point too much,

but some of the Proud Boys were convicted of seditious conspiracy today. Seditious conspiracy, like an absolutely major charge. It's basically like being charged with treason. There really is no higher charge than seditious conspiracy. Remember in the beginning after January 6th, we said this earlier in Fox, they would be like, well, there hasn't been any sedition convictions or whatever. There hasn't been any sedition charges. Well, now flash forward to today, there are 14 seditious conspiracy guilty verdicts for those counting, 10 by jury and four by guilty plea. Today, the Proud Boys, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rell, and the chairman of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio, were all convicted of seditious conspiracy. They joined the Oath Keeper, Stuart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs,

among many other charges. The one that was not charged, the one that was not convicted of seditious conspiracy today was Dominic Pozzola. He was found not guilty of that, but he was found guilty of obstructing an official proceeding, which carries a max 20 year sentence also, which is the same sentence that seditious conspiracy carries. Also convicted of destroying government property and several other charges. So this is bad news for, I mean, these are like basically Trump's co-conspirators. Let's just be real here. And I don't know why this doesn't get enough attention here. When you go back in time and you look at this post, which should send a chill down your spine.

I thought this was far too ignored at the time. Enrique Tarrio posting on Parler, RIP Parler. I remember when Kanye was going to buy Parler. What the fuck? What the hell happened to that? Anyway, Parler, which now does not exist. Enrique Tarrio posted this before January 6th. Last minute invite to an undisclosed location. Wow. I'm in awe.

Hashtag Trump 2020. And he posted photos of him at the White House. I mean, how could that not send an absolute chill down your spine knowing that? And I just want to show at least for any viewers right now, and we posted this on our Instagram. Follow us there if you want to see this photo. Just a little montage of Enrique Tarrio with a lot of very prominent members of the Republican Party. I mean, hey, I'm just going to say this guy gets around. You see in this photo. You are the company you keep, Brett. That is right. Show me your friends. I'll show you who you are. And here you have Enrique Tarrio with Sarah Huckabee Sanders. You have Enrique Tarrio with, which looks like a very blitzed and wasted Don Jr. No surprise. You see him with Rick Scott. You see him with Roger Stone, Ted Cruz, Dan Crenshaw, and others.

I mean, this guy really got around in the Republican magosphere. And this is a huge win for the Department of Justice at this point. Like Ben said, this is 100% rating right now for the Department of Justice of securing these sorts of convictions. It's a big win. It shows you that their methodical approach of doing this is indeed working. And it's great news. We should celebrate, honestly. Think about this. Proud boys, proud boys, stand back and go cry. And by the way, you know why this is also important too? Tarja was actually not there on the day of January 6th, and he was convicted of seditious conspiracy. I think that is also super important. I mean, Tarja was arrested a couple of days before January 6th.

He was pulled over on an arrest warrant. He had vandalized. He had lit on fire a Black Lives Matter sign and caused a lot of public damage. And then cops pulled him over and they found two unloaded magazines with the Proud Boys logo in his bag. And he tried to say like the clips that he had for his gun, they were being purchased by, I don't even know his excuses. But anyway, he was arrested and he was not actually even at January 6th, but still got that seditious conspiracy conviction. Well, here's the biggest point though. And you were close to hitting on it at the end that he wasn't there.

And then kind of tying that though to Donald Trump, right? Because just think about what the Proud Boys argued throughout the case and what was the closing argument that is now a judicial record. This is why when you build the case against Trump, if you led with Trump before getting all of these other witnesses before the criminal grand jury, when you wanted to get the building blocks there, but you also wanted to get these other convictions. And so you really couldn't have got these seditious conspiracy convictions unless you worked your way up to get

all the other convictions of the lower level people and then the mid-level violent people. Because ultimately, what happened when you charged the Proud Boys? What happened when you charged the Oath Keepers with seditious conspiracy? What was their defense? Their defense was, Donald Trump told us to do it. Their defense was, don't blame us, blame Trump. That's Enrique Tarrio's closing argument that his lawyer said. You're trying to charge Enrique Tarrio with the crimes of Donald Trump. Stop trying to make him a proxy. He wasn't there. Donald Trump was the one who told everybody to do it. And when you look at the jury instructions for seditious conspiracy, the agreement doesn't actually have to be a written agreement between the co-conspirators.

It doesn't even have to be like a formal deal. You don't have to go, okay, here's what we're all going to do. Mind you, that's what Donald Trump actually did., okay, here's what we're all going to do. Mind you, that's what Donald Trump actually did. He said, here's what we're going to do on this date. But it doesn't have to be that. It can just be implied through your conduct, which sends an overall message to other co-conspirators to act in a concerted way, to engage in the underlying conduct of trying to use force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any and the Proud Boys, right? 14 so far in total. You have 14 basically separate ways to communicate to a jury about Donald Trump's role in the seditious conspiracy because they're all blaming him. Think about how powerful that's going to be. And you can take in their testimony now against Trump.

And you couldn't do that if you charged Trump first. That's why you climb the ladder that you do in mafia-style prosecutions and here in ultimately the criminal investigation of Donald Trump. And we're talking about, Brett, 100% convictions or partial convictions. We're talking about hundreds of cases so far, like almost a thousand trials, a thousand. Think about that. And all of those, they haven't lost one. You would think just one. We sometimes joke with each other as brothers when one of us does something that isn't great. We go, hey, all you got to do to be a Hall of Famer is bat 300, bat 350, three of 10. They're batting 1,000%.

They haven't missed, which is beyond incredible that that is taking place. And finally, I just want to show you this clip because I think it ties it all together. And this clip is like, I think perfectly encapsulates the modern day Republican logic. And this is President Biden is going to be sending troops to the border because he thinks that there's action needed there. And so the press asked Lindsey Graham, who was giving a press conference with Ted Cruz, what do you think about Biden's plan to send troops to the border? And Lindsey Graham responds a certain way. And then the person asking the question is, well, what do you think about when Trump did it?

Play this clip. How are you on the administration sending troops to the border? We heard you say you reported. I think it's ridiculous theater. It will not change the outcome. Did you feel the same about it being theater when Trump sent troops to the border in 2018? I feel that Donald Trump did the best job in my political lifetime.

When Donald Trump did something, it worked. Everything he did, as Ted suggested, worked. I mean, nothing else says MAGA Republican like that right there. I'm seeing in the chat, a lot of people want to know what the photo is behind me. I'm at my mom's house right now. That's me, Brett and Jordy from Brett's wedding and our mom, Randy, right there, who you sometimes, sometimes she's always in the chat. So you see her there and I'll just show you right here. I'm in this where I'm, this used to be my bedroom, which is now, this is where, this

is the bedroom that I grew up in for 18 years. This is the, this was the bedroom. That's now our mom's office. The brothers, the three, the three of us will be getting together. Actually this weekend, we have a family event, which is why we're all out here on the East Coast. Look at that. The audio listeners are showing Ben's.

Is that your college graduation photo you're showing, Ben? Law school graduation? Law school graduation. And you got the photo. Try to go up on the basketball shot if you can, a little closer on the basketball. Good basketball shot. This is a classic Midas Brothers photo right there on the bottom left. I love it.

The three of us holding the basketball and our basketball jerseys. Gotta love it. I'm excited to see all you two in person over the weekend. This has been a great show. It's been so much fun hanging with the Midas Mighty. Always a pleasure to bring the Midas Mighty into our family. The Midas Mighty really is our extended family. And we hope to keep growing this family,

to keep growing this pro-democracy movement. And we can't do it without all of you. So remember, please, if you're listening to this on audio, remember to head on over and subscribe to us on YouTube. If you're here on YouTube, go right now. I'm not kidding. Go right now. Go to the audio podcast, any podcast app, search Midas Touch Podcast, and you could subscribe. It's free. And you could also look in the description of this episode to get one of the many incredible products from our sponsors and all of our great discounts we have with our sponsors. And there's also a full list of all the podcasts on the Midas Touch Network for you to subscribe

to. Man, we have a lot of free content for you guys to keep everybody informed. You know what, Brett? I just saw in the chat, someone said Randy for Congress, which is actually a great idea because we live in, what's his name's district? Santos. Santos. We grew up in George Santos' district.

So that's where Ben is currently in Santos' district. As we speak, I will be there next week. And yeah, let's take on George Santos. One of us should maybe run on it. I don't have too much more work. I got to devote my full time to Midas. Thank you everybody for watching. As Brett said, make sure you hit the subscribe button. Appreciate you. I got to adjust to this New York time and the red eye, but I'll get there and Jordy, take it away. Shout out to the Midas Mighty. Lock him up. Indictment season is upon us. Celebrate with the new indictment season t-shirt and v-neck exclusively at store.midastouch.com.