The Michael Knowles Show - "Do Catholics Worship Mary?" Cardinal Burke Answers REAL Posts | Off The Clock
Episode Date: August 15, 2026In this episode of Off the Clock, Michael Knowles sits down with Cardinal Raymond Burke to react to real posts and questions from social media. Together, they tackle common misconceptions about the Ca...tholic Church, discuss controversial topics, and respond directly to what people are saying online. 👇 What question would you ask Cardinal Burke? Leave it in the comments. https://sempervirgo.org - - - Today's Sponsor: PureTalk - At just $15 a month for your first three months on ANY plan... now’s a great time to choose PureTalk. Simply go to https://PureTalk.com/KNOWLES to claim this offer. - - - DailyWire+ Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://dailywire.com/subscribe 📚👩🏼🏫 Back-to-School Sale - Get 3 months for $19 📝👨🏻🏫 Becoming a Daily Wire member allows you to see all of our content ad-free. 📲 Download the free Daily Wire app today on iPhone, Android, Roku, Apple TV, Samsung, and more. 🍿 Run Hide Fight: Infidels will premiere on The Daily Wire, Wednesday September 16th. 📘 My book "Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds" is available here: https://dwplus.shop/Speechless 📗 My book "Reasons to Vote for Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide" is available here: https://dwplus.shop/ReasonsToVoteForDemocrats 🕯️ Get your Michael Knowles candles: https://thecandleclub.com/collections/michael-knowles 👕 Don’t dress like a squish. Shop my merch here: https://dwplus.shop/MichaelKnowlesMerch - - - Socials: YouTube — https://youtube.com/@MichaelKnowles Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/michaelknowlesshow Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/michaeljknowles TikTok — https://www.tiktok.com/@notmichaelknowles X — https://twitter.com/michaeljknowles - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Your summer travels deserve an upgrade.
With select Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, and Cadillac vehicles connected by OnStar,
you can stream, game, and more on the go.
Whether you're headed to a music festival or a cottage getaway,
you can access hundreds of apps on Google Play right from your center display.
Explore OnStar Tech today at OnStar.ca and discover how to take your summer to the next level.
OnStar. Better never stops.
Going on vacation?
We're here for it.
With kids, who turned the backseat into a courtroom drama over whose tablet is louder,
whose charger is faster, and while watching the same cartoon for the hundredth time is a human right?
Yep, we totally have vehicles to handle that.
Because whether it's a road trip or a business trip, where your flight's delayed, your phone's at 2% and your dinner is whatever is open?
Yeah, here for that too.
Enterprise, we're here for it.
Could God make a burrito so expensive that he could not buy it?
I think there actually is a serious theological question hidden in there.
You say, can God make a square circle?
Well, it's ridiculous question.
A circle is a circle and a square is a square.
God doesn't contradict himself.
See, this is evidence as to why I want to ask my questions instead of taking them from Twitter.
This one is going to be hard to top.
It is my superlative honor and privilege to be joined at one of my favorite cigar lounges in Nashville for an episode of Off the Clock with
His eminence, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke.
Your eminence, thank you very much for coming.
Thank you for the invitation.
I'm pleased to be with you.
This is, I don't, this is not flattery whatsoever.
Someone was asking me, one of my colleagues, right before we were in, gosh, where was it?
Oh, it was in lacrosse, actually.
He said, Michael, do you ever get starstruck, meeting all these politicians and actors and
and I said, nah, not that much, really, but, you know, there are a few people I would.
And then an hour or so later, you walked into the green room.
I said, this is the example.
This is where I get StarStrakes.
Cardinal Burke.
So in any case, thank you, so I really appreciate you're making the time.
We have posted to X.
We've asked for all the questions that people have faithful, agnostic, atheist.
It's X, so it's infested with the demonic, at least the figuratively demonic, maybe the
literally demonic.
So we'll filter around all of these questions.
First, though, I should point out.
that 2031 is the 500th anniversary of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
Yes.
And you obviously are rather interested in that subject,
with the shrine, etc.
Yes, we're making our plans for a five-year preparation
for the quintennial.
And each year we'll be devoted to one of the doctrines
on our Blessed Mother
that we come to know her better more deeply
in order to know our Lord.
more deeply and to be more closely united with them.
So we'll begin on December 12th of this year
with a year devoted to her maculet conception,
then the next year will be her perpetual virginity,
then her divine maternity, the assumption,
and then her mediation of all graces,
her motherhood of the church we could say.
So I know people can go to Sempervirgo.org.
Yes, that.
Go there and you can register in every
day we've taken on, thanks
to God, we have a wonderful staff to
help me, but every day I will send
a meditation for the next
beginning on December 12th
for five years. There'll be a
daily meditation for people to
help them to prepare for this
historic
event. I can barely
muster a handful of tweets every day
on my random musings, and you will have a
teaching on the Marion Dogg.
We started already now to get them ready
because it's going to be a work, but it's
It'll be a good work because there's a lot of misunderstanding
and even ignorance about the mystery of the redemption
and the unique role played by our Blessed Mother
as the mother of God, the Son incarnate.
And God willing, these five years will help us
to understand that mystery more deeply,
and it's the mystery of our salvation.
Well, okay, this brings us to our first question from Twitter,
which is from Tiago Vinhaz, who says,
ask the cardinal, why does he worship and pray for Mary,
or maybe to Mary, if Jesus says he is the only way
and no one comes to the Father except through Jesus?
First of all, I don't worship Mary.
I worship her divine son, and that's what she's all about.
The last words of our Blessed Mother in the Gospel at the Wedding Feast of Cana.
She takes the wine stewards, this very embarrassing moment.
they're out of wine for the wedding guests.
She takes them to our Lord and says,
do whatever he tells you,
absolute confidence that he would help them.
And so we, our Lord, of course, he alone is our Savior.
But as he was dying on the cross to save us,
he spoke to St. John, the Apostle and Evangelist,
representing the whole church,
behold your mother.
In other words, he gave his mother to us as our mother
to in that way that she was the first to accept him
in her womb, the announcement of the Archangel Gabriel,
accept the Redeemer into the world,
she helps us to draw near to him and to accept him as our Savior.
She's incomparable help.
And how could we know God incarnate,
God who united our human nature to his divine nature
in the womb of the Virgin Mary
and not know his mother and love her?
it was her fiat, her, and she said to the angel,
because she couldn't understand how this could be
that she, if she was a virgin, she was a consecrated virgin,
she could understand how she would have this child
and the archangel explained to her
that would be the work of the Holy Spirit,
and then she said, let it be done according to your word.
And that for us is the beginning of our salvation,
because God, the Son, has entered the world, conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary, to save us.
I think at a very plain level, I try to be respectful of my friends' mothers.
And I think the mother of God probably deserves even more respect than that.
Exactly. Exactly.
Okay. The next question is from Thomas Bowers.
How does a person who believes in a higher power, but not the church, find a way to come to Christ?
You know, this became very popular in recent decades.
People felt spiritual but not religious.
They believed in some higher power, but not organized religion.
So I'm kind of dismissive of that now, even though I once thought that as a teenager.
Maybe that's why I'm dismissive of it now.
But I think there are a lot of people who earnestly think, look, I want to find God.
I want, but I don't know, I don't buy this church stuff and the smells and the bells.
Why does it need to be organized and so formal?
I think that, first of all, that a person has this attraction to the supernatural to the divine
is already a sign of grace at work, and then they need to answer the question, who is God?
and that we find the answer to that in his revelation of himself
in the Holy Scriptures and in the whole tradition of the church
which embodies both the covenants of the Old Testament
and the new and eternal covenant of the New Testament
and I think basically
there's only one way that they will
be able to respond to that attraction,
and that is in the Catholic Church,
in which the fullness of the revelation of our Lord is taught.
St. Paul might remember he spoke in the Ariopagus,
and the Athenians at that time were very progressive people and so forth.
So they had this altered what they called to the unknown God,
a kind of an anonymous god that people would honor.
And he spoke to them.
He always felt he was a failure
because he didn't speak strongly enough
about that Jesus Christ is the God that you want
to come to know and to worship.
But when one has this attraction,
one then must go to the Word of God and the Holy Scriptures,
and then the Church in which the Holy Scriptures came to be
as an expression of God's revelation.
It does seem, you know, when God in the Old Testament,
which, you know, is prefiguring the new,
when he tells his people to worship him in a certain way
and to pray in a certain way
and to organize themselves in a certain way,
it boggles the mind of modern people who want everything on their own terms.
That's exactly it.
And we can't, God calls us to himself,
but in the integrity of his own being,
not to make our own God,
like in the Old Testament, the story of the Tower of Babel,
the people thought that they could build a structure
to reach up to God instead of worshiping exactly,
as you put it,
worshipping in the way in which God teaches us,
and they had it all in the Old Testament scriptures,
and all of the details about divine worship
to respect God as the origin of all being,
the source of all being, and our participation in his being,
but as his children, not as other gods.
Right, right.
Well, on the particulars of what God tells us to do,
we have a question from one of our Hebraic writers
here. This is, let me see if I can pull it up. Here it is. This is from, I lost it. Here we are.
This is from my Jewish friend who happens to be sitting right over there, who's an associate
producer of this show, Jacob Fulach, who says, with respect to his eminence and Catholics at
large. How do, you never, nothing good is going to follow from that. With respect to no offense
intended, you know you're going to hear the most offensive thing ever. He says, how do Catholics
reconcile the belief that Jesus is the figurative third temple as described.
by the prophets, as well as the final sacrifice for humanity's sins,
when Ezekiel specifically gives the temple's measurements,
500 by 500 cubits, and also says sacrifices will occur on it by the priests.
Was Ezekiel therefore a fraud, according to Catholic belief?
Well, no. All the prophets are preparing the way
for the fulfillment of what they were teaching.
And yes, the temple,
was a prefigurement of God's dwelling with us
in the most extraordinary, most perfectly possible
by taking our own human nature,
uniting it to his divine nature,
becoming one with us in order to save us.
And so in the Old Testament, Ezekiel,
all the law and the prophets sometimes is called,
is all pointing, leading,
to our Lord, and he himself said in the sermon on the Mount,
I've not come to abolish the law on the prophets,
but to bring them to their fulfillment.
And so we understand that all of the care for the dimensions of the temple,
for the appointments in the temple and so forth,
all of that is in view of this perfect dwelling of God with us
by the redemptive incarnation.
And so we accept the book of the prophet Ezekiel
as part of the canon of Holy Scriptures for us,
as it is also for the people of Jewish faith,
and we see nothing contradictory in it.
Yes, I was just reading through Genesis yesterday, actually,
and it occurred to me, a lot of the commentary,
especially from atheists and unbelievers,
is they'll try to debunk the Bible.
And if you try to debunk the Bible,
you will succeed at whatever it is you're attempting to do.
You know, even in the first two chapters of Genesis,
you can find an apparent contradiction,
which is in one of the tales of the creation,
the plants come before the humans.
And in the other tale, the humans come before the plants.
So in modern times, people will just say,
well, there you go.
There's a contradiction.
It's not inerrant.
It's not divinely inspired.
I can go on and do what I please.
But if you, you're not going to get a lot out of the book if you begin that way.
If instead you begin and you say, well, look, based on this historic fact, namely the crucifixion and resurrection of our Lord, if we can like believe that this book has something to offer us, that maybe, you know, 2,000 years of Christians haven't all been a bunch of adults, then you can say, okay, well, there are actually different angles on the account of creation, a cosmic angle and an anthropological one.
You know, when our Lord says to forgive our brother 77 times, he's not telling us not to forgive him 78 times.
That's right.
It seems to me that if Ezekiel is giving numbers for the temple, there might be a deeper significance to that, figurative or moral or analogical.
Of course, it's the order of God, the order that he intended from the beginning, which was disrupted by the sin of Adam and Eve.
and so this right order, this proportion, the beauty of it,
all of that is meant to bring us back to him
and eventually to recognize him at his coming
as the anointed of the Lord, the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
And so that's the way, yes, and you point out,
for centuries the most learned of men
have been studying the Holy Scriptures,
writing commentaries on them, and only to preach the faith,
to announce the faith to others,
not to come up with these artificial contradictions,
as you say, to debunk the Bible.
Yeah.
Good luck.
Yes, if you are.
This is one thing we need to get over,
that our generation is the first to discover the truth about things.
all of us, our life is a gift and also so much culture and knowledge is given to us a gift
and the faith of most of all.
And we ought to be deeply grateful for that and to try to deepen it not to be prideful
and think that, well, I can do better than this.
Yeah, you know, I think about this in particular with regard to St. Thomas Aquinas,
because I go back to St. Thomas so frequently, I just think, when I have a disagreement,
with Thomas Aquinas.
I think I have to assume he's right.
That's not necessarily going to be the case,
but I think betting odds are he's going to be right.
And this is true for all of the great doctors of the church,
church fathers should proceed us.
St. Augustine, St. Gregory the Great,
St. Louis, Leo the Great, the Ironias,
all the great fathers of the church.
And they all fundamentally are in agreement
with each other, but studying these truths
from different angles, from different approaches,
and even using different metaphors,
different forms of literature to present the truth.
Yeah, so now, even when some of my Protestant friends
were, we'd kind of razz each other about religion,
and they would go after me and say the Eucharist
is a kind of developed tradition, or praying to Mary,
to use the example we just cited,
that's a new thing you Catholics invented.
And I think, you know, the early Christians kept pretty
good notes. So you can go back to Justin Martyr and you know the very early
Christian writers talking about the Eucharist you can go back to the I think it's
the Rylans papyrus with the first prayer to the Blessed Mother in the second
century. Yes, so do them proceed him under your protection. No this is this is
exactly the case and we have in the catagombs in Rome from the very first
centuries, images of the mother of God, of the Blessed Mother holding the child Jesus, clearly,
the people professing their faith in her divine maternity, and in that way, professing most
of all their faith in both the divine and human nature and the one person of our Lord.
Next question. I hope we've answered that for my colleague and Frank Jacob. Next question,
this is from, this also sort of relates to Judaism, but
it's more from a Protestant angle. This is from Ruslan K.D., who is a prominent Protestant apologist.
He says, if Protestants are separated brethren in imperfect communion with the church,
why does Catholicism actively seek their full communion with Rome, while the Vatican says it does
not support any specific institutional mission aimed at converting Jews? What is the theological
distinction? Well, the church proclaims the truth to everyone to the Jewish.
to Jews, to Protestants,
we believe that in the church,
one finds the announcement of the fullness
of the revelation of God in Christ's son.
And in the church, he calls his mystical body.
And so we don't, we announce that to everyone,
we don't force anybody,
everyone to become Christian, become Catholic,
but we certainly, if we didn't think that salvation came to us through the church,
why are we members of the church?
Why don't we just becomes indifferent that way you could be Jewish or you could be Protestant?
Why am I a Catholic?
Because I believe that the fullness of the means for my eternal salvation are found in the Catholic Church.
church. And I announced that, not with any kind of condescension or anything else, but simply
this is what we believe, and this is why we believe it, and people will either accept
it or they won't. They are invited to them. Yes. And so we pray for the unity of the church
because we don't believe that our Lord intended that there be all these denominations of Christians,
and we know historically how all of this came about,
and we pray for the reconciliation of those divisions.
Well, okay, there's one last group that we haven't touched on them.
We've got the Protestants, we've got the Jews,
the one last group that is especially represented on Twitter,
the Eastern Orthodox.
There are a lot of orthopros on Twitter,
and one of the masks, he might, I think he's Orthodox,
he's at least interested in the question,
from Verger Grandison, the filiocque.
Why is it important?
Well, this might be the only even semi-popular podcast that is going into the Philly Oak Way today, but I'm actually quite interested in.
Yes. Well, I, to be honest with you, I don't understand the objection to it. In other words, if one understands that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are of the same substance, but three distinct.
persons, the action of the father is with the son in the Holy Spirit.
And so I, to be honest with you, and I haven't studied this in great depth, but I think
if this is understood correctly, I don't see where the Orthodox would have a difficulty.
You know, it is true.
Historically, it was added a little later, but not much later.
So for the people who don't follow these sort of Latin controversies,
the filiocque means with the sun.
With the, yes.
And this was a controversy between the West and the East in antiquity
because the original creed says the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father.
Yes.
And then we were dealing with the heresy of Arianism,
which denied the divinity of Christ.
So there was a clarification.
was added said the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. And the Eastern Orthodox
don't like that. So if you go into an Eastern Church, they don't put the, and the son part.
Right. But I don't think it's because they don't believe that the Holy Spirit came forth
from the Father and the Son, because the Trinity is one. And it would be even, our Lord said,
the father and I are one.
And he said, I've come to do the will of my father.
In the agony in the garden, he says, not my will with I be done.
And so I think because in Nicaea, the filiocque wasn't there,
Constantinople was added.
The church, over time, finds always fuller expressions of her truths.
But the truth didn't change.
It's just, to me, it's just a fuller expression of it.
So I trust that at some point this will
there will be a piece about this.
I hopefully this side of the Eschaton.
You know, in the show, I talk about politics ostensibly.
And there's always culture and religion brought in.
But it's a political show, which I think helps me understand
this Philly-Oquay controversy and the split between the east and the west.
Because the split, the split.
strikes me much more as a political split than a theological split.
You would know more about it than I do.
Well, there's a lot of truth to that.
I wouldn't be prepared right at this moment to go into it,
but there is a definite political aspect,
the involvement of the emperor of the East and so forth
in matters of the church.
And I think that has to be looked at.
I know that that has to be looked at very seriously.
All right, so the next question is from Father Victor Feltais, who says,
What signs in our time give his eminence the greatest concern and which give him the greatest hope?
The signs that give me the greatest concern is this rebellion against the law of God.
We see it in many ways, for instance, in the attack on the inviolability of human life,
the attack on the integrity of marriage,
the attack on the freedom to worship God
as he teaches us to worship him.
Those are my great concerns also for our own country
in this 250th anniversary.
The plague of abortion, we have procured abortion.
Over a million children are killed in the womb
in this country every year.
That's horrible.
people mutilating themselves because they think they have the right to determine their sexual
identity, which is a gift that's given to us at birth. We should be happy with the gift as God
gave it to us. And all of this is on the part of man taking, it's fundamentally a prideful act,
that taking the place of God, that I should be able to decide when human life begins,
when my life should end what sexual identity.
I'm male or female.
And those things concern me the most.
And I think they're the font of a lot of other related concerns
about the violence, for instance, in society today.
I think when you want a society,
well, we just saw in these days in Massachusetts,
they signed into law,
law which permits the killing of a baby
right up to the moment of birth.
And the governor who signed it
is ostensibly Catholic.
Yes.
This is an image I saw
were of these young women
cheering on.
I don't know if they were young mothers or whatever,
but there's something about that
that's so disordered.
And so that concerns me the most.
What gives me the greatest hope
is I see
among many young people, a desire to really lead a good and holy life.
We find that the religious communities that are the most demanding are receiving
great numbers of vocations, many young people returning to church, and they want the more
ancient usage of the Roman right, the beauty of the classical Roman lives.
liturgy, all of these are very positive signs.
I see many more families now with more children,
and that's also a good sign.
I remember when I was a young priest,
there was this idea that also supposedly inspired by a care for the planet
that people shouldn't have more than one or two children.
And I remember when I was young priest,
this mother came up to me in tears.
It was in the Catholic school,
and she had announced one of the teachers
that they were going to have their third baby
and the teacher said to her,
don't you think you should have more regard for...
For the rocks?
Yes.
For the trees?
Yes, for the environment
and not be overpopulating.
Well, these are the kind of things.
But I think that's passed.
I see many positive signs
and I hope we need to raise up in our country leaders
real statesmen who have principles who respect the natural law and who see that any positive
law has to be rooted in the order that God is placed in creation so that you don't have these
Supreme Court decisions that tell people that they can decide what their...
A new definition of marriage, for instance?
Exactly right.
Right now, go to puretalk.com slash knolls.
There are certain things in life that does.
deserve a lot of thought. Faith, family, the state of the church, the future of the country. Your
wireless bill should not be one of those things. Okay. I have had my Pure Talk phone and service
for six years now. It's unbelievable. Pure Talk makes cell phones incredibly simple. Right now,
for the first time ever, any pure talk plan is just 15 bucks a month for your first three months.
Any plan that includes their unlimited high-speed data plans, even their top-tier plan. Whether
you're calling your family, watching this interview, listening to a homily, or spending entire
entirely too much time arguing with strangers on the internet. You can get the service you need
without paying an absurd amount for it. No service contract, no cancellation fee. You should not need
a law degree to sign up for a cell phone. Pure Talk is veteran-led, 100% U.S.-based customer
service. Right now, you can save up to 150 bucks during your first three months. This offer is
extremely short-lived. Make the switch while it is available. PureTalk.com slash knolls to make the switch
to PureTalk. That is puretalk.com slash k-n-o-w-L-E-S to start saving
now. There's a lot in there. On the point of the young people returning, it seems, I travel around a lot,
maybe not as much as you, but I travel around a lot, and I go to a lot of different parishes,
sometimes Nova Sorto, you know, the new Mass, and I prefer the traditional Latin Mass, as do many
of my age cohort. And I've noticed the parishes are filling up, and younger people are
going. But if you want the real young people, and especially the real young people who have lots of
kids who are really into it and really on fire, it does seem to me that skews toward the traditional
Latin Mass.
Yes.
The Nova Sorto parishes tend to be older, fewer kids, more open seats.
Just an observation.
No, it is true at one time whether highly placed figure in the church made the comment that
once all these older people die out, there won't be any request for the traditional
the Latin Mass. And I found that rather amusing. He said, obviously, he never went to one of those
masses because they're filled with young families, young people in general, but also young married
people. And there are many children. There are a lot of crying babies and so forth.
I'm responsible for a few of those crying babies every week.
Well, I say to priests when they would express impatience, I said, don't be impatient.
That's the future of the church. We would let them cry. People will
hear what they need to hear from you.
But anyway, I have a very good friend
who's the Archbishop of Butrek, Cardinald, Ville, Ike.
And he's told me that in the last years
in Holland, where it seemed like the church was dead, really.
I mean, their participation was so low
that now the young people are coming back in great numbers.
But he told me, he said, they want the traditional liturgy.
They want something that speaks.
not that the more recent usage is valid,
there's no question about that and so forth,
but the more ancient usage communicates more fully
and more richly the divine action.
That this is our Lord Jesus Christ
who's come down to renew on the altar,
to make sacramentally present,
his sacrifice on Calvary,
and the young people are simply,
they're attracted.
And then they want that.
And he said,
and they want to know
what the church teaches about things.
They don't want everybody saying,
you know,
oh, everything is fine, you're just fine.
Be nice.
Yes.
As one young person said to me,
came to see me,
to ask me some questions.
He said,
I've come to see you
and don't tell me that I'm all all right.
I'm a sinner.
And we all are.
But I think this is
really a positive sign.
But as far as I can see, there will be an ever greater number of Catholics who are worshipping the way that we worshipped for over 15 centuries.
There's nothing contradictory about that.
There's this idea that somehow the form of the Roman right up until the reforms after the council is all bad.
No. Well, you know, I will get back to the Twitter questions, but one just for myself on this point, which I care about a lot.
You deserve to ask.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Like the earlier question, when people say, why do you have to pray to Mary?
Why do you have to pray to the saints?
You can just pray to God directly.
I say, well, I can.
Yeah, that's true.
Yeah, I can do that.
But why wouldn't I avail myself of all the help I can get?
And I think that for the people who say, well, the new form of the mass is valid.
So why don't you just go to that?
I say, yeah, it's valid.
And I can.
And I do go to that sometimes.
But if you have a lot of young people who are desiring this use of the mass that we had for 1,500 years,
that they feel is speaking to them and nourishing them in a special way,
and they're really drawn to that, why would you restrict that?
You know, Pope Francis restricted the traditional Latin Mass after Pope Benedict had liberated or acknowledged
that it never should have been suppressed in the first place.
So where would you say that stands right now as we're in a new pontificate looking ahead?
I'm not asking you to predict the future, but how do things look right now?
I think that the most important thing is for those who love the traditional Latin Mass
to make known to their bishops and to the Holy Father most of all their desire to worship according to this form
and that they're not calling into question
the validity of the Second Vatican Council,
but that they're simply saying that this farm of the mass,
which was never suppressed and never could be,
the fact of the matter is it's been celebrated continuously
even in our time,
and that more people desire this exactly,
as you say, if they're nourished spiritually in this way,
and they become more...
committed to the faith, why should we deny that to them? I remember visiting an archdiocese and always
whenever to celebrate a pontifical mass according to the more ancient usage. And I always write a letter to
the bishop saying I'm coming and that I'd be happy to meet him if he has time to greet him. And I remember
this, I went to this one diocese and it was a beautiful mass, very well attended, a wonderful
an old church that had been kept up well.
I have to say that bishop came himself
and attended the whole mass
and greeted all the people.
But when I met with him, he said to me,
he said, I have no attraction to it,
but he said those that do
are some of our most devout Catholics.
They show the most respect toward me as bishop
and are very generous with what I asked them to do.
And he said, they're clearly spiritually nourished.
He said, why would I deny that to them?
It just doesn't make sense.
It does seem to, you don't have to predict the future,
but I will.
And I'm a pundit, so if I get it wrong,
I have no responsibility whatsoever.
It does seem to me that the future of the liturgy
will very likely be closer to the past than it will be to the recent moment.
That shouldn't surprise us, because that
is the whole nature of our faith,
St. Paul said when he wrote to the Corinthians,
because already at that time
there were abuses in the Eucharist.
He wrote to them in a very strong way.
First of all, I gave the account
of the institution of the Eucharist.
And when he did that, I said,
I'm handed unto you that which I first received.
He wasn't handing on to them something that he made up
or that was his, but what he received.
And so we received along the centuries
this beautiful form of the Roman right.
as Pope Bank of 16th said, what is beautiful and good at one time doesn't suddenly become bad.
And so that it would be recovered and even more and more the liturgical expression of the church wouldn't surprise me at all.
Okay, now, see, this is evidence as to why I want to ask my questions instead of taking them from Twitter.
This comes from Stevie Mac.
He says, could God make a burrito so expensive that he could not buy it?
Now, this is, this comes after, there was a big debate on social media over the affordability
and the cost of burritos.
And I think there actually is a serious theological question hidden in there, could God make
a burrito so expensive if he couldn't buy it?
Or as it's sometimes put, can God make a stone so heavy that he couldn't lift it?
Well, let us put it this way.
If I may, maybe I don't understand the question correctly, but God made us with intellect and
free will.
God is the creator of reason, of right reason.
And he also revealed himself to us in his fullness through the Holy Scriptures
and first through the people of God, the Jewish, the Hebrew Nation,
then the fulfillment of their faith and the Catholic faith.
But he doesn't contradict himself.
So God, they say, can God make a square circle?
Well, it's ridiculous question.
A circle is a circle and a square.
is a square. God doesn't
contradict himself.
In his revelation, when we,
St. Thomas is brilliant on this,
but also other great theologians,
but we, in the revelation that God gives,
even in the miracles that he works,
they all are perfectly in harmony
with the beauty of creation and express its perfection.
They don't contradict it.
And so this, you know, what God heals,
is sick, restore someone to health, whatever it may be. God is not, he is the God of reason
and the God of divine revelation, and it's the same God.
Pope Benedict got in a lot of trouble at the Regensburg Address because he pointed out the
differences between the Muslim conception of God and the Christian conception. And in it, he was
quoting this Muslim writer, Ibn Hasam, who said that in the Islamic concept, he said that in the Islamic
conception and this kind of voluntarist conception, God is totally transcendent. So if he wanted to
demand that his followers worship idols, he could do that. Whereas the Christian understanding of God
as synonymous with the Logos is different. It's not pure will. It's reason also.
Yes. Absolutely. That is a distinct difference between Islam and Christianity. But even for instance,
If we take the story, it's a powerful account of the sacrifice of Isaac.
God promised Abraham and Sarah that they would have a child,
even though they were advanced in years.
And they had the child Isaac, and then God to test Abraham's faith,
he told him to sacrifice Isaac, which would be really a contradiction.
But it wasn't God's will.
And in fact, and so poor Abraham, heartbroken,
leads this little boy up to the mountain to sacrifice him,
according to the Lord's command.
And at the moment when he was going to sacrifice him,
an angel comes and stops him and says, no.
And so God can test us in various ways,
but he doesn't contradict himself.
And Isaac, of course, his son Jacob,
and then the 12 sons of Jacob,
and the whole, from which descends then our Lord himself.
And even not merely, I was just reading that this morning or last night,
that not merely is God testing Abraham's faith,
but he's also prefiguring what he himself will allow to John.
Yes, because our Lord carried the wood of the cross to Calvary,
and God gave what he would not ask us to do.
himself, he offered his own son for our salvation to save us.
Next question from Oreo with an I, not like the cookie, O-R-I-O, says,
would it be beneficial for the world if the Vatican gave up its wealth?
We hear this question a lot throughout history.
No, it would be detrimental to the world because the Vatican's wealth is all history.
and beauty, all having to do with the history of the church,
with the beauty of her worship.
And these are the great treasures of our tradition.
And to give those up, it would be a sign of a lack of respect
for the tradition itself and would deprive the future
in generations of being able to see, for instance,
what they see in the Vatican museums or in St. Peters.
and no, there's plenty of wealth to meet the needs of the world,
and it's in our pockets, and we need to come forth
and help all of us as we can with the needs of those who are poor,
with the other needs in the church.
But the answer is not to selling chalices and precious vestments,
and so forth that come from along the centuries.
Those are for us rich treasures.
In a way, when I was an atheist,
I was very attracted to those arguments.
But then I realized not only would it be a bad thing to do,
but it wouldn't help the poor.
You would actually be robbing the poor
in the sense that when we used to build big great cathedrals
and we had lots of beauty all over churches,
that is a gift to the poor.
I'm a successful cigar salesman.
I sell enough cigars that I can go travel to places and see nice art if I want to do it.
But it was the case for a lot of the history of Christendom that peasants could go and see the most beautiful marvels
that I now have to pay a lot of money to get on an airplane to go fly to the places that still remain.
These were, you know, these were opportunities.
These were open to everybody.
And I even think of it not to belabor the liturgical point, but I think I was in Italy.
I go to a mass at a papal basilica, a Santa Maria Majorie, and I'm there with my family,
but I'm the only Italian of the crew.
The rest of my family, they don't speak Italian.
So they're saying the mass in Italian, and so I can understand it reasonably well.
They can't understand it.
But the changing of the liturgy to the vernacular is supposed to make it more accessible to everyone.
And I thought, all of these people here are tourists, none of them are Italians,
Italians don't go to church anymore.
So they're all tourists.
Probably none of them speaks Italian, very few of them.
And ironically, had the liturgy not been put into the vernacular,
the liturgy would have been more accessible to everybody who is in this room.
It would have, in fact, seemed like their home parish,
even if it were on the other side of the world.
I remember when I was a boy, sometimes neighbors
or people we knew would take a trip to place like Japan or something.
And it was always their comment that they went to,
church and the mass was exactly the same as in my hometown of richmond center or wherever it was
and that's the beauty of the latin liturgy and now that's that's quite correct now in fact in
st peter's used to be that the priest any priest could celebrate a mass there it's from seven o'clock in the
morning there are of course many altars and so and the priests would come in with a group of faithful
and celebrate the holy mess now they'd they stopped
that and they say the priest should concelebrate mass in Italian but that
doesn't make any sense because it Italian is not a universal language I love
Italy and I speak Italian and I'm very fond of the Italian people but the Latin is
the is our common language yes I mean the Italians for better or worse they were
never that good at colonizing anyway so really not that many people speak it no
and they don't have kids anymore in Italy either so it's yes not
not ideal.
But I want to make a comment too about the poor.
Several years ago I was invited to Barcelona by an apostolate for the street people.
These were young, devout Spanish Catholics who have a love for the traditional liturgy, but
they were caring for the people who live on the street.
And so they invited me to offer a pontifical mass at the Church of Arle de Montserrat, the
shrine of Arlese de Montserrat, just above Barcelona.
and they bust all of the street people there for the mass.
The people, and people said,
well, there you are with all these fancy vestments and so forth
in this very elaborate liturgy, and these poor people.
They were thrilled to death.
Of course.
And they saw it as a great sign of respect
that we would give them the finest that the church has to offer
in terms of a beautiful mass.
And I was very touched by that.
In fact, many of them, they wanted to touch me,
and they were expressed their happiness to have been there.
And then we had a nice meal there.
But it was all, it was very appropriate.
Yes.
Yeah, because it's a sign of respect to dress up for Mass on Sunday.
It's a sign of respect.
I think if I would put on some nice clothing
to go meet a congressman, surely I should put on nicer clothing
to go see God.
And the sign of respect goes the other way too.
if you're going to the far reaches, the flung places,
to the marginalized people, to present the fullness of the liturgy
is very respectful of the people as well.
Sure.
No, exactly.
And I remember as a boy, too, I grew up
on a dairy farm in rural Wisconsin.
Thanks be to God, my parents sent me to a Catholic school.
The sisters there were teaching us to sing Palestrina
and, of course, Gregorian chant.
And we were just simple farm children.
You could have said, well, you know,
those farm children just entertain them with guitar music or something.
But in fact, we were being given a great gift.
And to this day, I have such an appreciation for that beautiful music that, of course, God
willing, it's more and more sung in the churches, churches too.
But, yeah.
I agree.
And I was raised not with the beautiful Gregorian chant.
No, I was raised more with the guitar music.
And every day that goes by, I hear less and less of it in church, and I'm happy to
happy to see it. At propos of that point, Tyler Lazarus writes, if Cardinal Burke could bring
any Christian from the first century into a Catholic mass today, what would that early Christian
recognize? You know, sometimes here that a lot of what we consider distinctly Catholic is
a creation of the Middle Ages, and if you took a first or second century Christian into a mass,
they just wouldn't recognize any of it. Oh, I think they, what they would recognize would be,
the substance of worship as they worshipped,
but with all of the deeper appreciation for it
and the beauty and so forth,
which they knew that in their form of worship,
but as found along the centuries,
this ever greater development in terms of the rights themselves,
the beauty of the vestments and vessels and so forth.
But fundamentally, they would recognize the same,
the praque, well, actually, the mass begins with the same prayers
that the high priest used before entering the temple
with the prayers at the foot of the altar, Psalm 42,
and then the other prayers that quote the scriptures and so forth.
But then they would see the proclamation of the,
of the word of God, and then its realization
in the offering of the Mass.
And I think they would be deeply moved
to see how that great mystery
that they knew had founded an ever-fuller expression
along the centuries.
Two questions, I know you have to go,
but two questions before you go.
One is, and I hear this a lot myself,
the church is attacked for supporting open borders.
Why does the church,
the Vatican has a wall, why does the church support open borders?
Is that a fair charge?
And do we have to support open borders if we're Catholics?
No, the church's teaching with regard to immigration.
It's never been contained the principle of open borders.
We told that we're to receive those who are true refugees
and other immigrants to the degree that we're able to properly accommodate them in society.
and, of course, open borders.
We saw what happened recently in Spain
where there was this influx of people
in the Spanish government
had to send them back, but they weren't refugees.
They were people who were coming to...
Fighting age men.
Exactly, right.
Economic migrants.
Right, exactly.
So, no, that's...
I know that some Iraqs have said this,
to be a Catholic, you have to say that anybody has the right to come in, that's not true.
Even Pope Leo has acknowledged.
The countries have a right to regulate who comes in.
Exactly.
And what about the safety of the people, both the people who already live in the country,
but of anybody who comes into the country, if you just have open borders,
we've seen what happens.
You can have criminals coming in who are coming to perpetrate horrible crimes
that result people's death and other evils,
and so that has to, you can't have that.
Imagine if Pope St. Pius V had supported open borders
at the Battle of Lepanto,
the West would look very different right now.
Yes, that's the other thing too.
People say every war is evil.
That's not true.
The Battle of Panto was a great good.
It saved the church from being destroyed
and overcome by Islam.
And were those men who landed on Omaha Beach
to liberate Europe from the Nazi invasion?
Were they engaged in the evil act?
I don't think so, not at all.
And people hear this.
They're deeply hurt because saved relatives and so forth
who gave their lives to defend freedom.
So we have to think more deeply about these questions.
War is something we always want to avoid,
but as far as I understand,
as long as man is affected by the original sin,
as long as there will be wars and conflicts.
We have to try to be as much as we can be agents of peace,
but in the same way too with the borders,
yes, we welcome, and I quite agree with the people,
say, well, neighbors,
who have been in the country for 30 years
but aren't properly documented
to come in and seize them and deport them,
that's, we need to address each situation
with reason and charity.
Yes, but to say, yes, to say that the battles of Lepanto,
Vienna, Poitiers, that those were not just wars,
I think they're probably pretty just, you know?
Good enough for St. Pius V, good enough for me.
Yes, yes, and at times have changed
with the kind of weapons and things we have,
but the people still have a right to defend themselves
against unjust aggressors.
Yes, and I know we have mere minutes left,
but this has been too highbrow for Twitter.
This has been much too polite and highbrow.
So I'll give the usual denizens of Twitter one question before we go.
This is from Sam the Boat Guy.
Has God revealed to the Cardinal any upcoming sports championships
or winning lottery numbers that we should meditate upon?
No, God doesn't get into that.
that God only tells us what we need to save our souls,
and I don't think that we'll save our souls
with winning lottery numbers.
No, no.
And I try to avoid sports betting,
which is very good for me this year as a Yankee fan,
because I would have lost a lot of money.
Your eminence, obviously people can follow you all over,
and I hope that they all sign up at sempervirgo.org.
Oh, yes, we'd love to have you so you can receive those messages.
And when I asked for the questions, I did receive notes and comments that they didn't even have questions.
They said, just tell Cardinal Burke we love him.
Well, thank you very much.
I can say, getting back to the top of it, no flattery whatsoever, not even just being starstruck, but it is a great honor to be with one of the great men of the church of our age or of any age.
Well, thank you, Michael very much.
God bless you and your work.
Thank you.
See you next time.
