The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 1123 - Fetterman Is The Future Of The Democrat Party

Episode Date: November 10, 2022

Click here to join the member exclusive portion of my show: https://utm.io/ueSEl A bunch of crucial races remain up in the air, Trump ramps up his attacks on DeSantis, and NBC floats John Fetterman f...or president.   - - -  DailyWire+: Become a DailyWire+ member to access the entire DailyWire+ content catalog: https://bit.ly/3SsC5se The Daily Wire is hiring a Senior Vice President of Marketing Analytics, Data, and Operations and a Vice President of Paid Media. For more information and to apply visit https://bit.ly/3WGQNy6   - - -  Today’s Sponsors: Birch Gold - Text "KNOWLES" to 989898 for your no-cost, no-obligation, FREE information kit: https://birchgold.com/knowles Black Rifle Coffee - Get 10% off your first order or Coffee Club subscription with code KNOWLES: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/ Express VPN - Get 3 Months FREE of ExpressVPN: https://expressvpn.com/knowles - - - Socials: Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RwKpq6  Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3BqZLXA  Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eEmwyg  Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3L273Ek Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 It is now two days after Election Day. People have been voting in some states since September, and we are still waiting to find out for sure who won control of the House and of the Senate. If you were born before 2017 or so, you will remember a time when America was able to conduct elections in one day. You know, like France or Brazil or every other. even quasi-democracy on planet Earth. Apparently, though, that is over now. So we're all just waiting, and we're waiting on three Senate races in particular. Republicans currently have won or held 49 seats. Democrats, 48 seats. In Nevada, the Republican Adam Laxalt is leading by 20,000 votes. It's 49.6 percent to 47.4 percent, and that is with 79 percent of the vote in
Starting point is 00:00:59 as of last night. In Georgia, the race between Herschel Walker and Raphael Warnock is essentially tied and headed for a runoff. And in Arizona, Democrat Mark Kelly is leading Republican Blake Masters with 70% of the vote in, with no sign of when the race will be settled for sure. And on top of that, Arizona's gubernatorial race looks like it could be headed to court. I'm Michael Noles. This is the Michael Nulls show. Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday is from Cool Papa J. Magic. That guy gets so many of my, and I don't even see their names when I pick the comment. That's very impressive, cool Papa J magic.
Starting point is 00:01:42 He says, Carrie Lake, they got to fix this problem. Democrats, you're having issues because the problem has already been fixed. So true. So true. I think people are looking at this thing a little bit backwards sometimes. We know that paper ballots work. So why are we moving to these computers and these machines that sometimes don't work and drag the vote count out for many days and weeks when there can be more, broad and should. Okay, I think I understand it. No, I think I get it. We need to be revved up,
Starting point is 00:02:09 okay? We need to be fired up. We need to be peppy. We need to be alert about our elections throughout our entire life. And when you want to be peppy and alert, you got to check out Black Rifle Coffee. Right now, head on over to Black Rifle Coffee.com. Enter promo code Knowles. While today's coffee often comes with hints of soy and just little notes of social justice, black rifle delivers an entirely different experience. Bold, strong, and delicious. Black Rifle Coffee is the coffee that I choose to get me through the day. Black Rifle Coffee Company is veteran-founded and operated. Their mission is to help service members successfully transition from the military into entrepreneurship. They provide assistance to veterans who seek to launch businesses of their own with the goal
Starting point is 00:02:54 of helping more companies, such as Black Rifle, become a reality. Black Rifle is committed to hiring 10,000 veterans. They're well on their way. As for the coffee itself, because frankly for me, even beyond all the great work Black Rifle does, the coffee. That's what I'm interested in. Black Rifle is very selective about where they source their coffee beans, very disciplined when it comes to ensuring the freshness of every bag. Go to Black Rifle Coffee.com, use promo code Knowles for 10% off your first order, or when you sign up for a new Coffee Club subscription. The subscription gives you free shipping on all coffee club orders, early access to club deals and promotions,
Starting point is 00:03:29 and special discounts from their partner brands. That's Black Rifle Coffee.com. promo code knolls for 10% off your first order or when you sign up to become a coffee club member. Black Rifle Coffee supporting veterans and America's coffee. Do you think we're going to get the Arizona election results before or after the next midterm elections? I assume I'd like to think we'll get it before 2026, but I don't know. It's kind of weird. Don't you think we should be able to count the votes and give Carrie Lake her job? But relatively soon? No, maybe not.
Starting point is 00:04:03 America anymore. We're not an advanced country like Brazil. We're only the United States of America. Why could we conduct elections? Some of the races do seem truly to be tight, even as they're properly counting all the votes. There's one house race. This would be my friend Lauren Bobert. Lauren Bobert in Colorado running against Adam Frisch. The race right now is, so Frisch has it, technically by 50.01% to Lauren Bobert's 49.99%. The vote count is Frisch, 155,579 to Bobert, 155,506. And by the way, actually, those are the numbers as of last night. I think it's actually tightened up since then. So it was, it was separated by, what, 73 votes? Now I think it's it's actually 60-something votes. So it's just shockingly, implausibly close. It reminds us that every
Starting point is 00:05:08 vote matters. I mean, there have been elections that are decided by 200 votes. And I think that it's easy for Republicans to be depressed and say, all the Democrats rig it and they changed all the voting rules and they're going to drag out the count. And in some cases, they don't want poll watchers to pay attention to what's going on. And coincidentally, the voting machines and the conservative precincts break. And it's just easy to get depressed. But that's what they're counting on. They are discouraging Republicans. They don't want us to show up to vote. But if 65 voter, whatever, 75 voters in Lauren's district who were Republicans had showed up to vote who didn't, that could have been the difference in the election. We'll see. I mean, there will have to be a
Starting point is 00:05:51 recount if we're only talking about 70 or some odd votes. Now, regardless of what happens in that race. I obviously hope Lauren pulls it out. Joe Biden is signaling now that he thinks that the GOP is going to take the House, and he is intimated that he's willing to work with the House GOP. And he's, the Biden world seems to have accepted that reality. But a lot of people are asking this question, where was the red wave? Where was the red wave that we were all promised, that we saw reflected in all of these polls? Where is it? And it's difficult to work through because the polls are often wrong, but they're almost always wrong in the Democrats' favor. So they almost always oversample Democrats,
Starting point is 00:06:32 and they say things are going to go a lot better for the Democrats, and then the Republicans outperform the polls, and that's when we always say, well, don't believe the polls. But it's always in that direction. So what do we make of this here, where the polls, so many of the polls, seem to favor the Republicans, and the Republicans underperformed. I think it is important to remember that,
Starting point is 00:06:53 as you hear people bickering over why the Republicans had such a poor showing and how it's Trump's fault and no, it's the voter integrity issue fault, and no, it's the this fault, no, it's the that fault. Don't forget this talk of the red tsunami only really began in the last few weeks. If you were talking about the polls in September, then it was much less clear. And if you were talking about the polls six months ago, it was much less clear. Six months ago, and even back in September, the talk was, yeah, Republicans will probably take the House, but it's kind of 50-50 on the Senate because it's a tough election map this year for the Republicans. It was only in the last couple of weeks that the pollsters
Starting point is 00:07:33 started talking about, no, Republicans are going to take 54 seats, 50, 56 seats maybe. But that was not the talk for the vast majority of this campaign. So I'm not trying to help Republicans cope with a disappointing night, but it is important to have some of that perspective. If the Republicans can take the House, and especially if the Republicans can take the Senate, that is a win. That is a big win. You only need 51 or 52 senators there to stop the Biden agenda. And even just taking the House can heavily impede the Biden agenda, though, not nearly as much as if we take the Senate. And then it's got to rile us up for next time. I think a lot of the battle over what happened on the midterm election night, and even some of the catastrophizing of that, is frankly a facade for people who are
Starting point is 00:08:19 already campaigning for candidates in 2024. It is a warning, though, for Republicans next time. Maybe we need to be wary of the polls, too, just as Democrats need to be wary of the polls. Maybe we need to recognize sometimes the polls will overestimate Republicans' chances. So now the Senate might all come down to Georgia. Depends what happens with Arizona, Masters and Kelly, and then what happens in Nevada with the laxalt race. But let's say they split it. That Republicans win one, the Democrats win one, which right now seems to be where the numbers are. So then you could be looking once again, just like in 2020, Georgia decides control of the Senate. Now, this is probably not great news to Republicans who remember that last time we had a Georgia runoff
Starting point is 00:09:08 with Leffler and Purdue on the ticket, we lost and then we lost control of the Senate. I think this is different. So just the facts here, the runoff is going to take place December 6th. Early voting must begin by November 28th in all counties, but it could begin even a couple days earlier, November 26th or November 27th. Are Republicans going to stay home like they did in 2020 or are they going to get out and vote? I think probably Republicans will get out and vote in this one. And I think the reason for that is that other than whatever the hell is going on in Arizona, the problem of voter fraud doesn't seem to be quite as widespread as a lot.
Starting point is 00:09:51 was in 2020. I know. We're not allowed to say that there's any voter fraud or any shenanigans or any rigging, but there obviously was a ton of rigging going on in 2020. And the Democrats admitted that in that longtime magazine article, and they changed all the rules before the race. So I think it was perfectly reasonable for Republicans in Georgia in 2020 to feel dispirited and say, screw it. I'm not going to go vote because the Democrats are just stealing this thing. And I know maybe I'm in the minority of conservative pundits who is willing to say that. But I think it's perfectly understandable why Georgia voters in 2020, who saw all of these shenanigans, who saw a complete upending of election laws over nonsense, over a Chinese cough,
Starting point is 00:10:33 would say, you know what, I'm not going to go vote. But 2022 is different. And this year you saw major Republican gains, and you saw the vast majority of election results come in on election night, which greatly, I think, reduces people's skepticism of the election. And so now you have a real race here. Okay. And Raphael Warnock is really, really bad. And Herschel Walker will be a reliable Republican conservative vote. And they threw some bad opo at Herschel in October. The October surprises were tough. And they said he had all sorts of women problems. And they said that he even accused him of paying for an abortion. Again, I'm not totally sure that that happened. But even if it did, you know, you've got a choice here between Raphael Warnock, who wants abortion on demand up until the 17th trimester. You know, and is going to be a rubber stamp vote for the Democrats who want to subsidize that with your taxpayer dollars. Or you got Herschel Walker, who's going to be a reliably pro-life vote. Who are you going to pick? Obviously, it ought to be Herschel. So we'll see. The problem in Georgia is that Brian Kemp vastly outperformed Herschel Walker,
Starting point is 00:11:38 and Kemp won't be on the ballot this time to help bring Walker up. But nevertheless, I mean, if this is, if this actually does become the race that determines control of the Senate, I think there is going to be a fair amount of voter enthusiasm, And I think that Republican suppression that comes from the dispiritedness of 2020, I don't think that you were going to see that quite as much this time. So the race, once again, for control of the Senate, is going to go on for another month or so. But Republicans, I think, do have a real shot at it. Now, once that's settled, 2024, we are off to the races and Donald Trump is not holding back his fire. Now, when you want to express your political views in this oppressive kind of culture, you're probably
Starting point is 00:12:22 going to want to anonymize yourself. That's why you've got to check out ExpressVPN. Right now, head on over to ExpressVPN.com slash Knowles. Do you know what big tech and our corrupt, big government have in common? They both want to silence any dissenting voices into submission. Let's say that you're a gun owner. You want to talk on social media about your right to keep and bear arms, your Second Amendment right. Well, that post will probably be flagged. by a content moderator and you will end up on a government watch list. To fight back against having your voice censored by both big tech and our corrupt big government, I recommend ExpressVPN. Big Tech tracks everything you do online.
Starting point is 00:12:59 They match your activity to your identity using your device's unique IP address. When I use ExpressVPN, Big Tech cannot see my IP address, making me virtually anonymous. Plus, ExpressVPN encrypts 100% of my internet data to protect me from hackers and eavesdroppers. ExpressVPN is by far the greatest VPN I've ever tried. You don't need to take my word for it. It's the number one rated VPN by CNET, Business Insider, and countless other tech publications. Stop letting big tech and our corrupt big government censor and track you. Protect yourself at ExpressVPN.com slash knolls. E-X-P-R-E-S-V-N-N-N-S-V-N-S. To get three months free, that is expressvvPN.com slash knolls. The midterms are over. We're going to be counting the votes until we're all
Starting point is 00:13:47 long in the tooth, but the midterms are over. So Donald Trump seems to be running full steam ahead 2024, and he is going after his chief rival, Ron DeSantis, real hard. President Trump just gave an interview on News Nation, where he is. explained why he is so offended that Ron DeSantis appears to be running for president. Ron is a person. I've always had a decent relationship with him, but when I endorsed him, he was gone. He was not going to be able to even be a factor in the race. And as soon as I endorsed him, within moments, the race was over. I got him the nomination. He didn't get it. I got it. Because the minute I made that endorsement, he got it. Then he ran, and he wasn't supposed to be
Starting point is 00:14:33 able to win. I did two rallies. We had 52,000 people each one, and we ended up, he won. And I thought that he could have been more gracious, but that's up to him. I like that at the end. He says, I'm entirely responsible for Ronda Sanders' his political career, okay, the guy's nothing without me. And so listen, I thought he should be a little bit gracious, okay? But hey, look, all right, I don't, I'm not saying anything here. And this answer from Trump is a very good answer to the chief anti-Trump attack right now, which is that in these midterm elections, the Trump picks in the primaries were total losers. Trump has terrible picks in the primaries. And Trump's answer to that is, hey, guys, DeSantis was one of my primary picks.
Starting point is 00:15:24 So the argument is Trump's picks in the primaries are terrible, and maybe Ron DeSantis would be better. He says, oh, yeah, hey, guess who, guess who one of my most prominent primary picks was? Ron DeSantis, thank you very much. So that's his argument here. Then he's taking to truth social. He's not taking to Twitter. He's not on Twitter anymore. But he's taking to truth social and he says,
Starting point is 00:15:44 now that the election in Florida is over and everything went quite well, shouldn't it be said that in 2020, I got 1.1 million more votes in Florida than Ron D. He got this year, 5.7 million to 4.6 million. He goes, just asking. You know, it's not really. comparable because presidential election years, more people show up to vote than in the midterm elections. But look, I don't think it's a great look for Trump. I think it makes it look like he is insecure about his ability to win the nomination. Ron DeSantis did not attack him first and
Starting point is 00:16:16 is not attacking him back. If DeSantis were attacking Trump, then I think it would be probably all right for him. But the fact that DeSantis is not attacking him, it doesn't look great for Donald Trump. But I tell you, as always, the reaction to Trump's statements and tweets or fake tweets here now, the truth social tweets, I think a lot of it depends on the tone in which you hear him. So, for instance, some of the big headlines are, if you read that truth social tweet as, I did much better than Ron DeSantis, I got, I got 1.1 million. He got 4.1 million more votes. he got, he only got 4.6 million, I got 5.7 million.
Starting point is 00:17:01 Right, if you just read it like that, then it seems kind of petulant and annoying. But if you read it as, hey, how come nobody's talking about this? You know, I did a lot better. I'm just asking, you know, if you read it as a joke, it's much funnier, obviously, and it reads much differently. I'll give you a better example of this. There was a big headline where it said, Donald Trump says, if candidates win in the midterms, then he deserves all the credit. But if the candidates lose, he deserves none of the blame.
Starting point is 00:17:32 Can you believe this? Do you believe this Donald Trump? And so I read that headline and I said, what did he actually say? I went to the clip. Here's what he said. You've endorsed more than 330 candidates this election cycle. Tonight, win or lose, the results for Republicans. How much of that will be because of Donald Trump? Well, I think if they win, I should get all the credit. if they lose, I should not be blamed at all, okay? But it'll probably be just the opposite.
Starting point is 00:18:02 When they win, I think they're going to do very well. I'll probably be given very little credit, even though in many cases I told people to run, and they ran, and they turned out to be very good candidates. You know, they've turned out to be very good candidates. But usually what would happen is when they do well, I won't be given any credit. And if they do badly, they will blame everything in me. So I'm prepared for anything, but we'll defend ourselves. So it's the same words that you're reading in the headline, but it's a completely different tone. And if you're watching it on TV, you can see that as Trump's saying that, he's got a little smirk. He says, oh, what's my take on the midterms?
Starting point is 00:18:36 Here's what I think should happen. If they win, I should get all the credit. And if they lose, I shouldn't get any of the blame. You know it's going to be the opposite. But listen, my preference would be that. And he's joking. He's joking. It's a joke.
Starting point is 00:18:48 Okay. And I remember this in 2016. my friends who were the most irritated by Trump and who just were the most befuddled by Trump are the ones who are not from New York, have never lived in New York, and don't know a lot of New Yorkers. And the people who kind of laughed at Trump or shrugged him off or got a kick out of him tended to be the New Yorkers
Starting point is 00:19:13 or people who have spent time in New York. Okay, this is it. Donald Trump is at his core a New Yorker. Okay. And New Yorkers make jokes and they're brash and they use hyperbole and they speak with their hands like I am doing right now and like Donald Trump does. And they bust people's gulions and they hit people and they just, you know, it's just the way that they are. Okay. And so this is going to keep up because Donald Trump seriously wants to be president, I think. Donald Trump rightly understands that Ron DeSantis is his chief rival in 2024.
Starting point is 00:19:56 And so he's going to keep dinging him. He's going to keep digging him. Now, this might just turn people off. I've been following a lot of the commentary on this. And a lot of people are saying, look, I love Trump. I voted for him twice. But enough, don't hit, why are you going to hit this good Republican governor down in Florida who's doing great stuff? Come on. Man, it's two years away. Chill out. But Donald Trump, he is who he is. He is a New Yorker. he is brash, he's bold, he hits, he fights. And so that is just going to happen. That is just baked in. The presidential race is on. We're not done counting the votes for 2022, but the race is on, okay? And for the people who are saying, Trump shouldn't hit DeSantis, give me a break. Okay, Trump is who he is. It's a
Starting point is 00:20:35 presidential contest. He's going to do it. And for Donald Trump, by the way, who says, Ron DeSantis shouldn't run against me, I made him. He should be gracious. Okay, give me a break. This is politics. We're talking about the highest office in the land. This is the time that Ron DeSantis probably has to run if he wants it. The way the cycles fall, next time he's probably going to be yesterday's news. And in politics, as in comedy, timing is everything. So he's going to run.
Starting point is 00:21:01 I don't think that he's a bad man for running against Trump who helped him win his first race. And frankly, I don't think Trump is a bad man for trying to get his old job back and for running, especially when he's this high up in the polls. This is politics. Politics is a really tough, brutal business, and the guys who do well in it are really tough guys who can take a punch. I think DeSantis can take a punch. I think Trump can take a punch. They can both throw them as well. And starting most likely next Tuesday with that announcement at Mara Lago, Trump could surprise us and not announce, but all the signs are pointing to him announcing a run. That means 2024 is off to the races. Now, on the Democrat side for 2024, A lot of people saying Biden can't run.
Starting point is 00:21:46 He's just so exhausted. He's so confused. He can barely form an English sentence. So you're going to need a new candidate. And who's the candidate that they're proposing to fix all of those problems about Joe Biden? John Federman, of course. Federman as a nominee at some point for president. I know there's some variables, obviously.
Starting point is 00:22:11 Just a few. But I just a few. But I just, you know, what he did in the super red, deep red parts of Pennsylvania and the way that he ran ahead of Biden, as you were saying, ran ahead of Trump. I mean, it just makes you wonder about his future. Makes you wonder about his future. I mean, John Federman, his entire political experience is being the mayor of a town of 1,800 people and briefly being a lieutenant governor and now having just been elected to the Senate after not campaigning, because he can't speak because he's very, very ill man with extremely radical ideas. So he should be president, right?
Starting point is 00:22:51 Maybe he should. He's probably going to be in the Senate about as long as Obama was. He's got exactly as many political achievements under his belt as Barack Obama did. So maybe. It's not the craziest idea. From the beginning, the health attack on Federman was a loser attack. And it was a loser attack, one, because it seems kind of ugly. You don't want to make fun of people for having a stroke. But two, it's a loser attack because no one really cares because the job of senator is not what it
Starting point is 00:23:19 once was. We used to have active senators who would cross party lines and who were very involved in foreign policy even and who were involved in lots of oversight and who would pass a lot of legislation. That's kind of over. The legislature doesn't really do most of the legislation. Most of the actual legislation at this point is just pumped out by the federal bureaucracy, which is under the executive branch. So the senators, especially as we move more toward a kind of parliamentary style system where the parties are very clearly defined and the individual senators
Starting point is 00:23:51 are just kind of rubber stamps for party leadership, just doesn't really matter. And frankly, I think the same principle is true for the president. I don't know that it matters all that much who the president is if the president is incapacitated, as he is right now, by the way. People are saying, well, Federman can't be president. His brain isn't working all that well. Yeah. Tell me more about that. Because the machine of government just kind of rolls on as our government throughout the 20th century became more of a technocracy. Then the legislators and even the president mattered less and less. You think Federman 2024 is crazy? I don't think you've seen crazy yet. I think things are going to get a whole lot crazier than we're looking at right now. That's why in these periods of craziness and chaos, you're going to want some pretty solid assets.
Starting point is 00:24:42 Why you've got to check out, Birch Gold. Right now, text Knowles to 98-98-98. Inflation continues to plague our economy. The Daily Wire reports that in less than two years, inflation has soared from 1.4% to 8.6%. As of May 2022, the price of gas was up nearly 49%. The price of meat, poultry, and fish was up 14.2%. And the price of used cars was up 16%. The current administration's irresponsible spending patterns, including Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion rescue plan, continue to exacerbate the problem. Now is not the time to have all your money tied up in the stock market. Do not let your savings wither away. Hedge against inflation with gold from Birch Gold. Text Knowles, KNAW. LAS, to 98-98-98. Birch Gold will send you a free info kit
Starting point is 00:25:31 on protecting your savings with gold. Birch gold is giving out a free gold bar with any purchase made by December 22nd. You must submit your claim by Black Friday. With almost 20 years of experience in converting IRAs and 401ks into precious metals IRAs, Birch Gold can help you to. Don't sit around while the Fed devalues your hard-earned money. Text Knowles, KnaWLAS, to 98-98-98, and learn how you can convert at least part of your savings into a precious metals IRA. If you place an order by December 22nd, Birchgold will send you a free gold bar. Text NOLS, Knaw, Knaw, 98, 98. Speaking of insane choices in elections,
Starting point is 00:26:14 we've talked a lot about the Georgia Senate race, the Arizona Senate race, 2024 presidential contest. We haven't talked a ton about the New Hampshire, Miss America contests, okay? And we haven't talked in particular about Brian Neuyan. Brian Neum, who is the first man to win the,
Starting point is 00:26:38 Miss Greater Dairy 2023 competition. Your new Miss Greater Dairy is Brian Noyan. And you see him in his dress and all the poor little cute blonde girls
Starting point is 00:26:55 or they have to pretend to be happy behind him. And then he who is a, for those of you who are not watching right now, for those of you who are only listening, this man is I don't want to be mean. to the guy. He, there's a lot of pretty little blonde girls around him who look like, you know,
Starting point is 00:27:17 young blonde girls. And then there's this more corpulent guy, a little, he just looks more like a man. And he's bigger and he's just bigger, okay? And he is, he wouldn't have gotten my vote for Ms. Grater Derry. And I'm not on the electoral commission for this contest, but it's absurd. how did he win? Even if he were a woman, it would not make sense for him to win this beauty contest. He probably has many other virtues and talents,
Starting point is 00:27:57 but this would not, he should not win. So why? Why? They have to do it. They have to do it. Because the left we know hates truth and the left we know hates goodness and the left also hates that third. Transcendental, hates beauty. That's why the leftists all over the world are throwing soup on
Starting point is 00:28:18 famous beautiful paintings. That's why they attack beautiful buildings and beautiful architecture, and they try to burn these things to the ground. The left hates beauty. And so the left has to redefine truth as falsehood and goodness is evil and beauty as grotesquery. And that is what they're doing. This is why now when you see Billboard, for clothing. It used to be you'd go in magazines and you'd see on billboards for clothing companies. You'd have these beautiful models. Christy Brinkley, right, Heidi Klum, oh my God, Tyra Banks, you know, these really beautiful people. Now you don't see those people on the billboards and in the magazines. You see big, ugly, mutilated people who make themselves look uglier than they otherwise would,
Starting point is 00:29:10 who contort themselves and that's, they call it positivity. It's not positivity. It's an inversion of standards to reorder all of society. That's what they're really after. It's part of the exact same attack on truth and goodness that we see everywhere. They have to do it. And the saddest part of it, the most sort of Stalin-esque totalitarian part of it, is those poor little girls in the background, one of whom should have won the contest, they have to applaud. And they have to smile. And they have to say, oh, this is so great that this big dude won the girl's beauty pageant. We ha ha ha, just like all those girls on the swim team at UPenn, have to smile and applaud when that big dude, Will Thomas, who calls himself Leah, takes all of their trophies. They have to do it. Because if they do not
Starting point is 00:30:02 affirm this absurd dominant regime, they will be exiled, they will be ostracized, they'll be called awful phobic, terrible people. So they have to do it too. And you're supposed to do it to. And I'm supposed to do it too. And I don't. And then they take some of my shows off YouTube and, you know, don't invite me to the nice fancy parties and things like that. But it's a total kind of ideology. It's everywhere. It's not just Joe Biden and that fellow Richard Levine, the assistant health secretary. It's not just them from the official government posts who are pushing the trans ideology. It's everywhere. It's all the way down to the little teen beauty pageant in Miss Greater Dairy of 2023. The drag stuff is now a sort of religious right for public life.
Starting point is 00:30:56 And this is why you're seeing all the politicians do it. Justin Trudeau has just become the latest prominent politician to go on a drag race TV show. Ready for world domination. Please help me welcome the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau. This one is about to go down in history. My jaw just draw. The most shocking thing about this clip is how ordinary it is now. You would have thought two years ago, if a major politician goes on to a drag,
Starting point is 00:31:33 queen show. That's a shocking thing. Wow, isn't that so crazy? Trudeau's the third guy to do it. First, you had Nancy Pelosi. She went on one of the American drag queen show. And then AOC went on the exact same drag queen show. And now Justin Trudeau, up in America's top hat, goes on the Canadian drag queen show. This is just what happens now. This is a religious right for politicians. In the old days, politicians who wanted to win office in the dominant powerful culture would go to churches. They'd go to a church and you'd see them with their Bible, you know, maybe they'd kiss a couple babies there and, you know, they would go to the old religious rituals. In India, when someone wants to become prime minister of India, they go to Varanasi and they go into the Ganges River
Starting point is 00:32:28 because it's considered holy and they'll sometimes go. And the river, and the river is full of bacteria and they'll sometimes go into the river, sometimes they'll even drink out of the river, which is not very good for their physical health, but they have to do it. So important is that religious ritual. Well, that's just what we're seeing now with the left. The left's religious ritual that you have to perform if you want to be considered holy in their extraordinarily unholy religious view is you need to bend the knee to the weird transstand. the LGBT stuff. You certainly have to show up to a pride parade. And I mean, I remember seeing this even 10 years ago in New York. They always have all these sorts of weird, crazy LGBT parades with the
Starting point is 00:33:14 pride parade, the mermaid parade on Coney Island. Chuck Schumer was showing up. You have to do that now. And now it goes even further. You have to show up for transgenderism. It makes me think of a point that my friend Alan Estrin said to me yesterday, I was on Alan Estrin who runs Prager University, I got on a call with him and Jeremy. We were just sort of catching up. And he said, hey guys, well, welcome to the states of America. And I thought, wow, that is so incisive. Yeah, that's a great takeaway from the midterms. We live not in the United States of America. We live in the states of America. We live in different realities with different cultures and different, not just different kind of practices, but different religious views with different languages. We don't even speak
Starting point is 00:34:07 the same language with a different conception of marriage, the bedrock political institution, with completely different conceptions of life, with completely different conceptions of the nation state. We're just, we have very, very little in common. And now if you want, I mean, this is one of the stories of the midterms is that people had voted with their feet, which is good news. That's why, that's one of the reasons why Florida had such a great night for Republicans. But it's also one of the reasons why Lee Zeldon, the Republican candidate, wasn't able to win in New York. He got pretty close. But how many conservative New Yorkers had just left voted with their feet said, I don't want to live like this anymore. I want to go live in a normal place. And so if you want to win elections in the normal conservative places, then you're going to have to still keep going around to those churches and potluck dinners. And if you want to to win elections in the radical leftist states, then you're going to need to go on the drag queen TV show. And those are just different forms of campaign with different rights because people have different fundamental views of the world. One of the other results of the midterm elections is because Biden lost. I mean, let's not forget. Republicans still seem to have won. They didn't win by as
Starting point is 00:35:19 much as we hoped they would, that we would, but Republicans still won, unless something gets a little screwy in the final vote count. But because they didn't win with a huge mandate, Joe Biden was just asked by Zeke Miller, what are you going to change now after this midterm, sir? And he says, not a thing. You mentioned that Americans are frustrated. In fact, 75% of voters say the country is heading into the wrong direction, despite the results of last night. What in the next two years you intend to do differently to change people's opinion of the direction of the country, particularly as you contemplate a run for president in 2024? Nothing, because they're just finding out what we're doing.
Starting point is 00:36:00 The more they know about what we're doing, the more support there is. I'm not going to change a thing. Forget about after Bill Clinton gets shellacked in the midterms, and he comes out and he says, the Arab big government is over. I feel your pain. I hear your midterms. Forget about that. That's over.
Starting point is 00:36:18 Joe Biden says, I'm not going to change a damn thing. Although, frankly, even had he gotten completely destroyed in the midterms, I don't think he would have changed a damn thing at all. Because I think the left is much, much more willing to flex their power right now. And they've shown this time and time again, forget about the polls, forget about what people want. People broadly don't want you transiting their kids. Well, the White House is going to push it. People broadly don't want more migration. White House is going to push it. completely open borders. People want energy prices to come down. White House doesn't care. White House is going to shut down energy production. The liberal establishment does not care.
Starting point is 00:36:59 What are they going to change? They're not going to change a thing. You know, if you're looking for a change in your job, the Daily Wire is looking for a senior vice president of marketing analytics, data, and operations. I'm told that this is a high profile executive role with paid relocation to Nashville. This innovator will design. and oversee a world-class marketing data and analytics team that is built atop the marketing data stack from CRM platforms to multi-touch attribution tools to propensity targeting models. What language is that? I don't even know, I don't know what any of the, I barely know what those syllables mean. This leader will, for example, study which Daily Wire shows and films
Starting point is 00:37:37 most interest to the audience. Don't think we need to hire a new vice president of whatever the hell to do that. I think that answer is pretty obvious. But anyway, they want to do it. Maybe that could be a good thing for you. If you understand what a full marketing data and analytics stack is, head on over to dailywire.com
Starting point is 00:37:59 slash knolls and click careers for more information to apply. Also, the Daily Wire is seeking a vice president of paid media. The ideal candidate will be a season leader and media strategist who can toggle between player and coach who thrives in fast-paced highly creative environments.
Starting point is 00:38:15 and is excited to evolve DailyWire's media mix while retaining ROI. In more simple words, all those ads that people ignore or like to skip, we need someone to make it so that they don't want to ignore or skip them. Having prior experience with entertainment subscription or high-growth consumer businesses would be a huge plus as well. If this sounds like you, go to dailywire.com. Noles and click on careers for more information and to apply today. The establishment has bought into transgenderism, even though the people broadly don't like it,
Starting point is 00:38:53 even though the Republicans who did very, very well in the midterms and in recent years, have done so running against transgenderism. I'm thinking of Ronda Santis, especially in Florida, biggest winter of the night. During the midterms, I'm thinking of Glenn Yonkin in Virginia. I'm thinking of an issue that has brought a lot of people over from the Democrat side to the Republican side. The establishment still pushes it. including the supposedly right-wing media channels. Not all of them, but the ones that have most accommodated themselves to the elite kind of media apparatus, they go along with it.
Starting point is 00:39:32 You know, I'm not surprised when NBC and ABC and CNN and all that were New York Times and Washington Post, I'm not surprised when they buy into the absolutely absurd idea that a man is a woman and that a man who dies as hair a crazy color and mutilates his body, he puts lipstick on, you know, is totally normal and brave and stunning and so, so brilliant and, you know, should be affirmed in that delusion. I'm not surprised by that. But even I, with my low expectations, was surprised, I shouldn't be anymore, but I was surprised to see this piece from Fox News. The Fox News tweets out yesterday, breaking barriers, lay thinky, a tribuner. A tribut her victory to the rise of queer political power. I said, oh, lay finkey. Who's lay
Starting point is 00:40:21 Finky? Then I look at the picture, and it's this, you know, poor caricature of a troubled man who has pink-died hair in a woman's haircut and is wearing a kind of turquoise woman's top and wearing lipstick. And it's just ridiculous. The man should be in an insane asylum, not in any sort of political office. And then I read the headline and I thought, is Fox News kind of mocking this absurdity? Is Fox News? Is this a sort of tongue in cheek? But Fox used the pronoun. Fox News is referring to a dude who is very obviously a dude as her. Unironically, I think. I've got the article here. Minnesota elects first transgender state lawmaker. Even though, even to use the phrase transgender seriously is just to buy the premise of the left, which is absurd.
Starting point is 00:41:24 The idea that there is such a thing as transgenderism, there is not. There is no ontological category of, you know, trans women or trans men. It doesn't exist. There are men who wrongly express their sexual nature and women who wrongly express their sexual nature, but there's no such thing as transgender as an actual category of being. Minnesota voters have elected the state's first transgender lawmaker into office. Finkie's opponent lost or received, you know, just 18.5% of the vote. When Finkie is sworn into office in January, she will replace Alice Hausman, who was first elected to office in 1989. Oh my goodness gracious, she, her, she.
Starting point is 00:42:10 she, many stories will be written about Minnesota's elections. She said in a tweet, quoting the Victory Fund, one undeniable story is the rise of queer political power. Yeah, that's true. We do have very queer powers in this country. The principalities and powers of this world have long been a bit queer, and they're now very explicitly queer, including at Fox News, I guess. What is that about, guys? Come on, you're, come on, you're supposed to be the right-wing cable channel. And if even the supposedly right wing, even center right, conservative cable channel, is embracing the most insanely radical leftist idea, possibly in American history, you know, who needs Democrats? With right wingerers like this, who needs leftists? Absolutely pathetic. It's misinformation is what it is. To call that man a woman is misinformation. Elon, censor this tweet. It's misinformation. You're not allowed to mention that COVID probably
Starting point is 00:43:20 came from a Chinese laboratory or that the vaccine isn't all that effective at stopping infection and transmission of COVID. That's horrible misinformation. But you can call this obvious due to chick, and that's true information? I don't think so. I don't think so. Speaking of misinformation, there was a story on election day. I meant to get to it. It kind of snobes. It kind of snobes. not passed a lot of people. This was a minor story, but it happened in Tennessee, and it could have had pretty serious consequences. It shows you how subtle the shenanigans can be. Someone gave us this tip and sent us screenshots, and Daily Wire has reported on it, that Alexa, the Amazon voice app, had information about polling places. You know, all of social media had been primed to give people
Starting point is 00:44:09 information about where to go to the polls and how to vote. And so Alexa did this too. And when you asked Alexa, what are the polling hours in Tennessee on election day? Here's what Alexa said. There are no polling hours in Tennessee. Ballots must be sent by mail before election day or returned to a designated ballot drop box or in person to the county elections department by 8 p.m. on election day. Huh? If you asked in other states, it gave you the polling hours. But in Tennessee, it didn't. And it's not even, it didn't, like, Alexa couldn't look it up on Google or something like that. Alexa didn't have the right information. There was a lot written there. There are no polling hours in Tennessee. Ballots must be sent by mail before Election Day or returned in person to, but that's not true.
Starting point is 00:45:02 I went. There were polling hours. I voted. So what's that about? Was it malice or incompetence? I don't know. Maybe it's incompetence. I mean, this was one of the disagreements that some of us were having on backstage night, is we were talking about the Maricopa County machines, and Ben said, charitably, perhaps,
Starting point is 00:45:22 listen, don't ascribe to malice, that which is equally explained by incompetence. Those Maricopa County machines. It's just incompetence. Maybe, maybe it's incompetence. Maybe the widespread mail-in ballots in 2020 in Pennsylvania, maybe that was incompetence. Maybe that burst water pipe and the stopping of the vote count in 2020 in Georgia. Maybe that was incompetence. Maybe the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020.
Starting point is 00:45:49 Maybe that was incompetence. Maybe Alexa telling Tennessee voters that there are no polling hours on election day. When we know that Republicans are more likely to vote on election day and we know Democrats are more likely to vote before election day and after they have died. We know that that's true, too. Maybe it's all incompetence. But, man, that's sure a lot of coincidences, isn't it? It's just funny how the incompetence always redounds to the benefit of Democrats
Starting point is 00:46:15 and to the disadvantage of Republicans. Maybe some of it is incompetence and not malice. But it's just the whole system of it. I think it would be hard to say that that whole system of mistakes and mishaps and that that that's all just incompetence. Once can be a fluke, twice can be a coincidence. Three times seems a little bit more strategic and systematic. Now, speaking of issues on election day, one issue that, as the polls got things wrong for Republicans in those last two weeks, one issue that may have played a role more than a lot of conservatives thought was abortion.
Starting point is 00:47:02 and in a very specific way, we've known for years now that abortion does not rank for most people at the very tippy top of their list of issues. And when people are considering issues, the economy, crime, immigration, those sorts of things, tend to rank much, much higher. But there was something this year that motivated people, I think, to vote more specifically on abortion. and that's what might have skewed the polls. And that is that abortion came up on a lot of ballots in referenda. So it's not just that people were voting for a pro-life politician or a pro-abortion politician. They were voting specifically on abortion issues. So when abortion is literally
Starting point is 00:47:49 on the ballot, perhaps that motivated more pro-abortion fanatics to get to the polls. And when they did that, they obviously voted for Democrats. So it's sort of one degree, moved from the normal way that you would think about voting, that might have explained things as well. Now, I always think, look, especially if Republicans win the House and win the Senate, then you say, you know, okay, whatever. Yeah, we didn't get 56 seats. Okay, fine. We got 51 seats or 52 seats, whatever. But even if not, even if it had cost Republicans the Senate to overrule Roe v. Wade, totally worth it. Of course, totally worth it. You, I just knew the Supreme Court shouldn't have If they had just waited and not gone and overruled Roe you wait, oh, well, if they hadn't done that,
Starting point is 00:48:35 hundreds of thousands more babies a year would be murdered. And it's true, maybe some more psychopath politicians would have held some seats in Congress or something, but I don't care. I'll rather take the win. The reason that we want to win elections is to get good stuff done for the country and stop the bad stuff happening in the country, right? and I can think of few issues where good and bad are more starkly defined than on abortion. So totally worth it. But it's worth pointing out. California pro-abortion prop was on the ballot, and 65% of Californians voted for it. You saw the same thing in Vermont, in Montana, Kentucky. Well, you saw it all over the place. Michigan. Did that push, you know, if the abortion prop is on
Starting point is 00:49:25 on the ballot in Michigan, and it passes. Passed pretty clearly, 56.4 to 43.6. Is that what gives Gretchen Whitmer that extra boost to get over Tudor Dixon, who is a good candidate? Maybe it is. And maybe that's just the cost. First of all, though, you can't just say, well, it's Trump's fault. He picked bad candidates. In a way, it is Trump's fault because he got the conservative judges on the court who then overruled Roe v. Wade. So it is. But that's something that I think he would want to take responsibility for. And you can't just say, well, it's the fault of election. or, well, it's the fault of this that, or, well, it's the fault of even a bad Senate map. No, okay, if it is the case that abortion actually did play a role in some of these
Starting point is 00:50:05 tighter races, okay, it's too bad that the Republican lost, but lost for good purpose, because we got a major, major win. And we just shouldn't be so doer and so absolutely depressed, okay? Conservatives are making big gains, conservatives are taking back some political power. are getting more of a specific vision. And it's going to be messy and there's going to be fighting and it's going to be tough and we're going to get some setbacks. Overall, though, the conservatives are doing more right now than they have in my entire lifetime. That's very, very exciting. Now we've got to win those races. We've got a very important conservative lawyer coming on to
Starting point is 00:50:42 help us discuss that. That would, of course, be Jenna Ellis. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. If you're not a member, click the link in the description and join us.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.