The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 1710 - Warning from the President: Don't Be a "Panican"
Episode Date: April 8, 2025President Trump warns Americans not to be “Panicans,” a woman breaks down on television over the end of her maternity leave, and 55% of leftists think that murdering Trump would be justified. C...lick here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4biDlri Ep.1710 - - - DailyWire+: We’re leading the charge again and launching a full-scale push for justice. Go to https://PardonDerek.com right now and sign the petition. Now is the time to join the fight. Watch the hit movies, documentaries, and series reshaping our culture. Go to https://dailywire.com/subscribe today. Live Free & Smell Fancy with The Candle Club: https://thecandleclub.com/michael - - - Today's Sponsors: Fast Growing Trees - Get 15% off your first purchase when using the code KNOWLES at checkout or by visiting https://fastgrowingtrees.com/knowles Hillsdale College - Start learning today. Go to https://hillsdale.edu/knowles to sign up for over 40 free online courses. PureTalk - Switch to PureTalk and start saving today! Visit https://PureTalk.com/KNOWLES - - - Socials: Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RwKpq6 Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3BqZLXA Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eEmwyg Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3L273Ek Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The president is warning you not to become a panacan.
That is apparently, in his words, a new political party based on weak and stupid people.
What I say is, in a world of panacans, be a panicant.
I'm Michael Knowles. It's the Michael Knowles show.
Welcome back to the show. A woman has gone viral and even been featured on Good Morning America
for complaining about the end of her maternity leave.
and her impulse is so right and what she's doing is so wrong.
There's so much more to say first, though.
Go to fastgrowingtrees.com, use code Knowles.
Did you know that fast growing trees is the biggest online nursery in the U.S.
with thousands of different plants at over 2 million happy customers?
They have all the plants your yard needs, fruit trees, privacy trees, flowering trees, shrubs,
so much more.
Whatever plants you're interested in, fast growing trees has you covered.
Find the perfect fit for your climate and space.
Bastarding trees makes it easy to get your dream yard. Order online, get your plants delivered directly
to your door in just a few days without ever leaving home. Their alive and thrive guarantee ensures
your plants arrive happy and healthy. Get support from trained plant experts, uncol to help you plan
your landscape, choose the right plans, and more importantly, learn how to care for them. Right now,
this spring, they have the very best deals for your yard up to half off on select plans and other deals.
listeners to our show will get 15% off.
I did not stutter. I did not misspeak.
You will get 15% off your first purchase when you use code Knowles at checkout.
That is an additional 15% off at FastGerenetrees.com.
Using code Knowles, KnaWLES at checkout, FastGorentrees.com code Noles, KnaWLAS.
Now is the perfect time to plant.
Use code NOLES to save today.
Offers valid for limited time.
Terms and conditions may apply.
The big news this morning, who knows?
By the time you're listening, if you're watching this lot,
then this is real news. If you're listening to this one hour after I record it,
if you're listening to this five, six hours after I record it, who knows what the stock market
is going to look like. But right now, the stock market has rallied. Dow futures were up
1,100 points, I think. The NASDAQ 100 was up 2.5%. S&P 500 futures were roughly about 2.5%
up. So don't be a panican. What is a panic? A panican is a member of the political party that
panics all the time. I'm not panicking. Do you see me panicking? I'm not panicking. The main takeaway
for over the past few days, as you've seen pundits and analysts and chattering heads,
freaking out over the tariffs, my biggest takeaway is knowing with certainty exactly which
public figures are overexposed inequities. That's my big takeaway. And I don't mean to be
glib about the market downturn. A market downturn can seriously harm people if we do enter into
a recession, a global recession. That could harm people. However, remember, deep breath, you only
lose money when you sell. The only two times that the price of a stock should ever concern you are
when you buy and when you sell. Goes up and down and the little colors are moving up and down on the chart.
It doesn't affect you really at all. I mean, if the company goes out of business, I guess I would
affect you to. But as of now, nobody's really lost any money. And on an even more serious point,
weren't we conservatives the ones who were saying that the market was inflated under Biden?
Weren't we the ones saying that the market was artificially high and the underlying economic
realities really didn't support those high stock prices? And furthermore, aren't we conservatives
the ones who have said that the real deep underlying economic realities that we've seen over the past
20, 30 years are really not good for Americans. Because, yes, we have more services bought and sold
in America now. Maybe GDP ticks up a little bit, but we've hollowed out our manufacturing base.
We are now extraordinarily reliant on hostile foreign powers. The minute that the Wu-flu comes out
from China and our supply chains get disrupted, we can't buy anything because we don't have
anything anymore. Haven't we've been talking about that in both parties for 30 years? So what Trump is doing
is making a move for a generational win. Here's what he tweets at. The United States has a chance to do
something that should have been done decades ago. Don't be weak. Don't be stupid. Don't be a panican.
A new party based on weak and stupid people. Be strong, courageous and patient and greatness will be the
result. Now, we'll see how this goes. It is entirely possible that this doesn't work out.
It sends us hurtling into a global recession. Republicans get completely destroyed in the midterms.
A Republican never wins election again. It's all possible. Okay. But Trump's gut has been pretty good
so far. He won re-election with a mandate to do something different, something much like this.
I would just say, channeling my inner spiritual zoomer, let him cook.
Okay, let him cook a little bit.
See what he whips up in the kitchen.
I understand that the market volatility is insane.
Yesterday, there was a rumor totally unsubstantiated that started going around social media.
I think by way of Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council,
who said that Trump was considering a pause on tariffs.
And so the market had been tanking.
This completely unsubstantiated rumor from a Trump economic advisor comes out.
Market shoots through the roof.
Then the White House clarifies, says, no, no, we're not pausing the tariff.
Market goes down again.
But then, hey, you wait a few hours and the market's up.
It's like they say about the weather in Iceland.
You don't like the weather?
Wait 15 minutes.
Trump was in the Oval Office yesterday with Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel.
He was asked about the tariff paused directly.
No uncertainty in his answer.
Well, we're not looking at that. We have many, many countries that are coming to negotiate deals with us, and they're going to be fair deals.
And in certain cases, they're going to be paying substantial tariffs. There'll be fair deals.
As you know, I spoke this morning with the Prime Minister of Japan, and we had a very good conversation. They're coming.
And I said, one thing, you're going to have to open up your country, because we sold no cars, like zero cars in Japan.
and they sold millions of cars into our country.
With China, as you know, against my statement,
they put a 34% tariff on above what their ridiculous tariffs were already.
And I said if that tariff isn't removed by tomorrow at 12 o'clock,
we're putting a 50% tariff on above the tariffs that we put on.
So they've gone for years, they've become a rich country
because of people, again, that were in the White House,
that allowed this to happen.
Okay, two really important indicators
that came out of this comment.
One, we might be in a trade war with China,
and that will be very bad for markets and investors,
and that could be really dangerous,
and it's unclear how we get out of it,
because we're very relying on China,
though China needs us to.
Two, Trump wants more trade.
I am increasingly confident of this,
and I think that maybe that has something to do
with the market rebounding.
This follows, this statement follows
what Scott Besson, the Treasury Secretary was saying.
which is that Japan's coming to the table.
China bad, Japan good.
China won't negotiate, and we're in an escalating tariff situation.
Japan, good, we are negotiating.
And what the Treasury Secretary said was that we are about to enter a new golden age of trade.
So I've been saying for some weeks now, in fact, I ask this of the Treasury Secretary.
It's unclear what the chief goal of the tariffs is.
is it leverage to lower trade barriers in other countries?
Is it the reshoring of American manufacturing?
Is it raising revenue?
Any of those things are good, but they contradict each other.
If you lower the barriers in other countries, you don't get the jobs of the rev.
If you reshore American manufacturing, you also don't get the rev because you got the jobs.
You buying stuff here.
Which is it?
I am increasingly confident Trump just wants better trade deals, but I think he wants more trade.
I think that's what pitting Japan against China is about.
I think that's what this language from the Treasury Secretary,
the Golden Age of Trade, is about.
I think that's what this comment from the Oval Office is about.
I think he wants more trade.
I think markets like more trade.
Whether or not he can land the plane is a totally separate question.
Because as of now, we still haven't seen how this is going to play out,
and it will probably play out over the course of weeks.
But Trump levied tariffs on China.
China responded with reciprocal.
tariffs, Trump said, if you don't get rid of those reciprocal tariffs, I'm going to levy a 50%
tariff on top of everything I've already done. So we're in an escalating situation. I think the
deadline he gave to China was noon today. So it could be the case that Trump wants more trade and
doesn't get it because he can't land the plane. But at the very least, it appears that the chief
goal of all of this is more trade. And markets like that. And maybe we just let Trump cook.
And maybe we stop being panic hands, okay, because really no one has lost any money yet.
until you panic and sell.
Then you have lost money.
Meanwhile, the Agriculture Secretary, Brooke Rollins, goes on CNN
and has some great news that also might buoy the markets.
There's so much more to say first, though.
Go to hillsdale.edu slash knolls.
Have you ever come across someone who says capitalism is evil?
Probably you have, at least in a video online or on TV.
You're maybe just talking to someone at your school.
What was your reaction if you did?
When did capitalism become such a hot button issue?
It seems like people have very strong opinions about it, but they don't really know anything about it.
Well, luckily...
Not loving your AT&T or T Mobile Bill?
Yeah, we've been hearing that a lot.
Good news.
Bring your AT&T or T Mobile Bill to Verizon and we'll give you a better deal.
So get away from that unfortunate phone bill and get to Verizon.
Run, ride, canoe.
Whatever it takes, we'll be here.
Bring your AT&T or T Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal on the best network.
A better deal.
No surprises.
That's Verizon. Best network based on route metrics, best overall mobile network performance U.S.
second half 2025. All rights reserved. It must provide a recent consumer mobile bill in the name of the
person reguming me the deal. Additional terms, conditions, and restrictions apply.
If you're looking to expand your knowledge and horizons on a broad range of topics, not just capitalism,
but including capitalism, then check out Hillsdale College, which is offering more than 40 free online courses.
Totally free, one of the premier institutions of higher learning in the country.
You can learn about the U.S. Constitution, explore stories from the book of Genesis,
discover the rise and fall of the Roman Republic,
even the history of the ancient church,
and they have their new course,
Understanding capitalism.
In just seven lectures,
you will learn about the role of profit
and laws have human nature shapes our economy
and why capitalism depends on private property rights,
the rule of law and freedom.
Right now, go to Hillsdale.
Atedu slash Knowles to enroll in the course,
understanding capitalism.
No cost, it is easy to get started.
Hillsdale.edu slash Knowles, K&WLES,
to enroll for free.
Hillsdale.edu slash Knowles.
Now, on the question of economics, we turn to the Agriculture Secretary, who had this to say about the tariff plan.
I think we'll see, in short order, really positive outcome from this.
We already have 50, 50 countries that have come to the table over the last few days, over the last weeks, that are willing and desperate to talk to us.
We are the economic engine of the world, and it's finally time that someone, President Trump's
it up for America. Okay, so this number is important too. Fifty countries coming to the table
because it helps us to make sense of the way the tariffs were rolled out in the first place.
Many people, there are some people who just hate tariffs. Forget about them. They're not caught
up to speed on what Trump campaigned on and what Americans voted for. Some people like tariffs,
but they say this was rolled out poorly because Trump should have been more tariff.
So Trump's levying tariffs on what? The McDonald and Hurd Islands? What's he going to do? He's
going to tariff penguins. There aren't even any people there. That's crazy. It's too broad.
It seems indiscriminate. The way that they arrived at the tariff number was what? Taking the trade
deficit and dividing it by like four or something. It wasn't quite that simple. But it was a
blunt equation that gave them the number for the tariffs. Why were they so broad and blunt about this?
Well, now the fog is beginning to clear when you say, okay, maybe it really wasn't about 50 countries, 100 countries, 150 countries.
50 countries are coming to the table. We're going to renegotiate our trade deals. It's going to be great. We're going to declare victory over that. But China's not coming to the table.
So what you're seeing play out now, I think, is exactly what the people who were calling for targeted tariffs pretty much only on China were asking for in the first place.
It's all a little bit. I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday.
He said, it seems kind of like shiny keys. He's a military guy. And he said, you know, if I was
ever dropping a bomb on someone, I'd kind of dangle shiny keys over here. So I'd go, you know,
I'd drop a bomb over here, then everyone goes over there, they leave their homes, and then I can get them.
You know, I don't hit the target immediately in the first place. I play it out a little bit
over time. I get people to come to where I want them to come. I set the conversation in terms
that are favorable to me. That might be what Trump's doing here. Because if 50 countries,
go down to maybe just a flat 10% tariff,
if all the extra or punitive tariffs
or reciprocal tariffs go away,
now you're really just dealing in a situation with China.
And do we forget, is our memory so short
that when we left off with Trump
in the first term, right before COVID hit
and the world shut down,
Trump was engaged in a trade war with China
and was doing a good job of it.
It was winning the trade war.
And then the woo flu snuck out and everything went to pot and then Biden became president.
But is that just what this is all about? Is this just all about China? Increasingly seems that it is.
Okay. Moving from the Agriculture Secretary, but sticking on women in politics, a woman has gone viral and even been featured on Good Morning America for crying about the end of her maternity leave.
So today is my last day of maternity leave and I go back to work tomorrow.
And I just feel like I haven't had enough time with them.
I know I got longer than a lot of women get with three months.
But it just doesn't, I just don't feel ready.
I had a very high-risk pregnancy because they shared a placenta.
They were five and a half weeks premature.
We were in the NICU for several weeks,
so you kind of feel a little robbed of that postpartum experience
and that does not get accounted into your maternity leave.
It's just such an abrupt change that you're with your babies all the time
and then you pick them up from daycare and you might just get a few,
hours. I just felt like so disconnected to them. I would, sorry, I'm going to get emotional. I would just
like cry, like they're going to forget me. Okay, I get it. I have a pity sandwich for this woman
that is stuffed with a no sympathy cold cut. It is, there is, it is a pity sandwich. I immediately
feel bad for her and in the end I feel bad for her. But there is a little bit of no, no sympathy
he's stuffing in there. Because my first question is, why is this woman on TV? Why is this woman
putting her children first on social media, then on national television? Not a great start to
motherhood. Don't do that. Don't put your kids on social media. Don't use your kids to become a big
celebrity. Don't do it. They didn't ask to be famous. I get it. They're not going to resemble what
they look like right now for very long. But just, come on, cut it out. Be with you. You want to be with
your kids? Be with your kids. Now, I do feel bad for her. I feel bad for her. I feel
bad for a lot of mothers who they go through this pregnancy and it's extremely physically taxing.
It's emotionally taxing. They're postpartum. They want to be with their kids. And they got to go back
to the widget factory. And they got to go work for Mr. McGillacutty and make widgets and get a paycheck
that they can give to their husband so that their husband can hire some other woman to raise
their babies. Well, his wife is at work? It seems crazy. It seems so inefficient. Seems so inhuman.
And this woman says, I want to be with my kids more, but I got to go back to my stupid job.
That's true.
Now, the little no sympathy stuffing in here is, you can live on one income.
You can live on one income.
I'm not saying that it's easy.
I'm not saying you can maintain your quality of life that you have now.
But you can.
Your grandparents had things that were not as nice as you do.
So how can, and I'm not just speaking abstractly here.
I am speaking with some knowledge because I am part of a rather traditional community, okay,
and I know plenty of people who do it.
But if you want to live on one income today, it means you're not going to live right downtown,
probably.
It means you're going to live a little outside of the city.
Maybe more than a little, maybe you're going to live an hour outside the city.
And you're not going to have the nice big McMansion.
You're going to have a starter home, maybe.
And you're not going to have two cars.
you may not have two
everyone has to have his own car
well your grandparents didn't have two cars probably
maybe your parents didn't have two cars
maybe you have one car
and maybe you don't go on the big fancy vacation
every year and maybe you don't have all the latest gizmos
and maybe you're not subscribed to every streaming service
and maybe you're not getting Uber Eats every night
and many of the creature comforts
that define our age
you will not have
but you can live on one income
okay we
We are the richest country in the history of the world.
If everyone else can do it for all of history, we can do it too.
But I don't want to just sound callous or disconnected or anything like that.
Because I understand why people don't want to give up the creature comforts.
It's not just that we're indulgent.
It's not just that we've become accustomed to luxury.
It's that we are memetic creatures.
We imitate each other and we imitate each other's desires.
And so it's not enough to say, look, you give up your extra car and your Netflix and your
vacations and your new clothes and your Uber Eats and going out. Because if all of your friends
are doing all of those things, you're going to be missing out. And it's actually going to affect
your friendships and it's going to affect your social life. And people really do try to keep up
with the Joneses. That's not just a vice of human nature. That is how we behave. That's actually
a key feature, not just a bug of human nature. We imitate each other. So I get it. It's a very
very difficult. And I wish that we had, the libs want to have maternity leave for three months or
something. Conservatives want to have maternity leave for two months. I think we should have
maternity leave for 18 years. Now that requires reshaping the incentives, financial incentives,
provided by our government. Maybe it means we need a family policy closer to what we have in Hungary,
where mothers don't pay taxes after they have a few kids. Now you'd say, well, if the mother's not
working at the widget factory, she's not going to have an income anyway. Well, maybe we
reconfigure how families are paying taxes. Maybe we incentivize mothers to stay home if they want
to do it. Don't forget, this was a big feature of the debate over feminism between Betty Friedan,
the American feminist and Simone de Beauvoir, the French feminist. Betty Friedan,
very American, said, you know, we need people to have a choice. Women should be able to choose
if they want to work or not. Simone de Beauvoir said no.
if women have the choice to stay home and raise their kids and keep a home, too many women will
take that choice. Most of them will take it. And we can't have that because then they won't be
liberated. So we maybe need to give women that choice. But you could do it now. If you really want to do it,
you don't need to cry on TikTok in Good Morning America. You can do it. No one's saying it's easy,
but it's possible. Now, speaking of perverse financial incentives in our day and age,
Big, big story out of the reform of the federal government and religion, Catholic Charities has
suspended its deal with the U.S. government. And this is great news, great news.
Catholic Charities has had a 50-year relationship with the federal government.
What is Catholic Charities? I mean, there are a lot of Catholic Charities, right? I support
certain Catholic Charities, but I'm talking capital C, capital C, Catholic Charities, Trademark
over the S is an organization from the Catholic bishops run by a bunch of NGO workers that
facilitates mass migration. That's really what it's about. It's about bringing millions and
millions of people into the United States in contravention of our most basic laws.
Archbishop Timothy P. Brolyo, who's the president of the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishop,
said the bishop's decision came after the federal government suspended our cooperative
agreements to resettle refugees. The drastic reduction of these programs forced us to reconsider
the best way to serve the needs of our brothers and sisters seeking safe harbor from violence and
persecution. And he wrote that for the Washington Post. Why a Catholic would write for,
even read the Washington Post is another matter. This might be presented as the Trump administration
attacking Catholics or something. Ninety-nine percent of faithful Catholics are thrilled about this,
because 99% of faithful Catholics have had the number of Catholic charities for many years now
and recognize that they're better places to put our money.
If Catholic Charities had a deal to stop abortion,
let's say it wasn't a deal to facilitate mass migration of economic migrants from Venezuela.
Let's say instead it was a deal to stop babies from being murdered,
a much more important issue than moving economic migrants around some borders.
If the Catholic Charities had a deal to do that,
we would be all for it. That's not really what Catholic Charities does. Catholic Charities
acts as an NGO that is affiliated with the Catholic Church, but for which Catholic theology and
tradition is not the most important thing. And the federal government, you, the taxpayers,
are not going to fund that anymore. I'm a Catholic, and I don't give my money to Catholic charities.
I give it to other organizations associated with the church. I don't give it to Catholic
charities. So why should you, the taxpayer,
maybe you're a Protestant, maybe you're a Jew, maybe you're a Muslim, I don't know.
Why are you funding this?
Also, why are you funding this when it's just about resettling migrants?
It's not, let's, that's good.
This is a good reform of the federal government.
Maybe we have a reform of Catholic charities too.
Sounds fine by me.
There's so much more to say.
First, though, go to Peartalk.com slash Knowles.
As Doge continues to cut the fat from decades of bloated government spending and corruption,
Pure Talk, the cell phone company that,
I use is cutting the fat from the wireless industry.
That's right.
Pure Talk says, I don't think so, to $100 a month cell phone plans.
That's just wasteful.
It's irresponsible.
Instead, Pure Talk is offering America's most dependable 5G network
at America's most sensible prices.
Listen to this.
Unlimited talk text and 15 gigs of data plus mobile hotspot
for just $35 a month.
Best part, right now you will get a free one-year membership to DailyWR Plus.
that includes access to the entire library of DailyWR Plus movies, documentaries, uncensored, ad-free daily shows,
kids programming, and, of course, your free leftist, yours Tumblr.
With Pure Talk's U.S. Customer Service team, you can switch hassle-free in as little as 10 minutes.
Right now go to PureTalk.com slash Noles. Switch to PureTalk at puretalk.com slash Noles.
Get a year of DailyWR Plus for free with a qualifying plan.
Pure Talk wireless by Americans for Americans.
Speaking of social issues, this is a providential news story. I'm at Pittsburgh right now. I'm at the
University of Pittsburgh. They didn't blow me up this time. Great news. I'm here. No char, no ash on me.
It's good, too, because I wore a suit that I think is made of recycled bottle caps or something.
This is one of my least expensive suits. Highly flammable, but no one threw a bomb at me. No fireworks at the building like they did last time.
So the topic of my speech was political violence, how political violence is not exclusively a left-wing phenomenon, but it is distinctly a left-wing phenomenon.
And the speech is on my YouTube channel and Yaf's YouTube channel and you can go check it out right now.
I encourage you to do so as good time.
As I'm giving this speech, there's an article published in the Federalist, hat tip to M.D. Kittle here.
And it's about a report that came out of the Network of Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University.
55% of leftists say that murdering Trump would be justified.
55%.
A clear majority.
This was a large part of my thesis last night,
which I wrote before that report came out.
But I just knew it.
You know, I hate to say I told you so.
Anybody could see it.
Democrats, not just the crazy fringe,
but all the way up to mainstream Joe Biden as president,
justified the murder of President Trump for years.
So is it any wonder that 55% of leftists would say murdering Trump is justified?
It's 31 to 38% of respondents said that it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk and Trump.
But the numbers were totally skewed by the leftists.
48% said it would be justified to murder money.
it would be justified to murder the electric car manufacturer rocket man who is advising the president
on how to make the executive branch more efficient. For that, for doing this great service to
America, which has great precedent going back at least to Woodrow Wilson with the Bureau of Efficiency
up through FDR, Truman, Reagan. Al Gore. Al Gore eliminated a quarter million federal jobs
and consolidated some 800 agencies when he was vice president.
But when Elon does it, he should be murdered.
And then 55% say, Trump should be murdered.
I think, and this was my thesis last night,
if you want the whole lecture, you can go check it out.
I think that political violence is a feature and not a bug of liberalism.
And the reason that I think that is,
one, we just see the enormous number of violent left-wing incidents.
the handful of right-wing cooks who commit violence
pale in comparison to the consistent left-wing violence.
The Republicans, mainstream Republicans,
never endorse the cook who commits some violence on the right.
They disavow it.
No Republicans are defending the Oklahoma City bombing, okay?
Meanwhile, on the left,
mainstream leftists are defending BLM
as they murder dozens of people and burn the cities down.
They're defending Antifa in some cases.
they're bailing the rioters out of jail. This is going all the way up to Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, staffers for Joe Biden.
So you can see it with your own eyes. And I think the reason for that is this paradox at the heart of liberalism, which is that liberalism begins by making an idol out of individual human reason. It exalts individual human reason above all else and excludes things like history, morality, religion, duty, all the rest of it. Just,
individual human reason. We're going to recreate the world anew. Some people see things that are
and ask why. I see things that never were and say, why not? The problem is the moment that you
untether or you liberate your human reason from morality, history, religion, all the things that
keep the appetites in check, then the appetites are going to start to take over. And all of a sudden,
you're going to be pulled into ever more absurd fantasies. So how do we see this? You have the classical
liberals who generally defend negative liberty, you know, the freedom from, freedom of speech
from prosecution, freedom from the government confiscating my firearms. The more progressive liberals
embrace positive liberties. So they say, we need the freedom of self-actualization. You're not
really free if you don't have the necessities of life. So we need the liberties and the rights of
welfare and food and health care and a universal basic income. And the list goes on. But the progressive
liberals go further. They'll say, in order to really self-actualize, in order to really be totally
free, we need the right to same-sex marriage. In other words, the right to a thing that cannot
possibly exist. Same-sex marriage is a contradiction in terms, or to use even a less controversial
example, we need the right to transgenderism, you know, for a man to become a woman,
which is not possible. But they demand these rights as their appetites and their desires become
untethered from reason. And so the irony is
the political project that starts out by making
an idol out of human reason,
by exalting human reason, destroys
human reason, because there's
nothing left to hold the appetites in check
and the appetites devour human reason.
And so,
if you get to the absurdity point
in liberalism, and I think we're there, if you get
to the point in liberalism, where we can no
longer even agree on the meanings of words,
we can no longer agree on the meaning of the word
woman, then the only way
to conduct politics is
through brute force. Because you can't persuade anyone. You don't even speak the same language anymore.
You have denied reason and objective truth. You've sacrificed that in favor of your own personal
and absurd desires. So the only thing left to do is club the other guy on the head. And that's,
that's, I think, where we are. I think 55% say murdering Trump is justified. It's because they can't make
reason to arguments. They can't persuade people.
they will not subdue their desires to their reason.
So the only thing left to do is pop the guy off.
Expect that number to go up.
Expect that number to go up as liberalism advances.
Now, the culture, I think, is on our side.
That's why we won the Electoral College in a landslide.
That's why we won the popular vote.
That's why we won the House and the Senate.
We have the Supreme Court.
And now I feel confident that we have the Supreme Court
because you've been hearing for weeks.
from panic hands, a lot of panic hands out there. You've been hearing for weeks that President Trump's
deportation policy is illegal, unconstitutional. He's denying due process to the poor face tattooed Satan
worshiping gangsters. He invoked the Alien Enemies Act from 1798. And that, he can't do that.
That's a really old law. Don't you know laws have expiration dates? I didn't know that. I don't know.
I didn't go to law school, but I don't think they have expiration dates. In fact, I think the older a law is,
the longer it's been around, probably the sturdier it is. But anyway, we're told that's unconstitutional,
terrible, awful. Well, the Supreme Court just ruled on it. Chief Justice, John Roberts,
has issued an order blocking a previous order from a district court judge that demanded that a
deported Salvadoran national, a foreigner, an illegal alien, be returned to the U.S.
So remember, Trump just enforces the most basic aspects of our long.
The libs lose their minds because they want an open border. They want to flood the country with foreign
nationals because I think it'll give them an advantage. Some two-bit district court judge comes out and says,
you need to turn the planes around. You're not allowed to deport the face tattooed Satan worshiping fentanyl dealing gangsters.
You're not known. And what do the libs say? They say, you must listen to the random district court judge.
It doesn't matter President Trump that you control the executive branch. It doesn't matter that you were elected in a landslide. It doesn't matter.
No, we must, we have a government in this country that is ruled by a random district court judge, is that?
And they would say this is what we need for checks and balances. This is what we need for separation of powers.
I said, well, if we have checks and balances and separation of powers, that doesn't mean judicial supremacy.
Certainly doesn't mean supremacy from some random district court. He's not even an appellate judge.
You're certainly not a Supreme Court justice. Well, anyway, the Supremes have ruled. We get to deport the gangsters. It's cool.
Disrecord judges, they got to sit back down. The panic hands, they're never going to recover from this.
Trump's policy will proceed to pace. That's very good news. You know, the establishment media,
they think that you are too dumb to see through their lies. They twist the narrative, they manipulate the headlines,
they bury the truth. We know better. At the Daily Wire, we bring you the facts, no filter, no spin.
Then you get in on the conversation. Join the chat live during our daily shows 100% uncensored,
ad-free pact with the members of the Chim Dule dechperm. Our producers are in the daily chat
to add to the conversation. That's actually one of the downsides of joining. But please don't let that
stop you. Get the news the way that it should be honest, fearless, without a lib agenda. Your voice
matters. Be part of it. Join now at dailywire.com slash subscribe. My favorite comment
yesterday is from Patrick Ogin 4553 who says, I have lost most of my money at the gas pump. This is the
other reason that the panic hands don't get it. This is the other reason that the chattering class,
political elites and the economic analysts, don't understand how Trump could implement the tariffs,
the market could tank, and his approval rating could go up four points. They don't understand
that for most people, stock market fluctuations mean nothing, and stock market, even massive 40-year
high collapses in the stock market.
pale in comparison to the price of gas going down.
And by the way, as a result of this tariff policy
and the market volatility,
the price of oil has dropped down.
And the price of gas is coming down.
And that's going to matter a lot more to a lot more people.
You might say, well, what about me?
What about me with my 401K?
Yeah, I'm not downplaying it.
It could be bad.
But unless you are in retirement right now,
and really even more specifically,
unless you are in retirement
and overexposed inequities in retirement,
which you should not be,
and a good financial planner would discourage you from doing that,
for the vast majority of people, even who are invested in the stock market,
none of this matters right now.
Be cool, let it play out,
don't re-register with the Panicam political party.
We'll see how it goes.
Because while we're hearing that the Democrats are going to clobberous in the midterms
and Republicans are going to get blown out of the water,
then I look to the Democrat,
thought leaders. Not just the cooks. I'm not just straw manning. I look to the most normal,
mainstream, moderate Democrats there are. I look to guys like the Rage and Cage and James Carville,
whose big pitch right now is that Republicans are Nazis. Do you know what's going to happen?
Do you know how this end? Do you know these collaborators with the country is going to feel
toward collaborators with this regime?
Maybe you need to go in history
and see what happened in August of 1944
after Paris was liberated.
They didn't take very kindly to the collaborators.
No.
It was not a very pretty sight in the streets of Paris.
I'm not saying that these people
should be placed in pajamas,
and have the head shaved,
march down Pennsylvania Avenue,
and spit on. I'm not saying that.
But I'm saying that that did happen.
So James Carville learned a new word.
He learned the word collaborator.
It's why he said it three times
in the span of about 15 seconds.
And this is the really nuanced,
big-brain Democrat take.
Hey, James, you ran the Clinton presidential campaign,
like the original one, you know, in the 90s.
and you, you know, you've been such an important figure.
You're one of the cooler heads that prevails
when the wackos from the Democrats, you know, take over.
So what's your messaging?
After the Democrats lost the White House
and the popular vote and the House and the Senate
and the Supreme Court, what's your messaging?
I think y'all a bunch of Nazis.
I think y'all were now and when I was saying,
and I'm a baby bum bum bum bum, bum, bum, bum.
What?
Say that again?
I wouldn't say my million voter
You go to the voter
And tell him you're a bunch of Nazi
We're going to shave your head march you down Pennsylvania Avenue
We're going to shoot you
We're going 55% American want to
On the left say that we can murder Donald Trump
We're going to murder you too
Because you're Nazi, you big fat Nazi
Hitler drank water
You drank water, you're a Nazi
Oh, okay
Never mind then
Great, we have nothing to worry about it all
If that is
The best messaging the Democrats can come up with
Come on, this is supposed to be the best
to be the best week for them. Markets, tanking, Trump's on the ropes, the walls are closing in,
and the best they've got, the best they've got is the only line they had throughout the 2024 campaign,
the 2020 campaign that they've had for years. Trump's a Nazi. That makes me feel really good.
Why is this the best line they have? I'm not just making fun of James Carville. I'm making fun of him
a little bit, but I'm not just, I'm not calling him, I don't think he's a dummy. I think he's got pretty good
political instincts. But what else are they going to talk about? Are they going to talk about trade?
What's their opinion of trade? Some of the Democrats love free trade. Some of the Democrats
hate free trade. It was the Democrats who were calling attention to the problems of globalist free
trade before many Republicans were. So which is they can't, they just can't talk about it.
Are they going to talk about, are they going to talk about Israel, Palestine? Well, do they like Israel or do
they like Palestine. Seems like
the Democrats are totally split on that issue. Are they going to talk
about
golly, I don't know, any other war? I guess Ukraine, they're
kind of united on, but they know Ukraine is a political loser.
Are they going to talk about
what? What are they going to talk about? They have nothing.
So the only thing they can say is Trump's a Nazi. And if we don't head
for a global depression,
I think the guy's sitting in a pretty good spot right now.
One thing that could threaten the Trump administration and the new golden age
is the prospect of war with Iran.
Trump broached this question yesterday in the Oval Office with Benjamin Netanyahu.
Here's his answer.
We're having direct talks with Iran,
and they've started it'll go on Saturday.
We have a very big meeting and we'll see what can happen.
And I think everybody agrees that doing a deal would be preferable to doing the obvious.
And the obvious is not something that I want to be involved with,
or frankly that Israel wants to be involved with if they can avoid it.
So we're going to see if we can avoid it.
But it's getting to be very dangerous territory,
and hopefully those talks will be successful.
And I think it would be in Iran's best interests if they are successful.
Well, we hope that's going to happen.
America has zero interest in a war with Iran.
Well, I'm not saying we don't have interests.
We have interests everywhere on earth.
But the American people who elected Trump with the popular vote do not want war with Iran.
Full stop, period.
It ain't the Bush era anymore.
In fact, the Republican view on war in the Middle East is largely shaped by the Bush era.
nobody wants it. However, America does still have interests. And so I think Trump's answer is very good.
He's saying, look, we're going to leave open the possibility that we engage in some kind of war with Iran
because we do not want Iran to get a nuclear weapon because if Iran gets a nuclear weapon,
we're very likely going to be dragged into war anyway, and it's going to be a worse war.
But we want to strike a deal. And there are going to be hawks on the right. The neocons or the
Wilsonian spread democracy all over the world or whatever.
They are going to say this isn't tough enough.
We've got to get even tougher on Iran.
I think Trump's via media here,
I think his middle ground is very, very good.
You have to recognize that the United States has alliances.
He's sitting next to Netanyahu.
Netanyahu hates Iran.
Iran is the number one enemy of the state of Israel.
But the state of Israel has different interests than the United States.
We're not the same country.
We're allies, but we're not the same country.
So he's sitting there next to Netanyahu, he says, look, we're going to be tough, we're going to back our allies, we're going to pursue American interests, take Israel off the table for a second. The United States does not want Iran to get a nuclear weapon. We're going to pursue our interests, but we would rather strike a deal. For anyone who thinks, for anyone who thinks that Trump is being too tough on Iran here, I would say grow up. America has strategic interests everywhere in the world, certainly in that tough neighborhood. But for the people who say,
say that Trump is not being tough enough. There is zero appetite in the United States for war with Iran.
Nobody, nobody but nobody. We're talking less than 1% of people probably would celebrate if America
went to war with Iran. And I think Trump knows that. And while Trump is fighting political wars on
multiple fronts, a once-in-130-year-plus tariff regime and a reorganization of the executive
branch, a massive reform of the executive branch led by Elon Musk, and massive transparency and
declassification, and a major tax bill that Trump has to get over the finish line, and this,
and that, and this and that. We don't want to be dealing with war with Iran.
okay so maybe we strike a deal that would be good that's what we want also i'll just leave you on this
from the trump oval office meeting with menjahoo trump uh reaffirmed lest anyone is forgotten
that man wants to build a casino in gaza the times of israel uh the idea is fighting to get
into gaza strip by myself might be called up in a month do you think that's the way to pressure
to chmas to get to a deal and do you think blocking humanitarian aid is also an effective
pressure well you know how i feel about the gaza trip i think i think that's trip i think
I think it's an incredible piece of important real estate.
And I think it's something that we would be involved in.
But having a peace force like the United States there, controlling and owning the Gaza Strip would be a good thing.
Because right now, all it is is for years and years.
All I hear about is killing and Hamas and problems.
And if you take the people, the Palestinians, and move them around to different countries,
and you have plenty of countries that will do that.
And you really have a freedom, a freedom zone.
You call it the freedom zone.
A free zone, a zone where people aren't going to be killed every day.
That's a hell of a place.
We call it the freedom zone.
Then we're going to call it the Trump-Gazan International Hotel and Golf Course and Casino.
I love Trump's innovation here.
I love Trump's audacity.
And I even like his broadly imperial understanding of geopolitics.
I don't think there's much appetite for this either.
So he keeps floating it out there.
And then Yahoo's not even on camera during that.
Wait a second, I want to cause.
Why are you taking goes?
Give me goes out.
No, no, no, it's ours.
It's ours, it's ours.
It's ours.
We're going to build beautiful black jack tables all around, guys.
It's going to be beautiful and make it a lot of money and be really great.
I don't think there's a ton of appetite here.
So I think also, because I'm not a panic, and I don't know about you,
I hear these things.
I see them as chips being moved around.
in a casino, I see them as negotiating tactics.
Not disconnected from the potential war with Iran.
And we see where it lands.
I'm a panic-a-can't, though, baby.
You can't get me to panic.
Today is T-he-he-he-he Tuesday.
The rest of the show continues now.
You do not want to miss it.
Head on over to Daily Wire Plus.
Use code NOLES at checkout,
and get two months free on all annual plans.
How many discounts does USA Auto Insurance offer?
Too many to say here.
Multi-vehicle discount.
Safe driver discount?
New vehicle discount.
Storage discount.
Legacy.
How many discounts will you stack up?
Tap the banner or visit usaa.com
slash auto discounts.
Restrictions apply.
