The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 552 - When Karen Met Karen

Episode Date: May 27, 2020

Two weirdos had a viral meltdown in Central Park, and now one of their lives is ruined. Then, for the first time ever, Twitter “fact-checks” President Trump on voter fraud, and for the seven-zilli...onth time, what Trump said turns out to be true, and the “fact-check” turns out to be a lie. The mainstream media get caught in more coronavirus hypocrisy, and in Washington State gunshot victims get added to the COVID death toll. If you like The Michael Knowles Show, become a member TODAY with promo code: KNOWLES and enjoy the exclusive benefits for 10% off at https://www.dailywire.com/knowles Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Two weirdos had a viral meltdown in Central Park, and now one of their lives is ruined. Then, for the first time ever, Twitter fact checks President Trump on voter fraud, and for the seven zillionth time, what Trump said turns out to be true, and the fact check turns out to be a lie. The mainstream media get caught in more coronavirus hypocrisy, and in Washington State, gunshot victims get added to the COVID death toll. All that and more. I'm Michael Knowles, and this is the Mike. Michael Nolz Show. You saw the video. There was no way to miss the video going around the internet yesterday. If you did miss it, we will play it for you. It was this interaction in Central Park between the woman who is walking her dog and the guy who starts filming her, and then the woman
Starting point is 00:00:53 has a meltdown, but the guy also kind of has a meltdown. Both of these people are being called Karen's. You know the term Karen. Initially, it meant a middle-aged white woman who's very nosy and tells you your business and gets involved in your affairs. Now it transcends. sends race and sex. It refers basically to everybody. Which of the Karen's was in the right, which of them was in the wrong. We will get to that in one second because I think most people are getting this completely wrong. And I was pretty shocked and appalled by that video. But first, I got to thank our friends over at Ring. You know, it's very hard to even remember what life was like before Ring. Ring is so terrific.
Starting point is 00:01:37 We are home more than usual these days, and it's still hard to keep a close eye on things. More deliveries mean more boxes left unattended and more opportunities for packages to go missing. A lot can happen outside our front doors, and we are not always free to check on things in person. With Ring, you can keep your home safe no matter where you are. You can be at home, you can be at the office, you can be on vacation, you could be anywhere you can check in on it. Ring is on a mission to make neighborhoods safer. Their home security products are designed to give you PC. of mind around the clock. You know, I give Ring out as a housewarming gift to friends of mine.
Starting point is 00:02:13 Unfortunately, there was one friend of mine that I had not yet given Ring to. Guess what happened to him the other day? He got his laptop stolen right out of his apartment. I should have given him earlier and I'm certainly telling him to go get it now. Get a special offer on the Ring Welcome Kit when you go to ring.com slash Knowles. The welcome kit includes video, ring video, doorbell three and Shine Pro. It's all you need to start building custom security for your home today. Go to ring.com slash knolls. That's ring.com slash knolls. I'll set the scene for you in Central Park.
Starting point is 00:02:46 There's a woman walking her dog. There is a man who is bird watching. But he's really people watching because he starts getting involved in this woman's business. I will refer to her as Ms. Karen. I will refer to him as Mr. Karen. So Ms. Karen is walking. her dog and she's got the dog without a leash. So Mr. Karen decides to get very nosy and tell Ms. Karen to put a leash on her dog. Ms. Karen then says she doesn't want to put the leash on her dog.
Starting point is 00:03:24 So Mr. Karen, like a creep, says, okay, well, then I'm going to do something that you're not going to like very much, reaches into his bag, pulls out doggy treats. Doggy treats that this guy only had so that he could lure other people's dogs away because he was so irritated when the dogs didn't have leashes. So Mr. Karen pulls out doggy treats to lure Ms. Karen's dog away. Ms. And I think the exact words that Mr. Karen said, according to him, were, I'm going to do what I'm going to do and you're not going to like it,
Starting point is 00:03:56 which is a pretty weird thing to say when you're isolated with somebody in a park, especially if you're a man and she's a woman. Then Ms. Karen loses her mind. I have caught you up. We have set the scene. Now take a listen to what ensues. Would you please stop? Sorry, I'm asking you to stop. Please don't come close to me. Sir, I'm asking you to stop recording me.
Starting point is 00:04:19 Please don't come close to me. Please take your phone off. Please don't come close to me. Then I'm taking a picture of calling the cops. Please call the cops. I'm going to tell them there's an African-American man threatening my life. Please tell them whatever you like. Excuse me. I'm sorry, I'm in a ramble. And there is a man African-American. He has a fight. He is recording me and threatening me and my dog.
Starting point is 00:04:55 There is an African-American man. I am in Central Park. He is recording me and threatening myself and my dog. I'm sorry, I can't hear you either. I'm being threatened by a man into the ramble. Please send the cops immediately. I'm in Central Park in the ramble. I don't know.
Starting point is 00:05:17 Thank you. Okay, so obviously this woman behaving absolutely hysterically. but the guy was behaving hysterically too. They are both Karen. This is Mr. and Ms. Karen. I think they should get married. They should live unhappily ever after. Everyone is focusing on how wrong this woman was.
Starting point is 00:05:39 And they're calling her all sorts of things. She's a racist. She's terrible. She's got to have her life ruined. And no one's focusing on what a weirdo, creepy dude, this guy is. This guy, Mr. Karen, is much more in the wrong than this lady. Ms. Karen, much more in the wrong. Men should not behave like that. Men should not go up to women in the middle of parks and start chatting with them if they don't want to be chatted with and
Starting point is 00:06:07 stick around there if they don't want to be stuck around with and then start feeding treats to their dogs that you're trying to lure away, treats that you only have to lure people's dogs away, and then start filming them. That's weird behavior. People shouldn't do that. Also, men should not humiliate women. They should not humiliate women privately. They should not humiliate women publicly by filming them and putting that video all over the internet. And then subsequently, or consequently rather, ruining her life. That's not very chivalrous behavior. That is the behavior of a society that has lost the sense of manliness and gentlemanliness. And then let's not forget, most of all, he started it. This guy started it because he had to start caronning around her business
Starting point is 00:06:53 and making a big fuss because she didn't have her dog on a leash in the park. Okay. Now, what people are trying to do, what race hustling, mostly white liberal, social justice warriors are trying to do is make this a whole racial issue. I guarantee you if the case was flipped, and this woman was walking around and this guy didn't have his dog on a leash, they would be making a big deal about that. They would be saying, oh, it's not a big deal to have your dog on a leash. This is obviously a very opportunistic case for people to push a leftist narrative.
Starting point is 00:07:29 It's the same narrative that we see constantly, you know, all over the political left. The New York Times is pushing this precise narrative. Listen to this. They describe him. Mr. Cooper, 57, a Harvard graduate who works in communications. Is hearing that he's a Harvard graduate supposed to make me think he's a more respectable fellow, that is not the way to convince somebody that this guy is really. respectable. I don't think so. He's long been a prominent birder in the city and is on the board of the New York City Audubon Society. A prominent burder? What is a prominent burder? Oh yes, Mr. Cooper, that well-known birder. That, oh, yes, I see him birding about. What is birding? I guess he looks at birds. That's what that means. He's a bird watcher. There are no prominent bird watchers. Okay, he's a guy. Here's what they're saying. Mr. Cooper, who, who,
Starting point is 00:08:23 35 years ago went to a college in Boston, looks at birds and enjoys looking at birds. Okay, fine. Maybe he's an otherwise nice guy. He doesn't seem like a nice guy from this video, but sure. Then the New York Times admits what he did. This is directly from the New York Times, quoting Mr. Cooper. Look, if you're going to do what you want, I'm going to do what I want, but you're not going to like it, he told her before he pulled out the treats and began filming, according to his post. Mr. Cooper then produced dog treats and said, he said, I pull out the dog treats I carry for just such intransigence, he wrote. He's admitting he carries the treats to get weird with other people's dogs. That's when I started video recording with my iPhone and when her inner Karen
Starting point is 00:09:09 fully emerged and took a dark turn, he said, using the name that has become slang for an entitled white woman. So first of all, the people who are trying to make this a racial thing should at least admit off the top, this guy is using a racist term. The New York Times is calling it a racist term. Now, it would appear that the word Karen has transcended race and sex, mostly because of this guy. But from the very beginning, if they're saying that this woman is a racist, surely this guy is a racist too. He's using the term that the Times admits is racist. What's the end result? She loses her job and she loses her dog. I'm not joking. She got fired from her investment management firm and they took her dog away.
Starting point is 00:09:51 For what? Because she had this hysterical meltdown in the park because some hysterical guy goaded her into it. And now she's being smeared as a racist. Is this woman a racist? I don't know. Maybe she is.
Starting point is 00:10:03 But from the video, I can't conclude that she's a racist. Why? The two pieces of evidence that this woman is a racist are that she behaved hysterically on the phone with the cops and that she noted several times
Starting point is 00:10:17 that he is an African-American man. Well, she was behaving hysterically before she ever called the cops. From the very beginning of the video, she says, hi, hi, I'm gonna get away from me, please, stop it. And she's behaving in a ridiculous way, but it's not as though her behavior changed in any significant way when she called the cops.
Starting point is 00:10:37 She was already behaving hysterically. So that was not performative. And the implication here is that she was performing this hysteria for the cops because she wanted to get the cops there to kill the man. Because, you know, there's an epidemic in America of racist cops killing innocent black men, which is not true.
Starting point is 00:10:55 There are incidents that are sensationalized that try to craft this narrative that there is an epidemic of racist cops slaughtering innocent black men. But that isn't the case. The reason that the stories become so sensational when they happen is precisely because they are so rare. It is very easy to be emotionally manipulated, particularly by the mainstant. media on issues like this, but these statistics do not bear it out. So there's that first part, gone. What about the second one? She kept noting that he's an African American man. Again,
Starting point is 00:11:27 maybe she's a racist, maybe she's not a racist, maybe the definition of racism keeps changing because the left exploits it so much. I mean, now we're told that only certain races can be racist, but other races can't be racist. I'm not joking. That's what the left tells you. So again, I don't even know what definition we're working with anymore, but let's just look at that piece of evidence. She keeps saying on the phone, he's an African-American man. She also notes that he's wearing a bike helmet. Right. When you call, if you are going to call and make a police report, which was a ridiculous thing for this woman to do in this case, but both of these people were behaving in a ridiculous manner. So she calls and makes a police report.
Starting point is 00:12:06 When you make a police report, you describe the person that you're making the police report on. Right? You don't say, well, he's wearing a blue shirt. Okay, can you take you? tell us anything else about him? No, I'm not allowed to say anything else about him because if I do, I'll be smeared as a racist and lose my job. So she mentions his race. She also mentions that he's wearing a bicycle helmet. Is she a cyclophobe? Does she have a deep-seated hatred of bicycles or something like that? I don't know. Why did she include that detail? That would seem to be evidence to me that she's including descriptors so that hopefully the police can come and arrest this man for the high crime of being a weirdo with dog tree.
Starting point is 00:12:46 conservatives need to stop playing into this nonsense. They have to. Both of these people behaved badly. Both of them behaved in a shameful way, an embarrassing way. Now, only Mr. Karen filmed Ms. Karen and ruined her life, but they both behaved in a, in a silly way. The woman, apparently, according to reports, is a liberal. So I don't exactly have a political dog in this fight.
Starting point is 00:13:15 but I'm just so offended by this guy's behavior. It's so unschivalrous. It's so unmanly. It's just so, it's just ugly behavior. Okay. And I think some conservatives want to prove that they're not racists to the left, which, by the way, is not possible. Because the left doesn't care whether you're a racist or not. They just want to smear you.
Starting point is 00:13:37 You know, who's going to know if you're a racist or not? You. Do you hate people of other races? And do you judge them unfairly based on their race? No, okay, good, you're not a racist. Good. Don't worry. Doesn't matter what the left says about you. If you know it, it's good enough. Okay, defending this creep does not make you Rosa Parks, all right? Ruining this woman's life does not make you Martin Luther King. Does anyone really believe that this woman should have her life ruined over this thing? Because she was walking her dog and some creep tried to lure the dog away and then filmed her and humiliated her nationally?
Starting point is 00:14:12 No, nobody thinks that. I don't think the guy, this weirdo birdwatcher, should have his life ruined either. I don't think either of these people should have their lives ruined. I think they should both take a good long think, sit down, have a good long stew session on how their lives came to this point and maybe what's wrong with the way they see the world. But I don't think either of them should have their lives ruined for this. a society that gets pleasure out of ruining people's lives like this for ideological fantasies is sick and ugly.
Starting point is 00:14:48 I tweeted out. I said, hey, Twitter mob, do you all feel good now that you ruined this woman's life? And a lot of people responded, mostly white liberals. It's always the white liberals that tends to be the first wave of meanness and nastiness when it comes to this kind of ideology. But, you know, other people, too. Some people responded and said, yeah, I feel great. I feel awesome.
Starting point is 00:15:15 I feel so happy that this woman's life is ruined. That is a sick and ugly society, and we should not want any part of that sort of thing. They're not the only Karens in New York, though. Mr. and Ms. Karen, who will go and live unhappily ever after, are not the only ones. There was a big Karen session in Staten Island. We'll get to that in one second.
Starting point is 00:15:32 First, though, I've got to thank our friends over at Bambi. You know, having a good HR department is the key to running a great company. When running a business, HR issues can kill you. With Bambi, however, you can change HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength. Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email, or real-time chat. From onboarding to terminations, they customize your policies to fit your business and help you manage your employees day to day. You know how much? Do you how much for?
Starting point is 00:16:04 $99 a month. That is practically nothing. Month to month, no hidden fees, cancel any time. You didn't start your business because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance. Let Bambi help get your free HR audit. Today, go to Bambi.com slash Michael right now to schedule your free HR audit. That is Bambi.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L. That is spelled BAM to the B-E-E-E-D-com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L, solve your HR problems today. We're moving from Central Park.
Starting point is 00:16:42 We're moving all the way down Manhattan Island. We are now crossing over the water, getting into Staten Island, the forgotten borough in New York, in a grocery store. Another example of men behaving abominably to women. It's funny. Everyone thinks that this story is about race,
Starting point is 00:17:02 these kind of Karen stories. It's not about race. Frankly, it's much more about sex than it is about race. Because some woman doesn't wear a mask. And the Staten Islanders in this supermarket lose their mind, start screaming obscenities to kick this person out of the supermarket. That's normal behavior. That's a normal society, right?
Starting point is 00:17:43 Somebody walks in to a supermarket does not have a mask on. You know that thing that we all did up until three months ago? Doesn't have a mask on. You know the thing that we were told not to wear because they don't do anything. Actually, because it would hurt the health care workers, they said, if we wore masks. Someone does that. And it would be as though this guy walked in totally naked, screaming obscenities, firing on off pistols. That's the kind of reaction that he got. Because I actually couldn't tell from the
Starting point is 00:18:18 video if it was a he or a she, regardless, whoever the person is. I think it was a she. It looked like a woman, but, you know, who can tell with these kind of things. Regardless, this is the kind of reaction that that person gets. Something has gone a little bit off in society. People are a little bit too on edge. And it's not just the pandemic. I don't think, I don't think that this epidemic really helps people in how on edge they are. But I think we were already on edge. I think that the phenomenon of the Twitter mob, the phenomenon of the gotcha video, the phenomenon of I'm going to ruin this person's life because they said something that I don't like. That is indicative of a deeper edginess in the culture. We're just really angry in each other. We just really, we just want,
Starting point is 00:19:07 we just want to get some revenge for something, for I don't know what, because we got a chip on our shoulder because people are very miserable. I'm sure that these two things are connected. There have been a lot of social scientific surveys in recent years that show that people are really miserable. They're lonely. They're angry. Their lives haven't panned out the way that they think that they should. And I think a big cause of that is because of the disconnect, because between ideology and reality, the ideological vision that we've all been sold, that nothing really matters. There's no God. There's no love. There's no joy. There's no no nobility. There's no point in serving our country or each other. It's all just a farce. We're all
Starting point is 00:19:46 going to turn to worm food in the end. We need to just pursue our pleasure ruthlessly and live for ourselves. That's the thing we've been told on the left and the right and the reality that all of those things will make us miserable. I think that's the disconnect. That's got us all a little bit on edge. Well, guess what? I don't think that you will feel any better by taking that sort of anger out on other people. The only way you will feel any better is if you look in at yourself, take a gander in the mirror, and fix your own life. The masks also are just really dumb. Okay? They're dumb. I'm not saying they don't work sometimes. I'm not saying there's not a place for masks. I'm not saying that in all circumstances, you shouldn't wear masks. But the masks generally are
Starting point is 00:20:31 dumb and nobody seriously believes that they're going to save them. Least of all, the mainstream media, the news media, who were telling people to wear them. How do I know this? Because MSNBC sent a reporter out into the field to shame people for not wearing masks, but the segment didn't go that well when one of the people that the reporter was shaming decided to point out that the cameraman himself was not wearing a mask. Are the people there just not worried about it, Cal? Are they not worried about their own personal safety? I haven't met anybody who is. I met some folks actually from Lake Geneva who lived in the area. They were staying a few miles outside of town where I were. And they said they're worried
Starting point is 00:21:10 about it. They're worried about that second spike. They're worried about folks coming in from Chicago. But they'll quickly add at the same time, this is a place that relies on that business. I think people here want a little bit more funding when it comes to these programs so that they could stay closed. But again, I think people felt like the Supreme Court made the decision here in Wisconsin that it was time to open up. But you can see here, just around. Nobody's wearing them. Nobody's, uh, there you go, including the chairman. Yeah. Okay. Striking images, Cal Perry. Oh, but they just can't, they don't.
Starting point is 00:21:43 I guess these reporters never took an improv class. So they've got their narrative, right? Here's the narrative. Masks are really important and helpful. And these irresponsible people, probably Trump voters, if you ask me, they're not wearing masks, so they're the bad people. And we need to shame them on national television. Maybe they'll lose their job.
Starting point is 00:22:02 Maybe they'll lose their dogs. I don't know. But they're really bad people. And then one of the really bad people points that he goes, hey, hey, buddy, if masks are so important, why is your cameraman not wearing one? And the reporter doesn't know how to respond to that because he's just got his narrative. He doesn't know how to improvise when he gets thrown off his obviously fictitious script. So he goes, yeah, and including the cameraman. Okay, yep, just completely undercut my argument. Yeah, I have no credibility whatsoever.
Starting point is 00:22:27 I'm a hack. I'm a liar on television. Back to you, Katie. And Katie goes, yep, that's right. Pretty crazy images out there. Next time, we'll have to make sure that. that all those people telling the truth are kept far from the camera. They don't, neither of those journalists react to the reality, which is that even MSNBC doesn't think these masks matter that much at all. It's just fake. It's just, it's just a performance. It's every bit the performance that those two people on MSNBC were putting on. That's not me saying that. That's them saying that, right? They're the ones not wearing the mask. All I can do is observe. And what I am observing is the very people telling us that the masks matter are the people not wearing masks.
Starting point is 00:23:19 You saw this in the White House briefing the other day. Oh, the reporter very, I think it was, who was it? It was one of the CNN reporters wearing a mask for all the questions on camera. The minute she thought the cameras went off, she takes the mask off. She doesn't think the mask matters. It's just a political cudgel. It's just a way to signal her virtue to, all of her followers and to make Trump look like a mean, terrible bad guy. The masks don't look that good. Joe Biden wore a mask. Didn't go well.
Starting point is 00:23:46 Mayor Garcetti wore a mask in the middle of an empty baseball stadium. Didn't go that well. And the surgeon general told us not to wear masks right before he told us we had to wear masks. We'll get to all that in one second. There is a whole lot more to get to, especially, frankly, probably the biggest story of the day, which is that Twitter is now fact-checking Trump, even though Twitter's wrong and Trump is right. We'll get to that in one second. First, though, I've got to thank our friends over at Ebb's sleep. You know it's very important to get enough sleep every night.
Starting point is 00:24:12 But maybe you have a little bit of trouble falling asleep and staying asleep. Well, then it's time to try Ebb. Eb is the first and only wearable drug-free solution that targets the root cause of sleeplessness, which is your racing thoughts. Eb is clinically validated and four out of five users report falling asleep faster and improving overall sleep quality. Eb's sleep is a wearable solution that fits over the forehead. and gently and precisely cools the forehead to reduce those racing thoughts to allow people who suffer from sleeplessness to drift more comfortably into a deeper and more restorative sleep. It's a pretty amazing product. You put on this headband and it just sends this cooling stuff right around you. I tried it out. I've never felt anything like it. And it's amazing. It's so simple in a way, but you've never felt it before, which is that just that cooling feeling on your head and Ebb does it really, really perfectly will just dull those thoughts. Help you get to sleep.
Starting point is 00:25:05 Eb, sleep understands the uncertainty you may be experiencing at this time. They want to help. Our listeners right now can get $25 bucks off your order by using promo code NOLS and save. Continue to try Ebb, risk free for 60 nights and confirm it's the solution you've been looking for at tryev.com slash Noles. Let us help you get the sleep you need and remove the risk from your purchase. TRIBBB.com slash Noles. Use the promo code NOLS to save. Order today with everything going on, get the sleep you need and deserve.
Starting point is 00:25:34 Biden wears the mask. He put a mask on. He went out in public. He looked like Bain from Batman. He looked like a really lame, unintimidating, daughtering Bain from Batman. This is why Trump doesn't wear the mask. Statesmen cannot wear the masks. I know. But what if the masks help? Okay, yeah, maybe the masks do help. Then even if that were true, the president needs to situate himself in such a way that he doesn't have to wear the mask because just as a matter of optics, as a matter of images and images matter a whole lot in politics, the masks don't look good. And frankly, Biden looked good compared to Eric Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles, who was giving an address in the middle of Dodger Stadium. This is a completely empty baseball stadium.
Starting point is 00:26:26 Mayor Garcetti is standing in the center of the completely empty baseball stadium with a mask on. what does he think is going to happen? Does he think somebody is going to send a heat-seeking guided coronavirus missile right at him? And so he's going to have the mask and the mask is going to protect him? No, it's obviously signaling his virtue in a very ridiculous way. I'm noticing a pattern here. I'm noticing a theme.
Starting point is 00:26:52 People signaling their virtue and making themselves look ridiculous in the meantime. Let us not forget the Surgeon General. Surgeon General of the United States, February 29th. Seriously, people, stop buying masks, all caps, exclamation point. They are not all caps, effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirus. But if health care providers can't get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk. This original tweet didn't make any sense in the first place, because what he's saying is stop buying masks. They're not effective at helping you, but they are effective at helping other people.
Starting point is 00:27:31 Why is that? How's that? Is there something different about me? Is it that when you graduate from medical school, all of a sudden, your immune system completely changes? No, I don't think so. Didn't make sense in the first place. But don't forget, the experts in the lab coats,
Starting point is 00:27:44 the political authorities, right? The top guy told us, don't buy masks. February 29. Then, May 23rd. Quote, as our communities reopen, wearing a face covering is something we all can, and should do to protect each other. So no matter how you're spending Memorial Day weekend,
Starting point is 00:28:02 wear a face mask covering, went out in public. Comment with a selfie and encourage others to do so too. Which one do we believe? Well, you would say we've got to believe the most recent one because that's the newest one based on the science. Science hasn't changed. The science, I know you think,
Starting point is 00:28:22 well, you don't think. If you're listening to this show, you probably have a decent grasp on this. But many people think that science is like something that changes with total precision day by day. Now we know. Everything that ever came before today was wrong, but now we know for certain the eternal scientific truths of the universe. That's not how it works. They're going to change their mind on masks again. They're going to change their mind on a whole lot of things again. You cannot simultaneously say that we can export, outsource all of our
Starting point is 00:28:53 politics to the scientific lab coat experts because they are so in. invariably correct. And also, they contradict themselves on a daily basis. You can't have those at the same time. Perhaps the more reasonable thing to do would be take the advice of scientific experts and other sorts of advisors, take that advice and then engage in the process of politics, which is what we're all doing in self-government debating what kind of society we want to live in, what kind of risks we want to assume, how we want to get along together. That's probably what I would do. That's how politics is really supposed to be engaged in. But people are trying to cut that off left and right, including a Twitter, which is now trying to cut off the political process by declaring, unprecedented, declaring that President Trump is wrong.
Starting point is 00:29:42 And ironically, they're saying he's wrong about things that he's actually right about and they're wrong about. We'll get to that in a second first, though. I've got to tell you about backstage, which is happening 4 p.m. Pacific, 7 p.m. Eastern. That's coming up tonight. So get excited for that. Also, don't forget, you get one Tumblr, that's pretty good. What if I told you, you can get two tumblers. That's right. Some great news the double tumbler is back, but it's only available for our most exclusive membership tier, which is All Access. The All Access membership tier is our premier level of membership. You know, you get the Q&As, you get exclusive editorials, you get bonus hours of Ben's show, you get an ad for your website. You get everything. Head on over to DailyWire.com slash subscribe to join All Access. Get 15% off with coupon code Knowles. KINWLES. Now, that is dailywire.com slash subscribe.
Starting point is 00:30:30 See you there. We'll be right back. This is a big deal. President Trump is being fact-checked on Twitter. But as you know, fact-checking is a relatively recent political phenomenon. I mean, actual fact-checking has been going on for a long time. But this journalistic phenomenon of fact-checking is probably at this point about 10 years old. And what fact checks really mean is they are less.
Starting point is 00:31:08 wing opinion columns that pretend that they are objectively, indisputably true. And so that's the fact check that refutes right wing opinion columns or opinion pieces. You see this in the Washington Post. They never call it the counterpoint. They never call it the left wing point. They always call it the fact check, even though the fact check is nothing more than a left wing piece. So they're doing this now on Twitter. President Trump sends out a tweet, says, quote, there is no way zero that mail-in ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mailboxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged, and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed. The governor of California is sending ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the
Starting point is 00:31:52 state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one. That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these people, many of whom have never even thought of voting before, how and for whom to vote. This will be a rigged election, no way. So what Trump has just made is not, he hasn't even made a statement about what is currently happening or what has happened in the past primarily. He's making a statement predicting what will happen in the future if there is an unprecedented policy that people are trying to push as the unprecedented response to the unprecedented coronavirus pandemic, right?
Starting point is 00:32:29 There would be no way. If we're talking about mail in voting across the country, there would be no way to gauge how that works out because it's never happened before. We've never had something of that scale. So he makes this prediction. Twitter decides to ding him with a fact check. And it's just a little blurb underneath. It says, get the real facts. Get the facts about mail-in ballots with an exclamation point. You've got to pay attention to this. Then you click on it and says, Trump makes unsubstantiated claims. And, you know, this is basically they're saying this is BS. Don't believe it. Except, and I, something tells me that the White House just has to know about this. They have to time these things because they know
Starting point is 00:33:10 how the news is going to play out. The very same day that Trump makes this point that there will be voter fraud, which there will be, having to do with mail-in ballots. We get a story out of West Virginia. Thomas Cooper, mail carrier in Pendleton County, was charged yesterday in a criminal complaint with attempted election fraud, according to U.S. Attorney Bill Powell. Cooper, 47 years old, is charged with attempt to defraud the residents of West Virginia of a fair election. This is based on the fact that in April, the clerk of Pendleton County received a 2020 primary election COVID-19 mail-in absentee requests from eight voters on which the voters' party ballot request appeared to have been altered.
Starting point is 00:33:55 So they see, they get a bunch of these ballots where it looks like something changed. And now it turns out that this mail carrier, Thomas Cooper, was trying to commit election. election fraud. Just one guy on just one day that happens to be the day that President Trump tweets this and Twitter fact checks it. Sure looks like Trump's claims are substantiated to me. And don't forget, we're just talking about election fraud having to do with the mail system. There are other types of election fraud too. Non-citizens voting, lack of voter ID, people voting multiple times, busing in from other counties and other states. All this sort of stuff has happened. Okay, all this sort of sort of stuff happens regularly. We have many cases of well over a thousand documented cases in
Starting point is 00:34:40 recent years, but even if we did, this is kind of the problem with voter fraud is you don't get a lot of documents on what actually happens. So we do have a lot of evidence that's happened, and presumably the problem is much, much larger than that. This is a big issue that Twitter is fact-checking Trump, because Twitter and Facebook and Google, right, in all these places, have a monopoly over the flow of information on the internet. I'm not saying they have a monopoly over information per se, meaning there are still conservatives who are on Twitter, right? Trump is still on Twitter, so he can say his point of view.
Starting point is 00:35:17 But they have a monopoly over the flow of the information because whenever Trump gives his point of view, they can smack a fact check here and say, nope, really, that's not true. even if it is true. That's a very bad situation. We should not permit these decidedly left-wing big tech monopolists to control our flow of information and our elections. We haven't allowed that to happen in other ways that we communicate.
Starting point is 00:35:49 We shouldn't allow it to happen here. You know I'm as skeptical of the government as anybody, but I am more skeptical of big tech, because at least the government has some slight accountability to me. And there is no reason in the name of, I don't know, in the name of any kind of slogan, the free market that we need to allow Twitter and Google and Facebook to control our elections. It's not even, you wouldn't even make a free market argument for that. But some people have suggested that sort of thing. No, no way, Buster.
Starting point is 00:36:21 I'm not letting some Silicon Valley weirdos control my politics because of some misguided interpretation of a principle that I actually hold. Speaking of misinformation, turning to Washington State, not too far from Silicon Valley, we are now looking at the coronavirus death tally. And, you know, certain things are a little bit wrong. Like, for instance, the New York Times yesterday published this piece with virtually all of the victims of coronavirus. Then you look down the list and you see the sixth name on the list did not die from coronavirus, he was murdered and left in the woods in New Jersey. Okay, well, that's not coronavirus.
Starting point is 00:37:03 I wonder how many other issues there are here. Well, we got one out of Washington State. Washington State's Department of Health has now confirmed that among the coronavirus death tally, they've included people who died from other causes, including gunshot injuries, which means I guess the virus is now picking up guns and we should all really be afraid. That certainly would terrify me if this Chinese virus decided to arm itself with firearms. The Freedom Foundation, which uncovered this, reported in remarks made during a telephone briefing, the DOH officials acknowledged knowingly including, knowingly including multiple deaths caused by gunshot wounds in the state's COVID-19 fatality account.
Starting point is 00:37:46 A reporter asked the Washington governor and failed presidential candidate Jay Inslee about it, and Jay went on the defensive. What sort of criteria are being used to mark these fatalities? Well, it's from the official documents, the best information we have from the local health officials. That's the best information we have. I'm not sure the relevance of what that group, I guess they're saying that that would make it 887 dead. That's okay. And we should not act responsibly if there's only 887 people instead of a lot.
Starting point is 00:38:22 a thousand people. I'm not sure I understand that logic. I don't think anybody does understand it, who knows any of these families who've lost a loved one. So I don't think that's a particularly persuasive argument, even if it was true. Yeah, that's not a persuasive argument because that's not the argument that anybody's making. That's the straw man that you're making because you got caught lying. He's saying what? So people are saying because we got the numbers, wrong pretty significantly by double, double digit percentages, that, what, that we shouldn't take the virus seriously? I don't think that's a good argument. Yeah, of course, it's not a good argument. That's why nobody's making that argument. We're just pointing out that you got the numbers
Starting point is 00:39:07 wrong and you got them very wrong. And you did something extraordinarily dumb, which is include gunshot victims as coronavirus deaths. And it's making us question, question your credibility on everything else having to do with this virus. Also because you guys have been wrong about this from day one. You've been wrong about the models. You've been wrong about the predictions. You've been wrong about the efficacy of masks. You've been wrong about putting sick people into nursing homes.
Starting point is 00:39:35 You've just been wrong about everything, basically. So, yeah, we question your credibility here. And, of course, Jay Inslee goes on the defensive. He fights this straw man. Then he attacks the people who are, who did the actual research, who did the investigation, and who had their suspicions confirmed by the Department of Health, right? So the Washington State Department of Health is confirming that this mistake happened. And Jay Inslee writes it all off is a crazy conspiracy theory.
Starting point is 00:40:12 The conspiracy theories that are fanning people's efforts to go out and do it, this group did and argue that 887 dead is just not something to be worried about is really disappointing to me. I've heard people say things that are from a different planet, and it's very unfortunate that some folks in public life have fanned the flames of misinformation in that regard, because it's dangerous. It's dangerous to people's health. I have no reason to doubt the fatality numbers that we're using in the state of Washington right now. The problem is you got some people out there who are fanning these conspiracy claims from the planet Pluto. And it's just disgusting what they're trying to say of all these crazy deep state malarkey
Starting point is 00:41:01 who kind of suggest that this is not a problem in our state. I find that hard to accept with the number of dead in our state. So that's a problem. And I hope it gets resolved. So nothing he just said is true, not one single thing. Where's the fact check? Hey, Twitter, Twitter, where's your fact check on this demagogue and liar, Jay Inslee? He said that people think that 887 dead is nothing to worry about.
Starting point is 00:41:30 Nobody said that. Not a single person has said that. Jay Inslee is the only guy who said that. Nobody thinks that 887 dead is not something to worry about. We think that you, Jay Inslee, are something to worry about because you've lied about this and you've gotten everything wrong. and then you're smearing your constituents who showed that you got something wrong as some kind of crazy conspiracy theorists. Your own Department of Health admitted that the so-called conspiracy theorists were right and that you were wrong.
Starting point is 00:42:03 But there's no humility here. And this is something you've got to pay close attention to this around the country. None of these politicians are going to admit that they got this wrong. They can't do it. They are dispositionally incapable of that kind of humility, of that kind of self-awareness. Narcissism is a professional risk of politics, and at the high levels, it's nearly a requirement. They're not going to admit they got it wrong. They're going to double down, and they're going to get nasty, and they're going to get vindictive,
Starting point is 00:42:38 and they're going to try to ruin people's lives, and they're going to try to smear all of their critics as conspiracy. theorists, even when the state health departments admit that the conspiracy theorists were correct. This is what the left does all the time. You see it on Wikipedia now over the past couple of years. One thing that they've managed to do is for a huge number of prominent conservatives, they've included this phrase conspiracy theorist on their Wikipedia page. They never put conspiracy theorist on James Comey's Wikipedia page, after James Comey said that there might be a Moscow prostitute urine tape with Donald Trump in it based on nothing. That's conspiracy theory. They never put a conspiracy theory mark on any of the left-wing journalists' Facebook pages,
Starting point is 00:43:27 Jake Tapper, Jim Acosta, any of them who peddled the Russia lie and hoax for three years. They never do that. But they will put conspiracy theorists on right-wingers just to convince people not to listen to them. That's why they're going to put fact checks when President Trump says things, which actually are true, so-called fact-checks. It's just a way to signal don't believe this person, don't listen to this person. It's going to get very vindictive. The only way that we're going to be able to get back to anything even resembling normal society as we once knew it in the way back ago days of three or four months ago
Starting point is 00:44:02 is by pushing fearlessly, not afraid of what they're going to call us, not afraid of the consequences which can be dire, not afraid of the digital consequences which can be dire. They won't just change your wiki. They won't just fact-check your Twitter. They'll put videos of you all over the internet just like that. Creepy Karen in Central Park did to Ms. Karen in Central Park, right? That is the kind of vitriol that we're talking about.
Starting point is 00:44:23 We are in an election year. This is all geared toward the election. The ridiculous responses from governors, the day-by-day, more ridiculous responses of governors on lockdowns that no longer have a scientific justification, the fact- check checks from Twitter, the rhetoric, the vicious rhetoric coming from guys like Jay Inslee about citizen groups that are trying to correct the record. It's all the focus on certain highly charged emotionally manipulative incidents in this country to divide people on issues like race and sex. It is all geared toward November. That is only going to get more intense.
Starting point is 00:45:05 Don't let them fool you. Don't let them whip you up into that frenzy. Do not become either of those two crazy people in Central Park and don't get pleasure out of ruining people's lives. That's the trap. That's the trick. Don't let them dupe you. All right, that's our show. Got a lot more to get to. We'll do it tomorrow. In the meantime, I'm Michael Nulls. This is the Michael Nulls show. See you tomorrow. If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Also, be sure to check out the other
Starting point is 00:45:46 other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show, the Andrew Claven show, and the Matt Wolls Show. The Michael Noles show is produced by Ben Davies and directed by Mike Joyner. Executive producer Jeremy Boren. Supervising producers, Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Technical producer, Austin Stevens. Assistant Director, Pavel Wadowski. Editor and associate producer, Danny Domeco. Audio mixer, Robin Fenderson.
Starting point is 00:46:13 Hair and makeup, Nika Geneva. Ryan Love. The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2020. Hey, everyone, it's Andrew Claven, host of the Andrew Claven show. Social media, the same jackasses who turned us into a nation of Karens to make themselves rich, now think they should be able to censor and fact-check the president of the United States. I don't think so, and I'll talk about it. On the Andrew Klaven show, I'm Andrew Klaven.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.