The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 820 - Leftists Terminate Your Freedom
Episode Date: August 12, 2021LA votes to mandate the vax at restaurants and movie theaters, a Texas judge deems transgender surgery child abuse, and Australia’s chief health officer bans conversation. My new book ’Speechless:... Controlling Words, Controlling Minds,’ is now available wherever books are sold. Grab your copy today here: https://utm.io/udtMJ Subscribe to Morning Wire, Daily Wire’s new morning news podcast, and get the facts first on the news you need to know: https://utm.io/udyIF Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
As the Delta Sigma Phi Beta Kappa variant of the woo flu reportedly rages around the country,
Democrat states and counties are turning the tyranny up to 11.
Even some prominent Republicans are joining the calls to get you masked, faxed, and locked back in your home,
including the governor who does not think very highly of your freedom.
There is a virus here. It kills people. And the only way we prevented is to get vaccinated,
to wear masks, to do social distancing, washing your hands all the time,
and not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here.
No, screw your freedom, because with freedom comes obligations and their responsibilities.
We cannot just say, I have the right to the X, Y, and C, and when you affect other people.
Quite an about face, we've gone from don't be a girly man to wear your mask and
hiding you all home. My Schwarzenegger's not that good. Believe it or not, Schwarzenegger is actually
moderate in his views compared to the rest of the world, where some different countries' health
officers are calling for an end to conversation in the name of saving lives. Meanwhile, federal judge
tries to lock up capital riders and throw away the key, even as Minnesota Democrats celebrate
the George Floyd arsonists. Lots of people are going along with these new rules in the hopes of
getting back to normal. How long before they all realized this is the new.
normal. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael
Noel show. Welcome back to the show.
My favorite comment yesterday is from
Deborah Gessner, who says, we have now
reached herd stupidity.
I'm glad that that is spread threat.
Though, frankly, I actually don't think
that the stupidity
and the inanity
and the neurotic
aspect of this whole virus is among
the people so much as it is among
the ruling class.
The ruling class are the ones pushing this. I think people
are pushing back against it, which is why
you're seeing members of the ruling class come out and say,
screw your freedom or don't have conversations with your neighbors.
I think that's really the big divide that's going on now.
When you want to protect yourself against all that kind of crazy turmoil,
I would recommend you go check out acre gold.
Inflation is going way, way, way up.
Every time there's a new report,
the report shows that inflation continues to rise.
And expectations are that it'll rise even higher,
which is why I like to hedge my portfolio with physical goals.
Now, you might be saying, Michael, physical gold's expensive. I can't afford all that at once.
Well, don't worry, Acre has you covered. Acre gold has this incredible new product where you can
subscribe to gold bars for as little as $30 a month. You pay each month once your gold stash reaches
the price of their gold bars, they will discreetly ship Acre gold to your house.
Acre's got a new $100 a month subscription for a five gram gold bar. They keep you updated every
month. Then they ship it once you meet the price threshold. I've really enjoyed investing in
precious metals. I've really enjoyed my physical acre gold. Head on over to getacregold.com
slash knolls today. Start investing in physical gold. Make sure you go to that URL because Acre is
giving away a gold bar to qualify for the giveaway, tweet or post why you should be the recipient
and mention at get underscore acre. That's getacregold.com slash knolls. Thank you Acregold for supporting
the show. Arnold Schwarzenegger sort of has a point. He sort of could have a point. Let's put
it that way. When he says that with freedom comes responsibility, of course, nobody denies that
with rights come duties and obligations. Yeah, of course. Does that mean that because there is a
cough that's been going around the world, we need to lock people in their homes out of their
businesses, out of their churches, take away their civil liberties, and shut down travel, shut down
Christmas, shut down Thanksgiving, shut down conversation among your neighbors? I don't think so. That
seems to be a step too far. But that is the line. He is articulating. And don't forget,
Arnold Schwarzenegger is a moderate Republican. He's not even a far leftist. And Arnold Schwarzenegger
is articulating the excuse that the ruling class has relied on since the beginning of this
lockdown. Namely, in the name of public health, we can do whatever we want. And this is being
taken to an even crazier extreme, not among the Austrians like Schwarzenegger, but among the
Australians. Australia's chief health officer, Dr. Carrie Chant,
as a message for anyone who has the audacity to leave their homes to, I don't know, go grocery
shopping or something like that, namely, keep your mouth shut.
We all need to work together. We need to limit our movements. We need to consider whenever we leave
our house that anyone with us, anyone we come into contact with, could convey the virus.
So whilst it is a human nature to engage in conversation with others, to be friendly, unfortunately, this is not the time to do that.
So even if you run into your next door neighbour in the shopping centre, in the Coles washer at Coles Awards or Aldi or any other grocery shop, don't start up a conversation.
Now is the time for minimising your interactions with others.
if you've got a mask, do not think that affords total protection. We want to be absolutely sure
that as we go about our daily lives, we do not come into contact with anyone else that would pose a
risk. Do you get it yet? Do you get what this is really about? I suspect you do get what this is
really about. I suspect if you're listening to this program, you've known what this is about
since the beginning. But I think a lot of people have not. From the beginning, many of us said,
this is not about a virus, this is not about the unique once in a millennium global health threat.
This is a political power grab to shut people up, isolate people, and to take away their way of life and their rights.
It's literally the symbol of the pandemic is a muzzle that you put over your mouth.
And if you in any way contradict the liberal establishment narrative, you'll be ostracized.
You'll be kicked out of the public square.
You will be deplatformed.
You'll be suspended from social media accounts.
you will not be permitted to espouse these sorts of views in public.
Now, what this woman is saying in Australia is yes, yes, the muzzle is not just about keeping
the variance and the virus, it's actually about shutting you up, about keeping you quiet.
From the beginning of the lockdown, I think there were well-intentioned and naive people
who believed that if we just go along with it, if we just compromise a little bit on our
rights and our way of life and going to church and having our businesses, if we just give them,
okay, we'll just wear the masks. Okay, well, maybe we'll just get the shot. Okay, maybe we'll just
do this, we'll do that. That that would be a way to go back to normal. And what I said from the
very beginning and what a lot of us said from the very beginning is no, it's actually the opposite.
Wearing the masks in public is not going to convince people to go back to normal. It's going
to do the opposite. It's going to convince people that this is a once in a millennial.
insane, terrifying, most dangerous event you've ever seen. And so we can't go back to normal.
When you see your neighbors running around like banditos, that does not tell you things are normal.
That tells you that things are quite extraordinary and we've got to suspend our normal way of life.
Every inch that we the people have given to the ruling technocratic elite from the beginning of this
has only further harmed our situation, has only taken away more and more of our rights,
taken away more and more of our way of life, has only encouraged them. The 15 days to slow the
spread that we granted very quickly turned into, well, just maybe a couple more months to slow the
spread. Well, maybe just another year to slow the spread. Well, maybe now we need to find a cure.
Well, now maybe, actually we need to stop the surge. Well, now we need to, let me check my notes,
abolish conversation. 15 days to abolish conversation, but then we'll go back to normal, right?
I don't think so. And this is coming to the United States, by the way. This isn't just staying down under
in Australia, and it's not just some questionable Austrian immigrants who once were the governor
of California. This is coming to the United States. The L.A. City Council just voted 13 to zero.
This was an absolute unanimous vote for vaccine mandates at restaurants, movie theaters, and concert
venues. They just did this in France. And very thankfully, by a stroke of providence, I left France before
the vaccine mandate went into effect. So I was just in France last week. I was there for my buddy's
wedding. Fortunately, the country was not totally locked down yet. You can still come in from the
United States without a ton of regulations. But the day I flew out, you had to start showing
proof of vaccination to get in anywhere. I wanted to get a cup of coffee at the airport.
They demanded proof of vaccination to get into the little cafe at the airport. I said,
I'll get the coffee on the airplane or something. That's fine by me. That could never happen here,
right? It already is. It already is.
happening here. And it's going to happen in New York. I mean, L.A. right now is passing measures
that are more draconian even than what's going on in New York. But it's going to happen in Washington,
D.C., it's going to happen in Chicago, unless we push back against that sort of thing. And
there's not going to be a compromise. It's not going to be, well, let's wear our masks. Is that
going to, no, no. Either you say no, or you go along with it. The councilman in LA at the L.A.
at the LA City Council, Paul Koretz said, quote,
frankly, I'm tired of our politicization of science and public health.
While people outside this building are protesting that this is a violation of their civil liberties,
Angelinos are dying unnecessarily.
People die.
A lot of people die every day.
You and I are going to die.
I can tell you with 100% certainty, we are going to die.
No one here gets out alive, okay?
Every one in history has died.
You might have life everlasting.
You might have, that's a whole other aspect.
We'll get to that too.
But you are not going to get off this rock alive, okay?
And what the left has done so spectacularly is they have taken this one virus that has caused
deaths.
I'm not saying that the virus hasn't caused deaths, but they have made it seem as though.
That is the only cause of death.
And of course, the lockdowns have led to other deaths as well.
Deaths of despair, deaths of drug overdose, deaths of not getting your treatment for various
diseases, cancer treatments, for instance.
suicides, but none of that counts. None of that, all that matters is if you die from this one
particular virus and as a result, you've got to take away people's civil liberties. Listen to how
incoherent this statement is. I'm tired of our politicization of science and public health, says the
politician. Public health is by definition political. The word political and the word public are
synonyms. They mean the same thing. Politics is how we all get along together.
It's what we all do together.
That's why some politicians use scientific data to manipulate our politics.
And he says, stop politicizing.
What he's saying is shut up.
That's all that means.
Whatever they say, don't make this political.
All that means is shut up, let me affect my political agenda, and you don't say boo about it.
And too many people are going along with it.
When you want to do things for yourself, like fix your own car, I would strongly recommend
you check out rock auto.com.
So you need a part for your car.
where do you want to spend your day? Do you want to spend your day in a hot, sticky, physical brick and mortar auto parts store where they ask you a million questions and then finally you get the answers and then they go in the back and they don't have the part and then they go online probably to rock auto.com. They charge you twice as much and then you got to wait a week to get the part or or do you want to just wait in the comfort of your own home. Go to rock auto.com. Search their tremendous catalog. It's so simple to navigate. Even I can do it. Find whatever part you need for your car
truck, get a fair price, always reliably low prices, no gimmicks, and then get that part
ASAP. What do you want? I think probably you're going to want the latter. Head on over to
rock auto.com right now. It's a great family business. They've been serving auto parts customers
online for 20 years now, 20 years, that is, as far as I can tell, almost the entire history of the
internet. Go to rock auto.com. See all those parts available for your car truck. And then write
Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, in there. How did you hear about this box? So,
they know that we sent you. There is a fight going on right now between the people who want
Vax mandates at the restaurants and the movie theaters and in the schools and the mask mandates
everywhere and the people overseas who want to abolish conversation and the handful of
conservative politicians with a spine. One of those conservative politicians that seems to have a spine,
Ronda Santis. Ron DeSantis is standing up. He is threatening to withhold pay for
from Broward County school administrators who are violating the state anti-mask mandate rule
by instituting a mask mandate.
And what does that mean?
This is kind of complicated and there's so many layers to this.
Some schools in liberal places want to force kids to wear masks.
That's wrong.
That's stupid.
They shouldn't do that.
That's wrong for many, many reasons.
So some misguided conservatives have said, well, it's not government's place to tell people
that they can or cannot have mask mandates, right?
You know, in this, the usual way that we've talked about policy for the last 10 or 15 years
is between big government and free choice.
But it's a little more complicated here because, sure, the big government of the school board
wants to take away the free choice to wear a mask or not.
But then you've got the big government of the state coming in and taking away the free
choice of the school district.
And then you've got the big government.
So I don't think it's so simple as big government versus small government.
I don't think it's so simple as tyranny versus slavery.
I think it's actually a question of prudence.
I think it's actually a question of the substance of it.
Should these kids be forced to wear the masks?
And so DeSantis goes in and he says, absolutely not.
We will not permit school districts to force kids to wear these stupid masks.
So now the school boards are fighting back against DeSantis, especially in Broward County,
very corrupt school district.
And they're saying, no, we're going to do it anyway.
So DeSantis is going in through the Florida Department of Education and is saying that if
these school districts force the kids to wear the masks, he's going to take away their pay.
This is, frankly, Reagan-esque. People have been making a comparison between Ron DeSantis and Donald
Trump recently because he's doing all the hand gestures, you know, and his skin seems to be
getting slightly more orange. He's probably got a can of, you know, yellow hair spray in the
corner. He's clearly running in the Trump lane. But my pal, Andrew Claven, pointed out,
It's less Trump that DeSantis is going for, and a little more Ronald Reagan.
And this line to the school administrators, it reminds you of Ronald Reagan when the air traffic controllers illegally went on strike.
I must tell those who failed a report for duty this morning.
They are in violation of the law.
And if they do not report for work within 48 hours, they have forfeited their jobs and will be terminated.
action as your first action, why not the...
What lesser action can there be?
The law is very explicit.
They are violating the law.
And as I say, we called this to the attention of their leadership, whether this was conveyed
to the membership before they voted to strike.
I don't know.
But this is one of the reasons why there could be no further negotiation while this situation
continues.
You can't sit and negotiate.
with a union that's in violation of the law.
And their oath.
Classic Reagan.
What lesser action can there be?
They're in violation of the law.
And this ought to be our attitude, too.
There is no reconciliation.
There is no negotiation here.
The negotiation has failed.
The negotiation has lost us everything.
Because we thought that we could negotiate in good faith here on how to return to our normal
way of life.
And we can't.
They just lied to us.
They lied to us about everything.
They lied to us about the masks.
They lied to us about the 15 days.
they lied to us about the Vax mandates. They just lied to us about everything. They're not playing
in good faith. They're idiots, frankly. They're incompetent at best, and their liars and deceivers
at worst, and more likely. So I just don't think we should play that game. It's also not going to be
a battle between individual autonomy and strong government. The real battle is going to be between
their strong government and our strong government. And one of the worst mistakes that the right
has made in recent years is that we have given up political power.
What we have done, we've taken Andrew Breitbart's basically true statement that politics is downstream of culture,
and we have allowed Republican politicians to use that as an excuse not to do their job.
Politics is downstream of culture does not mean that you completely give up the government in the political sphere,
because it's somehow unjust ever to rule. It means you use the government, you use political power on the happy occasions that the people give it to you for just purposes.
That's what Ron DeSantis is doing here. He's saying, oh, you're going to use your government power in Broward County to,
try to force this ridiculous thing on children, okay, I'm going to use my government power here
in Tallahassee to stop you from doing that. That's a good thing. We need to encourage the largely
cowardly Republican politicians to do just that. The left is not very happy that people are
pushing back against forcing the kids to wear the masks. There is a liberal professor.
You know, I've got to give thanks to one of my favorite Twitter accounts. It's called Libs of
TikTok. I do not participate in TikTok.
I feel that Xi Jinping has enough of my data already, so I don't need to give him any more of it.
Also, as far as I can tell, TikTok is just like 16-year-olds jiggling around, and I don't want to unwittingly commit a felony.
So I don't look at that app.
But there are great clips that go on TikTok, and so I'll see them on Twitter from lives of TikTok.
So there's this gal.
Rachel Kessler.
Rachel Kessler is a liberal professor at Kenyon College.
she also styles herself a priestess of some sort, some sort of kooky cult or something.
So she calls herself a reverend.
The Reverend Professor Rachel Kessler has come out now, screaming, crying, wailing,
rending her garments and gnashing her teeth because at her children's school district,
they're not going to force all the little kids to muzzle themselves.
I need to go home. Instead, I'm sitting at my desk crying because we just got word from our superintendent that
masks will not be required in our school district this year because the school has to respect
the choice of parents that don't want to have their kids in a mask.
And that's just the most bullshit reasoning and I'm so over it because there is no such
thing as a personal choice in a pandemic because I have no choice now to send my child
to school in a way that will be safe for them.
Because my child's mask will do a great job of protecting the other kids around her.
but I have no choice not to have my kid coughed on by her classmates.
I am so tired of this.
I'll do what works for me.
You do what works for you take on a public health crisis.
And we are never going to get out of this if we cannot start collectively thinking about how our actions impact the people around us.
She said one thing there that's probably true.
Did you catch what it was?
We are never going to get out of this.
That was the only thing she said that,
very well be true. Now, her argument is we're never going to get out of this if we don't give
into all the new measures and give up all of our rights and upend the standards of society.
Of course, the opposite is true. We're never going to get out of this if we do constantly
wear the mask and allow them to jab us with whatever they want and give up all of our rights
and give up our churches and give up our business. That's the way we're never going to get
out of it because when people take power, they usually don't want to give it back. They don't
give it back very easily. She has another interesting line there.
She says, there is no such thing as individual choice during a pandemic.
Right.
Right.
That's the premise.
That's the whole premise.
And so the pandemic can never end.
And so when the pandemic is ending, you've got to change the rules, which they have done now like five times.
You've got to change.
So the goal has to go from flatten the curve to slow the spread to,
find a cure, to spread the cure to everybody to stop the surge. They're already talking about
the, what, the Lambda variant, the, there's going to be a million more variants. And it will
never end because they don't want you to have individual choice, because they basically agree
with Arnold. Screw your freedom. I really have to work on my sports. Everyone has a good sports
and anger but me. That's what they really believe is what Dr. Fauci said yesterday, when he was salivating,
Oh, Fauci was so happy. He said, I know all you people. You want your individual liberty, but we cannot have that now. And he just, you could, he was so thrilled that he could take more power from you for himself. Dr. Fauci who has never appeared on a ballot anywhere. No one has ever cast a vote for Dr. Fauci. He has been in his position of power for, I think, what, five presidential administrations now. Let's see. It was Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush.
Obama, Trump, Biden, seven presidential administrations. This guy has been in political power.
So no, they don't want, they don't want you to have any of that. What is the pandemic?
What is the pandemic? From the very beginning, the death rate was much, much lower than people
warned us that it was going to be. Among children, which is what we were talking about right here,
way, way, way, way lower. Beyond that, we know that the media and the scientific establishment
and the politicians have been lying to us from the beginning. And when you compare it to other,
not just other pandemics, but even just public health problems, you can see in its context,
not quite as big a risk as people have made it out to be. But as long as it remains the pandemic,
then your individual freedom, your way of life, more importantly, goes by the wayside.
You want to remember those good old days when you had your way of life, your traditions,
your freedom. I would strongly recommend you check out Legacy Box. One of my most treasured
possessions. Maybe my single most treasured possession is my collection of photographs and old movies. Because,
you know, I got, I got some nice stuff, you know, all sorts of nice doodads and gizmos, but those
can be replaced and your memories cannot. And what happens over time is that they fade. They start
to deteriorate. They degrade. And sometimes they get lost. I've lost some very important photographs.
Or sometimes they get destroyed in the fire. Or sometimes they just don't last. That's why you need
legacy box today. Get it today.
It's an affordable way to have the priceless moments from your aging home movies and photos
safely stored in a format you can access and share whenever you want.
You mail in all those physical pictures and movies.
Legacy Box will digitize them by hand.
They'll send you back a CD or they'll send you back a thumb driver.
They'll give you access on the cloud.
And you will get your physical memories back as well.
And then you get to keep them preserved forever.
I love LegacyBox.
I'm so pleased that they digitize my memories.
Go to Legacybox.com slash Knowles to take advantage of this limited time.
offer for 50% off and discover the magic of bringing your past back into view anytime,
anywhere. Take advantage of this exclusive offer today, then use it whenever you're ready.
That's legacybox.com slash knolls to get 50% off. Legacybox.com slash knolls.
This crazy moment has been called The Authoritarian Moment by none other than Ben Shapiro.
That's this new book. It's available at Barnes & Noble, Amazon, other major booksellers.
It is a wonderful book to order immediately after you order my book, speech.
controlling words, controlling minds. I would say it's one of the best second books that you can order,
also because it has my campaign slogan in the title, The Authoritarian Moment. If you sign up right now
as a Daily Wire member with Code VIP, you will get 25% off your new membership. You'll be automatically
entered to win a chance to win a trip for two to the Daily Wire Studios in Nashville to see Candace live.
Not only will you meet Candace herself, but you'll be getting an inside look at her studio.
Front row seats to watch her show live. Maybe you'll meet me. I hope so. They don't even put me in the
copy here. DailyWire.com.
slash subscribe code VIP, get 25% off,
be automatically entered to win a chance at this VIP experience.
How many more ads do we have?
Subscribe and listen to the Morning Wire on Apple Podcast, Spotify,
and everywhere you listen to your podcasts so you don't miss a beat.
Is there anything else we got to advertise here?
Goodness gracious, we'll be right back with a lot more.
The schools are the epicenter of the fight right now,
because the schools are the intersection of the family.
They're the intersection of the culture.
They're usually run by the government.
They are a way to shape the next generation.
If you want to look at what your country is going to look like in 20 years, look at a classroom, a classroom is a crystal ball.
And so now there are battles going on not just over whether the kids have to muzzle themselves in class, but what the kids are going to be taught.
You've seen these battles on critical race theory, people showing up to their school boards to get the crazy gender theory and the crazy race theory out of the classrooms.
you've seen teachers during remote learning say, hey, make sure that the parents aren't paying attention
to what their kids are learning on the computers. Make sure you've got to be very careful because
if the parents knew what their kids were learning, they'd get the teachers fired as well they should.
So there was a lesson plan that just popped up from Virginia. This is a third grade lesson plan
from the Virginia State Education website which glorifies communism. Virginia Department of Education
has third graders learning that police hate black men.
They have them watch a video that seems to glorify communism.
First of all, the lesson plan is just ridden with typos,
which at the most basic level shows you the state of American education.
But it's provided for use by any teacher in the state.
The lesson plan, which is very radical on gender theory,
very radical on racial theory,
and explicitly Marxist and anti-American.
The lesson plan was developed.
by Chesapeake public school teachers. Their names are Candice, Anthony Kuzanov, Jamie Marquitz.
They have children, especially focusing on this book. A is for activist. A radical leftist book has no place in the classroom.
So what should happen here? What should happen? I think there are three schools of thought.
There's the leftist school of thought, which is yes, that's right. That's what education's about.
it's not about teaching kids facts. It's not about teaching them how to think in a critical way that's
reasoned and based on logic. No, it's about turning them into activists to fight the system,
even though we're the system, by the way. It's about turning them into radicals who are going to
end depression. So that's the leftist view, right? This is all great. This is basically all that
they should be learning in schools. Then there is the kind of squish view. This is the view of the
conservatives for the past 10, 15 years, which is, well, you know, this isn't, that's not good.
That's been so, okay, they can read their radical gender racial theory in the classroom.
I don't want to, academic freedom.
I don't want to tell them they can't.
But maybe, could they also possibly read a history book or something?
Maybe, please.
Right.
So that's the squish, academic freedom view.
Then there is the conservative view.
This is trash.
This is harming children's education.
This is harming the children's understanding of the world.
It should be banned from the classroom, and the teachers behind it should be fired.
Simple enough.
A teacher doesn't have a right to go teach Nazism in the classroom.
A teacher shouldn't have the right to teach communism in the classroom.
Simple enough.
I'm not saying teach about Nazism or communism.
Of course, they should teach about these things.
But they shouldn't be able to teach through this lens of ideology.
They shouldn't be able to teach you, yes, Naziism is good.
Hitler's awesome. You should all
Goose March and
Zieg Heil. Likewise,
they should not teach you. Communism
is good. The tenets of communism are wonderful,
and you should all become communist activists.
Fire them. Academic freedom,
to quote William F. Buckley Jr.,
as mainstream a conservative as ever there was,
founded the post-war conservative movement.
He said, academic freedom is a hoax.
It's a farce. It's never used
to justify teaching things that are more conservative or right wing,
it's only ever used as an excuse to teach your little kid that you,
your little boy that he's a little girl,
or to teach white kids that they're evil,
or to teach every child that America is a rotten, terrible place,
and to teach them all that communism's terrific.
Fire them, fire them, ban it from the classroom.
Some people get it.
Again, in Florida, they're actually doing a pretty good job at this.
Other Republican politicians need to follow suit.
Speaking of child abuse,
you know, that just a light topic for your morning.
Speaking of child abuse, there was an image, an award-winning image that was going around the
internet yesterday.
That award-winning image was from the Netherlands.
It's of a little kid, I guess a little girl, I can't tell, sort of everyone's gender-bending
these days, so who knows, but, you know, a little child at a swing set with a bunch of
creepy men wearing leather sort of straps and little leather booty shorts behind them,
obviously preparing for some sort of perverted sexual thing. And they're all, you know,
some of them, they're not really engaging in any overtly sexual act, but they're all sort
of hanging around, preparing to go on some sort of perverted adventure. This just won a prize.
The photo competition was put out by pride. This is one of, you know, one of the pride organizations
in the Netherlands. It was won by Jan van Breda. 13,000 photos were submitted. Three of them won.
This is the description. This photo in its composition, child in the foreground, men preparing for
canal pride in the background, everyone busy with their own activities and fascinations sublimely
depicts what will hopefully remain self-evident that we, unhampered by prejudices, and almost unsuspectingly,
all may and can exist side by side. That's what the jury said about this photo. You know, if
if the consequence of getting rid of prejudices is having kids play around among a bunch of sick leather
daddies at a parade, maybe we could use a little more prejudice. Maybe people haven't stood up
enough for prejudice. Actually, you know who did stand up for prejudice is Edmund Burke.
Not prejudice in the sense of, you know, I'm going to hate you because of your skin color. I'm
prejudice in the sense of prejudgment.
Prejudice in the sense of we actually can know things.
When we have a natural visceral reaction to seeing a bunch of these sickos like oiling each other up around a little kid,
that visceral reaction, though it may not be totally conscious and we might not have like a 10-paragraph reasoned argument as to why this situation is bad,
that reaction is right.
that actually is bad. We shouldn't permit that. These things should not exist side by side.
The BDSM people like whipping each other should not exist side by side with the little children.
But it raises a question also about the limits of autonomy, which is kind of what we're all talking about today.
What are the limits of freedom and autonomy? We all know. You look at that picture. If you're listening right now, you can Google the picture later. Or maybe you
shouldn't because it's just gross. But when you look at that picture, we all know that there's
something wrong with that. But what's wrong with that? What's the problem? Is it just that it's
that there's a kid there? Why is it wrong that there's a kid there? If there's nothing wrong
with what the guys are doing and they're kind of like leather daddy costumes, if there's
nothing wrong with that intrinsically, then why is it wrong that there's a kid there? Why should
kids be protected from that? If there is something wrong with what the guys are doing, with the kind of
leather stuff in public and, you know, getting a little in your face, then why are we encouraging
it? Why? If there's something like so disordered about this that we should, that we should protect
children from it, then why are we encouraging it for everyone else? And why are we pretending, by the
way, that you can encourage all these sorts of things everywhere, ubiquitous in the middle of
Main Street for adults, but yet somehow protect kids from it? Obviously, you cannot. We do
We are not totally isolated beings.
We do live in a society.
We do have neighbors.
We do want to talk to people when we go outside,
even though the Australian health minister doesn't want us to.
Why are we encouraging the liberty to do things that we all agree are very bad?
That, I think, that's actually a problem for the right to figure out.
We're trying to work on that right now.
There's a big debate on the right over that.
And I think the kind of desiccated libertinism of the last 10 or 15 years is just
complete, it's a deader than disco man.
put that away with your bell bottoms. It is over. Now, there is some good news, by the way, coming from the
Departments of Health on this issue of radical gender theory and child sex abuse. The Texas Department
of Health was just asked by Governor Greg Abbott, a simple question. Abbott deferring to the agency
said, is pumping little kids full of cross-sex hormones and mutilating their bodies because their
psycho mothers think that the little boys are little girls. I think Governor Abbott used more
clinical language than I did, but that's obviously the situation that we're talking about.
Is performing gender surgery on kids proper medical treatment or is it child abuse?
This is a difficult question, apparently, for some Republicans. Asa Hutchinson, the allegedly
Republican governor of Arkansas, says that it's a wonderful medical treatment. He refused to sign a bill
banning genital mutilation gender surgery on little kids.
Remember, he said, no, this is important medical treatment.
So the Texas Department of Health came out and said, yes, it is child abuse.
Quote, genital mutilation of a child through reassignment surgery is child abuse,
subject to all rules and procedures pertaining to child abuse.
Such mutilation may cause, quote, a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child.
Good stuff. Good stuff.
Now, this raises another tricky question.
I'm glad we should take this win.
I mean, we should pursue this state by state by state
to ban the genital, gender reassignment mutilation surgery for children, obviously.
But there is an even further question here, which is,
if this is not medical treatment,
if this really is mutilation when you do it on children,
then why are we doing it on adults?
It's not as though reality is one way if you're under 18,
and then reality is completely different if you're over 18.
It's not as though a surgery is completely different for people who are 17 and a half,
but not for 18 and a half.
But we don't want to come to that term,
in part because we so value individual autonomy.
We say, well, if you're a man and you want to be a woman,
then you have the right to do that.
You totally have, if you're a man and you want to mutilate your body to look more like a woman
and harm yourself in that way.
You totally have the right to do that.
But you don't.
You don't.
Why do you have the right to do that?
Why is it cruelty and abuse
when you do it on a child,
but not when you do it on an adult?
Just because of the issue of making a decision?
No, I think there's more to
good and bad and right and wrong
than just who makes the decision.
Consent is very important.
Don't get me wrong.
But I think there's more to it.
I think the substance is there
as well.
Speaking of transitions,
I can't miss this today.
Valparaiso U.
University has changed its mascot
from Crusaders to Beacons.
They used to be the Crusaders,
now they're the beacons.
Why?
Because the Crusaders are very bad, right?
The Crusaders,
Christian soldiers who protected Christians
in the Holy Land from Muslim invaders.
The Crusaders are bad
because the Crusaders represent
Western civilization, and so you've got to get rid of them.
they've changed it to beacon because they say that their students should be a beacon of hope.
A beacon of hope, okay.
Crusaders were a beacon of hope in the late 11th century to the Christians who were being persecuted by Muslims in the Holy Land.
But we now take this as just common sense.
We take this for granted that anything that the West ever did is bad and anything that other civilizations ever did is good.
we now take it for granted
that Muslims should control the Holy Land. Why?
Christians and Jews were in the Holy Land a lot longer
way before the Muslims. Why do the Muslim? Because the West is bad
and everyone else is good. That is the
sometimes not so tacit premise that our education
begins with. And if you raise generation upon generation
to hate its own civilization, you're not going to keep that civilization
and you're not going to keep those rights. You're not going to keep that
way of life for very long, which we're seeing happen to us
right now.
Speaking of political violence,
an Obama appointed federal judge
has just come out
against the Biden DOJ,
specifically with regard
to the January 6th
political insurrection
coup d'etat,
the worst event in American history,
you know that, you know that thing.
Worse than Pearl Harbor,
worse than 1812. Okay.
So this is good news,
right?
an Obama-era judge is now coming out against the Biden DOJ. The problem is, this judge,
she's coming out against the DOJ because she thinks the DOJ is going too light on the Capitol
rioter people. She thinks that they need harsher punishments. Already, you see these guys
whose worst crime is dancing around the Capitol in a horn helmet who, you know, come in and
maybe they broke a window, maybe not. The one smiley guy took Nancy Pelosi's lector and you remember
that, not defending it, just saying there are worse crimes in the world. And these guys are getting
the book thrown at them already. And she is saying that they need even harsher punishments for
terrorizing members of Congress. Meanwhile, as we've reported on this show, actual terrorists,
BLM leftist terrorists who burned down private businesses. They actually went after civilians.
They killed people. They killed infinitely more people than the capital.
6th rioters did because the capital January 6th rioters didn't didn't kill anyone and the BLM people
killed a lot of people. The BLM people who also went after federal courthouses, burned down federal
courthouses, burned down police stations, they're basically getting off the hook in Manhattan
and in the Bronx. They're being released without any charges in many cases. And when they are being
charged, they're being charged with much less serious offenses. This is a,
the new normal. This is the new regime. I think a lot of conservatives believed that if we went
really, really hard after January 6th, if we kind of bought into the leftist line that January 6th was
the worst event in the history of the world, why then, maybe they'll recognize that BLM was bad too,
and we'll all get, and we'll reconcile, and it just didn't happen. It didn't happen. During the BLM
riots. You had members of elected Democrats in Congress calling for more violence. Actually, even before
that, you had that sort of thing. You had the now vice president of the United States bailing out
the rioters from jail. You had staff members for now the president of the United States,
bailing the rioters out from jail. And they basically want the capital conservative people to go
Gitmo. And it's not even close. What happened at the Capitol on January 6th is not even in the
same galaxy as what happened during the BLM riots, city after city after city for six to eight
months. It's not even close. It's nothing compared to what BLM did. And BLM mostly gets off the hook.
That's the real political situation. There's not going to be a negotiation. There's not going to
be a come together and you give a little and I give a little. This is a bare-knuckle political
fight over who can wield political power more effectively. That doesn't mean that it's absent logic
injustice. Obviously, we want to wield political power with justice, with logic, but you've got to
wield that power. Devin Hogan, chairman of the Minneapolis Democratic Farmer Labor Party, which is an
affiliate of the Democratic Party in Minnesota, has just said, quote, like it or not,
setting the third precinct on fire was a genuine revolutionary moment, an act of pure righteousness
to open new worlds of understanding. The people declared themselves ungovernable and unilaterally
took their power back. The largest international human rights movement in modern history had
gun, the youth of Minneapolis carried all of this, the cops started it.
Doesn't get clearer than that, does it?
The Democrat activist, a Democrat official, it's part of an affiliate, but a Democrat
nonetheless in Minnesota, defending the burning down of police stations and saying, yeah,
the cops started it.
I think they call that victim blaming.
That's what we're talking about.
And there's something we can learn from it when he says, the people declared themselves
ungovernable and unilaterally took their power back.
The way the left did that.
The substance of what they were doing was wrong.
It was unjust.
It was very bad.
But we can do that too in a just way.
We can declare ourselves ungovernable under these unjust laws.
We can, using logic and persuasion and not being terrorists like the left was,
but we can assert our political right.
You're seeing some people do it, right?
You're seeing DeSantis do it in Florida.
You're seeing some of the governors do it.
we can do that, but it does require some courage. It does, and that unfortunately is in short supply
in a lot of places. But speaking of terrorists, I can't leave today. Before I note, some actual
important news that's being swept under the rug, we just lost the war in Afghanistan. We'd
fighting this war in Afghanistan for 20 years now, and we just lost. We've basically officially lost
the war. Now, the soldiers didn't lose the war.
Soldiers did a great job. The soldiers achieved all of their military objectives. But the political
leadership did lose that war. They chose to lose that war. And they chose to lose that war because they
didn't even know what they wanted to win. What was winning? What is winning the war in Afghanistan?
I couldn't even tell you. I couldn't even tell you. But here's what I do know. George W. Bush came
out after 9-11 and he said, those who are horrible.
terrorists will be treated as the terrorists themselves. We will make no distinction. And what he was
talking about was the Taliban harboring al-Qaeda terrorists and we're going to go in and we're going to
make no distinction and you're not going to have a moment's peace until we kill all of you.
And now the Taliban is coming back. So they won. And we lost. And what is Jen Saki, the White
House press secretary, have to say about this? Well, you know, they've just got to figure out
what they want to do in the international community.
The Taliban is clearly on the march. Your objective is to have a negotiated political settlement.
What gives you confidence the Taliban is interested in that?
Well, the Taliban has to make an assessment. One, we have also said that there's no question
that the Afghan National Defense Security Forces would be strengthened, as with the Afghan
political leadership, if they were to have more success in fighting back. There's no question
about that. We're not hiding from that in any way, shape, or form. The Taliban also has to
make an assessment about what they want their role to be in the international.
community. And I know that Ambassador Khalil-Zid made comments when he was at the political
negotiations yesterday, making clear that the international community is going to watch closely how the
Taliban behaves. They have a range of tools in their arsenal as well to take steps should they
choose. Well, the Taliban just has to figure out what it wants its role to be in the international
community. These are the people that are governing us. Spoiler alert, the Taliban doesn't want a role
in the international community. Okay, it took 20 years for these ruling elites to figure that out.
Sometimes some better, sometimes some worse.
These are the people governing us.
I don't think they have any credibility.
I don't think we should follow their orders.
I think we should using every just and right and legitimate political tool at our disposal,
fight back against them tooth and nail before they terminate our way of life.
I'm Michael Knowles.
This is the Michael Knowles Show.
See tomorrow.
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.
And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe.
We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show,
the Andrew Claven Show, and the Matt Walls Show.
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies.
Executive producer Jeremy Boren.
Our technical director is Austin Stevens.
Supervising producer Mathis Glover.
Production manager, Pavel Vidowski.
Editor and associate producer, Danny Demiko.
Associate producer Justine Turley.
audio mixer Mike Coramina and hair and makeup by Nika Geneva.
The Michael Knoll Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire, 2021.
John Bickley here, Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief.
Wake up every morning with our new show, Morning Wire.
On today's episode, vaccine passports are on the rise,
the showdown between Texas Republicans and Democrats heats up,
and the California recall election, Titans.
Join us and get the facts first on the news you need to know with our show, Morning Wire.
