The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 990 - The Most Humiliating CNN Fail Ever
Episode Date: April 22, 2022CNN+ shuts down after just 21 days, Michael gets protested at BU, and Elon shows he’s in it to win it. NBA star Jonathan Isaac has withstood immense pressure to conform to popular social issues. He...’s now writing a book about his experience and is publishing with the Daily Wire. Pre-order your copy now: https://utm.io/ud96e. I’m exposing the most successful failure in government history. Stream Fauci Unmasked here: https://utm.io/ueogL. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm in Boston. I flew here yesterday on my first flight since that hero judge struck down the CDC's
mask mandate. And 99% of the people in the airport loved it. We were happy as a clan. I would say,
I'm just, I'm just estimating here, 99% of the people in the airport were not wearing masks. On my
flight, even a flight to a liberal city, I would say 95%
of the people were not wearing masks. They were so, so happy. And the lifting of the mask mandate,
the fact that it's now voluntary, allows you to tell with 100% certainty exactly who the libs are
on your flight. And there actually are not a whole lot of them. Everyone was very, very happy,
except for Dr. Fauci. I was both surprised and disappointed because those types of things really
are the purview of the CDC.
This is a public health issue.
And for a court to come in,
and if you look at the rationale for that,
it really is not particularly firm.
And we are concerned about that,
about courts getting involved
in things that are unequivocally public health decisions.
I mean, this is a CDC issue,
it should not have been a court issue.
So we're hoping that the inevitable increase in cases
which we're seeing are not going to be associated
with an increase in hospitalization.
So all of these dynamic things going on at the same time, it was perfectly logical for the CDC to say,
wait a minute, we were planning on ending this mandate on a certain date. Let's wait a period of time until May 3rd,
which was a very sound public health decision.
I hope you've gotten this by now, but if you haven't, this isn't about the masks.
This isn't about whether or not you should wear.
the stupid masks. Dr. Fauci himself has been the most pro-mask and anti-mask politician in the
country. It's not about the masks. This is about who governs us. Dr. Fauci believes that we should be
governed by the whims and caprices of totally unaccountable bureaucrats at the CDC. Normal people
believe that we should have some say in our government. If we're not going to be ruled by the
legislature, at the very least, we could be ruled by the courts, where there's some sort of
kind of almost accountability. Dr. Fauci is furious, not because people are not musseling themselves
anymore, but because for now at least, he's no longer running the country. I'm Michael Knowles.
It's the Michael Knowles show. Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday is from Astora
Noble, who says, Chris said that Democrat positions become far more popular.
when they lie about what their position actually is. That's true. Actually, it was very nice Chris Hahn to come on the show yesterday. He is a Democrat. I wanted to hear out his side for the education law in Florida and also the Disney retaliation against the education law. And what Chris said was, he really loves the way Democrats have spun this thing. Because while don't say,
is not an accurate representation of the law, politically it can be useful. So he's admitting
this is cynical and it's not really honest. It's not representing what the law does, but it's
politically useful. And my only argument there is, I don't think it is all that politically
useful. I think the majority of Americans, the majority of Floridians, the majority of Democrats
even support the Florida educational law. So I just don't think it worked. I think the credibility
of the left, whether we're talking about the CDC, whether we're talking about Fauci, whether we're
talking about the weird groomers at Disney and elsewhere, I just don't think it's there. I think
it's beginning to crack. Now, when you want to make sure that your home security is very solid,
I would strongly recommend you to check out. Ring. Right now, go to ring.com slash knolls.
It will be one small gadget for your home, but one giant leap for home security. One giant leap for
home security. That is what CNET says about Ring alarm pro, which is a phenomenal product.
You know, Ring has the video doorbell. I've been telling you about it for years. And then Ring has an award-winning alarm. Well, that's great. That way you can protect your whole home. Terrific. Well, now you've got to go pro. Because you don't just live your life in the physical world. You don't just live your life in the physical home. You spend a lot of your life in the digital world, in your digital home, and you've got to protect that too. Ring Alarm Pro does both. It's a combined home security system and Wi-Fi router so that you will feel secure, whether you're in the
the home, whether you're down the street, whether you're at the office, maybe you guys are on the
other side of the world with a Ring Protect Pro subscription, which is an amazing deal. By the way,
you can get professional monitoring for the ultimate peace of mind. If anything happens,
the professional monitoring will call and can request emergency services. Go to ring.com
slash Knowles right now and go pro with the Ring alarm pro. That is ring.com slash knolls.
dot com slash noles.
The credibility, the authority of the ruling class is cracking.
That's why Dr. Fauci is so upset.
He actually had the audacity to say, I only wanted two more weeks.
That's what he said, because the mask mandate on the airplanes was supposed to expire on April 18th.
And then he said, look, the CDC, I think very responsibly, said that we just need two more weeks of the, oh, two more weeks, huh?
Where have I heard two more weeks before?
You jerk? I heard two weeks two years ago.
And then you never gave up your power.
So you know what? We're going to take the power back from you.
And if we can't even do it through the legislature, then we'll do it through the courts.
And this hero district judge who struck down the mask mandate.
Great. That's what we're going to... Come on. Just two more weeks, guys.
No. People are not buying it anymore.
We're not buying that it's only going to be two weeks.
We're not buying that the masks are going to save us from our...
We're not buying what Dr. Fauci is selling. We're not buying what the liberal establishment is selling broadly. That's why CNN Plus, the CNN subscription service, is collapsing. It's being shut down 21 days after it started. 21 days. That's less than two scaramucci's. A scaramucci is a discrete measurement of time. It's 11 days, the length that Anthony Scaramucci lasted in the White House. These guys didn't even make it too.
Scaramucci's Warner Brothers' discovery is reportedly, and according to lots of reports,
shutting down the new CNN subscription service. CNBC reported last week fewer than 10,000 people
were using CNN Plus on a daily basis. To put that in perspective, that's, gosh, what is that?
Something like 1.30th? Between 1.30th and 150th, the number of people who watch and listen to this show
every day. This show, this is a pretty big show, but it's not even the biggest show out there on the
internet. This show is getting between 30 and 50 times the viewership that CNN was getting on a
daily basis. That is pathetic. That it just, it just didn't work. And so, they set this goal of having
two million subscribers to CNN Plus within the first few years of the services launch. Nobody's
watching it, it looks like they're going to cut their losses. Why? I could have told them that this
was going to happen. No one in their bubble could have told them this was going to happen because
they have relied on brute force to maintain whatever position they have in public discourse for
not just recent years, really recent decades. People don't make the decision actively. I'm going to
go subscribe to CNN. I don't even think they make the decision to go watch CNN. I think it's just
kind of on. I think people, we joke about how the only time people watch CNN is in the airports. Well,
there's a lot of truth to that joke. And why do people watch CNN on their TVs, on the rare occasions
that they do? Because it's just on, and CNN is bundled as part of cable packages, and you're not
going to go in, I don't even subscribe to cable, but people who do subscribe to cable are going to
go, they're not going to go in and say, I want every channel except for CNN. They're just going to take
it, it'll be on, and they'll flick through the channels and that's that. But with CNN Plus,
that subscription service requires you to actively go out, put down your credit card, say,
I want CNN. And no one wants CNN. I'm not even just scoring cheap partisan points. No one actively wants it.
It's just there as background noise as a propaganda arm for the ruling class,
which increasingly is losing its credibility. All these guys are losing their credibility.
Jen Saki, we played around the show yesterday, spokesman for the president, was crying,
literally crying on camera over the prospect of not being able to trans the kids.
So, Jen Saki appeared on Chris Wallace's new, new, soon-to-be-old CNN Plus program to discuss this law.
Chris Wallace was basically fair about the law and about the question of transgendering the kids.
And Jen Saki doubled down on it, saying that five-year-olds and six-year-olds are questioning their sex and ought to be affirmed in their delusions.
I understand that it's an emotionally fraud issue.
I understand that some of the supporters of the bill have used inflammatory language saying that opponents of the bill want to sexualize children or groom children.
On the other hand, don't parents have a right to have concern?
I mean, we're talking specifically here about teaching about sex in kindergarten through third grade.
I have to say as a parent, I would have problems with that.
But the law is not about teaching sex education.
It's about teaching about gender identity.
And so what do you do if a parent or a kid, should I say a kid in one of these elementary
schools, says, what about Sally?
Sally has two moms or I'm not sure if I'm a girl or a boy.
I mean, these are kids who are experiencing, you know, these moments in their lives.
I also think that these are not, there's not a big record of their
being either sex education or extensive gender identity education in these schools. And this is
creating a problem or a political cudgel about an issue that I don't think exists. Lots of places
can expose you to identity theft. Oh no. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of
data points a second for threats to your identity, which is way more than anyone can do on their
own. If we find anything suspicious, like new loans or changes to your financial accounts, we alert
you right away, all through text, phone, email, or the LifeLock app.
Get the alerts that could make all the difference.
Save up to 40% your first year at LifeLock.com slash special offer.
Terms apply.
Jen Saki made a really big mistake here, and she did the thing that I keep pointing out that
the LIBS do, except she actually did it backwards.
Usually what the LIBs do is say, this issue that's being addressed by the Florida
Education Bill doesn't exist, it's not happening at all, and it's really important that
the issue does exist.
And she just did it backwards here.
She said, it's so, this is so awful, this Florida education bill.
This is going to really hurt kids.
You know, Sally with two mommies and, you know, the five-year-old who thinks that he's actually a girl.
This is really going to hurt these kids.
It's going to hurt them so bad that I'm going to cry on camera.
I'm going to literally cry tears on camera.
But it's not happening.
It doesn't matter.
It's not doing anything.
It's addressing a problem that doesn't exist.
Well, if the problem doesn't exist, why are you crying, Jen?
If the problem doesn't exist, why are you trying to touch?
on my heartstrings about Sally
who doesn't have two mommies.
Sally has a mommy and a daddy somewhere.
I don't know where the mommy and the daddy are
and I don't know what weird social experiment
is messing with Sally's head.
But whatever Sally has, she doesn't have two mommies
because that's not how biology works.
That's not how babies are made.
That's not even a discussion that kindergartners
should be having in the classroom
how babies are made.
But I guess the teachers should know the answer.
Sally doesn't have two mommies.
Further, the five-year-old boy
who thinks that he's a girl
is not a girl. What should the teacher say to the five-year-old boy who says that he's a girl?
The teacher should say, you're not a girl, you're a boy. The teacher should affirm his actual sex,
meaning dispel the delusions that he has. The teacher should stand up for traditional standards and
mores and biology and reality. We have got to remain in contact with reality. When you want to
remain in contact with all the people associated with your business, I would strongly recommend
you check out, Constant Contact. I have been using Constant Contact for something like 15 years now.
I have relied on Constant Contact when I worked my earliest campaign jobs, when I've worked with
other companies. It's a great way to help get your business in order and reach new people.
It's a digital marketing platform that helps small businesses and nonprofits of all sizes grow,
build and succeed. They've got a 97% deliverability, right? So you know when you send something out there,
you are reaching your people. Their list growth tools help you to find a bigger audience fast.
We're talking lead generation landing pages, text to join, social media ads. They are a proven way
to grow your list and drive engagement with your brand. With thousands of integrations, you can sync
constant contacts tools with the tools that you're already using. I know that's always one
big hassle at companies when you start using some new software you think, is it going to integrate,
do I have to switch everything over? Constant Contact makes it super easy, powerful automation tools,
help you send the right message to the right person at the right time, every time.
To start your free digital marketing trial today, head on over to Constant Contact.com.
Jen Saki said yesterday, two days ago, that this issue of transgendering the kids makes her completely
crazy. And those are the truest words that Jen Saki has ever said. It does make her crazy.
It makes everyone who is in the thrall of this weird transgender ideology completely insane.
I'm at Boston right now.
I gave a speech last night at Boston University on this topic.
The topic was, teach the ABCs, not the LGBT's.
And the topic made people crazy.
There were more shenanigans at this speech I gave last night than I've seen at a campus speech in years.
First of all, the event was sold out.
and then the captain of the BU Police Department
wouldn't let half the audience into the room.
The captain of the BU Police Department,
I don't know what his axe was to grind.
He wouldn't let our photographer into the rooms.
There actually aren't any even professional photos from the event.
So you had half of the room was stuck outside
and they had to stream the speech on their phone.
And then of the people who were let in,
there was a planned walkout by the left-wing lunatic kids.
I had an inkling of who those kids were going to be because they were the only people in the room with the masks.
This does underscore my point, my favorite part about the airplane mask mandate being lifted, which is just that you can now tell with 100% certainty exactly who the libs are.
So you just know, you're like, okay, I guess I'm sitting next to one lib and one normal person and that's, okay, that's fine.
I'm just, I'm just going to plan out my conversation now.
I'm going to plan out my flight.
So I'm looking and I see rows of these students wearing the masks and I think, okay, they're going to stay.
some protest. And right when I got to the topic of the gender unicorn, the gender unicorn is
this weird assignment about a purple sexually confused unicorn that is being handed out to
third graders and second graders and kindergartners and even is being used in certain pre-K
classrooms, the gender unicorn and the gender bred man. That's another weird, creepy,
sexually confused cookie assignment. These are being used with really young kids when
I mentioned that. The kid stormed up and flipped me off and yelled and screamed and said all
crazy things and waved the transgender flag and then walked out of the room. This issue makes
people crazy. And the point I drove home last night at BU, you can watch my speech online.
It's been streamed to YouTube. It's over at the Y-A-F YouTube channel. The point I made here is that
it's not enough just to stop the weird sex lessons in the classroom.
You've got to go further. Teachers need to teach something. It's not enough just to say,
hey, don't talk about transgenderism to six-year-olds. Well, what are we going to talk about?
If you're reading a story in a kindergarten classroom and the story is about a family of bears,
mama bear, daddy bear, and baby bear, I don't think anyone would object to that, right?
Even though the lesson does have implicit lessons about sex, about family, about human nature,
where did baby bear come from? Baby bear came from Mama Bear and Daddy Bear and Daddy Bear and
Daddy Bear lived together in a marriage because that's a sort of ordinary, normal thing to do. Well,
what if the story instead being read to this kindergarten classroom were about Daddy Bear and Daddy Bear's
boyfriend and Daddy Bear's polyamorous trans billy goat and this were being read to five-year-olds?
Would we object to that? I think we probably would. We would. You say, no thank you. Don't read that to my kid.
both stories make implicit claims and have implicit lessons about sex and family and human nature,
but we like the normal one and we don't like the one with the trans billy goat.
It's not just, as some Republicans are saying, it's not just this education law in Florida
bans all sexual discourse entirely.
Sometimes you'll hear Republicans say, you could call it the don't say straight bill
because it doesn't discriminate between gay or straight or trans or this.
It just says all sexual conduct is out.
But I just don't think that's really what we're talking about here.
I don't think that really gets to the heart of the issue.
You can't teach anything, even all the way down to an elementary school classroom.
You can't teach anything about history, literature, biology, certainly, civics.
You can't teach these things if you don't touch on topics involving men and women and a human nature.
That those things are just too central sex and desire and family and community.
Those things are too central to the human condition to avoid.
And so I think we've got to stand up and say, no, we have norms.
Not saying we got to be mean to gay guys.
Not saying we need to be cruel to people who are confused about their sex.
But we're allowed to have norms.
There's nothing bigoted about that.
The reason that Republicans don't want to say any of these things is because we're afraid
of being called a homophob or a transphobe or a phob or whatever nonsense
and slur the libs want to throw at us. But who cares? They're going to throw slurs at you anyway.
And what we're standing up for is perfectly ordinary and normal. And everybody would have
agreed with it five years ago. But now you go to a college campus and people lose their minds,
talking about a really basic fact of human nature. The craziest protests I've ever had,
the only time I was physically assaulted on the campus was talking about this issue.
This issue where the Overton window, as it's sometimes called, or the standards have just
completely changed to the point that now you're not allowed to say men and women are different.
If you, for instance, if you go on to Twitter and you don't make the general claim that men and
women are different, but you go in, you're retweeting Bruce Jenner, Bruce Jenner says, I'm a woman
and I want to use the women's bathroom. Let's say. He's actually one of the least offenders on this
transgender ideology, but let's go with it. He's one of the most prominent ones. And he says,
I want to use the women's bathroom, and you retweet that and you say, you are not a woman,
Jenner, that's a violation of Twitter's terms of conduct. You could lose your Twitter account for that
because the Overton window has shifted. But if you retweeted some, I don't know, straight white
male and said you're a terrible person and you're an oppressor and you're the cause of all the
evil in the world, you won't lose your Twitter account. The latter is objectively more offensive
than the former. The latter is not true while the former is true. And yet you'll be banned for saying
the true thing, and you'll be fine for saying the false thing, which is why it's so important
that we get a hold on Twitter and Facebook and Google, and the big tech platforms that control
our speech and therefore control our democracy, which is why it's important that Elon succeeds
in taking over Twitter. And there's some news on this front. Every day, there's more news
on Elon's hostile takeover of Twitter, and I'm here for it. I love it. It's great. Elon Musk bought over
9% of Twitter, they tried to put him on the board. He rejected the board seat because it would have
greatly limited his power. He tried to buy up the rest of the company. The Twitter board issued a
poison pill to dilute everyone's shares of Twitter and offer every other shareholder the ability to buy
shares at a steep discount, except for Elon Musk to basically make it prohibitive for Elon Musk to take
over Twitter. So that was it, right? Well, not quite. Elon Musk has then cryptically been
tweeting about the word tender. And the reason he's doing that is because it's
seems like he wants to make a tender offer, where he goes directly to the shareholders of Twitter
and just buys their shares from them, and then eventually he'll have enough to control
Twitter. Can Elon actually do that? Well, we're getting reports out right now that Elon Musk has
secured $25.5 billion in financing to buy Twitter from a group of banks led by Morgan Stanley,
which includes a $12.5 billion in-margin loan against a $12.5 billion margin loan against his
shares. So he's leveraging his other company to buy Twitter. And then Musk has said that the rest of
the money, $21 billion, will come out of his own pocket. This is being reported after Elon Musk has
filed with the SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which is to say, I don't know
how this is going to end, I don't know what the board is going to do, I don't know what the next,
what the next episode of this saga is going to be. But what that tells me is, Elon Musk is serious
about it. And he's serious about buying Twitter because Twitter's a serious problem. We joke about it. We
call it a hell site. We say we all waste too much time on it and probably we do. But Twitter,
and to a greater degree, Facebook and Google, control our speech, control our discourse,
control our whole political order. And Elon Musk gets it and he knows this is no laughing matter.
He'll troll on Twitter. He'll joke when he buys 9% of the company that when he buys the rest of it,
he's going to take the W out. T-he-he-he. He said,
titter, ha, ha, ha, but he's dead serious here. You don't spend $40 billion on a joke. I don't think.
Maybe Jeremy would. Maybe the God King of the Daily Wire would spend $40 billion on a joke,
but there has to be a serious point here. And Elon Musk is really proving it. I've been sort of
down in the dumps at how excited I am about the mask mandate being taken away. Because I think,
is this our new standard? This is it. Hey, I get to breathe fresh air. Score one for the conservatives.
That's it. That's our new standard. I'm a little down in the doldrums about how happy I am over the Florida
Education Bill. Yeah, we're going to wait until kids are nine to indoctrinate them into transgenderism.
Score one for the conservatives. That's it. That's our new standard. That's all we can hope for.
It's easy to be discouraged because the libs have so much control over the culture and the political order.
But you have to remind yourself, take the win when you can get it.
Take the win when you can get it.
Get those marginal wins creep a little bit further and further and further down the line of where you want your political goal to be, which is a flourishing, good, free society.
That's what the Libs did for a century.
It gave them the country, slowly, slowly, slowly, a long march through the institutions.
We can take that ground back.
It's popular.
We've got the common sense.
The elite institutions have completely lost their credibility.
We can do it, but it's going to require patience and determination.
And when we need a little relaxation, what are we going to do?
Why, we're going to go check out Allform.
We're going to sit on our great sofas.
Right now, go to Allform.com slash Knowles.
I've told you about how great the Helix mattress is.
I've told you about that for years.
Well, Helix has a new company.
It's called Allform.
Helix is leaving the bedroom.
They're going into the living room and the family room.
They have got phenomenal sofas.
Not only are they extremely high quality, aesthetically, in terms of the materials, but also they're just very, very cool.
The way it works with all form sofas is you can pick an armchair, a love seat, up to an eight-seat sectional.
You can pick your fabric.
You can pick the sofa color.
You can pick the leg color.
The sofa's size, the sofa shape.
And then you can grow the sofa as your home grows.
So if you're in a studio apartment right now, you can start with a really small one.
and then you can add on as you grow. It's phenomenal. They've got a 100-day, decide if you want to keep it,
guarantee. So if you don't like it, they'll come. It's no big deal. You can send it back. Not a problem.
They'll pick it up for free. They'll give you a full refund. They've also got a forever warranty.
Forever warranty. So right now to find your perfect sofa, go to allform.com.com slash Knowles.
Allform is offering 20% off, all orders for our listeners. Allform.com slash Knowles.
I am very pro-Musk. I am pro-Elon Musk. I don't know that I agree with him on everything.
It's kind of sad that the way that we take back speech and political control in our country these days is just to pit billionaire oligarchs off of one another.
But Musk, as far as billionaire masters of the universe go, Musk seems like one of the good guys.
And the reason that I have a hunch that he's one of the good guys is completely unrelated to Twitter or free speech or BigTack or the Constitution.
It's actually, it has to do with his answer to a particular hobby horse of extremely rich and powerful people for decades.
Actually, for centuries now.
Very rich and very elite people have worried about overpopulation.
You saw this in the 1970s, especially.
There was a book called The Population Bomb where all the genius elite scientists who follow the science and they're so smart and we should follow them.
They said that it was inevitable that within a day,
decade, you were going to see mass famines around the world. You should encourage abortion. You should
encourage contraception. You should coerce abortion and contraception, if need be. And even then, we're still
going to have mass famines. And that's just because we have too many people in the world. And then what
happened? It's 50 years later. The world population has doubled since that time, and people are
fatter than ever. Malnutrition is at an all-time low. And Elon Musk has broken ranks with his
fellow billionaires. And he's come out and said, the problem in the world today is not overpopulation. Actually,
it's underpopulation.
Most people in the world are operating
under the false impression that
there are too many people.
This is not true.
Earth could maintain a population many times
at the current level.
And the birth rate
has been dropping like crazy.
And unfortunately,
we have these
like ridiculous population estimates from the UN that need to be updated because they're just
don't make any sense.
Really, you can just look at, say, what was the birth rate last year?
How many kids were born?
Multiply that by the life expectancy.
And so I'd say, okay, that's how many people will be alive in the future.
and then say, is the trend for birth rate positive or negative? It's negative. So that's the best
case, unless something changes with the birth rate. Very simple, very correct, and most important of all,
very pro-human. Elon Musk might be the one billionaire who is pro-human. All the rest of these guys,
Bill Gates in particular, has this bizarre obsession with overpopulation and trying to discourage birth rates.
and to try to promote contraception and abortion and things like that.
This isn't some tinfoil hat stuff.
He's promoted this on television for decades at this point.
And all the rest of the libs are, too,
whether it's because of climate change,
whether it's because of, I don't know,
all sorts of neuroses that the libs have,
they want there to be fewer people.
And it's always interesting
that the people prattling on about overpopulation
never volunteer to help solve the problem.
You notice that?
All the people who are worried about overpopulation
want someone else's kids not to be born,
want someone else's kids to be killed through abortion.
It's never them.
It's never they themselves who say, you know, okay, I'll check out.
There's too many people on earth I'm at.
Ronald Reagan made a similar point on abortion.
He said, I notice all the people who support abortion
have already been born.
That's convenient, isn't it?
So it seems like it's out of left field,
but Elon Musk's answer on that question
tells me at a really basic fundamental level, this guy gets it. This guy, one, understands reality
and realizes that the earth could sustain many times the number of people that are currently on it.
But two, he likes people. He's not a misanthrope. He's not saying, we need fewer people so that I can have more stuff and money and resources.
Like all of the other rich guys. He's saying, no, we can have more people. Have more people. We don't have enough.
Come on, have kids. Make a family. Have some kids. Let's go. The more the merrier.
It's a very human perspective.
Speaking of humanity, a really horrible story coming out of Los Angeles, homeless deaths in Los Angeles
have increased over the past five years.
This is people who died because of exposure or just die on the street.
And they've increased not by a little bit, but by 200% in just five years.
Nearly 2,000 homeless people died in L.A. County last year, according to a report, by the New York Times.
Hundreds of those who did so did so in plain sight of passers by. People just walking on by them.
287 of these people died on the sidewalk. Another 72 were found on the pavement.
24 of them died in alleys. This is based on a report from the L.A. County coroner.
is that humane? The libs tell us that if we do not let bums and derelicts and mentally ill people and addicts
live in squalor on the street, that we're cruel, we're anti-homeless, we're inhumane. You think this is
humane? I don't think this is humane at all. I think it's a horrible, disordered thing that we allow
people to live on the street. I remember back during Occupy Wall Street, so this was probably 10 years ago now,
Rudy Giuliani, speaking of this as a New Yorker,
as someone who's the best mayor of New York,
probably in that city's history,
came out and he said,
this is a simple question.
Don't let people live on the street.
Living on the street is a disordered act
that harms the individual and harms society.
Why are the libs in L.A. doing this?
They're doing this because it's nice.
They think it's the nice thing to do.
I guess it is the nice thing to do.
You don't bother the homeless people.
You let the drug addicts do what they,
want to do, at least what their appetites want to do,
and you just hands off, not my problem, I'm going to look away.
But it's not loving.
It's not loving at all.
You're letting these people live in squalor, experience great pain,
be completely discarded by society, and then die.
And you're seeing their death numbers go through the roof.
It would be much more loving to force these people into homeless shelters,
force these people into rehabilitation centers,
force the criminals among these people into prisons.
That would be much more loving.
It's tough love, sure, but it's a much more loving thing.
And that is the conservative answer.
And what the libs want to convince us,
that when we get back to reality and get back to basics
and enforce the fundamental lowest bar basic functions of a society
that we're cruel and inhumane, not at all.
It is completely, completely the opposite.
Speaking of reality, have you checked out Matt Walsh's book yet, Johnny the Walrus?
Matt Walsh, as you know, is one of the most cherished leading LGBTQ plus best-selling authors in the country.
He is a scholar in the Department of Women's Studies, a really, really noted sexual theorist.
So Matt has his great book.
That would be Johnny the Walrus.
It sold out within 48 hours when it was released.
Don't worry, more copies are on the way.
So reserve your copy of Johnny the Walrus over on Amazon.
We'll be right back with a lot more.
Welcome back to the show.
My favorite time of the week, we are now in the mailbag.
First question up from Brandon.
Dear Michael, did you ask your wife's father for his blessing in marriage before you propose to her?
The reason I ask is because I plan on proposing in the near future.
However, I'm not sure if I respect her liberal dad for constantly calling me every name in the book for being a conservative.
He's also pretty frustrated that I converted his daughter to a conservative Christian.
and we have plans on moving from California to Texas. I know that he wants me to ask him,
but to point out the hypocrisy, he never asked his wife's father for his blessing. I'm just curious
what your thoughts are. Yes, I did ask my father-in-law's blessing. I like my father-in-law a lot.
It sounds like you don't really like your father-in-law very much, but you should ask his
blessing anyway, not because your father-in-law is some great guy, but because it's the right thing to do.
the
act of asking a blessing
is not so much about the people involved,
the prospective groom and the father-in-law,
as it is about the act itself.
It's a good, respectful act.
It's the sort of thing that good, civilized young men will do.
And so, whether you're doing it for him or not,
whether he plays any factor into your thoughts on doing it,
You should do it for yourself and you should do it because it's the right thing to do, young man.
From George, Michael, I wanted to get your opinion on having arguments with leftists in comment sections online.
I often find myself getting into these arguments on YouTube and the Lions Den TikTok,
in which I can probably count on one hand the number of times the discussion has ended peacefully or in good faith.
Most of the time, the other side will start resorting to insults mid-conversation or start talking to me in a condescending manner.
My question is, is it worth participating in these arguments?
arguments at all, or should we just let them be? It is not worth participating, and you should just
let them be. Yes, that's it. The definition of badness is doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results, right? I'm not saying you should necessarily get off of social
media. I'm not even saying you should necessarily stop voicing your opinions on social media,
but there is really no reason for you to get into fights in the comment section. And these long
threads, you're probably not going to convince the person you're talking to. Now, there might be a side
benefit of this, which is you might convince people who happen to be reading the thread.
This is the purpose of really big public debates. When you have a dinner party and you go out
and have drinks and cigars and you start talking to someone, you could have maybe a private
debate and potentially persuade the other person or that person could persuade you.
When you're standing on a stage having a formal debate, the point is not to persuade the
other person. The point is to score as many points as you can and persuade people in the audience.
That's pretty much the same thing that you're seeing in social media.
So you might get something at, or someone else might benefit from that,
or you might just make your point in the comment section and then let it go and move on with your life.
And you'll have more time to make more comments and do things that are more productive and more edifying.
Chris says Michael, I was sexually assaulted in January by a woman I work with,
as much as the libs would have you believe females assaulting males is not having.
happening, and if it is happening, it's really not that big of a deal. I didn't fear for my physical
safety, but I was deathly afraid of how it would affect my marriage. I struggled with myself
over whether I should tell my wife what happened and pray we would get through it or hide it
from her out of shame. I decided the best outcome was to be completely truthful with her
about it, and thank God my wife didn't blame me at all. While my wife wanted to do some terrible
things to the woman that assaulted me, we decided I wouldn't report the assault out of fear of retaliation
from the woman and possibly at my job, given the hashtag Me Too skew in paper of women.
Ironically, my wife and I have never been closer, and our emotional connection has reached a deeper level.
I think I know your answer, but what is your opinion on tragic and emotionally distressing things,
bringing a marriage closer together? Well, that certainly happens. Shared experience is a really
important part of marriage. I asked my grandfather this. My grandfather and grandmother have
best marriage I've ever seen. They've been married for about a bazillion years. And I asked him,
years and years ago, even before I was about to propose. I said, maybe this was on his 60th wedding anniversary.
I said, what's the key to a good marriage? And my grandfather said, patience, shared experience,
and frequent absence. Because he was a captain in the Navy, and so he would deploy for long periods of time.
And that was a pretty funny joke. There's probably some truth to that, actually, too. But shared experience is a really important one,
because you're going to grow together or grow apart. And it doesn't mean just going on fundraising,
rides at Disney World, it doesn't mean just that great vacation to Hawaii and all the happy
memories, but the sad memories, too, will bring you closer together as well, as they are shared
experiences. As for telling your wife, I don't know the details of this assault, sometimes it's
hard to even picture it because you think, well, if some woman is going to come up and assault
you, why don't just push her out of the way? You're bigger, presumably. But I don't know. I mean,
obviously it does happen, so I'm not disputing that. But in terms of your struggle with this,
do I tell my wife?
It's kind of maybe you feel embarrassed about it,
maybe you feel some shame about it.
Well, you certainly shouldn't feel any shame in that,
unless you were participating,
unless this is not just a clear-cut assault,
you didn't do anything wrong.
In order to commit a sin,
it requires an act of the will,
certainly to commit immortals,
and requires an act of the will,
and you were an unwilling participant here.
And this issue in particular is coming up
because of this case between Johnny Depp
and Amber,
heard, a defamation case that Johnny Depp is bringing because of this very acrimonious breakup
between the two. I have not been watching the case because I'm a grown man and I'm not.
We got other things to do. But it is fascinating, the reports that I've been reading about it
because this woman Amber Hurd seems to be a complete loony tune and just extraordinarily
manipulative and wicked and just a terrible person. And poor Johnny Depp does seem generally like
the victim here.
So what's the answer to that? I've had people write into me, say similar points. Michael, can you please talk about woman on male domestic violence? And so what do you do with that? Well, I still come down to the point that the men need to handle it. The men need to get a hold on things. The men need to lead here. And so it's bad. You might find yourself with a complete lunatic like Amber Heard. But still, it's kind of on you to take
some control of the situation. And if something goes wrong and if you suffer in some way,
you shouldn't feel any shame about that unless you're a willing participant.
From Andrew, hello, Nolstra Damas. This may be a triggering question to some, though I expect
not to many of the Daily Wire subscribers. Do you think there is any correlation with the current
movement of gender ideology and self-identity with a diagnosed or undiagnosed mental disorder?
throughout history, many topics that these agendas are pushing could land someone in a mental institution.
Is it possible we're seeing history repeat itself? Or simply a minority of confused individuals
now have the ability to indoctrinate impressionable minds at the click of a button?
Well, of course. I mean, if you're a man who thinks that he's a woman, then you have a mental disorder.
You have a very acute, very clear mental disorder. There's no question about that. It's in the
diagnostic and statistical manual. It's in the DSM, the textbook of psychiatry.
So that's certainly the case.
There is a social phenomenon to them.
Because while a very small number of people suffer from this acute psychological condition
where you have confusion about your sex, the numbers are now exploding because it's also a social
phenomenon and because these delusions are being affirmed by all of the institutions of power,
whether we're talking about the White House, whether we're talking about corporations,
whether we're talking about big tech, whether we're talking about a kindergarten teacher.
Everyone is affirming this madness that boy can become a girl.
And so there are some people who might not have severe psychiatric conditions who are just going along with this because it's in the zeitgeist. It's blowing along. And that's a big problem. And we need a little bit of tough love here, I think. We need to stop being so nice and be a little bit tougher and more loving and tell people who are confused, no, you're not a woman. And even conservatives need to get tougher on this. Conservatives try to split the baby. And so they'll say, well, if a grown man wants to protect, you.
that he's a grown man who is wearing a dress who calls himself Sally. If he wants to pretend
that he's a woman, that's his right. That's totally fine. But just don't do it to little kids.
No, it's not his right. He has no right. You have no right to delusion. And we have no obligation
as a society to indulge delusion, no matter what the ruling class tells us. No, you got,
we actually have an obligation to tell him the truth and say, no, Buster, you're not, take the dress
off, stop calling yourself Sally. Sally's a girl's name. You're a Sam. You're a boy. Sam's
kind of an an erogenous name anyway, so there you go. And you can't use the girls' room and you can't
swim on the pen girl's swim team. And you got to, you got to come back to reality. From Julia.
Dear Smokey Mike, is there any way you can send out the chords to together again from your original
album? I promise I won't steal anything. I'm just not good enough to figure out what chords to play
and I can't get the song out of my head. Love Smokey Mike's number one fan girl. P.S. Don't tell Jeremy,
but I'll be on your side 100% when the band breaks up. Thank you, Julia. You're obviously a woman
of discerning taste. I can't send you the chords two together again because I don't remember
them. I realized this the other day. I pulled out my guitar. I was playing guitar. My son was playing
around. I figure I'll play a little guitar for him. And I remembered the guitar solos. I was kind of
playing the song. But I realized I couldn't remember exactly how to play the song. I'm sure I could
remember it and figure it out pretty quickly.
But that's what happens with music magic.
These things just pop out of the God King's head.
He did write that song in the shower.
He literally wrote that song Standing in the Shower.
Pops out of the God King's head.
And we sit there, you know, like 1970s
National Treasure Rockstar as we play it.
Then it's gone, man. It's in the ether.
If you want it again, you just keep click and play on Spotify,
on Apple Music, on YouTube.
from Nick.
Uh-oh.
Nick, we've missed Nick.
Hey, Michael, me again.
I'm sorry for being MIA
the past few months.
I've been on a spiritual journey.
So apparently there's this thing
called ayahuasca.
Long story short, I fell off my king energy
and was seduced by another goddess
who loves crystals.
I was listening to Joe Rogan
and got really into the Beatles,
none of which I'm proud of.
After I lost track of Sydney in Tulum
and made it back to the States,
I couldn't shake the ayahuasca trip.
I felt like I saw and spoke to other beings.
It was nuts.
Do you think ayahuasca and DMT make you hallucinate
or finally see what's already there?
As a spiritual dude who doesn't do drugs,
I figured you could tell me what's up.
This is actually a good question, Nick,
and I get this from a lot of people.
They'll say, hey, man, you know, I'm not religious or nothing.
I'm not one of you crazy Christians or nothing, you know.
But I do a bunch of drugs and I see lots of spirits, man, you know,
and so I believe in that, you know.
I think, oh, so you believe in,
demons. Okay. You don't believe in angels and God, but you do believe in demons. Okay. I don't do drugs. I've
never been into drugs. The hardest drug I've ever had was a puff or two on the old Haitian oregano,
but it does not interest me because I don't want brain damage and I think I rely on my brain.
I think it's working okay right now. And if I want to explore metaphysical questions like you're
talking about, I would like to do it in a way that is rigorous. That does not involve me losing
control of my rational faculties and my will like you do when you do drugs, but that actually
focuses my intellectual faculties and my will on things like philosophy and theology that applies
intellectual rigor to all of these questions. So what are people seeing when they take ayahuasca or
DMT or whatever other mushrooms or acid? What are they seeing? Well, they could be hallucinating
probably, that's a big part of it. But also, we, we, that's...
There is more between heaven and earth than is dreamt of in our philosophies, Horatio.
Also, there is a spiritual reality to the world.
There are angels and there are demons, and there are spiritual battle, and there's good and bad and right and wrong.
And we're in that, and we are bodies, but we're also souls.
And so that stuff is real.
And when you lose control of your intellect and your will, you open yourself up to a lot of potentially pretty nasty things.
And that's real.
I mean, we talk about spirits.
Forget about ayahuasca for a second.
Let's say you just go out and you drink too much.
You're opening yourself up by drinking a lot of spirits.
You are opening yourself up in a way to spirits because you're no longer as in control of your will.
So long and short, Nick, is don't do drugs, buddy.
Go to church.
Open your Bible and go to church.
From Jen.
Gen.
Nostradamus, you are the very person, I believe, can help me answer this question about
evangelization. It is my understanding that Catholics slash Christians should spread the word of God,
but how can one do that without being an overbearing Jesus freak to those around them?
Or how can I tell my friends of that description, how to chill? It's a good question. A friend of
mine, when he was converted, when he described this experience of just being opened to the Holy Spirit,
he said his first thought was, dear God, please don't make me a Jesus freak. And he made the
It's actually a good place.
Please.
And I had a pretty radical reversion as well in my, after college in my early 20s.
It was a process that was gradual and then sudden.
So I really can empathize with what you're talking about here.
And everyone, when people convert or revert, I have noticed they go through a very intense period where they're pretty weird.
Because it's a pretty wild experience.
So I suppose my prudential judgment here, though, is if you want to persuade people, if you want to convert people,
you can't seem like you're just completely off your rocker.
You can be joyful. You can be excited. You can be eager to spread the joy that lives within you.
But you've got to be grounded in reality as well. Don't forget, the Gospels are not poetry.
They're not philosophy. The Gospels are news reports. The Gospels are journalism accounts.
And the rest of the New Testament is letters. It's grounded in real hard facts. That's where the hope lies.
I'm Michael Knowles. It's the Michael Nolts show. I'll see you Monday.
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.
And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe.
We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show, the Andrew Claven Show, and the Matt Walls show.
The Michael Noles show is produced by Ben Davies, executive producer Jeremy Boring, supervising, supervising,
producer Mathis Glover. Production manager, Pavel Vidovsky, editor and associate producer,
Danny D'emico, Associate producer Justine Turley, audio mixer, Mike Coramina, and hair and makeup
by Cherokee Hart. Michael Null's show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2022.
Hey, everybody, this is Andrew Claven, host of the Andrew Claven show. You know, some people
are depressed because the Republic is collapsing, the end of days is approaching, and the moon's
turn to blood. But on the Andrew Claven show, that's where the fun just gets
started. So come on over to the Andrew Claven show and laugh your way through the fall of the
Republic with me, Andrew Claven.
