The Michael Knowles Show - Michael Knowles REACTS to Conspiracies | YES or NO with Luke Rudkowski

Episode Date: August 24, 2024

In this thrilling episode of "YES or NO," Michael Knowles sits down with renowned conspiracy theorist and journalist Luke Rudkowski to delve into some of the most popular and controversial conspiracy ...theories. From government cover-ups to secret societies, watch as Michael reacts to these intriguing ideas. Will he dismiss these theories, or do some of them hold a kernel of truth? Find out as these two dive deep into the world of conspiracies in a fast-paced, no-holds-barred discussion.     Today's Sponsor:     Hallow - Download the Hallow app and get 3 months free at https://hallow.com/Knowles Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Pete is real. So I want to stay on YouTube is the thing? Yes. We can do another one. Sometimes when spicy questions come up, we look into the camera and without any audible affirmation or denial. I am joined now by a man for whom I have opened a separate pack. I have opened the yes or no conspiracy expansion pack.
Starting point is 00:00:32 Luke, thank you for coming on the show. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it. So, you know the rules? Maybe, sort of. Sort of. I'll play a line. Okay. Cryptocurrency.
Starting point is 00:00:41 This is perfect for the venue. Cryptocurrency is a CIA op. So you have to answer how I would answer it. All right. Let me know when you want me to do it? I have to think of my answer first. Yeah. Okay.
Starting point is 00:01:02 You do. No, no. I think it's the CIA. I meant to say no. You actually gets right. No, no, it's not. It's not. It is something that.
Starting point is 00:01:10 libertarians are ideologically enamored by. It is something that in the case of some of those ridiculous coins, scam artists are making money on, but in the case of Bitcoin and some of the more relatively stable ones, it is an actual alternative vision of money. Yeah, right? I think so. Very interestingly, when Bitcoin was still in its infancies, we were actually talking about it with Max Kaiser many, many years ago. And that was actually one of my first questions to him because he was like, we have this new currency. It's digital. It's going to be global. It's going to surpass the U.S. petrol dollar. It's going to be the, and I'm like, is this a CIA one world government currency that they're siamping us into? So, and very curiously, I asked
Starting point is 00:01:56 Max Kaiser that question because that's what a lot of people were thinking about as well. But if you look at the early infancies of Bitcoin specifically, you do see a lot of old Tea Party, Ron Paul people. You see a lot of libertarians. You see a lot of anarchists. A lot of free staters that have really been helped tremendously with this technology. And overall, if you assess it, you know, many years back when I was first skeptical of it originally, I think it's been a very net positive and a net good for the overall kind of freedom movement that it has helped tremendously, in my opinion. So, you know, it's not enough. I don't think it's an op. Who knows? I could be wrong, many years down the line when we have, you know, a thought police and literally, you know, microchips inside of us
Starting point is 00:02:39 that punish us for thoughts that we have, and then we're forced to use Bitcoin and their transactions, that trace and database, everything. Then when I'm wrong, I'll admit it. But as of right now, it's more of a disruptor than kind of a centralized kind of thing. I think that's very big of you to say that when we have brain chips and the logs, you'll admit,
Starting point is 00:02:56 you could be, you could have to be. Exactly. Okay, now you pull a card and you have to answer yes or no. Got it. Light bulb companies intentionally made them go bad. I don't even. Was the person who wrote that card literate? I don't, what is...
Starting point is 00:03:14 So I actually know about this. I already know my answer. Oh, okay, all right. If you understand... So light bulb companies intentionally made them go bad. Meaning like otherwise a light bulb would just work in perpetuity? Yes. Uh...
Starting point is 00:03:28 I already know the answer. No. Wrong. Okay, hold on. Planned obsolescence, and there's actually a light bulb that's still being used right now, still for many decades and decades ago. So if you look at a lot of companies, there's a conspiracy that the kind of companies came together
Starting point is 00:03:55 and said if we're going to want to sell more products, we have to make them products that go bad quicker. So there's a conspiracy within that with light bulbs that I kind of subscribe to that I think is legitimate, especially with the new light bulbs that they're putting in, that they're mandating all for kind of being echo friendly. And a lot of people are also reporting like a lot of conspiracies surrounding that as well.
Starting point is 00:04:17 But the ones, the new ones that have the ugly light, those last forever. Those last for 20 years. Yeah. But before that, they used to die out like every six months to a year. And I still, because I'm a good right winger, I still insist on using incandescent balls. If you can get, they're hard to get now. And they burn out every, you know, three weeks or whatever. Yeah, I prefer those over the ugly blue ones.
Starting point is 00:04:41 But blue light is also associated with a lot of negative health factors. But so you're saying that for the good incandescent bulbs that we like, they are designed to, but they don't necessarily have to go out every month or two. So then why hasn't someone made an incandescent bulb that lasts? Very good question. Well, now with the regulations, they can't because the government's mandating these ones. So you would think a company would kind of come in there, and that's a good kind of plausible kind of explanation to it that would probably maybe even disprove this theory. But I particularly subscribe to it based off research I did when I was like 16 years old on the internet. There's so much more to say.
Starting point is 00:05:19 First, though, go to hallow.com slash Knowles. The hallow app offers an incredible range of guided meditations and prayers that help you deepen your spirituality and strengthen your connection to God. With hallow, you can embark on a journey of exploration, diving into different themes and types of prayer and meditation. For the third year in a row, Hallow is having their wildly popular saints in seven days prayer challenge where over the course of four weeks, you will journey through the life of an incredible saint, learning more about that saint's faith, story, and ultimate surrender to the will of God
Starting point is 00:05:47 in their life. Saints in seven days goes deep into the lesser-known parts of a saint's life to show that while his or her journey to sainthood was filled with God's grace and glory, these people also had human struggles, great suffering and mistakes, and a profound need for God's mercy. Download the app for free and join the challenge at hallow.com.com slash knolls, KnaWLAS, hallo.com slash Knowles for an exclusive three-month free trial of all 10,000,000 thousand plus prayers and meditations. That is hallow.com slash knolls. Greek gods are fallen angels or nephylene. Huh.
Starting point is 00:06:26 So I have to give my answer. Do you believe they're nephalum? Or fallen or demons? Yeah. I'm just saying no. The answer is yes, but, but. I agree with you actually. Do you, okay. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:06:47 Yeah. So they are. They are pagan deities, you know, pagan gods are demons. Yep. Except when they're imaginary. And except when they're, I do believe there's a kind of philosophical paganism, like the paganism of Plato and Aristotle, which recognizes that the one true God in some misty way. But, yeah, when it's like, you know, you know, for opera, papalapa, lapathustra, you know, was sleeping with his sister and. law, whatever, that's all demons. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:07:18 It's an interesting question because there's a spiritual aspect and a religious aspect to this, but there's also kind of a logical, historical answer. I was kind of thinking you would go towards more of the logical, historical context of it. Of course, there's a lot of stories, there's a lot of myths. But for me, you know, I'm more kind of in tune with the spiritual aspects as well. So that's why I would kind of agree with you that there are larger kind of entities, demons, out there, because if there wouldn't be, there wouldn't be things like the Bohemian Grove. There wouldn't be things like spirit cooking. There wouldn't be really weird anomalies that
Starting point is 00:07:54 happen with the rituals that a lot of powerful people do that are literally trying to summon in demons. Yeah, it is kind of weird because it's, you know, I think Richard Nixon described the Bohemian Grove in phrases that I can't use on air. The most effidy, darnest place in the world. Yeah, a little, effidy, blank, Yeah, referring to... Scotch tape over that one. There's an Italian word, frociaginess. Yes, sort of like that.
Starting point is 00:08:20 So he did... And so in a way, you know, it's easy to make funnable. But then I think, okay, you know... A very Pete Buttigieggy place, you know. So to speak. Yeah. But, you know, I think, okay, guys, yeah, it's all funning games. It's all just innocent, funny games,
Starting point is 00:08:33 and you're kind of innocently worshipping these giant idols, and you're kind of... It's all just like funny games until you're worshipping demons. Yeah, and I think a lot of people also in the psychedelic world don't understand their... their kind of larger interdimensional aspects and entities around them, that they kind of open themselves up to blankly without having any kind of larger religious backing.
Starting point is 00:08:55 And once you start getting into the kind of religious philosophy, and not to sound like a kind of religious cellar, you do see it more than ever. And I think you do see it politically. You do see it spiritually. You do see it energetically, even with human beings when you're interacting with them. You can tell if someone is like demon-filled.
Starting point is 00:09:10 You can tell if someone is like just absolutely rotten to it to their core. Yeah. I totally agree. Okay, your turn. I get the host. This is the last one. You get the host chips. You keep your answer now.
Starting point is 00:09:19 All right. Pizza gate is real. So I want to stay on YouTube is the thing. Yes. We can do another one. Because that word by itself already YouTube, the algorithm, do, do, do, do, do, do. We might have to edit this one, and I keep picking next one.
Starting point is 00:09:37 Yeah. Okay. So then sometimes when spicy questions come up, sometimes we say we look into the camera and without any audible affirmation or denial, Maybe one can infer one's answer. Yes. Yes. Yeah, let's do one more. Okay.
Starting point is 00:09:57 I agree. The accepted account of Hitler's death is not accurate. That's another buzzword. Yeah. We say the Austrian painter. I say the guy with the funny mustache in the 1930s. The mustache guy. Okay.
Starting point is 00:10:13 Another card or... Oh, no, that's okay. So I got to give your answer to you. Yes. I got a good mind. So, you know, he commits suicide in a bunker, kills Blondie the day before, kills his girlfriend, does not go to Argentina, doesn't go to Antarctica, doesn't go to the moon, he dies in a bunker in Germany. So is the accepted account of his, the funny German mustache guys, is it not accurate? Is it not accurate? Is it not accurate? And this is me, I already answered.
Starting point is 00:10:40 So if I said no, would it be no, that you believe the historical account as told to us? Is true? Yes. Okay, so I'm answering for you. For you. I think you do not believe the historical account. You're right. So what happened?
Starting point is 00:10:57 What happened? Argentina? I think it's pretty clear there's a lot of sketchiness around this entire account. The Russians, the Soviets at the time, excuse me, are known for their propaganda. They're known for lying. Stalin was a horrible, awful human being that always tried to have these larger historical kind of propaganda victories. My family, being Polish, was victim to a lot of those. My grandmother and my grandma was, my grandma, who's still alive, has horrible stories with the Soviets.
Starting point is 00:11:28 And the whole occupation that they went through was absolutely awful. And when you look at Hitler's death, particularly, you look at the kind of propaganda surrounding it. There's no actual real evidence that it was Hitler. The skulls that they found, they showed for a little bit, a couple, I think it was a couple months or years. I don't remember the exact context of it. And people are like, wait, that's kind of weird that you're not really giving us
Starting point is 00:11:51 a lot of details or information about this. And then many decades ago, they released the skull of allegedly Hitler as a female skull. So I think it's fair to say that... Let's say you're Hitler. You sneak out somehow, you get to Argentina. How are you going to disguise your...
Starting point is 00:12:05 You're not going to wear the groucho glasses. You cut off the mustache. You do the opposite of the groucher. You cut the moustache. Or you just grow your hair. And Argentina had very close connections with the Germans. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:12:15 And you get into a submarine, you go wherever, Antarctica, Argentina. And there was Mossad agents that hunted down, like, prominent Nazis. Yeah, and they got, they got a lot of them. But if you're someone with the full backing of a country, all right, and people who love you, you have many different ways of hiding, you have a lot of resources, you have a lot of money. And I think it's absolutely probable. if not, maybe he was taken prisoner or used, just like Operation Paperclip here in America, the Soviets had a similar program where they took their, you know, Nazi kind of scientists and
Starting point is 00:12:56 doctors and officers and used them for their own military purposes. And painters, potentially. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. He was like the Hunter-Biden-esque kind of painter of that society. So I absolutely don't believe that to be, you know, true. Okay, that gives me a lot to think of. about.
Starting point is 00:13:13 Luc. Fascinating. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it. If you've not already, you must go to dailyware.com slash shop. You must get the yes or no game so you can play yourself.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.