The Michael Knowles Show - Would You Be Catholic or Protestant? | YES or NO: Ben Shapiro

Episode Date: August 30, 2025

Would Ben Shapiro be Catholic or Protestant? Michael Knowles puts him on the spot in this fiery episode of YES or NO. From faith and theology to politics and pop culture, nothing is off-limits. The two dive into religion’s role in American life, the future of conservatism, and even react to viral videos along the way. Can Ben convince Michael? Can Michael hold his ground? And which surprising answers will shock you the most?  - - - Today’s Sponsor: Balance of Nature - Go to https://balanceofnature.com and use promo code KNOWLES for 35% off your first order PLUS get a free bottle of Fiber and Spice - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

USAA knows dynamic duos can save the day, like superheroes and sidekicks or auto and home insurance. With USAA, you can bundle your auto and home and save up to 10%. Tap the banner to learn more and get a quote at usaa.com slash bundle. Restrictions apply. Choice hotels get you more of what you value. Here's a little tune to help you remember. Same drive, different day. Don't you wish you were getting away?

Pack your bags and come on through. Texas, Ohio, Alaska, we're up there too. Comfort in It's calling your name Save on the stay Oh, and free waffles are yours to claim Well, I hope you like my little song Book Direct at Shoreshiltails.com

Would you lean Catholic over Protestant? Very, very good question. Very spicy. I actually know the answer. I don't know if you know the answer to this, but I do know the answer to this. I would be shocked if you had any other heads. It's an obvious.

I know you think it's an obvious answer. Welcome to Yes or No, the Bibulous battle to discover who knows whom better. My guest today is Ben Shapiro. How do we play? I'll ask Ben a yes or no question. He will select his answer away from my prying eyes. Then, I'll guess how he answered. If I guess correctly, I get a point.

If I guess incorrectly, I lose a point. No matter what, I'll probably drink. Then it's Ben's turn. Neither of us has seen the questions beforehand. Whoever has the most points at the end wins, the stakes could be higher. You know, the stakes for America are also high, which is why you need to get Ben's new book, Lions and Scavengers, The True Story of America.

Pre-order it right now. Ben, thank you for coming to my show in your soundstage. I mean, this is, this is magical. It's pretty cool, huh? It is pretty awesome. Since the last time you were on, we've kind of, raise the rent a little bit. Yeah, you definitely have.

So we're spending even more money. I didn't think it was possible. Now we have moving life. Now, I have to ask, what are you drinking? I don't know, whatever they gave me. This, because I, there was a debate. Apple juice, apparently. I'll let people in on it.

It's a little early, it's the morning. Yes. And so I said, I'll have a martini, a dry, little dirty, blue cheese olives. Breakfast of Champions. But apparently, I think they gave you a non-alcoholic drink. Did they? Or is it the whiskey? I told him to give you the whiskey. It's whiskey.

Is it? Yeah. All right. There we go. All right. I'm glad to hear that. It's kosher. It's kosher. Do you know the rules? I think so. I don't. I don't. But I'll go first. Okay. If I were running for President of the United States, would I need to kiss the wall? Do I have to?

Wow, that's a very realistic. The AI has gotten good. Professor Jacob, your co-religionist, made this up on AI the other day and showed it. This is not my first time seeing this picture. But the question is a serious one. Both parties, people go to the wall in Jerusalem. If I were running, would I need to kiss the wall? I have to, you have to get...

I'm going to answer it, and then I think you have to guess what I would say to is. Okay. You ready? Okay. What does Ben think that you would have to do? Yes. I can see Shapiro-esque arguments for both answers here. You would say, no.

No, I would not have to. Yes, you would not have to. Because I'm Catholic. Right. If I were even evangelical, if you're Jewish, no one has to kiss the wall. It's ridiculous. It's not even like a Jewish thing. I was trying to explain this to someone.

People do if they want to, but it's not like a commandment to go, it's not even a commandment to visit the wall. And certainly for non-jew, like, I've said this to Ted Cruz. All these people, they'll come to synagogues. I'll put on yamika. I'm like, why, you're not Jewish. I don't care. I think he would have to kiss the wall.

I think for evangelical Protestants or Baptists, I think it plays very well to kiss the wall because it largely came out of evangelical movements in the 20th century. Whereas for Catholics, that's not like a traditional thing to do. You go to the Holy Sepulchre, you go to all these different places. But I tried to explain this to someone. I was like, because people say that you kiss the wall

basically because the Jews force you to. I was like, the reason American politicians have started kissing that wall or praying at the wall or whatever, I think, I don't know, maybe you tell me if the Assad has any other view. It seems to me the reason is because evangelical Protestants have played a huge role in American politics in both parties, especially in the Republican Party, and they tend to be into that religious ritual. And so I think it's more playing to them than it is playing to Jews. Well, I mean, I think that's certainly true. I also think that it has to do with, I would assume, biblical solidarity, meaning like, Jesus clearly, I mean, this is the temple that Jesus was talking about.

And so it's not that Jesus was a big fan of the temple. But it is the idea that Jesus was actually, well, he was an observant Jew. I mean, like, it does talk in the New Testament about Jesus, you know, being a Jew and doing Jewish things and such. And so, like, that whole area, these are areas where Jesus legitimately walked. Yeah, yeah. You can walk up, I believe in September, they're going to open up the pilgrimage road that goes down from the Cillam Pool all the way up to the temple and to the Western Wall area. And, like, you can see the stones where Jesus walked. You can see where he was standing and yelling at people about the money lenders in the temple and all this kind of stuff. So I think as sort of a, this is connected. This is like an area that Jesus was. I think that's probably why evangelicals are doing that sort of thing. But from a Jewish perspective, as you know, we've known each other a long time. I don't care. Yeah.

Like, politicians come to Shul, and again, they'll put on the keep, I'm like, why? You're not Jewish. You're not, you're, it's fine, you wear a Yankee hat. Right, exactly. For me, what I would prefer? Strymel. Well, I mean, that's pretty slick, right? I mean, if you're going to go like the old school Polish garb from 1750, Polish nobility, that's

where it came from, then you should totally do that. I'm too cheap for them, though. Apparently, I've heard they're very expensive. But for all the anti-somits in the audience, actually what we mandate is that you wear like fully the side lock. And also you have to have a radio near the Western Wall to shut it all down. You do. That's actually where they tell you, he's coming.

He can be president now. Okay. You're up. Okay. No clear answer. Okay. Do you, Michael Mulls, have dual loyalty to the Vatican? I'm warning you so you don't think that I'm cheating.

This answer goes down about like three levels. I know. I actually think I know what the answer is going to be here. Okay. Okay. Go ahead. Correct. Why? Because you have sole loyalty to the Vatican. That's like the second level of it. So I would say, if not for an unfortunate event in history, well, a few unfortunate events, they concluded with the latter entreaty. But one of them was this event that began with this awful man Garibaldi, who stole a lot of land from the church and from the Pope and all these problems into the 20th centuries.

There could be real territory. Now, I'm still, you know, I'm still. and American. None of my family. They all came from either North Africa, also known as Sicily, or from England and Ireland. But if the Vatican had, you know, the papal suave's with that great uniform and a sword and what I could go, I don't know, like slay Saracens or Lombards or something, we're cool. I'm in. But the reason I would say no, I don't have dual loyalty, is because the loyalty to the Vatican as presently constituted, which is about half a square mile of a space, and to the United States are loyalties of a different kind. So one is a national loyalty, one is a spiritual load. Just like my loyalty to the Yankees is of a different kind

than my loyalty to, well, I have no loyalty to Ben Davies, but to someone on my producing people. Yes. That is the reason why, but if they reconstituted. Wow. The Vatican's army, no, no. I don't know. I don't know that they put on a pressure. I mean, honestly, when I said that, I was kind of half joking, but not totally. And the reason I'm saying that is because of what you're saying, which is we have a very dumbed-down conversation about the nature of identity. Yes. And the truth is that everybody has layers of identity, right? So, like, for me, on a personal level, I have an identity as a Jew, meaning, like, that's my religious adherence. And then I have an identity as a father and a husband. And then I have an identity as an American.

And the idea is that these do not conflict. I can be a good American and also be a good Jew and also be a good dad. And hopefully all three of those things not only don't conflict, but actually buttress one another. And so me saying that you have like sole loyalty, that's like, That's like saying, if you ask literally any Christian in America, are you a Christian first or are you an American first? It always said Christian. They would say Christian because, of course that's the answer. Of course that's the answer. And the fact that that somehow become radically controversial in some way is because people make gigantic category errors about this particular question.

Yeah, yeah, of course. So I'm not insulted by that at all or I don't find it troublesome. It's bizarre to even think that way. But I think it's become kind of a trope that's designed to create conflicts where none ought to exist. It's not usually directed at my religious group. Well, it was. It was in the 19th century. For actually, a huge percentage of our politics from about 1830 to probably 1960 was about this, right? I mean, this was a major issue in the JFK campaign in 1960.

Sleshinger said that anti-Catholicism was the deepest prejudice in America. Not that I always quote Schlesinger, but that was a reality. It was a real thing. It was a real thing. Yeah, yeah. But it is funny because this is kind of what pluralism is, you know, which, pluralism can be taken weight to too great and extreme, but it's like, obviously, there are different identity, layers of identity. But this is, you know, whenever we talk, the Westphalian system has to

come up at some point, obviously. Of course. I mean, we're going here. It has to come up. We're like seven minutes in. Yes, yes. And, but this is one of the problems. This is one of the many problems with the modern system of nation states. Is it, oh, it just complicates everything. Even the very notion of Cuyus Regio Aos Religio, you know, whose reign his religion, it just, it makes, am I a nationalist? Like, kind of. I also think empire is fine.

I also think it's not, like, nation matters, but it's not the be all and end all of my identity. Right, and it matters in one context and not another. Yes. Like, I don't think the king has the right to declare religious truth. I don't think that's real.

That was a consequence of the end of the, religious words, but like, I don't know, most kings can barely articulate political truths. And this actually is the fundamental basis of the United States Constitution in many ways, which is that the king does not have the power to declare religious truth. Now there were many states that had instituted religions, but not at the federal level, right? So, yeah. Anyway. Yeah, that's pretty, okay.

Hold on one second. Go to balance of nature.com. Use promo code Knowles. We all know we should be eating more fruits and vegetables. But I want you to be honest with me, you are not getting nearly enough variety. That is where balance of nature comes in, because what you have, put in your body matters. Their whole health system gives you 47 different whole food ingredients. 16 fruits, 15 vegetables, 12 aromatic spices and four fibers. We're talking real ingredients like wild

blueberries, kale, turmeric, and cillium husk. When was the last time you just sat down and gorged yourself on some cillium husk? It's probably been a while. No artificial additives, no sugar added, just nature doing its job. What I love about balance of nature is the convenience. I can be on the road. You take the fruits and veggies capsules with water, chew them, open them up, mix them into powder in your smoothies, your yogurt, sprinkle them on your oatmeal. Fiber and spice blend mix is great into drinks, too. These supplements are vegan, kosher certified, and gluten-free. They're terrific. They will help you become a gig of Chad like myself and Mr. Davies. Go to balance of nature.com. Use promo code NOLAS for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer. Plus get a free bottle of fiber

and spice that is balance of nature.com. Promocode Know. We went deep on that one. That was good. I know. Mr. Davies is thrilled because at this rate, this episode will only be seven hours long. Yeah, exactly. Right, okay. Did you have, did you have, a pleasant experience unsurrounded? They're also like, I could think of like five different ways that you can. Yeah.

Not loving your AT&T or T Mobile Bill. Yeah, we've been hearing that a lot. Good news. Bring your AT&T or T Mobile Bill to Verizon and we'll give you a better deal. So get away from that unfortunate phone bill and get to Verizon. Run, ride, canoe. Whatever it takes, we'll be here. Bring your AT&T or T Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give.

give you a better deal on the best network. A better deal. No surprises. That's Verizon. Best network based on route metrics, best overall mobile network performance U.S. second half 2025. All rights reserved. It must provide a recent consumer mobile bill in the name of the person regained me the deal. Additional terms, conditions, and restrictions apply. I think you would say it was pleasant enough. Yes. That's right. Pleasant enough is a good description. I mean, it was rather variable. Being screamed at for like seven solid minutes by a trans person was not the most pleasant thing I've experienced. It was definitely, and at a certain point I was like, okay, I'm just going to sit here and this person's going to yell at me.

And I was amused by the fact that nobody would raise the red flag when the person was, like, it was the most boring thing in the world. And they're all like so intimidated by the idea that this person's identity is sacrosanct, I must not raise the red flag under any. That's true. Wow, that gives them an advantage even in the game of surrounded. Yes. It's like, well, I can't silence.

I can't tell this trans person to sit down and shut up, even though she's saying nothing. Yeah. But yeah. And so that was kind of unpleasant. But overall, I thought it was pleasant. And afterward, a bunch of the people who had been arguing with me kind of came up and wanted to snap selfies and were kind of fans. And so that, you were on it. What was your experience? I quite enjoyed it.

I don't know. It wasn't a day at the beach, you know. It wasn't like walking around the Parthenon or something. But it was pleasant in as much as there were some moments where I felt like I was actually talking to someone. Yes. There weren't many of them, but there were a few moments. This is right. You know, the funniest thing about that show, and this one, this I did find delightful.

There was one kid on there. He was the kid at the top who was, he was actually raised at traditionalist Catholic. He's kind of fallen away for now, but he'll come back. But he, very left wing and all this stuff, very pro-LGB. But I was sitting there,

and he was starting to ask good questions. He was starting to go from angles of the natural law, and he was kind, it was a little clumsy about it, but he was starting to get into a decent conversation. So, of course, they voted him off immediately. Yeah, exactly.

Enough of this. We need some giant maniac to yell at you. Yeah, exactly. So, yeah, I enjoyed it. The funny thing with that show, though, is I get a kick out of that environment. Some people have not done well on that show. And you did well on the show. But I've noticed, without naming it, some people have had a tough time. Because you can win for two hours of that show.

If the show is two hours and two minutes long, you can win two hours of it. If you flubbed for two seconds. It's very high pressure. It's very high pressure. You'll lose, you look crazy. You look terrible. Because it all gets clipped. It's all about the clips that come out from the thing, for sure. Yeah. And that is very, you know, it's not as though the arguments that are being made are stellar most of the time. Most of them are pretty terrible. But you're right. But that's now kind of the name of the game on the internet.

And so if you do any sort of long form thing, the chance is that if you screw up for 30 seconds, that ends up as like the featured thing on Twitter that day, very, very high. That's high sticks. Yeah. All right, you're right. Here we go. Hmm. Would banning TikTok save more lives than banning fentanyl? Oh, wow. Okay. Okay. I would be tempted to because... It depends how trolley you were being that day. No, it's sort of like you could...

Do you mean save their body? Do you can save their soul? Right. That's kind of where I was thinking you were going to go. And I do think that that TikTok is more wrought for your soul for a larger number of people than fentanyl. Fentanyl. But... Fentil is going 100,000 people a year. Yes. Yeah, it's a lot of people, but TikTok is poisoning more people in a spiritual level and just an intellectual level. By the tens of millions, yes.

Yes. The difference is if we ban TikTok, they would just go to Instagram Reels or they would just go to Twitter Reels or they would just. And maybe that's not quite as poisonous as TikTok is, but it does rot your point. Okay, fine. So I actually disagree with this. And I'll tell you why I disagree with this. Because if you, if you, so first of all, fentanyl's already banned. Yes.

Right? I mean, it's not as though you can like just go down your local. corner store and pick up fentanyl. They banned fentanyl already. And so banning fentany fentany would not save additional lives at this point because it's already banned. Banning TikTok, actually there's a delta. So TikTok's algorithm is tremendously good. Like very, very good at featuring virality and maximizing for virality. And it's run by the Chinese communist government. And so even if you were to say that, you know, people are going to game the system, they'll go to X or they'll go to Instagram. First of all, Instagram does have better

controls and they're not run by the Chinese government. And two, X is kind of a shit show at this point. So, you know, like, it's just kind of a lot of everything all over. And you see people who are gaming the system there for sure. There's a lot of bots. There's a lot of foreign governments that are messing around on X. I wrote a whole book about how conservatives need to get on the bandwagon of restricting speech in a proper and civilized way. And it completely went out the window. You were a profit ahead of your time.

You were a profit ahead of your time. I know. Okay. So, right. And that's an interesting way to read the question, which is banning TikTok would save more lives than banning fentany. If it saves one additional life. Right, exactly. There's no doubt.

Okay, all right, that's fair. That's fair. With the hire of Isabel Brown, it seems that you may be Christian curious. If so, would you lean Catholic over Protestant? Oh, very, very good question. It's spicy. It's very spicy. I actually know the answer.

I don't know if you know the answer to this, but I do know the answer to this. I would be shocked if you had any other answer. Yes. But, no, there are some people. Well, I'm not going to give away my... I'll just let you answer first. It's an obvious answer. I know you think it's an obvious answer.

I understand all of the problems for the obvious... But yes, Catholic. So... No, give me a break. Give me a break. That is coke. That is coke. That is total cope.

Okay, I'll tell you why. Okay, so in order for me to become a Christian, the central pitch of Christianity to me, would be getting rid of all of the rituals. Right? I mean, that's like the central pitch. Right? You're saying you'd want to mix it up.

You got to mix it. Yeah, man. I mean, like, if, like, I do more ritual than you, right? I'm like, as Jewish as it's possible to be, almost. And what that means is that if the, I've said this before, Catholicism is more similar to Judaism and Protestantism. Yes. By far.

There's no question because Catholicism, as I've said to Bishop Barron, backfilled all of the ritual by basically saying, faith will save you not works, but also it turns out that if you think that that is like a practical way of governing, it turns out that you need hierarchy and actual works. And like let's let's give some, you know, credence to James here who says like you are justified not by faith alone. Right. You are justified by works, not by faith alone.

And so Paul, Paul also compliments that by writing a lot about faith. But it is, there's a lot of stuff you do. There's a lot of doing stuff. It turns out that like the actual practical life for Catholic is much more similar to the practical life of a Jew, then Protestantism. So I guess the question is on what basis? So first of all, let's just acknowledge the obvious. Whichever Christian converts me gets a million heaven points.

And we all understand this, right? Like, this is like, and honestly, I'm very flattered by all the people who want to convert me and care enough about my soul that they wish me to be saved. That's like, really, that's very nice of you. I was at the-Nap. I'm not insulted by it at all. I don't find it a problem. I was at the Napa conference.

It was, I don't know if this is Tails at a school or whatever. It's a big Catholic conference. I was, anyway, speaking into a room. And some people were saying, like, hey, some of our favorite guys, You, Charlie Kirk, you know, Protestants, you know, how close are they? Whatever. I said, well, look, it would be tough for Ben. It would be tough for Ben for a number of reasons.

It's like, but I am, you're, that's such a fake answer. Because like, you, the thing is, if you converted, you would not just convert because you got sick of doing the wrapping. Yeah, exactly. You wouldn't do it because you got sick of Shabbat, which is Shabbat's actually a very nice ritual to do. Yeah. It's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, you would have gotten sick of fast. Right. So this is.

It's not. You would do it because you would be convinced that the most Jewish thing to be would be Christian. Right. And if you were— Okay, that's a totally fair argument. Honestly, it's a totally fair argument. And so that's what I was going to say is, if you believe that I was going to convert because I was actively attracted by the story of Jesus and his divinity, then I would probably end up Catholic.

You have to. Give me that point. I want that point. Okay. If, however, I were to convert because I just got sick of the Jewishness of it, I'd go Protestant because honestly, like, you guys do a lot of stuff. It's a lot. It's a lot.

But you're right, Catholic. Listen, both the Pope and I wear keep us. You can see the picture of us. His keep us bigger than mine. Right? That picture was so wholesome. It was great. You're giving, you're meeting the Pope.

You're like, you know, Forrest Gump or something. Yeah, exactly. And you're like, you're standing there meeting the Pope. And then you hand him a, it was a signed white socks. I mean, I'm a white Sox fan. So I had in my collection and assigned 2005 World Series baseball, and I said to him, you know, your holiness, you're Catholic, I'm Jewish, but the one miracle we can both agree on is the 2005 White Sox winning the World Series.

And he laughed. He thought he thought it was funny. It was funny. It was funny. I presented it to him. And he goes, is it for me? I was like, well, yeah. I mean, I'm not bringing it here just to show it to you.

It's not sure what would I have. You know? Someone said to me, Michael, how is it that your Jewish colleague gets to meet the Pope before. Yeah. That's definitely. I said, well, they have, look, the Pope and I have a lot in common. You do. I said, but the Pope and Ben have a very, very deep connection.

The Weissack's connection is carried by few. It's a burden carried by few. It is a true suffering experience, maybe sanctifying? I don't know. Yeah, that's pretty good. Now, okay, my final point, look, you're going to take the point. It's fine. But my final point on this is, okay, I get it.

One day you say, look, I've had enough of the rituals. I want to, I want to, you're telling me, Ben Shapiro is going to, in order to get out of the rituals, you're going to go show up to the big auditorium with the smoke machines and the electric guitars. You're going to, I'm going to see Ben Shapiro in that audience. I mean, I wasn't aware that that's all Protestantism was. It's a particular type of Protestantism, correct? If you become Episcopalian, that's just twice the liturgy, half the guilt of the Catholics. So now you're kind of right back where you were.

I mean, Episcopalian's a whole different thing. I wonder if that bishopress from the National Prayer Service would love to meet you. I don't know. I don't know. She hasn't answered my calls. Okay, you're up. I need to drink. Okay, fine.

Davy's in my ear. I have to drink. Okay, fine. The good news is when you lose you drink, so that's nice. When I went, I was already drinking what I want. Yeah, that's true. Okay. All right, it's almost.

It's five o'clock in India. How you're going to like this one. You ready? Is it more likely? that the moon landing was faked than that Brigitte Macron has a penis. Okay, come on. Who am I not offended?

Let's read the question again. Okay, is it more likely that the moon landing was faked than that Bruce Jean Macron has a penis? I don't know my answer to this. Okay. You got it, yeah. We got it, yeah.

We went to the moon. We definitely went to the moon. That's going to give me a lot of it. We went to the moon, right? Yeah. And the thing is, it's not, I, As I said on the show, I think there are, in the political fight over the gender of the First Lady of France, there are all sorts of legal and political maneuvers that could turn lawsuits out in any direction.

All sorts of things that are not necessarily relying on biology. But we live in a time when transgenderism is accepted. We live in a time when people think transgenderism. Some people think it's normal. We live in a time when people go to the doctors to get chopped up. and usually they don't really look that convincing, but whatever. So I cannot be convinced that the Soviet Union would have let us get away with lying about the moon.

That's my biggest problem with all the moon stuff. Why, if it were all fake, and it were so obviously fake that anyone in his dorm room can figure it out, why would the Soviet Union let us get away with it? I mean, that's a great question. Also questions would be like, we went back there multiple times. And then golfed, right? Also, we developed, like, actual inventions

based on things like travel to space that ended with the landing on the moon. Space, yes, but they would say, yeah, we've been to lower orbit. So here is my thing. Obviously, both of these things are on true. We did land on the moon, and Brescute Macron does not have a penis.

However. What about Carla Bruni? Because you, what about... But you are right that actually the basis of the dismissal of a case in France about this was not whether or not Brigitte Macron had a penis, it was that the court said you cannot show that there are damages from claiming that Brigitte Macron has a penis, meaning like you can't even say that's an insult in France, so no damages, therefore attend to the case. It got dismissed on that

basis. And so you're right that the widespread acceptance of the silliness means that anything is at least slightly possible. I would go even further, like yes, because you say, how are there damages? That's a good thing. If anything, you should be happy. Tolerant. Yeah, exactly. But the other thing is on actual malice, You know, you have to prove actual malice, which means either you knew you were lying, you knew it wasn't true, but you said it anyway, or you had a reckless disregard for the truth. To me, again, I'm not a lawyer, but when you're talking about the transgender issue, everyone tells us it's totally normal, it's existed forever, it's a reasonable assumption to make that someone could be transgender. And if you're asking me who has the reckless disregard for the truth here, it's the pro-transgender activist.

It's not the people of all the people in the world. Yes, that's true. But, yeah, I mean, the moon landing happened. Yes. As you know, I'm deeply annoyed by virtually all conspiracy theories. Yeah. Because they assume a level of competence that is not in evidence. Yeah, yeah.

I think it... Are there any you buy into? I mean, I sort of buy into the Justin Trudeau is Fidel Castro's kid. Do you? Yeah. I mean, like, I'm joking about that. It depends on the picture you look at. Right. Because some, he's a dead ringer.

Right, exactly. And the mom was like buddies with Castro. Yeah, and was traveling in that area at the time. Yeah. And it was kind of known for, you know, knocking boots. But, yeah, but in general, but that kind of conspiracy theory is more plausible to me because it does not actually, it involves a personal relationship, not an actual gigantic conspiracy to accomplish a thing. Right, exactly. So if you're talking about a conspiracy between two people, that's a lot more plausible to me.

Yeah. Then every single person at NASA was complicit in the shooting on a standstage and everybody in PR, everybody at the Pentagon, everybody in the White House, all the media, they were all complicit in this gigantic. Have you seen how any of these institutions work? They're filled with humans. And humans are stupid and venal and bad at things. And like, I'm just, I'm astonished that it would take more brain power to come up with the conspiracy about a moon landing than it would brainpower to actually put a man on the moon. Yeah. I noticed something.

I was totally opposed to all conspiracy theories. And then I got into some of them. I at least enjoy entertaining them. It's kind of an intellectual exercise. and they're kind of fun to go down. And then I got into them a little bit, and then I came out of them a little bit more. And the determining factor from stage two to stage three

was when I was not in politics, I thought, whatever, everything the government tells me is true. And I got a little bit into politics, I thought it's all a grand conspiracy. And then I got pretty into politics where I am spending a lot of time in the halls of power and seeing with the players. And I realized they are,

they are human beings. Yeah, it's VEP. It's not... It's not... It's definitely... It's definitely much... It's 99% VEep and then 1% people

thinking they're in housing. I think it's exactly right. I think it's exactly right. The other thing that I think... The reason I went from, like, mildly amused by it to annoyed is that I do think that a lot of these theories

are enervating and actually are driving negativity about the country. I don't think that the moon landing stuff is just like, oh, it's fun to speculate about whether there's moon landing. Who cares?

Whether there was really a moon... It was more like America was never awesome. America wouldn't have... incapable of that. Yeah. And it's kind of a rip on America, which I think sucks. Yeah. Like, America kicks ass.

We did put a man on the moon. We beat the Soviets there. We took down their entire empire. Like, we are awesome. And can you please stop trying to, and I feel like every conspiracy theory, not actual conspiracies where there's actual evidence of people in a room doing a thing. Anthony Fauci and Jay Batichari or something. There are false flag attacks.

That's real. Yes. There are actual, like, government operatives, like Fauci, who, like, conspire to cover up crimes and do they, or cover up at least incompetence, rush a gate, that does happen. Yes, and then there's evidence of it, and then we can tell there's evidence of it. But so many of the, like, real conspiracy theories are really about just kind of in the end, running down the country and also making you believe that you have no control over your own life, which is really my bug-the-boot.

Yeah, yeah. I hate that. I really hate it. Like, to me, the fundamental basis of Judaism and Christianity is if your life is screwed up, there's like a 95% shot that it was probably you. Yes. It's not 100%. It's not 100%.

Terrible things happen to people. People have health problems. You know, a brick falls from the sky. Like, things happen. But most people's problems, most of the time, are at least partially caused by them. On a long enough time scale. Yes. And this is a very biblical principle. Right?

The Old Testament, which I'm much more familiar with it than the news, the Old Testament is very big on the idea that, like, you screwed up and then you got walloped. Yeah. It's not like the gods were randomly fighting in the sky and then you just kind of like got knocked over. Like this is, you violated the rules and then you got walloped. And so that's, that's in one sense scary, but on the other hand, it's actually quite empowering because it means that many things in your life are in your control. You see this in the New Testament though, when, you know, the parable of the man is in hell.

And he says, oh, no, I want to go back and warn my loved ones, you know, that you can go to hell and everything. And he says, no, why? You had all the prophets. You had all the, I told you so many times. Like you, you think one more, no, no, no, but me, one more time I'm going to go try to, that's not going to do it, man, you know. And this is the thing about these people in their basements doing the conspiracy? Is your life better because you're doing this? Like, really, this is the thing?

Is your life better because you're sitting in a basement theorizing about a shadowy cabal who's running your life? It would be if they could uncover, if the premise were true, if they could uncover the truth, if they could act upon the truth. Then in principle, then in principle would be. But does that happen? Right. It's never... Do any of those things happen? No. No. No. They don't.

Your turn, I think. I'm up. This question will follow a short video prompt. Speaking of speaking. Wow. Wow, this is good writing. Because they knew that we'd be talking about that. Yes.

Now that you've seen more evidence. Wow, man, this is good writing. I never complimented it. Wow. Now that you've seen more evidence, are you at least skeptical that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself? Oh my God. You just have the evidence. Can we play it again?

Can we play it again? Wow. Okay. Are you now? I thought Mr. Facts don't care about your feelings. I know. You're asking me not to believe my life. Okay. Ready?

Yeah. You are wrongly going to say no. No, you said yes. Ah, man. Yes. Because it was, because it was, because it was, because. it's a logical conundrum. I don't believe... That's a terrible piece of evidence,

but I've also set up a paradigm where if I see additional evidence of a thing, I have to then change my opinion. So, you know, I think the premise of your question is that we're going to pretend that's actual evidence and not AI of Hillary Clinton. It's better than the video they released, that's for sure.

By the way, I mean, that would take some, like, serious strength on her part, right? Like, does Hillary have that sort of, you know, grip strength that she could really, like, go after Jeffrey Epstein that way? Maybe. The adrenachrome. That's what does.

Yeah, exactly. Did I pronounce that correctly? The CBS report. Did you see the CBS report on Epstein? Which one? The one that came out like a week or two ago, and it kind of just goes down the list of, okay, we've examined this video evidence,

and yet it's not raw footage, the metadata show, it's a screen grab. Also, there's like a cursor in the footage, and it's missing a minute, but it might actually be closer to three minutes. And it goes through even beyond the video. But within the video is important because it shows actually there was another person

kind of on camera who they said was carrying linen, but it's probably in an orange jumpsuit. And actually, you can't see the entrance to Jeffrey Epstein-Sallin. Actually, you can't and actually, actually, actually, actually. Then it goes through all of the confusions. I don't want to say contradictions, but contradictions in the government's reporting on this. I'm not saying he didn't kill himself necessarily. I'm not saying he, you know, is the greatest super spy that's ever lived in the whole history of the world.

There is no way we're getting the straight story. Don't you think? I mean, it depends on how you're defining the straight story. Why would they say they're releasing the raw video? Say the devices reset at midnight, like it's 1993. Now, certain government agencies do this. Because they literally, until we, they literally were storing all government documents in a cave. Right, right.

No, I get government agencies sometimes are like that. But according to CBS at least, so, great. Yeah, yeah. They said, high government source in Intel says that's not what's going on. The FBI has the full footage without the skip, without the frame, sat with that. Come on. It's like, come on, man. One or two anomalies, I say, whatever, that's the government. It's like, you know, a dozen anomalies. Okay. So again, I said this to Megan Kelly and she got pissed at me, but the reality is that I'm talking to people whose names

people would know in the government, who looked at all this stuff. So you have to now posit that they are in on it, that they aren't involved in the cover up. And knowing the people that I'm talking about, I do not believe that they are in on the cover up. I don't think President Trump is in on a gigantic cover. I certainly think that the most extreme version of this case, which is that Jeffrey Epstein was a Assad agent who's running child sex trafficking on behalf of Israel. With compromise on Trump. With compromise on Trump, and then Trump is covering it up. Like, I think, first of all, if people are actually articulating that theory, they should have the balls to just say it out loud and see how President Trump takes it from them. I notice they like

to kind of flirt around the edges of it, but they won't actually say the thing. But, you know, Dershowitz said that he thinks that Epstein killed himself, but that he was probably aided in the killing of himself. That I find plausible. Right? Because he did have somebody was removed from his cell. He had a cellmate. The cellmate was gone. He went out, he apparently, according to the CBS report, he went out, he made a phone call, an unsupervised phone call, like hours before he died. I mean, I could certainly see a world where Epstein was bribing guards. And you can see why he would kill himself. He was about to spend the rest of his life in prison for raping children, which, as it turns out, is a really, really bad way to spend the rest of your life? So, could there be, again, if there were, is every question I have answered? No. I have to make a judgment now as to who I think is lying.

Yeah. And I haven't seen the evidence to suggest that the people I'm talking about are lying. And if they are lying, I want to know why they're lying and what your theory of the case is as to why they're lying. Okay. My, because my view, as is as often the case, is probably the least popular view, but it's certainly correct. Which is, I don't think the government's being forthright. I think the government has contradicted itself many times on this. I think even just looking at the video, the video, the, the,

video was told on itself in a way, you know, just the reset and the time and the framing and everything. The interpretation of what the video showed, whatever. But because I'm not a libertarian and because I'm not like one of these, you know, I'm, I think politics is a complicated, nuanced system of alliances and longstanding operations that go on for many presidential administrations. The Epstein thing long predates Trump. And we know, we've known now since 2018, though, Radar Online reported it as breaking news like three days ago, that the FBI had a deal with Epstein, at least by 2007, at least by the time of his sweetheart deal that he got in Florida, that had been reported by Daily Beast through Alex Acosta reportedly when he was up for

and his secretary. And they say it was foyer now, but this was reported in 2018, that the FBI was getting information. We have memos from the FBI. he was getting information from Epstein. Well, as part of his plea deal, which, again, is incredibly common. Yes. So, yes. There's, by the way, I should mention here that what the document says is that as part of the plea deal, which means that it was supposed to close the case, essentially, he was going to provide

information. But that does not mean in an ongoing relationship. That's true. It could have been, like, for that case. I just want to be clear about the legal. I mean, that is the legal of it. Now, maybe he was, but there's been no evidence of that. And, again, I think that.

But if the government, look, if the FBI wasn't totally, the FBI wasn't totally, forthright about its relationship with Epstein, even around the plea deal. But I guess my argument is governments don't have to be. Governments are not meant to be radically transparent. Governments do sometimes cover up intel they're getting from people. They do cover up certain clandestine operations. They do, I think what the American people want on the Epstein thing is they want to know that justice is being done in some way. So I think that's true for some. I think what some people really, really want is for there to be a giant ring of pedophile with people who control the world.

Yes. And anything short of that is going to be insufficient to quell the uprest. Right. Yeah, no, that's true. It's like... Like if a bunch of these people who are pushing this got what you said, which is, okay, you know, here are the names of three low-level randos who Jeffrey Epstein traffic girls do. And that's it, and we're prosecuting them. Right? They would not be satisfied. No one would be satisfied. Certainly. Because what they actually want is for there to be this thing that happened. But I... Because it's a nice thing to believe.

Again, it goes back to the whole, like, there's a secret cabal running your life. Again, if you provide me evidence that the secret cabal is running, then you're now in the position of having to argue that Donald Trump and Cash Patel, and Dan Bojino and Pam Bondi

are all involved in the secret cabal or covering up for the secret cabal. And the people who, again, are opposing the strongest version of this theory do not have the balls to just say it out loud. They're constantly playing around the edges. Yeah, it's funny.

This is where, as more of a traditionalist, I just say, like, if they're not releasing everything for whatever reason. I think I elect them for their judgment. You and I are making kind of similar arguments here, meaning like, I don't know. I don't know what's on the files. You don't know what's in the files. But you know who knows who's in the files? Cash, Dan, Pam, presumably Trump, presumably JD. Yeah. Like, they're all meeting on it this week. So yeah. Yeah, that's true. They're all meeting on it a couple weeks ago. Yeah, yeah, it is. But I'm still

pretty firmly, team, nothing ever happens. The number of things that happen in history that like happen, happen, happen, that like happen, it's like four. I agree. Maybe five. I agree. Okay, I think I'm reading you a question. Yes. Here you go.

We have a message from Lizzo. My jeans. Oh, come on. Are stolen. Hmm. Wow. Okay. Wow.

Was the Sidney's version better? You have to get my answer. Yeah. Did I enjoy it? I don't know. I got to enjoy it. I don't know. It's both body shaming and racist, wasn't it?

Yeah. Yeah, I can, look, I could make a little joke or something, but... Let's be clear. The Sydney-Sweeney-Gines ad, I said the whole time, two cheers for Sydney-Sweeney-Gines. Because it's not... I don't think, like, women bearing a lot of their bodies and, like, inciting lusts is, like, the...

I don't think it's, like, the best thing. The best thing. Yeah. But a return from whatever we're at, androgynous, creepy 2020s to 90s, moderate liberalism is an improvement. And she's very beautiful and she's normal. This is a very good take.

So I said this on the show that I'm old enough to remember when conservatives went nuts over Paris Hilton grinding on a car for Carl's Jr. commercial in like 2005. That was like a big thing on the right. I remember. And we were all like, what is this? She's only famous for doing pornography. And here she is grinding on a car.

to sell burgers. Like, what the hell? Like, this is gross. And so I'm still from that school, which is it is not good for what, but, but we live in a time in which they have gone so far crazy that it is now right-wing-coded for a beautiful woman to be on your TV in a sexy way. Yeah. And so, like, as a, I've said this before about politics is one of the very weird things about politics, is that it's sort of like that optical illusion where you take a color and you put it against blue, and then you put it against yellow. And it looks like two separate colors, but it's the same color. Yes.

Right? So if I go on Bill Maher show and I say a thing, I look like a rabid right-winger, but if I go on a show with you, then I look like a moderate. Right? Like this, like, it's the exact same thing, word for word. So I feel like that about this particular jeans ad. You put this jeans ad on TV in 2005, and we're all like, man, the kind of pornification of American society just continues apace.

It's not great. And then you put it next to, by the way, men are women. And this could have been Dylan Maldaney. Yes. And it would have been. It would have been if it were Jaguar. Three years ago, it would have been. That Jaguar ad was crazy.

100%. Yes, I mean, I had this thought which is my reaction to the Sydney Sweeney ad is, that's a good ad. I'm fairly disciplined. But if I looked at the ad too long, my reaction might be, oh, that's a nice ad, you know, I'll watch it again. But my reaction to the creepy, androgynous weirdo sex ad is actually nausea. Yeah. It's actually a...

In one, it's appealing to the prurrian interest in a way that is natural. Yes. Okay. In the other, it's appealing to the prurian interest in a way that is entirely contrary to nature and everything we know about reality. I guess the former is better. Right, exactly. Right?

I'm with you. Okay. I'm up. But you know what's going to happen before I read this question, Ben? I'm going to tell you that the yes or no game has sparked more honest conversation. It's sparked a few heated debates. It's done more for public discourse. and private discourse in America than just about any other card game.

And now the Daily Wire's best-selling party game is getting bigger. Judge the stances of your friends, family, and colleagues on the most unifying topics in American life with the politics, philosophy, and religion expansion pack. Which one? Where is it? There we go. Look at that beautiful pack. Over 110 bold new cards only available dailywire.com slash shop. You will tackle questions like, do dogs go to head?

heaven? They don't. Should TikTok be banned? Is gender ideology more dangerous than Islam? Hmm. I actually don't have a quick answer to that. It's a perfect game for anyone who loves spicy conversations and unapologetic truth. Go to dailywire.com slash shop. Dailywire.com slash shop, S-H-O-P. Yes or no? Because the family game night wasn't heeded enough. Ben, do you know what time it is? I don't. It's time for the rapid fire round. Slow fire. It was the slower fire round. I have to say on the dogs going to heaven thing, that is an unanswerable question once you have kids. We have a dog and I have four kids, 11, 9, 5, and 2. And I was asked this question. Yes. And you know the answer. Of course I know the answer. And so you are left with two possible

answers to a child. One is to lie and the other is to also lie. It is to either say, yes, the dog goes to heaven, or two, the dog never dies. Right? It goes to us. All right. I actually felt the second was less blasphemous. Yeah. I went with, don't worry, we'll come up with medicines and the dog will be 150 years old. Wow. You didn't even do like, well, maybe the dog, we'll send the dog to a farm. No, I didn't. In an hash box. Yeah, you're not going to send a glue factory. No, I guess that's horses. I mean, my son did say this the other day. He, for some reason, was just in a dark mood. He turns to me, it's like, I'm very sad the dog's going to die.

And I was like, yeah, the dog's really young. And the dog's, like, two and a half years old, probably lived to be 15 or whatever. That's the most Shapiro. Like, you're a Shapiro kid. You're just like, well, in 11 years, this is what's going to happen. Yes. I need to prepare. And he's still, like, listen, you know, we can talk about this, but let's be real.

Like, in a billion years, the sun is going to explode and eat the earth. So, like, you know, we just put off this conversation. for another day. You think, you'll have to say, the dog's going to die? Wait till you hear what's going to happen us someday. Exactly. He won't be dead by then. He asked me about that one time.

He's like, is it true? The son's going to eat there? They'll be, yeah, we'll all be dead by then. Who cares? Yeah, we'll all be. Whatever. I know. I know.

I was just talking about this with Elisa last night. She was like, how do we tell the kids about death? They're reading fairy tales, and they're talking about so-and-so died, so-and-so-al-and-so-al died. And they're starting to wonder about death. It's like, what do we tell them? Yeah. We're going to tell them brutal realities, which includes some hope, but it's going to be... By the way, I mean, death kind of naturally comes up in a biblical worldview pretty much all the time.

Yeah. I mean, like, it's within the first few chapters of the Bible. Like, you're there. I was, we were in it, we were walking around a church in Italy, and so it's like, you know, the chore guide said there's the skull over there of saint, I don't remember what's saint. And, but, you know, it's very controversial. The veneration of relics, it's not controversial to me. It's very controversial. I don't know if you want to see the... And then my two-year-old, just like, I want to see the skull. Show me to skull.

There you go, buddy. My son, we went to, we were in Italy, we went to one of these, it was actually Maltaxon. We went to one of these catacombs. And they had unburied some of the... There's like a skull and some bones there. And my son was like, I can't believe that...

And so later he turns to me and said, you know, dad, I never thought that I was actually going to see that face to head. Mom, can you tell me a story? Sure. Once upon a time, a mom needed a new car. Was she brave? She was tired, mostly. But she went to Carvana.com and found a great car at a great price.

No secret treasure map required. Did you have to find a dragon? Nope, she bought it 100% online, from her bed, actually. Was it scary? Honey, it was as unscary as car buying could be. Did the car have a sunroof? It did, actually. Okay, good story.

Car buying you'll want to tell stories about. Buy your car today on... Carvana. Delivery fees mail. fly. I was looking right at it. Face to face. It was very funny.

Now, Ben, do you know how to play this round? I don't. I don't either, but they put it in my teleprompter. Three rounds, 30 seconds, no time to outthink each other. That's, that's short-hand for shut up. Yeah, okay. You're up. No, I'm up.

I'm up. Okay. Ready? Rapid fire. Even though they're crafted in the likeness of pagan idols are lab-lobuboes. Labubus? Labubus. Or lababus, like a succubus, incubus. Are lababos totally fine?

You're going to say yes, you're sicko. Oh, no, you said no. I thought you had one on your set. I mean, my producers put it there, but I don't prove what my... It's like my children. I don't approve what they do. Yeah, no, that's fair. Yeah, nothing named after and looking like a demon gets to go on set.

That's crazy. Do you believe the remains of giants can be found? You're going to say no. Yeah, because, again, it gets into definitions. So, you're talking about, like, a giant back in biblical days, which means, like, some of the people around the office are, like, five foot eight. Yeah, exactly.

Given the overwhelming scientific evidence for the miraculous image on the Shrout of Turin, have you been shroud-pilled? I know the answer, but there's a good episode, if you're a doubter of a show called Michael And that you can watch about this. Are you shroud-pilled? You are, for now, so far, going to say no. Correct.

I'll watch your episode. Okay, the episode is good. And, this is weird, it's with a Protestant. I thought the Catholics were the shroud people. Whoa, don't you automatically go to hell? Do you? For bringing Protestants? Johnston, he was amazing.

And actually, another guy came in with the Sudarium of Aviedo. It's very good. And I was actually very glad because I said to Davies. I said, I thought only Catholic. Catholics believed in the shroud. He was what you're talking about? I believe in the shroud in my whole life. And anyway, you should watch it.

You should watch it. I know nothing about the Troutonauton, so I'll definitely watch it. Watch it, and then we'll see. Okay. And then do you go to the auditorium with a smoke-filled thing? And then we get to that second question. Okay, here we go. Per words written, are your books more successful than mine?

What? Okay, hold on. By word. Yeah. Now, the thing is, if it had been copies sold. Right, total. Then you've written a hundred. thousand books.

Yeah, yeah, for sure. Okay. All right, I'll take that. But you contributed to that book. You'll never get a word. I'll never get a word. It was the most important word. That was the key.

The first word you said. And then I got you an agent for that book. And you got a second advance on that book. Well, for the rights. Yeah, for the rights. Too a blank book. Yeah, of course. Unbelievable.

Does standing and sitting methodically during mass count as physical exercise for you? Yeah, it does. Well, he forgot kneeling because he's a Protestant. I don't know about that. But it does also. Because because I got my kids jumping on me the whole time. So that's like actually, that's like all the little muscles in there. All right.

Are you surprised you've lasted as long as you have at this company? Are you surprised? I'll give a... You got it wrong. Give me those points. It's not a lack of self-confidence. I'm not surprised that I have lasted in any organization. I could have at least been, you know, the pizza boy or something.

I didn't, when the company, when the company, was starting up. It's not that I just, these things don't last. These things don't last. I mean like, the company itself, yeah, yeah. That's fair. And I thought, and so I was like, oh, whatever, that'd be a fun thing to help out on for like six months or a year, whatever. That was like, at this point, 47 years ago. Yeah, exactly. How long have we been doing this? Ten years in real time, but like the planet's an interstellar. It's actually like 70 years in politics. Yes, yes. Yeah. That, it's amazing. Okay. Now, Ben, it's time for the final round. It's faster.

Oh, it's faster. The prompt will be read. We will both lock in our answers, then move our glasses to yes or no to see if we can read each other's minds. This round is worth double points. It could change everything. The score right now, Ben, this is unfortunate. I actually didn't think it was this bad.

It's one to three. Oh, wow. Okay. You're winning. Okay, so the way you do it, I'm going to put my glass here. This, hold. I'm going to move these cards. because all the books and all the merch that were hawking, shamelessly, is taken up.

Okay. So I read the prompt. Then we each lock in how we would answer for ourselves. Then we move the other guy's glass. Okay. To how we think the other guy would answer. Okay. If it were allowed by the Constitution, would you support a third Trump presidency?

In principle or in practice? I'm overcomplicating it. If it were allowed by the Constitution, would you support a third? not been that amendment. If there... Would you be in favor of him running again? Okay. It's my own answer here.

Okay. Okay. Correct. Wrong. Wrong. I mean, good answer. But okay, so why? Why, yes?

So I actually think that, shockingly, Donald Trump is now the most rational person, maybe in American politics. Like, truthfully. Like, I actually think that, as you know, I'm a pessimist by nature. Yes. I think that we're at the end of something.

Yeah. And I think that Trump is holding back a flood tide of bad stuff. Oh, interesting. Right. I think that Trump is a populist by appeal, but a pragmatist by nature. Yeah. And so he's not ideologically a populist in the sense that he's just going to continue running that car directly into the direction if the populism doesn't work. Yeah, yeah. I could see a world where you get somebody very ideological after Trump on the right, either in a very populist direction, which I would oppose, or in a very anti-populist direction, which would, you know, provide some political problems. Trump is a shockingly pragmatic figure.

Yes. Who's able to unite many, many things. in what he is doing. And I don't agree with everything he's doing. I've opposed his tariff wars, for example. I don't think they're a good idea. I've criticized some of the way, like firing the BLS head. Like I think there's stuff he does

that I don't particularly love. But what I've said about him is that he's heterodox but responsive. And so he will do a thing that he'll break a long established precedent. And at least half the time, that's very good. At least half the time, that's really good. He's done this on foreign policy a lot,

and I've loved it. He's done it some on domestic policy and I've really loved it as well. Going after DEI, for example, which was like an untouchable thing. Yeah, yeah. Breaking the trans momentum, like all that. And so the question of a third term or not for him is because I don't know who picks up the mantle of sort of pragmatism in a popular way after Trump on the right. And I think what comes after him on the left is going to be egregiously awful.

You know, I came to the same answer. I have totally different reasoning. My reasoning is more in principle. I know this is unpopular in some quarters. I'm with Ronald Reagan. I hate the 22nd Amendment. I'm anti-term limits as well, actually. Yes, I think we have a term limit. It's called the ballot box. Yes, I agree.

And I think the way the government is set up, fairly consciously actually by our framers, is to be a mixed regime where you have a monarchical element, an aristocratic element, a democratic element that kind of balances your other route. And FDR took that, obviously, to an extreme. That's how you get the 22nd Amendment. but I, so I like the idea of more continuity of the executive kind of flexing itself, so we're not just governed by judges or whatever. And I think Trump has done a very, very good job. I'm a little more hopeful about the future of the Republican Party.

Well, you're friendly or sort of the populist kind of sentiment than I am. Without question. And I do see an uptick in traditionalism, in a good kind of, populism is kind of a term of injury, but I think it's some good versions of it's more a tactic than a philosophy, to be fair. Yes. And so, And I think there are a lot of people in the administration who are great. Obviously, probably the heir apparent is the vice president. I'd be thrilled with that. Rubio is getting a lot of play right now as Secretary of State, and he has like 100 other jobs.

But I think even there are other people who could run for president in the admin, in Congress. So it could go wrong, but I think there's good stuff. But I was waiting when Trump was reelected for a full Charles the second moment. He shows up to Capitol Hill in the joint session. Gentlemen, go home! You are not needed here. We will govern ourselves. But we still have that 22nd Amendment.

That's life. Okay, you're up. Morally speaking, is AI-generated porn worse than real porn? Hmm. Hmm. Okay. This is not, I don't have a confident answer on this. You're going to say no, and I'll barely say no. I'll barely say.

Yeah, yeah. Why? Because AI-generated porn involves the sinfulness and evil of the person who is typing in the prompt, but does not involve a second party who is prostituting herself. And real porn involves multiple parties being horrific in a myriad of ways that empty sex of its meaning, content, joy. Yeah. And, yeah. So, I mean, it's AI, first of all, I assume AI-generated porn will mostly be just men. using Grock imagine to, you know, fulfill their most perverse fantasies. Exactly. They're most perverse. That's the key. So I think that you're thinking there's a limiting principle here for the ladies on only fans, and I think you are wrong. So I think that if you pay

with ladies on only fans enough, they will do whatever is the most perverse thing. But they're at least limited by reality. Realty. Constraints of reality. Are you not being raped by an alien? Yeah, no, this is the issue for me is it, I might even change my answer. There are these medieval arguments, which I'm sure you've seen, which that, you know, like, masturbation is worse than rape or something, or that sodomy is worse than rape or something. And people are so shocked by that because they say, well, one's consensual, one's not consensual. The reasoning behind those arguments is that they're both terrible, but one is contrary to nature, whereas one is not contrary to nature. And so, whatever,

that's an argument for another time, leave it to the scholastics. But you can see this play out in the AI thing. What are people going to use AI porn for that they can't get on OnlyFans or any of these other things. They're going to go undress their classmates. You see there's reports about this all the time. They're going to go make porn of people they know. They're going to create porn of things that cannot exist in reality that are so going to melt their brains. There was an article just the other day in Wired magazine, a guy who got addicted to AI porn, and it was creating these creatures that are barely recognizable human. And so you say, well, is that more evil to so contradict reality, even if it doesn't involve immediately harming another person.

I mean, this is a good argument. I like this argument. I think that's a good argument. I think that you can make the case that, what was the wording of the question? It's always poor. Is it worse? Is it worse? I mean, if we wanted to really quibble, you could make the case that in the immediate ramifications, real porn is worse.

In the societal ramifications, AI porn is worse. You could make that argument. Yes. Although I do think that removing the incentive structure whereby women get naked for money, which is what I'm going to be a good thing. A lot of these young women who right now think that their pathway to fame and fortune is by essentially being online prostitutes. The business goes away and steals their jobs. And the crazy thing about it.

And maybe the thing they can actually offer to people in real life would be like marriage. Like actual real physical, sexual activity with another human being involved in a deeper relationship. Like all the best parts of what you are saying. simulating on OnlyFans, you can do that in a way that will be edifying and lead you to happiness and flourishing. Yeah, maybe. What is such sex as something? I don't know, it's awful, that's terrible. Yeah, it is, the other, just one last point on the Onlyfans thing, they, they do it because they think they're going to make millions of dollars.

And because like one of them ever made millions of dollars, it's like every Faustian bargain, you trade something valuable for something that's not that valuable and you don't even get the thing that's not that valuable. That's the craziest part. I mean, even the ones who make a lot of money have destroyed themselves. Yes. They usually lose the money, too. I mean, that too. But they destroy, yeah, it's like there is no amount. There's no life behind Bonnie Blue's eyes.

Yeah, that lady is dead inside. It's horrific. And you can see it. It's like, it's kind of horrifying. Do not turn yourself into a human lub-lub-lis. What is that thing called? Labubu. Leboobobo.

Don't do it, don't turn yourself into a little. I love that you turn it into a Latin term. Lubbubus. Lubbubus, Lubbubi. Bhabi, la babo. Yes. Final score, that's a whole... Are you kidding me?

Seven to one? I got wrecked. I got wrecked. That might be the... Is that the worst one ever? No, at least I ain't go negative. I didn't go into the negative numbers. Right now, you need to go pre-order.

Mr. Benchaproo's new book, Lions and Scavengers. The True Story of America. See you next time on Yes or No.