The NPR Politics Podcast - Debt Dilemma, Debate Deepen
Episode Date: May 22, 2023After cutting short his trip to Asia, President Biden returned to Washington to meet with Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to try and hash out terms over increasing the country's debt li...mit. Where are they finding common ground, and what still needs to be resolved?This episode: political correspondent Susan Davis, reporter Barbara Sprunt, and national political correspondent Mara Liasson.The podcast is produced by Elena Moore and Casey Morell. Our editor is Eric McDaniel. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi. Unlock access to this and other bonus content by supporting The NPR Politics Podcast+. Sign up via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Connect:Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.orgJoin the NPR Politics Podcast Facebook Group.Subscribe to the NPR Politics Newsletter.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, this is Melanie in Big Sur, California, where I'm with a team from the Oregon Zoo
watching some of the once nearly extinct California condors we raised soar above us.
This podcast was recorded at 1143 a.m. on Monday, May 22nd.
Things may have changed by the time you hear this,
but we'll still be in awe of this magnificent bird returning to our skies.
Okay, here's the show. Nice.
A wonderful achievement in a very beautiful place. That's very nice.
Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
I'm Barbara Sprint. I cover Congress. And I'm Mara Liason, national political correspondent.
And high-stakes negotiations over raising the nation's debt limit continue this week.
The U.S. government is getting closer to that X date, the day where the country doesn't have enough money to pay its bills and could default on its debt.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says that will happen sometime in early June. Speaker Kevin McCarthy and President Biden
remain pretty far apart in negotiating a deal to avoid that default. So, Barbara, a lot of on again,
off again developments over the weekend. Catch us up from what happened between Friday to this
morning. Yes. And as I think about this, I'm like, OK, so today is Monday. So, yes, lots of starts
and stop on the negotiating front. Remember,
Speaker McCarthy and President Biden, along with other top congressional leaders,
have now met twice on this, you know, at the White House. And they're separately having
McCarthy's designated negotiators and some of President Biden's staff do like the main duking
it out in terms of negotiating talks before the
principals get together again, which McCarthy and Biden will do today. There was a series of
kind of toggling back and forth between everyone saying we're feeling very optimistic. Yes,
it's early. You know, it's still early in negotiations and there's still a bit of
distance, but we feel optimistic. We're not going to default. And then you toggle
that back and forth between a lot of statements from Biden and also from some of the GOP negotiators
that said there's so much daylight between us, like we're in a bad situation. And at some point,
they walked away from the negotiation. So it's been interesting and long, 72 hours.
And the president and the speaker are set to meet again today.
Yeah, so they had a conversation on the phone as Biden was traveling back from Japan where he was for the G7 yesterday.
And McCarthy told us yesterday on the Hill that it was a productive call, that the two leaders decided that they would meet again on Monday.
McCarthy said something twice in his
remarks to us. He said, you know, he said he would meet in the morning, but, you know, he should
probably sleep and rest after his trip and then we can meet. And I thought it was interesting
because like, that's true. And everyone would want to do that and rest after, you know, a
trans-Pacific flight. But it did kind of have, to me, it felt a little bit like just
enough of a dig. Like, let's let him sleep. It does speak to the tone of the negotiations, too.
So, Barbara, I've covered a handful of these debt ceiling negotiations in my time. And
there's a part of me that if you squint, you can sort of see the outlines of a deal. They're
talking in the orbit of setting the
discretionary spending limits for the government. There's things like clawing back money,
unspent COVID funds that could be part of a deal. Talk of permitting reform that's pretty popular
with some element of both parties that would make it easier for new oil and gas projects.
There's the contours here. What are the sticking points? What is this daylight they're referring to that they just can't come to terms on?
Well, the big sticking point is spending.
You know, McCarthy for months has pledged that like any bill that will pass, which and we should say the House did pass a bill, a partisan bill that would raise the debt ceiling.
But he wants anything that raises the debt ceiling to be done in tandem with spending cuts. It's all about spending cuts. Garrett Graves,
a Republican congressman from Louisiana who's like McCarthy's top guy on the negotiating staff,
he told us yesterday when we were staking out his office, if we don't adjust spending,
which is McCarthy's biggest red line, what is even the point? But you know, Mara, President Biden has for months refused to engage in any kind of negotiations. The
line from the White House was, you know, raise the debt limit, and then we'll talk about spending,
then we'll talk about these other priorities. I'm not going to link them. But now they're linked,
and he is negotiating with the Speaker now. And did the President potentially misstep here?
I mean, now we're back at this deadline.
Everything's on the table, and it doesn't look like a deal is close at hand.
Well, I think the President miscalculated on a bunch of things.
He keeps on thinking that the world is like it used to be, but Republicans in the House aren't like they used to be.
There always was a face-saving off-ramp for these debt-ceiling
standoffs. But this time, there are a lot of Republicans, more than in any other debt-ceiling
standoff I can remember, who are talking about default as maybe it's worth it. Maybe it won't
be so bad. You know, Donald Trump said Congress should let the country default. So I think the
White House wasn't expecting that. They weren't expecting McCarthy, who came into office as a
very weak speaker, they weren't expecting him to hold together his conference as well as he has.
Also, they were surprised at the absence of corporate America and Wall Street. Where's
the pressure from outside, from the business community coming on both sides, but particularly
Republicans, because they're their constituents, to make a deal. So I think on all those things, he miscalculated.
But in terms of the president's disadvantage here, he even talked about it in Japan.
He said that he believes that Republicans think that it's politically advantageous for them
to engineer a default because it would hurt the president because, as he says,
a president is responsible for everything.
Biden would take the blame, and that's one way to make sure Biden's not elected. So, you know,
he comes into this with some weaknesses in his negotiating position.
And Barbara, what about the speaker? I mean, the president did cut short this long-planned
foreign trip to deal with the debt limit. They have brought him to the table to engage in these
negotiations. Do you have a sense that the speaker feels like he can negotiate a deal that can win the support of his
conference? There's two things here that I think are important. One on the front of, you know,
to the part of your question about winning support from that part of his conference. I think that
it's entirely possible that he strikes a deal with the Biden administration that is a compromise deal that will not make House Freedom Caucus members happy.
They're very hard to keep happy.
They're hard to keep happy. And also, you know, I think this is a little bit about the dance of a negotiation.
And I think, you know, similarly, like we shouldn't just focus on the House Freedom Caucus members. I've talked to a lot of House progressives who have said that they're concerned that Biden may give away parts
in this negotiation that they're going to be uncomfortable with and that they will not support.
So you could definitely see a path forward where there's a compromise package that makes everyone
angry. to go. And I think it's important to remember that, you know, for months we heard a refrain
from the White House and from top congressional Democratic leaders, like, show us your plan,
House Republicans. Like, you say you want to raise the debt ceiling in tandem with spending cuts.
Well, where's your plan? And I think that they thought that he might not be able to pass a plan
in his conference. And lo and behold, that's exactly what happened. He united the conference, they passed a bill, and now he will tell you every
day, as he's been telling us for days, we're the only ones who've done that.
Does he have a strategy? I mean, one of the things that's been interesting to me is that the fact
that the Republicans keep on upping their asks instead of trying to come to some kind of a compromise. In other words, did they really
think that in divided government with a Democratic White House and a Democratic Senate that they can
insist on everything they passed in that bill and more?
Well, it's interesting because I think that if you were to a month ago look at where we are right
now, you would say, I can't believe it
would have gotten to that place. I mean, he's been able to push the envelope here a bit further than
I think a lot of members thought he'd be able to, much to the delight of, you know, his conference.
You know, in terms of the tea leaves of what happens next, I mean, it's hard to know. But
I think we're just in that sweet spot where the clock is really ticking. It's very much
crunch time. And it's not an understatement to say there's anxiety here on Capitol Hill about
getting a deal done. But it's not the night before. It's not 72 hours before. I think it's
going to be really critical to see how the talks go between the speaker and the president.
All right, let's take a quick break. And we'll talk more about this when we get back. And we're back. And Barbara, we were just discussing the
speaker's role in this. And while of course, this debt ceiling negotiation has a lot at stake for
the country, a default could have any number of economic consequences. There's also a lot at
stake here for the speaker as well. I mean, you were saying that at this moment in time, he feels confident.
He's been able to unite the conference.
But this needs to go well for the speaker.
I mean, I will say one thing that stood out to me yesterday when he was talking to us was he said something like he alluded to his own battle for the speakership earlier this year,
which we all remember, the 15 rounds of
voting, and it was just day after day, lots of questions about his ability to lead the conference,
the support that he would have. And he leaned into that yesterday in a comment to us where he said,
you remember that I didn't back down and look where I am now. And, you know, kind of don't
underestimate me on this. I think he's aware this does have to go well for him. This is a big test for his speakership. But he to support a discharge petition, something like that, does he come out actually a weaker speaker?
For him to come out strong, he has to come out with something that most Republicans will vote for, right?
And that looks like a win for the party, right?
Yes, it has to look like a win. And it's hard to see what that is right now. Mara, one of the things that's fascinating to me
about this round of debt ceiling talks is in other high stakes negotiations, probably most notably
back in the Obama administration, what was at stake was so much higher. You know, at the time,
it was talking about tax levels that would affect basically almost every American household.
I mean, people had a direct connection to what was happening in Washington.
And this round, it just seems like the pot of issues on the table seems relatively low stakes.
And people don't care.
Voters do not care about the debt ceiling.
The programs that Republicans want to cut or add work requirements to affect low-income people only, and they've walled off Social Security, Medicare, and defense.
The country might go into default over an argument over permitting reform and spending caps.
Really?
Yeah.
I mean, Barbara, you are also talking about there's the Freedom Caucus component.
There's the progressive component.
Let's talk about the middle where these deals tend to be struck. I mean, what is stopping a coalition of moderate Republicans who are in competitive races who don't want to default from jumping ship from saying, you know, we'll vote with Democrats to raise the debt limit if it comes to play? Or are they leveraging their power in any way in these negotiations? I think that for those folks in
the middle, more moderate Republicans, I think that they're kind of biding their time a little
bit to see how these what are supposed to be these final negotiations between the president
and the speaker go before they sort of show their hand. But it wouldn't surprise me. I mean,
a debt default, even though, as you said, it's not particularly like a barn burner of an issue for voters, it does have very real consequences. I mean, you can debate exactly how much they'll be felt immediately because the U.S. has never defaulted on its debt before. But economists widely agree, you know, there could be a recession. It's going to be harder to borrow money. People will feel this in some way. For
folks who have competitive races next year, they don't want to be tied to something that could have
long-ranging implications into 2024. I think that it's worth believing the president and the
speaker when they say they don't want to default. But if the country does cross that red line and
we do go into that scenario, we just don't know who's going to get blamed for it. I mean,
there's no playbook for those politics. There's no past lessons for how that gets played out.
That's right. And also, you know, it's what, May 2023? A default would happen sometime in June
2023. That's a long time. That's a lifetime between now and when voters go to the polls
next fall. And there's a ton of stuff that could happen, you know, in the cascading ripple effects, you know, of a default that like we cannot predict.
So it is kind of difficult to sort of chart out the blame game that will happen, you know, over a year from now.
All right. Well, if the weekend was any indication, Barbara, you have a very busy week ahead.
So looking forward to it.
Thank you for this.
I'm Susan Davis.
I cover politics.
I'm Barbara Sprint.
I cover Congress.
And I'm Mara Liason, national political correspondent.
And thanks for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.