The NPR Politics Podcast - Fight Over Trump's Confidential Docs Remains Ugly And Tedious
Episode Date: September 12, 2022Donald Trump's legal team and the Justice Department disagree over who should review the documents, what that review should entail and who should foot the bill. The saga is far from over.This episode:... political correspondent Susan Davis, political reporter Deepa Shivaram, and national political correspondent Mara Liasson.Learn more about upcoming live shows of The NPR Politics Podcast at nprpresents.org.Support the show and unlock sponsor-free listening with a subscription to The NPR Politics Podcast Plus. Learn more at plus.npr.org/politics Connect:Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.orgJoin the NPR Politics Podcast Facebook Group.Subscribe to the NPR Politics Newsletter.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey there, it's Ashley Lopez from the NPR Politics Podcast.
You might have heard we're going back on the road, and Houston will be heading your way
very soon.
Join me, Susan Davis, Asma Khalid, Tamara Keith, and Domenico Montanaro at Zilka Hall
on Thursday, September 15th.
You can find more information about tickets, including student ones, at nprpresents.org.
Thanks to our partners at Houston Public Media.
We hope to see you there.
Hi, this is Jody and Ryan from Portland, Oregon.
And you might hear the end of our summer, a little bit of rain that's finally falling for the first time in months.
This podcast was recorded at 2.08 p.m. on Monday, September 12th.
Sounds like a tin roof.
Things might have changed by the time you hear this.
Enjoy the show.
These end of summer time stamps make me kind of sad.
Summer's my favorite season.
I am sad, but also big, big into fall.
You ready for the pumpkin spice lattes?
I love a good rain.
Right.
Yeah, can't complain.
Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
I'm Deepa Shibaram. I also cover politics.
And I'm Mara Liason, national political correspondent.
So who's going to be the independent person asked to review the materials seized by the government
during the search of former President Donald Trump's Florida estate last month?
As you might imagine, Trump and the Justice Department disagree
on this matter. So Deepa, let's start with this. Why did the judge overseeing the case ask for what
we're calling a special master to be appointed here? Yeah, so the special master, if you recall,
is the idea that the court would appoint a third party sort of independent person to look over
materials that are considered privileged,
right? So in this case, Trump has documents that he was holding at Mar-a-Lago that he considers to
be his. This person, the special master would come in, review that material and act as sort of a
third party between the Department of Justice and Trump's lawyers. And so that's why Trump's team
had wanted the special master to be called in in the first place. And so that's why Trump's team had wanted the special
master to be called in in the first place. And part of the reason why Judge Eileen Cannon,
who's the judge in this whole case here, said that she would approve the idea of a special
master is because this is a really not normal situation, right? You have a lot of documents
that were being held in Trump's home. This is not just a regular person in this case.
This is a former president.
And so I think what Judge Cannon was trying to do here, legal experts are saying, is trying to put some neutrality into this situation.
Now, there is some disagreement over that.
There are legal experts who say that is a good idea.
There are those who say, you know, she's not really making the best choice here in assigning a special master, particularly because Trump's team has been so adamant about assigning one.
And the DOJ, for their part, has really disagreed with that.
They appealed the judge's decision just days ago and say that there is no need for a special
master in this case at all.
We should note the judge here, Eileen Cannon, was appointed to her position by former President
Trump.
What else did they say in their filing, the Justice Department?
So yeah, the DOJ appealed that decision. And they also, per the judge, had to outline essentially
who they would want to see as a special master, even though they disagree with that decision
in the first place. So late Friday night, those court documents came in. The DOJ has made it,
again, very clear that they don't
want this to happen, but they did offer up two names and they also offered up an idea of what
they would want that role to look like, what they would want the special master to have access to,
things about the timeline. So essentially the DOJ has said that they have two people in mind.
Lucky them. Lucky them. So the Department of Justice has suggested two
retired judges who they think could serve as special master. That was their idea if the appeal
fails. And those names are Barbara Jones, who served in the Southern District of New York and
was appointed by Bill Clinton to the federal bench. And the other person is a judge named
Thomas Griffith, and he was a George W. Bush appointee who served on a federal circuit court in Washington, D.C.
And I imagine Trump has very different ideas over who would be the best special master.
What has his legal team said?
Trump's legal team proposed retired federal judge Raymond Deary, who was appointed by Ronald Reagan to the Eastern District of New York and who also served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. And their second
candidate is Paul Huck Jr., a former partner at Jones Day and a contributor to the Federalist
Society. And he served in the Florida state government under former Republican governors
Charlie Crist, who is now a Democrat, and Rick Scott. Deepa, did these filings cast any light
on how we're going to resolve the argument over whether or not Trump owns these documents, whether they're classified or not?
There's not a single legal expert that says that he does.
But the Trump team has gone from calling this a dispute like argument over an overdue library book to saying now that this is a document storage dispute that spiraled out of control. Is this special master going to resolve the question of whether Trump owns these documents or not,
or had any right to have them?
So that's a little unclear at this point.
I will say two things.
One, the DOJ appealed that call for a special master like we talked about,
and then today Trump's lawyers responded to that appeal. And they
leaned into what they've been saying this whole time, exactly what you were talking about, that
Trump had the right to have these documents, that any kind of investigation into this would cause
irreparable harm to his reputation and to the public. And they went on, nothing new there from
what we've already heard. But they do have, the DOJ and Trump, have a pretty large disagreement about what the
special master would even have access to if the special master goes forward and is a part
of this investigation.
So Trump's lawyers have been really adamant that the special master, whoever it may be,
if they do come up in this investigation, should have access to all of these documents.
They want even classified documents. The special master should have access to all of these documents. They want even classified
documents. The special master should be able to go through everything. And the DOJ for their part
has been really adamant that there should be some documents that are really classified that the
special master shouldn't have access to. So at this point, the question is that we don't really
know. We don't really know how that will end up and whether the special
master will even have access to all those documents to kind of go through that question
in the first place. All right, we need to take a quick break, but we'll be right back.
And we're back. And Mara, I mean, it's been stated, but we should restate it. This is an
extraordinary fight that we are following right now. I mean, this isn't just a citizen and classified documents.
This is the former president of the United States holding what we believe to be very sensitive and classified documents at his personal home in unsecured, certainly outside the parameters of secure information to the United States government.
And he's in an all out fight against the U. the US Justice Department right now. Yep, he really is. And don't forget,
this has been going on for a long time. He kept a lot of this information after the government
asked for it back. It's really clear that most of this information does not belong to him.
The Department of Justice in their filing has said, okay, maybe it was mixed in with some of
Trump's personal effects, passports and other things. The special master can weed those out. But this really is an argument
about whether the former president has some kind of special privilege if he's above the law on this.
And what makes it incredibly ironic is if you remember back in 2016, Lock Her Up, the Trump
rally chant about Hillary Clinton, she should be locked up because she mishandled classified documents, even though a government review showed that she hadn't. But we know that
Donald Trump has a history of being very loose with classified information. When he was the
president, he actually shared some information with Russian diplomats in the Oval Office that
caused an Israeli program to be shut down. So we really don't know what he was planning to do with these documents.
Were they just souvenirs?
Why did he want to keep them?
And why did he resist handing them over after months and months of the government asking
for them back?
And that's a key thing.
And we should also note that beyond the Justice Department question, I mean, the national
security infrastructure is also trying to do a risk assessment.
I mean, of knowing what was there, who might have had access to it. It is known that, you know, people come and go out of
Mar-a-Lago all day long. That's right. People who have had ties to other foreign governments. We
don't know who's coming in and out of Mar-a-Lago. We don't know who had access to these documents.
Yeah, I just think about it from Capitol Hill when they have like classified briefings, like the
layers by which even members of Congress with security clearances have to go through to go see information and like so-called, you know, in the skiffs, they have to leave electronics outside. parameters that I think that the security infrastructure and certainly the picture of
the classified information files on the ground at Mar-a-Lago cannot do much for the national
security worldview on this. Deepa, I have to imagine that this is not the end of the road
here. It sounds like there's probably a lot more to come on this. There is. There's a couple things
that still need to be hashed out like you can imagine. One of them is just the basic timeline on this, right?
So in that filing that came late Friday night, both parties, DOJ and Trump, can't even really
come to the same page on how long this process would take if a special master were to get
involved.
Trump's team said that the special master should have 90 days to look through all the
documents that are provided.
And the DOJ is saying, you know, we only want till October 12th.
So there's that question still hanging.
We need to hear from the judge on that.
And then the other question is, who's going to pay?
You know, this is another third party person coming into the investigation.
It's not exactly like they're doing it for free.
And Trump's team says, OK, well, the DOJ and our lawyers can split the cost.
And the DOJ is saying, well, you're the one who wanted a special master in the first place,
so you should pay for the cost. And those are all things that still need to be hammered out
in order for this investigation to move forward. And like you guys were talking about just a second
ago, the national security implications of this, that investigation and that look into it has kind
of paused while this criminal investigation has also been paused.
So there is a big standstill here overall.
And in between all this, Mara, he might still run for president again in 2024.
Yes. And not only that, he might announce that he'll run for president before the midterms.
All right. Well, let's leave it there for today.
I'm Susan Davis, I cover politics
I'm Deepa Shivaram, I cover politics
and I'm Mara Liason, national
political correspondent
and thanks for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast