The NPR Politics Podcast - MAGA And Evangelical Christianity Converge At Kirk Memorial

Episode Date: September 24, 2025

Charlie Kirk’s memorial service this past weekend put the convergence of the MAGA movement and evangelical Christianity on full display. We discuss how MAGA and evangelical Christianity are shaping one another, and how MAGA’s version of Christianity is different from that of past Republican leaders.This episode: White House correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben, religion correspondent Jason DeRose, domestic extremism correspondent Odette Yousef, and senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro.This podcast was produced by Casey Morell & Bria Suggs, and edited by Rachel Baye.Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Support for NPR and the following message comes from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. RWJF is a national philanthropy, working toward a future where health is no longer a privilege but a right. Learn more at RWJF.org. Hey, this is Judy from Mound, Minnesota. David and I just finished a year-long camping tour of the National Parks. This podcast was recorded on Wednesday, September 24th, at 107 p.m. Eastern. Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but I will still be reflecting on our beautiful country filled with beautiful people. Okay, enjoy the show.

Here's a free idea for 2026. Yeah. An NPR Politics Podcast slash National Parks Calendar. What do we think? Wait, so are there photos? Are there photos of us in like Yosemite or something? I don't know. Maybe our listeners.

Why us? It's about them. I don't know. I'm uncomfortable for some reason. Hey there, it is the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Danielle Kurtzleman. I cover the White House. And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent. And we have a special guest, NPR religion correspondent, Jason DeRose. Hey, Jason.

Hello. Today on the show, we are talking about Charlie Kirk's memorial service this past weekend, and specifically what part Kirk's Christian faith played in his politics and vice versa. So, Domenico, let's start with you. You watch that service. It reflected Charlie Kirk's evangelical Christian faith. So let's just start with the basics. What happened at that service?

Yeah. And where it took place was important, too, because it was in Arizona and, you know, Turning Point USA, which is what Charlie Kirk had founded, is based there. And they held this massive event in a football stadium with, you know, I mean, you're talking tens of thousands of people. And it felt, you know, part religious ceremony, remembering Charlie Kirk's life and all of that. and part political rally. You know, TPA, turning point action, President Trump was there. You had a whole slew of administration officials who were there, not just eulogizing, memorializing Charlie Kirk, you know, as his wife, Erica Kirk, you know, said she forgave the shooter in a very emotional moment in that service. But then you have President Trump get up there and say he hates his opponents, that he can't agree with Erica Kirk. And maybe she can convince him. but he doesn't feel that way. So it was a very unusual kind of event, especially for someone who wasn't really, you know, a pastor or someone of the cloth to have such a religious overtone for this kind of an event. But Kirk's Christianity really was infused throughout his politics.

There was even a turning point faith piece of things that became more popular in recent years. And it was always, you know, Bible passages and the like were laced throughout his events on campuses and his political action, as it, you know, has also now influenced the Trump government. And Jason, we have politics and religion budding up against each other or alternately overlapping here. How did this service reflect evangelical Christian symbols and what we would typically see at a religious memorial service? Well, I would say it was really a hybrid of the two, a hybrid of a political rally and a memorial service in the Christian tradition, although I think it tended a lot more toward a political rally. And, you know, I've never before heard a memorial service that talked about vengeance in the way this one did. I mean, that was really striking. I mean, another thing that

really struck me was the central imagery on the stage was the Turning Point USA logo, sort of floating around on those screens, not the Christian cross, which, you know, is a surprising thing to not have at a memorial service. While there was an overlay of religion, the central iconography, I think was the Turning Point USA logo and a very large portrait of Charlie Kirk. They're on the stage. Also, a lot of flags, military flags, the U.S. flag, which, you know, is not an uncomplicated thing to have at a worship service. Lots of clergy would say, I don't want a U.S. flag in a worship service because God is God of all the nations, not just of this nation. So I really saw this fusing of the two, and I call it a hybrid because they weren't bumping up

against each other. They were working in concert to, I think, reinforce. force each other as the people who put the memorial service together were trying to do. And in person, I mean, there was a very large cross there. I mean, there was a man who brought a cross with them that was, you know, 10 plus feet tall. But it wasn't like hanging in the middle of the church, you know, in this case in the, in the football stadium. Yeah. Right. Well, and you know, that guy actually shows up at a lot of different events when I was covering the shooting at the church in Minneapolis just a few weeks ago. He was standing in front of that church, too. So that was not really part of the service. That was a guy who shows up

with that cross at things like this. Well, there's a big question after this service that I really have been noodling that I can't get over. And it's this. It's that Erica Kirk, as Domenico said, she got up and said, I forgive him of the man who allegedly killed her husband. Now, forgiveness is central to Christianity, but it's also very not central to the MAGA movement. As you guys have pointed out. Donald Trump got up and talked about his opponents and how he hates them. But also, Jason, you've said that Christianity and mega republicanism really were in concert here. So how do those two things come together? Is there a conflict or does this logic work? Well, it seemed like there was a conflict between what Erica Kirk was saying. I forgive him. I mean, she's essentially quoting Jesus hanging on the cross, forgiving the people who crucified him in the gospels. And then having Donald Trump, just moments later, come out and say, I hate my enemies. I don't want what's best for them. And that's what I meant by sort of a talk of vengeance at a memorial service is really stunning to me. And not stunning because I think we're used to it from Donald Trump, but stunning at a memorial service, which rarely have I, I don't think I've ever heard one that talks about vengeance in that way.

Yeah, I mean, there's an inherent tension between what, you know, you normally hear from religious people. And any religion, the mainstream of those religions, talking about peace and patience and forgiveness. Those are key tenets, right? For Trump, it's very different. And he kind of gives the crowd a permission structure to not have to feel like they have to forgive, but you've got to get on your horse, so to speak, and get to work politically. But, you know, it's a very different kind of Christianity that he's talking about because he's not talking about the, love and forgive, you know, one of the critiques of the mega movement by Christians who are not, say, white evangelical Christians, but the many other kinds of Christians in the United States

and around the world is that they focus on the teachings of Jesus to do things like feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to welcome the stranger, to house the homeless, to heal the sick. And they think that is the central message of Christianity, not the power, of God, but the care for the neighbor. And that critique is central to people who disagree with this version of Trump's understanding of Christianity. Right. So the intertwining of white evangelical Christianity in modern Republican politics, that goes back decades. But this does not feel the way it felt in the 90s and the George W. Bush 2000s. Domenico, what has changed? Well, I think it's different type of Christianity also. I mean, different types of wings of

this, right? Just because you hear Bible passages, you know, put on TikTok doesn't necessarily mean that the agenda or the goals are the same, right? And there's a difference here because this style of what we're talking about that's infused with Trump's politics is really about guiding government and being in power, you know, over other religions. Certainly, this is how this, you know, kind of Christian nationalism sort of feels about it. I mean, Christianity and evangelical Christianity has been something that really kind of came on the rise in politics in the 1970s. Jimmy Carter, Democrat, became really the first, you know, self-avowed, born-again, white Christian evangelical to win the presidency. Then we saw that again, you know, with George W. Bush,

he really rode what had been this movement that had started in the 1980s with Pat Robertson. And we see it every four years, right, on the campaign trail in Republican politics, especially in places like Iowa. as you know well, Danielle. But George W. Bush and the way that he tried to frame what Republicans are based on his Christianity was about compassionate conservatism. And I think that was very much rooted in his religion. That's not what we're seeing right now. Yeah. I'd ask you this, Jason. This connection between Christianity and the Mag of Movement escalated in some ways following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life in July 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania. And I can tell you, I was there. that I was there at his second butler rally where many people in the crowd talked to me about God. They said that God saved Trump that day. And now this assassination has happened. And I'm wondering, how does this religious political connection change when you have this kind of very present, terrifying, deadly threat? Well, I think what you saw after the attempt on his life in July of

2024 was almost immediately pastors who support him and other political people who supported him, started saying God saved Donald Trump's life in order for him to be president, in order for him to be the leader of the country. That is a unique way of talking about, you know, assassination attempts. But the idea that God saved Trump for this specific thing, it became very quickly the rhetoric of the day and, you know, has really, I would say, kicked into high gear there and has maybe reached its apotheosis this past weekend in this memorial service that a lot of combining Trump's agenda with what God wants, which is very different from, you know, traditionally politicians try to say, I'm trying to be on God's side rather than saying God is on my side.

This was very much a God is on my side kind of rally this past weekend. And I would say, you know, going back, really kicking into high gear at that first assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Okay. Well, we're going to have to leave it on that note. Jason, thank you so much for joining us. You're welcome. And we're going to have more on the connection between politics and evangelical Christianity in a moment. Pts, did y'all hear? Code Switch is one of Tom Magazine's top 100 podcast of all time, baby. They called our show, quote, a kind of cultural compass, never preachy, always curious about the roots of inequality in people's lived experiences.

I mean, I'm biased, but we couldn't have put it better ourselves. And we're We're digging into all this every week. So make sure you catch the next episode of Code Switch on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Support for NPR, and the following message comes from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. RWJF is a national philanthropy, working toward a future where health is no longer a privilege but a right.

Learn more at RWJF.org. are back with NPR's domestic extremism correspondent Odette Yusef. Hi, Odette. Hey, Danielle. I want to start by asking you about Christian nationalism because I know it's going to come up in this conversation. So give us a quick definition. What exactly is it? Yeah. So Christian nationalism is a worldview that believes that America was founded as a Christian nation and where people believe that America must return to being a Christian nation. And one of the important, things about this worldview is that, you know, we've always sort of held as sort of a principle in America, the separation of church and state. Well, what you frequently hear from

Christian nationalists is that that has historically been misapplied and misinterpreted and that, you know, it's been incorrectly, they would say, used to keep the church out of the state when they say it was always intended to keep the state out of the church. And it was really, Danielle, during the COVID years, that this became sort of turbocharged when you saw states sort of barring religious groups from holding, you know, large services, particularly indoors, you know, that was really seized upon as an example of the state interfering in church affair. It really galvanized this movement and the argument that they've long made that really that separation of church and state was always really only intended to keep the state out of church. So how is this brand of white evangelical Christianity influencing politics? What exactly is happening here?

You know, there has been this alignment of this administration with a particular component of the, you know, mostly of the evangelical movement. that sees America is deeply sinful in this moment and deeply sinful because of policies that exist. You know, access to abortion, LGBTQ rights, limits on prayers in school. I think it was very visible on January 6th, right? You'll remember from images that day, there were certain symbols, some iconography that day, including crosses, including what's called the Appeal to Heaven flag. This is a white flag with the image of a green tree on it, and it has become one of the symbols that you'll frequently see at Christian nationalist-type gatherings. And I actually saw this, Danielle, like about a year ago in the run-up to the election, I went to D.C. where there were a couple of large gatherings put on either as worship rallies or Christian concerts from people that sort of run within these particular circles.

and the alignment, the overlap between politics and their religious faith was 100%. I really wanted to do a gut check of what my impression was of this memorial service. So I called up Matthew Taylor. He's a scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies in Baltimore. And I asked him how he interpreted what he saw. I would argue that the memorial service was a dramatic. capstone on a long-running merger between charismatic spirituality and MAGA politics. And so, you know, Taylor, who's been watching this merger between these two things for, you know,

over a decade now, you know, he says this sort of alignment between the MAGA movement and this kind of charismatic spirituality, he calls it MAGA Christianity. And he says that this was really the high point of it. Fascinating. Well, I want to ask you, you guys, what has led us to this point where Christian nationalism is ascended the way it is? After all, plenty of white evangelicals love George W. Bush. So, Domenico, let me start with you. What's changed since then? Well, I mean, this is a very different type of Christianity, as Odette is noting here. And, yeah, we've seen religion and politics mixed, you know, quite a bit throughout history. I mean, you've seen people like the Reverend Billy Graham, who was perpetually at president's side, whether they were Republicans or Democrats. Often presidents would say that he gave them a lot of sense of patience and themselves and to try to think about what the right thing would be to do, not necessarily what the Christian thing is to do. And there's a fine line because we're all infused with whatever our beliefs and upbringings are.

And sometimes those can come through in our policies. But there has been a firm belief, as Adette talks about the separation of church and state, that religion should stay out of politics when it comes to. to overtly saying that Christianity or Islam or Judaism is the national religion and the rules of that religion are then going to be administered to the rest of the country. That seems like something that a lot of the founding fathers have talked about, about not wanting to have. Of course, as a debt notes, some of the Christian nationalists obviously disagree with that. And, you know, people could argue that what we're seeing is an outgrowth of that rise in white Christian evangelicalism. But the types of people who are in the president's ear now, and we see

them at the White House, we see them on the campaign trail with them, they had been on the fringes of Christian politics. The idea that Christianity should be the religion at the exclusion of other religions, it's really interesting to see this group of people who believe this, who are now front and center with Trump, it really comes from this place where Trump politically needed to have white evangelical Christians on his side. But there were a lot of things to not necessarily like about Trump from a religious standpoint, whether his divorces or how, as Jason was noting in the earlier segment, how he views immigrants or any other list of number of things. Right. I remember when he first came on the scene, various evangelical Christians when I was out

reporting would tell me they had misgivings about him. And those misgivings, I haven't heard about them in years. Right. And part of that is because he gets cover from these pastors and people within this movement who had previously been on the fringe, who he elevated, who he became sort of not obsessed with, but he really started to like how they were able to convince their flock, convince their followers. And he started to sort of learn a little bit of the way that this operates. And you see this through polling that white Christian evangelicals are the highest in supporting Trump almost more than any other group, and that's not everybody within white evangelical Christianity, obviously is a Christian nationalist, but they are certainly within that group and are firmly in Trump's camp. And now that he's had more than one term in office, Domenico, Trump has delivered on a lot of policy goals that those evangelical Christians have had.

Definitely. I mean, if you think about things like abortion rights, the Dobbs ruling, of course, reversed Roe v. Wade. think about things like religious liberty, quote unquote, in terms of, you know, speech and health care, greater access to government relief programs and resources, and even think about curriculum in schools and being able to get rid of what they find to be objectionable books like teaching about gender or LGBTQ issues. O'Dette, let's ask you, what's changed? There's a lot that's changed. You know, I think the thing that's really important to understand about this expression of Christian. political activism versus, you know, what Domenico was referencing, is that, you know, previously, if we're talking about, like, the moral majority, you know, the activism was still situated within a democratic framework. You know, the thinking was if we just get more Christians to vote, or if Christians would just lobby their politicians, or if Christians ran for office and achieved office, like, that was the way to change things. But now, this is. is a movement that is actually centered around a different theology than that. And it's that theology that is fundamentally anti-democratic. And if you don't mind indulging me, I do want to get a little bit into the weeds on that. Let's hear it. So there's a concept known as dominionist theology that was really born in the last century, mid-century. And it started gaining uptake back in the 1980s and has really grown since then.

And the gist of it is that, you know, they believe that Christians have a religious imperative to take dominion, to take authority over every aspect of society, not just in the U.S. actually, also in every country. We've seen in different sort of religious circles. This has been expressed in different ways. You may have heard Danielle about something called the Seven Mountains mandate, which Kirk himself has spoken about. this is the idea that you can sort of break down society into seven different spheres of influence, family, religion, education, government, media, entertainment, and business, and that Christians have a responsibility to gain authority over every one of those mountains and assert their interpretation of biblical government. So this is a top-down approach to fundamentally reforming society. And that is not achieved through voting. It's not achieved through running for office necessarily. Like, that is achieved with seizing power.

I see. I want to bring this back to Charlie Kirk, where we started this episode, and that display of Christianity and mega-Republicanism that we saw this past weekend. I've been wondering how to think about this. Is it that white evangelical Christianity has changed the Republican Party? Is it that the MAGA movement in the GOP has changed evangelical Christianity? Or is it just that the two are becoming more fused? Because that kind of seems like what you're saying, Odette. I think it's kind of all of the above, frankly.

You know, what Domenico was saying earlier about the evangelical leaders from the fringes sort of now being at the center. I mean, this is correct. We saw that in 2015, many evangelical leaders didn't want to endorse Trump initially. He was, however, given sort of the stamp of approval by a figure named C. Peter Wagner, who was a central figure in sort of assembling a network of what was called the New Apostolic Reformation. These are church leaders of, you know, really large churches across the U.S., who are non-denominational, mostly Pentecostal church figures, who have really sort of galvanized their congregations and grown to be firmly behind President Trump. So, you know, that has greatly influenced the imprint of that particular wing of evangelical Christianity on Republican politics. And at the same time, he has opened the door for them to be at the center of his sphere of influence. And so it's a, it's a reciprocal relationship, I would

say. I was just going to say they found use for each other, right? I mean, this is a group that was seen as a fringe sect of Christianity that wasn't getting enough attention. And Trump himself was seen as kind of a fringe candidate who needed the stamp of approval from a Christian group to be able to win over an important piece of the Republican base. And they were able to marry each other and be able to really kind of elevate each other's platform and gain more significance and more prominence and more power based on that merger. All right. We're going to have to leave it there for today. Until tomorrow, I'm Danielle Kurtzleben. I cover the White House. I'm Odette Yousaf. I cover domestic extremism. And I'm Domenico Montanaro. I'm Senior

political editor and correspondent. And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast. Support for NPR and the following message comes from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. RWJF is a national philanthropy, working toward a future where health is no longer a privilege, but a right. Learn more at RWJF.org.