The NPR Politics Podcast - On The Trail With Julián Castro

Episode Date: July 23, 2019

In an ongoing series, The NPR Politics Podcast is hitting the road and interviewing 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. This episode Scott Detrow and New Hampshire Public Radio's Lauren Chooljian sit down with former secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julián Castro to ask why he's the best pick for president. This series is produced in collaboration with NHPR and Iowa Public Radio.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Scott Detrow. All summer, we're taking you to New Hampshire and Iowa for interviews with many of the Democrats running for president. That's why last week, New Hampshire public radio reporter Lauren Chulgin and I found ourselves in the state capital of Concord in a very stereotypical public radio environment. First of all, we're in a bookstore. There's a coffee shop attached to the bookstore. But more importantly, we're standing next to the I read it all, we're in a bookstore. There's a coffee shop attached to the bookstore, but more importantly, we're standing next to the I Read It on NHPR section of the bookstore.

Literally, if there was a book mentioned on NPR or on NHPR, anything that has to do with public radio, we're looking at it. And we're two public radio reporters. It's like we're like a moth to the flame. We couldn't avoid it. There's David Sedaris' book. You pointed out there's Linda Holmes' book. All the NPR family, they're right here in front of us.

But we're not here to oogle the books. We're here to talk to Julian Castro. Very serious business. Julian Castro first jumped onto the national scene in 2012, when as the young mayor of San Antonio, Texas, he was picked to deliver the keynote speech of the Democratic National Convention. The American dream is not a sprint or even a marathon, but a relay. Our families don't always cross the finish line in the span of one generation,

but each generation passes on to the next the fruits of their labor. Later on, President Obama tapped Castro to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development. He was on the short list to be Hillary Clinton's running mate. And despite all of that, Castro struggled to gain attention and support in the first six months of his presidential campaign. That all changed after Castro's breakout performance in the first debate. I will say every time I talk to someone about him, they bring up the same thing. They're like, oh, did you see him on the debates? He was excellent. And so it's kind of a similar way that I feel like the country is kind of looking at him right now, where they feel like he had a big moment in those debates and now he's worth a second look.

Suddenly, more people are showing up at Castro's events. More reporters, too. When Castro arrived at Gibson's bookstore, several TV producers were waiting, ready to pin their microphones on his top. And then do you want to put on your tie? Oh, for sure. Hold that one. I got one more. This is like every egomaniac's dream. All these microphones right on here.

Castro was campaigning after a week that revolved around President Trump's attack on four Democratic congresswomen, all women of color. For Castro, questions about immigration and who counts as an American citizen are really personal. Just two generations after my grandmother got to the United States with almost nothing, which I bet a lot of folks in this room, you can relate to that in your own families. Just two generations after she got here, one of her grandsons, my brother Joaquin,

is a member of the United States Congress. And the other one is here asking for your support for President of the United States. That is America. After Castro was done speaking, answering questions and taking a whole lot of selfies, he came back to the young adult section of the bookstore where Lauren and I were waiting. Secretary Castro, thanks for joining the NPR Politics Podcast. I should point out we are in the young adult section of the bookstore here. I've got a Super Mario Brothers encyclopedia that I've got my notes on. I could look for another Harry Potter book for my daughter.

She's going through the series right now. Oh, that's a great time. So we have a lot of serious news this week. But to start out the interview, Lauren has a very important question that she needs to talk to you about. Yeah, you kind of played into my hand here with your iced tea. But I really just we need to talk like tea is not Yeah, you kind of played into my hand here with your iced tea. But I really just, we need to talk. Like, tea is not a food. You said it was your favorite comfort food.

Ah, yes, I know. I got pilloried for, you know, saying that my comfort food was iced tea. I said, look, I'm addicted. This is my comfort food. Food? That is a beverage. I was using the word food broadly, just broadly, you know? So are you just drinking this all day long? Is this like...

Yeah, I mean, I drink no soda anymore. I never got into coffee, but my weakness is this iced tea. And I also, I mix equal and sweet and low. I may be one of the only people you ever meet on earth that mixes equal and sweet and low, which probably means I'm going to die twice as fast. What's up? Why? Well, if you use it in iced tea, it actually produces a much better and sweeter taste than if you just use Equal or Sweet and Low alone or Splenda or anything else.

So to all your listeners out there that are wondering what they might try, please try it. It works. The more you know. The story of this week, we're talking on a Friday. The story of the week has obviously been President Trump's racist tweet against several members of Congress and all of the fallout up to and including people chanting, send her back at one of President Trump's rallies. You were saying at a campaign event last night, you're talking about how you think the president is trying to win re-election based on division. And you talked about how Democrats need to counter-program. In your mind, the way that this week played out, with Congress responding, voting to condemn the tweet,

grinding to a halt, everything that followed, was that good counter-programming by the Democratic candidates and members of Congress? We absolutely need to make clear that we object and that we have a different vision for the future of our country, because what he's trying to do is he's trying to split people along racial and ethnic and religious lines. His specialty, if you will, in politics is division, trying to just amp up a base. He's the biggest identity politician that we've had over the last 50 years. So how do you combat that effectively? Well, you do that in part by building coalitions. And that coalition is going to be built of people of different backgrounds, different skin colors, different religions from throughout the country that actually believe that we're a nation that

will be more prosperous, more successful if we appreciate our differences. So everybody has a place at the table. We don't send anyone away. We don't create the other. All of us have a stake in this country and we can make it stronger in the future if we work together. I know you have said that a lot of reporters will ask you about the fact that you did not grow up learning to speak Spanish. But one of your answers to that recently stuck out to me. And you talked about how when your mom was younger, she was shamed for speaking Spanish. But the arc of progress that you see that in 2016, the United States elected Donald Trump president and the president of the United States make statements like he did this

week? Well, I believe that you and I live in the greatest nation in the world and that we have so much progress to be proud of. I said that at the close of the first debate, the fact that, you know, today my daughter in many ways and other kids are celebrated for learning a second language, whether it's Spanish or another language, but that in my mom's time, my grandmother's time, they were punished for speaking Spanish. It's true that you do have some people like the president that want to take us backward. And the truth is that a certain amount of bigotry has never left this country or other countries. But what's happened and what gives me hope is that over the generations, we've gotten better and better. And this youngest generation, their challenge is to get even better, you know, to throw away the bigotry, the hate, the division. What's saddest about what the president did this week is that he is trying to make him go backward.

I think about all of those little kids that look different in a classroom in schools across America. Maybe they're wearing a hijab. Maybe they're wearing a Star of David. Maybe the color of their skin is black. And because this president is inciting people to say, you're the other, they're bullied more in school. They're shamed more in school. I believe in an America where our leadership actually says, we're better because of our differences.

We appreciate those differences. That's what we have to do in this country, not even as Republicans and Democrats, because I do believe that there are a lot of Republicans that agree with me, even though their politicians won't stand up right now and say it. But there's a lot of voters who agree with the president, who support what he's doing, who chant, send her back at a rally. How do, as a candidate, as a president,

how do you engage with them? Well, the percentage of people, of voters who agree with me, I believe, is bigger than the percentage of people who agree with him. And that if he keeps up with this, what he's betting on is that he's going to be able to get every little bit of base support out there and barely, narrowly win another electoral college victory, lose the popular vote again. But I believe that enough people who bought into Donald Trump three years ago in 2016 have buyer's remorse. They see that he came in promising to be a disruptor and that he was going to drain the swamp.

And he's been the dirtiest politician that we've had in a very long time. He promised to create a whole bunch of new jobs for folks and bring manufacturing back. And instead of that, we've had layoffs at places like GM and other companies. The prosperity out there in the United States has been unevenly distributed, including in my home state of Texas. There was just a big report on how a lot of the jobs that have come in have been in the big cities of Austin, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and their suburbs. They haven't gone to small town Texas or rural Texas. I bet you can write the same story about Iowa, about Michigan, about Ohio, other places. So he's a politician with a record now. I want to switch over to specifically your

immigration plan. You talked last night in Nashua about how you'd want to enact a Marshall Plan, which is where you'd invest in countries like Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala. I mean, the original Marshall Plan was to rebuild Europe after we engaged in a world war where we obliterated much of that continent. So why is that kind of investment from U.S. taxpayers justified in Central America? The 21st century Marshall Plan makes sense for Central America because, first of all, they're more and more important as our neighbors. In this competition we're engaged in, for instance, with China around the world, China is going to Latin America and Africa and forging their own strong relationships. They're projected to eclipse the United States in terms of their economy becoming the biggest economy in the world in 2030. So it makes sense for us to

strengthen alliances around the world. The fact is that if we want to solve this immigration issue, we need to go to the root of the cause, the root of the challenge. And that's that people can't find safety and opportunity in Central America. So the investment is worth it because we're going to solve a problem. And because that's cheaper to the taxpayer than building a wall and constantly detaining people and spending more and more and more money on cruelty. Instead, look at Mexico. 20 years ago, most of the people that were coming across the border were single Mexican men. But now more people can find opportunity in Mexico. So fewer of them come. That's what we need to achieve for Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

So then part of your goal is then to not have people from Central America be immigrating here? My goal is for people to be able to find safety and opportunity in those countries. I think that we're always going to have people coming from Central America and other parts of the world. Do we need 144,000 people in one month coming from those countries? That's an indication that something is wrong in those countries, and I want to help heal that. So anyone who's read anything about you lately knows that if you get elected president, you want to decriminalize border crossings. You've been very clear about that. But, I mean, I live here in New Hampshire, a very purple state,

and that's not going to go over well with everyone who lives here. And so I just wonder, do you think some of these more seemingly drastic proposals could continue to divide this country over immigration? Not at all. It's not drastic at all. This is how we treated border crossing. First of all, if we did what I want to do, there are still consequences for crossing the border. Somebody is still subject to deportation. Folks may not know that deportation proceedings are a civil procedure, not a criminal one. So we treat it like a civil issue, civil violation that still subjects somebody to the court system, still subject to deportation. But what we take away is that it's a misdemeanor crime.

It's only been about 15 years that we've been really treating it as a misdemeanor crime. And when we started doing that, that part of the law is what allows the Trump administration to incarcerate migrant parents and then separate them from their little children. I want to guarantee that no future administration ever does that again. I want to guarantee we don't have family separations. We can both have consequences, have accountability for people that cross the border through our court system, but not separate little children from their parents. Policing is something you've talked a lot about as well. The San Antonio Express analyzed public data from part of the time that you were mayor from 2010 to 2015, the use of force by San Antonio's police department against black and

Hispanic suspects, twice that of white suspects. What did you do during your time as mayor to deal with that? It's a good question. You know. When I became mayor, I made sure that we implemented more than 100 different recommendations that had been made by an analysis of an outside group on how we could improve our policing. Because, hey, I grew up in one of those neighborhoods that was lower income, that was very minority. And I know that oftentimes the color of your skin and the neighborhood that you grow up in determines the kind of policing that you get. So as mayor, I wanted to make sure that we got better. And we worked to get better. Now, you know, San Antonio, like other big cities, of course, still has its challenges.

But we absolutely made progress. In fact, so much so that our city was involved in the task force on policing in the 21st century that President Obama later put together. I was no longer mayor at that time, but I think that was an example or that was an indication that San Antonio was one of the ones that was working positively on this. I mean, the standardized use of force policy that you talk about, that just seems really hard to implement on the federal level. I mean, every city is different, every town is different, there are different laws, there are unions. I mean, how do you take direct steps to make that happen? What we're talking about is a national use of force standard that would say that a police officer should not use lethal force unless they have exhausted all other reasonable alternatives in the situation.

California just passed a similar law recently. This makes sense if people think about it because why should you be treated differently at the hands of a police officer if you live here in Concord versus if you live in Des Moines, Iowa, or you live in Brooklyn, or in my hometown of San Antonio. Your life has no less value. Policing shouldn't be any different when we're talking about whether a police officer is going to fire his or her gun. So how do we achieve that? Well, I think it would take some time, but we do it with a carrot and a stick. The carrot is more federal funding to those communities that are willing to adopt a national use of force standard. The stick is that if a community does not adopt the national use of force standard and there's a civilian that gets injured or killed because a police officer uses excessive force, that they risk losing federal funding. So I believe that over the years we can achieve that. And I know

we have a lot of great police officers, but I also know that we've seen too many of these videos and too many examples, whether it's Tamir Rice or Michael Brown or Eric Garner or Laquan McDonald or so many others that we could name, that too often young black men are treated differently at the hands of police. And if I'm elected president, I will do everything that I can to work with local communities so that everybody, no matter the skin color or no matter what neighborhood you live in, you're treated the same way. In New Hampshire, housing and affordable housing is a really, really big issue. And, you know, you mentioned that, you know, that there's a lot of sprawl from Boston, but it's even bigger than that. I mean, places like Portsmouth, where people love

to visit on the seacoast, you know, it's a great tourist town. But if you live here and work here, you're increasingly unable to afford even to rent. And so I wanted to ask you, you said you wanted to expand the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and you say that every family that needs a voucher will receive one. So I'm wondering, how do you define need and how do you end up paying for that? Yeah, thanks a lot for that question, because here in New Hampshire, you all see a rental affordability crisis, and this has many dimensions to it. A lack of supply, obviously the fact that too many people are working for wages that don't support them being able to afford a two-bedroom or oftentimes even a one-bedroom apartment. The emergence of Airbnb

and similar endeavors that in some communities, probably like Portsmouth, that are visited oftentimes, can drive up the cost of rent in a community. My proposal is to make the Housing Choice Voucher Program an entitlement program. And the way that it would be determined is if you make less than 50% of the area median income, you would be entitled to get a housing choice voucher. More with Julian Castro after this break. Support for this NPR podcast and the following message come from BetterHelp. BetterHelp offers licensed professional counselors who specialize in issues such as depression,

stress, anxiety, and more. Connect with your professional counselor in a safe and private online environment at your convenience. Get help at your own time and your own pace. Schedule secure video or phone sessions, plus chat and text with your therapist. Visit betterhelp.com slash politics to learn more and get 10% off your first month. Support also comes from Google. Veteran Mitch Hoyt founded Skinny Sticks Maple Syrup, and he's showing that small businesses can do big things.

Mitch started making syrup from a few trees in his Wisconsin backyard and now is connecting with customers worldwide with help from Google tools. Skinny Sticks is one of millions of small businesses using Google to grow. On this season of Rough Translation from NPR, we are following people who break the rules. New episodes every other Wednesday. Subscribe. And we're back with our interview with former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro. In the second half of our interview, we talked raw politics, his close relationship with his identical a situation where you've got a lot more momentum than you did after that first debate. I mean, so many people at the last few events have said, I came because I saw that debate and I was interested in learning more about Secretary Castro. But you've got these front runners who are polling in double digits, who are raising tens of millions of dollars. And then there's a wide gap. How do you get across that gap over the next few months?

Like what specifically do you need to do? Well, I need to continue to do well in these debates. I need to build on that. What we're doing is increasing our staffing here in New Hampshire, in Iowa. The other early states need to make sure that the resources are there to fund a robust campaign. And so our fundraising has picked up. There's no question that I'm behind where some of the other candidates are. But you know what? Number one, I have time. I've had a very clear vision for this campaign since the beginning of it. I've said that I don't want to be a flash in the pan candidate. I want to grow stronger and stronger and stronger. And that's the path that we're on right now. And secondly, the reality of today is that it's not always money that talks.

I mean, look at Trump. I think he raised, what, 60% of what Secretary Clinton raised in 2016. So, yes, I'm going to probably be outspent, but nobody's going to work harder. And so far, we've executed on a good plan. And I don't think that we're going to need as much money as others do to be successful. A lot of public radio listeners heard you preparing for that first debate on This American Life. What's your top goal for the second debate? I mean, you've established yourself in the way that you needed to the first time. What's goal number two? Well, I have the same goal. The goal is to introduce myself to a lot of people who still may not know who I am because my name ID is still lower than some of the other candidates

and to articulate a strong positive vision for how all Americans can prosper in the years ahead. I want to connect with voters about what they and their family need. Good health care, good education, good job opportunities, and the kind of country that we want to become. A country where everybody has a place at the table. Everybody counts. So no matter what the issue is, I'm going to speak directly to what the American people are looking for in the years ahead. So when you're looking for those votes, a place that you have come, people have come is here, New Hampshire, as well as Iowa. But I'm curious, you know, when you launched your campaign, you went to Puerto Rico, and you've said that that

is a big theme of your campaign, that diversity is extremely important to you, it's important to this country. And so given that Iowa is not very diverse, neither is New Hampshire, I'd be curious to know, I mean, do you think that these two states should have such an outsized power in the way we pick presidents? Well, I'm comfortable with them having a big role. I think ideally what you would have in the future is you would probably have a day where you have Iowa, New Hampshire, and then those two other states that go on the same day. Or if you have a state that goes first, that you rotate that out so that you achieve what's great about this process right now, which is that, you know, I am a big fan of the voters here in New Hampshire and the ones in Iowa because they take their role so seriously.

And these are small enough states, you know, compared to California or Texas, that you really can do a lot of retail politics. And I like that because it means that you don't have to have all the money in the world to make inroads, to make your case and to gain support. That's what's fantastic about Iowa and New Hampshire. I think the downside is that, sure, there are states that are more reflective of America overall than Iowa and New Hampshire. And that's just a fact, and that's not a knock on these two states. So the ideal system would be where you have these two states that are so great about how they vet candidates, and then also add to that a couple of

states or at least another state that is perhaps more reflective of the demography of America. So in this podcast, we often talk about personal failures that candidates have, not political ones. And I've been thinking about how I wanted to ask you this because I've been fascinated by the relationship you have with your brother. It seems like the two of you don't just try to succeed individually, but as a unit. And so I would be curious to know, when was a time that you feel like you failed Joaquin? I thought you were going to say, do I think my brother is my personal failure? I'm kidding.

You wish. No, that wasn't it. He and I have a neat relationship. We can rib each other. That I failed my brother. You know, I mean, we've been so close. We've gone through life completely together. I think that probably one of the weaknesses in our relationship has been that we have not been like outwardly, overly emotionally supportive of each other. In fact, I was thinking that the first time I remember hugging my brother was in college. In fact, I was thinking that the first time I remember hugging my brother was in college. In fact, right after we won our election for the student Senate, like we tied and we found out we got this news that we had tied for first place. And we like kind of spontaneously hugged each other.

But this wasn't something that we would, you know, do all the time. I think that men in general have issues with showing emotion and relating to each other that way. But also, I don't know, I think with Joaquin and me, and I'd be interested, I've never talked to other twins about this in this way. It's almost like the closeness is assumed somehow, because you're moving through the world constantly together. We shared bunk beds for a long time. We went to college together, went to law school together, started practicing law together, went into politics together. That in some ways, there's such a closeness.

And then in some ways, a distance. Yeah. I mean, that's the first thing I think about. As you keep going to new levels, does the closeness continue? Or is there a strain sometimes when you're like, hey, I'm running for president of the United States? I mean, that would be a big difference between the two of you after a very parallel path forward. Oh, I mean, no. He's the chairman of my campaign. And in fact, he's going to be in Iowa in a couple of days campaigning for me. We're going to see each other probably at the debate,

getting ready for it in Detroit. So yeah, I think this is one more way that I think we're staying close. And it's been wonderful having somebody that I'm so close to that also understands politics very well. I mean, he's not your run of the mill brother, right? I mean, he's in exactly the same business, so to speak, that I am. And we're each other's strongest advisors, closest advisors, and strongest supporters. I just think that, you know, if you were asking me at the end of my life, did I wish that we had expressed that more outwardly? First of all, hopefully that can change in the years ahead. But, you know, yeah, I think I think my answer would be yeah. One of the other personal things about you that I was

really curious about is every politician deals with with the pros and cons of hype, media hype, especially, right. But I feel like you've gotten the extreme ends, you come on to the national stage in 2012, the next Barack Obama, all of this hype being written up. And you know, in the first few months of the presidential campaign, you were really struggling to get traction, struggling to get media attention. I feel like you've seen the peaks and valleys of the way that politicians are covered and treated. And I'm curious, how do you respond to that? And how do you make sense of that when it can so drastically change? Well, different ways. I mean, number one, and I tell this to young people all the time when I speak to them, is that you have to fundamentally believe in yourself. There

hasn't been a single moment of this campaign where I didn't know that I could step up against the other candidates on that stage and do better than them. And the media should have known that because we had candidate forums that were going on. However, they were not covering it. And I don't say that to, to be arrogant. I say that to mean that, um, I believe that, that I'm good at what I'm doing and that I have a confidence about it and that I've seen the results of that with people when I speak to them. So how do you handle the highs and lows

is that you never doubt yourself. On top of that, I know that the media are what the media are. Media are always interested in timeliness. That's one of the core values of media today. Whatever is hottest, whatever is new, whatever is fresh. So I knew that when I got into the presidential race, the response wouldn't be exactly the same as if I had decided that I wanted to run in 2016 for some reason, I would have been the young, new, fresh candidate running that year after delivering the keynote address in 2012. I knew this would be

different. I accept that. That just means, like everything else in life, that you have to work hard. And that's what we've done. We've kept our head down. We've tried to connect with people. And I knew that I would have to get stronger in this campaign little by little. Honestly, you know, after that first debate, you know, I believed that we might see a bigger bounce in the polls than we did. You know, we've seen some, especially in favorability and name ID, and in some of the polls have gone above 1%, had one that was at 4%, 3%, 2%. But again, that does not affect my confidence in myself or my message for the voters or the fact that I still have over six months to win this election in Iowa and then New Hampshire. So we do a thing here on this podcast called Can't Let It Go, where you tell us about something that you're just obsessed with and you just can't let go of it. It could be politics. It

could be otherwise. I mean, we prefer it be otherwise. But what is the thing right now that Secretary Castro just like cannot let go of? I'd say that Top Gun trailer that we saw. Top Gun trailer that we saw. Top Gun trailer. Top Gun, look. It came out in 1986. I was 12 years old, basically. This is one of the few movies that I've been waiting for a long time for them to make a sequel to.

I'm not the hugest Tom Cruise fan, but I did think that that was a great movie back then. And I saw the trailer yesterday. And so I'm looking forward to seeing that movie. Wait, this is somehow completely past me. So am I too. Is he in the remake? Yeah, yeah.

Yeah, he's in the remake. Tom Cruise is in the Top Gun. It's not a remake. It's a sequel. Top Gun 2. Thanks for telling us. Well, the other thing that got a lot of attention

was the Cats trailer. Well, that got a lot of attention was the cats trailer i think it got it kind of got big-footed by the cats trailer but with some folks maybe the npr crowd for sure sorry but there are some that we're looking forward to the top gun uh yeah so this is you know i've thought about what the storylines would be you know whether it's with uh because in the original one they were going up against the old Soviet union, you know, whether it's Russia now or it's China, I think that would make for an interesting storyline. But if you thought about it, what is like in your head, the Top Gun 2 plot? I have said for a number of years that I think it would be fascinating. And he is an instructor again at the, at the, training academy where the first one was set, that he would

be an instructor that gets called into duty basically in a showdown with China because China has risen in its military power and the United States in the future is somehow in a conflict with China, right? I'm sorry, you have said for a number of years, like you've been thinking about this? I probably told that to somebody like three or four years ago. Yeah. I said, oh, it would be really fast because they've had like fits and starts. They've started where they've said there's going to be a sequel. So back then I said, oh, there's going to be a sequel.

This begs continued follow up questions. Who's like the goose type character in this? As I understand it, part of this plot is that his son goose's son is at the academy and he i imagine he's being instructed by tom cruise and if i had to guess i would guess i have not read anything about this but i would guess that probably you know the son would be somewhat um uh mad at tom cruise because as you, it was sort of partly his doing that Goose ended up being killed in the first play or in the accident.

So yeah, I've spent a decent amount of time thinking about what the plot might be and I'm looking forward to seeing it. Wow, noted. There you go. Can't let it go. I'm just going to say based on this conversation here,

I'm going to guess you have a fan a fan fix script on a hard drive somewhere. So that's OK. So please send it. Secretary Julián Castro, thanks so much for coming on the NPR Politics Podcast. Gracias. Thank you. That was the ninth episode in our series of interviews with the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. You can find the previous interviews in your podcast feed. The series is a partnership between the NPR Politics Podcast, New Hampshire Public Radio, and Iowa Public Radio. Thanks to Lauren Chulgin for helping with today's episode.

We'll be back as soon as there's political news you need to know about. I'm Scott Detrow. Thank you for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.