The NPR Politics Podcast - Trump Talks Tariffs, Immigration, Pardons

Episode Date: December 9, 2024

President-elect Donald Trump sat down for his first broadcast television interview since winning a second term. On NBC's Meet The Press with Kristen Welker, Trump talked about economic and domestic po...licy proposals that may find support — and opposition — among many members of Congress. How likely will it be for his agenda to get enacted? This episode: political correspondent Sarah McCammon, congressional correspondent Deirdre Walsh, and senior White House correspondent Tamara Keith.The podcast is produced by Jeongyoon Han and Kelli Wessinger, and edited by Casey Morell. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is Madeline from Chicago celebrating my 35th birthday on Maui. This podcast was recorded at 106 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 9th, 2024. Things may have changed by the time you hear it, but I'll be old enough to be President of the United States. Here's the show. Happy birthday. Nice place to have a birthday. Yeah, can we join you?
Starting point is 00:00:23 Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics. I'm Deirdre Walsh. I cover Congress. And I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House. Today on the show, unpacking some of the things President-elect Donald Trump said this weekend
Starting point is 00:00:37 in his first major broadcast interview since the election. Trump talked about many things on Sunday on the NBC show, Meet the Press with Kristen Welker. And, Tam, I wanna start with an issue that was at or near the very top of the priority list for many voters this year and a long time priority for Trump. That, of course, is immigration. He was asked about his plan to carry out mass deportations, a big theme of this campaign,
Starting point is 00:01:03 and what that might mean for families with children, some of whom, if they were born in the U.S., would be citizens. I don't want to be breaking up families, so the only way you don't break up the family is you keep them together and you have to send them all back. Even kids who are here legally? Well, what are you going to do if they want to stay with their father? Look, we have to have rules and regulations. Trump also signaled he was open to creating some kind of a deal to protect
Starting point is 00:01:27 Dreamers. Those are the people who were brought to the country illegally when they were young, when they were children. Tam, what did you hear in those comments? Trump started out by saying that he wanted to start his deportation plans with people who are convicted criminals or who are dangerous. And then you would have to work your way down from there, he said. On family separation, he admitted that this could lead to images that could turn the American public against these policies, but he said that it had to be done. On the Dreamers saying that he wanted to work with Democrats. That is in essence
Starting point is 00:02:06 a softening. He says, you know, some of these people are middle-aged at this point. Where would you send them back to a place that they never knew because they came here as young children? Interesting though, that he has a lot more sympathy for them and politically the whole political universe has a lot more sympathy for them than he does for children who were born here and would have to choose whether to stay in the country where they were born and where they've been living or to go back to their parents' home country if their parents were being deported. You know, it's interesting, Deirdre, this issue of DREAMers that's been around for a long time. As you know, I'm thinking back to Trump's first term. Early on in his administration, he tried to do away with what was known as DACA, the policy to protect dreamers
Starting point is 00:02:50 under the Obama administration. Trump then tried to work out some kind of an immigration deal to protect dreamers, but the Republican conference in Congress held him back. Do you think Republicans are going to back Trump on this this time? I mean, this was his number one campaign issue. So Republicans are going to back Trump on this this time. I mean, this was his number one campaign issue. So Republicans are going to support whatever policies President-elect Trump rolls out. But yeah, I mean, he did cut a deal essentially with then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the minority leader at the time, Chuck Schumer, to pay for his border wall with a deal to protect DACA. Republicans weren't happy about that and he sort of
Starting point is 00:03:25 backed down from that deal at the time. In terms of what's going forward now though, while Trump is saying this that he could work with Democrats, the reality is that the Republican controlled Senate and the Republican controlled House are gonna move first on a package that they can pass with just Republican votes on a party line that is supposed to focus on border and energy policy and money. This is the sort of like the first of several big packages that Republicans plan to move early in the trifecta of controlling the White House in both chambers of Congress. I would be surprised if there were any kind
Starting point is 00:04:05 of bipartisan element in there, plus it's a very narrow package that they have to pass under strict rules in terms of what can impact the budget. Maybe down the line, he could negotiate something with Democrats, but that is not the top policy, and that's not what Republicans on the Hill are focused on at all.
Starting point is 00:04:22 And it's also not what he campaigned on. He did not campaign on a humane solution for DREAMers. He campaigned on securing the border. He campaigned on mass deportations. There were signs at his rallies that said mass deportations. The DREAMers thing is part of a broader theme, I think, in this interview, where he's sort of the generous victor. And he is saying, no, but you know, I'm going to be president for all Americans. theme I think in this interview where he's sort of the generous victor and he
Starting point is 00:04:45 is saying no but you know I'm gonna be president for all Americans I'm going to be humane I think that this was part of that sort of theme that came up throughout the interview. Yeah I mean Deirdre you just said you don't expect a bipartisan deal. Do Democrats have any room to maneuver here? I mean they obviously want to stop a lot of the things that Trump is proposing but they do do want to protect DREAMers, something he's saying he wants to do. Right. Well, I mean, in order to pass anything, they're going to need bipartisan support. I mean, some of these big policies that they're planning to run through with procedures to get around Democrats will be very limited. I do think in this political moment, Democrats
Starting point is 00:05:23 are feeling some pressure, political pressure, to address the border. They clearly lost a lot of ground on the issue. The voters sort of trusted Trump and Republicans much more on the issue of border security. So a lot of Democrats are saying we need to do something to show we care about border security. There could be a world in which they talk about backing some additional funding for more border agents, more ICE agents as part of some kind of bipartisan deal. But
Starting point is 00:05:51 I covered Congress and immigration negotiations for a really long time, and it's the toughest issue to maneuver. I don't see the Republican base embracing some of the types of bipartisan things that have helped create deals in the past. We'll see. But I think for now, I think Republicans are very focused on the enforcement side and backing the president. I mean, I think we could see a combination of executive orders just get around Congress. Okay, time for a quick break.
Starting point is 00:06:23 We'll have more in just a moment about President-elect Trump's agenda and the role of Congress. On the Embedded Podcast from NPR, what is it like to live under years of state surveillance? So many people have fear, fear of losing their families. For years, the Chinese government has been detaining hundreds of thousands of ethnic Uyghurs. This is the story of one family torn apart. Listen to the Black Gate on the Embedded Podcast from NPR. NPR brings you the updates you need on the day's biggest headlines. The Senate narrowly passed the debt ceiling bill that will prevent the country from defaulting on its loans.
Starting point is 00:07:04 Stories from across the world. Knowing how to forage and to live with the land is integral to Ami's culture. And down your block. From CPR News, this is Colorado Matters. And you can find all of that and more in your pocket. Download the NPR app today. And we're back. I wanna take a moment to talk about Trump's nominations
Starting point is 00:07:30 for his cabinet. He provided a defense on the program of Pete Hegseth, his pick to run the Pentagon. That's after Hegseth has been accused of sexual misconduct and alcohol abuse, which he has denied. Deirdre, where does the Hegseth nomination stand? How are his prospects looking on Capitol Hill? I think they're looking better after President Trump's very public support for Hegseth. I think
Starting point is 00:07:54 he still has a lot of work to do in terms of building support and getting the votes he needs, but I think there was some question as these stories swirled last week and he was making the rounds on the Hill when Trump wasn't saying anything. And now that he's come out and vouched for him and believes he'll get through and says senators are saying good things about him, I think it adds to the public pressure campaign that a lot of Republican senators are feeling from the base that Trump deserves to get these people through and anyone who doesn't vote for them is going to come under immense pressure.
Starting point is 00:08:28 You already see it with Iowa Republican Senator Joni Ernst, who has been careful about what she's saying but is signaling that she has major concerns with Pete Hegseth. Ernst served in the military, has a daughter in the military, was a survivor of sexual assault and all of these issues are very important to her. And she's meeting again with Pete Hegseth. And I think as he makes additional rounds with people like Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, we're going to see a lot more pressure on Republicans. And I think Republicans in the Senate keep saying the same thing, let the process play out.
Starting point is 00:09:05 Let him prove himself through public hearings, and they know that those hearings are going to be tough. That is if he makes it to a hearing. I think that in the past, there have been candidates for cabinet positions who faced difficult issues for whatever reason. Their votes might not be adding up, and typically they have chosen, instead of going through a public hearing
Starting point is 00:09:29 that could be really painful, just bowing out. Now that may not be the case with Hegseth because he's actually compared himself to Justice Kavanaugh and his hearing, which was a very fiery hearing and extremely uncomfortable, but Kavanaugh got confirmed. And I think Hegseth is taking a page from that book. Kavanaugh, who was also, of course, facing allegations of
Starting point is 00:09:51 sexual abuse. I mean, I've heard the Kavanaugh example raised by Senate Republicans who aren't necessarily coming out against any of these nominees, but saying this is what you should be prepared for. Democrats are going to have tough questions and are going to be really aggressive. So a lot of the behind the scenes meetings with these nominees are expected to be pretty frank and thorough, which is what Joni Ernst said about her meeting with Hegseth, because they don't want any surprises. They want to get through any concerns they have before they come out in public. Now Trump also took the opportunity to defend a couple of other controversial
Starting point is 00:10:27 nominees. Tulsi Gabbard, his choice for director of national intelligence who has made comments sympathetic to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Robert F Kennedy Jr., Trump's Health and Human Services secretary pick who is skeptical of vaccines among other controversial positions, does publicly defending these nominees help put pressure on Republican lawmakers to move forward? I think without a doubt. I mean I think the more Trump gets involved, the more he publicly lobbies Republican senators, the better the prospects are for his nominees. I think a lot of these also controversial picks, Gabbard for DNI, RFK for HHS, Cash Patel for FBI, have benefited from the sort of all the attention
Starting point is 00:11:13 being on Pete Hegseth. And now that we're going to see some of them started making the rounds today on Capitol Hill meeting with Senate Republicans, there's going to be more interest in their nominations and questions about concerns senators may have. In terms of Tulsi Gabbard, I think that the news about the Syrian regime being toppled also puts another spotlight on her nomination because of her high profile visit back when she was a member of Congress, when she met with then Syrian President Bashar al-Assad after there was evidence that he had been gassing his own people. So that was already going to be an issue for Tulsi Gabbard.
Starting point is 00:11:54 It just sort of reignites interest in the issue just because of the news there. Trump also talked about a couple of other things on Meet the Press with Kristen Walker that he can do without Congress. The first is tariffs. Tariffs are going to make our country rich. Tariffs are going to help us pay off $35 trillion in debt. Tariffs are going to make our country safe because China, as an example, doesn't want to play games with us if we're going to do tariffs on them. They don't want to play games with us if we're going to do tariffs on them. They don't want to play games and we have a lot of games being played on us right now.
Starting point is 00:12:29 Well, I think that... Okay, Tim, another favorite Trump topic. What did you hear there? It's as if tariffs are a magical wand that can do everything. In another part of the interview, he said that he had prevented a war with tariffs. But more notable was, Welker really pressed him on whether most mainstream economists say that tariffs are basically a tax on American consumers. And Trump simply doesn't see it that way. She pressed him on it, was like, well, could
Starting point is 00:12:56 prices go up? He said, well, they could, but I don't think they will. I don't think they did before. He has an orthodoxy that tariffs are good and that they are part of the toolbox or maybe the most essential part of the toolbox in international negotiations for the United States. I think Republicans in Congress are split on this issue. There are still a lot of hill Republicans who are very skeptical, like economists, about what the impact of these tariffs would be.
Starting point is 00:13:27 I think a lot of them are sort of withholding comment because they believe that Trump may be using this as a political, you know, sort of diplomatic tool as opposed to being really serious about it. And I think, you know, they're just going to sort of withhold any kind of criticism until they are faced with what he actually does. Another thing you talked about pardons the possibility of pardoning people convicted of crimes in association with the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol. He said he would do that on day one of his administration. How would that go down
Starting point is 00:14:02 with lawmakers if it is indeed his first act, Deirdre? He campaigned on this. I mean, he's restating campaign promises he made. I don't think people would be very surprised. I think it would depend on sort of how broad the pardons are. If they are focused on some of the people who didn't attack cops, who didn't assault cops, that could be something that Republicans on the Hill would think would be okay. I also think that in terms of January 6, a lot of Republicans on the Hill have really
Starting point is 00:14:35 left it in their rearview mirror, have seen their base not be as upset about the impact and the violence at the Capitol that day. And a lot of them just sort of downplay it or have moved on. Despite the fact that, you know, over a thousand people have been convicted, and this is the largest investigation that the Justice Department has has ever done on something like this, it's not something that really animates Republicans on the Hill. And I don't think they're going to have much criticism for whatever Trump decides. I think we have to wait for day one to see what actually does happen. There's one other thing related to January 6th that came up in this interview. At one point he was asked about going after President
Starting point is 00:15:17 Biden and he said no success is my retribution. You know we succeed that's all we need. But then he was asked about the select committee that investigated his actions on and around January 6th and the attack on the Capitol. And he said this. A whole year and a half worth of testimony. Do you know that I can't get, I think those people committed a major crime and Cheney was behind it. And so was Benny Thompson and everybody on that committee.
Starting point is 00:15:45 For what they did, honestly, they should go to jail. I mean, this was a pretty stunning statement. I think that there's been a lot of similar rhetoric from Trump on the campaign trail, but I think it was such a departure in tone from the rest of the interview and saying that his inaugural speech was going to be one of unity and then saying he wants to throw members of Congress in jail who investigated him. I think that some of these people know that they are going to be targeted in some form by Trump but I still think that this is something that is in a different category than pardoning some
Starting point is 00:16:21 of the people who were there that day who didn't get in the building who didn't attack the police. I think this is something that takes it to sort of a very different level. I also think that Trump was also being Trump in the sense where he kind of would say something and then be like, well, you know, it's really up to the FBI director or Pam Bondi, his nominee, to run the Justice Department
Starting point is 00:16:43 in terms of whether they think these people did something criminally wrong. Of course they were picked because they say they want to investigate the investigators and because they are loyal to Trump. I mean I imagine they're going to get asked about this in their confirmation hearings should those hearings happen. For sure, for sure. No doubt they will be asked about this. And we'll be keeping an eye on those hearings when they begin. All right that's all for today. I'm Sarah McCammon. I cover politics. I'm Deirdre Walsh. I cover Congress. And I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House. And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.
Starting point is 00:17:24 Listen to this podcast, sponsor free on Amazon Music with a Prime membership or any podcast app by subscribing to NPR Politics Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.