The Opinions - Tom Friedman on the Only Way to Solve the Israel-Hamas War
Episode Date: October 8, 2025Two years after Hamas’s attack on Israel, delegates from Hamas, Israel and the United States are in Egypt this week to see if President Trump’s cease-fire proposal can lead to an end to the war. I...n this episode of “The Opinions,” the columnist Thomas L. Friedman explains why this round of peace talks could be different and what obstacles still stand in the way of making lasting peace a reality.Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com.This episode of “The Opinions” was produced by Derek Arthur. It was edited by Alison Bruzek and Kaari Pitkin. The rest of the show's production team includes Vishakha Darbha, Kristina Samulewski and Jillian Weinberger. Mixing by Carole Sabouraud. Original music by Sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker and Carole Sabouraud. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski. The director of Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is The Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times opinion.
You've heard the news. Here's what to make of it.
I'm Thomas Friedman. I've been following the Israeli-Palestine conflict since I was 15.
I cover foreign affairs for the New York Times, but with a particular emphasis on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
So on this second anniversary of the war, how am I feeling?
You know, this has been the longest Israeli-Palestinian war.
It's also been the first war that, despite its length, two years now, it actually has no name.
The 1948 war, the War of Independence, the Nakhba War from Palestinian point of view, the 67 war, the Six-Day War, the Sinai War, the October War.
This war, two years.
Still no name.
And so I have a name for it.
It's the worst war.
This is absolutely the worst war ever between Israelis and Palestinians.
Because it comes after a failed attempted peace.
It's a war that was launched by Hamas with complete viciousness,
aimed to kill as many Israeli soldiers and civilians as Hamas soldiers could encounter.
And it triggered an Israeli response against Hamas that has devastated Gaza,
inflicted tens of thousands of Palestinian casualties, both soldiers,
and civilians, and done so without Israel offering any political horizon for the morning after.
And so it's left both communities more devastated, physically, more traumatized than ever,
and farther than ever from what is the only solution to states for two people.
So now, thanks to initiative by President Trump, the two sides, Hamas, and Israel,
are trying to forge a ceasefire that will involve a return of all the Israeli hostages, both living and dead,
Palestinian prisoners, hundreds of them in Israeli jails, and an Israeli withdrawal from at least most of Gaza to some border region,
and basically paving the way for a international peacekeeping force to come into Gaza and secure the areas where Israel is,
evacuated, a Palestinian technocratic cabinet to basically run Gaza, and over and above that cabinet,
a kind of international body chaired by President Trump, to supervise the reconstruction of Gaza.
It's an extremely complicated plan in an extremely broken place. There have been a lot of
optimistic noises about whether or not this will be achieved. I certainly pray that it will be,
but I think it's going to be very difficult because Hamas is going to want to read.
at least some arms for its people for self-protection, so it can still play a political role
in a post-war Gaza. And Israel is going to be very careful about how far and wide it withdraws
from Gaza and what kind of security arrangement will fill in its wake. And so I hope the ceasefire
that President Trump has initiated will come to fruition. And I'm watching every day, but it's not
going to be easy.
What intrigues me about this plan is that it contains the seeds of what I think is the only possible solution now to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
You know, former U.S. Secretary-Defense Donald Rumsfeld once said, you know, many people have said, when you have a difficult problem, enlarge it.
And in effect, that's what we're doing.
I think the thing that people need to understand most about the peace talks going on, right?
now is the sheer number of actors involved.
What is the underlying logic of this plan is that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now so broken.
The two sides are so traumatized that this problem can no longer be solved with the traditional
tools and at the traditional level that it was resolved before.
That is, the two sides negotiating with each other and an international mediator in between them.
I believe if we're ever going to get to two states for two people,
it's actually going to require some kind of international body
to oversee both Gaza and the West Bank
and assure Israelis that no threat can ever come from those areas
and that they don't have to rely on Palestinian promises to demilitarize
and assure Palestinians that Israelis will be gone
and enable Palestinians to develop their own non-corrupt governing authority.
And so basically, if we want to solve this problem now,
I think we have to go back to the whole idea of mandate,
kind of agreed upon Arab international mandate,
to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza,
to oversee the rebuilding of Palestinian governance in the West Bank.
And only that kind of international structure
that would assure both decent Palestinian governance
and real demilitarization of both Gaza and the West Bank
supervised by international troops
that would almost surely have to have an American component.
I think that's the only way to solve this problem now.
Let's step back for a second and ask, you know,
how did we get to this point where we can even have these kind of talks
that are going on in Egypt this week?
And it's for several reasons.
One is that Iran and its threat network of Islam, Hamas, the Houthis, the Shia militias in Iraq,
Iran was dealt a devastating blow by Israel with the help of the United States in what was called the 12-day war.
So Iran, its ability to meddle and destroy peace talks has been severely set back.
Israel, under Prime Minister Netanyahu, finds itself not only more isolated,
than ever internationally. But it has a very different sort of diplomatic slash political problem
with the Trump administration. Whenever U.S. presidents, particularly Democrats, tried to press
Prime Minister Netanyahu to enter into peace negotiations, Netanyahu could always run to
evangelical Christians and Republicans, basically, and use them as a lever to neutralize
the White House and to deflate any pressure on Israel.
But under Trump, that's not possible because he completely controls his party now.
And so Netanyahu found himself really forced to enter into these negotiations very grudgeonly.
But his old levers that he used to pull in order to diffuse American pressure, they weren't available under Trump.
For Palestinians, you have an analogous situation.
For decades, basically, Palestinians were able to have enormous influence over.
over the core Arab leadership in Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq,
by threatening them that if they didn't support
the Palestinian cause, which their people did,
the Palestinian movement would attack
and delegitimize those leaders.
And because those leaders, in most cases,
were illegitimate, they were very vulnerable
to that kind of sort of political blackmail
from Palestinians.
But what's happened in the last 10, 15 years,
is that leadership of the Arab world has moved from Egypt,
Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, the republics, to the Gulf, to Saudi Arabia and the UAE in particular.
And these monarchies have a lot more legitimacy.
And therefore, they're actually not so vulnerable to the sort of traditional Palestinian
blandishments.
And they have made it very clear that they are ready to participate in a ceasefire in Gaza,
in a transition for a different kind of Palestinian governance.
And one thing we know about the Palestinians living in Gaza, many of whom have been uprooted
four, five, six times from their homes.
They are exhausted.
They're traumatized.
They've lost their homes in many, many cases, and lost family and relatives.
They want this over.
And I think that's another pressure on Hamas.
Hamas knows that it does not have the mandate of heaven anymore to perpetuate this war indefinitely.
And so for all these reasons, the parties have found it very difficult to avoid.
this negotiation. This is a hugely complicated process, but, you know, certainly one of the key actors
has been the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu was finally cornered by Trump.
After, let's remember, you know, last January, December, President Biden had a very similar
deal on the table, and Netanyahu rejected it, walked away from it after the first stage of
hostage release. Netanyahu has managed to survive this war because of the devotion
the cult-like devotion of a core of his support.
He has done everything to divide Israel in order to stay in power,
to give basically a permission slip to the ultra-Orthodox,
to not fight in one of the most vital wars of Israel's history
in order to keep them in his coalition.
He's done a whole series of what I find really disgusting things,
but has managed to survive politically
and avoid a commission of inquiry.
Bibi Netanyahu never wanted this war to end.
He did everything he could to perpetuate it
because he knew that the morning after the morning after,
there will be a reckoning for him.
I think he deserves to be called to account,
and I believe there will be a reckoning if this ceasefire comes through
and the hostages are released.
The biggest loss maybe for Israel is that it lost its moral halo
among people who were predisposed towards Israel.
So Israel has lost something deeply important, albeit intangible,
because the way it fought this war, the way Netanyahu fought this war,
which was to basically go after Hamas with little, often not zero,
but little regard for Palestinian civilian casualties along the way,
when you fight a war that's going to necessarily involve so many civilian casualties,
but you offer no political horizon whatsoever, which is what Netanyahu did,
it starts to just look to people around the world,
especially if you're viewing it in 15-second bites on TikTok,
is just killing, killing for killing's sake.
And that's how it was perceived by many people around the world
and particularly many young people.
And as a result, Israel's credibility, standing, moral support
among lots of young people around the world in particular,
not to mention old people,
has been so badly damaged that Israelis are not welcome in a lot of places now around the world,
whether it's their soccer teams or their singers or their academics.
And that's been a huge price to pay.
So what about Hamas and its leadership?
Well, I certainly hope there'll be a reckoning for them too.
You know, I wrote a while back when Yahyazinewar, who was the leader of Hamas,
who planned and launched this war, was still alive,
that if there were ceasefire and he held a press conference,
I wanted to be in the first row,
and I wanted to be able to ask the first question.
Mr. Sinoir, you just achieved what you called a great victory.
Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a restoration of the ceasefire.
What did you have on October 6, 2023?
You had Israel out of Gaza and a ceasefire.
You launched this war to get yourself exactly where you were the day before, with a ceasefire in Israel out of Gaza.
Shame on you.
Yes, you drew attention to the Palestinian cause, but that attention will only be translated into something positive if it actually leads to exactly the solution you didn't want, which was two states for two people.
so you will go down in infamy.
Donald Trump has been saying for a while that he really wants,
he already thinks he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.
Well, if Donald Trump is able to secure a ceasefire,
Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, return of Israeli hostages,
and it holds and paves the way for negotiations
on the only solution of two states for two people,
to quote my Israeli friend Nachum Barnaya, the columnist from Yidiot,
Trump will not only deserve the Nobel Peace Prize,
he'll deserve the Nobel Prize in physics and chemistry as well,
because that would be quite an achievement.
It's like he's trying to put together a Rubik's Cube
while people are still shooting at each other
and at him, metaphorically speaking,
and the pieces themselves are sort of crumbling.
And so to try to get them all arranged,
all the same color on one side, all going the same way, and sustain it the morning after the morning after.
Sustaining this would require the full work of a single U.S. Secretary of State for the rest of his career.
And my question is, will the Trump administration have the attention, the energy, the focus?
That'll be required every day to keep such a complicated solution on track.
I hope so.
If you like this show, follow it on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.
The Opinions is produced by Derek Arthur, Bishakadarba, Christina Samuoski, and Jillian Weinberger.
It's edited by Kari Pitkin and Alison Bruzik.
Engineering, mixing, and original music by Isaac Jones, Sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker, Carol Sabro, and Afim Shapiro.
Additional music by Amun Sahota.
The fact check team is Kate Sinclair, Mary Marge Locker, and Michelle Harris.
Audience Strategy by Shannon Busta and Christina Samuelski.
The director of Times Opinion Audio is Annie Rose Strasser.
