The Pete Quiñones Show - Episode 1133: The Thought of Eric Hobsbawm: Part 3 - 'The Age of Capital' w/ Thomas777
Episode Date: November 14, 202460 MinutesPG-13Thomas777 is a revisionist historian and a fiction writer.Thomas concludes a series in which he discusses the thought and work of Eric Hobsbawm. In this episode he talks about "The Age ...of Capital."Thomas' SubstackRadio Free Chicago - T777 and J BurdenThomas777 MerchandiseThomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 1"Thomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 2"Thomas on TwitterThomas' CashApp - $7homas777Pete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Airgrid, operator of Ireland's electricity grid, is powering up the Northwest.
We're planning to upgrade the electricity grid in your area and your input and local knowledge are vital in shaping these plans.
Our consultation closes on the 25th of November.
Have your say, online or in person.
So together we can create a more reliable, sustainable electricity supply for your community.
Find out more at airgrid.i.4 slash Northwest.
On the many nights of Christmas, the Guinness Storehouse brings to thee Christmas nights at Gravity.
This Christmas, enjoy a truly unique night out at the Gravity Bar.
Savour festive bites from Big Fan Bell, expertly crafted seasonal cocktails, and dance the night away with DJs from love tempo.
Brett take infuse, amazing atmosphere, incredible food and drink.
My goodness, it's Christmas at the Guinness Storehouse.
Book now at giddlestorhouse.com.
Get the facts be drinkaware, visit drinkaware.com.
Employers, did you know you can now reward you and your staff
with up to 1,500 euro and gift cards annually, completely tax-free.
And even better, you can spread it over five different occasions.
Now's the perfect time to try Options Card.
Options Card is Ireland's brand-new multi-choice employee gift card
packed with unique features that your staff will love.
It's simple to buy, easy to manage,
and best of all, there are no extra fees or hidden catches.
Visit OptionsCart.comit today.
If you want to support the show and get the episodes early and ad-free, head on over to freeman
beyond the wall.com forward slash support.
I want to explain something right now if you support me through Substack or Patreon.
You have access to an RSS feed that you can plug into any podcatcher, including Apple,
and you'll be able to listen to the episodes through there.
If you support me through a subscribe star, gumroad, or on my website directly, I will send you a link where you can download the file and you can listen to it any way you wish.
I really appreciate the support everyone gives me.
It keeps the show going.
It allows me to basically put out an episode every day now, and I'm not going to stop.
I'm just going to accelerate.
I think sometimes you see that I'm putting out two, even three a day.
and yeah, can't do it without you.
So thank you for the support.
Head on over to freeman beyond the wall.com forward slash support and do it there.
Thank you.
I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekinguena show.
Thomas 777 is back in.
Do you think this will be the last Hobbsbom episode or do you think there's another one in this?
I mean, it's up to you because it's, I mean, it's your platform.
and we can go as long as you want on it.
I think that, I think three-part series are a good,
I think it's a good model for this kind of content.
But I'll go as long as you want on whatever topic.
I was basically going to conclude what I have to say on the subject today.
Let's do it that way and then it gives us a chance to start something new.
Yeah, indeed.
yeah no before as I said before I went live I don't feel right today so I started repeating myself or
whatever please advise me of that and we're hopping around a bit in terms of the timeline
and but I think people have been okay with following it the what's important to me
especially in terms of at least what I the kind of real value I find in a house blog
I mean, obviously it's this 20th century
historiography, but especially
World War I, because it's so ill
understood, and
it's such a critical event.
You know, like, I,
this is something of a tangent.
Like, the other week,
I'm not going to name names because
I don't want people to think I'm being mean, or
I'm not even trying to, like, suggest
something punitive. But I was on this panel
with a few guys, and I was talking
about how people,
especially in America, but also,
basically like across anglophone countries and like their academic culture and stuff.
The other say they reject historicism of the continental type,
but they fall back in this kind of like midwit idea of oh,
history repeats itself or alternatively they like a shoe that.
But then they claim that, you know, well, there's not really precedent to extrapolate
so you can't make a search nxy Z.
So like, I was making the point that the 20th century basically
there's nothing you can glean from that
moving forward, either in terms of the
strategic landscape or power political
development, and this guy's like, well, you can't
say that. I'm like, actually, I can.
You tell me World War I's going to
happen again. That never, ever
happens. You know, like, that's
the equivalent of, like, a meteor strike.
You know, I mean,
so,
but that aside,
Hobbsbom was interesting, especially
the way he characterized the Great War.
I mean, obviously, because he
was at base
a doctored air
Marxist Leninist.
He
overstated
material and economic
causes. But there is
nuanced there that I think
warrants attention.
But first, I mean, a little bit of
background in terms of like
what laid the foundation
for his sort of breakdown
of the Great War.
Hasbun was very much
he very much
proposed the theory of what's now
called the general crisis.
Okay.
What the general
crisis refers to is
this odd period
in the 19th century
whereby
on the one hand there was this
kind of running stability
in terms of power political
activity and
interstate warring.
After Waterloo,
after Waterloo, not much
happened in Europe. I mean, a lot
happened. But I mean, in terms of
war and peace developments,
there's the Crimean War,
which is very much restricted
to the theater,
to the primary battle
space,
you know,
which
you know, very much spared
the continent.
And there's the Francoe-Prussian war
which really,
that's kind of what started
to knock France out of the game
as like a true, like, burgeoning
super. And there's, the war. And there's the, that's kind of what started to knock France out of the game.
Bower, in my opinion. But that also, I mean, that was, that was kind of the most, that was one of the
greatest, like, Prussian victories of all time. But that also, I mean, that was kind of the first
of Blitzkrieg in some ways, you know, and there wasn't large-scale civilian attrition in it,
you know, but other than that, I mean, the only reasons, I think, like I mentioned before,
with so many European mercenaries, like, streamed into the United States. So, like, to take up,
to take up arms for pay for, you know, the union or the Confederacy,
because there just wasn't, there wasn't a lot going on.
You know, if you were, if war fighting was your hustle,
you know, either because that's just what you like to do,
you know, you were an action junkie,
or like, that's how you made a living.
Like, well, you kind of had to look abroad if you wanted to fly your trade, you know.
But there was a lot of social instability.
And there was a lot of,
There was a lot of sociological, there was a lot of punctuated disturbances.
You know, like in the social structure of the main European countries.
And like this started really after the 30 years of war.
You know, Hugh Trevor Roper is another guy.
He was very, very different than a Hobbesbaum,
but he basically abided this as well.
Okay, like basically, in the middle of the 17th century,
there's this total breakdown in politics and social order and economics and everything else.
And this culminated in, you know, the 30 years war.
You know, then there's the English Civil War.
Then in France, what they call like the front, which was basically like this running civil unrest.
You know, and in some cases, just like violent criminality that didn't even really have a political raison d'etreau.
It was just like guys kind of like clicking up and like robbing, raping, and killing people under some like loose auspices of economic justice by violence.
You know, the Holy Roman Empire, which was actually a really important political structure.
You know, I know that there's a lot of Anglophone historians, they kind of like a heartily declare like,
it was neither holy no Roman nor
an empire. It's like, okay, that's great.
But it, the reason
why, like, it took on
that moniker
was to suggest that, you know,
this is a transfer of sovereignty to Europe
Central, like, from what was
like the Juice public on
the Romanim.
You know, I mean, it does track, okay?
Um,
there was revolts against the Spanish
crown in Portugal.
Um, there was
there were secessionist movements
in Naples and Catalonia
and there's also just like jumping off
like at the same time
you know it wasn't coincidental
that something was happening
you know
and um
when
when the dust kind of settled
you had this increasing centralization
at government okay
like we talked about last
session
there was this kind of like nationalism
that kind of took rude
but it was like very much
like an enlightenment phenomenon.
Like, again, we say like nationalism.
We're not talking about some return to sort of like tradition or or some kind of
adivistic tribalism.
We're saying that like kind of the court in these countries consolidated and it's like,
okay, look, you know, like within these sovereign parameters, like we are the only sovereign.
We have the power to tax you, you, you and you, you know, the only, the only legitimate
men under arms, the ones we, you know, stuff like that, okay?
Airgrid, operator of Ireland's electricity grid, is powering up the Northwest.
We're planning to upgrade the electricity grid in your area, and your input and local knowledge
are vital in shaping these plans.
Our consultation closes on the 25th of November.
Have your say, online or in person, so together we can create a more reliable, sustainable
electricity supply for your community.
Find out more at airgrid.i.4.Northwest.
On the many nights of Christmas, the Guinness Storehouse brings to thee Christmas nights at gravity.
This Christmas, enjoy a truly unique night out at the Gravity Bar.
Savour festive bites from Big Fan Bell, expertly crafted seasonal cocktails,
and dance the night away with DJs from Love Tempo.
Brett take infuse, amazing atmosphere, incredible food and drink.
My goodness, it's Christmas at the Guinness Storehouse.
Book now at Guinness Storehouse.com.
Get the facts be drink aware, visit drink, aware.
Employers, did you know, you can now reward you and your staff with up to 1,500
euro and gift cards annually, completely tax-free. And even better, you can spread it over
five different occasions. Now's the perfect time to try Options Card. Options Card is Ireland's
brand-new, multi-choice employee gift card, packed with unique features that your staff will love.
It's simple to buy, easy to manage, and best of all, there are no extra fees or hidden catches.
Visit OptionsCarrant.comte today.
And this kind of central bureaucracy
developed to kind of prevent this chaos
that have been happening.
And this was like a 150 year cycle
from the end of like the 30 years war
and the peace of its failure
until like the start of the 19th century.
You know, but throughout the 19th century
despite these, this kind of basic stability
in terms of like power of political activity,
there was this increasing tension
because a lot of these
a lot of these like, you know, otherwise
progressive states
that it centralized,
you know,
despite that,
they were,
they were most of them were,
like,
run by absolute monarchs.
Or they were run by a court that
was essentially staffed by,
you know,
like an upper house
of landed aristocrats.
Okay.
And obviously,
you know,
clergy people still had a lot of clout,
you know,
the Roman church
couldn't assert itself
in an absolute
way over sovereign governments
anymore but it still had great power
so there's this weird disconnects
on the one hand like structurally
you have the structure of the modern state
like as we know it today
but it was populated basically
by these aristocrats
and and clerical types
and people who
derive their mandate from sort of
traditional modalities
that were ceasing to exist.
Okay. I want to Haslam's big points, and a lot of people don't understand this about Marxists.
Marxists don't look at aristocrats and the bourgeoisie is the same thing.
They look at them as opposing classes, which they are.
Okay.
And the first revolution before the proletarian revolution can happen,
like basically the bourgeoisie have to annihilate the aristocracy.
And when that doesn't or can't happen, does this kind of?
kind of stagnation in like the Marxist
Latinist worldview.
Like nothing is progressing.
You know, there's not like innovation,
government kind of, it has this like monopoly
on power, but there's nothing dynamic about it.
And this is critically important.
Because I've heard people talk about,
and especially because I understand
like people develop that impression based on
the rhetoric,
as well as the experience
historically of the Russian Revolution,
they view like Bolsheviks as guys who like want to kill
kings or who view like them as guys who just like want to burn down the churches because they view
the church as the repressor. It's not the way they look at it. Yeah, they want to do those things.
But their whole notion is that the bourgeoisie is a revolutionary element too. It's got to
annihilate like the throne and altar and like the European court as it's existed for, you know,
millennia and it's now consolidated under the trappings of the moderate state. And then like when
the bourgeoisie is able to consolidate
control of this modern means of production
that can be applied
to basically resolving
shortages and poverty. That's like when the
proletariat rises up and then like takes over those
means. And that's like the final revolution.
Then there's like no more class.
There's no more caste. You know
and like life can be like socially
homogenized like in circumstances
of plenty and there's not material need
anymore. And because there's not
contradictions anymore and there's not
there's not material deprivation
like there's not war anymore
and like all the superstructural features
that cause those things
you know like like racial problems and things
like those are all like annihilated
because they can no longer be exploited
either deliberately by design or
or just by
you know or just you're just
owing to intrinsic tensions
that that
that that cause hostility
or the internal contradictions of
of an non-periscive paradigm like that's what they're talking
about. Okay.
So,
Hobbs'
Wom's view and
Roper's view, albeit for three different reasons
that a lot of, like, Anglo historians,
was that this phenomenon I'm
talking about, it basically kind of
it created this, like, weird
stagnation, and
these tensions kept on
developed this
sort of unsustainable momentum.
And then by the time
of the Great War, what it
essentially happened was
you had this kind of like
hyper-competitive capitalist
paradigm between
the major European powers
but
it was kind of inconsistent
across national frontiers and
uneven, okay?
So you had the Germans that were absolutely
killing it and they were eclipsing
the UK which had previously been
you know kind of like the
like the factory of
Europe you know and
British products had been
flooding the planet in markets far and wide.
Like that was over with.
But the newly consolidated
German state, like, it was cash poor.
And then he had the French who, like I said, they'd been kind of
knocked off of their pedestal
by the Franco-Prussian war and never really recovered,
you know, frankly, from like Waterloo
and stuff.
You know, so they were like realizing that like they were going to
like the future basically was them being
like a junior partner kind of in this
like German dominated continent.
Europe becomes a superpower, okay?
And Hobbs on view is like, look, what the great equalizer is is in military power.
And he's right.
And if you don't believe that, I mean, I'll really you this, okay?
Like at peak, I'm talking in the era of like undeniable strategic parity, like after
1977.
The Soviet Union at peak, its GDP was like one-fifth of the United States.
okay
its annual growth
was like 1.2%
or like something that would be like
viewed as pathetic by
you know by
the
by the Bundes Republic
or by the United States
but they were probably
like the strongest
military power
that's ever existed on this planet
okay
so in a Hasbom's view
like look if you're being
if you're basically being murked
like in the great game of
of capitalist commerce
and you know
they kind of zero sum competition
before European integration was a reality
your trump card is essentially
that you can defeat your enemies
on the battlefield
you know
and there's a certain confidence here
because again
you know the Crimean War
resolved pretty rapidly.
The Francoe-Russian War resolved pretty
rapidly. The war between the
states here in America was a bloodbath,
but that owed
this peculiar conditions.
Okay? So going into World War I,
the combatant states, like, yeah, I mean,
there was complex historical factors
that conspired to make it happen.
But the major
combatants figured that,
well, you know,
this was going to resolve pretty rapidly
you know and um
the British especially thought that
and um
you know I
I this is a discussion for another
series but
I said during our World War I series that a whole big
I think was
I mean here's the really sympathetic
figure in the Great War
and that perfectly exemplifies like what
Hathlund was talking about.
The dynamic between like a Holveg,
the consler, and the Kaiser.
You know,
Um,
Wilhelm was not a good man and he,
he did not have good command aptitude,
but even if he had,
there was like this bizarre kind of tango
where you had, you had, like,
you know, the leader of government in a
whole vague, then you had literally the Kaiser,
who was the king.
Then you had these industrialists,
And both Hoveg and the Kaiser, they had to organize, like, purchasing, you know, arms, munitions,
figuring out some way to appropriate manufacturing means to sustain battlefield demands,
but also compensating these private actors for, like, you know, their outlays and things.
So it's like you've got kind of like three bases of sovereignty that are basically at odds
and have competing interests
but they're all profiting
or at least
you know
surviving by virtue of this war
enterprise you know
and it leaves us conditions
where like nobody's really in charge
and like how do I made that point too
you know and that's why I put him kind of
head and shoulders above
most Marxists who just say like
oh well what will want to happen because you know
of overproduction.
You know, like, and that's ridiculous.
Like, one didn't happen because there was some conspiracy of capitalists.
Like, well, we got to kill off, you know, our workers, because there's, you know, we can't employ them.
And, well, you know, we, we don't, we don't have a destination for these overproduced goods.
So we're just going to blow them up on the battlefield.
Like, nobody thinks that way.
And that's also not why wars happen.
And if that was the case, like, if that was true, like, basically any time there was a major recession,
like the president would just like
devise a war like that
that's not all things happen
you know like if
if there was a huge financial crisis next year
and America and the Chinese
wouldn't be like let's like let's pretend to have a war
and sink each other's navies like well
would that accomplish you know that's I mean I'm being
obtuse deliberately but this is an
important point because the refrain
even a guys should know better
it's like well war is about big business
or it's about money you say no it's not
man like how is it about money like how is it about money
Like how, I mean, yeah, people definitely find ways to profit from war,
but you can profit from literally anything.
You know, I mean, that doesn't tell us anything.
Airgrid, operator of Ireland's electricity grid, is powering up the Northwest.
We're planning to upgrade the electricity grid in your area,
and your input and local knowledge are vital in shaping these plans.
Our consultation closes on the 25th of November.
Have your say online or.
in person. So together we can create a more reliable, sustainable electricity supply for your community.
Find out more at airgrid.a.e. 4. Northwest. On the many nights of Christmas, the Guinness Storehouse
brings to thee Christmas nights at Gravity. This Christmas, enjoy a truly unique night out at the
Gravity Bar. Save her festive bites from Big Fan Bell, expertly crafted seasonal cocktails,
and dance the night away with DJs from Love Tempo. Brett take infuse.
amazing atmosphere, incredible food and drink. My goodness, it's Christmas at the Guinness Storehouse.
Book now at Guinness Storehouse.com. Get the facts be drinkaware, visit drinkaware.com.
Employers, rewarding your staff? Why choose between a shop voucher or a spend anywhere card,
when with Options Card, you can have both. With Options Card, your team gets the best of both worlds.
They can spend with Ireland's favourite retailers or choose a Spend Anywhere card. It's simple to buy and easy to manage.
There are no hidden fees, it's easy to use, and totally flexible.
They can even re-gift or donate to a good cause.
Make your awards more rewarding.
Visit Optionscar.i.e. today.
You know, but that's, this is fundamentally important.
And this, not just the catastrophe of the Great War and, you know, the fact that it kind of deformed an entire generation and put an entire generation in the grave as well.
but it these these tensions and these uncertainties this is what uh this is what facilit this is what expedited
the bolshevik revolution which very easily by the way could have prevailed europewide you know i mean it's
uh i'm the first to acknowledge as any serious student in the 20th century is it's strange
that the literal
heart of the
of the communist international was Russia
that's weird
but people conveniently forget
or they just don't know because they
subjected to bad history
you know I mean there was a communist revolution in Germany
there was a communist revolution in Hungary
there almost was in the UK
you know this stuff was
stopped by force of arms.
It didn't just fizzle out or something.
You know, but
this is the way to
understand the 20th century and the degree
to which, you know,
the 20th century
was basically
a reaction to
communism. I mean,
they can't be overstated.
You know, in power
political terms, I mean, like, obviously
we're talking about human
life at scale.
in any epoch there's an entire myriad of factors across a broad spectrum that um
go into that but um the kind of key takeaway is uh you know um what hosbong called the age of capitalism
like facilitated this and like that's um he actually he wrote an essay that became a book called
the age of capital 1848
to 1875
and he makes the point
the word capitalism
it first entered like the
academic lexicon in the 1860s
you know
from 1848
like after the
revolutions in Europe were
were quashed
in both Europe and America
there was this
there was this kind of like massive economic boom
okay
and that's one of the things that
meant that there wasn't another like 1848
revolutionary sentiment
because there's a lot of wealth being produced
you know
but again there were these kinds of obsolete
social structures that
were sort of organizing people's lives nonetheless
yet these societies were flooded with capital
but it was
it wasn't
it was very much like funnel
into specific channels
you know not by conspiracy of design
or something
but
there just was not like a free
like individual people
did not have a lot of purchasing power
and it's created like weird disparities
you know like there wasn't
there's a lot of like
if you're a
if you're a neoliberal economic
economist you'd look at this as like
basic market inefficiencies.
You know, this is why
like banking is so important to like the
monitorist view.
And then they're right about that.
You know,
the availability of capital
and, you know,
confidence in financial instruments,
like that's the regulatory
mechanism that's essential. But beyond that,
you basically need like capital flow,
like where it's going to be most efficiently
allocated in order to produce
produce wealth and that that wasn't really happening despite the fact that you had
you know you you had kind of at the top and also kind of like
unevenly distributed like sort of throughout the
sociological spectrum you know you had some like some incredible innovations
that were like altering people's lives and there was um
like government could simply do things that it couldn't before
I mean like World War one like that's totally
insane. Like the ability to mobilize
like 5 million men, arm them,
equip them, feed them, then like
turn them loose to like assault your
ops. Like,
that would be like unthinkable even in
like the Napoleonic era.
You know?
And it's not just modern command and control.
It was like transportation. It was, you know,
it was a more efficient
fuel sources. It was like more efficient
killing technology. It was like, it was all
these things.
But
something else that's important
to is Hobblum said
and he was writing this in the 50s
he first wrote this I'd say like in the 50s
but this age
of capital this was like the first
this was like the nascent earliest stage
of globalization
okay
because if you were a major
capitalist power
you know and again I invoke
a capitalist and within the terms
Hasblam does I don't use those kinds of terms
but um you know you
the British Empire held equity
basically at every continent
you know and um
America was not yet a superpower
but you'd find American goods
basically all over the world
okay and um
there wasn't a
um there wasn't a unified banking structure
but
lending across national
frontiers at scale with governments guaranteeing financial instruments that started blowing up.
You know, and that, that would have been unthinkable before.
You know, in a lot of countries, it was literally illegal for national banks to, you know,
to trade across national frontiers or to issue financial instruments in foreign markets.
But a lot of countries simply wouldn't deal in your currency.
like even if it was a even if it was viewed as you know a desirable currency and speculators would invest in it oh and in person foreign currencies at this time was also largely illegal it was quote-unquote currency speculation it was like literally a crime which is crazy but that that that was the norm you know um but this uh but because of that like in the early stages of any economic system or any paradigm not system but like paradigm does
going to be like really really uneven growth okay and that's going to lead to certain
disparities I'm not talking like social justice disparities I mean like between
enterprises a lot of capital is being created but a lot is being wiped out
like we just mentioned across national frontiers this kind of development is
uneven but also certain industries develop a kind of
outside's clout okay and not the arms industry per se but the um the kind of a terrestrial
manufacturing enterprises that facilitate the arms industry they developed
outsized power like as did again um you know financial institutions this wasn't
some conspiracy and it's not why we'll were one to
happened, but it was a, but it
facilitated resorning to military
measures to remedy
power political imbalances
at scale.
Okay, it was a perfect storm
at things. And
again, that's really
important. You know, and
in my own, like, manuscript
I try and emphasize this point.
And, um,
Hazam, I don't, he's not like my primary
authority on that, but I do
cite him. Um,
But, yeah, moving on.
It's also, too, domestically,
whether you're talking about the United States,
the UK, France, or Germany,
the way such things I'm about to mention were characterized
kind of differed along the local custom
and cultural differences in convention.
But kind of like the lingua frank
a government became
you know this like there was like this
resurgence of sort of like enlightenment
chivalrous
so whether you were in Berlin
London Washington Paris
all you heard from government is
oh see like this is like an age of
unprecedented plenty
you know it's the age of reason
and science and progress
but people were getting like
ground into dust
you know and like working in a factory
or a slaughterhouse that was like
hell
you know it's not
I tell
a lot of guys in the right
who they you know
they throw shade on stuff like
upton Sinclair's the jungle
and I'm like okay
I'm like yeah I don't agree with
those kinds of conclusions either
but what he describes
that's that's that's
100% accurate
you know
there'd be guys
there was no welfare state
you couldn't just get like a link card
so if you were out of work
like you weren't eating
and basically your ability to make a living
dependent on your ability to physically
perform
you know and guys would die on the job
like there's like 10% like attrition
and like a steel mill or like a slaughterhouse
you know and God forbid you get injured
or like you lose three fingers on your hand
in some machine
you know
the biggest surplus in any major city at this time
was like that of like able to
men who want to work.
So did,
um,
did Hobbswam have anything to say about the move from agrarianism to
basically employment where you're providing for yourself with your own,
with your own hands?
And then all of a sudden it seems in,
in the span of a decade,
people are moving to cities to get jobs.
Yeah. He,
uh, yeah, yeah, he got,
he got a lot into that. I mean, the,
the extrapolation of, you know,
the household.
being the center of production
to people
being forced to sell their labor
as some sort of factory
worker like yeah that was tremendously disruptive
and
you know it also
I mean
Havam was insightful and
in his sociological take down
because unlike a lot of people
you know
Shumpeter's big critique of the Marxist's paradigm
and I'm going to bring this back
I'm going somewhere with this was
like, look, like, Marxists aren't really talking about class.
Like, the job you do isn't your class.
You know, like, your class is what you're born into.
And it's defined by how you relate to other people,
similarly born to this kind of, like, social stratum,
that isn't really mobile.
You know, so in Schumpeter's view, which is the traditional view,
it doesn't matter what job you're doing around which money you have.
That's not what we're talking about.
We're talking about a class.
And class isn't something you can just, like,
jump up from or down from, like, within a generation.
And Hasbaum accepted some of those premises.
He's like, yeah, you know,
one of the reasons why the working class exists is because the social capital
that kind of facilitated no blestage oblige,
as well as, you know, kind of the communitarian impulse
that, you know, stood in for the welfare
of state in antiquity and things.
He's like, capitalism
like rips all that apart, and it makes
every man like a stranger, and it
enshrines the war of all against
all not only
as, like, an
implacable reality,
but as like a positive good, almost.
So, the only
thing you have in common with, like, your
neighbors, figuratively and literally, is
that you're all being
crushed, like, in this, like,
industrial labor environment.
And, you know, you've got to stand together or all die.
And that's, like, what the working class is.
You know, it's not a class on, like, the traditional sense.
Or there's not some, like, basic affinity between, um, between peoples.
Like, they're your comrades because you're, you're, like, in the same way you are,
like, with the guys you're, like, unjustly locked in prison with.
You know, it's circumstances that, like, drive you together.
so
and that actually tracks
with like what Mars was talking about in
Das Kapital like if
when you talk about alienation
he's not just talking about the process
of whereby labor is not
personal anymore you don't create
things you're not a producer
you're just doing this like pointless
process like over and over and over again
that's dangerous and dirty and
and painful but it's alienation
from your fellow man
and even if you haven't to be married like you never see your wife
she's stuck with some dangerous, dirty job, like you have, you know, at the end of the day,
like, maybe you, like, get to sleep in the same bed as her, and occasionally you collide in intimacy and have children.
But he's like, that alienation touches the concerns every aspect of the workers' existence.
It's not, it doesn't just, like, remove his labor from his own domain and creative power.
it alienates him from what should be his community,
it alienates him from his ethnos, it alienates him from his wife,
it alienates him from, you know, he doesn't have neighbors anymore.
You know, this all tracks.
And, yeah, so he makes a lot out of that.
And that's one of the reasons why this process whereby
the vestige of aristocracy is able to, like, hang on to power
because people
like bonded in peonage
they are dependent upon
like the Lord of the Manor
and this is a deeply psychological process
okay
and it's enduring
so in a Hasma view
okay this alienation
that is a matter of life
and death in a lot of cases
it's not a matter of quality of life
like it stands to kill you
he's like
really the only remedy these people have
is like appeal to the church
or to like appeal to
traditional social elements
that are kind of like the guardians of the culture
if you want to think about it that way
so they appeal to aristocrats
and stuff you know for justice
and that's one of the things that keeps
these guys like if not relevant
like able to remain
like in situ
you know
that's why Haswell
it keeps the revolution
in stasis, there's no
chance to have a revolution.
Yeah, exactly.
And so guys, like a
hobbomb, he said, this was the big problem
during, like, the long crisis
he talked about. Because
there was all this, like,
technological innovation and this
kind of future shock and disturbance.
But political
cultures were, like, frozen.
You know, and
there was, I mean, that's the point of, like,
any revolutionary Marx
in the 20th century, but Hasman especially,
because I think that he had a particular emphasis
as well as insight into sociological questions.
He's like, we've got to educate people to break them
of these things, of these tendencies.
We've basically got to break them with their short-term self-interest
or their attachment to it,
because we've got to literally kill the aristocracy.
We've got to allow the bourgeoisie to conquer everything.
We've got to let them consolidate.
We've got to let them create conditions of plenty.
before we kill them, figuratively and literally.
You know, it's a very brutal
view of historical processes,
but within the bounded rationality
of Marxist-Leninism
that tracks.
You know, and
there is like a kernel of truth to it,
not in terms of its ethical conclusions,
but, I mean, like today,
this is a bit of a tangent,
but I'm always making the point to guys
this has died somewhat
but it won't die completely
this is a favor of
dissoned people as well
there's going to be a massive financial collapse
in the Great Depression that's never going to happen
again okay
because it can't happen
in the state of information
awareness like to the second
information awareness
that kind of stuff only happens going to uncertainties
there's not uncertainties
anymore. That doesn't mean the dollar
can't bottom out.
But even if it did, that doesn't mean like
you're not going to be able to buy food.
Okay?
Now,
there could absolutely be shortages.
I don't believe in climate
change in the sense of these crazy
people who weren't
a stand-in, like,
apocalypse cult for them.
But I'm certain that there's
all kinds of
environmental factors that
just going to God's will or the nuances
of this planet,
I could easily see famine is coming back.
I mean, you know, I mean,
if it suddenly became impossible to grow certain kinds of crops,
that would fool bar everything.
I mean, so I absolutely do not say, like, crises can't happen,
but this idea that, you know, like, owing to miscalculation
or owing to, like, a gap in, you know,
information awareness
you know of hours or days
like you know like
billions of dollars is going to be like wiped out
overnight in the stock market
that would never happen again
that's retarded
you know um
and
guys like how have one predicted that
you said stuff's going to largely be rubberized
moving forward there's not going to be like food shortages
you know there's not going to it's going to be
very easy to produce things that
today him talking in like 1950
these are hard to produce
you know you're going to like a lot
these problems are going to go away
you know and that and it happened
you know and that's one of the
reasons why
this is I mean this is probably
I've got the scope but
one of the ways you can tell like our government
is like full of like crackheads and
insane people is because
if they didn't overreach and remotely
smart they could
basically hold on to power
indefinitely because this isn't the
because people aren't going hungry because there's not a military draft where you're expected to sacrifice your son in a meat grinder.
You know, there's not a Soviet Union whereby, you know, at any time basically, you know, some enemy society that's like mobilized at massive scale could decide to like sue for war to remedy the kind of uneven power paradigm.
you know like
so it's
you can tell these people are insane
because like they're basically
burning the house down when there's no reason to do that
but um
you know that
the degree to which
uh that that's also why too
I mean like I said I
I it's it's dumb
for people to claim that people like
Mrs. Harris are Marxists anyway
but it's Marxism isn't just
Marxism isn't wokeism.
It's not it's not liberalism
it's a very
discreet
claim and series of claims
about historical processes
and in the short term
Marxists absolutely want
capitalists to succeed
they don't want it to fail
they want it to fully succeed
they want it to conquer everything
and then they want to kill the people at the
helms of the apparatus
like that's the whole point
you know
what
what's strange about how it developed
in terms of actual praxis
is that
it did
again like the
quite literally like the heart of the
of the Bolshevik revolution in the real world
was a place that really had no
like industrial working class
you know it was this like basically backwards
monarchy
that ruled over this
this is this
massive territory.
You know, like, the Russian Empire had more in common with the Ottomans
than it did with Europe. Okay?
I'm not saying, like, racially or whatever,
like, I'm not taking a position on that.
So I don't want people get mad.
But in terms of the way it was structured
and in terms of it being, like, an anachronism
in the 20th century when it finally got brought down,
it's really, really strange that
this is where the Bolshek revolution was consolidated
and truly succeeded.
You know, that's one of the reasons
why
when
I talk a lot
to these guys
not Jackson Hinkle himself
I don't know him
but I know guys in his orbit
and guys who ascribed
to that kind of worldview
so like there are a lot
of their like rebuttals
that people like me are like
well you can't extrapolate
a lot from the Soviet Union
it's like
well I can
but even if I accept that
partial it
well I can't
extrapolate a lot
even by your own
criteria from East Germany
okay
you know and it's a little
you go. Okay, you tell me, like, East Germany
wasn't an industrial state. Like, it,
I mean, if you want to
perfectly realize, like, Marislanda state,
it was the DDR. I mean, that, that
can't be argued. I mean,
I suppose, like, there, I suppose their, like,
rebuttal of that would be, like, well,
that was an artificial state that emerged
out of, like, military exigencies,
and, you know, the fact that it was
beleaguered and threatened,
you know,
owing the conditions
imposed by capitalists, like, is, like, is,
somehow like takes it off the table as a pure example of praxis.
But be as it may, you know, the, to bring it back.
And again, I forget me if I'm ramblings, I don't feel good.
But the degree of which, again, like,
actual Marxists viewed these things as necessary processes, like,
can't be denied.
like Marxists would not be in the street saying like
we need we need we need
Acme widget company to hire more women
because it's bad not to and they wouldn't be saying like
we need to tax these people more like none of that would be like
in their horizon
they'd be like we want Acme widget company to become like as massive
as possible we want it to insinuate itself into everything
we want it to be able to produce everything we need
you know, almost like magic.
And then we want to kill the people who own it,
and we want to take it,
and we want to make it the public domain of the workers.
That's what they want, or wanted.
Like I said, I like guys like Jackson Hinkle.
I think they're playing an important role right now,
if you're any kind of dissident
or any kind of actual resistance actor.
The real interesting thing about that is,
it's the way you know that these people who call themselves Marxists or call themselves
communists nowadays aren't because they would want Elon to succeed and take over and become,
you know, like my friend Matt says, his own Hanseatic League.
They'd want him to do that so then they could take it over by force.
But they should all over him and, oh, you know, yeah.
Well, the point that the degree to which these people,
today are just like goofy envy crats
who are like, it's
just, they're just like people who are like
that guy's a big shot, I don't like
him, it's like that basic, you know, and it's
like it doesn't, and like you can only
that too is a symptom of prosperity as well, because even
you read, Ernst Younger
was a fascinating guy in all kinds of ways
but he lived through
this stuff and
you know, he kind of, um,
he was kind of a stressorist man, you know, like
he was very much a social,
list. And if you read something like
the Glass Bs, the character of
Zaporone, like, he's
obviously kind of a matchup of like Howard
Hughes and Andrew
Carnegie and like
Walt Disney.
But, you know, and like
guys like Zaporone are a real type.
But, you know,
guys like younger thought these guys
were historical giants. They're like,
these guys are going to change the world.
They're going to change everything. And they're playing an essential
role in this historical process.
You know, that's, it's not, I mean, I'm as anti-communist as it's possible to be.
I don't think that should be in dispute.
But communists, they're not dummies or they weren't dummies.
We're just like, I don't like that guy because he has more stuff than me.
It has nothing to do with that.
You know, like, it's not, it's not just, like, dumb, lumping bullshit or, like, guys who think, like, gangster rappers or something.
like that's not like that that's fucking retarded you know and um
this uh these it's it's these like internet guys who have never read a book in their life like calling
people moxas it's like goofy as fuck but um but no i think um you know and today uh i realize i'm
going kind of outside of scope don't forgive me for that it's um boring people but
guys like emmanuel wallerstein um
who, uh, these kinds of post-Marxist types, who do, like, talk about, you know, social justice
within globalism. I mean, yeah, obviously, I don't, like, have common cause with those guys,
but they're really the only, like, intelligent aspect of the left. And I think those guys
are making a comeback because everybody hates the fucking regime and, like, literally everybody
hates liberals. Like, everybody fucking hates liberals and things are, like, awful pieces of
shit. You know, um, that's why, like I said, like, people,
I mean, people throw shit on me all the time.
I don't care.
I'm not here to make friends and I'm used to it.
But, you know, they get mad at me, whether it's because, you know, I got respect for Muslims
and view them as, like, an essential part of the new resistance,
or they get mad at me for, like, retweeting, like, Jackson and Hinkle or something.
But it's, like, they don't understand part of bringing down the regime and discrediting it
is, like, pointing out, not just having it.
how morally bankrupt it is, but how
like, staggering or, like, ignorant it
it is, and its accolades are.
You know, and, um,
if there's, if there's a serious left wing
with revolutionary ambitions,
that's not a bunch of degenerate
natural slaves, like, that's, that's a
good thing, man, like, how's that bad?
You know, like, you've got, people can't, like, take their, like,
personal feelings out of stuff. It's pathetic.
It's, like, talking to a bunch of, like,
is, like, talking to much little kids, or, like,
modeling old women or something, but
the, um,
But that's, you know, and that's also why, you know, again, the, like I said, we started out, like that dude, I'm not going to name, you know, acting like I was dropping cap when I was saying, like, you know, the, it's asinine to, you know, to arrange force structure or to conceptualize grand strategy in, like, 20th century.
terms, you know, like the,
like, 20th century wars can never happen again.
That's never going to happen again.
You know, it's not going to happen again in a thousand
years. You know, like
that, um,
that's the end of the,
uh,
the, uh, the changing, um, like, like, everything
these days is changing. Like I,
you know, like, I made the point before
about, like, just today I was talking to some of the
fellows about, like, public education is dying
and nobody believes in any.
anymore. So is law enforcement.
Like a couple of months back,
like I see it in Chicago now, like I said,
even, you know,
like policing is going to be privatized.
It's, you know, in the south,
like, I mean, I'm sure you see this.
You know how, like, they're still trying to fight
the war on drugs? Like, it's 1982 or something.
And, like,
there was this ridiculous press conference
and they, like, the Tennessee Bureau
investigation.
They held this, like, press conference. It was them
Homeland Security,
ATF, FBI.
There was this whole mass
investigation to literally bust
these two outlawed
bikers, like, slinging meth.
And they're like, we're taking drugs
off the street, and the comments were like,
you people are idiots.
You know, they're like, what do you think this is?
You know, it's like, there wasn't like a single
positive comment, man.
And it's like, this is like a time war.
It's like, what the fuck are these people doing?
You know, like nobody believes in that
garbage anymore. Now, now you got
Homeland security, like, shaking down, like, trailer park meth heads, really?
You know, like, that's, like, that's pathetic, man.
You know, this whole apparatus, the people sustaining it,
there are these, like, increasingly aged parasites who can't, like, adapt to the 21st century.
You know, and that's one of the things that swept Trump into power,
it's the kind of stuff of Hobbsbomb and, frankly a lot of the Marxists we're talking about.
like they
the way they would have viewed Trump is like
you know
they wouldn't have viewed him as some like
arch reactionary they would have been like
well this guy is basically a con man
but he's saying he's going to like sweep away
these obsolescent aspects of
of state
that people like don't think serves their interests
anymore
and that's why a lot of people voted for Trump
it's not I mean yeah there's like people who just like
love Trump
there's people who
you know like
who would have voted
for RFK Jr. who are just like protest
voters. But like your average
man or lady
who's not particularly politically sophisticated
nor inclined, like they voted for Trump
because
their instincts are basically sound and they're like
what the hell's going on here?
Like we, they'll put together
that this regime that live under is like this
20th century obsolete structure.
They don't think about it in those terms.
They realize like this is like a zombie regime.
Like it doesn't make sense anymore.
Like why
you know, like it's, it's, um,
and then, you know, it's, uh,
it's really interesting to see this develop in real time, man, you know,
and that's why, um, one of the things, like part of my vetting process,
the people who I kind of take on his allies, um,
I mean, that's a complicated process. I can't really break it down into like criteria,
but my thing that's essential was like if, like, we do not want reactionaries.
We do not want people who think that good old days
were dope or that we need to like
turn back time or that
or people who think like EnSIG is
like making things
like where we take over the government
and can like manage its bureaucrat.
It's like people like that
or not with the program.
And I mean not only is that like not at all
what we're about but that's
that's got nothing to do with
the trajectory of history and stuff like that.
I don't mean to be
I don't mean to like abrogate this, but I really don't feel good.
So if we could like, if we could wrap it up, that'd be great.
And if you want to do another episode, because this wasn't up to snuff, we can absolutely do that.
No, I appreciated the conversation at the ending because I think that's a conversation that people on the right need to hear.
That, yeah, I think there's too much of a jump towards capitalism solves everything, you know, and I've been reading.
some of lists letters lately
and it's really opening up
my eyes to
just how damaging
the
especially the overseas
the globalism
just what it does to
you know
the Volk
and the Met
Oh yeah
what's also why it's crazy
these people think they hate Muslims
for no reason because some like Zionist on TV
told them to or because they think that
because they think that like some
like shitbag immigrants who did
something to do them as like Islam. It's like
man, you want to know, like Darla Islam's been getting
crushed man by globalism for decades.
I mean like they're on the front lines
of this shit. Like what's happening to them is as bad
as what was done to Europe. Like you think
that's cool. Like these guys, your ops because
they're like fighting back against that shit. It's like
get the fuck out of here.
I mean, people actually think that way are my
ops, you know, like it's
yeah, yeah.
But it's also too, like they, it's
part of internalizing like
enemy um conceptual vocabulary
like people who they
they just like mirror like
they use terms like racist or like they think like oh I'm a capitalist
because that's who my ops like say I am
it's like so you define yourself
or like somebody like Mrs. Harris or Joe Biden says or like
what some like idiot Berkeley professor says like I
I mean how basic are you you know
I don't use those kind of terms because again we're talking about
people like Hobbs
I kind of have to use
his shorthand.
You know, it's like, but I don't,
there's not,
there's not really,
I'm not like a Kaczynski guy.
I know, like, a lot of, like,
I know a lot of, like, dissident type dudes
really, really, like, head K.
I mean, there's nothing wrong with, like, being into him.
Oh, I've, I've,
studied him extensively.
I've read him extensively.
Yeah, but, well, you call it industrial society.
That's a lot more accurate.
You know, like, um,
And post-industrials.
People think that that book, people think that book is like, I have a friend who says,
oh, you can take an Al Gore book and hold it right up next to it, and it's the same exact thing.
It's like, no, he's writing about the human condition.
He's writing about what the industrial revolution did to the human condition.
Is that what I read his whole-al-Gore?
No, that's fucking retarded.
Well, I mean, these guys are just, like, say things.
I guarantee these guys, like, never read a book except maybe, like, some fucking airport
paperback, but I, um, no, I remember when the manifesto dropped in 95 or 96, I think it was in,
I think it was like late summer 95, well, like, when it ran in the papers, late summer, late
summer 95, yeah.
Yeah, when I ran the papers, like, I made sure, like, I, I read it, you know, and it was, um,
it was, uh, it was insightful stuff.
I mean, he's got some blind spots, like, especially a lot of, like, Massivant types do,
like, a lot of those guys don't really, fully grasp, like, politics.
But the stuff he, when he was talking about technological development and the impact on production and labor and how man like individually and collectively interfaces with that, that was pretty insightful.
And like I said, the term industrial society that that's a lot more meaningful than capitalism.
You know, and it's, and obviously too, like a term inherently reduction is like the capitalist is just everything he does.
It's just like stack up capital and like assets.
It's not the way people think.
Like even some guy on Wall Street who's like, you know, kind of a stereotypical wall here hustler,
that's not like the way he thinks.
Like he's, you know, he...
And at base, the reason he like, the reason the guy like that, his world is defined by money
is because that's like power activity in his world.
And that's like a way, that's a way he can like engage in power activity congruous
like his discreet capabilities and like psychology.
It's not because like money is like this ending itself.
to everybody, like in the capitalist system.
So, I mean, these things are important.
But, yeah, like, again, man, like I said, sorry if this wasn't up to par, but I, this,
it's been, I'm not trying to be a murder, but just because I do have responsibility to people.
Things this week has not been great in terms of my whole.
I think people, I think people like this episode more than you think.
Okay, that makes me happy.
Do, do plugs real quick.
Yeah, man.
As always, I, I think.
try and direct people to my website.
It's Thomas 777.com.
It's number 7.
H-M-E-S-7777.com.
I'm going to tweak that some, man.
I was going to try and get on top of it at this week.
But it's dope.
The kid who put it together, he's great.
And anytime I drop anything new,
it pops up there on, like, the feed.
So that's, like, a good way to, like, keep up with stuff,
if you like the stuff I do.
I'm on social media.
at capital R-E-A-L underscore number 7,
H-M-A-S-777.
The best place to find me is Substack.
That's where my PODD is and stuff.
It's Real Thomas 7777 at Substack.com.
And, yeah, in the description,
if you could include some MERSC links too,
like a big like t-shirt and clothes and merch guy um
and uh
that's actually been selling pretty well which makes me very happy
but yeah that's um that's what i've got
i'll take care of that for you all right thank you appreciate it
yeah likewise man
