The Pete Quiñones Show - Episode 1423: The Univ. of Texas Issue is Not New w/ Jose Niño

Episode Date: September 17, 2026

58 MinutesPG-13University of Texas alum, Jose Niño, joins Pete to talk about the the recent dust-up and responses to pictures of the student section at a UT football game.Jose's SubstackJose on unz.comJose on XPete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

With election time approaching, political ads will be inserted into the episode, along with other ads that, frankly, I'm not going to like and you aren't going to like. So please ignore them, skip by them, whatever you have to do. I don't endorse any of the ads that are inserted, but it is another way for me to generate income. So I appreciate you guys putting up with them. If you don't want to deal with them, go to the Picanuena Show.com. can subscribe through Patreon. You can subscribe through Substack, which is my preferred one. Because with both of those, you get an RSS feed, only Patreon and only Substack give you an RSS feed. There's also a link to my website, Gumroad, and SubscribeStar, where you will get the audio

files that you can download and listen to or you can stream in most cases through those locations as well. So if you want to avoid the ads, consider supporting the show. If not, just know none of these ads get any endorsement from me. Skip by them. Do what you need to do. I appreciate all of you. Head on over to Piquino Show.com. You can get the show early and ad free over there.

If not, here's a show. I want to welcome everyone back to the Piquino show. Jose Niño's back. What's going on, Jose? How are you doing today? Oh, just chilling, man. Yeah, really looking forward to this talk. all right i'm i'm usually not somebody who likes to jump into like the um on my own show

what's happening um in the in the current time in the uh you know the the thing that's in the news but um you know like you reminded me um you went to university at texas and with all this with this blow up and seeing um you know and somebody who's from texas you're you're from Texas, seeing this blow up of the Texas GOP. And, yeah. So what did you think when you started, when you saw that, well, what did you think? Did you know about the Indian takeover of University of Texas? Yes.

And this, this is what's actually kind of funny. It brought me back to a conversation I had in terms of. 2018 with a friend. And some people may know this guy, Harlan Dietrich. He was the owner of Bravenew Books, this defunct conspiracy bookstore in the Austin area. He's also a UT alum like myself. I worked under Harlan for some time. And we had a conversation in 2018 where we were talking about demographics, racial demographics and all of that. And he said this straight up. If you want to see one of the like the starkest demographic shifts, it's just look at the alumni section of a UT and compare it with the student body section in the stadium.

And yeah, he knew that from like the rip off the rip then. And even when I went to UT in 2013, I picked up on that. And as someone who grew up in the North Dallas suburbs as well, my high school was already trending in that kind of direction where my graduated class, I would say was about 15 to 20 percent Asiatic. you had like all sorts of people like south asians vietnamese a lot of koreans my friend group was mostly korean but you saw especially like the north side of the town i grew up in started to get more south asian like indian immigration and um that's only magnified since then and even the top 100 people who graduated my class i was like one of two hispanics there but I would say at least 60% of those people were of like Asiatic extraction and then you had like the rest whites and then some token Nigerians here and there.

But it was already in motion like in 09 and stuff. And Texas demographically tipped, I would say around like 04 to 06. I remember this too in high school where all like the social studies teachers were just gushing about how the democracy. graphics in Texas have already tipped to where it's no longer majority white and that trend is only accelerated but what is interesting though in the last 20 odd years is how the Indians have done like multiple great replacements the obvious being against whites because that's what's the whole point of mass migration it's to undermine the state building peoples of the United States in Europe, it's part and parcel of like the post-World War II order.

That is the Jewish grant strategy. But what is very curious is this South Asian migration is a also has a broader regime strategy where they're the only people. They can really trust, a jury can trust in a lot of elite institutions to be like the managerial classes and like the intermediaries there. So they're replacing a lot of people. They're pushing out Hispanics. they've pushed out a lot of East Asians as well because where I grew up it was mostly like a

balance between like East Asians some Southeast Asians Chinese sprinkled in and then you had a lot of Indians but now it's predominantly Indians like across the board and they seem to have um Indians are also just more politically organized too and they're starting to infiltrate the general pop culture much more, in a much more proficient manner than their East Asian oriental counterparts. And the events of like last weekend made me, it made a lot of things click for me from the time I grew up in like North Dallas suburbs all the way through my experiences in UT. And then that conversation I had with my friend that just realized, yeah, this is the culmination of stuff that I've observed over the years. And it's, and it's not random. It's very much public policy.

So, created that. Yeah. One thing that I've said is that managerialism is political jury, basically. It just allows, it allows a well-funded, well-organized minority to take over the governance of any country. And I guess what you could look at is you could go, okay, well, you know, Squatomalans aren't smart enough to come in and do that job. So is it that because the Indian culture is so similar to the Jewish culture and they would have a higher mean IQ than like Central Americans, they're like the perfect group to come in

and jump right into managerialism and to help push out any kind of white influence over a, What seems to be a shorter period of time than we've actually seen with international Jewry? Yes, so Indians, this also goes back to the British Empire, one of like the first kind of like Western European policies that was just totally captured by Jewry, is that the Indians had a very similar role there. And if you look at the colonies ranging from like Africa, parts of Africa, and even of parts of South America too. You still see in these political classes a residual Indian economic elite that's still there

that were that's functioned as like intermediaries when it comes to business or just colonial administrators because there are certain segments of like the Indian subcontinent because it's such a large con subcontinent in of itself and pretty diverse that there are certain groups within there that are not just like higher IQ but they have traits that there that lend themselves to be good administrators meaning that they're going to be subservient they're going to not rock the vote and they will accomplish basic tasks and just say yes sir and stuff like that as opposed to like trying to turn against their their masters especially in the case of jury where they've found like new golems especially with Hindu nationalism

which adds an interesting quirk because Hindu nationalism, Hindu nationalism, Hidu, that movement is actually, if you trace its origins to the 1920s, a lot of its primary thinkers were pro-Zionists and just pro-Jewish in general, on top of having the traits that makes them good golems. So it's been a model that has been tried out before, and it's now being brought to the U.S.,

and that's why they've almost have fit like gloves in many ways because of the fact that you have this experience of Indians being shipped to British colonies before to be funky as coolly labor, administrative labor, or act as merchants as well. And they have a lot of traits that make them useful

compared to other migrant groups. I mean, other, migrant groups are useful for jewelry as well because the thing is these are biological weapons in some shape or capacity like the squad of all ends the mexicans and other groups that the op against like working class whites has been largely finished they've thoroughly decimated those sectors the problem with Hispanics um is that beyond IQ as well they're just not as well organized and you even look at it like in their respective countries you see tons of ethnic mafia's overperform in Latin American countries where you have like the likes of Carlos Menem winning in Argentina, even Naïbe Kelly as well, who's of Palestinian extraction of a lot of these groups, like the Fujimori's in Peru, that belong to highly organized minorities. They do really well in these multiracial Spanish-speaking polities. And Hispanics, with the exception of Cubans in the United States, which are kind of similar in many ways to Indians and how they're able to organize.

and interface with Jewish power on a pretty cordial level. With the exception of them, Hispanics are just not proven to be competent, but they have a use nonetheless, just like how blacks have a use to terrorize whites and ethnically cleanse them in many respects from urban centers. Indians have a use in how they can create a new elite, if you will, that will be more pliant to the jury, because this goes deeper in many respects. UT, for example, these Indians, they're basically replacing white libtards in at UT because UT is a very liberal-coded university. There are not that many conservatives that go there like before.

And now they're going after the white libtards because like a lot of golems, they've turned against their masters by going more pro-Palestine and starting to indirectly challenge world jewelry. But they're also, these people, they're getting kind of a taste of their own medicine because they, they all. also like white liberals have supported a lot of the the many precepts of like the multicultural multiracial order that has completely dominated post-World War II politics in the United States. And now they're getting a kind of taste of their own medicine with this, with their great replacement at the hands of Indians and a world jury there. And UT is one of those one of those testing grounds in particular because I've argued that Austin, in many ways is kind of like one of these new regime cities, if you will, that because of like the tech boom, it's experience, thanks to the likes of Michael Dell, Aju, and similar actors, it has turned into a backup plan for Silicon Valley so they have a new hub that's more business

friendly and all. And because it's so business friendly and it has a broader state governing structure that's pro-business, it's going to naturally bring in tons of jeets. You've got billionaires like Mark Cuban and Michael Dell that dominate Texas business. So they're going to naturally advocate for that. And that's why regardless of who you elect in the Texas legislature, you're going to get infinity Indians or whatever non-white group jury deems as useful in a given political moment. Yeah, I think one of the things that was said, that, like, somebody who's like, oh, well, you have to look at the overall population of how, you know, the percentage of Indians that are actually in Texas. It's like, well, even if it's below 2%, it's growing.

But also, you have to take into consideration. What is the white population of Texas right now? It's 37%. Yeah. So one thing that, like, the GOP always relied upon, I've known this, ever since I started following politics is Texas is going to be a red state. They're always going to vote red. You don't have to worry about it.

But if Texas ever voted blue, well, then you never have another Republican president. You never have another GOP president. Not that I'm not that I'm shilling for the GOP here. It's just it's just a reality. So if you only have 37 to 39 percent white and you know, the Tejanos aren't, backing up the Republican Party anymore. And you're just, and now, especially with, with Governor Wheels, just opening the door and like going to India constantly to make deals to bring Indians there, if you are the Texas GOP, and if you, if you think that, you know, national elections

matter, well, you're pretty much going to have Texas go blue in how long. long, you know, in what, 10 years? I mean, it could be 10 years. Yeah, I think, I personally think that it's just going to become more of a swing state because of the fact that a lot of these more right-wing Jewish figures and some of their house pets that have gained prominence in conservative and just right-wing circles, they have been able to introduce some new polarization vectors where they're able to get a lot more non-white men voting GOP and occupy GOP positions.

And I think what's going on here is more like it's a continued dispossession of whites where they want to make sure that none of the two parties becomes like an explicitly white party or an explicitly non-white. They want to have enough like token groups in these parties to kind of create this type of kosher equilibrium, if you will. Because if you, and I've seen Jews talk about this like, Yasha Monk, he's this German Jew that's like a big, like an influencer in like a lot of political science circles.

And he's written at the Atlantic and other outlets. he um he's like he's talked about how the the policy makers and political strategist should in both parties should try to cater to all racial groups and not focus on fully like identitarian policies and so as to kind of create his equilibrium because one of the biggest fears with um the jews have always have had that this is why they promote mass migration is that they don't want one racial group to turn into like a super like a cohesive super majority that can function correctly they would rather have like multiple that are beefing not just with like whites but beefing amongst each other and all that because it creates like like multiple diads of divided rule which is perfect for Jews because as a

minority they they need like every other group that's um that's around them like beefing against each other so that they can like move in the shadows um quiet in the shadows and not attract much attention that way because whenever a lot of these groups like say for like whites for example a 75% white Texas that has like a cohesive political program does present like a structural threat to it but a Texas where whites are like a plurality but like 37% well they're there are um they're no longer a plurality because Hispanics are like at 40% now but um a Texas where those type of racial groups are kind of like balanced against each other That's a wet dream for Jewry at the end of the day because a lot of these groups are going to beef against each other. You even see this in California that this experiment already happened where Hispanics beef with blacks, Hispanics beefing with Asians,

Hispanics beefing with whites, and then whites having issues with Asians displacing them in universities. So that's perfect for them because Jews don't want cohesive policies that are ethically homogenous and that have very like coherent type of political programs that could challenge a lot of their devious antics. Well, I mean, we know from jury that you don't need a plurality in order to be in charge and to be able to move that. I mean, you know, less than 3% of the population of most countries and significantly less than a lot where they have overwhelming power.

But, I mean, that can also become the Indians, too. the Indians could absolutely do that, especially if they have the backing of another, you know, well-fying, that's well-organized group. But, you know, what I, you know, what you're talking about here is you're talking about, like, you know, we're getting the ones that, you know, have the higher IQ and everything. But, you know, I don't know. Have you ever interviewed Giant Bandari? Yes. Okay. Yeah. Several times. Yes. Yeah. Remember what he says. He says, you're seeing, you know, it's the IQ shredder. We're seeing the ones with the highest IQ now.

We haven't met the average Indian. And the whole goal of this is to get more of India into Western countries, including our own. And then, you know, that's when things, you know, can go camp of the Saints very, very fast. Yeah. And that's where, um, I forget the guy's name. there is this guy in the BJP, the ruling party of India, who openly said that Indian diasporas,

they need to actually copy Jewish organizational strategies. And they're already doing this. Like Texas already has like an Indian Chamber of Commerce that's pretty active in the Dallas area. Dude, they got fucking 100-foot statues of monkey guys. Yeah. Yeah, this guy, Ram Mahdhav, yeah, this is where, from an article I have, he was like the BJP General Secretary like a decade ago.

He like ultimately like said like, here's a quote. He said this, we are changing. the contours of diplomacy and looking at new ways of strengthening Barat's interests abroad, India, in this case. They could be Barat's voice even while being loyal citizens in those countries. This is the long-term goal behind diaspora diplomacy. It is like the way the Jewish community looks out for Israel's interests in the United States. So, yeah, there you have it. And, yeah, they're going to be doing this.

And yeah, in terms of the demographic statistics, honestly, there can be a lot of undercounting too that the Texas GOP is doing because the regime doesn't want like white backlash if they actually see the real figures, which could be an undercount two, where the Indian population is probably considerably larger than those percentages, the official percentages. and once you get like the update, like the census update, it may actually be kind of breathtaking, but back to elite politics, US politics is top down, and it's not very much determined by like raw, like numbers per se. It's determined by lobbying, by having control of certain information checkpoints

and being able to dominate certain types of elite spaces. And Indians have just copied the Jewish strategy of occupying many of those major checkpoints, They've got a whole intricate series of motel lobbies, trucker associations, and all of that. So they're not even really bothering with mass electioneering. Because if they relied on electioneering, solely relied on electioneering, they would get outvoted easily. I mean, if immigration policy was dictated via national referendum, we'd probably have an immigration moratorium, or at least like, huge restrictions on immigration.

And that's one thing Jews and other groups have found out that, like, you don't win this game through referendums or, like, Democrat or just raw democratic votes where it's a question of getting that 51%. Nope. You do this stuff in the shadows through high pressure lobbying, where you can impact things like in an asymmetric manner, or where you can at least build associations that last, like, not only decades, but even like a century,

where you can have like electoral strategies that function more on macro cycles as opposed to like one specific electoral cycle. And it's one thing like the Indian groups and other and like Jews and other groups that regularly interface of groups have learned thus far. And honestly the

the back to jury Emmanuel seller, he's obviously known for the 1965 Hart Cellar Act. He actually passed a law 20 years before helped pass a law

called the Luce Seller Act which was the first it was actually a really small measure but it's part of a broader strategy where they lifted prohibitions on Indian migration this was I believe it was

signed into law in 1947 or 1948 and this was like the first law that kind of broke the taboo of prohibiting immigration from the Indian subcontinent and similar areas and that's the thing too um that these people play a long game as well because they're a minority group so they can't get everything in one fell swoop but they will um

use their lobbying power and kind of like informal political informal political maneuvering to try to reach a broader like grand strategic objective yeah the um you mentioned a man Emmanuel seller there. Jewish response. He's smart to put his name second on both of those because then they could go, oh, but look, the goy. The goy was the one who was leading the charge. He was just there.

But famously, when Truman was trying to get out of recognizing Israel as a state, seller went into the Oval Office, banged on the desk and said you we will run you out of town unless you unless you recognize Israel so you know it's obvious that characters like seller were arch you know arch Zionists who wanted closed borders for his own homeland and wanted wanted his own homeland but when it came to the united states know the order the borders had to be thrown wide open and everyone was allowed to come in Yeah, this was in 46. I'm looking at this now, almost like two decades before. But yeah, Seller, he's part and parcel of the invade the world, invite the world order that has dominated

Western politics since the end of World War II. And World War II was basically a fight between the Aryan policies and a Jewish agenda and the Jewish agenda won. And since then, people like Seller have feasted um off the corpse of gentile western civilization but um yeah and that's the thing that's where this connection happens to and even in the present it's wise to look at it because yes there's going to obviously be the front goy or the um the fall goys if you will that will collaborate with jews like the texas gop for example in Texas. But there's always going to be that element of the Jewish element as well, because you obviously have a very economically reductionist Gentile GOP that pushes these policies,

but it's large, it's amplified by the likes of people like Mark, Jewish billioners, like Mark Cuban, Michael Dell, and that cohort that guarantees that these streams of labor continue. because the Gentile facet of it tends to be more with the illegal immigration, like the typical GOP donor or small, the medium-sized business owner that hires illegals

which is bad, but then you've got the Jewish element like Cuban and Dell that heavily promote H-1Bs. And that's the problem with the GOP because the GOP's big selling point in a lot of Sunbelt states is like

boosting the big red line and the state being business friendly, but a lot of that stuff is buttressed through mass migration, just bringing in more non-white consumer units that will consume all the slop, that will help a lot of developers through their increased housing demand and all of that, but does nothing at all for the general population, especially whites. That's the thing that people have to look at these things in a much more structural manner, as opposed to like an electrician cycle, any electorally, cyclical manner.

Well, it's also important if you look at the Loose Cellar Act, something like that, where if you read it on like Wikipedia, you will read it as, oh, they were looking to limit immigration. It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. They were introducing two new nationalities that could never naturalize into the United States. And when you do that, that just opens the door for the future. It's like now you have the precedent of, oh, we let these people in, and then we can let everyone else in. It's like, oh, only a hundred, only a hundred a year could come. Well, yeah, but as soon as they came and they, they, quote, unquote, naturalized. Now they can own property in their name. Now they can, you know, now they can do, send things back to their own country. And, I mean, this is, this is the guy using a, and I mean, Claire Booth Loose was just a, I mean, a singer. You know, she was like some kind of, um,

She was some kind of ambassador that they had used, but she was really a singer. She wasn't a politician. So, I mean, she's not in charge of anything. They're just throwing her name on there to be like, oh, look, here's the butt boy who, you know, who's doing all this. Yeah. And that's that's a foot in the door strategy because these people are playing the long game. They don't necessarily, like at that point at that juncture, jury, have the power to pass like full scale comprehensive legislation that could just flood the country

with jeeps but they could at least break the taboo by bringing in a limited amount and then they could follow up with the 1965 Immigration Act and then the 1990 Immigration Act which honestly if you look at if you're going to use like a causal chain to explain H-1Bs from like a legislative framework it's that one the 1990 Immigration Act that's what established H-1B OPT and all these other alphabet soup of legal

migration pathways and that's the thing one one figure that was really big well that played an underrated role who was actually kind of like legislative contemporary

of Ron Paul in Texas politics was Martin Frost he was a Jewish Democrat, I think, from the DFW area that would always brag about how he was like the first Jewish congressman elected in Texas. He was a big proponent of the 1990 Immigration Act. And he, I think he died in like the early aughts, but he, one of his final party gifts was that he was one of the few Democrats that voted for the Iraq War. I know three, but yeah, it's like these people that are playing, they're playing this long game here.

And that's why you have Jeets. So you have all, all sorts of mystery meets at UT. And why you, like a flagship institution like UT just looks like a Tower of Babel. It's why, like, Rice University, quite literally puts the rice and rice paddy there as well because it's like it's actually it's there um the Asian student body um out numbers the white body on a clear basis whereas Texas it's debatable but like there's obviously a clear demographic shift and the UT system with very few exceptions is already minority white as it is yeah I was looking at I was talking to someone

yesterday who is very familiar with Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. That's my sister's alma matter. Really? Yeah. Well, what I was told is that this may be low-balling, but not much. 10% of the student body is white. Pretty much in order to get in the school, if you're white, you have to be legacy. And the rest of the school body is.

is like Asian, Chinese, Orient, and Indian. And the Indians will openly say on like internal servers, they have their own, you know, little groups on internal servers. Yeah, we're here to replace you. Yeah. There's nothing you're going to be able to do about it. Here's the rub about a lot of the white university statistics. A lot of those, there's probably a disproportionate amount that are like Jews

because of the weird racial categories. of people that count as white and there are some of the few groups because I've noticed at UT as it's become like much more non-white there has been intensified like Jewish activism

and like there's cases of like legit like former IDF people like active at UT I remember during the pro-Palestine protest and what's going to end up really happening is whatever white people you see in these universities, they're going to either be those legacy people or just like straight up just Jews. If Jews haven't fully created like a separate

category for themselves, which they're actually in the process of doing. But yeah, you're not going to see any legacy like heritage Americans or any Americans except for like maybe like certain state schools. But at like the elite institutions that matter, for the most part, just not going to see it. So do you think this whole, you know, shut down the southern border, prevent, you know, prevent South Americans and Central Americans from coming in, but import infinity JETs. Do you think that this is, that's part of the strategy? It's like, oh, look what we did with the southern border.

Meanwhile, the northern border is completely wide open and the subcontinent is incredibly incredibly overrepresented up there on the Indian subcontinent, as well as China, is overrepresented in Canada. Yeah. Do you think this is all just part of shutting down the southern border is like, oh, yeah, we'll do this just to make some of you happy and everything, but we're still going to do whatever we can to get Jets to come in here and, you know, basically replace you in. in the highest paying jobs yeah there is a bait and switch aspect to this where um elites they get

really cynical and will throw you a bone but they they've got something up their sleeves in the in the meantime the thing about latin america too there's a lot of demographics and other push factors that are no longer in play like there was from like the 70s up on the other 2020s the early 2020s because um in Latin America they still had really high birth rates at that time they're collapsing now across the board from Mexico all the way down to Argentina most of these countries they're becoming like at replacement rate or sometimes even below like well below and then they're they're also more economically stable because they're not um using all like these IMF reforms and these other neoliberal reforms that destroy their economies and create the factors for moving to the states.

And I've argued that those IMF reforms are part to parcel of that order because it benefits the general globalist agenda to bring in Mexican migrants and cheap labor. But with China becoming more of a dominant economic partner in that region, You're seeing a lot of these countries actually economically stabilized or at least pursue more like trade and economic arrangements that don't turn their countries into just like, um, a playgrounds for Jewish capital. And when you become a playground for Jewish capital, you're going to get like a massive economic instability and refugee crises, people leaving the country for better economic prospects. A lot of these factors have played a role in making Latin America no longer like a primary source of migrant labor for the United States for the time being. However, I would watch out in the next decade or so because I do think you may see a revival of like the North American Union of attempts to do that when they have a more like Judeo-liberal or like liberted president or some type of woke versus. of the Knights of the Golden Circle pop up because Latin America now

is going to have more strategic importance for the US as it starts to decouple more from China to just get like raw materials and all of that so that the US can actually be competitive geopolitically because one thing that the Iran War has shown is that the US's military industrial base has just as hollowed out as its domestic civilian industrial base so it's going to have to repivit and do a lot of like near shoring and friends shoring

in Latin America but it might not be as dependent on Latin America for migrant labor but it's definitely going to bring in like elites like that and do a lot of questionable trade deals but I do think that there's a multitude of factors from like the border closures to some more domestic factors in Latin American countries that no longer make these countries like a primary source of migrant labor. However, I do think like the U.S., the way it's been structured for a while, is that it's like a shark. It needs to be constantly swimming. And in this case, it needs constant inflows of labor. And this time, because of like political necessities, they're just going to rely more on so-called skilled labor at the top with Indians.

You'll have like some African sprinkled in and some East Asians, like South. East Asians in there. But I think until there is a thorough clear cleaning out of like the ruling class, mass migration in some capacity, whether it's like unskilled, illegal immigration or skilled migration, is just going to come in? Well, we've heard in the past month that H-1Bs have been shut down. And Indian was complaining that it would take them 129 years to be able to be okayed for but yet I've with my own eyes gone to Texas and seen you know in Austin um just the amount of

Indians that are oh yeah this yeah this this doesn't seem to stop it almost seems like if a governor wants to do something they're not going it doesn't matter what what they're the national level says to do. You know, if Abbott has a deal with Modi, then that's going to, you know, that's going to preempt anything that, that they're handing down as far as limiting H-1Bs in out of Washington.

Yeah, the problem as well. Here's the thing that it's multifold. Is that, you can think, theoretically shut down H-1Bs, but then they'll find another legal pathway in the labyrinth of other legal pathways that were established by the 1990 Immigration Act, or they could create some new weird alphabet soup of, like, migrant pathways, because there's no real desire from the political class to do that.

They'll throw you that bone, but they'll open up a new front against you. And that's why a lot of times it feels like you're in a sysfian. type of struggle trying to limit immigration because of the fact that you just have a hostile occupation class has no desire to do so and I would note as well that a lot of this stuff is mostly pushing back against the excesses of this multiracial agenda that we've been subjected to for decades but still reifying the premises of multiracialism mass and mass migration We saw that with the Texas, with various people from the Texas GOP and the national GOP going after Beau French when he, you know, makes his post about what, you know,

where are the Americans, you know, in this University of Texas picture. I mean, they're going to be their, they're, they're anti-factual. Ashism, anti-racism is so suicidal that they're just like, look, we're just, you know, if you're going to act this way, we're going to increase it by 10. Yeah. The issue ultimately is that we're well past the point of putting like roadblocks on like H-1Bs and all that. Like that stuff is in a vacuum is fine and dandy. But like there has to be. there's like a full-blown, repeal of all these immigration acts or immigration moratorium.

Because what's going to end up happening is like, say like after the midterms, they may actually reopen the H-1B pathway or at least kind of tweak it so that those inflows are up and running again. Or they might just create a new thing. Actually, if you look at a lot of,

there is legislation there have been some Democrats like Rocana and them that have proposed like putting stronger caps on H1B and restricting that but like this stuff is majoring in the minors because you have to have like a full measure at this point because a lot of that stuff is not

even like a half measure it's like a tenth of a measure at best and there's no real political will to do that in Congress because in some capacity all these people are reliant on like a donor class or political coalitions of people that are funded by mass migration boosters. And it's not going to change until you have like a like a actual revolution of sorts that clears out the present ruling structure. So when did this change or when did you change? Because I went and looked at an old episode we did and we were, you were.

talking about how you know you're praising the the Texas GOP for you know for having some some really good policies is this something that's very recent or is this something that was just it wasn't on your radar I mean we're talking about six seven years ago man and um yeah yeah um yeah I would say it had to be Hmm. And it'll be somewhere within the last four years or so the exact date. Because after going back and reading up on history, some history and looking at a lot of macro trends, started to realize that we've kind of been in this dissident activists and right-wing activists have been in the same type of position,

like over and over again, thinking that we were trending in like the right direction, but really we were just being taken for a ride. because I'm of the view now that the US has been in a clear post-democratic moment where the ruling class doesn't really care that much about public opinion and the public opinion only places like a restraint on the bad stuff they're already doing and they'll just stop it like they'll stop the excesses

but they'll never stop like the inherently bad stuff that they initiated fully stop it or they'll just put a pause on it and then open up a different set of problems put up a different front. But yeah, I would have said probably honestly October 7th in the ensuing environment

that's when I started to realize how bad, how captured both parties are and how you really no matter who you vote for you're getting some faction of like organized jury in power

and they present like their own set of problems but nonetheless they make it harder for us to organize or really muster any form of like resistance to it and that's where I've become like more post electoral I mean

my whole career most of my career up until like 2019 was like thoroughly like either in electioneering or single issue lobbying. I'm still pretty partial to single issue lobbying. I think that it is a form of asymmetric pressure you can use to throw rent as a machine. But in the last like four years or so, that's when I've started to become like very much anti-entryist for the most part. and generally think that there has to be some new strategies used on like the cultural front single issue front also media as well and in the information war where i think we there are many opportunities for us to capitalize and not just spread our message but also jam up um the enemy's communications and throw renters in that as well yeah you know people When people look at elections, they tend to want to know what the candidate believes.

And it's like, well, it really doesn't matter what the candidate believes. It matters who's financing the candidate and what they believe and what they want. So, I mean, to change Texas politics, because I think, you know, in Texas politics is obviously incredibly important when it comes to like national elections. that might actually that actually could mean something if we're if we're headed towards right or left authoritarianism which is probably where we're headed

you know the national election is probably where that's where that's going to begin to take shape so how do you I mean do you see anything that can be done to this Texas GOP because everybody tells me from what a lot of people

tell me is they're probably the most corrupt state GOP in the country. I think the best thing that can happen to it is the younger people

which are more radical is to try to create some type of factional struggle or like a proverbial civil war within it and try to do like a takeover I think there are

a lot of opportunities for building media outlets and certain single issue pressure groups as well that could really expose these people i do think that good like investigative journalism like like old school journalism is very necessary to expose a lot of these jeet scams and also these connections as well they're going on with the texas gop to expose it as just like a really corrupt structure um I think that has immense value. Ever since I've pursued more of a writing career, I do think that more patronage of that is long overdue,

more so than a lot of electoral campaigns. And yeah, ultimately with electoral campaigns, that's going to be downstream of the fact if you have a good, like, a good, like, consortium of organizations, whether it's like donor organizations, single issue lobbies that work in concert with one another and other associations that's gonna be downstream of that

if you don't have that kind of infrastructure in place you're always going to be engaged some type of rearguard action or just on the back foot and it's gonna feel like impossible and we have to like almost take a page from other groups that have organized themselves

like through these associations and single issue lobbies and informal organizations that aren't really electoral per se because one thing that I've noticed with people is that they do have a reductionist mindset to politics where they reduce it to only elections whereas there's a lot of political activity you can engage in in like that's not electoral

and also that's in that's outside of the election season that I think it has has very high ROI and can build long-term foundations for an actual revolutionary movement. But people have to think outside the box, essentially. You just reminded me of somebody who's doing some work in Texas that I need to get on the show to talk about that. Let me bring back Canada. I mean, how long, even at the beginning of this, at the beginning of this election cycle, we heard that, oh, you know, we need to absorb Canada into the United States or at least a couple

territories. Maybe we should take, I mean, you're talking about like infinity jeets already up there. And, you know, it's like, what do we, what would you do with Canada if you, you know, I mean, I would build a wall 100 feet tall at this point, but, you know, I'm not in charge. And that's probably, you're probably not going to. to get anybody to do that. So, you know, what would be your strategy with Canada? Because it's so easy for the end.

I'm sure you've heard the stories about the doctors that were, the Indian doctors that came through diploma mills in India that were hired up there. And they're like, I mean, they're practicing, quote unquote, practicing medicine up there. I mean, what do we do with that? Yeah. I mean, you know, I'll pray to the monkey demon and hopefully. you know, your cancer will go away. But, um, you know, what do we do with that? You know, especially with the people who have proven themselves that they just do not care. They don't

even care about their own people, which is very interesting because, you know, they don't care if their own people live or die, which is interesting considering how, um, you know, how insular they actually are. Um, but they certainly do not care about us. And that couldn't be any more, any more evident than, you know, some of the things that we, you know, seen them say in some of the you know the killing on the roads and you know I talk to people in Canada and they're like you know I drive on like Ontario highways every week and I see a truck overturned and it's always someone with a fucking turban standing standing beside the truck yeah you know what do we do with

these people man what do we do with Canada yeah I've joked that just like how only Richard Nixon could go to China only Donald Trump could sell the population on the North American Union or some type of permutation of it by annexing parts of China let's say Canada

yeah this is something that's already been discussed by that one Jewish liberal commentator Matthew Iglesias in his book 1 billion Americans and how you reach that number is going to be through mass migration mostly and also through just raw incorporation of like places like Canada, Mexico, through like a North American Union. And this guy was also platformed by Glenn Beck in that to promote his one billion

Americans book as well a few years ago. And that is a, I've argued it is a regime objective. Trump is just blurting this stuff out and these manga influencer types have blurted this stuff out it's a very in a very incoherent fashion but I think what they're doing there does reflect something that elites are talking about

albeit like they're doing it in like a pretty bombastic and low IQ way but I do think it reflects certain elements of elite discourse because go to any pan like at UT I've been to numerous panels where people have openly said, like, they need to follow the Canadian model

or like a kind of point-based system where we're bringing in, like, three to five million legal migrants, stuff like that. I've heard that openly discussed, and this stuff is not, like, fringe in those circles at all. If anything, like Matt Iglesius, publishing one billion Americans is a way to condition

elites and would-be elites and the broader public eventually into accepting this ridiculous prospect of basically accumulating biomass on the North American continent. And really the, I guess if you're going to even address that, you would have to start at what is our population now. And no one can tell us that. Yeah. And this goes back to the racial demographic statistics. I'll go on a limb and say that they're just not accurate.

the situation is probably more dire than people are what to admit because there is like the GOP does have an incentive to kind of downplay that make you think that you're like everything's all fine and dandy when it's actually not and we got to engage with reality sometimes like your eyes will will tell you something way different from what the government is saying especially in their press releases or their statistical figures well I guess that's enough depressing news for for one day. Jose, tell everybody where they can find your work and, you know, your substack, anything you want to promote. Yeah, you can catch me on substack, Jose Nino, unfiltered. Jose A.L.N-I-N-O dot org. You can go there to check out my articles. And also, if you want to become a paid subscriber, you could go there as well. to have access to the members-only group chat and also weekly live stream Q&As.

And you have access to me via DMs for any questions before the show or during the stream. And then I'm also on X at Jose Alino. And you can just follow me there. Appreciate it, Jose. Thank you, as always.