The Pete Quiñones Show - Pete on 'Our Interesting Times' Talking About Zionism's Mask Slipping

Episode Date: May 24, 2024

101 MinutesPG-13Tim Kelly is the host of the Our Interesting Times podcast.Tim invited Pete to come on the show and talk about the fact that Zionist power over the US government is becoming more clear to even normies.Our Interesting Times podcastVIP Summit 3-Truth To Freedom - Autonomy w/ Richard GroveSupport Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's Substack Pete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

Did you know those Black Friday deals everyone's talking about? They're right here at Beacon South Quarter. That designer's sofa you've been wanting? It's in Seoul, Boe Concept and Rocheburoix. The Dream Kitchen? Check out at Cube Kitchens. Beacon South Quarter Dublin, where the smart shoppers go. Two hours free parking, just off the M50, exit 13.

It's a Black Friday secret. Keep it to yourself. You catch them in the corner of your eye. Distinctive. By design. They move you. Even before you drive. The new Cooper plugin hybrid range.

For Mentor, Leon and Terramar. Now with flexible PCP finance and trade-in boosters of up to 2000 Euro. Search Coopera and discover our latest offers. Coopera. Design that moves. Finance provided by way of hire purchase agreement from Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited. Subject to lending criteria.

Terms and conditions apply. Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited. Trading as Cooper Financial Services is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Ready for huge savings? We'll mark your calendars from November 28 to 30th because the Liddle Newbridge Warehouse Sale is back. We're talking thousands of your favourite Liddle items, all reduced to clear.

From home essentials to seasonal must-habs, when the doors open, the deals go fast. Come see for yourself. The Liddle Newbridge Warehouse Sale, 28th to 30th of November. Liddle, more to value. I'd like to know if any of the Democrats on this committee are employing Judge Mershon's daughter. Please tell me what that has to do with Mayor Garland.

Is she a porn star? Oh, Goldman. That's right. He's advising. Okay. Do you know what we're here for? You know we're here about AB? I don't think you know what you're here for.

Well, you don't want to talking about. I think your fake eyelashes are messing up with you. No, I ain't nothing. Hold on. Hold on. Order, Mr. Chairman. That's beneath even you. Would you get in the order of your committee?

I do have a point of order and I would like to move to take down Ms. Green's words. That is absolutely unacceptable. How dare you attack the physical appearance of another person. Move her words down. Oh, oh girl, baby girl. Oh really? Don't even play. Baby girl, I don't think of that.

We are going to move and we're going to take your words down. I second that motion. So who will have to Make her words? I believe she should apologize. No, no, no. Hold on. Then after Mr. Perry is going to be recognized, then Ms.

I'm not apologizing. Well, then you're not straight to your word. I am not apologizing. Hello, let's go. Come on, guys. Why don't you debate me? Mr. Chairman. The minority...

I think it's pretty self-evident. You're not... You're out of order. You don't have enough intelligence. You're out of order. Chair recognizes Mr. Perry. Okay, move to strike the ladies' words as well. I move to strike.

I move to strike. Let's go to strike the ladies' words again. That's two requests to strike. That's two requests to strike. Oh, they cannot take the words. There's another motion to strike her words again. Please get your members under control. Here's the correct apology.

Ms. Green, do you agree to unanimous consent to strike your words? I repeat again for the second time. Yes, I'll shake my words. But I'm not apologizing. Without objection. Not a apology. Mr. Chair, point of order. Who's who's?

It's me. Ms. Crockett. I'm just curious, just to better understand your ruling, if someone on this committee then starts talking about somebody's bleached blind, bad-built, butch body that would not be engaging in personalities, correct? A what now? Chairman, I make a motion to strike those words. I don't think that's a part of it.

I'm trying to find clarification on what quality. Chairman, motion to strike those words. We're not going to do this. Look, you guys. Earlier, literally just voted to do it. You just voted to do it. Order, order. I'm trying to get clarification. Look at calm down.

Calm down. No, no, no, no, because this is what they all do. So I'm trying to get your purpose. You're not recognized. Ms. Crocket. I can't hear you with your yelling. Calm down. No, please calm down.

No, please calm down. Because y'all talk noise and then you're out of control. Because if I come and talk to her, you'll have a problem. Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman. All right. Chair. Welcome back.

Welcome back. Another episode of Our Interesting Times. It's my pleasure that Pete Keone is back on the show. Of course, Pete is the host of the eponymous Pete Keone's show. Pete, how are you doing? I'm doing well. How are you doing, Tim? Very well. Thanks for coming back on the show. Oh, love to do it. Love to do it. Let's do it.

Last time we talked directly, I think it was late. I think it was December, right? At 2023, I think we discussed Jewish hysteria. And it's only gotten worse or since we talked. hasn't died down at all. We've had legislation passed billions, billions and billions like late Carl Sagan, money sent to Israel to continuous war.

And of course, we have, we entertained by sort of the absurdity of modern politics. Did you listen to that cat fight on, that committee hearing on, it was a, I guess, oversight committee hearing, a subcommittee hearing between, I guess, Margie Taylor Green and Aerosy and who's that? What's Crockett?

That black lady is. Yeah, her name. I can't remember her first name. Jasmine? Is it Jasmine? Yes, Jasmine. There you go. So that's the state of politics.

Now, in their defense, the House of Representatives has always been kind of rocket. So though I don't remember fights occurring committee hearings before, but I think who was it? It was the, there was, oh, that caning that occurred? Charles Sumner. was Cain by

Yes. Yes. Brooks, Preston Brooks. He had insulted, I guess, his honor. Charles Sumner was a radical repal,

I think from Pennsylvania, right? Or Maryland. Pennsylvania, I think, right? Am I right about that? Oh, I'd have to look it up,

Tim. He was, well, he was an abolitionist, sort of a senator, you know, who hated everything that was in the South.

And so he insulted, I think his, I think Preston Brooks' brother or his family. So Preston Brooks showed up walked over from the house and Kane, the senator, put him in the hospital. I think there are like 70 incidents in the House representatives in 19th century with dueling and threats and all that. Although those things were carried.

Nevertheless, they were carried out with much more dignity than what we saw last week. Wouldn't you agree? Well, yeah. I mean, I would rather see proper violence. I would rather see a glove thrown down something like that than basically what, I mean, the hood rats just going all chicken head in uh you sir are a scoundrel yeah i'm okay with that i'm i'm okay with tools yeah you know let's let's have some aaron burr you know uhlexander hamilton going on i mean this is just and so what what other what else can you say other than this is

just end of empire. This is either end of empire or it's banana republic kind of stuff. I mean, you just have people who are being elected who, you know, and then someone screams, oh, went to law school, what, went to Yale? I'm like, yeah, I mean, I'm, I'm familiar with affirmative action as well. So, I mean, it's pretty much when you see something like this happen now. How are you surprised? And here's the thing. We know it's not going to get better. No, it's not supposed to. It's not in the plan to get better. How can it? These things don't get better, really. Outside, absent, you know, an exterior, exogenous event, if you will, you know. Well, maybe we will see one of those. I, you know, you know,

It seems like it's about time, right? About 23 years away from the last one. And, you know, Israel had Israel had theirs in October, whether they allowed it to happen, whether it was something planned. I had your buddy Joe Atwell on the show last week. And I thought he explained October 7th rather well. A bunch of sexy girls dancing at a rave, the dirty Muslim, should dirty Muslim terrorists show up? start killing them, the good guys show up, and then the Muslims kidnap people and take them back in.

And then, you know, that's where the movie starts. Yes. It's just like an 80s movie. You're expecting Chuck Norris to come out. If it's not Chuck Norris, if you need someone, you know, lesser than you, you have one of the B actors from the 80s or Robert Ginty or someone like that show up. And, you know, I mean, it's where we're, I don't, I don't even know what's real any. It just doesn't seem. Did the president of Randai, apparently?

I'm sure he did. Why? It was in a 50-year-old helicopter where the parts were being manufactured, like in downtown's Iran or something. I mean, I don't even know what's happened. You know, states, was it, 33? Great number. states looking to pass anti-Semitic legislation.

Some of those states don't have a Jew in them. And you have the house passing anti-Semitic legislation that would just basically create lists. You know, any kid who goes through there, they say something. Now, this isn't anti-Semitic legislation. It's legislation against so-called anti-Semitism. Well, yeah, well. Well, it's kind of that they're there, they're, they're, they're, they're, They panic, this sort of hysterical concern over the rising tide of anti-Semitism and incidents they report.

That's BS. And this exaggerated claims regarding violence on campus against Jews. I heard this one Jewish guy talking about invoking Kristallok, of course, and talking about his family and how apparently the protest on the college campuses are reminiscent of Kristallok. Of course, he never mentioned what precipitated Kristallok was a Jewish guy assassinating a German diplomat, I think, in Holland. or Holland or Belgium somewhere? I think something like that. Yeah, it was up there. But they never talk about the precipitating act

is always about the reaction they talk about. But again, again, we're not supposed to be able to criticize Israel or Jews should not be subject to protest or have for witness protests against Israel or have their sensibilities offended or feelings hurt because of a crystal knock. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, well, I mean,

something that they didn't, you know, experience themselves. But I guess there is some kind of ancestral blood, something that causes them. No, it's not that. It's that Jewish elites just constantly, constantly every generation put the scare into them. I mean, this happened before the 1940s. Dennis Prager said recently that every generation, Jews are, there's a fear that Jews will be a threat that Jews will be exterminated. And, you know, one of those, you know, my question, so that would be, obviously, why?

Why do you, why do you believe that? And if it's true, why? Is it because they're, you know, we're jealous of them, you know, we blame all of our problems on them. If you talk about the Jews, you're jealous of them, you're jealous of their riches, you're jealous of their, you know, how brilliant they are, or, you know, you just blame all your problems on them, or you're just low IQ, you know, so like pretty much every intelligent, white European before 1940 was low IQ and, you know, was jealous of Jews. And because, well, let's face it, if you look at any survey before 1940,

you're going to find that most people just were very distrustful of them. You will find out that most of, you know, a lot of the people in power, you'll get Henry Ford. I guess Henry Ford is low IQ and jealous. Charles Lindenberg, these people who, you know, Francis Parkiaki, just low IQ.

I'm very jealous. it's yeah hiller hiller hello hiller belloc yeah yeah was low IQ and jealous Martin Martin Luther yeah

yeah you can go to both sides you go to both sides of the of the split and you could find people who are who are like what the heck is going on with these people

but yeah Alexander Solznichin was yeah yeah well yeah but he was he was Russians he can't be trusted okay but the

yeah but yeah It's just all becoming, it's so transparent now. You have, you know, there are Twitter accounts that all they're doing all day is posting Jewish history. And, you know, things like this is what they, you know, there's one out there that, you know, no matter which, no matter how you feel about, you know, the thing that happened in the 1940s, it basically has this one. one post after another of people who were caught lying, saying that this happens to them in the Holocaust. Some of them weren't even there.

Some of them, and you have to ask yourself, you know, you know, a lot of people lied about going to Woodstock. They said if everybody who went, about $250,000 people went to Woodstock, if everybody who's ever said they went to Woodstock, went to Woodstock, there'd be four or five million people there, maybe 10. Yeah. People lie about stuff like that. Most people don't lie about,

oh my you know i was having nails nails um drilled drilled into my head on a daily basis for four years what why why would you want to be a part of that unless your whole identity is based upon is based upon persecution and if your whole identity is based upon persecution

please tell me why i think the German law against Holocaust skepticism or revisionum actually cites the assault on the Jewish personality by spreading doubt regarding the Holocaust narrative because it is part of their identity to be persecuted, to be victims. And so if you question the Holocaust narrative or aspects of that narrative, you are offending their personality. That's actually the law, I think. I read that in an article by Michael Hoffman this week. He was citing the law. So you get your denying them their identity. And that's why it's criminal in Germany and illegal in many other countries, apparently.

It says a lot. That's, wow, I mean. It's really interesting to me that when you go back in history and you look at ethnic groups or religious groups, there's, you know, you had some that are just known as great warriors, some that are known as great scholars, some that are not. it's it's very rare to find groups in history who their whole identity was them complaining and basically talking about how everybody's out to hurt them it doesn't really make any sense to me I mean it's you know it makes to me it makes you look weak and and I and I I wouldn't want my enemy. Maybe that's a product of modernity.

That weakness is fine. Appearing weak is fine because you know, you're under no real threat of, you know, unless you live in certain places. And then you're under no real threat of being killed, being hurt or anything like that. You know, outside of crime, things like that. A act of God kind of thing. It makes it, I have to wonder. why? What would be the benefit of revealing to the world that your whole identity is one of,

you know, someone's always trying to hurt me and that my people, who I call my people, my tribe, every generation, we're threatened with the genocide. Why are you so obsessed with Jews? Well, I mean, I, I, maybe. because I'm just watching the news feed. Well, yeah, I mean. I'm like, if you ask you, it's like, why are you so obsessed with not talking about them?

That's my question, avoiding the issue. Yeah, I think Dr. Jones says 457 Jews, working Biden's White House. And if it was 457 Latvians, I'd have a lot of questions. Especially if American policy was geared towards, you know, subsidizing and defendants, meaning Latvia, you know, from its enemies, yes.

Right. Yeah. And, yeah, imagine if it was 457 Chinese, you would, yes. You would have to come to the conclusion that Washington, D.C. was Chinese occupied territory. And it was a Chinese occupied government. It would be a cog. But apparently when it's our greatest allies,

who's literally never done anything for us except steal our secrets, spy on us, and then celebrate their spies and have a president of the United States pardoned probably their most, a spy who did the most damage as far as national intelligence

for the United States went, pardon him and send him back to Israel, as a conquering hero. And then he goes back to, he goes back to Israel and he gives interviews and says, it's the job of every Jew in the diaspora to spy on the country

they're in for the benefit of Israel. Well, I mean, I've come to, I think I'm pretty good now at figuring out when they're telling the truth and when they're lying. When they're lying, they're usually very defensive.

When they're telling the truth, they're very, very straightforward. Very, they're, you know, it's like Dennis Prager saying, you know, when it comes to isms, when it comes to ideologies, with the exception of Nazism, Jews are responsible for creating and promoting all the isms, communism, capitalism, all of these things. when somebody's bragging like that, I have a tendency to believe them. If he, like, came back a week later and said,

no, no, that's not what I meant. I would tend not to believe him. You know, if Barbara Lerner Spector says that, you know, Europe cannot survive unless being a monoculture, they have to be multicultural, and Jews are going to be responsible for that. And then it happens. And then you, when you look into the NGOs that did this,

their majority Jewish run, I have a tendency to believe what? You're really speaking the truth. But if somebody comes at me, when I point that out and go and says, you're anti-Semitic, we're pointing that out. Well, I am, what? I'm just repeating back what,

a Jew was bragging about was saying that we're going to save Europe by making it multicultural You catch them in the corner of your eye distinctive by design They move you even before you drive The new Cooper plug-in hybrid range For Mentor, Leon and Teramar Now with flexible PCP finance and trade-in boosters

of up to 2,000 euro. Search Coopera and discover our latest offers. Coopera. Design that moves. Finance provided by way of higher purchase agreement from Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited. Subject to lending criteria. Terms and conditions apply. Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited.

Trading as Cooper Financial Services is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Ready for huge savings? Well, mark your calendars from November 28 to 30th because the Liddle Newbridge Warehouse sale is back. We're talking thousands of your favourite Lidl items all reduced to clear. From home essentials to seasonal must-habs, when the doors open, the deals go fast. Come see for yourself. The Liddle Newbridge Warehouse Sale, 28th to 30th of November.

Lidl, more to value. Those Black Friday deals everyone's talking about, they're right here at Beacon South Quarter. That designer's sofa you've been wanting, it's in Seoul, Boke-Concept and Rosh Bougat. The Dream Kitchen, check out at Cube Kitchens. Beacon South Quarter, Dublin, where the smart shoppers go. Two hours free parking, just off the M50, exit 13. It's a Black Friday secret. Keep it to yourself.

Yeah, part of juror supremacy is not really worrying about those contradictions. It's the presumption. They can have these contradictions in their rhetoric, in their thought, and their policies, and really not be shamed about it at all, and not even be thought to be held accountable for it. So you can have, like, in the anti-Semitism awareness bill, that passed the House a couple weeks ago it's headed to the Senate

they can embrace the International Holocaust Rememance Alliance's working definition of Semitism and in that are a series of contradictions it just doesn't make any logically sense

one example they say is an attribute or an example of anti-Semitism is thinking that Jews have a suspicion that Jews have a greater loyalty of Israel than their host nation that they happen to live in

but that is a principle of Zionism. And it's also reflected in the words of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, uh, of, uh, Pollard, John of the Pollard, John of the Pollard. John of the Pollard. He, that's that the thing. And also, it's born out in the, uh, in the activism of various wealthy Jews. Sheldon Adelson boasted about wanting to, you know, be an idea, rather than he would have rather

served an idea of the U.S. Army. He's passed away now. Um, I think Heinzaban has, has, has, has, he said. said about simply about his love for Israel more than America. It's born out in his so-called philanthropy and what he gives money to. And it's who is the Hollywood producer who boasts about being a spy for Israel? I got a medal for it. You know, and not to mention, you know, the hundreds of hundreds of Jews, the Biden administration, the thousands in the federal government, everyone, because of that is a potential saying them.

would be a spy for Israel, and they're proud about it. But in their mind, is that's just what you do. Like, Dennis Prager would say, yeah, this is the natural order of things. There is a double standard because Jews are supreme. They actually believe that. So when you pointed out, they're not ashamed by it. And then they turn around. And then if you say something like Jews enjoy extraordinary or inordinate power,

they can impose censorship and punish people for criticism. And for saying that, they turn around and censor you and punish you for that criticism. But they're not shamed by that. And they can get Congress to pass a law. It's obviously it was written by the ADL or some functionary ADL or the American Jewish Committee or, you know, and they can pass this bill. And that the House of Representatives, you know, you have 320 representatives, really ignore their oaths of office, their oath to the Constitution just to pass this bill because they get money from APEC.

But Congress is bought and paid for by APEC. It's obvious at this point. Yeah. You said a couple things there. One of the things you said was you were talking about how they don't see any contradictions. And I think that's interesting because when you look at progressivism and leftism in this country, they don't have any problems with contradictions either. I wonder where they learn that from. Yes.

Well, it's basically, it's basically it's Talmudic. Right. Right. Their outlook is Talmudic, and we see it expressed that's instantiating policy in their rhetoric. And, you know, in their shamelessness, it's Talmudic. And that's the issue. I'm sorry, I interrupted you. Go ahead. No, that's fine. That's fine. You also mentioned the IDF there. And, you know, I was driving with my wife the other day. And I asked her, I said, you know, I know Jews in America, who are American citizens who have gone to. Israel and served in the IDF. I've done two years in the IDF and come back here.

I'm pretty sure that in Israel, just like in the United States, when you serve in their military, you probably have to take an oath of loyalty to Israel. Okay, so how am I supposed to trust somebody who is, you know, living next door, who has taken an oath of loyalty to another country. How am I supposed to trust them as an American citizen?

I mean, I don't know how many other countries American citizens are allowed to go and serve in their military, take an oath and then come back. I mean, if an Iranian American wanted to do that, would that be allowed? I find it very odd that when you, one of the things that you get, you know, you catch crap for is talking about dual loyalty. I don't even talk about dual loyalty anymore. I think it's single loyalty. I don't think, I don't see even in our politicians, loyalty to this country at all. It's loyalty to Israel. And Israel, Taiwan is another country they're loyal to.

Ukraine is another country, though. They have no loyalty to this country. They have no loyalty to, you know, when I think about this country, I think about my neighbors, people live in my town. They don't have any loyalty to their neighbors. They don't have any loyalty to the people who live in their town. And, you know, even when they go back home, and most of them don't want to go back home.

That's why they become career politicians because they actually hate the people where they come from. if you have a senator from Iowa, that person wants to be a senator for life because they hate the people from Iowa. That's why they want to leave. They're not going there to serve the people of Iowa. They're going there to get rich.

They're going there to get wealthy. They're going there to gain power. They're going there to set up their future and the future for their families too. So when I look out at the, what's happening to this country. And I see people, I see politicians who are passing laws to protect other countries. Their rhetoric is that if you don't stand with this other country, you're not American,

you're not a loyal American, and they are passing laws to protect people who call themselves people of the diaspora, which means that they're not really in their. their homeland. And I do understand that there are a lot of Jews who love America. They don't want to go to Israel. They want nothing to do with Israel. We're talking about the people that we're talking about the people who want these bills to be passed.

Well, when I look at them, I just see that what, basically what is left to fight for this country. If somebody, if a foreign power was attacking this country. Who should step up and fight for it? Why? They don't, your own leaders don't care about this country. They would only, I think most of them would applaud some kind of invasion, some kind of attack. Because that just means that their constituents who are basically businesses,

military industrial kind of pharma, all of these, the healthcare lobby, all these ones that would benefit for something as such. I mean, that's why they would be like, we need to get there and fight because they know that they're not going to, they or their children or their families are not going to be affected by this. And they can get their constituency rich and wealthy, give them more power. And, yeah, they don't, you know, it just really goes to show who, their constituency is. The constituency

of the politician, the average politician in Washington, D.C. is dual loyalty, Jewish Jewish people in this country. Israel, three other countries I can think of right off the top of my head that are I don't know if Taiwan

he considers Taiwan a country, but yada yada. Yeah. I mean, I just don't, I don't see how I'm really supposed to worry about anyone outside of my culture, my immediate culture, my

immediate culture, my religion, my people who I would share values with. Why should I care about anyone else at this point when I have, no one, no one's there to protect me, no one's going to be there to save me, you know, if something were to happen. Yeah, unfortunately, this isn't anything new. if you go back more than a century, at least in

the 20th century, none of the wars that America has fought declared, undeclared, have been in the interest of the American people. None. Yeah, World War I. I mean, the United States got into

World War I for one reason. Jewish interests went to Lord Balfour and said, give us to Balfour declaration, and we promise we'll get you know, we'll get Wilson to send troops to help you fight. Pretty much it. How did this beleaguered, oppressed minority, have that much influence in the United States? Especially, yeah, yeah.

I mean, and insane influx from 1890 to 1905, so much so that in 1905, the fake, the fake Odessa program. In Russia, not Ukraine, screw that. In Russia, they were able to get sanctions against Russia, against Zahar, because of a program that happened in a city that most, no, people still can't find that a map today. Well, how did that happen? Why there were no other atrocities around the world happening at that time that, interests in this country could have stepped up and tried to push for?

No, no, it's been this way, it's been this way for over a century now. And people, you know, like the aforementioned argument I made earlier, that I've said people have made earlier, oh, you just, you talk about Jews because you blame all your problems on them. I've never once said in my life any of my problems are because of a Jew. ever ever i take i take responsibility i'm a very self-aware person who takes responsibility for their problems i even if i may not i have a too thing you know you just didn't cause that yeah that's like no i mean that's the straw man argument because but you know what you're really

i mean you're pointing out if i look at the state of american culture and and if you argue what form culture what does entertainment does movies do these these have an impact or influence on culture? Yes. Okay, then it's Hollywood and it's advertising. And do Jews have anordinate influence in those things? Yes, they do. And do they brag about their control of those industries and that influence. Yes, they do. Well, then the Jews have to accept some responsibility for the state of American culture. And when they're pushing an agenda, when the movies they push, the propaganda they push, we're all anti-Christian, pro-Jewish narrative movies, then they have to have some responsibility and they openly boast. Alan Dershowitz has bragged about control of the media in

Hollywood and how Jews must keep maintain control of it. There's a Joel Stein article about 20 years ago. It was in the LA Times, I think about yes, Jews control of Hollywood. They have to keep control of Hollywood. The history of Hollywood, there was that book, Empire of Their Own about Hollywood, how Jews shaped American culture by what's his name? Get the author of that I can't remember. But it's an empire of their own, and it's about how the Jewish control of

Hollywood, how they develop how impact American culture? Well, how has that turned out? They have to accept responsibility for these things. The great power comes responsibility, as they say, you know, whatever. But with these, you know, with these positions, they have to, you know, when they acknowledge and they boast about their influence, you know, whether it's because of high IQ or hard work or nepotism, nevertheless, you have it. And you have their responsibility for it. And so I do blame organized jury and those Jews involved in those industries for doing these things, just like the promotion of pornography, if you look at the litigation, it went into,

into bestowing First Amendment protection on pornography and a decency and the destruction of police powers to maintain local decency laws, there was Jewish activism. Look at all the legal cases, right? Same with abortion and feminism and these causes, these things, psychoanalysis, all that stuff.

It's heavily Jewish influence. you can't take credit for it on one hand and then and then say we're not responsible for it on the other but you can if you're Talmudic and you have no problem with that contradiction you know well an empire of their own was Neil Gabler Neil Gabler thank you yeah yeah well the I looked it up a quick

yeah one thing that I've been saying lately is I've been stepping back and I mean go look right everything in our culture everything and our basically our economics our entertainment everything our politics our activism is all it's all controlled by Jews they admit it their activists say it they admit it okay so when I say this

publicly when I call this out publicly and I say look all I'm asking is look where we are now you complain about where we are now. And, you know, especially like on the right or quote, on the quote unquote, right. I mean, we know that conservatives are liberals. And they're more liberals. Conservatives are more liberal than liberal than most leftists and most leftists are more Schmidian than anyone on the right. And that's the irony, yes, because they understand power. Yeah. Right. Yeah. So what I'm saying is,

okay, if we, if we, if, if a bunch of people are seeing all these problems we have, if, if right-wing Jews are causing the wars that displace Muslims, and left-wing Jews are the ones running the NGOs who are putting the Muslims into white countries, you know, I call that the kosher sandwich. You control both sides, you know, basically you control both sides of any dialect. Is that good for us? Now, if people want to seriously sit down, examine that question, examine what I'm saying, and what I'm saying is true because they say it's true, unless you're saying the Jews are lying,

which makes you an anti-Semite, but they say that they did this. This is what they did. Is it good for us? And if it's not good for us, should we decide that maybe we should. go in another direction. Maybe we should make some changes. The problem when you say that is, the changes that need to be made is

we don't follow Jewish values anymore. Well, and immediately when you say that, people think, oh, well, Holocaust and you know, pogroms and everything. No. They just have to, we just change

our values. We change the way we do things. And if they don't like it, they can leave. Right? Because what I'm being told now is if I don't like it, I can leave. Even though, and I'm being told that I'm a liar, I'm being told, I'm a liar. When I point out these videos that I have where Jews are basically admitting to being responsible for all this, no one says I'm a liar.

They just say that you're an anti-Semite. And it's like, how am I an anti-Semite for believing what Jews say? I'm that doesn't someone needs to explain that to me because you know I'm anyone who knows me personally knows that I'm a pretty laid back person I'm literally like the picture of the guy who just wants to grill I mean I'm literally yeah I spent time with friends up in Tennessee took in some confederate um confederate sites this this past weekend and everyone knows I'm looking for I want a Guinness in my hand. And, you know, I want a pipe or a cigar.

And I just want to talk. I want to have a good time. Are you a neo-Nazi or a neo-Confederate? I'm both. As you all know, Nazis and confederate, southerners, they're all the same. German national socialists and Confederate. I'm definitely closer to a neo-Confederate. Well, because you're not German.

Yeah, exactly. But I was born in Germany. So how's that? Oh, there you go. Well, yeah, it's a magic German soil. Yeah, yeah. So this is where I'm at. People, like, I know that some website,

some website wrote up, has written up a couple articles on me, basically how I, I've talked about how, that I, I talk about how Jews were responsible for feminism, and everything. They don't mention that all I'm doing is repeating their own words. But they take credit for it. They say they're not front progressive. They brag about it. They brag about it. And it's like, yeah, it's funny because you hold them accountable for the things they brag about. And again, yes, it was a Jewish cause. And of course, it's support of the CIA and all that too. The term anti-Semitism or anti-Semitism.

semi. Obviously, it's an accusation in a term of abuse instead of intimidate because it's considered a few. I guess your average person would think you're an anti-semit if you're some sort irrational hatred for Jews, dislike for Jews. It's irrational. It's not well-founded. They wouldn't think that just because you criticize an individual Jew or a Jewish organization or a particular policy matter that Jews favor that you would be an anti-Semite. The problem is the Jews who control the public discourse, course and have the ability to censor to docks people or ruin their career, ruin their lives believe that. Their definition of anti-Semitism is simply someone who's critical of Jews or or simply someone in their way. And so they know they can get away with that. Good example. When you say anti-s, it's almost like, based on their definition, if you look at the International Holocaust Romance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism, now it's being incorporated into the American law, civil rights law, is, well, yeah, based of this. definition, I guess if I follow your definition, if an anti-semitist is something who's critical

of Jewish power, critical of Jewish activism, critical of Jewish influence on our Christian society, once Christian society, then you can call an anti-Semite. Or, you know, as a Catholic, and by definition, anti-Jewish. The same way that a Jew, by definition, is anti-Christian, anti-Catholic. It cuts both ways, actually, because the two are irreconcilable, despite the claim of Judeo-Christian values, right? So based on their definition, so there's a rising tide of anti-Semitism, meaning there's increasing criticism because we're witnessing a slaughter, ethnic cleansing in Gaza that the U.S. people are implicated, American people are implicated by their government because the U.S. government is borrowing billions of dollars from Jewish bankers to send Israel. And the American people will not only are they help paying for the slaughter and all the problems that come from that, then they're forced to pay the interest on the debt that they're incurred by that.

And so if you point that out, you're an anti-Semite. But if that makes me an anti-Semite, okay, guilty is charged. But this is a question of terminology here. You know, just because you're criticizing Jews or organized jury, APAC, ADL, American Jewish Committee, the Mossad, the IDF, Israel, hundreds of self-identified Jewish organizations that are dedicated to supporting Israel at the expense of the United States. well I guess that would make me an anti-Semite you see what I mean and it's like this terminology thing well why are people anti-Semitic then it's another question what do you mean by the term they have a working definition it's always changing and in fact was that it was that rabbi who was debating candizone and said anti-semitism changes throughout the he says but this you can't do that because we need

definitions she she's thinking you know she's greek like a like she's thinking like a hell on this mindset. He's thinking tumultically, you see. So what we have here is you have a people that are simply are not compatible. You catch them in the corner of your eye. Distinctive. By design.

They move you. Even before you drive. The new Cooper plugin hybrid range for Mentor, Leon, and Teramar. Now with flexible PCP finance and trading boosters of up to 2000 euro. Search Cooper.

and discover our latest offers. Coopera. Design that moves. Finance provided by way of higher purchase agreement from Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited. Subject to lending criteria. Terms and conditions apply. Volkswagen Financial Services Ireland Limited.

Trading as Cooper Financial Services is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Ready for huge savings? Well mark your calendars from November 28 to 30th because the Liddle Newbridge Warehouse sale is back. We're talking thousands of your favourite Liddle items all reduced to clear. From home essentials to seasonal must-habs,

when the doors open, the deals go fast. Come see for yourself. The Lidl Newbridge Warehouse Sale, 28th to 30th of November. Lidl, more to value. Did you know, those Black Friday deals everyone's talking about? They're right here at Beacon South Quarter.

That designer's sofa you've been wanting. It's in Seoul, Boe Concept, and Rocheburoix. The Dream Kitchen, check out at Cube Citchens. Beacon South Quarter Dublin, where the smart shoppers go. Two hours free parking just off the M50. Exit 13. It's a Black Friday secret.

Keep it to yourself. Well, you also have, I mean, think about this. I mean, I've seen people say that the Palestinians were anti-Semitic. They're literally Semites. Arguably that they have a generically, they have a greater claim to the original inhabitants of that land than the current people who occupy Israel, yes. Yeah. Yeah. So it's just it's basically what the way you said it, it's Talmudic. They're just playing with words. Yeah. And that's it. You know, but the problem is is that, you know, we can play with words too. But we don't have the press. We don't have the banking. We don't have the, we don't have the power and the money. I thought it was hard. It's not the fact that they control the establishment media through nepotism and high finance, the banking. And basically, they bought it all up. politicians so they can control the political process, the legislative process, electoral process,

or even public discourse with the media. It's just their high verbal IQ. Well, yeah. And as I said in my live stream yesterday, I think all high verbal IQ means is that you're the best-to-use car salesman on the lot. I mean, that seems like that's all that is. Yeah, the... Why do they have to censor? Yeah.

If they can always marshal a better argument, how come they have to just basically shut things down? Yeah, well, that's a good point, Sam. When you see that they not only have to shut things down, I mean, they have to change the definitions. They have to kind of, like you were saying, they have to constantly move the goalposts all over the place. Because people are figuring this out more and more and more people are sure. bringing this out every day. But really, the when you do not have to be

the greatest debater in the world to repeat their own words back at them, you just have to have, you know, the patience and not take debate because, you know, most Jewish posts go like, you know, go something like this, you point out, you say,

here's a video of a girl representing the world Jewish. Congress who's saying that that the feminism and the 90th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act and you're bragging about Harvey you know they're they're talking about Harvey Milk

and praising him someone who was having sex with 14 and 15 year old boys when you point that out and you're like well I don't know that this is the greatest thing for this has been the greatest thing for our society they they immediately come back with something with an insult. Well, okay. I mean, I can do that too,

but I'm trying not to because, you know, I've been told that when you're having, when you're trying to have a conversation or a little debate, that the person who throws the insults first not only loses, but they know the reason they do it is because they know they've lost. Yeah. And when I see videos, I mean, I've seen tons of videos of Jewish people and Jewish leaders just saying, look, we're responsible for this.

And then I go and look and, okay, at war, you know, the most famous one I've already mentioned, Barbara Lerner-Spector, because she predicts what's going to happen. And then it happens. And when you point that out, you're a. a leftist. Isn't that famous record of about 15 years old? Yeah, that's 15 years old. But this is their new thing.

I've been seeing this on a lot on on X, Twitter, is any critic, right-winger who criticized Jews have reverted to identity politics and they're acting woke. It's right-wing woke. because, you know, right-wingers historically are the biggest, you know, promoters and defenders of Jews. I mean, let's take a bullet for Jews and have, they can't explain why. They may give some kind of vague or some kind of ridiculous, biblical, you know, eschatological, Schofield Bible kind of thing, reason for. it or they may just say they're our greatest ally or you know bring up the holocaust or something like that okay well what does that have to do at you do you have i mean do these people have their own problems

are their lives so perfect that they can just go out and take bullets for other people i mean is are these people what are these what are yeah what if you almost want to ask what is the jew ever done for you yeah 2020 would not have occurred without Jewish backing yeah all that nonsense you know all that pharmaceuticals yeah

black lives matter and Tifa 1619 project all the you know so all the humiliation they have to they have to go through these things and they can witness that the entire summer

and still not be faced by it not have And then they look at the contradictions, like the treatment of the rioters in 2020 compared to the protesters on various campuses today or the treatment of the January 6 protesters, you know, or the treatment of like pro-life protesters, just opposed to like civil rights protesters, right? You know, where, you know, the full force of law is thrown against these people, whereas the other side is giving kick gloves because they're serving, ultimately serving Jewish interests. you know so but I think to have that you'd have to have a a memory long enough an attention span long enough and I think one of the things the system does is this overwhelms your senses or you just

you just want to not not not think about it you know and then they they try to tag these protests on the campuses as left wing which is funny because you have you both have left wing governors and right wing governors cracking down on the protesters. What's the common denominator, though? Jewish interests. No.

Yeah. Yeah. You have left and right governors who are passing anti-Semitism laws. All of a sudden, all that, yeah, all that cancel culture and censorship, Josh Hawley endorses it now, if it's there to protect Jewish interests,

you know. Yeah. And, yeah, the one of the reasons they're able to say, oh, the right, you know, people on the right have gone woke is because a lot of these people who are protesting on campuses are basically the same, either the same people or the same type of person who was protesting 2020 in the streets. And if, I mean, God forbid that you, you know, you should be on the same,

beyond the same, be on the same opinion on an issue as, you know, people who are essentially you're in. I remember being, you know, talking about how this, this Iraq war thing doesn't look good. And, I mean, I don't know that I would have been considered a right winger back then, but I definitely would have been considered a conservative. And, you know, I mean, look who I was on the side on the same side as. And people said that. He says, oh, what, what are you left us now? You don't support the troops. Remember that? If you don't support the war, you don't support the troops. Tell me a Jew didn't come up with that. That sounds like an argument that I would hear when I bring up the fact that, hey, here's one of your representatives of the world Jewish Congress bragging about being behind feminism. Do you think feminism has been good for women?

Well, you're anti-Semitic. Or you can answer the question. why are you avoiding the question why are you avoiding this subject at all when people tell me that they were responsible for something I may take a little time to go and you know find out

let me make sure that they're not lying here and you five minute cursory looking up names and stuff like that you're like oh okay well yeah sure you're responsible for that is that a good thing for us Is that a good thing for, you know, for Americans? Is that a good thing for white people?

Hmm? Is that good for us? Is, you know, this teaching of this anti-white teaching, this curriculum, what you hear on the evening news, anti-white is where that come from? Okay, if I can track down where that came from, if I can even find someone bragging about where that came from, and I call it out, are we not allowed?

All I want to do is have a conversation. I just, literally at this point, Tim, I would love to be able to have an honest, an honest conversation about this with somebody who's Jewish who thinks that all the things that they brag about is good. And they're willing to have an open conversation

without them reverting to, you know, you want to, you want another, Holocaust, you want another Hitler, you want, you know, just an honest conversation. But it's just not out there because, you know, as the Rangigno showed in his great essay, Israel, the psychopathic nation, such a great essay, I covered it twice on my show, two different episodes. All he did in this essay was, quote, the Zionist fathers and Jewish thinkers. and they all to a man and woman say Jews can never ever say they were wrong, say they were guilty.

And they always have to be innocent. No matter what, a Jew has never done anything wrong. Zionist leaders, Jewish leaders have said this. Okay. How do you live with them? How do you live with the people like that? How do you live, especially when they control your culture, when they control your banking, when they control your media, when they control. You have to prevent them from getting control of those things.

Which we have to have illiberal protections. Yeah. You know, that's who. And who has been the biggest promoter. Yeah. Liberalism requires reciprocity, which means they don't, but see they don't offer. Therefore, liberalism doesn't work. It's just there.

It's just a system to be exploited and then be turned into an olig. an oligarchy favoring Jewish interests. And post-World War II, what has been pushed? Liberalism has been pushed, and any thought, any suggestion of illiberalism is, you know, according to authoritarian personality, fascists. Well, here's the thing. But I'm going to say anti-Semitism is a natural reaction to Jewish behavior. Does that mean anti-Semite?

It sounds like you're, it sounds like you have an opinion. and you could be quoting somebody else. Jonathan Greblay would say I'm an anti-Semitic for saying that. But then Theodore Herzl, who is the father of Zionism, he said, this perfectly understandable reaction follows, it totally anti-Semitism. This perfectly understandable reaction follows from the defects of the Jews. The Jews are people distinct and separate from others whose interests are different,

and who are often in conflict with those of the peoples among with whom they live. Haim Weitzman, the first president of Israel, said whenever in a country the number of Jews reaches a certain level of saturation, the country reacts against them. Now, this reaction is not anti-Semitism in the ordinary vulgar sense of the word, but a universal social and economic consequence of Jewish immigration. It is impossible to ignore. Well, do you know what happens, Tim, if you were to, what that, if you were to use those, use, those quotes to, you know, make a point, make a point about immigration, Jewish immigration, make a point about things that they brag about. They're not going to hear it.

And they're just going to tell you you're an anti-Semite. Was it, you were just, you watched that debate with, um, you're talking to the debate with a, with a, with a, synchry, is, but you eager, sink, Ugar, Smith, um, And what's his name? Prager and Dennis Prager, yeah. Yeah. I didn't see it, but I listened to your discussion about it. But Dennis Prager actually had the Adas, the Hutzpah, I think it's the sink.

Shink, he said he says, he brought up to knock, knock, and he goes, oh, that was 1948 a long time ago. Yeah. What? I think that was the Dyer. I think Dave brought up to Dyer Hassan Massacre. Okay, Dyer, yes, Sahn Massacre. Okay. That was 1948.

That was a long time ago. Yeah. Really? And the problem is, Chang's not smart enough, and Dave dropped the ball. I don't know, maybe a reason why, to be like, okay, but, you know. When was Babi Yar? Yeah. I mean, I don't know. If it occurred, I think there's some controversy about that.

Yeah. Kemmelneski, when did that happen? Yeah. Yeah. You know, how about the halibunga? Yes. Yeah, that was actually before 1948. But you want to keep bringing that up, right?

Well, that's a blood libel against the Jewish people. Well, how do you have an... I mean, in that debate, Prager actually said when... I think when Dave Smith mentioned something about Jewish terrorism in the past, well, that's a blood libel against Israel. okay how do you how do you talk to somebody like that how do you have a conversation with somebody says you have but did it occur yeah yeah but it's just how do you talk to somebody like that

you you can't yeah i mean you you can't you you shun all you can do is shun people somebody like that people like that so if i point out the king david bombing hotel the bombing at the king david David Hotel. Tim, that happened a long time ago. A long time ago. And it's a blood level. Okay. Even though there's a great description of it on the Jewish virtual library.

Yeah. And one of the perpetrators became a prime minister, right? Yes. Yes. And I think the. And all of those groups, Irgun, Hagana, the Stern gang, when it came time for Israel to form. they all took an oath to the Israeli government and became the IDF. They just changed your name.

That's where the IDF comes from. People should be proud of their history, right? They're proud of the founding, right? They're proud of the founding of Israel. It's something they just celebrated a couple days, you know, a few days ago. well what you should be happy about that right

killing civilians raping I mean I saw a documentary where people who who were part of those groups you know talked and bragged about what we did to this girl and he was laughing

yeah okay all right am I not allowed to bring that up am I not allowed to bring that up? I mean, if that's what you're bragging about, obviously you consider these people to be subhuman or at least beneath you. Okay, that's an attitude. That's an attitude.

Let's talk about that. Because that's the exact kind of accusation that's thrown at people who question Jewish power, a Jewish influence. I mean, you can't I know this is a gerbils quote. But, I mean, he must have got it from somebody Jewish.

Accus your enemy of that which you are you are guilty. Because that's all I see. That's all I see. That happens all the time. Yeah, it's also a Solonsky principle that too, isn't it? Yeah. Yeah, Solinsky principle. And it's also

it's like you'll see this from Jewish accounts on X. Release the hostages. Okay, you first. Yeah, they have like 10,000 or something around. Yeah. They have so many, I think, was it the defense minister or interior minister, just recommended just killing a bunch of them to open up space? Yeah.

They released hostages. They released one hostage who, I mean, basically they had, part of his skull was gone. And when he was captured, they were pictures of him being captured. Part of his skull wasn't going on. Apparently, they either beat him or experimented on him. Okay.

If that's what you want to do, if that's a game you want to play, if you want to live in your ethno-state homeland, then other countries should be able to do exactly what you're doing. that's the I'm of the opinion it's the reason why Israel's days are numbered because

World War II was fought to rid the world rid Europe of countries like rid the world basically of countries like Israel is right now they're an ethno state they're a they're basically I'll call

I'll reverse it. They're a socialist national state. Okay. So why? How do we allow this? And I think that protesters, a lot of protesters have figured this out. I think a lot of these leftists have figured this out.

And that's one of the reasons that they're protesting, the organic protesters. I know there's paid protesters out there. That's all anybody wants to come. concentrate on this. Well, there's paid protests. There's organic protesters out there, too. They figured this out. They figured this out. And they're like, how can we allow this to exist? You know, if it's okay to punch a Nazi or as some trans tattoo artist the other day said was bragging on Twitter. And then I found out that he was so, you know, such a tough, tough guy that it already had me

blocked, I saw a screenshot of this tweet, said, I covered up a swastika tattoo on a Nazi today with six feet of soil. Okay. If it's okay to kill ethno-nationalists who believe that they are, you know, they may be the chosen people, that they may be genetically superior to others and, intellectually superior to others. We have a country like that right now that exists and exerts inordinate. And I would say supreme influence over the West to the detriment of the host nations.

How do we do with that? Are we allowed to talk about that? I guess we're not allowed to talk about that. not allowed to talk about that. We're not free people. We're not free. And, you know, conservatives can make all the arguments they want about, it's a free country. I got my gun here. Yeah, you're never going to, you're never going to use. I mean, you're, you have to take a rascal when you go to Walmart. What are your guns going to do? What are they doing for you? So, well, what, we're slaves. We're slaves that can own, we're slaves. We're slaves that can own, we're slaves

that can own property, but most of the, but we don't even own that property when you, even after you pay it off, you still have to pay taxes on it. If you stop paying taxes on it, they'd take it away from you. What do you own? They can come into your house and take your guns anytime for no reason. What do you own?

They can come into, they can bust down your door and shoot, and Israeli trained police can shoot you in the head, and all you have to say is I feared for my life. You catch them in the corner of your eye. Distinctive, by design.

They move you, even before you drive. The new Cooper plugin hybrid range. For Mentor, Leon, and Terramar. Now with flexible PCP finance and trade-in boosters of up to 2,000 euro, search Coopera and discover our latest offers. Coopera, design that moves. Finance provided by way of higher purchase agreement from Volkswagen Financial Services, Ireland Limited,

Subject to lending criteria. Terms and conditions apply. Broke wagon financial services Ireland Limited. Trading as Cooper Financial Services is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Ready for huge savings? Well, mark your calendars from November 28 to 30th

because the Liddle Newbridge Warehouse Sale is back. We're talking thousands of your favourite Liddle items all reduced to clear. From home essentials to seasonal must-habs. When the doors open, the deals go fast. Come see for yourself. The Liddle New Bridge Warehouse Sale. 28th to 30th of November.

Lidl, more to value. Did you know, those Black Friday deals everyone's talking about? They're right here at Beacon South Quarter. That designer's sofa you've been wanting. It's in Seoul, Boe Concept and Rocheburoix. The Dream Kitchen. Check out at Cube Kitchens. Beacon South Quarter Dublin, where the smart shoppers go.

Two hours free parking just off the M50. Exit 13. It's a Black Friday secret. Keep it to yourself. You're free? This is a free hundred? fuck you yeah i mean after 20 20

the sort of knee-jerk support for the police so like when they took the knee and let billions of dollars of damage be done and let you know hundreds of people get assaulted and just let let these cities burn and then all of a sudden they come down so hard on these uh really actually were peaceful protesters

like in columbia they're just chanting and saying things and this equation that somehow the jewish students have to listen to this is the same as being attacked is ridiculous. They're saying, we're not safe. You're not safe for what, hearing alternative opinions or views that you don't like? Well, no one should be safe from that in the public sphere, in the public spaces.

I mean, that's just, it's part of going to college. You used to, I used to remember, protest or like, you know, they took the place of, like, hazing at dorms. That's the culture of college, for better or for worse. Now, I was never a big fan of attorney, can't be. is in the protest centers. You go to learn, but nevertheless they did in the 60s. That was the thing.

That's because of the draft and all that. Then it was sort of glamorized, romanticized because of the baby boomer generation. But now protests are seen as horrible. It's like these, you know, what the House representatives did last fall, hauling in the presidents of the universities and then getting them fired, these billionaires like Bill Ackman, obviously flexing their financial influence to get these people fired, fire the board. Was it UCLA?

What college out in California said they divest? And then the president was immediately fired for divesting. I think it was UCLA. Was UCLA? So, I mean, okay, so who is the power? Why is he fired for that? Because some Jew didn't like the fact that he did that. Why should some Jewish oligarch or billionaire have that power over academic freedom?

So I have this, you know, I just, there's an article in the Washington Post. I just heard it being talked about. I was listening to Mike, Mike Penovic talk about it. The Washington puts an article about how a bunch of Jews got together on a chat and started devising Jewish billionaires. I started a chat room and started devising strategy on how to respond to the protesters. And they're colluding with government, FBI. It's like, well, is it anti-Semitic trope that said the Jews meet in secret? You know, I was like, well, there they are.

They're coordinating. And these aren't just people. these aren't, you know, basement dwellers, you know, talking. These are billionaires, captains of industry. I think the article is captains of industries. If it's like J.P. Morgan or Andrew Carnegie, you get there. There's all Jewish billionaires strategizing against the public, conspiring against the public to violate people's First Amendment rights to free speech and protest.

And they're going to just like this, they openly talk about how people who are identified the protests are going to be blackball. right blacklisted rather and not being hired like I thought that was wrong remember McCarthy and all that wasn't that wrong you know but they openly talk about it

and there's no that that type is that's tortious interference that's racketeering that that should that's illegal you know but nothing's done about it

because they're because they're billionaires and they're Jewish billionaires you all know just being a billionaire I mean I protect you look at Donald Trump but I'm saying being a Jewish billionaire

well there you go but it's like this i mean you was a time there were some at least america put up the pretext pretense of respecting people's freedom of speech and all that um but the things they can't control the narrative now given the level of communication technologies so they have to remove the illusion of of these things for the longest time you can say yeah we support free speech but do you own a radio station you own a newspaper media consolidation in the late 20th century destroyed any real diversity in media in the United States, five or six corporations all owned, you know, by, you know, by,

probably like Black Rock and these things. So there's no diversity in opinion. And it's Jewish dominated. Look at any newsroom and all that. It's something else. But, you know, but the problem with the internet for about 15, 20 years, there really was sort of this lowering of the guard. And you really could, you know, a million of flowers of bloom.

to speak and then they couldn't put up with it. They just had to shut it down. They came out. ADL came up with hate speech and these things and the FBI working with these organizations. Like Google, you know, Google's owned by Jews, run by Jews, and they work in coordination with the FBI. The FBI works with ADL. They all work with Unit 182, or was it 82, 182, 182 in Israel.

And it's all coordinated. You know, and then at the same time we have, we have like Jews in control of cybersecurity. States who's an ardent Zionist, the lady in charge of cybersecurity for the country, is an ardent Zionist. Well, that's good. The guy who's supposed to in charge of border security is a Jew. And not only is a Jew, he used to work for highest, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, whose job is to compromise national borders by flooding countries with immigrants.

You know, it was a time they're only supposed to help Jews immigrate. Oh, they spread their wings, so to speak. They branched out. Now they're involved in destabilizing any country has any sense of ethno, ethnic, ethnic identity, you know. But he's in charge. Majoricus is in charge. You know, then wondering why the border is as poor as a Swiss cheese because he wants it to, you know. And once you realize that, you know, Majoricus, who's a Jew, you know, once the border open,

and then you look at all of these groups and you find out that the biggest of all of them and the most well-funded or Jewish groups, you have to ask, why, why? And are they, I mean, this, how hard is it for a, you know, an American, a red-blooded American to go, why would people who are members of a group

that belong to our, you know, that are our greatest ally, why do they want our borders open? And they're not even smart enough to say, and theirs closed. Just why do they want our borders open? Well, if you ask that question, then you hate Jews.

Well, why? Because, I mean, they've said that they blend in better in a country, they thrive better in a country that's multi-cultural. And the argument could be made, you know, United States, we import it, we imported, a whole workforce that was from a completely a different culture and then after that workforce was freed didn't get rid of them and then just allowed immigration after

immigration so the country has been multicultural for a while but look at Europe Sweden 15 years ago was Swedish yes you can't make that case about Finland or Sweden or Norway Yeah. Or Denmark for that matter. Yeah. Or Ireland. Ireland of all places. It's an island. It's eight. It's like, okay, so why do they need multiculturalism? And it's Jews. By the way, it's Jews in Ireland arguing for that.

You can make the argument. Okay. Sweden sided with the Nazis. And Finland, Finland fought against, you know, Finland fought against. Finland fought against. the Russians. Okay. But, but Ireland, Ireland remains neutral on all this. Why did they need to be multicultural?

My opinion is, for no other reason than spite, for no other reason than because we can. And we love it. Look, I mean, they were able to, members of that tribe,

were able to instigate a war in Ukraine, where Christians on one side are killing Christians on another. Yeah, and then Putin says, we're fighting neo-Nazism. Yeah, because he's a frigging boomer. That's the mind virus right there, isn't it? It's a frigging boomer. Yeah, but you have Christians, you have, You have Christians fighting, you have Christians fighting other Christians.

And I mean, I can't say this on your show, Tim. It's just too graphic. But you just know how much this excites them. Yes. Yeah. I mean, this image in my mind is terrible. But, I mean, this is what they want. This is what they've said that they want.

They have this war that they're dragging out. It's depopulating Ukraine. And they call it supporting Ukraine. Yeah. I mean, literally just there was a video the other day that was someone was walking down the sidewalk in St. Petersburg, Russia. And the person who posted said, do you notice something that's missing? And it was obviously people of color. It was obviously people not dressed well.

It was the white culture. somebody goes, oh, yeah, men between the ages of 18 and 50. And I'm like, they're all over the place there. In that video, you see men between ages. I mean, Russia isn't fighting this with Russians. Well, they are, but they're fighting it mostly with, not with conscripts. And that's all propaganda. I mean, there have been some, I mean, some of the first people,

into the country were Chechens. So it's like just this propaganda, and the account that said this was an account that is pro-Israel, has been attacking anyone who would say, who would criticize Israel in any way

since October 7th. I mean, it's how long? I mean, Well, I mean, this country's probably already at the point of no return. Yeah. Now it's just they, they want us to be, you know, a bleach skeleton with nothing left, what nothing left, that they've just raped of everything.

And especially, I think what they get off the most of taking away. from us is any kind of pride we would have any kind of morale any kind of happiness that we would have and they just love to see us miserable because they're miserable their whole existence is miserable if your whole existence is that of being the victim you're miserable and you want to see the rest of the world that way yes that's my takeaway watch any Woody Allen movie. And you'll get that. Just derotic and miserable.

There's a Here's a good example who is in Poland who is a member of NATO. They joined NATO. They now in Warsaw they're banning public displays of the crucifix, Christian dissembles.

I'm not mistaken. Wasn't there an incident last year where a Polish parliamentarians took a fire but sprayed a fire extinguisher to a manure a lit manure and the parliament the ship the shop to some

so they're banning displays of the crucifix but you can display a menorah and light it on fire well you know it's you know it's interesting Tim after that happened I you know went to the old Google because I know Google is going to tell me the truth.

And I put in how many Jews are there presently in Poland? And I found out about three to four thousand. You know there used to be a lot more, Tim. Yes. But about three to four thousand. But they needed a menorah, right? They need to have a menorah there. Why?

For the same reason that there's an anti-Semitism bill in South Dakota. for a state that has, what, four Jews? You know, the meme, the classic meme from, I forget what the name of that movie is, it's all so tiresome. I mean, I'm exhausted with this. But if we ignore it, people will say, oh, just ignore it.

What do you, why do you obsess about this? Well, look at what's happened to the country since they've taken power. It's gone. Yes. It's gone. I mean, we used to be a manufacturing hub. You can't.

Did you imagine trying to go to war now? Who's going to make the munitions? Who's going to, who's made China? Well, they can make it cheaper. You can make it cheaper. It's utterly insane that there is a group of people running around saying that China is our greatest threat. It's not.

It's a little, it's a very little tiny country in the Middle East is our biggest threat. That China is our biggest threat. Yet, these are the same people whose adoption of free market economics allowed them to say, you know, we should send our manufacturing overseas. It'd be cheaper to have it manufactured over there. and shipped back, then it is to have it manufactured here. That's right.

Who was the labor secretary in the 90s when that happened? Who was that, Tim? Robert Reich. Oh, that 4 foot 9, that 4 foot 9 Hobbit. It's like, how can that little country pose such a threat? How can that little man do so much damage? Unbelievable.

Have you ever seen the picture of him stand? and then I still Clinton, like, pictures of him standing next to Clinton. It's, it's comical. It's comical. It's, it, this would all be, if you wrote this as like a movie, like, no, no one would buy it. It would, no one would believe it. And I think that's part of the reason why people just can't believe it. People can't believe if they understood elite theory, they probably have a better chance of,

that small groups are much better at organizing, taking power, and exercising power than 350 million people. And it's also a lot easier for groups to infiltrate countries that are, hey, live and let live. You don't say anything bad about them. Hey, we have a marketplace of ideas, and the best ideas are going to win. Uh-huh.

there are people who still believe that, Tim. There are people who still believe that. People who are still libertarians in 2024. What we just have to do away with power? Yeah. Just end the state, bro. All these people, all these people who are so great. What constitutes the state these days?

Is it Washington, D.C. or is it BlackRock? It's an Amazon, right? I mean, pretty famously, I was a libertarian up until about 2020, up until 2020. But really, the thing that put me over the top was my friend Matt Erickson did a video on Black Rock. And he said, basically Black Rock has become the Federal Reserve. So if you're a libertarian and you defend private business, you basically have to, by default, you'd have to defend this. And I'm like, I can't be a libertarian. I can't promote these quote-unquote values anymore.

Yes, someone sent me a book, I think it was a free e-book, written by Thomas Woods about the Federal Reserve, and it's all well and good. I know what the Fed was created. Ostensibly the Fed was created to preserve the value of the dollar and promote economic stability. Of course, it's failed miserably in that ostensible mission, but it's been wonderfully successful, and its real mission was to enthrone an oligarch. make the rich richer. The question is, who are the bankers? Who are they? What are their names? Right? But there's a lot of other things. There's a lot of other things. You talk about these things. And you've talked about something that shows about Walter Sundbar's book on capital, Jewish capitalism. A lot of people think that capitalism is a Protestant creation. And truly, it's really a Jewish

thing. And if you look at the elements of the origins of the Protestant Reformation and who really promoted it and why it happened, its effects is the Protestant Reformation was sort of a Judaizing effect on Christian culture. It rationalized theft and capitalism, if you even, if you accept the thesis of the, you know, the famous thesis of Protestant work ethic and capitalism, if it is Protestantism or Protestantism was born out of theft, theft of church property. So capitalism is based on theft of property. It's also based on usually, which is a Jewish idea. So it's based on compound interest in property theft. So it leads to this sort of wealth concentration.

Now, a lot of other things going on in with the economy, particularly in the United States when there's so much property and dispersed economic power, took a long time for these things to sort of be concentrated. It was gradually concentrated over time. It's not as simple just like one group doing it. It's just a process as it play out. But if you read E. Michael Jones's book, Barren Metal,

you kind of get a good picture of this, how sort of the economic theories, particularly of the of the Whig, the Whig ascendancy in Great Britain, which of course at this point was Protestant, English Reformation,

was to justify that theft that started with the, with King Henry the 8th, you know, separating from Rome. And what happened was the, what you have is the sort of rationalization. You get that with Adam Smith

and, and, uh, idea, you know, the idea of economic, and supply demand and these things. And also like to you with a expunge or pull out morality from economics.

It's more like physics. So it's like, you know, it's it's inertia and gravity. It's a demand, supply demand and these things. And you can, you have the physiocrats coming up with laissez-faire. There's no real morality applied to politics, more like physics. And this, of course, were rationalized a lot of what was going on in Great Britain And with the Industrial Revolution, which was fired not only by the Protestant Reformation and the theft of property, but also the subsequent enclosure movement, which deprived the peasantry of the commons, which is their means of support. It also was this vast network of church properties which supplied sort of a commonwealth, a charity, welfare for the British people.

And all that accumulated wealth was stolen by a few wealthy landlords or sorry, wealthy, you know, aspiring aristocrats or aristocratic families. this is why they supported Henry the 8th. They take all that property. There's a book by Hiller Bellet called The Servile State. He talks about this. So understand the nature of Catholicism, you have to go way back. It's not, most people just know about Adam Smith and Marx, they think those are the two arguments.

But there's that. Then there's the function of usury in banking and, of course, how monetary manipulation and how that leads to wealth concentration. And the problem with wealth concentration, it's as important as political concentration. We have this idea that in the West, particularly with the Baron, was it Montesquieu? Was it Montesquieu? Was it Montesquieu?

Am I got that right? I'm going on my own. Yeah, it was Montescue, yeah. Montescue, the idea of checks of balances. The idea you divide power, ambition, checks the ambition, faction versus faction, there's a balance. You can kind of see as sort of a practical way to maintain a roughly free society, prevent the concentration of power.

The problem is nothing to prevent the concentration of financial power. And you live in a liberal society where money, is king, you live in a dollar democracy as people have this a whore, this amass wealth by exploiting the liberal system. And the moment you become a multi-millionaire billionaire, you can start, you can rig the game in your favor and get richer. This is what happened in the late 19th century in America, in early 20th century in America, you know, with the so-called robber barons. So that's where we are. But so, and you add to that, the liberal society, when you have Jews who are liberal, liberal, from the restrictions that existed up until the, you know, the 19th century in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars, Jews, some of the restrictions on Jews, some of the on Jews were lifted, and they were able to integrate themselves into European society and used their money power to, to want to buy their way into the, in the European aristocracy, particularly in the Great Britain where the Atlanta interstoxi were land rich, landed airstocks, but they were cash poor. So they borrowed money from Jewish financiers, like the Rothschilds Charles.

who used their financial leverage because of the debt that they had over the aristocratic families to worm the way in their power. And they were able to buy out and control the Bank of England. So by the end of the 19th century, the British Empire was more or less just a Rothschild concern. And see, with the U.S. empires now was more just a concern of international financiers and bankers. And the American Empire has become through the same monetary process of debt. You know, that's what the Fed was created, just create masses of debt. I haven't quite worked at my own mind, but this is what I see. So this is why the, how do you defend capitalism versus socialism when it's so convoluted, you know?

Do you have any thoughts on that? Yeah. I mean, I was, I was rambling. So I don't know for me. Right. I mean, I can't, I can't touch everything there. Yeah. But the, you know, the idea that you are going to, yeah, and this is an idea that I used to believe, that's why I can say it's absolutely absurd is.

is that the ruling principle of your, your culture, of your polity is going to be good economics, sound money, things like that, is to ignore the fact that you're never going to have a, marketplace of ideas, you're never going to have those checks and balances. Power consolidates.

and then you have to deal with the fact that that politics is about friend enemy. So someone was asking me about political parties. Do you think, would you pass a law saying that you can, you wouldn't, you're not allowed to political parties? I'm like, I don't want to have a government that that's even a possibility. I would rather have one man rule because you're, when you have democracy as, as Carl Schmidt has taught us, you immediately have friend and enemy. You're going to have friend enemy. So how are you not going to have parties?

But, you know, the money, the whole money issue is when it comes to, I've said recently when it comes to like a culture, a polity, the you're not going I'm thinking about culture and I'm thinking about the state having just enough power to or whatever whatever it is

if it's a king or if it's a CEO having just enough power to preserve that culture that should be their job we should be worried about culture we should be worried about having the power and having the ability to expel people

from that culture who would seek to damage it. Money, economics should be in the background. It's a tool. It's just a tool. And when you look at something, when you look at something like Friedrich Bliss' ideas on a national economy, how you have free trade within your polity and international trade is tariffed,

as much as, you know, do what it takes to protect, protect your people. Economics is what we see today when you have Black Rock who can basically go into any town and, you know, if I'm selling this house and I'm selling it for $200,000 and, you know, the lady down the street wants it, it's her, you know, she's been looking at it for years and she wants to move in here. and she offers me the $200,000, but Black Rock comes along and says, I'll give me $2.25 for it.

I mean, I'm going to go, screw you, Black Rock. I'm selling it to her, but most people who don't think about their neighbor, don't think about their culture, don't think about the fact that Black Rock is a, you know, is a malevolent actor.

We're going to sell it to Black Rock. Is that a free market? Is it a free market, when you have a company that basically has control of the printing press in a country of a country, that they can do whatever they can basically overbid. And it's insane to think that we allow that to happen to happen. Yeah. Who runs Black Rock?

Yeah. What was the name of the guy who runs Black Rock? Yeah, it's a Quaker. That's right. Yeah, yeah. Presbyterian. Presbyterian, yeah. Yeah, it's insane to think that we allow that to happen.

And not only that we allow it to happen, but some people actually champion it. Hey, that's a free market. That's a free market working. Yeah, there's a few years old that there was like a conference, a Blackrock conference. And Larry Fink was there, you see a BlackRock talking about he was using the corporations, his corporate his, the companies he's control to being about unpopular change, forced change on people. People just listening to this. Who are you?

Who elected you? What moral authority do you have? Oh, you control money. What does, no. I mean, just because you have money? This is the ESG nonsense, you know, and that's, you know, it's, another example is Ukraine where Blackark was planning to rebuild Ukraine. after the war. Now, you're going to tell me if BlackRock had no knowledge or influence on whether or not there was a war?

Maybe BlackRock's board factored into that decision by the State Department of Victoria Newland, a fellow member of the tribe, to provoke that war. She'd been doing that since going back to her, when she served in the Obama administration. They never leave. Even though she resigned, I'm sure she didn't leave. I'm sure she's still scheming and doing things. things. But so, I mean, this is a country that they're able to, I believe probably somehow be involved in the decision process to foment a war in Ukraine and then come in and when everyone that's been depopulated and destroyed, buy the land on the cheap with other people's money, of course, and get richer and more powerful. And then impose more ESG on everybody, you know, environmental social governance than these things. This is how the system works. and we're supposed to think that's the free market, as if it ever existed.

But no. And we're supposed to, it's like, you have to do because it's the market. No, I don't have to do that. Economics should be a subset of moral philosophy. And we have to, what's going to guide our moral philosophy? It used to be a subset of moral philosophy. Adam Smith was a moral philosopher. He just developed a philosophy that suited his benefactors,

which is a British East India company. He had to justify slavery and the opium trade. And how do you do that? We got to reverse the balance of trade. So if the Chinese want opium and they don't want our manufactured goods, we want their tea, well, we're selling opium. That's how you do it. And to hell with the consequences. That's the mentality.

You know, that's that capitalist mentality that ascended after the Reformation. You know, again, it's a, you can't, no system's going to function if it's devoid of morality. It's going to turn into this. If your system is run by self-described immoralist, whether it's the gold standard or monetary theory, it's going to run aground. It's going to turn into this because they're immoralists. And running an economy is moral. That goes like to Frederick Lest. He has some sense of national purpose or Germany.

His case was Germany. Then he came to the United States and developed these things. And then in the United States, you had various theories. These are difficult because they went against things like opportunism and corruption, like the railroad industry. The United States was terribly corrupt. I don't think the railroads in Germany were corrupt. I've never heard of anything bad about the railroad system as developed in Germany.

I heard a lot of bad things about the railroad industry in the United States. Yeah, it was very corrupt. There was a lot of things. But like anything, you have to balance things out with political interests, what your objectives are in these things. At the very least, continentalism would work because it would follow along with America's ideal position of non-interventionism or so-called isolationism

because it's under free trade where we're told we have to be involved than every corner of the world, right? It's free trade that creates that necessity. It's so-called free trade, right? It's free trade that made it. So we sent our semiconductor production out to Taiwan. At the same time, we're told any day China could invade.

Does that make any sense? I mean, what? How do we export energy? Why does I export energy? It doesn't. That one literally doesn't make sense at all. I mean, you think if you're an American corporation, you want to sell energy to Americans. So we're better off as Americans.

But under the sort of this homo-economics, you know, Manchester school thinking, it's like, well, we can make a little bit more selling for the time being. Yeah, but what if that undermines the security of the country and leads to the dissolution on the country? Then it's not good economics. If it happens in 30 or 40 years. You know, was what was the petrodalo good economics? You know, yeah, it boosted consumerism, but also boosted debt, which rotted out of American culture. Destroyed the family. Destroyed the ability for the single ways to raise the family.

But is that really wealth? As GDP, just because a few in the country can hoard immense wealth and statistically your GDP goes up, but everyone's poor, is your country a wealthier? No, it's not because it's not distributed properly. So how do you measure GDP? You know, I don't know. I'm kind of rambling now. I'm sorry. that's all right we got to wrap up we got to wrap up anyway yeah yeah yeah but that's all this

confusion you know has been introduced in in how we think about these things you know because because of ideology you have to be for free trade you have to be for capitalism what are you a socialist yeah it's yeah it's you know it's ridiculous so yeah everybody has to be yeah in this system, if you're not an economist, if you're not like on top of the economy every day, you just can't survive. And man was not meant to be, you know, man was not meant to become economized. There, no, man should, man should be doing other things. He should have other pursuits. And economics is way down on the list. But when you have a certain group that, you know, considers economics to be the, you know, their highest priority and money to be, you know, their highest priority and money to

be their most important commodity, then you're going, that's where we are. It just, it's going to happen because that's who they are. Yeah. And, you know, it's, we should be worried about fishing. Should be worried about other things. It should be, it just, not this. You know, and not to sound like Marx, where you're like, oh, you know, you should be able to write poetry and then go fishing and do all that stuff. Man should not have to, every man should not have to become an economist in order to be able to protect, you know, what little wealth he has. Yeah.

Just if you, if a system has been created that you have to survive in where that money can, where that can disappear in a second where it's like, you know, you can wake up and boom, a market just disappeared. If that is the system that you live in, you live in a system, you live in a system that is just gambling. And the only when it comes to gambling, the only one that wins is the house. And in this case, the house is a certain group. Yes.

And they've organized it that way, because that's what they do. You know, that's what they do. They pride themselves on it. They talk about it all the time. And you live in a system, it was, Tucker Carlson that said if society is arranged, if society, economy has arranged such a way that you, young couple cannot afford to get married and have children, that's a society or it's a system that should not continue in existence. Because it's basically you're destroying the very thing that

it depends upon to continue. And similarly, if you live in a society where Jeff Bezos has enough money to build a yacht that doesn't fit in a river in Europe and he has enough money to buy the bridge, to get the bridge out of the way so his yacht does fit, that's a system I don't want to, I don't want to operate in because there's something really wrong. with that you know yeah no 100% it's so yeah well Pete I think we've rambled on long enough I appreciate Sam I always like talking to you thank thanks for coming back on the show of course the Pete Keone show Piquino show um all podcatchers and uh Pete substack.com okay well I hope what we said tonight made sense so uh I hope I hope somebody gets something out of it thanks so thanks so much

then Tim. Take care. Bye. Bye.