The Pete Quiñones Show - Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge - Complete - w/ Thomas777
Episode Date: May 4, 20264 Hours and 42 MinutesPG-13Thomas777 is a revisionist historian and a fiction writer.This is the complete series about Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge regime. Radio Free Chicago - T777 and J BurdenThomas...777 MerchandiseThomas' Buy Me a CoffeeThomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 1"Thomas' Book "Steelstorm Pt. 2"Thomas' WebsiteThomas on TwitterThomas' CashApp - $7homas777Pete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's SubstackPete's SubscribestarPete's GUMROADPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekignano show.
Thomas is back and we're going to start a new series today.
So I'm going to let Thomas take it away.
Thank you, Thomas.
How are you doing?
Well, I believe an understudy aspect, not just of the Cold War,
but in 20th century studies and Marxist-Leninist studies,
as well as disciplines tending towards,
scaled sociopolitical behavior. There's a general neglect of
Democratic Campuchia, which existed from 1975,
1999. That was the Khmer Rouge regime. It's invoked by a lot of these
midwit academics as some cautionary tale from history.
And these people, part of it's born of ignorance, part of it's born of
commitment to an ideological narrative. They assign these arbitrary criteria,
the categorical criteria to what they call genocides.
Conspicuously, of course, the Soviet Union during the phase or epoch when America was allied with the Soviet state is conspicuously redacted.
But they'll lump together, Rwanda, Democratic Campocia, the Third Reich.
sometimes
Edia means Uganda
and declare that these are instances
of genocide
you know again according to arbitrary metrics
a combination of
what they perceive of as the
moral depravity
of the government in question and
the
scale of
attrition
that doesn't really tell us anything
don't get me wrong
one of the reasons I invoke Ernstinole
so much is he's one of the most important
gaily and fierce
whoever lived
but he had certain insights into the
way political power
is expressed
in the late
modern period
with a particular attention of the 20th century
and there was a severity
to political affairs
and an intensity to
violence that really isn't
precedented before sense.
Although I'd argue that
some of the excesses of the
Jacobin regime were comparable
and I
discussed that in my book or my
manuscript. It's not published yet.
Also, so there's that
and really such that
I remember
that if you'd read the National Review
or the American Spectator in the
90s,
when they were short on a bogeyman to talk about, obviously, because the Cold War was over.
It was around that time, Paul Pot, aka Saleth Sar, which was his actual name.
He passed away in 98, and that's when there was this ad hoc tribunal that was bringing
Camer Rouge leaders up on charges.
and there was this tendency of neocons to burn Paul Pot and effigy as sort of a lesser Satan.
Contra, Adolf Hitler is a greater Satan, and this man is a monster, and he's a perfect example of the evils of the left.
All this kind of breathless condemnation, but that doesn't suggest any sort of insight into the character of the regime.
the historical processes that created it, quite the contrary.
But other than that, you never really heard about the regime.
There was a series of sort of pop history books by journalists
that were full of lurid stuff,
casting Paul Potts-Seleth-Sars,
sort of an Ediamine figure, this figurative,
and then according to some apocryph.
story's literal cannibal who was the face sort of post-colonial savagery when the shackles
are thrown off the colored world I mean it's obviously couched in sort of boilerplate liberal
moralizing nobody actually believes in but that was the guts of it but then there's other people too
particularly people who have a sympathy for the orthodox marx's leninist perspective
there's few of them left anymore.
But in the 80s and 90s, I mean, they were very much around, especially in academia.
They sort of just avoid the issue, or they'd cast Paul Pot as some sort of dictator strongman of a secular nature
who didn't really understand Marxist Leninism and who only was able to capitalize on conditions of chaos and punctuated disruption owing to,
the Cold War proxy conflict emerging in Southeast Asia.
Then there's Maoist-type schismatics,
and they just sort of avoid the subject matter.
And there's a reason for that.
I mean, there's a few reasons for that.
And it's not just for the sake of appearances.
Paul Pah, Sal of Sarr, was very educated.
And he was something of a counterpart to Ho Chi Minh
in various respects, and he had a deep understanding of Marxist Leninism,
far more, I'd say, than most of the Soviet client apparatchiks in Eastern Europe.
And what happened in Cambodia, it's a pure example of historical processes
and the communist zeitguides taking hold with hellish consequences.
only as simple and reduces these things to the machinations of individual men.
And that's just not the way human affairs develop.
Cambodia also is a very, very strange society.
I don't mean that pejoratively.
I find it incredibly fascinating.
It's not, it's far more like India than is like China.
And it's more like sub-Saharan Africa than either.
Okay.
there was a very racially coded aspect to the Khmer Rouge Revolution.
There was a horrible racial animus between them and the Vietnamese.
And that's one of the things that Kissinger recognized
and Nixon's foreign policy and national security team capitalized on and exploited.
One of the things, you know, as we talked about,
Kissinger, for arbitrary reasons, is one of it,
is like some boogeyman in armies for no apparent reason.
As I think people know, well, one of the many alleged sins of Kissinger was
after, when, when Noem Saanuk, who was the king of Cambodia who'd been ousted by Law and Nahl,
who was an American client, sort of right-wing military type,
after 1970 it was
Law and Null, who was in the seat of government.
The Khmer Rouge
conquered Phnom Pen
in April
75. That was the end
of the Law and Null regime. During this time,
Sahanuk was in exile and holding
himself out as the government in exile.
America recognized
the Khmer Rouge regime at the
UN as the seat
of
government,
obviously because they were
at war with Vietnam.
And the Khmer Rouge regime went down when the people's army of Vietnam assaulted and occupied the country.
And they occupied until 1990 because something that's also not really understood, I don't think, by most people, including casual suits in the Cold War.
after the Senate of Soviet split, a genuine proxy war broke out between the communist juggernauts,
culminating in the war between the Khmer Rouge and Hanoi and then between Hanoi and China.
And America obviously backed the Khmer Rouge against the Vietnamese,
who were a very, very strong client of Moscow.
And this had dramatic ripple effects, okay?
I'd argue, and I'm sure some people would take exception to this because they think it's a neo-connish point. It's not. It's people like Lutfack, like Richard Pearl, like from Schlesinger, they were speaking of a, them and the whole team be cadre, they were speaking of a, of a strategic reality. How they interpreted that is questionable. But I think what's indisputable, the communists were winning the Cold War in military terms. It didn't.
didn't matter that their political societies were basket cases.
Because if they won, it wouldn't have mattered.
Because then there'd be no alternative.
But Nixon and Kissinger were able to neutralize the fall of South Vietnam by decoupling
Beijing from Moscow, and then back in Camp Ocea against Vietnam.
and the Soviets, and like I said before, in my opinion,
the shadow executive of the Soviet Union during the Brezhnavera was in drop off.
Ustinov and Grameko with a drop off being out front, as it were.
The Soviets managed to flip India to the Soviet camp.
So Washington in turn was able to come.
convert Pakistan into a client regime, which remains to this day.
And the India-Pakistan War owed to that, which led to the Soviets insinuating a communist regime into Kabul,
which then after the Iranian Revolution, they feared was going to pivot to the West under domestic auspices of
fieldtee to an Islamist ideology.
and like we've talked about before, that would have been catastrophic because
Afghanistan's within decapitation range of what was Star City, Kazakhstan,
which constituted the Warsaw Pax, command and control capability in the Pacific Theater.
So an event of nuclear war, they would have been annihilated.
And thus you have the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan.
Okay, so this was not a minor thing.
this is all related.
And the late Cold War,
there was this endless standoff and stalemate in Europe, obviously.
Even when the Aerostrategic parity made conventional force structure relevant again,
the stalemate gourd.
So Asia became the primary theater at Geostrategic competition.
And owing to things like the primacy of maritime,
strategic platforms, World War III was going to be, when it went nuclear, was going to be one or lost in Asia.
That's what underlay a lot of this decision making.
But the personage of Paul Pot was incredibly enigmatic.
Even his name, Paul Pot had something like 18 different names he'd gone under.
people weren't even sure he existed
and then when it became clear
who he was
people thought he was some kind of cipher
when in reality the men out front of the Khmer Rouge movement
were the ciphers
and he was the
lenient figure of the movement
he gave very few interviews
one of which he gave an interview in 977
to Yugoslavian state television
and the Yugoslavs never fully hedged by a lying with the Maoist camp,
because obviously that would have reignited hostilities with Moscow.
They always, Tito, until the end of his life, tried to tread this sort of middle road,
at least after Stalin was out of the picture.
But they were always, like the Romanians were, they were always looking for good offices
with communist regimes outside of Moscow's orbit.
So Paul Pot goes on Yugoslavian television,
and he gives this whole narrative of how he was this poor peasant boy,
who was illiterate.
That was a lie.
Salaf Sar, his name even,
Tsar means pale or white,
because Salazar was Chinese with some Khmer blood.
Cameras are a dark-skinned people.
They probably call themselves black commier.
Okay.
Salath-Sar was a lesser aristocrat.
One of his female cousins became a concubine to the then king.
There's this sort of sanguineary and libertine sensibility to the royal high.
houses in old Cambodia.
A lot of these kings and princes
had dozens of wives
and hundreds of concubines, like a great
con or something.
And
Salazar's female cousin
became one of these
concubines.
And then ultimately his older sister
did too.
And
his father had been a wealthy landowner.
And
owing to his
cousins and his sisters owing to selisar's cousins and his sisters position at court a bunch of his
other relatives got became royal officers at the palace and uh there's this kind of lurid story
that apparently is true when cellar was uh 13 or 14 he was still young enough to be allowed into
harem quarters and people didn't worry about it and one of his elder
brothers or cousins was a palace guard of the women's quarters and he'd let him go in there.
And when Salazar's boyhood friends would say Salazar'd go in there and be with the girls
sexually because the king was this elderly man and who was by that point probably quasi
demented and he certainly wasn't having sex with these women.
So they literally had nothing to do.
And some teenage boy coming to visit him made them really happy.
but the point is not to regale people with some kind of pornographic story,
but young Selif Tsar was literally in the lap of royal decadence.
You know, he wasn't, no, he was not a poor peasant.
He was the opposite.
And that seems very odd, but outsiders on the periphery,
of the core national, racial, ethnic population that comes to animate the historical process in the country in question, that seems to be the norm, not the exception.
You know, whether you're talking about Adolf Hitler, or you're talking about Napoleon or even Cromwell, to some degree.
And I speculate, although I'm sure the man himself and his apollo.
such that they still exist in Cambodia, would never acknowledge this.
Salazar's mixed blood, his education literally at court and in some of the best schools in Phnom Pen,
but his relative proximity to peasant life and real poverty, if only by observation,
that coupled with his instinct and intelligence for power political,
affairs. It situated
him in a way that was uniquely advantageous for
a revolutionary career. I don't think he was particularly committed
to Marxist Leninism and the way Lenin was or Stalin was.
He wasn't a man living as an outlaw
who developed a partisan sensibility. I think he looked around
him and saw the proverbial writing on the wall.
And like many people, particularly
in the colored world, as it was called,
and a less delicate epoch,
he thought that Moscow was going to win the Cold War.
So,
this was the path he chose.
One of the Khmer Rouge
field commanders,
who was very close to Salafs,
he said subsequently
long after
the Khmer Rouge had been deposed,
but we're still carrying on
military activity on the periphery of the country.
He relayed, I was in command of tens of thousands of men,
and I had no real authority.
We were all just trying to ride a proverbial beast that was out of control
and desperately trying to direct it towards some sort of constructive
or at least less catastrophic purpose.
And that's not an alibi.
If you've got millions of buyers,
on you, at least in the eyes of the world, you're not going to drop alibis.
That's something, there's something about myth and normies.
It's the same sensibility when people claim, oh, everyone in prison claims they're innocent.
No, they don't.
Because there's no reason to anymore.
If you were in the, if you were in the proverbial court of Paul Pot and this planet
and the dominant power political cadre is declaring you killed two million people,
what are you going to say?
Sorry? No. You're going to describe what conditions or as you experience them. People who claim otherwise don't understand the human mind. It's not a matter of conscience or anything like that or feeling remorse. There's just no percentage in it. Standing on ceremony is something people do who have normal liars that aren't impacted by apoccal events.
And interestingly,
Bonhpent fell on April 17th,
weeks before the fall of Saigon.
And that was gratifying
both the Peking and the Cameroos themselves.
U.S. officials claimed
that the final assault
on the Cambodian capital
was spearheaded by people's army of
Vietnam units backed by combined arms.
That's not true,
remotely.
But I don't think that was propaganda.
A lot of commentators
subsequently said that was U.S. propaganda
aimed to obfuscate
the situation, as well
as to mitigate the perceived
inability of America impact
outcomes. I don't,
I think people believe that
because they had no understanding of Cambodia.
They had no understanding the Khmer Rouge movement.
They had no understanding what was developing
in brass tax terms
between the Soviets and the Chinese.
They didn't understand the depth of hostility
between the Khmer and the Vietnamese.
There was a handful of people who understood,
at least in broad conceptual terms,
some of the concrete particulars here,
and I believe Kissinger was one of them.
But I don't think that was disinformed.
information.
And that's one of the things that brought attention, particularly of what was then called
the second world, as well as a lot of non-state actors who were engaged in the service of the
communist cause, that's something that brought their attention to Southeast Asia.
obviously victory by the people's army of Vietnam was imminent then but that was a massive proxy
conflict the Khmer Rouge had no outside assistance really they got some small arms from
China but even China's attention primarily was on Vietnam where they shared a border
and China had a bizarre relationship with the Vietnamese it's one it's one characterized
for all time, including today, by hostility.
But before the Sino-Soviet split,
there was an effort by the Chinese to steer Hanoi away from the Soviet orbit
with the incentive being material military support.
And owing to the shared border,
there was a handful of American servicemen who,
were shut down in proximity to the Sino-Vietnamese border,
but who crashed over Vietnamese territory
and were captured by People's Liberation Army forces
who were manning the AAA batteries,
and they spent years in Chinese captivity.
So there was a complicated convergence of military,
intrigues and overlapping spheres of control.
In reality, no Vietnamese force other than special operations and, you know, cable elements
and non-conventional, non-uniform forces that fought on the ground of Vietnam since 1973.
And obviously, that's another myth that won't die.
This idea, Nixon is responsible for the...
the disaster of Democratic Campania because invading Cambodia destabilized it and this gave rise
to an opportunity to Cameroos to capture the capital. That's asinine and it's more of this idea
that nothing in the world is approximately caused by anything other than America's decision
to intervene or not by way of hard power elements.
that's incredibly ignorant.
As it may,
the widening of the war to Cambodia
was essential
if America intended
to finally
obviate the ability
of
Hanoi to arm and equip
Nazi elements in the South
that were largely
wiped out by the Tet Offensive,
but the supply
lines along what was called colloquially the Ho Chi Minh Trail were obviously going to be used to
reinforce whatever conventional element assaulted across the 17th parallel. So it was the right
play. Law and all was not the right man to be installed after the removal of Sahanuk, but
beggars can't be choosers. You work with the mentioned material you have, including
the leadership element.
And, of course, since Saigon fell on April 30th, the 75,
the, upon Camero's victory,
a man named Ing Sari, born Kim Trang,
he was one of six members of the Standing Committee,
of the Communist Party at Camp Ocea.
He was the spokesman,
for all practical purposes of the Communist Party of Camp Lucia,
and as of April 17, 1975, he was held out by Western observers,
media personage, diplomats, American military officialdom,
as the leader of the Khmer Rouge, which is fascinating.
And he was cast as this sort of grotesque villain.
You know, in reality, well, to give you an idea,
it was some years later this one British diplomat.
So I think he's a guy who's been the ambassador briefly.
He talked about having lunch with Sari and Sari's wife.
And he likened the man to Fred West and his wife,
these two sex deviants who were serial killers in England,
that the hyperbole was just ridiculous.
But I think this is interesting,
because this was before, you know, the identity of the true control group of the,
the Congress Party of Campo, Chia was even known.
Then later, when Pulpott was sort of insinuated into the role in Western narratives,
and everybody had forgotten about, everybody had forgotten about,
But, I'm sorry.
This diplomat was still holding him out as this buggy man, replete with this lurid
historiotic narrative of him being no different than a serial killer.
It goes to say what a lazy script there is for these Anglo-American government types.
But moving on, the true depth of Paul Potts Salad Starr's secrecy,
Really the only intelligence record of him at all came from Sajano up secret police.
He'd been identified in a dossier along with dozens of other communist intellectuals,
identifying him as a former school teacher.
And in 1972, he'd been identified by U.S. intelligence as chief of the military director
to the Khmer Rouge front, alongside Nonche, who was chief of the political directorate.
And what's fascinating is when Sahanuk was desperately trying to manage a collapsing situation,
placating the Khmer Rouge, the United States, and Hanoi, he took to visiting Khmer Rouge held areas
to try and negotiate some sort of concord.
And there's photographs of Sahana talking to these random Cameroos officers
who are obviously being held out as the local commander,
and you'll see Paul Pot sitting in the corner unassumingly observing things.
You know, obviously totally invisible to the royal entourage.
There's a certain brilliance to that.
There's other times where during official Cameroon,
Award ceremonies or victory celebrations during the struggle years,
he'll be sitting literally in the back row of the theater or the assembly area,
essentially totally invisible.
He stands out again because of his pale complexion,
but that only stands out owing to hindsight.
You know, otherwise it would just be an oddity.
The people believed to, at least throughout the first several years of what can we call the Cambodian Civil War,
which pitted Law and Null's government, you know, which again was this client regime.
Jim of Washington against the Khmer Rouge.
The leading Cambodian communist intellectual was Q Sampan.
He won't probably support against Sahanuk in the 60s as being this sort of social
justice advocate.
And he had a reputation for not being corrupt, which was remarkable among any political
figure then, especially as the war heated up.
And he was viewed as, other than Ho Chi men, Sempan was viewed as the most significant Southeast Asian communist intellectuals.
He was technically defense minister, even though it was generally recognized that it was men commanding forces in the field who had real authority in that regard.
But this ruse was so convincing Sampan was invited to Beijing to meet Mao.
and when communicators were issued
not just to
not just to Mao
and the Chinese Politburo but across the
communist world
they were
signed by Sampan
and
if you wanted to
meet with formal
Cameru's representation
because you'd earn that
clout
by
you contribute
arms,
advisors,
money,
you want an audience with
Sampan. But that was a
smoke screen.
Sampon had no real power in the
movement. I don't even think people in
Cambodia
committed to the cause were
reading when he was producing.
But I mean, that itself
is brilliant because
in a scaled down way,
he was performing the
a function of the common turn or later what became common form for the east block.
He was putting on a civilized, lucid, intellectually articulate, and doctrinally sound within the
parameters of Marxist learning this ideology face for the outside world with a particular
eye to courting the resources and assistance of sympathetic actors, both non-state and states alike.
Somebody likened Paul Pot to a Hollywood director. He was a master at creating appearances
and assigning people roles within these artificial paradigms. It was tantalong to creating a potent
village of human beings and confagulated personages and doing it utterly convincingly.
Paul Potts said after the revolution, or after the Congress of Penel Penn, he said the CIA,
the KGB, Sahanax police, the Vietnamese knew who I was, but they did not know what I was.
and I think that's true.
Interestingly, too,
there was
the CIA
apparently, at least by
1974,
owing to one of
of Lon Nall's intelligence service
agents, he'd gotten
close to Paul Pot
and he relayed that
Paul Pot had some significance in the party
apparatus
of significance,
so after early
1974
there'll be references
and CIA
memos to a mysterious
Paul
who the agency had identified
as a person
of significance
within the commie communist movement
but to them
he was just a mid-level
functionary
and
it really wasn't
until
probably a year
after
the fall of
Pannon Penn
when
the
megasidal praxis
was fully underway
that it became clear
to
the intelligence services, which back in those days
were actually reasonably competent.
If not the world at large,
who
if not what,
Paul Pot, formerly Seloth Sar, was.
What's significant to, like I said, I'm jumping around a bit,
Celestar's upbringing, his father owned a plantation of approximately 50 acres,
and he was by far the wealthiest man in the village.
50 acres of rice paddy was about 10 times with the average free.
hold farmer owned in those days.
That's pretty remarkable.
And it's a little more remarkable.
I mean, even in the, obviously in those days,
there was, it was more difficult to track and identify people.
But owing to the prestige and notoriety of the man's family,
it's pretty amazing he could just disappear the way that he did.
and manipulate perceptions in that way that again that suggests a real brilliance quite literally for
political soldiery especially of that sort but again on to the fact that he was born to a land of
aristocracy he was the equivalent of a lesser mandarin he had chinese blood his family was
racially different from the population at large.
He was inevitably inundated with a strong historical consciousness.
And then when his young female cousins and sisters sort of becoming concubines of the king,
his first sexual experiences were literally with harem girls of the royal palace.
You know, how could you not, if you had the mind for it, develop an aptitude for deep history?
And coupled with that, the aggressiveness and the fearlessness and the ruthlessness for political soldiery.
It's sort of a perfect biography for a man to lead a revolutionary cadre or a splendid convergence of psychological traits, rather.
Well within historical memory, if not direct living memory, then too, the Vietnamese sense.
Even sometime after the French, established a protectorate in the 1860s, the Vietnamese came to feature as a boogeyman within the Khmer cultural mind and not entirely without cause.
There was this apograble story that all Khmer kids learned about a Vietnamese warlord who'd invaded Khmer land.
And then he buried three men in a triangle configuration up to their necks.
and every night he'd stoke a fire between them and balance a rice pot on their heads.
And that was supposed to be a metaphor for the relationship of the Vietnamese that come here.
They're this hated racial overlord.
And French missionaries relayed that during times of rebrand,
rebellion, Vietnamese
constabulary, they'd take
people suspected of partisan
activity and blind them
and bury them alive.
So this wasn't
just a fantasy or
some sort of mythology
built of racial animus.
You know, such as
crazy sort of
shitwibs going around, believing that
white people
are going to go around and like hang black people
at a moment's notice about
hesitation if, you know, they
cease worrying about being picked up
by the FBI. This wasn't
like, boogie fantasy stuff.
I mean, there was a reason
the Vietnamese were hated and feared.
And
racial warfare
and the specter of it
tends to have a brutalizing effect.
This is a fact.
Interestingly,
the ties
had perennially been
brutalizing
Khmer
within coveted territories
and there wasn't the same
sort of fear and animus
which can owe to a few different things
I
the ties are less alien
to the Khmer than the Vietnamese
I think and again I'm not some regional
studies guy and I'm not an expert on
Asian ethnicities
but if we're going to adopt the sort of French cultural anthropological paradigm of Southeast Asia,
literally being Indo-China where these two civilizational tendencies meet,
all right, well, there's as much of India in Thailand as there is China, okay?
The Vietnamese are very different.
when you think of
to
forgive me this is too colloquial
or simple-minded
but drawing in very basic broad strokes
when you think of gung-ho
industrious Asians
you think of your thinking of people like the Vietnamese
I think that goes without saying
and the Vietnamese
as much as they
have this deep hostility to the Han
they're very much alike
the Vietnamese are far more of a martial race
which is fascinating
but that's a discussion for
another time
Cambodia however
and again I'm not saying this
pejoratively at all
and I'm not
just making this observation from
some dilettance
understanding
people who've lived and labored there
for decades
and have made
a study of the culture over a lifetime, they insist Cambodia is more like Africa than like China.
From the fact that it was characterized by these kings who would take literally dozens of wives
and hundreds of concubines who would be bound to them because the king's virility,
literally the ability of the king to impregnate hundreds of women,
that's a sign from the heavens that the land is fertile,
you know, this idea of the Khmer viewing themselves as black,
quite literally, contra enemies from without who exploit them,
which isn't untrue.
This, these extended kinship networks at tribal level
that determine outcomes in the social strength,
all these things
and
in contrast
to those tendencies
you know
young Salazar and brothers
and sisters
they were inundated with
Buddhism
and there's something fascinating
I
I'm not at all a
religious studies expert
or anything
I don't something
about Islam, other than that, I can't really speak to other people's confessional heritage other than my own and Bible Protestantism.
But this odd nihilism that came to characterize the Khmer Rouge attitude towards homicide at massive scale, there's something of a Buddhist stamp on that.
I'm not saying Buddhism is evil or tends towards megal.
side at all.
But there's,
if you read Schopenhauer
in the world as well in
representation, and if you read
Julius Evela's book on Buddhism,
both of which are really interesting.
I mean, obviously, I mean, the world is willing
representation as essential reading. The Evela
book in Buddhism, I find that stuff
interesting, but it's probably not for everybody.
But
both make reference, this is primarily
an Vedic concept,
I believe, correct me if I'm wrong,
the comments. A meditative and spiritual practice called tapas. It's usually associated with a
sort of extreme and deep aceticism, but tapas literally means burning, burning away, not just of impure
thoughts and desires, but of desire itself and connection to the world. And release from
all things corporal and related to appetites and passions.
And there is precedent for pious Buddhists literally burning themselves alive.
You know, and I know that this has been held out as an example of Hindu savagery and what have you.
I'm not even saying that's incorrect.
I know in one of those Mando films, it might be shocking Asia, which interestingly was held out as a legit documentary, despite the fact that it's not like Gorgon video.
This isn't going to mean anything to youngsters, but the footage and it's not like faces of death.
It means real footage.
You know, there's these people, and this is in the mid-70s, when India was even more of a backwater than today, there's some poor people.
they'll find a holy man to cremate their loved ones when they're dead and then they
pour the ashes in the Ganges because they can't afford a proper you know mausoleum or
whatever but then there's people obviously bathing in the Ganges which is full of human
detritus it's fetid and
This footage was exhibited.
I mean, I believe the guys who shot it,
they probably had this passionate view,
which you'd have to if you're going to immerse yourself that way
in primitive cultures.
But it was obviously being showcased for kind of lurid reasons.
And, I mean, I'm not going to lie.
Like, I find that revolting.
I'm, I'm Anglo-Titanic.
I mean, I'm a clean freak.
I find that gross to the millionth fucking degree.
but obviously aside from the kind of visceral grossness of it it speaks of a lack of concern not just with human remains and proper disposal of these things but a total lack of a total apathy about death okay the sort of rationalist perspective and the perspective of
people like Burnham, James Burnham I mean, was, well, in the Orient life is abundant in cheap.
Yeah, that's part of it, but that's not the whole story.
There's something about that Hindu and original Buddhist conception about life and death being
basically synonymous, and they're not being anything to lament about an individual losing their
life and there being nothing to fear about losing one's own life because it represents a sort of
final release into this collective element that sustains all things until all becomes ash and i really believe
that i know that evil had a sense of early buddhism and hinduism being aryan
and that's not incorrect.
But it's a totally different conceptual orientation about the process of death and what it represents.
And filtered down after that racial overcast, who is the progenitor of these theological orientations, is long gone.
It takes on a certain casual banality.
that habituates people to certain excesses that I do not think would be realizable in other kinds of societies.
It's probably what I said to scope, but that's another thing that's neglected about it,
in part because, I mean, in the 20th century, even as theological impulses were quite literally tearing down the vestige of illegitimate,
of communist governments, people in academia and what have you still hadn't put together that
the hard materialism and the atheist sensibility of the 20th century was disappearing.
So this wasn't talked about in the era.
I mean, people are uncomfortable with that sort of subject matter anyway.
But that's one of the reasons I've been recent.
searching this a lot. And in my fiction, the Khmer Rouge, and it's a plot device. It's an important
aspect of the narrative. Billy Wong's father is killed by the Khmer Rouge when he's on
the ground fighting as a mercenary of sorts and the service of Warsaw Pact. And that haunched
Billy Wong.
And, you know, that's
it's kind of long
and a fascination of mine since I was a kid.
I thought the whole thing
frightening. But it's
just something, that movie,
I like the new 28 years later
movies, even though a bunch of people currently
don't. But you know, the
most recent ones,
28 years later, and then the sequel
was literally called the Bone Temple.
This massive Bone Cathedral
is a major
said piece, an aspect of it.
And there's a very Buddhist sensibility
around it. The guy who
builds it's a white man, he's this English
doctor, who
lives among the infected, because he's
trying to find a way to cure them so that
something
approaching civilized
life can be restored.
But he's taken on this
memental mori sensibility. So when
people die, whether they're infected
or whether they're, you know,
a human, he
he takes their remains and gives them a proper burial
and he boils down their skull and polishes it and he adds it to this
massive structure.
And it's profound. And you know, to this day, there's
there's
this whole monument of skulls in Cambodia.
I mean, people burn incense and stuff. And obviously it's one part
monument to the victims.
But it's also, there's something
totemic about it that you wouldn't
find in the West. That would
upset people. It's not a reliquary.
It's literally like skulls upon
skulls.
You know,
the only thing carnival of that
is there's the
bone cathedral in the
Czech Republic, I guess. I've only
seen photos. I think that's incredibly
cool. But at the same time, it's also really
creepy.
I wouldn't want to go to church there.
Okay.
but that that's also it was built i believe during the height of the the the 1389 plague which i think
was the worst so it you know it makes sense is in that capacity when death is most
proximate but yeah that's that's all i got man we'll get into the killing fields in the next
episode that not i mean i'll mention the film i mean the actual killing fields and
deal a bit more with the brass tacks of the of the communist megicide that happened there
i just thought some biographical information was imperative the way the foundation but that's
all i got all right good stuff thank you i'm going to point everybody over to thomas's
substack real thomas seven seven seven dot substack.com and um thomas's website is thomas seven seven
dot com the t is a seven and thomas has started uploading some stuff to his youtube channel so uh go
check that out too yeah thank you buddy i appreciate it talk to you on the next one thank you i want to
welcome everyone back to the pecaniano show thomas is here and we're going to pick up where he left off
talking about Cameroge and Pulpit.
Take it away.
Yeah, one of the reasons why I think this is an important area of study,
it's not just because of the obvious factors that it was an incredibly brutal catastrophe
and tremendous loss of human life.
And that the praxis of annihilation therapy,
as Ernsternity
refer to this phenomenon
mass homicide at scale
you know
derivative of categorical criteria
in the course of
political praxis or
ideological
warfare
that's key to understanding
the 20th century and the conflict
paradigms therein
and it's key to understanding
what the stakes were in existential terms, as well as rebutting the dominant myths of the prevailing
system that was established in the aftermath of the war by the International Military Tribunal.
But also, people have a misunderstanding of Marxist Leninism and the peculiar situation that
its standard bearers and partisans found themselves in.
and this is very much laid bare by the situation in Cambodia.
I've made the point, and I make it in my manuscript,
that Marxist-Lennus Praxis is intrinsically homicidal at massive scale.
That's not some cheap talking point or some sort of moral posture.
What I mean is that the place in territorial and spatial terms
that communism took root,
and where these revolutionary enterprises were successful,
were places that lacked a scaled industrial proletariat.
And revolutionary conditions were present
because cadres were able to sufficiently mobilize
to force outcomes and create regimes with exclusive access
to power according to the,
revolutionary model that they favored, but the historical conditions weren't present to facilitate
the realization of this mission in deep material and sociological capacities. So there came to be
an over-reliance on the application of naked violent force.
because material shortages hadn't been overcome.
Prosperity wasn't taken for granted
owing to a highly developed production schema
that rendered means of exchange
and privately held productive means obsolete.
These were conditions very much of deprivation.
And that meant that
in order to educate the body politic and render it malabal, really the only way that could be
incentivized is through violence. And if the subject population, in categorical terms,
proved to be uneducable, they had to be exterminated. And this is what happened again and again.
And that's why it's misguided, although this is tangential, not in terms of significance,
a tangential to this particular discussion.
It's misguided when people discuss equivalence
between the German Reich and the Soviet Union
because the causal nexus is interrelated,
but the prime move-on was the Soviet Union.
And every political act within that conflict paradigm
was in response to the Soviet application
of power according to the conceptual parameters that they had devised and that their proxies
and clients had devised within their own respective territories and Cambodia was particularly primitive
so that meant that there was a reliance on annihilation therapy above and beyond even that
which was characteristic of the Russian situation or called for
within the boundy rationality of political objectives there.
And the person of Salafsar, who can't even known as Paul Pot,
his conceptual horizon and his personality and his psychological makeup,
was also an essential component of how these things developed.
And what I started getting into last time was, you know,
he held himself out as a self-educated poor person.
He was not at all.
He was the equivalent of a lesser aristocrat.
And he developed a very deep understanding of Marcos Leninist theory.
It's misguided would people claim otherwise.
Salazar was very, very intelligent.
And he had a very, he was every cosmopolitan person.
As a young man, he went to France to study at the Ecole Francaise,
their technical program.
They had a radio electronics and communications program.
He had some of his friends ended up studying there.
And as we discussed, Sal of Sar, some of his female relatives were royal concubines.
And some of his male relatives were officers of the palace court and things.
Well, owing to King Monavon's affinity for Salafsar,
and the fact of Salazar being friends with some of the king's nephews,
he had a leg up and getting admittance to the cold front city.
I believe he actually arrived there on the day of the successful ascendancy of the Chinese Communist Party
to absolute power in Beijing, which is very important.
remarkable for a few different reasons.
And Salazar, he fit in very well in France and among
Westerners. He became fluent in French, although he always
seemed somewhat ill at ease with the French language. I don't know how much of that
was an affectation under the nationalistic trappings that
the Communist Party, Campo Chia,
outwardly exhibited, which was a
substantial aspect.
of their mandate was as an ethno-nationalist force of racial defense.
And we'll get into that.
But he also, he picked up an aristocratic girlfriend.
Her mother was literally a Cambodian princess.
Her name, the girl's name was Son Mali.
And she and her family lived in Gentile,
because despite their noble title and her great beauty, her father was a degenerate gambler who squandered the family fortune.
But apparently, unlike some of these liaisons with palace concubines as a teenager,
Salazar, he took this very seriously and quite clearly wanted to marry this woman.
So his life in Paris was very much that of, you know, I,
a princely type being educated in the west to become, you know, worldly and to receive a princely education in the Machiavellian sense.
It was really in 1950s, El Sars got a true education in communism.
There was an active commier student life in Paris, which makes sense, obviously.
considering that
you know
Indochina was an important
battle theater not just because it became
the
forum by
where we were a great power proxy conflict
between you know three
the two superpowers plus
you know the other communist juggernaut and the
feels probably in China
but it's
it's a
it has key maritime significance
just on its own terms, and particularly as the, as naval platforms became, you know, acquired an outside strategic significance in terms of capabilities on the final few decades of the Cold War, you know, that was a real consideration.
plus there's the prestige factor
Indochina is
something of
the jewel of Asia as it was historically viewed
and
the Europeans were reluctant to
sacrifice that prestige
in the early Cold War and to some
degree even in the late Cold War and to some degree even today
depending on who we're talking about
that's changing and I don't have
spit off another tangent but
the French effective
having no cloud in Africa anymore is remarkable.
I mean, I realize I'm getting old.
And so even somebody who spends this time
studying history and historical phenomena,
these sorts of shifts in conceptual horizon
are, it remains striking nonetheless.
It's not just advancing age, but
1950, that was a critical year in the course,
World War, particularly in Asia, but the Khmer students in France, they were very much
under the authority of Vietnamese that dominated academic culture, and we'll get into what
the implications that were, particularly the Indo-Chinese Communist Party, which technically
represented Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam.
the entirety of Vietnam, which is interesting because later the fiction of the Vietnamese Communist Party being a discreet entity into itself that wasn't active in what, you know, south of the 17th parallel, part of that owed to the, you know, a propaganda fiction of presenting the NLF as a purely spontaneous phenomenon. But part of it also had to do with this sort of fiction that even when the
the Indo-Chinese Communist Party was no longer the formal organizational mechanism.
The Vietnamese were sensitive to sustaining this illusion that there was equal representation,
as a matter of fact, as well as charter within the fraternal socialist parties of Southeast Asia.
That was not true. They were Vietnamese dominated.
And that had implications for the conflict between the superpowers and ultimately the
Sino-Soviet split as well.
But to bring us back in the summer 1950, Salazar had the opportunity, as did all freshmen,
foreign, freshman students who were, you know, studying abroad at the French, at the Ecole
France, say the opportunity to study in another country.
There was an entire list.
where they could choose to spend a summer semester.
Most of these were very costly,
the most prestige of which was traveling to Switzerland.
But the Yugoslavian communists were engaged in a,
where actively engaged in this kind of outreach
with the Indianist cadre building,
in part because, you know, of the Titoist animosity towards Moscow.
But part of it was Yugoslavia never had a particularly strong ideological mandate
and such that the main three ethnicities backed the party state.
You know, Tito was a Croatian, but the security apparatus was dominated by Serbs.
Bosniaks fell somewhere in between, but they were afforded a substantial degree of cultural liberty in areas where they were the majoritarian population.
But essentially, the real source of the mandate of the Yugoslavian communist was that they were protecting the Balkans from both the Soviets and the Americans.
Americans. There was sort of a deep freeze on power political activity and a garrison
sensibility. But Tito was very aware of the fact that there needed to be more depth
and relevance to the Yugoslav Communist Party, at least superficially speaking, less
that, you know, become dust in the proverbial wind.
And so they began a lot of outreach to try and build cadres, particularly with students from Asia, students from Africa, places that were the revolutionary conditions on the ground had more to do with anti-colonialism and nationalist sentiment and heterodox motivations within the Cold War paradigm, if you followed him saying.
and the cultivation of these commier students was no exception.
So Salazar took a train to Zagreb, and he got put to work with all these other international students building up infrastructure that had been damaged or wiped out during the war, you know, literally building roads and stuff.
and wiring up electricity and things into tenements.
And this is kind of where his political education began
in concrete practical terms.
And he relayed that the stunning difference.
You know, you'd ride just for two days on a train
from Paris to Zagreb, and it was like night and day.
And in Eastern Europe,
the people were very, very impoverished,
and one wouldn't think that, you know,
a partisan culture would take root there
that was oriented towards revolutionary Marxist feminism,
but he said that the fortitude of the people
and the zealousness with which they were willing to sustain
ongoing deprivation for the promise of
future liberation was he viewed it as a you know as a force multiplier essentially which
contained certain discrete potentialities in and of itself and obviously what he had in mind was
how this applied to the Cambodian situation and to be clear too this is when the
Stalinism had real clout I mean the East German situation was
always complicated for example um in a hungry there was this ongoing memory of uh what amounted to
the rosson creg against bellic coon and his cadre versus you know the magyar majority but elsewhere
communism had a great deal of momentum and specifically of uh an orthodox perspective that held out the
the Moscow model of political organization and revolutionary praxis as being the only revolutionary modality.
And by the post-Vietnam war era, you know, there was still a great deal of momentum, but it was basically restricted to the global south,
which is one reason why Africa and Latin America became these key battle spaces.
but the world of 1950 was very, very, very different.
You know, and Salafsar, I believe, I mean, as I'll, to reiterate, as I just said a minute ago,
it's misguided when he's cast as this cynic or as some sort of politically illiterate.
He was neither those things.
And, you know, I think he understood Marx's Leninism with a great deal of intellectual depth.
and rigorous
perception
but
he didn't come to this
he didn't come to the conclusion
based on some revolutionary
awakening
he wasn't
somebody like Che Guevara
he viewed
you know
Cambodia would either remain
under the boot
of the white man
you know I mean it was clear that the French
were going down but you know
they
they'd remain under the boot of the Americans, or they'd, you know, be able to liberate
themselves from Occidental domination with revolutionary communism as the praxis.
You know, ultimately, Democratic Campocia found itself in the Chinese camp solidly in substantial
measure because they were totally incompatible with the Vietnamese for reasons we got into the last time,
we convened in this for this discussion but also a lot of a lot of these profoundly primitive
societies like Cambodia and like some of these countries in sub-cirnard of Africa that
gravitated towards the the Chinese orbit after the Sino-Sovia split they viewed the Soviet
Union as just another white Western power.
You know, they viewed it as just a sort of newfangl iteration of the Russian Empire,
the sort of mass of Central Asian and poor Slavic people with a European overcast managing it.
And we were these people being, you know, Varangians or Baltic or Germanic oristic,
you know they were they were Belarusian and Ukrainian party functionaries you know
and that's something that's kind of under emphasized even in serious treatments of
the Cold War after 1972 or so I hope to do some more writing on that in the future
in a more
specifically dedicated capacity.
That's the true
that's the true
truly significant racial aspect
of the Cold War
in the
in the
Vatant
phase and beyond, rather the post-Vietnam
phase and beyond, I believe.
But yeah, it was
October 1st,
1949
is when
Salazar arrived in Paris,
which was the day when
Mao stood at the
the gate of heavenly
peace in Beijing.
I guess which is outside or the entrance
to the forbidden city.
I've seen paintings of it.
I'm sure there's got to be a photograph
of it
that these portraits are based on.
of but I'm sure most people have seen it who you know done any study of the Cold War
even a perfunctory one um and of course when Celasor arrived in Paris
you know it'd be a Diem Ben Fu was still five years away but the French were already
well into the the quagmire um
that developed in Vietnam, and they were fighting in Algeria.
You know, the war didn't kick off officially until 1954,
and then, you know, the French pulled out, Bigal pulled out in 62,
but the low-intensity conflict cycle was already underway in earnest.
I mean, it was true that, you know, this was the twilight of the French Empire.
And even more so than,
in other theaters.
Part of it was because the French
were refusing to let go.
And there
wasn't
a nuanced
model of
establishing a proxy political
culture that would be
willing to accept, you know,
French patronage
in return for client
fealty. The French were going to fight
it out.
You know,
whether that was the right player
not is arguable.
De Gaulle was a
perfectest bastard and arguably a race trader.
That's not debatable.
But this made it all the more imperative
for these revolutionary cadres in the
colored world to frame
the political struggle
in nakedly
anti-colonial terms.
And a hoci man had to tread a very delicate path.
I mean, he'd always been at pains to obscure the reality that, again, the Indo-Chinese Communist Party,
which was really the Southeast Asian representation within the common turn, you know, going way back.
You know, he tried to present this as an equal partnership between, you know, what became the path that Lao,
the Khmer and the Vietnamese.
And part and parcel of that was presenting his own struggle as a nationalist struggle
against the colonial oppressor, even though I don't think he really believed that.
But it wasn't just because that's what the conceptual literacy of the body politic would abide.
It was also essential to assuaging what seemed to be insurmountable obstacles.
to the diplomatic situation, particularly vis-a-vis the Khmer.
And they weren't fooling anybody on the Cambodian side.
You know, and that was, I think we got into briefly at least,
and we conclude this series, I'll explicate this further,
important that America never really understood this degree of emity and distance between the
Khmer and the Vietnamese. And I think Kissinger did. I know he did. And that's, you know, I talked
about how one of the many things that people like to claim is evidence of Kissinger being this
boogeyman is that he recognized the Communist Party of Campo-Cjew.
Shia is the legitimate government to be seated at the UN in lieu of a Zahanook's government in exile,
which was the correct play and that was political reality anyway.
But, you know, it, an interesting dynamic came to pass too.
As it became clear that French defeat was imminent, you know,
even well before the Umbun Fu, the Indo-Chinese Communist Party, they outlined the statement of purpose and their core principles, and it was the Vietnamese delegation that was essentially responsible for devising all the substantive aspects of it.
It declared openly that Moscow is the leader of the communist world and they lead the way of the socialist community and nations.
And that the Indochinese Communist Party is unconditionally subservient to Moscow's position, essentially, which is fascinating.
And that doesn't just owe to the fact that there's profound enmity between the Chinese and the Vietnamese.
but it was very clear that Ho Chi Min, Jop, their entire cadre, who were very sophisticated politically,
they had no confidence in Mao or in the Chinese regime.
And they had absolute confidence in the Russians.
You know, it was something of a mirror.
opposite to the view from the view of the Khmer.
But I go as far as the Ho Chi Minh was one of the best men that the communists had.
And Jop is, along with Ferdinand Shorner,
Jop, I think, is probably the most criminally underrated 20th century commander.
But Tom was up there too.
But, you know, the Vietnamese were, I mean, obviously Vietnam was highly underdeveloped,
even by the standards of the mid-20th century.
But the areas that were built up like Canoy and like Saigon, and to a less degree, like Hui,
you did have a cosmopolitan class of people, which does develop.
under you know conditions of traditional mercantilist colonialism because you have to you have to
curate that you know um you're still seeing the effects of this to this day like in in the
UK um that that goof who succeeded liz trust Sunak I mean he's uh I realize he married into some
royal family or something in the old country.
But, you know, guys like him, he's the product of the British Raj, okay?
And I mean, in his case, that's not a particularly good thing.
But in the case of Ho Chi Men, it was an example of the kind of effective political soldier that that system is capable of producing,
which is one of the reasons why colonialism is a dangerous game.
And people don't understand colonialism anymore.
It's some sort of stand-in for bad things or things I think are mean.
You know, it doesn't have a parallel in the 21st century.
But it's fascinating because by necessity, a native element needs to be created
in one's own image, yet also guaranteed to remain subservient by way of structural mechanisms
that make itself defeating to revolt.
And obviously, one of the reasons the Cold War was so firmly destabilizing is because
the ascendancy of Moscow, the superpower status, removed those structural incentives to not
disturbed
extant
order
but
you know
the
sociological aspect
of this
stuff is one of the
few ways
the Soviets
consistently beat
United States
NATO
but I mean
that's the
intelligence game
is the other area
at both
which are
derivative of
deep
sociological
aptitude and understanding,
which tells us something about
the Slavic character,
obviously.
But that's a discussion for another
day. Interestingly,
however,
China,
China was, for a time,
was North Vietnam's
primary patron.
On January 18,
1950,
China became the
first uh they've been the first government to recognize ho chieman's regime in north vietnam but moscow followed
suit immediately you know as did uh the eastern block um and it was uh after um the french defeat
the chinese trained um armed and equipped at least six division
of the people's army of Vietnam.
And like we talked about the other week,
if memory serves,
I made the point that
three of the long-term POWs
who were freed,
you know,
after the Paris Peace Accords,
and who came home during Operation Homecoming in 73,
three of those guys had been held in China
because they'd been shot down,
you know,
well north of the 17th parallel where AAA was manned by the People's Liberation Army.
You know, and just a few years later, you know, half a decade later,
it would have been unthinkable for an armed Chinese element to be in North Vietnam
without being treated as, you know, a hostile and engaged.
appropriately.
There's a really great book
that I highly recommend to people who've got
interested in the subject matter
and the Vietnam word generally.
It's by this
it's called Report from
Hanoi.
This guy Harrison Salisbury
as you can probably tell from his name
he was one of these old wasp newsman
types. You know, kind of like a
he was sort of like a moderate liberal version of Lothrop Stoddard, like that same kind of guy.
He was embedded in Hanoi before Tet, and his book mostly deals with 1966 into early 67, I believe.
But there was a couple of constant fears he relayed of the North Vietnamese of the North Vietnamese,
as well as Western journalists on the ground
and as Soviet advisors and everybody else.
Those were that the Chinese were gonna intervene directly
as they had in Korea when UN forces
cross the Yellow River.
And then there's gonna be a state of general war,
which very probably,
would escalate to general nuclear war.
The other fear was that because at that time,
that was before the moratorium on bombing the north,
was implemented by executive order.
There's this big fear that some Soviet honchos
were going to die in a bombing raid.
You know, God forbid, Brezhnev would be on the ground
in Hanore or something, and U.S. Intel would have flubbed,
and, you know, the Soviet general secretary gets blown up by an F4.
But I raised that not just because it's interesting,
and it shows the real stakes that were involved.
But really until Nixon took the oath of office,
there was grave concern that, you know,
the Chinese were going to force a,
a confrontation on the ground with
U.S. forces thus deployed.
And by 1969, I mean, that really was unthinkable.
You know, and that owes to the real
power political brilliance of Kissinger and
Richard Nixon.
But, you know, the Vietnamese were in an odd.
They were being called.
cultivated by both Moscow and
Peking, you know, at this time that
Ho Chi Minh was trying to placate all these
discrete elements, both, you know,
within the Southeast Asian theater and without.
And the fact of, I make a point a lot
that Mao would some
something of an idiot, and he was, but there were some cunning aspects to what he did,
particularly on the military side of things, I mean, which is how we, I realize that
Chang's forces were catastrophically weakened by combat with the Japanese Imperial Army, but it's
not the whole story. But he, it's pretty obvious that he, uh, he, uh,
thought that he that enmity between the Khmer and the Vietnamese was so great and that uh the
Khmer were so hostile to both the Vietnamese and suspicious of the Soviets that he could exploit
this enmity by arming and equipping Vietnam to stoke the fears of uh you know the racial
enemy in the minds of the Khmer well at the same time not catastrophically alien
them because there was really no chance of the commier being driven into the hands of the Soviets
that suggests real sophistication that not just the American military and intelligent establishment
lacked but I mean most most of the relevant players representing the engaged actors lacked
And it was, as time went on, the situation sort of took care of itself, because as Hoccheman realized that Vietnam would stand or fall based on how events resolved in Laos and Cambodia, he'd given up on Thailand.
And in the view of the Vietnamese, the Thais were just basically a corrupt mercantile race.
who'd never give up at at least a formal and cosmetic belief in the monarchy and things.
Plus, they were geographically distant enough that even if America could base forces there in a prerineal capacity,
it wouldn't constitute a catastrophic threat, or it's no greater a threat than, you know,
surface
warfare vessels in
the South China Sea and what have you
but
the way as America
took on the role
of
you know as per the Truman
doctrine
of holding
the line of the 17th parallel
to preserve the status quo
and
you know getting commitments from the republic of korea as well as cito superficial as that alliance
proved to be in terms of its military capabilities and political will therein it had it had significance
in terms of what was viewed as a legitimate application of of force
by America
in a theater that
theredefore had not been viewed
as within its precedent
and sphere of influence.
You know,
this delicate minuet
was something that
Ho didn't really have to continue
because
by default, you were in the Soviet
camp if you were
resisting the United States.
And you didn't need
to really
declare
allegiance
to commitments beyond that.
And
as
Beijing gravitated towards
Washington
and as early as
68, late 68, early
69, there have been
skirmishes between the People's Liberation
Army and Soviet forces
on
the frontier. It was
no longer a concern of trying to rationalize Hanoi's welcoming of Moscow's patronage.
You know, and that's a fascinating aspect to this, which as we talked about last time,
led to what amounted to a proxy war between the communist juggernauts, and the Vietnam,
which culminating the Vietnamese assault at Democratic Camp of Chia was the People's Army of Vietnam occupied until 1990.
And an attempt to mitigate the strategic loss they absorbed in 79 owing to the defeat of the Khmer Rouge,
obviously China assaulted Vietnam and Vietnam really broke their face, which is remarkable.
You know, the Vietnamese are a genuine martial race, in my opinion.
And one thing I found really interesting, I made the point before, in my opinion,
was the shadow president, at least on.
foreign policy and more in peace matters.
You know, it was Gates, you know, through, you know,
Obama, because Obama was, you know, formerly the president.
You know, we armed and equipped Vietnam
with some pretty serious hardware,
especially cutting-edge command and control stuff.
And, you know, the Vietnamese wear American helmets now.
You know, they ditch those pith helmets that were so iconic.
Like now they, now the People's Army Vietnam looks like the South Korean Army or something.
And I don't even think they pack AK-74s anymore.
They don't use an arm-like platform, but it's some kind of H&K or,
pseudo or some sort of like knock off European rifle.
One of the one of the gun guys in the comments will know.
But, you know, I found that fascinating.
And that's actually, that's one of, I can count in the last 30 years,
I can count the number of rational things that the U.S.
Defense Establishment has done literally on one hand.
That's one of them.
America should be cultivating.
in Hanoid.
And they're
and Vietnam's a really big country.
I think people have this idea
and it's something of polemic
around the
war when they read history books
or because it's remote
and people don't know much about it.
They have this idea of something like little country.
It's not. It's huge.
You know, and I think
a population now is
about 100 million people.
By the way,
I looked it up. I actually kind of knew this.
Vietnam uses
the STV.
All it is.
It's just a,
it's a K platform,
762 by 39.
Okay, okay.
But something really interesting
happened too
in 1950.
This was the final
sort of formal
meeting of the Indo-Chinese
Communist Party
where all factions
were represented,
you know, the Vietnamese,
the Khmer and the Laotians.
It was a 10,
day meeting near the Cambodian border in a town called Highten, the Vietnamese delegation
dominated the proceedings. The keynote speech was by a man named Nguyen Fanzan, who was a close
comrade of General Giaup, and Jop had gone as far as to place him in charge of Cambodian
affairs. And the subject of his speech, he made form.
points. The first being that there wasn't, that a Cambodian proletariat did not exist.
So the Khmer Revolution, it had to be based on the peasantry as the, as the partisan element.
And the overriding priority, the second point, had to be to train Cambodian cadres to carry out
political action among the
commier masses
and educate them adequately
to support
a communist party at Campo Tia
such that
the party can move within the population
according to Maoist
doctrines of asymmetrical warfare
he made the point that the Vietnamese
could help
and will arm and equip these cadres,
but ethnic Khmer need to take the lead.
Otherwise, there will be no legitimacy.
And the third point is really fascinating.
He said the best way to win Khmer sympathy,
you know, the hearts and minds,
was through Buddhist monks.
Because Buddhist monks, after the king,
wielded the most authority in the minds of Khmer villagers.
so some by some means or some combination of incentivization and threats and cajoling
the Buddhist monasteries had to be brought in line with the revolutionary cause
that had mixed success as the situation resolved
and finally and this was actually very for
forward-looking, the Vietnamese idea of communism and the Soviet idea of Marxist-Lenin's practice
for that matter, it had to be dramatically modified to make it conceptually intelligible
to the Khmer. And it had to be tailored to reflect Cambodian political and social reality.
there's a particular emphasis on not attacking the king and sahanox bizarre relationship with the
kameer ruse as well as the vietnamese as well as the americans as well as beijing is a testament to this
cambodians wouldn't follow anybody who who identified the king as an enemy or as an obstacle
of national liberation would jop and his delegation and his um and is uh
And the Vietnamese cadre representatives at this conference said the correct slogan needs to be something on order of,
we must liberate our king from the colonial yoke.
You know, because the king, our king has been maimed for all practical purposes by the Occidental oppressor.
And that suggests a very, very deep insight into the,
reality of revolutionary praxis in theater.
And I believe, look, I mean, one of the things that separates me from court historians,
it's not just the fact that they're ideologically compromised and they're not really studying history.
They're just presenting political narratives.
But this idea that historical occurrences are derived from intentional conspiracies and, I mean,
that's nonsense, I mean, if that's beyond nonsense, it's preposterous and suggests a total
conceptual illiteracy, but the way that political warfare is pursued and developed and implemented
as praxis absolutely owes to discrete decision-making by command and control elements.
and that malability that was taken for granted
or that need for unconventional solutions to
exigencies presented by the unique situation of Cambodia
and frankly's primiveness
and the lack of educability
of the body politic owing to the absence of a proletariat
that was whose lives and conceptual horizon was being molded and informed by historical forces.
I think this was a perfect storm of factors that made possible homicide in an absolutely massive scale.
That in percentage terms, obviously not in raw numbers.
But as attrition as a percentage of the overall population, what happened in Cambodia in three short years, I mean, it dwarfed even the Soviet megicide from 1917 until 1933, approximately.
I realized I talked more about the Vietnamese and the Ho Chi men than I did Pulpac.
it was a central
foundation, I believe,
in context.
I'll
conclude next episode
and I promise we'll get into the nitty-gritty
of the killing fields and
the Battle of Kotang and
these things.
The feedback on the first episode
was very positive, at least from what
the subs relate to me.
I mean, I'm very honored
by that, but also, I want
to make sure that people are
are, you know, benefiting from this.
So I worry sometimes that I'm not emphasizing the subject matter adequately because I get
bogged down in foundational aspects.
You know, that's kind of the, that's something that I think a lot of historical writers
fall prey to.
But yeah, that's all I got.
Well, knowing the subs, I think that if there were, if they were, if they were,
displeased with anything you were presenting.
They would certainly let us know.
Yeah, they'd probably come me up and say I'm a faggot or something.
I want to.
Yeah, it's a fair point.
All right.
Go to Thomas's Substack, RealThomas-777.com.
Go to his website, Thomas-Tem77.com.
It's easy seven.
Check out everything Thomas has got there.
You'll be able to click with them there.
And, yeah, until the next time, Thomas.
Thank you very much.
You're welcome. Thank you, man.
I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekingona show.
Thomas is back.
And we're going to continue the series, possibly conclude this series, on Pulpot and Democratic Campuchio.
So, hey, Thomas, it's been a while since we recorded.
How are you doing?
Well, except for me in the car on the live stream and everybody complaining about the audio quality.
No, I appreciate you doing that.
I mean, I always appreciate you contributing to the streams.
because your contributions are an essential aspect of it.
But particularly, I realize, you know, being on the road,
I don't expect you to drop everything and participate.
So, yeah, thank you for doing that.
And despite the audio issues, which obviously, you know, was out of your hands,
people really got a kick out of the conversation.
So, you know, once again,
Thanks for participating.
Well, it made, I'll just say, it made, car talk is always fun to me, and it made the,
it made a long drive a little bit shorter.
No, that's great.
I'm very happy to hear that.
I've got a discreet research interest in the Camer Rouge and Democratic Camp of Chia for a few
different reasons and people tend to emphasize the wrong things they view it as some sort of
outlier incident or there's just these simpletons who devised this a historical and arbitrarily
categorical discussion of it as an example of genocide which is in their little minds
some sort of conspiratorial enterprise that just periodically emerges.
And presumably the defining characteristic of it or what defines the category arbitrarily assigned
is the volume of the body count or some such thing.
That's patently moronic.
Like, make no mistake, the concept of annihilation therapy is in,
it's a real phenomenon.
It was a real phenomenon in the 20th century.
And it touched in concern every aspect of warfare in conceptual capacities as well as as actual warfighting praxis.
But it owed to the, it owed to a historical process by which politics became total.
and that's a different question because that's historically contingent.
You know, we're discussing the instrumentality as if it's some evil one to itself
and that that's what is the defining trait of the phenomenon.
You know, again, that's moronic, but it's unsurprising.
People approach it that way.
Or, you know, you get a lot of people, particularly these kinds of
national review types.
They
like to hold out
Democrat at Cambuchia as a unique
example of communist evil
and engage in this kind of shrill
polemic about
human rights and what have you.
I mean, don't get me wrong.
What happened in
Cambodia was
horrific.
But it wasn't
particularly remarkable
for the 20th century.
And I, it's an interesting case because especially if you're somebody who's basically a Hegelian in terms of their disposition and their analytical methodology about historical phenomena.
You know, I take an interest in it particularly because it's an example of how zeitgeist framed all political behavior.
in the 20th century.
So it was somewhat incidental that the Khmer Rouge found themselves solidly aligned with the communist world.
But at the same time, they very much internalized the communist praxis and the way that they pursued annihilation therapy
and realizing an ideological program.
and that's the distilled essence of the dialectical process at scale and how it has a formative effect on revolutionary politics
and uh paul pot himself is a misunderstood person he's mischaracterized you know like i got into
last time he discussed his subject matter he actually had an aristocratic background he wasn't some
barefoot peasant like mao he was a lot more interesting intelligent and sophisticated than mao for
frankly, but he
was far less
of an ideologue than say
Ho Chi Men.
What he was
is he was
an arch Stalinist and that's
important. And part of that's because
the Communist Party of France
there were still
strains of Orthodox Stalinism
that endured after the
1968
split
or schism.
But
prior to that, they were one of the most
solidly Stalinist
cadres in the
developed world. And
Paul Pot, he was the first
ethnic commier to attend the
Polytechnic Institute in France.
The Ecole Polytechnique, I think it's called.
So he was very much marinated in
French intellectual
culture and
really
sort of at ground zero
of where these ideas were
emergent. Paris
in the de Gaulle years, particularly
as, you know, they
were actively waging war against the Vietnam and then in
Algeria. It was a hotbed of
of dialectical
activity and political
violence. I mean, the gall almost got
whacked, as
you know, is commonly
known, I would imagine
the people even today.
But anybody
wanted to
accomplish anything,
they had to
find a way to insinuate that
into the Cold War paradigm.
There weren't any true neutralists.
Yeah, the
concept of a third position absolutely
had
momentum and context during the Cold War,
but even that wasn't truly a neutralist stance.
You know, it was a way of manipulating the realities of the extent paradigm that was all
consuming in localized theaters, you know, based on the relative state of tension at any given
moment, you know, that's why it makes no sense to talk about a
third position today.
There is, you know, today there's only
globalism and the resistance.
But, you know,
in any event, I,
so that the case, the case
of the Cameroon is instructive,
not unlike
the case of the
Roe-Dermy fraction and people like
Khorstamah was instructive.
Obviously, people like Moller
had a more sophisticated
perspective on these things than
somebody like
Paul Pot
I'm not saying
Paul Pot was stupid
but there was a
you know
I don't
I don't think the Orient ever
truly grasped
Marxist Leninism
just because there was
there was no context to it
you know
and it was
a fundamentally
uh
it was a fundamentally
uh
continental discourse.
And
these things
was much culturally and racially
contingent as they are historically.
But
there's basically two opposing
tendencies from inception
with the
Cambodian communists.
You know, and obviously
these guys were living in
an actual exile,
haven't been banished by
Sahanuk from the
the kingdom or they were in constructive exile because they were students like paul pot cello sar
you know um rather um and uh some of his fellows who were studying in france
they were very much in this sort of insular environment that was a hop out of political
activity but what was fascinating is um one of these factions of which cellosart found himself
Saudi alight, they're guiding a light, their sort of a ideological guru, was a partisan name
Son Noct Than. And Son Noct Than, he was this arch-commier nationalist, and he was actually a racialist.
And he'd agitated for independence from France his entire life.
he found himself at Oz with the authorities in 1942.
So he fled to Japan and he joined the Japanese Imperial Army and was commissioned as an officer.
And he wrote extensively on what he viewed as the fascist tendency in Imperial Japan.
Very much stuff that was in line with the Imperial Way faction and things.
And he began saying that the path to national salvation is,
is something like the Japanese are
accomplishing but
with a national socialist
structure
and ethic and those were his words. He said
national socialism.
And he became
a very powerful man in
Cambodia in terms of the following
that he cultivated and the
respect he commanded.
So Sahanuk ended up
exiling him because he
He knew that he couldn't have him whacked because that would have made him a martyr and that that would have
catastrophically backfired, no probability.
But Sunnachthan was more than anybody, you know, the primary influence on Salafsar in his worldview.
And there was a whole faction around him.
and the alternative sort of tendency, you know,
were pretty much these Orthodox Marxists
and this type intellectuals
and this tension developed within this, you know,
commier expat community.
And, you know, it's,
but even for these guys who represented
the left-wing faction, a commier,
revolutionary
sympathy.
You know, it was
independence
and not
communism that was sort of
the overriding imperative.
But
they were starting to become
intertwined.
You know, and
Stalin had
recognized
Ho Chi Men's government
as early as
1991
and Moscow
began championing the Vietnam cause
and
the message that that sent to people
really across the
colored world
as it was called
was that
you know the communists were
the only ones who would support
you if you were trying to throw off the yoke of domination from without you know everybody else
was basically against you you know the the the the plutocratic capitalists were against you
you know the the the trotscated internationalists were against you um you know uh america was
against you they had uh the americans and pay you for limited purposes
such that it served their ends if, you know, people that they considered a greater threat were down
range from, you know, the business end to your rifles. But, you know, that, that was a,
that was very cynical and that could just, that apparatus could turn on you just as easily.
But at the same time, what a lot of, a lot of this early cadre reported,
was that, you know, as we began studying Marxist Leninism, even if we felt that it lacked a complete trajectory in terms of our own racial destiny, it seemed scientific in terms of how it described processes of history.
So it insinuated itself into our thinking, even if we didn't view ourselves as doctrinaire communists,
beyond the fact that we respected Stalin and viewed Stalinism as an animating catalyst and a path forward.
And I think, you know, despite the secularization,
that impacted East Asia, just like it did everywhere else in the 20th century.
There was very much a Buddhist overlay to a lot of this and an ancestral memory of the great Khan.
It all sort of conspired to create this actually fairly cohesive ideological framework for how to resist the
Western or at least the American-led view of globalism or the intended, you know,
configuration of globalism.
And it's so resisting, create an alternative conceptual paradigm.
And that's what's important about the entire, the ideological culture of the Warsaw Pact
and other aligned countries and parties and non-state actors.
There was something coherent about it.
It was its own tenancy.
And that really can't be denied.
And the Senate of Soviet split, shattered that.
Because, you know, again, I think Stalin was really holding it all together.
and the international situation had changed as well.
And obviously, Nixon and Kissinger
exploited that very adeptly.
But this wasn't just superficial.
You know, it was a real thing.
And the idea of communism becoming this sort of oriental tendency,
of revolt,
I think there's a lot to that.
You know, and it's interestingly,
you know, Stalin was an opponent to the common turn.
He was careful about how he proceeded in that regard
during the war years for political reasons.
But he abolished the common turn,
essentially at earliest opportunity to do that.
so.
And what replaced it
was a kind
of alternative internationalism
that very much
sort of seceded from
the West
and the desire to impact Western
discourse.
You know, and for people, you know, for context,
I mean, yeah, like the jewel
and the crown of the
of the second world was the DDR and East Berlin.
But you know, you could travel at a zenith of communist power,
you know, which I'd put at 1975.
Yeah, you could, you could travel over the road from Berlin to Saigon,
and everywhere you traveled through
would be under communist rule
you know that's
that's that's that's that's that's that's that's that's that's a massive
um
percentage of this planet
and uh
you know there
there was something to the socialist
community of nations
it wasn't premised on the same sorts of
principles as
as the common turn and purported to be
although the gobbledygote language of Marxist Leninism remained.
But again, I mean, that owed the zeitgeist more than it did dogmatic belief
in the strictures of Marxist historiography.
But this is important, and that's essential to understanding the Camer Rouge.
but to drive the point home in terms of how this sort of
of yon left and right, Higalian dialectic,
informed the Cambodian situation.
Yeah, son, Nakh Thin, he was actually,
his mother was Chinese and Vietnamese,
and his father was Khmer.
He'd been educated in Saigon and Paris.
He was deeply involved in the Buddhist Institute of Phnom Penh, which to this day remains the primary apparatus of government that deals with Buddhist heritage and posterity therein in Cambodia.
He established the first commier language newspaper called Nagravada in 1936.
and it was a
it was very very pro-Japanese
it was pro-fascist
this is where
this is where
then first
invoked the term national socialism
to discuss
you know his ideology
and I mean obviously it was
there was very much
like a heavy dose of
commier nationalism
present, but the outlook was pan-Asian.
You know, and again, it viewed the Japanese Empire as
sort of the racial loci of the new Asian politics,
you know, shorn of domination from without,
and that was congruous and in, in one,
with presumably the racial destiny of East Asian peoples to realize, you know,
an alternative mode of modernity, you know, employing Western techniques towards that end,
but without adopting the political forms of, so, you know, they're derived from that same creative nexus.
And he, towards that end, he advocated teaching Vietnamese and in Cambodian schools.
He behooved people to become, you know, politically engaged people to develop at least a working understanding of Japanese.
You know, and again, this, this developed enough momentum that Sahana viewed him as an adequate threat to warrant.
his exile.
What ultimately happened was
Than formed this militia,
this anti-communist,
anti-royalist militia.
And
they assisted in the overthrow of Sihannock.
And
a lot of these people ended up
filling out the ranks of
Lon Null's security forces ultimately.
And U.S. Special Forces pumped a lot of money and small arms into their coffers, which is really interesting.
But as it became clear that there's a basic instability to the regime that replaced Sahanauk.
I mean, this gets really complicated, the intrigues involved in things.
the militia that
the Camer Surrey, I think it's how it's pronounced.
I think it means free Camer, or like free Cambodians.
The writing was on the wall that
Camer Rouge victory was imminent
and also people under arms
generally realize that if the civil war continued,
the only winners would be the Vietnamese
who were always chomping the bit to invade.
So a lot of these guys ended up
taking up with the Khmer Rouge
and eager to beef up their ranks
and not being at all averse
to assimilating right-wingers into their ranks,
they basically amnestyed them, which is really interesting.
You know, so it's, and like I said, I think one of the key takeaways of the Cameroon,
it's an example of pure communist praxis, but with a highly malleable conceptual and ideological
doctrine and posture.
and there's something
profound about that
that is instinctively apparent, I think,
but it's somewhat difficult to
flesh out in terms of concrete particulars.
But yeah, the
and there's actually a 1959
fan published the manifesto
of the commierre. That's what it was titled,
quite literally.
And one of the major points of attack of the monarchy
and Sahanuk specifically
was the allegation that Sahanuk was supporting the quote
communization of Campuchiya,
not just because he was viewed to be in bed with the Vietnamese
and overly friendly with...
Beijing, but, you know, the opposition to doctrinaic communism was very strongly felt by a substantial
proportion of the body politic.
And most significantly, you know, of that percentage of the body politic that was actively
under arms, you know,
And this validates a lot of what, you know, people like Auto Remmer, like H. Keith Thompson, like Francis Yaki, obviously.
And, you know, James Maddo were saying in the era.
And Kerry Bolton, who I have a lot of respect for.
I think he's great.
I don't know the guy, but I cite him frequently.
and I avidly consume what he produces.
He wrote this really great.
It's a thin volume.
I think it's under 200 pages.
The book on Stalin,
and specifically about, you know,
probably like the last,
the last five or eight years of Stalin's life
is the main focus.
What it's called Stalin, the enduring legacy.
and it deals with a lot of this subject matter,
particularly if Stalin was the standard bearer of these things.
You know, to be clear, it's not some epilogia for Stalinism at all.
And nor do I want people get the impression that that's something I have some fetish for or anything at all.
But that's not the point.
We're talking about how the 20th century conceptual paradigm and the extent zeitgeist was dispositive in terms of what, in terms of political potentialities and in practice therein, it framed everything.
just as today, everything is framed by
globalism
and resistance to it.
You know,
um,
and that's,
that's important.
And, uh,
it's important in understanding what the,
what, what the structure is
conceptually and ideologically of the
current regime and
the paradigm that it's
situated within.
But also, I don't think people understand what happened in the 20th century.
I know they don't.
And they don't understand how the Cold War resolved either.
They don't understand that the left won the Cold War.
The Stalinists lost the Cold War.
And Stalinism's not left-wing in the sense people think of it.
That doesn't mean it's good, but that's not the point.
and, you know, even the people who had, even people like Horst Mahler who had a pro-Soviet disposition vis-à-vis the Cold War,
and specifically as regards to European liberation,
they viewed the second world as an essential resistance element to, you know, the globalist, Zionist,
faction led by America and it was imperative that you know neither side be able to become totally
dominant but such that you know but such that um but such that um but such that liberationist
tendencies were possible you know obviously it was it was the communist world that was going to
facilitate that. And ultimately
you know
communism had an expiration date
because
the context
to
from which it derived its credibility
and
intelligible
parameters
you know O'Doo
an epoch that was
already passed by
the
by the middle of the 20th century
with
the exception of the developing world in the global south.
But, you know, and the way this ties together for me,
and in terms of some of my kind of grand theories of history, if you will,
is, you know, in a couple of ways.
Like I said, I think even though the Camero Rouge were not a doctrinaire communist movement,
Their practice was in some ways very purely communistic, and that always involves annihilation therapy at mass scale for conceptual reasons.
And the need to eradicate all competing modalities of conceptual organization in order for communism to flourish.
that's essential to its realization.
And that's why there was such a horrific body count
that attended communist regimes in the 20th century.
And that puts in context everything that happened
that was in dialogue with Marxist Leninism.
First among them, obviously, first among those events and aspects,
you know the Second World War.
So that completely rebuts
what the claimed
causative variables were for
you know, annihilation therapy
as perpetuated by the
German Reich and other
non-communist societies.
But also
it
tells us something about
how
political ontology
it went from being really only within a couple of centuries.
It went from being something that didn't touch and concern the only majority of human beings' lives
to being existentially central to their entire conscious existence.
And that's fascinating.
There was precursors to that in the 30 years war and the War and the War Three Kingdoms and things.
But it wasn't the same.
And when the catalyzing crisis abated, so did that all-consuming ontological reality.
So this looms large in a lot of the long.
long-form stuff I've been working on.
You know, and I wanted that to be clear,
because I don't want people just thinking that
I'm employing it as some cheap, polemical device,
you know, like, in the way that our,
in the way that our conservative enemies do.
But when, you know, let me see what else I got on my outline here.
Yeah, and I mean, to, for context,
I realize this is a lot more about Than than about Salafsar, aka Paul Pot, but I think this was important to explicate.
Eventually, Sahanup, he allowed Thand to return from exile around October in 1951, which is a very calculated play.
When Than arrived in Tom Penn, there was an estimated 100,000 people who,
who showed up to breed him and lined the route from the airport.
You know, the five miles into the city that his caravan was traveling.
You know, and it was, it gave Sahan a pause because, frankly, that those kinds of crowds
that only turned out, you know, for, for him himself.
you know and that was largely derived not from the charisma of sahannuk which really was not
existent but you know reverence for the monarchy itself and within Khmer Buddhism which I don't
claim to have any meaningful knowledge of but superficially I do know that the monarchy looms
large within its metaphysics you know
So the course that this took, Zahannock, what he lacked in charisma, he made up for in conniving political instincts.
His recognizing the malability of the body politic, you know, Sahanuk not just survived.
he survived the
overthrow of
the monarchy
by Lawn
Knoll
in the clientage
of the United States
he survived the
Khmer Rouge
Revolution
he survived the Vietnamese occupation
and actually profited from it
and he died as a wealthy
old man so he was doing something
right
I think he took steps to curate what happened between fans, people, and the Camero Rouge.
And the reconciliation is not really the right term because they weren't at odds in conventional war and peace terms.
but, you know, I think there's something there
because otherwise I don't see how this could develop
the way it did is splendidly in favor of the monarchy.
But it's also when Fan returned to Cambodia
that removed the political center of gravity
of the Paris
Camere
communist subculture
that had
sustained the
right wing among it
within it.
Among whose ranks, of course, was
Salazar.
So the Camer student movement
from then on began skewing very sharply
to the left.
But
this was tempered
because, again,
the French Communist Party was solidly Stalinist.
So when some of these commier students started making contact with French communists,
they became very close to institutions,
such as the French National Students Union and the ISU,
the International Students Union,
and these were very Stalinist organizations.
So any sort of internationalist or Trotskyite tenancy was being shorn from this remaining corpus of the Khmer student cadre.
And from these Europeans, including, you know, East Germans, obviously, the Khmer communists became very sophisticated.
They started organizing themselves into, they began calling themselves the Marxist circle.
And it was built up of individual cells, each comprising between three and six men.
And it was compartmentalized, deliberately and rigidly.
One member of each cell was in contact with a single member.
of the central committee, which was the leadership element.
And no cell member knew who belonged to the other cells or how many cells existed.
You know, everybody had their standing orders.
And it was understood not to seek information about the structural aspects of the wider cadre.
beyond an individual cell and uh that's uh the the rote army fraction that i that was something that they
were very big on as well okay so this was what the uh camere were learning about critical warfare
which is really interesting and um you know this also allowed them to
The Vietnamese had a tense relationship with the French communists,
because on the one hand, they were nominally on the same side, obviously.
But despite the supposed dissentress of communist partisans to matters of national or racial or ethnic.
ethnic loyalty,
you know, there were tangible divisions
and tensions between the
Vietz and the French owing to the war and owing to the
fact that the Vietnamese are far more interested in
throwing off the yoke of French nomination than they were
arguing about the finer points of
the Workers' Revolution. But the Khmer
Yeah, the Khmer, obviously, that was their primary impetus also, but they weren't actively fighting a war against the French.
You know, and again, they saw their primary enemy as the Vietnamese.
You know, there's an ancestral racial animus there that was very powerful.
And so really, you know, the Khmer looking for ideological patrons, despite their racialism,
despite their sympathy for, you know,
Dan's model of racialized politics,
which was sincerely felt.
You know, they felt a lot more comfortable having patrons in the French
in terms of how to build a cadre
that being subordinate to the Vietnamese.
So they didn't trust and were convinced look down on them.
So this is really sort of the DNA of the Khmer Rouge and how, again, they developed really this sort of splendid praxis, while at the same time not abiding nor being particularly interested in the doctrinaire aspects of Marxist Leninism as a historical process.
and beyond what they viewed as the inherently scientific aspects of it,
which owing to the zeitgeist and owing to a certain fascination with Western techniques
and perceived advanced modes of life, you know, held a certain fascination over them.
But, yeah, it's a really fascinating phenomenon.
and there's an outsized significance owing to these facts I enumerated in terms of understanding
sort of the wider process of development of revolutionary communism in what was then the third world.
You know, I think of the point a lot, and I'm sure people think I'm being panicked,
but there is no third world anymore.
You know, it's a Cold War paradigm
that described a very real and specific thing.
You know, and it's, the Khmerer cells would meet once a week,
usually for two hours in the evening,
and they'd study communist texts,
but increasingly, these sessions were apparently devoted
self-criticism and analyzing their own shortcomings as political soldiers and, you know, discussing
the practical business of armed revolution.
You know, and increasingly there was less and less discussion of, you know, of, you know, of Marxist-Leninism or Mao Zedong's theory on, you know, what he called
new democracy.
It, you know, became very much a sort of tactical college of revolutionary praxis.
And that also owed to why the regime was short-lived.
There was a chaotic aspect to it beyond the fact that they went kill-crazy.
But, you know, it was the shortcomings of that, the sort of intellectual posture became evident when this same cadre, 20 years on, you know, fell after a little over three years.
But, yeah, that's all I've got for this for today.
We can talk about this another episode if you want.
specifically I was thinking about
maybe discussing the film The Killing Fields
which for a
Hollywood movie is actually really
really great and
as far as my
research
indicates it's it's actually
very very accurate
and a
death pran
who's now deceased
but he was the subject
the you know the guy was the subject matter of it
He validated it.
He signed off on it.
But we don't have to do that if people are weary of this subject matter.
I think we can run.
We can do a movie review or at least an episode where.
Yeah, dedicated to the film.
Yeah, that would help too because it has a sort of visual narrative aid in the things.
Yeah, I think.
Yeah.
All right.
We'll come back for a part four.
I want to encourage everybody to go over to Thomas,
a substack real thomas seven seven seven dot substack.com where we are streaming at one central the only time zone
um on thursdays one p m and um you can support thomas there and you can connect to him there
um and also is website uh thomas seven seven seven dot com where the t is a seven and uh yeah go support thomas
thank you yeah thank you buddy
I want to welcome everyone back to the Pete Cagnos show.
Thomas is back and it's going to continue talking about the Camer Rouge today.
How are you doing, Thomas?
I'm doing well.
Something that I spent a lot of time with in terms of, you know, I'm not a regional studies guy, but I'm definitely a, you know, my subject theory is the 20th century.
with a
I have a strong interest in the
later Cold War
um
detente through
uh
it's you know the conclusion of
hostilities on November 9th
1989
and I've been that way since I was a kid
and the first time I visited the Vietnam
War Memorial was in 1990
on a school trip
you know um and i i knew quite a bit about the war because of my dad and also legacy media was
saturated with vietnam war content and you know i took a strong interest in it you know i'd watch
tv shows on prime time like china beach and tour of duty i'd read everything i could about the war
so and i knew a bunch of older guys
who I looked up to who'd been in combat and stuff.
So it was a big deal to me to visit the Vietnam War Memorial.
And I think it's a dignified memorial in like a lot.
But, you know, it's, for those who I've been to the Vietnam War Memorial,
it's organized by year that, you know, it's not alphabetical.
It's by the names are organized.
Each panel represents a year.
And it's organized by the month and day that they were KIA.
But so I'm looking at the wall and I get to the final panels.
And I'm assuming, you know, okay, maybe, you know, maybe the final casualties count.
It'll be, you know, some one-off casualty during the evacuation of Saigon or something.
but as it turns out
there's a bunch of names
from the Battle of Kotang
and I'm like, what is this?
And
I think this is a
I think this is really awful.
The Battle of Kotang was when the U.S. Marines
who were part of this ad hoc task force
they got into this heavy
they got into this heavy
they got it, they were engaged
very heavy combat with the Khmer Rouge on Kotaing Island.
And there were heavy casualties.
Three men were accidentally left behind, and they suffered a horrible fate.
It was really the last truly open-ended combat operation.
U.S. forces were committed to prior to the Gulf War.
And it's simply called, oh, this was the last battle of the Vietnam War.
nonsense. It had nothing to do with the Vietnam War. Why? Because it was approximately in theater.
So it's this forgotten event that
had profound implications in policy terms, as well as in forced structural terms.
This was one of the things that led to the creation of Joint Special Operations Command
about a decade later. Kotang Desert One,
which was the disaster, the disastrous efforts,
to rescue the U.S. Embassy hostages and Iran.
It was aborted because these two helicopters crashed into each other,
you know, both killing some people and giving away the position.
And then in Grenada, a bunch of Navy SEALs drowned
because there was these competing command elements
and the right hand, proverbially didn't know what the left hand was doing.
And Kotang also indicated that there,
There needed to be some sort of standing direct action element to deal with exigencies such as that.
And it also, it was a real, Henry Kissinger had stayed on from the Nixon administration.
This was post-Watergate.
The military was in a real crisis because South Vietnam was going down and defeat.
Gerald Ford was a president who had no mandate.
you know because initially when spiro agnew had resigned under cloud of indictment
because people forget that agnew was targeted and he was targeted by the by the same people
who facilitated the coup against Nixon but he was targeted for an for corruption basically
so agnew resigns Gerald Ford's appointed as you know vice president um
And then when Nixon resigns, Ford becomes the president.
You know, he literally was like an appointed president.
And he wasn't really respected within the chain of command.
You had these very strong personages around him, like Kissinger, who was Secretary of State and National Security Advisor.
You had James Schlesinger, who I think was a real snake and just a terrible human being.
But, you know, he was a very ambitious personality.
you know, Rumsfeld's White House chief of staff.
The media treated Ford like a buffoon, you know, and so there was already this credibility gap
vis-a-vis the Warsaw Pact in the Soviet Union, despite the fact that, you know, detente was
was
you know
what was being floated
as the status of relations
in the Cold War
you know there was all
in military terms
the Soviets
were winning the Cold War
on basically all fronts
and
despite the fact
of the Sino-Soviet split
had been realized
that that didn't mean
that Peking was America's friend
and
proceeding from a position of a
parent strength, especially in the Far East, was essential.
So that's the context here.
Okay.
And plus, too, like, it showed, the Cameroos showed how game and savage they were and
tactically sophisticated.
You know, they really, they really put a herd on the U.S. Marines.
And some real firepower was deployed there.
The Air Force was dropping 15,000.
pound bombs, which is the largest conventional ordinance in the U.S. arsenal at that time.
I mean, this was real war.
And undoubtedly, U.S. forces had engaged the Khmer Rouge before, you know, particularly on the Vietnamese border where two-core was situated.
But, I mean, that that was mostly special operations elements and things.
it wasn't at scale.
You know, so this is fascinating.
I'm not a military hound,
but I find incidents like this
to be really compelling, and there's
things to learn from them.
And the Khmer Rouge are an interesting phenomenon.
And they were some of the hardest cadres
that the communists had, in my opinion.
You know,
like the Vietnamese and, like, the Cubans
and, like, the National Vokes Army.
plus there's parallels with
USS Pueblo incident
and I'll get into that too
and what the implications for that for that
for that for that for that for
because that wasn't just a humiliating
incident for America
but
it came out later as to why
the Pueblo was seized and it was seized
at the behest of the Soviet Union
and that the North Koreans had always been
a reliably
dedicated proxy for the Soviets
you know and
um
There was this American naval cryptologist named John Walker.
And he was a spy for the Warsaw Pact for decades.
And he'd been feeding cryptographical data to the KGB and the GRU.
But they needed an encryption machine to interpret these signals.
and the Pueblo was an intelligence ship.
So it had the encryption machine.
And Walker had relayed to the Soviets
who related to Pyongyang
that this ship was within striking distance
of North Korean territorial water.
So they captured it.
You know, it's...
And that seriously compromised
American...
American nuclear strategy.
and the ability to hide intentions
vis-a-vis command and control.
That neutralized a lot of the advantages
conferred by the SOS mechanism.
That's an acronym S-O-S-U-S,
which were these listening cables
on the ocean floor
that
neutralized a lot of Soviet
countermeasures to detection.
But if so,
if, if,
Soviet Submariners could
listen in on American
codes
you know
encrypted communication
you know presumably
they could react to an intended
first strike
before
you know
weapons were deployed
and essentially neutralize it even if they have to
eat a counter value
strike
of substantial
destruction
destructive power, and so to give them the advantage, where, you know, particularly under
conditions of parity where literally seconds matter.
So this was a very complicated affair, and it's essential to understanding what developed subsequently
in all kinds of aspects.
So, I mean, it basically breaks down into two aspects.
There's the capture of the Mayegas and what was happening on board there.
There's actually three aspects.
What was happening on the Mayaguez, what was happening on Kotang, which turned into this huge battle,
and what was happening in the White House Situation Room.
And George Herbert Walker Bush was doing this shuttle diplomacy with Peking and the Chikoms,
because America
America had no
diplomatic relations
with Democratic Campoichi at that time
that later changed.
But the military government
of La Nol
who had overthrown
that was the American proxy
and the Camer Rouge overthrew
overthrew Lan Nol
and they began executing everybody
in any way connected
to that government.
You know, it was a bloodbath.
And so America was done an enemy
footing with Democratic Campuchia and
Salafsar and the entire leadership element of the Khmer Rouge.
But at that time also, America didn't know about
Salafsar, Al Pot. They had no idea who the leadership
element was even. But so
Kissinger, when the Mayagas was seized,
Kissinger tried to go through diplomatic channels
you know, and communicate to the Chinese American demands.
Chinese diplomatic representation refused to accept any memos
or communications from Kissinger or from anybody in the State Department.
So Bush, who had these good offices personally with the Chinese government,
became the point of contact with them, which is really interesting.
I mean, that's significant, too, because this further solidified his role as somebody who, the Chikoms and particularly Deng Xiaoping himself, who's the most significant Chinese personage, other than Mao, I believe.
So there's a lot here.
It's almost like a Frederick Forsyth story or something.
But that this ensued, the Mayagos was captured on May 12th, 1975.
It was a merchant ship.
It wasn't done, and I mean, it actually was.
It wasn't under some kind of cover or anything, or it wasn't deployed as part of some sort of ruse.
It was a merchant ship carrying standard commercial cargo.
And it got seized and boarded and contested waters.
It was approached by Khmer Rouge gunboats.
The same kinds of brown water, I mean, they're conventionally brownwater craft
with a mounted 50-Cal.
You know, like the boat, like the boat in apocalypse now.
you know, but they can still function in territorial and littoral waters, you know.
By territorial waters, I mean, you know, some distance out from the coast, say like 100 nautical
miles or something, you know, but ironically, these were American boats that had been furnished
to the Navy under the military hoot of La Null.
And, you know, for little boats, like a 50 caliber, that's heavy furtied.
firepower, you know, and a merchant ship that it doesn't have any mounted armaments.
I mean, a couple of 50 cows, you can tear that boat apart and turn everybody on at the hamburger,
you know.
So the Camer Rouge being constitutionally paranoid and being convinced, too, that they were
eminently going to be attacked by the Vietnamese.
you know, they were happy on the trigger.
So this was a very volatile situation.
The Camero Rouge, I believe,
didn't, they didn't know what the Mayagas was.
I think they assumed it was a listening ship.
You know, that's why they boarded it.
And I'm sure that they were acting under orders
to seize any ship that,
wasn't, you know, flagged as friendly.
You know, in other words, like, any, anything that wasn't Chinese or Thai or La Ocean.
But even in the case of La, someone would have been dubious.
Oh, I don't, I don't think Laos had a Navy to speak of.
But, um, it was a 40-man crew.
Um, highly experienced, uh, sailors.
a couple who were ex-military, one of whom had been in the Marine Corps infantry in heavy combat in Vietnam.
And that added to the potential volatility situation, too, like the third mate, his last name was English, the Vietnam vet.
mechanic were both ex-military and they were convinced that Cameroos were going to slaughter them
third made English relayed that in the wake of the Tet Offensive
when he and the the Marine element he was attached to liberated a village near the DMZ
they found 19 Americans with their hands bound behind their backs who'd been
beheaded and english relayed that him and his uh squad had had to untie them and you know
and um properly see to it that these mutilated bodies are medevac then english relayed to his
crewmates that i'm not i'm not gonna i'm not gonna go to my slaughter you know um i if these
gooks trying to take us off this ship i you know i'm gonna go down killing as many of them as i can
and so the captain, his name was Miller.
He had experience in the World War II Navy,
and he was a man in his mid-50s.
He was quite a bit older than the crew.
He seemed to realize that these Cameroos fighters were young guys,
and they were not remotely afraid of violence,
but they were obviously scared.
So Miller took the tack of trying to show them
some kind of hospitality, you know, and so he started giving him fresh fruit.
And apparently, he had the mess cook make up a big thing of Kool-Aid.
And at first, the Kamirooos didn't trust it.
But then Miller started drinking in and, like, see, like, I'm not trying to poison you.
So then the Kermir-Rooch tried the Kool-Aid and they became obsessed with it and, like,
asked him to make more.
They thought it was, like, the greatest thing.
I mean, there's nothing funny about that situation.
But the thing about these, like, a hard commier Rouge fighter is, like, slurping up Kool-Aid and thinking it's, you know, like, the greatest thing is kind of funny.
And to be fair, people make fun of me, especially youngsters who, uh, yeah, man, and there's nothing wrong with this.
They're kind of put off by processed food, which is actually a positive, but I love Sunny D and I love Tang.
Like, Tang is awesome, and I'll die in that hill, so I understand why the Khmer Rouge, we're, like, digging on Kool-Aid, especially if they'd never had it in.
you know, I would do on the same thing.
But, you know, it, and to set the, to set the tone of the strategic situation,
by the time President Ford got news of what was underway, you know, this was,
U.S. forces in theater were very scattered.
You know, having, they'd obviously, they'd had to redeploy from Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam, you know, owing to the, you know, the fact that, you know, Saigon was going down in flames, literally the path that Laos had conquered Laos.
Cambodia, obviously, had fallen to the Khmer Rouge.
the military was drawing down
across the board
and such that
any
command was given a priority
it was in the Bundes Republic
because that was the main line of resistance
the Cold War
despite the
relative stability
compared to the Far East
but there wasn't
you know so it was presumed that any
any military operation would have to be staged from Thailand.
And Thailand had been a major base of air operations during the Vietnam War.
But as Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos fell to the communists,
Thailand found itself in a very difficult position.
And those good offices began to dissipate.
you know, because the ties weren't going to avail their air bases to American elements
that were then going to strike, you know, their neighbors on three sides, obviously.
So there was the challenge of where it even deploy from and how to base forces.
Once forces are identified and, you know, that are mission appropriate and corralled and constituted, you know, to affect the
deployment. And, you know, there's tremendous confusion as well over command and control.
And especially in those days, Nixon and Creighton Abrams and the Joint Chiefs that somewhat
mitigated this, but, you know, the Johnson administration was notorious for micromanagement.
And Johnson said a lot of stupid things, but this actually had some merit, not merit in terms of any sort
correctness or or inherent value but in terms of its accuracy of the situation you know he
bragged around the time of the first operation linebacker i think that uh you know i like not a
single bomb you know is deployed over vietnam without my say so you know and that that's a
that's a disaster situation i mean mission oriented tactics could carry the day anyway whether you're
talking about air combat, ground combat, or naval warfare, you know, the Vermeck and the
Kriegsmarine and the Lufa thought us that, if we didn't already know. But there was all these,
there's this, even a president who wasn't prone to that kind of micromanagement,
there was this long and confused chain of command originating with the White House
down to the joint chiefs of staff, which could almost be considered as a state. It's a
single entity by virtue of what was designated the National Command Authority.
You know, then there was Commander-in-Chief Pacific region, you know, and from the days of
MacArthur, you know, the Commander-in-Chief Pacific acted sort of as Lord of his own fiefdom.
You know, you had the Marine Corps who, as much as a...
Marine brass and some support it to anybody.
It was Sync Pack and the president.
They did not coordinate well with the Air Force.
And increasingly the Air Force, based on its heavy strike capability and its diverse
litany of platforms was edging out the Navy in some ways in the Pacific.
You know, and then on the scene, you had defense intelligence, which I make this point a lot,
had really edged out CIA as sort of the spearpoint of U.S. intelligence, you know,
and then you had Navy intelligence, and you had these, this moldedal layers of the Department of State and the NSA,
and then you had President's cabinet of these guys like Schlesinger and Kissinger.
I mean, Kisner was a great man.
I'm not suggesting that he was the Creighton that Schlesinger was,
but he had a tremendous ego.
And Kissinger believed he should be giving orders
as the most qualified man on deck.
Schlesinger, who's secretary of defense,
resented the national security advisor
in the Department of State anyway.
He personally hated Kissinger.
And he viewed his president, Ford, as a moron.
You know, he had Ford was totally out of his element
and realized that he wasn't being respected like he felt he should be.
So, you know, he was operating with an eye to proceed with a show of force,
you know, not just because there was tremendous pressure to,
in the wake of American defeats in theater,
but also just as a matter of masculine pride and things,
you know, the whole thing was a mess.
it was a convergence of kind of the worst possible circumstances for something like that.
But back to my ag as it had been commissioned 31 years before, it was what you'd think of as sort of like a rusted Hulk, like not quite a tramp steamer, but, you know, it shipped at the end of its active service life.
it had around 275
shipping containers
filled a general cargo bound for Thailand
um
it's when it was captured
it was traveling at 12 and a half knots
um about 60 miles
in the Cambodian coast
and it's a little farther from Thailand
um
And Vietnam was to its east.
And again, the Cambodians were patrolling these avenues of maritime ingress
because they were anticipating an assault by the Vietnamese.
It was at that point, as they were rounding an adolph an adolph an
atoll or probably like this,
this compared to a tiny atoll or land spit called Polo Y.
As they rounded it,
the first Khmer Rouge boat emerged.
And several crewmates began like squeezing off rounds and their Klashtikovs.
And then one man trained an RPG on the Mayegas.
And then the second boat, both of which were PCF designated, or that was their designation, which is an acronym for patrol craft fast, colloquially swift boats.
You know, and again, they were designed basically for river patrol duty, but they were seaworthy.
And several of these boats had fallen in the Camer Rouge hands as the Law and Null government went down.
and again
generally these PCF boats are mounted with 50
Kells and
as the second boat emerged
the 50 KEL was
trained on the MAGAS
You know so the
Miller was the captain
Immediately
you know
Raise his hands made it clear that this was a civilian vessel
The community
Rue's commander was the first of board, as is generally the case with communist navies.
The implication being, you know, the captain goes first.
He doesn't send enlisted men, you know, that's part of the egalitarian sensibility.
Technically, the Khmer Rouge elected their officers, like the early People's Republic,
the People's Liberation Army did.
in actual fact, you know, these decisions came from above,
but this was the mythology that reign.
The Cameroge Battalion Commander,
who was, you know, the officer in command,
who boarded was a man by the name of Samien.
He was in his mid-30s, which was somewhat old
for a Cameroge combat commander.
the rank and file tended to be teenagers
platoon leaders and company commanders
and battalion commanders tended to be men in their mid-20s
Samin didn't speak English or French
something getting into the movie
the killing fields even Cameroos troopers who did speak French
would claim they didn't because
that could get you shot
you know because that could potentially
categorize as one of the old people
who couldn't be reeducated in the new ways,
you know, and whose mind had been corrupted by the colonial element.
So Miller had taken to basically communicating with Samian by, you know, pantomime,
adding to the tension.
When Samian inspected the radar, the telemotor,
the gyropilot and then the engine room
you know he has to see the chart room
he had his man effective search of the ship
and once he
looked at the navigation chart and the manifest
he became convinced there was a civilian ship
but
he was under orders to hold it
until you know it was clear what
its true mission orientation was
so Samien
took the navigation shirt
and he pointed to
Polo Y which was that atoll I just mentioned
and
they indicated to Miller that that's where they were going
and
one of the
gunboats was tethered to
the Mayagus
and they were instructed to follow
to Paulo White.
Thirdmate David English at this point, David C. English.
He was the Marine veteran that I mentioned.
He was 28 years old.
He'd been wounded twice, so being shot in Vietnam.
He was a muscular 250 pounds, like just a real badass.
He managed to get off an SOS.
because the radio man by a sale of the name of Sparks
suggested that he sent out an SOS by way of the telegraph unit
so as not to alert the Cambodians.
English pressed his luck, went down to the radio shack,
and sent out an SOS in SOS.
and as a
as a
as a
subtle voce as he could
um
and the
the May day went out and it was
it was received by
um
first by a
a
Philippine
tugboat which was then
relayed to an Australian
vessel
um
when the Australians
responded
English replied, call the American authorities,
call anywhere you can.
You know, we've been hijacked.
And English said,
you may be the last English voice I hear for a long time.
Apparently the Australian said,
things can't be that bad, mate.
And English, like, said, like, look, you know,
a pair of thing, look, motherfucker,
would be captured by the Camero Rouge.
I'm probably going to be dead within hours.
You know, fuck you.
But, um,
ultimately the message was relayed um it bounced around until it finally reached an outpost at a direct line um the commander-in-chief pacific
which was then relayed to the National Military Command Center in the Pentagon.
And the NMCC, for those that don't know, it took on more important during the Carter administration
as continuity of government measures were implemented, and we talked about what those entailed before.
but the NCC, obviously, its primary role was always nuclear command and control of strategic forces
and evented general war with the Soviet Union.
But crisis response was part of its core mission.
And the red phone of myth and lore you see in the movies, the line between Washington and Moscow,
that was in the NMCC compound in the Pentagon.
And so the message that MAG is being hijacked was related to the NMCC, which was appropriate.
And then, you know, the president and the joint chiefs of staff, who for a practical purposes are one command element in terms of, you know, the designated national command authority.
and that becomes important,
where the river meets the road
under conditions like this.
As the Cameroos and the Miagas,
Tetherdue them made their way,
you know, again, the Camer Rouge didn't realize
that an SOS had gone out.
They had no idea.
Anybody knew that the Mayagus had been captured.
And presumably, too, you know, again, the Khmer Rouge really weren't sophisticated on their understanding of how American commanding control worked.
You know, considering that they'd been fighting in theater, but, I mean, Cambodia was a backwater, frankly.
And they didn't have the experience of fighting the Americans that Hanoi did and the NLF did.
you know so they would have been they would have been ignorant about the immediacy of a response even in those days
the initial message that the nmcc got was you know my i guess have been fired upon and bordered by
cambodian forces at nine degrees 48 minutes north 102 degrees 53 minutes east ship is being towed
when I'm on a Cambodian port.
When the situation room at the White House convened
what amounted to an emergency war cabinet,
the first briefing was by Brent Skowcroft,
who was then the acting deputy assistant
for national security affairs.
But Skowcroft, he had outsized clout
because he was a very serious guy
you know and he that remained in national security circles until the bush 41 administration so
essentially uh scowcroft had first crack at the president to steer uh decisionism as in in terms of
the response um scowcroft uh he'd been an air force lieutenant general he came through west point and then
and then came up on his actual career through the Army Air Forces
because there was no Air Force Academy then.
You know, the Air Forces were part of the Army.
Skowcroft had a very up-to-the-minute conceptual horizon
of strategic situation pretty much always.
He ran out before that there'd been recent Cambodian incidents at sea
before the present situation that this was becoming a pattern
in assessing the mood of the Cambodians.
Skokroft said that he couldn't comment conclusively
for various reasons, including fact that, again,
the identities of the Khmer Rouge leaders weren't even,
hadn't even been verified.
But what was clear was that the Khmer Rouge were killing
huge numbers of people.
They'd expelled Westerners from Phnom Penh.
immediately, a huge percentage of the population, the commier population was being forced out of the city and to the countryside.
And pretty much everybody who'd been in any way affiliated with the law and all government, including their families, were being shot.
You know, so Skowcroft said, you know, we can, we can assume that these men are going to be murdered.
You know, and it's imperative, uh,
especially considering the state of American credibility and theater that we not let this stand.
Even if these men are already dead, we've got to retaliate.
We've got to retaliate with extreme force.
Kissinger over at Department of State, here out of the office at 8 a.m., on grounds that there was a twice weekly staff meeting.
Kissinger hadn't yet been advised of what was underway
because pretty much nobody had been outside of the
National Military Command Center
so Kissinger arrives
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia
Jay Owen
Zerlin Jr.
advises them that an American ship has been captured
about 100 miles off the coast
it's proceeding into Sahanukville
under Cameroo's guard
Kissinger was astonished
apparently he exclaimed
how can that be
you know and why isn't anything being done about it
you know and
Zahirland said that he
this is one of the few times he saw Kissinger's team
genuinely frazzled, like almost panicked.
He started to excoriate Zerhellen,
and he was informed that, you know,
he himself had only been advised of what was going on,
you know, two minutes previously.
Kissinger immediately called Skokroft
and closed the meeting that he was providing over.
He told Skowcroft,
you damn well cannot leave Cambodia capture.
ship 100 miles at sea and do nothing.
Because it was emphatic from
jump that
there needed to be a general assault
on Cambodia with maximum
forces available
to impose as much attrition as
possible.
And frankly, I think that was the correct
call. What happened was disastrous.
But the forces
deployed
although they should have
been far more overwhelming, even though that wasn't possible vis-a-vis forced structure and
basing options in theater.
I mean, thankfully, a lot of hurt was put on the Camero Rouge, but Kissinger was absolutely
right.
And one of the many things that people burn Kissinger and effigy over is, I found out lately
because in the very early 2000s, the number of books got written about the Kotang incident.
and some guy claims incredibly that it's Kissinger's fault that these men were left behind
because he ordered them be left behind because I guess Kissinger just does mean things in his spare
time and like rubs his hands together like I you know um well I'm pretty sure he probably
rubbed his hands together a few times considering his heritage but you know and like look I'm
not going to say that like Kissinger was like was a nice guy or that you know people should
you know consider him some great humanitarian
but, you know, he was
a brilliant Cold War
strategist. He was a great national security advisor.
And, I mean, look, like, if the
criticisms of his character and
of his policy dispositions, particularly
in his crisis, if they were grounded
in reasonable
in metrics, okay, fine, you can criticize
if you want, you know, as long as you make the
argument correctly.
But there's a, but there's a, there's really,
derangement syndrome around Kissinger.
You know, and that's, and like I said, when I met the guy,
you know, I didn't know it.
My dad did, but, you know, I met him.
I don't know.
I had a lot of respect for him because he was on the warpath in 1999, you know,
against the Clinton administration and the unprovoked assault in Serbia.
You know, he, he was a, and he was a voice in the wilderness then because
nobody listened to people like us who had a sensible view of these things.
You know, so I had respect for him anyway because I had read his books and stuff.
But I developed, you know, even more respect for him on account of that.
And he, I mean, by that point, he had plenty of money.
And, you know, he wasn't doing that for cloud.
He already had clout.
You know, he was doing it out of principle.
You know, like I said, it's like, okay, it's like a big deal.
you know, he was criticizing
an unprovoked
war, but it's like, but
26 years ago, people
didn't do that. You know, it was,
you were, you looked at
at some sort of crank or,
you know, some,
or somebody who
wasn't with the program or, you know,
you were shouted down and
called names, you know, that wasn't
something that was acceptable.
So I, I, I mean,
not,
not that I ever weighed my own conclusions against what the consensus was,
but I did feel validated when guys like Kizinger started coming out and saying,
like, no, this is this is not just ethically indefensible,
but it's strategically irrational and it's going to result in a disaster because,
you know, and that was the moment at which all of the goodwill that have been,
accrued by bush and baker was was destroyed then you know that's when that that's that's that's
that's that's that's when um america totally completely pissed away its victory dividend in the cold
war it was indefensible you know so i'll i'll die in that peribial hill um you know kisinger did a lot of
good things and even if he was a total son of a bitch okay fine but he you know he was a um
He was a great geostrategic thinker.
And the son of Soviet split, which was absolutely critical,
would not have been possible without Kissinger.
I mean, Kissinger and Nixon collaboratively facilitated debt.
But, you know, Kissinger was an essential element.
but yeah moving on the and at the same time the National Military Command Center as soon as you know like I said they they were the first point of contact really as was part of the course in those days in a crisis they weren't resting on their laurels
Admiral Norrell Gaylor
He was commander-in-chief
He was Pacific Command based in Hawaii
He immediately began launching reconnaissance flights
In order to locate the Mayegas
The planes deployed with these
With these surveillance
TurboProp planes
That I believe were unarmed
I think they might have had some kind of strikes
That could divert
heat-seeking
Sam's
and some
type of air-air missiles
but it was
but they were
you know
a surveillance aircraft
and
this is at the same time
Ford
he convened
an emergency meeting of the National
Security Council at 1205
p.m. with
the kind of the, this was the entire
sort of A-team on deck
of the Ford
cabinet. It was Kissinger
Skowcroft, Nelson Rockefeller
who was vice president.
Schlesinger was Secretary of Defense,
Deputy Defense Secretary, William
Clements, William Colby,
who was CIA director,
assistant secretary of state,
Ingersoll,
and
the NSC staff member,
who was the East Asia expert
was at W. Richard Smycer.
And of course,
Rumsfeld was
sort of presiding with things
because he was the White House chief of staff
at the time.
And they had an Air Force General
in deck too whose name
alludes me
because the understanding was,
you know, again, that
Air Force firepower needed to be
brought to bear
and
the Air Force had a lot more cloud in those days
I mean they were that huge cloud because of strategic air command
and things but
you know they had
the
the truly heavy
conventional capability
remained in the hands of the Air Force
you know and
air operations generally
you know what you
you wouldn't
Naval aviation always had a say
and combined arms operation
but you know Air Force
the Air Force brass
was king
in terms of devising
air operations
especially in those days
Kissinger and
Schlesinger began
budding heads with what to what should be done to free the crew you know Kissinger said look
we need to make a strongest statement as possible you know and it was Kissinger's idea to
go through the Chinese and he's like and Kissinger realized the political implications he's like
look we got to do this now and he said even even if it's a fool's errand it needs to be on record
that we communicated
to the Chinese
that there'll be dire consequences
that the crew's not released
and then he's like
you know the Chinese totally snub us
it'll be on record
that this communication was issued
and then we can get some credit
even if um
you know they're
even if they're released
you know completely spontaneously
and the message is even delivered
and Kedinger further said
like we need some kind of show of force
you know he's like even if the crew's already been
released you know he's like
He's like, maybe we can seize the Cambodian ship on the high seas.
We've got to punish them somehow.
Schlesinger's retort was, I don't even think that they came home.
He's having high seas ships.
Kissinger then said, well, we at least got to, you know, mine the harbor at Kumpong Sam.
Finally, Schlesinger realized he was going to be upstage.
If he didn't push for a military solution of equal severity.
since Schlesinger began pulling metaphorical rank and the secret defense role
and said, I can get, I can get, you know, I can get mines in the harbor within 24 hours.
The, uh, then the Navy in the Air Force started budding heads
because the nearest Navy aircraft carrier wouldn't be near the scene,
um,
of Kampong Somme for 24 hours.
Air Force General Jones then weighed in and said,
yeah, well, B-52s can deliver mines just as well,
and there's B-52s in Thailand.
You know, the Navy retorted, yeah, well, the mines were in Subic.
And this went on.
And the inner service rivalry
and the confusion over command and control
and integration of operations became a huge shit show.
But Kizinger, correctly,
pegged Schlesinger, among other things, in addition to being a weasel, Schlesinger was kind of a pussy.
Schlesinger was repulsed politically at the idea of re-engaging in Indochina in a substantial military capacity
so soon after the Vietnam disaster. Kissinger was disturbed by this because not only the
said the second offense, obviously in those they set the tenor for the pace of operations at
command authority level.
And on top of it at the Pentagon at this time was a mess.
And the entire military was a mess.
Like Kissinger feared that the Pentagon being less than enthusiastic anyway, he was going to drag their feet.
And Kissinger also, uh, Kisinger had been in the army during World War II.
in an intelligence role, in part because of his linguistic fluency in German,
but also because of his Jewish heritage.
That's who they favored.
But he was not, he was a very unmilitary person.
You know, the best of times, he didn't have great offices with the military.
You know, so this was, aside from the intrinsic hazards of the,
a hostage situation and the volatility in theater if America found itself in a general war with the Khmer Rouge
and God forbid, you know, finding itself engaged once again with, you know, the people's army of Vietnam.
there was also this in-house hostility within the presidential cabinet itself.
And if a real executive, like a Nixon or an Eisenhower or a Kennedy, who whatever is false,
like proved to have brass balls in a crisis, an executive like that would have been able to quash these tensions and generate a quorum and build confidence they're in.
but I mean, Ford was not the man to do that.
You know, he was the worst,
he was kind of the worst possible man to having the role.
You know, I mean, I, I said,
I'm that stupid aircraft carrier being named after Ford.
Like, Ford's real legacy is, you know, how, like,
I said at live Chevy Chase would play Gerald Ford.
And you always be doing, like, dumb slapstick shit.
Just falling down the stairs.
Yeah, like, and, like, Ford actually did, like,
trip down the stairs of Air Force One.
And, like, he'd mispronounced words.
And, like, he, and Chevy Chase kind of looked like him.
Something like that doesn't, that, that, that didn't help, man.
You know, like, um, my earliest memories as a little kid, um, you know, like, very
early 80s.
Remember, Saturday, like, reruns.
And in my mind, like, like, Ford's associated with Chevy Chase.
And, like, that's about it.
I mean, obviously, I don't really remember Ford as a president, but the point being,
and it's not that that that kind of speaks for itself but um but yeah we'll we'll stop there and then we'll
in part two we'll deal with the battle of kotang and then we'll we'll wrap on our our cambodia series
with that all right man everyone go over to thomas's substack real thomas seven seven seven seven
out substack.com.
Check out his website,
Thomas 777.com.
The T is a 7.
You can connect with Thomas there and think Thomas drops all of everything he does.
Everything he appears on is on the website.
So go check that out.
Yeah.
And I've been uploading about this stuff to my YouTube channel too.
And I'm making use of the Rumble platform.
And I'm home in a, it's a mirror basically on my YouTube.
But I'm going to start dropping fresh stuff there too.
So yeah, that's.
That's what I got. Yeah, thank you, man.
Awesome. Thank you, Thomas.
I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekingana show.
Thomas is back and good chance.
We're going to finish up the talk on the Camer Rouge today.
Thomas, how are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thank you for hosting me.
Of course.
Something that what really stands out in the public mind about the Battle of Kotang,
like I said, it's misguided that it's just associated
as this sort of addendum to the Vietnam War
when it was a totally different conflict paradigm.
The tragedy of the three men were left behind,
that's a truly horrifying incident.
That's sort of what people associate,
first and foremost, with the conflict.
Secondly, it, like I said,
it's become yet another pretext for
torching Kissinger and peribial effigy.
If there's a villain here,
It really is Rumsfeld, who proved himself to be a real Creighton late in his career,
but he was White House chief of staff.
It became a controversy after the battle because casualties were severe.
There was, first of all, a majority of the choppers either went down or were too damaged to land,
the infantry element, and then to reinforce some of the surviving men,
one of the choppers that crashed, drowned, and others were killed by small arms fire as they tried to swim to shore.
There was over 40 KIA.
The Ford White House and the Pentagon insisted that there was only one KIA, which is preposterous.
And Rumsfeld in his autobiography, decades after the fact, stuck to that story, you know, which is the one of the media that the man was just a constitutional liar.
that that's just what he did.
He just lied about everything constantly.
But there's a complex confluence of events.
You know, like I indicated,
what made the situation very difficult
in political and strategic terms,
not only was the military drawing down,
but its force structure was not suited
to this kind of operation.
There'd been great success
in some direction.
direct action missions of an unconventional sort,
the Sontay rate in 1970,
where although the objective was to liberate the Sontay POW camp,
the prisoners have been moved,
but it was a tactical victory
because the people's army of Vietnam,
they really got massacred.
And there was probably Soviet advisors on the ground
because the men who were there said that they were engaged
by tall Caucasians
among the
Vietnamese forces
which was kind of fascinating
but any
you can't really train for these kinds
of direct action missions
like Sontay it was planned for months
beforehand and
a dedicated special forces element
trained for that purpose.
They created a mock-up of the prison
based upon
you know, spy plane flyovers
and things
and they had good intel onto what the imposing force would constitute
and its capabilities and things.
If you're talking about a spontaneous crisis,
like the seizing of a ship,
you can't really train for that.
You can't really train for rescuing hostages on an aircraft.
You know, I don't like people claim that something Delta Force does,
but it's really not because every situation
different. It's always going to be ad hoc.
And I believe that's one of the reasons why
these days
Special Operations Command, it's become this sort of like
kill force where they kick in people's doors
and shoot them in the face on their sleeve.
I mean, part of that's the Israelization of the U.S. military
and it just does grimy stuff.
But also, that's something
you're going to actually train for.
And if you're in the business and make work,
you can get it done.
You know, when the,
when the Mayagos was seized, the U.S. Marine Corps hadn't done a shipboarding rescue since the war between the states.
It's not something that happens.
You know, and there's instances sure where, I mean, to this day, where, you know, Navy SEALs will board some Somali pirate vessel and blast everybody, but that's totally different, you know.
So not only was it not an integrated command structure,
it wasn't even clear how this should be done.
You know, and the conventional military was drawing down
owing to the end of the Vietnam War and detente.
But the problem is, even though this wasn't the true strategic parity
wasn't accomplished until probably 1976, 77,
but it was approximate enough that there was a,
a real stalemate and strategic forces setting in, coupled with detente, and, of course,
dramatically exacerbated by the fact that the communists were winning on the military front
in essentially every relevant battle theater.
Conventional forces and credibility therein took on a real significance that hadn't been the case
probably since the Eisenhower era.
So America had to do something.
It wasn't just a question of rescuing the Miyagas crew,
which in a lot of ways,
calism might sound,
it brought strategic and political terms,
was secondary to the question of sustaining credibility.
This is one of the reasons people villainize Kissinger,
because as I'll get to,
as was decided,
Ford was,
President Ford was by the Joint Chiefs of Staff
and by Brent Skowcroft,
and by Schlesinger, he was basically presented with five different scenarios and potential
assault packages.
But everyone assumed that, every one of those options assumed that the Mayaga's crew,
some of the hostages were still on the Mayas itself, and some of them were on the island of
Kotang.
That wasn't true.
So Kissinger was in Missouri at the time.
he double-timed back to the White House and he said,
and he was savagely criticized for this at the time and later.
He said, look, he's like, if these men are on Kotang or any other island,
they're probably dead, okay, because the Khmer Rouge isn't going to keep them alive
because they're savages and they kill people, which was reasonable to assume.
He's like, so that said, Kessinger's like, we've got to assault
with everything we have in theater.
And we got to start pounding the Cambodian mainland with Arklight.
Because he's like, otherwise it's going to happen again and again.
And he's like, I'm not worried about the Khmer Rouge.
I'm worried about what the Soviet Union is thinking.
I'm worried about what the Chinese are thinking.
You know, because he's like, we've basically just disengaged from the Cold War with the Chinese.
And if we appear weak right now, you know, they're going to walk all over us.
And on top of that, Ford's rebuttal was the Chinese were refusing to convey messages to the government of Democratic Campo Chia.
So George Herbert Walker Bush was sent as an unofficial liaison.
They read the note that he delivered but refused to take receipt of it.
But the point is that they were aware of the situation.
And what they conveyed to Bush was that within reason, they'll tell.
an American response that's proportionate.
Or it said, look, if we start bombing Cambodia back to the Stone Age,
you're going to outrage the Chinese.
And then we're going to be in a general war with Cambodia.
And then we're going to find ourselves potentially at war with the Chikoms after we just decoupled,
after your mission to Beijing just decoupled them from the socialist community and nations in military terms.
you know and that was a fair point but from her kisinger was sitting what he was saying made sense
and um you know he uh he was national security advisor so he was basically reliant though on
on the secretary defense and the jcs and uh the intelligence community for what the situation
was on the ground which was not at all what they were conveying you know so what
was underway as these as these um can that meetings were happening f4s and f11 ardvarks were buzzing the mayegas
um which was then within proximity to kotang and uh they started strafing uh they started strafing uh
they started strafing uh the water in in front of the bow and the stern with uh 30 millimeter uh vulcan fire
you know and terrifying the the Khmer Rouge you were shipboard and um from that point
onward the Khmer Rouge were looking for a way out of this you know and uh when they tried to
disembark at Kotang the commander on the ground there who's a hardened Khmer Rouge battalion
commander is only 23 years old but that was pretty common for commier Rouge officers he said
under in Norway shape or form are you going to drop Americans on this island?
You know, and if you try you, I'm going to fire on you, which was the correct play, because he said,
you had a foresight to realize, look, if they're, if they're already deploying aircraft like this,
you know, they're, they're going to launch a general assault of the island if they believe that
there's American hostages here.
And also his orders, the reason why Kotang was so fortified,
was because
it was an anticipation of a Vietnamese assault.
You know, so
the potential
worst case scenario would be
that Cotan comes under general assault
by American combined arms
while the Vietnamese also decided to assault it
you know, to kill the Khmer Rouge
and then to try and prevent the Americans from landing.
You know, and then
and then
the
Cameroos joined a general war with the
People's Army, Vietnam and the United States of America.
You know,
um,
so,
uh,
as it were,
the Mayaga's crew
disembarked on an island
uh,
in proximity to Hanukville,
about 30 miles from
the coast.
And they were informed by,
the garrison commander
there, you said, Ken, is there any
way that you can get your radio to work
and
contact either the embassy
or
the United States Air Force
or Navy or any military element
attached to
the commander
in chief of the Pacific?
And they said, yeah.
So he's like, okay, you're going to do that.
You're going to say that
we're, you know, essentially
begging them to stop assaulting the meagas and uh you're going to be released in 24 hours
and you know one of the conditions is that please convey that you have not been harmed or
in any way mistreated and that the commie ruse not want war with the united states
you know so that should have uh that that should have been it um and under normal conditions
i mean normal conditions for the cold war like this probably would
have been a wait and see, at least for the next 48 hours, that would have been the posture
of the White House. But, you know, again, it was a constellation of elements. It was the fact that
Ford didn't have, the Ford didn't really have any mandate to be president. It was the situation
vis-à-vis de Tant. It was the fact that, you know, Saigon had just gone down in flames.
There was a push by communist elements in, you know, in Africa, India had been brought into the Warsaw Pact camp for all practical purposes.
It was all those things.
And just bad intelligence.
I mean, this was really, when I point out to people that the CIA is a joke and has been for a long time.
I mean, this is another example of that.
you know and and the the church committee hearings got the nail in the coffin but you know the
the CIA produces bad intel basically 100% of the time you know and then of course
subsequent there's the Aldrich Ames thing and everything so it's it's it's this sort of a
bogeyman of the ignorant that the CIA is this shadow government sinister thing that
is pulling strings like that's that that's really
preposterous
beyond all belief.
And this is yet another
example of that,
you know, and also
a course if
the Camer Rouge are fairly
predictable. And
you know, like I said, I
tend to similar to anything to Kissinger
than most people, and I acknowledge that.
But he was absolutely right
in his assessment.
You know,
that what an amount
to do was that these men are already dead or the Camer Rouge are planning to release them.
You know, and we need further accurate intel to determine which way it's going, but, you know,
they're not, they're not going to use them as a bargaining ship. This isn't the Pueblo,
although I was on the mind of the civilian authorities. And so it initially, the assault
package that was initially being contemplated, this Air Force General said,
He wanted to call from volunteers from these Air Force MPs and ground defense elements,
which made no sense whatsoever because, like, how are these guys suited, you know, a hostage rescue situation on a ship?
And the idea was that we're going to try and land.
First, he said we're going to, like, repel the assault force down.
And then a civilian staffer who was in the situation room spoke up.
And he's like, if you repel these men down,
the Cameroos are going to open up on them with Soviet SMGs
and turn them into hamburger.
What are you talking about?
So then he says, well, we're going to land the choppers on the containers
and rapidly disembark and do it that way.
And one of a Navy man who was a liaison to the,
you know, admiralty representation on the JCS said,
those containers can't handle the way to a chopper.
They're going to crumble like cardboard.
What are you talking about?
You know, so even, even back then with some exception,
it's like William Odom and honestly,
I think like Creighton Abrams,
you know, the, the U.S. officer corps was not fantastic.
You know, it's become catastrophically comically bad
these days. It's become, you know, Fauci with guns. But even back then, it wasn't stellar. And I, I know people think I just hate on the military and the police and stuff. I mean, whatever. But I don't think that can be disputed in this case. But what, ultimately, it was Admiral Noel Gaylor. And he was, and he was,
was the commander, he was the, it was the sync pack commander, you know, and he reassured the
White House that, you know, a substantial naval force was already on the way, but a carrier
couldn't, the nearest carrier in Brexsum was used as Coral Sea, and it couldn't, it would be at least
48 hours and we're going to reach the crisis area. And several hours before that aircraft could
be launched, you know, from the deck.
But Gailor had the wherewithal to realize that, you know, there had to be, there had to be
some sort of infantry assault element.
And if there was going to be a landing on Kotang Island, it had to be substantial.
Ultimately, it was decided a combination, a combined marine assault force.
consisting of the 2nd Battalion 9th Marines at Okinawa and another element at Subic Bay was going to be utilized.
And when these available force elements were relayed to the White House,
that's when Ford decided.
He decided to combine basically two potential assault packages
and divide the attack between the Mayagas and Kotang Island,
where he became convinced based on faulty intelligence reporting
that the hostages were divided between.
And he refused to.
to abide Kissinger's recommendation, which interestingly,
Vice President Rockefeller was very hoggish on this.
He agreed with Kissinger. He said that there's got to be a punitive assault on the mainland.
And, you know, there's got to be a display of overwhelming force.
But that was kind of Ford's middle of the road compromise.
but again, too, in Ford's defense, he was getting bad intelligence.
And he was painfully aware of that because the third candidate meeting, he was on record.
It's in the minutes of the meeting saying that, you know, every couple of hours were being told different things.
And every time the communication includes with a guarantee that, you know, that this is a
fact, an accurate sit-rep.
So the whole thing was kind of,
the whole thing was kind of doomed from
inception, in my opinion.
The three men who were left behind, and we'll get into that,
they were part of a machine gun crew.
And despite the way things shook out in Nam,
as I'm sure the military type guys
among the subs,
will, you know, substantiate.
An M60 was intended to be a crew-served weapon.
It was supposed to be a three-man machine gun team.
And, you know, you had machine gunners
humping the big gun and as many animal belts
that get carried by themselves and usually the tripod,
you know, and other, you had other,
platoon mates of theirs
who would, you know, hump
extra belt of ammo
as needed.
But it was intended to be a
crew served weapon. And the men
who went missing were
left behind were
a NM60 machine gun team.
The force structure was strange
in 1975, both the army and the Marines
because it was between
it was this post-viewed.
Vietnam drawdown where
at least the Army
and in NATO
forces in Europe
and to be clear this is back when
NATO actually had a plausible military mission
and a purpose and it actually
made sense the way it was structured
this is when the Army first did
it came to be known as Air Land Battle
and
the Marines were on a different
tip obviously
because they had a different mission
orientation and and plus their their theater of operations was totally different but uh they too
it was a combination of stuff we'd associate with the remit era and um some uh holdover stuff from
the old uh army that was sustained by the draft so it was uh it was odd um
But, yeah, the three men who were left behind were Joseph and Hargrove, who was a corporal, and he was the machine gun team leader, Gary L. Hall and Danny G. Marshall.
Hargrove, tragically, he was this poor kid from the Carolinas who really came from the dirt.
His older brother had been killed in Vietnam in 1968, you know, and then, and that devastated the family, of course.
and lo and behold, Joseph Hargrove, he goes missing and it's decades before his surviving mom,
like even found out what had happened to him.
You know, just awful stuff.
Not only were the Marines of 2-9, you know, not, you know, they had no reason to believe they'd be imminently going into action.
but they'd been on training maneuvers for the preceding 24 hours in the field.
You know, I mean, all the inventory does is train.
So they were exhausted, you know, and they got orders to deploy to the crisis area.
You know, these men were deprived of sleep.
Both the riflemen and the machine gunners,
they'd had
I guess I've never
fired blanks before
and I don't know much about military
small arms but
I guess if you're running blanks through a rifle
or through an M60
you've got to fit the muzzle
with something
you know that can
you know
allow for those
you know
dud low
to be run through.
And
you're supposed to, once you remove
those modifications,
you're supposed to run live ammo through,
like at least a magazine,
is that you can, you know,
battle sight your rifle.
They didn't have a time to do that.
You know, so this was,
you had this exhausted element
that hadn't even had time to properly maintain their rifles
for going into battle.
You know, just really inexcusable stuff
that never should have even been an issue.
I mean, and this is the idea of the Cold War.
You know, it's not, you know, you're not talking about the makework army
that is in constant search of, you know, a raison d'etre.
That's really inexcusable.
I mean, I say nothing in the fact that, you know,
you never send people into combat without, you know, the stuff they need.
And there was only a handful of men in this element, too, who had combat experience.
A company commander, a captain James Davis, he'd been in action in Vietnam.
A gunnery sergeant had similar experience.
There was a couple other officers, one of whom at an Audi Murphy like resume,
you had a Navy Cross and something like five Purple Hearts and stuff.
But, you know, it was only, it was less than 10 men who'd ever heard a shot fire into anger, too.
You know, so it's not these guys were, these guys were busting their cherry, as it were,
going into combat against the very seasoned commuterge element.
And that, I mean, that's absurd, too.
Yeah, the blank adapters, I guess, is what they used in those days.
I think later the military switched at some, like, laser tag, like actually was a training device used by the army.
I don't know about the Marines.
And I know, you know, some innovating capitalist that worlds of wonder, the toy company realized, hey, you can market this to kids and stuff.
But I guess in those days, like using blanks is what they did for realism or an attempt at realism.
You know, it's the, the Vaf and SS and the Vermacht,
believe live fire was essential, but it's interesting.
That hadn't really occurred to me that blanks would be used outside of Hollywood,
but, you know, apparently that was a thing.
But moving on.
And yeah, the C-141s that landed to convey the men to Thailand,
where they would then, you know, depart by helicopter for the LZ.
They hadn't even been purposed for, like the Ford cargo space hadn't been purpose,
purpose for passengers.
So these guys were sitting on the hard floor, which was freezing, you know, no seatbelts,
using only their combat packs for back support.
you know, just, and again, these guys, these guys were going on no sleep, and it's, you know,
I'm sure you don't get restful sleep on a starlifter anyway, but, you know, especially not if you're,
you're just sitting on a cold aluminum floor.
The Air Force element in attempting to deploy as a contingency, um, to, uh,
northern Thailand, their helicopter crashed on route and a bunch of men died.
That's another thing that was redacted.
And when it came out, the statement from the Pentagon in the White House was that, you know,
well, these men weren't part of the operation, I mean, which was another lie.
You know, these guys from the 56 security police.
squadron, you know, just, which again was just a ridiculous suggestion to begin with.
You know, but by this time, by the night of the 14th, the crew of the Mayages was already on, you know, an island north of Kotang.
So it was
the nominal reason for the
operation
was that already resolved
hours before
as it happened
on May 15th
at 612 a.m.
8 helicopters
disembarked
It was five CH-53s and three H-H-53s,
constituting the first wave of the KOTANG assault force.
There have been two landing zones designated.
Kotang's a tiny island.
There were two beaches, identified as the West Beach and the East Beach.
That were natural landing zones.
The rest of the island was a very, very dense jungle.
But the problem is that, you know, these are also natural kill zones.
And Marine chopper pilots generally, and they learn this in Nam,
they generally hover in an LZ with the nose pointed towards the main line of resistance.
so that the Marines could disembark and use the fuselage for cover.
Naval pilots weren't really wise to this.
So the side of the chopper was flush to the mainline of resistance.
And as they were approaching, they weren't taking any fire.
and then immediately when they got within range and began their descent,
like the entire jungle opened up, you know,
and they started getting hit with heavy automatic weapons fire.
The first chopper in, which was designated in Knife 21,
it actually landed, but when the Marines were disembarking,
a bunch of them got hit.
Knife 21 itself was severely damaged.
One of its engines was taken out,
but it managed to take off
because the second CH53
designated knife 22 was coming in
and it was opening up with its mini guns.
So there was enough suppressive fire
that it could get away.
It ditched
about one and a half kilometers offshore.
Knife 21 did.
Knife 22 was so badly damaged that it had to turn back.
So, I mean, that meant that the first wave of the assault was missing a substantial component of its element anyway.
Surviving passengers and Knife 21 were picked up, but a bunch of men drowned.
and some were killed by Kalashnikov fire as they tried to stay afloat.
At 6.30 on the East Beach, it was the same deal.
The CH 53's were approaching, and they immediately started getting hit by B40 rockets.
Knife 31, as it was called.
It was hit by two RPGs, which is,
ignited the fuel tank on the left-hand side and ripped away the nose of the helicopter.
So it exploded in a fireball and crashed 50 meters offshore.
Killing five Marines, two Navy corpsmen, the co-pilot.
Three more Marines were killed trying to reach the beach.
A couple of Marines burned to death while clinging to their.
wreckage, which is just awful
to think about.
Ten men survived
and three Air Force
crewmen
did too.
They were floating in the water
for two hours.
And the Henry B. Wilson, which is one of the
vessels that
was en route from
Subic, was
able to pick them up.
So this was a skeleton crew that was
landing on
landing on the beach
in the first wave,
both beaches in the first wave.
One of the,
thankfully one of the Marines
who survived
the crash on the east beach,
he was the battalion's
forward air controller
and he had his
Air Force survival radio in his pack.
So while he was floating,
he was able,
to call
an airstrikes from
some A7s
that were in the region
and uh
so they started they started pounding
um
the main line of resistance to try and
you know
bring fire support to the Marines that were
you know now in this desperate fight on both beaches
um
you know so this was just
uh
this was just a disaster
finally the second wave was able to break through with support from an AC130 gunship
you know that's spooky that started uh it was able to penetrate Cameru's fire after five
attempts and ultimately all told on the west beach 81 Marines were landed
and a further 29 Marines from the Battalion Command Post,
plus a mortar platoon,
were able to land also.
And the 81 millimeter mortar is proved essential
in preventing a route.
So by 7 a.m., May 15th,
there was 109 Marines and five Air Force crewmen on Kotang,
but they were in three isolated beach areas,
two of the designated LZs,
and then another one where, you know,
surviving choppers had to emergency land,
you know, and then reinforce those men
so that they didn't, you know, get wiped out.
The Marines at the West Beach
tried to move
southward and eastward
to try and link up with this
isolated element, which incidentally was, you know, the battalion command element.
But they were beaten back by heavy Camero fire.
And to be clear, as this came out later, including because the battalion, the
commierers battalion commander, this one American, like, lay historian took his oral history
around between like 1996 and 2000.
and what he relayed was he said that he said we were convinced we were under general assault
you know and that this was the the the americans marines were going to conquer ko tang
and then used it as a staging area to assault the mainland you know so he's like we had
orders to fight to the last man you know and uh obviously you know there's only two ways home
of your serving in the Khmer Rouge as an officer,
you know,
it's either victory or death.
You know, there's not,
there's not a third alternative.
You know, so he said,
we were convinced, you know, this is it.
You know, he's like, that's why we,
he's like, that's, that's why we resisted so hard,
you know,
because, um,
we,
we were convinced that you were,
invading us as,
as part of a general,
you know,
assault operation.
which was a reasonable
which was a reasonable
conclusion
you know
as it
the second
the five
ultimately
ultimately
I'm still service about helicopters
were able to pick up
the remainder of
what was to be the second
wave and finally able to stage a landing at the East Beach to relieve beleaguered forces there.
But once again, one of those helicopters, they're in a night 52, its fuel tanks were ruptured,
and the pilot had to abort. Two more chopped.
had to abandon their landings and assume a holding pattern owing to impenetrable groundfire.
Finally, Word got to the CIA station in Thailand in Bangkok proper, the communication from the Liyah's crew that they were going to be released.
this was transmitted to the White House
um
Ford
told the JCS
you know to
you know
of effect a fighting withdrawal
you know of these Marines
ASAP
you know
and
get the hell out of there
so this chaotic
withdrawal ensued
the Marines to their
credit, they said, we're not, we're not even going to think about withdrawing these men until we can
reinforce them so that they're not, you know, massacred and in trying to, you know, scrambled
to an extraction site, you know, which was the right call. Some more mortars were landed
on the three choppers that were still operational. And within,
range, but
there was a constant
shifting of
orders as to where the Marines should go for
extraction. And the machine
gun team that was left behind,
they were hearing conflicting things.
And on both beaches, there was basically
like a loose horseshoe perimeter
that had been established opposite
the Cameroo's main line of resistance.
and on what would have been the furthest flank of the horseshoe is where these guys were entrenched.
And there was a number of KIA who were left behind on the island pending retrieval.
And owing to a combination of conflicting orders and a...
the miscommunication to the, you know, the pilots within the extraction element, you know, they were told that, you know, there's no, there's no living left behind on the island.
And when it became clear that there were, you know, it was, it was several hours before they realized that, um, these men were unaccounted for.
and the Marines wanted to immediately go back in.
This one admiral who was a liaison to Commander-in-Chief Pacific,
he came up with this absurd idea of,
well, you know, we should send an unarmed contingent under a white flag
with a commier interpreter and explain that we're only there to retrieve our
people living and dead.
So this Marine lieutenant said, I'm not going anywhere near that island unarmed, fuck you, basically.
And one of the senior men at the Thai air base, he said, you know, we can get a team of Navy SEALs here probably within, you know, 12 hours.
Let's put an assault package together with them, you know, with some of the surviving Marines who know the terrain of the island and let's get our people out.
The Ford White House was adamantly opposed to reengaging, especially because Kissinger was being shadowed by the national media because he wasn't in Washington when the crisis broke.
He was in Missouri.
So as you trail back to Washington, everybody from Time magazine to, you know, the big three television networks, you know, and, you know, both the Washington major papers were, you know, kind of waiting with bated breath to find a way to report a disaster and, you know, a totally Fubar resolution and hanging on Kissinger and the kind of failing Ford White House.
So they wanted to break with this as much as possible and, you know, essentially declare victory.
And when it went over the AP wire, like, you know, this lie of, oh, you know, there was, that the crew has safely been rescued.
And we only took, you know, we, you know, we only took one, one fatality, you know, suddenly Ford became the man of the hour, you know, and all this kind of praise was lavished upon him.
especially because nothing but bad news have been coming in, you know, from Southeast Asia.
So it became very politically untenable to admit that, yeah, you know, we got our asses kicked and we left people behind.
You know, I mean, the guys who fought a Kotang were hard as nails.
Like, those guys did great.
It wasn't their fault that they got creamed by, you know, being sent into action with shit intel and not the, you know,
without the equipment they needed and, you know, well, well, being outnumbered and, as it were,
you know, outgunned because a, you know, without, that, I mean, honestly, you don't need to be,
you don't need to be some sort of military savant to realize.
I mean, that island should have been being pounded with with airstrikes, you know, beforehand.
They should have been, they should have been leveling it, you know, before any infantry element set foot on it.
You know, like those B-50, that arc light should have been hitting Kotang, not the mainland, to some punitive gesture.
But, you know, that's what happened.
And as it turned out, and this wasn't known for decades, how it resolved until some Camer Rouge veterans who were witnesses and parties to the events, you know, proffered their testimony as to what happened.
After the Battle of Cotang, the Camer Rouge element remained on alert because they didn't know if there was a,
going to be another assault.
But the next day, about 24 hours later,
a Cameroo's patrol
came under fire, and they recognized
the report as, you know, coming from an armolite.
So eventually, you know, they
close with whoever was shooting at him.
It was Joseph Harborough, who'd been wounded in the leg.
So he couldn't walk.
and Hargrove had, you know, he was trading fire with him until he ran out of ammo from his M-16.
And he was taken prisoner.
And then about a week later, and this was horrible to think about.
So Hargrove because Hargrove because he was wounded, he got separated from the rest of his machine gun team.
And then as this chaotic extraction was underway,
Gary Hall and Danny Marshall got separated from him, you know, and couldn't fight their way back,
owing to the fact that, you know, the beach had by that point had been cut in half by the advancing Cameroon.
But a week after the fact, the Cameroge noticed that Rice from the...
their food stores was missing.
And the first night had happened,
they didn't really think anything of it.
But then,
as it continued to happen,
they set in the ambush.
And as it turned out,
Gary Hall and Danny Marshall,
you know,
trapped on Kotang a week after the,
the withdrawal,
you know,
we're surviving on a food they were stealing
and then Khmer Rouge camp.
So they were captured, too.
They were taken to the mainland and imprisoned in this Buddhist temple that had been repurposed as a prison and a death house.
They'd been locking prisoners and what had been the monks' quarters.
And Hargrove Hall and Marshall had been, they remained there for another five days.
and then the order came down from
Cameroos command to execute them
and as part of the course
the Camer Rouge didn't waste bullets
they were beat the death
with a B-40 rocket launcher
you know just like pummel to death
which is horrific
but
you know that's
that's
that's how it resolved
as it were
you know and like I
said. This wasn't even really
spoken of.
You know, and after
I mean, in those days, too,
I mean, stuff obviously remained in the public mind
for longer. There wasn't this news cycle
where things just immediately left
people's awareness.
But, you know,
no scandal ensued from it.
And it was reported as this great victory
of the Ford administration and then quickly
forgotten about. And
the casualties, you know, which, which were many,
they're just an afterthought on the Vietnam War Memorial.
Like, oh, this was the last battle of the Vietnam War, which makes no sense whatsoever.
And then a couple of very dedicated historians, as well as Kotang veterans,
who were pushing for decades to get some recognition for this and what happened.
You know, it finally became known and some recognition was afforded.
And I guess that the, there's some kind of memorial now on Kotang.
And I guess some guys at the Cambodian embassy, which is guarded by Marines, like all embassies are.
They, after relations normalized, you know, with Vietnam, with Vietnam,
Vietnam was occupying in Cambodia until 90.
Like they never left after they took out the Khmer Rouge, you know.
I guess there was some sort of memorial erected there.
But pretty grim stuff, but important, not just because, you know,
we should honor the dead, especially young guys or basically just kids
who were literally abandoned by their government to a horrible, horrible face.
but militarily it was highly significant.
You know, so it's not, I realize I've got some kind of esoteric areas of concentration of my research,
but I don't think this is just reducible to that.
It's actually a very important subject matter for the era.
But that's all I have on this subject for today.
No, I think it's important to people hear that in the context of this.
series. So, yeah, thank you for that.
Yeah, of course. I appreciate you hosting me as always.
Go over to Thomas a substack, real Thomas 777.com. Go to his website,
Thomas 777.com. The T is a 7. And you can hook up with Thomas there, support him on the
substack. And Thomas will interact with you on the substack. He may even be nice.
I think you're always nice.
We're just, you know, every once in a while.
Every once in a while.
No, and then sometimes, like, lately, there's been, like, a glut of fools,
but I've, like opted to ignore them.
And, you know, I, I'm playing with the idea of at least when I recorded kind of, like,
rebranding the Inquisition thing because it seems to be like a magnet for, like,
mental defectives who are, are, it's, I don't get it, man.
I don't get why that particular brand just like attracts like total fucking idiots,
but they need to be purged.
And that, yeah, I found that profoundly irritating, but I bought it to do ignore them.
I'm just ignore them.
Best to do.
Block and move on.
All right, Thomas, talk to you.
Thank you very much for this.
Appreciate it.
Until the next one.
Yeah, man.
