The Pete Quiñones Show - 'Who Owned the Boats?' - SS Empire Windrush Edition

Episode Date: July 26, 2026

45 MinutesPG-13Pete reads and comments on the 2015 Andrew Joyce Ph.D. article, The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain. The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural BritainPete and Thomas777 'At the Movies'Support Pete on His WebsitePete's PatreonPete's Substack Pete's SubscribestarPete's PaypalPete's VenmoPete's Buy Me a CoffeePete on FacebookPete on TwitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.

I want to welcome everyone back to the Peking Yon show. And it's just me again. I don't know. I've been in the mood to just do solo episodes and readings lately. So you got me. And, you know, I mean, I do so many interviews. And the only time I really get to talk on my own is the live stream. And that's just interacting with everybody.

So, you know, I don't know. Maybe for the summer I'll do a bunch of reading. I have some, I have people sketching. schedule is to come on. Don't worry. Of course, Thomas will be back on and Dr. Jay will be talking about Hagel soon enough and Mr. Bagby will be back and maybe some new people who haven't been on before. But this is an article I've wanted to read and talk about for a while. It was shared with me years ago. And I've never had a chance to, you know, to go over it and read it. And I don't know why.

I just thought with everything, all of the news coming out of England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, that I would talk about this. So before anybody freaks out, I know a lot of people know the author of this, no of the author. author of this article, Andrew Joyce. I would love to talk to Andrew Joyce. He drops in every once in a while and does like a couple podcasts, writes a couple things, and then he disappears for a couple years. So I haven't heard from Mr. Joyce in probably a year, a year and a half when a couple new things popped up. But this is an article from July 12, 2015 by Andrew Joyce. PhD and basically he's talking about the windrush generation. And anybody who knows anything about what happened to Britain after World War II,

sure they had Indians there. Well, why did they have Indians in Great Britain? Well, because they were an empire and they controlled India and Indians were going to be there. But basically a whole crop of people. from the blacks from the West Indies showed up, especially on a ship called the SS Empire Windrush. And Mr. Joyce, because his concentration is similar to what I do sometimes, except his main concentration, is the history of the Jewish people.

He sought to find out if the SS Empire Wind Rush, and this specific beginning of the flooding of the island had anything to do with them. So I will start reading, and we'll see where this goes. The SS Empire Windrush to Jewish origins of multicultural Britain. Starts off with a quote, Will you find out who is responsible for this extraordinary action? End quote. Oliver Stanley, MP, June.

1948. The SS Empire Windrush holds a special place in infamy in the mind of British Nationalists. When the ship arrived at Tilbury Docks from Jamaica in June 1948, carrying 417 black immigrants, it represented more than just a turning point in the history of those ancient aisles. In some respects, it signaled the beginning of mass organized non-white immigration into northwest Europe. Back in November, T.O. published my research on the role of the of Jews and limiting free speech and manipulating race relations in Britain in order to achieve Jewish goals and protect Jewish interests. I've recently been revisiting some of my past essays delving deeper and expanding each of them and expanding each of them in an effort that I hope will

result in the publication of a book-like manuscript on aspects of Jewish influence. During this process, I've been particularly compelled to research further into the role of Jews in Britain's immigration and racial questions. What I present in this essay is a survey of some interesting facts, which I hope to document and integrate further as my work on the volume proceeds. One of the things that struck me most when I began looking into the origins of multicultural Britain was the hazy and confused background to the arrival of that notorious ship. First, though, I might point out one of history's bizarre ironies. The vessel that would signal the end of racial homogeneity in Britain started life as a Nazi cruise liner.

The ship began its career in 1930 as the M.V. Montserosa. Until the outbreak of war, it was used as part of the German Strength Through Joy program, Kraf Durs Freud. I'm terrible a German. Strength through joy enabled more than 25 million Germans of all classes to enjoy subsidized travel and numerous other leisure pursuits, thereby enhancing the sense of community and racial togetherness. Racial solidarity rather than class position was emphasized by drawing lots for the allocation of cabins on vessels like the Montserosa, rather than providing superior accommodations only for those who could afford a certain rate.

Until the outbreak of war, the vessel was employed in conveying NSDAP members on South American cruises. In 1939, the ship was allocated for military purposes, acting, as a troop ship for the invasion of Norway in 1940. In 1944, the Montarosa served in the Baltic Sea, rescuing Germans trapped in Latvia, East Prussia, and Danzig by the advance of the Red Army. Finally, in May 1945, her German career ended when she was captured by advancing British forces at Kiel and taken as a prize of war. The British renamed her Empire Windrush on January 21, 1947, and also employed her as a troop carrier. Sailing from Southampton, the ship took British troops to destinations as varied as Suez, Aden, Colombo, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

Crucially, the ship was not operated directly by the British government, but by the New Zealand shipping company. It is with this little fact that we begin tumbling down the proverbial rabbit hole. I quickly discovered that the New Zealand shipping company, like other crucial players in the story of the wind rush, was Jewish owned and operated. The company was for the most part controlled by the Isaacs family, particularly the direct descendants of Henry and George Isaacs. Henry and George left England in 1852 at the instigation of a third brother Edward and arrived in Auckland via Melbourne. They established a firm Ian H. Isaacs, acting as profiteers, acting as profiteers during the Taranaki and Waikato War and winning a number of heavy contracts in connection with the

provisioning of the troops. Henry took a great interest in shipping affairs and was for many years a member of the Auckland Harbor Board. He was one of the chief shareholders of the Auckland Shipping Company, which was subsequently merged into the New Zealand Shipping Company. The other major shareholders of the company were Lawrence and Alfred Nathan of L.D. Nathan and Company. The Auckland shipping industry, like many colonial shipping routes, had by the 1890s been effectively monopolized by Jews. During 1947 and 1948, many former German vessels were passed on to several of these contracted private companies at the discretion of the Ministry for War and the Ministry

for Transport. The Secretary of State for War during these crucial years was none other than Emmanuel Shenwell, the socialist son of Polish and Dutch Jews. With a degree of loyalty and patriotism, typical of his race, Shenwell was discovered by MI5 to have been passing British secrets to the Irgun in Palestine in November 1947. To Shinwell, disproportionately handing government vessels and contracts to fellow Jews would have been mere grist to the mill. In 1948, the British Empire was crumbling. India had been granted independence in 1947 and an exhausted, overstretched, and indebted Britain was busy arranging for the return of colonial troops to their homelands and the collection of

others for present or future conflicts. The wind rush was used mainly for this purpose until in May 1948, the ship's Jewish operators were given permission by the British Ministry of Transport to increase their profits by filling to capacity with commercial customers. immigrants, rather than contracted troops, at Jamaica before returning to Britain with these new settlers. The momentous decision appears to have been taken very arbitrarily and certainly undemocratically, since it elicited great shock and confusion among British politicians when it later came to light. So basically what he's saying there is very arbitrarily, it would have seemed that way to the Brits. But what's the intention of another group?

They might not have been so shocked had they considered the ethnic origin of the head of the Ministry for Transport who authorized that action. The Ministry of Transport in that crucial period was Henry Lewis Nathan, formerly a member of the law firm of Herbert Oppenheimer, Nathan, and Van Dyke, and a distant relative of the owners of the New Zealand Shipping Company. I mean, this is all just, this is coincidence, right? I'm not going to pronounce it the way some of you want me to pronounce it. If the web is already beginning to look a little tangled, readers would do well to consider some of these developments and coincidences within the context of the Anglo-Jewish cousinhood,

a topic I covered for T-O-O about, well, COO is the Occidental Obserner. That's the website I'm reading this off of, about three years ago. From the early 19th century until the First World War, English Jewry was ruled by a tightly connected oligarchy. Daniel Guitwan states that the Anglo-Jewish elite comprise some 20 interrelated Ashkenazi and Sephardic families, including the houses of Goldsmith, Montagu, Nathan, Cohen, Isaacs, Abrahams, Samuel, and Montefiore. Some of these names have featured already and will feature again in the Windrush story. At its head, of course, stood the House of Rothschild. This network of families had an exceptionally high degree of consanguinity,

leading it to be termed the cousinhood. Conversion and intermarriage in the group was exceptionally rare, if not, non-existent. The business activities of the group overlap to the same degree as their bloodlines. I illustrated in my previous essay by pointing out that, quoting his previous essay. In 1870, the treasurer of the London Jewish Board of Guardians was Viennese-born Ferdinand de Rothschild, 1838-183898, 183898. Ferdinand had married his cousin Elvina, who was a niece of the president of the London United Synagogue, Sir Anthony de Rothschild, 1810, 1876. Meanwhile, the board of deputies was at that time headed by Moses Montsefiori, who was, wife, a daughter of Levi Barron Cohen, was related to Nathan Meyer Rothschild. Nathan Meyer Rothschild's wife was also a daughter of Levi Barron Cohen, and thus Montefiorei was uncle to the aforementioned

Anthony de Rothschild. Anthony was married to Anisein Montefiorei, the daughter of Abraham Montefiore and Henry Rothschild, etc. In financial terms, the houses of Rothschild and Montefiore had united in 1824 to form the Alliance Insurance Company, and most of the families were involved in each other's stockbrokering and banking concerns. Endelman notes that in these firms, quote, new recruits were drawn exclusively from the ranks of the family. Working tightly within this ethnic and familial network, the cousinhood amassed huge fortunes, and in the years before World War I, despite comprising less than three-tenths of one percent

of the population, Jews constituted over 20% of non-landed British millionaires. William Rubinstein notes that of these millionaires all belong to the cousinhood. Do we need to have another talk about diaspora groups? As I like to say all the time, one thing that has really been emphasized this year and basically since Trump took office is a look at Haitians coming in. of Springfield, Ohio, but more importantly, the organization of Somalis in Minneapolis. That's a diaspora group. A diaspora group has no intention of assimilating, some will. For the most part, they have no intention of assimilating, and the leaders and the organizers

are going to do everything they can to enrich themselves, while the heritage group that's there, well, they're going to do whatever they can to take from them and lessen their power. But there's one diaspora group that you're not allowed to talk about. I like to call it the final boss of the Osprey groups. It was the cousinhood that pioneered the way into direct political power for Jews in Britain. By 1900, through a process of ethnic and familial networking, the cousin had secured many of the most significant administrative positions in the empire.

Feldman notes that the Nathan family alone had, by that date, secured the positions of Governor of the Gold Coast, Hong Kong, and Nate and Natal, Attorney General and Chief Justice in Trinidad, private secretary to the viceroy in India, officiating chief secretary by the governor of eastern Bengal and Assam, and Postmaster General of Bengal. In Parliament, Lionel Abrahams was permanently, assistant undersecretary at the India office, working under his cousin Edwin Montague, who was then

parliamentary undersecretary for India. Together with the rapid development of a Jewish monopoly over key imperial positions were countless cases of nepotistic corruption and profit-seeking. The cousinhood was instrumental in disseminating false Russian pogrom narratives throughout the West in fomenting the profit-driven Boer War and in the Indian silver and Marconi scandals. To go back on the Russian pogrom narratives, I can't remember if it's Kishiniv, 1903, I believe it's 1903, or Odessa 1905, but the Jewish press in Europe, before the program, before anyone even, like, noticed something was happening, was writing headlines that 20,000 Jews had been killed in Russia and a pogrom. It just didn't happen. Solzhenycin in 200 years together details these quote-unquote pogroms and lists the dead. You might find it hard to believe it wasn't only Jews that died.

Why? Because this has to do with Jewish revolutionaries rising up, trying to kill people, a lot of Orthodox. In 1905, trying to overthrow the government. and when the Russians fought back, their papers in the West screamed the pogrom. And that is still in the history books today. The Nathan and Isaac's family, who owned and operated the New Zealand shipping company,

also comprised part of the cousinhood, as was the case also with Harry Nathan, who occupied the strategically valuable position of Ministry for Transport between 1946 and 1948. These were crucial years in which many foreign and domestic ex-military vessels were being repurposed for commercial purposes and handed over by the Royal Navy to private, most often Jewish-owned companies. Much like the nepotistic corruption at the heart of the Marconi scandal, having a Jew running the ministry for war and a Jewish cousin running the ministry for transport

was good news for cousinhood members who had monopolized shipping companies and routes and now stood to gain from successive government contracts to newly acquisition vehicles like the Empire Windrush. These government contracts and the Jewish Quest for Profit played a huge role in the burgeoning of the commercial passenger industry that would bring wave after wave of blacks, Indians, and Pakistanis to Britain over the next two decades. I mentioned that there were already Indians in Britain,

but it would have been a percent. It would have been percentages. Percentages. I mean, we're... Minute. It doesn't really concern me whether the beginnings of this movement was part of a concerted campaign

to flood Britain with non-whites, whether the motivation was purely profit-driven, or whether it was a mixture of both. The fact remains that Jews occupied conspicuous roles throughout the process. Even the method by which blacks were enticed to set sail for Britain must be remarked upon. Around three weeks before the Empire Windrush arrived in Jamaica,

blacks were bombarded with ads for cheap travel to Britain and articles of stolling the new life they could have in London. What does that sound like to you? Why them? Stephen Pollard writes that quote, the response was almost instantaneous. Cues formed outside the booking agency and every place was sold, end quote. Many of the ads were propaganda pieces that presented an idealized picture of life and job opportunities in Britain, in stark contrast to the bleak reality. Nonetheless, the ads were successful in generating a buzz of excitement among blacks keen to make the move to the new welfare state. Maybe this is a good time to talk about basically up until World War II,

although not as strong as it had in the past before World War II, Britain was an empire. And they pretty much, I've heard it explained by right-wing English real Brits, that basically the England gave up an empire for the NHS, for the National Health Service, for welfare, for free health care. Now, as somebody who thinks that in a very small country that is tightly knit and monoracial, monoehtnic, monolingual, you can probably make that work. And it works in certain countries, no matter how much libertarian economists, once you talk about how bad their economy is, their economies keep going on. free health care, for your brother, for your cousin, for your seventh cousin, and makes sense.

You might even make an argument for it, but what happens when you start bringing people in from the outside? And then, to pile on top of it, when people start saying, hey, wait a minute, we can't take care of these people. The NHS is going to go broke if we, well, who do you think is going to work for the NHS. We're not only bringing these people in here. They're not going to be sponging off the NHS. They're going to be working for the NHS. Okay, so not only are you bringing them in there and people are like, well, where are these people going to work? But, oh, all these new jobs are being opened up. We're coming out of a war. And you're going to give the jobs to people who are not our race, not don't barely speak our language definitely don't share our culture and now they get that they get the

benefits of it not only the benefits of the NHS but they're going to draw an income from the NHS who's going to get left out of this even if not immediately Daniel Lawrence quotes as an example one migrant who explained his move to Britain quote well I left Jamaica because I saw the advertisements in the gleaner. I left to better my position. This was the chief reason." End quote. The gleaner is part of the gleaner company, which to this day enjoys an effective monopoly of the Jamaican press. The company has its origins in 1834, when it was founded by the Jewish brothers Jacob and Joshua de Cordova. I would almost certainly expect them to be Sephardic. Since its founding, it has been kind of a Jamaican micro-cousinhood. Even when it

registered as a private company in 1897, its first director has possessed a mixture of Ashkenazi and Sephardy names, from Aschenheim to Damarcado. At the time the Empire Windrush ads appeared, the managing director was Michael de Cordova. Even as late as in 1960s, and despite numbering no more than 600 in the whole country, according to Anita Waters, the powerful Jewish minority of Jamaica controlled, quote, many of the larger economic enterprises, end quote. Before the socialist policies of the Manly administration were implemented, Jews, quote, controlled the country's only cement factory, the radio sector, the telephone company,

and the largest rum company, end quote. You want to talk about colonization a little bit, how the white European gets blamed for colonization. I think you know where I'm going with that. For all intents and purposes, the Empire Windrush was passed into Jewish ownership by a Jewish secretary for war, given the green light to boost profits

and start bringing non-whites to Britain by a Jewish minister for transport and provided with armies of eager passengers by a Jewish-owned media. Despite these facts, a very different narrative emerged in the aftermath of the ship. arrival. Pollard writes that, quote. In the years since the arrival of the Empire wind rush,

a myth has taken hold that the British government was responsible for bringing the passengers over as part of a concerted plan to help overcome a labor shortage. But this is wrong. It is clear from the reaction of ministers that they were as surprised as the public when they first learned via a telegram from the acting governor of Jamaica on May 11th, what was about to happen. End quote. The myth was a helpful one because it acknowledged the undemocratic nature of the event while deflecting blame away from the most obvious source of the scourge, the Jews of the shipping industry, and the Ministry of Transport. It's an interesting fact that, with the relevant contacts assigned in the process underway,

Harry Nathan quietly vacated his position on May 31st. Astonishingly, since that date, Nathan has eluded all scholarly, and journalistic attention until my own investigation. The labor government fumbled in the aftermath of the arrival of the empire wind rush, clinging to the fantasy that upholding that the tradition that members of the colonies should be, quote, freely admissible to the United Kingdom, could act as a means of holding the crumbling empire together. They've already given up the empire for welfare.

and now they're going to do everything they can to make sure that the welfare is enough, is honey for foreigners, unlike them. We're not talking about people from South Africa. We're not talking about whites from South Africa. We're not talking about whites from New Zealand. We're not talking about whites from Australia. No. Part of the cabinet's strict adherence to this established but previously superfluous protocol may also have been influenced by the interpretation of existing immigration law presented to them.

The responsibility for interpreting existing law for the Crown and the cabinet lies with the Solicitor General, a role that has been occupied since 1945 by yet another Jew, Frank Soskis. As I noted in a previous essay, Soskis would later introduce Britain's first legislation containing a provision prohibiting group libel. Soskis was the son of a Russian Jewish revolutionary exile. It was Soskis who drew up the legislation and piloted the First Race Relations Act 1965 through Parliament. The act aimed to outlaw racial discrimination, in public places.

Quoting, crucially, the 1965 Act created the Race Relations Board and equipped it with the power to sponsor research for the purposes of monitoring race relations in Britain and, if necessary,

extending legislation on the basis of the findings of such research. Clearly, Suscus would have been at pains to admonish, with legal jargon, any racist reactions against ministers to the arrival of Empire Wind and subsequent streams of black immigrants sailing on Jewish vessels.

It was Soskis who informed Arthur Cheech Jones, the anti-immigration minister for labor, that neither the Jamaican nor the British government had any legal power in peacetime to prevent the standing at Tilbury of the landing at Tilbury of the Empire Windrush. And so the former Monta Rosa, once a triumphant symbol of strength through joy, disgorged its passengers on the Thames as part of the new initiative, destruction through diversity. It was soon followed by numerous other troop ships like the SS Orbita, laden with dusky immigrants and stinking of vomit and urine. So when you read now about what's going on in Britain, especially with Rupert Lowe,

publishing all the findings on the grooming. and rape gangs. And you see how politicians, the press agencies like the Nudge Unit, how they immediately go to bat how racism is more important to them or looking at a group with suspicion is more important to them than white girls being gang raped and raped by. animals, literal animals. This is the origins of it. It's been building for a long time. This isn't something that came out of woke. This has been happening for a very long time. It was only during the next Churchill government that some reflection took place on the longer term implications of what

had begun. With Churchill recorded by Sir Norman Brooke is remarking, quote, problems will arise if many colored people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with color problems in the UK, attracted by welfare state? Public opinion in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits." But by then it was too late. Over the course of the following decade, black immigration to Britain increased dramatically. Between 1948 and 1952, between around 2,000 blacks and, entered Britain each year. By 1957, the figure had climbed to 42,000. We're talking about a small

island. We're not talking about an expensive landmass like we have. I'm not making excuses for anything that's happening here. I'm just saying that, yeah, there's places to go here. There's places to send them. You could even make reservations, but this is a small island. Government investigations into the new population reveal that the idea that blacks were helping fill a labor shortage was grossly ill-founded. In one report completed in December 1953, civil servants stated that the new population found the difficult to secure employment, not because of prejudice among whites, but because the newcomers had low output in their working life was marked by irresponsibility. responsibility, whoralsomeness, and lack of discipline. Black women were slow mentally,

and black men were more volatile in temperament than white workers, more easily provoked to violence, lacking in stamina, and generally not up to the standards required by British employers. Maybe this is a good time to dispel the myth that these are, you know, these are rape gangs or, you know, just bad people that were sent on purpose from Pakistan and places like that to destroy Britain. No, from what I understand in the Rupert Low report, the first reports of these gangs was in 1955, which is interesting because Soskis in 1965 is in 1965 is already, having his anti-racist laws and organizations put forth. Worse, future social and criminal patterns were already being established.

In 1954, Home Secretary David Maxwell, David Maxwell Fife, issued a secret memorandum to the cabinet on blacks pimping white women, stating that, quote, figures I have obtained from the Metropolitan Police do show that the number of colored men convicted for this offense is out of all proportion to the number of colored men in London. In other words, per capita. Three months later, he again wrote to the cabinet stressing that, quote, large numbers of colored men are living on national assistance or the immoral earnings of white women, end quote.

While the fame Notting Hill race riots of 1958 are often pointed to as an example of black victimhood and the need for a black reaction against white oppression. the riots were instead the culmination of white reactions against black crime and miscegenation. Earlier in 1958, the Eugenic Society, now the Galton Institute, issued warnings that the mingling of races that had started in Britain, quote, ran counter to the great developing pattern of human evolution, end quote, and attacked the United Nations for minimizing the, quote, quite obvious to similarities between people and individuals, end quote. The Notting Hill riots occurring a decade after the arrival of Empire Windrush,

receded one August evening when white youths intervened in an argument between a Swedish prostitute and her black husband, Raymond Morrison. A brawl broke out between the youths and Morrison's friends. The following day, some of the white youths

verbally assaulted the Swede for being a black man's trullop. The white youths then assembled between three and four hundred fellows to begin a violent demonstration against black criminality, resulting in six days and nights of almost uninterrupted inter-ethnic warfare. This period represented one of the clearest opportunities for Britain to turn back the tide.

But as I have previously documented, it was also the period in which the efforts of a largely number of unelected Jewish lawyers began the British race relations sham choking out free speech and with it any opportunity for effective white resistance, where it says unelected Jewish Jewish lawyers, there is a link, and I am going to click it. Yeah, he has another full article here entitled Jewish, Jews, Multiculturalism, and the War on Free Speech. And it looks to be a case file, just numbering case after case after case.

And it shows, yeah, it's just basically naming who is responsible. All right. After catching fire during a voyage, Empire Windrush sank to a watery grave off the coast of Algeria in 1954. Its legacy was to last much longer. Liberals and the cultural Marxist elites named a public space in Brixton, London, Windrush Square, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of its landing. It also featured during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games and the salvaged wheel of the vessel so its relic-like for vexed. at the offices of the Open University in Milton Keynes. Your society is always going to have a religion.

It's always going to have religious symbols. It's always going to have worship. The only question is, is what values and what worship is going to benefit your society the most? Because all they're describing here is religion. Hardcore atheists, when you tell them that they worship a religion, whether it be reason, whatever it is, they hate it. They don't want to hear it. They think it's, you know, you're trying to start a meme of some sort. But once you understand, once you get away from individualism and you start to start to start to start.

study the group, the mob. When you start to study ethnic groups historically, you start to see every single one of them worship something and every single person on the planet worship something. They have a belief system that they hold as dear as any Christian Muslim. I don't even know if the Jews believe anything anymore. Well, I think the car rights are probably, probably have a belief. I see a more tangible legacy, however. Last year, and he's writing this in 2015, last year, Jamaican Lloyd Byfield,

smashed his way into the apartment of Londoner Ligon Duffy after she spurned his advances. Armed with a claw hammer and a knife, he stabbed her 14 times, in front of her six-year-old daughter. What made the brutal crime even more disgusting was the fact that Byfield was an illegal immigrant who had previously been jailed for 30 weeks after attacking a white woman with a chisel. A deportation order had been made during that sentencing,

but was never carried out because Britain remains as catatonic on matters of race and immigration as it was in May 1948. The motherless raped and murdered white children of Britain are the truest legacy and reflection of that fateful voyage.

But it is hoped mechanics behind the voyage behind that voyage are now a little better known. And he 20 footnotes here with links if anybody has read Andrew Joyce before, you know

that he is well researched. So as we I got a chance to spend some time with Harry Robinson from the Lotus Eaters recently and hearing the stories firsthand of what's happening there and then seeing the report which I think Rupert Lowe dropped yesterday. I think, yeah, it was yesterday. Today's the 17th. That would have been the 16th.

Here's your origins. Here's who own the ships. Here's who own the shipping companies. Here's who own the newspapers. Here's who are the head of the departments. What does a diaspora group do? Diaspora groups are going to do what they do. And eventually what happens is either total destruction or total takeover.

And in the case, this case of Britain, it's funny someone. someone mentioned the United Kingdom today and I was like, I don't need, I'm, I guess I'm just too old to use that term. I always heard Great Britain when I was growing up. So in the case of Great Britain, when you look over there and you read about the horrors and you see the things that you hear the stories that I don't want people I love to hear, I don't want my wife to know. anything that is in Rupert Lowe's rape gang report. But I'm subjecting myself, no matter how much it's going to change you forever, you know that you have to solve the problem, but also you definitely have to look at where the problem started,

or else it'll just happen again. So that's it. That is the SS Empire Windrush, the Jewish origins of Multicultural Britain, July 12th, 2015 by Andrew Joy's PhD. And I will provide a link to the article on the Occidental Observer in the show notes. And I hope you learn something. First time I read this article many times. I hope you learn something.

I hope some of us are able to start opening up. people's eyes about the Aspera group. Well, both sides of my family are part of the Asper group that came here. I like to think we became American. It's kind of, if I try to compare myself to this, to these people who are brought here, it's kind of like low-lying fruit, like, hey, look how good I am. I hope I add something. That's it.

Take care, everyone. If you want to support the show, you can go to the Piquino Show.com and all the ways you can support the show are there. Thank you. Until the next episode.