The Peter Zeihan Podcast Series - Nigeria, After America || Peter Zeihan

Episode Date: February 19, 2024

Today's entry into our 'Post American' series is a country with a complex political, economic and security landscape. Its a country forged from colonialism that is comprised of diverse ethnic groups coexisting under a single political entity - Nigeria. Full Newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/zeihan/nigeria-after-america

Hey, everybody, Peter Zion coming to you from very snowy Colorado, already 10 inches in and another 6 to go. I know what I'm doing tomorrow. Anywho, this is the latest in our post-American series, and today we're going to talk specifically about a country that a number of people have written in, and that is Nigeria. So what makes a Nigeria tick? This is a country that is a creation of the post-World War II strategic order and took a few pages from the post-Westphelian system of nation-states. Uh, in essence, what that means is it's a little bit like the settler societies, uh, of the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in that it's a polygot group. Uh, lots of different ethnic groups, each of which have a very clear homeland, but they've been lumped together into a single political authority. Now, in a lot of places where some version like this happened because of colonialism, and you can make that argument for Nigeria as well, it has gone very, very badly with lots and lots of civil wars.

And Nigeria is no exception. Uh, they had the Biafran War, short. shortly after independence in 60s, and it was one of the most disastrous wars that we've seen on the African continent. But in its aftermath, things went an unexpected direction. Instead of the victors trying to wipe out the biafarin's, they were included into a transition into democracy. And while it's not something that we would recognize in the United States as democratic, what they do is they rotate the presidency among the various ethnic groups and the other regions. and then within each of those regions, there's actually competition within the ruling party

to decide who is going to be the candidate. So as a rule, and I'm vastly oversimplifying in a very messy situation here, as a rule, the president is selected at the primary level, basically. And while this doesn't necessarily generate the most creative or competent leadership, it has kept the piece

and has kept Nigeria in one piece as well, which is more than you can say for a lot of the other post-colonial countries in Congo here. Angola, both either even war-racked or chaotic or both. Now, the con of this strategy is if you are of an ethnic group that doesn't hold the presidents at a time, you have to basically be paid to not protest or riot or launch a war. And that's where the oil comes in.

Nigeria is the continent's largest oil producer. And most folks say that if civil unrest could be tamped down, a degree of competence could be injected into the system, well, then, they could probably be producing five, six million barrels a day without too much of a challenge. And instead, it's been pretty much less than three for the last 20, 30 years. Basically, whoever sits in the big chair directs where the oil funds go, he takes a cut of it himself. It's always a he. And the rest is used to buy off the other minorities to limit their willingness to cause chaos,

which of course encourages some of the more militant-minded of those groups to deliberately cause chaos in order to get a better cash settlement. And under the globalized order, this has not been a hugely successful system from an economic point of view, because it means that people actually have a vested interest in attacking the oil patrimony in order to get a slice of the oil patrimony.

And that means that the oil patrimony has probably been about one-third to one-quarter as large as it actually should have been under normal circumstances. But hey, that's what happens with the political system like this. Now, that's under the globalized order where no one interferes in other people's affairs. You get these series of ethnic-based militant groups, some with very creative names, and some of which are creative and tenacious and have taken speedboats 50 miles off the coast to take over oil production sites.

And in this sort of environment, the oil companies that bring in the technology that allow all of this to happen have basically lost interest. after seeing their people kidnapped or shot up for purposes of budgetary debates, most Western oil companies have bailed, and the last, such as World That Shell, are in the process of getting out right now as I am recording this video in February of 2024. It's not a great model, but the world is changing, and if we're moving away from a world where civilian maritime shipping is sankresanct into one where piracy and state piracy and attacks on ships are far more likely,

well, then you have to reevaluate how Nigeria plugs into its relationship into the global energy system. Because right now, much to the Saudi's happiness, Nigeria is very self-limited, just like Venezuela has been very self-limiting these last 20 years. And you can count on Nigeria never significantly increasing its oil output for any period of time, which makes them a non-factor as far as the countries who try to actually manage the oil markets, see things. but if you break down global stability, oil is just not going to be transported as far, and in places that have a little bit of a hot spot going for, like say the Persian Gulf or Saudi Arabia is, you should expect significant reductions in output because there's going to be a lot of militancy and state militancy,

not to mention neo-imperial activity, either trying to take the oil offline or take the oil period. And in that scenario, I would expect that the stuff that's coming out of the Persian Gulf is probably going to fall by conservatively half and take most, if not all, of say Iran's crude with it. But Nigeria is not in that sort of situation. Nigeria is on the western side of the African continent. While it has plenty of territorial disputes with its neighbors, it's not like it's facing an outright war with anyone. The countries that are to the northwest, the north, and the east are either in the Sahara, so don't have military what should speak of, or in the Sahel, where the densest concentration of population cell is in Nigeria. So when we had all of those coups, and back in

2022 and 2023, there is a real concern slash hope based on your politics that the Nigerian military might just move into some of these places and knock off the coopsters because the Nigerian military is something like three times as large as all of the French coup belt in the Sahel combined. They ended up not doing that. But the point remains is that Nigeria is the undisputed superpower in the region from the Sahel down to the tropics. There's no one else can hold a candle to them. And if there was a conflict, I have no doubt, well, if it would be messy, that the Nigerians could give a lot more than they could take. But ultimately, we're talking about oil here. In a place where the Persian Gulf has problems,

in a place where Russia is treated like Russia, and a lot of that stuff goes offline, secondary oil producers in the Eastern Hemisphere need to get a fresh look. Because if you remove a lot of these or weaken a lot of them, all of a sudden Nigeria shows up as the largest or second largest by most math. They don't have a physical border where they are going to expect a war. Most of the piracy that's in the region comes from them.

It is funny. And I can see a new sort of environment where the Brits and the French are actively looking for partnerships in the Gulf of Guinea region where Nigeria is in order to secure crude that they can't get from places like the North Sea or the Russians any longer. It's not that the North Sea is going away.

It's just all going to be spoken for. And so if you're going to have growth, you're going to have to find another source. The United States can help with some of that. But Nigeria is the only thing that's proximate, really. You've got Algeria to the north, but a lot of their fields are very, very, very tapped. And they've been in diminishing returns for the last 20 years. Nigeria is really the only place where you can put really in grain field or brownfield. So I expect we're going to see a significant reversing of this trend of the Western

Supermajor's, it out of Nigeria because there's not going to be a lot of choice. Other maybe tertiary energy produces in the area, your Angola's, your Gabans, your Equatorial Guineas, they're probably going to get a fresh look too for very similar reasons, but make no mistake, Nigeria is the security decider in this region. And if they don't want these secondary powers, especially ones that are closer to them, to play a significant role in regional oil markets, then it's going to be really hard to make that happen. And this is not a colonial experience. Nigeria may be decades behind, say, Britain when it comes to military firepower, but it's not like Nigeria is unindustrialized. So you're

not going to see the sort of neo-colonial relationships that a lot of people fear where the former colonies come in and take over. No, no, no, no. The population imbalance is not there. The technological imbalance is not there. Instead it's going to be a degree of partnership and one that while it can be messy is probably going to work pretty well. Because the French and the Brits have the technology in the markets and the Nigerians have the asset and the guns. So it's

a partnership that can actually be quite productive. The question is of the outside powers who will get there first. And I'm telling you, it's going to be the French and the Brits and they're not necessarily going to agree on where that crude has to go. So the geopolitics of this region is going to start

to look a lot like it did a century and a century a half ago, but with a lot more money and with the Nigerians being a player in of them themselves. All right, that's it for me.