The Peter Zeihan Podcast Series - The Fire Hose of Chaos: Corruption || Peter Zeihan
Episode Date: April 28, 2025The Trump administration has introduced a level of chaos that can only result in one thing: corruption. I'm not talking about starting a cryptocurrency or manipulating the stock market, this is deeper....Join the Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/PeterZeihanFull Newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/zeihan/the-fire-hose-of-chaos-corruption
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey all, Peter Zine, coming to you from Colorado.
Today, we're going to do the most recent in our Fire Hose of Chaos series,
looking at the economic impacts on the U.S. from corruption that is being imposed upon the system by the Trump administration.
We're not talking about here corruption at the top, like when Donald Trump forces foreign dignitaries to stay at his hotels,
or when he starts a Bitcoin program to basically scam people,
or when he does pump and dump systems with the entire stock market.
That's a separate topic.
And we're not talking about a more traditional corruption that happens in a federal bureaucratic environment
when bureaucrats basically pad things like invoices and take a cut themselves, not the Chinese style.
We're talking here about corruption that is being imposed by the Trump administration on the broader economy
where it can have a much bigger, deeper impact and really start eating away at the cultural advantages that we have in the United States, including rule of law.
It all has to do with the rapid, rapid, rapid changes in economic policy, most notably tariff policy.
I'm recording this on tax day, April 15, and we have now had 94 tariff policies in 44 days, all coming from Trump himself.
This is not counting the policy suggestions that are coming from cabinet secretaries or the back and forth that's happening within the administration as they're trying to come to grips with whatever the most recent thing to come out of Trump's mouth is.
This is just hard Trump tariffs.
And in that sort of environment, it is impossible for companies who are doing importing to really know what to do.
Because there's a process for collecting tariffs.
I mean, think about the volume here.
It's roughly $3.8 trillion in goods imports every year.
That's over 62 million container units.
And we have no, none, zero staff at U.S. ports to collate those things to understand what the value is of the product.
and so therefore what the tariffs should be.
The way tariffs are collected in this country
is the importer self-reports what is coming
as it crosses the border and into the port of entry
and then pays the taxes electronically.
And in that sort of environment,
clarity is absolutely critical
and having 94 tariff policies in 44 days
and knowing that much, much, much more is coming down the pipe
means that no one's really sure what to do
because oftentimes we get multiple tariff policies in a single day.
We've had two days already where we got six tariff policies within an eight-hour period.
And so even if you are attempting to follow the rules to the letter,
you can't because you never know what is going to come out of Trump's mouth.
These tariffs happen instantly or maybe with a 48-hour lead-in,
and then it's just a question of enforcement, and there is no enforcement.
So take, for example, auto tariffs.
On May 2, we're supposed to get a new tariff that's 25% on all auto parts.
If you have a container of auto parts coming in on a truck from, say, Ontario,
when that hits the border, you need to know each an individual part that is in there and then report it.
But what if it's something that is dual use?
Like, say, wiring.
Is it an auto part?
Is it an electronic part?
Is it a welding part?
Is it something else?
So the administrative cost of that goes through the roof and probably is going to be higher than the part is in the first place.
The other problem, let me give you another example, is what's going to happen with electronics.
Over a two-week period, starting on April 2.
We had tariffs going up on China.
We started with 20%, we went to, I think, 54%, then we went to 80-something%, then 80%, then 125%, and finally 145%.
So everything coming in from China had that kind of scale going up, and the importers didn't know what to do.
Now think about electronics, a specific subset, over 100 billion.
of electronics coming from China every year.
Well, what we did originally was 145% tariff.
That's why I bought my extra phones and my extra computer.
And then, about April 11, Trump said, just kidding, they're in abeyance.
In fact, we're not even going to charge or 10% base tariff on electronics products.
So it used to be relatively simple, relatively, where every container in just had a flat 145% tariff.
Now they had to do a carve-out for electronics.
The next day, Howard Lutnik, the commerce secretary said, this is temporary, don't get used to it.
So they started putting it back on again.
The next day, Trump said, no, it really is off.
And so they started peeling it off again.
And then the next day, Donald Trump said, actually, no one is going to get an exemption.
We're just going to have a different bucket for computing and electronics products.
It's going to be part of our semiconductor tariff.
So what?
Now we're going to have an additional tariff on everything that has a computer chip in it?
Well, that includes everything from backyard gritty.
to white goods to your fridge.
No one knows what the system is,
so no one can choose to follow it dutifully,
because the rules keep changing,
they're not clear,
and instead of being built up by the bureaucracy
who puts this all into the public register
where anyone can follow it,
it is literally often nothing more than a Trump tweet.
So, where does that leave us?
Well, it's a question of how do you administer these things?
There's two problems there, too.
Number one, Donald Trump fired,
well, Doge fired, all of the temporary workers in the federal system. Imports and exports
don't flow in the same scale for the same products every single day. So we have a lot of
temporary workers who work in the ports to help out with the work as it needs to be done,
specifically for Border Patrol. Those people have either been fired or directed to other
tasks, and so there no longer is a staff to do it. So for example, on April 11, when the software
for this entire system failed, we just didn't collect tariffs that day.
There's also the issue at the upper levels.
There's no one to interpret what Trump says.
Remember that the top 1,400 positions across the federal bureaucracy
were basically cut when Trump cleared out everyone,
including the people who are typically not fired between administrations
because they have all the organizational knowledge and technical skills.
They're all gone.
So there isn't a cadre of people at the top that are loyal to Trump
that also have the ability to design these programs.
And even if there was, you know, they'd have to do it
hour by hour. Well, we have seen this before. This reminds me a lot of Argentina, where the Peronist
governments through the 2000s, the 2010s kept changing the rules over and over and over and over and
over again for personal, political, or ideological reasons, and it became easier for everyone
to just find ways to avoid them. See, the problem is, is when you make the rules impossible to follow,
the only way that business people can function
is to have a personal relationship with the people who are enforcing the rules.
The way terrorists work, you self-report, and then there are spot checks.
We have set up the perfect system that will force American importers and businesses
to bribe the people who do the spot checks,
and that is something that will corrode out through the broader system.
This is very Russian 1990s right now.
We're setting up the stage where we're telling our business community that they have no choice but to violate the rules if they are going to function because the rules are almost designed to not be followable. Is that even a word?
Anyway, it would be nice if this all settled down in the near future, but Trump has promised us in the next few weeks we're going to have tariffs on sector products.
So agriculture, car parts, semiconductors, medications, and so on.
As with everything, there is no one in the upper echelons of his administration.
who knows much of anything about these economic sectors, so it's all going to be arbitrary.
It'll all be based on the ideas that Donald Trump is having at the time, based on whatever
data point he happens to find egregious, and there will not be a rules creation system,
but it'll simply be imposed by tweet. No one will know how to follow it,
and it will set us up for an erosion of rule of law throughout our corporate world.
Bluh.
