The Philip DeFranco Show - Candace Owens BANNED, Leaked Texts Expose "Young" Republicans, & The Voting Rights Act Seems Doomed
Episode Date: October 15, 2025Crashing Out #3: https://youtu.be/I5TRWzTNGxA Go to: https://go.trainwell.net/PDS & take the quiz to find your perfect trainer and get 14 days of free training. Head to https://equipfoods.com/PHIL..., use code PHIL to get 20% off your first order, or 35% off your first subscription! Use code “PHIL” for $20 OFF your first SeatGeek order & returning buyers use code “DEFRANCO” for $10 off AND your chance at weekly $500 prizes! https://seatgeek.onelink.me/RrnK/PHIL LISTEN TO THE SHOW iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-philip-defranco-show/id1278424954 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ESemquRbz6f8XLVywdZ2VWATCH CRASHING OUT w/ PHILIP & ALEX Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCergKLoy-Yv9zlPk3XQYK7Q?sub_confirmation=1 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2DkU87umhGH9mH1z24Bi9w?si=6sSdjhVNQjyVeBQDLiXcyg Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crashing-out-with-philip-defranco-and-alex-pearlman/id1843429519 WATCH/LISTEN TO MY NEW PODCAST w/ Hank Green Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2CePXwDrvdQTes844wflKp?si=55a6b6049c4841ed Youtube: https://youtube.com/acw?sub_confirmation=1 iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/in-good-faith-with-philip-defranco/id1827016835 JOIN OUR COMMUNITY 📸Instagram: https://instagram.com/PhillyDeFranco 🐦Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillyd 🎵TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@philipdefranco TODAY’S STORIES 00:00 - Major Fallout After Young Republicans National Federation Telegram Chat Leaks 06:06 - State Dept. Revoked Visas of Those Who “Celebrated” Charlie Kirk’s Death 08:53 - Sponsored by Trainwell 09:56 - Australia High Court Rejects Candace Owens' Visa Appeal 11:52 - SCOTUS Hears Arguments in Case that Could Reshape the Voting Rights Act 16:00 - Sponsored by Equip 17:06 - Trump Admits that U.S. Won’t Benefit from $20B Bailout for Argentina 22:06 - Sponsored by SeatGeek 22:36 - Are We Getting Used to the Chaos of Trump 2.0? THE TEAM Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg, Christian Meeks, Matthew Henry Art Department: William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Chris Tolve, Star Pralle, Jared Paolino ———————————— #DeFranco #CandaceOwens #Asmongold Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Sup, you beautiful bastards.
Welcome back to the Philip DeFranco show you daily dive into the news.
It is Wednesday.
And in fact, there is so much to talk about today, you're getting a double dose.
So after this one of you want to watch me crash out a bit, links to that in the description.
But again, there is so much to talk about, starting with this.
Top young Republicans were just exposed in 2,900 pages of slurs, Hitler praise, and rape jokes.
In a chat, they very much would not want you to see.
In this, coming from Politica, who just released a massive report detailing the contents of a leaked telegram chat that included leaders of young
Republican groups across the country. And over the course of seven months, these these leaders
they exchanged some crazy texts. And the chatting question is called Restore YR War Room and it was
created by this guy, Peter Junta, during his campaign to become chair of the Young Republican
National Federation. Also, just something to mention here because I've seen certain people
characterizing the situation in a certain way that it is just not. The Young Republican National
Federation is not like a group just for high school kids. This is the GOP's 15,000 member political
organization for Republicans between 18 and 40 years old. And in fact, many of the people included in
chat already held positions within the government or party politics. And that includes one who's
actually a state senator. Now as far as a chat mixed in with formal conversations about social
media strategy, logistics, and earning votes were comments from Guinta like, if your pilot is a
she and she looks ten shades darker than someone from Sicily, just end it there, scream the
no-no word. With him also appearing to respond to a question about watching an NBA playoff
game with, I'd go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball. And at one point it appeared that
he made a comment about loving Hitler and saying that anyone voting against his bid for
leadership of the Young Republican National Federation, quote, is going to the gas chamber.
And adding, I'm going to create some of the greatest physiological torture methods known to man.
We only want true believers. But it also wasn't just Gupta saying off the wall shit.
And so you had people like Joe Maligno, who previously identified himself as the general counsel
for the New York State Young Republicans responding to that last comment from Guantta by saying,
can we fix the showers? Gas chambers don't fit the Hitler aesthetic. Also, at one point, the chair of
the Arizona Young Republicans, Luke Mossaman, told the chat, quote, the Spanish came to America
and had sex with every single woman. With a minute,
responding to someone else's comment that sex is gay with quote sex it was raped.
And to that you had Bobby Walker the vice chair of the New York State Young
Republicans at the time responding by saying epic. Right and all of this it's
in the midst of a lot of slurs including slurs about black and Hispanic people as
well as the LGBTQ plus community. For example William Hendrix the Kansas Young
Republicans vice chair being specifically called out for using variations of the N-word
more than a dozen times. And again like this is just a bit. Political reports that
this goes on for roughly 2,900 pages. Right, all of this is it seems like the people involved
were aware that what they were saying was deeply, deeply controversial.
Right, according to Politico, there were occasionally messages about how toxic the chat was
and what the fallout would be if anyone outside of their group were to read it.
Or with Walker a point explicitly saying, if we ever had a leak of this chat, we would be cooked.
And it appears he may be right though, to what degree we'll see.
Because the fallout from this chat, even just a day after Politico's article went up,
it's been substantial.
Hell, at one point, Politico noted in the article that since they began making inquiries into this story,
one member of the group already lost their job and another had a job off a rescinded.
But also, since its publication, both Joe Maligno and Peter Guyunta, they've been removed from their positions.
There have also been calls for the state senator in the chat to resign, and the Kansas Young Republicans was disbanded by the state GOP.
And we've also seen demands for all the people involved to resign from young Republicans, and that includes from the organization itself.
For you, the Young Republicans National Federation putting out a statement on X, hey,
such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.
Those involved must resign immediately from all positions within their state and local young
Republican organizations. We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and
professionalism. You then also saw Republican leaders on the national level chiming in,
quickly condemning the chat and the people in it. For you had a senior advisor for Representative
at least Stefanik, who had previously applauded Guantas leadership saying that she was, quote,
absolutely appalled to learn about the alleged comments made. And adding, according to the
description provided by Politico, the comments were heinous, anti-Semitic, racist, and unacceptable.
If the description by Politico is accurate, Congresswoman Stefonic calls for any New York
young Republicans responsible for these horrific comments in this chat to step
down immediately. You also had Representative Mike Lawler saying something similar in his
own statement, saying the deeply offensive and hateful comments reportedly made in a private
chat among members of the New York State Young Republicans are disgusting, saying they should
resign from any leadership position immediately and reflect on how far they have strayed from
basic human respect and decency. And that sentiment was also echoed by others, including New York
Governor Kathy Hochel and Vermont Governor Phil Scott. But that is not to say that everyone's
on the same page here. Are you at Vice President J.D. Vance, for example, notably not condemning
the chat in its participants and instead drawing in comparison to Jay Jones, who's a candidate for
Attorney General in Virginia.
With him sharing a screenshot of Jones acknowledging, he'd previously said he
hoped the children of the former Republican Virginia House Speaker would die.
With Vance saying, this is far worse than anything said in a college group chat, and the
guy who said it could become the AG of Virginia.
I refuse to join the pearl clutching when powerful people call for political violence.
Right, you also had some coming to the defense of Guinta and friends here, saying that this
is all clearly sarcasm, or at least a lot is.
But with many specifically pointing to Guantza's Hitler comment, saying that it's a clear
response to Democrats calling those on the right Nazis and referring to Trump as the new
Hitler. It's super conservative commentators like Matt Walsh saying, if you actually read the Politico
Hit piece, you'll see that many of the messages are being taken wildly out of context. For example,
the guy who said, I love Hitler was clearly being sarcastic. It's explicitly meant to be a sarcastic
joke. He was saying, yeah, I'm so right-wing, I guess I love Hitler. Basic sarcasm of a kind
deployed by right-wingers all the time. I have theocratic fascist in my bio. Again, Politico made
this the headline of the piece. Fundamentally dishonest, nobody on the right should be giving it any
credibility. But then, you had no shortage of people pushing back against this idea that many or
any of those comments were men as jokes. And that includes big creators in the space who you
might have thought would land somewhere else or you were unsure where they'd land on this topic,
like Asman Gold sang on X. If you think all of these are jokes, you're in for a very bad time
over the next 10 to 15 years. Raiden, it was sarcastic, doesn't appear to be the route that Guantza
is taking right now. Instead, his response to the situation has been an apology for the, quote,
insensitive and inexcusable language in the messages. The we then appeared to undercut that
apology by seeming to imply that the messages may be fake, saying while I take complete
responsibility, I have had no way of verifying their accuracy and am deeply concerned that the
message logs in question may have been deceptively doctored, which definitely is a take.
And one, I'd love to hear your thoughts, opinions, and reactions on along with the rest of this
story. But the next up today, we need to talk about the U.S. announcing that it's revoked visas
for at least six people accused of celebrating Charlie Kirk's death.
With a state department saying in a post, the United States has no obligation to host foreigners
who wish death on Americans.
And while they didn't disclose their names or identities of those who lost their visas,
they did post a threat of commons.
Reporting to a Mexican national who allegedly said that Kirk died being a racist,
he died being a misogynist, there are people who deserve to die,
and saying there are people who would make the world better off dead.
As well as a German national who's accused of justifying Kirk's murder by writing when
fascists died, Democrats don't complain.
Right, in Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, he previously said that he planned on doing this,
and you had tons on the right, very supportive of measures punishing those perceived to have mocked
or celebrated Kirkstep.
But there's also been a ton of backlash and tons of people slamming the Trump
administration for officially revoking visas over this.
Where with free speech organizations like fire, writing that,
you can't defend, quote, our culture by eroding the very cornerstone of what America stands
for, freedom of speech and thought.
And saying the Trump administration must stop punishing people for their opinions alone.
The Supreme Court has been clear that non-citizens have a right to freedom of speech.
In America, no one should fear a midnight knock at the door because of their political views.
Right in this news about the visas, they actually came as Charlie was getting the Presidential Medal of
freedom yesterday. Where we talked about how it was going to happen on the show. And then once the
ceremony actually happened, there were a few standout moments that went viral. Right, moments like this one
where Trump brought up the assassination attempt that he survived. They've rammed vehicles into
federal law enforcement, fired sniper rifles at ice agents, and me, you know. But I was, I made a turn
at a good time. I made a turn at a good time. I turned to the right. Charlie couldn't believe it,
actually. He said, how the hell did you make that turn? I said, I don't know. And then the
This pair of clips where both Trump and Erica Kirk discussed Charlie's feelings about his enemies,
those got attention as well.
He didn't like losing.
And he was able to fight people that were enemies.
And he didn't necessarily love those enemies so much.
You know, I heard he loved his enemies.
And I said, wait a minute.
Is that the same Charlie that I know I'm not sure?
He stood for God when it was costly, but that's what we're called to do.
Surprisingly enough, he did pray for his enemies.
Which is very hard, but he did.
He did.
I, he did.
No one else, I mean, I saw him do it.
No, he never did it in front of anyone else,
but I can attest to that.
Right, and so you had people comparing,
contrasting those clips and takes.
Some saying it came off like Donald Trump was kind of calling BS
on Charlie Kirk actually praying for his enemies.
But of course, most of that,
it's connected to the, the arguments and debates being made around Charlie Kirk's legacy.
Right, which is a conversation being had in addition,
to the one being had around, you know, the government cracking down on people saying things.
Yeah, with all of this, like with anything that stands out in today's show, I'd really
love to know your thoughts, opinions, and reactions.
And then we've got more news to talk about in just a minute, but first, let me say, you know,
I've been working with Trainwell for years.
And here's the truth.
The hardest part of fitness isn't the workout.
It's sticking with it.
Right, and Trainwell, today's sponsor is what helped me.
Right there, the ultimate one-on-one remote personal training service that actually keeps you
accountable.
Forget cookie-cutter workout apps.
Train Well, it pairs you with a real human trainer who builds a plan just for you.
You start with a quick quiz, you'd get matched with the perfect trainer, and boom, you've got someone who actually cares if you'd ghost leg day.
And you have super easy, you can message your trainer any time or switch trainers if you're not vibing.
The motion tracking tech that works with your Apple or Android watch, it checks your form and keeps you from looking like you're inventing a new yoga pose.
So if you've ever struggled with time, motivation, or just not knowing, you know, what to do with the gym, train well's your move.
Because again, it's about long-term fitness, not quick fads.
Think healthy habits that actually stick.
And your trainer helps with workouts and healthier eating habits.
So you're not crushing push-ups just to cancel them out with...
Notchos. So you know, get with your trainer, do your workouts, and feel better. It worked for me.
Right, and to get started, it's as easy as scanning the QR code, or go to go.
Go.trainwell.net slash PDS. Right, and then take that quiz to find your perfect trainer and
get 14 days of free training. The next up in the news, let's talk about this Candace Owens'
drama. Because Australia is now refusing to let Candace Owen step foot on its land,
right with the highest court in their country rejecting a visa challenge that she filed after the country
blocked her from entering last year. And for some important context here, Candice was set to do a speaking
tour in both Australia and New Zealand and November of
But then, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke refused her visa on character grounds,
citing the Migration Act. With that filing claiming, were she to be allowed to enter Australia,
there was a risk she would incite discord in the Australian community or a segment of the Australian
community. And you administer Burke saying that because she is a political commentator,
he examined her views and found they, quote, amounted to extremist and inflammatory comments
towards Muslim, black, Jewish, and LGBTQIA plus communities. With Burke adding that
Australia was already experiencing heightened community tensions and he believed that Candace's presence
would amplify grievances and lead to hostility in violent or radical action.
And then actually, after Australia made their call, New Zealand followed suit and blocked her
visa over there as well.
But a judge later overturned that one and said that she would be allowed citing free speech.
But then, back in Australia, Candace, unsurprisingly, did not agree with the decision,
and she appealed it to the High Court.
And she argued that it violated the implied right of freedom of political communication.
So sort of a free speech claim, but also Australia doesn't have a First Amendment free speech,
right the same way the U.S. does.
But again, now, what we're seeing is that the court rejected her, ruling that the implied
freedom of political communication is not a personal right and it is also not unlimited or absolute and then actually on top of having her visa denied the court ordered Candace to pay the Australian government's costs related to this case as you administer burr calling the court's decision a win for social cohesion and adding inciting discord might be the way some people make money but it's not welcome in Australia Australia's national interest is best served when Candace Owens is somewhere else but also a big thing is that this is actually not the the first high-profile visa denial that Australia has issued on character grounds lately.
In July, they canceled Kanye's visa over his song Hail Hitler and promotion of other Nazi ideology.
But that, you know, it's ultimately where we are with the situation with Candace for now,
and we'll have to wait to see if she responds. I imagine she will very soon.
But the next up today, we should talk about how today could be the day that the Supreme Court is convinced to gut the Voting Rights Act
and, among other things, hand the Republicans up to 19 more House seats.
Right, and at the center of this case is Louisiana's six districts.
Because after the 2020 census, Louisiana made a new congressional map that was quickly taken to court.
And that, because it had one district out of six where black voters had a chance to elect
candidate despite making up 33% of the state's population.
So a lower court said that this violated Section 2 with a Voting Rights Act, which led the
states at a second black represented district.
And as far as, you know, what is Section 2, to keep it simple, section 2 bans racial
discrimination in voting.
And in the case of congressional districts, this means giving minority voters a meaningful
chance to elect their preferred candidates.
So it's meant to effectively ban packing and cracking communities to either concentrate
their voting power into just a single district rather than multiple, or diluting them
across multiple districts.
But then, you had a group of non-African American voters flipping this argument on
head and suing over Louisiana's redrawn map.
And they argued that it dilutes their voting power and that Section 2 violates the 14th and 15th Amendments.
And after a lot of legal back and forth, the case made its way up to the Supreme Court, which first heard arguments back in March.
And at the time, what you saw as Chief Justice John Roberts not seem to be impressed with the 6th District.
Specifically, you know, one of the things that lawmakers are supposed to do is keep districts reasonably compact.
But Roberts, he didn't seem convinced of that and he said, if you look at CD6, what does reasonably compact mean?
It's a snake that runs from one end of the state.
to the other. I mean, how is that compact?
But despite initial skepticism, the court did take the rare move of rehearing the case again today,
which is something that's usually only done in major cases like Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board
of Education. And this time, conservative justices like Brett Kavanaugh, they
signaled that they were interested in hearing more about the argument that Section 2
violates the 14th Amendment. Now, very notably here, there is past Supreme Court precedent
that has been in place for nearly four decades, and it states that representation should be
proportional to racial groups. But, as we've seen, precedent really doesn't matter these days, and despite
Despite that, Kavanaugh hinted that he wasn't happy with Louisiana's map.
Or with Kavanaugh saying that race-based districting puts the U.S. on a most dangerous course.
And that is, he was also concerned about whether states could use race-based maps indefinitely.
Or with him saying and asking today.
This court's cases in a variety of contexts have said that race-based remedies are permissible for a period of time.
But they should not be indefinite and should have an end point.
What exactly do you think the end point should be?
With then lawyers representing black voters in the state saying that the Voting Rights Act
addresses this already since state maps have to redraw their maps every 10 years after a census.
And then you had Justice Sonia Sotomayor arguing that race-based maps are always a thing and said
Race is a part of redistricting always.
Race is always a part of these decisions and my colleagues are trying to tease it out in this intellectual way that doesn't deal with the fact that race is used to help people.
Well, right now we don't know which way the Supreme Court's going to go.
I mean, the impacts here, they could be massive and that is just, that's putting it likely really.
We're removing Section 2, it would heavily limit how powerful the Voting Rights Act is, especially since about 10 years ago,
conservative justices struck down another provision of the law.
And in the long run, I mean, killing section two could mean that as much as 30% of the congressional black caucus and 11% of the congressional Hispanic caucus could lose their districts.
And so that, along with what we've been seeing in the news, it doesn't seem like that could be far off.
I mean, we've talked about Trump's demands that states redraw their districts to get more votes in the upcoming midterms, which then, of course, sparked some blue states to do the same in response.
Right now, depending on which way this case goes, this could be the push that some states want to make it happen.
And actually, with that, North Carolina is now the latest pushing to redraw their men.
Also, you know, all these efforts are facing their own lawsuit.
So even after this Louisiana case is finished, we might be seeing another fight about congressional districts playing out in the court just before the midterm.
You know, while I am personally of the mindset of gerrymandering sucks, I wish no one would do it.
It is feeling like more and more we're headed towards this place of gerrymandering is going to need to happen to try to combat gerrymandering happening.
Like it feels like it's all just playing towards an end game.
Trump and Abbott, they're doing what they're doing in Texas and then that kicked off Newsom in California.
And of course, there's that vote coming up.
And personally, I'll say this part's my opinion.
I think in regards to that in California, I think you have to vote yes.
and Prop 50. It genuinely sucks that we're in this place, but it feels like the only way to
not be fighting with your hands tied behind your back. Really all the high road arguments I've
heard against it, they just fall short. There's no honor in letting a bully take your power
and try to take away your rights. Extraordinary circumstances require extraordinary actions.
And as a move, I hope, is temporary towards a path back to something remotely normal.
And then there's more we've got to dive into in just a minute, but first let me say, you know,
most protein bars, they taste like someone compressed sadness into a rectangle. The prime bars from
Equip Foods right today's sponsor, those actually taste like food, the kind you want to eat,
not just tolerate because you're hungry and desperate. These bars are sold out twice, but
Equip restocked them in full force. Each bar packs 20 grams of pasture raised protein from grass-fed
beef and collagen. There's no way, no soy, and definitely none of those sketchy fillers that,
you know, they sound like failed science experiments. So gut health, handled thanks to colostrum,
nature's complete food for recovery and immunity. Fats from grass-fed tallow and cocoa
butter. The sweetness, dates in honey, which means fuel for your body without the sugar crash. And
Equip test every ingredient for pesticides, heavy metals, and microplastics.
What you see, it's what you get.
You know, I use prime bars post-workout on road trips and just when I want a snack that
doesn't feel like self-sabotage.
And I'll also add, Equip just launched a fresh new look today, new branding and packaging
that finally matches how good these bars actually taste.
Also, just gotta say, if you're a peanut butter lover, they got you covered with the peanut
butter prime bar.
So hey, what are you waiting for?
Get out on this and grab yours by scanning the QR code or heading to equipfoods.com slash fill.
Right, and use code fill for 20% off your first order or 35% off a subscription.
The next up in the news, we've got to talk about Donald Trump and Argentina.
Because Trump has admitted that Americans will not benefit from his administration's $20 billion
bailout for Argentina, aka your tax dollars.
But also, he said that the country won't get that money unless his far-right ally,
his buddy, current President Javier Malay, wins the next election.
Right, because Trump, he loves this guy.
He's described the man as his favorite.
President and Malay actually ended up being one of only two world leaders on stage at Trump's inauguration.
But back in Argentina, he's not quite as popular these days.
because his policies, they've sparked mass protests.
I mean, his administration's been racked by corruption scandals and lawmakers have recently voted to overturn his vetoes.
Right, and all this, it's led to his party losing a key provincial election by a landslide last month.
And this, you know, it's generally being seen as kind of a bad omen ahead of the national midterm elections coming up on October 26th.
Though also, I will say, because I've seen confusion on social media,
Malay himself is not actually due to run again until 2027.
And also, it's not exactly clear which election Trump is conditioning American assistance.
Also unclear are the exact details of this $20 billion.
lifeline, except that it would come in the form of a currency swap with Argentina's central bank.
But what's really important to note is that this was seen as something that might provide a
political boost for Malay. And the Trump administration has made it very clear, like, that was
one of the aims here. You had Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent describing the deal as a bridge
to the election. Also had him saying that he had been in touch with numerous U.S. companies
who intend to make substantial foreign direct investments in Argentina's multiple sectors in the event
of a positive election outcome. And that, it's notable because it's expected that major hedge funds
might benefit financially from this bailout. And those, what you know,
this is crazy what a small world we live in they just so happen to include several that are led
by friends of Besson though of course he's rejected the idea that enriching his buddies has anything
to do with this right he earlier said this month this trope that we're we're helping out
wealth wealthy Americans with interest down there they couldn't be more more faults what we're
doing is maintaining a u.s strategic interest in the western hemisphere
reign with that he also argued that the currency swap of the government plans to offer
Argentina does not amount to a bailout claiming we are
not putting money into Argentina.
But experts, they push back on that, with, for example, a senior fellow at the Peterson
Institute for International Economics saying, they can call it what they want, but it's a bailout.
It's a country in crisis.
It's running out of dollars, and the U.S. is giving the country dollars.
That's a bailout by definition.
But then also, you've had experts pushing back on the idea that this makes any economic sense
at all.
For example, one economist at the University of California comparing it to actions taken by the
Clinton administration to help out Mexico and South Korea, saying, in both cases, there was a
significant risk of financial contagion to other countries.
which is not the case of Argentina today.
And adding in both cases, the U.S. was significantly exposed to instability in the subject country,
either economically or financially.
Neither condition applies today in Argentina.
And then, of course, on top of all that, right, this is happening as the government is shut down
and you have many Americans struggling.
So one, I mean, that's just an issue in general if we care about Americans.
And two, it's become an easy target for Democrats.
With that, you actually had eight Democratic senators last week introducing legislation to block the bailout.
With Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the banking committee and one who helped draft
the legislation saying in a statement, it is inexplicable that President Trump is
propping up a foreign government while he shuts down our own. Trump promised America first,
but he's putting himself and his billionaire buddies first and sticking Americans with the bill.
But then also, you know, while none of this has seemingly changed Trump's mind,
what he may have noticed is that this bailout has seemingly failed to calm the markets
or improve Malay's party's polling numbers.
So when you had Malay visiting the White House yesterday, you actually had Trump seemingly
acknowledging that the U.S. really wasn't getting anything out of this deal.
Very simple. I mean, we don't have to do it.
it's not going to make a big difference for our country.
Trump then trying to draw a parallel between bailing out a foreign country and providing federal funding to American cities.
With him basically saying that just like a New York city run by Zora Mundani wouldn't get his help,
neither would in Argentina run by anyone but Malay.
It's a little bit, it's a great question.
It's a little like New York.
You know, you're reading in Argentina about New York, we have a problem.
We have a communist who's 33 years old, doesn't know a damn thing.
Practically, he's never worked a day in his life.
And he's sort of caught on, right?
And I'm not going to send a lot of money to New York.
I don't have to.
And I'm very generous, and I was always very generous with New York, even when you had opposition there, but I was always very generous.
But I wouldn't be generous to a communist, a guy that's going to take the money and throw it out the window,
because you're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars.
And we're not going to let somebody get into office and squander the taxpayer money from this country.
We're not going to let it happen.
So it's a little bit like that with, if you take a look, Argentina.
If the president doesn't win, if he loses, we are not going to be generous with Argentina.
Which one, I'll just say, it feels crazy to me that Donald Trump says that he's anti-socialist
when he's seemingly letting Zoran Mamdani live rent-free in his head.
And two, when he was talking here, I couldn't feel like it's both,
but I couldn't figure out if it was more a quid pro quo bribe or political threat.
But hey, that is where we are right now.
And so really, as far as what comes next, we'll have to,
see what happens with Argentina's election in a couple of weeks.
Right, and then, depending on the result, we'll see what happens from there.
But then finally, today, I want to end on a different note,
and that is a congratulations and one last thing.
Starting with congratulations to Michael P.
C.C. Geek's latest weekly winner who just snag $500 in tickets and is planning to see Adam Ray.
And also, for everyone else out there, that's right.
Seekeek is still giving away $500 a week in tickets,
and you should definitely answer today if you haven't already.
I mean, you could be the next winner and snag $500 towards seeing your favorite artist,
sporting event or play.
I mean, there's like over 70,000 events to choose from.
And all you got to do is just add code DeFranco to your Siki cat profile for a chance of the weekly $500 prize, no purchase necessary.
But then for our one final thing, I just wanted to share this piece from today's episode of crashing out.
I'm in this weird space now where over the last, I want to say, how long has it been now?
Nine months.
We're like almost nine months, around nine months into this presidency.
Is that a long time or a short time?
I don't know anymore.
It feels like an eternity.
It feels like a very quick eternity.
But it feels like every day, you know, I'd open my phone every week and I would start.
compiling a list of like all the things that are horrifying and this week i would open my phone and
be like oh we don't have a cdc anymore okay that's what they do they just close those things
oh we got rid of the special education for everybody by the order of the CEO of wwe okay that
happens uh fat texas national guard has invaded chicago okay i don't what and like but the
whole time i was just like okay and i closed my phone and just went back to what i was doing
And that's, I think that subliminally has been driving me more crazy.
It's like a dull roar now underneath in the background.
You know what I mean?
Like I'm not, I'm not just grabbing, ah, bark, bark at my own reflection.
But I'm like, something there.
I don't know.
There's something.
Are we getting used to it?
Oh, yeah, right?
I mean, it has to be.
I think, I think it's like the slow grinding down.
And I don't know.
Maybe there will be, I mean, we're, when this goes up, we'll be three days away.
from the no kings protest so maybe there'll be kind of like that spark of like oh yeah that's right
this isn't normal but it's very easy to be like this is i just want to i mean this i just want to
get away from the world i mean this weekend for me i just i just threw myself into family
and consumerism we went to a theme park like you know there's always that kind of thing of like
a lot of americans uh they live in disneyland i like i went to universal studios and i was like
Let me just turn off my brain and let just get into a machine that's going to shake my brain around
to like maybe get the sads and the crazy out.
And that, my friends, is the end of this video.
But there's more to watch from here.
You've got my other new video today.
It's episode three of crashing out of me and Alex.
It's a special one.
And or there's the newest Philip DeFranco show that you might not have seen yet right here.
I've even got links to the pods or the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts in the description.
You know, no matter what you do or how you like getting Phil.
and let me just say thank you for watching. I love yo faces and I'll see you right back here
probably tomorrow maybe 50 50 probably best to turn all the notifications on. It's like a nine
hour travel day but I think I might be able to pull it off.
