The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 11.21 People Freaking Out On Jussie Smollett AGAIN, Brenda Song "Asian Enough" DENIAL, & Israel
Episode Date: November 21, 2019Here’s a good ole long one before we take a Thanksgiving break. Have a happy holiday and eat a lot! SHOP BLACK FRIDAY! Check out https://Ridge.com/DEFRANCO and use code “DEFRANCO15” to get 15% o...ff & free worldwide shipping. Check out TODAY’S Rogue Rocket Deep Dive: https://youtu.be/F2n4MR3GVf8?t=1 Check out the latest A Conversation With Simply Nailogical: https://youtu.be/hdrA3eDipdo Follow On The Podcast Platform Of Your Choice: http://Anchor.fm/aConversationWith We have skeleton and holiday merch galore! Check it out HERE!: http://ShopDeFranco.com ✩ FOLLOW ME ✩ ✭ TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PhillyD ✭ FACEBOOK: http://facebook.com/DeFrancoNation ✭ INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/phillydefranco/ ✩ SUPPORT THE SHOW ✩ ✭Buy Merch: http://ShopDeFranco.com ✭Lemme Touch Your Hair: http://BeautifulBastard.com ✭Paid Subscription: http://DeFrancoElite.com ✩ TODAY IN AWESOME ✩ ✭ Check out https://phil.chrono.gg/ for 63% OFF “Portal Knights” only available until 9 AM! ✭ Gerrymandering Explained: How US Politicians Choose Their Voters: https://youtu.be/F2n4MR3GVf8 ✭ Simply Nailogical On A Conversation With: https://youtu.be/hdrA3eDipdo ✭ Constance Wu & Mindy Kaling - Actors on Actors: https://youtu.be/zgJJZGrV5Cc ✭ Lil Nas X Goes Undercover on Reddit, Twitter and Instagram: https://youtu.be/V_JjNnGUOfE ✭ Chadwick Boseman and Sienna Miller Teach You Slang: https://youtu.be/mDTN3hIa9hA ✭ Chance the Rapper Battles Spicy Wings: https://youtu.be/SB98eQE4KkU ✭ These Grizzly Cubs Don't Know What to Do with Their Food: https://youtu.be/zfELIWmUrHE ✭ Inside a $35M Hollywood Mansion With a 2 Level Glass-Bottomed Pool: https://youtu.be/iG8Rc83iSy4 ✭ Secret Link: https://youtu.be/-vI9X7Au0u0 ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Jussie Smollett Sues Chicago: https://twitter.com/TheRogueRocket/status/1197621068833447936?s=20 ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ Director Denies Brenda Song’s Claim That She’s ‘Not Asian Enough’ to Audition: https://variety.com/2019/film/news/brenda-song-not-asian-enough-crazy-rich-asians-jon-m-chu-denies-claim-1203412173/ Syracuse Chancellor Agrees to Demands: https://roguerocket.com/2019/11/21/syracuse-demands/ Netanyahu Indicted & Israel Election Updates: https://roguerocket.com/2019/11/21/netanyahu-indicted/ ✩ MORE NEWS NOT IN TODAY’S SHOW ✩ South Korea confirms BTS won’t get an exemption from military service: https://roguerocket.com/2019/11/21/bts-military-2 ———————————— Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg Produced by: Amanda Morones Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Cory Ray, Neena Pesqueda ———————————— #DeFranco #JussieSmollett #BrendaSong ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Sup, you beautiful bastards.
Hope you're having a fantastic Thursday.
Welcome back to the Philip DeFranco Show.
And a quick note before we get started.
Next week, with it being Thanksgiving,
I'm taking the whole week off.
I'm using it as an opportunity to see my dad, my family.
I haven't seen them in a while.
I know it is too long for my liking,
although on Wednesday,
I should have an update video of some sort.
Also on the podcast channel next week,
we have a podcast, a conversation with MKBHD.
So look forward to that.
But with that said, buckle up,
hit that like button
and let's just jump into it.
And the first thing we're gonna talk about today
is news around Jussie Smollett,
or as Dave Chappelle calls him, Juicy Smollett.
And Jussie, if you don't know, former Empire actor,
he made headlines back in January when he said
two masked men looped a noose around his neck,
poured bleach on him, and yelled homophobic and racist slurs.
But after an investigation, Chicago police determined
that the attack was staged
by Jussie, who was then indicted on 16 felony counts
of filing a false report.
Now Smollett has maintained his innocence.
Prosecutors also eventually dropped the charges against him
back in March.
This though, notably after he agreed
to complete community service
and forfeit the $10,000 bond he paid following his arrest.
But main point, the reason that we're talking
about this today is that Jussie Smollett
is now countersuing the city of Chicago.
And specifically what I'm talking about
is that Smollett's lawyers filed a two count counterclaim
against Chicago on Tuesday in response to their April lawsuit
because Chicago was suing him,
where the city of Chicago was demanding
that Smollett pay over $130,000
to cover the 1,836 hours of overtime
that was paid to police officers who were working his case.
The city's lawsuit also saying
they intended to seek attorney's fees
and a civil penalty of $1,000 for each of his false claims.
However, Smollett's legal team says the city
is not entitled to any of this,
arguing in part that the city shouldn't be allowed
to hold him liable because of that plea deal, right?
Because the city accepted $10,000 from the actor's quote,
"'Payment in full connection with the dismissal
"'of the charges against him.'"
With the counterclaim adding that the city
cannot seek additional recovery from Mr. Smollett
under the doctrine of accord and satisfaction.
His attorneys also went even further, accusing the city cannot seek additional recovery from Mr. Smollett under the doctrine of accord and satisfaction. His attorneys also went even further,
accusing the city of malicious prosecution,
saying that Smollett suffered humiliation,
mental anguish, and extreme emotional distress
as a result of the city's actions against him,
with a claim also specifically calling out
Chicago Police Department Superintendent Eddie Johnson
and two other detectives, Edward Wodnicki and Michael Theis.
And a counterclaim saying the police released
false and misleading information,
which led media outlets to report that Smollett might have arranged
the alleged attack.
Now in response to this counter suit,
we saw Chicago police issue a statement saying
the city stands by its original complaint
and will continue to pursue this litigation.
With the city adding, the judge in this case
has already ruled in our favor once,
and we fully expect to be successful
in defeating these counterclaims.
Also, another thing that I wanted to point out,
it's kind of interesting timing.
On the same day as Jussie Smollett's counterclaim,
you had Cook County State's Attorney Kim Fox
officially announce that she was running for reelection.
She has four challengers fighting for her spot
and she has the whole outrage over the Jussie Smollett case
hanging over her head.
And the reason for that, if you don't remember,
Fox recused herself from the case before Smollett's arrest,
saying that she did so because she had conversations
about the investigation with one of Smollett's relatives.
But a few months later, her office actually released
documents citing a different reason,
showing that she was advised to withdraw based on unfounded rumors that she was actually related to Smollett. Though. But a few months later, her office actually released documents citing a different reason, showing that she was advised to withdraw
based on unfounded rumors
that she was actually related to Smollett.
Though she disagreed with the advice
and called the rumors racist,
she complied with the recommendation.
Fox's office also faced intense scrutiny
for abruptly dropping the charges against Smollett.
That was just something that left both police officials
and community leaders confused and frustrated.
At the time, Chicago Police Department Commander
Edwin Nicky called the reversal of charges
a punch in the gut and said prosecutors
did not discuss their decision with the police department
prior to announcing it.
You had then Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Superintendent Johnson
speaking out against the decision.
This is without a doubt a whitewash of justice
and sends a clear message that if you're in a position
of influence and power, you'll get treated one way,
other people will be treated another way.
And as far as Fox, she actually even addressed
this situation in a campaign ad,
admitting to mishandling the Smollett case,
but arguing that her opponents are attacking
her personally over it to undercut progress.
Truth is, I didn't handle it well.
I own that.
I'm making changes in my office to make sure we do better.
That's what reform is about.
And once again, one of the reasons
that the timing is really interesting
is with Smollett having this counterclaim
with it getting press.
It all brings back Kim Fox's office recusal or not.
Their decision being used as Smollett's defense.
Yeah, that's where we are with this one.
And of course, I'd love to know your thoughts on this.
And then in quick entertainment news,
let's talk about Brenda Song.
This is a story that's been picking up more and more steam.
It's coming from an interview with Teen Vogue
that was posted yesterday.
There we saw Brenda Song saying that she wasn't picked
to read for Crazy Rich Asians because she was told
she was not Asian enough.
So in that interview, you had Song saying,
the reasoning behind that, what they said was that
my image was basically not Asian enough
in not so many words.
It broke my heart.
I said, this character is in her late to mid 20s
and Asian American and I can't even audition for it?
I've auditioned for Caucasian roles my entire career,
but this specific role, you're not gonna let me do it?
You're going to fault me for having worked my whole life?
I was like, where do I fit?
And then adding, I got myself together and said,
Brenda, there is only one you,
and you can't change who you are.
You can't change your past.
I am so grateful for every job that I've done.
All I can do is continue to put good auditions out there,
do the best that I can, that's all I can ask for."
And obviously there were a number of reactions
following that, but one of the most notable
was we ended up seeing later from Crazy Rich Asians
director John M. Chu who tweeted,
"'Would these words ever come out of my mouth?'
Nope, makes no sense.
I feel horrible she thinks this is the reason.
The fact is I love Brenda Song and am a fan.
I didn't need her to audition
because I already knew who she was."
And also later tweeting about the casting of the film saying,
One of my favorite memories of making Crazy Rich Asians was when we opened the auditions to anyone in the world with our open call.
We watched hundreds and hundreds of videos from very talented people from all over the world.
Made us tear up many times.
But still, following this, you had a number of people responding that songs should have still been offered apart.
Some just confused in general.
People kind of questioning, you know, you said you know who she was, you love her,
but also because you knew her,
that's why you didn't offer her a role.
I don't know.
I guess with this story, I'd love to know.
What do you think?
Then let's talk about what is going on at Syracuse University in New York,
which sort of came to a boiling point last night.
I'm gonna try and break it down.
So over the last few weeks,
there have been a number of racist incidents
occurring on campus.
According to the Daily Orange, a campus newspaper,
racial slurs have been written in buildings at the school.
In one case, reportedly lights were pulled
out of the ceiling in bathrooms,
put into the toilet with the N-word being written
on the light mirror and garbage can.
There's been racist graffiti using slurs
against Asian people and a swastika found
near an apartment building students live in.
You also had a freshman reporting
that racial slurs had been yelled at him.
And you also had the Department of Public Safety
saying that they were investigating an incident
that had recently occurred where a black woman said she had been verbally harassed and called the N-word. This you also had the Department of Public Safety saying that they were investigating an incident that had recently occurred where a black woman
said she had been verbally harassed and called the N-word.
This then resulted in the suspension of a fraternity
because reportedly members were involved in this incident.
And actually on that note, all fraternity social activities
on campus have been suspended.
The four students responsible have also been suspended.
This then continued into Monday when reportedly
a white supremacist manifesto was airdropped
to students at or near the library,
with reports saying that it was actually
the 74 page manifesto written by the suspect
in the shootings in Christchurch, New Zealand,
where 51 people were killed.
Though here investigations have led officials
to believe that this airdrop incident was a hoax,
but still you have students reportedly scared after this
to walk alone, go to campus, or even just be on campus.
But also in response to this,
we've seen a lot happening both on and off Syracuse's campus.
You have government leaders chiming in,
you have presidential candidate Joe Biden who actually went both on and off Syracuse's campus. You had government leaders chiming in, you had presidential candidate Joe Biden
who actually went to law school at Syracuse saying,
"'We are truly in a battle for the soul of this nation
"'and it requires all of us to stand up together
"'as a country against racism and bigotry.
"'We must give hate no safe harbor.'"
We also saw New York Governor Andrew Cuomo
releasing a statement saying,
"'The hateful activities at Syracuse University
"'are most disturbing not only
"'to the Syracuse University community
"'but to the greater community of New York."
And notably here, he also added that he did not believe
that the school's chancellor, Kent Syverud,
had handled the matter, quote,
"'in a way that instills confidence,' and adding,
"'I believe the board of trustees of Syracuse University
"'should immediately bring in an experienced monitor
"'with the relevant expertise to effectively investigate
"'these incidents, clearly communicate the facts
"'with the board and to the State Police
"'Hate Crimes Task Force force and recommend a decisive strategy to address
both the specific incidents and behavior.
With him also saying that he is directing the task force
who had already been assigned to investigate the incidents
to look into the manifesto as well.
And regarding this, he's also not the only one
condemning the chancellor.
You have a number of students upset with him,
saying they think he hasn't done enough
to address the recurring racism at Syracuse.
Many responding to these incidents in protests and sit-ins.
These protests have been peaceful,
though one arrest was made as one student made graffiti
in support of the movement.
As far as the protests, we've seen student group
Not Again SU occupy a campus landmark for a week.
This group has also been specifically leading the fight
against these incidents, also taking charge
and making sure the school takes action.
With their mission statement reading, Not Again SU,
a black student-led movement believes transparency
from the administration is necessary.
The safety of students on this campus,
specifically the safety of underrepresented
and underserved students is paramount.
They also have a list of 19 demands,
which include expelling the students involved
with hate crimes and related incidents,
diversity training for faculty and staff,
hiring more counselors that better reflect
the growing identities of the student body,
allocating $1 million to the creation of a curriculum
that educates the campus on diversity issues,
specifically anti-racism, a 48 hour response
to racially motivated incidents for the school
to not punish students who are participating in sit-ins
and to receive monthly updates on the demands.
And we've seen a lot of support for this movement online.
Good presidential candidate Kamala Harris showing support,
the College Democrats of New York also releasing statement,
as well as the school's high profile basketball team
also backing them on Twitter.
We also saw Not Enough SU yesterday calling
for the resignation of the chancellor
along with other school officials.
Right, and all of that led to a forum
at a campus chapel last night,
where students asked the chancellor
would he agree to the demands.
And according to the Daily Orange,
she responded by saying,
"'If the question is, can I produce agreement
"'to every word at this instant, the answer is I cannot.'"
And according to their report, after he said this,
"'hundreds of protesters then rose out of the pews,
having had enough of what was going on.
They then walked out chanting, sign or resign.
They then made their way to protest outside
of the chancellor's house.
And as of this morning, it appears that these protests
were effective because what we ended up seeing
is that the chancellor released a statement saying,
"'I signed the recommendations presented
by international students and the students
peacefully protesting.
Of the 19 recommendations made by student protesters,
I have agreed to 16 as written,
adding I have suggested minor revisions
to the other three for them to consider.
As far as whether or not the students have agreed
to the changes, not again,
SU shared a photo of his signature
as well as the changes he made,
with many congratulating them on enacting change on campus.
But yeah, ultimately that's a story as it is now.
It'll be interesting to see how this develops,
what other information comes out. Yeah, and of course with this one, I would love a story as it is now. It'll be interesting to see, you know, how this develops, what other information comes out.
Yeah, and of course with this one,
I would love to know your thoughts on it.
And then let's talk about this just massive news
coming out of Israel.
You know, we've touched on this story before
with the back-to-back elections that we've seen.
We've just kind of been waiting for an update.
Today we saw Israel's attorney general
announce that he was indicting Prime Minister
Bibi Netanyahu on bribery, fraud, and a breach of trust
as part of a long running corruption case.
If you want a super detailed version
regarding the charges in the background,
I'll link to our previous coverage.
We even did a deep dive.
But for some quick context,
Israel's Attorney General announced back in February
that he intended to indict Netanyahu on those three charges,
which stem from three different cases.
One of which claims Netanyahu illegally accepted
$264,000 worth of gifts from tycoons
in exchange for lobbying.
Two other cases alleging that he traded favors
for positive news coverage
from an Israeli newspaper and website.
Netanyahu denied those allegations,
calling them fake news and saying that those claims
that were against him were part of a politically motivated
witch hunt by the left and the media.
Right, and this formal indictment is massive
for two reasons.
I mean, first off, it is a first.
It is the first time in Israel's history
that a sitting prime minister has been indicted.
And secondly, it throws Israel's political system,
which really even the nicest way to describe it right now
would be a shit show into even more chaos.
Or if you didn't see our previous coverage,
Israel's entire political system has basically been
up in the air since the first election this year
back in April.
And then what, though?
The last time we talked about the situation
was right after Israel held their second election
in just five months.
And it's been really interesting to see how Netanyahu
has kind of failed these both times.
Because I mean, really, if you look at the situation,
he's gotten so close both times,
but it just, the pieces won't fit together.
Right, and to explain, right, in the first election,
Netanyahu's Likud party and opposition leader,
Benny Gantz's Blue and White party,
each won 35 seats in Israel's 120 seat parliament.
Right, which meant that neither party won
an outright majority of 61 seats,
which meant that they had to build coalitions
with smaller parties until they got to that sweet, sweet 61.
Following the election, even though it was a tie,
Israel's president gave Netanyahu the first shot
at forming the government because he was seen
as the most likely to create a majority.
This because a group of right-wing parties
that were expected to back him
had won a larger block of seats.
But Netanyahu ended up failing to form a coalition
in the 42-day deadline that he was given.
And while today we're talking about firsts,
this was notably the first time in Israel's history
that a prime minister elect was unable to form a government
after an election.
As far as why Netanyahu failed here,
I'll explain it in a second
because he essentially failed the second time
for a similar reason.
The main point, first election, it's a failure.
And instead of giving Gantz or someone else
a chance to form a government,
Bibi pushes through a bill that dissolves parliament
and triggers a second election in September.
And in those September elections,
we see slightly different numbers.
With Gantz's blue and White Party getting 33 seats
to Netanyahu's 32.
Now, despite the fact that Netanyahu got fewer seats,
and he already failed to form a government
just a few months prior,
Israel's president still gave him the first shot
at making a government again.
But one thing was different this time around.
Instead of trying to build a coalition of smaller parties,
Netanyahu tried to form what's known as a unity government.
And under a unity government,
what would happen would be the Likud
and the Blue and White Party would come up
with an agreement to share power and then pool their seats to make a majority. And if you're government, what would happen would be the Likud and the Blue and White Party would come up with an agreement to share power
and then pool their seats to make a majority.
And if you're thinking, that doesn't really make sense,
I find it very unlikely that two rival parties
would come together.
You are not wrong.
Or because even though pretty much everyone,
including Netanyahu and Gantz,
believe a unity government was the only way
to form a majority, there was one huge sticking point.
Gantz said that he would not form a unity government
with Netanyahu as the leader of the Likud
as long as Bibi faced indictment.
But, unsurprisingly, Netanyahu refused to step down.
And I say unsurprisingly because if he stayed on as Prime Minister, he could pass a deal giving himself immunity against any indictments.
And that's a big part of the reason that this has dragged on for so long.
Yeah, really for Netanyahu, this was his last shot and everything was on the line.
Right, and so what we end up seeing is Netanyahu on October 21st announcing that he once again
failed to form a government.
So then at this point, Israel's president
handed the task over to Gantz, who was then given 28 days
to try to just cobble up together a government.
And just yesterday, hours before his deadline,
Gantz announced that he too had failed to build a government.
Now as to why Gantz was unable to make a government,
both Gantz and Netanyahu blame one another.
Speaking yesterday, Gantz slammed Bibi for his insistence
that he maintain his right-wing ultra-religious bloc
rather than trying to create a unity government and saying,
"'I will not cooperate with an effort
"'to turn the majority of people to a hostage
"'being held by a small group of extremists.
"'I will not be prepared to impose a radical agenda
"'on the majority of the people
"'who have chosen differently.
"'And I will not accept the delegitimacy
"'of any part of the Israeli public.'"
Netanyahu, for his part, hit back again,
saying that he had been quote,
"'willing without preconditions
to enter immediate discussions with you even tonight
to form a unity government,'
saying that it was Gantz's failure,
also accusing him of being willing to work
with Arab lawmakers who Bibi called terror supporters."
But then finally, there's also this third player
that has just been absolutely key
in everything that's been going on
and the repeated failures to form a government.
The person we're talking about is Avigdor Lieberman,
the leader of the secular ultra-nationalist
Israel our home party.
Lieberman was once a Netanyahu ally
and even served on Bibi's cabinet in multiple positions.
But he last year denounced Netanyahu,
citing the prime minister's growing dependence
on ultra-orthodox parties.
And like we talked about in the past,
Lieberman's decision not to form a coalition with Netanyahu
after the first election was ultimately the reason
why Netanyahu was unable to form a majority. He's essentially throughout this situation had the ability to be a coalition with Netanyahu after the first election was ultimately the reason why Netanyahu was unable to form a majority.
He's essentially throughout this situation
had the ability to be a kingmaker.
Right, and the reason for that is he was basically
the only chance for either of these two
to form a unity government.
Right, essentially if Netanyahu had the support
of the religious parties,
Lieberman seats could give him a majority.
And then on the other side,
if Gantz had the support of more left-wing parties
as well as the Arab party,
Lieberman seats would give him a majority.
But Lieberman has refused to work
with both the ultra-Orthodox religious parties and the Arab list. Right, and would give him a majority. But Lieberman has refused to work with both the ultra Orthodox religious parties
and the Arab list.
Right, and so with this story, of course,
there is a question of, okay, well, what now?
And the answer is a very, very clear,
huh?
Right, this entire situation puts Israel
in totally uncharted waters.
Right, you have two elections,
three failures to form the government,
indictments against Netanyahu.
It is just an absolute mess.
So we kind of have to focus on, well, what do we know? Well, we know that Israel's parliament has 21 days to get a majority to support Gantz against Netanyahu. It is just an absolute mess. So we kind of have to focus on, well, what do we know?
Well, we know that Israel's parliament has 21 days
to get a majority to support Gantz, Netanyahu,
or some third candidate.
And if parliament can't put together a majority
in the next three weeks,
then Israel will automatically be put
into their third election in less than a year.
That would most likely happen in March of next year.
And right now, many experts are saying
that's the likely scenario.
That said, there's also the question of,
well, what does this mean for Netanyahu?
Well, it's being argued by some that he legally isn't required to step scenario. That said, there's also the question of, well, what does this mean for Netanyahu? While it's being argued by some
that he legally isn't required to step down,
that's only because a prime minister
has never been indicted before.
So even though Israel has a law
that requires indicted ministers to resign,
whether that law applies to a prime minister
hasn't been tested.
Though there, we're already seeing reports
that several lawmakers have said
that they are going to petition the Supreme Court
to remove him from office.
But Bibi, for his part, has made it clear
he does not intend to step down.
Speaking after the indictments were announced,
he told Israelis that they were witnessing an attempted coup
and called on them to investigate the investigators.
And going on to say,
I will not allow lies to prevail.
I will continue to lead this country.
But even if he doesn't step down,
some experts believe that the indictment
could make it far more difficult for him to retain power.
Though it is important here to point out
that Netanyahu has largely kept his popularity
with his base during these last two elections,
even with the charges against him.
But polls have also shown that an official indictment
would change the minds of many, including right-wing voters.
Though I think it's important to note
that how someone thinks they would react to something
is different than how they might actually react
in the moment.
Also, let's say we go to a third election,
Netanyahu does win, he still faces a new legal problem.
It would be the first time he was a candidate
under indictment, which raises questions
about whether or not the president would even give him
a shot at forming a government.
And on top of all that, there were already reports
that some in his own Likud party were wanting
to change leadership after Gantz failed
to form a government.
And already today, we're seeing reports
that a lawmaker in the Likud party has called
for a primary contest for prime minister within the party
and said he would be a contender.
So now there's a possibility that maybe more members
are on board. But ultimately, ultimately right now we kind of just have
to wait and see.
The situation there likely is not going to be any less
of a shit show anytime soon, but we'll definitely keep
our eyes open and see kind of which way it ends up going.
That said, in general, of course, I always love to know
everyone's thoughts.
If you live there or in the area or you have family there
or in the area, I would definitely, definitely love
to know your thoughts
on what's happening right now.
And that is where I'm gonna end today's show.
And hey, if you liked it, let me know.
Hit that like button.
Also, if you're new here,
you want more of these daily dives into the news,
hit that subscribe button.
Definitely tap that bell to turn on notifications.
Also, if you're not 100% filled in,
you're looking for more to watch,
you should definitely check out that brand new podcast
with Simply Nailogical,
or maybe just miss yesterday's Philip DeFranco show.
You wanna catch up, you can click or tap right there to watch either of those. But with that said, of course, as you just missed yesterday's Philip DeFranco show, you wanna catch up, you can click or tap right there
to watch either of those.
But with that said, of course, as always,
my name's Philip DeFranco, you've just been filled in,
I love yo faces, and I'll see you next time.