The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 4.14 Jake Paul Threatens Accuser with Lawsuit & Denies Allegations, KallMeKris & More News
Episode Date: April 14, 2021Go to https://juneshine.com/defranco and use code DEFRANCO to get 20% OFF JuneShine PLUS Free Shipping. Get their Best-Selling 18-pack today SUBSCRIBE to our newsletter! http://www.DeFrancoDailyDo...wnload.com -- Their Midnight Painkiller flavor is 6% alcohol and gets hundreds of 5-star reviews, but you also MUST TRY my favorite Blood Orange Mint! I actually really appreciate not feeling so full after I drink 2 or more of these and I also feel great the next morning! -- WATCH KallMeKris Podcast: https://youtu.be/BTBxSsrACPc WATCH Full “A Convo With” Podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/ACW LISTEN On The Podcast Platform Of Your Choice: http://LinksHole.com WATCH the ACW Clips channel!: https://youtube.com/ACWClips -- 00:00 - New ACW With KallMeKris 00:42 - Jake Paul Denies Allegations 03:35 - Kim Potter Arrested And Charged 04:20 - Sponsor 05:20 - New Report Shows Failures That Led To Jan 6th 07:11 - Biden Pulls Troops -- ✩ SUPPORT THE SHOW ✩ ✭ BUY our GEAR, Support the Show!: http://ShopDeFranco.com ✭ Lemme Touch Your Hair: http://BeautifulBastard.com ✭ Paid Subscription: http://DeFrancoElite.com ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Kim Potter Charged: https://www.axios.com/kim-potter-daunte-wright-charges-315c1eb1-7e32-46d5-a901-3c5aace733b7.html Jake Paul Denies Allegation: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/14/jake-paul-denial/ Capitol Police Were Told to Hold Back Ahead of Jan. 6: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-report.html ✩ STORIES NOT IN TODAY’S SHOW ✩ Businesses & Celebrities Join Growing Calls Against Restrictive Voting Efforts: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/14/business-celeb-vote-letter/ Texas Students Created Snapchat Group To ‘Slave Trade’ Black Classmates: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/14/texas-students-snapchat-group/ Egypt Seizes Ship That Blocked Suez Canal Until Owners Pay Nearly $1 Billion: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/14/egypt-seizes-ever-green/ —————————— Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg, Maxx Enright Produced by: Amanda Morones Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Cory Ray, Neena Pesqueda, Brian Espinoza Production Team: Zack Taylor ———————————— #DeFranco #JakePaul #KallMeKris Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The world's on fire and I am tired.
Let's talk about that.
Good mythical morning.
I got a fantastically depressing
and exhausting show for you today.
And so before we jump into it,
while you hit that like and or subscribe button,
you should know that after today's show,
you should go to youtube.com slash ACW
and watch my brand new podcast
with the fantastic Call Me Chris.
She's blown up over the past year
with now 27 million plus followers on TikTok.
Growing really everywhere.
At a fantastic time, I think you'll love her too.
Check it out, youtube.com slash ACW.
But with that said,
welcome back to the Philip DeFranco Show.
Not Good Mythical Morning, he was lying.
But yeah, let's just jump into it.
And the first thing that we should talk about today
is that Jake Paul has now responded
to the sexual assault allegation
that was levied against him last week,
denying that it ever happened.
That accusation, of course,
coming from TikToker Justine Paradise,
saying that this happened back in 2019.
Right, and after this, for several days,
Jake didn't respond to this.
He just kept posting on social media,
seemingly ignoring the claim.
But yesterday we ended up seeing his attorney
responding to the allegations,
saying in a statement to TMZ,
"'While others have already begun begun to debunk the claim
alleged against him,
our client categorically denies the allegation
and has every intention of aggressively disproving it
and pursuing legal action against those responsible
for the defamation of his character.
Jake Paul then putting out a statement himself on Twitter
saying that this is a topic that he takes seriously
and her claim is 100% false, adding,
not only have I never had any sexual relationship
with this individual,
but this claim is solely a manufactured accusation
and a blatant attempt for attention
during a highly visible fight week.
With him also saying that he will pursue legal action
and continuing,
this individual is directly using the attention
from her social media posts and video
to promote her adult content website
and Amazon shopping list.
And adding, at the time of her story,
I was in a relationship
and as someone who was a mama's boy growing up,
I respect women and mothers more than anything.
I most certainly have never laid a finger
on a girl without their consent.
I will fight this to the end to prove my innocence.
This isn't the first preposterous allegation
made against me in my career,
and it most likely won't be the last.
With him ultimately closing by saying
that dealing with liars, fake news, and false accusations
is part of his job and he won't back down.
Following all of that, we saw Justine herself
responding on an Instagram story, criticizing his statement,
writing, I wasn't even aware
that I still had an Amazon wishlist.
I just checked and there were literally six items on it.
I am not looking for gifts or money.
I made it very clear that all I wanted from him
was an apology and for him to stop doing this to people.
With her also claiming that a minor came forward to her
who also had a similar experience with Jake.
With her then thanking the people who have stuck up for her.
You also have the likes of Julia Halbanel,
who describes herself as a personal trainer,
a gym instructor, a financial dominatrix,
responding to Jake Paul's statement in an Instagram story
saying, never touched a girl without consent?
Hmm, crazy, not what I heard
from a friend's experience with you.
And that is ultimately where we are with this story.
We have to wait and see what other developments
we're gonna see.
Is there any more evidence?
Are there other stories?
And while definitely we've seen a lot of people
throwing out their opinions on this saying,
this person's lying, this person's lying.
One of the interesting conversations and debates
that's popped up is Jake Paul and his team
pursuing legal action.
Are you people here that think that Jake is telling the
truth that she is lying saying yes,
that that's exactly what he needs to do.
Go after her legally.
Make an example out of someone that is making a false claim
because false claims hurt actual victims.
But on the other side of this, you have people saying,
no, Jake Paul's denial is BS, he is lying.
This young woman bravely is telling the truth,
even though she knew she was gonna get kind of piled on.
This is an act of legal and monetary intimidation
by an abuser to his victim.
And so while we wait to see what happens
from a legal standpoint, what stories come out,
what evidence comes out,
I do wanna pass a question off to you.
What are your thoughts on this whole situation right now?
And specifically regarding the legal action
that's being talked about here.
What camp do you land in?
Are you somewhere in the middle?
I'd love to know.
And then we should talk about a big update
around the death of Daunte Wright,
who of course was shot and killed by a police officer
in Minneapolis on Sunday.
With the big news today being that Kim Potter,
who shot and killed Daunte Wright,
has now been arrested and charged
with second degree manslaughter.
A charge that in Minnesota carries a maximum penalty
of 10 years in prison and a $20,000 fine.
Now, obviously we're gonna have to wait
and see what happens with all of this,
and every situation is different,
but in a New York Times review
of what people have referred to as a weapon confusion case,
right, you had the chief of police saying
that it appeared that Kim Potter thought she had the taser.
She shouted taser, taser, taser,
actually shot Dante with a gun.
In the New York Times review of those 15 cases,
they found that the police shooting people
were only indicted five times with three getting convicted.
But you know, the news of this charge just coming out now,
and we're gonna have to wait to see what happens next.
But from that, let's pay some bills
and thank the fantastic sponsor of today's show, Juneshine.
And if you didn't know, Juneshine is a hard kombucha
made with real organic ingredients
with surprisingly low sugar.
Started by a team of artists and creatives,
Juneshine is the better for you alcohol
that's refreshing, gluten-free,
and easy on the digestive system thanks to the probiotics.
Their midnight painkiller flavor
has hundreds of five-star reviews and is 6% alcohol.
Though the new chili mango is easily my favorite,
though you can never go wrong with a glass of blood orange mint either. Really appreciate the not feeling It's a five star reviews and it's 6% alcohol. Though the new chili mango is easily my favorite though.
You can never go wrong
with a glass of blood orange mint either.
Really appreciate the not feeling so incredibly full
after drinking a few, still feeling fine the next morning.
Junshine uses green tea and honey instead of malted grains
and sugar for a smoother, less acidic taste.
They kind of consider themselves the champagne of kombucha.
Junshine is one of the only, if not the only,
hard kombucha that delivers nationwide,
and it's only $2 per can with their bestseller 18-pack.
So what are you waiting for?
Go to juneshine.com slash defranco
and use code defranco to get Juneshine's best-selling
18-pack for 20% off plus free shipping.
Seriously, even if you're not a kombucha drinker,
I haven't been, try it, trust me.
And then we should definitely talk about this new report
from the US Capitol Police Inspector General.
The report is titled,
Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6th, 2021
Takeover of the US Capitol.
It's 104 pages and has been described
by the New York Times as quote,
"'The most searing portrait yet of the lapses
"'and miscalculations around the most violent attack
"'on the Capitol in two centuries.'"
And according to the outlets who viewed the publication,
the Inspector General found that Capitol Police
had more clear advance warnings about the attack than were previously known to the outlets who viewed the publication, the inspector general found that Capitol police had more clear advance warnings about the attack
than were previously known to the public.
This including explicit intelligence
about the potential for violence warning
that Congress itself is the target.
In fact, the police department's own intelligence unit
warned three days before that the Trump supporters
spurred on by his false election claims
were targeting Congress and could become violent.
Those concerns were also relayed to USCP
by an FBI field office, as was a warning
from the Department of Homeland Security
that the agency had found a map of tunnels
that run under the Capitol on pro-Trump message boards.
But despite that, the watchdog reportedly found
that when an operations plan was written,
police leaders included, quote,
"'No specific known threats related
to the joint session of Congress.'"
Beyond that, the report also allegedly found
that when the mob did reach the Capitol,
USCP leadership directed a special crowd control unit
not to use some of its most effective
crowd control techniques,
which prevented them from containing the mob.
And in addition to all of that,
the officers were also given
defective protective equipment and expired ammunition.
Right, and all of this is incredibly significant
because while the Capitol Police have long been accused
of not being properly prepared,
this report is the clearest and most in-depth piece
of information so far on how big the failures were.
And as for what happens next,
you had the watchdog reportedly listing more than a dozen
recommendations, including new training,
addressing communication failures, and centralizing intel,
with some lawmakers from both sides saying that they hope
to use the report's findings to better secure the Capitol.
But given the polarizing nature of increased security
among Republican leaders who fought to remove security,
which resulted in another attack that left one officer dead,
it's unclear what will happen.
And then we should definitely talk about today,
President Biden announcing that he will withdraw
all American troops from Afghanistan
by the 20th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks
that of course drew the United States into its longest war.
And this decision comes as Biden is nearing
the May 1st deadline set under the February 2020 peace deal by the Trump administration to bring the troops home from longest war. And this decision comes as Biden is nearing the May 1st deadline set under the February 2020 peace deal
by the Trump administration to bring the troops home
from the war.
A war that has killed nearly 2,400 troops,
injured or killed nearly 100,000 civilians
and cost about $2 trillion.
Now with all of this, Biden had previously said
that it'd be hard to meet the date after taking office,
but even with the extended timeline,
many experts and defense officials
have warned against this move.
When the US first entered the war
to oust the Taliban government,
which was harboring Al-Qaeda militants involved
in planning the 9-11 attacks,
the Taliban was removed within months,
but the group still had support in parts of the country
and steadily regained territory and strength.
And now, almost two decades later,
the group is the strongest that it's been
since the 2001 invasion.
And in fact, according to reports,
it has influence or control over half the country.
And what's more, the situation has gotten worse
in recent months after Trump,
during his last week in office,
reduced the official number of troops in Afghanistan
to 2,500, which is the lowest level since 2001.
As the US has scaled down its operations,
the Taliban has taken control over major highways,
tried to cut off cities and towns and surges
that have exhausted Afghan security forces.
Violence has also ramped up in recent months.
In fact, according to a UN report released just today,
nearly 1800 civilians were killed or wounded
in the first three months of the year,
which is a nearly 30% increase
from the same period last year.
Now, as far as what this will mean for the US domestically,
US intelligence agencies have said
that they do not believe that Al-Qaeda
or other terrorist organizations present
an immediate threat to strike the US from Afghanistan.
And while reportedly that assessment has played a big role
in Biden's decision to withdraw US forces,
many experts are now more concerned
about how the move will impact Afghanistan and its citizens.
In fact, the Pentagon has warned
against removing American troops from the region
until Afghan security forces,
which the US has been funding and training
for the last two decades,
can effectively fight back against the Taliban.
So as a result, critics of the plan have argued
that the withdrawal will leave the forces,
which have limited capabilities and resources,
totally in the dust.
Beyond that, many also worry that this move
could undermine the entire goal of the 2001 invasion
in two different ways.
First, because the Taliban has led Al-Qaeda operatives
remain in the country,
who could become emboldened once the US troops leave.
And second, because some experts and Afghan politicians
have said that withdrawing from the country
without a solid peace deal in place,
they could very well just end up with concentrating
more power in the hands of the Taliban.
Right, after a long delay following the US agreement
in February of last year, peace talks between
the Afghan government and the Taliban
finally started up in September.
But those talks have since stalled partly
due to Biden's win and the anticipation
of a possible change in policy under the new administration.
While other countries have recently made moves
to restart the talks,
there are a number of possible options on the table
and nothing is set in stone.
And you have American commanders who have long said
that a peace deal with the Taliban
is the best security measure for the US,
have argued that the US will need to use the promise
of withdrawing their forces as a condition for a good deal.
But now they would see this as the US
taking a major bargaining chip off the table,
causing concerns that if a deal is struck,
the already weakened Afghan government
will make key concessions to the Taliban.
That in turn has promoted many Afghan citizens
who oppose the Taliban to worry that if the group
secures a role in a power sharing agreement,
it can eventually take over the government.
Then reimpose the harsh rule that it imposed
before the US removed it in 2001,
particularly on women who were basically barred
from public life.
So with this announcement,
we've seen a lot of political backlash, in fact, particularly on women who were basically barred from public life. So with this announcement, we've seen a lot of political backlash.
In fact, from both sides, though,
particularly from Republicans like Lindsey Graham, who said,
"'It is insane to withdraw at this time,
"'given the conditions that exist on the ground
"'in Afghanistan.'
And adding, "'A full withdrawal from Afghanistan
"'is dumber than dirt and devilishly dangerous.'
President Biden will have, in essence,
canceled an insurance policy against another 9-11."
But on the other side, we've seen Democrats arguing
that the US presence in the region is just not helping.
If we base removal on condition-based approaches,
we will never leave.
With many arguing that the plan is actually careful
and will still emphasize diplomatic efforts in the region
while simultaneously removing the US
from a highly unpopular and expensive war.
This, including the likes of Chuck Schumer,
who praised the plan today, saying,
"'The president doesn't want endless wars.
"'I don't want endless wars,
"'and neither do the American people.'"
And it's refreshing to have a thought out plan
with a set timetable instead of the president
waking up one morning, getting out of bed,
saying what just pops into his head,
and then having the generals having walked it back.
Now, as far as how leaders in Afghanistan have responded,
the country's president tweeted today
that he had spoken to Biden and emphasized
the two nations would continue to work together,
and adding, "'Af, Afghanistan's proud security
and defense forces are fully capable
of defending its people and country,
which they have been doing all along.
But at the same time, the Taliban has focused more
on the fact that the initial timeline has been delayed
with a spokesperson saying,
we are not agreeing with delay after May 1st.
Any delay after May 1st is not acceptable for us.
Right now, it is unclear how that stance
might affect the situation,
especially when it comes to peace deal negotiations.
Well, obviously with this story,
we're gonna have to wait and see what happens.
I mean, there are big concerns for what's gonna happen
in the Middle East this year.
And this, because according to the US intelligence
community's annual threat assessment report
that was released yesterday,
"'Ongoing conflicts, economic crises,
and the fallout from COVID-19 will likely destabilize
several countries in the Middle East in 2021
and could even put some on the brink of collapse.
According to the report, as noted by Axios,
Iran will take risks that could escalate tensions
and threaten US and allied interests in the coming year,
but will attempt to avoid a direct conflict
due to concerns about the US response.
Sparring between Iran and rivals in the region will continue.
In Iraq, the government will continue to struggle
to fight ISIS and to control Iran-backed Shiite militias.
In Libya, the interim unity government will face
enduring political, economic, and security challenges
that will make reconciliation very difficult.
And in Syria, the crisis will continue for years to come
and President Bashar al-Assad will struggle
to reestablish control over the entire country.
And ultimately with this story, and honestly,
anything that stood out to you today,
I'd love to know your thoughts in those comments down below
because this is the end of the video.
As always, thank you for watching, liking, subscribing,
all the good stuff.
If you're looking for more to watch right now,
I got you covered with that brand new podcast
with Call Me Chris,
or maybe you just missed yesterday's show,
you wanna catch up, click right there
or in the top description.
But with that said, of course, as always,
my name's Philip DeFranco, you've just been filled in.
I love yo faces and I'll see you tomorrow.