The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 4.20 The Truth About My Son Mark Rober Backlash, DEREK CHAUVIN FOUND GUILTY, & More News
Episode Date: April 20, 2021Go to https://trynoom.com/phil and take your free 30-second quiz! Thank you #noom for sponsoring today’s video! SUBSCRIBE to our newsletter! http://www.DeFrancoDailyDownload.com -- WATCH KallMeKri...s Podcast: https://youtu.be/BTBxSsrACPc WATCH Full “A Convo With” Podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/ACW LISTEN On The Podcast Platform Of Your Choice: http://LinksHole.com WATCH the ACW Clips channel!: https://youtube.com/ACWClips -- 00:00 - Fat Boy Summer 00:54 - Mark Rober Backlash 06:07 - Sponsor 06:57 - Tesla Crash Being Investigated 09:34 - Chauvin Verdict and Maxine Waters 11:54 - Florida Governor Enacts New Anti-Protest Bill -- ✩ SUPPORT THE SHOW ✩ ✭ BUY our GEAR, Support the Show!: http://ShopDeFranco.com ✭ Lemme Touch Your Hair: http://BeautifulBastard.com ✭ Paid Subscription: http://DeFrancoElite.com ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Mark Rober Faces Backlash Over NEXT For Autism Fundraiser: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/20/mark-rober-faces-backlash/ Federal Officials Investigating Tesla Crash: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/20/tesla-investigation-texas/ Judge in Chauvin Trial Says Maxine Waters’ Remarks Could Be Cause for Retrial: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/20/chauvin-judge-rep-waters/ Florida Enacts Nation’s Strictest Anti-Protest Law: https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/gov-desantis-signs-floridas-anti-riot-bill-into-law/2431822/ ✩ STORIES NOT IN TODAY’S SHOW ✩ Netanyahu Loses Key Vote in Knesset and First Step in Losing Power: https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/20/netanyahu-loses-key-vote-in-knesset-and-first-step-in-losing-power/ —————————— Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg, Maxx Enright Produced by: Amanda Morones Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Cory Ray, Neena Pesqueda, Brian Espinoza Production Team: Zack Taylor ———————————— #DeFranco #MarkRober #DerekChauvin Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
So I just read this article from Buzzfeed with the headline,
the pandemic has made summer body pressure even worse.
And to that, I say, no way.
I'm about to have an unapologetic fat boy summer.
Summer body pressure?
I just spent an entire year of my 30s stress eating
through a once in a lifetime pandemic
and a generation defining election.
No.
Granted, over the past few months,
I've been taking better care of myself, working out more.
I'm aiming for a better tomorrow, but it's gonna take time.
And yeah, in the meantime, I'm built like a Squishmallow,
but that's perfect for squeezes and hugs.
Yeah, give yourself the time and the grace
because a lot of us weren't thriving,
we were just surviving.
But with that said, welcome back
to the Philip DeFranco Show, your daily dive into the news.
It is Tuesday, April 20th, 2021.
Definitely hit that like button.
Also subscribe, one lucky subscriber
for the month of April will be getting $5,000.
But with that said, let's just jump into it.
And the first thing that we're gonna talk about today
was easily one of the most requested stories.
It's in the world of online entertainment, business,
charity, and that is the news around Mark Rober.
And so for those that don't know,
Mark Rober is one of the biggest YouTubers on the planet.
Pretty much anything that he releases
on his YouTube channel gets 20 to 100 million views.
A lot of his content is about cool sciency things,
cool engineering stuff that also has
a very interesting story with a ton of people
that have come to know him for his yearly glitter bomb videos
where he essentially trolls people who steal packages
from people's front doors.
But his most recent video was different
because he allowed people into his real life
with a video titled, The Truth About My Son.
In the video, he shares that his son is autistic
and he says that he's normally very private about his life
and his child because he wants to protect his son.
But also saying that he wanted to share his son's story
because he feels so lucky to have him.
And in the video, he explains a little bit
about what autism is.
He introduces the stories of other people
who also have autism and announced his fundraiser
with Jimmy Kimmel.
With that fundraiser being called Color the Spectrum
and the proceeds going to a charity called Next for Autism.
And essentially he's gonna be doing this massive live stream
with a whole slew of stars on April 30th to raise money.
With some of the celebrities participating being Mr. Beast,
Jack Black, Charlie and Dixie D'Amelio,
Andy Samberg, Paul Rudd, and more.
Actually, so far, according to the fundraising tab
on YouTube, just from the announcement video,
the event has already made $858,000.
And while the video itself on YouTube
has received almost universal praise,
with 1.6 million likes and only 8.4 thousand dislikes.
But, Mark is now facing a lot of backlash.
A lot of it really seems to be centered around Twitter,
with a lot of people speaking out about Next for Autism,
saying they're not a worthy cause to give money to
for multiple reasons.
Some saying they don't like the charity's ties
to Autism Speaks, which previously had Curing Autism
in its mission statement, and many believe the group
still tries to find cures.
But most in the community don't see it as something
that needs a cure, so people have been calling out
Next for Autism because they believe that,
like Autism Speaks, they have funded that as well.
Additionally, people have pointed out that Next
is tied to the Center for Autism and the Developing Brain,
which is researching and enhancing treatment options
in their mission.
That center has also been accused of trying to prevent
autism with many sharing this screenshot
where prevention is in their mission statement,
though it is worth noting it's not there now.
Others saying that Next for autism supports a practice
called Applied Behavioral Analysis,
which is a therapy that targets and changes
certain social skills that many have described
as conversion therapy for people with autism.
And finally, some just didn't like Mark's video
about his son and the way that he painted autism.
You also have a change.org petition getting some traction
with that petition aiming to stop the fundraiser
saying that Next for Autism supports eugenics
and other extremely harmful ideologies
that all come down to the sole purpose
of ending the existence of autistic people.
And saying that no one involved in the organization
or event are from the autistic community
and there are better organizations
that do more to help autistic people.
And so far, it does appear that this vocal backlash
has had an impact on the event.
Are you the likes of Rhett and Link
announcing that they were no longer participating
in the event?
But also for their part,
we have seen Next for Autism putting out a statement
saying there has been some outrageous misinformation
circulating about Next for Autism, its mission, methods, andThere has been some outrageous misinformation circulating about Next for Autism,
its mission, methods, and partners,'
and saying, "'Our mission has never been the cure
or prevention of autism.
In fact, Next was created to fill a void.'"
Adding that, "'At the time it was formed,
most groups were trying to fund biomedical research,
while Next was focused on school services.'"
Also adding that,
"'Their partnership with groups like Autism Speaks
are to fulfill their mission of expanding access
to programs and services.'"
And adding,
"'Anyone using these partnerships
to draw a line from Next to eugenics
or anything related to the prevention and cure of autism
is doing an enormous disservice to the people we serve
by spreading this gross untruth.
Also regarding applied behavioral analysis,
they said that the methodology has changed over the years
and bears no resemblance to the conversion therapy
like treatments that people are claiming the group supports.
Noting that they're working on getting more representation
in the group and are committed
to including more autistic board members in the future.
With Rober himself also tweeting last night,
"'In my video I mentioned there is a services cliff
after an autistic person graduates from high school.
My son is almost there.
Every last penny raised from Color the Spectrum
will go towards helping that transition.
The three buckets below are the extent
of how the money will be used,
and they are showing work, home and social.
Right, Robert there is seemingly trying to put people's
minds at ease as far as what the money donated
is actually going to go to.
Essentially saying that the money isn't going towards
an ABA program or curing people of autism.
It's about helping people that are in high school
transition to being an adult because the services drop off.
And I mean, ultimately that is where we are right now.
And as far as my opinion on this,
I don't fully know right now.
I will let you know, I have a Mark Rober bias.
From everything I've seen, he's an awesome good guy.
You talk to anyone in the community,
almost everyone will universally say that.
And I watched this video and I think that Mark Rober
is just trying to do something good here.
And for me personally,
when I watched that adorable ass video with his son,
it doesn't come off in any way that he's saying,
I need to cure my son, that we need to cure autism.
With it seeming like to me, like he's saying,
I love my son as is, but I'm very concerned
for people that may be in his position that, you know,
they're not as fortunate as Mark Grover.
We need to think about that transitionary type of period.
Also, he's the kind of guy I would normally
just give the benefit of the doubt
that he's done his research into whatever he is touching.
Meanwhile, I do want to be sensitive to people
that are making claims against this charity,
many saying that they are autistic themselves,
while at the same time acknowledging
that the charity has refuted claims, denied things.
Personally, I'm just trying to use the situation
as a way to kind of educate myself on the whole thing.
I mean, I didn't even know there was a debate between
is it okay to say autistic person or a person with autism
and also what the people it's meant to describe want.
But yeah, with that said,
based off of what we've seen so far,
I would love to know your thoughts
and why you have those thoughts in the comments down below.
But from that, I want to take a second
to thank the fantastic sponsor of today's show, Noom.
If you've watched my podcast,
you know that I've mentioned Noom a few times
as a new and different way to lose weight.
If that's what you're looking for, get healthy,
achieve your goals using proven
cognitive behavioral therapy tools and practices.
Personally, I use Noom because I've been trying
to develop healthier habits and to be honest,
I feel better about myself when I'm actually able
to keep some sort of a schedule.
And Noom feels different because it works
by leveraging psychology and science
to help people live healthier lives.
Right, strive for progress, not perfection.
Basically just do what works for you,
which is the type of encouragement I find helpful
as I work on my daily habits.
With articles and real life coaches to support you,
the program reminds me that making better choices
takes practice and I just gotta keep practicing.
Basically, it's the pep talks, motivation, support,
and reminders that you need when life gets away from you.
So if you wanna check it out,
head on over to trynoom.com slash phil
and take Noom's 30 second quiz for free
to create a custom program for you.
And then let's talk about Tesla, right?
So federal agencies are now investigating
whether or not an autopilot feature is to blame
for a deadly Tesla crash that happened over the weekend.
And so what we know there is that incident happened
around 1130 Saturday night, just outside Houston.
You got a Model S running off the road at a high speed,
crashing into a tree, killing both men inside the car.
And according to local authorities,
no one was behind the wheel,
with one man reportedly in the rear of the car
and the other in the front passenger seat.
And alongside that, Constable Mark Herman noted
that the fire caused by the crash took hours to put out.
With the madding that normally would have taken a matter
of minutes, but instead 30,000 gallons of water were needed.
Right, so there it raised a concern
about the batteries being used in electric cars
because while generally safe, they can also result
in what is referred to as a thermal runaway, right?
If the car crashes at a high speed.
But as far as the autopilot feature goes,
according to testimony from the men's wives,
just minutes before the crash, both men had been talking
about going for a drive as well as the car's autopilot feature.
So while it has not been 100% confirmed, there is a decent amount of evidence to suggest that
they may have been using this feature at the time of the crash. But we've also seen a lot of people
unconvinced, including one person who tweeted, this doesn't make sense. With that person then
citing a number of the autopilot safety features, including that seats are, quote,
weighted to make sure there is a driver, hands must be on steering wheel every 10 seconds
or it disengages."
And that autopilot doesn't go over the speed limit.
We also saw Tesla CEO, Elon Musk,
directly replying to that person,
saying,
"'Your research as a private individual
is better than professionals.'"
Data logs recovered so far show autopilot was not enabled
and this car did not purchase full self-driving.
Moreover, standard autopilot would require lane lines
to turn on, which this street did not have.
However, in replies to that comment, you had users sharing dozens of videos of people appearing to have autopilot would require lane lines to turn on which this street did not have. However, in replies to that comment,
you had users sharing dozens of videos
of people appearing to have autopilot activated
without anyone in the driver's seat.
Others claiming that autopilot can be enabled
without lane markings and will go over the speed limit.
One Duke researcher also citing her publication,
which found that in 30% of trials,
Tesla vehicles drove autonomously for nearly 30 seconds
on extreme curves that lacked even a single lane marking.
But no matter the online discourse that we're seeing,
as of now, local authorities say
that they plan to issue search warrants on the data,
which should tell them whether or not autopilot was on.
And as part of a federal response,
both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
and the National Transportation Safety Board
have also said that they're sending out teams
to investigate the crash.
And very notably, this is all coming
after the NHTSA said last month
that it's investigating nearly two dozen Tesla crashes involving
either confirmed or suspected use of autopilot.
And as the Washington Post has also pointed out,
this could be a sign that regulation is coming.
The outlet noting that agency critics say regulations,
especially of Tesla, are long overdue
as the automated systems keep creeping
toward being fully autonomous.
And adding at issue is whether Musk has oversold
the capability of his systems by using the name autopilot
or telling customers that full self-driving
will be available this year.
There, as far as Tesla itself goes,
it does warn drivers that they still need to pay attention
and be ready to take control of their vehicle
even when using autopilot.
And then we should definitely talk about,
I mean, it's the reason that today's show is late.
We should talk about the murder trial of Derek Chauvin
because the verdict has come in
and the verdict from the jury was guilty on all counts.
Guilty of second degree murder, third degree murder,
and second degree manslaughter.
And if I can insert two personal notes here,
one, I'm so relieved, but also two,
isn't it kind of ridiculous that we had to be this nervous?
That we all saw what happened,
but we had so much doubt
that justice would actually be served?
Also with this story,
we need to remember
that it is not over yet.
One, we still obviously have to wait to see the sentencing.
And two, we should also mention following yesterday's
closing arguments that Chauvin's lawyer, Eric Nelson,
asked for a mistrial.
With Nelson arguing the comments made
by representative Maxine Waters over the weekend,
where she said that protesters should quote,
"'Stay on the street' and quote,
"'Get more confrontational.'"
Right, if Chauvin is acquitted,
amounted to threats and intimidation against the jury.
And while Judge Peter Cahill ultimately dismissed
that request saying that he didn't believe
that her remarks would prejudice the jury,
he also added, I'll give you that Congresswoman Waters
may have given you something on appeal
that may result in this whole trial being overturned.
And immediately we saw a ton of Republicans
seizing on this, condemning Waters
and accusing her of inciting violence.
This including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy,
who said that he was introducing a resolution to censure
Waters, which in politics speak,
essentially means a public reprimand.
But just this afternoon, the House blocked that measure
along party lines.
Additionally, we've also seen numerous people
defending Waters, claiming that she was not inciting violence
like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
who said that she was talking about confrontation
in the manner of the civil rights movement,
with many others echoing that on Twitter,
arguing that in fact, by contrast,
McCarthy himself spread Trump's false election claims
that literally incited an insurrection.
Some also taking aim directly at Judge Cahill,
saying that he was undermining Waters' right to free speech.
Also noting that while the judge ended each day
warning the jury to not pay attention to the news,
he also didn't sequester them from the get-go.
And finally, others arguing that her remarks
are not at all grounds for appealing a case,
with one user writing that if Waters' statement
is used to overturn a guilty verdict for Chauvin,
courts are gonna have to go back and revisit
every single case where Donald Trump made a comment
about pending trials for four years when he was in office.
But ultimately, that is where we are with this story now.
It's still a developing situation.
We have to see, once again, what happens with the sentencing,
what the public reaction is going to be,
because I'm filming this just as it was announced. So in the meantime with this story, I'd love to see once again, what happens with the sentencing, what the public reaction is going to be, because I'm filming this just as it was announced.
So in the meantime, with this story,
I'd love to know your thoughts,
one, on the verdict we got today,
and two, what are your thoughts
regarding the Maxine Waters situation?
Then we should definitely look to Florida
because yesterday Florida governor Ron DeSantis
signed a law that he described as the strongest
anti-rioting pro-law enforcement measure in the country.
And so the law, which takes effect immediately,
was written following the nationwide protests
over the death of George Floyd.
Among other things, it will increase penalties
for protesters who block roadways
or deface Confederate statues or other public monuments.
Mandate that anyone arrested at a protest be denied bail
until their first court appearance,
meaning many will likely have to stay overnight in jail.
It also creates two entirely new crimes,
one called aggravated rioting,
which is a felony that carries 15 years in prison.
And another called mob intimidation,
which is a misdemeanor punished by up to a year.
It also bumps up crimes or previously misdemeanors
such as blocking the highway during a demonstration
to felony charges.
It cracks down on efforts to defund police departments
by allowing local officials to appeal decisions
to reduce police budgets to the governor's office.
And finally, in one of the most notable provisions,
it gives legal immunity to people
who drive through protesters blocking a road.
And so with all of that, you have DeSantis
and other supporters of the new law,
arguing that it will protect Florida from the kind of unrest
and destruction that occurred in certain places last summer.
The governor is specifically saying that the state
would be prepared for protests if Chauvin was acquitted.
But you also have Democrats and civil rights groups
condemning this policy,
arguing that Florida experienced very little violence
during the summer's demonstrations,
which is something DeSantis even mentioned himself
when signing the law.
With those groups saying that the law
is simply meant to intimidate people,
claiming that it was intentionally signed
the same day of closing arguments in the Chauvin trial
to send a message.
Arguing that the new policy violates
the First Amendment right to peacefully protest, right?
And as Kara Gross,
the legislative director at ACLU Florida explained,
the problem with this bill is that the language
is so overbroad and vague that it captures anybody who is peacefully protesting at a protest that turns violent through no fault of their own.
Those individuals who do not engage in any violent conduct under this bill can be arrested and charged with a third-degree felony and face up to five years in prison and loss of voting rights.
The whole point of this is to instill fear in Floridians. With others also arguing that the measure that will give immunity to people who drive through crowds
may have protected the white nationalists
who ran over protesters and killed a woman
during the Charlottesville protest in 2017.
And while yes, you do have Democrats and activist groups
already saying that they're going to challenge
this new law in court, it is currently in place
and that is where we are now.
And ultimately with this story and honestly,
anything else that stood out to you today,
I'd love to know your thoughts in those comments down below
because this is the end of today's show.
As always, thank you for watching, liking, subscribing,
all the good stuff.
If you're looking for more to watch right now,
I got you covered here with more news,
or maybe you want to catch my latest podcast.
You can click or tap right there or in the top description.
But with that said, of course, as always,
my name's Philip DeFranco.
You've just been filled in.
I love yo faces and I'll see you tomorrow.