The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 4.4 What Elon Musk Buying Twitter Really Means!
Episode Date: April 4, 2022Start your free trial today: http://www.Squarespace.com/Phil & enter offer code “Phil” to get 10% off your first purchase! News You Might Have Missed: https://youtu.be/ij-Z0szC0g0 TEXT ME! +1 (813...) 213-4423 Get More Phil: https://linktr.ee/PhilipDeFranco – 00:00 - Louis C.K. Grammy Win Sparks Backlash 03:34 - Elon Musk Buys 9% Share in Twitter 06:09 - San Diego Woman Pleads Guilty to Faking Cancer Diagnosis to Avoid Prison Sentence 07:50 - Sponsor 08:37 - Amazon Warehouse Workers in Staten Island Make Historic Vote to Unionize – ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Louis C.K. Grammy Win Sparks Backlash: https://roguerocket.com/2022/04/04/louis-ck-grammy-backlash/ Elon Musk Buys 9% Share in Twitter: https://roguerocket.com/2022/04/04/gelon-musk-buys-stake-in-twitter/ San Diego Woman Pleads Guilty to Faking Cancer Diagnosis to Avoid Prison Sentence: https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-faking-cancer-diagnosis-to-avoid-prison-sentence/ Amazon Warehouse Workers in Staten Island Make Historic Vote to Unionize: https://roguerocket.com/2022/04/04/amazon-labor-union-created/ —————————— Executive Producer: Amanda Morones Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg Art Department: Brian Borst, William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Maddie Crichton, Lili Stenn, Ben Wheeler, Chris Tolve Production Team: Zack Taylor, Emma Leid ———————————— #DeFranco #LouisCK #ElonMusk ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
So unfortunately, I have to start today's show off with bad news for you.
Right before uploading today's show, I had to remove several minutes of a whole story
because it was just too horrific.
And unfortunately, the way that YouTubes work, they would have killed that video
instead of getting to 850,000 to 1 point whatever million,
it would have gone to like maybe 300, 400,000.
But I'm not going to let YouTube and their system dictate what news gets out to you
because I still want to get important news out to you.
But it is their platform, so I have to play by their rules,
which is why tomorrow morning, in addition to the Tuesday Philip DeFranco show, tomorrow morning I will be uploading that
story and video. So this way I can let as many people as possible know to come back in the
morning to see that. But with that said, I still got a great show for you today, so buckle up,
hit that like button to help support some common sense news coverage, and let's just jump into it.
Hey y'all, first up today, another award show, another scandal though. This one not involving
Will, keep my wife's name out of your mouth, Smith,
but rather Louis C.K. and James Charles.
Initially, it sounds like an odd pairing,
but it'll make sense.
So starting with Louis, as you might remember,
back in 2017, he was accused of sexual misconduct
by multiple women, later admitting
that the allegations were true.
He then kind of disappeared from the public for a while,
though he ended up testing new material,
ultimately releasing new specials in 2020 and then 2021.
With all that leading to last night,
where his special, Sincerely Louis C.K.,
won Best Comedy Album at the Grammys.
And so with that, you saw a range of reactions
getting thrown out onto the internet.
Over here, you had people disgusted and outraged at you,
of someone that admitted to sexual misconduct
being rewarded just a few years after,
people arguing that this is yet another example,
that cancel culture doesn't actually exist
for famous people, and actually those who accuse
powerful people of those kind of wrongdoings
often face more consequences.
With people tweeting things like,
I wonder if the careers of the women comedians
Louis C.K. forced to watch him masturbate,
who were allegedly threatened by C.K.'s manager,
have recovered from the stigma of coming forward.
Louis C.K.'s own career seems to have bounced back very well.
Though regarding the conversation around cancel culture,
we saw people like associate editor for Reason,
Liz Wolfe tweeting,
Louis C.K. winning a Grammy after more than four years
of being mostly sidelined does not in any way prove
"'that cancel culture isn't real.
"'It proves that his offenses
"'weren't broadly considered egregious enough
"'to permanently disqualify him from a career.'"
And then going on to write in a thread,
and of course they weren't.
Masturbating in front of women,
women who said yes but meant no,
is not a particularly trauma-inducing thing.
Those women aren't survivors.
Having someone masturbate near you isn't tough to survive,
which is what that term implies.
And those tweets kind of hit at the core
of a number of defenses that people have for Louis C.K.
Or that you can believe that Louis C.K. was in the wrong,
but also not at a level that he should permanently
not be able to make money or create.
And while you had that argument happening,
you had people saying,
hey, this is an example of a double standard.
People bring up the Will Smith of it all, right?
Because after he slapped Chris Rock,
you had a ton of comedians saying that they now fear
for their safety that someone might slap them on stage.
With comedian Jen Kirkman tweeting,
"'Remember when male comedians this week were like,
"'Chris Rock got slapped?
"'Comedy is in danger.
"'They never gave a fuck about those of us in comedy
"'who were always in danger.
"'There's silence tonight on Louis C.K.
"'winning a Grammy for an album
"'where he jokes about his assaults.'"
And then for those that are like,
"'Okay, well how does James Charles
"'fit into this situation, right?
"'Louis C.K. is over the age of 18.'"
Well, yeah, that's why you had people outraged
that James Charles has seemingly been able to rehab his image
that he's still going to the Grammys.
With him having been in the past accused
of sexual misconduct, of sexting underage fans and grooming.
With people tweeting, getting a lot of support
for saying things like,
how is James Charles everywhere other than prison?
But to finish this story with Louis C.K.,
you know, I was really wondering,
what do people think about this?
So I put out a poll.
Well, just from a small section of the internet,
the results were interesting.
So the question, how do you feel about Louis C.K.
winning a Grammy last night?
The response was 29% don't like it
with 15% really not liking it.
10% liked it with 5% really liking it.
And finally 62% saying they don't care
that he got a Grammy.
Looking through the comments, if I was to condense
and try to paraphrase, it appeared that a lot
of the thinking for this majority was,
hey, say what you want about cancel culture
or just, you know, being held responsible for your actions.
At the end of the day, we get to decide
on an individual level.
Though some of the pushback from the 29% seem to be,
well, it sends a horrible message,
and so it could actually impact others.
But hey, that was also just a poll
of under 40,000 participants.
So now I'll pass the question off to you.
What are your thoughts here?
Then, in massive business and social media news
that people are freaking out about right now,
we should talk about Elon Musk buying 9.2% of Twitter.
At about $3 billion worth, for comparison's sake,
Jack Dorsey, who was one of the founders of Twitter, was previously the CEO, only has a 2% stake in Twitter. At about $3 billion worth for comparison's sake, Jack Dorsey, who was one of the founders of Twitter,
was previously the CEO, only has a 2% stake in Twitter.
Unsurprisingly, this news sent Twitter shares skyrocketing.
As I'm recording, it's up 30%.
One of the big things that people are talking about
right now is Elon Musk's timing.
Right, the SEC report made public today
lists the date Musk made the purchase as March 14th.
Very notably here, the SEC requires anyone
who buys more than 5% of the company's common shares
to disclose the purchase in 10 days.
But, according to CNBC, Musk didn't make that filing for 21 days, which is significant for two reasons.
First, because it shows that he's kicking off this massive decision by kind of giving the SEC a middle finger,
though those fines are pretty much gonna be nothing for Elon Musk.
Historically, they're around $100,000.
And second, because on March 25th, after he was already supposed to have disclosed his new stake,
he tweeted at a poll saying,
"'Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy. Do you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?'
Also adding,
"'The consequences of this poll will be important.
Please vote carefully.'"
With a result showing 70% said no,
and around 30% said yes.
And later writing in another tweet,
"'Given that Twitter serves as the de facto
public town square, failing to adhere to free speech
principles fundamentally undermines democracy.
What should be done?'
And adding,
"'Is a new platform needed?'
And so now following the news breaking that Elon Musk bought so much of the company,
there are people in two camps.
One, you have people saying,
oh, he's only to try to take control over this company
or at the very least get his will done.
But on the other hand, you have some arguing
this is just a smart business move.
That with the tweets, he was planting seeds,
then the news broke, oh my God,
Elon Musk bought so much stock,
something must be about to happen.
It then sends his shares through the roof,
with people noting, yes,
this is a massive shareholder position,
but it's also unclear if he's going to ask
or be invited to join Twitter's board.
Also, the securities document Musk signed indicates
that he intended for the investment to be passive,
so he doesn't plan to take control of the company.
But things can change, things can be a faint,
and this is Elon Musk we're talking about.
Like, it wouldn't be surprising if he bought the company
just for the meme of it all.
But where I will end this is that in this uncertainty,
I mean, this could be a massive and significant move
because as places like Bloomberg have noted,
Twitter is particularly vulnerable to outside pressure
because unlike Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Snap,
the company's founders don't have special voting control
over its future.
And adding, the company has just recovered
from activist pressure by Elliott management
that started in 2020, which led Dorsey,
who was serving his second stint as CEO of Twitter,
to set a succession plan.
And as we wait to see, is this a small part
of a much larger move to drastically change Twitter,
or it's just an investment in smart business moves
to drive the stock price up,
everyone's having big reactions.
We've seen a lot of people, including prominent conservatives,
cheering this move as a win for free speech,
many calling on Musk to bring back people
who were banned on Twitter, including Trump.
But also on the other side, you have people expressing
concern over what this might mean for the platform,
especially if Musk tries to expand his role.
And on the note of reactions, I'll ask you yours.
What do you think here?
And then in news, it starts with a question.
When you were in school, or if you still are,
did you ever fake being sick to get out of going to school?
Personally, yes, of course.
But this woman in California took it to a whole nother level from school to prison.
Back in 2019, Ashley Lynn Chavez pled guilty
to embezzling more than $160,000 from a former employer.
And while she was permitted to live in the public
until her sentencing, she was more than likely
going to face prison time.
However, on the eve of her sentencing,
she reportedly pulled a doctor's note out,
like a kid trying to skip class,
with the note reading that a doctor had found
cancerous cells in her uterus,
but the whole thing was 100% forged.
But still, according to the Justice Department,
her attorney believed that it was genuine
and it was submitted to court.
The next day, Chavez was sentenced to a year in prison,
but because of this note, the judge overseeing her case
allowed her to stay out of custody for another three months
while she received treatment.
And over time Chavez began submitting more notes
to try to get her sentence pushed back even more.
Those notes reading a mix of things
that her cancer had progressed to stage two,
that she was in too vulnerable of a state
to be exposed to COVID.
And eventually the doctors, or rather the doctors,
they began recommending that she serve her sentence at home
with one note saying,
"'A year in prison could be a death sentence
"'for my patient.
"'I highly recommend the chance to allow home confinement
"'or anything else that you deem appropriate
"'rather than a year in prison.'"
But ultimately all of it came crashing down
when the government finally did its job
and investigated these claims.
And finding that while one of the doctors
whose signatures she forged
had actually seen her as a patient,
they never diagnosed her with any form of cancer.
Meanwhile, the second doctor claimed he hadn't even seen her
and had no idea how or why his identity had been stolen
and his signature repeatedly forged.
And so, I think I'm using the right terminology here,
because she was such a dumb fuck,
in her effort to not go to prison for one year,
she is now facing up to 10 more years in prison,
where they're set to be sentenced in June
after pleading guilty to obstruction of justice.
Which is why, Ashley, I wanna leave you with two things.
One, don't be stupid, stupid.
And two, you are our douchebag of the day.
But from that, I wanna take a second
to thank the fantastic sponsor of today's show, Squarespace.
You know, I've been partnering with Squarespace
for years now, and I have to say,
if you're getting your business off the ground
or creating a place to share your homemade goods,
new favorite hobby, current obsession,
or even a personal blog to get all those thoughts
out of your head, no matter what you're doing, Squarespace is there to a personal blog to get all those thoughts out of your head.
No matter what you're doing, Squarespace is there to help.
And it's all so easy.
There's nothing to install, patch, or upgrade ever.
Creating a beautiful website with Squarespace's
all-in-one platform has never been so simple.
It's extremely intuitive and easy to use.
And with their mobile optimized websites,
your content automatically adjusts
so your content looks great on any device.
Plus, with Squarespace, you get access
to all their marketing tools and analytics
and their award-winning customer care team via email or live chat 24 seven.
So if you want to check it out,
see why so many others before you have loved it,
see if it's right for you.
Start your free trial today over squarespace.com slash Phil.
And when you realize you love it,
make sure you enter an offer code Phil to get 10% off your
first purchase.
And then over the weekend,
there is a big possibility that you saw this clip.
You want to thank Jeff Bezos for going to space.
Cause when he was up there, we were signing people up.
Yeah, we were signing Jeff Bezos. What that space because when he was up there, we were starting to keep going. Yeah, we were starting to keep going.
And what that man Chris Smalls is talking about
is an absolutely historic union vote.
It is a David versus Goliath story.
And depending on what happens from here,
this could have massive implications.
And because of all that, I wanna get into the details.
So with the center of this, on Friday,
you had the JFK 8 warehouse in Staten Island
voting to unionize, creating what's been called
the Amazon Labor Union or ALU.
Over 2,600 voting in favor, 2,100 plus against,
at a facility compromising of 8,325 workers.
And this made them the first Amazon warehouse ever
to do so in the United States,
making this one of the biggest victories
for labor in decades.
And to make it all even more impressive,
the ALU pulled this off independently
without the legal or financial backing
of any more established union.
But even the simple fact that they stood up
against this giant and they won, that's crazy.
Right, because Amazon has successfully
and aggressively stamped out any and all efforts
to organize its workers for the past two decades.
With similar efforts finding little success
in places like Chicago, Sacramento, and Minnesota.
And for a while, Staten Island was no exception, right?
You had the company desperately trying
to convince its workers to vote against unionizing,
doing things like plastering banners around the warehouse,
proclaiming vote no,
creating a website that says about the ALU,
they think they can do a better job speaking for you
than you can do for yourself.
And even holding captive audience meetings
where workers are forced to listen to anti-union propaganda.
With audio last month from one in Staten Island
capturing two managers giving a slide presentation
and being derided by the workers.
With another worker accusing a manager of union busting,
then being asked to leave for being disruptive.
And so after all that work, Friday's union victory sparked
an explosion of righteous celebration
from the workers themselves.
People on social media like Daniel Denveer tweeting,
"'Amazon Labor Union not only beat Bezos,
"'they cleansed my timeline of the slap.'"
Now with this, as far as Amazon,
they responded on their blog saying it's disappointed
because it believes a direct relationship
with its employees is best,
which led to people like this guy, Rafael on TikTok,
translating that statement for the people.
We're disappointed with the outcome of the election
because we believe having our workers divided is best
for our fat stacks.
Now, as far as the ALU,
they're demanding pay raises appropriate
to the high cost of living,
actual paid sick days, job security,
so we can't be fired at will,
a shuttle service for workers from all five boroughs
and more, and adding that they want to be, quote,
"'treated as human beings' and not mere replaceable appendages
to the robots and algorithms that run the warehouses.
And over the weekend, preemptively slamming any attempt
by Amazon to delay their right to collective bargaining,
requesting negotiations by early May,
as well as the immediate halting of any changes
to employment policies in the meantime.
And as I mentioned in all of this,
Chris Smalls has emerged as a leader for this movement.
Because this whole thing has been going on for years now.
Chris was a former rapper and Amazon employee.
He's now the interim president of the ALU.
Having worked for Amazon since 2015
and transferring to the Staten Island warehouse in 2018.
With the ALU story then beginning in March of 2020,
when one of the workers tested positive for COVID,
leading Smalls to organize a strike
and protest over unsafe working conditions.
With Amazon then firing him that day,
ironically claiming that he violated social distancing rules.
But even after being fired, he refused to give up,
continuing to organize the warehouse
and piss off the company.
Leaving Amazon's general counsel, David Zapolsky,
to write in a leaked email,
"'He's not smart or articulate,
"'and to the extent the press wants to focus on us versus him,
"'we will be in a much stronger PR position
"'than simply explaining for the umpteenth time
"'how we're trying to protect workers.'"
With the email going on to add,
"'Make him the most interesting part of the story and if possible make him the face of the entire
union slash organizing movement. And that, my friends, completely fucking backfired. One, you
have people saying that not smart or articulate comment felt very racist, but it also led Smalls
in that moment to know he was going to continue taking on this retail behemoth. Recently recalling
when I read that memo that motivated me to start an organization.
And so with zero background in union activism,
he and the ALU co-founder, Derek Palmer,
began waiting at a bus stop near the warehouse,
talking to workers on their way home,
making s'mores at a bonfire, inviting them to cookouts.
With Smalls later recalling,
we had over 20 barbecues giving out food every single week,
every single day, whether it was pizza,
chicken, pasta, home cooked.
And ultimately after the first attempt at a petition failed,
Smalls finally met the 30% threshold needed
to trigger a union vote in February.
With that leading to later in the month,
Amazon intensifying its pressure
against the fledgling union,
police even arresting Smalls and two other organizers
for allegedly trespassing while they were delivering lunches
to warehouse workers during their break.
Why are you arresting them?
Hold it out, look, throw me against the car.
Why are you arresting them?
Throw me against the car. Trespassing. They said you were- We're workers car. Why are you arresting them? Throw me against the car.
Trespassing.
They said you were-
We're workers here.
Why are you arresting us?
And so with all of that said,
it's going to be very interesting to see,
does this begin to spread?
For example, there's another smaller warehouse
on Staten Island that also has a union vote
set to begin on April 25th.
Then there's also this warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama,
where the workers voted about two to one
not to unionize last year,
but the NLRB ordered a do-over election
after ruling that Amazon improperly interfered in the tally.
With that vote wrapping up last week,
993 no votes, 875 yes votes,
but there's still reportedly more than 400 contested ballots.
So it could go either way,
but I mean, it could swing in the favor of the union
once the NLRB holds a hearing on it in a few weeks.
Yeah, ultimately time will tell,
was this a drop in the bucket
or a first step to something much bigger?
But that's it for today's show.
Click here for more news and I'll see you tomorrow.