The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 6.23 IRAN ATTACKS US BASE! All Hell Breaks Loose as Trump MAGA Implosion Grows, & The MrBeast AI Problem
Episode Date: June 23, 2025Use code “PHIL” for $20 OFF your first SeatGeek order & returning buyers use code “PDS” for $10 off AND your chance at weekly $500 prizes! https://seatgeek.onelink.me/RrnK/PHIL Subscribe fo...r New shows every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, & Thursday @ 6pm ET/3pm PT & watch more here: https://youtu.be/Nc7hBzvbHns?si=YJoc8PahZK5DpBg-&list=PLHcsGizlfLMWpSg7i0b9wnUyEZWI-25N3&index=1 – ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ – 00:00 - Iran Attacks U.S. Military Base, Escalating Conflict 12:21 - MrBeast Faces Backlash for Launching AI Thumbnail Tool 15:41 - Sponsored by SeatGeek 16:51 - Michigan Churchgoers and Staff Prevented Potential Large-Scale Attack 18:57 - Khalil Does First Interview Since Release; Judge Orders Abrego Garcia’s Release 24:25 - Community Builds Box Car Around Child’s Disability so She Can Race -—————————— Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg, Christian Meeks, Matthew Henry Art Department: William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Chris Tolve, Star Pralle, Jared Paolino ———————————— For more Philip DeFranco: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-philip-defranco-show/id1278424954 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ESemquRbz6f8XLVywdZ2V Twitter: https://x.com/PhillyD Instagram: https://instagram.com/PhillyDeFranco Newsletter: https://www.dailydip.co TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@philipdefranco?lang=en ———————————— #DeFranco #MrBeast #DonaldTrump ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Iran just attacked the United States and fired missiles at American bases after Trump dropped more than a dozen of our biggest bombs on them with now new signs emerging as to what's going to happen next.
Mahmoud Khalil is now free after two of Trump's highest profile deportation cases just collapsed in court, but there's a lot happening that people don't realize.
Over a hundred lives were likely saved in a Michigan church thanks to quick thinking heroes.
While you have top creators right now blasting Mr. V Beast and saying he's stealing from others and ruining YouTube.
We're jumping into all that and much more
on today's brand new Philip DeFranco show,
you daily dive into the news, starting with this.
Iran just attacked the largest American military base
in the Middle East, right?
And that coming in response to Trump dropping more
than a dozen of the US's biggest bombs
on Iran over the weekend.
And so with that, we got to talk about how we got here
and what the fallout has been and will be both for you
and I and in the Middle East and what happens next.
Right, starting with the US attack on Iran
because you had it coming only a couple of days
after Trump said that he would take up to two weeks
to make a decision.
With White House press secretary, Caroline Levitz
saying that the timeframe was, quote,
based on the fact that there's a substantial chance
of negotiations that may or may not take place
with Iran in the near future.
And with that, you had the Iranian foreign minister
actually responding by claiming that his country
was absolutely ready for a negotiated solution
on their nuclear program.
But he also said that he wouldn't take part in the talks
as long as the country remained under attack.
And that as he also claimed that the Iranian government
had a reason to believe that the United States
was involved in Israel's attack on Iran from day one.
Telling NBC News, we have come to the conclusion
that negotiations by the US was in fact a cover for what the Israelis did.
And then with that, he suggested that Trump's two week
negotiating window was just a smoke screen,
which actually sort of turned out to be the case.
Because you have multiple officials telling Axios
that the public countdown, it was actually concealing
a plan already in motion with one saying,
it was a head fake.
He knew the media couldn't resist amplifying it.
He knew the Iranians might think he was bluffing
and adding, well, everyone was wrong.
And then with all that, you know,
as far as how the attack went down,
well, you had seven B-2 stealth bombers
dropping 14, 30,000 pound massive ordnance penetrators,
better known as bunker busters,
on the most heavily fortified nuclear site in Iran.
With satellite photos now showing several places
where the massive bomb seemingly punched
deep holes in the rock.
And then you had Navy ships launching 30 Tomahawk missiles
from submarines toward Iran's other
two major nuclear facilities.
With Trump then revealing that an attack had taken place after the planes were outside
of Iranian airspace and on their way home with him writing on social media, there is
not another military in the world that could have done this.
Now is the time for peace.
And then Trump soon after saying this in an address to the nation.
Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
Remember, there are many targets left.
Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal.
But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision,
speed and skill.
But of course, peace?
That doesn't appear to be in sight right now.
Plus, despite Trump's claims,
it's far from clear right now
that these Iranian nuclear sites
have been completely and totally obliterated.
Where with, for example,
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
and the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
Dan Kaine, saying an initial battle damage assessment
showed only severe damage and destruction.
And then the Israeli military's initial analysis
also concluded that the site hit with the bunker busters
suffered serious damage
but had not been completely destroyed. And then according to two Israeli officials, there analysis also concluded that the site hit with the bunker busters suffered serious damage, but had not been completely destroyed.
And then according to two Israeli officials,
there was also evidence that Iran had moved equipment
and uranium from the site in recent days.
With that, including more than 800 pounds of uranium
enriched to 60% purity, which is not that far off
from the 90% that's usually used in nuclear weapons.
And if that stuff is still in Iran's possession,
then they still have at least one key ingredient
for developing nuclear weapons.
So notably, well, Trump has said that the attack
was because Iran was just months or even weeks away
from getting nuclear weapons.
The consensus in the American intelligence community,
it's actually long been that Iran has not been actively
building or trying to build a nuclear weapon.
I mean, you even had Trump's own director
of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, saying as much
when testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee
in March.
The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and
Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program
that he suspended in 2003.
But then he had Trump telling reporters before the US attack that he believed
that Iran was very close to having a weapon and that he quote, didn't care
what Gabbard said.
What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?
Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at
this point. Well, then Your intelligence community had said they have no evidence that they are at this point.
Well, then my intelligence community is wrong.
Who in the intelligence community said that?
Your director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.
She's wrong.
And then actually with that,
we saw Gabbard responding by echoing Trump's own point
of view on social media, writing,
America has intelligence that Iran is at the point
that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months
if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen and
I agree. Gabbard then also accusing the media of intentionally taking her testimony out
of context and reposting the clip of her testimony as proof. Which I'll play now because it does
contain some key information.
In the past year, we've seen an erosion of a decades long taboo in Iran on discussing
nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear weapons advocates
within Iran's decision-making apparatus.
Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels
and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.
And so the fact that a regime like Iran's
has been enriching uranium in amounts
and two levels far above what's necessary
for any civilian use, it's worrying
because it has actually put them in a position,
according to American intelligence
to be able to build a functional weapon,
maybe in a matter of months, as Trump said,
but also maybe in a matter of years.
We just don't know for sure.
One of the big key things is that the assessment
that Iran hadn't started building one,
as far as we know, that had not changed.
And with all that, you've had the Iranian foreign minister
accusing the US of violating international law,
calling the attack outrageous,
and saying it will have everlasting consequences.
And adding, in accordance with the UN charter
and its provisions allowing a legitimate response
in self-defense, Iran reserves all options
to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.
With you then seeing Iran following through on that today
with them attacking a US air base on Qatari territory,
holding more than 10,000 military and civilian personnel.
But thankfully there, you had the DOD confirming
that although Iran fired multiple short and medium range missiles,
there were no reports of US casualties.
Though actually with that,
Iran reportedly gave advance notice of the attack
as a way to minimize casualties.
With officials saying that Iran needed to be seen striking
back at the United States,
but in a way that allowed all signs an exit ring.
And with that, Trump has now actually thanked Iran
for giving early notice saying,
perhaps Iran can now proceed to peace
and harmony in the region,
and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel
to do the same.'"
And then he added in a separate post,
"'Congratulations world, it's time for peace.'"
Of course, we'll have to see
if that's actually the end of it.
Because Trump, he has warned previously
that any retaliation made against the United States
of America would be met with even greater force
than what was unleashed in the initial US attack.
And if that were to happen,
there are obviously concerns
about how much more this could escalate,
how involved the US would get.
And if there's some version of events
where we have another version of Iraq
or Afghanistan on our hands.
Though of course, like even without the US,
the situation is extremely volatile right now.
It's because you have Iran keeping up attacks on Israel,
though no more have reportedly been killed yet.
And then on the flip side,
Israeli strikes have killed at least 400
and injured 3000 according to the government.
You also have one US-based rights group
claiming that the true number is closer to 950.
And then beyond the death toll,
Israel has continued expanding its campaign
beyond obvious nuclear and military targets.
With you seeing them today, for example,
striking the gates of a prison famous
for holding political activists
and the headquarters of the military force
known for cracking down on protests.
Those sort of being seen as symbolic targets of the regime,
although Israeli officials have continued to insist
that they're not seeking to overthrow Iran's government,
even as you have Trump hinting
at the possibility of regime change.
Though notably here you had Netanyahu saying last night
that Israel was very, very close to realizing its objectives
in the conflict with Iran and saying
that he would not be dragged into a war of attrition
with them, and so we're gonna have to wait
to see what happens there.
And in the meantime, there's obviously a whole debate
playing out in the U.S. right now.
And it was one connected to the moment that the news broke,
with the probably best scene with the news breaking
for Bernie Sanders as he was giving a speech
as part of his fighting oligarchy tour.
Not only is this news that I've just heard
the second alarming that all of you have just heard,
but it is so grossly unconstitutional.
All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress.
The president does not have the right.
It might be a good idea if we concentrated on the problems that exist in Oklahoma and Vermont.
(*crowd cheering*)
Rather than getting involved
in another war that the American people do not want.
Right, and his point there about Trump's actions
being unconstitutional is one that we've seen echoed widely
by lawmakers and experts across the political spectrum.
Because the constitution, it gives Congress the power
to declare war and to raise and support armies.
But it also makes the president the commander in chief
of the US military, which is language which presidents
of both parties have cited to justify military action
without congressional involvement.
And this long running debate over presidential war
authorities has only been further complicated
by the War Powers Resolution of 1973,
which says that a president can introduce the armed forces
into hostilities in only three situations.
One, a declaration of war.
Two, specific statutory authorization,
both of which have to come from Congress.
Or three, a national emergency created
by an attack upon the United States.
And for presidents, they've often disregarded that language
or argued for a narrow definition
of the introduction of forces.
Congress has actually done very little
to enforce the resolution.
And so in this specific case,
Trump officials are arguing that this was a limited strike
aimed at dealing with an imminent threat,
but that it isn't an act of war
or anything else requiring congressional approval.
There, you have many experts pushing back with,
for example, John B. Bellinger III
of the Council on Foreign Relations,
arguing that it's also necessary
to look at legal interpretations
from the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel,
explaining if the use of military force
would be substantial and prolonged
or would pose a substantial risk to US forces
or American civilians, such as from attacks by Iran
or its proxies against US interests,
there is a good argument that it would require
congressional approval consistent with Congress's authority
in Article 1 to declare war.
And that is an incredibly relevant argument
now that Iran has attacked a US military base.
And then with all this,
we've seen a number of high profile Democrats
also pushing back on the Trump administration's
justifications here.
With that, including Bernie's fighting oligarchy partner,
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
who called Trump's decision to strike Iran
without authorization from Congress,
absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.
With her then adding,
the president's disastrous decision to bomb Iran
without authorization is a grave violation
of the constitution and congressional war power.
And he is impulsively risk launching a war
that may ensnare us for generations.
This also is very notably,
we've seen divisions emerging among Republicans as well.
For example, Thomas Massey appearing to be the first
Republican to oppose Trump's decision,
just simply writing, this is not constitutional.
Then then also telling CBS News
that there was no imminent threat
to the United States from Iran.
Though there I'll say Massey stances
and exactly surprising, right?
Because he just introduced a bipartisan resolution last week seeking to block US military action
against Iran unless explicitly authorized by Congress.
But notably with all that, you had Trump responding by seemingly excommunicating Massey from the
Church of MAGA.
Trump launching a barrage of insults at Massey and saying he'll be out campaigning in Kentucky
for Massey's opponent in the Republican primary.
Also, despite the divisions emerging in the Republican party, we saw Trump claiming
that there's great unity in the party,
perhaps unity like we have never seen before.
Well, you know, that is clearly false.
We still have seen many Republicans
falling behind Trump here.
With, for example, prominent Republicans
like Lindsey Graham, Nancy Mace, and Elise Stefanik,
all praising the decision.
You then also had Ted Cruz, who you may have seen
learning a number of things about Iran
from Tucker Carlson, of all people,
arguing that the attack was necessary,
saying the prospect of the Iranian regime
acquiring nuclear weapons represents
the most acute immediate threat to America and our allies.
And that is you had House Speaker Mike Johnson
explicitly arguing that Trump's move was constitutional,
writing, the president made the right call
and did what he needed to do.
Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency
of this situation and the commander in chief evaluated
that the imminent danger outweighed the time
it would take for Congress to act.
And then adding, the president fully respects
the Article One power of Congress
and tonight's necessary limited and targeted strike
follows the history and tradition
of similar military actions under presidents of both parties.
Also something that's gone a big spotlight on it
is that not all Democrats are against Trump's decision.
Right now because you had Democratic Senator John Fetterman
backing Trump's move.
I'm saying that Trump strikes were the correct move
and adding, Iran is the world's leading sponsor
of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.
And adding, I'm grateful for
and salute the finest military in the world.
But for now, we're gonna have to wait to see what happens
both internationally and domestically.
How does Iran continue to respond?
How does Trump respond to that?
And then domestically, it's gonna be very interesting
to watch that play out though.
I will say Trump has a majority of Republicans on his side.
So like the possible impeachment attempt,
I imagine that's gonna be dead on arrival.
But we've also seen lawmakers from both sides of the aisle
demanding that Congress approve any further military action.
And in the meantime, as we wait to see
if this is gonna escalate into a full blown war,
I gotta pass the question off to you.
What are your thoughts here?
What are your reactions to this news?
But then next up from that today,
MrBeast is stealing from other creators
and he is ruining YouTube.
That is what many, including top YouTube creators
are saying right now after MrBeast announced
that his platform ViewStats is launching
an AI thumbnail tool that will allow creators
to create a prompt and receive a data-backed viral thumbnail.
And while he has since deleted that tweet
following the backlash, the ViewStats website
still has articles and FAQs about the tool
and many have also reshared a previously uploaded video
where MrBeast explained some of the functions.
From creating custom results from any channel
to literally being able to put your face on a thumbnail,
it literally feels like cheating.
This is the home of the AI tool
where you can type in any channel on all of YouTube
and it'll use it as inspiration
for the thumbnail it's generating.
Right in that video, MrBeast then uses himself as an example
and had it generate a thumbnail
of him stranded on a volcano.
You also have him saying that there are ways
to generate thumbnails without specific channel inspiration
or you can take the URL of a pre-existing video
and modify its thumbnail like in this example.
To demonstrate, I have this F1 thumbnail with an F1 car.
And so in the prompt, I'm just gonna simply type in
change F1 car to minivan.
That is all I'm typing in.
I'm gonna hit generate.
Let's see what it produces.
And boom, it's done.
And so immediately what you saw
is you had tons of people pissed off arguing
that this tool, it hurts thumbnail artists and editors
and allows people to just blatantly copy
and rip off other channels with some writing.
So the biggest YouTuber is pushing AI
while also posting about how he hopes everyone watches
his work because of how much creative effort went into it.
So you understand the value of work and creativity,
but don't understand that this tech
is destroying the concept of both.
As well as some saying, I need every YouTube creator
who can afford to take a stand
to sue the shit out of this company.
They're literally just stealing every single thumbnail
on YouTube to feed to their shitty fucking AI
and fuck you too, MrBeast.
But then some noting that MrBeast in the past
has called out other channels for copying his thumbnails
by using face swapping tools and writing.
So Mr. Beast gets to complain about channels
stealing his thumbnails, then turns around
and makes a tool that does the same thing,
but faster and cheaper.
Way to take out the creator and content creator
and the fun that comes from thinking up new ideas.
Majorly, fuck this.
If there's any class action lawsuit, count me in.
I'm so done with this guy.
Right, you had major creators like Jacksepticeye
chiming in because his channel's logo
specifically appeared in Mr. channel's logo specifically appeared
in MrBeast's video when he mentioned taking inspiration
from other channels.
And so you had Jack writing,
"'What the actual fuck?'
And he used my logo in the promotion for it too?
I hate what this platform is turning into.
Fuck AI."
And so far what we've seen is that MrBeast appears
to be open to the pushback.
With us seeing this one creator saying
that he had a conversation with MrBeast
to make these complaints clear.
And then MrBeast responding by saying,
I appreciate all the feedback.
I love the YouTube community more
than anyone can even remotely comprehend.
Already working on changes like face swaps
should only be used to swap your face on your thumbnail.
Obviously not others.
And adding overall, I'll build this more in a way
to be inspiration for artists slash a tool they use
and not replace them.
Very good feedback.
My goal with the view stats is to build tools
to level the playing field between people like me
with 300 employees and new creators
that can't afford a small army.
And then he also said that he's open to adding a tool
that would allow creators to connect
with thumbnail artists directly
so that he can boost that community.
It was far as what actually happens with MrBeast
and view stats, as well as what the reaction continues
to be from the community that remains to be seen.
I mean, MrBeast on that, I appreciate the feedback reply.
He got ratioed.
With the main reaction there reading,
wanting to level the playing field
between those with 300 employees and those without
means you wanna make those 300 people redundant,
meaning they won't have jobs.
Seems like your tool is designed to enable firing
your artists whilst getting $50 from everyone else.
Out of touch, evil genius move.
For now, I'll have to wait to see how this plays out.
And of course, in the meantime,
I'd really love to know your thoughts and reactions to this.
And then you've got even more news in just a minute,
but first, you know, y'all, it is summer,
it is officially upon us and you need to get out more.
And you know, connected to that,
we've been giving out $500 every week for over a year,
thanks to our sponsor at SeatGeek
and somehow you still haven't entered for free.
And the lineup right now, it's stacked.
Lady Gaga, Coldplay, Tyler the Creator,
The Weeknd, Beyonce, Chris Stapleton,
it's a wild time for live events.
And you know, it's been awesome seeing so many
of you beautiful bastards winning the $500 SeatGeek
weekly giveaway and using it to hit up concerts,
games, Broadway shows, just y'all live in your best lives.
And if you haven't entered yet, it takes two seconds
and next week's $500 winner, it could be you.
And for the uninitiated, SeatGeek is the number one
rated ticketing app with over 28 million downloads
and tickets to over 70,000 events, sports, music,
comedy, theater, you name it. And so, hey,000 events, sports, music, comedy, theater,
you name it.
And so, hey, if you're a first timer,
download the app, scan the QR code,
or hit the link in the description,
and use code Phil for $20 off your first ticket purchase.
And then, this is key, add code PDS
to your SeatGeek account as well.
That gets you $10 off of any ticket
and enters you for your chance
to win the weekly $500 giveaway, no purchase required.
And then also for the SeatGeek,
that's right, you've used SeatGeek before,
this applies to you as well.
Just add code PDS to your account and you're entered.
Hey, main thing, scan the QR code or click that link below
and then use code Phil and PDS and go make some memories.
But then next up from that today,
we've got to talk about how a potential mass shooting
at a Michigan church was stopped by quick thinking heroes.
And we also now know who the gunman was.
Right in this horrifying situation,
it comes from a suburb of Detroit
where over a hundred people on Sunday
were gathered for mass at Crosspoint Community Church.
And according to reports,
you had children that are part of the church's
vacation Bible school.
They were pleading the mass yesterday
when a gunman arrived outside of the church driving
erratically, which caught the attention of staff,
as well as a church goer who was arriving late.
With reports saying that the man then got out of his car
in a tactical vest, armed with a rifle and a handgun,
and he began firing while heading to the church.
With him hitting one person in the leg,
but then according to local authorities,
a parishioner then struck the man with a vehicle
and two staff members fatally shot him.
As you had the Wayne police chief, Ryan Strong,
telling reporters yesterday.
We are grateful for the heroic actions
of the church's staff members
who undoubtedly saved many lives
and prevented a large scale mass shooting.
Right, and all of this is you had other footage showing
that the people inside the church heard what was going down
and figured out what was happening.
With a live stream showing many ducking
and running as gunshots were heard outside
before a woman instructed them
to head to the back of the building.
It's just an utterly terrifying moment.
And as far as the person who was shot in the leg,
they sustained a non-life-threatening injury
and they underwent a successful surgery.
And so luckily that was the worst of it.
But as of this morning, we then got details about the shooter. And as it turns out, he is a 31-life-threatening injury and they underwent a successful surgery. And so luckily that was the worst of it. But as of this morning,
we then got details about the shooter.
And as it turns out, he is a 31 year old
whose mother was a member of that church
and he had been to a couple of masses with her
over the last year or so.
And with that, you had officers saying
he may have been suffering a mental health crisis
and had no prior contact with law enforcement.
So right now we just don't have an official motive
though you have some outlets noting that
he had mentioned the church in two Facebook posts
but it's unclear what prompted this. And so far we're just seeing things like
officers saying that there's no evidence suggesting it's tied to the conflict in the Middle East.
You also have the church's pastor telling the AP that the suspect's mother wasn't present at the
church during the shooting but the pastor said that he had met with him before and told them.
He seemed to really have some thoughts that were not threatening or anything like that but he
definitely had some thoughts as far as hearing from God. The pastor then applauding those who stopped him
from getting inside of the building.
And so all in all, while we wait to see
if there's more to learn, we can just say,
thank God that this is the worst that it was.
Because truly, had it not been for the quick actions
of a few, who knows how bad this could have gotten.
But then next up from that today,
we've got to talk about Trump losing ground
in his most high profile deportation case battles.
I'm talking about Kilmar Abrego Garcia and Mahmoud Khalil.
Starting with Abrego Garcia,
he's that Maryland father who was mistakenly deported
to El Salvador's mega prison back in March,
despite an order not to deport him.
Then the White House apparently resisting orders
from federal judges and the Supreme Court
to facilitate his return.
But then earlier this month, after a lot of delay,
he was returned though only for the Justice Department
to charge him with smuggling illegal immigrants
across the country for nearly a decade
Something to which he has pleaded not guilty
So now he's preparing for trial but already before that's even begun the federal judge in his case slammed the government's
Allegations with Judge Barbara Holmes saying that they failed to provide evidence that a brego Garcia would pose a threat if he was released
And ruling that he must be released from federal custody though
That doesn't mean he's actually free since that ruling it only pertains to this case or the DOJ that can just hand him over to ICE instead
as it said it would.
Meaning that if the government can persuade a court
to lift the 2019 order staying as deportation,
Abrego Garcia could be deported again
before he even gets the chance to go to trial.
But that's a threat that he would have faced anyway
and this ruling by Judge Holmes is still being seen
as a victory because it casts serious doubt
on the evidence that'll come up during the trial.
The judge writing the government alleges
that Abrego is a long time well-known member of MS-13,
which the court would expect to be reflected
in a criminal history.
Perhaps even of the kind of violent crimes
and other criminal activity the government describes
is typically associated with MS-13 gang membership.
But Abrego has no reported criminal history of any kind.
With her then adding that much of the supposed evidence
he is a gang member consists of double hearsay.
Not to mention that some of the witnesses reportedly
have serious criminal histories
and they're hoping to dodge deportation
or avoid prison sentences for helping with the case.
So you have the judge saying, for example,
one is a two-time previously deported felon
and acknowledged ringleader of a human smuggling operation
who has now obtained for himself an early release
from federal prison and delay of a sixth deportation
for providing information to the government.
Then even that aside, you have Holmes noting
that their claims, quote, her words, defy common sense.
So for example, while they alleged that Abrego Garcia
often brought his children on smuggling trips
between Maryland and Houston three or four times a week,
according to Holmes, the sheer number of hours
that would be required to maintain this schedule,
which would consistently be more than 120 hours per week
of driving time approach physical impossibility.
So for all those reasons,
plus the fact that his union is offered
to help him return to work if he's released,
home sided with a Briegel Garcia.
But still you have the White House remaining defiant
with DHS spokeswoman, Tricia McLaughlin writing on X,
Kilmara Briegel Garcia is a dangerous criminal
illegal alien.
We have said it for months and it remains true to this day,
he will never go free on American soil.
But notably they said similar things
about another high profile detainee who is now free
and that is Mahmoud Khalil.
He was the first student protester who was arrested
for deportation by the Trump administration back in March.
And that even though he was a legal US permanent resident
married to his pregnant American wife
and a Columbia university graduate.
But as a Palestinian and an outspoken activist
opposing what he called genocide in Gaza,
he put himself firmly within the White House's crosshair.
So one day plain clothes agents arrested him
in the lobby of his Manhattan apartment building.
And since then, he's been locked up
a thousand miles away in Louisiana.
Because he had Secretary of State Marco Rubio
invoking an obscure law to deport him on the grounds
that he had undermined American foreign policy
and spread what he called antisemitism.
But then, this last Friday,
after three and a half months of detention,
during which time he missed the birth of his first child,
a judge finally released him on bail.
And over the weekend, you had him immediately touring
the press circuit, speaking publicly for the first time
since his arrest.
I felt like I was literally kidnapped.
All the know your rights that I've indulged myself into
felt like nothing because at that moment,
ICE made it clear that you have no rights."
He then had him telling the New York Times that in Louisiana he shared a room with more than 70
other men and adding that he had no privacy and no knowledge of what was going to happen next as
he wracked with concern for his wife and then unborn child. But then with that he explained
that he tried his best to make meaning out of his suffering there and he says that he began helping
other inmates. We're spending a few hours each day translating questions into proper English about things like what had happened
to the money in someone's commissary account
or why they hadn't received their medication.
And in the meantime, saying that he gathered strength
by reading Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl,
the Holocaust survivor among other books.
So they're adding that there was nothing in this world
that would compensate me for the time I lost with my family
and witnessing the birth of my child.
And all of this is, you know,
he's still not out of the woods yet because his case,
it's still going through the courts
and the White House still wants to deport him.
And on that side, you had a spokesperson saying,
this isn't about free speech, but rather,
this is about individuals who don't have a right
to be in the United States siding with Hamas terrorists
and organizing group protests that made college campuses
unsafe and harass Jewish students.
And adding, the Trump administration won't hesitate
to hold Khalil and others who mimic his tactics accountable.
But of course right now there's not much evidence outside of a couple of vague slogans like from the river to the sea that Khalil is
anti-Semitic or supports Hamas. And that is he insists that he's definitely not.
There's no place for any form of racism including
anti-blackness, anti-Semitism, and in the Palestine movement.
But also right outside of his case, he says that the struggle for Palestinian justice,
it still goes on with him telling the Times,
I'm free, but those who made me go through hell
are still free outside and actually emboldened.
And he says that far from suppressing
the pro-Palestine movement,
Trump has actually inflamed it
and that he's going to continue doing his activism
despite the crackdown on dissent.
Mahmoud Khalil is a human rights defender. Mahmoud Khalil is a human rights defender.
Mahmoud Khalil is a freedom fighter.
Mahmoud Khalil is a refugee.
Mahmoud Khalil is a father and husband.
And above all, Mahmoud Khalil is Palestinian.
But then to shift gears from that
as we're winding down today's show,
I wanna talk to you about this little girl,
eight-year-old Gabi Brillbrain.
And there are two things that you need to know about her.
One, she absolutely loves racing.
And two, she was born with a birth defect
that prevented her legs from developing below her knees.
And while Gabi, she got her first taste of competition
last year during the local Soapbox Derby
where she was allowed to ride as a second
in a two-man vehicle contest.
But that, as it turns out,
it didn't fully scratch the racing itch for.
In fact, it only made her want to drive a car by herself.
Well, I've done it last year,
and then, not like I did pretty good,
that I like to maybe do it on my own.
Last year, somebody drove it for me,
so I didn't drive it.
So Gabby's family and the local club that puts on the Derby, they work together to design and build a car somebody drove it for me, so I didn't drive it.
So Gabby's family and the local club that puts on the Derby,
they work together to design and build a car
that Gabby could drive on her own.
And so traditionally, so box Derby cars,
they have a foot pedal brake system,
but since it obviously wasn't an option here,
they had to try a couple of different alternatives.
And so first they tried a hand brake system,
but that didn't work out.
David Holland, the club member who custom built the parts
for Gabby's car, saying,
Rather than pushing a pedal with your legs,
you pull back on the handle and it actuates the brake.
What we found after installing that was Gabby, 46 pounds,
very difficult to hold and maintain that pressure.
She went down four times, she crashed four times.
And so then they tried something else, pneumatic brakes.
With David explaining that the brakes are made
from a paintball gun compression cylinder
and all Gabby has to do is flip a switch to stop the car.
But then Gabby's dad explaining.
It's a great thing because it puts Gabby
on the same level playing field as other kids her age
so we can compete at the same activities
and at the same level that they do.
That's really great to see her take the initiative
to want to do things on her own
and have that drive to overcome those obstacles.
You know, for David, it's been a great experience
working to make this happen for Gabby
with him telling a local news outlet.
It's the biggest reward of the whole thing.
If you'll just pair with a child, it can be Gabby,
it can be any child.
It's what makes it worthwhile
because it does get hectic.
And there's a lot of parents, you know, they get involved.
But the kids are true innocent.
You know, they're dreaming and they're focused
on having a good time.
And so now for Gabby,
she's just really excited to race this year.
But they're also adding that her favorite part's
either the actual driving or winning the trophy.
So I just want to say good luck, little G.
I'll be rooting for you.
And I also want to give the title of Banff of the day
to Gabby, to Gabby's family,
as well as David Holland and everyone else
that's making this little girl's dream come true.
How we treat others and especially how we treat those
who are not able to do something based off of the systems
that already exist, that is so fucking telling
about who people are at the core.
And that's where I'll leave it,
because this is supposed to be
the kind of the more positive story of the day.
I'll do my little ranty rant,
a different time, different place.
But that is where today's show is gonna end.
Thank you for watching.
Thank you for subscribing.
And I'll see you right back here tomorrow,
because of course I've got a brand new show for you
every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday
at 6 p.m. Eastern, 3 p.m. Pacific.
Love you, mean it, bye.