The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 9.1 WOW! The Logan Paul Andrew Tate Problem Got Ugly Fast, The 3 Big Problems Post-Pandemic, & More
Episode Date: September 1, 2022Start your free trial today: http://www.Squarespace.com/Phil & enter offer code “Phil” to get 10% off your first purchase! News You Might Have Missed: https://youtu.be/aR2VfdwF5ro TEXT ME! +1 (813...) 213-4423 Get More Phil: https://linktr.ee/PhilipDeFranco – 00:00 - Logan Paul Calls Out Andrew Tate 04:31 - CA Passes Law Protecting Right to Smoke Outside of Work Hours 06:34 - Man Stirs Controversy By Winning State Art Competition With AI-Made Art 08:58 - Sponsored by Squarespace 09:44 - How The Pandemic Has Impacted Military Safety, Education, and the Box Office 13:15 - Michigan Board Rejects Consequential Referendum Over Formatting Issue – ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Logan Paul Calls Out Andrew Tate: https://roguerocket.com/2022/09/01/logan-paul-andrew-tate/ CA Passes Law Protecting Right to Smoke Outside of Work Hours: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-08-31/california-oks-bill-to-protect-workers-who-use-pot-at-home Man Stirs Controversy By Winning State Art Competition With AI-Made Art: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-08-31/california-oks-bill-to-protect-workers-who-use-pot-at-home How The Pandemic Has Impacted Military Safety, Education, and the Box Office: https://roguerocket.com/2022/09/01/military-sa-reports-spike/ https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/01/federal-school-test-scores-dropped-pandemic-00054414 https://www.vox.com/culture/2022/9/1/23330691/national-cinema-discount-movie-summer-box-office SA Hotline:https://www.rainn.org/resources Michigan Board Rejects Consequential Referendum Over Formatting Issue: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1565142439001788416?s=20&t=3C4FOUjZXMcP4rX5d82eTA —————————— Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg, Christian Meeks, Maxwell Enright Art Department: Brian Borst, William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Maddie Crichton, Lili Stenn, Chris Tolve Production Team: Emma Leid ———————————— #DeFranco #LoganPaul #AndrewTate ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Logan Paul just brought the hammer down on Andrew Tate, not, no, I'm trying to build up hype so I
can fight you and get paid sort of way, but rather, I think you should go die in a dark corner sort of
way. The shit that Andrew Tate is saying will have a ripple effect much more dangerous than you can
imagine because his narrative is truly hateful. His rhetoric has extreme negative energy in it,
and it will affect impressionable young people in a way that will not
show until years from now, and it is dangerous. And just in case you've ignored the news cycle,
Andrew Tate, of course, blew up over the past few months with viral clip after viral clip online.
Some of it is like general hustle culture, motivational bullshit, but really the thing
that has gotten the biggest spotlight are the completely violent misogynistic messages he's
put out there. I think sex is alpha bro crap and then multiply it by a hundred.
You know, with him, there was this debate of what do you do about a guy like this and his influence?
You just trust other influencers to challenge him and that somehow is going to make him smaller?
Or do you limit his influence at a social media level?
And with that, we actually ended up seeing major social media companies responding by banning him, though, that really hasn't changed anything.
Because there's still a whole army of fan accounts on all these platforms resharing his content anyway.
And while most recently we're seeing the likes of Logan Paul speaking out against Andrew Tate,
we saw Logan's brother Jake actually kind of supporting him.
Tweeting,
I don't roll with Andrew Tate, may KO his ass out in the ring one day soon,
but I roll with freedom of speech.
With him then sharing a link to a video that Andrew Tate uploaded regarding his social media bans.
You've also separately had absolutely massive creators like KSI seem to challenge Andrew Tate to a fight,
which is in no way supporting that person's message,
but you have people saying fighting him would still give him a ton of
visibility. And that's actually something that Logan Paul, who is also a friend and business
partner with KSI, spoke on. I don't feel like platforming this guy. I don't feel like giving
him the blessing of being my dance partner in the ring, especially after the social media platforms
have made it very clear how they feel about this guy, right?
And I would even put a little call out here to, like, fellow creators and even JJ.
Like, you want to re-platform this guy?
Anyone.
You want to have him on your shows?
You want to give him another opportunity to speak and spread his agenda?
Bogan also diving into the freedom of speech argument and the role of social media companies.
Essentially saying that if you think
Tate and his message deserve to be spread,
but are upset that it doesn't fly on,
let's say YouTube or Instagram too bad.
Freedom of speech, go for it, brother.
You can say whatever you want.
Go in the courtyard of the mall,
scream on the fucking table and say whatever you want.
But when you are now at the mercy of,
you know, an organization that has brought you
the visibility that you so desperately
seek. And now you want to not play by the rules like that's just not going to work.
Logan also asking if it's violence, if it's racism or sexism, at what point do you look
at someone with a massive following spreading dangerous ideas and put it to an end?
So where's your line in the sand? Do we want to let Andrew Tate keep doing this before his
subscribers of little TikTok schoolboys start doing negative, bad shit to women? So how bad do we want to let it get?
When we know where it's going to lead, you know how this ends. With one of his co-hosts,
Mike Malik, at various points noting how severe the consequences to this can and have been,
how people online are already eating up this misogyny, and how that stands to do a lot of
damage. The jokes about violence towards women, about, you know, that type of activity are at a
height right now. I will say, I was actually surprised to hear these two saying this on their
podcast, because I feel like a majority of creators out there, they're scared to say things
that their audiences might not like. And I'm not saying it would be like a one-to-one overlap of
the impulsive audience and like Tate fanboys. But if I were to just guess, I would think there was
like a decent chunk of crossover between the audience, maybe not even majority, but a decent but a decent meaningful chunk that you could see so with them publicly saying this on the podcast
It wasn't a surprise to me that all their top comments are people lashing out at them with some of it just getting ugly
Nasty ranging from ugly personal attacks to others mentioning his past with the Japanese for us people saying that makes Logan a hypocrite
You also saw people defending Logan from those comments saying that is not a one-to-one comparison.
Both in why there was massive backlash against the creators,
as well as what the creators did after the backlash.
Also, regarding the argument of being free to say what you want,
you have people pointing to Ethan Klein.
Because regarding Tate just yesterday, he said,
Dear Free Speech Champions that defended Andrew Tate,
tell me what you think about this.
I just got a cease and desist letter from Andrew Tate.
He demands I stop talking about him.
Thoughts? Which also, congratulations to Ethan. This is like a land speed record. I joked yesterday
about how you attract legal problems like I attract people with daddy issues and already
another one? But ultimately, with all that, I'd love to know your thoughts on any aspect of the
story. I know we covered a lot, whether it be about the cease and desist to Ethan. What are
your thoughts on the points that Logan Paul was making? Also, do you think someone like a Logan
Paul speaking out makes a difference? Why? Why not? Anything and everything.
I'd love to hear from you in those comments down below. Why are you high right now, James? Does
this really feel like the appropriate time? Also, yes, I'm specifically talking about you. I'm not
actually, but if you are high, how great was that moment? Also, if you're wondering why I said James,
it turns out it's because it's the most basic-ass bitch name in America.
It is the most common name for men in America.
Let's go through it together.
James, John, Robert, Michael, William, David, Richard, Charles, Joseph, Thomas, and just to Adam, Christopher,
you got basic-ass bitch names.
It's like 25% of American men right there.
But, I'm getting sidetracked.
Before I decided to alienate about a quarter of my audience,
I was trying to talk about pop because it's in the news for a
number of reasons. Things like if you live in California, you had big news, the state Senate just passed a bill that would amend the
anti-discrimination laws and the Fair Employment and Housing Act to protect pot smokers from their employers. Now before you degenerate, but beautiful bastards get too excited,
you should know this doesn't mean like you can go hot box your workplace.
But it actually does mean you would be able to smoke pot outside of work
and if you test positive at a hair or urine test your boss can't punish you for it
Which I think for a number of jobs makes absolute sense. I remember when I applied to work at Target
They were like you need a drug test motherfucker. It's Target
I should be required to be high to work with the public
But also with this law there are a few caveats for example
You might get hit with a loophole other tests that may determine whether you're currently high like saliva tests are not covered by the bill
So watch out for that and the bill does notably exclude building and construction workers, federal contractors, workers who receive federal funding,
and federal licensees who are required to maintain drug-free workplaces. Also, you need to know not
to jump the gun on this. This is not signed yet, though Newsom does have until the end of this
month to do so, and once he does sign it, it'll go into effect January of 2024. And with this,
you have supporters saying that it could strengthen job security and open up employment
opportunities for cannabis users since drug tests are commonly used to weed out prospective applicants.
Also, yes, fuck you, pun intended.
And notably, California is not breaking new ground here.
It would make it the seventh state to codify such protections.
And very notably, and also another bit of news, this comes just as a new Gallup poll dropped this week, finding that for the first time ever, marijuana use among Americans is outpacing cigarette use.
With only 11% of respondents saying they smoke cigarettes,
which is down from 45% in the mid-50s. And to make the comparison,
16% of people say they now smoke weed and 48% say that they've at least tried it at some point in their lives.
Art is dead and that is not in reference to the famous Bo Burnham song that I play every time I'm sad or uninspired.
Also, it's one of the only three songs I actually know all the words to. Rather,
that's what some are saying after this piece won an art contest at Colorado State Fair.
But why? You might ask, because you're a crazy person like me who talks to videos I can't speak
back. Well, the issue is that the artist Jason Allen never actually painted this, nor did he put
a stylus to a screen, since this was technically the digital art category. But rather, this art
was made with AI software called Midjourney. So interesting in its own right, but this entire
conversation and debate about this piece
quickly took off on Twitter after an artist posted,
TLDR, someone entered an art competition with an AI-generated piece and won the first prize.
Yeah, that's pretty fucking shitty.
With a lot of people agreeing with them.
But also, you had people pointing out, Alan knew what he was doing here.
He knew that he was kicking the hornet's nest.
But he was also critical of his critics by pointing out that he had to create hundreds of images
and prompts to fine-tune what the AI came up with before coming across three pieces he was proud of. With him
going on to say, how interesting it is to see how all these people on Twitter who are against AI
generated art are the first ones to throw the human under the bus by discrediting the human
element. Does this seem hypocritical to you guys? But to that, there was a lot of pushback. With
people saying that's no different than sending prompts to another artist until they made a piece
that you liked and then you took credit for it.
And in this case, the AI isn't a person, so Alan could take credit as maybe a collaborator on the project.
But also with this, we saw no shortage of arguments.
Some saying AI is just another tool for artists to use and another medium to express themselves.
Some saying it's no different than poetry made manifest as Alan had to write words.
Also people questioning, is something not art because it was not made by a human?
Another saying, is it no different than photography as the photographer just chooses the best image
from the ones they've captured?
But also one of the points that made many artists angry
was that these AIs are trained on datasets
of pieces made by other human beings.
So it's allegedly quasi-stealing.
But then that has a whole different argument
of is it theft or just being inspired by?
Well, of course, I'd love to know your thoughts
on any aspect of this story.
I wanna know your thoughts on this specific reaction,
which reads,
we're watching the death of artistry unfold right before our eyes. If creative jobs aren't safe for
machines, then even high skilled jobs are in danger of becoming obsolete. What will we have then? What
is your opinion on that? What does it make you feel? Are you more excited or inspired or are
you indifferent on something like this? Because if you're an artist, maybe it makes you feel better
that you're not the only ones that need to worry. In fact, apparently you can now make scripts for
YouTube videos with an AI. Though my writers assure me that it's just
absolute shit at writing and refuse to even link me to a video because I would be so offended by
how bad it is. But yeah, what are your thoughts regarding this whole situation, whether you're
in a creative field or not? And from that, I want to take a second to thank the fantastic sponsor
of today's show, Squarespace. You know, I've been partnering with Squarespace for years now,
and I have to say, if you're getting your business off the ground or creating
a place to share your homemade goods, your new favorite hobby, current obsession, or even a
personal blog to get all those thoughts out of your head, no matter what you're doing,
Squarespace is there to help. And it's all so easy. There's nothing to install, patch,
or upgrade ever. Plus, creating a beautiful website with Squarespace's all-in-one platform
has never been so simple. It's extremely intuitive and easy to use. And with their
mobile-optimized websites, your content automatically adjusts so it looks great on any device plus with squarespace you
get access to all their marketing tools and analytics and their award-winning customer care
team via email or live chat 24 7. so if you want to check it out see why so many others love it
see if it is right for you start your free trial today over squarespace.com fill when you realize
you love it make sure you enter an offer code phil to get 10 off your first purchase
sexual assault test scores,
and movie sales. What do those three things have in common? Well, it turns out all have gotten
worse since we re-emerged from the pandemic. So starting with the first and worst, SA across the
US military has shot through the roof recently. According to new data, as military bases began
relaxing COVID restrictions last year, sexual assault jumped 13%, with close to 36,000 service
members saying in a confidential survey that they had experienced unwanted sexual contact, which is an absolutely insane number
considering when a similar poll was taken in 2018, only roughly 20,000 said the same. And if last
year's numbers are accurate, that means only around one in five victims officially reported their
experience, with these revelations coming just over a year after the Biden administration formed
an independent commission to study the issue and devise solutions, and coming up with 80
recommendations including things like removing military commanders from the adjudication process and assault cases,
better evaluating commanders for the climate that they create, and making victims advocates independent of the chain of command.
And all of that leading to a bill being passed by lawmakers back in December,
where, among other measures, it made it so that independent prosecutors, not commanders, decide whether a case goes to a court-martial.
And so where I want to end this section is that if you are a survivor of assault,
this is the essay hotline.
There's also specific numbers that you can call if you're a male survivor
or if you're a member of the military.
Please stop doubting yourself and get the help that you deserve.
There is no reason to feel ashamed and you deserve justice.
Then we should talk about the second post-pandemic trend, test scores.
And this one, likely not a surprise if you've kept up with our coverage
of the state of the American education system
or your kids are in school right now or you are in school right now. Our kids are doing
far, far worse in school, with new data being published by the National Center for Education
Statistics, which administers what's commonly called the Nation's Report Card. You've got
exams for reading and math that nine-year-old students took first in early 2020, and then again
in early 2022, with results showing that average scores dropped five points in reading, which is
the largest decline since 1990. And it's even worse in math points in reading, which is the largest decline since 1990.
And it's even worse in math, seven points, which is the first decline in that subject ever recorded.
Plus, for the students who were already falling behind before COVID, the picture's even uglier,
with their scores crashing as much as 12 points in math and 10 in reading,
with the Secretary of Education saying, yes, this is connected to the long absence of in-person teaching
and that the U.S. is in an education crisis.
And while we've seen test scores dropping, we've also been seeing increases, but it's increases in things like school shootings,
violence, classroom disruptions, teacher and staff vacancies, absenteeism, cyberbullying, and
students' use of mental health services. But all of that brings us to the third and least concerning
of this trio that we're talking about, movies. Right currently, box office figures in North
America, France, and Germany are tracking at around two-thirds of pre-pandemic levels for the first half of this year.
With the U.S. bringing in $3.6 billion during that time, far short of the $5.4 billion over the same period in 2019.
Numbers that would be even worse if you didn't have big blockbusters like Spider-Man No Way Home and Jurassic World Dominion.
Though, the industry's saving grace in the first half of the year was actually Paramount's Top Gun Maverick, which brought in $692 million in the U.S. and Canada.
But here's the thing, a lot of studios have not done so well, such as Warner Bros., with inside sources reportedly
claiming that they can only afford to release two more movies this year despite having several
ready to go. And apparently a lot of this stalled return to the theaters is being driven by older
demographics who have refrained from theater since COVID. Meanwhile, young audiences are back in
full. In fact, theaters in America are so desperate. This Saturday, they are selling
tickets for just $3. They're trying to turn it into an event?
They're calling it the first annual National Cinema Day.
You've got over 3000 locations participating,
equivalent to more than 30,000 screens.
And really, in a lot of places, there's no better time
because it's so fucking hot outside.
I went for a hike yesterday
and I looked at my phone halfway through
and it was 107 degrees.
I felt like my face was melting.
I was scared I was gonna look like fucking Ted Cruz
when I got back to my car.
But hey, I guess the way that I'll end this shitty trio
is $3 movies this Saturday.
What are we going out to see and watch this weekend
while we try to, you know, forget about the state of the
world for two to three hours?
And then let's close out the day with the least polarizing
topic we possibly could talk about, and that is abortion.
And that is in part because pro-birthers are making
some interesting moves. Right, so for months now,
abortion rights activists in Michigan have been collecting
signatures for a ballot initiative that would enshrine
abortion rights in the state. And not only would this proposed
referendum install permanent abortion protections in the
state constitution, it would also extend those
protections to other reproductive health services like
birth control, prenatal care, miscarriage management,
and more. Plus, it would also stop a law from taking
effect that would ban abortions without exception for rape
and incest. That law, which by
the way is from
1931, was supposed to go into effect after Roe's reversal, but had been blocked by a county court. So unsurprisingly after the Supreme Court
decision, this ballot initiative got a ton of momentum with tens of thousands of people volunteering to knock on doors, ultimately gathering over
750,000 signatures from all 83 counties in the state, far more than the roughly
425,000 required for an initiative to make it on the ballot.
Which makes sense.
Polls have consistently shown
that Americans broadly support abortion protections.
I mean, hell, it's saying something
when you go to a place like Kansas,
a reliably red state,
and voters there resoundingly rejected an amendment
that would strip abortion protections
from the state constitution.
And as Politico explains,
along with a slew of pending court cases
and state legislative battles,
these ballot initiatives have the potential
to remake the country's abortion access map as the number of states implementing near total bans has mounted.
And all of that is likely why we saw Republicans doing what they did yesterday in undermining the will of the people.
Because the reason we're talking about all this now is despite the fact that the Michigan Bureau of Elections recommended that the ballot initiative be certified,
the Michigan Board of State canvassers, thanks to you guessed it, Republicans, killed it.
With the board yesterday rejecting the inclusion of the amendment on the ballot this November after getting deadlocked
two to two. With both the Republicans on the board voting against certifying the measure while both
Democrats voted in favor. And as far as why these Republicans killed this initiative before it could
come into this world, they said they were doing it because of a literal formatting issue. I am not
kidding, really. Screenshots of the petition that was circulated to collect signatures for the initiative
appeared to have spaces missing between multiple
words. And while parts of it can be hard to look at
and it takes a minute to parse through, if you know how to
fucking read, you can. And beyond that, the
language that appears to be missing spaces isn't the
summary of the measure which most voters read
but instead just the full legal text of the
proposal. The legal mumbo jumbo technical
legal definitions of words part that most
people probably didn't even read or understand.
But pro-birthers use this little thing to argue that it should be invalidated and of course the Republicans on the board went along with it.
And truly anyone who hasn't drank the Kool-Aid yet can see through this bullshit.
And it really brings up the question of how are there so many fucking people in our government at so many different levels that do not
care about the will of the people. But ultimately that's where we are as far as what happens next. The groups behind the ballot initiative can appeal the board's decision to the state Supreme Court, which they've already said they'll do, also about the will of the people. But ultimately, that's where we are. As far as what happens next, the groups behind the ballot initiative
can appeal the board's decision to the state Supreme Court,
which they've already said they'll do,
also accusing the board of disenfranchising voters.
And hopefully we see a resolution,
but this is fucking ridiculous.
Right, how are you gonna use the argument
that this is about states' rights,
but then at the state level,
they try to make sure you don't use your right
to vote a certain way?
Bananas.
But ultimately, that is where that story
and today's show ends.
As always, thank you for watching and subscribing to my daily dives in the news, which if you didn't know,
I actually post on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday as well now. They're just shorter videos. But as
always, my name's Philip DeFranco. You've just been filled in. I love yo faces, and I'll see you tomorrow.