The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 9.17 Shane Gillis Andrew Yang SNL Controversy, Lilly Singh's Mixed Reviews, & The GM Strike
Episode Date: September 17, 2019Go to https://buyraycon.com/defranco for 15% off your order! Brought to you by Raycon. Check today’s Rogue Rocket deep dive!: https://youtu.be/5-Alg4POtTQ Check out my conversation with Casey Neista...t: https://youtu.be/oaKl78WB9Fk The wait is over! Head on over to http://ShopDeFranco.com to grab a pair of ‘Have a Great Day’ shoes! ✩ MY NEW PODCAST ✩ ✭Listen on Anchor: http://Anchor.fm/AConversationWith ✭Watch: https://youtu.be/woe_W4VXdho ✩ FOLLOW ME ✩ ✭TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PhillyD ✭FACEBOOK: http://facebook.com/DeFrancoNation ✭INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/phillydefranco/ ✩ SUPPORT THE SHOW ✩ ✭Buy Merch: http://ShopDeFranco.com ✭Lemme Touch Your Hair: http://BeautifulBastard.com ✭Paid Subscription: http://DeFrancoElite.com ✩ TODAY IN AWESOME ✩ ✭Check out https://phil.chrono.gg/ for 46% OFF “Heroes of Hammerwatch” and 75% OFF “Full Metal Furies” only available until 9 AM! ✭How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything: https://youtu.be/5-Alg4POtTQ ✭Big Mouth Season 3 Trailer: https://youtu.be/70CN9XeDnf0 ✭In the Tall Grass Official Trailer: https://youtu.be/7afc9gTbVFI ✭Monica's Tiki Death Punch from FRIENDS: https://youtu.be/BbTLWn9596Q ✭Bill Nye Answers Science Questions: https://youtu.be/FaCeZsOOKEY ✭Secret Link: https://youtu.be/u9SXN_4VEdE ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ SNL Drops Comedian Shane Gillis https://roguerocket.com/?p=14846& GM Workers Strike: https://roguerocket.com/?p=14849 A Little Late with Lilly Singh Premieres: https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/17/20847627/lilly-singh-late-night-youtube-jimmy-fallon-jimmy-kimmel-seth-meyers-nbc https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-49726027 A Little Late YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2gzy_aI-luPtEpL-GzQP6w ✩ MORE NEWS NOT IN TODAY’S SHOW ✩ Elon Musk Defends Comments About Rescue Diver in Lawsuit: https://roguerocket.com/?p=14847 US Dogs Die From Neglect in Jordan: https://twitter.com/TheRogueRocket/status/1174050625191104514 ———————————— Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg Produced by: Amanda Morones Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Cory Ray ———————————— #DeFranco #SNL #LillySingh ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Sup, you beautiful bastards.
Hope you're having a fantastic Tuesday.
Welcome back to the Philip DeFranco Show,
and let's just jump into it.
And the first thing that we're gonna talk about today,
I can't believe we're having to talk about this again.
And since apparently everybody else on the internet
is scared to say it, once again,
I will preach it from the rooftops.
Racism is bad. I mean, it was an honor just to be nominated.
No.
But the reason I'm doing this bit again is because of this controversy surrounding Saturday Night Live.
As you might have seen, last Thursday you had SNL announcing three new cast members for its upcoming 45th season.
You had Shane Gillis, Chloe Fineman, and Bowen Yang.
And initially, it was actually Yang
that had most of the spotlight.
There was a lot of praise pouring in,
people excited for him to be the only
Asian American regular on the show.
Also joining Kate McKinnon as one of the show's
two openly gay regulars.
But then the focus shifted to Shane Gillis
over the past few days.
And that is because of a series of podcasts
that he made with fellow comedian Matt McCusker
called Matt and Shane's Secret Podcast.
One of the first of these clips that went viral
was Gillis talking about Asian people
living in cultural areas like Chinatown.
All right, no one said anything.
Let the live there.
And the translation between you and the waiter.
Yeah.
It's just such a hassle.
It's like, can you, I'm pointing at it.
Like this is the fucking shooter.
It's actually in the note of the video
being out there in the world,
when this story started to break,
Gillis actually deleted all the videos from his YouTube channel.
But of course, copies were soon posted.
There were clips all over the place.
And so in those now not so secret podcasts,
Gillis can be heard making comments about Latino people,
Middle Eastern people, Jewish people.
You also had people sharing a clip from a different podcast,
where reportedly on May 27th,
Gillis seemingly used slurs directed at Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang.
Give me your next candidate Dems.
Jew next.
Actually they are running a Jew.
You also have people calling Gillis homophobic
after uncovering a podcast where he repeatedly used
an anti-gay slur.
In one of those instances, he uses the slur
right after doing a caricatured Middle Eastern accent,
all while criticizing comedians who talk about
their depression and their standup routines.
Those guys are fucking gayer than ISIS.
Mm-hmm.
At least ISIS is out there like,
for me, we need to get the pussy.
After we blow ourselves up, we get the bunch of pussy.
These white f***ing comics.
Oh, yeah.
They're like, I'm just sad because life's hard.
And, like, it turns out, and I'm gay.
And with all of this happening,
we had a co-owner of a comedy theater that Gillis used to perform at telling Vulture,
good, good comedy theater stopped working with him within the past few years because of racist, homophobic, and sexist things
he said on and off stage. Now later on Thursday, we saw Gillis kind of apologize on Twitter writing,
I'm a comedian who pushes boundaries. I sometimes miss. If you go through my ten years of comedy, most of it bad,
you're going to find a lot of bad misses. I'm happy to apologize to anyone who's actually offended by anything I've said.
My intention is never to hurt anyone, but I'm trying to be the best comedian's actually offended by anything I've said. My intention is never to hurt anyone,
but I'm trying to be the best comedian I can be,
and sometimes that requires risks."
Although, I will note, with those that were not happy
with Gillis here, there were criticisms,
because it's not like a lot of this was from 10 years ago,
with a number of them being from the past two years,
and notably the most recent, seemingly,
at least according to reports,
is that Andrew Yang clip from May.
The main point, though, the reactions in the debate,
they continued over the weekend until yesterday
when you had SNL put out a statement saying,
"'After talking with Shane Gillis,
"'we have decided that he will not be joining SNL.
"'We want SNL to have a variety of voices
"'and points of view within the show,
"'and we hired Shane on the strength of his talent
"'as a comedian and his impressive audition for SNL.
"'The language he used is offensive,
"'hurtful, and unacceptable.
"'We are sorry that we did not see these clips earlier
"'and that our vetting process was not up to our standards.
All right, so you had the show pulling Gillis' offer.
You then had Gillis making another statement,
writing, it feels ridiculous for comedians
to be making serious public statements, but here we are.
I'm a comedian who was funny enough to get SNL.
That can't be taken away.
Of course, I wanted an opportunity to prove myself at SNL,
but I understand it would be too much of a distraction.
I respect the decision they made.
I'm honestly grateful for the opportunity.
I was always a mad TV guy anyway."
And among the people responding to this news,
we saw former cast members and an SNL host chime in.
You had Sandra Oh, who hosted the show earlier this year,
saying,
"'Glad to see NBC-SNL decision to not legitimize
slash give platform to purveyors
of racist homophobic content.
Risks? Lazy ass unoriginal."
You also had the likes of David Spade talking about
the ouuse with guests
on his Comedy Central late night show.
Notably there, you had those guests
bringing up SNL's past history with racist skits,
with them specifically referencing John Belushi
portraying a samurai back in the 70s.
In the 90s, you had Mike Myers playing a host
on a Japanese game show skit
where people cut off their fingers,
and with Spade himself saying,
I think when I was younger on SNL,
when you get hired, the first move wasn't to rifle through your past to make sure you get fired right away.
You also had Rob Schneider, who was on the show in the 90s, saying,
Dear Shane Gillis, as a former SNL cast member, I am sorry that you had the misfortune of being a cast member during this era of cultural unforgiveness,
where comedic misfires are subject to the intolerable inquisition of those who never risked bombing on a stage themselves.
Notably there, he was challenged by another user who wrote,
but he knew what he was doing. He wasn't treading the line, he was crossing it.
He was using derogatory and racist language on a public platform.
He should accept the consequences and learn from it. To which Rob Schneider responded,
I felt sad when I saw the clip, but I was even more sad that he went there and it wasn't funny, just an ugly conversation.
He has the right to say it, cancel culture is wrong,
but people have the right to call racist things racist as well. And soon after adding, last thought on this. There's a difference between exposing truths
through free speech and just being ugly. It's not okay to say racist things under the guise
of comedy. Just because you have a mic in your hand doesn't make the racist things you say
any less racist. Following those comments, we saw a number of users sharing old photos of Rob
Schneider dressed as people from different cultures. So people seemingly saying, who are you
to criticize? Also, very notably, you had Andrew Yang
jumping into the mix, with Yang saying on Twitter,
"'Shane, I prefer a comedy that makes people think
"'and doesn't take cheap shots.
"'But I'm happy to sit down and talk with you if you'd like.
"'I think we have, as a society,
"'become excessively punitive and vindictive
"'concerning people's statements and expressions
"'we disagree with or find offensive.
"'I don't think people should be losing jobs
"'unless it's truly beyond the pale and egregious.'"
And then also adding,
"'It's also the case that
anti-Asian racism is particularly virulent
because it's somehow considered more acceptable.
If Shane had used the N-word, the treatment would likely
be immediate and clear.
And it appears that that message may have resonated
with Gillis because Yang has said that the two
will be sitting down with each other.
And so that's where we are right now,
but with all of that said, I pass the question off to you.
What are your thoughts on this?
Do you think it was right or SNL is smart
in removing Gillis?
Or do you think it's maybe hypocritical
that SNL is getting rid of Gillis given their past?
Or is it not because the sketches being referenced
are decades old?
Yeah, I'd love to know your thoughts on this.
I mean, as far as how this goes forward,
I know that I've seen a lot of people cheering
that Gillis isn't getting this job.
They think that it's gonna be bad for his career.
I really don't think so.
This has potentially given him way more attention
that he would have gotten as being kind of just one
of the new guys on SNL.
He's been gaining followers since this started.
He could definitely ride this wave of people
that see this as PC culture run amok.
I mean, I would honestly be surprised
if this whole situation doesn't get him thrust
onto the Joe Rogan experience,
and or maybe some other large podcasts,
but there's definitely gonna be an audience for him.
Especially if other comedians like Tony Hinchcliffe,
who was vouched for how funny Shane is, are correct.
Yeah, I guess give it enough time, we'll see.
But of course, once again,
I'd love to know your thoughts on this.
Then, in interesting internet-y slash mainstream
business news, we had Lilly Singh.
And Lilly Singh, if you don't know,
is a long-time YouTube creator, a popular creator,
and you may remember when we last reported on this,
she got a late night show with NBC.
And the reason we're talking about it today
is that it launched last night.
And as one might expect, there are a number of reactions.
You know, we saw praise and support
from a number of her fans, you know,
excited that she was kind of shaking up Late Night,
excited that because she's different
from what we've seen from Late Night,
she can tell different jokes.
Also support from fellow creators like Timothy DeLaGhetto,
Adelaine Morin, iJustine.
You also had articles popping up like this one
from the Metro with the headline,
"'Lily Singh Takes Down the Boys Club'
in the Premiere of Her Talk Show A Little Late."
Mashable giving us,
"'Lily Singh's Feminist Music Video Slays Late the premiere of her talk show, A Little Late. Mashable giving us Lilly Singh's feminist music video
slays late night stereotypes on the first A Little Late.
But at the same time, there was criticism
of the show and content.
With some of the top comments on the videos
that they posted to YouTube reading,
wow, race bait much?
This was disappointing but more so disturbing.
That was unfunny and extremely uncreative.
Another writing and asking,
all the jokes are based on color?
On her first episode, was it deliberately written
by a saboteur of hers?
And then some who seemed supportive but felt like the content fell short.
You know, as far as that content, it included kind of a skit and rap at the beginning.
Hello, my name is Lily and I ain't no white man.
My skin got some color and it ain't a spray tan.
I know you're used to only jimmies in the spotlight,
but I'mma throw some melanin up in your late night.
She also had an opening monologue.
But I get it because it's also tough for you.
Listen, I understand that for some people, white people,
seeing someone like me host a show is terrifying.
Hashtag not my Carson Daly.
She also had Mindy Kaling on as a guest.
I am so thrilled to be your first guest.
Only for you would I be here at 1.30 in the morning.
I don't know who's watching my child.
And I don't care.
Rainn Wilson, also hot by...
What is that? I don't recognize that sound.
It's Birkenstocks.
It's Birkenstocks walking across the floor of an REI to go buy a Patagonia jacket.
It's a white noise machine.
Okay, I get it.
Right, and I'll link to the videos they have up on their YouTube channel so you can come
to your own conclusions based on the full content.
But, as far as my personal opinion on it, I'm reserving it for the kind of first one
to three months.
But if you're a fan of late night shows, even daytime shows, where a show is now compared
to where it started, it's usually vastly different.
In the beginning it's about one, introducing yourself, differentiating yourself from other
people in the marketplace.
Three, establishing the content.
Or figuring out what works, what doesn't work,
what feels more comfortable, authentic.
Right, and I say that because I believe at this moment,
it could be incredibly easy to criticize something
as being one note, but if you kind of pull back, right,
the picture becomes bigger.
I see this as kind of the first note in a much larger song.
Granted, time may reveal that the song is one note,
but I guess to kind of close out this analogy,
I guess I'm just waiting for the beat to drop
before I also drop an opinion.
That said, for me, just pure analytics,
marketing, business standpoint, I am so fascinated.
I mean, you had a lot of people kind of crapping
on this show because they're like,
"'It's on at 1.30 in the morning.
"'It's not a big deal.'
"'But it really is.'
You know, yes, on TV, you're gonna have live viewership,
but the whole system has evolved.
You know, whether it be someone watching on TV,
you know, they DVR it, when they wake up they watch it,
or YouTube.
Probably the most symbiotic relationship we've seen evolve
has been late night and YouTube.
I have watched more late night TV,
thanks to YouTube, than ever before.
They chop up the content, they upload it to YouTube,
they give you the ultimate a la carte experience,
each piece having the potential to blow up.
With Lilly Singh in this show,
that is more apparent than ever, since they actually premiered it on YouTube
before it aired on TV.
But yeah, I guess the main point here is I'm excited
to see the successes and failures that stem from this
and just how the ecosystem in general changes.
And then let's talk about the big General Motor Strike,
which if you do not know is entering its second day.
It is a very massive deal in the auto industry.
And that's because in addition to there being
nearly 50,000 employees that are striking
and reports saying that that could cost the company
up to $90 million a day,
it's also because this is the first strike
led by US auto workers since 2007.
Notably, that strike was also led by GM workers,
lasting about three days.
But that said, as far as the strike now,
which is taking place across dozens of factories
and facilities in nine states,
it reportedly started because over the weekend,
GM and the United Automobile Workers Union
couldn't settle on a collective bargaining agreement,
and the UAW's vice president, Terry Dittes,
announced they would not be extending the current agreement
from 2015 that expired on Saturday night.
And this reportedly because the workers' requests
were not met in their negotiations.
And in a statement he said,
"'While we are fighting for better wages,
"'affordable quality healthcare, and job security,
"'GM refuses to put hardworking Americans
"'ahead of their record profits of $35 billion in North America
over the last three years.
We are united in our efforts to get an agreement
our members and their families deserve.
Union leaders then met and planned a strike starting Sunday
at midnight with employees demanding fair wages,
affordable healthcare, their share of profits,
job security, a defined path to permanent seniority
for temps, and following the demands or the requests,
whatever you want to call it, GM responded.
And in fact, on Sunday, they publicly shared this offer,
which they said would give over $7 billion in investments
and over 5,400 jobs.
It would also boost wages and benefits with wage or lump sum
increases in every year of the four year contract
and improved profit sharing formula and new coverage
for things like autism therapy, chiropractic care,
and allergy testing.
But obviously, because we're talking about it today,
GM workers, or at least the union, they still wanted more
as they proceeded with the strike.
With D'Tess adding in a statement,
"'We stood up for General Motors when they needed us most.
"'Now we are standing together in unity and solidarity
"'for our members, their families, and the communities
"'where we work and live.'"
And yesterday we also saw GM saying that negotiations
were back on the table with the UAW,
with the company saying,
"'Our goal remains to reach an agreement
"'that builds a stronger future
for our employees and our business.
And with all of this happening,
we've seen a fair amount of support behind the workers,
with numerous politicians tweeting out,
applauding the workers.
We have the likes of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
tweeting, incredibly inspired by GM's almost 50,000 workers
for having the courage to strike
for the dignified work they deserve.
In a time of record profits,
workers should prosper, not suffer.
That's why unions play a key role
in an economy
that works for everyone.
Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang tweeted,
"'Unions and the UAW have been a force for worker equity
"'and fair treatment for decades,
"'even as our economy has grown more inhuman and punishing.
"'GM should value its workers fairly
"'and compensate them what they deserve.'"
And I mean, as far as how the employees are doing now,
because right, we talked about the consequence
for the company, but there are consequences
for the employees.
For example, according to a Fox Business report,
strikers have to wait until day 15
to receive their assistance pay,
which is a pay that strikers can receive from the union
while they're striking and not at their jobs.
But a key note there is reportedly that comes
to just $250 a week, which would barely cover rent
in Detroit, which is the city that hosts
a lot of GM's employees.
And regarding that, one employee told Fox Business
that the one thing that she's afraid of
is that we might be here for a while
and we can't make it on $250 a week.
You know, GM might not want to budge.
So I'm just here trying to prove a point, that's it.
But ultimately, that's where we are
with this story right now.
It's gonna be interesting to see
how long this strike will last.
This of course has the potential to be devastating
to both sides, obviously to different degrees.
And so of course, like with everything we talk about,
I'd love to know your thoughts on this.
And that's where I'm going to end today's show.
And hey, if you like jumping into it with me today,
let us know, hit that like button.
Also, if you're new here,
be sure to hit that subscribe button.
Definitely click that bell to turn on notifications.
Also, if you're not 100% filled in,
you wanna watch some more,
we got a brand new deep dive you can check out,
or maybe you just missed yesterday's Philip DeFranco show,
you wanna catch up, you can click or tap right there
to watch either of those.
But with that said, of course, as always,
my name's Philip DeFranco, you've just been filled in.
I love yo faces and I'll see you tomorrow.