The Philip DeFranco Show - PDS 9.5 I'm Going To Get Banned For Nudity, Liz Truss, Obesity in America, & Nevada AG Aaron Ford
Episode Date: September 5, 2022Download the FanDuel Fantasy app and sign up with promo code DEFRANCO to get your FREE SINGLE GAME ENTRY! News You Might Have Missed: https://youtu.be/zsd3YH3vGS0 TEXT ME! +1 (813) 213-4423 Get More P...hil: https://linktr.ee/PhilipDeFranco – 00:00 - Twitch Is Falling Apart 02:43 - The U.S. Diet Is Deadly 07:15 - Liz Truss Will Be UK’s Next PM 08:19 - Sponsored by FanDuel 09:24 - Interview With Nevada AG Aaron Ford 10:55 - What Does Your Opponent Say About the Current State of Politics? 12:02 - Why Doesn't Your Opponent Have Voter's Best Interest in Mind? 13:14 - What Was Your Opponents "Defense" of Saying You Should be Lynched? 14:22 - How Would You Respond to People Who Say You Should Still Debate Your Opponent? 15:35 - What Are Your Biggest Concerns If Republicans Win? 16:51 - What Can AG's Do to Counter Election Deniers and Protect Election Systems? 18:42 - Why is it Important for People to Vote for Democrats in this Election? 20:26 - Anything Else You Want to Highlight for Voters? – ✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩ Twitch Is Falling Apart: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgd2MZwt4Rc The U.S. Diet Is Deadly: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/08/31/1120004717/the-u-s-diet-is-deadly-here-are-7-ideas-to-get-americans-eating-healthier?utm_source=nextdraft&utm_medium=email Liz Truss Will Be UK’s Next PM: https://www.npr.org/2022/09/05/1121104284/the-next-prime-minister-for-the-u-k-to-be-announced-monday Russian Cuts Off Gas Flow To Europe: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/no-stream-eu-gas-markets-brace-price-surge-after-latest-russia-gas-cut-2022-09-04/ —————————— Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier Art Department: Brian Borst, William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Maddie Crichton, Lili Stenn, Chris Tolve, Ben Wheeler Production Team: Emma Leid ———————————— #DeFranco #Pokimane #JiDion ———————————— Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Sup, you beautiful bastards! Welcome back to the Philip DeFranco Show.
I hope you've had a fantastic Monday, a fantastic Labor Day.
And for the next little bit, just buckle up, make sure you subscribe,
because once again, I'm splitting $10,000 across 10 lucky subscribe beautiful bastards this month,
and let's just jump into it.
This is a news show.
Everyone's getting banned off of social media platforms right now.
That's what it feels like.
But today, you have a lot of people angry about someone getting unbanned.
And that's largely because of this streamer.
I believe her name is Kimmika.
I might be mispronouncing that.
But she was recently banned off of Twitch
because she actually had sex on stream.
And there was a question of, well, how long is she banned?
Our one constant criticism about Twitch
is that they do not implement their bans equally,
which is why you had so many people,
Furious, one another massive creator
who's actually banned off of Twitch,
Gideon interviewed this other streamer
and she said that she was only banned for seven days, which resulted in people in two camps. Some saying,
okay, she's got to be lying. She's just doing this for clout. Seven days is going to pass.
People are going to be like, oh, remember her? And she's going to try and convert it into something.
But others are saying, no, that sounds like Twitch as usual and this is wrong. And during
this time period, we saw more and more creators speaking out. People like Charlie, Moist Critical.
Yet this girl orders a hot dog extra wiener on stream
and only receives a seven-day suspension.
And then lo and behold, yesterday,
she got unbanned after just seven days,
which a number of people pointed out
was the same amount of time Hasan Piker got banned
for saying the word cracker.
And I think for a lot of people,
this just further cements that Twitch
is so incredibly inconsistent.
And I think it's very easy to make the argument
that Twitch has favorites
when you have a former Twitch staples like Ludwig
even speaking on this in the past. Talking about
instances where he should have gotten a three-day ban, but then got a homie move from upper
executives and he was fine. So I was meant to get banned for three days. However, it was kind of
like a homie move from a couple people at Twitch. They were like, hey, we went through, talked to
some higher execs. You have a squeaky clean profile. I think I was a favorite back then. Okay. People would say I was the golden
boy of Twitch or whatever, and they didn't ban me. But I think I know full well a bunch of other
creators who did the same thing probably would get banned. And that's not a bash on Ludwig. I
think it's good that he's actually openly speaking about this. And while I will say,
I think places like YouTube or really any place that has like an incomprehensible scale
also have issues, but especially on Twitch,
I don't know how you could feel safe
from unequal crackdowns on your channel
if you really look at their track record
and dog shit communication.
They just seem to do things haphazardly,
but of course, I'd love to know your thoughts
on the situation.
Oh, and before we move on to the next story,
I'm very excited to announce my new Twitch show,
DeFranco's Dancing Dong.
It's my one time a week show where I just,
I helicopter my dick until Twitch bans my channel for what, seven days? And then I'll come
back and do it again because apparently seven days is the price of admission or do I actively have
to put my dick in someone to get seven days? Otherwise it's maybe only three. To the Twitch
execs, my DMs are open, so feel free to provide any clarification whatsoever.
So I want to dive deeper on this with you because, you know, last
week we put out a video titled Stop Promoting Obesity, where we talked about the Abercrombie
situation and the big online debate around large people being accepted and included versus promoting
unhealthy ideas and standards. For all the details or a refresher, I'll link to that video down below.
We had an Abercrombie ad that featured a bunch of models with many people just focusing on
the largest person.
And a lot of people saw that as promoting obesity,
whereas I and others just saw this as, you know,
someone being included.
Even noting that over 42% of Americans are obese.
So this was essentially a clothing company going like,
hey, our clothes will fit you 42%.
And something I always try and hit on with those stories
is, you know, I've been every size,
whether I'm big, I'm small, I'm whatever,
and same for you, you have value.
You can love yourself while at the same time going, hey, I should probably make some healthier decisions.
And your size shouldn't dictate whether it's okay or not to bully you. It's not okay. It's also,
as we talked about, not fucking helpful. But also with that, I think it's important that we don't
shy away from the very real health problem we have in this country. For example, you recently
had NPR reporting diet-related deaths outrank deaths from smoking and about half of US deaths
from heart disease, nearly 900 deaths a day,
are linked to poor diet.
And noting, the pandemic highlighted the problem,
with much worse outcomes for people with obesity and other diet-related diseases,
with a cardiologist even describing it as the U.S. being in a nutrition crisis.
Especially as we continue to see studies finding
that ultra-processed foods are linked to cancer and early death.
Things like prepackaged soups, sauces, frozen pizza, ready to eat meals, hot dogs, sausages, French fries,
sodas, store-bought cookies, cakes, candies, donuts,
ice cream and more.
With a number of people arguing it's also hard
because a lot of those foods are also
some of the most affordable.
Because in this country we also have
a food insecurity problem.
And as NPR notes there,
the US can't fix hunger by just feeding people
cheap high calorie processed foods,
which is the food that's so abundant in our food supply.
Which is why we're seeing a new report
putting out recommendations. The first being treat food
as medicine, noting that there's mounting evidence that providing prescriptions for
fruit and vegetables can spur people to eat better and manage weight and blood sugar,
with there also being an idea for healthcare systems or insurers to provide or pay for
healthy groceries, and combining that with a nutrition education. And there, it turns out,
there are actually some pilot programs that let Medicaid or Medicare pay for the meals in several
states. Two, focus on quality of calories, not just quantity.
Noting that when you're on a tight budget or you're relying on things like food stamps,
processed foods like chips and soda can set you back less than fresh produce.
We've actually seen attempts to tackle this.
Like in select communities, if you get food stamps, you get more money to buy fruit and vegetables.
There have also been things like a double bucks program,
which doubles the value of food stamp benefits when used to buy produce at farmer's markets and other venues.
But those are small programs and not something we're seeing at a nationwide scale.
And among the other seven which I'll link to down below, one of them is having a federal food SAR.
With the recommendation noting,
the US government spends more than $150 billion each year on food and nutrition related programs.
And the healthcare system also spends billions of dollars on treatment of diet related diseases.
But the task force pointing to,
this spending is fragmented across 200 separate actions
in 21 different departments and agencies
without harmonization or synergy.
The idea being that if it's not streamlined,
there's not this grand plan
where everything's working in harmony,
there's just gonna be a lot of waste.
And we got to say, hey, we tried,
we threw money at the problem
without actually implementing meaningful change.
And it's gonna be interesting to see
what changes do we potentially see
with a country continuing to get more and more obese.
And also how effective will those changes be?
Because, yes, there are systemic issues in our society that make it harder to not be obese.
But I'm also aware as me having had pretty much every resource I would need to live a healthy lifestyle at my fingertips, it still took so much more.
And it was just a very personal journey. And so I do think trying to change the system and making it more accessible for people to live healthier lifestyles,
that's going to be helpful, but it's not going to be like the thing that solves it all.
But I guess why this has been in my head is I want to say I think there are two separate issues.
I do genuinely think that we have a health crisis in this country.
But that does not make villainizing or bullying people who are obese or severely obese okay.
And showcasing that larger people can fit in your clothes is not like promoting obesity.
And in that space, one of the only areas where I do get pissed off
are people that kind of promote this idea of equal health at every weight.
I saw a TikTok the other day that said a doctor was being fat phobic
because they told their obese patient that they should maybe, you know, lower their calorie intake.
And of the calories they were getting in,
they should also try to get more of them from fruits and veggies.
Well, everyone can have different health issues,
and I know people like talk about thyroid issues
and stuff like that, as far as everyone,
as far as that being a general statement,
that's not fatphobic, that's science.
It's literally part of a doctor's job.
You can't compare your general practitioner or dietitian
to some guy on Reddit or Twitter calling you fat
or attacking you for existing.
When I was at my biggest,
my doctor prescribed me blood pressure medication
and recommended a healthier diet.
I wasn't like, how dare you call me fat and
insinuate my health problems are connected to me being obese. I don't know
There's just like a lot of ridiculousness and a lot of hate and it's just it's it's so much
You're gonna want to keep your eyes on the UK because things are probably about to get interesting Liz Truss just won the Conservative Party
Leadership election which means she is going to be the UK's next prime minister, beating her main opponent 57% to 43%.
As far as why this is going to be interesting to watch, as Axios explains,
most recently as foreign secretary,
Truss took a hawkish approach to relations with the EU and the war in Ukraine.
And that's in addition to more local things,
like vowing to slash taxes despite the rocky state of the UK's finances.
And reportedly saying that within a week,
she will come up with a plan to tackle rising energy bills and securing future fuel supplies.
Which is an incredibly important thing to note because Russia has now suspended gas flows to Europe.
And saying that it will not resume until sanctions are lifted on it.
And so this will raise energy prices in Europe even higher than they already are and will likely raise gas prices in the States.
With this, Russia's decision to shut off the gas came after the G7 said it would impose a price cap on Russia's oil exports.
And so this is being seen as Russia's most brazen attempt to break Western unity, but many experts believe it's unlikely to work.
With previous polls having continually shown that Americans are willing to pay more at the pumps
to keep Russia sanctioned, and European countries have been preparing for this scenario since March.
And just politically speaking, if the West shows that it can be blackmailed,
it won't just be Ukraine that's endangered, it'll be all of Europe.
Y'all, fantasy football season is finally here, and my nerdy ass is excited.
And to make it even more awesome, I brought in today's fantastic sponsor, FanDuel. Y'all, fantasy football season is finally here, and my nerdy ass is excited.
And to make it even more awesome, I brought in today's fantastic sponsor, FanDuel.
Single game contests are a great way to get in on the action for the week's biggest matchups with huge cash prizes up for grabs.
I mean, we're talking millions of dollars in prizes all football season long in FanDuel fantasy contests.
And if you're new to fantasy or just new to FanDuel, there's no better time.
And that's for a few reasons.
First, new customers get a free single game entry when you sign up for FanDuel, there's no better time. And that's for a few reasons. First, new customers get a free single game entry when you sign up for FanDuel.
For that one, you just draft your five-player lineup,
you put your best player in the MVP position,
where fantasy points are multiplied by one and a half.
Plus, on FanDuel, you can also play full slate contests featuring multiple games,
season-long best ball contests, and so much more.
And when you win, you'll get paid fast.
So what are you waiting for?
Kick off football season with a free single game entry when you download the FanDuel fantasy app and sign up with promo code DEFRANCO.
That's promo code DEFRANCO to get your free single game entry. Also, separate from that,
if you want to go head to head with me, on my own, I made a 100 person $10 entry contest I'm
going to be playing. Just make sure you get in before Thursday because I'm going to be doing
something around the first game of the season, as well as after Thursday night, setting it up for
Sunday. Same link, same setup. Make sure you use promo code DeFranco and happy football season.
The future of this country is at stake in these upcoming midterms and unfortunately in pretty much
every election for the very near future. While understandably going into these midterms,
many people are just focused on the House and the Senate. There's much more at play here. And
that's especially true for swing states with races that are expected to ultimately determine
the control of Congress as well as what the fucking country looks like moving forward.
We're talking about states that are some of the last holdouts with abortion protection, states that Trump and
his allies fought to try to overturn the election, and where Republican candidates are campaigning on
his lies about voter fraud. And if those folks win their races, even the ones that are just about
their state, it could have serious consequences nationwide. Or they could cut off access to
abortion not only for the residents of their state, but further limit options for those who
live in neighboring states with restrictions and need to travel to get the procedures.
They could also, and this is what we've been talking about
for the last two years,
seriously meddle with the election system.
Or at the very least, have people who are willing
to throw out the popular vote and the will of the people
in a situation like 2020, where Trump tried to get officials
in swing states to do just that.
One of those key states, of course, is Nevada.
Nevada specifically is one of the places
where Trump most intensely contested the results.
So it's not surprising that it's one of the states
that has the higher relative percentage of far-right and extremist
candidates. Some of those candidates are running for key offices that you might not think about,
like the office of the Attorney General, who notably is one of the main people fighting
against all the attempts to destroy democracy in the state. Right in that race, the current
Attorney General, A. Ron Ford, is facing right-wing lawyer Sigal Chadha, who notably strongly beat a
more moderate Republican in the primaries and has many extremist views. And that's just the public stuff.
That's not even including her leaked text messages where she said that the AG should be lynched.
But, you know, to try to get a better lay of the land and learn more about what is at stake for the voters in Nevada and beyond,
we reached out to AG Ford to talk about everything.
So, AG Ford, I just have to jump into it.
There's a lot I want to talk about, but I guess my first question is just,
what do you think it says about the state of politics that Seagal Chata is the Republican nominee for your job right now?
So you've always been picky about your produce, but now you find yourself checking every label to make sure it's Canadian.
So be it. At Sobeys, we always pick guaranteed fresh Canadian produce first.
Restrictions apply. See in-store or online for details.
Well, I think it says a couple of things, because in addition to her being the nominee,
we have seen a part of the party, the reasonable part of the party, that has endorsed me over their own candidate. Right. So it's clear that there's a schism within the Republican Party and that schism has produced on the one hand an extreme
MAGA Republican in Seagal Chatha, who, you know, does not have the best interests of Nevadans
in mind and would be not a good fit for the Attorney General's office. And on the other
side of the schism are those who, you know, to be sure, may be ideologically different on
approaches that we take as Democrats, but are certainly more moderate and more reasonable in their approach. And those individuals, we've been able to roll
out a Republicans for Forward committee. They have, to their credit, supported the better
candidate in this race. So on the note of not having the best interests in mind, what do you
mean there, if we're comparing, what do you mean there?
If we're comparing and contrasting you and her?
Well, there are a number of things that I can offer in response. I'll start with one of the most prevalent headlines right now, which is the Supreme
Court undermining a woman's right to choose and winning rid of a constitutional right
for the first time in the history of our country, one of this super 50 years.
And with Seagal having been
quoted as or noted as having said that she essentially wants to prosecute and imprison
women who seek abortions. And that's notwithstanding the fact that in our state, we have abortion
rights and statutorily codified and protected. So how she would go about doing that, you know,
I'll leave it to her imagination. But the point is, she's adverse to that particular right. You
know, and frankly, from my
perspective, this job requires someone who is going to respect the humanity and dignity of
everyone who lives in this state. And it's clear to me that she does not respect the humanity and
dignity of people in this state, including me. She is quoted as having said she wants to see me
hanging from an effing crane. And so those are two examples of why I know
she would not have the best interests of Nevadans at heart. And we have to reject it.
Also, for anyone watching, that is a legitimate quote. That's from a leaked text message, right?
And she tried to defend it by saying it was, I don't understand how you defend that statement.
Yeah, well, there's no defense to it. She's not apologized.
Not that it would matter, frankly.
But you're right.
That's a leaked text that she sent to someone at some point last year, I believe it was.
And she did defend it by saying she's Israeli-American.
And that's part of her cultural dialogue, so to speak.
And she says that essentially she was essentially comparing me to the leader of Hamas.
And that as terrorists talk, that's how terrorists deal with traitors.
So, again, you know, her explanation is nonsensical and certainly one that doesn't speak to the fact that here in this country, when you talk about hanging a black man, that's that, you know, that's that's that's lynching. And at the end of the day, there's no place for that in Nevada politics, in politics anywhere.
And I'm hoping and I'm grateful to see, again, some Republicans come out opposed to her for that reason alone.
But but certainly we have to, as a state, reject that and reelect me as attorney general.
So I believe you've used that text message because it's disgusting. Some
would argue that it's disqualifying as a reason that you won't engage in a debate. So I guess
what do you say to push back from people saying, yes, it is disgusting, but it shouldn't take away
Nevadans' right to see their AG talk about the last four years and what he would like to do moving
forward? Well, there are a couple of responses. The first of which is that they can absolutely
hear me talk about what I've done the last four years and what I intend to do the next four years,
because I am an open book in that regard. I'm having interviews like this, for example, with
you, which is open to the public. I speak frequently and periodically on what it is that
we do in our office, what we intend to continue doing. And there will be no dearth of opportunity for the public to hear about Aaron Ford and what
I stand for. But what I will also say is that I do not feel compelled for one second to stand in
the same room with a person who wants to see me hanging from a freaking crane. And I say freaking,
but that's not what she said. And, you know, at the end of the day, you know, those those words are hurtful words.
And it, again, demonstrates she has no respect for my humanity or my dignity.
And I will I will communicate with the public in a different way.
And then I think moving forward, what would you be concerned with if Republicans do win
in this upcoming election? What do you where do you think that there are the biggest concerns?
Obviously, you already talked about abortion rights and concerns there. You're going against someone that has said that they believe that there was election fraud. What do you think is the worst case scenario? What happens if you don't get to surmise. We can look at what's already happening. Look, I don't know if people call me progressive or not, but here's what I know, that the opposite of progressive is regressive.
And I'd much rather be progressive than regressive. And I am absolutely concerned about regressing with a Republican in the attorney general's office.
We can see what happens. We've regressed 50 years in the context of abortion rights.
We've regressed to before the times of civil rights with attacks on voting
rights. We've regressed relative to recognizing the humanity of our LGBTQ plus brothers and
sisters by not being able to say gay in Florida, for example, right? And so these are examples of
things that Republicans are doing and will continue to do if we don't stand up and push back and
refuse a regressive approach
to the way that we coexist with one another. And could you also explain what an attorney
general can do to counter election deniers and what you can do to safeguard the institutions
that we're supposed to protect? Absolutely. And I don't have to guess or surmise because I've
lived it. Two years ago, there was an attack on the basic
integrity of our election system. Look, I took an oath of office four years ago that said I would
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and of the state of Nevada. Didn't really
realize that that meant that I would literally be defending the existence of a democratic republic
with people trying to undermine the actual existence of our republic by claiming and lying about widespread voter fraud.
And attorneys general can push back on that by doing what I did.
And that's defeating lawsuits that are waged to undermine the electoral process.
There was at a minimum of six that were directed toward the state that my office had to defend.
And we prevailed on them to be sure when the off occurrences of voter fraud do occur.
And every once in a while they do. I prosec on them. To be sure, when the off occurrences of voter fraud do occur, and every once in a while they do, I prosecute them. And proof positive of the fact is that there was this
one individual who was claimed to be the poster child, essentially, of the problems with widespread
voter fraud in Nevada. He was over news stations like Fox, for example. Given the story about his
deceased wife, God bless her soul, whose ballot that was mailed to her had been voted, and he
swore up and down. He didn't know what happened, but he claimed that someone voted his dead wife's ballot. And
that was the proof positive fact that there was voter fraud going on and shame on whoever voted
her ballot. Well, we investigated that and found out that he voted his dead wife's ballot. And I
prosecuted him. I charged him for that and took a guilty felony plea from him. And so in the one
off instances where they occur, my office prosecutes those. But what we are not
about is people lying about widespread voter fraud. And attorneys general can be those who
are protecting the front line as a front line defense and a last line defense, protecting
our democratic institutions and our processes. So H.E. Ford, I would say, what is your message
to voters in regards to why it's important to vote for Democrats this fall, especially in a state like Nevada, where it's a massively important battleground state, not only for the House of Representatives, not only for the Senate, but it's a sell that we have to undertake.
We know what's going to happen if Republicans take over.
Look, in 2014, let me back up.
In 2012, I was first elected to the Nevada State Senate, elected into a majority in the Senate Democrats as a Senate Democrat.
And two years later, we lost that majority.
We were in the minority.
I was elected minority leader by my caucus. What we saw them try to do relative to rolling back voting rights, getting rid of early voting or getting rid of Sunday voting, which is a direct attack on on souls of the polls and the black voters, you know, and doing other things of that sort.
We saw what happened. Now, we were able to push back and we were able to stop some of that.
But we got there because of not a red wave, which is what they tried to
attribute it to and what they say is happening, potentially happened this year. But because of
what I call a blue boycott, it wasn't so much that the Republicans swept, it was that Democrats
boycotted and stayed home. They didn't show up. And because they didn't show up, we almost lost
so much in 2014. We cannot have that repeat. And that's not even a whole decade away in the past.
So my my comments to Nevadans is that it's important for us to remember the difficulties that we had to address and face in 2014 and what's ahead of us and stand up and protect our rights and continue putting people into office who respect us from a humanity and a dignity perspective, but also from a constitutional rights perspective.
And A.G. Ford, are there any other issues that you want to highlight for voters or anything else you want to tell them? Usually, I like to ask the person I'm talking to,
what's a question that you wish you had been set up for that you could speak on that you
think is important to voters? Well, I think we've covered quite a bit of what I think is important.
And again, it's to focus on justice. It's to focus on justice for all, recognizing that it doesn't always, for example, manifest itself in the criminal justice context in an arrest and a conviction.
Sometimes it manifests itself in an exoneration and compensation. And that too is justice because systems are made of people. The criminal justice system is made of people and people are fallible. And so justice
requires us to recognize that fallibility and redress injustices by pursuing justice. And that's
the criminal context, but it's also in the civil context. And it's also in the context of our
everyday interactions. And it's important, again, to have people in this office, the top law
enforcement officer position in this state to understand the importance of justice and to not shy away from pursuing it under any circumstance. And so I'm proud of the
work we've been able to do in those areas that I've talked about today. And I think those efforts
speak for themselves. And I would hope that that's a sufficient reason for Nevadans to continue to
support me and to return me to office in November. AG Ford, thank you for the time.
Happy to be here. Thank you so much.
So that was Nevada's Attorney General Aaron Ford. And going into the midterms,
this is going to be something that I'm going to be trying to do, interviewing more incumbents
and candidates as we get closer and closer to the midterms, because there's a lot of
races that matter and some not even at the top of a lot of people's minds. And in a number of
these potential nation changing races, like it's going to be decided by a fraction of a point. With all that, I just want to say thank you once
again for watching and being subscribed to my daily dives in the news. This is the end of today's
show, and so I'll say my name's Philip DeFranco, you've just been filled in, I love yo faces,
and I'll see you tomorrow.