The Philip DeFranco Show - The Fauci Diary Isn't What They Are Telling You
Episode Date: July 28, 2026https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPcmRtuXWYY Go to https://ground.news/defranco to see beyond the headlines and stay fully informed without feeling overwhelmed. Subscribe today through my link f...or 40% off unlimited access. Shop plans starting at 15 bucks a month at https://www.mintmobile.com/DEFRANCO. Thank you to Mint Mobile for partnering with us on this video! Limited time offer. Upfront payment of $45 for 3-mo, $90 for 60-mo, or $180 for 12 mo. Plan req'd ($15/mo. equiv.) Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. >50GB may slow when network is busy. Capable device req'd. Availability speed and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com Get Yourself New https://BeautifulBastard.com shirts! S-5XL now! AND Get Your Tickets to see us live! 12 cities. 12 dates. https://CrashingOutTour.com Today’s Synopsis:Senator Rand Paul has released over 1,000 pages of Anthony Fauci’s private COVID-19 pandemic diaries, sparking intense backlash across MAGA world and right-wing media. While critics claim the entries reveal deliberate coverups, gain-of-function lies, and narcissism, a closer look shows a more complex reality of the early pandemic response. Here is what you need to know about the diary release, the lab leak debate, Fauci's private thoughts on Trump, and why figures like RFK Jr. and Ben Shapiro are demanding accountability. LISTEN TO THE SHOW iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-philip-defranco-show/id1278424954 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ESemquRbz6f8XLVywdZ2VWATCH CRASHING OUT w/ PHILIP & ALEX Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCergKLoy-Yv9zlPk3XQYK7Q?sub_confirmation=1 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2DkU87umhGH9mH1z24Bi9w?si=6sSdjhVNQjyVeBQDLiXcyg Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crashing-out-with-philip-defranco-and-alex-pearlman/id1843429519 JOIN OUR COMMUNITY 📸Instagram: https://instagram.com/PhillyDeFranco 🐦Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillyd 🎵TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@philipdefranco TODAY’S STORIES 00:00 - MAGA Claims It Has the Smoking Gun in Fauci’s Newly Released Journal Entries 10:31 - Sponsored by Ground News 11:39 - Mamdani Announces City Run Grocery Stores Selling at 30% Discount 18:03 - Judge Reviews the Darkest Epstein File Redactions for Possible Release 22:57 - Sponsored by Mint Mobile 24:00 - YouTube & NBC Strike Deal to Bundle Peacock with YouTube Premium 24:55 - Kentucky’s Governor Tells McConnell to Prove He Can Serve or Resign 26:13 - Japan Rattled by 7.1 Magnitude Earthquake 27:33 - Arizona State University Launches a BA in Content Creation THE TEAM Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg, Christian Meeks, Matthew Henry Art Department: William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Chris Tolve, Star Pralle, Jared Paolino, Victor Sledge ———————————— #News #Fauci #Diary Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The scandal around Fauci's secret COVID diary is blowing up why MAGA's claiming it's the smoking gun and things are just going to get even crazier soon.
What's really going on with the Mamdani grocery store backlash?
Where the names behind some of the most disturbing Epstein emails might be about to finally be exposed.
We're talking about all of that and even more on today's brand new Philip DeFranco show you daily dive into the news starting with this.
Let's talk about this Fauci scandal because you have MAGA, again calling for the head of Anthony Fauci after Senator Rand Paul released more than 1,000 pages of Fauci's personal diary from during the COVID-19.
pandemic. It's part of his investigation into whether the COVID-19 virus might have leaked from a Chinese
laboratory and whether, as Paul claims, Fauci lied to Congress about it. But the diary, it doesn't actually
provide the evidence that Paul and many others seem to think that it does. And instead, it largely
shows that Fauci was dealing with a fast-moving crisis that science was struggling to keep up with.
But, and it is a big but, that is not to say that it paints Fauci in a positive light. You have it
showing that he may have lied about some things and he at times appeared obsessed with his own fame.
And so with all this, you have some mega personalities calling for his imprisonment,
some supporters calling for his death, all while he is now set to testify before
Congress and what is definitely going to be a heated hearing tomorrow. But also, if you're not aware,
scientists still have not definitively concluded where the virus originated. And so the debate over
whether it may have leaked from a Chinese laboratory either accidentally or on purpose,
it's still been raging all this time. And you have much of the conversation focusing on the
question of whether the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci led for nearly
40 years, had funded so-called gain of function research at a lab in Wuhan. Right? And gain of function
research? That basically involves messing with the genetic makeup of viruses to study them better and
ultimately prevent pandemics. But you also have a hypothetical risk there that a super
powered virus could get out and can't be stopped.
Now Fauci, he repeatedly insisted that his institute never funded
this type of research in China and that the most likely origin
of the COVID-19 vaccine was in nature.
But you have people like Rand Paul claiming otherwise
and arguing that as a result, Fauci might bear personal responsibility
for millions of COVID-19 deaths in the United States
and around the world.
And then this week, you had Paul announcing that his years-long investigation
into the origins of the virus uncovered that Fauci kept this diary.
He knew Paul claiming that what Fauci wrote privately
and what he told the country are two different stories.
And he said that he was releasing Fauci's entries
from December 2019 through December 2022,
which is worth of 1,100 pages.
While Rand Paul has it explained how he got this diary,
it's typewritten, so it looks like Fauci may have taken notes
on his work computer, possibly for his memoir,
which was published in 2024.
You've got Paul and others arguing that it shows
Fauci was lying about the origin of the virus,
pointing to what he wrote on January 26th, 2020, which was,
now we know the market was not the source,
it was the amplifier.
Right with that, appearing to reference
the Wuhan fish market that had early on
been thought to be a key site for the start
and spread of the virus.
But what you didn't have Paul pointing out
is that Fauci followed that
by writing, having said that, somewhere the virus jumped from animals to human.
And Rand also notably didn't explain that all this is exactly consistent with statements made by Fauci publicly around the same time.
And that includes at a scientific conference the same week and in an interview with USA Today, less than a month later,
or when he used the exact same language describing the market as an amplifier for something that was already going on.
Also, he failed to mention that just a few days later, Fauci still described claims that the virus had been deliberately or accidentally released in Wuhan as conspiracy theories that so far lacked evidence.
Though then also very notably, in that same entry, Fauci said that he had heard
from experts who believed that certain mutations of the virus
could not have occurred naturally.
And he said that he had suggested getting
a larger group of experts together
to carefully look at this.
And he had that meeting, then taking place,
the next day of a conference call and Fauci said in emails at the time
that if they found evidence of a lab leak,
they would have to alert appropriate authorities,
including the FBI.
But then also after the meeting, he wrote in his diary
that only two of the 11 other scientists on the call
were convinced that the virus had occurred naturally,
whereas, quote, the rest felt that deliberate insertion
was possible.
And so Paul also pointed to this entry
to argue the scientific establishment
was more divided than Fauci
on in public writing, this was never a 50-50 room. But there, you've seen pushback, people
saying scientists armed with little information and refusing to rule out a possibility. That is not
the same as saying that they believed that theory or had solid evidence to support it. And then
noting that the consensus that eventually emerged among most virologists was for natural
animal to human transmission as the most likely origin. Right. You had one from Tulane University
telling NPR that there's just no actual evidence for the lab leak theory and also noting that no one,
including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, had a precursor virus similar enough to COVID-19 virus to
create the pathogen that ultimately caused the pandemic. And in fact, the scientists who initially
told Fauci that they thought that the virus might have come from a lab prompting that whole
conference call. You later had them saying that more extensive analysis and new data led them to say
they didn't believe any type of laboratory-based scenario was plausible. And Fauci, while he publicly
downplayed the possibility of a lab leak from the very beginning, he did consistently refuse to make
definitive statements. Where with him, for example, expressing his view in a 2021 entry writing,
I had always said that the very high likelihood is that the virus originated naturally from an
animal reservoir jumping to a human. Then adding, however, over the past couple of days,
given the amount of speculation about the possibility of a lab leak, I have been saying that no one is
100% certain of the origin, including me, and so I am calling for a thorough investigation.
And adding, calling for an investigation is merely to put to rest the extraordinary amount
of speculation and conspiracy theories. And going on to say, however, this is being interpreted
as Fauci flip-flopping again. The far right is really amazing in their distortion of reality.
Now with that, you know, not everyone in the executive agreed with Fauci, but the FBI assessing
as far back as 2021 that the virus most likely emerged in a lab incident in Wuhan.
You also had Fauci writing at the time that the FBI has no idea what they're talking about
and dadding. The reasons that they give do not make any sense. Also, in January 2025, you're the
CIA becoming the second intelligence agency to come out in favor of the lab leak hypothesis,
but even they acknowledge that the finding was made with low confidence. And ultimately,
there was no smoking gun there, and there was also no evidence there that Fauci had solid
information that with all this he had withheld or lied about. And while you can definitely
still have something to criticize about the handling of the situation,
this is just kind of how it is right now.
Just like, it is also true that there are other things
that Fauci may actually have been less than honest about it.
And so at a 2022 interview, for example,
you had Fauci saying that he had nothing to do
with school closures during the pandemic.
But in March of 2020, he wrote in his diary
that he had convinced Mayor Bill de Blasio
to close city schools.
And he also said that California Governor Gavin Newsom
had decided to close the schools in California
as well as the bars and restaurants
based on Fauci's suggestion.
Though notably, while Fauci's also gotten
a lot of the blame for mask mandates,
he actually wrote in his diary
that he really had a problem defending
the ultra-conservative approach of the CDC regarding the wearing of masks outdoors.
And then with that, when the policy did change, you had him writing, the radical right-wing
maniacs who blamed me for the rigidity of the CDC recommendations will probably not realize
at all that it was me that triggered this change. Also, you had Fauci writing about his relationship
and interactions with Trump. Sometimes he described it very positively, but ultimately he painted
a picture of a kind of doddering, distracted old man, even back then. This was more than five years ago,
and so, for example, you had him writing what he described as a disturbingly rambling
discussion with Trump, since he kept talking about TV ratings and hydroxychloroquine and influenza
and virtually everything else as I was trying to keep him on track, saying I insisted through the
rambling and lack of attention span that the POTUS explicitly say that this is not a quarantine.
You also had him in other entries saying that Trump still didn't understand the pandemic,
and he described Trump at one point as acting even more erratically.
And of course, just after the 2020 election, he wrote,
Potus still insisting the GOP won the election.
Completely alternate universe.
Kaylee and GOP senators, Graham McConnell, Ted Cruz, all prostituting themselves by supporting
the potus' baseless claims, heading towards a constitutional crisis. With him then adding a week later,
continual surge, 138,000 new infections yesterday. Potus has no interest at all in the pandemic. He is
focusing on blocking Biden from being POTUS. He is embarrassing the USA, however, 72 million people
voted for it. Difficult to understand, craziness has overtaken part of our country. And with all that,
you would vouch you also deriding what he called the entire extreme right-wing Republican group in the
House and Senate, having completely sold their soul to the infinitely lying ex-president Trump.
With him then also describing efforts from Paul and other lawmakers to question Fauci over what he viewed as conspiracy theories as an amazing and unbelievable waste of our time while
cases, hospitalizations, and deaths continued to soar. But then also as far as public perception, besides the misrepresented claims about Fauci's view of the virus's origin,
you've also got a lot of right-wing media focusing on his apparent excitement over becoming so well-known and admired.
Or yet I'm writing proudly about his interactions with celebrities like Barbara Streisand, Julia Roberts, Kreme Abdul-Jabbar.
He saved copies of favorable press coverage and he noted numerous interviews and media appearances that he had
He even once wrote that he had achieved the Fauci 5 by appearing on all five major Sunday morning TV news shows.
You had him literally writing in one entry, the public adulation of me has been amazing.
And in another saying, it is not hyperbole to say that today I am the most famous and talked about person in the country and one of the most recognizable in the world.
And that's led to more criticism for many, including from Paul, who posted an AI generated image of Fauci as a teenage girl, writing in a diary, for example, while also saying in another post,
While America buried loved ones, Anthony Fauci was counting headlines that doted over him.
And then, of course, this is also sparked backlash from the wider right wing in MaguWorld.
With, for example, Health Secretary RFK Jr.
blaming the media for building up Fauci and other experts that he accused of lying.
The media malpractice that told us all we had to trust the experts
and that he was the expert that they elevated.
And anybody who did not give complete blind faith to these expert opinions,
which we now know were lies,
was marginalized, vilified, demonized, censored.
Canceled.
You also had people like Ben Shapiro
taking Paul's claims at face value.
As it turns out, it turns out
that Fauci knew pretty much all along
that the origins of COVID
were in fact not related to a wet market.
Now again, COVID was almost certainly a leak
from the Wuhan laboratory.
Everyone knows this.
Fauci was the bad guy.
not because bad guys know they're being bad,
but because they think they're lying for a higher purpose.
Fauci was lying because he thought that he was quote-unquote doing the right
and just happened to align with his personal interests.
And then with all of that,
you had people like former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green saying
that Fauci needs to face consequences for his alleged crimes writing in a post.
I'll say it again, Fauci belongs in prisons.
So many lives were destroyed after the shutdown.
Yet I doubt there will ever be accountability.
Though then notably there, she added,
especially from Trump.
He loves the COVID vaccines and thinks he saved millions of lives from Operation
warp speed, which then makes a blame game even more interesting because with all this, you have people not just
talking about investigations or prosecution, but you have accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers
between them saying things like, Dr. Fauci should be given the death penalty. And after receiving
his fair trial, Anthony Fauci must be hung on live television as an example. And actually with all that,
I'll say, among other things that are in those diary entries, Fauci also expressed concerns about
threats to him and his family. Though as far as the possibility that he could be targeted by the justice
system? Paul has already repeatedly referred Fauci for criminal prosecution, but Biden issued a so-called
preemptive pardon. However, Fauci is still scheduled to testify under subpoena before the Senate Homeland
Security Committee, which is chaired by Paul. And he argues that the pardon won't protect him
from charges based on any lies that he tells tomorrow. So we're going to have to see what happens
there, how it goes down, how Fauci responds to the many questions that he's sure to face about this
diary and whether Paul actually finds a way to get charges pursued. But in the meantime, I got to hear
your initial thoughts, reactions, and where you think this is going to go in those comments down below.
And then there's even more that we gotta dive into in just a minute, but first let me thank a sponsor and say, you know, one thing that I've learned after years of cover in the news is that often actually the biggest disagreements, it's not stemming from what happened, but how the story got framed.
And so that's one of the reasons why I'm happy that ground news is sponsoring today's show.
I actually use the platform to sometimes compare coverage and get deeper context that you can't get really anywhere else.
Things like bias breakdowns, factuality ratings, and ownership insights.
And I mean, take the recent debate over President Trump's Iran strikes.
Some outlets like the right-leaning Washington examiner focused on how the conflict's causing midterm worries.
You know, while others, like the Seattle Times, which leans left, focused on how Congress has effectively been cut out of the decision-making process.
And I like the ground news puts that coverage side by side, showing you where outlets agree, what details you emphasize, and where the narratives start to split.
And that can give you a better context and perspective that you're just not getting from reading one publication or scrolling through socials.
Also, I'll say the blind spot feed, it surfaces stories receiving heavy coverage from one side of the political spectrum, but little to none from the other.
That ends up being useful with topics involving Congress, elections, foreign policy, right where the framing or lack of it can become part of the story itself.
So hey, if you want to check it out, scan that QR code or go to ground.
Dot news slash Debranco to get 40% off unlimited access to the vantage plan.
That's ground.
Dotting right back into the news, totalitarian communism is almost here, and it's now coming
with a 30% discount.
Don't we have fun here?
No, what I'm talking about is how much the food at Zora Mundani's city-run grocery store
is going to cost when they open their doors?
Because if you haven't been following this story, Mamdani plans to open one in each of New York's
five boroughs, and he's already selected locations for two of them, in the Bronx, and Manhattan.
And actually, you have the first set to open its doors by the end of next year, and the rest, they're going to open up before the mayor's first terms up.
And in a press conference yesterday, you had Mammany announcing that the stores will sell a collection of basic goods for 30% below typical retail prices.
No exceptions, no gimmicks.
Anyway, that number of being chosen because apparently food prices nationwide have gone up by just over 30% since 2019.
So these stores, they're going back to pre-pandemic prices.
And you've got the city projecting that they'll cut New Yorker's average grocery bill by 15%, so about $90 a month or roughly $1,000 a year.
For many, that 30% discount is the difference between an evening spent around the dinner table,
with family or working another double shift to make ends meet.
Right, and they're arguing that there's a need for this, with Mondani citing a survey from late
last year that found that more than 40% in New York City families can't afford weekly food costs.
Now, granted, he says of the prices they will be reevaluated each month, but that's arguably
more stable than private grocers whose prices go up and down on a weekly basis.
That means no weekly fluctuations nor sticker shock at the checkout line.
And like we talked about at the beginning, they're focusing on the most basic goods that
people need to survive.
This core set of goods will include all fresh produce, meat and seafood along,
with 20 other essential items like cheese, milk, and bread.
Now immediately with us, you had criticism rolling in
with, for example, the New York Post calling the plan vague,
citing a random West Harlem resident who said,
it's stupid and added,
what kind of bread, I'm not letting them choose what kind of bread I want.
I'm not taking anything other than what I want.
I won't eat mayonnaise unless it's Hellman's.
Which I will say, that went from zero to don't fuck with my mayonnaise so fast.
But also I should note that the city is not the one
that's actually going to be picking which brands get stopped.
Or because Mamdani is inviting private operators
to bid for the chance to run these stores.
And so the city will cover the rent.
maintenance and property taxes as well as dictate the mission, standard, and store design.
And then the private operator, they'll handle day-to-day stuff like sourcing products, stocking shelves,
assuring quality, and hiring staff.
If you know how to run a grocery store and you want to do more to help your fellow New Yorkers,
I encourage you to head to Grocery.NyC.
Also, as far as the staff, they'll receive family sustaining wages and benefits and they'll
be allowed to organize a union if they want to.
And while you have all of this, sounding really nice on paper, you then have critics arguing
it is not going to work in practice.
With some predicting that local stores will shut down, the government stores will
become the only option, shelves will empty, rationing will start, and you'll see daily rushes,
hoarding, and lines around the block. Meanwhile, you have others imagining near apocalyptic
catastrophe with supply chains breaking down, people panicking and fleeing, the government
trying to box them in with an exit tax, and those who remain stop working, hoard goods,
and turn on their neighbors as society descends into chaos. But also, I will say, as far-fetched
as that specific picture may seem, there is reasonable concern at the heart of it. Right, New York's
local bodegas and corner stores, they're not sitting pretty on mountains of cash. They often get by
with really small profit margins, like one to three percent.
And so you do have many small business owners worried that if the city starts undercutting
them by 30%, they just won't be able to compete.
We hardly paying rent, utility bills, employers, and we just get in by.
Imagine coming and open another business is going to be harder for us to compare with the government.
Imagine that. And 30%.
Now, in his defense, you have Mom Dhani's saying that they're only going to be discounting these
basic goods and they're not even going to sell stuff like alcohol, cigarettes, lottery tickets,
or hot food, all the way, he says drives revenue for the bodegas.
Plus, New York's home to some 13,000 bodegas anyway, so it's doubtful that just five new stores are going to cause economic ruin.
And that's as he says that these specific locations that his administration has selected can accommodate the competition.
When you are speaking about a dense neighborhood, there is more than enough market for both existing grocers as well as one city-run grocery store.
The city already operates subsidized markets, for example, at Essex Street Market.
And those are operating near multiple grocers, multiple bodegas, and we have not seen harm to local stores.
or operators. And in fact, Mamdani argues that making the city generally more affordable
enables working class people to stay there and that actually means more customers for private
grocers and bodegas, not less. But that is also if the stores actually serve the people
they're meant to serve. And so some are asking, what if people take advantage of the discounted
items by reselling them somewhere else at a market? And well, actually, in response to that,
you have the city's plan including a free membership card program that will track sales and
block excessive bulk purchases. But then still, you have others saying, well, what about the cost?
Isn't this going to mean higher taxes? And yeah, I mean there, there's really no way around it.
This is going to cost the city money.
$70 million to be exact.
That's out of the $125 billion budget, but still, I mean, that's just to get the stores up and running.
The city doesn't have estimates yet on how much it's going to cost them to keep it going,
since it'll depend on a lot of factors.
So regardless, in theory, it should amount to a downward redistribution of wealth,
with richer people's tax dollars subsidizing a discount for poorer people's groceries.
And of course, whether you like that or not, it will often depend on your philosophical outlook.
But there, I'll say if you look at the comments in the New York City subreddit,
they are largely negative there.
You've got a lot of folks basically echoing the same objections that you just heard,
that the stores are going to hurt local businesses, that there will be shortages,
the quality will decrease.
And then for the conservative faction, this whole thing apparently stinks like the totalitarian nightmares of the 20th century.
This has never been tried anywhere except for, you know, Cuba and the USSR and pretty much all the communist countries.
This is socialism and communism at its best.
But here I'll say, you don't actually have to look to just Cuba or Russia, for examples, as state-owned supermarkets.
You can actually stay right here in America.
because it's actually been tried in several places like Baldwin, Florida, and Erie, Kansas,
where the town's only local store closed or the government stepped in to fill the gap.
And actually, even in New York City, Mayor Fiorello, LaGuardia,
created city-owned markets less than a century ago, as Mamdani pointed out.
He did so because he believed in a simple definition of the task of government,
to make people's lives better.
But also with all this, it is worth noting that those two stores that I mentioned in Florida and Kansas,
they ended up closing down in 2024 for financial reasons.
But then again, it doesn't guarantee failure in New York City.
It's not a struggling small town.
You have this huge, prosperous city, and so we're going to have to see how the experiment plays out.
Though also, when these stores open, managing the money, it's not going to be their only challenge.
Because without a doubt, there is going to be a battle over the perception of all this.
And you just know that if there is a single banana that is bruised or maybe a little bit too ripe,
box news, the New York Post, Ben Shapiro, they are going to plaster that shit all over social media.
And so really whether these stores are objectively good or not, and once again, we're going to have to wait to see.
They're going to have to fight against a right-wing propaganda machine that is already.
before they're even a thing trying to make them look terrible.
And the groundwork's already been late.
Zohran's stores probably are going to give you plastic schlop.
Disgusting, emulsified guar gum garbage.
And then also while you've got Mom Donnie dealing with this on the other side of things,
you have Trump again finding himself unable to escape a very big skeleton in his closet,
the Epstein files.
Right?
Because we might just end up getting more documents pending a decision from a judge this week.
That's because over the weekend, a federal judge ruled the DOJ has to turn over a set of redacted
withheld Epstein documents to the court by Thursday for review.
And these documents reportedly include emails sent to Epstein about women and girls
where the sender's name was redacted as well as FBI notes about Trump and other documents not in English.
And you've got this stemming from a case where independent journalist Katie Feng sued the DOJ for concealing those files.
So now you've got this judge asking the DOJ to provide documentation proving that the redacted names are in fact the names of victims.
And in the case of one specific file named potential co-conspirators, the DOJ has to prove that the redacted names are those of law enforcement personnel involved in the investigation.
But also, people are most interested in these emails because they include some of the most questioned parts of the files,
like one from her redacted sender who told Epstein, thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty.
And another where someone told Epstein, I found at least three very good, young poor, but we were so tired.
I will cover up this week, meet this one, not the beauty queen, but we both likes her a lot.
Then also one where someone's complaining to Epstein about the articles in Reuters and The Guardian, and they add,
The key are the 14 to 15-year-old girls. I am a sexual pervert because I say they are now of a reproductive age.
And my heart goes out to you, brother, being called a sexual pervert is no fun.
Hope you are fine and more than well protected.
You might remember that when the files were first released,
there was a ton of outrage that these individuals were redacted.
Because people, they felt that these were just incredibly disturbing messages
and that the public had a right to know who wrote them.
And in fact, you had the reporter suing the DOJ adding.
Blanche says this is from a victim.
The overarching big question that we all know the answer to.
What are you hiding, Donald Trump?
What are you hiding Trump, DOJ?
and what are you hiding Todd Lanch personal lawyer for convicted felon Donald Trump?
Now, as far as what comes next, after the DOJ turns these files in this week,
the federal judge will look at them unredacted to decide if they should be released.
And that's actually something that could have a fast turnaround,
because according to Forbes, he could rule any time after Thursday for them to immediately come out.
Or he could provide up to a 60-day delay.
But then also something very crucial about this timeline is that the files are due to the court on Thursday,
which is a very big day for the DOJ for another reason.
That's when the Senate Judiciary Committee is currently scheduled to hold a vote
on Todd Blanche's confirmation, though that could be such a mess that it does get postponed.
And there, you've got Epstein survivors urging senators to vote against it,
arguing that he's mishandled this case enough and he shouldn't be officially confirmed as attorney general.
And where they're putting most of their focus is with senators Tom Tillis and John Cornyn.
Or because you've had both expressing their doubts with Blanche for a few reasons,
especially the anti-weaponization fund.
But then also, the Epstein files have actually come up with Tillis actually saying that he would not advance the nomination
unless Blanche met with Epstein's accusers.
And while that meeting did take place, you had one survivor writing an op-ed,
calling it a box checking exercise to secure Tillis' vote and adding,
Blanche offered no meaningful explanation for how the redaction failures happened,
who approved the release or what steps he would take to prevent survivors from being exposed again,
saying we were told to take our information to the FBI.
We have already done that.
Telling us to start over was not a plan for accountability.
There was no attempt to work with us.
It was another way to dismiss us.
And you then had her arguing that the country needs an attorney general
who can listen to survivors and hold predators accountable,
and then making this plea to Tillis specifically.
Saying, if your support for his confirmation depends on his ability to treat survivors,
of human trafficking and sexual assault with honesty and respect, then you and every senator
should vote no on Blanche for Attorney General. And this matters because if Blanche cannot get
Tillis or corn in support, he's in trouble. Well, personally, I'm not going to hold my breath here.
We will have to wait to see what comes from the vote. But then also I'll say it seems like now,
after months at Trump, being able to dodge the issue by pointing to the war, the midterms, or
any of his side shows, the Epstein files, they are back in the news cycle again. And for a number of
reasons, including just last night while speaking in Michigan, you had him getting heckled
while hitting as usual talking points about the economy and tariffs.
It was causing tremendous problems for your jobs.
But now all of that is changing because I placed historic tariffs on foreign producers
and manufacturers, including a 25% tariff on foreign automobiles.
He's a communist.
He's a communist.
Thank you.
He's a communist.
We're running against communists.
This is great.
I didn't even hear the guy, I think.
And also in recent weeks, there have been headlines
about Epstein Associates dying of the files
and Trump's efforts to suppress them coming up
at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
An actor also made a massively vial rant
suggesting that Trump was a pedophile.
The Epstein files?
Don't you want to see what's in there
so that we can hold people accountable?
These fucking rapists?
We're just cool with it.
That bitch has the keys to the nuclear.
He's like all up into 13 year olds.
Like, dude, what? Go to jail.
And it appears that it is back in the cultural conversation.
People still want answers. They don't want the keys jingled to distract them. They want someone to be held accountable.
But as far as if that can happen with the people that are in power right now, that seems, I will say unlikely in my opinion.
And then there's more we're going to dive into in just a minute. But first, let me thank a sponsor and say, you know, there are certain bills that I review carefully.
And then there's my phone bill, which historically has been more of a don't make eye contact with situation.
Because when something's on auto pay, apparently it can just keep taking your money forever without having to explain itself.
And that's where today's sponsor, MintMobil comes in. They make wireless pricing extremely easy to understand.
Right now, Mint's offering three, six, or 12 months of premium wireless for just 15 bucks a month.
And that applies to any plan, even unlimited.
You can also bring your unlocked phone, keep your number, and activate online with ESIM and minutes,
no store or waiting around, which is a huge plus for me.
And saving money does not mean sacrificing coverage.
Mint runs on the nation's largest 5G network reaching 98% of Americans and 4GLTE.
It reaches 99%.
And you can also choose a plan that actually fits how you use your phone from 6 gigabytes all the way up to unlimited.
And every plan comes with a seven-day money-back guarantee, so you can give it a try without feeling like you've been
entered a lifelong wireless commitment.
So stop paying that I've always paid this much tax
and scan that QR code or go to mittmobile.com slash defranco
and get three, six, or 12 months of premium wireless
for 15 bucks a month.
Again, that's mittmobile.com slash defranco.
But then from that, for your final block of today's show,
I am going to cram some more news you need to know
down your throat like I'm making some foie gras.
And so first up, you've got the big news
that starting next year,
you're going to be able to get Peacock
with your YouTube premium subscription.
Apparently, it's going to come at no extra cost.
Right, because you have YouTube and NBC Universal
so finally striking a deal after their shaking negotiations last year.
And there, you had NBC even warning that they were considering going dark on YouTube TV
if they couldn't land the right deal.
And while they eventually worked something out to patch things over,
we really weren't sure how that was going to play out for the long term.
But now you've got this multi-year deal working for both of them.
NBC, they get better distribution for Peacock and YouTube.
They get an extra boost to its premium package adding perks like more live sports content
and access to Universal Studios movies.
And so that's why some saying that this appears to be where the streaming world is heading.
Programmer is trying to reach as many people as possible,
even if that means dipping into audiences they don't own directly.
There are some big numbers here.
YouTube has over 125 million premium subscribers,
while Peacock, they have around 48 million.
And that's as the access to Peacock is ad-supported.
The next step, you've got Mitch McConnell,
who is definitely 100% alive
and issuing the statements that they say that he is issuing.
Though he, apparently is two options,
prove that he can actually work or resign.
Because that is what you have a Kentucky Governor,
Andy Bashir, telling him in a letter to his office yesterday.
And that, of course, because McConnell's been MIA
for more than 40 days at this point due to health reasons.
And yesterday, you would a capital physician,
saying that he still hasn't been cleared to leave rehab.
And that says you have the rest of the country stuck on a roller coaster we can't get off of.
And so you had Bashir saying President Trump is stuck in a war of his own making, prices continue to rise,
and Americans' voting rights are being eliminated.
All while McConnell is absent and refuses to communicate clearly and directly with the people he serves.
Because what we've heard from his office in the last few weeks has been unclear, to say the least.
You've gotten some updates, but really they've all been written and then also connected to weird photos.
And that, of course, has raised some right flags.
His office also released a statement earlier this month saying that he initially kept quiet about this most recent episode because people as age
Quote, hesitate to share the vulnerability that comes with growing older. But to that, you had Bashir saying, I understand anyone's desire for privacy, but when you run for office and serve as one of a state's U.S. Senators, you willingly abdicate much of your personal privacy. That's the deal, and we all know it when we run.
And so now with this letter, Yub Bashir also calling on Senate Majority Leader John Thune to get to the bottom of McConnell's medical situation and to let the American people know what is really going on. And if he isn't fit to serve, he says that Thune should
start the voting process to get him out. But then also in the news, you had Japan just getting hit by a massive 7.1 magnitude earthquake,
collapsing historic landmarks, trapping people in damaged buildings and sending shock waves across the region.
The trammer reportedly hit at a shallow depth of just 10 kilometers, meaning that the surface shaking was extremely intense. I mean, you're looking at a maximum JMA intensity 7, which is the highest level on Japan's seismic scale. And the footage were getting, is crazy. And the footage were getting
Parts of the historic 400-year-old Kumamoto Castle's stone walls collapse,
setting massive dust clouds over the area.
Meanwhile, you had local authorities reporting severe structural damage across multiple towns,
though things like key infrastructure in the nuclear power plants,
those are reportedly fine.
But in Kashima, for example, a section of the Aon Mall reportedly collapsed
which triggered fires and sent emergency crews racing to search for survivors.
And it's actually because of massive collapses like this
that right now we don't know how many deaths or injuries there have been.
Are you local officials saying that between 20 and 30 employees at the mall haven't been contacted,
and some officials are anonymously saying that they expect their
to be a surprising amount of deaths.
And that's as you've got locals trying to get to their hometowns to check on loved ones
who are facing some problems as transit is shut down.
You've got bullet trains being suspended, even slower options, or facing backups
because at least one freight train was derailed.
But also some good news here is that an initial tsunami advisory for one meter waves
along the nearby coastlines was officially lifted after two hours with no major waves
recorded.
But still, you have officials warning that strong, hazardous aftershocks
remain a major concern over the coming days.
But for right now, you have rescue operations actively underway,
and you have the prime minister stating that life safety is the government's top priority.
But then last up today, let's end. Kind of light, but still interesting.
Arizona State University just turned content creation into an official degree program.
So it is not just a class.
It is four full years, at least 120 credits, and it includes gen eds.
And so it's the real deal.
You've got them teaching content strategy, personal branding, audience analytics,
and other tools that are meant to give students what they need to start a career online.
And for their capstone project, instead of a paper,
it's left to choose a platform, develop a content strategy, and build a full online presence.
And you've got all of this as, you know, content creation has become a multi-billion dollar
industry. And it's really only been getting more valuable with ad spending, creator tools, and all the
developments. And you have studies finding that more than half a Gen Z, they're looking to join that
crowd. And so you're seeing reports framing this program as a way for the university to keep up with the
flow of entrepreneurship. Because soon, the highest earning businesses, they could be personal brands
instead of just random startups. And on top of that, you've got people saying that the program also
shows another industry shift because it's housed under their school of journalism and mass
communication, which then also, it just goes to show how much the lines between journalism and content
creation are blurring right now. Right. And research shows that people actually go to social
media for news more than they go to things like TV or online websites.
Though of course, rightly, there are concerns there because, you know, obviously just
because you have a camera and a lot of followers does not mean that you're a journalist.
And I also will stress there, while I've had many a young journalists come to me and say
I inspired them to go that route, I personally do not consider myself one.
You know, I'm just a guy doing a little newsy news thing.
Which on that note, thank you so much for watching another one of my newsy news things.
And actually, if you're not 100% filled in yet, I just put out another really interesting
news video, let's call it a bonus video.
We dive into what's very likely going to be a horrific,
problem if you take generic drugs. It's crazy. It's why you had some stocks plunging. A lot of people
just really uncertain about the future. You can check it out by clicking or tapping the screen,
or I got links in the description or the top-hand comment. But yeah, I love yo faces and I'll see you
right back here tomorrow.
