The Philip DeFranco Show - Trump Just Fired Pam Bondi Right Before Her Epstein Testimony
Episode Date: April 2, 2026Watch Ad-Free & Get Extras @ https://PhilipDeFranco.com Go to http://proton.me/defranco and sign up for Proton Mail's awesome service today. LISTEN TO THE SHOW iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us.../podcast/the-philip-defranco-show/id1278424954 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ESemquRbz6f8XLVywdZ2VWATCH CRASHING OUT w/ PHILIP & ALEX Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCergKLoy-Yv9zlPk3XQYK7Q?sub_confirmation=1 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2DkU87umhGH9mH1z24Bi9w?si=6sSdjhVNQjyVeBQDLiXcyg Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crashing-out-with-philip-defranco-and-alex-pearlman/id1843429519 WATCH/LISTEN TO MY NEW PODCAST w/ TOMMY VIETOR Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2CePXwDrvdQTes844wflKp?si=55a6b6049c4841ed Youtube: https://youtube.com/acw?sub_confirmation=1 iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/in-good-faith-with-philip-defranco/id1827016835 JOIN OUR COMMUNITY 📸Instagram: https://instagram.com/PhillyDeFranco 🐦Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillyd 🎵TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@philipdefranco TODAY’S STORIES He Stored Documents in His Bathroom. Now He’s Gutting the Records Law. - https://open.substack.com/pub/philipdefranco2032/p/he-stored-documents-in-his-bathroom?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web Humanity Is Going Back to the Moon. The Toilet Broke on Day One. - https://open.substack.com/pub/philipdefranco2032/p/humanity-is-going-back-to-the-moon?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web Trump Fired Bondi. She Begged Him Not To. The Epstein Testimony Is Still Coming. - https://open.substack.com/pub/philipdefranco2032/p/trump-fired-bondi-she-begged-him?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web Prediction Markets Are Moving Oil Prices. The President’s Son Is Invested in Them. - https://open.substack.com/pub/philipdefranco2032/p/prediction-markets-are-moving-oil?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web Trump’s Primetime War Address Gave No Answers. Oil Jumped 7%. - https://open.substack.com/pub/philipdefranco2032/p/trumps-primetime-war-address-gave?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web 00:00 - Trump Fires AG Pam Bondi 04:30 - Stocks Tank & Oil Prices Jump After Trump’s Speech on Iran War 12:19 - Sponsored by Proton Mail 13:17 - Polymarket Is Influencing Oil Markets Amid Iran War 16:13 - DOJ Says Trump Is Not Required to Turn Over Official Records After His Term 20:10 - Artemis II Launches For Historic Moon Mission THE TEAM Produced by: Cory Ray Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg, Christian Meeks, Matthew Henry Art Department: William Crespo Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Chris Tolve, Star Pralle, Jared Paolino, Victor Sledge ———————————— #DeFranco #Trump #PamBondi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Tellus Online Security.
Oh, tax season is the worst.
You mean hack season?
Sorry, what?
Yeah, cybercriminals love tax forms.
But I've got Tellus Online Security.
It helps protect against identity theft and financial fraud
so I can stress less during tax season or any season.
Plans start at just $12 a month.
Learn more at tellus.com slash online security.
No one can prevent all cybercrime or identity theft.
Conditions apply.
This episode is brought to you by FedEx.
These days, the Power Move isn't having a big metallic credit card to drop on the check at a corporate lunch.
The real Power Move is leveling up your business with FedEx intelligence and accessing one of the biggest data networks powered by one of the biggest delivery networks.
Level up your business with FedEx, the new Power Move.
When Westchaff first took flight in 1996, the vibe
were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion. Inline skates were everywhere,
and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s,
one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board.
Here's to WestJetting since 96. Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us
at westjet.com slash 30 years. You're fired. Pam Bondi is officially out as Attorney General,
and Tulsi Gabbard, she might actually be next on the chopping block. There had been some murmurs,
some speculation, but Trump announced on truth social today that he axed Bondi.
And you've got reports already rolling in that he plans on replacing her with Lee Zelton,
the administrator of the EPA.
And this is absolutely huge news.
I mean, we're talking about one of Trump's biggest proponents in attack dog.
Someone who's gone to bat for him countless times and weaponized the DOJ for him in ways that
we've truly never seen before.
But it also isn't the most surprising because Trump's been souring on Bondi for a while now.
With his biggest complaints being the way that she handled the Epstein files, which makes sense
because the whole thing's been a shit show no matter how you look at it.
And actually to that point, the timing here is incredibly notable because it comes
just before Bonnie's expected to give a deposition to the House Oversight Committee after being
subpoenaed over the Epstein files. The were firing shouldn't change any of that, with the committee's
ranking member saying in a statement that she is still legally obligated to appear. And then beyond that,
as far as Trump's problems with her, he reportedly didn't think that she'd been aggressive
enough in targeting his political opponents. And that's something he's been grumbling about
for months. Right, he was especially angry with the Justice Department because he couldn't
get a win against the former FBI director James Comey and the New York Attorney General Tish James,
though that wasn't for a lack of trying. Right, it activates the part of my brain when I'm
watching some real housewives over my wife's shoulder, even though I said I wanted to watch
something else and I didn't want to really watch this, but I'm kind of watching it. And oh my God,
it's three hours later. According to the Daily Mail, her firing was messy as fuck. With him reporting
that Bondi begged Trump not to fire her in an explosive showdown at the White House after
he accused her of an unforgivable offense. And he added that when Trump told her she had been
terminated, Bondi responded by pleading for the president to give her more time in the role. And as far as the
unforgivable offense that the Daily Mail is referencing there, you had them claiming.
Trump's reasoning for the sudden dismissal comes in part because the president believes Bondi
tipped off Eric Swalwell about the FBI's efforts to release investigative documents related to his
relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. But despite all that, Trump's generally been in Bondi's
corner publicly. And in fact, when asked for a statement after rumors of her firing first started
circulating last night, Trump literally responded. Attorney General Pam Bondi is a wonderful
person and she is doing a good job. And even in his post announcing her termination,
Trump described Bondi as a great American patriot and a loyal friend who faithfully served as my
attorney general over the past year. We love Pam. And in her own statement, there wasn't any sign of
begging or pleading, just her announcing that she was leaving the role and then patting herself
on the back for her great accomplishments before closing by saying, I remain eternally grateful
for the trust that President Trump placed in me to make America safe again. Now, as far as what
happens from here, you know, unlike what we've seen with other top loyalists who Trump got rid of,
it appears that Bonnie's not just going to be reshuffled to some lesser consolation prize job
in his administration. And instead, you had Trump saying she will be transitioning to a much needed
and important new job in the private sector to be announced at a date in the near future. Which to me,
I think if you read through the line sounds like that's that's him putting boot to ass,
get her out the door. And he probably really doesn't care. But he also added that deputy attorney
general Todd Blanche is going to serve as acting attorney general for now. Right, it doesn't look
like he'd be transitioning into that role permanently. Instead, what we're seeing is that
Trump's planning to tap EPA administrator Lee Zeldon is Bondi's replacement. And if that name
doesn't ring any bell, Zeldon's a former Republican congressman from New York who unsuccess
who unsuccessfully ran for governor. And he's also, and this is more important, a dedicated
Trump foot soldier in his position at the EPA doing the work to enact Trump's plans for energy
dominance. But also today, it doesn't look like it's just Bondi on the chopping block,
right? Because there's also a report from the Guardian saying that Trump is polling his advisors
about whether he should replace Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence. And here,
his big issues reportedly that she refused to condemn Joe Kent, right, the former deputy who resigned
days after arguing that Iran didn't pose an imminent threat to the U.S. With Trump kind of giving her
lukewarm support and a statement over the weekend when he was asked if he has confidence in her
leadership, saying, and this is a quote, yeah, sure, I mean, she's a little bit different
in her thought process than me, but that doesn't make somebody not available to serve. Then you had her
spokesperson seemingly clinging on for dear life responding. Over the past two weeks,
President Trump said both that he has confidence in the DNI and that she did well at her
hearings before Congress. She remains committed to fulfilling the responsibilities the president
placed in her. But there's also been a notable back-and-forth about Gabbard in her place within
Team Trump since he came back into office. And some of the things it earned her public
criticism, including a video that she recorded warning about the horrors of nuclear war after a
visit to Hiroshima or her testimony to lawmakers that Iran had not decided to build a nuclear
bomb. Though others, it earned her support from Trump and his loyalists, like producing an
official report asserting that Russia didn't try to boost Trump's campaign in 2016 against Hillary Clinton.
Now, what I will say is at this point, any word on Gabbard, it's largely just rumor, but it does
come as Trump's been making other major shakeups in his cabinet. Just a few weeks ago, she's in the
news for a different reason now, but DHS Secretary Christine Nome, she was ousted and replaced with
Mark Wayne Mullen. And so now with his Bondi news, I mean, anyone in there who has even the slightest
doubt about how much Trump likes them, they should be quaking in their lifts. So we're going to have
to keep our eyes on this going forward. But also, I will say, well, you know, leadership of some of our
biggest departments in the government, they're in limbo, Trump's still making assurances that no one's
buying. Because according to him, the war in Iran, it's going to be over in just two or three more
weeks. He just has to send them back to the Stone Age, and also he doesn't know if they'll agree
to a deal or if he's going to have to deliberately commit a war crime first. And he doesn't
care if the straight-of-hormuz is opened, but it will be opened and prices will come back down
even though they're not really going up. And Iran, they'll never be able to get a nuclear
weapon, even though we supposedly destroyed their ability to do so earlier, but also they're
gonna get to keep almost 1,000 pounds of nuclear fuel. That, it's pretty much what we learned in
Trump's prime time address to the nation since the war began. In other words, we learned
this was Trump's rambly tweets in a different format. Or I guess you could say we learned that more
than a month into this whole thing, we still have no clear rationale for this war and no real endgame.
But if there was one big overarching goal behind all this, now that they kind of threw out all the
different reasons and solidified on one, a goal that Trump suggested has defined both of his
presidencies is that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. With Trump saying at the beginning of his
address. From the very first day I announced my campaign for president in 2015, I have vowed that
I would never allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. And with that, Trump rehashed his criticism
of the nuclear deal negotiated under Obama, and he repeated his claim that U.S. strikes in June
had obliterated Iran's key nuclear site. But then, he also argued that in the months since,
they had rebuilt their nuclear program, making clear they had no intention of abandoning their pursuit
of nuclear weapons. And they're raised for a nuclear bomb, a nuclear weapon, a nuclear weapon, a nuclear
weapon like nobody's ever seen before. They were right at the doorstep.
There's no solid evidence that Iran was actively pursuing a nuclear weapon and as far as
we know it would have taken the months or even years to do so if they want it. But said
though, there is believed to be around 960 pounds of highly enriched uranium inside of the
country deep underground but potentially within Iran's region, reportedly enough for 10 to 12 bombs.
But then also with that, Trump appeared to rule out an operation to retrieve the material.
The nuclear sites that we obliterated with the B-2 bombers have been hit so hard that it would take
months to get near the nuclear dust.
And there I'll say he's not wrong.
Getting in and out of a hostile country
with almost half a ton of radioact material
would be an extremely risky, complex, and time-consuming mission.
And Trump also noted that the US is monitoring
those sides via satellite and would attack
if Iran attempted to access them.
But if it is, as he says,
and he's leaving the material exactly where it was
before the war started, when the alleged overarching goal
of this war is preventing Iran
from ever having a nuclear weapon,
it begs the question of what the conflict
will have accomplished on that front.
Right, the administration's argument
has basically been that it is already,
almost, you know, depending on the day, eliminated Iran's ability to hide its nuclear program behind its conventional weapons capabilities.
Which is why the specific objectives of this war that have emerged and more or less solidified over the past weeks
include destroying Iran's Navy and Air Force, missiles, and weapons factories.
And with that last night, you had Trump insisting that these objectives are nearing completion.
Iran's Navy is gone.
Their air force is in ruins.
Their leaders, most of them, terrorist regime they led, are now dead.
Their command and control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is being decimated as we speak.
Their ability to launch missiles and drones is dramatically curtailed, and their weapons, factories, and rocket launchers are being blown to pieces.
But of course, Iran, you know, they've been battered, but definitely not beaten.
And while Trump, he continued to insist that the regime change had been inadvertently accomplished,
claiming that the country is now being led by a less radical and much more reasonable group,
It appears that the new supreme leader may only be more hardline and the Revolutionary Guards may only have more influence.
And actually, regarding the country's military capabilities, you add a spokesperson pushing back against Trump's claim saying,
your intelligence on our military power and equipment is incomplete.
You know nothing of our vast strategic capabilities.
Do not assume you have destroyed our strategic missile production sites, long range, attack, and precision drones,
modern air defense systems, electronic warfare, or special equipment.
Such assumptions will only deepen the quagmire you have fallen into.
And adding the sites you think you hit are insignificant.
Our strategic military production takes place at locations you do not know about and will never reach.
Do not bother trying to count our missiles, drones, and strategic systems.
You will be wrong and achieve nothing.
And of course, this guy, yeah, he's probably downplaying the impact of US and Israeli strikes,
but the fact does remain.
Iran does continue to launch attacks across the region, with Israel, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia,
all responding to drone and missile strikes just today.
And then, on top of all that, the Strait of Hormuz is still mostly locked down.
Although as Horace Trump, he continued to try to play it off as a problem for other countries,
even though he had said hours earlier that he would not
agree to any ceasefire deal unless the waterway was open.
The United States imports almost no oil through the Hormos Strait
and won't be taking any in the future.
We don't need it.
We haven't needed it and we don't need it.
The countries of the world that do receive oil through the Hormone Strait
must take care of that passage.
They must cherish it.
They must grab it and cherish it.
They can do it easily.
We will be helpful, but they should take the lead in protecting the oil.
that they so desperately depend on.
But with that, you know, of course, Trump is ignoring reality.
One, the reality that opening this rate is obviously not easy.
I mean, if it was, why can't the most powerful military on earth do it?
And two, the reality that oil prices are set globally.
And what's happening in the Middle East, it does affect the United States,
despite it not being directly dependent on oil from the region.
Not to mention that this isn't just about oil,
but other key commodities like fertilizers.
But Trump, he decided to barely acknowledge the economic consequences of his war.
But he only once recognized the quote,
recent rise in gasoline prices here at home,
but he argued that this was a short,
term increase due to Iran's attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
And in any event, he claimed that when the war is over, the the strait will open up naturally
and prices will rapidly come back down.
Though that has been widely contested by economists, and it's also not clear that ending
the war opens up the strait, especially if Trump's now actually willing to pull the U.S.
out and leave it to other countries.
And also, in any case, Trump wasn't able to clearly lay out how the war is going to end.
We are on track to complete all of America's military objectives shortly, very shortly.
We are going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks.
we're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages where they belong.
In the meantime, discussions are ongoing.
If there is no deal, we are going to hit each and every one of their electric generating plants very hard and probably simultaneously.
So just first things first, as we have talked about, targeting power plants is generally considered a fucking war crime under international humanitarian law.
So just an absolutely insane way to try and bring someone to the negotiating table.
But also, Trump's willingness to resort to extreme force that might be exactly.
why Iran is hesitant to even come to the negotiating table,
with a spokesperson for Iran's foreign ministry,
saying after Trump's address,
we will not tolerate this vicious cycle of war,
negotiations, ceasefire, and then repeating the same pattern.
This is disastrous not only for Iran,
but for the entire region and beyond.
We are defending against an illegal war.
Now that said, you've had two Iranian officials
and a Pakistani official telling the New York Times
that public statements from Iran
they've been harsher than private messages passed
to the United States, also claiming that the Iranian government
could engage diplomatically under the right conditions,
or which could include something to show that the US is willing
to talk seriously about ending the war permanently.
And actually with that, Iran's president
came out with a letter addressed
to the American people yesterday,
defending Iran's actions criticizing the United States
and suggesting diplomacy might be possible.
Writing today, the world stands at crossroads.
The choice between confrontation and engagement
is both real and consequential.
Its outcome will shape the future for generations to come.
But with that, it's also not totally clear
who in the Iranian leadership actually
has the authority to make a deal right now.
And it's not clear whether the president's letter
was written in coordination with the Supreme Leader
or the Revolutionary Guard.
Though I will say hardliners in the country
reportedly went after him for suggesting that Iran
was open to negotiations. And in the meantime, all this uncertainty combined with Trump's escalation
and the seemingly lack of interest in opening the straight-of-hrues back up, it has shaken the markets
once again. Were you the price of oil dropping more than 7% after Trump's speech and
stock markets around the world fell? Especially in Asian countries that are extremely reliant on oil
and gas from the Middle East. And actually, shortages are so bad in some parts of Asia that
people are being killed. In Bangladesh, for example, criminal groups have reportedly rated transport
vehicles to stockpile fuel. And there, as well as in India and Pakistan, some workers have been
killed and robberies or attacks stemming from anger over the lack of supplies.
And then, actually, there's more we've got to dive into in just a minute.
But first, let me thank a sponsor and say, you know, you ever think about how much of your life
is tied to just one email address and how most of us picked ours when we were just too
young with zero long-term thinking?
Because, yeah, not ideal.
And that's why today's sponsor, Proton Mail is pushing something that I actually think
is pretty smart with their newborn private campaign.
Because email, it's not just email anymore.
It's basically the center of your online life.
I mean, think about it.
Logins, apps, school accounts, banking alerts, random subscriptions that you for
forgot about, it all connects back, usually to one inbox.
For most of us, that inbox, it was created in a rush years ago with absolutely no
thought about privacy or permanence.
But Proton Mail, it's different.
They use end-to-end and zero-access encryption, which means that your emails are actually yours,
not for advertisers, trackers, or even Proton itself.
So no ads, no tracking, no profiling, which honestly feels rare at this point.
And Proton's even made switching from your old cluttered email easy with a tool that lets
you do it in just a few clicks.
Or you can start fresh with a new email account and a clean inbox from the jump.
All you gotta do is just go to Proton.
Dot me slash DeFranco to reserve your child's email before someone else does.
After 19 years, they're back.
Frankie Munes, Brian Cranston, and the rest of the family reunite in Malcolm in the middle,
life's still unfair.
After 10 years avoiding them, how and lowest demand Malcolm be at their anniversary party,
pulling him straight back into their chaos.
Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair.
A special four-part event, streaming April 10th on Hulu on Disney Plus.
Then, I've been right back into the news.
there are new concerns that prediction markets might have an outsized influence over oil markets.
Because you decide energy traders telling the Guardian that Polymarket has been the best predictor of the oil markets direction since the war with Iran.
The data from these platforms is being used in algorithms that advise on trading in the Brent crude futures market.
Goldman Sachs, which forecasts oil prices, now includes prediction market data in its research for investors and clients.
And the Intercontinental Exchange also has a tool that provides a feed of Polymarkets predictions for traders to use in their assessments.
This ends up not being that surprising because you had a leader at one agency telling the outlet that,
that polymarket is having an increased impact on many markets now into adding there.
Petting markets do have a long history of strong prediction accuracy, and since
polymarket is in the ascendancy, traders are indeed increasingly turning to it for market
indicators. And when it comes to oil, polymarket has a ton of events to trade on.
But that also doesn't mean that it comes without potential consequences with the guardian explaining.
Energy market traders have said that the deepening ties between prediction platforms and the global oil
market could amplify the impact of insider betting on global markets or incentivize betting behavior.
Because it's worth noting that outside of the polymarket, of it all,
we already had tons of concerns regarding insider trading on oil prices amid the war.
And so now what you're seeing is that there are fears that
that is adding fuel to that fire and the prediction markets in general,
it could be used to influence the price of oil.
And there you have outlets like Axios noting,
as the Iran war sends prices soaring for ordinary Americans,
a select few appear to be profiting in plain sight.
It's precisely the kind of alleged corruption
Trump built his political career railing against.
But of course, in his administration,
they don't actually seem to be motivated to do much about it.
No, could it be because he or others benefit in some way,
and or his son has his hands in both Polymarket and Kalshi?
Who's to say? You, you're probably saying yes.
And so really no one's expecting him to act here.
But I will say we are seeing at least some baby steps
in some other areas.
Right this week, you had reports that federal prosecutors
in the Southern District of New York
are exploring how suspicious bets on these platforms
might violate insider trading laws.
So there, no one's been charged or even formally accused
of any wrongdoing in the district yet.
Right, chiefs in the securities and commodities fraud unit
simply met with Polymarket reps to discuss
how existing laws might apply to potential misconduct.
And with this, you had an attorney in the district
previously sending a warning on this issue saying,
because it's a prediction market,
doesn't insulate you from fraud.
And then also you might have seen headlines over
in Congress this week.
And that's because 40 Democrats in the Senate and House
sent a letter to Trump administration officials
about training to curb insider trading
among government employees,
with the letter being specifically sent
to leaders of the CFTC and the Office of Government Ethics.
And it noted that not only is there rising evidence
suggesting possible governmental insider trading,
but it also appears that there is confusion
around the laws that exist in this arena.
So it asks these groups to issue executive branch-wide guidance,
reminding federal employees of their existing legal
obligation to refrain from using their insider governmental information to profit from prediction market
trades. The theory of the White House kind of shooting back at the notion that insider trading is even an
issue, or the spokesperson telling NBC News that all federal employees are subject to government ethics
guidelines that prohibit the use of non-public information for financial benefit. However, any implication
that administration officials are engaged in such activity without evidence is baseless and
irresponsible reporting. And so for now, it really looks like it's just going to kind of be the
the Wild Wild West until someone gets in there that actually wants to regulate things. And then also in the
In the meantime, we've got to talk about how the Trump administration is trying to kill the
Presidential Records Act, or the law that requires memos, emails, briefing papers, and other
records to be turned over at the end of a president's term.
It's a law that literally exists because of Nixon.
It was passed after Watergate, specifically to stop a president from destroying incriminating
records.
And now, the administration that wants to gut it is led by the first president in American history
convicted of 34 felonies.
Felonies that include charges related to mishandling classified documents that he stored
in his bathroom at Mar-a-Lago.
As far as why and what they're doing, the administration has decided that the Presidential
Records Act, and then,
is unconstitutional and overreach of congressional power.
With the Trump DOJ official saying,
Congress does not have the power to compel an entire branch of government
to create and save every single possible piece of paper.
There's the thing, Congress does in fact have that power,
and they have it for that specific reason we just talked about.
After Watergate, Nixon wanted to destroy recordings
that incriminated him.
And the Presidential Records Act was passed in 1978
to make sure that that could never happen again.
It established that presidential records belong to the public,
not the president, and that they must be preserved
and turned over at the end of each term.
The National Archives, they already allow the release of official records,
five years after a president leaves office.
This isn't some crazy radical transparency requirement.
It is a standard part of how American democracies function
for nearly five decades.
But this administration, they say,
well, Congress, they can still access records
through a negotiation process.
Because you know, Trump respects Congress.
But also, here's what makes this so suspicious.
Reports say that Trump's already been telling
White House employees to preserve documents
for historical value to explain past actions
and guide future ones.
So he's apparently fine with the concept of keeping records.
He just doesn't want it to be legally required.
And you have many wondering if they're okay
apparently with the public eventually,
seeing these records anyway, what's in them that they want the power to decide whether or not to hand them over.
You know, during a time of war, covered up scandals and an administration staffed with loyalist first, yes, men,
gutting the one law that guarantees that the public will eventually see what happened inside of the White House,
it is not a transparency move. It is a cover-your-ass moon. And of course, this is where Trump's history makes this
exponentially worse. I know so many of us don't have memories anymore, but he received a 37-count federal
indictment for allegedly mishandling classified documents that were found stored throughout his Mar-a-Lago estate.
That included, infamously, boxes stacked in his bathroom.
An indict moves unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump with felony violations of our national security laws,
as well as participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
I got indicted.
And next week, I'll be indicted again, and the following week again, and then again and again and again.
I did nothing wrong at all.
In fact, my boxes, it was secure.
It was everything was good.
Those documents appear to be stored in a facility where public events and gatherings took place,
though Trump has maintained his innocence.
And they come after Donald Trump, weaponizing the Justice Department, weaponizing the FBI.
We can't let this continue to go on because it's ripping our country to shreds.
We have such big problems, and this shouldn't be one of them.
Right in that case, it ended up getting dropped when Trump was reelected.
Also in February, a Trump appointed judge permanently blocked the release of former special counsel
Jack Smith's final report, keeping the public from ever knowing the full findings of that investigation.
And then there's the leaked audio from after his first term where he appeared to reference
a classified memo about an attack on Iran.
See, as president, I couldn't have declasseted.
No, I can't, you know, but this is classic.
Something that contradicted his own prior claims.
I have no classified documents.
And by the way, they become automatically declassified
when I took them.
And he's also been caught tearing up documents before,
a practice that itself violates the Presidential Records Act.
And that beyond the transparency question,
there is a genuine security concern.
If he took classified documents into his personal possession once
and stored them in a bathroom,
what is stopping him from just doing it again?
And if the legal requirement to preserve
and turnover records is
gutted, what mechanism actually exists to ensure that classified material stays where it's supposed to be.
And so as threats against government officials from hacks and leaks continue to grow,
weakening the system that tracks where presidential records go, it's not just suspicious, it's dangerous.
So as far as why this matters and we've got to talk about it, this isn't just like a policy disagreement.
This is a dismantling of one of the post-Watergate safeguards that exists specifically because we already
learned what happens when the president gets to decide what the public sees.
We already learned that lesson in 1974 and the guy that's trying to undo it stored evidence in his
bathroom. But also, you know, if it feels like life down here on Earth, it keeps getting more
and more hopeless, maybe we can, you know, find at least a little reason for optimism up and outer
space, right because humanity's going back to the moon for the first time since 1972. And last night,
you had thousands of people camping out on Florida's Cocoa Beach to watch that enormous rocket
shooting up from the Kennedy Space Center. Four, three, two, one, booster ignition, and lift off
the crew of Artemis II now bounce. They are on the way and God bless them. These are,
brave people.
This mission, it's called Artemis 2 because it's the second out of four missions that NASA has planned.
And the first one actually went up in 2022, but no one was kind of really paying attention
that time except like the really hardcore people.
It was uncrewed, there wasn't a lot of fanfare.
But this one, it had people pumped.
He had four astronauts, three Americans, one Canadian.
But also, they're not actually gonna land on the moon.
They're gonna fly around it.
And actually, the third mission in 2027, that one's not gonna land either.
It's just to test the equipment to dock with the landers that they planned to use.
But in the fourth, in 2028, that's when they're gonna put boots on the lunar surface again
for the first time since the Apollo missions.
But also, and I have to stress this because my son will get very angry if I don't,
just because the astronauts on this flight aren't going to be landing,
that doesn't mean it's not super fucking cool.
I mean, for one thing, space is dangerous, no matter what.
There is a risk tied to it, there's a million things going on,
and a lot of those impact life or death.
But then also, they are going into deep space on this one.
I mean, to put it into perspective, the ISS, it orbits just 250 miles above her.
And the moon, it's some 250,000 miles away.
And they're going to be going around that even further than we've ever done before.
And they're also flying aboard a spacecraft that's never,
carried humans before, ever.
All while again, anything could go wrong.
During the first uncrewd mission,
the spacecraft's heat shield suffered unexpected damage.
And that's just one example, but you know,
not great because the craft is gonna have
to deal with heat of up to 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit
when it re-enters Earth's atmosphere.
And so yeah, I'm gonna agree with Trump on this one thing.
He said these guys and one gal, they're brave.
Unfortunately, so far, things are going well.
And the launch itself went pretty smoothly.
Outstanding stand, we see the same
and we have a beautiful moon rise,
we're headed right at it.
So there, I'll say they're technically not headed
to the moon yet.
Because first they're gonna circle the earth
and conduct a bunch of tests
to make sure that everything's good
before making what's called a trans lunar injection.
Which really quick, calm down R of K,
that is not something getting cooked up
by Pfizer and Moderna.
It just means getting on a trajectory toward the moon.
And assuming that everything's normal,
they're supposed to do that tonight,
but also there was an issue,
potentially gut wrenching problem, if you will,
the toilet didn't work.
But apparently its fault light was blinking
when the astronauts tried to turn it on,
so NASA told them to kind of just shit in bags
in the meantime, which I will say
is actually how the Apollo astronauts
did it back in the day.
So, you know, they just stumbling
all their waste on the moon where presumably it is still sitting there today.
But by contrast, the Artemis crew, they're supposed to enjoy the luxury of a dedicated private
bathroom at the toilet.
You have a urine hose, so this is where you collect all your urine, and then this is just
like a toilet seat, and this is where the solid waste is collected.
The feces get sucked down into the bottom, into a bag, and you close that off, and you
squish it down into the bottom into the canister.
The room also comes with pan-rails and foot tether, so you know you've got something to hold
on into zero gravity and or you, I guess, haven't been eating on enough fiber.
And then actually, one more fun fact, instead of recycling their own urine and drinking it
the next day like they do on the ISS, the Artemis crew, they're just gonna bend it out into
space. So yeah, the Artemis crew, they're gonna be literally pissing into the void multiple times
a day. But back to the actual news, NASA said, you know, they did fix whatever was wrong with
the toilet, so barring any other hiccups that they should be on their way tonight.
With them then expected to reach the moon by Monday, and since they'll swing even further past
it than the Apollo guys did, they'll break the record for distance from Earth by over 4,000
With the astronauts then spending hours gawking at the lunar surface, including portions of the far side that have never been seen by
human eyes before.
And in fact, they were trained by geologists before they left so that they could spot unique features and snap
photos of them for further study.
And meanwhile, tiny chips containing the astronaut cells are distributed throughout the spacecraft
so that medical researchers can study the effects of space travel, zero G, and radiation exposure.
With them then slingshotting around the moon, hurtling back toward Earth, where they'll end up parachuting
down in the Pacific Ocean on April 10th, completing a nearly 700,000 mile journey.
And then presumably we're off to the races, first to, a...
put humans on the moon before China does,
then to build a permanent base on the lunar service,
which it just sounds fucking awesome,
and finally realizing Elon Musk's dream
of reaching Mars.
And hopefully he does it make it a hell hole
like he did with X.
Though also speaking of Elon Musk,
his company, SpaceX just found to go public in June,
which could be one of the biggest IPOs in history.
It values itself at over a trillion dollars
and Elon's open to raise another 50 to 75 billion with this.
So yeah, man, I hate my brain.
This is supposed to be like just a positive story,
but now I'm like, oh yeah, the same money getting us to Mars
is also eroding our democracy back on Earth.
But that right there, my friend,
you beautiful bastards is the end of today's show,
though it doesn't really have to be.
Because we can keep this party slash dumpster fire going,
whether it's you clicking or it's happened to watch that brand new episode
of crashing out my podcast with myself and Alex Perlman,
and or you take 30 seconds to click the link
and subscribe to Philip DeFranco.com.
We're in addition to getting solo breakdowns with sourcing
on stories covered in the show and sometimes more.
I also do exclusive posts that I'm aiming to do once a week on every Friday.
I'm actually in the middle of writing one now.
I've been having a lot of fun, like figuring out the ecosystem
and gearing up for like what the next three, six, 12 months are.
But whatever you do, let me just say, thank you for watching.
I love yo faces, and I'll see you right back here next time.
