The Pomp Podcast - #1027 Darius Dale On How To Navigate These Difficult Moments In The Market
Episode Date: July 1, 2022Darius Dale is the Founder & CEO of 42 Macro, the leading macro risk manager adviser. This week, Julia La Roche filled in for my weekly conversation with Darius. In this conversation, they discuss th...e macro economy, consumer expectations, recessionary fears, Darius' concerns about Bitcoin dropping below $20k, and how to navigate the market during these rough times. Darius joins us every Thursday on "The Best Business Show." To see the video with the corresponding charts that Darius references throughout the interview, go to "The Best Business Show: LIVE" YouTube Channel ======================= BCB Group is the leading payment services partner for the digital assets industry. BCB Group provides payment services in 30+ currencies, FX, cryptocurrency liquidity, digital asset custody and BLINC, which is BCB’s free, instant settlements network for the BCB client ecosystem. Find out more by visiting bcbgroup.com/pomp ======================= Exodus is leading the world out of the traditional financial system by building beautiful and user-friendly blockchain products. With its focus on design and user experience, Exodus has become one of the most popular and loved cryptocurrency apps. It’s supported on both desktop and mobile, allowing you to sync your wallet across multiple devices so you can have access to your funds anywhere. You can instantly exchange around 100 different cryptocurrencies straight from your wallet. Interactive charts let you view an asset’s price history and your portfolio’s performance over time. And maybe the best part, Exodus is integrated with the Trezor hardware wallet - making advanced security easy for everyone. Visit exodus.com/pomp for your free download or search Exodus on the App Store or Playstore. ======================= The Pod Pro Cover by Eight Sleep is the most advanced solution on the market for thermoregulation. It pairs dynamic cooling and heating with biometric tracking. Go to https://www.eightsleep.com/Pomp to check out the Pod Pro Cover and save $150 at checkout. Eight Sleep currently ships within the USA, Canada, and the UK. =======================
Transcript
Discussion (0)
what's up everyone this is anthony pompliano most of you know me as pomp you're listening
to the pomp podcast simply the best podcast out there now let's kick this thing off
today's episode is an interview between darius dale and julia laroche in it they talk about
the macro economy the federal reserve interest rates monetary and fiscal policy and what the
hell is going on in the american economy i really enjoyed listening to this episode and i know that
Darius, and Julia really enjoyed actually recording it. I hope that you enjoy it as well.
Before we get into this episode, though, I first want to talk about our sponsors.
This episode is brought to you by BCB Group. With a dedicated focus on institutional payment
services, BCB Group provides business banking, cryptocurrency, and foreign exchange market
liquidity for many of the world's largest crypto-engaged financial institutions.
BCB business accounts allow businesses to load fiat currency and cryptocurrencies for payments,
operations and trading purposes bcb's clients can trade fx and cryptocurrencies quickly and
at scale with market leading value bcb's blink network is the european crypto industry's first
instant settlements network and one of the first real-time payment networks of its kind to allow
free real-time transactions across fiat and digital currencies bcb's vision is to empower
the global financial revolution through sustainable and innovative banking you can find out more by
visiting bcbgroup.com slash Pomp today. Again, if you want to learn more, go to bcbgroup.com slash
Pomp today. Today's episode is brought to you by Exodus, the world's leading desktop, mobile and
hardware crypto wallet. They offer beautiful user-friendly blockchain products that sync
across all of your devices, making it easier to send, receive and exchange over 150 or more crypto
assets in one place. And with world-class customer service available to you 24-7, Exodus always has
your back. But the fun doesn't stop with staking and trading. They recently launched a new NFT
marketplace where you can buy and sell your favorite NFTs on the Solana network. By partnering
with the popular NFT platform, Magic Eden, they're offering the full Monty on verified collections
with more added every single day. Ready to check it out for yourself? Run, don't walk over to
Exodus.com slash Pomp for your free download today. Again, if you want the world's leading
desktop mobile and hardware crypto wallet go to exodus.com slash pomp today this episode is brought
to you by eight sleep eight sleep is the single best product that i have purchased over the last
three years it completely changed my life i'm not joking pay attention the pod pro cover which goes
over your mattress by eight sleep is the most advanced solution on the market for thermal
regulation it pairs dynamic cooling and heating with biometric tracking you can go to eight sleep
dot com slash pump to check out the pod pro cover and you save one hundred and fifty dollars at
checkout. They currently ship within the United States, Canada and the UK. I told you it changed
my life. It helps me sleep deeper, helps me sleep longer. I feel much more refreshed and I have
better energy. You want to know how I have relentless energy every single day because I
sleep on an eight sleep. Seriously, go check it out. Eight sleep dot com slash pump today.
Anthony Pompliano runs pump investments. All views of him and the guests on his podcast
are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of Pomp Investments. You should
not treat any opinion expressed by Pomp or his guests as a specific inducement to make a
particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of his
personal opinion. This podcast is for informational purposes only. All right. Well, I'm excited to
bring in our next guest. We have Darius Dale. He's the founder and CEO of 42 Macro. Darius,
Welcome to the show. Hey, Julia, what's up? How are you? I'm really excited to talk to you.
It's like something I'm like, oh, my gosh, I'm just it's something I've always wanted to do.
So I appreciate that. Yeah, I get to even get going. I think you need to tell Joe and John
that we're currently running at an all time high in the employment cost index. That's the
broadest measure of wage inflation. So they might need to have a talk with their brother.
Oh, they've been trying to unionize. I don't know if you've heard about that.
Yeah, I don't want to be in their union.
they're mad at me now um definitely will all right so um we're closing out the quarter we're
closing out the first half of the year obviously like markets have just been a steep decline
um worst for the s&p about or such a close at the worst since i don't know since 1970 so um
it's been a long time i would just love to start with like more of like your big picture of where
we are in the markets and maybe your outlook ahead yeah absolutely so uh you know for those
who have been paying attention to the show, it's pretty straightforward. So I'll summarize
everything. At 42 Macro, we believe that if you use enough data, use enough math, have enough of
a repeatable process, you can sort of harness these sort of big macro cycles that tend to drive
dispersion within and across asset markets and obviously take advantage of that from a portfolio
perspective. There's sort of, you know, we consider there to be four big cycles. There's the liquidity
cycle. So as you know, if you think about the Fed balance sheet or interest rates, is that getting
more positive or favorable for asset markets or less favorable. Clearly, we're in a liquidity
cycle downturn. Our views is we're close to, let's call it, inning five or six on that.
For those of you who are not Americans, baseball is played in nine innings, so we're probably,
let's call it, two-thirds of the way done in terms of liquidity cycle downturn. As it relates to the
growth cycle, which is another important cycle, we're probably in inning four or five in the
growth cycle downturn. That's significantly deepened in the coming months, at least according
to our forecast. We're probably in extra innings in the inflation cycle upturn, as evidenced by
the most recent headline PC and headline CPI reports that we've gotten in recent weeks.
And then lastly, I think we're probably close to inning one or two of the profits cycle downturn.
And what I mean by profits, we're talking about corporate profits, corporate earnings,
of things that will drive, you know, incremental decisions, you know, going back to your previous
discussion about, you know, whether or not companies are spending more money on marketing,
more money on hiring, etc. So we are not in a favorable place to be speculating on the long
side of most risk assets as a function of those four downturns. There's a lot of talk right now
about, you know, are we in a recession? We'll obviously find out when we get this second
quarter GDP print. But what is kind of your thought process there? And like, how do you kind
of think about that. Yeah. So I see you guys are charts. Are you able to put them? Yeah,
we can pull the charts up. Which one would you like us to pull up? Maybe the first one. So
model by probability. Yeah. Let's pull up the model and model implied probabilities chart if
we can. Yeah. So this this first. So what we're trying to do with these charts is identify
whether or not we are in recession or likely headed to a recession over the medium term and
some investable time horizon. Anything over a year is generally not investable from a risk
management perspective. You can talk about stuff from here and from now, but it's not going to
really matter to markets. So what I'm showing in this top chart, the blue line in the upper panel
just shows the New York Fed, that's the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's recession implied
probability model, down at 4%, 4% probability of having a recession over the next 12 months.
One, I think that number is wrong, but two, it's significantly lower than where it's typically at
on a mean basis heading into recession, that number is around 27%. So typically right into
a new recession, that number is on average around 27%. So it tells you a couple of things. It tells
you, one, at the onset of recession, even the recession probabilities are still generally low.
So you need to have forward-looking indicators to give you a better view on that. And then number
two, the red line in the upper panel just shows the model I put together just based on a couple
Bloomberg models that are anchoring on the 10s-2s treasury yield curve and the 10-year-3-month
treasury yield curve, that recession probability is currently around 25%. Historically, it's been
on average around 35% at the onset of recession. So that's much closer to signaling, hey, look,
we might actually be in recession. But to me, I think the discussion around recession is really
coming from the consumer. The second chart I sent you is consumer confidence. Yeah, we can pull that
up too. Yeah, absolutely. So the chart, the top upper panel on that chart shows, the blue line
just shows conference boards, consumer confidence measure. That's sort of one of the more stickier
autocorrelated consumer confidence measures that we have. It tends to be more correlated to the
labor cycle than the University of Michigan survey, which is also widely followed. That tends
to be more correlated to inflation. But the key takeaway on this chart is that historically you've
seen consumer confidence break down below its trailing three-year average. You're typically
in or just about heading into recession. And very clearly with the most recent data point we got
yesterday, I want to say yesterday or two days ago, you know, 99, I think we're now careening
well south of the trailing three-year average, which takes me to my final chart, consumer
expectations. You know, this other chart, consumer expectations sort of breaks into a couple of
different indices within that consumer confidence report. Again, these are June data points, so
they're pretty relevant. They're pretty fresh. The red line in the top panel just shows the
present situation index within that conference board consumer confidence report. The blue line
shows the expectations index. So how do consumers think about what's likely to happen over the
medium term? And as you can see, there's this massive divergence between how consumers think
the economy is today, how they feel about the economy today relative to where they think the
economy is going to be in the future. That's denoted by the spread there down at the bottom
panel. Now that spread, you know, minus 80, 90 basis points wide to the negative side is about
as deeply negative as it has ever been. You know, it's in the first percentile of all monthly
readings since going back to the late 60s when these indicators were born. So that tells you
that, you know, as you can see where those red bars are in the chart, historically speaking,
when you get to a very deeply negative spread between consumers' expectations and how they
currently feel about the economy, you typically are walking into a recession because that's
typically how it happens, right? You start feeling bad about the future and therefore you adjust your
current spending, your current expenditures, et cetera, to how you feel. And this is all part of
the behavioral dynamic associated with, you know, economies of financial markets called prospect
theory. We don't need to get into that now. Definitely go check out Danny Kahneman's book,
Thinking Fast and Slow, if you want more details on that. I like that. And it's like the psychology
of it. I guess like a follow on to that, because like I'm looking at your models, like,
is there a way to like assess um you know how severe recession might be like when you're looking
at these indicators like how do you kind of think about like is it like something that's quick and
i would love to explore that with you yeah so that's a great question julie so there's a couple
of ways to do that on an ex-ante basis uh one you could sort of you know the the the the easiest way
to do that is try to understand kind of the different leverage cycle dynamics the first would
be, how fast has credit grown into the downturn? Historically speaking, whenever you see a
significant positive deviation in the credit-to-GDP metric, particularly private non-financial sector
credit-to-GDP into a downturn, that's what we saw in 2007, you typically get a more deeper,
nastier kind of asset price-led recession that takes longer to recover from.
A second way to explore that on an ex-ante basis is looking to observe if you have a positive
deviation, a significantly positive deviation from the trend in what we call the debt-to-service
ratio. So that's the total amount of sort of interest payments and amortization or paying
back debt for the broader private non-financial sector. And currently speaking, neither of those
two indicators are signaling kind of a cause for significant alarm, i.e. neither are suggesting
that we're likely to have a deep, lasty, prolonged protracted recession, which is a good thing.
Now, the one thing I'll caveat this by saying, the data that we get this out,
we derive those statistics from are released on a pretty severe lag. So we're talking about Q4
21 statistics, and it's obviously the end of the second quarter of 2022. So fast forward six months
from now, we could be getting statistics for the second quarter of this year that may say otherwise.
But for now, just being data driven, we can understand that any recession we're likely to
experience over the next 12 months or so should be shallow, should, in my opinion, I think it's
more likely to resemble the 2001 recession, which was, you know, you got to need a magnifying glass
to kind of really see it on the map. It was the shallowest recession in U.S. economic history at
peak to trough decline and output of minus 70 basis points. But guess what? That didn't matter
to the market. S&P was cut in half. NASDAQ was down 80% in the span of that two and a half year
bear market. So you have to be careful not to associate your expected outcomes in financial
market terms with your expected outcomes in economic terms. The destination doesn't have
to be the same, but the rate of change is likely to sort of perpetuate and feed upon each other.
That's interesting. You say that didn't matter to the market. Also, it just kind of makes me wonder, say we find out, we get the Q2 GDP number, and it's like, okay, you have two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. Do you think the market's kind of priced in that scenario? Or is there further to go here? What do you think?
Yeah, great question. Great question. So I'll start by, there's two things to unpack there.
I'll start with the first part of your question, which is the two consecutive quarters of negative
GDP. That would constitute a technical recession by the letter of the law, two consecutive quarters
of contraction is a technical recession. That will not constitute an actual recession by the
sort of market and by the Federal Reserve and certainly by the people who determine whether
or not the economy has been in recession, which is the NBER. Their definition is more along the
lines of my definition of recession, which is a statistically significant deviation, negative
deviation from the trend in output. You can measure output, obviously, through GDP, industrial
production, consumer spending, consumer income, total employment. All those things tend to be
correlated to the downside and a significant deviation from their respective trends. We have
not seen that yet. However, when you go back and you think about it from a technical recession
standpoint, we are certainly developing that one. I mean, we got the PCE data, the personal
Consumptions Expenditure Data Point for the month of May this morning. And it was pretty bad. It was
very bad, actually. We talked about that in our Macro Minute program. Check out our YouTube
channel, by the way, for those of you who don't pay attention to those. But anyway, so on a
headline basis, so aggregate consumer spending in the economy, which is two-thirds of overall GDP,
slowed to 0.2% on a three-month annualized basis through the month of May. And so if we stay around
these levels, or if it gets any worse for the month of June, we will have negative consumption
growth on a three-month annualized basis, on a quarter-over-quarter basis in the second quarter.
That's being dragged down by goods consumption, which is down 1.4% on a three-month annualized
basis. Services consumption is up at 1%. But guess what? 1% ain't going to cut it. One,
that's half the trend growth rate. And number two, we're supposed to be in the middle of a
services sector boom, right? I mean, how many stories have we heard about the pandemic being
over and getting on airplanes. We're going on a vacation. We're going out to eat. We're going to
the theater, et cetera, et cetera. And guess what? All that narrative adds up to a mere
one percentage point growth rate in three-month annualized terms for services consumption.
So we continue to see consumers get squeezed from a real income perspective. Real incomes
have been basically trending at down 4% year over year for the last year on either an aggregate or
per capita basis. And so in our opinion, the data is starting to get nasty enough to start pondering
the question, are we currently in recession? Are we, you know, getting close to entering one?
And I think the jury, the sort of, you know, the answer to that question certainly moved in the
direction of recession very much in the last kind of two to three hours. I think that's why, like,
I love, like, listening to you, because I feel like I always learn things, too. And you point
out, yeah, like, there's been that narrative, like, oh, it's a services boom. But as you point
out, probably not the case, as it turns out. I want to ask you about inflation, too. Like,
you mentioned we got the PC this morning. It was bad. And I know that's a gauge that the Fed does
look at. How do you think about inflation? Is it systemic? Is it abating? I just wonder how
you begin to assess that. Yeah. So inflation is very much systemic. There's several ways we can
assess that, not the least of which is the data we got from this morning's report. We saw an
acceleration in headline PCE inflation, both the three-month annualized and year-over-year rate of
change terms. So that was a problem. We saw a re-acceleration in three-month annualized terms
in core PCE, which is the Fed's preferred inflation metric at 4.1%. It's basically a
double of where the Fed needs it to be. So that's a problem from the liquidity perspective of the
liquidity cycle. But to answer your question specifically on is inflation systemic, the
answer is unequivocally yes. The Cleveland Fed has an index called median CPI, which measures
the median rate of change in inflation terms for everything in the inflation basket. There's
of indicators in the inflation basket. And what we're seeing on a median basis, not on a weighted
basis, on a median basis, inflation accelerate to new all-time highs. 5.5% on a year-over-year
basis, that's a new all-time high in May. 6.4% on a three-month annualized basis, that's a new
all-time high for that time series. So to answer your question, yes, we are very much in a systemic
broadening inflation shock that ultimately we think the Fed is going to stick to its guns and
do something about. Let's talk about the Fed and sticking to its guns. Jay Powell, we had comments
from Jay Powell this week. We also heard from Christine Lagarde. We heard from BOE's Andrew
Bailey. Just kind of would love to hear your reaction from what we're hearing from central
banks as it relates to some of these issues. Yeah. So I thought Jay Powell, so was that
yesterday, Wednesday? Yeah. At the ECB forum, Jay Powell really stood out to me, one, in his tone,
But also he made a very important direct comment to financial market participants and investors, you know, to everyone in the economy.
And it was, you know, it was very basic. Look, we are going to do whatever it takes to get inflation back to our two percent target.
That process will involve some pain, but that it will be a worse that will be less of a pain than just not achieving our objective.
Right. So he's basically saying if we allow inflation to stick around here, more people, particularly people on the low end of the income spectrum, are going to get, you know,
they already feel like it's a recession for them already, by the way. Some 10 to 20, 30% of the
economy is already in recession just as a function of their income level. And so what he's effectively
saying is, look, it's going to be bad no matter what. And right now, if we allow inflation to
continue to fester, it's going to be bad for the largest number of people for the longest period
of time, as opposed to just tightening us into a significant enough slowdown in output to get us to
a more balanced supply and demand spectrum that will ultimately give us better outcomes on the
inflation front. So I thought that was about as direct as I've ever heard a central banker talk.
Usually, sorry, I take that back in hawkish terms. When they talk, usually they're very direct when
they're talking about stimulating, right? Because they want to prevent deflation. They want asset
markets. They want to revive animal spirits. It's very rare that these people talk so directly and
frankly, when they're actually trying to, for lack of a better term, beat asset markets with
a wooden stick. I've been making this joke that Powell's got this aluminum bat. He's like a 12
year old at a birthday party with the aluminum bat taking it to the pinata and he doesn't even
have a buying photo on so he's just beating the crap out of the pinata until this dang thing
breaks i.e inflation he's going to keep beating the pinata yeah all the all the candy is going
to be the inflation that's an interesting visual um you just mentioned like him being direct like
just as a market participant someone who's been in this business for a while like i mean i imagine
like your peer group also was feeling similar things like you probably want him to be more
direct, I'd imagine, like, do you think that that's the kind of pal we're going to get going
forward? Yeah, I mean, well, so I'm sort of dating myself. I found out today I have a bald spot.
I didn't know that. So I guess I have been in this industry for a while.
I've been in it for a while, too.
So that's neither here nor there. But yeah, so the answer is yes. This is a Federal Reserve.
Don't forget, I made this comment on this program many times for the last, you know, six, nine
months, that this is a Federal Reserve that is fighting two wars, not one war. It's not just
inflation, they're fighting the war of credibility as well, right? Like they spent all of last year
aggressively easing, aggressively expanding their balance sheet to the tune of $120 billion of QE
per month as inflation was continuing to fester with this sort of narrative that it was going to
be transitory. One of the worst calls in financial market history, let alone one of the worst calls
for the central bank. So now they're fighting to regain the credibility associated with getting
the inflation call so wrong, that call that was so wrong that it's currently roiling the budgets
of so many millions of American households right now. If you, I, everybody watching,
many of the people watching this show, inflation is a nuisance for a lot of us. I grew up very
poor. It's not a nuisance when you're poor. It is a life-altering event. You have to stop consuming.
You trade down even though you're already at the low end of the trade-down spectrum. If you're
buying bagged cereal because you can't afford boxed cereal, now you're no longer buying cereal.
That's what 8.6% inflation does in this country. I'm not sure that everyone understands that.
It's a really important point that you bring up, how it affects lower income America. And you just
gave that example. Let's explore that further. What could be some of the broader consequences
of that? What could that mean for maybe even the social fabric of our country?
So as you can see, it's being clearly reflected in Joe Biden's approval rating,
on the broader approval rating of Congress.
You know, obviously there's a lot going on down there.
So let's, you know, don't get too far into that.
But, you know, it's clearly an issue.
I mean, this is the key takeaway.
And in some way, I'm going to misquote
or misassign the quote,
but it was one of the most sort of,
one of the most interesting things I heard
about inflation all year.
And I apologize for who I'm still in school from.
I'll remind everyone next Thursday.
But they said, and I thought I agreed with it.
And I realized, oh my God, this is what Powell thinks.
And the quote is, when you go into recession, the unemployment rate backs up two, three, four, at worst, four or five hundred basis points.
So that's that percentage of people in an economy are going to have that hard time.
When you have a significant inflation shock, 100 percent of the American citizens are dealing with it right now.
So we're talking about, you know, a recession being this big boogeyman that may only impact, you know, significantly impact, you know, let's call it three to five percent of the economy, as opposed to this inflation, which is currently impacting, you know, skimming off the top of rich people who don't even notice, you know, at least 90 percent of the economy.
So I think that's the battle they're fighting. And to me, it's a it's a much more common sense battle.
Yeah. Let's see. I'm trying to think what's, let's kind of pivot a little bit and just bring up some other topics just because I think it's interesting. Like I like at the top of this, you go over like the indicators that you pay attention to. What are kind of maybe more of the underrated signals that you look to or pay attention to that could be helpful for folks watching?
so i mean you know anybody who's subscribed to our work see my work over the years or my career
you know there's not any we look at everything i mean if there's a statistic that matters to
financial markets or that matters to predicting gdp to predicting cpi to predicting you know
eventually inflections in the liquidity cycle then we're analyzing i mean our now cast models
have thousands of data points in them from a fundamental standpoint our market regime model
has 100, no, sorry, 1,048 data points sent in on a daily basis to identify what market regime we're
in. You know, we run serious models at 42 Macro. So I don't want to give your listeners the sort of
the sense that, oh, there's one or two things you can look at to do this at a high level,
because there's not. You know, it's a full-time job to be average at this industry, average at
what we're trying to get accomplished here. And knock on wood, we've been a lot better than average
this year. Totally. Fair enough. And then also kind of going back to when you were showing the
models. When you had your first chart, how the one was kind of like totally off, what are they
missing though in the model? What is it that's not in there? Well, so right now you have a pretty,
the number one thing that will tell you that we're unlikely to be in, two things that'll tell
you we're unlikely to be in a recession right now is corporate profitability. Historically speaking,
you've seen sort of a significant decline in corporate profitability during recession. So
on a trailing 12 month basis, that is very much not the case. We have some pretty robust earnings
growth on a look back basis. And then second, the yield curve that is typically associated with
timing recessions, which is the 10-year, three-month treasury yield curve, that continues
to be very positively sloped, very wide yield curve on that measure. So that continues to tell
investors, say, hey, look, if we are going to recession, it's a ways away. It's a year away
at best, if not, you know, maybe even two years away as a function of that. But, you know, I have
the belief that if you get into a significant slowdown in growth, which is what our models
are forecasting for, you know, really the better part of the third quarter and really into well
into the early part of next year. Once we start to observe the economic statistics associated
with that significant decline in output, then you're very much likely to start to see a rally
in long end of the treasury curve while the Fed is continuing to hike. And that's how you can
eventually get that inversion perhaps by the end of the year okay um how about in terms of i'm just
thinking back to from the beginning of our conversation um i i guess i i wrote down a
couple notes here but you know anything over a year not being investable when you're kind of
going over like the big cycle so we're in um from an investment it's not that it's not investable
it's just the market won't give a damn yeah you know when you talk about you know the market's
response to the growth cycle the inflation cycle the profit cycle and most importantly the liquidity
cycle, you, when we, I mean, we've back-tested this as well as anyone I've seen. I mean,
certainly we don't have the opportunity to look at everyone's buy-side process, but certainly I
can observe what's happening on the sell side. And I think we have some of the best back-tests
in the world. And our back-tests show that once you get beyond three months, you know, in terms
of, you know, look forward, markets don't really have any response to those kinds of dynamics.
Right. And so if you're talking about like liquidity cycle, growth cycle,
pile inflation growth having an impact on asset markets, it's usually within the next few months
that the market is trying to, you know, fill around and price in. It's not the next two to
three years, you know, that stuff will happen along the way. You know, the catalysts are,
you know, drive you higher or drive you lower along the way. That's a good point. Yeah,
it's happening, I guess, much more, I guess, closer to where we are than further out. I do
want to just ask like maybe um from an investment perspective like i don't know if you could share
like like what where would you want to be like right now like yeah i mean so uh you know out
of respect for our paying subscribers and we're very appreciative of them you know i'm not going
to give too specific of advice but you have one thing i'll say um you know just uh something i've
been saying in the program all year which is cash is king in an environment like this you don't need
when you're in a simultaneous liquidity cycle downturn,
growth cycle downturn and profit cycle downturn, you know,
few things in the history of asset markets are as negative for risk assets as
those things being, you know, in that state,
in that condition all at the same time. And so, you know,
if you came into the year looking backwards, you know,
we were in a growth cycle upturn, liquidity cycle upturn,
it was the liquidity bonanza. I mean, it wasn't an upturn, it was a bonanza.
Some of the most aggressive easing we've ever seen out of the federal reserve
in the history of that institution you know so it was you know if you were whatever risk you were
running whatever you know capital risk you were running in that environment it needs to be
significantly curtailed to risk manage this environment i mean just just have less risk on
is the number one the answer to your question then obviously you know which is called we may
going back to november last year the higher beta the more volatile the things that go up the most
of the markets going up the most tend to go down the most when the market's going down and so we
made a call to say, hey, if you have a lot of high beta assets in your portfolio, you need to get
rid of them because the market is going to sell them. And ultimately, obviously, it continues to
sell them to this day. Yeah. I want to bring it up with you just because of the makeup of our
audiences. Just kind of your views on, I don't know what your latest is on Bitcoin. I'm just
looking at the price right now. It's just under $19,000. So it's $18,930 and some change right
now? What are your kind of your views? I think it's on track. It's going to be, I want to say
it's like worst month, at least in a long time. Worst quarter since 2011.
There you go. See? Yeah. So Bitcoin, I'm concerned. I don't want to scare you. I know
this is a Bitcoin friendly program. I myself am a Bitcoiner, but I'm definitely concerned. And
here's why. We made a call going back to April that we thought the support for Bitcoin, where
you would back the truck up and buy it was 19,000. I am shocked that we are here so fast. I am
absolutely shocked that we have gotten down here so quickly. And that tells me that if 19,000
doesn't hold, I don't know, pick a round number, 15,000, 10,000, I don't know. There is no support
when you break 19,000, at least not in terms of our analysis. And so, you know, we talk about
this liquidity cycle downturn. Let's not forget that we're only doing about half the total amount
quantitative tightening that the Fed intends to initiate, you know, over the course of the
medium term. So by September, we're going to double the pace of quantitative tightening from
draining $45 billion of liquidity out of the market, for lack of a better phrase, to $95
billion. That's as fast as the Fed has ever drained liquidity from the market by a double.
And so my point I'm bringing up is that when you factor that in, you factor in the overcapitalization
of the treasury as a function of, you know, the T-bill shortage as a result of that, and
ultimately the rapidly rising uptake in the Fed's reverse repo facility balance, all these
dynamics are sort of combining to drain massive amounts of liquidity from financial markets.
And so if you do the math on our analysis, you know, we get to about, you know, basically,
you know, just I have a trillion dollars of liquidity is going to get drained from financial
markets between now and year end if the Fed stays on this course and if the dynamics with
reverse repo facility don't materially change. If that happens, fair value on the S&P 500 is $2,900.
So guess where Bitcoin is going to be on a correlation weighted basis if the market
declines significantly from here? I'm just looking right now. You said a trillion?
It's $915 billion to be exact. Sorry. Okay. I guess the quick following question too,
when you talk about the liquidity cycle downturn, you said the top of this program,
we're in the fifth or sixth inning um does it accelerate over time does it get like
as you go through that cycle like how does that kind of how does that play out is it like a smooth
thing or does it just like spiral and get worse and worse as you get further in the cycle i'd love
for it to be smooth but the reality is i wake up before 30 in the morning every day because it's
not smooth it's non-linear markets are you know they're dynamic ecosystems and so the reality is
you know one acceleration and one factor can lead to a deceleration another factor and vice versa
one thing we know we're going to get is we're very likely to get a reduction in the size of
rate increases, particularly as we get past this July 27 FOMC meeting. I'm not so sure we're going
to get another 75 base point rate hike. I mean, maybe it's 75, but I think by the time we get
there, it could be 50. If we get a couple of decent inflation prints, we get June CPI on the
13th. Maybe we get some significant decline in crude oil into the summertime, potentially. I
don't know. I'm not making that call. That could cause the Fed to go to 50 in July 27. But the
reality is we're not going to stick at 75, 75, 75. That's unlikely. So we're going to see a
slowdown in the pace of rate hikes. But at the same time, we're going to get an acceleration
in the quantitative tightening program. So on net, generally speaking, quantitative tightening
has more of a near-term sort of coincident impact on asset markets, QE and QT, than interest rate
hikes and interest rate cuts. Just like you mentioned the inflation print, do you have
like, um, kind of a number in mind? Like, I don't, I don't know if we actually mentioned
a specific number, but what do you kind of think in there? For headline CPI, we are at,
sorry, pull up our estimates now. We're sticking at 8.6 for June or yeah, sorry. Yeah. For June.
Yeah. So that number will be out on, um, on July 13th. Gotcha. Um, any parting thoughts before I
let you go? Yeah. Um, this is, this is not the time to be cavalier. Um, I know a lot of folks
of probably this first half of the year has not gone the way they probably hoped.
And that's okay.
You know, not everything in life is going to go the way you hope, but the most important
thing you need to make is you need to make a decision and determination on what is your
next play.
You know, sometimes you give up a sack, sometimes you give up a touchdown, but at the end of
the day, the game is not over.
You have to make a decision on how to regroup, refocus your, reallocate your focus budget
so that you can take advantage of the next series of opportunities and catalysts and
markets.
and if you don't know what those opportunities and catalysts are then come check us out at 42
macro if not just so catch back here next week i love that well i was going to ask you where can
folks find you online so you mentioned 42 macro uh let yeah let folks know where they can find
you and learn more yeah so uh come check us out at 42 macro.com if you're a serious investor and
what i mean by serious investors someone who has legitimate investment objectives you know serious
size in terms of their asset allocation in terms of their capital risk um you can be professional
you can be non-professional you know both obviously as subscribers and if then you know
obviously if you're either a non-serious investor,
someone who can't afford it, college student, et cetera,
then come follow us on Twitter.
We put out a lot of research on our YouTube channel as well.
So, you know, we definitely have something for everybody,
but I definitely think this is the time
where if you don't have a legitimate macro process
heading into the second half of this year,
you will struggle.
That's a guarantee.
Yeah.
They can also find you on Twitter as well.
We just showed your handle.
42 Macro details, my handle.
Amazing.
Well, Darius Dale, founder and CEO of 42 Macro.
I thank you so much for your time
and your fascinating discussion
and just also the way you end things
with like those parting words of wisdom
for everyone really puts things in perspective.
So thanks again.
Of course, Julia.
Look forward to next time.
Cheers.
Thanks so much for listening to today's episode.
I really hope you guys enjoyed this one.
Make sure you're subscribed on Apple, Spotify
or your favorite podcast player.
And if you're looking to try to transition
to get a new job in the Bitcoin or crypto industry,
we've got you covered.
Head over to palmscryptocourse.com.
We've developed a curriculum with a top team
across the industry it's a three-week intensive training program with over 50 events packed into
that three-week time period go to pompscryptocourse.com to learn more and i'll meet you guys for the next episode
