The Pomp Podcast - #1088 Zuby Exposes Everything Wrong With Society
Episode Date: September 12, 2022Zuby is a world famous rapper, author, podcast host, and public speaker. In this conversation we discuss everything off-limits, including coward-ness, mass shootings, politicization of everythin...g, the obsession with diversity, the secretaries of "health", cults, Andrew Tate, and much more. ======================= The number one name in NFT domains and the world’s most powerful wallet are teaming up to bring something new to the crypto and Web3 world: <Your Name.Blockchain> That’s right, Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com partnered to create NFT domain names ending in .Blockchain. It’s the perfect ending to show that you’re a believer in a decentralized future. Either sign up for a free blockchain.wallet or visit Unstoppabledomains.com to buy your domain today. ================== If you’re trying to grow and preserve your crypto-wealth, optimizing your taxes is just as lucrative as trying to find the next hidden gem.Alto IRA can help you invest in crypto in tax-advantaged ways to help you preserve your hard earned money. So, ready to take your investments to the next level? Diversify like the pros and trade without tax headaches. Open an Alto CryptoIRA to invest in crypto tax-free. Just go to https://altoira.com/pomp ======================= Valour (formerly DeFi Technologies) represents what’s next in the digital economy -- providing simplified, trusted access to crypto, decentralized finance and Web 3.0 investment opportunities. Institutions and investors can gain diversified, secure, compliant, and easily tradable access to a diversified set of industry-leading equity products and protocols, through a single stock purchase on a regulated exchange. Currently listed on U.S. (OTC: DEFTF) and Canadian (NEO:DEFI) exchanges. For more information or to subscribe to receive company updates and financial information, visit our website at valour.com ======================= The bridge between iGaming, online sports betting, and emerging technology, such as Blockchain, NFTs, fintech, GameFi, metaverse, and AI, is loud and clear. The largest global summit of this kind is heading to Malta from November 15 to 17. Over a thousand exhibitors and 25,000 industry leaders will be there, including top executives from Draft Kings, Bet365, Socios, crypto exchanges, betting software providers, operators, gaming affiliates, and more. Log on to AIBC.WORLD and SiGMA.WORLD to see all our upcoming global summits! See you in Malta, November 15 to 17 for the leading global event in Gaming & Emerging Tech! THIS IS SiGMA! ======================= Exodus is leading the world out of the traditional financial system by building beautiful and user-friendly blockchain products. With its focus on design and user experience, Exodus has become one of the most popular and loved cryptocurrency apps. It’s supported on both desktop and mobile, allowing you to sync your wallet across multiple devices so you can have access to your funds anywhere. Visit exodus.com/pomp for your free download or search Exodus on the App Store or Playstore. =======================
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's up, everyone? This is Anthony Pompliano. Most of you know me as Pomp. You're listening
to the Pomp Podcast, simply the best podcast out there. Now let's kick this thing off.
Zuby is a world-famous rapper, author, podcast host, and public speaker. In this conversation,
we talked about everything that we're not allowed to talk about, including the importance
of not being a coward in today's society, mass shootings, the politicalization of the
world, the obsession with diversity, secretaries of state for health that don't look so healthy,
and many, many more topics that most of you will be very interested in. I really enjoyed this
conversation with Zuby, as I always do. I hope that you guys enjoy this episode. Let me know
what you think once you've completed it. Without any further ado, let's get into this episode with
Zuby. Anthony Pompliano runs Pomp Investments. All views of him and the guests on his podcast
are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of Pomp Investments. You should not treat
any opinion expressed by Pomp or his guests as a specific inducement to make a particular investment
or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of his personal opinion.
This podcast is for informational purposes only. All right, guys. Bang, bang. Zuby's here. I think
this is your third or fourth time on the show in person, and I thought a fantastic place to start
would be the importance of not being a coward on the internet today. It feels like there's tons of
people who publicly don't say shit. And then I go to dinner with them. I talk to them in private
and they'll just go off. And I'm like, yo, you're like a little bitch online and you're super based
or like at least willing to like, say what you actually believe in private. Like, why is that
happening? Ooh, man, that's a, that's a big question. And I think last time I was here,
I talked about the pandemic of cowardice that I felt was going on in society and happening across
the world. And it's something that I, I understand it's not a new thing. It's not a new thing. Um,
I think one of the most common human desires is to fit in with people. And another is to avoid
avoid criticism and backlash and avoid rocking the boat. I think there's a lot of reasons why
we have those tendencies and it makes sense, right? Most of us don't want to go around every
day and deal with more conflict than we have to both online and offline. So, you know, there's
no one, and it wouldn't be sensible to be constantly saying absolutely everything that's
on your mind at all times or getting in every single conflict or argument that you have to,
and so on. So I understand that to a degree. I think the problem is when it does become
actual cowardice, right? Not just like a basic level of decorum or sensibility, but when people
are genuinely afraid to say something that needs to be said or do something that needs to be done.
And I think especially over the past, I mean, the past few years that we've just lived through,
it became so clear, number one, how pervasive that cowardice is and how unwilling people are
to speak out even when it's very, very necessary. I mean, you've really seen this play out a lot
over the past decade, to be honest with you. But I think most of it is self-preservation and
wanting to maintain social status and social currency and to, you know, of course, there's
people who have people often use their jobs and their families and say oh well you know we the
truth is we all have stuff to lose people have this idea that oh there's these people who can
speak out and these people who can't because these people are in some amazing it's like no
there's people who are broke with jobs who will speak out and there are people who are billionaires
and who are self-employed and have true fu money and whatever but they're absolute cowards in fact
this goes for the majority of celebrities. So it's more of a character thing. I think it's
really a character thing. And it's one of those things that day to day, it's not always a problem,
but everything we do is habitual. So both cowardice and courage are both habitual and
contagious. So that's why I use that term pandemic of cowardice, right? Because when everyone else
is behaving in a certain way, the fewer people who are speaking out, the harder it is to speak
out. And one of the things that frustrates me about it is number one, it's why certain things
keep getting worse because people are not taking any type of stand and continually refuse to for
years on end. But also it puts the burden on, it increases the burden on those of us who are
willing to say something right people want to hide behind the sofa and to your own you know
imagine i don't know you're you're you're with a group of friends and i don't know somebody jumps
you and your friends all jump and hide behind a sofa and they're like yeah go get them pump go
get them it's like bro like you're hiding behind the sofa like keep coming don't put it now now
you know there's five of us and five of them now it's five on me and and when the fight's over
then you have a friend who's like yeah i'm glad they left hold me back yeah exactly exactly so
that's why it can get it can get frustrating so to me one of the things i hear most often i mean
i've been i travel a lot i've been to probably i mean most most people were not traveling much
over the last few years i went to eight different countries dozens of different cities and
when i get recognized in public or if i do meetups or you know the thing most people say is well
firstly, thanks people who recognize me. Um, but I'm often thanked for my courage and that's really
interesting to me because on one hand it is a compliment and I'm like, thanks. On another hand,
it kind of annoys me because it makes me realize like, why is the bar for courage so low? Like I
don't consider myself, maybe I'm a more courageous person than average, but I don't consider myself
like ultra brave. I mean, there's people who are in, in the military, there's firefighters,
there's police officers risking their lives, dealing with really dangerous criminals and so
on. I'm like, man, I wouldn't want to be in the military, right? Like I'm just, I'm just talking,
I'm saying things, I'm talking on podcasts, I'm talking in my music, I'm talking on Twitter.
That to me, that's, I mean, if people don't feel free to talk here in the, in the USA and the UK
and Canada and Australia, or places where you're supposed to have actual freedom of speech, both
in a legal sense and also in a cultural sense, then what hope do we have for the rest of the
world? And part of the problem, another part of the problem with it is you can't fix anything
unless you can talk. This is one of the biggest issues I have with political correctness. And
when I talk about political correctness, I'm not talking about basic politeness and civility.
I'm talking about political correctness in the true sense that there's things you, you, oh,
you, you can't talk about it. You can't, oh, you can't say that. It's like, what, how, how can
there be a fact or a piece of data or a statistic or something that's just real? Or even, even if
it's an opinion that you're, you just can't, you can't say, cause if you can't, if you're not
allowed to discuss a topic, you can't, you can't fix it. And that's the, one of the biggest problems
that is going on and is plaguing the West. As far as I'm concerned, there are certain issues
that are happening on different levels, societal issues, crime issues, cultural issues,
political issues, and you're not even allowed to talk about them. Well, I mean, you, you are like,
I'm not saying you're not allowed to, but people feel like you're not allowed to.
There's social pressure. It's like legally you're allowed to talk about it. And if you talk about
it, uh, no one is going to come knock on your door and say, uh, you are under arrest, but you
will lose friends you will be shunned from certain groups and you will feel the social pressure of
why are you talking about that why are you questioning this thing but do you think that
there's been a shift from i don't know maybe it's nostalgia maybe it's a hindsight bias maybe it's
just uh we're young dumb kids but growing up it felt like when you were told something by a position
of power expertise influence uh government you know whatever you want to put in that category
the default was you believed it until you found something to make you question it yeah now it
feels like the default when we're told something maybe it's the internet maybe it's whatever the
default is i do not believe that and i question it and i only believe it once i learn the information
that confirms that it's true uh-huh do you feel that shift from like the default position being
acceptance to now maybe questioning that doesn't mean you don't believe it as much as it's just
Like the default is now critical thinking or critical questioning of what you're being
told.
Have we lived through the same past three years?
I don't know.
Have we?
It's not the default.
You don't think so?
No, the default is complete acceptance of the narrative.
Clearly.
I don't know if I agree with that.
How can you disagree after what we've just lived through?
Because if you look at the virus as one thing, I agree.
If you look at the economic story, I don't think the majority of people in America believe that inflation is low, not a problem, transitory, whatever.
Well, at this point, it's hitting them in the face.
So it's hard for people to deny it now.
A year ago, even though you could – it was obviously coming.
A year ago, I think a majority of people would have bought that line.
now you you can't say it and have any credibility because people are there and they're in their
store or they're at the gas pump and they're like well this is like that shit says five dollars
and never said that before exactly right so and this this is this this is the sad reality is that
people humans always have to learn the hard way right not every single person but in general
people like learning the hard way uh they want to put their hand in in the fire and get burned you
can tell them, yo, don't touch the fire. The fire, the fire is hot. And this goes across a lot of
different subjects, but oftentimes the lesson will not be learned until it, until it happens.
Then it affects that individual directly. This is something I've talked about for many years. And
one reason why I publicly started speaking out more about a lot of stuff was just that I could
see where you could, I could, I just, I have a good foresight. I have good foresight. I practice
second, third, fourth order thinking. And it's like, okay, well, this thing's going to lead to
this thing and this thing's going to lead to this thing. And if there's no resistance, one crazy
thing that can happen in a population is a very tiny minority of people who are dedicated can
completely shift and control society and culture. Right. And I'm not even just talking about the
people who are referred to as the elites or whatever. I'm talking about fringe activist
groups. I'm talking about the ESG movement. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. But, but even, even on a lower scale,
There are some really kooky ideas that have been floating around at this point for years, which almost nobody believes in.
But people are afraid to say that they don't.
People will still go along with the narrative or at –
Is there an example of something that like sticks out in your mind?
Dude, I'm the British women's deadlift record holder.
Still.
Say that again for people so they get it.
I said I'm the British women's deadlift record holder.
Bro, that was –
No women's beat you?
how can they they need to have some advantage um they need to have something most women still are
the record holder i think if you google uk women's deadlift record someone can verify this for me but
i think my name still pops right up um but my point is i did that in february 2019 this is three and a
half years ago now this is still a conversation this is still a quote unquote debate and so on
Bro, no one believes this. How many people, if you go outside, around the USA even, and you ask
people, are biological males and females different? Do you think it is fair for males to compete
against females in profession? No one believes it. No one believes that men can get pregnant.
No one believes that women have penises. But we're living in this weird world where people
would even be afraid to say what I just said. Oh my gosh. You just said that women don't have
penises. It's like, bro, like we know this. That's not a controversial statement. Why am I,
why am I even saying this? Like we're in this weird battle of, of, for, for reality. That's
one of the most concerning things about, about this all is that it's not that, okay, we're
agreeing on objective reality and people have different opinions on how to interpret it or
what should be done with it or so on. It's people are no longer even agreeing on objective reality.
We saw this again, all through the, all through the pandemic situation. And it was like, well,
if, if we can't even like agree just on the reality and numbers and they, you know, just
even just what we can all observe, then we're, we're in massive trouble, right?
This goes back to like, I think the default was always, uh, at least the perception was like
science and math were not political. Now it's not completely true. And, uh, maybe the science
standpoint, because for decades, centuries, whatever, uh, there would be certain scientific
breakthroughs. People wouldn't believe it. You know, the earth is round. People would get killed
for saying that, whatever. Right. So it's not exactly black and white, but I do think that
most people for a very long time thought that it wasn't like Fox news and MSNBC were going to argue
over gravity. Yes. Right. Like, like there was certain things that were just not where my mind
started to change on this. And I was like, Oh shit, we're going to a place. We don't want to go
was I read an article. This may be two to four years ago. So, you know, I forget exactly.
And it talked about the massive investment that was being made by MSNBC, Fox news and CNN in
weather interesting and i was like why are they all going so hard at weather and obviously the
weather channel in the united states had been super successful and and there was a business there
and then towards the end of the article i started talking about climate change it's a political
issue yes i was like wait a minute ain't that a science issue no like what's going on and then
that's when it dawned on me i said oh my god the media companies are going to compete over science
because whoever gets to say we have the science gets the political upper hand in all of their
other coverage. Yeah. And dude, it's, it's, it's a problem. And the politicization of everything is,
is a huge problem. I mean, I did a thread on this just the other day on, on Twitter. And I was just
saying this obsession with politicizing and racializing everything, especially in the USA,
it's a big problem. It happens in other places, but not like this. Like I'm from the, I'm from
the UK and it's not any issue. I mean, you know, I don't know when this interview comes out, but as
we, you know, just yesterday, there's another shooting that happened in a city and I'm there
and everyone's talking about race and Democrats and Republicans. And I'm like, guys, what the
man like every time every time there's a there's a mass shooting there's a there's a tragedy there's
something awful that happens people some people's minds immediately jumps to okay what race was the
perpetrator what race was the uh were the victims um were what were their leanings were they right
leaning were they were they a white nationalist or was a white guy was it was it a black and i'm
like dude like the bodies are warm like how how are you immediately some tragedy happens your
immediate thought is like, okay, how can I use this to fit my political agenda? Or how can I
use this to demonize the group that I feel some kind of animosity towards or whatever? And I'm
like, dude, that's sick. Like that's, that's really messed up. Um, there's a time and place
for certain conversations, but it's just like, man, like, and I think even with these, with these
situations, this is another problem is that it's all talked about on such a shallow level.
it's all talked about on such a shallow level you know it's like okay you're allowed to talk
about guns of course you can talk about guns right you can fish oh you know it's guns guns guns
you know when can we have the talk about the spiritual war that's going on when can we have
a conversation about morality when can we have a conversation about family and fathers and community
and morality right when could we even talk about you know you could you can sort of talk about
mental health and pharmaceuticals that's allowed but you know as soon as you go into kind of any
spiritual or moral realm anything that's a little bit deeper you know it's like oh no we we we can't
even we can't even talk about that it's like well you're gonna keep getting this problem until
you're allowed to talk about it right if you're only if if the thing is just oh we need to ban
ar-15s and we need to reduce the magazine i'm like bro like in the uk it's stabbings and in the uk
they do the same thing by the way. They're like, Oh, maybe, yeah, we need to, maybe we need to
reduce the length of knives. I'm like, dude, if someone wants to hurt or kill somebody, we all
have access to lethal weapons. Every single person, we all own knives. We all pretty much
own vehicles. We have bats, we have clubs, we have fists, we have feet, right? If you want.
And by the way, I think it's important for people to know that even in the U S way more people
are killed by those weapons than they are by rifles, right? More people are stabbed to death,
more people are beaten to death, right? And way more people obviously killed by handguns and so
on. But it's just this obsession of, you know, we've got this political thing about this particular
tool. And it's just so, it's so shallow and so superficial and so annoying. And ultimately the
reason it, the reason it pisses me off is because people are just going to keep on getting hurt and
keep on getting died and keep on dying until you, until some real conversations are had.
Yeah. Right. I think a lot about the media coverage of this stuff as well. So you're
talking about like the internet conversation, right. To the degree of a shooting happens and
immediately gets polarized. Media does the same thing. Um, yeah, but, but they also, uh, in some
way are, uh, by not covering certain things, they are telling us a lot about society. And so, uh,
I don't know, maybe the last couple of weeks or whatever, I saw that there's a Twitter account
and uh every monday or sunday night they will tweet out how many people were shot and killed
in chicago oh boy yeah and the numbers are like staggering it's insane right it'll be like you
know 35 people were killed over the weekend and you're like yo what like i didn't hear about that
anywhere else and then you're like okay go in the comments take away their guns do this and then
people are like dude the guns are illegal but like you can't have the gun right and the criminal
soul somehow figure out how to get it and it goes back to this idea of like wait a minute like what
if our entire like framework for evaluating the problem is wrong? It is wrong. And okay. So
explain. It's completely wrong. As I said, look, it's a problem of the human heart and the human
spirit, right? If you, why, why do I think sometimes it's important to not just consider
why people do things, but to consider why they don't. Okay. So as we've established, we, we both
have access and the physical capability to kill right we have access to weapons and we have the
capability to kill right um why don't we why don't we kill people no honestly right well one we want
to be a good person yes right uh two is uh there's this almost a social contract for the people in
your community of uh let's all get along to some degree uh three is you'll go to jail right so
There's like a punishment component to it.
I'd say that that's pretty low down.
Oh, yeah.
Well, here's the way –
I think the moral aspects and ethical aspects are much, much higher than the threat of –
Without a doubt.
I mean I remember when Egypt went through the uprising, I don't know, maybe eight years ago or whatever it was.
And everyone was like, it was Twitter.
It was Twitter.
It was Twitter, right?
And, yes, social media, without a doubt, I think everyone who looked at that situation and learned about it would say social media played a role.
But you know what played a bigger role?
they didn't have food yes guess what everyone thinks that they're a super moral uh ethical
person until literally they're looking at their wife and their kids and they're like if i don't
go and kill our neighbor my kids won't eat and they will die of a starvation it's horrible
it's just it just becomes the most brutal form of human nature and obviously those are very
extreme cases. They happen very, very infrequently, uh, globally, thankfully, but you can take the
watered down version and bring it back to there's a morality aspect. There's a huge morality aspect.
Okay. Let's take one. Let's take one specific issue, which is a hot topic, not just in the
U S but globally school shootings. Okay. When did that really, when did that become a more
regular thing? Right. It's only in the past couple of decades. For sure. The guns have,
the guns have been there kids used to work in the 60s the seven kids were taking rifles to school
kids had guns in their lockers and so on school shootings were very very rare right it was around
the columbine time where it started to become this early 2000s probably yeah i want to say like
i want to say like late 90s or early 2000s and so on so how can you say it's just the guns when
the guns have always been there if the guns have always been there and the problem just really
started say 25 years ago right how can you know guns were not introduced as a new thing um so yes
of course there's more guns on the school campuses 25 plus years yes this is this this is my point
right or even if you look within cities like where are shootings happening what's happening
in places with the heaviest gun control laws and so on and so forth it's not just as simple as
more guns equals more shooting. It's really not that simple. Even if you look at a country like
Europe, I think Switzerland is the most heavily armed country in Europe, I believe, followed by
Finland, right? And you're not getting a lot of shootings in, you know, there's probably more
shoot. I believe there's going to be more shootings in the UK than there are in Switzerland, even per
capita and so on. So it's not that simple. The problem is people wanting to hurt and kill other
people. If you decided, if an individual decides they want to hurt or kill another person or a
group of people, they will use whatever tools are at their disposal. Yes, sure, it might be easier
to kill people with a gun, but there's bombs, there's knives, there's vehicles, right? Some of
the most brutal killings that have happened in Europe were just someone taking a van or a truck
and just running it through a crowd. That's what happened in New York City. I think it's happened
at least two stories that i know yeah uh and in one case they rented like a u-haul truck
and just drove down the bike path so my the thing is okay so the questions to me is like
why what what possesses someone to do that and as i said the flip side okay most people
99.9 percent of people wouldn't even dream of doing that wouldn't do it so what are they getting
right and what's going wrong here and if you look at the individuals who do this there's always a
pattern. First, it's always young men. It's not women doing it. It's not girls. It's always young
men typically between say 15 and 30. Okay. Hmm. What else do they have in common? Majority of
time, there's no father in the picture. Okay. That's, that's a factor. Oftentimes they're on
some type of psychoactive substance or drug, right? Oftentimes they are known to the authorities
already right there there's a certain profile where you could narrow this down and be like okay
what's going on here right so there's some type of depravity here there's some type of moral
loss the way this child has been raised something that's going on in their brain like there's some
there's stuff that's going on there um and i don't have all the answers my thing is just
this conversation we're having this this should be the conversation as soon as people are just
Oh, you know, I'm talking about magazine sizes and AR-15s.
I'm just like, dude, you don't think that person could have done that with a handgun
or with a shotgun or like, it's just so, I know people have their political pet causes
and they have their, people like this idea.
Here's another big one.
And I've tweeted this before and it went viral.
I said, we keep looking for political realm solutions to spiritual realm problems and
being surprised when it doesn't work.
Yeah, I think it's a great way.
Not everything can be solved with politics.
And people don't like to hear that because in this rather increasingly secular society that we're living in, people increasingly view the government as the be-all and end-all and view everything through this political lens.
I also think there's an element where when it's politics, I have a weapon to tell you what to do.
Yes.
When it's spiritual, I only have a weapon to try to improve my situation.
that there's there's no way for me really to use uh a spiritual tool to impact you control you or
anything right yes you can try to get you to go to church or you know whatever uh but it's not as
direct of a control mechanism as let's change the rules let's use the police let's you know do
whatever i i am i'm reading this book uh it's called cult uh i was in the bookstore and i saw
what the hell is this right open it up 10 people and uh as you can imagine cults have a very
negative connotation um and usually because they end in some horrific way yes uh and the first 50
pages of this book charles manson and the whole story now charles manson i think a lot of people
would say uh i heard the name before especially young people uh i know bad person uh there's some
murders but i don't really know the story in this book the first 20 25 pages is all about his
childhood okay it's exactly what you're talking about absolutely horrific got moved uh multiple
times between all these different homes in and out of jail uh to the point where like 10 years
old like stealing a car and like going across state lines right i mean just like to the point
where you're just like this is really bad compared on the scale of like a bad 10 year old right um
And it's just like if you looked at that child's life, you wouldn't think that they became the president of the United States.
Now, you might not jump to the conclusion that there was murder and cults and kind of the other extreme, but it's kind of just like, yeah, of course that person has challenges.
Yes.
And of course that person probably ended up in a place that society was like, man, we wish that people didn't go there.
And so it just made me think a lot about like that is a situation where like there's no ability for somebody else to show up without understanding that backstory and be able to help that individual.
Like the context is so important.
Now, again, that doesn't excuse the behavior.
It doesn't do any of this stuff, right?
It's still horrific.
But like that's a pretty big fucking detail of a story.
and as you see some of these people who go and do these horrific things today in society
that's what you're talking about like there's the uh the drugs that they're on it's broken families
it's uh known to the authorities that's the one that always gets me it's like you're telling me
that the police knew this person had threatened to go kill people a bunch of times and somehow
they still did it like dismembered a kid in or like done some really effed up thing and you know
we don't have the data so we don't know how many times does the authorities get alerted to uh
this person is a person of interest, right. Or however they characterize it. And then what
percent of those people actually go and do something super horrific. You also can't arrest
crime people for crimes they have not committed. Correct. Right. Um, that's a fact, you know,
there's, there's so many factors and it, and it's complicated, you know, I'm not,
and that's part of the problem. I think this is why people want the simple solution.
People, people want the simple solution. It's, it's complicated and it's also generational
and it's multifaceted, right? I'm not saying that it's just the one, one thing, right.
There can be political elements, social elements, religious or spiritual elements, like overall morality and social fabric elements and so on, you know, a huge family component as well.
You know, how rare is it for someone who is like, you know, well-raised in a stable, loving family to go on and do anything like this, right?
It's extremely, extremely rare.
And this is not to say that, you know, most people who aren't raised in that environment go on and do that.
But, you know, it's it also begs a question, which I don't have the answer to.
OK, should the parents be held accountable for certain actions of their kids?
This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Domains.
They've partnered with Blockchain.com to create NFT domain names ending in dot blockchain.
It's the perfect ending to show that you're a believer in a decentralized future.
The Blockchain.com community can join a short wait list to get one for free at Blockchain.com slash wait list slash blockchain domain.
Free NFT domains provide all the benefits of premium Unstoppable domains, including fee-free lifelong ownership.
If you don't have a Blockchain.com wallet, no worries, there's new free domains available to everyone.
Either join the waitlist for a free Blockchain.com domain or visit UnstoppableDomains.com to buy your domain today starting as low as $5.
UnstoppableDomains.com
This episode is brought to you by Alto IRA.
They can help you invest in Bitcoin and crypto in a tax-advantaged way.
That helps you preserve your hard-earned money.
Alto's Crypto IRA lets you invest in Bitcoin and over 200 other different coins and tokens,
and it has all the same tax advantages of your traditional IRA.
There's no setup or account fees, and it's all you need to do.
Invest in crypto tax-free.
Let me repeat that again.
You can invest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies tax-free.
So are you ready to take your investments to the next level?
Diversify like the pros and trade without tax headaches.
open an alto crypto ira to invest in bitcoin and crypto tax-free go to alto ira.com slash pomp
that's a-l-t-o-i-r-a.com slash pomp start investing today so for example if your kid uh is 10 years
old goes to the store uh and you're with them and they steal something yes they may yell at the kid
or whatever they don't take the kid to jail right at least in the united states but they yell at
parents too like hey what's going on here you know whatever uh okay that's like i don't know
petty theft if you even want to characterize that as a 10 year old taking a candy bar or something
if your kid goes on a and does a school shooting okay like that's a whole different ball game and
there's a bunch of stuff in between but right now there's this complex question of the parents
you don't control the kid right especially the kids over 18 and all these things
but also how do you create a system that incentivizes good parenting? Right. And so
like maybe it's incentives, it's not punishments, maybe it's punishments and end incentives. I don't
know what the answer is, but it just feels like a really important question that we have to ask
ourselves is like, how do we incentivize better parenting so that maybe we could divert, even if
it was 10% of the bad stuff, that'd be a win. Yeah. And, and you know, I, I'm not a parent yet,
But it's really hit me over the last few years that there is no – I think the importance of parenting is vastly underestimated and underappreciated, both in the positive and the negative.
Because if you really think about like how stuff ripples out and resonates out, I mean it's insane.
So the person I am and my four siblings is, yeah, some of it is just, you know, your genetics and your personality, but a lot of it is how we were raised.
Okay.
And by me being raised in a certain way and being put on a certain path and instilled with certain morals, I then have, how many people do I impact on a daily, monthly, annual basis?
I reach millions of people.
Right.
And so, and those people then also reach thousands or millions.
So the way both the positivity and the negativity ripples out into wider society cannot be understated.
If you raise a terror of a child, if you raise a demon child, right, that's not just bad for them and bad for the family.
That's bad for society.
That's bad for your wider community.
That's bad for your country because they go on and they hurt people and they're leaving in their wake this path of destruction, which is now impacting all these other people.
And then oftentimes it becomes a generational thing and that's passed on.
You know, you can pass down the goodness or you can pass on the nightmare.
And yeah, sure, that cycle can be broken in both ways.
So I think it's actually understated and underappreciated just how important parents are and families are because that's really the foundation for an individual's whole life.
And then, like I said, yeah, that individual impacts others.
And I think this is uncomfortable.
It's very uncomfortable for people to discuss this.
Like this is a conversation that's considered very unpolitically correct, right?
Even if you tell people that it's better for a child to have a mother and a father, people are like, oh, right?
People want to immediately want to object to that now, like not long ago in most parts of the world as a completely not not even a slightly controversial statement.
It's like, duh, obviously. Right. And here it's it's contentious and it's hard.
And, you know, sure, if someone's like, oh, well, you know, well, I was raised by a single mom and I'm like, bro, no one is attacking you.
People deem everything as an attack. Everyone personalizes everything. Right.
But they also switch it.
When you say it's better for the child, it immediately jumps to don't attack single moms or single fathers or whatever.
But it's like if you're optimized, if the sole optimization is what is the best thing for a child, let's have that conversation.
By the way, like you can disagree.
You can have other facts, like whatever.
But it's like stay focused on what are we optimizing for in this specific conversation versus try to twist it around.
And do you know another thing that's plaguing the West is this obsession with exceptions.
Oh, interesting. Right. People trying to base everything on exceptions rather than the general rule.
OK, so everyone everyone's we're focusing on exceptions to the detriments of the norm and the majority.
Right. So with any particular issue, someone will want to say, oh, well, you know, what about this or what about that?
And it's like, dude, can we talk about like the 90% scenario or the 98% scenario rather
than obsessing over these exceptions and basing the rules and the standards and the
norms around exceptions rather than around norms?
In anything, you're going to have exceptions, right?
If I say, you know, oh, people have five, you know, five fingers on each hand.
Someone's like, oh, well, you know, my auntie has six fingers on her.
Or, you know, oh, well, what about-
So let's make all the gloves with six fingers.
Yeah, that's insensitive.
You know, I lost my left left hand in a in a in an accident.
I'm like, dude, I'm not. Yes, I recognize there are people who do not have 10 fingers.
There's people with more. There's people with fewer. That does not change the general fact that people have 10 fingers, you know.
So, yes, there are children who can be raised in all sorts of you know, there's children who can be raised in what looks like an idyllic, perfect environment.
and they go on and, you know, they're, they're screw ups. And there can be people who are raised
in very, very bad situations and so on. And they go on and achieve great things. Yes, we, we know
there are billions of humans. There's so much variety and variation, but objectively all other
things being equal, even by a simple factor of two being more than one, it is better for a child to
have two parents. We know this, that's not a controversial statement, right? And yes, there
And there can be – and you have to acknowledge exceptions, right?
There are people who are widows, right?
Someone dies or this happens or that happens, right?
Not everything works out perfectly.
But just because not everything works out perfectly doesn't mean you blow up and disintegrate the standard, right?
And this is what I'm seeing.
I'm seeing all the standards being disintegrated, right, in the name of making people feel comfortable or feel more accommodated and so on and so forth.
And in this avoidance of avoiding hurting anyone's feelings in any type of way, we've essentially in the West prioritized people's feelings over objective reality, even when that's extremely detrimental.
You want to see another great example of this?
Look at this whole fat acceptance, body positivity thing.
Right?
It literally is wild.
It's wild.
Yeah.
It's wild, right?
Obesity is being promoted.
And this is the biggest killer of people.
This is a problem that, again, it didn't really used to be a big problem.
You could go back less than 100 years ago, and obesity was very rare.
Obesity was very rare.
And just in a century, in one person's lifetime, we've got into a stage where the majority of adults in this country are overweight or obese.
The majority, right?
Childhood obesity did not used to exist, right?
You look at fat kids from like the 70s or the 80s, and it's like, oh, he's only like slightly chubby.
Now it's like a fat kid weighs more than I do, right?
And it's getting worse.
And it got worse over the last couple of years, despite the fact that 80 percent of the people hospitalized with the Rona overweight or obese can't talk about that.
And it's like, dude, do you care?
Do we care about like not offending anybody or do we care about actually trying to help people?
I've always thought for a long time now, normalizing offending people and just like we are not going to be held captive by trying to tiptoe around offending.
You can't do it.
It's just, listen, again, objectively, if you are unhealthy, it is bad for you.
There will be people who hear you and I say that, and they will be like, these guys are assholes.
Yeah, but what about someone who had a car crash and has a thyroid issue, and so they got – it's the exception.
And I'm just like, dude, I recognize most people who are obese are not obese because they have some hereditary thyroid issue or because they got disabled in a car accident.
It's because they eat too much and they don't move enough.
But I also think there's an exception issue.
There's also what I'll call like a reverse extreme issue.
So when you say people should be healthy, immediately Americans are idiots.
So like everyone, you expect everyone to have a six pack, be able to squat 400 pounds and they only can eat like a rabbit lettuce.
You are an asshole.
Right.
And you're just like, no, dude, we're talking about like, can you go outside and walk down the street without losing your breath?
Yes.
Right.
Like, like that's the baseline to start.
Yes.
And then it's even like you start thinking about, uh, I do think a lot about like, if you just say healthy rather than like people should work out for whatever reason.
Like we're all stupid, you know, uh, uh, idiot animals.
And we're like, Oh, healthy sounds like healthy sounds good.
Like that's a nice rapper.
That's acceptable.
Workout.
You shouldn't be able to tell me to work out.
What are you, who are you to tell me that I need to be a certain size to fit in pants
or this or like, no dude, just be healthy.
Like literally just whatever that means for you.
By the way, some people feel healthy because they, uh, run on a treadmill or ride a stationary
bike or, uh, do like cardio stuff.
other people feel healthy when they go and they lift weights some people i don't know there's a
lot of fucking people in suburban america who if you go around about i don't know 9 30 10 o'clock
what do you see walking a bunch of people walking and some of them even have some weights in their
hand right like that's how they feel healthy great who cares what they're doing it's just like
that direction is way better than us being like you know what 400 pounds let's put the mannequin
out there. And, uh, that, that, that is, that's the new standard. Yeah. That's like a good thing.
Look, look at us. Yeah. That's, yeah. That's, that's the worst part of it. It's when they do
the, you know, healthy at any size, you can be obese. No, you cannot be obese and healthy,
right? You cannot be healthy at any size. That is a lie. If you are 600 pounds,
you are not healthy period. All right. You cannot be healthy at any size. It's a complete lie.
And something I've noticed about this is doctors never say that. And something that's interesting
about this is uh have you noticed it's only targeted at women only there's no body positivity
fat acceptance movement for men the so i i may disagree on that okay and the only disagreement
i would say is the whole like dad bod it didn't work though but but but when i go to like a
department store which unfortunately you will not see me in very often uh but i was recently in new
york and uh they had a bunch of the women mannequins that you know whatever uh and i don't
think I saw any of the men ones, but I've seen pictures on the internet of the like dad bod with
like the collared shirt or whatever. Have you ever seen that on the cover of a men's magazine,
a fitness magazine? No. Right. But you'll see, you'll see fat women on the cover. You know,
it's, um, so this is how, you know, this stuff is very engineered. It's very engineered. It's not,
it's not organic and people call it compassion. I don't think it's compassion. I think it's cruel
straight up i i think i i don't think it's compassionate at all i think that man well
you're lying to people that you're lying this is the part that i think uh it's kind of like
feedback in business there's a lot of times uh business leaders and this is pretty well
documented right business leaders will be super nice to folks and the companies never work okay
because what happens is like the truth is never said so if you keep going to work every day and
you're never told hey you're slacking on something we need you to improve you never improve right and
if you never improve the business doesn't improve and then therefore it's much harder to be
successful yeah so it doesn't mean you have to go be an asshole someone's got to yell and scream at
you and call you an idiot and like all this stuff it's it's what is what how did you describe it
before the reverse extreme yeah that that's that's literally what it is you say one thing you know
i'm like you know i i i like apples and it's oh you hate bananas i'm just like dude like
you forgot to mention what about pineapples what about i was like it's like dude like
canceled yeah that's the thing you know and it's it's it's just a problem because again you can't
fix things there are certain things that are getting worse the obesity problem is getting
worse did you see the adele it's getting worse story oh and people hating on her for losing
weight she lost weight and all i saw two tweets about now i just got to keep scrolling because
i'm uh fucking but it's don't don't you think it's interesting not to i don't even want to
make this like a gendered conversation but don't you think it's interesting how that's like
like man that's not a male thing at all jonah hill remember you uh the actor yeah he lost a
bunch of weight and uh it was treated very differently of course right and there's just
two anecdotes yeah whatever yeah but but it's real by the way i've observed this my whole life
not just on social media but there is a difference in this regard right i mean even if right what's
the criticism of what's the criticism of of barbie dolls right the unrealistic body standards and
this and that or you know someone there was that in the uk there was this company called i think
they were called protein world and they had this ad which said you know are you beach body ready
and had this foot woman fit woman in a bikini and it became this like huge outrage thing right they
went after them so hard and whatever by the way they had a male one as well and no one cared about
you know the are you beach body ready with the male body but this one's misogynistic and this
and unrealistic expectations like bro have you seen have you seen what action figures look like
have you have you ever seen superman or batman or wolverine or psycho with their freaking pecs
and their 16 pack and they're like we're just sure do you imagine superman with a dad
no but but the point is no one ever said oh this is setting an unrealistic and harmful
expectation for young boys and it's gonna so there's something like really interesting
going on there right like because women uh have through society's kind of reinforcement
more of a focus on appearance their appearance and i say this as somebody who uh i've got a
nine-month-old daughter and i think about even just if you walk into a toy store right if you
walk into certain things like you walk down the street the way that people say things sure it's
like oh she's so pretty yeah and like i don't have the experience of having a son so i don't know
would people be like oh he's so handsome maybe but like for whatever reason i'm like no she's
fucking a genius for sure right sure like and so it's like a weird thing do you think that plays
into it absolutely i think it absolutely plays into it i i think it would be i think it's clear
and obvious that across societies and cultures that women are valued more on appearance than men
or women are judged the way men and women are judged is different and the way men judge women
and the way women judge men is different, right?
I was saying actually to someone the other day
that you'll often hear, feminists in particular,
but other people often say, you know,
that there's men who look at women like sex objects.
There are men who do that, sure.
There are also, one could argue that society
and women view men as success objects, right?
um if a man the way men and women view and sort of rate and rank each other is is just different
right it's just different if you are a high-powered successful man in your career and you're
accomplished in this and that that weighs differently to a woman with the same achievements
right guys will be like yeah but is she hot you know that's why i'm surprised they've ever gone
after the dating apps what's that i'm surprised that like the mob has never gone after the dating
apps where literally uh judgments on humans are being made by the photo that you're shown and
you're swiping left or right in like the most uh uh impersonal way possible but the initial
impression which by the way is exactly what happens in real life too is based on looks it
does and i've always been shocked that they're not like this is ridiculous yeah you know these
conversations are interesting, because the truth is, biology always exists. You know, so we can
talk about like this and this. And there's many things in the world where maybe we think it sort
of, it feels unfair, or it feels like a double standard. Oh, how come it's like this? Or, you
know, it should be like that it should be. And within reason, you can make certain accommodations,
right? You can certainly treat people fairly, right? This is generally how I operate across
the board. And what I strive to do is simply treat people fairly, treat everybody decently.
Equal is a weird word because equal is equal. Human beings are, we're equal, but we're not,
right? In a spiritual sense, like in a religious sense, in a worth of your life and how the laws
should apply to you and so on. I believe human beings are equal. I believe human beings are
created in the image of God, right? We're all equal. In the literal sense, we're not equal at
all in any way. We're all very, we're very different. We're the most diverse species that's
out there, right? We're not equally tall. We have different body weights. We look completely
different. We have different eye colors. Some people are attractive. Some people are less
attractive. Some people are highly athletic. Some people are very intelligent. Some people are dumb.
Some people are right. Like we're, we're, we're not, we're not equal at all in, in that sense.
And also when it comes to say conversations about men and women, men and women are equal in a sense,
right. In terms of your worth, in terms of your, your value and so on. But we're fundamentally
like as groups, we are, we're different. And that's, that's not a problem, right? There's
people who problematize that, right? They almost want this like homogenous, genderless, weird
society where it's weird. Cause at the same time, these people will be like diversity, diversity,
diversity. And then at the same time, they kind of want everyone to just be the same, just to be
these like genderless blobs who there's no difference between the males and the females.
And everyone, maybe those categories don't even exist. And everyone's just, you know, everyone
even earns the same amount of money and everyone does the same. And it's like, dude, that sucks.
Like that's, and it's just not real. It's not realistic. It's silly to have a goal. Number
one, that's not even a good goal, but it's unachievable. It's like, why would you want
to achieve that? And you're also not going to use, you see this in many things where people
are even trying to force like certain things to be 50, 50 in terms of gender, right? Oh, we want,
you know, it should be 50, 50. Number one, it's funny because people only want that in certain
jobs and sectors, right? I've never seen anyone advocating that 50% of construction workers or
garbage disposal people or crab fishers or lumberjacks should be female. Um, it's only
like cushy executive jobs and whatever. Um, but it's also like, why, like what problem are you
trying to fix? Why is it an issue that most primary school teachers are female? That's not an issue to
me. Men should be allowed to be primary school teachers and they shouldn't be discriminated
against. Like if you're treating, again, it comes back to fairness. If you're treating people
unfairly, that's a problem. If you're unfairly discriminating against people, that's a problem.
Everyone should have the opportunity to do what they want.
But understanding basic human nature and basic biology, you recognize that you're not going to get like this perfect magical split on everything.
Because men and women, lo and behold, have different interests.
You're in the Bitcoin and crypto space.
It's probably what?
Eight men to one women?
Not because women are not allowed in Bitcoin or crypto.
It's literally like the most open thing available.
but there's just more, it's more of a masculine tendency to be interested in that kind of stuff,
right? I'm a rapper. What percentage of rappers are male? It's a very male dominated, not women
are allowed to rap. There's just more men who are into it. And you can find that on the inverse.
There's plenty of things that are female dominated and so on. And it's just like,
cool, that's fine. As long as people are not being unfairly discriminated against and there's
equality of opportunity at the point of entry, then I don't have a problem with it. Let the
fall where they do and then people do it with like race and so on and again they're very selective
with it right imagine how crazy it would sound if someone came and said that like the nba and the
nfl are racist against non-black people right they'd be like oh my gosh black men are seven
percent of the population and they're over 70 of the nba this is clearly where where are all the
where are the jews where are the asians where are the it's like do you go just like it's a it's a
meritocracy like everyone's allowed to play basketball well it's also this is how the nba
they discriminate against short people yeah how can we forget right like how like that's that's
unfair yeah right i'm not six five that's fucked up i'd have been michael jordan y'all be talking
about anthony popliano if i if y'all let me in there right but like it's like yeah no shit yeah
it's you know it's it's really funny how people do it because when you bring up those type of
examples people see how silly it is but then they'll run off and they'll do that in a whole
leather sector and i'm like wait why why would you expect everything everywhere to perfectly
represent the population demographics that's just not how it works there's a a weird thing of um
when people try to do the right thing there's people who definitely are uh not good actors
or not kind of well-intentioned right so put those people aside for a second people who say like um
let's use a computer science okay uh as a sector there's a lot of folks who say hey there's not uh
as many women or uh minorities in that sector now put aside for a second whether people want
to debate that or not or whatever just hold that as as a truth yeah in most cases what would make
sense is cool let's go do things to incentivize more of those people to do it yes sometimes it's
like an exposure thing if you live in an area where no one's ever told you that's even a
possibility then like you don't know how many kids end up going through a high school and their high
school had some program, they get exposed to something and that ends up being their career.
And if they'd gone to the high school across town that didn't have that program, they would
have never even been exposed to that thing and whatever. So like, okay, cool. Like you can do
all these things that help build up one group or one effort without tearing down the others.
And it works in reverse as well, right? Where, uh, people say like, um, you know, the NBA,
it'd be like saying, okay, we only can have 50% of a certain type of person, whether it's race,
height whatever so well why don't you just try to go get more people to try out that you know fit
some other criteria and i actually think that if just that was the focus cool you identified
something that you want to change like go work to change it in a positive way but you're not
allowed to tear down other things yes society would be like way chiller yeah and people would
be like you know what like i actually like that effort i think that's great it's when it becomes
like a zero-sum game that's where you get all the politicalization of it that's where you get the
debates that's where you get all the fucking sensitivities like and then it just spirals out
of control yeah because now now if it's if it's zero sum yeah well we're playing a zero sum game
we've both agreed we're playing a zero sum game i'm not losing yeah which means you have to lose
yeah if it's positive sum then it's much more working together man i have so many things i
could say on this dude we got a lot long time go ahead well first first of all this this zero
sum mindset thing is a real plague. It's a big problem. People need to understand that life is
not a zero sum game. Money is not a zero sum game. Health and fitness is not a zero sum game.
Relationships and dating or whatever, these things are not zero sum. And one of the amazing things
about the world, one of the coolest things with all the diversity we have in humanity is there
are millions of games to play and you only need to be really good at one to be successful.
Right. So, I mean, just look at jobs in Korea, like how many different ways are there to make
money? Right. So, oh, you, oh, you can't make it in the NBA. You're not six foot six and amazing
at basketball. Do you know what? There's another million things that you can, you can create in
this day and age. You could even create your own thing. Like, look at what we both do for a living.
Like this, we probably struggle to explain this to like our great grandparents and be
like, wait, you do what for a living?
That's not a job.
Like, what do you, what do you mean?
Or you have a podcast where you sit and you talk to people like, wait, you, you do none
of it, none of it, no level of it makes any sense.
And it's just like, that's awesome.
So you don't need to, if you're not competitive in a particular field or you're just not interested
in it, it's like, cool.
Like you can just get in where you fit in, man.
Like we all have a different pool of talents.
We all have different experiences and interests and personalities, and that's dope because if we didn't, if we didn't, the world, firstly, the world wouldn't even work because the way everything works with free trade is we all have different services and products that we can offer that other people find value in, and we're all constantly exchanging.
That's literally what the economy is.
People have been brainwashed to think the economy is like some stock ticker or something.
This is what the point I was making back in 2020 when they were locking down and shutting down.
And I was like, yo, you're crushing the economy.
People are like, you care more about the economy than human?
I'm like, bro, human lives rely on the economy and human lives are, we are the economy, right?
Like our ability to interact and trade and do all, like this is, this is what gives everything,
everything value and also gives us meaning and purpose.
It's not the stock price when you say the economy.
No, it's literally the corner store isn't fucking open and I need food.
And if I can't get food, you got 72 hours where people are going to start doing fucked up shit.
Exactly.
Like, yeah, and sure, they didn't shut down the grocery stores, but they shut down a hell of a lot of businesses.
Yeah, and that was the thing with it.
So people need to get out of this zero-sum mindset thing.
This is also where the whole, like, eat the rich thing comes from, right?
People think that by, oh, their neighbor made money or that person has money, so therefore they must have stolen it from everyone else.
The reason why there are poor people is because there are rich people.
There's people who believe that.
There's hundreds of millions of people who believe that, that poor people are just there
because there are rich people and it's the rich people being selfish and it's just them
being greedy.
And that's why, you know, there's this limited pool of money and they're just hoarding it.
So those people there can't get some.
And I mean, people have believed this for centuries.
It's what so much of like Marxist thought and what it's all this zero sum mentality
thinking.
So people need to get out of that mindset and everything because it's number one, it's
literally not correct.
And then number two is it just makes people very resentful and it creates more animosity
and more division and so on.
And it stops people from taking that personal responsibility and bettering themselves.
Coming back to a different point that you were making before, I'm so glad you talked
about this encouraging people to know about and have access to certain opportunities,
because I experienced this myself in a very interesting way when I was in university.
so um i studied computer science at oxford when i was at oxford
for going to oxford man are you from cambridge or something um
you're educated oh you have an unfair advantage you know what people at oxford and cambridge
call the other university the other place oh jesus christ so people from cambridge call
oxford the other place people from oxford call cambridge the other place there's a little uh
a little rivalry there um but yeah when when I was in university it was really interesting so
in my first year there so in the whole university of I think I think Oxford at the time I want to
say has around I want to say 12 12 to 15,000 undergraduate students okay um Oxford got put
in the spotlight because out of that say 15,000 undergraduate students do you know how many black
people they had. Actually, I have a guess. This episode is brought to you by FTX US.
They're the safe, regulated way to buy and sell Bitcoin and other digital assets.
Trade crypto with up to 85% lower fees than the top competitors. There are no fixed minimums,
no ACH transaction fees, and no withdrawal fees. Download the FTX app today and use referral code
POMP to earn free crypto on every trade over $10. The more you trade, the more you earn.
Go download the FTX app today and use referral code POMP.
This episode is brought to you by Valor, which represents what's next in the digital economy.
They provide simplified trusted access in crypto, decentralized finance, and Web3 investment opportunities.
Institutions and investors can gain diversified, secure, compliant, and easily tradable access
to a diversified set of industry-leading equity products and protocols,
all through a single stock purchase on a regulated exchange.
They currently are listed in the U.S. under the DEFTF stock ticker and on the Canadian NEO exchange under DEFI.
For more information or to subscribe to receive company updates and financial information, visit their website at valor.com.
That's V-A-L-O-U-R dot com.
I'm going to under guess now 250.
55.
Wow.
55 out of over 10,000.
Wow.
And so there were newspaper articles and stuff.
Oxford is racist clearly this institutional racism and there was all this talk you know
because that's how people look at things they just see a disparity and their brain immediately
jumps to some type of bigotry discrimination racism sexism whatever it is right they don't
think and my immediate thought was oh wow that's low like how many applied
and then if you look at it it was like oh okay like not that many people are that many black
people like even applied and um when i was there i was part of something called the oxford access
scheme which was to uh do exactly what you were saying so bring in school students from
certain backgrounds more like it wasn't really it wasn't like a racial thing per se but more like
uh, certain inner cities and state schools and so on places where most, so Oxford and Cambridge in
the UK are obviously viewed as these very elite establishments. They're kind of viewed as things
that there, there are many people in schools or certain sectors of life who don't even think that
they or their children or whatever can ever go to Oxford or Cambridge. Like it's not, it's not even
on their radar, right? Like if you go to, if you go to like a private boarding school or, you know,
you're from Eden or Howard, like there's a whole tradition of people going to Oxford and Cambridge,
right? But from certain schools, it's like no one from that school has ever gone to Oxford or
Cambridge. Like even the teachers are, it's not even on the radar. The students don't believe
they can go. Kid is guided in a different direction if that's even an aspiration.
Yeah. So, so this scheme was just to, you know, show people and encourage academically gifted
students, regardless of whether they were from a private school or a state school or
whatever, um, to consider higher education, number one, and if they have the academic
chops, potentially Oxford or Cambridge.
And that I think is the right type of approach.
So if someone does think, oh, okay, there's, you know, like there's, okay, there's a, there's
a real disparity here, like very, very clear, like some, maybe something's going on there,
then that's the way to handle it.
The way to handle it isn't to reduce the bar or to create a quota system where you start bean counting how many people of – we need this many people of this gender and this many people of these race, racial and ethnic groups and so on.
Because once you do that, you're – the only way you can achieve it through that method is active discrimination, right?
So if you're going to create a quota, like you said, like you joked about with the NBA, if you said there's – OK, there's a 50 percent hard cap on –
People over six foot.
Yeah, right?
Then now you have to discriminate against people in order to so-called balance it out.
And again, what – you're now creating the problem, right?
Because if your claim is that the problem is unfair treatment and unfair discrimination and your idea to remedy that is unfair treatment and unfair discrimination, then it's like, well, you've just created a problem.
This isn't hypothetical though.
This is here in the United States, Yale, which is probably equivalent as these schools, was accused of and I believe was actually found responsible.
I don't want to say guilty because I don't know exactly how kind of it played out.
But they had introduced certain quotas and criteria in the academic application process.
And I think that they actually ended up having discriminated against Asian students.
and so you like look at it and you're like oh there's some someone along the line was saying
exactly what you're saying and they were like well i'm not just gonna go say it you know and and uh
just move on to the next topic i'm gonna go bring it to the courts and there was agreement like yes
you you cannot do this uh or you should not do this uh which then begs the question of like well
what about all the other schools that yeah exactly yeah there was a big scandal with it with harvard
as well, discriminating potentially against Asian students. And that's, um, it's, it's so odd.
And it's also, it's also bigoted in multiple directions. This is the thing, right? So I'll
tell you one thing that I would, I'll tell you something I would hate. Okay. And I never say
this, but as a black man, I never, I never start a sentence with that. Right. But I would hate
to think or feel that I am in my position or I achieved something simply because I'm like a
diverse, I was a diversity hire. Like that I got into Oxford because they just needed more black
students. Not because I'm smart enough or I did well enough in my exams, but just because they,
they lowered the bar for me because I mean, that's the hard bigotry of low expectations.
So the thing should never be, oh, let's reduce the standard. It's like, cool. Like, let's try
to get, we can try to get more people from whatever community, whatever demographic over this bar or
encourage people to apply or whatever it is. But I think at that point of application, whether it's
a university position, it's a job, whatever, you've got to run with the meritocracy because
otherwise you are, you're creating really bad conditions. And I think, I think it's bad for
everyone. I think it sucks for, I mean, an Asian student who has worked hard, who is an individual,
Like Asians are not a group.
Like these are individual human beings.
A kid who's worked really hard in school and done well in his exams and you're going to make it harder for him to go to a university because he's of Asian – because his parents are from Korea or from China or something.
That is insane.
That's racism.
Like that's crazy.
Also, oh, there's a kid who's – oh, his parents are Latino or black or – and oh, we're – oh, he might not be as smart as the Asian or the white kid.
So let's lower the bar.
like what are you insane like it's it's so backwards to me and that's why i think it's
hilarious how it's called progressivism because like so much stuff that they do is backwards
um but yeah no i i i have a real problem with that and i think it creates so much resentment
it's the same thing i i hate i hate the concept of white privilege explain hate it why because
it's racist and it's bullcrap it's not real right like it it's it's bad for everybody i don't see
how i i we were raised in like a a normal time right like it honestly feels like that yeah like
like during the 90s we were just i don't know i mean i wasn't i grew up in saudi arabia but i was
like yo i had extremely diverse classes what i was like just whatever like people are people
treat people as individuals. None of my friends are ever like focused on like what skin color
people are. Oh, your parents are from this country or that or whatever. We were all just there and it
was all cool. Everything was fine. And I think that's how like most of us in our generation were
raised. But people are going back to the sort of like racial essentialism where you're no longer
looking at people as individuals, but everyone is being made extraordinarily conscious of what
group that they fit into. And then not just that, but you are then assigning whether virtues or sins
to entire groups, right? So you're telling a young white kid that he is somehow privileged
or he's an oppressor, or he should have some type of guilt, some permanent, some type of permanent
guilt, something he's never done because centuries ago, someone who shared his melanin content
did some, like on multiple levels, it's just insane. And then you're telling, oh, you're
telling the black kid now that, okay, well, society as a whole, all the institutions,
the whole system, everything is set up against you, right? You're going to have to work five
times as hard as your white friends in order what the police by the oh also like you need to stay
away from the police because they're all racist and they're probably gonna like shoot you what
oh and by the way you should like feel some type of way about you're just creating resentment on
all these levels now those kids are going to school and they're looking at each other not
like oh this is my friend johnny this is my friend billy it's like oh well i'm in this position i i
have this color he has that color and so um i should be treated this way or i can't say this
or we should i don't like i don't like any of it it's almost the again reverse extreme yes uh
skin color doesn't matter to now it's skin color is everything right is that kind of it's yeah it's
a it's a regression right because that used to be the problem it go back to 1850 right in the 1850
usa i was like skin color is everything like that we should judge people based on this you know black
people are this and white people are this and so therefore this and therefore that and it's like
bro okay we all acknowledge that was a huge problem and then it's like okay cool we we generally
fixed it got to a place where you know 90 of plus people i mean and now you want to reintroduce it
again in the name of you know wokeness or progressivism and you now want people again
to start to view i've heard you know these so-called progressive people saying that
you know, it's bad to be colorblind, right? Or no, we must see race. We need to see it. We need
to talk about it. We need to acknowledge in every conversation, right? One of these wokies will come
into this conversation and they'll insert, they'd insert it into this conversation. They'd be there
like trying to analyze the power dynamic between us two and be like, oh, well, you know, he's in
this category and he's in this. This is the women's British deadlifting champion. I want to
And it's also all the assumptions that come with it as well. Right. Like it's operating off such a low resolution worldview. Right. These people have this worldview that like every white person is like quaffing champagne on their yacht and has like generations and generations of inherited wealth and what like they completely like ignore the like the vast majority of white people who kind of don't fit the fit the bill.
And they also have this idea of like, oh, like every black person or every minority person is like from, bro, I've had arguments with people about whether or not I'm oppressed.
People, I've had people trying to convince me, I've had people trying to convince me I'm oppressed.
And I'm like, what are you talking about?
That's so nice of them.
Right?
I'm like, like, what are you even talking about?
Because they have all their like academic theories and whatever.
And I'm like, bro, my dad is a doctor.
Like, I've never wanted for, I'm like, I am privileged, right?
I went to freaking Oxford.
I went to boarding school.
Like, I'm from a great family.
My parents have been married for like 40 something years.
I'm healthy.
I was born in the UK.
Like, I've got so many, like, they're like, oh, but, you know, still, like, you're somehow, I'm somehow still a victim apparently of systemic.
And I'm just like, bro, stop.
Did you see the viral tweet?
The guy was joking, but he was like,
recently visited like a Portland coffee shop
and they're really taking this seriously.
They have created an area, no whites allowed or whatever.
And he basically was like describing segregation,
but like doing it from the world perspective.
You know, some universities have that now.
Oh, there are real places.
Yeah, there's universities that have that now
that have spaces for people of color or – what do they –
they have different terms for them.
But yeah, they've brought back actual segregation.
Yeah.
I saw a video also.
I think it was like maybe a library or something.
Of course, it's on a college campus.
And there was a guy who was like sitting at his computer
and somebody was yelling at him.
I think I know the one.
Saying that they were feeling unsafe.
I think I know the one.
They were feeling unsafe because he was in their presence.
and like again you see these videos and you're just like literally the guy two minutes ago could
have been yelling and screaming and threatening people and like doing all this stuff and then
all of a sudden you just see like this calm scene but if you just take it at face value and say like
okay there's no uh outlier there's no you know exception to the rule it's just like some guy
sitting there i know the one you mean he had the blue live sticker on his um blue blue lives matter
sticker on his laptop it was the two the two white guys yes and then there's the girls and
they're like and they're just going off on going off on this and i always just think of these
situations and i'm like is this because humans are bored and i'll give you uh uh context this
so i've been reading a book and it describes in one section uh 1870 to 1970 and it basically
makes the argument like there was so much human progress that happened in that time period because
of technology inventions of the automobile electricity all this stuff uh the elevator
created urban density the automobile created horizontal speed so we now can move things
faster we had the steam engine we started going through all that the industrial revolution like
all these things were happening and it was just an explosion but in order to describe how great
that time period was they have to explain to you what life was in the you know 1870s and before
and basically the takeaway is like that shit was hard horrible yeah and some of the key details are
men worked till they died there was no retirement there's no social security there's no anything
like literally you worked because the day you stopped working your family stopped eating
and so they worked in the fields also 75 of americans uh in 1870 were in rural areas
over 70 of all workers worked in what were categorized as unpleasant jobs women inside
of the household had immense responsibilities and physical labor in terms of carrying flour
and water and all these different things they had to sew their own clothes they don't do all this
stuff and the homes were all unconnected they called unnetworked meaning that they had no gas
electricity you know running water like any of this stuff that is a hard life that we are very
fortunate today we don't have to do this there's technology that does a bunch of this our homes
are all connected like all these different things the shift from unpleasant to pleasant jobs is like
basically a 180 so you're saying they weren't debating about pronouns and misgender no they
were out in the fucking field with the mule trying to make sure that they had food for the winter
and so like you look at this and you're like yo we got it so good that people are bored and like
you want to know how i know we're bored go check every person's cell phone and see the hours spent
on instagram twitter tiktok and youtube and by the way you can be learning about educational stuff
or you can be doom scrolling yes and we all do both but like if you spend an hour on your phone
basically just rotting your brain yeah you got an easy life yes because anyone who has a hard life
doesn't have that luxury and so it's like is this the end result of of basically just being so so
free so uh good in life that we debate this shit yeah we yeah we're living through an overcorrection
of multiple sorts. Do you know why I talk about this stuff? Why? It's because of what you,
it's literally because of what you just said, because I recognize how good we have it and how
freaking long it's taken for things to get here. And I'm like, guys, don't mess it up.
Don't mess it up. The conversation we were just having about, you know, racial harmony.
dude look around the world look through history people were freaking racist man like like it was
horrible people used to enslave each other segregate brutalize each other call each other
like just nasty stuff people used to people used to get lynched bro like it was the kkk at its peak
had over four million members the kkk had members like in people in congress they had governors they
had like in the kkk like the gov imagine the governor of a state being in the kk like that
used to be okay. Like not even a hundred years ago. And it's fucking wild. I'm sorry. Like that
is just such a fucking insane statistic. That's what I mean. So when I hear people say like,
oh, you know, racism is just as bad as it's always been. In fact, it's getting worse.
I'm like, dude, what are you talking about? Like we can recognize things not being perfect
and we can strive for better, right? We all have ways we want society to improve.
But if you are going to discount the progress that's been made over the past century, two centuries, then it's going to lead you to this area where you lack perspective and you lack gratitude.
And when you lack perspective and you lack gratitude, you problematize things, you create problems where they don't exist.
And if you're not careful, you can make things worse, right?
So human nature, I don't believe, has fundamentally changed over those centuries, right?
What has changed?
The two advantages that we have as people who are alive in 2022, the two big advantages we have over our grandparents and great-grandparents is, number one, we have better stuff.
We have more technology.
We have the internet.
We have the opportunity and the tools to just do cool stuff, right?
We have new tools.
And we have knowledge of the history.
So rather than trying to reinvent the wheel all the time, we can look back and go, how do we know segregation is a bad idea?
How do we know that racial segregation is a bad idea? Right. Oh, because we can look at apartheid. You can look at Jim Crow. You can look at how this has happened in different places. You can see what it led to. You can see, man, that was like a moral deficiency. It led to this problem. It led to that. It was, you know, and it was just wrong. Right. You can look back. How do we know that slavery is wrong?
because it was tried for thousands of years across different countries. And yeah, you don't
even need to debate it. It's just like, okay, that was clearly wrong. And those are the only
two advantages we have. Fundamentally, we have the same hardware, right? Our brains operate in the
same way. We have the same bodies and the same organs. And so let's not be stupid with that
technology and with that knowledge. Let's use it. Let's be like, okay, here are some things that we
should repeat. These are great things we've inherited from our ancestors, and this has
worked really well for society and we should maybe keep those institutions going. I mean,
a great example of this to me is like marriage, marriage and marriage in the family. It's like,
okay, well, every country, every culture all across the site, really hundreds, thousands of
years, they've all had this institution and brought children into the world primarily under
this and it's worked well for, and places who tried something totally different, they're not
round anymore or they're very small or whatever, or it led to chaos. So that's probably a good
idea. I mean, that's something we should, we should keep. It doesn't mean everyone has to
get married or whatever. It doesn't need to be enforced, but generally speaking, cool. Like
that's a good institution. And then the stuff that's bad. Okay, cool. Like we can, we can
jettison that. Let's keep that. Let's get rid of that. And this to me is just where the proper
balance between what people, what you could call conservatism, liberalism, and progressivism
is, right? You conserve the things that are working well and lead to a positive functioning
society and happiness. You have liberalism, which in its proper sense allows, prioritizes the rights
and freedoms of the individual. You can make your choices regardless of who you are and these
categories you fit into, whatever. You have the free choice to live your life as you see fit.
You have the right to speak. You have the right to practice or not practice a religion. You have the right to freedom of association, so on. Right. You have your your basic fundamental rights. And then what progressivism should mean is, OK, look, there are still some things that we need to improve. There are things there are changes that we can make. Let's balance these things out and let's do this. Let's do this carefully. Right. Let's do this carefully.
If you are driving a car and it's like, you know, if someone gets in a car and is asking me, is it better to accelerate or brake?
Like, well, what do you know?
Is it best to turn left or right?
Well, yes.
So this is the thing, right?
So when people go to these kind of like radical ends of, say, what people call progressivism, it's just change at all costs.
Just change everything.
Just flip the whole thing on.
No, get rid of that.
It's like, bro, but that thing works.
Like, why do you want to get rid of this stuff?
It's like, no, just go.
just slam your foot on the accelerator. And it's like, dude, you're, you're going to crash as a
wall. Yeah. Similarly, if you just like hold down the brake, right. Just hold the brake. No,
you can't change anything. Like, no, we must conserve and preserve complete status quo.
It's like, all right, well, you don't move anywhere. You don't go forward. So
this is actually why, you know, I think some people won't, won't like me saying this, but
this is the value of having dialogue between people of different socio-political perspectives
and so on, right? Because there is value and intelligence in each one and they all check
each other, right? So the natural conservative tendency is hit the brake, right? The progressive
tendency is hit the accelerator. So it's actually, if you have a sensible dialogue and you bring
people together, then we can have an honest and mature conversation. Yeah. People are going to
have, people are going to disagree. It might get, you know, heated at times and so on. It's not
going to, you're never going to have like this perfect harmony because people are different,
but I think you can have a good balance where society is slowly improving. I think that's
generally what we, what we have had. I think it's still what we do have. I think we're just in a,
like a messy very messy phase of it and with the introduction of smartphones and social media
it's made it all far it's made it faster and it's made it more chaotic because you now have access
to billions of people's thoughts and opinions and ideas whereas before that was all just in
people's heads and you couldn't see it and you couldn't and then you've got the bot interference
it's nuts especially on your account i i am going to nominate my account for the single
worst twitter account in terms of the bot problem it's crazy i uh i've thought i haven't done it
yet uh uh i did it one time like kind of half-heartedly but like i've thought every
time that i tweet i should just tag the ceo of twitter so that his notifications get as many of
the bots as mine and the problem be fixed tomorrow like it's literally uh hundreds right i went and
i looked the other day uh and i had blocked manually over a thousand accounts and i went
and then they've been wiping them right so they're doing something it's just they're not stopping the
ones from actually getting posted uh and then i blocked a bunch more and i was back up over a
thousand and i was like i've probably spent hours of my life fighting hand-to-hand combat on the
internet with some fucking bot farm outside the united states somewhere and there's somebody who's
just running a script and they're like here you go motherfucker right like how quick can you report
and block these people yeah and i'm like i don't know but i'm gonna try because the product's
unusable without it it's annoying it's also annoying because it's so easy to fix that's
not a that's not a hard problem to fix anyone who has cz binance in their fucking name and isn't the
verified account block them like okay i just solved 80 of the bot problem and literally i
thought for 10 seconds about it right like it's so simple yeah i remember when elon brought up the
idea of verification and people freaked out because they were like, oh, you're going to
have to submit like your social security number. And I was like, dude, I don't think that's what
he means. I think you're going a little, I understand. You don't need a social security
number to prove you're not a bot. Yeah. I don't think he wants like full on, you know, KYC. I
think it's just a basic verification of humanity, which in itself could cut down that nonsense
probably by 80, 90%. Well, you know, it's going to become a discriminatory because they're going to
come up with a verification for like celebrities and then like the common person and uh doesn't
that already exist uh well if now there's different colored check marks oh right like
but this is the game it's like well why do they get the blue one fucking blue people
blue people and you're like wait what is going on you know they haven't they done an experiment
with that where they've just like given people like different colored stickers and so really
yeah and and they band together and start even to some degree start mistreating people who have
the did you see did you see the uh wolves and i think it's yosemite uh national park no so i don't
know exactly how they captured it but uh there's an image that i saw going around um and they were
able to track different packs of wolves in this national park and you know if you imagine tracking
a pack of wolves it's like a bunch of lines everywhere right because they're moving around
and must have been for months if not years each pack has its own color okay when you zoom out look
at the map it's like the blue lines are all right here the pink ones are here the red ones are here
the green ones are here the yellow ones are here and basically the takeaway was like the wolves
don't fuck with each other they stay with their pack and literally there was no blue going into
the red area like it's almost like gangs right like just like they knew what the rules of the
road were and they stayed in their pack and my takeaway from it was like you mean to tell me
that it's literally like a genetic like national uh natural thing that people tend to stay in packs
the wolves do it humans do it all stuff now again that doesn't mean that you can't go to
another pack doesn't mean that you can't have social mobility all these different things
but like there's like a biology conversation somewhere in there that if the wolves do it
and humans do it maybe it's not humans maliciously doing stuff and again there's exceptions fine but
that was more eyeopening to me than anything else that I've seen in this conversation around like,
yo, you tell me the wolves do the shit that humans are being accused of. Maybe it's not a human
thing. Oh dude, no, it's not at all, man. Tribalism is a biological thing and tribalism
just exists. It's not good nor bad. It's just, it just exists, right? There's a positive and
negative impact from it, but it's just a thing that exists. Yeah. It's a thing that exists.
And again, if you if we communicate intelligently and again, I do think that to give props to most Western countries, certainly the USA, certainly the UK have made fantastic headway in this direction in moving away from overly toxic tribalism.
I mean, you need tribalism because we're all members of families and communities.
And then on top of that, we have we have nationalities.
People are from certain.
So, you know, that's fine. People, even what people support, right? You, people have their sports teams that they support or whatever, and you can have, you know, some fun tribalism there. But as soon as you start like, oh, you beat somebody up because they wore the wrong football jersey or you, you know, you get like to levels of hooliganism or you get to, as we've discussed, you know, racism or like going, let alone going to genocides or something like, okay, like the tribalism has gone way, way, way too far.
So I think the key thing is, yeah, just recognizing that that exists and then what's the best thing you can do?
I often think of just going up a level, right?
So if you think of how tribalism works, we're all members of multiple different tribes.
But if you actually go up a level, you gain more commonality, right?
So if someone is like getting – people are getting stuck in this tribalism and division over here, it's like, wait, why don't you all go up one level and you'll see what you have in common, right?
And this is something that's particularly crazy when you look at certain things that have happened in history or even certain conflicts that are still going on, which are weird.
I mean, if you – okay, take the religious line.
I mean, look at Northern Ireland, right, where there's that whole conflict between the Protestants and the Catholics.
And I'm like, bro, you're all Christian.
And you're all Irish.
You're all Irish Christians.
Why are you bombing each other, right?
Or who –
Because they're wrong.
Who – they're wrong.
They have a slightly different interpretation of the Bible.
Or who is most Islamic terrorism aimed at?
It's aimed at other Muslims, right?
And I'm like, man, that's so wild.
That shows how toxically tribal people can get.
Man, you look at – obviously, people always use the example of like the Holocaust.
But something much more recently, I mean, 94, the Rwandan genocide.
I don't know how much listeners have looked into that.
But that's such a horrible story.
But it's like, man, it shows you the power of unhinged tribalism and when the media and politicians get involved in it and start stoking tensions.
Like these are all Rwandans, right?
You've got Tutsis.
You've got Hutu.
And you had about a million people killed, slaughtered, not by a government machine, by their own neighbors, primarily with machetes.
This is just 1994, right?
And people kind of like gloss over this.
I think oftentimes things that happen in Africa are glossed over in the West.
They only kind of talk about Africa when it's convenient.
But when you look at these stories, this is why looking at history is important.
Like I'm not a historian, but I like to look at stories of history because it teaches you really about the human condition.
And because we haven't fundamentally changed in our hardware and in our biology, it's really important to recognize that because –
And this is why I think it makes people uncomfortable because if you do it honestly, you realize that you have to face your own shadow.
You have to face the darkness, right?
Everyone wants to imagine, oh, if I was in Nazi Germany, I would have freed the Jews.
I would have done it.
The majority.
Yeah.
There would be people who would do it.
The majority would have either been Nazis or have been sympathetic to them or have just kept their heads down.
That's the truth.
And no one wants to even like envision that.
How do we know that?
Well, because that's what majority of people did.
They fell into one of those three groups.
Yes, that's just what happens.
And so one reason why I'm even how I am is because I've really thought about a lot of this stuff.
I've really thought about it.
I've looked at the – I've read the Gulag Archipelago.
I've read Ordinary Man.
I've read certain things and looked at even certain studies, the Milgram experiment, the Ash experiment, and say, okay, the dynamics when people are in groups or in tribes.
like this can lead to this really loopy and even very dark and violent stuff. So even when I was
in my, say in my, my twenties, I was thinking, okay, if I were ever in this kind of situation,
what are my boundaries and principles and how should I, how should I behave? Because
there's this group think thing that happens and there's when fear takes over and I'm just like,
okay, I need to think about this. And I've spent a lot of time kind of doing that mental work of
like, okay, hopefully in my lifetime, nothing that bad is ever going to happen or be coming
down the pipeline. But if it does, these are the things to be aware of. And you understand
how the fear takes over and how the social pressure takes over and how, you know, the
authorities, even, even just the way people defer to authority, which can, again, it's not always
something that's inherently bad, right? We all need, we all need to be able to be leaders sometimes
and followers sometimes. Right. And if we're being honest, even people who are leaders, you probably
spend more time following than leading for the, for the most part. So it's not that deference to
authority is, is a bad thing, but the authority has to be, has to be good, has to be valid,
has to be legitimate. And you can't just, you know, what's that? Well, those magic words,
I was just following orders, right? That, that doesn't cut it, right? There comes a time where
you have to be like, no, I'm not going to I'm not going to do this thing that completely goes
against my morals or my ethics or my values just because I was told to. And that line is different
for different people. But I do recommend people think about it and have one. This episode is
brought to you by Sigma, the bridge between iGaming, online sports betting and emerging
technology such as blockchain, NFTs, fintech, GameFi, Metaverse and AI is loud and clear.
The largest global summit of its kind is heading to Malta from November 15th through the 17th.
Over 1,000 exhibitors and 25,000 industry leaders will be there, including top executives from DraftKings, Bet365, crypto exchanges, betting software providers, operators, gaming affiliates, and more.
Log on to AIBC.world and Sigma.world to see our upcoming global summits.
See you in Malta November 15th to 17th for the leading global event in gaming and emergent tech.
This is Sigma. Go to sigma.world today.
and swap Solana and ETH tokens natively right within the extension.
And if you ever hit a snag, world-class customer service is available 24-7.
More of your favorite chains are on the way.
So run, don't walk, over to Exodus.com slash POMP
to download the Exodus Web3 wallet right now.
Again, Exodus.com slash POMP.
Go check them out today.
So there's people who get put in the position, right?
And they can choose whether to follow either side of that line.
But there's been a larger resurgence.
I don't know if you can say it's large, but it's growing,
of people who are starting to speak out about all kinds of stuff.
Obviously, the pandemic was kind of a wake-up call for lots and lots of people.
And they were like, wait, hold on a second.
This is kind of crazy stuff.
One of the people, Andrew Tate, took the world by storm
and then essentially got kicked off all the social media platforms.
What do you think about the state of deplatforming and censorship
and like how bad is it right yeah free top g man um before i answer that question it's actually
been really fascinating to see that because i had him on my podcast in february 2019 um and then i
i visited him and his brother in romania in 2020 and i was hanging out with him in dubai actually
earlier this year so it's interesting when somebody who you know becomes this sort of like
global conversation and you're seeing like 90 of what i read about him online is wrong
which is interesting because i'm like i know this guy like what like people are just saying
crazy stuff so um but yeah in terms of deplatforming it's it sucks man honestly it
sucks it's extraordinarily illiberal um it's actually dude i mean again i don't think people
think about this stuff deeply enough they de-platformed the former president of the united
states of america from multiple platforms simultaneously i don't care whether you
like trump dislike trump what that is insane that should freak you out like that should freak like
i don't he technically was still president when they did it he was still the the sitting president
of the united states someone's in bed twitter instagram facebook like in a coordinated you know
off of a very fuzzy notion that he i mean he didn't directly he didn't call for violence he
didn't actually people oh well he broke it's like you can't even like people just repeat stuff people
just parrot stuff but here's here's a here's another issue that happens the sitting part by
the way yeah is like when people are like oh it happened i think so we were like and it still
happened he's still not allowed back on but the sitting president of the united states of america
and again if they were to go and do it to joe biden yeah i would still be just as much as like
hold on because it becomes a thing where who's in charge dude it's crazy like wait what yeah
dude anyone who celebrated that you're a dummy if you if you celebrated trump being deplatformed
you are a fool because it goes back to the idea of uh never use a tool that you wish for your
enemy to never uh to never have access to right and so like if twitter got sold and they went
and they hired somebody and uh they wanted to go after all the democrats i think there'd be a lot
people oh shit yeah right and so it doesn't it's not a political left or right thing to me it's
just uh again there are exceptions of if you call for violence if you do certain things okay got it
but it feels like uh there's this world of just like you got too much power as a user
and i think that you know if you look at uh tate it's not very clear to me as to like why he got
taken off all these different do you know i mean i spoke i spoke to him the day that it happened
because i had called him immediately i was like dude like what the heck just happened um this is
when he you know he his youtube had his it was just his instagram and facebook okay but you know
his youtube hadn't been taken down and so on and then you know that came a follow a couple days
later um do you know coincidence yeah but this is this it's important for people to understand this
because he did not violate he didn't post anything the violated the policies you know the policy
that they banned him under was the, um, dangerous individuals or organizations.
So they just, so my partner was spitting too much truth. So if you think, why does this policy
exist? This policy exists so that the Ku Klux Klan can't have an official Instagram page. This,
this exists so that, um, Al Qaeda cannot be putting out recruitment videos on, on YouTube,
et cetera. That's why, you know, dangerous persons and organizations. So they've essentially
thrown him in that same category with the worst, like actual terrorists, actual murderers, actual
genocidal maniacs, because they, and this is how they weaponize these words. The words they
weaponize, some of the most dangerous words being used these days are dangerous, safety, harm,
and harmful. That's how they always phrase it, right? It's always, oh, we need to protect you.
we need to protect you right oh this is harmful this is misinformation this is this oh this is
harmful you made that person feel unsafe you probably saw the other day about you know the
from the podcast thing when ben did you see the one with ben shapir no you didn't see you didn't
see the the podcast thing in dallas no where someone's laughing yo oh my gosh oh he went to
the conference this is the conference where he showed up to a conference and then they said
uh people felt unsafe because we apologize for the harm his presence caused his presence
just that's a powerful motherfucker sounds like five foot eight jewish man in a kappa or you know
standing there after his organization spent 30 grand to rent a booth and sponsor the event
dude like the whole thing is wild but this is the weaponization of language right during during the
pandemic, why were they kicking people? Oh, he's harmful, spreading harmful disinformation,
misinformation. There's people who literally put out facts, right? They de-platform doctors. They
de-platform scientists. Oh, harmful, misinformation. And so that sort of safety language, it's how they
de-platform Trump. It's how they de-platform Tate. Prior to this, by the way, because I've been on
Twitter since 2009. So I remember when this all started. Because for the first, up until about
2014, 2015, no one, no one worried about getting de-platformed. That's when they got, what was
alex jones alex jones but then there was another gavin mckinnis another conservative
milo yiannopoulos um yeah there were there were like a bunch of them and it was all people on
the right yep you know and they always start with the people who are more objectionable
right so again people now there's these dummies celebrating andrew tate's band it's like oh so
okay you considered him on okay a couple years ago they considered alex jones on the fringe
and they considered um milo yiannopoulos and gavin oh they were they were on the right now
you consider Andrew Tate do dummies not realize that as that closes in you are at some point are
going to be standing on the edge of that island as it's crumbling all around you um you know that
the YouTube video we put up of uh Andrew Tate the title was Andrew Tate is the new Alex Jones yeah
because it was so obvious really an interview by the way that that was going to be the game
it's just like oh you're saying things are outside and I joke about like oh that somebody's saying
too much truth right whether it's like Shapiro Tate whatever uh but you know what the most
telling part of the entire andrew tate situation to me was tell me he came out the last minute the
last message an hour hour and 10 minute video it came out and i said you know what i owe this guy
my time he did a bunch of stuff he said when all this stuff and everything people have been asking
me hey you met him what does he like all this stuff and everything right and i said the fact
that somebody would ask me that tells me that you're a critical thinker right because you're
like hey i see all this stuff on the internet but like what's he really like let me talk to
somebody who at least talked to him because i can't talk to him or whatever it's like okay cool
but then i'd be at dinner and other people be chirping and you know saying all this crazy
shit and everything and i just sit down it's a human trafficker just like you just have no clue
right you have you have no clue because you're you have an opinion about somebody that you've
never spoken to before so when that came out i took it and um i'm a bunch of these group chats
and stuff with people who you know for generally have big audiences or influential whatever and i
put it in there i said listen whether you like this person or not whatever your preconceived
notion is watch this yeah see what you think if you want to watch it because you think that this
is the 21st century way of communication and this is like you know uh uh you're studying the tactics
not the the content cool you'll get some value out of it but if you actually want to know more
about the person watch this and i'd love to hear what you guys all think i can't tell you how many
people responded to this so i don't have time to watch it yeah of course it's it's our i don't have
that time. And they just didn't even look at it. But then they kept, I saw them, they were still
sharing opinions about it and everything. And I said, look, I don't expect people to defend
somebody they don't know. I don't also expect people to go back to kind of the beginning of
our conversation, have some crazy opinion either way or whatever. But if you do have an opinion,
you owe yourself. Be informed. Yeah. Go get the information. And another thing is, you know,
people need to stop this thing of conflating, defending, you know, like, I like to say,
I'll, I'll, I don't, I'll, I will defend Andrew Tate himself, but not that he needs me to,
he can defend himself. Um, but you can defend it's defend principles. There are principles.
If you are someone with principles and values and beliefs, if you are, if you believe in the
concept of freedom of speech, right? Not just on a legal level, not just on this narrow legal level,
but it's actually a cultural issue too. Freedom of speech is not supposed to just be a legal
concept. It's also a social and cultural concept, right? You could, if you have, if, if you have
freedom of speech, so-called protected under the law, but like societally and societally and
culturally, it's absolutely not tolerated. Then you don't really have it. If people are terrified
to speak and say basic things, then you're not supporting freedom of speech. So anyone who I,
whether I, I doesn't, my personal feelings about the person or what they're saying, whether I agree
with them politically or I don't care. I will defend the principle of someone having a right
to voice what they want to voice for a huge number of reasons. Another thing that's also been
getting lost in our society, and maybe, I don't know. I don't know if this is linked to the loss
of religion because it can, you know, religion can also overly be used to kind of push the opposite,
it, but forgiveness and salvation, right? This is one of the, I don't think like, yes,
social media, private company, you can do whatever you want. Like, bro, I'm largely
libertarian. Like I'm not even arguing that, but just because you can do something doesn't
mean you should, this cuts in all directions. And also you need to give people a pathway
to people change. You need to give people a pathway to forgiveness and salvation and
understanding and so on. If you just, I mean, even the proper legal system understands this,
right? There are people who have killed people who are walking free. There's people who have
raped, robbed, burgled people who are walking free. They served their time. They spent 25 years
in prison they they did their whole sentence fingers crossed they actually reformed and they
changed and now they're an integrated productive member of society again you don't condemn the
person forever oh you stole something when you were 17 we're gonna lock you up forever in jail
and we're gonna throw away the key oh you had if you tweet if you tweet bad things you don't get
a comeback i don't think i don't permanent bans shouldn't exist i know that social media is not
everything, but bro, like majority of the world is on social media. Billions of people use it.
That's where the conversations happen. So the idea that you said something in 2014,
which Twitter felt cross line. And so never again, can you use that? That is insane to me, bro.
That's crazy. Even if you did actually cross line, how about, okay. One year ban, you know,
one year ban after that, you know, you learn, you can, you can come back and play nice. But the
idea that you just kick people off forever especially to do it so arbitrarily to me is i
think it sets a i think it sends a really bad message and i think also and this has been studied
i know that the guys at minds.com studied this um they're great it radicalizes people more of course
it radicalizes people more how do you get someone to change their mind you have to talk to them like
i understand trust me i understand that having conversations with certain people is not fun and
it's not right like there's people out there who are just so far gone i'm like dude i don't want
I don't want to sit down and really have a conversation with like an actual white supremacist
or something, right?
But that's the only way to get them to change their views.
You have to hear them out.
You have to rebut them.
You have to talk.
I believe that good ideas ultimately win.
If you don't censor, I do believe the good ideas generally will float to the top.
Not all the time, not 100%.
But you let people voice their stuff.
You let them have their concerns.
You can correct them on this.
You can debate this.
Just censoring that person and pushing them out to the corner and then who do they go hang with and who are they conversing with, right?
They're just with the other band people, right?
That's one of the problems you've had with some of the alternative social media platforms, especially something like Gab, right?
Because it's like become the home of everyone who got kicked off of everything else now goes to this one platform and it's like it's not moderated at all.
It's just like, okay, well, you can kind of just say whatever on there and people are going to like back you up and reinforce that.
And so you believe it's even more and more true.
And it increases the polarization.
It's not helping.
I think there's this natural tendency as human beings when we see or we hear something we don't like.
Like I understand censorship because it's not hard to understand.
If someone says something that offends you or you don't like or you have a visceral reaction to, the natural inclination is to want to shut that person up.
Right?
you, you, you, you, that's the, that's the first urge. That's like the biological urge is shut this
person up, get them out of my sight. I don't, I don't, I don't even want to talk to them. I don't
want, in fact, they shouldn't even be allowed to say what they're saying. I get where that tendency
comes from, but we have to be able to fight it because ultimately in this country, you've got
about 340 million people in this world. We've got about 8 billion people. No two people are the same.
There's no two people on this planet who agree on absolutely everything. It doesn't exist. We're all
different. We have our different social views, cultural views, personalities, religious views,
political, like we're, we're just, we're different, right? It's a good thing. Yes. And it's a good
thing and it's, and it's fine. And we need to be able to coexist, right? So if I look at a country
like the USA, I talk about the US a lot. I'm here right now. But also it is, the USA truly is a
leader. I don't know if Americans always understand just how much, when people call the USA the leader
of the free world. That's not just a cute name. That's actually what it is, right? Other countries
across Europe, Australia, Canada, the UK, they take cues from the USA. Even non-Western countries
take cues from the USA. So what happens in the USA does matter, right? Whether it's the music
that becomes popular here becomes popular in other countries. The ideas that become popular here
often become popular in other places. And so that's why, because some Americans don't go,
oh, like, you know, mind your own business. Why are you talking about the US? And it's like, dude,
because it impacts everyone.
It impacts everyone.
And you've got such a big population.
And, oh man, sorry, I'm losing my,
what was the initial point I was gonna make?
Well, yes, people need to be able to coexist, right?
If you're gonna have all that diversity
in every true sense of the word,
then you need a way of having things,
you need not just, you need a legal structure, obviously.
But also culture changes
and things that were not previously acceptable
become acceptable yes and in reverse so there's a lot of people who uh the mob came for because
of things they said in 2000 and uh i always remind folks you want to know the single best way
uh that i found especially men um but but uh to figure out how much culture has changed
go on youtube and search the man show jimmy kimmel and adam kroll they had a show comedy central
this show literally called the man show it was for men yeah it had women in like bikinis
jumping on trampolines they were drinking beer and doing dude shit yeah right i told somebody
that this show existed like that shit never was on television i said it was on a fucking regular
cable like it wasn't a pay-per-view what you know it was like literally if you just like had the
cable at the house you could get the show and they were like no way so we went the first the
very first episode from this show is on uh youtube you will watch five minutes of this
how did they ever air it you're literally like there's no like what were they thinking
yeah but it's because it was a different time yeah and so obviously what was okay then
is now viewed as not okay okay but the reverse happens there's things that you couldn't say
three years ago that now you can say and so if somebody was punished or kicked off or whatever
how do you accommodate or account for what if things change and now what they're saying is
like an accepted thing and zero hedge was uh was probably the example where we saw this most
they were the first to talk about the lab leak kicked off immediately the second they got kicked
off i was like somebody's gonna have to find out some more information on this now we have
politicians i i would argue that actually there's the most common theory now a number of politicians
who think it's the most likely it's the most likely theory and so again they got reinstated
and all this stuff but like imagine if they've been kicked off of any platform and not allowed
back it was a permanent ban and then all of a sudden three years later we're like oh yeah
everyone thinks this yeah how do you bring them back yeah yeah i agree man that's the that's the
salvation component i think a big part of it also is just maturity i think a lot about like
how mature we are as a society and i think that we've been some of this stems from the comfort
you alluded to earlier. But we've had a lot of infantilization of adults over the past few
decades to a level that is where people cannot handle and regulate their own emotions. I call
it emotional incontinence. And we essentially are catering to the most neurotic, most scaredy cat,
most easily offended, most easily triggered people. It's like a race to the bottom. And
instead of trying to encourage people to become more resilient and strong mentally, physically,
and emotionally, we're trying to nerf the whole world, right? So instead of telling the person who
wants to cry because someone called them not their preferred pronoun. Instead of telling that person
like, look, man, be strong. It's not, it's not, it's not the end of the world, right? People talk
like people generally refer to people based on the biological gender that they think they are.
Like, bro, like get over it. Just get over it. Instead, it's like, oh no, we need to get 99.9%
of people who never had any issue ever with how pronouns are used now you all need we need to
change the entire english language and your understanding of it to cater to this not even
0.1 percent of people right like this one guy on twitter got offended so we all need to cater to
by the way we had the same thing during the pandemic right instead of just going okay look
there's a certain segment of the population that's particularly vulnerable to this disease and there
should be certain accommodations and perhaps policies and things put in place for them
instead it's like nope we need to treat everyone the same right we because this there's this you
know one percent of people 100 of you need to completely sideline your entire lives for two
years because of this thing by the way can you imagine how offended people would have been if
they said old people and unhealthy people and you were anything below the age of 60 and you were
do you know do you know who wouldn't have been offended old people of course isn't that funny
of course the people who are most vulnerable i remember early i remember early on and when i
was in the old people like yo it was save me i remember i remember whenever uh you know whatever
i was like gonna going around maskless like the rebel i am like the other people i see not wearing
masks were almost always over 60 of course it was hilarious like i'd be in the supermarket you know
All the, everyone in like from teenagers to 40s are, you know, all wearing their mask.
And then I'm just seeing like some old guy or some old woman just going around.
And I'm like, they don't care.
Like no one even, like, was there ever a poll done on elderly people asking if they even,
all this was done supposedly in their name.
It's like, do they even want that?
Is that even, like, why can't they take care of themselves?
But again, it's this infantilization and that, cause that's how you treat children.
You don't let children make all their own choices.
You don't even get to choose what you eat for breakfast.
Maybe we'll have two cereals and you can pick one, right?
But that's how they're treating adults now, right?
There's this loss of idea of adults are mature and therefore you can give them a level of autonomy and liberty and freedom and ability to make their own choices and so on.
it's like, no, we need to take that away and be more authoritarian because we can't trust the
people to make their own decisions. And I think that people need to stop playing into that. And
I think that when you encourage this censorship or safe spaces or deplatforming everyone you
disagree with or whatever, and you're discouraging conversation and debate and discourse, then
it it furthers the problem and you're appeasing again you're appeasing the weakest links of
course you're appeasing the weakest links and we've never done that before we've gone from
survival of the fittest to tyranny of the weakest speaking of survival of the fittest what's up with
the secretary of state in the uk uh or secretary of health uh oh the new one the new one uh she
doesn't look healthy uh yeah and uh then i saw a lineup of a bunch of uh secretary of health
across all these countries and a lot of them don't look very healthy now i don't think that
arnold schwarzenegger is the expectation right of like somebody who's like a bodybuilder or like
super super fit because they do nothing but work out all day but there is some irony to the fact
that uh a number of people who supposedly are in charge of the health of tens of millions hundreds
of millions of people may not actually be healthy themselves no we don't live in serious countries
bro like it is kind of like a simpsons episode right like yo we gonna have a secretary of health
let's make them really not healthy that'd be funny it's it's weird man it's weird i often
it's it's strange because it's it's across the world i mean do you remember the old one from
belgium yes like i and this isn't me trying to be mean to people but if you are here here's a
controversial opinion i think that if you are a personal trainer or a health secretary or a health
sick i think you should be in shape like i mean i don't think that's too much to ask for i feel
the same when i say like an obese personal trainer and i'm like um like practice what you preach like
If I'm going to hire a financial advisor and they are like broken massively in debt.
See, when you say it this way, people are like, oh, this is ridiculous.
Warren Buffett, who's like somehow has escaped all of the mob, whatever.
One of his like famous quotes is Wall Street is the only place where millionaires ride in nice cars to go get advice from people who rode the subway.
Right.
Like basically the rich people are getting advice from people who may not be rich.
And again, I don't think that – take money as an example.
To be a financial advisor, you have to be rich and –
Like ultra rich.
Yeah, like richer than your clients.
But like it goes back to like maybe you just need to have good financial habits.
And guess what?
If you have good financial habits, you will eventually build some level of wealth.
Yes, you shouldn't be ultra broken in debt.
Same thing with fitness.
You don't have to be the bodybuilder.
You don't have to be an ultra marathon runner.
but like be generally eating healthy be generally taking care of yourself uh in whatever way like
if someone if a health minister whatever you want to call them right was like you know what i go for
a 30 minute walk every day i eat healthy and uh generally feel good and uh and all that great
like that's what works for that person they seem to care it is they're like putting things into
practice and by the way that's gonna be the message it's also just modeling you know it's
role modeling, man. I mean, bro, I've, I've written two fitness books. If like, just that
alone means I can't be out of shape. Like, like even from my own perspective, if I'm ever like,
I'm like, bro, I literally wrote fitness, but like, I tell people about fitness. I cannot
let myself go. Right. Like, that's embarrassing, dude. It's like, bro, like you're not even like,
why don't you read your own book and take it? It's just like, it's such a, it's such a basic
thing but people on the internet also live uh you you grow accustomed to the trolls so like what
like before you tweet something you like pretty much know like oh here's what the trolls will say
or like hey let me say it in a way that takes away their like argument or whatever i think that
those same people in the real world like you know right you're like if i get out of shape some troll
will be like dude read your own book right like so like there's this like conditioning that happens
where you're constantly always just like all right i have that troll in my own head like that's why
That's why you're good at what you do, though, is because you're like, oh, I fucking know what you trolls – I got your argument already.
I'll hold myself accountable before anybody else does.
But, man, politics is so weird, though, in that regard because I don't – I don't know.
Like I flip-flop between thinking the whole thing is just kind of a game or an illusion or like it's real.
I don't know. But I believe I feel like any every American I know, all of my American acquaintances or friends, I believe, would be a better president than the current one.
All of them. I think you'd be a better president than Joe. But I think everyone, your staff, I think.
So I'm always how even when you look at like the mayor level or, you know, I think Florida, Florida, well, we're in Miami and Florida both have, you know, good mayors and governors, I believe.
But like around the country, I just see some of the mayors and some of the they're so goofy.
I'm just like, how is this? How did this person become the leader?
Because I'll go to the city or whatever. And I'm like, bro, like you, you, you, you like any of you could do this better.
Have you seen there's one race specifically? I think it's in Pennsylvania or say it's in Congress.
maybe they got, uh, two guys and I pay so little attention to this that I'm definitely afraid of
getting something wrong. Uh, but I think it's this guy, John, uh, Fetterman and Dr. Oz. And
the only reason why, uh, I know those two guys are running against each other is because somebody
took a video of Dr. Oz, like yelling and screaming, whatever about the other guy.
And John Fetterman guy yelling, screaming about him. And they put it like back to back and they
are like dude what the fuck is going on here and it's just like man those are the two choices that
some group of people have it's and like i don't know what their policies are i don't know like
anything right but it wasn't exactly like a video that made me be like you know what i need to wake
up and be better yeah and i think that's part of this whole like role model thing is i think again
uh people will debate presidents if you start at the top used to be aspirational in the sense of
people wanted that job yes people felt like you had to be a good citizen moral like all these
things to get that job and the president made the nation want to be better yes and the way that the
nation wants to be better is the individual feels like that like well that sounds a lot like fucking
leadership but put that aside i feel like there are very few people in the world today
that are in traditional positions of power influence that have that impact i agree now
it's people on the internet with like a fucking cell phone who like are doing selfie videos
and so to me like that's a pretty interesting dynamic where we shifted from like all this
centralized control and power and influence all stuff and like those that's what the aspirational
role model you know uh type relationship was now people are running to like this other thing yeah
and they're still getting it like i don't know jocko wilnick verse like the president of the
united states like well he's probably more actionable for the everyday person in terms
of like you know wake up take responsibility you know do whatever i don't think very many
presidents were like make your bed but like that's still a pretty big shift to me yeah and it feels
like we just like oh yeah yes these people are important now and we just don't even worry at all
about uh uh the fact that the people in power aren't yeah and that extends to traditional
celebrities as well and i think this is i think long term this is actually good okay i i think for
some people regardless of what people say most people are not huge fans of change
um regardless of what they think like most people don't actually love having drastic changes and
we're living through a totally unique period in human history right now. And I think this is part
of why it feels so it's why we're having this conversation. It's why stuff feels so chaotic
and confusing and deranging and destructive because there's this weird reordering that is
going on. There are institutions and positions and things that have existed forever and they're
losing the power and centralization that they had. You see this in the media. You've just talked
about it in politics, even in celebrity culture or who's deemed an influencer, right? Before you
had to go through the proper channels, there were always gatekeepers, whether you're a musician,
you're an actor, you're a comedian, you're this, you had to go through very certain things, right?
To be a celebrity, even 40 years ago, you know, there were not like independent musicians,
celebrities, or of course there were no YouTubers or podcasters. It was like, okay,
You've got news anchors and you've got, you know, the people in the political levels and you've got the Hollywood celebrities and you've got this and that.
And if you talk to the younger generation, already the shift has happened because they know YouTubers and TikTokers and Instagrammers and actually recognize them more than they recognize what we consider traditional celebrities.
A hundred percent.
Right. And also they aspire more to that.
There aren't that many young people you'll talk to and be like, oh, I want to be an actor.
I want to be a YouTuber.
I want to be, you know, I want to be an influencer.
Now, some people might not like that because they might think it's weird and those aren't real jobs or whatever.
But my point is that there's this creative destruction which is happening.
I actually think a lot of it started.
I think the music industry was one of the first things that got massively disrupted by the internet and by social media and so on.
50 Cent broke the music business.
50 Cent.
Everyone forgets that.
50 Cent broke the mixtape strategy.
and he also had a website
and he was leaking his own music
on his own website.
He was reading the comments
and then he was basically going back
and saying,
okay, let's not release that one.
It's not, you know,
the audience doesn't like it.
Let's do something else or whatever.
But like that eventually became
what music did
and he was one of the first people
to realize it.
And it's all because Columbia Records
dropped him the night that he got shot.
Yep.
And so this has happened.
We see it happen with, you know,
digital photography,
with film industry.
Now you've got, you know,
dude, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix
when it was cheap, right?
I mean, Blockbuster doesn't exist anymore.
So just in our own, I mean, if you just look in our own relatively short lifetimes, the
shifts we've had are insane, absolutely insane.
And so, I mean, even in just in the last 10 years.
So while I have many concerns and we all have concerns and we're worried about this and
that, even with stuff like the de-platforming, right?
I think a solution will be worked out long-term.
Like right now it sucks.
Right now it's like, dude, like what's going on?
Why are they doing this?
Why don't they know how to moderate properly?
I think part of why they don't – sure, they have their political biases, right?
And there can be some malice involved.
But also it's like this is new.
This is a new problem.
I don't think that when Jack Dorsey made Twitter or when Mark Zuckerberg made –
I don't think they had a clue they were going to be as big as they are.
There is no way on earth Mark Zuckerberg thought, oh, three billion people are going to be –
there's over three billion.
No, dude, he was like hot or not.
Half the world's population uses your product?
That's insane.
And they're all talking.
They're talking.
Like, sure, there's moderation issues.
But that's not easy.
That's not an easy task to just be like, okay, like this is exactly the way you do it.
You're going to have new things popping up.
MySpace was the big thing when I was starting out in music.
Like new things are going to come in.
This is going to come in.
That's going to become bigger.
That's going to become smaller.
And I think one thing that's great is that we are having this actual increased democratization.
Did I say the word right?
Where anybody, you, I, anybody out there, we can build – you can build your own platform.
You can become a well-known person or celebrity in your own right.
We're getting all these – instead of just having a handful of Hollywood celebrities or a handful of actors or athletes or whatever, it's like, yeah, you still got that.
But now you've just got – there's like millions of micro-influencers and micro-celebrities and people are finding that – I think overall that's really good.
It's creating new jobs, new creative outlets, new ways of doing things.
I'll tell you something that I think is going to be massively disrupted by this and I don't think that the legacy version is prepared and I can't wait for this to happen actually.
This is an area where I'm a progressive.
Education.
education and higher education we're still running off the fumes of this centuries old
academic model both in schools and at universities and as we're seeing as the cost of university
continues to increase while the value of a degree continues to decrease that's not sustainable you
can't keep having the value of a degree staying the same or decreasing as the financial cost goes
up and up and up and up every year, as well as you're having this whole digital revolution going
on. It's going to move. It has to change. It has to shift, just like the music industry was forced
through this change, just like the film industry was forced through this change, just like other
things are happening, right? We're, we're, we're Bitcoin guys, right? The financial industry is
going to, is being disrupted and is going through this change. It's going to happen with education
and that will be, and that will be good. The one thing that the legacy still has is what I would
call, it's funny me saying this as an Oxford graduate, um, perceived legitimacy, right? So
the average person, and lots of this is an overhang from older generations,
so many people still think have this mentality of oh you know you have to go to college even
employers have this so many people will say oh well you have to go to college because
employers have say you need a degree to get it's like that's going to change it's already
changing with certain companies most companies driven by younger people don't care about your
degree they care about what you can do and your personality and so on so that whole i think in
the next decade or two the whole education system especially in higher education is going to be
much more fragmented and decentralized. The thing that needs to be worked out online, I believe,
and this will take time, is the accreditation. The accreditation and then with that, the perceived
legitimacy that comes with it. So as someone who went to Oxford University, even though like a
day-to-day thing, I don't use my degree for anything that I do. But just the fact, if I ever
wanted to go back into the traditional world of work, which I don't. The fact I have an Oxford
University degree, on a global level, that is recognized as, oh, wow, this guy is smart. There's
the prestige with it. And that's cool. That's cool. But, and I will say this myself, the thing
really should be like, well, what are your capabilities? What can you done? What have you
done? Right? It's not having an Oxford degree that makes me smart or makes me capable or makes me
competent or anything. It's, it's, it's who I am and the way my brain works and the way that I
operate. Um, so yeah, it's cool to have that box ticked, but I think as time goes on with it,
I think it'll take a couple of generations for this shift to happen and for there maybe to be
online equivalents in terms of perceived legitimacy as the Oxford's and the Harvard's
and the Cambridge's and the Yale's and so on. That'll take some time because these institutions
are old. I mean, Oxford is, Oxford is about, I want to say about 600 years older than the USA.
My college was founded in the 1100s. Yeah. Right. That is crazy. It was founded in the 1100s. Right.
And so, you know, you've got people from, you know, CS Lewis to JR, Tolkien to all these
prime ministers and so on who, who went through those halls. So I don't think that's going to
completely go away but i think that the i think that you know when it comes to university stem
stem stem is going to be there and it's going to stay in certain universities and stay but
there's so much that's ripe for not just disruption but i'd say destruction i think
there's a lot of nonsense out there that is you know just nonsense degrees yeah nonsense degrees
at nonsense universities that are not helping anyone they're kind of glorified ponzi schemes
as far as I'm aware, because the only thing you can use to you, the only way you can make money
with them is to either get a fake job or become someone who then goes back into academia and
teaches everyone about, you know, lesbian dance theory. You know, they're not real degrees. They
don't help anyone. They don't do anything of value to society. So I think those are going to,
those are going to naturally go, you know, you let the free market happen. Yeah. And you know,
the most dangerous person in america is oh it's along these lines of disruption so it's not
education but it's it's media okay joe rogan rogan yeah the reason being not for what most people
think of the audience size yes that is important but because he's willing to have the conversations
yeah that nowhere else basically will with that size of audience but do you want to know what
my prediction is for somebody who will become one of the most dangerous people in america
andrew schultz interesting because one he's got uh the protection of being a comedian
there's a lot of say things in society that many other people cannot say
uh second is his weapon of choice is his mind he's willing to go direct to the people
and it's the number one thing that scares the shit out of the centralized institutions yeah
so if you're sitting there and you know for those that don't know he uh he sold one special
sold a second one they wanted to edit out some jokes he said now i'll buy it back from you
and i'll just go direct and i'll set up a website the andrewschultz.com and i'll sell directly to
the people and he claims that he made more than five times more money than if he'd done it with
a streamer i believe that if you're sitting there and you're a streamer you have to be absolutely
shaking in fear that he just basically red pilled a bunch of these comedians that say
why would i come to you why don't i just go direct yeah and then i have the contact information of
the audience i can remarket to them i could do all these things i could sell them tickets i can do
like like i just cut you out of the process and now me and my people we communicate directly yeah
that's like the new danger in society is these people who are willing to think differently and
can disrupt these institutions these uh mechanisms because it's not about the first person who does
it because technically even schultz wasn't the first one to do it right there other other people
had done it before but the people who popularize the strategy everyone who follows and so when you
think of things like you know youtube or whatever it's like there was one person who was the first
actor who was like well i'm not gonna act in a movie i'm gonna act on the internet and another
than another and then mr beast comes along and now people are like yo mr beast is bigger than
the movie studios and there's a bunch of young kids who are like i won't be the next mr beast
in my own you know whatever and so it's like to the movie industry the biggest threat is actually
mr beast yeah he got more views than squid games got on netflix good and so you're sitting at the
oh shit yep that one video is not the threat it's that he just red pilled an entire generation of
kids you don't have to go do the movie yeah i love it do you do you know who worked this out early
who rappers independent rappers explain like independent rappers back in the 90s who would
just hustle their music independently right whether you're talking about too short or ludicrous before
the record deal or you know later 50 cent with the mixtape hustle a lot of the guys in the south a
lot of the guys from like houston um some of the berry rappers there was just this thing you know
even jay how jay-z even started right like print up your own record market it and sell it yourself
and i mean that's that's where i took my inspiration from i mean i don't know how much
you know about my, my story of how I like built up my music audience in the UK. Yeah. On the
streets. Well, the whole UK, the whole UK. So when I was at Oxford, I started rapping when I was in
my first year of university. Um, I released my first album when I was 19 in my, in my second
year, it was an album called commercial underground. And the first ever run I did, I just
did, I did a run of 50 CDs to begin with. And I just sold those to friends and family boom in a
week, they were all sold. I went back, took that money, cool, printed 250. Similar word was getting
around, primarily sorted around people in my university. And then boom, I took that money
and printed a thousand. And at this point I'd exhausted my, yeah, people I knew. And I'd bought
CDs off people in the street before. Like if I'm walking around in London or central London, you
know, I'd meet guys and London rappers and I'd buy CDs off of them. I knew about the mixtape
hustle that was going on in the USA and so on. And I bought mixtapes in the USA when I traveled
here. Um, I was like, ah, that's what I'll do. So I remember I'm in the first day ever. I went,
you know, I went out on the street. I think I just had like six CDs with me or something.
And I was like, okay, let me just try this out. And I think it took like half an hour before I
even approached anybody. Cause I'm like, Whoa, this is people see me now. And they're like,
oh wow. Zuby's so extroverted and confident. But it's like, man, like that's cause I've had
hundreds and thousands of conversations. And, but you know, I remember I think the third person I
spoke to bought, bought my album for like five pounds. And I was like, Oh wow. What's that set
up for life? I was like, wow, I sold one. That means I can sell another, you know, within a
couple hours, within like two hours, you know, I sold all the CDs. I came back, I came back the
next day, you know, I brought 10 CDs with me. Boom. I sold 10 CDs. I made 50 pounds. I was like,
okay, this is what I can do. And then over time I started doing that all over the country, right?
I would travel all the way to Scotland. I'd go to Wales. I went to the Isle of Wight. I'm going to
East Anglia, all over the UK, every city. And I was just selling my CDs. I've sold, I sold over
30,000 albums hand to hand. Jesus. Out of my backpack. Just me. Hand to hand. Do you know
how many people you have to talk to to sell 30,000 CDs? Like, dude, that's what I did. People
aren't buying 10,000 at a time. No. So that was my, bro, I learned, I learned to speak French.
I learned to speak Spanish because I was, because in the UK you get people from all over Europe. So
I was like, man, I keep bumping into French people and I'm sure I like taught myself French. I was
like there, I'd have days where I'm just speaking French all day, selling my CDs to all these French
kids in Oxford or in Canterbury or whatever. And then, um, in 2014, uh, with my, with my friend
shout out, who's also an independent rapper, we started a, what was called the blue and purple
store. So it was a pop-up shop. So you, you know, on shopping malls, sometimes if you're walking
through, they've got the little kiosks and stores and independent retailers selling their stuff.
So we started doing that. We opened the first one at the white lease shopping center in London,
and we were selling our CDs and also our t-shirts and hats. We didn't have that much
merch at the time um and that went well and then we opened one in like west key and south and we
started doing pop-up shops so rather than just being on the street all the time yep we moved
indoors crappy british weather too so we were protected from the elements uh in fact when it
started raining it was good because everyone would come into the mall so we'd be there we
started selling our hoodies our t-shirts i used to have my own brand of headphones and that became
the bread and bread and butter for me from 2014 to 2018 uh or even early 2019 the majority of my
income was coming through doing those pop-up shops interesting so one thing that a lot what
what's weird with my career trajectory is over probably 99 of people who know me discovered me
since 2019 but i released my first album in 2006 so i've been going for a long long time so by
it's funny now people see me doing certain things or whatever like oh this guy you know came out of
nowhere ever over. And I'm like, dude, like I've been grinding. Yeah. Like half my life. Like I've
been, you know, I put out my first album 19. I'm like, bro, like I'm, man, I'm 36 now. I'm just
like, dude, like it doesn't even seem that long, but I've just been out there grinding. And with
that has come, oh, thankfully one thing people often say, my man, Zuby, like you've got away
with words. You're so good at talking to people. And so I'm like, bro, I've spoken to more people
than anybody or when people are like oh how do you deal with uh how do you deal with people saying
mean things on the internet how do you deal with it i'm like dude i used to sell my cds on the
street you ever heard somebody say something mean to you in person for a decade i would just be out
there in different cities like literally i just get in my van i just go travel to manchester for
stay in a crappy hotel for a week and just go and every day i'm just out there whatever the weather
talking to people, getting ignored, getting love, getting people hating on me, getting this,
getting that, just, so I've already experienced like in person, every type of, whether it from,
from love and praise to complete misunderstanding, to being ignored, to be, it's also why I have so
much like time and love and support and gratitude for where things are now, because yeah, I'm still
on my pathway but it always blows my mind if i go to an event especially if i'm in the states
because i'm not even from here right my mind is blown if i'm walking around miami and someone's
like oh hey zuby like over here i'm like dude that's crazy like i'm an independent rapper from
england i'm from another country i'm from a whole other country and i don't have any machine behind
me yeah i don't have so i don't have a team i don't have an agent i don't have a manager i
never had loads of money put into me or whatever and i'm like oh wow like i'm i'm in the white
house oh i'm talking joe rogan wants to talk to me oh i'm hanging with tucker carlson oh i'm here
with i'm here with pump like i'm doing this i'm doing that i'm being asked to speak at you know
uh in october i'm going to i'm going to australia i've been invited to speak at some big events in
australia i'm like whoa and i'm going there and people are like yeah i can't wait for you to come
and i'm like yo that's wild it's on the other side of the world yeah i'm like that's nuts like
Yeah. I mean, I take off on Monday, land on Wednesday. That's how far away it is.
And I'm just like, man. So I just feel such an extreme gratitude for every person. I mean,
I did an event. I did a bunch of events last month. I spoke at the Young Americans for Liberty
National Student Conference, the Young Americas Foundation, National Conservatives Student
conference uh freedom fest in las vegas and so on and in all these events i don't know lord knows
how many selfies i took and you know just talking to everyone who wanted and even sometimes with the
organizers because they always want to you know as a speaker they always want to make sure that
you're like okay and people aren't bothering you and i'm like it's fine it's fine they're like yo
like you don't have to take all these and i'm like i will take every photo everyone wants like
I worked my butt off for this to have. Like the fact that these people even know who I am,
let alone love what I'm doing and have taken some inspiration. If it means I'm standing here
cheesing for two hours, as long as I don't have like something else to rush off to, I will do it.
You know, I do meetups in different cities. Like I'll go, I'll just hang with people.
And I would like to do that as long as it is physically possible to do, no matter how big
or famous or whatever I become in the future, to me, it's always, from the beginning,
it's always been about people. It's always been about wanting to help motivate, inspire people
in different ways. I don't view myself as like, oh, this is another thing that would that change
in how celebrity works now, right? Because before it was kind of like you're cultivated to be a
celebrity and then you're put in this place where you're, that's why so many of them are so out of
touch right so they've kind of been on this weird pedestal stars who could tweet and be like i'm
gonna be at the you know whatever location and no one shows up and if you tweet and you're like
i'll be here a thousand people show up it's like who's famous yeah but but they wouldn't even do
that because they they beneath so yeah so many of them they're viewed in this different echelon
almost like you're not really a human and i think what's really cool about the kind of thing that we
do and how we've grown with organically with our social media and everything is um number
one you've been on that whole journey so you keep a level of yeah we're both confident people
but you're humble you're humble i'm not i'm not like here like oh i'm i'm this super celebrity
guy and y'all are below me or something it's like no like i'm me because like because of you you
guys support me and so that's why i'm even able to to do this stuff um and it's just i think it's
way more relatable it's way more real it allows you to be authentic and it also means that the
people who know you generally, yeah, of course we have our haters or whatever, but the people who
know you, they don't just know you because you're on TV all the time or, Oh, you're just that famous
actor or whatever. They know you because they like what you do. Of course. And that is, that's
awesome. But it also is, um, uh, is real impact. I think a lot about like, um, in the world,
there's a lot of people who say i i do x and you're like cool what like what what is the impact
of it and sometimes they just don't know right they just they don't get it but then there's a
lot of people who are like uh um we reach x number of people and you're like cool but i think like
paying attention right and um uh mr beast manager uh reed uh he did a uh interview with um colin and
samir i don't know if you've seen these guys they they do uh interviews with uh people like the
youtube ecosystem and uh i was listening to somebody sent it to me and he said something
that was just fascinating he goes if you watch three videos of somebody on tiktok you probably
don't even know who they are what their name is whatever if you watch three youtube videos of
somebody you definitely know what their name is right and it's just a difference of the audience
relationship with the the personal stuff but then you move into longer stuff if somebody is still
listening to this right now they've been listening for you know two hours and 20 minutes or whatever
right like damn they they definitely know what your name is right um and then you move it into
the physical world and then you get even to like uh uh shulton is uh especially he's got a joke
he's like man i'm judging all presidents now whether they can move merch right you can move
merch yeah people like you right so like you kind of like there's all these like stages to it but
what you realize is it comes back to like why do anybody care it's because there's somebody there's
some impact that happened right there's some like real connection to it and so i even think for
myself like there's certain people who if uh if they came to miami i'd be like fuck other people
show up and i'd be like you know i would pay money to go there sit and for two hours right uh uh
consume everything that they're saying all this stuff because i i find it fascinating or it has
some impact or whatever that's true of every single person in the world the difference though
is the authenticity this gets to the whole like movie star versus people on the internet
nobody thinks that the movie star is authentic except for you see some of the movie stars now
using social media to become authentic like that's pretty much it right and this is also how you can
now what's also funny with it is you can also tell who's an asshole now right i'm sure there
are celebrities out there who maybe you had a certain view on, and then actually you see how
they are on social media, how they talk to other people and how they treat people. I'm like, man,
this guy's, this guy's not cool. Yeah. Fucking loser. You know? And I think, I think that's
dope. Um, some people might think some people don't like the sort of loss of the mystique or
they don't like the fact that, oh, you know, they learned that their favorite author or actor is
actually not very nice. Um, but to me, it's cool. I think that the truth is whether or not you like
the truth the truth is good to have out there and um i see you eyeing up that book this book
it's the last thing i want to talk about the candy calamity which is a children's book yeah that you
wrote and you published with brave books and it's got amazing graphics all this stuff in it
why did you write a children's book because it fits into a lot of what we talked about today
It does. It does. So I have a simple heuristic to decide whether or not I want to do something.
And it's because I'm very clear on my mission and I have been for over 15 years. And my mission in
life is to positively impact, inspire, and motivate as many people as possible through my words and
my talents. I thought I was going to do that primarily just through music. And as time has
evolved, lots of additional things have been added to that. So if I think something is going to move
the needle on that. I typically say yes to it. If I don't, I typically say no. So brave books
reached out to me last year. Um, and they were like, man, we've been following you for a while.
All of our staff love what you do. And we're always sharing your tweets and sharing clips
of your videos and stuff. So we'd love to, we'd love to do a children's book with you. Um, and I'd,
I'd heard of them already. Cause I know a couple of people who'd done books with them and I was
like, yeah, let's do it. Let's do it. So clearly passes that test. I mean, children are not a
demographic that I've primarily targeted. Um, teenagers with my music, you know, lots of
teenagers have bought my music and stuff, but that sort of younger age group. And I was like,
oh, cool. And then they were like, have a, have a think about what sort of topics they typically do
more books that are more sociopolitical in, in terms of the overall message. It's not on the
nose because it's still children's books. But I was like, you know what? I want to do one that's
totally apolitical, has no slant to it in any way, and just has a positive and inspiring message.
2019, I'd written my book for adults called Strong Advice, Zuby's Guide to Fitness for
Everybody. Sold over 10,000 copies independently. It's helped a lot of people to lose weight and
get in shape. And I was like, man, there aren't that many children's books talking about health
and fitness. And why is it important? Parents will tell their kids, eat healthy, go out and
exercise. They won't normally tell them why. And I was like, okay, let me have a story which is fun
and it's an adventure and it's beautifully illustrated and I made it all rhyme. But it's
about the importance of health, nutrition, exercise, and self-control. So in the story of the,
in the book, it's about not going, avoiding the extremes, right? Not to be a complete lazy slob
been to sit there and eat candy all day, but also don't exercise and forget to eat. Don't exercise
to the point that you're forgetting to eat and you're exhausting yourself and you're, and you're
passing out that there's a healthy balance. So that's the message I wanted to convey in the book.
And, um, it was also just fun. You know, I also say yes to things that excite me. As soon as I
heard it, I was like, yo, actually the children's book wasn't on my radar, but it is right now.
And that would be cool. And that'll be fun. And that'll help more people. And, um, it's done so,
and it's doing that what has been the response from like parents and stuff that yeah so really
really positive I've had some really nice uh videos and photos which are always fun to get
like just people send you a dm and it's like their child holding their child holding the book or like
them reading I'm like man that's that's so beautiful um so I'm not a parent yet I do have
nine nieces and nephews so I that's basically yeah so when I was actually writing it I was
running it by them they range between like 3 and 16 so so i was when i when it was still just
digital before it got printed i was showing them you know have a look at it and even just putting
on an ipad and seeing how captivated they are and you know see can can you read along with the rhymes
and so on so i kind of was able to field test it a little bit on them yeah a little sort of test
This book was A-B tested by a group of nine kids.
Where can people go to get the book?
You can get the book at candycalamity.com.
Okay.
Brave Books, which is at bravebooks.com, they also do a subscription.
So they release a new book every month.
So if someone wants to get their monthly book, you can get the subscription.
It's all targeted for kids.
Yeah.
They're all children's books.
But, yeah, candycalamity.com.
You can grab it right there.
I just love also, by the way, I don't know if people are going to be able to see if they're
watched on the video but the the look of the candy right on the front i'm like yeah yeah i've been in
that mood before yeah and if you're a zoobie fan it's got it's got a couple uh it's got a couple
little references in there that people might understand like okay dude okay dude
you you have been able to capitalize on a number of different ridiculous uh
events from the uh the dead lifting to the okay dude okay dude one
did you ever get any blowback for the shirts and all that no no he just laughed nah
made five figures from it but um yeah okay yeah from the merch but yeah no uh no blow i mean
i'll be honest man and people always ask me about blowback and hate and criticism and nasty stuff
and yeah there's some of it but honestly it's it's like maybe two percent and it's and it's
only online yeah it's only online in the real world everything is cool everything's blessed
people are ultra nice i've had people come up to me in the stream but yo pop what's up yeah
maybe nice to meet you whatever dm me on twitter so that i uh uh have your information or whatever
and i will go look and in the fucking dm we'll bet pop you're an idiot like oh really
i'm like and you know it's like two years before i'm like
don't dm me if that's what you did before like what and i just been like are you good and they're
like yeah sorry man you know i just had a bad day that day whatever like and i'm a cool dude that
happens all the time yeah i i i tell people this especially people who want to grow on social media
there are at right now there are millions of people scrolling through their twitter facebook
and instagram feeds looking for something to get upset about yes they're having a bad day
they're already angry. And you might just be the person that day who comes across their feed,
who's saying something they don't like. And it's, don't take it personally, right? Sometimes people
are just in a nasty mood and you're the person who's in their crosshairs that day and they lash
out at you. Also, some people just have weird ways of trying to get attention. So they might
think by saying, by calling you an idiot, that's the best way to get your attention. In some ways,
it kind of is because we react more to negative than we do to positive you'll certainly get
noticed but i'm probably not going to do you any favors after you've called me an idiot so i it's
not the approach i recommend but and some of it's probably just bots i just look i always i'm sorry
you feel that way yeah i'll try to do better next time right and they're like it's kind of hard
right or like i remember one time somebody uh i think it was an email yeah i pretty much emailed
And he was like, you're the biggest fucking moron, blah, blah, blah, whatever.
And I just remember responding and just being like, well, if I was the smartest guy in the room, I'd be in the wrong room.
Right.
And then they were kind of like, uh, yeah.
It disarms people, doesn't it?
But yeah, just like, how do you react to somebody who's like.
Sometimes I've had people like apologize.
Like sometimes someone comes at me like super harsh and then I won't respond in kind.
And I'll be kind of like, well, you know, like, I hope you, I hope you still have a good day or whatever.
And they're like, and then, you know, they'll message a couple of the other side, man.
I was kind of an asshole.
Yeah.
Like, hey, man, that's cool.
No problem.
Just don't be an asshole on the internet.
Exactly, exactly.
All right, where can we send people to find you on Twitter, too?
Just at Zuby Music?
Yeah, sure, at Zuby Music.
Yeah, on all social media, at Zuby Music.
And what's the website?
TeamZuby.com.
TeamZuby.com.
And by the time this podcast comes out,
the new version should have been launched.
I'm doing a whole new merch relaunch.
I've shifted my whole merchandise operation to the USA.
Got brand new stuff.
Yeah, so the merch is going to be taken over in the next year.
All right, so TeamZuby.com, CandyCalamity.com.
That's right.
And then Zuby Music on all social media.
That's it.
You are welcome here whenever you want, my friend.
I enjoy talking to you every single time, so thanks so much.
Appreciate it, bro. God bless.
Thanks so much for listening to today's episode.
I really hope you enjoyed this one.
Make sure you're subscribed on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast player.
And if you're looking to transition into a brand new job in the Bitcoin or crypto industry,
we've got you covered.
Head over to thecryptoacademy.io.
My team and I have been working with the top HR teams in the industry to develop an intensive
three-week training program with over 50 live events. We teach you exactly what you need to
know to break into the industry, including live interview prep and resume review. Our students
have been hired at over 75 of the world's best Bitcoin and crypto companies. Go to thecryptoacademy.io
to learn more. Again, that's thecryptoacademy.io. If you enjoyed today's episode, make sure you
share it with your friends, and I'll see you all for the next episode.
We'll be right back.
