The Pomp Podcast - #1519 Anthony & John Pompliano | BlackRock’s Insanely Bullish Bitcoin Take
Episode Date: April 1, 2025John Pompliano and Anthony Pompliano discuss Larry Fink being a big bitcoin bull, tariffs, stock market, recessions, crypto assets, and is a recession coming?=======================Simple Mining makes... Bitcoin mining simple and accessible for everyone. We offer a premium white glove hosting service, helping you maximize the profitability of Bitcoin mining. For more information on Simple Mining or to get started mining Bitcoin, visit https://www.simplemining.io/=======================Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm dedicated to helping clients move their businesses forward. With an inclusive culture and innovative mindset, Reed Smith delivers smarter, more creative legal services that drive better outcomes for their clients. Their deep industry knowledge, long-standing relationships and collaborative structure make them the go-to partner for complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters. Learn more at www.reedsmith.com=======================Pomp writes a daily letter to over 265,000+ investors about business, technology, and finance. He breaks down complex topics into easy-to-understand language while sharing opinions on various aspects of each industry. You can subscribe at https://pomp.substack.com/=======================View 10k+ open startup jobs:https://dreamstartupjob.com/Enroll in my Crypto Academy: https://www.thecryptoacademy.io/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's up everyone? This is Anthony Pompliano. Many of you know me as Pomp. You're listening
to the Pomp Podcast, which is my effort to find the most interesting people in the world
and sit with them for hours while I ask questions in an effort to learn. So it would mean the
world to me if you would subscribe to the show on your favorite audio platform, watch
episodes on YouTube, and tell your friends and family about the podcast. My goal is to
help millions learn from the world's most interesting people. So let's get into today's
episode. What's going on, guys? We got a great conversation with John Pompliano. John is back,
and you guys are going to love this one. In this conversation, we talk about Larry Fink being a big,
big Bitcoin bull. We talk about what's going on with recessions, what you should actually think
about tariffs, stock market, crypto assets, and much more. This conversation is always fun to
talk to my brother because him and I, we've been talking for a long time, and these topics are
things we talk about in private. So now you get to hear the whole conversation. I hope you guys
enjoy my latest conversation with John Pompliano. Anthony Pompliano runs Pomp Investments. All
views of him and the guests on his podcast are solely their opinions and do not reflect the
opinions of Pomp Investments. You should not treat any opinion expressed by Pomp or his guests as a
specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an
expression of his personal opinion. This podcast is for informational purposes only.
Are you looking for a simple way to earn Bitcoin rewards every single day? At Simple Mining,
we help people mine Bitcoin, even if you're brand new. We're a vertically integrated Bitcoin
mining company based in cedar falls iowa offering a premium white glove hosting service that helps
you maximize your mining profitability with over 500 clients worldwide we manage over 15 000
machines across our sites our facilities are staffed seven days a week and we fix most on-site
issues in under 48 hours in fact we can repair more than 2 000 hash boards each month in our
dedicated repair center ensuring your miners run smooth want to see it firsthand tour our mining
sites either in person or online anytime plus for your first year of mining we cover all repairs
No questions asked. We bill you for the exact time your miners are running and you can pause
whenever you want. Need to buy or sell? Our exclusive miner marketplace gives you the
freedom to trade on your schedule. You'll even have a custom dashboard to track your miner stats
in real time. And if you're thinking about running your operation like a business, our tax team can
guide you through the depreciation advantages. Ready to grow your Bitcoin stack? Visit simplemining.io.
Today's episode is brought to you by Reed Smith. Their practice of law has the power to drive
progress to move businesses forward and support them in achieving their goals by seizing opportunities
and overcoming obstacles reed smith is focused on outcomes i personally use them as my law firm and
i think that they are fantastic they know that your time is valuable and that your matters are
important their deep industry knowledge long-standing relationships and collaborative
structure make them the go-to partner for complex disputes transactions and regulatory matters
reed smith delivers purposeful highly engaged client service that drives progress for your
business. Go to ReedSmith.com to learn more about the best lawyers in the game. ReedSmith.com. Go
check them out today. All right, John, what's the first topic? First topic, Bitcoin supremacy. Larry
Fink, bullish on Bitcoin. His recent comments about Bitcoin and his annual letter have come
out. What are your thoughts about Larry Fink and him being so bullish on Bitcoin?
Well, Larry Fink's the CMO of Bitcoin. I think a really important part of this whole thing is
sometimes the messenger is more important than the message. And what I mean by that is
if you really look at the comments that BlackRock, Fidelity, many other people who are talking about
Bitcoin on Wall Street, they're just repeating Bitcoin talking points. They're saying, hey,
the debt's really bad. Hey, the dollar's being devalued. Hey, this thing is decentralized. Hey,
this thing has sound money principles. Hey, this thing's outside the system. Hey, this thing is
really valuable to people in international markets. Hey, Americans should really go and
embrace this thing because there's only 21 million of them, right? All these things that they're
saying, Bitcoiners have been saying for years. And so on one hand, you have Bitcoiners who have
infiltrated into these organizations. And they're saying the same stuff that they were saying before
they were in the organization. But two is they're true. And so you just need intelligent people to
spend the time to actually do the work, to look at this stuff. And then they come to the same
conclusion. And that's why Bitcoin has been so successful and it continues to win in the free
market. And so hearing Larry Fink or any other Wall Street executive talk about Bitcoin in this
way is more so just the truth actually being kind of infiltrated into their organizations.
and that messenger is really, really important
because in the recent annual letter,
Fink talked about the fact that the debt's exploding,
the dollar's being debased,
and he specifically says
that if we do not correct the situation,
the dollar risks losing world reserve status
and it could be replaced by digital assets like Bitcoin.
So it's not just, hey, we got problems,
but now there's a potential solution.
And so if people are going to show up to Larry Fink's door
and say, knock, knock, BlackRock,
$10 trillion in assets,
largest asset manager in the world. I hear you on the problems. What's the solution?
It sounds like they may say Bitcoin, which would be kind of crazy to go from Satoshi Nakamoto,
nobody knows, on an email list, puts this gift into the world, bam, fast forward 15, 16 years,
and we got Larry Fink being like, oh yeah, this thing may solve all your problems.
It's not exactly, I think, the speed run through this that everyone thought it was going to be.
How do you think about different executives in the industry thinking about Bitcoin in
different ways. So obviously, Jamie Dimon is very anti Bitcoin. Larry Fink, on the other side,
both large asset managers, is very bullish on Bitcoin, or at least seems to speak positively
of it. How do you think about like, why are there differences? And like, why can't these people just
agree on, hey, is this solution or is it not? And there's a lot of intricacies here. But like,
how do you think about the differences? Well, I think that there's two different things
that are happening. One is they have different businesses, right? BlackRock is really more of
an asset manager. JP Morgan is much more of like a bank or a financial institution. On top of that,
you have, I think, Larry Fink saying, hey, this is a safety mechanism, right? He's gone on television
and he said, people are buying Bitcoin as a flight to quality. I think Jamie Dimon looks at it much
more as a speculative tool. And that's no different than if you go outside of Wall Street and go into
the market, like why is there a market here? It's because this thing is quote unquote controversial,
right? There's a lot of debate around, is it going to go up? Is it going to go down? You need bears
just as much as you need bulls to have that market and that liquidity. And so I think what you're
really seeing is their public commentary. One is bullish, one is not. Okay, there's nothing wrong
with that. What I will say, though, is these executives, they are paid to make money even
when they're wrong. And so if you think about a risk reward standpoint, JP Morgan is working on
crypto related things, right? They may not be going and saying, hey, we're gonna put Bitcoin
on our balance sheet as a publicly traded company, but they are not going to let this actually be a
thing and not benefit from it. And so the risk of, let's say, putting a dedicated team of 10 or 20
people to work on this and being wrong is whatever the cost of that 10 or 20 people, right? You kept
it a small little thing in the corner. No one really cared. You were publicly bearish. You're
good. But if you put that 10 or 20 people together and they start working on it and it becomes a
thing, then what do you say a couple of years from now? I'd be like, ah, yeah, at one point I was
bearish, but I changed my mind. We've had a team working on this for a number of years. We're right
there. We're a leader and we're good to go. And so what really ends up happening is the strategy
of a lot of these companies is they hedge. They're never going to take a full-on 100%
strong position without that hedge. And frankly, I think it's good business. I think that it is
good risk management, if you will. And that's why these people run these large organizations
is because they're very, very effective at what they do.
Yeah. It reminds me of the Warren Buffett quote where when he was asked about his
biggest mistake in investing. He doesn't talk about the ones that didn't do well. He talks
about the missed opportunities. And I think that's a lot of what we're seeing here is basically
setting yourself up to look like, I don't want to miss opportunity. I want to be ready. But that
doesn't necessarily mean I want to jump the gun and go ahead full speed. Let's talk about another
one that's probably near and dear to you. Hut 8 did a subsidiary or announced a subsidiary yesterday
with Don Jr. and Eric Trump. What are your thoughts on that? Yeah. So the big thing to understand is
business cycles are all about bundling and unbundling, right? So people take a bunch of
things, they bundle them together, we go for a few years, and then somebody comes along and says,
well, I bet you I can create some value by unbundling those things. And you see this with
cable television, you see this with music, you see this with a bunch of this stuff.
And so what really has happened over the last five years or so in what I'm just going to call
energy infrastructure for modern use cases is that there's been bundling. So people had Bitcoin
mining. Then they added in the AI data centers and you're starting to see more and more say,
hey, look, we are just going to provide all of this under one roof. The problem with doing that
is there's plenty of benefits, but the trade-off being that the market values Bitcoin mining and
AI data centers at very different multiples. So I think the revenue multiple on average for
Bitcoin miners is like six to seven X. I think the revenue multiple on an AI data center is
something like 19 to 22X. So obviously you get way more equity value on a revenue multiple basis for
the AI stuff than you do the Bitcoin miners. And so if you have both of those sitting inside of
a company, then you're likely to be undervalued. And so what you are seeing here is they basically
are saying, look, we don't want to sell our assets. We don't want to give them away. What
we want to do is we want to retain ownership of it, but we're going to separate it and we're
going to create two pure play kind of exposures. If you're an investor and you want AI data centers
and energy infrastructure. Now you go and you buy the HUD 8 stock. If you're an investor and you
want Bitcoin mining infrastructure, then you go and you buy this American Bitcoin stock. And so
when you do that, now you really, really make it clear in investors' minds where they want to
allocate their capital. You give them choice. The second thing you do is you actually change
the cost of capital, right? When you have things that trade at lower multiples and have kind of
the risk profile of, let's say, Bitcoin mining with the cyclicality, et cetera, you may actually
They have more expensive capital that you have access to.
And so if you're able to separate these, now your AI data centers should actually be able
to get access to cheaper capital, which obviously is conducive to that business.
And so the way I look at this, you know, look, I'm an advisor to the business.
I'm a shareholder of the business.
I really think that there is a big market opportunity for many winners around this energy
infrastructure and being able to sell that energy and computational power or space to
these modern use cases like Bitcoin mining and AI data centers, et cetera. But one of the things
that I was really gravitated towards when it came to HUD-8 originally was I want to be in business
with dealmakers. And Asher Ganut, who's the CEO of that company, I said very early on when I
publicly was like, hey, I'm going to join these guys as an advisor, is I think that he is a very
smart dealmaker. And he structured some of the customer contracts in a unique way where he's
giving himself a lot of optionality and things like that.
There's a lot of hedges and stuff like that
that he thinks through.
But this is just another data point
of like deal makers make deals, right?
And so that's what you're seeing happen here
is he's been able to figure out a way to do it.
And then add in the fact that, you know,
if you flip around and look at the other 20%,
so HUD-8 owns 80% of American Bitcoin.
The other 20% is owned by a business
that used to be called American Data Centers
that counted Eric Trump and Don Trump Jr.
as shareholders there.
They now own 20% of this entity.
Eric Trump is joining as the chief strategy officer,
and they're going to go build a Bitcoin miner, right?
And so if you look at the kind of Trump family,
but also I think anyone who is wealthy from real estate or stocks or anything,
if you want Bitcoin, naturally you start looking at Bitcoin mining as well,
because a good Bitcoin miner should be able to produce Bitcoin at a cost
that is cheaper than what the market price is.
And so anytime that you can produce something for, you know,
10, 20, 30% less than what it's actually trading for,
that should be a good business.
And I think that's really where these guys get attracted to this.
And so, you know, Trump, the president, he's going and really embracing Bitcoin.
It's obvious that his sons are embracing Bitcoin and crypto more at large.
And I think this is just another step to it.
And so, you know, I don't know what happens, right?
I am, you know, watching like everybody else is.
But I think it's a really unique way to kind of create that, you know, pure exposure.
and then also to cheapen the cost of capital
for the AI data centers.
So let's see what happens.
And my prediction is if this works
and you see a kind of positive impact from this decision,
you're going to see a lot of the other companies
that have Bitcoin mining and AI data centers say,
well, maybe we should unbundle as well.
And so the last five years have been bundling
or the next five years going to be all about unbundling
remains to be seen.
How much do you expect the Trump family
to be involved in this, right?
Obviously, I think their name carries a lot of weight,
both as their father is the president,
but also their family just has a brand
and a reputation with them, either good or bad.
How much do you expect them to be involved
in like the day-to-day operations
versus, hey, look, I'm the chief strategy officer.
It's more of a, you know, kind of title and I step away.
Well, I think each business that they're involved with
is probably different.
One of the big, you know, secrets, I think,
of people who are involved in a lot of businesses,
I'm involved in a lot of businesses,
is you actually don't get super involved
in the day-to-day operations of the businesses
that are going well.
They don't need you, right?
They're operating, there's a dedicated team.
It's not like these guys are the CEO of this.
And so what you end up actually doing
is you end up getting involved in one of two cases.
There's fires to put out, there's a problem,
all hands on deck, we got to solve this problem.
Or there's a potential inflection point
in the business cycle that if you are involved,
if you are helpful, if you make a connection,
if you do this, that, whatever,
then that will help accelerate the business.
And so what I find is people underestimate how one person can be involved in many businesses, because they don't understand that you're not involved in the day to day operations every single day. Instead, you're looking for those fires to put out or for those potential inflection points. And I think that what you're seeing here with this structure is you've got a team that has already proven that they can build these Bitcoin mining facilities and operate them, etc. And then you're matching it up with against strategy, right chief strategy officer from an Eric Trump.
And so I think that it's pretty clear, like, he's not going to be running the day-to-day meetings.
And that's probably a good thing.
Like, you don't want him doing that stuff.
He probably doesn't want to do that.
And so, like, I think that's where you kind of see these businesses gravitate to say, like, what is everyone's strength?
Let's all lean into our strengths.
And by creating the right team structure, then there's an opportunity for us really to build something special.
Let's stay talking about Trump.
Let's talk about the father now, President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Liberation Day is tomorrow.
What do you expect to hear?
And what is the sentiment around from what you understand in both the investing world
and also operating businesses?
Are people nervous?
Are tariffs coming?
Is it going to ruin the economy?
Like, what are we expecting to see tomorrow?
People lost their minds.
These people are insane.
If you're selling stocks because of tariffs, you literally should take all the money that
you are managing for other people.
You should give it back to them, right?
Think about what a tariff does.
a tariff increases the prices of people importing goods elsewhere. So if you're taking products from
elsewhere and you're bringing it to the United States, those products are more expensive.
So what does it do? It shifts demand towards American made products. So American companies
should do better, not worse because of the tariffs. But that's not how people think about it.
What people think about is like, oh, there's uncertainty. He's going tariffs on, tariffs off,
tariffs on, tariffs off, right? On top of that, they say, oh, the consumer, the consumer is going
to bear the brunt of the tariffs. Wrong. They say tariffs are inflationary. Wrong. And then they
also say that tariffs end up actually causing this isolationism, right? And nobody wants to
trade with people who have really high tariffs. Wrong. So think about this. Every other country
in the world, pretty much, that is a material trading part of the United States, they have
higher tariffs on us than we have on them. They seem to be doing all right. No one's like, we're
not going to trade with Mexico anymore because they got tariffs on us, right? No one's like,
we're not going to trade with Canada anymore because they got tariffs on us. What do we do?
We still trade. And so the same thing is going to happen here. The United States can put tariffs
in place. No one's going to stop trading with us. We're the most important capital market.
We're the most important economy. Everyone wants to sell their products to Americans.
We are the definition of consumerism. We consume goods and services. If you got something to sell,
you want it in front of Americans because we got money. We're dumb enough to buy it.
And we also don't put a really high emphasis on quality products. So you probably can sell
the same product three or four times. And so everyone wants to sell to Americans, right?
Now, if you go and take a look at inflation, well, if tariffs are so inflationary,
then why are all these other countries not have high inflation? It's because they're not actually
inflationary. On top of that, if you go and you look in 2018, we put tariffs on products and we
saw not only that the price of those products went down over the next 18 months, but also inflation
did not go up across the country. And so everyone's worried about all this stuff, but it is all rooted
in this like mental disease of what has been taught in these economics classes inside these
universities, which is wrong. The same people who are regurgitating that tariffs are bad,
tariffs are inflationary, tariffs are going to ruin the economy, tariffs, all this stuff,
literally in the same breath will tell you that the efficient market hypothesis is true
and intrinsic value exists. Like it's dumb. You're wrong. And so if you're so smart,
why aren't you richer? That's my point to all these people, right? And so when you look at it,
it ultimately goes back to guess who is really, really rich, right? Multi-billionaire rich.
Scott Besson, Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, right?
Just go down the line.
All these people in the administration, Elon Musk, et cetera.
Guess what they're saying?
Put the tariffs on.
So-
But they're all in Trump's cabinet, right?
So they are-
Of course.
Voicing from the megaphone.
They're voicing from the Trump megaphone, but here's the thing.
It's hurting their wallet.
Billionaires in America, since Trump got elected, have lost $400 billion in their net worth.
Elon Musk personally has lost a hundred billion dollars
and they're still doing this.
They're still saying this is a good thing.
And so I think the part that people kind of get lost
in this whole conversation is that the tariffs,
everyone is looking at them through the lens
of this like Keynesian collegiate academic economic view.
Your college professor was wrong.
That's not how the world works.
We have example after example after example.
We have examples in the United States
in the last 10 years, putting tariffs on prices go down. American jobs get created. American
manufacturing comes back. We have examples around the world of people who have VAT taxes or who put
tariffs in place, et cetera. Inflation doesn't happen. And so when you look at this, it all goes
back to, you can either buy into the mainstream narrative, which is just basically the regurgitation
of people saying, I'm worried about the future. I'm worried about the future. I'm worried about
the future, but none of them can point to show me in a specific example of why you think American
citizens, not wealthy people in their investment portfolio, but American citizens are actually
going to be worse off because you know what's happened so far? Again, gasoline, one of the
staple purchases of American citizens, four-year low already. It's been 75 days. Gas is at a
four-year low. Egg prices have fallen more than 50%. So you look at this stuff and you say,
wait a second, let's take a look at what is already happening to prices. And so the dirty
secret is that the same people are yelling and screaming that tariffs are bad, or the same people
who are telling you that inflation's at 2.8%. They're looking at the government data. The
government data is wrong. Do you know how I know? Because Scott Besant, the treasury secretary,
was asked point blank in an interview with Chamath Palpatia and David Freeberg, they said,
do you believe the economic data, GDP, inflation, et cetera? The first word out of his mouth was no.
Why would you believe that data? We know the data collection is inaccurate. We know the methodology
is flawed. It doesn't make sense. If you go and you look at something that's more of a real-time
metric, that's an alternative inflation measurement like Truflation, inflation has
dropped. It was at over 3% in December. So it was actually, they were showing a higher inflation
number than the government data in December. It has now dropped more than 50%. And today they
showed about 1.38%. Inflation has been crashing because what is the government doing? The
politicians are creating uncertainty because they're trying to slow the economy. They're
trying to get interest rates down. And so everyone's yelling and screaming, worried about
inflation. I'm worried about the opposite. I'm not worried about inflation. I'm worried about
actually that inflation is too low
because what it's going to do
is everyone starts to now hoard, right?
When you start to hoard,
you get the economic slowdown.
And so guess what's going to happen?
Knock, knock, Jerome Powell.
Knock, knock, Federal Reserve.
Start cutting interest rates.
Actually go and start to spur the economy.
Now, they can't cut interest rates right now.
There's no way they can do that.
They cut interest rates right before the election
and they're not going to cut them right now
because that would mean that Donald Trump is right.
And so, again, I think that sometimes Donald Trump does good things. I think sometimes he does absolutely crazy things that are completely outlandish. And I completely disagree with him. Right. Same thing with Biden. I think actually that people are very accurate in some of the critiques of Biden, but also they don't give him credit for things like the stock market did pretty well under Biden. Right. And again, that doesn't mean that he's a good president or a bad president. But you can look at the facts and you can say that some good stuff, some bad stuff with Biden, with Trump, some good stuff, some bad stuff.
That's every president, regardless of what aisle you're on.
So if you're an independent and you look at this stuff
and you say, tell me a specific thing, a topic,
and let me evaluate it.
Right now, the economic policy is working.
The problem is that the people who control the media,
the people who go on television and talk about it,
the people who hold assets that are all over Twitter,
they're yelling and screaming about it
because their investment portfolios are down.
But you want to know who's really happy right now?
The working class.
And people don't quite understand this.
If you're living in the coast, right?
It's hilarious for me to be like the coastal elites
living in New York City, right?
Doing what I do on a day-to-day basis.
But as I've talked about before on the podcast
is I basically have two different groups of friends.
I have what I call like my New York friends.
They're all super successful.
They're killing it.
They're making money.
They're doing all the things
that you would think that they're doing, right?
I have a whole nother group of friends
that pretty much were my entire life before,
whether it was the people that we grew up with,
whether it was people that I played football with,
people in the army, all those people, right? If you are part of the kind of elite wealthy class,
right now you're like, oh, there's a lot of uncertainty and stocks are falling. And this
is crazy. I didn't vote for this. This is nuts, right? The working class is saying,
I did vote for this. This guy actually understands our plight. This guy is advocating for us,
a return of these jobs. He's trying to actually help us. And so it's not a hundred percent,
But I do know that the polls that are run by both Republican media outlets and Democrat
are showing that the current number, depending actually Republican media sites are showing
38% of the country says that we're heading in the right direction.
The Democrat polls are showing 44%.
Both of those are near or all time highs over the last 20 plus years.
So more people think the country's heading in the right direction than at any point in
the last 20 years.
and again if you go and you do just a wall street poll confidence is down people are worried stocks
are down like that is the that's the ultimate poll right as people are selling off their stocks
but why is it that such a large portion of the country thinks we're heading the right direction
it's because it's the group that's not involved in that stuff and so i just think that the tariff
conversation like liberation day there's a reason why it's called liberation day right is because
literally, we're going to play a game. And we're going to tell American citizens, if you don't
want to pay the higher prices for non American made goods, then buy American. It's very simple
by the American made good, right? In many cases, we actually have the capacity to produce more.
And now that's the goal, get people employed, get that production going and get to people actually
buying American goods. If you're a company who's outside the United States, and you don't want to
pay the tariff? No problem. We created a loophole for you. There's a free walk to not paying the
tariffs. Come and produce your product in the United States. You still get the revenue. You
still get the profits. You still get to sell to America. You still get to do everything you want
to do. Come and build your product here in America. Use American labor to actually go and
do this. That should take a few years to actually come into fruition, right? Maybe. What I know is
that in 2018, we put tariffs on washing machines. And within 18 months, two different South Korean
manufacturers of washing machines came, they built American plants, and they created 2,000
American jobs and washing machine prices went down over 18 months. So guess what? I don't think
they went and they bought like some random patch of land and was like, let's build from scratch.
They probably went, they found a facility, right? They were able to move into it. They started a
production, got up and running. There are very few goods that America could not produce.
avocados, we ain't going to be the best producers of them, right? There's certain things obviously
that we're not going to be the best at. Bananas, probably not going to be our thing. Chiquita,
they got other operations going on. So again, you go and you look at this and you say to yourself,
there are certain things, yes, you may actually end up seeing those things pay a little bit more
prices if there's blanket tariffs, but it will be offset and you'll actually see overall prices go
down. Things like grocery prices have actually not been growing. The rate of growth has been
drastically slowed since these economic policies have been put in place. And so if you can already
see grocery prices going down, gasoline prices going down, things like that, that is what people
spend money on on a day-to-day basis. And so naturally, if they're actually able to get more
money in their pocket, tariffs are working. People may not like that. People may not want to give
one political side a win, but at the end of the day, the tariffs are working. And I think what
you're going to see a lot of is a return to, we are going to keep a steady hand here. We're going
to keep these on. And what I personally think is that we should actually have tariffs that
are blanket 5% or 10% tariffs on every single import into the United States, point blank period.
And then that's the default. We say to people, there's a product that you have. Oh, you have
avocados, we need those really badly. We'd like you to come sell them in the United States. We're
going to remove the tariff. Right now we have zero tariffs and we add them as a punitive damage,
right? As a punishment. Instead, why don't we actually say everyone has tariffs and then we're
going to incentivize people to bring us products that we need, right? And we'll remove them. Now
it's an incentive system. That's a very different way of looking at it, but I think that's how the
administration is doing it. All right. Let's talk about a recession. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan,
every company in the world thinks that, or every bank and financial institution in the world
seems to think we're going into a recession. Goldman Sachs raised the chances of a recession
from 20% to 35%. And then JP Morgan has it at 40%. Deutsche Bank has it at 50%.
Calci has it at 42%. Are we about to see a recession?
No. No. I mean, just let's think of the odds. You named one company that has the recession
odds at 50-50. Every other company, yeah, people are like, oh, 40%, 30%, 20%. That means that
if you have your odds of a recession at 20%, that means there's an 80% odds that you're not
going to see a recession, right? If you're at 40% odds of recession, ooh, big scary. That means
you're 60% confident or 60% odds that we're not going to have a recession. So the odds still
drastically are in favor of us not having a recession. On top of that, the Fed, they got
a lot of firepower. They got a lot of interest rates they can cut. And so I think that there's
just a lot of ways to avoid this kind of slowdown. Now, will we see economic, you know, velocity of
money, spending, growth, et cetera, come down a little bit? Absolutely. Because of some of these
economic policies. But what you're really doing is you're whacking the market, right? You're kind
of building this foundation and then go, you fire the firepower and we take off. And so I think that
that's pretty much what's going to happen here. I would not be surprised if stocks and crypto hit
new all-time highs by the end of the year um that would be like if i had a probability bet right now
i would say that both of them hit all-time highs by the end of the year and um i think that a
recession uh is very unlikely if everyone's talking about it so every if you go and you
see a bunch of uh headlines of recession recession recession recession probably not going to happen
right definition is uh definition of recession is what two negative quarters of gdp growth yeah
and so uh maybe we get one in q1 we'll see um who knows if the government data is accurate but
let's see what they say um so let's go right i mean look we had two previous quarters of negative
gdp growth they said it wasn't a recession and everyone said what are you talking about it's
definition of recession and they said no no there's this random organization that no one
knows anybody who works there uh they get to tell you if it's a recession or not like okay like now
we're just playing gaslighting right um so i don't know maybe uh but i do know this there's two
negative quarters of GDP growth, I promise under this president, they definitely going to say it's
a recession. Um, let's talk about one thing real quick about the ideal. Like most of the
conversation I've heard around the tariffs and around other things is that, um, the Trump
organization wants to get interest rates down so they can refinance our debt. You think that's
true? A hundred percent. You think that's their main goal? We have like six to $8 trillion. I
forget the exact number. Uh, maybe $7 trillion of debt that is, uh, needs to be refinanced this
year. We could do it a four and a half percent or whatever. No, you want that thing down. So
get that thing down right and uh remember he advocated he told jerome powell cut interest
rates he tweeted at him right posted it on true social he said truth them right like dunked on
his ass and said get the interest rate down and powell said no and then immediately people like
are you going to step down if he tries to fire you or you know pressure you or anything powell said
no so scott besant howard letnick and donald trump went into the oval office they stroked their chin
said well how do we get interest rates down they said we got a grand plan that come out and they're
going to get interest rates down and they're going to do it because they're basically going to break
the arm of Jerome Powell to do it. And he doesn't want to cut interest rates right now. That's fine.
Inflation is down under 2%. They're going to break him and they're going to make him cut
interest rates. And so let's see what happens. But I think the Fed should be independent. I don't
think that the president should set the interest rate or anything crazy like that. Although some
people think differently. But I just think, yeah, that's kind of the closing course that we're on.
Awesome. All right. Thank you. Thanks for doing it.
Thank you.
