The Pomp Podcast - Bitcoin Is Just Getting Started, Says Billion Dollar Investor | Moez Kassam

Episode Date: October 20, 2026

Moez Kassam is the co-founder and CEO of Anson Funds, one of Canada’s top-performing hedge funds. In this conversation, we break down how he trades hype and momentum, why he went from bitcoin deals to bitcoin believer, and the lessons from putting $1 billion into bitcoin treasury companies. We also discuss the AI trade, Korea’s memory boom, long activism, prediction markets, and SPACs.========================Arch Public is an agentic trading platform that automates investment strategies across Stocks, Commodities, ETFs and Crypto. Whether you’re rotating into AI & Gold, allocating to the S&P 500, or accumulating Bitcoin, Arch Public executes your plan 24/7 without ever taking custody of your assets or funds. Sign up today at https://www.archpublic.com, and start your FREE automated trading strategy! ========================GalaxyOne is a financial technology platform built for people who want their cash working harder. → https://go.galaxy.app/HMiq/pomp Galaxy Premium Yield is an investment note issued by Galaxy Digital LP and guaranteed by Galaxy Digital Holdings LP. It is not a bank deposit, is unsecured, and is not FDIC or SIPC insured. U.S. accredited investors only. Cash deposits held at Cross River Bank, Member FDIC. Securities products are not FDIC insured, not bank guaranteed, and may lose value. GalaxyOne Crypto is not FDIC or SIPC insured. Terms apply.========================Sleep better with Fitnexa SomniPods 3 — ultra-thin sleep earbuds built for all-night comfort. With 42dB of noise cancellation, sleep tracking, and personalized AI insights, they're designed to block out noise and help you actually rest, whether you're a side sleeper, a light sleeper, or dealing with a snoring partner. Use code POMP10 for 10% off at https://www.fitnexa.com.========================This episode is brought to you by Investor Health — clinician-prescribed protocols for weight, metabolism, energy, and longevity, delivered to your door in 48–72 hours. No office visits, no referrals. Plans start at $149/mo. Learn more at http://www.InvestorHealth.com/pomp. Investor Health is a telehealth platform, not a medical provider. Compounded medications are not FDA-approved. Individual results may vary and treatment requires evaluation by a licensed provider.========================0:00 - Intro1:11 - Chasing hype, momentum & dealmaking6:34 - Bitcoin: from deals to believer9:02 - Bitcoin treasury companies & Strive’s preferred15:40 - AI hype & sky-high valuations17:53 - Private AI deals, tokenized stocks & 24/7 trading21:23 - Trading against ChatGPT24:50 - Finding your edge (SpaceX vs small caps)28:46 - Korea, memory stocks & record put buying34:27 - Short selling vs long activism42:35 - Why Moderna could fall45:16 - Prediction markets & social media sentiment51:44 - Space & SPACs54:56 - Canada, trade wars & funding Olympians

Okay, when I sell my business, I want the best tax and investment advice. I want to help my kids, and I want to give back to the community. Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime. I wonder if my out of office has a forever setting. An IG Private Wealth Advisor creates the clarity you need with plans that harmonize your business, your family, and your dreams. Get financial advice that puts you at the center. Find your advisor at IG Private Wealth.com.

So your decaf oat milk extra but not piping hot, four pumps of caramel, no sugar, small latte, and a large cup. That will be 10 minutes. No worries. I'm having fun on Playojo. And I keep it fun with all the latest slot and live casino games. Plus I get instant payouts with no minimum withdrawals. Here's your decaf oat milk extra but not piping hot. Ah, thanks. Playtime's over. Mmm, lovely.

Feel the fun. Playojo. 19 plus Ontario only. Please play responsibly. Concern about your gambling or that is someone close to you. Call 1866-531-2600 to visit connectxontera.ca. And that's what happened with Bitcoin. And I'm looking at today, I'm like, oh, my God, these things aren't 70, 80, went over 100,000. We were there. But you start to notice when things go up in a big manner.

And yeah, we've had a lot of volatility over the years, and we've had a couple of cycles. But there is an inherent group of people who, you know, are going to keep this thing going. And it's not just before it was a bunch of people talking about the road, Silk Road and underground and this and, you know, anonymity. now you've got major institutions that have adopted it, put them on their platforms, and, you know, this is something that's here to stay for sure. What's going on, guys? Today we have a great conversation with Moaz Qasam. He is the co-founder and CIO at Anson Funds. And in this conversation, it is going to be one of the most entertaining investors that we've ever had on the podcast. In this conversation, he's going to talk about Bitcoin, AI, space, what he does by chasing momentum. Why some of the legacy financial advice he may have heard about investing could be wrong, how he thinks about countries like Korea versus the United States, versus Canada, And then we get into what he is doing in terms of shorting individual names, what investment ideas he's excited about, and what you should be considering for your portfolio as well. This conversation is full of all sorts of types of alpha.

I think you're going to enjoy it. Here's my conversation with Moaz. All right, Moaz, most people, if you went to like an economics 101 or personal finance class, they would say the number one rule is to stay away from all hype. Do not chase hype. You have made a killing chasing hype, chasing momentum. And I think that you've actually understand how this stuff works and figured out not only how do you enter into these trades,

but also how do you get out of them? Can you talk a little bit about maybe your approach to looking at technology hype cycles and how you play this stuff? Well, it's funny, you know, you say that the rule of thumb is to stay away from hype. It's not to stay away from hype per se, but it's make sure on the other side of the hype.

Is that at the end of the day, you know, all that glitters is not always gold. And, you know what I tell people, at the end of the day is anything that has too much hype around it, that's when you want to be walking away. So you know what? We're around stuff that has, has hype, but it's understanding and being objective about it.

So I tell everyone, if you ever at a party and someone's talking about a new theme or idea, you look at the stock charts around and they're all screaming high. And the idea can be great, but how much of that is already priced in? The idea is you want to be objective and patient because whenever there's hype, there's, you know, movements back and forth and there's an ability to make money as long as you're patient. So really what you're doing is you're looking for the idea right before it becomes consensus. And what ends up happening from my understanding is, you guys will put these positions on,

and as they become, you know, significantly hyped up, that's when you're basically like, all right, now's our time to get off the train. Yeah, you know what? It's not as simple as that, but the idea is, you know, trying to get in early, but also recognizing when the music is too loud, because it's musical chairs and it always stops at some point. And the idea is not just about riding the train,

but understanding sentiment, understanding who is getting in, how many people are around, and how many people are around, and how loud is that music playing to say, listen, you don't have to get all the way to the ninth inning. If you make seven innings, you can have a pretty good return on whatever theme you're looking at. You manage a couple billion dollars. You are the best hedge fund manager in Canada, as I always tell you.

I know you're a very good investor. And I think that you now have seen kind of the evolution of financial markets where it used to be very institutional driven. Now you have retail investors, and the retail investors, they're very well informed. They have the ability to communicate with each other on the internet and they drive a lot of momentum into names, but also out of names. If something is a fallen darling, then all of a sudden, you know, that can punish these stocks as well. How does

that change the way that you invest in the market? It's a great observation. You know, things have really shifted since COVID, right? The retail investor is more informed. There are a lot more people. People are trading all around the world. You know, speculation is rampant. But it's, you know, seeing what happened during that time period with GameStop and AMC and all that is that you need to be very patient and, you know, not go in too quickly and not exit too quickly, especially of people who are shorting a lot of stuff around retail. Like we do a lot of, you know, buying and underwriting of deals, but also when we think things are too frothy or, you know, there's the Me Too companies. We'll sort of look at that on the short side. But things can go up a lot faster and a lot longer and a lot higher than you think. So it's really about being prudent around risk and allocations.

So if most people looked at like your resume, they would be like, oh, Moez is a hedge fund manager. If somebody came to me in the street and was like, hey, do you know, Moez, what does he do? I'd diagnose a dealmaker, which I think is, you know, they're similar, but they are two distinctly different things. And what I think is unique about you guys is you have a big pool of capital, but you also have this like dealmaking, you know, kind of component or interest. Can you talk about why putting those together, the capital pool plus the dealmaking has made you guys so much money over time? Yeah, you know, with the dealmaking, you can turn over a lot of deals, especially in this NASDAQ world where there's just so much liquidity where, you know, we do run about

two and a half, three billion U.S. dollars, but we're underwriting deals multiple billion dollars a year. And it's just about understanding structure and deals and around where hype and themes are. So we're looking. People go, how are you going to make money tomorrow? And I go, honestly, I have. no idea, but there's always some theme, whether it's autonomous driving, whether it's crypto, whether it's cannabis. Whenever there's hype, inadvertently, there's all the companies moving

together, liquidity, a lot of deals will be had at that time. And so for us, it's just about identifying what the themes are. We never really identified the theme of, I'm going to figure out what's going to be big, but I can identify it as it starts to percolate and then take advantage of that and then start to understand the system, you know, as a generalist, what people are looking for, what's going to make it continue higher, and, you know, what the pitfalls and headwinds are going to be, and then start looking at what companies are going to resonate with the average or a retail investor.

The reason why I think I am so sympathetic to your approach is because it is kind of like a retail investor in the sense of they are not usually experts in anyone field. They have a good pulse on, quote, quote, quote, the market. The market may be conversation online. It may be actual individual stocks. Like, they're just obsessed with this. And so they're kind of watching.

They don't have as strict, you know, bureaucracy of like, we've got to go to a huge risk department. We've got to a big investment committee. And so there's a little bit more of like that deal-making approach of, hey, if I see something good, I can strike quickly. I think you guys still have all the risk management, et cetera, but you have that ability to move quickly. And then you have gone theme by theme by theme over the years,

like AI, space, Bitcoin. Like, you have exposure to this stuff. Maybe let's start with Bitcoin in particular. Somebody on your team told me you did not like Bitcoin when it first came out and you first heard about it. But then in the last couple of years, maybe have loosened your stance and become a little bit more excited about Bitcoin? No, no. I'm definitely a fan of Bitcoin. But just to take a step back, you know, I'm actually based in Toronto.

And when Bitcoin first started becoming a thing and people wanted to get into equities, all the companies actually started listing in Toronto. And there aren't a lot of hedge funds in Toronto. So we were naturally very exposed to what became Hive, and we were the original fund who backed Mike Novagrats around Galaxy. And so, yeah, we did it from a deal perspective, but then I started to appreciate the nuances of Bitcoin and the worry around the world and inflation and this and that.

And like, is there an actual theme around this that's sustaining it? I have become definitely more of a believer, where before it was just deal related, now I believe Bitcoin has an inherent value in it's here today. You know, what's interesting is I used to tell people, get off zero. That was like my big calling card, if you were. And I would just, look, take $5 and buy some Bitcoin. And if it's in your portfolio, even if it's $5, you're going to pay attention.

It's going to be on the screen. You're going to be on the screen. You're going to kind of get a feel for it. Maybe you'll end up putting more money into it. You kind of did the same thing. You got off zero, but not because you went and bought Bitcoin because the deals came. And then as you got exposure to the deals, it feels like maybe that pulled you down the rabbit hole and you started to learn more about it.

Yeah, no, it's funny. I tell the story. When I launched my fund, I went to a bunch of super high net worth guys. you know, they get ability to invest millions of dollars. And I said, just give me 100,000. Because then I'm on your, I'm on your map. You're going to have to start looking at me. And if I do well, you're going to be like, why do we only have $100,000 in this?

And that's what happened with Bitcoin. Bitcoin, we're investing. And I'm sad. Like, you know, we were looking at it was 100, 200, 500,000, and I'm looking at today. I'm like, oh, my God, these things aren't 70, 80, went over 100,000. We were there. But you start to notice when things go up in a big manner. And yeah, we've had a lot of volatility over the years.

And we've had a couple of cycles. but there is an inherent group of people who, you know, are going to keep this thing going. And it's not just before it was a bunch of people talking about the road, Silk Road and underground and this and, you know, anonymity. Now you've got major institutions that have adopted it, put them on their platforms, and, you know, this is something that's here to stay for sure. Let's talk about what you guys did in the Bitcoin world recently.

You backed some of the Bitcoin Treasury companies. You did converts, you did. you did equity. I mean, you guys were kind of a player in all of this. What are some of the lessons that you took away? And maybe like what was the best deal you did? And then what were some of the things that you wish you hadn't done? No, I think, you know, when the what's called the Datch, the Treasury companies, you know, people started saying, hey, listen, which started with, you know, sailor and micro strategy. And they said, listen, instead of buying Bitcoin, let's buy a leveraged way to play it. And then, you know, with the, you know, new aged around perpetual preferred,

you have an ability to get a levered return on Bitcoin through some of these debts. And then everybody, what you realize is the first move of advantage is huge. So the first few guys who did it, you know, BMNR, guys who came out for Vacca Rman Swanee around Strive, those people, you know, have way higher adoption. And then suddenly everybody wants to get in the mode.

You know, you were early, we did very well with you. And then at the end of the day, you've got 74 companies coming, and every day we're looking at a bunch. And it went from us giving you, 20 million, 50 million, eventually we gave a billion dollars to, you know, treasury companies last in the last 18 months. But you realize the later you are and the louder the music, the worst the deals are, that they aren't, there's too many guys trying to hold up that many names, but also everyone's trying

to get away with just get rich quick, oh, I can do this, I can do this, and everyone's saying, I've got a treasury company. And so you realize there's something around being early, and then there's something around trying to catch the momentum at the end where you really need to avoid. What I think is interesting is, so you put a billion dollars to work across all these companies over 18 months. Now, people here, if you manage two or three billion, they're going to think that you've got, you know, 30 to 50 percent of your fund invested in treasury companies.

That's not the case. You're recycling some of the capital. There's other components of how you're doing that. But let's just say that you put a billion dollars to work there. You started with the equity and the converts and kind of the companies themselves, but I think You are one of the either largest or one of the big investors in Strives' recent SATs, which is their preferred equity, similar to Stretch or SATA. What are you guys excited about with these preferred equities?

You know, this one is a very unique opportunity, in my opinion, is that you, you know, all the Treasury companies have now trading at big discounts to their underlying NAV. And people are like, oh my God, we should just buy them and do activism, which we do as well. but because they were put on with such bad covenants, in order to get rid of a management team, you had to pay three, four, five forward earnings of that team, which takes away the discount. You know, strive, it was set up by a very legit group of people.

It was really thought out, guys who have had a huge backing Matt Vivek in that field, and they traded a multiple of NAV and they've got a lot of euphoria behind them. And so they were really the second player to do a perpetual preferred. And the interesting part for us is there's a little bit of an arbitrage where they need to do a big underwriting in order to do that with institutional investors or yield guys. It ends up coming at a bigger discount. So these things normally trade at 100 and have a yield of like 13%. This one, you know, just got issued at 90. And then the idea is it'll slowly gravitate towards 100.

And at that point, we'll probably start exiting as the retail guys come in. But, you know, they put aside 18 months of cash flows associated with the earnings. a 15% yield. And, you know, a lot of guys are underwriting, where's Bitcoin going to be? And they're saying, you know, they're in their model is 30 to 50% up in the next year. And then you're like, wow, this really can have the convexity, the vortex to keep going. And so the idea really is they need initial capital. That initial capital, they basically allow for institutional investors to come in at a lower entry price. And that starts the flywheel. And then as it moves up, this is a good example, I think, of where you're like, hey, we see

something early, we like it, we understand the risk reward, and then as it gets to par, well, par is par, right? Like, there's not really a return in the holding the thing. You're not in it for the 13% yield or 15% yield. Maybe that's nice for a period of time. But really, what you're trying to do is you're trying to drive a double-digit percentage return off of the actual capital appreciation more than just the yield. Is that right? Yeah, I know that's a good observation. So we'll look at it underwriting a 20% IRA because we'll be in it for a shorter term period and get 90 to 100 in the span of a month, then maybe we'll keep some for sure, but we're not fixed income players. The idea is buying it institutionally and then taking it where all the retail guys

come in. And that's sort of what we did with Morgan Stanley when they did the original micro strategy deal or Barclays and Cantor have done it with these guys. And it's a great opportunity for us. But I also believe, you know, even the retailer net investor buying it at 9 to 100, these things have a pretty good return profile for everybody. Today's episode is brought to you by Galaxy One. A lot of people got their money working for them. But the question now, how hard is it working? Well, the folks are ever at Galaxy One, they're taking a very different approach.

Everyone earns 3.5% APY using Galaxy One cash. And if you make over $200,000 a year, that means you're probably an accredited investor. And then you can earn up to 8% on your cash guaranteed by Galaxy Digital. The best part, though, is that you can actually set it so that your yield immediately is reinvested into your favorite stocks, crypto, or ETFs. You don't got to think about it every single month. It just automatically does it for you. That's why I love Galaxy One. So if your cash isn't working as hard as you are, then it's time to make a move.

Check out the link in the description and start earning today. What are your investors talk about when they talk about Bitcoin? Are they excited and they're like, hey, let's go get more exposure to this? Are they kind of like, hey, that was cool, but now this AI thing is like, sucking the wind out of, you know, kind of the market. And so, like, why are you spending time on Bitcoin? What's the sentiment in those conversations? You know, our investors are somewhat agnostic to how we do it.

They sort of like the, you know, approach that we sort of will go anywhere. Like, and the idea is we don't pretend to be, you know, one type of investor and only look at one type of security or one industry is that we can, our advantage is just we have our eyes wide open. We understand sentiment. We understand euphoria. And we understand not taking a lot of risk. And there's a lot of ways to get to the top of the mountain.

And so for them, it's sort of, you know, if we say we like Bitcoin or we don't, they don't really care. And the problem is I used to always tell people what I liked, and then someone would go and make that trade associated. But then I would change my mind in a few weeks, and then I feel bad because they're like, oh, what happened? I'm like, oops. So now I just try and keep things as general as I can. All right. Now, let's talk about AI. There's obviously this, like, very persistent and long-term trend.

I think people are very excited. There's a lot of different ways to play it, though. You can go and you can buy the hyperscalers. You can go and get into the components. There's obviously all the land. all the Bitcoin miners are switching over to HPC. Like, when you look at AI as a macro trade, if you are, general trade, where have you guys played

and what have you been not excited about? You know, as I mentioned it earlier, whenever the music is too loud, it's probably not a good time to be investing. And the entire world is talking about AI. And 100% they should be, because the disruption, adoption, all that, 100% is legit. It's changed my life.

It's changing everyone's lives. Even people who didn't think they could ever do it. My parents, who barely know to use a computer, I loaded the new bot dot from chat GPT. And it just starts looking at their email and calendar. And it's just amazing the efficiencies that you can get. But when you look at the valuations associated with some of these companies, you know,

it reminds me when I first started training was like the dot-com boom. Everyone talked about the disruption, which was true. But it was all about Yahoo and X-Site and AOL. and all that. No one realized at the end of the day the winner was AOL, which came out of nowhere, that it can be the same thing now with all the disruption we're seeing. Are we really ready to pick who the winner would be? And should a company in the second, third inning, of where the technology is heading, be worth $2 trillion. And into my mind, how are you going to pick? Someone

could literally come out of nowhere, you know, as we're seeing the evolution of this and disrupt the whole industry. And that's why you're seeing a lot of weirdness around the ecosystem, right? You have invidia and you have the data centers and you have the chips and the everything has one big, you know, circle right now where it's all interrelated, interparty stuff. It gets me a little, you know, reserved into taking big bets. But the momentum is there, so we're happy to structure deals around it. But am I here to say categorically, I know, anthropic or, you know, whomever will be the winner? You have no idea. And the valuations are very rich to make those types of bets today.

Let's talk about Chatsub EBT or Open AI and Anthropic, maybe as a good example. So, like, one, they're in the private market. So have you guys ever been incentivized or kind of tempted to go and start investing in privates? But two is, if you look at Anthropic, like, the other day in some of the tokenized or like perp, you know, kind of future stuff, it's sold off, like, I don't know, from $2 trillion down to like $1.6 trillion or something, right? I mean, like, pretty significant movement in the price in, like, a matter of, like, two weeks.

And so do you ever get tempted on the private side? And also, like, do you guys go play in tokenized stocks or perps or anything like that? We definitely play in all aspects. But I'm telling you, I see every private offer, every secondary, it's crazy out there. It's the Wild West and everybody's investing in these random SPVs that have fees on fees. And, you know, Anthropics have been a little more prudent in the way they've approached their structured holdings. But around Open AI, around any of these companies. it's like one set of investors,

and then there's a hundred layers below it of SPVs charging one in 10 and two and 20, and everyone's like, oh, I own this, and I go, do you own it? Are you on the cap table? And 95% of the time they're not, because that's literally the original Silicon Valley or major venture-type funds.

But you've got all these family offices and new groups being set up just for the purpose of taking advantage. But to me, that's where the music's playing a little loud. And, you know, there's a lot of money being made, off all these things. And, you know, as that starts to trickle or come back into the system, there could be a lot of stress on it. I forget which hedge fund it was, but they, maybe it was Ken Griffin or somebody had said, you know, I want the guy who wakes up early on Sunday morning

and lives in London and will go and play online poker because he knows he's going to take advantage of the East Coast people who are just getting home drunk. And so, like, understanding an edge. Perps and Tokyo. going to have stocks, the promises they're going to trade 24-7. Right now, most people think of the stock market is, you know, normal hours Monday through Friday. Have you guys started to think about or look at, like, what are you going to do overnight? What are you going to do on weekends? Like, is there an opportunity to kind of be one of the first institutions to go play in the, like,

off hours, or there's just not enough liquidity and, you know, anything that is, like, weird, like that kind of scares you early on? We've started to dabble in it, you know, eventually the Ken Griffin's Cinderella's of the world, like that's their world, automated trading and all that. We're never going to be able to compete from a technology basis, whereas our advantage is really understanding sentiment and seeing something go wrong. You know, we started playing, now you get equities

that are about to get listed. So when SpaceX was about to get listed, SK-Hinex was about to get listed, it's all very active in that market. And at night, weird stuff happens where there's a little bit of a move and everybody's playing on margin. As soon as someone tricks, tips some type of stop loss, to sell, there isn't a lot of liquidity,

and somehow these things can go down 10, 15% in a matter of an hour, and that's when we'll sort of take advantage. We have guys who are monitoring through the night. We're pretty good at the 4 a.m. pre-market through when the regular market opens and right to 7 p.m. But yeah, now it's a different world

as we're going to head into a one-hour break and then keep going. So we're looking at it, and we're taking advantage where we can, but we're not systematic traders. It's more, I see something's gone wrong, and we can turn it around in a few minutes and get into the market and start flying.

How do you guys make decisions, right? Like, one, you've got a big personality. Two, you're very good at what you do. Three, for anyone who doesn't know, they should go follow you on Instagram. Munching Moaz is incredible follow. Your Instagram stories is like better than anything on television. But I have to imagine that you're not up 24 hours a day,

so something gets dislocated at, you know, 2 a.m. How do you guys make decisions in day? internally of like, do they have to call you and wake you up? Or is there kind of like pre-given instructions? Like, just talk through, you know, you're opportunistic, but there's got to be some overlay of decision-making on like what opportunities to take and whatnot to. Yeah, no, it's an interesting thing

that's constantly evolving for us in that, you know, we sort of operate amongst a pod structure. So there's a bunch of managers within our group that are doing different things at different times. But I'm the CIO, the chief investment officer. So I'm usually the one overlaying. Most people have autonomy need to do a certain amount of trading on their own size, volume, et cetera, but after it gets

to a certain size, they need to call me. I don't really sleep a lot, which is kind of an advantage where I'm just sort of living and breathing this world. And, you know, people think it's crazy. But for me, I love this life. I love the action of the market, the intellectual honesty of everyday knowing whether you're right or wrong and not being able to, you know, spin it in another way, right? You're either right or you're wrong.

The money's there. It's not. You've lost. You've won. And so I'm always. watching the stuff, but guys know to call me at all hours. I wake up in a second, we're ready to go. I keep a Bloomberg literally beside my bed.

I just call- Do you really? Literally like, it's like one foot out because my wife would kill me if it's beside the bed. So I can literally roll out and then move to two feet away. And there's a machine with six screens ready to ready to go, which happens like three, four times a night I find. Really? Yeah. So like when you get one of these phone calls in the middle of the night,

and it's like a traitor calling you, what are they calling for? And they're like, hey, this just happened. And they're instantly, I don't need to think about it. Like I already know what they've told me and I'll know this, other than like, because there's no real information that comes out in the middle of the night, most of the time, something went wrong with somebody else and we're taking advantage of it. So you ask how, you know, AI is, you know, changing our business landscape. Now I've noticed when there's, like, reports come out.

There's like a short report or a buy report. And you'd read the report and then read the assessment, say, is there new information, how are people reacting to it? Nobody reads the report anymore. So what they do is they just drop it into Claude or they drop it into chat GPT, and then there's a little bit of a summary at the end. And then it says, oh, this guy has this right or that right or might have gotten this or X, Y, Z.

We know most of the names that are in the momentum world. So all I'm doing now is looking at the reaction and looking out with the summary of what Chappi, chat, GPT, or Claude says, and I know if they've got something wrong, we'll take advantage of it then. Because the people who are listening to them are trading based on that outcome, believing that it's 100% right.

And we're finding, you know, 75% of the time there's something that they've missed or 10, 15% of the time they've got the whole thing wrong. So really what you're almost doing is your trading based off of what ChatGBT is telling everybody else. Correct. And you find that so far to be a pretty good strategy. Yeah, but people say, oh, you're going to be out of a job soon.

I say, I go, I think my job and our returns are going to actually get better because everyone else is becoming effectively a robot. They're just listening to another instruction. And if you can be objective and understand why people doing what they're doing, you can then take advantage of that situation. Now, in the AI trade, there's companies like SpaceX, SI, I think is now the official name, which is supposed to be merging with Tesla, at least that's the rumor.

Do you look at things like, okay, hey, there's a 50% odds that they're going to merge these companies. Tesla is likely to be the one that is acquired, therefore it has to be traded at a premium, and so you'll, like, go try to, like, orb that type of stuff? or is that too like insider Wall Street type stuff, and you're more so, like, that's not momentum, and so we stay away from it. You know, for us, people look at our numbers. Like we've had very, very, very good performance.

I've seen them. They're very good. Yeah. And they go, are you the smartest hedge fund in the world? And the answer is no, because I'll avoid situations like Tesla and SpaceX for the most part, because it's too, there's too many people looking at it, right? Every major fund in the world has four people who worked within that ecosystem, and they know it to have the network better,

to have a better educational guess about where something's gonna go than us. But step down a few levels, down to this world of, you know, Bitcoin treasury companies or autonomous driving small cap, things like that. It's a lot of retail investors and us. You know, the larger funds are running the same systems we are, but they have a box that says above $5 billion,

above $10 billion, or must trade $100 million a day. And we have the same system, but we'll say, I'll look at a small company, and I know that we'll know that, I know I have a distinct advantage there versus trying to figure out if SpaceX is going to buy Tesla. So let's say their boxes above $5 billion market cap has to trade $100 million a day. What is your box?

Like how low, will you look at a $50 million company? You know, the problem is we came from humble beginnings. See, I'm always reaching over to pick up the quarter. Probably for not always the, you know, the best outcome. But if someone shows me a free $5, I'm like, oh, I sweat if I can't get it. But generally, you know, we're trying to look at $100 million. a company plus, we're trying to put at least four or five million bucks to work. It's just not worth it for, you know, a company of our size to make two, three hundred grand

on something. The opportunity, I still love making it, but the opportunity cost is too high. Yeah. And, you know, I've seen you write very large kind of eight figure, nine figure checks, right? So like, if you'll go from a $5 million check up to $100 million check, that's very, pretty big universe you could play there. Yeah, no, no. So that's the beauty. As I say, well, listen, we're open to anything. People are like, what kind of stuff will you invest in? I go, if you can show me a way where I can wrap my head around how we're going to make money here, we're happy to take a look at it. And it doesn't matter what it is, where it is, you know, especially when we develop partnerships with people. If I make money with you once, chances are, then I know you've got

luck on your side or you've got a good head on your shoulders, and it's way more likely for us to convert and do it again. Now, this strategy of being a bigger fish in a smaller pond is usually not what people want to do. Most people want to go up, right? They want to be the small fish in a big pond and they want more capital, more kind of liquidity. You've been somewhat disciplined. I mean, yes, you have moved up, but you're explaining this box. And it comes back to the idea of like the guy in London who wakes up early to pick off the, you know, the drunk Americans, you kind of know where your edge is and you have been

pretty disciplined and staying in that box. Yeah. And I think that's the truth is that, you know, people say, you know, oh my God, look how much money you've raised your two and a half billion dollars. And I go, we've made, we've made three billion dollars. We haven't really taken in any new money. We get net redemptions every year because we don't market. Now, if someone wrote me a check, I usually just cash it,

but we're not doing that. Go and take meetings and go to conferences and try and get money. I did that forever when I needed to. Now I'm better off sitting with my team looking at ideas. And if we make a 10% return, that's hundreds of millions of dollars on its own. There's no point raising it. And the idea is we're getting the returns we're doing and getting the situations that we can have an impact because of the size we are.

You become too big, and then I have to have an opinion on Tesla and where SpaceX is going. Now, let's talk about the country of Korea. Just your reaction alone tells me that you're interested. Why is Korea so important? Korea is a fact, you know, I've been, I don't really sleep because I've been literally playing Korea for the last six months, eight months. And Korea is literally the engine around this whole trade, right?

All the memory companies between Samsung, and S.K. Heinex just on their own, they control the game in terms of memory. And, you know, these companies have gone from relatively been obscure to some of the biggest companies in the world, now trillion-dollar businesses. People don't even realize that Samsung put out

their last earnings. It was the largest earnings in the history of the world in a quarter. And people, half the people don't even know they think Samsung's a TV guy. And, you know, these are huge companies. that trade, obviously they're big market caps, but there was so much rampant speculation around the names.

They went from a boom to kind of in this bust, but the earnings for these companies looks insane over the next few years. But again, I get a little bit of hesitation because these are trillion-dollar businesses that people should know very well. What advantage do I have on that? Not a lot, but I do understand sentiment.

And now that everyone is thrown in the towel, we're going back into Korean names right now. because as we've seen this AI sell-off, you know, it's funny to me, I recently wrote this piece about, we're 2% off the S&P all-time high, and people are acting like we're in the global financial crisis. I mean, literally, this past weekend, people were predicting Black Monday.

October 19th, 1987, we're going to get it again in 2026. And the number one data point that I saw, which, I don't think a lot of people realized, Friday, last Friday, second largest put buying in history. NASDAQ was third largest put buying. in history. So first question I go to, well, like, what if the stock market doesn't go down, it goes up? Isn't everyone going to have to just go cover all that stuff? And it looks like that is much more likely going to be the outcome, you know, so far this week. To me, that is almost

like you get paid for just not going with the crowd, which I think a lot of hedge fund managers are very nervous about. And in a world where information spreads at, you know, the speed of light, it does feel like people emotionally are much more prone to these, like, panics, and everyone wants to be the smart guy who calls the top of this market. No, it's an interesting observation. Like I told you, our world is, you know, we see people zig, we zag.

And so anyone's put buying, time to get out of the puts and go the other way. And so everybody was talking about the AI trade being the greatest thing in the world. We kind of stayed away. And then now everyone's like, it's murder ink out there. You can't buy anything. So Corwee, like, oh, my God,

Corrieve is going bankrupt, which is, you know, obviously trades at a high book value, but it wasn't going bankrupt in the day. And they go, we've never seen as much put buying in Correweave in one day. I had the Citadel guys in to our office on Thursday. And in the morning, they go, we've never seen as much put buying in the last night. It goes, time to buy, time to buy Correwee. And we bought Corrieve on the Thursday. And then it ripped eventually.

And I'm like, you know what? And everyone was like, okay, we've got to get back into Correwee. I go, time to get rid of Corweef. And so you're seeing that, that now you're getting paid a good amount of money, you know, to buy some of these companies. companies that cheap multiples, if you believe they even have a future, a couple of years or earnings. What do you think the average holding period is for a position for you guys? Days, weeks, months, years?

I would say it's weeks to weeks to months. The larger the trade, we're in for longer, but we're turning over a lot of deals. We're turning a lot of stuff around sentiment. And, you know, well, some companies will hold for, you know, a couple of years, but some, you know, are literally around the momentum. So I was talking to my team and they go, you really want to get in. to the memory trade. I go, everyone's gone risk off. They don't want it. I go, I'm not playing the long-term game here, but as things stabilized, you'll get a 10, 15% jump in a matter of days or a matter

of weeks, and at that point, I can just reread and get out. Now, when I think about kind of these shorter holding periods, the first thing that I think about is how much money do you think is the most that Anson funds ever made in a single day? Like, what was the best trade? I remember once we played an arbitrage around the National Bank of Greece during the recap, which was a long time ago. And we made like $80 million in that day, which was huge way back then. We have days where we make, you know, there's a big, because we're very conservative on the way we mark things,

so we don't take it unless there's liquidity and the position's unlocked. But, you know, we have days where we can make, you know, two, three, four percent. But it's very rare. Like we're more singles, doubles, that sort of our world. You know, just sort of stay under the radar. As long as we get a lot of at-bats, we know,

we've got a high batting average, and we're just going to keep pounding those out, single double, single double. Now, with the Bank of Greece, when you see a huge move like that in a single day, do you just immediately get out and say, hey, we'll take our money and your IRRs off the charts and see you later? We're pretty objective.

You know, I tell companies that we're, you know, we're here for a good time, not a long time. You know what I mean? But we're going to be your friend, right? We're there when you need us. And as things get good, that means you don't really need us anymore. Let us exit. Because inadvertently, there are going to be trip up,

trick up, hiccups, et cetera, and then we'll be back to be there again. So I'd say, guys, some people get offended. They go, why would you sell? We're here for that. And I go, listen, this is not our game. If you have everyone acting the way the management wants you to act, you know, you're not going to do well. Where I say, listen, you've got a few guys who are doing X, a few guys doing Y, a few guys doing Z.

You know, we'll be around, but at least we'll be there when you need us the next time. When we go and we look forward, everyone is very obsessed with the short sellers. We've seen the Michael Burrys of the world, they've become famous, the housing, trade, all stuff. You used to do a lot of single name short selling, not as much anymore. Maybe explain why you don't do that, but then also talk about this idea of long activism

rather than short activism. Yeah, you know, short selling is a hard game, especially we've been in this, you know, perennial bull market. You know, it's very difficult to short. So yeah, people look at Michael Burry and, you know, guys like that, but most people who short are gone. You know, I work with guys... Michael Burry is a sub-stack writer.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, but I mean, like, in terms of their ability to get capital. People are all, you know, remember, same thing for institutional investors. Everyone's chasing the idea. If something hasn't worked, they don't want it. So nobody says, oh, I need to short now

because its time is going to come. They're like, this hasn't worked for years. I don't want it anymore. I don't really know any managers who are really short. They just buy puts and they have hedge strategies or they short a basket. No one actually is trying to short to make alpha, which inadvertently should make it easier, right?

It's the opposite of the zig and the zag. No one's avoiding it. and everyone's avoiding it, time to look at it. But because it's more difficult, yeah, we've kind of pivoted away. And as you get bigger, it's not as much money to be made, single shorting. And then, you know, like the volatility we've seen since, you know, the COVID era is immense. So you really got to be careful. So, you know, short activism is important to the market and people have done somewhat well.

But in a when the wind is facing the other way, it's very hard to go in that other direction. So, yeah, we've started a group. doing long activism, where, again, there's a lot of super smart, massive companies doing this, you know, Elliott, Starboard, et cetera, we're running again, running the same system, but instead of saying above $5 billion, $10 billion, we can look at a billion and below. And inadvertently, we can have a larger stake where there's a lot of retail investors fragmented and start working with management teams or trying to affect change that can yield that type of return on an absolute basis and on an I or R basis to make it worth a while for us.

I hope you're enjoying this conversation. Before we continue, most of you know I live in New York City. And when I try to go to sleep, it is noisy as hell outside. There's trucks, there's sirens. There's all kinds of noise, including people just yelling and screaming for no damn reason late at night. That's why I'm so excited to tell you about the FitNexa Somni Pods 3. These are earbuds that you sleep with, and they're actually built for sleep, not just

for music. They've got up to 42 decibels of total noise reduction, so if you've got a snoring partner, city noise, or you just can't shut off your brain at night, these are built to cancel that all out. They're ultra thin, and if you're a side sleeper, you're not fighting a bulky earbud all night. There's a private alarm built in, too, so you can wake up on time without waking up whoever's next to you, and I know some of y'all, y'all got people next to you. And the app, it has an AI sleep coach that actually tracks how you slept, and it gives

you real feedback on it. These come with a 30-night trial, so there's no risk to try it. out, you can go to Fitnexa.com and use code Pomp10 to get money off on your first purchase. Like I said, if I needed these to go to sleep in the city, then my guess is that you'll probably find them valuable as well. Go check them out at Fitnexa.com. Today's episode is brought to you by InvestorHealth.com. You've built the portfolio. You've made the long-term bets. You still have to be around, though, to compound. Your body is the balance sheet, and most people never invested in a way that they invest in everything else. Investor

Health is a product. Investor Health is a company that we've built that is a clinician prescribed protocol for weight, metabolism, energy, and longevity, GLP ones, NAD Plus, B12, all reviewed and prescribed by board certified clinicians not picked off a menu. The process is a short online intake form, a clinician review, then medication compounded and shipped straight to your door. Most patients are approved and shipped within 48 to 72 hours. No office visits, no referrals, and no waiting rooms. Ongoing check-ins at 30, 60, and 90 days, and a 24-7 clinician support line. Health coaching is included as well.

Plans start at $149 a month. There are HSA and FSA eligible, and it's available in all 50 states plus Washington, D.C. There's no contracts, and you can cancel any time. Go to investorhealth.com and complete. your intake form today. Investorhealth.com. Go long on life. Investor Health is a telehealth platform, not a medical provider. Medical services are provided by affiliated licensed clinicians. Compounded medications are not FDA approved. Individual results may vary. And treatment requires evaluation by a licensed provider. Terms and conditions apply. See investorhealth.com. You know my favorite

Elliott story ever? No. Or Argentinian warship? You know this story? No. No? He, he went time, I think he had Argentinian bonds, and he bought him, you know, 25 cents on the dollar or whatever. And I forget all the exact details. But basically he was like, well, you gotta pay me back par. And they were like, no, we're not gonna do that. We'll strike some deal. And he just didn't like the deal terms.

And so he hired essentially mercenaries, and they went, and they confiscated an Argentinian warship, like in a port. And he was like, that's my collateral. And he had like a showdown with the government. And I remember reading that just being like, Do you understand what a gangster you got to be to play not only the kind of arbitrage and short, you know, do this, but to go up against a government and then be like, by the way, we're taking our collateral? I mean, that is a different game that is, you know, if you're looking at momentum and sentiment, going after the warship, it feels like a whole different ballgame that most people just aren't prepared to do. Yeah, I don't think we're at that level to going into seizing ships.

I'm guessing that story is a little more nuanced than what you're saying. but the idea is trying to work with management teams and saying, listen, we all have the same objective to the most part that we want the stock price up. And we're saying, you know, either divesting a certain asset or doing a buyback or, you know, going and making another acquisition or just putting yourself up for sale, sometimes is the best thing to do. And, you know, at sometimes you get management teams

that are appreciative of them and sometimes you don't. And the idea is saying, listen, we're willing to go to bat. We're willing to, you know, try and effect change through board changes or through making a little bit of noise, we think it's important. And I think there's a little more, it's a little more fragmented on the smaller end of the market. What is the best long activist campaign that you've had?

Like, where have you guys really gone, spent a lot of time, and you've seen the impact? You know, we've had some success in Canada. Reets, you know, real estate has been terrible and inadvertently when everyone zigs, we zag, we've done there, a clear channel in the US, you know, getting the companies to, you know, put on a campaign, like putting on a campaign to bring more awareness

about what could actually happen and then getting either management changes or them to act on bringing on certain people around the board or divesting of assets or buying stock back or putting themselves out to sale. It works a lot of the times, but it's a lot of effort right now. You know, we're in one campaign right now

with Lionsgate, the big movie producer, and, you know, it's got a... a great runway, it's got a great stable business. They've done well in the big campaigns going on, but these things take time. What is the argument for Lionscape? Like, what do you want them to do? You know, ideally you think a company like that,

you know, either needs to find a way to get the price up. They should be, you know, everything is consolidating in that world. You've seen everything around Netflix, everything moving to streamers. There's a lot of people that would appreciate this business. And the idea is, if you ran a proper process, it's probably worth a lot more than where it's trading at. And so you want them to sell the business?

That would be in an ideal world, yes. And why do they not want to sell? You know, I think they're trying to do the right thing. They're exploring what's out there. But inadvertently, everyone thinks that they're just about to have something great, right? So they'll talk about the pipeline of new movies coming. But, you know, sometimes, you know, a burn in the hand is worth more than, you know, more in the bush.

Uh, Moderna, you think is not going to do well? Madurna, again, was the bell of the ball, the darling during COVID. And, you know, again, I tried and stay away from these huge, huge businesses. But, again, sentiment always seems to find me. And Moderna's been on a tear up, you know, 100% in the last little while. They've announced, it's a really nuanced thing where they basically said that they were running a trial around, you know, a nuanced cancer treatment. And they have cancer, I heard. Exactly.

That's the perception out there that they've been able to cure every cancer. and the stock is trading as such. And they haven't released the details associated with the efficacy of the trial. And so they're going to do that in the next 10 days. But no one, everybody was short the stock because they believed it to be overvalued before all this came out. It's for sure worth more than that point, but it's probably not worth another 100%. But every smart manager I've talked to who's in that healthcare biotech world says,

I already lost money, I'm not shorting it, or I'm going to short it just before, or it's too risky. But it's pricing, like you said, the retail perception is it's solving all cancer. And so for me, it's like, you know, buy on rumor, you know, sell on news. The earnings, in my opinion, should mark the end or even before it because there's a lot of guys who play the momentum and they don't want to wait for the binary outcome either. So they start selling a few days before. So, you know, it's...

You're short at going into the earnings and basically they go the readout. The readout, yeah. And so the readout happens and the idea is that it won't wait until the 31st or whatever, it'll happen in the next few days, in my opinion. Now, what if they did cure cancer? You know, that's why you got to be pretty, you know, we're doing a little nervous there. You're like, sure. But again, you know, what do we do?

We play an expected value game. And we're not going to be 100% right. We're not going to be 100% wrong. It's, you know, where is the expected value lie? And so for me, like you said, there is a chance that somehow, you know, and again, you realize that your limitations, too. What do I really know about efficacy and data around Canada? Not a lot, but I'm good at understanding the different players around it and who owns what.

And there aren't a lot of legit, bigger institutions sticking around here. So they already believe it's overvalued and it's a lot of retail guys going crazy talking about solving full cancer. And remember, this is a weird one because it's a lot of people are emotional when it comes to cancer, right? They know someone with cancer, this and that. They want to believe that these guys are going to be the holy grail, but it's affecting their judgment on if it's a good investment or not. I want to cure all cancer, but at the end of the day, is this going to be the guy to do it? And are you getting paid, you know, the right price for the risk you're taking? Let's talk about prediction markets.

I find it very interesting if you look at them as a source of information. Now, there's not a lot of liquidity in many of these markets. So you've got to be careful that, you know, one guy's just not in there manipulating the market inadvertently. But I think the promise of these is that we should be able to build much more clear pictures. So, for example, if there are markets on a business, bunch of individual data points going into an earnings report, you should be able to see, well, what does the market think if Tesla's going to beat on car deliveries or not? Is, you know, Tesla going

to beat on EPS or not? And as you kind of build out this profile, it's kind of the wisdom of the crowd. Is that all bullshit? Or do you actually think that the prediction markets can be a source of information for you guys? I love this prediction market stuff. I think the people, I say the reason people do things is around incentive. So if your incentive is aligned, you know, things fall through and so now people have an ability to bet on stuff where they have a distinct advantage and it's weird because it's a lot of insider trading and things people are doing that but for me to see it I know the people putting up the money irrespective of where they got the version or not it's incredibly accurate and so

it's better than polling data like when I'm looking at voting and elections it's better than everything because the guy you're asking about the Tesla car delivery it's probably a guy who's physically working on Tesla car deliveries and making those bets is what you're seeing all the time. So for me, it's extremely telling to see where prediction markets are versus other things, and we use it to our advantage all the time. I've talked to regulators about this, right?

Like, if you are, let's say just use an illustrious example, illustrative example, you work at the windshield manufacturer. You have no clue about anything to do with Tesla other than your business, which is private, has produced more windshields than last quarter. You probably don't have to be Albert Einstein to think that, hey, maybe they're going to be delivering more vehicles. And so you don't have information about their company,

but you are taking your day-to-day job and you're using it to invest in the market. Is that insider trading? I don't know. Like, this is where regulators got to figure this stuff out. And then it's like, okay, well, how deep does that go? Right? Because what if you're not the actual company

that is a vendor to Tesla? What if you're the component manufacturer that's sensitive to someone who's then the vendor? And so you start getting in this weird world where people have way more information than they've ever been able to express. And so it sounds like from a hedge fund manager's standpoint, you don't care where the information is coming from

because that's not you. You're just looking at it from a data standpoint and understanding how to actually invest your capital based on what the prediction markets are saying? Yeah, like we're looking at it as one variable to making an investment that if something seems, we're not going to just, if I see someone, you know, buying up Tesla deliveries, it's not going to make me want to buy Tesla stock,

but it is going to affect my calculus around the situation. You know, going down into the, you know, that black hole of, is it allowed or ethical or legal? I got no idea, right? But I know the people who are playing in that generally have better information than not. And so the truth is what we're seeing there is what happens with larger funds all the time, right? They're looking at Apple. They don't really look at Apple.

They're looking at every chip supplier and every little silicon chip and silicon piece and this and that. And they're speaking with all the other guys. And then they're pumping it into a model, and they're getting, figuring out better information where I don't have that ability to do, so I don't really make a prediction on Apple.

Well, they also are looking if Tim Cook, you know, walks out of the office and goes left or right every Thursday. You know, does that mean that earnings are going to go up or down? Or how long the Fed chairman talks for? Or they're watching the tail number, or how many times he's flying here or doing that. There's a lot of interesting ways that people are, you know, deriving data. But for us, I'm a participant who just watches everybody else, and then I'll

make a decision based on the output. So you're using it as information, but you guys are not participating in terms of you're not actually investing in the prediction markets themselves? No, we don't invest in the prediction markets. Okay. Let's talk about social media. Although you are prolific on Instagram, and for those that don't know, it's highly entertaining. You have to go and follow. It's around food and fun. So people say, you know, why do you do this? And I say, I just love, you know, socialization. I love meeting people. So I have this my Instagram at Munching, I'm mouez. I'm munching, M-O-E-Z.

And it's just stories around food and fun and interesting people. And, you know, once in a while, it's an investment theme and stuff that we're doing. All right, chef, what do we got here? Yeah, we like to showcase chefs, you know, show different types of food, different types of things going on. And I enjoy it. But some people say it's too much, but, you know, you got to have a... It's incredibly entertaining. I love watching it.

But social media, most people are not on Instagram using social media. Given that you guys will do long activism, do you guys use social media in any way? Do you guys put out reports? Do you think that social media can be a piece of driving returns for the hedge fund? We use the data around social media. We don't really use social media ourselves to put out a report or anything like that. You know, we're governed, you know, SEC regulations, OSC regulations in Canada. So we don't really, do we just stay away from that world?

But, you know, if we're looking at retail investors, right, we're looking at sentiment. And in order to gauge sentiment, you have to really understand what people are thinking. we have software and analytics that sort of looks at, you know, how many people are talking positively about a name negatively, and when there's a divergence and when things are really, you know, turning on an up trend or downtrend and taking advantage of that because the retail guys inadvertently all go online and chat about it. And then you can just start to find patterns,

and that can help you with your decision-making process. What do you think has, over the last five years, six years, with all of these changes that generally, I think of democratized access, giving people more participation. There's all these fintech that now are empowering access to the market. What are the downsides? Like, is it just like more gambling in the market

may not be good for the individual investor? I think the downside is people believe they have an advantage more than they do because they think they have access to information and news and other people. But guys like us, you know, funds are successful because we're taking advantage of that euphoria. Like, I link, the imagery I give is that, You know, we're like the casino, right?

Someone else is coming in and making these bets. And yeah, once in a while a guy is going to hit a slot winner or get blackjack. But for the most part, people leave that game a little more disgruntled than when they came in. Yeah, it makes sense. Space, you guys have started to spend more time on as well, kind of one of these themes that was contrary and starting to become consensus. Obviously, SpaceX IPO has helped with that. What are you guys doing there?

What are you interested in? Yeah, like, you know what? These are big themes going forward. but you know everyone gets way too excited too early so you know we were there underwriting a couple of names and a couple of on that theme but you know everyone's extrapolating that you know we're gonna be in space and driving cars and doing all this in short order and it doesn't seem that's going to be the case and so these things are more nuanced and they're more boring because there's not there's no data

and news every day like this is a theme that may work out over time but you can't have 10% of your money in these types of names. It's just, it's too speculative in nature, and it's too long of a period to underwrite. We're gonna be driving the cars in space. I don't know if you heard that, right? Just like, put all the themes together and... And the thrusters, it'll take you up there.

Yeah, well, you flip the car, drive over traffic, whatever. Are you gonna buy one of the Teslos that can jump over traffic? You know, I drive a mini cooper, you know, I sort of like... Do you really? Yeah, I do, a convertible mini cooper. And so I like just whipping around getting in... Oh, convertible. Okay, sorry. That's like four grand more.

But the idea is, you know, I like the maneuverability of being around a go car. I'm not really a car guy per se, but I appreciate the technology and, you know, the genius around the R&D. And, you know, I was one of the first guys. People always talked about shorting Tesla. And I go, you can't call it a car company, right?

This is a technology company, first around the batteries, then around autonomous driving. There's always something. But, you know, valuations are pretty deep now. So it's hard to say that it's value. But again, I come back to, I got no advantage. one way or the other and something like that. Talk about SPACs.

SPAC seemed to have had a heyday, went away, now have come back. They've gone back down again. Yeah, what is your current evaluation of the SPAC market and something that you are excited about, not excited about? Yeah, no, you know what? It's funny. The SPACs move with sentiment. And so SPACs were all the rage at one point during COVID, and then it came back down.

And we've done a SPAC together. And, you know, SPACs were getting hyped up the last six months. but, you know, you mentioned the S&P is only 2% below its all-time high. The momentum name is not in the same world. So Russell names and IWM and they're all down 20, 25%. And when you go risk off on more the momentum retail world, it hurts the SPAC market. So SPACs have gone back down to being where they were speculative. They were trading above their treasury, but what they were yielding based on their money in the bank,

to now being pretty cheap, where you got guys like Michael Klein, who's been one of the Godfathers in the SPAC world, you know, it's had unbelievable exits, so only got to actually have bigger exits in the last few years. And his things were being bid up. And suddenly, a lot of them will come back down to Treasury. So we're looking at names that you have bigger sponsors, guys who have a huge network, access to good financing. That's an interesting one where, like, as you know, Spacks, your risk is only back down to Treasury. So, and you can lever them up at a, at a decent level with the bank because you can't really lose a lot of money. So we're, we're nimbling again on this back market itself.

All right. When you look out over, uh, I don't know, next 10 years, you're based in Canada. Advantage or disadvantage? Well, we're kind of in a trade war right now, but, uh, you know, I... We're gonna get to that a second. From an investor standpoint, like, I could make an argument that you're not in the, like, day-to-day craziness of like every single guy, uh, with an idea is coming in through your office because they have to go to Canada

to come see you. Uh, at the same time, though, it's this virtual world. And it's like, you can jump on Zoom, you know, quickly. So, like, how do you think about location as an advantage or disadvantage? I think it's an advantage in that, you know, you're not in the circus every day. When you're sort of in the circus,

you don't realize you're in it. So we're one step removed that we can be in any time. You're on the Bay Street. We're on the Bay Street. We're literally physically on Bay Street in the Brookfield. Like literally, I never thought I'd be there, but we're literally at that level where, you know, everything's around this.

But it's Canada. It's just banks and resource companies. There's nothing really for us to do in Canada. 90% of what we do is in the U.S. And so it's an advantage. because you get a lot of people who are smart, who started in Canada, and then they want to go abroad.

They work in New York, Hong Kong, and then they want to come back and start a family because Canada is a great place. And there aren't a lot of hedge funds to work at. So we get unbelievable people that we can hire and bring a part of our team, and that's an advantage we see. But also, when you get a new industry,

Canada is a little easier to start. So that's where the cannabis companies came. That's where the crypto companies came. And because there's not a lot of hedge funds involved in these new types of companies, types of markets, you know, we're probably the first and only call. So we do pretty well from that perspective as well. All right.

So I know you know Ford. What was Premier Ford? Yeah. Is that right? Premier Ford. Trump down here in the U.S., him and Ford, they've been going jawing at each other back and forth. Maybe we just strike like a little peace deal between you and I to then bring to them and say, hey, America and Canada should get along.

It's not a bad, it's not a bad thing to do. You guys want to join up? You want to join America? I don't think we want to join America. We appreciate you being a good. partner and our next door neighbor, but, you know, I think we both do better as independent sovereign countries. Kevin O'Leary, fellow Canadian, he says maybe the Canadians just want to become American.

Kevin and Kevin and O'Leary is my neighbor in Muscoca, which is the best place in the world to visit is like the Hamptons times 10 if anyone wants to come visit. We throw live music parties four nights a week, but we talk about this and that, you know, obviously Kevin has a lot of stuff around the joking, but I think he appreciates what Canada is. And, you know, obviously he has a big, successful show here. but Canada is a great place. We've got a great thing, but we're also ready to be a great partner.

And obviously, you know, your president has identified certain things that a lot of countries aren't stepping up in regards to defense and in regards to, you know, their obligations. Supply, the whole thing. But like, you know, we're better off being friends than foes, I believe. 100%. And I think that, I don't want to speak for anybody else, but I think that most Americans understand that.

And it's almost this like, hey, let's all get on the same page. and then being friends in a united front is obviously very helpful, especially in a world where we have shared adversaries who may not be as excited about the powers that can come from a united front of all the Western Hemisphere countries. No, for sure.

It's a game being played. Eventually, you've got to work through it. And it's like brothers. At the end of the time, sometimes you fight, sometimes you don't. Sometimes it's longer, more protracted. But eventually you get back and you realize we have such common interest that we're better off

being on the same side. Did you cry when the U.S. won the Olympic gold medal in hockey? I was not happy for sure. I was there and I made a bet and I go, you know what? You bet on your own team, you don't need to. Like, there's just, you're going to be happy either way. But as they played that first period, I was like, we're going to win this game.

And now with this interactive world, you can make more bets at the time. And I go, this is going to get better and better right to the end. But, you know, you can't win it all. But you DM'd me, I don't know if you remember. I posted, I said, if America beats Canada and the gold medal hockey, uh, you guys got to become American. And you just responded, which is like, L.L.

L.L. L.L. Yeah. But here's the thing is, I do think, maybe we're we'll end is, you do a lot of philanthropic stuff. One of them, which I think is probably the coolest thing that you do, is you support a lot of the Olympic athletes, right? Explain a little bit what you and your family do there.

Yeah, you know, we have a foundation. Instead of calling it a foundation, we call it an equity fund, where we're looking to provide equity, but we're looking to get a return on equity. So using the same hedge fund strategy model, in philanthropy. And so, you know, in Canada, we don't get a lot of philanthropy around sports and athletes.

And I'm on the Canadian Olympic board. And, you know, I was talking to athletes who are on the board and they go, man, you don't know how hard it is. We do so well and we get no support. I'm like, they're like half of them are on welfare and they're getting $18,000 or $20,000 a year. But people don't understand that in the business world

or just generalizations that go on in Canada. And so I'm like, listen, why don't we identify athletes who are heading to the medal, heading to the Olympics, within the last six months to a year, and provide them last mile funding. How can they go from what we call great to gold and saying, listen, if we got you extra coaching, if we got you to an extra regatta,

if we got you better technology, how much better can you do? And I said, listen, I'll just pilot it myself and myself and my partner, Adrian Rocca, we did it with our own money, and then we expanded and expanded. We showed that, you know, we sponsored 10% of the athletes, which weren't even the best. because the best already had real sponsors,

they didn't need extra money, and we got 30% of the medals. And then we repeated it in the winter Olympics. And so now we're bringing more awareness, but it's fun because we have guys internally in our office, they're crunching the data. They're looking at this and say, oh my God, these guys are crushing it with old skates

or an old bobsled or without going to nine events a year. Imagine if we can turn that headwind into a tailwind, what can they do? And so we're really excited about that. I love it. All right, we're, other than munching Moaz on Instagram, where can we send people to find out more about Anson? You know, AnsonFunds.com,

and we're on here on social media, Twitter, this and that, or LinkedIn, we're all over. And we're happy to engage. People throw ideas and ask them, we'll respond, and we're happening to open kimono and the stuff we're doing. It's sort of, it's enjoyment. I sort of love this world. I love it.

All right, thanks for doing it. We'll do it again soon. Thank you.