The Pomp Podcast - Proof That Bitcoin & AI Are Going MUCH Higher | Jordi Visser
Episode Date: October 25, 2025Jordi Visser is a macro investor with over 30 years of Wall Street experience. He also writes a Substack called “VisserLabs” and puts out investing YouTube videos. In this conversation, we cover T...esla’s robo-taxis, inflation, interest rates, and the U.S.–China trade dynamic. Jordy also shares how he’s positioning his portfolio, and what Bitcoin, gold, and market psychology reveal about where investors are headed next.======================Check out my NEW show for daily bite-sized breakdowns of the biggest stories in finance, technology, and politics: http://pompdesk.com/======================This episode is brought to you by Figure (https://figuremarkets.co/pomp), the platform to Earn and Borrow. Need liquidity without selling your crypto? Figure offers Crypto-Backed Loans, allowing you to borrow against your Bitcoin, Ethereum, & SOL with 12-month terms and no prepayment penalties. They have the lowest rates in the industry at 8.91%, allowing you to access instant cash or buy more Bitcoin without triggering a tax event. Your BTC collateral is protected by decentralized MPC custody. You can always see your BTC ownership in your FM account and verify holdings in your personal BTC vault on chain. Unlock your crypto’s potential today. Visit their app to apply (https://figuremarkets.co/pomp) for a Crypto Backed Loan (https://figuremarkets.co/pomp) today! Figure Lending LLC dba Figure. Equal Opportunity Lender. NMLS 1717824. Terms and conditions apply. Visit figure.com for more information. Figure Markets Credit LLC. 650 S. Tryon Street, 8th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28202. (888) 926-6259. NMLS ID 2559612. Terms and conditions apply.======================As markets shift, headlines break, and interest rates swing, one thing stays true — opportunity is everywhere. At Arch Public, we help you do more than just buy and hold. Yes, our dynamic accumulation algorithms are built for long-term investors… but where we really shine? Our arbitrage algos — designed to farm volatility and turbocharge your core positions. The best part of Arch Public’s products is they are free! Yes, you heard that right, try Arch Public for free! Take advantage of wild moves in assets like $SOL, $SUI, and $DOGE, and use them to stack more Bitcoin — completely hands-free. Arch Public is already a preferred partner with Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, and Robinhood, and our team is here to help you build smarter in any market. Visit Arch Public today, at https://www.archpublic.com, your portfolio will thank you.======================DeFi Development Corp. (Nasdaq: DFDV) is pioneering a new category in crypto investing with the first Solana-focused Digital Asset Treasury. DFDV offers public market exposure to Solana’s growth, yield, and onchain innovation, offering investors a leveraged way to participate in a trillion-dollar opportunity. Learn more about why Solana and why DFDV at SolanaTo10K.com.======================Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro1:39 - Tesla and the rise of robotaxis15:33 - How AI, abundance, and bitcoin connect21:05 - Generational divide and government control23:14 - Why AI adoption mirrors Bitcoin adoption26:00 - Gold’s parabolic run and sharp pullback29:27 - China–US trade deal impact on gold and markets37:22 - Layoffs, future of automation, and wealth effect43:06 - Who could be selling bitcoin right now?48:58 - The inevitability of AI and the next wave of innovation
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's up everyone? This is Anthony Pompliano. Many of you know me as Pomp. You're listening
to the Pomp Podcast, which is my effort to find the most interesting people in the world
and sit with them for hours while I ask questions in an effort to learn. So it would mean the
world to me if you would subscribe to the show on your favorite audio platform, watch
episodes on YouTube, and tell your friends and family about the podcast. My goal is to
help millions learn from the world's most interesting people. So let's get into today's
episode. Anthony Pompliano runs Pomp Investments. All views of him and the guests on his podcast
are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of Pomp Investments. You should not treat
any opinion expressed by Pomp or his guests as a specific inducement to make a particular
investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of his personal opinion.
This podcast is for informational purposes only. I think for Bitcoin, the fact that so many people
have gotten, let's say, tired of it, is a great sign. And I believe the next top will happen with
two things that have happened both times. Number one, Bitcoin needs to massively outperform the
MAG7. That has happened at both of the prior peaks, both at the four-year cycle, and literally
just massive moves. And the second thing is... What's going on, guys? We've got a great episode
today with Jordy Visser. In this conversation, we talk about what's going on with Tesla,
the robo-taxis, Bitcoin, gold, the US-China trade deal, tariffs, inflation, interest rates,
and your portfolio. Jordy is in rare form. He breaks it all down for us. I learned a ton from
this conversation, and I think you will as well. Here's my latest conversation with Jordy Visser.
All right, Jordy, I thought a great place to start today's conversation is there's a ton of
stuff going on all across the financial industry, but actually there was a development with Tesla
and the robo-taxis that you think is going to have this profound impact on Bitcoin, on AI,
on energy what is going on with tesla and these robo taxis
well first of all i think it's really important to let the audience know i've seen you three days
in a row now we're hanging we're hanging we're hanging dinners every dinners and then today
all right and so at the dinner we were at last night um the way that my brain likes to kind of
deal with the modern world, which to me is the most interesting time I've ever had. So I'm a
macro person who tries to think of the end game, think where it's going to be, and then connect
all of the different pieces to that. So more of a systems perspective, and I believe in abundance.
So I believe in whether it's 15 years, 20 years, the world that Elon Musk has talked about
is something I believe in. And so over the course of the time that we've been spending
together and over the course of the last really two years of using AI all day long,
my belief in this continues to grow. And so when I do my weekly YouTube,
it's meant to connect the traditional finance world to the AI world, to crypto,
because that's the end game. Abundance involves Bitcoin. And so the gateway to that, the chat GPT
moment is when we leave stage one of AI, which we are doing. We are leaving the auto-complete text
part, the really boring part of artificial intelligence, where it's really good at
predicting the next word. And technically easy to do. And technically easy. And especially if
you put more compute, but we're also getting garbage thrown into it now. So I listen to that
and then I hear all the bubble stuff. And I love a market where I have a view and everyone
that owns money. The people that have the wealth, they believe there's a bubble. They like talking
about gold, which I'm sure we're going to get into because I have very strong feelings about
that in this whole context. But in listening last night, I can't listen to macro people talk
about debt, deficits. You probably saw me at some point lose interest a little bit,
just because if you don't have a view on how AI connects us to crypto and you're locked in this
world, this ancient world where people will say, Niall Ferguson said that interest expense,
have you heard this one? When interest expense crosses defense. You know what I've never said
on this show or to anyone who'll listen, here's a new data point for everyone. Do you know that
all those times in history, you know what there wasn't? Entitlements. So we're talking about
nominal dollars comparing two things. In a world of AI where maybe people will live forever,
that doesn't mean anything. So you can't take historical wars, historical relationships,
and then put them in the context of a world of AI. So Tesla comes out and reports earnings.
And as usual, everyone goes up, here we go. This is the big number. And you have 90% of the people
that hate Tesla. And then you have 10% that are cultish. And there's really nobody in between.
And I can say that as someone who speaks to both groups and it's very polarizing. It's like
anything else. So I only cared about one thing. It's not a car company. The cars are data centers.
They're collecting data. So the reason I bring up stage one of AI, when you leave that LLM world,
and for everyone listening, you're at some point going to enter a world where embodied AI,
intelligence with inside a machine is going to be there. And that just means we're getting closer
to abundance because you don't have abundance with replacing knowledge workers. You have to
actually replace everyone to get to abundance. And we won't go through the whole thing in
abundance today, but it gets rid of that whole debt deficit thing too. And that's why I like
when I listen to these conversations, it doesn't matter. So in the report or in the earnings
release, they basically said, we're going to have driverless robo taxis in Austin this year
and poly market, which has proven to be a really good thing to pay attention to,
especially right now for Bitcoin people. It has two things. Number one, it has this now
99% before the end of the year. So this is, Elon Musk is not trusted in any timeframe he gives.
And yet the market betting market said, this is 99%. Somebody knows something. Somebody knows
something. This is going to happen. This week, Dwarkesh Patel had an interview release about
a week ago when we were doing last week's episode. I got so many things over the weekend about how
Carpathy, Andre Carpathy said AGI is way down the road. The ironic thing is he is the architect
or one of the engineer architects of the Tesla approach to robo taxis on that. The reason he
said AGI would be out longer is because, and I agree with him to have true AGI, which to me means
true abundance where robots can do everything a human can do. They need to perceive the world,
the physical world, and they need to be interacting it. I've said this before. Robo taxis are just
humanoids on wheels. It is the first step and it is the same brain that will go into Optimus.
So with that percentage being up there, when they release it and people start to realize that the
cost will be 60% lower than an Uber because we don't have a person in it and the cost of the
cameras is cheaper than LIDAR. So that puts pressure on Uber's business. But you know what
else it does? Every city in this country has an inflation problem. They have a living expense
problem. Even though this is in Texas and people go, the regulations will never allow it to happen
in New York. You know what we want in New York? The people that want to have cheaper rides.
And this is the way FOMO will happen with abundances, even if the regulators are against
it. And I mentioned this last night at the dinner. The voters want deflation. The voters want cheaper
things and so the earnings report for tesla was not about the car stuff it's about in my opinion
the chat gpt moment for embodied intelligence so on new york in particular i think it cost is
probably the biggest input by far like far away the second thing though is it's safer both in
terms of driver safety it's also safer for the riders how many times do you hear a story about
some crazy situation happens there's an argument between the driver rider i mean all that stuff
gets resolved the third thing is that the car actually follows the rules that the city sets
right so you just go through all these things it is better now there will be jobs that get displaced
but that has happened throughout uh society now you say that this is the chat gpt moment for
embodied ai one of the things that i found most interesting is you can now go to the app store
and you can download the driverless robo taxi app and sign up for the wait list i would love to see
give it a week or so how many people went and did that because not available yep right and it's not
getting inserted into an uber or lyft so it's kind of in the same interface whatever they are
essentially are going to ask people to change behavior and switch from uber or lyft to a
driverless robo taxi app which is an entirely new experience you guys have a whole profile you're
gonna attach your uh you know credit card they're not gonna play the like oh let's go partner they're
going to go and compete head on and the only way somebody does that is if it really is materially
cheaper it's a better service it's set right you cannot get people to switch like that if it's just
a me too product that is you know comparable in price etc it's why uber has had such a big
advantage over lyft for so long and lyft could never steal the market share yep here they're
coming to market with a different product that we think is going to be better but to me that's
going to be the thing if you can get people to leave uber and go over to tesla this is going to
be exponentially bigger than everyone thinks. So for everyone who lives in the New York area,
everyone knows how much the cost of an Uber and a taxi went up from 2019 to now. Forget how much
rents went up and everything else. You know exactly how much it went up and it was a shock
value. I left you at the dinner last night. I took an Uber back to Brooklyn. It's an expensive
ride to go across the river. And we were right at the Midtown Tunnel. So it shouldn't have taken
any time for me to get over any cost the reality is for people who don't understand how big this is
what would happen with robo taxi is it would reset that all the way back to 2019 levels
immediately and so for everyone who's like thinking about oh inflation i heard this all
day yesterday with the macro world another thing that i'm like i've had enough of oh all the
inflation i'm like government says it's three percent yeah i and again true inflation says
whether it's three three point three two point eight everyone was wrong on inflation from
tariffs everyone was wrong on growth from tariffs everyone it is insane to still be doing this stuff
so old y'all i told you i told you you you did go ahead you you got you got that one you got
that one right nine months go ahead um it is slightly higher so people can have their thing
but the reason this gets important is if you start rolling stuff back and you start bringing
out embodied intelligence, starting with this, it's going to be rolled out to trucks. All of a
sudden, the shipping costs are going to start to come down. It is very difficult to then look and
go, well, how long will it take for Optimus? Well, there's a shareholder meeting for Tesla coming up
on November 6th, and on the front page is an Optimus. He also said in there, we will be
unveiling Optimus in Q1 of next year. All that really matters is the Robotaxi brain
is the optimist brain. And that's what people have to understand. This whole thing with
Waymo, those, I was talking to someone about this this week and they're like, well, what's
the difference between the two? I'm like, can you spot a Waymo on the road with the gigantic
thing on top that looks like an archaic piece of equipment? A Tesla Robotax, you can't tell.
It's just, you can't tell it's a driverless thing. If they had tinted windows, you wouldn't be able
to see anything. So if people want to go mess around with the Waymo, it's very easy. You pick
it out. You go mess with it. You want to go mess with it. There's so many reasons why this is so
important. And I made this statement and I don't want this to go because if people are sitting on
their seat, what does Jordy mean? This is important for Bitcoin. The concept of abundance, whether or
not you believe in it. I've said that I've gone forward. The reason I got so interested in Bitcoin
is because I believe that AI would disrupt everything and eventually cannibalize capitalism.
That's what I believe.
Now, it's not a negative thing in the end.
It's a very positive thing.
In fact, what Elon Musk says is we're not going to have universal basic income.
We're going to have universal high income.
And the reason is because the employees that are making the money, they don't spend money.
So that money gets redistributed in a way.
So the profits actually become profit sharing as opposed to wages.
And that becomes something that's very easy for governments to distribute, whether or
not companies have it or whatever, the robots have it. And so whether or not you believe in that,
the robo-taxi getting there ends the concept of scarcity. And with no scarcity, you have to go
to the place where there is scarcity. So leverage goes down in abundance. Time collapses. Those are
all the things that the entire fiat system is based on. It's not just based on trust. It's not
not just, it's based on scarcity and it's based on time. And all of that is what Bitcoin compresses.
So I will say it again and again, I believe this moment where labor really starts to feel the
pressure and the foundation of society shakes because people are worried about jobs and they're
voting in people to get them there. I do believe that the crypto market is going to be a major,
major beneficiary of reducing and being the deflationary force in the financial side and
everything else as transactions speed up. Today's episode is brought to you by Figure.
They're the largest non-bank mortgage lender in the United States with over $15 billion
unlocked on their lending platform.
They've just lowered rates on their Bitcoin and Ethereum-backed loans to 8.91%, improving
their already industry-low fixed-rate 50% LTV loans.
They keep building as well, being the only major CBL player to launch decentralized MPC
custody to protect against single-entry failure, and they just removed interest deferral fees
entirely so you can let Bitcoin price appreciation pay for your loan over time.
What is MPC decentralized custody? It's a Bitcoin or ETH on-chain wallet with multiple
key shards to protect you from single entity custody failure. You can always see your crypto
ownership in a segregated wallet and verify your collateral hasn't moved. Whether you're funding a
major purchase like a down payment on a home, investing in new opportunities, or even buying
more Bitcoin, Figure makes it straightforward and transparent. Visit their app or click my link
below to take out a Bitcoin-backed loan with Figure today. Today's episode is brought to you
by ArchPublic. As markets shift, headlines break, and interest rates swing, one thing stays true.
Opportunity is everywhere. At ArchPublic, they help you do more than just buy and hold.
Yes, their dynamic accumulation algorithms are built for long-term investors. But where
they really shine? They're arbitrage algos designed to farm volatility and turbocharge
your core positions. The best part of ArchPublic's products is they're free. Yeah, you heard that
right. Try ArchPublic for free. Take advantage of wild moves and assets like Solana, Sui, and Doge
and use them to stack more Bitcoin completely hands-free. ArchPublic is already a preferred
partner with Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, and Robinhood, and their team is here to help you
build smarter in any market. Visit ArchPublic today at archpublic.com and your portfolio will
thank you. Let me give you maybe a different way of talking about this and I want your reaction
from it so uh when people hear artificial intelligence it reminds me a lot of uh when
people first heard bitcoin last night at dinner uh we literally at one point had to stop talking
about bitcoin and put it to the side because people could not get over the word bitcoin it
was so polarizing and so we had to talk about what we were talking about and basically like
not use the word and all of a sudden people could like have a much more rational conversation
but i remember uh andrew ross sorkin of all people told me this is probably like four or
years ago. He said, Bitcoin is the one asset where I can bring 10 of the smartest fund managers that
I know in a room, say, what do you think about Bitcoin? Leave, come back in an hour. Five will
be on the pro side, five will be on the con side, and they will think the other side are complete
idiots because of what they believe. So AI is now entering into this around bubble and is the
technology actually going to do what it's perceived to do, all that kind of stuff. If you flip it
around though instead of talking about the technology and what is being built if we instead
called this the efficiency era and we just said technologists are now assaulting inefficiencies
across the economy across business and across your individual life i actually don't think it's as
controversial now all of a sudden people are like i want efficiency i want to get uh more pay less
i want companies to be more productive and spend less right i want the efficiency and so it almost
feels like because we are also focused on the technology and the companies and like the inputs
to this that's what we talk about but actually the thing that is not controversial is the outcome
which is we are going to go through a rapid increase in efficiency across all aspects of
the economy and that efficiency will actually create this abundance and create this kind of
productivity that will have a profound impact both on the micro like individual level but also on the
macroeconomic level to a point where in hindsight people look back and be like that was one of the
greatest moments in our lifetime yeah i i so you you hit on on two things there that i just want
to make sure that so the great thing about our relationship is you've been involved with bitcoin
for a long time and if you had gone back six years ago to 2019 and someone had asked me what's your
view on bitcoin i'm like it's a trading vehicle like i i don't the blockchain itself i get i had
not been able to place the concept of Bitcoin into something that made sense. But at the time,
it wasn't a big enough asset either for me to even really kind of think about. And things that
move parabolically and then end parabolically, they don't really interest me that much,
which is ironic because that's what gold is doing right now, being fueled by retail and a whole
bunch of things. But I'm sure we'll get into that. And Bitcoin's vol has collapsed and everyone's
worried about the four-year cycle and all these magical things. Last week, I said the four-year
cycle is like an overlay with the MDX. So if you're bearish on stocks, you should be expecting
a four-year cycle. One more thing for the four-year cyclists. Is that what they're called?
Now they are. Four-year cyclists. You know what happened before 2017? Fed was raising rates. You
know what happened before the last thing? The Fed said they were going to go on a major, they pivoted
and that was the peak. They're cutting rate system. I don't know if you heard the rumor.
they're cutting it so this efficiency thing and this bitcoin thing the part that makes it
polarizing to me is kind of where i go i think it's a generational thing so one of the reasons
that i was interested in us sitting down doing this is because i'm much older than you you don't
look it that's a different story we'll talk about that someday all those injections are working
great uh what's really important in this whole thing is that having a generational gap is
important because the older you are, the less likely you are to embrace Bitcoin.
True.
And that's just a fact.
I love the boomers in the comments, though. There were always some of them say,
and they'll put their age and say, but I've been into Bitcoin for so long. It's like a point of
pride. I respect all of you, but go ahead. When you get to something that the older you are,
the less you believe in something, think about what's happened to religion in the world.
And it's like the reverse scenario. Younger people don't embrace religion as much as older people do. I just think people have not paid enough attention to what the younger people's complaints are about the world that they live in and that the people that are older that already have made money, they had a job, even if they don't have a lot of money.
the one thing they had was a job and in a lot of cases even if they were middle class they had a
job for 30 years at the same company young people don't even have that and so to think about the
fact that they have this perma inflation not high inflation to where we get a recession and you get
to reset it which is what all the boomers went through oh recession i always say recession is a
good thing then you get a reset they don't get that they just get this perma it never gets better
at the same time they have ai and they have social media which means they can drown in all the
negativity and go through all this. I just think this generational gap in the belief of efficiency
is good. Efficiency leads to deflation. And that's why everyone who's older keeps talking
about inflation, about wars, about stock market going down, about politics. They're talking about
a lot of things that I think in the case of younger people or even people that are in that
position, younger than 40, I know they have pain because I have three kids in the 20s and 30s.
So, well, I do think that, sorry, so my kids don't get mad at me.
I have four kids, three of them in the twenties, one of them in the thirties.
If, if you think about some of the people that we've talked to this week and this belief
that inflation, capital controls, war, et cetera, we were talking with one gentleman
and he kept talking about this idea of there are these big macro issues at nation state
levels.
They are going to have to create capital controls in a variety of different ways.
And his basic conclusion on a Bitcoin was they're just going to outlaw it, and therefore people will not be able to use it.
Then the AI thing is he recognizes AI is there and is going to continue to become pervasive, but probably doesn't believe in the profound impact and kind of the more abundance type outcome.
And I think what was interesting is one of these dinners we were sitting at, there was, I don't know, 10 people, maybe 12 people, whatever it was. And there was a pretty wide range of folks. There were some folks who were later in their career. There were some folks who weren't early.
they're you know i don't think there's any like 25 year olds i think it's probably like 30 to
maybe 60 you know it's kind of the range and um the younger people in the room were pretty
dismissive of the old world view and immediately were like if the government takes a you know kind
of heavy-handed approach there is a release valve there is an escape and it was fascinating how much
the older folks were just like the government always wins yeah and the younger folks were like
the government can't control the internet, right?
And even one person brought up the fact of like,
dude, just look, the government officials
say stuff on the internet
and they're just getting slammed in the comments and meme.
They're shutting off comments.
They're deleting their tweets.
Like there is this difference of,
do you believe that government has ultimate control
or do you believe technology now
is the predictor of success?
And I think that to your point,
it applies to AI, to Bitcoin,
to all these things we're talking about, right?
Yeah, actually, you just you clicked on something for me. So before the dinner yesterday, I had a at event to present to. And there are about 40, 50 people there. And these are all very sophisticated financial people that are in the industry. And I gave a presentation on artificial intelligence because the theme was shocker.
AI. Yes, that's true. So one of the things I had to, one of the goals that the person who organized it gave to me was, you know, we really want you to help inspire the board members that are here to embrace AI because we've been kind of slow moving.
Now, adoption has been slow for a lot of places, but the message that I presented, which is very similar to what you just said about the view of government, is there are three layers in most organizations due to the hierarchical structure that's existed for a long time.
You have leadership. You have the technology layer, which has grown in importance over the course of the last 30 years because of the Internet, because of cloud, because of everything. And then underneath that, you have the younger employee employees.
And what has happened with artificial intelligence is very similar to what you're saying about Bitcoin and about governments and the way younger people view this control thing.
Leadership at every organization fears losing control, just like a government.
The technology layer is the layer that is the party pooper in this.
And they go, no, no, no, you can't use AI.
The data could be stolen.
Everything could go on.
And so their job is they're fighting to not be irrelevant because AI coding replaces them
in many, many ways.
So they don't embrace it.
And the employees put pressure on both groups because they're like, hey, my friends are
using it down the street.
How come I'm not a part of this?
That is a microcosm of what's happening in the world.
And AI is connected to that with Bitcoin.
They're everything that you mentioned is exactly the way I see it.
And it's funny because we go out to a dinner the night before.
We're just talking about our dinner the whole time.
I chose all the people at that dinner.
You did.
And the range of ages was still about the same as last night.
The difference was at the dinner I put together, it was all people that embrace.
Optimists.
Yeah.
100% optimists.
And embrace crypto as part.
And you're talking about, I mean, one of them had been a CEO at two major companies.
Embraces crypto.
You don't find many of those people.
The reason I like to have conversations like that is because we can talk about the China-US
situation.
We can talk about Bitcoin.
We can talk about tokenization.
You can't have that conversation in the dinner last night.
And I had to shut down.
And I'm very hard to shut down unless I run into a stubborn conversation where it's like,
I'm over here, you're over here, nowhere will we meet.
All you want to do is be open to the concept of abundance and how it could play out differently
because a probability distribution curve has all of the outcomes that are possible.
For people with Bitcoin, it's not even part of the distribution.
It's a bubble, just like AI.
Well, good luck to those people.
I hope their portfolios aren't crying later.
Let's talk about a couple of current events.
Let's start first with gold.
Gold seems to have been on this parabolic run.
It's supposed to be a stable asset.
It has not been stable to the upside, which is good for gold holders.
But then there seems to have been a transition, a shift, a regime change, and it fell 8% in 48 hours.
I did not see a single headline saying that gold is a bad store of value because it fell 8% in 48 hours.
But if it had been Bitcoin, they would have wrote that.
What's your read?
Is the bull market over or the gold bug is going to go back to irrelevance for a decade?
Love you guys.
So, you know, last week, at least the timing, I'm saying that I'd be very scared if I was long gold with the China-U.S. thing coming up.
Nailed it.
Because I think if there's an agreement, the risk could be fairly big.
And that's because the most recent rally, which occurred during the summer from the summertime.
So from August to now, gold went up like a thousand points after a range that traded for all the Bitcoin people.
Remember, gold was in a big range.
Then it broke out and it got lunar very, very quickly.
Here's my take on gold.
And since we really haven't talked about it.
So in 2007, myself and some other people at the fund that I was at, we had a gold dealer.
that came into the office regularly.
Like a physical gold dealer.
Physical gold dealer.
Because I thought the entire banking system
was going to go under.
And most of that came from my time at Morgan Stanley,
but most of that came from before the printing press.
Everything changed after I saw what they did with TARP.
That changed my entire mindset
and believed that at that point,
we were entering a different kind of world.
But during that time, I bought gold continuously.
And what I said last week is,
even during the period of 2010 coming out of the crisis
to like 2016 gold did nothing. So I said gold can go long stretches of doing nothing. And the reason
it can do nothing is just like Bitcoin. There is no story to it. That is a value story. It's just a
people are buying it. So the debasement trade is not a new trade, but when the banks start talking
about it, doing research on it, but most importantly, when retail inflows hit record
highs, which is what happened last week. Retail's involved because they're attracted to volatility.
And as long as they can make money in something, they'll get on anything. And gold does have a
limited amount of kind of supply. And you very seldom in life are you going to see macro people
that are all bragging about it and retail people that are all bragging about it, while the macro
people are saying that retail's in a bubble. And yet they're all participating in gold.
So I found this to be kind of unique.
So my viewpoint on this is very simple.
I believe the China-U.S. thing is the single most important thing for the rest of the year.
The Fed rate cuts are going to happen.
If China and the U.S. come to a trade deal, and I want you to think about last night and
the historian that was at the table, he and I had a conversation before.
At the presentation I was at, there was a specialist on war that had predicted the last
two wars, meaning he predicted the invasion, Russian invasion of Ukraine, and he predict the
Iran-Israel situation. And I won't give up what his background is, but he's a very smart guy.
And he was in the technology and cyber side. And he gave a really good presentation.
What he said was similar to what the historian said, which is the U.S. and China are headed to
something right now. And the reason I think this is important is because even in my mind,
If I was doing the probabilities of when China should invade Taiwan, U.S. munitions are down significantly.
They control rare earth and they just put a ban on it.
So we don't have munitions at all right now.
And to rebuild them is going to take some time and we need rare earth to do that.
At the same time, this trade war is kind of the reason for them to do anything.
So if they can go in there and do something, now would make a lot of sense.
And so in the discussion we had was, if you believe in the macro version of capital flows
and the anger towards all these countries, and that it's a de-globalizing world and blah,
blah, blah, and all this stuff, if there was going to be a war, I do agree that in the
near term, it should be the case.
But there's one other element I want to bring into this, which I said to both of them.
the determinant of quantum and the determinant the determinant of a agi i just don't think if
you're going to do a war you don't want to wait until after we reach these like mythical things
of the ability of like i said i mean unless i'm missing something on quantum if people are worried
about breaking bitcoin wouldn't you be worried that you could break into nuclear arms and shoot
them at have the country shoot them at themselves like i i i think if you get to quantum everything
kind of changes. And I think that would be a great deterrent for doing something. So I'm leaning
towards the fact that the macro people that are still happy with the returns this year, despite
being wrong on the stock market, despite being wrong on bonds. So they want to be short both of
them. And that hasn't worked. Dollar hasn't weakened. So all of the macro trades that were
beloved, anti-US exceptionalism, all of that, they're not working anymore. The one that has
saved them this year is gold. And so what I'd really be worried about if I was running a
portfolio where my only trade that was working was gold, and I have retail buddied up next to
me in the speculative side, and I have this China-US thing, I think if there's a China-US
trade deal, I think gold will continue to go down. And then we'll just take it from there.
I think it has had an excessive outsized return. And I also think that would be a positive for
Bitcoin. I'm going to give you a couple of data points. So on PolyMarket right now, the odds that
china is actually hit with 100 tariffs in november nine percent was over 40 earlier in october uh
the odds that um china ends up signing a deal with the united states before the end of the year
is like over 50 the odds that the much higher tariff rate is between 25 and 40 is like 70 so
basically what the market is telling us is they're not going to get hit with 100 tariffs a trade deal
is going to get done this year and the final resting tariff rate will be somewhere between
25 to 40 percent which is much lower than the 100 that's being threatened if that happens which the
market is saying you know from the prediction market that's going to happen i mean do we just
go vertical up like a spacex you know rocket in terms of stocks bitcoin and gold goes down
because they're like rotations on so here's the way i i'm thinking about it um
when when trump won last year we had an immediate reaction in the market
and the things you described were the immediate reaction so small caps ripped yet a whole bunch
of things that are like oh this is going to be good for the manufacturing it's going to be all
this but then he does tariffs and beginning in you know january into march the market starts
repositioning for this world the only thing that has saved the market this year has been the ai
trade. And the AI trade is based on earnings. So the part that was based on the broadening
out of the economy has not occurred. The PMIs are still below 50. So to your point, I do think
you have to go reset back to the way you were thinking about the markets in November of last
year after the election. And I think those trades are actually going to work now. And this is kind
of like the reverse of what happened in his first presidency, because in 2017, the stock
market ripped, Bitcoin ripped, and then it peaked.
But that year was the tax cut years.
The next year was the tariff years.
This year, we got the tariff year first.
The question is, with all the cuts in rates that have gone on around the globe, not just
in the US, with the cuts that have come, but also something I've shown to a bunch of transportation
people.
The economy has had a problem because China is critical to the country from a trade basis.
Everyone knows that.
Like if you need windows, if you need anything, to get that from any place else in the world
is very difficult.
Chinese exports to the US are down 27% year over year.
If all of a sudden they buy soybeans and they come up in a trade agreement, and I would,
if I was going to pick any of those polymarket things, and I think a trade deal by November
10th is actually at 70 something percent. So by the end of the year, I'm guessing it's got to be
much higher than that. But even by November 10th, it's still high. If I was going to pick one of
those that I would bet against, it's actually the tariff one. I think where the Chinese hold
cards and what they're trying to get to, a win for them is that the tariffs actually are not there,
that they're like every other country in the world. So you get a 10% blanket.
Yeah, like in that's I think they just want to be treated fairly. And my guess is, is that if I was going to pick one to be lowered, that would even make it more bullish. And the interesting part about the guy who spoke last night or spoke yesterday at the event, he said, what's really interesting about this situation is that there are so many China hawks in the administration and the most dovish person is the president.
And that's the interesting thing in if Donald Trump wants to make a deal, he's going to
make a deal.
Of course.
And I think we're at that point where if he wants a big deal, maybe it doesn't happen
October 10th.
Maybe the market falls again.
That's why I still believe until you get it.
And your question was a good one.
I would wait in most cases until after the event.
If I was going to do anything before, I'd be buying call options because I do think
it's an asymmetric risk to the upside if they do this.
If there's a delay, it'll fall again like it did two weeks ago.
and then he'll come out and say,
we're going to get a deal done
and we just haven't come to an agreement yet.
So I think it's asymmetric to the upside
in terms of if it comes out,
I do think we're going to get a big move.
Today's episode is brought to you by DeFi Development Corp.
Global wealth today exceeds $500 trillion,
yet crypto still represents less than 1% of that total.
DeFi Development Corp, NASDAQ ticker DFDV,
offers investors a new way to gain exposure
to one of the most disruptive technologies of our time,
crypto infrastructure.
As crypto and Trad5 veterans, the DFDV team is building the first Solana-focused public treasury.
They're accumulating soul to give shareholders direct exposure to what they believe is the definitive crypto infrastructure,
poised to capture a significant share of the $2.4 trillion in revenue generated from global value transfer each year.
DFDV believes Solana's position to disrupt the world and aims to provide investors with one of the most levered ways to participate in that upside
by tapping into capital markets fundraising,
leading the way in on-chain innovation,
maximizing yield,
and launching similar public vehicles
in key international markets.
To learn more about why DFDV believes
Sol represents a transformative opportunity
and why DFDV is the best way to capitalize on it,
visit dfdv.com slash pom.
That's dfdv.com slash pom.
The Truth Social post,
if he gets a deal done,
it's going to be a banger.
It will be.
He, he, he's probably already got it drafted.
He's got a lot of all caps, a lot of exclamation points, you know,
thank you for your attention to this matter. I mean,
he's going cook on that one.
Let's talk about this Amazon leak.
They say that they're going to get rid of 600,000 employees over the next five
years. If I'm at Amazon, I'm probably looking for a new job right now,
but the 600,000 people that are basically saying robotics and automation are
going to get rid of these jobs.
I think people kind of forget Amazon is a public company.
they have to keep growing. So what they're telling you is that revenue and profits are
going to keep growing, but they're going to do it with 600,000 less employees, which
they have somewhere around 1.5, 1.7 million people, depending on, you know, the day and how
you count. It's like a third of their workforce. They're basically saying they're going to get rid
of, but they're going to keep growing, which would be a massive boom to profits.
Well, let's keep one. I think the way it read was they're not going to hire people that they'd have
to hire, but it is a replacement thing in some form. It's a semantics thing, but I reposted
something which fits into this. And I want to continue on the labor theme, which gets into
the abundance and kind of this whole societal thing, which is I reposted something on X today,
which had an overlay basically showing that the job opportunities, the hiring, the jolts number
for job openings relative to the S&P 500 has completely broken down. And it's alligator jaws.
it's the K-shaped economy. But it's really meant to say that this thing that people are missing,
which I brought up, and I don't know if you had already left the dinner last night,
but I brought up this fact that people should just be aware of. Since the iPhone came out,
we've had a major drop in the labor participation rate. And when the labor force participation rate
drops, well, that suppresses the unemployment rate. People are not looking for jobs. So it's
taking off supply of people. Now, everyone can go through the reasons why, but one of the major
reasons why is the wealth effect. People don't need to work as much because the stock market's
gone higher, and a lot of that has to do with the profit margins, and the profit margins are coming
because of AI. So when people try to figure out how the economy is doing, well, how much is AI?
It's such a ridiculous goal that they have, because if the stock market goes down,
well then gdp goes down if profit margins go higher and the stock market goes up because of
earnings and profit margins well then that's an ai impact and so what you're describing to me for
amazon and all these companies we're entering the agentic world and the replacement of actual labor
whether it's through we're not hiring as much which is what we're seeing so far i actually think
we're going to get into the replacement side because capitalism is based on driving shareholder
wealth for public companies. Everyone who runs a public company, you too, you've got shareholders
that want you to drive profits. And the profit equation has revenues versus expenses. And so
if you can do it with less people, then the shareholder value or the shareholders want you
to do that. So I think the pressure that Amazon is showing, Walmart has publicly said this,
And I mentioned this Accenture has also publicly said, if you guys just type in Accenture, Walmart and Amazon, what have they said about jobs?
Those are three of the four biggest private employers in the country.
They're all saying the same thing.
So this wealth effect you're talking about, I have a Amazon related wealth effect, which prime example of both the insanity in society, but also how this works, which is McKenzie Bezos has given away.
like i think the latest number i saw was like seven nine billion some crazy number given away
she took it and gave it away to other people she has more money now than when she got divorced
even though she's given away you know whatever the number is seven or nine billion dollars
so that is like the ultimate wealth effect is you're not even spending it and consuming it
you're just giving it away to crazy causes but you're giving it away and you still have more
money than you did when you started the entire philanthropic effort nobody is spending money
like she's giving it away so that is ultimately what you're talking about here is like no matter
how much money they are spending the people who have assets they are still net you know up because
of that wealth effect since the end of 2019 and i i didn't look at the numbers in the last month so
I might be off a little bit. I think the household net worth was around $110 trillion. Net worth,
not assets, net worth. That was in the end of 2019. I know now it's up near $180 trillion.
So you've increased over the course of the last five years, $70 trillion. Now that is through,
yeah, that'll be towards the end of the year. Some of that came in housing. Some of that came
in stocks, regardless, to go up by 70 trillion means that is of the economy size today. Forget
where it was in 2019. You've had such a massive move. And that's why when everyone kind of looks
at this, when Bitcoin goes sideways and a great, the great thing is everyone's depressed on it.
It's still up 20% year to date. It's still going on. So you've had fiat assets in the US,
the pie go up to net worth of $180 trillion. So the wealth effect is real. It's why when people
said savings are being drained and I'm like, well, wait a second. If the wealth effect created it,
we're up to 180 trillion. And we're saying that the top 40% are responsible for basically all
of consumption and they all own stocks. Why are you worried about the other 60 other than the
K-shaped economy and the anger that they're having, which again, gets back into the need
for abundance and the need for artificial intelligence. Started from the bottom. Now
we're here um last thing i want to talk about we have alpha we got some alpha for you guys uh
you've had a couple conversations you shared them with me um mike novogratz started to talk
on some podcasts uh maybe the reason bitcoin's price isn't going up because there's a lot of
people selling what are you hearing uh with your ear to the ground as to who could be selling and
how much they're selling right now this is one of the more interesting parts of kind of entering
the crypto world is bringing the skills that I had in the traditional finance world, the way I was
trained. And I was a trader for the first 13 years of my life. And once you're a trader and you're
born as a trader, you're watching every tick, you're talking to people, you want to know the
flows and you're trying to figure out when a consolidation turns to a breakout, whether it's
a breakdown or a breakout, when vol compresses and you start going in, by definition, that means
there's a lot of supply and there's a lot of demand. So on both sides, you've got why, you
know, for bearish people like, wow, this thing. And we heard some of it last night. Well, this
hasn't gone up yet. You've had all the treasury companies buying. You've had MicroStrategy buying.
You had all that. So people are saying MicroStrategy is going to blow up. I know it's
going to happen soon. I've seen that posted in X by people that are traditional finance people.
At the same time, on the other side, you have what Novogratz said in public on an interview,
but also released it in the earnings for Galaxy. So this is complete public information on every
channel where he said in september alone we sold nine billion for one client now before i i came
over here i sent you something and i forget the on the desk chain or chain on the desk i don't
even know which one it is but i sent you something um would you like me to read the numbers sure
galaxy reported earnings and said they sold nine billion dollars of bitcoin nova talked about this
on the raul paul and specifically mentioned asian sellers the asians are selling i think it's
worthwhile to talk about og whale sellers and how important they are to this market and also how
volatile has collapsed rather than run like prior high four-year cycle tops this feels like a
ownership for the big move higher yeah and what he did say to make sure i quote him properly he said
there was there's continuous asian vol selling so selling call options and again compressing it so
vol has gone lower and the sellers that he talked about are selling because they're rich they're
rich and they want some money. But there's another angle on this that I think I've heard from people
that I believe in, which is if Bitcoin has moved to a vol that's lower, and if you believe that
its current size, which is now $2 trillion, and I've heard this and you may have heard it too,
it'll never move like it used to in the past because it's just too big now. And it takes so
much to move it that there's obviously been a lot of buying, but it's just churning and vols going
lower. So it's kind of like a dead asset. If it's a dead asset, and let's use China for an example
as an Asian country. A lot of Chinese individuals bought it there, partly to hide it from the
government back when corruption and things were going on. But China has a bull market and the
bull market's in AI. And I can tell you with inside the AI world, if I mentioned Micron,
well, Micron's tripled since April. That's a big company. You've had other companies like
Nvidia, like the AI trade, you can make a lot of money, but also there's a startup world where
these businesses are going parabolic. What these guys said was the people who made a lot of money
there. Now they're looking to make it in other places and they've got other choices that are
going to move faster. So it's a combination of Bitcoin's old. It's kind of big now. It's not
worthwhile. And this is going higher. And the other thing is people have to remember the ecosystem has
really been hurt this year. Most coins are down. So aside from Bitcoin, and I think Ethereum is up
a little bit, you're dealing with an ecosystem where most of the coins are still down for the
year. So it has not been a good trade because there's been other things to be involved in.
gold is much bigger. And I remind people that gold was up over 60% at one point this year.
Well, that's over $20 trillion. So assets can still move. And that's why I believe what will
end up happening is the OG selling that's been happening that has been distributed to many,
many buyers. Those many, many buyers are just building a position. The people that are selling,
they made a lot of money in it from back when you probably got in or when you started doing
your show i was late i was late you were late okay so they got in at really good times i just
think this turnover is very healthy for the market and i will say what i said last week if we break
through the highs at any point the next time we get through the highs i think for certain we are
going to break higher now i've been wrong on it all year in terms of where i thought it would be
at this point i heard tom lee's interview i just want to say one thing before we get off about tom
lee and dan ives who are both now involved in the crypto space as of this year two guys that have
been dead right. Two guys that wear clothes and kind of bring this hatred that they want to get.
They're kind of like Tesla people at this point for the macro crowd. Like they view them as being
bubble symbols, just like Saylor. It's actually fascinating to realize that we've got all these
figures that have been right on AI, been right on the stock market all year, but they're the ones
that are a little off. They're the ones that are now Ponzi scheming things. When you listen to Tom
talk on your interview. Everything he said was very deep. He got into a lot of intelligent
things. I think for Bitcoin, the fact that so many people have gotten, let's say, tired of it
is a great sign. And I believe the next top will happen with two things that have happened both
times. Number one, Bitcoin needs to massively outperform the MAG7. That has happened at both
of the prior peaks, both at the four-year cycle, and literally just massive moves. And the second
thing is it needs to happen with volatility being much higher than it is. I do not believe tops and
things like Bitcoin happen with the vol being at five-year lows. I believe they at least need to
be close to five-year highs. I think that Tom, Dan, you, getting laughed at by the traditionalists
has proven to be a very good place to be. So the louder that they screech, the louder that they
laugh i've just learned over time means you're closer to the bullseye than uh than you previously
thought so let them uh let them attack as my father taught me at the racetrack if you can
find the scenario that you believe should be the favorite and it's a long shot those are the kind
of opportunities that you have to basically wait for be patient and when they come you have to be
involved in a big way and that's what i believe is happening with tesla that's what i believe is
happening with Bitcoin. That's what I believe is happening with all of these macro arguments about
this has to end badly because look what happened in 1800. The tariffs are bad. Look what happened
before the light bulb the last time. It's really impossible for me to look 20 years ahead and not
look at these people and be like, are you kidding me that you fell for the trap of comparing history
when we were dealing with AI, which was also should have been named replacement intelligence.
We're replacing all of labor.
I don't know how to say this is not the same as the industrial revolution.
This is not the same as the light bulb.
This is not the same as the plow.
We're actually getting to the point where every single job can theoretically be replaced
with humanoids and with white collar, a gentic world.
I wish the best to the bears, but I believe the market will rip their hearts out and they
will all be very upset.
that. And so if you are an investor sitting at home, I would just be very careful listening to
all the doomsday predicting and the bubble talk. There will be a bubble one day. I just don't think
we're near it. And I don't think you do either. I think there can't be one. And Tom said this
yesterday, and I say this all the time. We've had three 20 plus percent corrections in the S&P 500
over the last five years. Three. From 1990 to the dot-com bubble, we had one. And that one lasted
for literally like a week. And it was during LTCM, and then they cut rates and it went right back up.
We've had three of these now. If you go back to my time thing, and you think about what
exponential innovation means, if you compress time, the concept of a cycle disappears. If you
compress it to instantaneous we've had three major advancements in curing cancer over the last week
from artificial intelligence we are still in the beginning stages for people to fade that cycles
are dead and that the cycles are now a boom bust a 30 correction the s&p used to be a bust it
happened correction for ants just rallies back faster and tom said we're gonna see he even said
next year, I think we'll have 20% correction in the S&P. I think we'll have 20% correction in the
S&P next year, too. I think we'll have one almost every single year. But that is more of a function
of the pain that's going to come between the voters and the politicians and all of the things
that have gone. That's what makes the China-U.S. thing so important. We could come back in here
in two weeks, and Xi could have walked away from the table, and the market could fall 20%.
That doesn't change the inevitability of AI. That doesn't change the inevitability of this.
Unless there's a war, I don't think you can stop the certainty that will happen with artificial
intelligence.
And you have to put that into your mindset.
And that's why for people, Dan Ives, Tom Lee, myself, we all believe in artificial intelligence
and what it's going to do.
For macro people, they just say it's a bubble and they don't spend time on it.
It's just a parrot.
It just answers things.
Humanoids are coming and autonomous vehicles are coming.
So if you want to be positive, those are the things to be positive.
But there's a negative that comes.
And for five years, I think the labor versus capital thing is going to be a hard thing
from a society basis to deal with.
I agree.
We'll see you guys next week.
